From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 00:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478533] Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901010020.n010KbtI015757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478533 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-31 19:20:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-fr Short Description: French hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 01:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478563] New: Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478563 Summary: Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libnice.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libnice-0.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libnice is an implementation of the IETF's draft Interactive Connectivity Establishment standard (ICE). ICE is useful for applications that want to establish peer-to-peer UDP data streams. It automates the process of traversing NATs and provides security against some attacks. Existing standards that use ICE include the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Jingle, XMPP extension for audio/video calls. Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1028345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 03:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478565] New: Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478565 Summary: Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gupnp-igd.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gupnp-igd-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: gupnp-igd is a library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1028365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 05:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 00:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478570] New: Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Summary: Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/RiordonFancy-fonts/RiordonFancy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/RiordonFancy-fonts/RiordonFancy-fonts-3-1.src.rpm Description: RiordonFancy is a highly-stylized font designed by ten-year-old Riordon Thurman. It includes all ASCII glyphs, most Latin-1 glyphs, a number of Latin Extended glyphs, and the interrobang (?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 09:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 04:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901010935.n019Zq8H019056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #63 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-01 04:35:46 EDT --- Thanks. When you think the requested packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit the bodhi interface and edit your requests. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 09:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 04:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901010933.n019X5eu004412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-01 04:33:04 EDT --- Thanks. When you think the requested packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit the bodhi interface and edit your requests. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 09:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 04:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901010938.n019cLgQ005249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-01-01 04:38:20 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 10:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 05:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478534] Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011009.n01A9RU2010742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478534 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-01 05:09:26 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file - It would be nice if you are not using a macro in URL because copy-and-paste is not possible from the spec file for humans - Your missed to verify/install the desktop file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files - With make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" you can preserve the time stamps - I think 'BR: GConf2-devel' is not needed BTW, happy new year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 10:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 05:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011024.n01AO7AC013328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-01 05:24:06 EDT --- Everytime you make changes in your spec file, you need to bump the release. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs BTW, happy new year -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 11:22:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 06:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011122.n01BMbx6024002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 Bug 438609 depends on bug 457219, which changed state. Bug 457219 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 11:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 06:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011122.n01BMafK023966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-01 06:22:33 EDT --- Thanks Michal and Kevin! I've rebuilt 8.1.0 for devel, but pushed an older 0.2.0 + patch on F-9, F-10 and EL-5 since those don't have Twisted 8 yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 12:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011228.n01CSXFq002442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478581 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 12:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011229.n01CTmu0002569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: pnglite - A |Package Review: pnglite - A |lighteeight C library for |lightweight C library for |loading PNG images |loading PNG images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 12:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] New: Package Review: pnglite - A lighteeight C library for loading PNG images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: pnglite - A lighteeight C library for loading PNG images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Summary: Package Review: pnglite - A lighteeight C library for loading PNG images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 462181 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/pnglite.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/pnglite-0.1.17-1.el5.src.rpm Description: pnglite is a C library for loading PNG images. It was created as a substitute for libpng in situations when libpng is more than enough. It currently requires zlib for inflate and crc checking and it can read the most common types of PNG images. The library has a small and simple to use interface. Notes: RPMlint complains about no documentation files, but there are no documentation files in the distribution. See the comment in %files. There's a typo in Summary line, I'd fix that on import or next package spin: A lighteeight C library for loading PNG images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 13:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 08:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011326.n01DQNdn013963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 Jonathan Underwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.underwood at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-01-01 08:26:19 EDT --- Hi Jon - there doesn't seem to be any requirement in the sponsorship guidelines that a new contributor must perform a few unofficial reviews before being sponsored. I agree that it is desirable, but it doesn't seem to be mandatory? I don't think performing unofficial package reviews should block this package from being approved and imported, therefore. OTOH, perhaps the submitter has vanished. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 14:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 09:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478534] Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011415.n01EFpdH023201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478534 --- Comment #2 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-01-01 09:15:50 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/gnome-mastermind.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/gnome-mastermind-0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog : - Add desktop file install/validate - Edit URL - Preserve timestamps during install I must preserve GConf2-devel as a BR, without this package doesn't build under mock. rpmlint is still silent. Happy new year too ^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 14:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 09:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011425.n01EPnuw024846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-01 09:25:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Hi Jon - there doesn't seem to be any requirement in the sponsorship guidelines > that a new contributor must perform a few unofficial reviews before being > sponsored. I agree that it is desirable, but it doesn't seem to be mandatory? See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored#Sponsorship_model Actually it depends on the judgment of the people who is going to sponsor the new contributors. However for my case I always request new contributors to either submit anothere review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request, especially because - after getting sponsored he/she now can formally approve other person's review request - and the new contributor has to _maintain_ his/her packages on Fedora (of course the sponsor must support him/her, however basically it should be done by him/herself). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 15:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011531.n01FVJJX003598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-01 10:31:18 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (gfan) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #4) > However, LICENSE only says this: > """ > The manual for Gfan is NOT distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. > The manual may be freely redistributed but is not allowed to be changed. > The manual may be removed from the software package. > """ > > Does that violate Fedora guidelines? I don't think so. "The manual is not allowed to be changed" is definitely non-free, so this part cannot be in Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 15:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011534.n01FY8qO017838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tadej.janez at tadej | |.hicsalta.si) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-01 10:34:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 15:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011534.n01FYBht017869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #11 from Lane 2009-01-01 10:34:07 EDT --- > #004: Are these useful ? > /usr/share/verilator/bin > /usr/share/verilator/bin/verilator_includer Yes. As far as I know, verilator uses these. > #005: move BUIDROOT/usr/share/verilator/examples to examples/ > then %doc examples/ I don't understand this comment. > #006: Are these important: > chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpm -ql verilator | grep -v examples | grep .cpp > /usr/share/verilator/include/verilated.cpp > /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpTraceVcdC.cpp Yes. These are included in all verilator simulation builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 15:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011534.n01FYnWR003893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(phil at linuxeinstei | |ger.net) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-01 10:34:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 16:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011615.n01GF0ur010378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #12 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:14:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328036) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328036) simple verilator test case Attached is a simple verilator test case per Chitlesh's request. Here is how to run this: 1. untar the file and cd into the verilator_test_case directory. 2. Compile the simulation by running 'make'. This generates an executable called obj_dir/Vcounter. 3. Run the simulation: 'obj_dir/Vcounter' This will output the following to stdout: Hello World from counter! Time 0: count = 0x0 Time 2: count = 0x0 Time 4: count = 0x0 Time 6: count = 0x1 Time 8: count = 0x2 Time 10: count = 0x3 Time 12: count = 0x4 Time 14: count = 0x5 Time 16: count = 0x6 Time 18: count = 0x7 Time 20: count = 0x8 Time 22: count = 0x9 Time 24: count = 0xa SUMMARY OF TEST CASE: This test case implements a counter in the verilog file counter.v. The C++ file tb.cpp implements the testbench that provides the input, including the clock. This example does not turn on any tracing. See the verilator documentation on how to enable tracing to generate a VCD file for viewing with gtkwaves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 16:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011619.n01GJEe4011129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #13 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:19:13 EDT --- I have an updated spec and src file you can download from: Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.681-3.fc10.src.rpm I incorporated Chitlesh's feedback from Comments #7 and #9 except for #004 from Comment #7 as I do not understand this comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 16:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011626.n01GQYZJ026451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #15 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:26:33 EDT --- This is a URL correction of Comment #13 I have an updated spec and src file you can download from: Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.681-1.fc10.src.rpm I incorporated Chitlesh's feedback from Comment #7 and Comment #9 except for item #004 from Comment #7 as I do not understand this suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 16:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011623.n01GNdDJ025818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-01 11:23:37 EDT --- Ping The .so file should really go to the main package and the static library should be eliminated, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries Ville: By the way -- is it ok for a shared library to have no soname? Without it we can't depend on exact ABI version. Probably the right way to fix it to persuade upstream into using a SONAME themselves (they already consider package versions to be API versions, according to comments in source code). But anyway, if upstream did not do that, shouldn't we just make up a soname? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 16:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011625.n01GPhk3012357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #14 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:25:42 EDT --- Chitlesh, I would like to get verilator into Fedora 11 if it is not already too late. Can you give me a summary of the milestones and dates that are required to accomplish that? This will help me as I am still extremely swamped with a tapeout. With the milestone list I can make the necessary time to get this done. Lane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 16:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011633.n01GXVEx013555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 --- Comment #4 from Christof Damian 2009-01-01 11:33:30 EDT --- I was wondering about that, but I thought it wasn't necessary, because the SPEC is not even approved yet. I bumped the release now: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/podcatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/podcatcher-3.1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 17:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] New: Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Summary: Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fspy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fspy-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://mytty.org/fspy/ Description: fspy is an easy to use linux filesystem activity monitoring tool which is meant to be small, fast and to handle system resources conservative. you can apply filters, use diffing and your own output format in order to get the best results. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1028638 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint fspy* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint fspy-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 18:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011812.n01ICoT8011848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 Simo Sorce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ssorce at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Simo Sorce 2009-01-01 13:12:49 EDT --- Will do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 18:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011824.n01IO6JS013417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josephsmidt at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Joseph Smidt 2009-01-01 13:24:01 EDT --- Hello, is there still interest in packaging root? If so great! If not I would be willing to continue the packaging process for root. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 18:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011841.n01IfJHb001775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-01 13:41:17 EDT --- [16:37:47] < lkundrak> cassmodiah: I'm wondering if you can review pnglite? [16:37:57] < lkundrak> cassmodiah: should be fairly simple -- just one .c file :) [16:38:46] < cassmodiah> i'm not sure with this [16:38:58] < cassmodiah> wait, i know which is a better guy for that [16:39:00] < cassmodiah> rsc ping [16:39:14] < lkundrak> :) [16:44:20] < rsc> cassmodiah: pong [16:46:02] < cassmodiah> rsc do you have time for a short look at a review request? [16:47:05] < cassmodiah> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 [16:47:06] < buggbot> Bug 478581: medium, low, ---, nobody at fedoraproject.org, NEW, Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images [16:49:44] < rsc> lkundrak: I'm not absolutely sure, whether the ABI soname stuff is clever. Was this practised somewhere else was well? [16:51:17] < lkundrak> rsc: I'm not really sure. I know I did that, but don't remember if it was in Fedora package. But if upstream is not willing to maintain soname (which I did not ask though), is there anything else we can do? [16:53:16] < lkundrak> rsc: you know -- pnglite is just a single pnglite.c file, upstream doesn't even maintian a build script where soname could be enforced [16:54:52] < rsc> lkundrak: understood. Why is %{abi_minor} == %{release}? If you've to rebuild for e.g. a new GCC; soname would be minorly bumped... [16:55:31] < lkundrak> rsc: abi_minor was not meant to be the part of soname. If it is, then it is a mistake [16:56:04] < lkundrak> rsc: -Wl,--soname,libpnglite.so.%{abi_major} [16:56:10] < lkundrak> rsc: there's only abi_major [16:56:12] < rsc> libpnglite.so.%{abi_major}.%{abi_minor} [16:56:24] < lkundrak> rsc: right, that's not a soname. only a filename. [16:56:35] < rsc> ah right. Sorry. [16:57:43] < rsc> but anyway: If you bump %{version}, %{release} should be reset. Then you would have to increase %{abi_major} to ensure, that libpnglite.so.%{abi_major}.%{abi_minor} is newer, not older from the filename. [16:57:53] < rsc> is that expected behaviour? [17:00:18] < lkundrak> rsc: yes. that's why there's a huge comment in the beginning [17:00:54] < lkundrak> rsc: but in case a new major version is released without abi change, then we would unnecessarily change soname [17:01:05] < lkundrak> rsc: I don't think that's likely though [17:11:03] < lkundrak> rsc: on a second thought -- I don't know what is the last digit in the library file name for. Probably it won't be a problem if it was reset. Probably we could decouple if from release. [17:17:59] < cassmodiah> lkundrak one of my teeworlds testers has no sound [17:19:26] < lkundrak> cassmodiah: well, I do not think it is related to any change we did [17:20:34] < rsc> lkundrak: I'll try the formal review in a few minutes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 18:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011849.n01InBBC002961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e | Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-01 13:49:10 EDT --- Lubomir, can you please add the license to %doc of the base package? I know, it is in the header file of -devel as well, but that's not perfect IMHO. So just the license for %doc, not the whole header file. Maybe the license just from the header file as Source2 simply. Package seems sane to me, source matches, debuginfo is okay, description and overall readability of the spec file, file locations/ownings fit etc. Please add license to %doc and correct your typo in Summary. As this is very minor: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 19:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011901.n01J1iAA005228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #13 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-01 14:01:41 EDT --- Persuading upstream to implement versioning would be best. I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to invent versioning independently of upstream in the Fedora packages - there may be a good deal of confusion when/if upstream later implements versioning as well and ships a version using the same soname that was earlier used in Fedora for something that's not ABI compatible. And additionally, if the shared lib is left unversioned at least for now, I don't think adding an unversioned soname would add any value either - AFAIK sonames are all about versioning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 19:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011922.n01JM5BT022470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-01 14:22:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Lubomir, can you please add the license to %doc of the base package? I know, > it is in the header file of -devel as well, but that's not perfect IMHO. So > just the license for %doc, not the whole header file. Maybe the license just > from the header file as Source2 simply. That can't be done, see [1]. And given the size of the package and license being included in the header I don't think it would make sense to make upstream distribute one more file with a copy of the license. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pnglite Short Description: A lightweight C library for loading PNG images Owners: lkundrak, cassmodiah Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 19:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011935.n01JZXlL010369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #8 from Simo Sorce 2009-01-01 14:35:32 EDT --- New f-10 and rawhide packages including this spec file patch have been built in koji today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 20:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012000.n01K0AX8013930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-01 15:00:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linsmith Short Description: a Smith Charting program Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 20:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478563] Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012009.n01K9if2029431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478563 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 20:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 15:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478563] Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012009.n01K9Ux4029392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478563 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-01-01 15:09:28 EDT --- $ rpmlint libnice.spec libnice.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint libnice-0.0.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint libnice-devel-0.0.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint libnice-debuginfo-0.0.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ md5sum libnice-0.0.4.tar.gz 3a5a68cbc58a2f2d53d00e8c2cbb1f7a libnice-0.0.4.tar.gz $ curl http://nice.freedesktop.org/releases/libnice-0.0.4.tar.gz | md5sum % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 517k 100 517k 0 0 68985 0 0:00:07 0:00:07 --:--:-- 101k 3a5a68cbc58a2f2d53d00e8c2cbb1f7a - + Okay - Needs work * Not applicable [-] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [*] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as B ildRequires is optional. [*] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [*] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [*] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [*] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [*] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [*] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [*] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [*] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [*] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [*] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Just one small thing should be fixed: the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning from rpmlint, but this isn't a blocker ============================================= The package libnice is APPROVED by epienbro ============================================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 21:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012107.n01L784P024221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-01 16:07:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > However, LICENSE only says this: > > """ > > The manual for Gfan is NOT distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. > > The manual may be freely redistributed but is not allowed to be changed. > > The manual may be removed from the software package. > > """ > > > > Does that violate Fedora guidelines? I don't think so. > > "The manual is not allowed to be changed" is definitely non-free, > so this part cannot be in Fedora: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ """ Does Fedora permit anything under "Non-Free" licensing? When it comes to software or fonts, the answer is definitely no. We strongly prefer that items classified as content (see Code Vs Content) are under a Free license, but we only require that they be freely distributable without restrictions. """ I think a manual is content as opposed to code and therefore freely distributable is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 21:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012114.n01LE5q7007320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 21:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] New: Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Summary: Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pysnmp.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pysnmp-2.0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://pysnmp.sourceforge.net/ Description: This is a Python implementation of SNMP v.1/v.2c engine. It's general functionality is to assemble/disassemble SNMP messages from/into given SNMP Object IDs along with associated values. PySNMP also provides a few transport methods specific to TCP/IP networking. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1028810 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint pysnmp* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pysnmp-2.0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 21:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012142.n01Lgs51029333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Devrim GUNDUZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devrim at commandprompt.com --- Comment #1 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2009-01-01 16:42:53 EDT --- Tom, PyGreSQL 4.0 was released. Would you like to update the spec file first? I'm willing to review this now. Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 21:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478563] Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012152.n01LqKBx030608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478563 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2009-01-01 16:52:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnice Short Description: GLib ICE implementation Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 22:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012234.n01MY07J018444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 22:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012233.n01MXJes003875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #2 from Tom Lane 2009-01-01 17:33:17 EDT --- The purpose of this change is to split out what we are already shipping in the postgresql RPM. I don't want to confuse the issue by folding a major upstream version bump into the same update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 22:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012248.n01MmMUU005964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #3 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2009-01-01 17:48:21 EDT --- Ok, but this package will go to -devel. I *think* Fedora 11 *may* ship with PostgreSQL 8.4, so this won't probably hurt people -- and it may be the correct time for upgrading to newer PyGreSQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 22:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012255.n01MtQtq021657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #13 from Simon Wesp 2009-01-01 17:55:25 EDT --- Spec: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/teeworlds-0.4.3/teeworlds.spec SRPM http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/teeworlds-0.4.3/teeworlds-0.4.3-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 23:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012325.n01NPhHb026117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-01 18:25:42 EDT --- Well done, APPROVED Just a few notes, none of them blockers and can be addressed on import: 1.) please drop the first line from %description -- it duplicates Summary 2.) Do -data really have to depend on %{name}? Probably they are usable in server-only installations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 23:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012333.n01NXkVC012538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #4 from Tom Lane 2009-01-01 18:33:45 EDT --- You miss my point. I'm not against updating to pygresql 4.0 --- I'm against doing it as part of the package split. Once pygresql is in as a separate SRPM I'll be glad to take a look at that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 23:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478605] New: Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 Summary: Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/arpcheck.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/arpcheck-1.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://ge.mine.nu/arpcheck.html Description: arpcheck checks /proc/net/arp for MAC/IP combinations and compares them to a static or dynamic MAC list. If something does not fit, you'll get an alarm which will also be logged. You can also run custom scripts. This is useful, if you're a router with multiple interfaces (e.g. WAN, LAN, DMZ) and want to check if anyone from your clients is evil and does some arpspoofing (mitm) or changes his IP. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1028979 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint arpcheck-1.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm arpcheck.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint arpcheck-1.8-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 23:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012346.n01NkN6l029081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #5 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2009-01-01 18:46:22 EDT --- Ok, fair enough. I'll review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 23:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012345.n01NjWkM028975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-01 18:45:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328048) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328048) Review. Attached is my initial review. Please fix the problems indicated by rpmlint; also, I have a question. Otherwise looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 00:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020008.n0208quI032235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-01 19:08:50 EDT --- Degrading successful fedora-cvs flag as the review wasn't that successful; please do a real and full formal review solving all the mentioned issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 00:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020017.n020HsJ1018886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Simon Wesp 2009-01-01 19:17:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > APPROVED Thank you > 1.) please drop the first line from %description -- it duplicates Summary i removed it > 2.) Do -data really have to depend on %{name}? Probably they are usable in > server-only installations? ooops :-( I removed it SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/teeworlds-0.4.3/teeworlds.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/teeworlds-0.4.3/teeworlds-0.4.3-5.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teeworlds Short Description: A portable OpenGL framework Owners: cassmodiah, lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 00:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020034.n020Y2iE003108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #16 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-01 19:34:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teeworlds Short Description: Online multi-player platform 2D shooter Owners: cassmodiah, lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-9 (Just correcting the short description) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 00:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020054.n020sU7k005961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #14 from Simon Wesp 2009-01-01 19:54:29 EDT --- I chatted with Phil a few minutes ago, he won't continue this work. perhaps Robert Scheck, or me, or we both together, will do it. I will speak with Robert about this (he added himself today in CC-List). We shouldn't close this "over-hasty". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 04:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020414.n024Em2L004455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 Avi Alkalay changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 04:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] New: Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 Summary: Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: avi at unix.sh QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, herrold at owlriver.com, cweyl at alumni.drew.edu, fabian at bernewireless.net, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, felix at fetzig.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/djmount/ SRPM URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/djmount/ Description: Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. This is specially practical when you have a Windows Media Center sharing content through UPnP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 05:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020503.n0253ePk012147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 --- Comment #2 from Avi Alkalay 2009-01-02 00:03:39 EDT --- All fixed. Please recheck updates at http://avi.alkalay.net/software/id3mtag/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 05:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478613] New: Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 Summary: Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: radford at blackbean.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/ledger.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/ledger-2.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ledger is a powerful, double-entry accounting system that is accessed from the UNIX command-line. This may put off some users ? as there is no flashy UI ? but for those who want unparalleled reporting access to their data, there really is no alternative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 05:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 00:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] New: Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Summary: Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-transitfeed/1.1.9-2/python-transitfeed.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-transitfeed/1.1.9-2/python-transitfeed-1.1.9-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides a library for reading, writing and validating Google Transit Feed Specification files. It includes some scripts that validate a feed, display it using the Google Maps API and the start of a KML importer and exporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 06:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 01:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020658.n026w5c6029683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 07:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 02:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020700.n02703iK030132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2009-01-02 02:00:03 EDT --- First glance - Builds fine in mock, however /usr/bin/merge is actually owned by RCS: [jstanley at rugrat result]$ yum whatprovides /usr/bin/merge Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit rcs-5.7-33.fc10.x86_64 : Revision Control System (RCS) file version management tools Repo : fedora Matched from: Filename : /usr/bin/merge Expect a full review soon..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 07:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 02:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020726.n027Q1bO001755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2009-01-02 02:26:00 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. See Notes - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: $ md5sum transitfeed-1.1.9.tar.gz /data/home/jstanley/Download/transitfeed-1.1.9.tar.gz 709ab37eaaa3b56e7ff5f874091aa390 transitfeed-1.1.9.tar.gz 709ab37eaaa3b56e7ff5f874091aa390 /data/home/jstanley/Download/transitfeed-1.1.9.tar.gz N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and anything provided by glibc.) python-transitfeed-1.1.9-2.fc10.noarch.rpm python-transitfeed = 1.1.9-2.fc10 ----------------------------------- /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 pytz SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs Didn't test - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Issues: 1. As noted previously, /usr/bin/merge is a file conflict with RCS. That's a blocker :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 09:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020935.n029Zo8n008945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bruno at gnoll.org) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-02 04:35:48 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 09:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478617] New: Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 Summary: Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/zsync.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/zsync-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://zsync.moria.org.uk/ Description: zsync is a file transfer program. It allows you to download a file from a remote server, where you have a copy of an older version of the file on your computer already. zsync downloads only the new parts of the file. zsync uses the same algorithm as rsync. However, where rsync is designed for synchronising data from one computer to another within an organisation, zsync is designed for file distribution, with one file on a server to be distributed to thousands of downloaders. zsync requires no special server software just a web server to host the files and imposes no extra load on the server, making it ideal for large scale file distribution. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029364 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint zsync* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint zsync-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 09:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] New: Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Summary: Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/srm.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/srm-1.2.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://srm.sourceforge.net/ Description: srm is a secure replacement for rm(1). Unlike the standard rm, it overwrites the data in the target files before unlinkg them. This prevents command-line recovery of the data by examining the raw block device. It may also help frustrate physical examination of the disk, although it's unlikely that completely protects against this type of recovery. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029369 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint srm* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint srm-1.2.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 10:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] New: Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Summary: Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/conspy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/conspy-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/conspy/ Description: Conspy allows a (possibly remote) user to see what is displayed on a Linux virtual console, and send keystrokes to it. It is rather like VNC, but where VNC takes control of a GUI conspy takes control of a text mode virtual console. Unlike VNC, conspy does not require a server to be installed prior to being used. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029393 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint conspy* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint conspy-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 10:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021031.n02AVLNd019194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 10:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021042.n02Ag5bV021263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-01-02 05:42:04 EDT --- Package adheres to guidelines. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 10:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021043.n02AhHgZ003220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 10:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021048.n02AmA0f004178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-01-02 05:48:09 EDT --- Package adheres to guidelines. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 11:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021101.n02B1QIB006838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-02 06:01:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: conspy Short Description: Remote control for text mode virtual consoles Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 11:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021102.n02B2vPk007161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-02 06:02:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fspy Short Description: Filesystem activity monitoring utility Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 11:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021139.n02BdKwH030889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 11:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021139.n02BdLoV030936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 12:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] New: Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Summary: Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dhcping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dhcping-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.mavetju.org/unix/general.php Description: Dhcping allows the system administrator to check if a remote DHCP server is still functioning. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029498 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint dhcping* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint dhcping-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 13:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021333.n02DXOLB020622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-02 08:33:22 EDT --- It shouldn't block the package, but it can block sponsorship if the sponsor wishes it to, which I do. I like to see 1-3 practice reviews. If this package is hugely critical, an existing maintainer can take it over if the submitter is unable to become sponsored for whatever reason. I don't see anything glaring that would stop Ugo being sponsored, I just like to have some indication of understanding of the guidelines, beyond the construction of one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 13:38:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021338.n02DciYx003135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-02 08:38:43 EDT --- The comment about *.so applies to *.so.*. I'm actually not sure how to correct the debuginfo issue, which I was hoping to find someone to assist with. I see strip mentioned a few places in the source tree, but my cmake-fu is insufficient to finding the most clueful way to remove it. What's the question? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 13:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021347.n02Dl5Ac023214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-02 08:47:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The comment about *.so applies to *.so.*. (This was my question.) > I'm actually not sure how to correct the debuginfo issue, which I was hoping to > find someone to assist with. I see strip mentioned a few places in the source > tree, but my cmake-fu is insufficient to finding the most clueful way to remove > it. Probably easiest just to remove strip wherever it's mentioned (my cmake-fu is no better than yours). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021416.n02EGgYJ010578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-01-02 09:16:41 EDT --- Jon, Mamoru - thanks for your responses, I can certainly understand that point of view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021436.n02EaDsZ032623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-02 09:36:12 EDT --- I patched the '-l' parameter out. This way the users still use 'mr help' Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mr.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mr-0.35-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021441.n02Ef8bO001094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #7 from Jerome Soyer 2009-01-02 09:41:06 EDT --- Hi, SPECS and SRPMS are updated. http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.08-1.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 16:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021619.n02GJ9Sm031715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-02 11:19:08 EDT --- Some notes: - Please remove unneeded macros or conditions which are not related to Fedora * especially rh7 age condition is not needed * And I don't think aix4.1 part is needed. - Also please explain why you want to introduce %name, %version or %release macro (note that when you write "Version: 0.9.0", the %version macro is automatically defined (and same for %name, %release) - For source tarball hosted by sourceforge.net, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net - Remove "Vendor" item. This is automatically set when rebuiding your srpm on Fedora site. - Your srpm does not build * One reason is that "BuildRequires: ed" is missing http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029717 * The second reason is that "%_libdir/libmilter.a" (in sendmail-devel) is not compiled with -fPIC. So either - C module support for this package should be dropped - Or you should file a bug against "sendmail" to compile libmilter.a with -fPIC (I guess filing a bug is better anyway) - "%files -f INSTALLED_FILES" in your method is not allowed on Fedora, because with this method all needed directories under python sitelib/sitearch directory are not owned correctly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) - The directory %libdir is not owned by this package (again please refer to "UnownedDirectories" wiki page) - "%config" file should be under %_sysconfdir (/etc) and files under %_libdir should not be marked as %config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 16:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021642.n02Gg9Fw003014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt 2009-01-02 11:42:06 EDT --- > -License: GPLv3 > +# Each plugin has its license information in its setup.py > +License: GPLv3 and MIT Doubtful. While the tiny gnome plugins setup.py file lists the MIT licence and Benjamin Kampmann as the author (and using a non-Fluendo address that doesn't appear anywhere else in Elisa), the main plugin code uses the GPL v3 and lists Gernot Klimscha as the author. Enough reason to believe this thing is just GPLv3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 16:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021658.n02GwIqT005190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-01-02 11:58:17 EDT --- I'll take this shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021700.n02H0Yt8024549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|felix at fetzig.org | --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-01-02 12:00:33 EDT --- Why do I always appear in the CC list on your review requests? I don't like that so much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] New: Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Summary: Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn-r11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This library implements a wrapper for dlfcn, as specified in POSIX and SUS, around the dynamic link library functions found in the Windows API. (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:23:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021723.n02HNebR028800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021724.n02HO1B4028849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com Fixed In Version|rjones at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021734.n02HYItg030451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #23 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-02 12:34:17 EDT --- You're absolutely right. I'll report this so that the PKG-INFO file gets fixed. I'm sure it was different before, the field was wrong because the files were cleaned up recently. But I've now double checked and changed to plain "GPLv3". Fixed package available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021745.n02Hjiq0032642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-02 12:45:43 EDT --- Some notes - First of all, your package does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029717 So I just check your spec file - After some long discussion, many Fedora contributors say that including the package name itself in its Summary is redundant. - By the way, is it really needed that the most part of %description is repeated on every subpackage? - For source tarball: I cannot see rev.714 tarball on the URL. Also your versioning of this srpm is not proper for Fedora. Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages ! Also please consider to use %{?dist} tag: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag - Please remove "Packager" item. This is automatically defined when rebuilding this srpm on Fedora site. - "%package -n mrpt-ann" can simply be replaced by "%package ann" (same for other subpackages) - Usually the dependencies between packages created from the same srpm must be EVR (Epoch:Version:Release) specific, not just name specific (i.e. usually should have "Requires: %{name}-mrpt = %{version}-%{release}", for example). - Packages containing pkgconfig .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig" (ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ) - Currently I am not sure if koji supports noarch subpackages build when main package is arch dependent, however for now I doubt this (and other packages don't this so). So please remove "BuildArch: noarch" for -doc subpackage. - Make build.log more verbose (to check if compiler options are correctly honored, for example). "make VERBOSE=1" seems to work for this package (ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake ) - Pleae call "make documentation_html" at %build stage (By the way, why is it needed to call "make %?_smp_mflags" at %install ?) - Please take care of directory ownership issue. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories - This package must not own %{_datadir}/applications/, %{_libdir}/pkgconfig or so - Instead %_datadir/%name is not owned by any packages - %post -n mrpt-apps -p '/usr/bin/update-mime-database /usr/share/mime' This cannot be done (you can simply think that this method can be used only for calling /sbin/ldconfig with no other additional scripts) - For %changelog format, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 17:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021759.n02HxPGE002503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-02 12:59:22 EDT --- (resetting all) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 18:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021810.n02IAMgC004918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet 2009-01-02 13:10:20 EDT --- ping ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 18:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021838.n02Ic8Ox022593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 --- Comment #2 from Avi Alkalay 2009-01-02 13:38:06 EDT --- Felix, I think thats because I created this report copying another one that you were probably listed in the CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 18:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021856.n02IuAVf013157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 18:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021854.n02Is6wS012516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-02 13:54:05 EDT --- I'll review this one :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 18:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021858.n02IwBU6026606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Ulrich Drepper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-02 13:58:09 EDT --- I've added the one BuildRequres. This means I should be ready to uild it for the distribution. Thanks for the review. http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-5.fc10.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021900.n02J06VP013970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #23 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-02 14:00:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pfstools Short Description: Programs for handling high-dynamic range images Owners: drepper at redhat.com Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021907.n02J75CK015545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-02 14:07:04 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f11/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: all clean [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f85d3b5fe50a2b2df278a143892e5d81967eb9d5 mr_0.35.tar.gz [-] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f10/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021910.n02JADpX029370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-02 14:10:11 EDT --- Initial comment about the licensing (formal review pending) : The Licensing wiki page states that "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include.", so since here the sources contain only "Distributed under the GPL", the License: field should be "GPL+" and not "GPLv2". Note that lots of files state "Based on Xiph.org's 'oggmerge' found in their CVS repository", but that doesn't seem to be a problem, as it has exactly the same plain "Distributed under the GPL" statement. See : https://trac.xiph.org/browser/trunk/ogg-tools/oggmerge/oggmerge.c All of the rest does look fine. Just that ChangeLog which could be converted to UTF-8, though I wouldn't consider that a blocker (I would if it was the main README for instance). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021941.n02JfZH8002743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #24 from Valent Turkovic 2009-01-02 14:41:33 EDT --- What is your estimated time frame of when working version of elisa will be in Fedora 10 repos? Is it few days, weeks or months? I'm just not a developer so I can't keep track of your conversations but would like to test it as soon as it gets into testing Fedora repos. Thank you very much for your hard work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:45:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021945.n02Jjgo4003665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02 14:45:41 EDT --- Lane, at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule is the schedule for F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021943.n02JhRD4002991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #16 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02 14:43:26 EDT --- The suggestion was to package the example files (i.e. the content of /usr/share/verilator/examples), which needed two steps - move the folder /usr/share/verilator/examples directly below $BUILDROOT - use the "%doc" directive to include the above mentioned folder -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:45:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021945.n02JjBog003475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-02 14:45:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mr Short Description: A multiple repository management tool Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:55:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021955.n02JtPbs024583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022008.n02K8OFh027046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022011.n02KBA6s027720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-02 15:11:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Re-opening the review. > Introducing an Epoch should be delayed as long as it makes sense. We do need to fix this now. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/478651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022009.n02K9kXS027178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022025.n02KPijb010683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02 15:25:43 EDT --- Hopefully Ian will react soon, otherwise we might as well close this bug and reopen #478617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022023.n02KNReh010083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02 15:23:24 EDT --- *** Bug 478617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478617] Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022023.n02KNPh3010036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02 15:23:24 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 461429 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022023.n02KNJxg029496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #18 from Lane 2009-01-02 15:23:18 EDT --- I updated the spec file to move the examples from the data directory to the doc directory. You can download the updates from: Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.681-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022037.n02Kb6uE031922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #7 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-01-02 15:37:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) OK, just to let you know I didn't forget about this: > ref: > gpm: waiting for solution. Fixed, this was plain wrong on my side. > docs: excellent, thanks > twmapscrn: of course, as long as you make sure all the deps are > required/buildrequired. > license: waiting for advices Waiting for upstream reaction -- still:( I finally succeeded to contact the author (e-mail address didn't work anymore), today I sent the second request to fix the license problem, I hope I'll get an answer (soon). Thank you for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022038.n02KcaMv032145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-02 15:38:35 EDT --- Hey Marcela. Any chance to look over the comments and spec from comment #5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 20:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022056.n02Ku1UC015626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-02 15:56:00 EDT --- I've updated the files. The BuildRequires are added and I've updated to the most recent release. Note that in this update upstream included two files with questionable (at best) copyright. I've added a patch to not rely on those files, they are not used. Do they have to be removed from the .src.rpm? I have deliberately not added the complete URL. This would defeat the mirroring sourceforge is doing. It would be a bad idea to insist on this. Unfortunately sourceforge doesn't provide a nice URL interface to packages. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Please review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022119.n02LJwxE006478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Bug 225865 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022119.n02LJxE2006495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Bug 226048 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022130.n02LUj3P008589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-01-02 16:30:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This package fails at the moment on ppc. > -> configure: error: OpenSSL libraries not found. Is this a bug in the OpenSSL package? What is the plan to fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022132.n02LWATk022038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #24 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-02 16:32:09 EDT --- I've updated to the most recent upstream release: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.7.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec One more subpackage is build and I added the appropriate new BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022138.n02LcCge022988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #29 from Till Maas 2009-01-02 16:38:11 EDT --- What is the status here? I noticed that kdenetwork-4.1.3-2 was pushed to F9 testing, but not to F10. According to comment #27, it seems that there is no need for the update in F9, but only in F10. Also there was no reply to my comment #28. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] New: Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 Summary: Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sion/sion.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sion/sion-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A frontend to easily manage connections to remote filesystems using GIO/GVFS. It allows you to quickly connect/mount a remote filesystem and manage bookmarks of such. rpmlint is silent on the package. rawhide scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1029974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 22:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022205.n02M5Icj014697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #3 from David Timms 2009-01-02 17:05:17 EDT --- Really minor suggestions: - since the spec mostly has a double blank line between sections, you should do that also between build and install sections. - The description could be improved (spelling and case at least). Perhaps: Description: fspy is an easy to use linux filesystem activity monitoring tool. It is is small, fast and handles system resources conservatively. Features include being able to apply filters, use diffing and set a custom output format in order to achieve the best results. - License: Since neither the web site nor readme contains a license statement, perhaps this could be requested of the upstream (since each source file includes a GPLv2+ header). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 22:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022255.n02Mt54Z002574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 23:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] New: Review Request: xfce4-screensooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-screensooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-screensooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-screenshooter.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-screenshooter-1.4.90.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Xfce Screenshooter utility allows you to capture the entire screen, the active window or a selected region. You can set the delay that elapses before the screenshot is taken and the action that will be done with the screenshot: save it to a PNG file, copy it to the clipboard, or open it using another application. Note: Successor of the xfce4-screenshooter-plugin (bug # 179202). Basically this is a re-review because the package has been renamed and split into standalone app and panel plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 23:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022334.n02NYSPB008805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-02 18:34:27 EDT --- I've updated the code to the latest upstream version. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstmo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstmo-1.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 23:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022342.n02Ng1tv010077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 23:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] New: Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Summary: Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dateshift.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dateshift-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.hornby.dsl.pipex.com/dateshift/ Description: Dateshift is a tool for shifting date/time. In particular it allows a process or set of process to run with a different clock setting, without having to change the system clock. This is useful because changing the system clock requires root privilege and is inconvenient on shared machines. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1030082 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint dateshift* dateshift.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libdsintercept.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 dateshift-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint dateshift-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I reported to upstream about the rpmlint warning. But so far I have no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 23:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022346.n02NksQY030026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |xfce4-screensooter - |xfce4-screenshooter - |Screenshot utility for the |Screenshot utility for the |Xfce desktop |Xfce desktop Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-02 18:46:53 EDT --- I'll review this. Look for a full review later tonight or this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 00:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] New: Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Summary: Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/dustismo.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/dustismo-fonts-20030207-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Dustismo is a font by Dustin Norlander with serif and sans-serif versions Upstream seems pretty much dead - none of the urls work. Dustismo is needed by the kdeedu package which currently ships with the font embedded (see bz #477406). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 00:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030053.n030rS7O021107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-02 19:53:26 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 8d0af5eecdb1a646e0f5ecce75be5648 sion-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/sion-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. FIX - MUST: The License field in the package spec does not match the actual license. All the headers read: * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License. This is GPLv2 only, AFIAR from my plugins Enrico usually uses this OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. NOTE - MUST: The spec file for the is legible, but I would prefer line brakes in the configure statements OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 d38ba0f6468793f1860bbc6a5797916d OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all arches OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package contains code OK - MUST: No large documentation files for a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. NOTE - MUST: The Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. But AFIAK we don't use vendor any longer for new packages. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. OK - SHOULD: The package has no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin OK - SHOULD: Timestamp of Source matches If you fix the License tag you can consider this package APPROVED. The rest is up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 01:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030107.n03179FO023429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivazqueznet at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-01-02 20:07:08 EDT --- GPLv2+ is a bad license for fonts in Fedora. I recommend you find a suitable replacement. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 01:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030116.n031GjHe011565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-02 20:16:44 EDT --- Not a review, but some comments: For the first, you should probibly exclude them if Fedora can't distribute them at all. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code You can (and should) specify a full URL for sourceforge hosted projects. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 01:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030141.n031fvFS015210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #5 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-02 20:41:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > For the first, you should probibly exclude them if Fedora can't distribute them > at all. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net It's not that bad. The code is simply copyrighted, you need a license to use it. From what that page syas there is no reason to modify the tarball and exclude the file. The binaries are not tainted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 02:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030213.n032D5vr020189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-02 21:13:02 EDT --- Sorry it took so long, holydays, etc... REVIEW for 7d6514c04ab3d2914b6cf971dba30c2c mumbles-0.4-5.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/mumbles-0.4-5.fc11.* mumbles.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mumbles/GrowlNetwork.py 0644 mumbles.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mumbles/Mumbles.py 0644 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. because this python, save to ignore OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. FIX - MUST: The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines: - IMO Group tag should be 'User Interface/Desktops' instead of 'System Environment/Libraries' - Timestamp of Source0 does not match, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. Note: GrowlNetwork.py is BSD OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 a6b24223dc23e5022332586ffc454e84 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package contains code. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. FIX - MUST: The Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. But the file needs to be fixed, the category "Application" is obsolete according to latest fdo specs, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Add --remove-category="Application" to desktop-file-install You should also add-category="Gnome" OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. OK - SHOULD: The package compiles and builds into noarch rpms OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane, but update-desktop-database if not needed, because mumbles.desktop contains no MimeType, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK - SHOULD: The package has no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. Package looks good so far, but needs some final fixes before I will approve it. BTW: The 'trick' from comment # 10 is not really necessary, %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info will also work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 02:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030225.n032P9BK003032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-02 21:25:08 EDT --- Regarding the desktop file: You should also add. Seem like you already remove 'Application' from Categories, seems like my browser had the file still cached, sorry. You could also add '--add-category=GNOME;GTK' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 02:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030238.n032cf84005119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-02 21:38:40 EDT --- (Sorry, hit the Commit button to fast) The package also 'Requires: dbus', because dbus-python only pulls in dbus-libs, not dbus itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 03:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030308.n0338R3c009983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-02 22:08:26 EDT --- You should consider adding mumbles to the default Gnome and Xfce sessions: desktop-file-install \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart \ --copy-name-to-generic-name \ --remove-category=Application \ --add-category="GNOME;GTK;TrayIcon;" \ --add-only-show-in="GNOME;XFCE;" \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 05:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464014] Review Request: findbugs - Find bugs in Java code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030521.n035L5wf000578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464014 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-01-03 00:21:04 EDT --- Updated to version 1.3.7: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs/findbugs.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs/findbugs-1.3.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 05:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030520.n035KKZV000477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-01-03 00:20:17 EDT --- Updated for findbugs 1.3.7: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel-5.2-1.3.7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 05:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464016] Review Request: eclipse-findbugs - Eclipse plugin for FindBugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030521.n035LgUQ000659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464016 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-01-03 00:21:41 EDT --- Updated to version 1.3.7: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-findbugs/eclipse-findbugs.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-findbugs/eclipse-findbugs-1.3.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 05:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:27:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030527.n035RVpH020559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 00:27:30 EDT --- The date in the changelog is wrong, it still 2008 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030604.n0364If7026138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-03 01:04:17 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 1bcd5d2e7428c7ced039be87dfa30d74 xfce4-screenshooter-1.4.90.0.tar.gz 1bcd5d2e7428c7ced039be87dfa30d74 xfce4-screenshooter-1.4.90.0.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: xfce4-screenshooter-plugin.x86_64: W: no-documentation which can be ignored. 2. I see you have --add-only-show-in=XFCE in the desktop file. Is that really intended? Doesn't that lessen the need for splitting out the plugin, if it's only going to be used in Xfce anyhow? On the other hand, other DE's have their own screenshot applications, so perhaps thats adding too much clutter. In any case, up to you. Neither of these are blockers, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030610.n036AW6C008407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-03 01:10:31 EDT --- Oops. I looked at all the files and saw that it was GPLv2, but for some reason put GPLv2+ in the spec. ;( > The date in the changelog is wrong, it still 2008 :) That's the second time I have done that today. ;( Thanks for the review and spotting that. Will fix on import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sion Short Description: GIO/GVFS management application Owners: kevin Branches: devel F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030613.n036Dhnd027599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-03 01:13:41 EDT --- I have no idea why it happened, and personally I don't see any issue with those files being 444 instead of 644. Perhaps someone from the perl list will enlighten us? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] New: Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Summary: Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxmusic.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxmusic-0.2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LXMusic is a very simple gtk+ XMMS2 client written in pure C. It has very few functionality, and can do nothing more than play the music. The UI is very clean and simple. This is currently aimed to be used as the default music player of LXDE (Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment) project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030621.n036LjS0028964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #15 from D Haley 2009-01-03 01:21:41 EDT --- Yet another update. This mainly just cleans up the 5.0.3 spec file. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.3-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Sat Jan 03 2009 5.0.3-2 - Fix up Requires & BuildRequires - Work around static lib installation (disable static libs issue?) - Trash zero length files during install - Added missing ldconfig in post/postun - Fix up file ownership to prevent duplicate owners - Fix up file permissions (644->755) on executable scripts - Fix so .so files are in -devel, .so.* are in main I still can't track down the gluegen plotting problems. Checking scilab's classpath.xml everything looks good (in the console session below there are no "no such file" errors). If anyone can help I would really appreciate it. Similarly I cannot work out why the help files are not located. This is probably due to the fact that I don't understand how scilab's help system functions. Scilab errors: Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11GLDrawableFactory at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186) .... Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no gluegen-rt in java.library.path at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1698) at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:840) at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1047) Console session: $ `cat $SCI/etc/classpath.xml | grep .jar |sed 's/!!' | sed 's/\" .*>//' | sed 's/\"//' | sed s/disable.*// ` | sed 's!$SCILAB!/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab/!g' > tmp && ls -l `cat tmp` -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 2088 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/action_binding/jar/org.scilab.modules.action_binding.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 2130 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/completion/jar/org.scilab.modules.completion.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 42847 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/console/jar/org.scilab.modules.console.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 25234 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/graphic_export/jar/org.scilab.modules.graphic_export.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 273140 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/gui/jar/org.scilab.modules.gui.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 23631 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/helptools/jar/org.scilab.modules.helptools.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 2909 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/history_manager/jar/org.scilab.modules.history_manager.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 13272 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/javasci/jar/javasci.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 6900 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/jvm/jar/org.scilab.modules.jvm.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 1944 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/localization/jar/org.scilab.modules.localization.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 152263 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/renderer/jar/org.scilab.modules.renderer.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 1979 2009-01-03 12:28 /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/usr/share/scilab//modules/shell/jar/org.scilab.modules.shell.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 478024 2008-12-21 22:26 /usr/lib/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2008-12-22 00:54 /usr/share/java//avalon-framework.jar -> avalon-framework-4.1.4.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2008-12-22 00:53 /usr/share/java//batik-all.jar -> batik-all-1.7.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2008-12-22 00:28 /usr/share/java//commons-logging.jar -> commons-logging-1.0.4.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2008-12-22 00:54 /usr/share/java//fop.jar -> fop-0.95.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2008-11-23 18:06 /usr/share/java//gluegen-rt.jar -> gluegen-rt-1.1.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 2008-12-21 19:30 /usr/share/java//jakarta-commons-io.jar -> jakarta-commons-io-1.3.2.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2008-11-22 16:54 /usr/share/java//javahelp2.jar -> javahelp2-2.0.05.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2008-12-22 01:10 /usr/share/java//jeuclid-core.jar -> jeuclid-core-3.1.3.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2008-11-01 12:33 /usr/share/java//jgoodies-looks.jar -> jgoodies-looks-2.1.4.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2008-12-22 01:20 /usr/share/java//jogl.jar -> jogl-1.1.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2008-11-22 15:48 /usr/share/java//jrosetta-API.jar -> jrosetta-API-1.0.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2008-11-22 15:48 /usr/share/java//jrosetta-engine.jar -> jrosetta-engine-1.0.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2008-12-22 01:20 /usr/share/java//saxon.jar -> saxon-6.5.5.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2008-12-21 22:25 /usr/share/java//skinlf.jar -> skinlf-6.7.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2008-12-22 00:53 /usr/share/java//xmlgraphics-commons.jar -> xmlgraphics-commons-1.3.jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030636.n036a2xh031129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 01:36:02 EDT --- Regarding the OnlyShowIn: Both Gnome and KDE already have Screenshot Utilities, so I'm maybe better of using NotShowIn=GNOME;KDE; New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-screenshooter Short Description: Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 InitialCC: (I don't think that renaming package in F-9 makes sense.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 09:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030928.n039S0LE007604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-03 04:27:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > GPLv2+ is a bad license for fonts in Fedora. True. Nevertheless currently we do accept GPL-only fonts in Fedora, as long as their packagers continue to try to locate right holders and add the FSF Font exception to the license. There are just too many GPL-only fonts :( Just don't use them to create PDFs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] New: Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Summary: Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pp3/pp3.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pp3/pp3-1.3.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1030504 Description: PP3 creates celestial charts. It generates resolution independent maps of very high graphical quality in Postscript or PDF format. They can be used for example as illustrations in books or on web pages. You may use the databases of the distribution or your own databases converted to PP3's simple text format. PP3 uses LaTeX+pstricks as the backend for generating the vector graphics. You can add arbitrary labels to the map. The output is configurable in many ways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031046.n03AkrHU008871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |454410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031046.n03AksqD008893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031048.n03Am3Gu022655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-01-03 05:48:02 EDT --- I think this is in rawhide, OK to close? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031049.n03Anunn022831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-03 05:49:55 EDT --- Itamar, can you try making a Koji scratch-build of this please. It will make it easier to review. You will need to do something like: koji build --scratch dist-f11 mingw32-dlfcn-r11-1.fc10.src.rpm (I'm not exactly sure if that is the correct command, and upgraded my machine yesterday so Koji is now broken for me, so please check it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031047.n03AlkH2009076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-01-03 05:47:45 EDT --- I think this is in rawhide, OK to close? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031048.n03Ampi6009205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-01-03 05:48:50 EDT --- Held up as per this post https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-December/msg00023.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 10:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031050.n03AoJuY009652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031101.n03B1ORH025378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-03 06:01:22 EDT --- Closed - sorry I forgot to do this before :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031102.n03B2txV012100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-03 06:02:54 EDT --- I'm rewriting portablexdr to remove the license issue and also to support a working rpcgen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031120.n03BKXRM015947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #16 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-01-03 06:20:32 EDT --- * gluegen issue It is not etc/classpath.xml but etc/librarypath.xml classpath is used to set paths to each jar files. librarypath is used to the set java.library.path (equivalent to LD_LIBRARY_PATH) which is the stuff used here to load the native libraries (ex: gluegen) for JNI For example, in Debian: $ dpkg -S libgluegen-rt.so libjogl-jni: /usr/lib/jni/libgluegen-rt.so $ grep /usr/lib/jni etc/librarypath.xml * Your help issue. Did you add the option --enable-build-help to the configure ? * "Work around static lib installation (disable static libs issue?)" => what is the problem you had ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031152.n03BqwcG002940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2009-01-03 06:52:56 EDT --- nrutil.cpp and nrutil.h are public domain. (http://www.nr.com/public-domain.html) I do not think there is need for patch1. Source0 URL is still wrong, it should be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pfstools/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:52:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031152.n03Bqolv021702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031157.n03Bv9eE003766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-01-03 06:57:08 EDT --- Package adheres to guidelines. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 11:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 06:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031159.n03BxYqf004008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-01-03 06:59:33 EDT --- > License: LGPLv2+ Web page says "Licensed under the GPL v2 or later for now". File COPYING contains the GPL v2. Only a few source files contain a LGPL header. This suggests the project is: => License: GPLv2+ > Summary: An LV2 host library Suggest dropping the "An ". > %description devel > slv2-devel contains the headers and development libraries for slv2. Suggest "This package contains the headers and development libraries for SLV2." for consistency and to avoid repeating the pkg name. > %files > %doc AUTHORS COPYING README > %defattr(-,root,root,-) %defattr ought to be moved one line up. > %{_libdir}/*.a https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries * The slv2.pc pkg-config file adds a redundant -L/usr/lib -lrdf from redland.pc * 0.6.2 is available (still marked unstable, though) * Run-time warning (in src/world.c) about Redland librdf not being new enough: $ lv2_list Warning: Unable to create "trees" RDF storage. Performance can be improved by upgrading librdf. * src/world.c contains hardcoded /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib paths also on 64-bit platforms! * The only real blockers: * licence * static lib * hardcoded lib paths -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 12:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031217.n03CHi36007416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-03 07:17:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: srm Short Description: Secure file deletion Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 12:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225894] Merge Review: icon-naming-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031235.n03CZg05010695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225894 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-01-03 07:35:41 EDT --- > Requires: perl(XML::Simple) Redundant. rpmbuild adds it already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 12:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031249.n03CnDMp012832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-03 07:49:12 EDT --- Thanks Manuel for the review. I will add the missing 'Requires' before cvs import. BTW, happy new year -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 12:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031250.n03CoOSO031753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-03 07:50:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: screenie Short Description: A small and lightweight screen wrapper Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 13:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478534] Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031341.n03Dfg4A023402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478534 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-01-03 08:41:41 EDT --- Please read this thread: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/games/2008-December/000068.html The name of this package is a problem. Blocking FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 13:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478605] Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031351.n03Dp3f8011212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 13:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031352.n03Dq1C9025372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 13:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031354.n03DsPAg025657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #5 from Christof Damian 2009-01-03 08:54:24 EDT --- I just reread the join process page and noticed that I forgot to mention that this is my first package and I need a sponsor. I added the FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the block list now. I also have some other packages, which I will submit once I have a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 14:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478362] Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031400.n03E0juo013192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478362 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 14:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031427.n03ERHes017891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 09:27:16 EDT --- Important: The package needs to require gvfs to provide gvfs-open. You also should require fuse because fusermount is needed, see http://mmassonnet.blogspot.com/2008/09/mount-remote-file-systems-tape-2.html Not sure if you also should require gnome-mount, because this can be configured in the settings and the gnome-mount package has been orphaned recently (or is going to be soon, I don't remember). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 14:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031434.n03EYwWF019048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 09:34:57 EDT --- I think requiring %{_bindir}/gvfs-open and %{_bindir}/fusermount is better than the package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 15:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 10:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031500.n03F0mHr005442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 10:00:47 EDT --- Oops, I did not read the comments before I took the review. This arping implementation is a little different and installs to %{_bindir} instead of %{_sbindir}, but the manpage collides with the one from iputils. Fabian, IMO i doesn't make sense to have another arping. If you want to submit something, do arping-ng (and install as arping-ng to avoid namespace collisions). What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 14:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478683] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://smile.org.ua/~andy/prj/Fedora/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub.spec SRPM URL: http://smile.org.ua/~andy/prj/Fedora/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.4-1.sh7.src.rpm Description: AuthSub is Google's method of authentication for their web services. It is also used by other web sites. You can read more about it here. http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/Authentication.html A Google Group for AuthSub is here. http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Accounts-API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 15:44:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 10:44:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031544.n03FiEhd012911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-03 10:44:13 EDT --- I have contacted the author and asked about his thoughts on relicensing as GPL + Font Exceptions. Considering that all his websites are down (and have been down for quite a while) I'm not sure the email will ever reach him (at least I haven't received a bounce for it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 15:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 10:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031543.n03Fho0G031072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #17 from D Haley 2009-01-03 10:43:49 EDT --- >* Your help issue. Did you add the option --enable-build-help to the configure ? Yes, it is set in the configure line. (see .spec file to confirm) >* "Work around static lib installation (disable static libs issue?)" Static libs get built and installed even with --disable-static-libs . However they do not get used, so I have to rm them. >$ grep /usr/lib/jni etc/librarypath.xml * glugen-rt is in /usr/share/java. Other components are in /usr/lib. Unlike debian. where gluegen-rt is in /usr/lib/jni/. Modifying this file to include has no effect. We should probably move further discussions elsewhere, to not clutter up this bug too much. I'll have another crack at getting it working soon. Thanks for the input however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 16:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478605] Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031635.n03GZrYK021591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 11:35:52 EDT --- The scrip itself is nice, but having the config inside the script itself is really bad. In the current state this should not be packaged as rpm. How about moving the the basic config to lets say /etc/arpcheck.conf, /etc/archeck/arpreck.conf or /etc/sysconfig/arpcheck and modify the script a little? ############# CONFIGURATION #################################################### ### ONLY CHANGE IN /etc/sysconfig/arpcheck !!! if [ ! -f /etc/sysconfig/arpcheck ]; then echo "Configuration file /etc/sysconfig/arpckeck not found." echo "Please copy /usr/share/doc/arpcheck-1.8-1/arpcheck.conf.default" echo "to /etc/sysconfig/arpckeck and edit it for your needs." exit 1 fi . /etc/sysconfig/arpcheck ### End of basic config Issues: - Default config is not sane: Defaults for dMACLIST, BLACKLIST and WHITELIST are not same. If the script is executed with root privileges somewhere is accidentially creates files that are left behind because they are not owned by the package - Log path requires root privileges - No documentation except in the script itself. Include a README with some of the info from the header of the script Ideas: - Allow per user config ~/.arpcheck.conf - Include a template for the configuration instead of providing the config file automatically to make sure the user edits the file before usage. Something like if [ ! -f /etc/sysconfig/arpcheck ]; then echo "Please copy /usr/share/doc/arpcheck-1.8-1/arpcheck.conf.default" echo "to /etc/sysconfig/arpckeck and edit it for your needs." exit 1 fi - Include a README.FFEDORA for distro specific changes - Install to /usr/sbin if this is only meant to be run as root -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 17:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031715.n03HFUbx013588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rezso at rdsor.ro --- Comment #6 from Balint Cristian 2009-01-03 12:15:28 EDT --- Folks, - I think this package violates Garmin (TM) proprietary format and their patents.We should be careful by adding such a package to Fedora, Garmin (TM) never released any specifications of their format, everything is a pure reverse engineering. On top of all it contains some patent subjected (not sure which one) which allows very smart routing information store. - Legal folk, can state some points over this package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 17:20:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031720.n03HKtmZ028707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #3 from Jose Luis 2009-01-03 12:20:53 EDT --- Mamoru, thanks a lot for all the notes! I'll write here again when I can process all the information and fix everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 17:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] New: Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 Summary: Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rfdump.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rfdump-1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.rfdump.org Description: RFDump is a tool to detect RFID-Tags and show their meta information: Tag ID, Tag Type, manufacturer etc. The user data memory of a tag can be displayed and modified using either a Hex or an ASCII editor. Tag contents can be stored and loaded using a specific XML fomrat. This effectively allows to copy data from one tag to another. In addition, the integrated cookie feature demonstrates how easy it is for a company to abuse RFID technology to spy on their customers. RFDump works with the ACG Multi-Tag Reader or similar card reader hardware. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1030722 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint rfdump* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint rfdump-1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 17:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:56:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225894] Merge Review: icon-naming-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031756.n03Hu5G6019838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225894 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-03 12:56:04 EDT --- Feel free to remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 18:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031803.n03I3Aab002676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-01-03 13:03:09 EDT --- > I think this package violates Garmin (TM) proprietary format and their patents You're not the Garmin's legal representative to make such statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 18:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031814.n03IEIxK022664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-03 13:14:16 EDT --- Michel, ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 18:31:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031831.n03IVPFu007131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-03 13:31:22 EDT --- No reply regarding license. I have resend the message. Probably maintainer is on holidays. Lets wait for few more days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 18:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031837.n03IbIZn026353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-03 13:37:16 EDT --- It looks like the patch included in the srpm is neither the one that you have submitted to http://bugs.l3ib.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=21, nor the one approved by Andrew Yates (andrewy). You use 077 in the bundled patch, suggest 177 and Andrew uses 0177. I suggest to create a new src.rpm with http://code.l3ib.org/?p=fsniper.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/main.c;h=cd49dffebe4b4c728b62c28c1381c4fb6f5ad87d;hp=03a8d701d6f9802ba346b591429e58741ca53479;hb=82cb0b46c48485fd4f6231ce3169c7be87d1ea07;hpb=2bbeb5d6e6b55bb9692c043fcdbeab15d9723c9e as patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 18:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031844.n03IiAiw027380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-03 13:44:08 EDT --- Add Legal Blocker. Let's see what's Fedora Legal says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 18:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:47:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031847.n03IlWq8028143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-01-03 13:47:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: javassist Short Description: The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 19:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031924.n03JOIB2001672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-03 14:24:17 EDT --- Updates http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc10.src.rpm http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog.spec As from this %release: - this package is named perl-Verilog and no longer perl-verilog. Thereby, following upstream namings and follows the namings of perl-Verilog-Codegen and perl-Verilog-Readmem - upstream has renamed vpm and vppp as comment #3 pointerd - test suites are not included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 19:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031927.n03JReBN016650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-03 14:27:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > nrutil.cpp and nrutil.h are public domain. > (http://www.nr.com/public-domain.html) > I do not think there is need for patch1. The files used in the package are not on the list. This might be an oversight but it's really not necessary to bicker about this. The code is using so little from these files it's absolutely unnecessary to pull in so much code. The patch is also an optimization. > Source0 URL is still wrong, it should be: > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pfstools/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz That's not what the URL referenced in comment #4 says and it shouldn't matter: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz This works just as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 21:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032123.n03LNi8k020152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-03 16:23:43 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type according to spec: Artistic (same as perl) License type according to source: unclear, probably (GPL+ or Artistic). See also note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 14c8c0227f290e7358fa8bb12f86f03bf2255f8f Verilog-Perl-3.100.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. See note 2 [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [*] Make test is OK ====== Notes ====== 1. It's a bit unclear to me what license the programmer wants to use. All source files written in Perl start with: // Copyright 2000-2009 by Wilson Snyder. This program is free software; // you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either the GNU // General Public License or the Perl Artistic License. // and end with: Copyright 2000-2009 by Wilson Snyder. This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either the GNU Lesser General Public License or the Perl Artistic License. I am far from being an expert but IMHO using "(artistic or GPL+) and (artistic or LGPL+)" does not fly because GPL and LGPL are specified in the same file. I assume GPL+ takes precedence, but I strongly suggest to ask the author what's the real intent (and maybe also adding the corresponding GPL or LGPL license file to the tarball, too). Anyway, all the licenses involved are free, so I will not block the review because of this. 2. /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Verilog is listed twice. At the first glance it looks like removing the %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Verilog line will fix this. ================ *** APPROVED *** but please take care of the above two problems before commit. ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 21:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032128.n03LS6S8020891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Summary|Review Request: moon-buggy |Review Request: moon-buggy |- Drive and jump with some |- Drive and jump with some |car across the moon |kind of car across the moon Flag|needinfo?(phil at linuxeinstei | |ger.net) | --- Comment #15 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-03 16:28:04 EDT --- I've locally built a new moon-buggy package with several fixes and enhancements. I'll let Simon test it a bit (because I rebased it on an older spec file by him) and afterwards I will put it into this review. Mamoru, will you then go for the review or shall I already look for somebody else doing this review? Removing fe-needsponsor blocker requirement as Philipp is no longer a real Fedora contributor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 21:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478362] Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032135.n03LZw1d022158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478362 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 16:35:57 EDT --- REVIEW FOR deecdd74d33f7ed0cb2cd358c27663c0 fmirror-0.8.4-1.fc9.src.rpm OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/fmirror-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. FIX - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines, see below for details OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv2+) OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2+) OK - MUST: The source package includes the text of the license in its own file, and that file is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL: md5sum 78652ce5bb50e6c120c9ca0988cb9dca OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: tested on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires: None, because all build deps are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines. N/A - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates: None except in docdir FIX - MUST: The package does not contain duplicate files in the %files listing, but the files listing needs work, see below OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included something as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures: tested in koji OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. Issues: I'm not happy with the URL tag, but there seems to be no upstream and it's better than nothing. The timestamp of Source0 does not match, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Files section: I'm not happy with the two folders in doc. Several Options: 1. leave the files in /usr/share/fmirror, but mark the confif files as %config and the README as %doc. 2. if you mark something as %config, it should usually should be in /etc. If it's in there it should better be %config(noreplace) 3. install the config /usr/share/doc/fmirror-%{version} and rename configs/README. Mark them as %doc, not as %config 4. install the config folder as a subfolder of /usr/share/doc/fmirror-%{version} 5. Patch the Makefile for one of the previous options Option 2: %configure --datadir=%{_sysconfdir} make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" chmod -x %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/fmirror.1 mv configs/README configs/README.configs rm -rf %config %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/README ... %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog COPYING README %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/ Option 3: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" chmod -x %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/fmirror.1 # these files are packaged in doc rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} mv configs/README configs/README.configs ... %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog COPYING README %doc configs/*.conf %doc configs/README.configs Option 4: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" chmod -x %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/fmirror.1 # these files are packaged in doc rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} rm -rf configs/CVS ... %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog COPYING README %docdir configs/ %doc configs/ Ideas: - Include a fedora.conf file - Debian seems to have a couple of interesting patches, see http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/fmirror/fmirror_0.8.4-13.diff.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 21:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032139.n03LdTN3022506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #16 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-03 16:39:29 EDT --- Robert/Simon: I suggest to close this bug and the one of you who wants to push the package forward should create a new bugzilla entry. This way we will have a correct bug owner / submitter (because AFAIK bugzilla unfortunately does not allow changing the bug owner) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 22:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032217.n03MHVP8010790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #17 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-03 17:17:30 EDT --- Manuel, I really don't care about that. Just let's finish the review and then we're fine. Same situation can ever happen, e.g. once the owner of a package changes (e.g. review request with somebody else than later a bug report). Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/moon-buggy.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.src.rpm Mamoru, would you be so kind and do the review? I think, I shouldn't have forgotten anything - hopefully. I'm aware about the two rpmlint errors, but that's the same accepted practice like at e.g. typespeed and nethack: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/moon-buggy 02755 E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/moon-buggy 0775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 23:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032314.n03NEKbf005149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #16 from John Anderson 2009-01-03 18:14:20 EDT --- With fixes from comments 12-15 http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles-0.4-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 23:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032331.n03NVNHP022911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 18:31:22 EDT --- AFIACS everything is fine except the desktop-file-install. The starter from comment # 15 was meant as an addition to the starter in the menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 23:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032332.n03NWWEk008278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 18:32:31 EDT --- This mean you need to run desktop-file-install twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 23:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032335.n03NZv8h008820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-03 18:35:56 EDT --- Lane, you have commented perl-verilog on #BuildRequires: perl-verilog, perl-systemc, systemc I'm packaging perl-Verilog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 I haven't yet looked at the details, do you think enabling perl-Verilog our verilator will provide more "features" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 00:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040026.n040QaSr016413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #20 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-03 19:26:35 EDT --- #001: These should not be shipped /usr/share/verilator/include/verilated.mk.in --> duplicate with /usr/share/verilator/include/verilated.mk #002: do we need to ship these with this package ? usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpCommon.h /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpTraceVcdC.cpp /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpTraceVcdC.h /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/systemperl.h Wouldn't it be wise to package perl-SystemPerl ? I have already started packaging perl-SystemPerl. Soon I'll post a package review for perl-SystemPerl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 00:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040034.n040YhFa017404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #21 from Lane 2009-01-03 19:34:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > #002: > > do we need to ship these with this package ? > usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src > /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpCommon.h > /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpTraceVcdC.cpp > /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpTraceVcdC.h > /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/systemperl.h > > Wouldn't it be wise to package perl-SystemPerl ? I have already started > packaging perl-SystemPerl. Soon I'll post a package review for perl-SystemPerl Are you packaging the system perl from Wilson Snyder at www.veripool.org? These files are included because they are get compiled into the verilator models whenever you want to do tracing to see your waveforms. If you are packaging the one from Wilson Snyder, then I can remove these files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 01:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040115.n041FUXH006444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 20:15:28 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 9050675dce622f3983571eb094ca60ec sbackup-0.10.5-3.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: ]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/sbackup-0.10.5-3.fc11.* sbackup.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 76) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. can be ignored, see comment # 4. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. FIX - MUST: The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines. - Timestamp of Source0 does not match OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 0d754b72da3b5cadf6de203cdf7afe13 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package contains code. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. FIX - MUST: The Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file that is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section, but there are some issues with the desktop files, see below. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. OK - SHOULD: The scriptlets used are must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - Timestamp of Source0 does not match, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - Desktop files: - paths are hardcoded - key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character - Categories are IMO not correct. Suggestion: sbackup-restore = System;Utility;Filesystem;Archiving;GNOME;GTK; sbackup-conf = System;Settings;SystemSettings;GNOME;GTK; In case of doubt see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html - add GenericNames for KDE compatibility. Use the window title Restore files/directories, Backup Properties - please add (at least German) Translations for the keys, e. g. GenericName[de]=Dateien/Verzeichnisse wiederherstellen - Requires: usermode-gtk for the password dialog - Use global pam config? #%PAM-1.0 auth include config-util account include config-util session include config-util - I suggest you include pam config as separate sources instead of creating them on the fly. - include an initscript for sbackupd? - What are the Exclude statements for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 02:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040257.n042vJJO006657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #19 from John Anderson 2009-01-03 21:57:18 EDT --- Ah, I see now whats going on there. Thanks for the clarification. Here it is with both desktop-file-installs. I believe this is correct. http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles-0.4-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 03:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225776] Merge Review: gamin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040321.n043LDWD026304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225776 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tbzatek at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-03 22:21:12 EDT --- I happened to stumble on gamin yesterday so I figured I could do a bit of cleanup and finish the merge review as well. I am submitting the new version as an attachment. I have also added Tomas to the CC: list because PKGDB shows him as primary maintainer in devel. Issues that might still be needed to be fixed: - the license: in July, Spot changed the license tag to LGPLv2. However at least one file is GPLv2 so I think that the whole package should therefore be considered GPLv2. I have added a comment about that (but left the tag as it was, as most probably Spot knows better) - I have removed the exec bit on the .py files included as doc in gamin-python and I have also solved the rpath issue which was triggered by _gamin.so. Most of the warnings from rpmlint are now gone, but two of them are still there: gamin-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gamin.py 0644 gamin-python.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/_gamin.a Most probably gamin.py does not need to be executable because (if I have correctly undestood the docs) it is meant to be imported by other scripts. OTOH I have no idea if _gamin.a is needed and if it is, if it should be packaged in -devel or in -python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 03:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040325.n043PGXV027079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-03 22:25:14 EDT --- Ok, that's fine with me, but you should also add GNOME and GTK in the first desktop-file-install. But you can do this after import, this package is APPROVED Good work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 03:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040322.n043MwPK026509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley 2009-01-03 22:22:56 EDT --- A few issues with this package (I haven't done a full review of it yet, these are just some things that stick out): I have no idea where or how to get this exact source. If this is an svn snapshot (which from the version looks like it is), you'll want to include instructions in the spec file on how to obtain this exact version - i.e. something like 'svn export -r1234 http://svn.example.com/svn/example example ; tar -czvf example.tar.gz example/' or whatever). You'll also want to version the package per the guidance found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages rpmlint complains about the summary not starting with a capital letter, pretty simple to fix. The changelog is not in a proper format. You have: %changelog * Mon Dec 29 2008 MindTouch - 8.08.12159 nightly built Which should be: * Mon Dec 29 2008 MindTocuh - 0.08.12159 - Nightly built or something similar. Refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs fore more info (It looks like you're using the third format sort of, but I've never seen anyone use that in practice and was kind of surprised to see it in the guidelines). In %post, you're adding users - please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups for guidance on doing this. Similarly, according to the guidelines, we don't want to delete the user for the reasons stated. You're also installing content into /var/www - according to the guidelines, this should be instead in /usr/share/dekiwiki - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Web_Applications for more details. I also noticed that your logfile is %ghost'ed - I wouldn't do that (but I don't think there's a guideline against it) because the administrator might want to keep the logfile around from the uninstalled package, and it doesn't do anything for logfiles that have been rotated. I think that's it for now, I'd like someone more familiar with mono than myself to look this over too. The guidelines for mono packages can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 03:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225776] Merge Review: gamin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040322.n043MUXQ011097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225776 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-03 22:22:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328123) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328123) cleaned up spec, silences most of rpmlint complains -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 03:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040338.n043cCs6028851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from John Anderson 2009-01-03 22:38:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mumbles Short Description: growl like notification system for GNOME Owners: janderson Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 04:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476936] Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040405.n0445K84001050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476936 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-03 23:05:19 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 04:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040404.n0444HTv017639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-03 23:04:15 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 04:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040424.n044Orqf003666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-03 23:24:52 EDT --- Fixed all issues. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnaural.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gnaural-1.0.20080808-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 05:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 00:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040513.n045Db9q011945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-01-04 00:13:36 EDT --- Problems: 1. Name of specfile and %name don't match. 2. None of the directory names given in the comments above the Source0 line actually match the directory name used in %setup. (I see "customfieldsadminplugin" and "customfieldsadminplugin-0.10", when both should be "trac-customfieldsadminplugin-0.10".) 3. trac-webadmin-plugin (a Requires) doesn't actually exist anywhere in Fedora. Please submit that package for review and add a dependency from this ticket to that ticket. (I'll review the other one too...) 4. %{__python} setup.py build needs to go in %build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 05:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 00:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040522.n045Mu5v013563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-01-04 00:22:55 EDT --- Spec: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-transitfeed/1.1.9-3/python-transitfeed.spec SRPM: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-transitfeed/1.1.9-3/python-transitfeed-1.1.9-3.fc10.src.rpm * Sat Jan 03 2009 Ian Weller 1.1.9-3 - Add a "gfts-" prefix to everything in /usr/bin to get rid of naming conflicts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 05:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 00:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478722] New: Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 Summary: Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rezso at rdsor.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/ossim.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/ossim-1.7.14-0.1.svn13945.fc11.src.rpm Description: OSSIM provides advanced geo-spatial processing capabilities through a state of the art C++ software library. A number of tools, applications, and examples are included with the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 06:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 01:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040623.n046Njp0007865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley 2009-01-04 01:23:44 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 06:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 01:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040630.n046Uldg024599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2009-01-04 01:30:47 EDT --- Thanks, Jon. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-transitfeed Short Description: Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools Owners: ianweller Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 09:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 04:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040915.n049FBiv019102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 04:15:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/moon-buggy.spec > SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.src.rpm Well, [tasaka1 at localhost moon-buggy]$ LANG=C rpmbuild --rebuild moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.src.rpm Installing moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.src.rpm error: source package expected, binary found error: moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.src.rpm cannot be installed [tasaka1 at localhost moon-buggy]$ LANG=C rpm -ivh moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.src.rpm error: can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/__db.000 (Permission denied) Something seems broken on your srpm... For now I unpacked your srpm by rpmdev-extract and repackaged it. Then: - Installing moon-buggy binary rpm rebuilt from your srpm - as tasaka1 (i.e. non-root) execute moon-buggy Then this creates the file "mbscore" under /var/games/moon-buggy with (owner:group) = (tasaka1:games). Then what happens if "tasaka1" user does some malicious things on mbscore (as tasaka1 can modify this file) and "root" executes moon-buggy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 09:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 04:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040943.n049hUah025290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-04 04:43:28 EDT --- > MUST Items: > xx - package meets Packaging Guidelines > > [...] > > + According to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > 'install -p' should be used to preserve timestamps. You missed this one. :-) Recently the Fedora Packaging Committee decided to not use --vendor=fedora anymore, but that decision was waiting to be approved by FESCo. See: + http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081021 + https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor I have just dropped a mail on fedora-devel-list to find out what the current is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041002.n04A2ms1029146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:02:44 EDT --- Please adapt to the new guidelines ; that should be easy and simplify your spec quite a bit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041006.n04A6rF1014372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:06:51 EDT --- Hi Ankur, This looks quite good and you've progressed a lot since your first submissions. However, you need to adapt this spec file to the new templates, like for your other submissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041029.n04ATdBl018416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:29:37 EDT --- Thank you for packaging a new font. Initial remarks: ? you should convert to the new Fedora packaging templates. That will make Behdad happy and simplify your spec file quite a bit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template (plain text version in fontpackages-devel) ? please use lowercase package name to keep consistency with other font packages such as dejavu-fonts ? You have more complete fontconfig templates that just need filing in fontpackages-devel (please send them upstream for inclusion in the font archive when you're happy with them) ? please ask upstream to add a detached txt license file, a readme and a fontlog. The OFL is quite specific about stuff like reserved font names, that require documentation in the license text and fontlog ? this font is available in the Open Font Library. Please ask upstream what the canonical home should be. If it is the Open Font Library, add the oflb- prefix to the fontname ? please add a page to the wiki that describes this font and will be referenced in the F11 release notes, using this template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template (see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle ) ? NEEDINFO while this is being taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041044.n04Airdt021275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-04 05:44:52 EDT --- Removed vendor SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnaural.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gnaural-1.0.20080808-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041056.n04AuFIM006813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sven at lank.es) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:56:13 EDT --- Hi Sven, Thank you for this new font package! Dustimo is a neat font that suffers from a missing upstream. We'll accept it nevertheless, but please continue to try getting an upstream response even after the package integration (sfd sources, addition of the font exception to the license). Anyway: ? Right now the best font source is probably Debian, as the font was created for this distribution. They have a more current dustimo.zip in their ttf-dustin package (20030318) ? Please make separate sans and sans-serif subpackages using the multi template in fontpackages-devel ? Please add fontconfig declarations to each subpackage. It's not difficult, just fill in the basic template in fontpackages-devel (you can ask for help on the list if you have a problem at some point) ? you don't really need to add an archivename if its value is the same as fontname ? please don't deviate from the template and use the provided macros or we'll have no end of problems lates ? NEEDINFO till this is taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041116.n04BGUYL010896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04 06:16:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > If you are > packaging the one from Wilson Snyder, then I can remove these files. Yes, I'll package the ones from Wilson Snyder. I'm also trying to package everything from veripool for F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041120.n04BKZNF011772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-04 06:20:33 EDT --- hi, packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Im not too sure of line 53 : install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I dint quite get that. Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" so there must be something wrong in the "ln ... " command.. line 61. I havent been able to correct that either. regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041120.n04BKiKx028648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041117.n04BHuj2027999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-04 06:17:55 EDT --- Fixed missing install -p SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnaural.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gnaural-1.0.20080808-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:36:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463912] Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041136.n04BaL2E014834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463912 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041136.n04BaBms014785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041211.n04CB1YS005774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-04 07:10:59 EDT --- Just a few minor issues/notes: 1.) The license seems to be GPL 2 or newer, therefore GPLv2+, please correct the License tag 2.) What is %contentdir for? You do: %define contentdir /var/www mkdir -p -m0755 %{buildroot}%{contentdir}/html Yet you do not seem to be putting anything there, nor is it included in the resulting package. 3.) This does not look very nice: set +x for f in `find . -type f` ; do if file $f | grep -q ISO-8859 ; then I'm not sure whether it's safe to rely on libmagic, since as far as I know (I may be wrong as well..), it identifies the charset used by the first few (kilo?) bytes, not reading the whole file. Why not convert all files -- it may be that iconving all files may be even faster than, or at least comparable, with calling file against them. set -x iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 $f > ${f}.tmp && \ mv -f ${f}.tmp $f I'm not sure about use of && here. I think you should break the build if iconv fails instead of leaving a stale .tmp file. Also, a good habit is to preserve timestamp -- touch -r $f $f.tmp before mv. set +x fi if file $f | grep -q CRLF ; then I'd say you don't have to call file here as well. It is safe to remove all \r-s. set -x sed -i -e 's|\r||g' $f set +x fi done set -x Given none of these are serious enough to warrant a blocker, the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:24:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041224.n04CODl9007998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 --- Comment #6 from Balint Cristian 2009-01-04 07:24:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Just a few minor issues/notes: > > 1.) The license seems to be GPL 2 or newer, therefore GPLv2+, please correct > the License tag > > 2.) What is %contentdir for? > > You do: > > %define contentdir /var/www > mkdir -p -m0755 %{buildroot}%{contentdir}/html - Temporary macro to allow /var/www path. Since this package deal a lot with /var/www path, and will in the future if this piece of software will expand. RPM really miss many of some handfull macros, this is not the first in my opinion. > Yet you do not seem to be putting anything there, nor is it included in the > resulting package. > > 3.) This does not look very nice: > > set +x > for f in `find . -type f` ; do > if file $f | grep -q ISO-8859 ; then > > I'm not sure whether it's safe to rely on libmagic, since as far as I know (I > may be wrong as well..), it identifies the charset used by the first few > (kilo?) bytes, not reading the whole file. Why not convert all files -- it may > be that iconving all files may be even faster than, or at least comparable, > with calling file against them. > > set -x > iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 $f > ${f}.tmp && \ > mv -f ${f}.tmp $f - Yes true. However if file is not ISO-8859-1 and try force convert to UTF-8 than rpmlint will yale, so its safe for now. ~99% is always ISO-8859-2. - I am upset all time when upstream not follow UTF-8 so this jhack is usefull, especialy rpmlint will allways signal if something. > I'm not sure about use of && here. I think you should break the build if iconv > fails instead of leaving a stale .tmp file. - Hmm. Never encounter such issue. However this combination never failed on any of my packages untill now. > > Also, a good habit is to preserve timestamp -- touch -r $f $f.tmp before mv. > > set +x > fi > if file $f | grep -q CRLF ; then - Will take care in next spin %{version}+1 > > I'd say you don't have to call file here as well. It is safe to remove all > \r-s. > > set -x > sed -i -e 's|\r||g' $f > set +x > fi > done > set -x - Will proceed in next spin %{version}+1 However these 'sanity' bits was suggested by Patrice Dumas and Mamoru Tasaka, my very first reviewers. I never investigated deeply how can be improved, i just always do it on any of my packages. > Given none of these are serious enough to warrant a blocker, the package is > > APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041229.n04CTi7Q009114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Balint Cristian 2009-01-04 07:29:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mapbender Short Description: Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures Owners: rezso Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463912] Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041235.n04CZkcC010510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463912 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-04 07:35:44 EDT --- 1.) Why do you throw away the valgrind run results? make %{?_smp_mflags} valgrind || true 2.) This can be replaced %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/* with %{_datadir}/%{name} and this pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml config.xml popd with ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config.xml Sorry -- I could not resist these; just because I found nothing severe ;) None of these is anything that would block the review: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463912] Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041246.n04Ck0Gw012467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463912 --- Comment #4 from Balint Cristian 2009-01-04 07:45:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1.) Why do you throw away the valgrind run results? > > make %{?_smp_mflags} valgrind || true - My behaviour is to trow it, but _allways_ look at build logs. I am unsure if on ppc64 will fail some tests (always an issue), if so than I complicate my life. Olso i prepare for alpha sparc/sparc64 and i can see some failures wich stop rpm build process. > > 2.) This can be replaced > > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* > > with > > %{_datadir}/%{name} > - will NEXTRELEASE > and this > > pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ > ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml config.xml > popd > > with > > ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config.xml > - will NEXTRELEASE > Sorry -- I could not resist these; just because I found nothing severe ;) > None of these is anything that would block the review: I must Thanks for the patient and meticulous review ! > APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463912] Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041249.n04CnGo1028219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463912 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Balint Cristian 2009-01-04 07:49:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tinyows Short Description: WFS-T and FE implementation server Owners: rezso Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 12:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041254.n04CsZjH013870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #19 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-04 07:54:33 EDT --- Interesting. Which Fedora release and which RPM version? I've _no_ issues to rebuild or install this package on plain Fedora 10 and CentOS 5. Maybe we can get out, what's broken here (btw, rpm2cpio | cpio -idm would have also worked). Danger is everywhere. You could exploit vi(1) with nice stuff, insert and execute your own malicious code written in the file, vi is going to read and edit - AFAIK this even was recently possible and is now fixed there. For me this example is the same situation as what you try to describe above, but for software like vi this seems much more dangerous to me rather to moon-buggy. There is always some risk once more than a single user is able to touch a file. Yesterday evening when enabling that feature I already had some kind of IRC discussion on #fedora-devel. But removing the highscore feature isn't acceptable for me at all. My C knowledge isn't the best, but when reading read_version2_data() or the read_version3_data() from highscore.c, the C code seems to be good. On the other hand, there AFAIK was no CVE report for that possible issue ever, even many various Linux distributions deliver(ed) moon-buggy to their users. So why should I feel not good for Fedora here? [20:32:08] < rsc> Packagers around? I've got a game which would like to write a multiuser highscore file. Where? /var/games/%{name}/*? And which permissions? Program offers setgid with games user. [20:32:22] < ixs> why not? [20:32:39] < ixs> but I'd give it a special user... [20:32:42] < ixs> for security reasons [20:32:56] < ixs> or simple remove the highscore feature [20:33:08] < rsc> ixs: w?h! [20:33:18] < ixs> :> [20:34:30] < lkundrak> ixs: yes, rsc is right [20:34:53] < ixs> ahh come on [20:34:57] < ixs> nobody needs highscores [20:34:58] < ixs> amirite? [20:35:54] < lkundrak> ixs: i suggest looking at some already existing game. probably nethack or something like that [20:37:11] < ivazquez> Using games should be fine. What are they going to do, overwrite other games' high scores? :P [20:37:35] < rsc> lkundrak: existing games are doing what the program offers (setgit + /var/games/) [20:37:51] < rsc> lkundrak: at least one, I was pointed to. [20:38:43] < ivazquez> nethack and Maelstrom both use the games group. [20:40:14] < rsc> ivazquez: /var/games/%{name}.highscore or /var/games/%{name}/highscore or what would you suggest? [20:44:53] < ivazquez> I would put it in its own directory. [20:45:19] < ivazquez> I would consider /var/games to be a games-specific /var/lib. [20:47:43] < rsc> ivazquez: thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041416.n04EGGKG014009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041436.n04EaWUW017603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 09:36:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Interesting. Which Fedora release and which RPM version? I've _no_ issues to > rebuild or install this package on plain Fedora 10 and CentOS 5. Maybe we can > get out, what's broken here (btw, rpm2cpio | cpio -idm would have also > worked). Both on my rawhide i386 system and koji scratch build fails (ref: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1031143 ) > Danger is everywhere. You could exploit vi(1) with nice stuff, insert and > execute your own malicious code written in the file, vi is going to read and > edit - I guess vi case does not apply for the case in this package. What I am saying is that the malicious code inserted by _one_ person is read by _another_ person unintentionally (i.e. like the case in which some malicious png file created by unknown person on the internet is accessed by local users). For /bin/vi case, the impact of the risk should be limited to the person who intentionally tried to read the file. > AFAIK this even was recently possible and is now fixed there. For me > this example is the same situation as what you try to describe above, but for > software like vi this seems much more dangerous to me rather to moon-buggy. So I don't think vi and moon-buggy are the same situation. > There is always some risk once more than a single user is able to touch a > file. Yesterday evening when enabling that feature I already had some kind > of IRC discussion on #fedora-devel. But removing the highscore feature isn't > acceptable for me at all. Then please do this in the safe way. By the way the basic problem I think is that the file "mbscore" is created by arbitrary person. > My C knowledge isn't the best, but when reading read_version2_data() or the > read_version3_data() from highscore.c, the C code seems to be good. On the > other hand, there AFAIK was no CVE report for that possible issue ever, even > many various Linux distributions deliver(ed) moon-buggy to their users. So > why should I feel not good for Fedora here? Because Fedora is more careful? (actually security responsible team on RedHat is very concerned about setuid/setgid binaries: e.g. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-security-list/2007-April/msg00004.html ) > [20:32:08] < rsc> Packagers around? I've got a game which would like to write a > multiuser highscore file. Where? /var/games/%{name}/*? And which permissions? > Program offers setgid with games user. > [20:32:22] < ixs> why not? > [20:32:39] < ixs> but I'd give it a special user... > [20:32:42] < ixs> for security reasons > [20:32:56] < ixs> or simple remove the highscore feature > [20:33:08] < rsc> ixs: w?h! > [20:33:18] < ixs> :> > [20:34:30] < lkundrak> ixs: yes, rsc is right > [20:34:53] < ixs> ahh come on > [20:34:57] < ixs> nobody needs highscores > [20:34:58] < ixs> amirite? > [20:35:54] < lkundrak> ixs: i suggest looking at some already existing game. > probably nethack or something like that > [20:37:11] < ivazquez> Using games should be fine. What are they going to do, > overwrite other games' high scores? :P > [20:37:35] < rsc> lkundrak: existing games are doing what the program offers > (setgit + /var/games/) > [20:37:51] < rsc> lkundrak: at least one, I was pointed to. > [20:38:43] < ivazquez> nethack and Maelstrom both use the games group. > [20:40:14] < rsc> ivazquez: /var/games/%{name}.highscore or > /var/games/%{name}/highscore or what would you suggest? > [20:44:53] < ivazquez> I would put it in its own directory. > [20:45:19] < ivazquez> I would consider /var/games to be a games-specific > /var/lib. > [20:47:43] < rsc> ivazquez: thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041441.n04Efq35003509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041457.n04Ev5Mo006117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #21 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-04 09:57:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Both on my rawhide i386 system and koji scratch build > fails (ref: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1031143) Looks like my Rawhide system is then somehow broken, possible. But shouldn't prevent us here from continuing, the packages for Fedora are anyway built by the build system hopefully not broken ;-) > For /bin/vi case, the impact of the risk should be limited > to the person who intentionally tried to read the file. And if the person doing intentionally this is root? Thus it is simply the same case as vi. You unluckily didn't get my point. > Then please do this in the safe way. By the way the basic problem > I think is that the file "mbscore" is created by arbitrary person. Patches by you are cheerfully accepted. As other packages having exactly (!) the same got successfully reviewed, I'm definately not going to change this as downstream. This would be upstream's job, I'm not forking foreign software as other packagers do, because we're just Fedora and because of we're just cool or we want to be better and more concerned about something than others. Again, can you show me how to exploit or manipulate read_version2_data() or read_version3_data() somehow? As mentioned - my C knowledge isn't the best, but the C code seems straight-forward to me. > Because Fedora is more careful? (actually security responsible > team on RedHat is very concerned about setuid/setgid binaries: > e.g. > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-security-list/2007-April/msg00004.html That thread talks about SELinux, PAM and that setuid is here not needed at all; wrong topic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041503.n04F3mQj022139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-04 10:03:47 EDT --- Your package looks sane, just fix the typo in SOURCE1. + name is acceptable + version matches + disttag is correct + license is correct and Fedora compatible (MIT) + source is same as upstream + BuildRoot is correct ( Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 Summary: Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rezso at rdsor.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/saga.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/saga-2.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: SAGA - short hand for "System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses" is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478744] New: Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Summary: Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/wmfire.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/wmfire-1.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: wmfire is a WindowMaker dock app which displays cpu, memory, or network load as flames with a docked icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041517.n04FHt2r009925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from steve 2009-01-04 10:17:54 EDT --- I need a sponsor although this is not the first package I have submitted (bug 473583 is the first, which is still has NEW status and has yet to be reviewed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041525.n04FP4Rv026303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #22 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-04 10:25:03 EDT --- According to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines of the Games SIG (http:// fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging), the current behaviour is okay and accepted ("[...] If necessary, a game can be made setgid 'games' in order to allow a shared scoreboard file. [...]"). So why are you here unneccessarily making the review more hard? If you would like to change something in general, please go to FESCO or ask the Games SIG to change this. But don't question the Packaging Guidelines in a Review, that's the wrong point in the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041541.n04FfQxr014047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 Andrea Francia changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | --- Comment #30 from Andrea Francia 2009-01-04 10:41:21 EDT --- After some discussion and consultation with other people, in particular with Ben Finney[1] I decided to rename the trash-file command to trash-put. [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/distributions/2009-January/000285.html The updated package can be found on pipy: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/trash-cli/ You can use the same instructions as before for installing and testing the package. Taking care of using the new download url[2], and using the test script with the updated name: bash trash-put-test.bash [2] http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/trash-cli/trash-cli-0.2.1.dev-r143.tar.gz#md5=7ec53b0039a41215d0e546c19f667f41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041539.n04FdGsJ013492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 10:39:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > For /bin/vi case, the impact of the risk should be limited > > to the person who intentionally tried to read the file. > > And if the person doing intentionally this is root? Thus it is simply the > same case as vi. You unluckily didn't get my point. Again what I am saying that a malious file created by one person can be read by other person, not only by root. > > > Then please do this in the safe way. By the way the basic problem > > I think is that the file "mbscore" is created by arbitrary person. > > Patches by you are cheerfully accepted. As other packages having exactly (!) > the same got successfully reviewed, This package is not the other packages, of course. > I'm definately not going to change this > as downstream. This would be upstream's job, No, maintaining the software in the safe way is definitely distribution maintainer's job (well, I really don't like the word "it is upstream's job" which is spoken carelessly. It must not be a maintainer's attitude). > I'm not forking foreign software > as other packagers do, because we're just Fedora and because of we're just > cool or we want to be better and more concerned about something than others. I think this must not be a maintainer's attitude. > > Again, can you show me how to exploit or manipulate read_version2_data() or > read_version3_data() somehow? As mentioned - my C knowledge isn't the best, > but the C code seems straight-forward to me. Potential crafted files may cause buffer overflow or numerical overflow, in such case we cannot tell what happens, for example? > > > Because Fedora is more careful? (actually security responsible > > team on RedHat is very concerned about setuid/setgid binaries: > > e.g. > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-security-list/2007-April/msg00004.html > > That thread talks about SELinux, PAM and that setuid is here not needed at all; > wrong topic. I just showed an example that RH security responsible team is very concerned about setuid/gid binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041547.n04FlebG014982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 10:47:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > According to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines of the Games SIG (http:// > fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging), the current behaviour is > okay and accepted ("[...] If necessary, a game can be made setgid 'games' > in order to allow a shared scoreboard file. [...]"). And of course this must be done safely. Unfortunately all setgid binaries under %_bindir related to game programs on my system are in gnome-games or gnuchess, and they handle high score files in a safe way. > So why are you here > unneccessarily making the review more hard? It is definitely needed. Review request is _NOT_ just checking "packaging" issue. > If you would like to change > something in general, I am not changing anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041605.n04G5A7b000400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 11:05:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dhcping Short Description: DHCP daemon ping program Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041606.n04G6RKo000649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-04 11:06:24 EDT --- MUST Items: xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM and SRPM + See: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-plugins-base.rpmlint OK - follows Naming Guidelines + Although the upstream tarball is named gst-plugins-base, the project is named gstreamer, which is the prefix used by Debian also. OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Please try not to mix spaces and tabs as field separators. + You could consider passing --disable-gnome_vfs to %configure, because a simple non-Mock or non-Koji rpmbuild will fail if gnome-vfs is present due to PolicyKit-gnome, abiword, brasero, evolution, yelp, etc.. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath we should avoid rpaths, especially for standard locations like %{_libdir}. Here is a possible solution: BuildRequires: libtool [...] %build %configure \ [...] rm -f ./libtool cp %{_bindir}/libtool . [...] + Here is how the unused-direct-shlib-dependency can be removed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used %makeinstall macro should not be used. To also preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Why not include ChangeLog, NEWS and RELEASE in %doc? + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation the REQUIREMENTS file should not be distributed. + The most recent entry in the %changelog has a typo. The %{version}-%{release} should be 0.10.21-3. + In the %changelog %files should be replaced by %%files in this entry: * Wed Jan 18 2006 John (J5) Palmieri - 0.10.2-1 + The following lines in gst-libs/gst/fft, are responsible for libgstfft-0.10.so.0.15.0 calling exit: kiss_fftr_f32.c:81: exit (1); kiss_fftr_f32.c:138: exit (1); kiss_fftr_f64.c:81: exit (1); kiss_fftr_f64.c:138: exit (1); kiss_fftr_s16.c:81: exit (1); kiss_fftr_s16.c:138: exit (1); kiss_fftr_s32.c:81: exit (1); kiss_fftr_s32.c:138: exit (1); I do not know what we can do about this, but nowadays rpmlint marks this as a warning. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license xx - upstream license file included in %doc + COPYING contains the GPLv2, while the actual license of this package is LGPLv2+. Please include COPYING.LIB instead. OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources xx - package does not build successfully + Libtheora has a broken version numbering in its *.pc file. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/478651 Since the version of libtheora in Fedora 8 and above is recent enough, we can disable the version check in the configure script. OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed + Pedantically speaking 'BuildRequires: libtheora >= 1.0' is wrong, but libtheora has a broken NEVRA (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/478651) so we have to live with it. OK - locales handled properly xx - %post and %postun do not invoke ldconfig + Since shared libraries are being installed in the dynamic linker's default path, ldconfig should be invoked in the %post and %postun scriptlets. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries OK - package is not relocatable xx - file and directory ownership + The -devel sub-package should have 'Requires: gtk-doc' as it installs files under /usr/share/gtk-doc. + The -devel sub-package should have 'Requires: pkgconfig' as it installs files under /usr/lib/pkgconfig. Or has the new autogenerated pkgconfig dependencies feature removed this requirement? OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - no static libraries xx - -devel has *.pc file and does not require pkgconfig + The -devel sub-package should have 'Requires: pkgconfig' as it installs a *.pc file under /usr/lib/pkgconfig. Or has the new autogenerated pkgconfig dependencies feature removed this requirement? OK - library files without suffix in -devel + Some plugins, which are shared libraries without a suffix, are in the main package. This is fine. xx - -devel does not require base package using fully versioned dependency + The -devel subpackage should have 'Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}' instead of just 'Requires: %{name} = %{version}'. Is there any reason for this to be otherwise? OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary xx - package does not build in mock successfully + Libtheora has a broken version numbering in its *.pc file. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/478651 Since the version of libtheora in Fedora 8 and above is recent enough, we can disable the version check in the configure script. OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected xx - scriptlets are not sane + Since shared libraries are being installed in the dynamic linker's default path, ldconfig should be invoked in the %post and %postun scriptlets. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed OK - pkgconfig files in -devel OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041607.n04G7h7C000818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-04 11:07:40 EDT --- hi, packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm same warning with the rpm for this package too : "oldstandard-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-oldstandard.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-oldstandard.conf " hope its okay other than that. @pablo : ive just really replaced the "font name" and "generic name" etc in the fontconfig template that nicolas has given. I dont exactly understand it. hope its okay other than that.. regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] New: Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Summary: Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace-9.3f-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Dinotrace is a X-11 waveform viewer which understands Verilog Value Change Dumps, ASCII, and other trace formats. It allows placing cursors, highlighting signals, searching, printing, and other capabilities superior to many commercial waveform viewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041610.n04GA7LL018722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-04 11:10:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328137) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328137) Sample Spec file fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041611.n04GBZYu018957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-04 11:11:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328138) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328138) Sample Patch1 to avoid libtheora version checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041617.n04GHfqa002364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #25 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-04 11:17:40 EDT --- Args, you're expecting me to create and own the /var/games/moon-buggy/mbscore file inside of the RPM package with 664 and root:games - right? As the mbscore file should be created after installing or with the first run of the game (if you looked to it, there are dates and expires mentioned), I would like to do that with %ghost and something in %post - also acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:20:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:20:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041620.n04GKfus003104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 11:20:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > same warning with the rpm for this package too : > "oldstandard-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-oldstandard.conf > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-oldstandard.conf > " You can ignore this warning for now, it's not even sure if we'll keep in in Fedora rpmlint http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041629.n04GTjHR004365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-04 11:29:44 EDT --- hi, packages: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec Gives this error while building packages..During the build using fontforge.."FindMatchinHVEdge didn't" I havent been able to understad what it is..Packages build normally though.. Getting this warning here too with rpmlint : "beteckna-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-beteckna.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-beteckna.conf" regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041633.n04GXL0Q005129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-04 11:33:20 EDT --- Sorry for not pointing this out earlier, but "Application" should not be a part of the "Categories" key in the .desktop file: [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/gnaural.desktop /usr/share/applications/gnaural.desktop: warning: value "Application;AudioVideo;AudioVideoEditing;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ Also, please try to discuss and submit your modifications to the .desktop file upstream. Otherwise it looks fine. +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041636.n04GaiQl023005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 11:36:43 EDT --- Well, the more acceptable method is - do touch %buildroot%_localstatedir/games/%name/mbscore at %install - In %files %verify(not md5 size mtime) %config(noreplace) %attr(664, root, games) (or %attr(644, games, games)) %_localstatedir/games/%names/mbscore With this no %post is required, and $ rpm -V won't complain because of %verify(not). Also I checked that with this (i.e. creating zero-size mbscore with (root,games)), mbscore is initialized, however (user, group) is still (root,games). Also normal user cannot write this file anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041639.n04GdqgC006068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #26 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-04 11:39:46 EDT --- Is there anything which is keeping us from closing this? It has been more than 2 months now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041637.n04GbuEb023152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 11:37:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (or %attr(644, games, games)) %_localstatedir/games/%names/mbscore Of course %attr(664, games,games)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041640.n04Ge6lg023647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041643.n04Gh7Z6024116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #28 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-04 11:43:06 EDT --- Okay, if zero-sized mbscore works for moon-buggy, I'll do it that way with the next build of the package. Something else, you would like to see changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041650.n04Go4UF025243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-04 11:50:02 EDT --- Will fix it before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnaural Short Description: A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041655.n04Gt9tp008685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-04 11:55:08 EDT --- Well, we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-), however I think that's all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041700.n04H0Ee8009475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 12:00:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I > dint quite get that. You did ok, I've tried to clarify the wiki page ping me if it's still unclear > Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: > symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" This is an rpmlint of dubious utility that will be discussed by FPC soonish. In the meanwhile, ignore it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 Please make your fontconfig file adhere more closely to the basic template in fontpackages-devel. Otherwise, everything else seems fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041700.n04H0adX026778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 12:00:35 EDT --- . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041736.n04HaRT9015357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04 12:36:26 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace-9.3f-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041751.n04HpIrc017688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 12:51:16 EDT --- Looks nice so here is a complete review: 1. probably better to use %define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} 2. The summary needs a little work (for example 'Geometric sans-serif font inspired by Futura') 3. you do not need to add "sfd" to the name, renaming is only a requirement for OFL fonts, GPL does not require it 4. beteckna.se seems dead, no need to reference it in the description 5. we already have a licensing field, do not include "The font is free, licensed under terms of the GNU GPL" in the description 6. You're wrapping your description lines too short, Fedora standard is 79 columns not 50 7. do package AUTHORS LICENSE CHANGELOG as %doc too 8. I see beteckna is actually 3 different font families: Beteckna, BetecknaLowerCase, Beteckna Small Caps. Please package them in 3 different subpackages using the -multi template (the two families which do not have a correct uppercase/lowercase mix are probably more "fantasy" than "sans-serif" fonts anyway) 9.[not a blocker] Please ask upstream to consider adding the FSF Font exception to their licensing so the font can be used by people who embed fonts in PDF files 10. Please change the category of the wiki page describing the font so other packagers see they need not work on it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Beteckna_fonts (see the help in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template ) You do not need a packager sponsorship for this, just a Fedora FAS account Anyway that's all mostly small stuff and nothing that should be too hard for you to fix. ? NEEDINFO in the meanwhile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041805.n04I5bet020550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 13:05:36 EDT --- PS for the fontforge warning, ask on the fontforge mailing list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041806.n04I6axk020791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04 13:06:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > #004: Are these useful ? > > /usr/share/verilator/bin > > /usr/share/verilator/bin/verilator_includer > > Yes. As far as I know, verilator uses these. > /usr/share/verilator/bin /usr/share/verilator/bin/verilator_includer is a duplicate of /usr/bin/verilator_includer You will need to remove the duplicates as well %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}%{name}/bin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] New: Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Summary: Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemPerl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemPerl-1.300-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SystemPerl is a version of the SystemC language. It is designed to expand text so that needless repetition in the language is minimized. By using sp_preproc, SystemPerl files can be expanded into C++ files at compile time, or expanded in place to make them valid stand-alone SystemC files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041807.n04I7exa021133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #24 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04 13:07:39 EDT --- Use perl-SystemPerl as from now on: Bug 478759 - Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041806.n04I6txx021038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041806.n04I6sc7021017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041851.n04IplXE028217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #30 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-04 13:51:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/moon-buggy.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 19:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041954.n04JsMSs022542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-04 14:54:22 EDT --- Fabian, do you mind to maintain it in EL-5? I'd like to see this package there. If not, I'll take it. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042007.n04K7C2M024947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:07:09 EDT --- F-8 branches are no longer accepted. Please do remember to fix the License before import. cvs done for the rest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042003.n04K3jCK024160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:03:44 EDT --- cvs done. note that this package doesn't seem to obey the normal rpm CFLAGS. You might need to patch the Makefile or otherwise get it to use them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042009.n04K9cMw008039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:09:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:11:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463912] Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042011.n04KBg3T025712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463912 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:11:41 EDT --- F-8 branches are no longer accepted. cvs done for the rest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042016.n04KGBh7009279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:16:08 EDT --- ok, sounds good. Nothing preventing them, just that we like to avoid making them if they aren't needed. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042013.n04KDf4S025876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:13:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478563] Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042016.n04KGv0X026484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:16:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042019.n04KJ7wF009514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:19:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042021.n04KLT6K027288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:21:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:20:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:20:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042020.n04KKG24027028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:20:14 EDT --- Good catch. I will fix that before importing. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042025.n04KPCgY010705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:25:11 EDT --- Additionally, there is no need to BuildRequire: glibc-devel. Thats always pulled in by gcc, which is in the base set of packages you can assume are present. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042027.n04KR1dp011042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller 2009-01-04 15:27:01 EDT --- Thanks, Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042028.n04KSatG028347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:28:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042029.n04KTvbA028490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:29:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042031.n04KVtDp029079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:31:53 EDT --- cvs done. BTW, your cvs requests for perl packages recently don't seem to have perl-sig as a CC. Is that an oversight? If you want me to go back and add that to a list of packages, just email me the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042036.n04KaY9t012728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:36:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042032.n04KWkm4011979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042032.n04KWxuk029240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:32:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042037.n04KbdLe012911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:37:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478533] Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042040.n04KeJkp013521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478533 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:40:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042039.n04KdJOA030218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:39:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042045.n04KjPsN014427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:45:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042042.n04KgPGo013746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:42:23 EDT --- F-8 branches are no longer accepted. cvs done for the rest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042043.n04Kh2vf030935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-01-04 15:43:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > A few notes : > > - License is PHP, not BSD (according to pecl.php.net) Off course. It has initialy 'PHP License' which is not correct, and I erroneously wasn't find "PHP" in list... > - must use %setup -q -c (to not have package.xml outside the build tree) Ok, I add -c flag > - missing require for ABI check : php(zend-abi) Hm... I fully borrow %if...%endif statement for that from your spec-file... Updated later: I found this in doc by link provided by you. > - should use %{pecl_install} and %{pecl_uninstall} when exists Ok. This is good note, thank you. > - why PEAR in sumnary ? Because description from it. Right, removed. > - should add example directory in %doc (rather than each files) Ok. > Read : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP Thanks a lot. (In reply to comment #2) > Also > - use %{php_extdir} instead of %{_libdir}/php/modules > - use %{pecl_xmldir} instead of your %{xmldir} Done. > As the package is available in my little testing repo, you can have a look to > http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SPEC/php-pecl-imagick.spec Yes, I have seen this new in your blog. Thank you for help. Your spec-file was very useful , but it also has some shortcomings (such as undocumented options documented only what its is undocumented :) in config, created from SPEC...) http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-imagick/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:48:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042048.n04KmXvC014788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:48:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 20:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042047.n04Klakr031782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 15:47:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] New: Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Summary: Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.77-1.b5.fc10.src.rpm Description: Spring is a project to create a realtime stategy game inspired by Total Anihilation (by Cavedog). There are 4 packages involved in bringing spring to Fedora : - spring (this one): the engine and a meta-package - spring-installer: GUI to install maps and mods - springlobby: the "lobby", i.e. the GUI for the engine (main GUI) - spring-maps-default: a default set of maps for Spring I will post the links to the review bugs below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] New: Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 Summary: Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-installer.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-installer-20081228-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Spring Installer is a GTK+ program that will install your Spring mods and maps for you. CA Installer is a GTK+ program that will install and keep up to date, the Spring, Complete Annihilation mod. Please see Spring's main review bug for details : bug 478767. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042123.n04LNVwO005221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 16:23:30 EDT --- mumbles-0.4-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumbles-0.4-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478770] New: Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 Summary: Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10372-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SpringLobby is a free cross-platform lobby client for the Spring RTS project. Please see Spring's main review bug for details : bug 478767. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042129.n04LTTce021437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042129.n04LTTnt021421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042129.n04LTSsp021405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042129.n04LTRcV021382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478769, 478770, 478771 --- Comment #1 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-01-04 16:29:26 EDT --- Here are the other review bugs: - spring-installer: bug 478769 - springlobby: bug 478770 - spring-maps-default: bug 478771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478771] New: Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 Summary: Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-maps-default.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-maps-default-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the default maps for Spring: Small Divide, Comet Catcher Redux, and Sands of War Please see Spring's main review bug for details : bug 478767. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042131.n04LVsEF022083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sven at lank.es) | --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-04 16:31:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Spec-URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/dustismo-fonts.spec SRPM-URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/dustismo-fonts-20030318-1.fc11.src.rpm Updated SPEC - the spec should address all the issues you listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042143.n04LhsRl023759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #13 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-01-04 16:43:53 EDT --- Fabian, Brennan and Kevin - thanks for your work and effort to get this package in. Happy 2009 to all of you... I'm busy getting the sources into CVS as I type this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042144.n04LiPqY008261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Hrozek 2009-01-04 16:44:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It looks like the patch included in the srpm is neither the one that you have > submitted to http://bugs.l3ib.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=21, nor the one > approved by Andrew Yates (andrewy). You use 077 in the bundled patch, suggest > 177 and Andrew uses 0177. > > I suggest to create a new src.rpm with > http://code.l3ib.org/?p=fsniper.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/main.c;h=cd49dffebe4b4c728b62c28c1381c4fb6f5ad87d;hp=03a8d701d6f9802ba346b591429e58741ca53479;hb=82cb0b46c48485fd4f6231ce3169c7be87d1ea07;hpb=2bbeb5d6e6b55bb9692c043fcdbeab15d9723c9e > as patch Yep, you're right, thanks for the sharp eye. I'll fix the srpm, as soon as I get some free time..hopefully this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478655] Review Request: sion - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042152.n04LqLFQ025256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478655 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 16:52:20 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478581] Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042157.n04Lv1SB010409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-04 16:57:00 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042157.n04Lv2ir010438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Bug 462181 depends on bug 478581, which changed state. Bug 478581 Summary: Package Review: pnglite - A lightweight C library for loading PNG images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478581 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] New: Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Summary: Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cdk/cdk.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cdk/cdk-5.0.20081105-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1031867 Description: Cdk stands for 'Curses Development Kit' and it currently contains 21 ready to use widgets which facilitate the speedy development of full screen curses programs. This little project of mine started as a test to see how compatible my Linux machine was to other UNIX breeds. While doing this I discovered Ncurses, and played with it. These widgets are the result of over a years worth of playing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042215.n04MF5ir028945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 17:15:05 EDT --- gnaural-1.0.20080808-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnaural-1.0.20080808-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:15:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:15:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042215.n04MFwSp013525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 17:15:58 EDT --- gnaural-1.0.20080808-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnaural-1.0.20080808-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042218.n04MIwD0029267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 17:18:58 EDT --- virtaal-0.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/virtaal-0.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042218.n04MItbr013794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 17:18:55 EDT --- virtaal-0.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/virtaal-0.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042228.n04MSquK015306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042229.n04MTHTp015348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042237.n04MbTvT016839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 17:37:28 EDT --- Thank you guys for reviewing and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042234.n04MYY1k016181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #14 from Jerome Soyer 2009-01-04 17:34:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nufw Short Description: Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux Owners: saispo at gmail.com Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042235.n04MZV59016577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #15 from Jerome Soyer 2009-01-04 17:35:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nufw Short Description: Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux Owners: saispo at gmail.com Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: saispo Miss InitialCC in previous commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042244.n04MirM1000902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 17:44:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== New Branches: EL-5 Owners: fab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042243.n04MhpaU017913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 17:43:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review and the cvs. Marek, I will request a branch for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042302.n04N2Sd2020811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 18:02:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Really minor suggestions: > - since the spec mostly has a double blank line between sections, you should do > that also between build and install sections. fixed > - The description could be improved (spelling and case at least). Perhaps: > Description: > fspy is an easy to use linux filesystem activity monitoring tool. It is > is small, fast and handles system resources conservatively. Features > include being able to apply filters, use diffing and set a custom output > format in order to achieve the best results. changed > - License: Since neither the web site nor readme contains a license statement, > perhaps this could be requested of the upstream (since each source file > includes a GPLv2+ header). I will get in touch with upstream about the license issue. (In reply to comment #4) > Additionally, there is no need to BuildRequire: glibc-devel. Thats always > pulled in by gcc, which is in the base set of packages you can assume are > present. fixed > cvs done. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:09:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042309.n04N9pUZ004709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:09:51 EDT --- mr-0.35-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mr-0.35-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:10:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:10:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042310.n04NAnbe005227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:10:48 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/screenie-1.30.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042308.n04N8QB3021792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 18:08:25 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042309.n04N9km9021924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:09:45 EDT --- mr-0.35-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mr-0.35-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042310.n04NAr69022340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:10:52 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/screenie-1.30.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042307.n04N7flM021707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:07:40 EDT --- conspy-1.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/conspy-1.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042307.n04N7cmm021676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:07:37 EDT --- conspy-1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/conspy-1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042311.n04NBxI6005369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-04 18:11:58 EDT --- Thanks Jussi for the review. Kevin, thanks for the cvs and the hint about the flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042313.n04NDeUJ005522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:13:40 EDT --- srm-1.2.9-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/srm-1.2.9-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042314.n04NEP6C005629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:14:24 EDT --- fspy-0.1.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fspy-0.1.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042313.n04NDhXb005550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:13:42 EDT --- srm-1.2.9-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/srm-1.2.9-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042314.n04NEM8x022843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:14:21 EDT --- fspy-0.1.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fspy-0.1.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042322.n04NMYuU007267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-04 18:22:34 EDT --- I apologize for coming late in the game, but the name of the package and of the files that it installs (binary, man) violates http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042325.n04NPOOP007949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042322.n04NMgRF024457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-04 18:22:41 EDT --- 1.) Please do not strip the packages while %install-ing The debuginfo is generated empty. export CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -s" make %{?_smp_mflags} Why do you add -s there? You should not strip the debugging symbols off the binaries. Tip: Besides environment variables, make takes initial variable values also from command line: make %{?_smp_mflags} CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} 2.) The manual contains also images, but you include only *.html in the package. You may want to wget -p it, generate a tarball and Source it along with the comment on how did you generate it. Tip: Work with upstream -- they may be willing to include documentation in the source tarball in next release. They may also be willing to include information on how to install it in Fedora, since the manual has "RPM installation section" 3.) You patch for gcc 4.3 compatibility, not 3.4 (I guess) ;) 4.) You don't have to patch makefile just to override variables. Just unset them on command line! (see 1.) By the way -- why do you patch info installation away? Please comment! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042340.n04Neeoa027257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 18:40:39 EDT --- xfce4-screenshooter-1.4.90.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-screenshooter-1.4.90.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042342.n04NgFcs010463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-01-04 18:42:15 EDT --- Koji (FAILURE) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1032161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042351.n04NpLie028994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042333.n04NXxJW009095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-04 18:33:58 EDT --- 1.) Description is stupid. You see :) 2.) Too much documentation in main package %doc CHANGES COPYING EXPANDING INSTALL NOTES README TODO VERSION examples demos I think you can move at lease examples and demos (maybe todo, expanding, ...) to -devel subpackage. 3.) Why do you chmod a symlink? chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.so 4.) You don't know/decide if the manual gets compressed %{_mandir}/man3/*.gz Please remove the .gz from the end -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042358.n04NwE6U012686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-04 18:58:13 EDT --- The package seems almost fine, but you definitely must include the LICENSE file in doc. And probably shipping cudd/doc (even as a separate cudd-docs if you do not want to add bloat to the devel package) would not be a bad idea either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 00:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478780] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Traits-Attribute-Ca scadeClear OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CascadeClearer is an attribute metaclass trait that allows one to chain attribute clearing actions. For instance, if you have attributes that derive their value from a "master" attribute, this would transparently allow you to clear all the children attributes by clearing the master attribute. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1032225 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 01:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050106.n05169TL007763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #24 from Tim Potter 2009-01-04 20:06:03 EDT --- Nuts - I was too slow to add LICENSE.txt to the 0.7.0 release, but it will be present in future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 02:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:06:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050206.n0526ogi032347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-04 21:06:49 EDT --- Fixed and imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 02:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050226.n052Ql3i020513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #25 from Tim Potter 2009-01-04 21:26:45 EDT --- Here's an updated version which fixes various rpmlint and other problems: http://samba.org/~tpot/python-pywbem/python-pywbem.spec http://samba.org/~tpot/python-pywbem/python-pywbem-0.7.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Currently open issues: - LICENSE.txt patch still present, but can be removed for the next major or minor upstream release - rpmlint says "symlink-should-be-relative" for /usr/bin/mofcomp and /usr/bin/pywbemcli symlinks. Is it official Fedora policy to have relative symlinks between different directories like this? Getting closer... (-: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 02:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050230.n052UKOQ021274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-04 21:30:19 EDT --- Fixed; see: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cudd.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cudd-2.4.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Thanks for taking the time to look at this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 03:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050343.n053h2Hv015343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Bug 476471 depends on bug 477728, which changed state. Bug 477728 Summary: changelog does not populate when making an SRPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477728 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 04:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050421.n054LxUa022436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 04:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455358] Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050451.n054plHV012937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Jeff Fearn 2009-01-04 23:51:45 EDT --- Request withdrawn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 05:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478780] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050504.n055451s015084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-01-05 00:04:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386) koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1032478 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c6787e2c956fdbe08d27a5c7b97d9b06 MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=36, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 1.43 cusr 0.06 csys = 1.51 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear-0.02-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::CascadeClear) = 0.02 perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::CascadeClearMaster) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Traits::Attribute::CascadeClear) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Traits::Attribute::CascadeClearMaster) = 0.02 Requires: perl(Moose::Role) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 05:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050530.n055UIN9020210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-01-05 00:30:17 EDT --- + OK - Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1032469 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 9db8053b5e2268234f516daed2731db8 rfdump-1.6.tar.gz - Source URL is not working and should be http://www.rfdump.org/dl/rfdump-1.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package rfdump-1.6-1.fc11 => Provides: rfdump = 1.6-1.fc10 rfdump(x86-32) = 1.6-1.fc10 Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libcairo.so.2 libexpat.so.1 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. Suggestions: 1) Change Source URL to http://www.rfdump.org/dl/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 06:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050613.n056D9sO028674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-05 01:13:04 EDT --- So, where do we stand here? Nicolas: Did you have any other packages to submit? Can you do some 'pre-reviews' of other pending submissions to show that you know the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 06:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] New: Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Summary: Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh-3.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SIMH is a historical computer simulation system. It consists of simulators for approximately 33 different computers, all written around a common user interface package and set of supporting libraries. SIMH can be used to simulate any computer system for which sufficient detail is available, but the focus to date has been on simulating computer systems of historic interest. SIMH implements simulators for: * Data General Nova, Eclipse * Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-1, PDP-4, PDP-7, PDP-8, PDP-9, PDP-10, PDP-11, PDP-15, VAX * GRI Corporation GRI-909, GRI-99 * IBM 1401, 1620, 1130, 7090/7094, System 3 * Interdata (Perkin-Elmer) 16b and 32b systems * Hewlett-Packard 2114, 2115, 2116, 2100, 21MX, 1000 * Honeywell H316/H516 * MITS Altair 8800, with both 8080 and Z80 * Royal-Mcbee LGP-30, LGP-21 * Scientific Data Systems SDS 940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 06:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050656.n056ubDN018144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #16 from Dan Hor?k 2009-01-05 01:56:33 EDT --- Hi Jerome, I am back from holidays. I need to review clamtk before I will sponsor you and then you can request CVS for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050708.n0578EH1020085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-01-05 02:08:13 EDT --- need BR: emacs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463912] Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050718.n057Icp0022020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463912 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050744.n057ipp8012099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, needinfo? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-01-05 02:44:50 EDT --- I found here typo in summary: %package devel Summary: Developpment tools for xfconf Everything else looks all right. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050749.n057ni8i027357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-05 02:49:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rfdump Short Description: RFID tags detector Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050749.n057n09g012909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-05 02:48:59 EDT --- Thanks Parag, you are right with the source url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050751.n057pgr6028014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2009-01-05 02:51:41 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 2f6cd136e0975f980f32628d908d1686b49f948a clamtk-4.08.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. BAD license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. BAD no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file is installed. - the LICENSE file says this software is licensed "same as Perl", that means the License tag should be "GPL+ or Artistic" - I don't see a reason why should be "gettext" required for building, the %build section is empty - rpmlint complains about hardcoded "lib", but this is a noarch package. Why can't be the content of ClamTk directory installed into regular Perl modules' place? - you should not specify Requires(pre,post): desktop-file-utils when a scriptlet is present for updating the desktop database - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database - the Gtk2 and other perl modules should not be included as manual "Requires", they are found automagically during the package building process - no need to run "update-mime-database" in the scriptlets because no file is dropped into %{datadir}/mime/... - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476623] Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050801.n0581JBl029864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-01-05 03:00:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay Short Description: Ensure that tests needing a display have one Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050808.n0588w5F031364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #10 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-05 03:08:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I apologize for coming late in the game, but the name of the package and of the > files that it installs (binary, man) violates > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainersPackaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace Are you aware of any other tool being named "mr" or is your remark just on the two character name? mr is a pretty well established tool that fits well in the unix philosophy and thus I'd say that ignoring that 'packaging trick' is acceptable in this case - unless there are conflicts of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050825.n058P0SI019453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-05 03:24:59 EDT --- No, for the moment I am not aware of any other tool with the same name, that is if we ignore http://www.dbmsmag.com/9706d07.html :) The remark was just on the two character name and the scarcity of this resource. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050823.n058NqsF019344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-01-05 03:23:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > cvs done. > > note that this package doesn't seem to obey the normal rpm CFLAGS. > You might need to patch the Makefile or otherwise get it to use them... Whoops, missed that; have to be more careful in the future. Thanks for catching. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050835.n058Z9F5021641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-05 03:35:07 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 0a0894ff5a2798a73fcacf76d451777aa02919ce cudd-2.4.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. ==> see note 1 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1.Given the efforts you have made to build a devel package which ships only static libs ( respecting Fedora's guidelines for that) I am going to assume that you really know what you are doing and building shared libs is not needed / useful ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050859.n058xpVP007970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #17 from Jerome Soyer 2009-01-05 03:59:50 EDT --- Oh, ok, excuse me :) Wish you an happy new year ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 09:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050928.n059SSPO014886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-05 04:28:27 EDT --- 1) Fixed. 2) Fixed, pp3-1.3.3-manual.tar.gz created. 3) Oops. Fixed. 4) Make info is trying to generate pdf files out of examples using pp3 itself - I thought adding BUILD_ROOT to PATH isn't the best idea as we don't need these files anyway if we are shipping it with pp3-1.3.3-manual.tar.gz - What do you think about it? Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pp3/pp3.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pp3/pp3-1.3.3-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 10:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 05:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051045.n05AjoN8016722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-05 05:45:48 EDT --- I just "happened" to have the tar.gz downloaded (and in use since Sept..) so I guess a quick review cannot hurt. So: fast forward review for release 1.fc11: * RPM name is OK * This is the latest version * sha1sum is OK /mnt/arhive/2/EDA/mentor/OWM/ovm-2.0.tar.gz db292f605d77b14d09ddb0f461942493be18d148 ovm-2.0.tar.gz from spec: db292f605d77b14d09ddb0f461942493be18d148 * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * works OK (in use since Sept, as I have said) at least with Questa >From my point of view, it's OK. Eventually it could go to RPMFusion if legal says "no go" here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 10:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 05:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051058.n05AwrgR019284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-01-05 05:58:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cmakeed.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cmakeed-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Update to 1.1.0 final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 11:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051110.n05BAb7m004288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #30 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-01-05 06:10:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > What is the status here? I noticed that kdenetwork-4.1.3-2 was pushed to F9 > testing, but not to F10. According to comment #27, it seems that there is no > need for the update in F9, but only in F10. Also there was no reply to my > comment #28. Sorry, it takes so long, some misunderstanding between me and Kevin - see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 11:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051134.n05BY21S027272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-05 06:34:01 EDT --- I think that I will merge my spec file with the one from 239470 and go on with arping-ng. It would be unfortunate to stop now because a lot of people thought about this tool in several bug reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 11:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051150.n05BofTT030616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-05 06:50:40 EDT --- 1.) You do not need to unpack the first (zero-th) tarball two times. And do not need to move the manual directory. %setup -q %setup -q -b1 cp -vr ../manual/ . This seems useless to me. Skip the first line. (In case you're keeping the manual tarball). And unpack the manual directory in place: %setup -q -a1 2.) Please do not use the dependency on obsolete package (tetex): Requires: tetex-latex this would be more appropriate: Requires: tex(latex) (In reply to comment #2) > 4) Make info is trying to generate pdf files out of examples using pp3 itself - > I thought adding BUILD_ROOT to PATH isn't the best idea as we don't need these > files anyway if we are shipping it with pp3-1.3.3-manual.tar.gz - What do you > think about it? I think you should be generating the manual, and adding build root to path is perfectly legal way to do that. Alternatively, you could patch the makefile to use ../pp3 instead of pp3 when building documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 12:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:49:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051249.n05CnOuD025219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 07:49:23 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-HTTP Short Description: HTTP client library for Haskell Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 13:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051301.n05D1xuc014389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478680 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-05 08:01:57 EDT --- Added workaround for bug #478680 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/nightview.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/nightview-0.3.1-3.el5.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1032749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 13:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478825] New: Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478825 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-el.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-el-0.20051018-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Greek hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 13:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478825] Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051330.n05DUS9m021430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478825 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-05 08:30:27 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1a1b08fae5a7e644d5baa91c937da6af92950e01 hyph_el_GR.zip [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English la nguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 13:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478825] Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051341.n05DfQJC005393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478825 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-05 08:41:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-el Short Description: Greek hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 14:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051415.n05EFFnW013518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-05 09:15:14 EDT --- All should be fixed, have a look: Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pp3/pp3.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pp3/pp3-1.3.3-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 14:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051420.n05EKaGa000849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-05 09:20:34 EDT --- 1) Fixed. :) 2) Done. 3) Becuase of this rpmlint warning: cdk.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libcdk.so.5.0 4) Done. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cdk/cdk.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cdk/cdk-5.0.20081105-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 14:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051446.n05Ek6ku007344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-05 09:46:05 EDT --- Everything seems fine now; thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051511.n05FBcXK014567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-05 10:11:37 EDT --- Much better! 1.) Soooo... you actually strip the binary upon installation: install -s pp3 $(ROOT)$(DESTDIR) Please patch the -s away from that, so that debuginfo is not empty. 2.) You get a lot of these: pp3.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/leo1.png.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). Please %exclude %{_infodir}/*.png* files You can fix those upon commit. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051513.n05FDhIB014998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-05 10:13:42 EDT --- Thank you for the review Lubomir. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cdk Short Description: Curses Development Kit Owners: mmahut Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051540.n05FexiA021575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-05 10:40:57 EDT --- Ok, I'll fix these before committing. Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pp3 Short Description: Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format Owners: mmahut Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051541.n05FfhI1003167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-01-05 10:41:41 EDT --- Well I'm looking to rpmlint output now. > W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile I think it's fine - these files are config files which SHOULD NOT be replaced but are not located in /etc or /var. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051544.n05Fiv9x022303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478773 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051544.n05FiwJc022334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] New: Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Summary: Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm-0.23-0.1.beta.fc8.src.rpm Description: CPM is a ncurses based console tool to manage passwords and store them public key encrypted in a file - even for more than one person. The encryption is handled via GnuPG so the programs data can be accessed via gpg as well, in case you want to have a look inside. The data is stored as as zlib compressed XML so it?s even possible to reuse the data for some other purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 15:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051547.n05FlKpP004411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051600.n05G0cZU007679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-01-05 11:00:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Possibly duplicate/conflicting files with system ones > - This rpm contains net/pop.rb, net/smtp.rb. These are > already included in ruby-libs rpm (however the files > in ruby-libs seems older than those in this rpm). > Can these files safely installed in parallel? That is the point of this gem - it's providing alternatives to those classes in Ruby. But it only overrides them if you explicitly require the tlsmail gem in your code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051607.n05G7Vvh009570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #6 from Lillian Angel 2009-01-05 11:07:30 EDT --- You are not obsoleting the netbeans-platform8 package? so, we will have 2 netbeans-platform* packages in Fedora? I don't agree with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051615.n05GFegM011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-05 11:15:39 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (moon-buggy) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051616.n05GGvkX030441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-01-05 11:16:55 EDT --- Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1032744 Changes: - Fix documentation encodings. - Include documentation. - Add patch to disable DevWarns. - Add patches to enable linking to pthread library. - Add patch to enable use of RPM_OPT_FLAGS in gcc wrapper. - Enable parallel make. rpmlint output: open64.src:137: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc-lib open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libmv.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libmv.a 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 14 warnings. None of these is a problem, since gcc has the same kinds of devel file warnings and /usr/lib/gcc-lib is not used anymore by other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051626.n05GQ5oi013770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-05 11:26:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > - README says it is under GPLv2 (unfortunately GPLv2+...) Should be read as "not GPLv2+" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051621.n05GLkKi012919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #5 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-01-05 11:21:45 EDT --- Updated with requested changes: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051621.n05GLhtT012894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Robert Scheck 2009-01-05 11:21:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moon-buggy Short Description: Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon Owners: robert, cassmodiah Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051625.n05GPIOU032336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-05 11:25:17 EDT --- Well, for this package I think the license must be clarified before approved because: - some files are under GPLv3+ - README says it is under GPLv2 (unfortunately GPLv2+...) - GPLv2 and GPLv3+ are incompatible So from my viewpoint the current situation cannot be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051637.n05GbrdG015718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-01-05 11:37:52 EDT --- I don't see why you need the LICENSE.txt patch. Why not just remove it? There is no requirement to ship the license text if the upstream does not do so. When upstream gets around to including the license text, this package can then include it. All of the program source files seem to have the correct license blocks so there is no confusion as to the actual license in use. Yes, the symlinks need to be made relative. Think about what happens when you install into a chroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051646.n05GkKYT017595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-01-05 11:46:18 EDT --- > Issues: > - Timestamp of Source0 does not match, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps I downloaded it again. Now it should be right > - Desktop files: > - paths are hardcoded > - key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing > character > - Categories are IMO not correct. Suggestion: > sbackup-restore = System;Utility;Filesystem;Archiving;GNOME;GTK; > sbackup-conf = System;Settings;SystemSettings;GNOME;GTK; > In case of doubt see > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html > - add GenericNames for KDE compatibility. Use the window title > Restore files/directories, Backup Properties > - please add (at least German) Translations for the keys, e. g. > GenericName[de]=Dateien/Verzeichnisse wiederherstellen Should now meet your requirements > - Requires: usermode-gtk for the password dialog rpmlint says "sbackup.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode" should be okay because usermode-gtk requires usermode > - Use global pam config? > #%PAM-1.0 > auth include config-util > account include config-util > session include config-util Okay, i changed it. > - I suggest you include pam config as separate sources instead of creating them > on the fly. I think creating them on the fly is very beautiful, because there are no hardcoded paths > - include an initscript for sbackupd? not relevant, because sbackupd will be controled by a crontab, created by simple backup config > - What are the Exclude statements for? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Unnecessary_Byte_compilation SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup-0.10.5-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478852] New: Review Request: lpairs - Classical memory game with cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lpairs - Classical memory game with cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478852 Summary: Review Request: lpairs - Classical memory game with cards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/lpairs/lpairs.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/lpairs/lpairs-1.0.4-2.src.rpm Description: Hi. Recently I have found that simple memory game which brought a reminiscence of an old Win 3.1 game Amnesia. LPairs is a classical memory game. This means you have to find pairs of identical cards which will then be removed. Your time and tries needed will be counted but there is no highscore chart or limit to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051658.n05Gwr1K019836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-05 11:58:50 EDT --- Well, a very simple package. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Just some comments on your spec file > > > > - 'Source0:' should point to the upstream tarball if possible. > > fixed, though the URL has to be looked up again on every release because it > contains some release id For rubyforge hosted tarball, I usually use -------------------------------------------------------------- %define repoid Source0: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/%{repoid}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -------------------------------------------------------------- Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 17:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051703.n05H3RSN021138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dodji at redhat.com) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-05 12:03:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 17:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051706.n05H6ChL009201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #15 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-01-05 12:06:08 EDT --- Email to Eric sent and license comment added to spec file. I received one patch during Christmas break, so it was ok to make rawhide build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 17:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051748.n05HmsYk016875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-05 12:48:53 EDT --- libicns-0.6.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libicns-0.6.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 18:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051809.n05I9cwI020702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-05 13:09:37 EDT --- libicns-0.6.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libicns-0.6.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 18:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051817.n05IHPpJ002558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sven at lank.es Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-05 13:17:23 EDT --- This looks good, a variant on the multi template I hadn't seen before, but it works. Please also consider adding a dustin- prefix to the package name especially if you intend to package more fonts by the same author (This is a proposed guideline which is not official yet, so I won't block on it. However if the guideline is approved you'll earn a renaming later.) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) Anyway, the package is ??? APPROVED ??? You can continue on from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Reassigning as I've done my part. Return review of bug #475661 would be appreciated (wink wink) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 18:41:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051841.n05Ifbg6013708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #4 from Jose Luis 2009-01-05 13:41:36 EDT --- Well, I've fixed all the issues commented by Mamoru Tasaka, plus: - Use of the release version 0.6.4 instead of the SVN snapshot, since there are no important changes and that seems to complicate a lot the naming of packages. - Added missing build dependencies. - Added generation of man pages, forgotten in the previous version. By the way, is there any specific command within %files for installing man-pages? I've added them manually with %{_datadir}/man/man1/* These are the NEW files: Spec URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.4-1.fc10.src.rpm About the repetition of %description, I've shortened all the texts, leaving only one short part common to all the sub-packages. I think everything is now much more aligned to Fedora policies. Let me know if there are new errors. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 18:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051825.n05IPfMk004827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-05 13:25:39 EDT --- Well: - First of all, your srpm doesn't build on F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1031148 - Please explain why you want to define %jpcap, %jpcap_version - For license tag: - No version of LGPL is specified in the codes - However some files are licensed under BSD with advertising (and BSD) So the license tag should be "LGPLv2+ and BSD with advertising" - Source must be given by full URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Please remove Vendor item. This is defined automatically when rebuilding your srpm on Fedora buildsystem. - For BuildRequires: * Please explicitly write "BuildRequires: jpackage-utils" to honor Java packaging guidelines (even if java-devel implicitly pulls in jpackage-utils dependency) (same for Requires) * "BuildRequires: libpcap" should be removed as libpcap-devel always requires it. - Please explain why you set "Autoreq: 0". - Remove all pre-compiled binaries (like foo.jar) at %prep stage to make it sure that all binaries are compiled from the source. - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) - The directory %{_libdir}/%{name} is not owned by any packages (ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 19:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051910.n05JAbbf016512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 472736, which changed state. Bug 472736 Summary: Update batik to 1.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472736 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 19:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478563] Review Request: libnice - GLib ICE implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051932.n05JWVAm020367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478563 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2009-01-05 14:32:30 EDT --- Imported & built for devel. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 19:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] New: Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Summary: Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/python-progressbar.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/python-progressbar-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This library provides a text mode progress bar. This is typically used to display the progress of a long running operation, providing a visual clue that processing is under way. The progressbar module is very easy to use, yet very powerful. And automatically supports features like auto-resizing when available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052001.n05K1xFC027158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #6 from Ant Bryan 2009-01-05 15:01:58 EDT --- Here is a new spec & source RPM. - license clarifications (GPLv3+) & man page upstream. - trimmed %description & added definition of metalink. - rpmlint complaint about script left as is. Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1300332 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/metalink/metalink-0.3.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: a .metalink is an XML file that describes a download, and includes mirrors and checksum information. Metalink is the main Metalink generation tool. It combines a list of mirrors (from stdin) and a number of files into one Metalink record (stdout). It can also be used to transform a MD5SUMS file into a metalink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052004.n05K49rs027568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 --- Comment #7 from Christof Damian 2009-01-05 15:04:08 EDT --- I have changed the spec to use your repoid idea. I also removed another unused macro: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/podcatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/podcatcher-3.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm ----------- Regarding the sponsoring: I have submitted another package for review: 478877 I will have a look at packages which I might be able to pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052017.n05KHs29030323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-05 15:17:52 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052017.n05KHvJD030351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-05 15:17:57 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052051.n05Kp7Mp017951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-05 15:51:06 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cudd Short Description: CU Decision Diagram Package Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052057.n05Kvmvj006755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-05 15:57:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dustin-dustismo-fonts Short Description: General purpose fonts in serif and sans-serif versions Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 21:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:43:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052143.n05Lhcje016318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-01-05 16:43:36 EDT --- REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/downloaded/libkml-* libkml-devel.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ I think this should be ignored. However I didn't checked whether I can build samples provided. %{__docdir}/libkml-devel-0.4.0/examples ). Another one thing I found questionable is the existence of "third_party" directory in %{__includedir} - we shouldn't allow user to build something against our version of boost. + The package is be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matching the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum libkml-0.4.0.tar.gz* c6317783cec04f2e2dd992b0dd95c028 libkml-0.4.0.tar.gz c6317783cec04f2e2dd992b0dd95c028 libkml-0.4.0.tar.gz.srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1033826 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No need to handle locales + The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files + Everithing, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files + The library files that ends in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + devel packages requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. So, please, resolve issue with third party libraries (I suspect that it even builds against shipped boost) and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 21:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052153.n05LrkqI030253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-05 16:53:45 EDT --- So, there were a few potholes on the road for giver: 1. I forgot to ExcludeArch: ppc64 sparc64... they don't have mono packages. 2. The missing perl-XML-Parser dependency. I fixed that up in -2 (I did it a bit differently than Luis did, because this is a perl dependency) 3. Missing BuildRequires: intltool (fixed in -2). 4. notify-sharp was never built successfully for F-9, not due to any fault of its own, but due to buildsystem issues happening at the time the original maintainer tried to build it. I've successfully built it for F-9, and submitted it as an update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.5.20080912svn.fc9 Once that gets pushed, giver should build properly on F-9. New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/giver.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/giver-0.1.8-2.fc11.src.rpm F-10 Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1033908 Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1033908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 22:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052224.n05MOLYw004151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-05 17:24:20 EDT --- #001: Upstream said : ""They should all be Artistic or LGPL+; I'll clean it up. I think listing it as just "artistic" makes more sense as it then matches other Perl packages.""" #002: %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Verilog will be %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Verilog/* thanks Manuel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 22:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052225.n05MPBjf024941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-05 17:25:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Verilog Short Description: Verilog parsing routines Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 22:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052230.n05MUCT3005541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 22:30:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052230.n05MUBI6005510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476386 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-05 17:30:10 EDT --- Yes in accordance to the logs : DEBUG util.py:250: No Package Found for perl(Verilog::Getopt) >= 2.211 DEBUG util.py:250: No Package Found for perl(Verilog::Netlist) >= 2.315 you will need perl-Verilog to build this rpm. perl-Verilog recently was approved. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 It is just a matter of time till perl-Verilog hits rawhide. I should have blocked this review against perl-Verilog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 22:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052234.n05MYGeb026594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-05 17:34:14 EDT --- Here is a new SRPM/SPEC: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/SolarModel-2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/SolarModel.spec Please note that this package depends on irrlicht (bz 474603). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:22:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060022.n060MWbh023735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060042.n060gQZc026623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gpt - The |Review Request: |Grid Packaging Toolkit |grid-packaging-tools - The | |Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) --- Comment #17 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:42:23 EDT --- Due to a naming conflict with an existing package in the Ubuntu distribution the package has been renamed from gpt to grid-packaging-tools. The new package name was discussed in an e-mail exchange with the upstream maintainer. Quoting the upstream maintainer: "I think grid-packaging-tools is fine if that name is not considered too long. Grid Packaging Tools is the official name of the software, it just goes by GPT because it is a more convenient acronym." SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/grid-packaging-tools-3.2-13.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/grid-packaging-tools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060045.n060jrom014966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:45:52 EDT --- *** Bug 453852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060043.n060hLr8014489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:43:21 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-openssl-3.0-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-openssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:43:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453849] Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060043.n060h9MA014461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:43:08 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-libtool-1.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-libtool.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060046.n060kbWo015134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:46:36 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-openssl-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453815] Review Request: globus-* - The Globus Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060045.n060jslD014999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453815 Bug 453815 depends on bug 453852, which changed state. Bug 453852 Summary: Review Request: globus-common-setup - Globus Toolkit - Common Setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453852 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453852] Review Request: globus-common-setup - Globus Toolkit - Common Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060045.n060jrvi014942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453852 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:45:52 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 453851 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060042.n060grw9014436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:42:51 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-core-5.15-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-core.spec Two additional patches submitted upstream: Make it work with older automake versions: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6565 Avoid race condition when renaming the libtool file: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060045.n060jPDt014882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:45:24 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-common-10.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-common.spec Two additional patches submitted upstream: Extradist should not be conditional: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6576 Check for function removed from newer versions of libltdl: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6578 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060048.n060maLW027356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:48:35 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-sysconfig.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060048.n060m0mq027302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:48:00 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.0-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060049.n060nai1027456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:49:36 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: hhttp://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-proxy-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060047.n060l4NW027243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:47:03 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060049.n060nuCc015457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:49:55 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-callout-0.7-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-callout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060050.n060of5c015850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:50:39 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gss-assist-4.0-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gss-assist.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060048.n060munP015378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:48:55 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-callback.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060050.n060otvw015895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:50:54 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-proxy-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060047.n060liGB015301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:47:43 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-openssl-module-0.6-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-openssl-module.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060049.n060n9gl015401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:49:08 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-credential.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060050.n060oF6Q015802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-01-05 19:50:14 EDT --- This package was updated due to the renaming of the GPT package. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-0.3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gssapi-gsi.spec One additional patch submitted upstream: Dereferencing of type-punned pointers: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478917] New: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-xio.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-xio-2.7-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-xio package contains: Globus XIO Framework BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Remove some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6585 Bad version information: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6584 Dereferencing of type-punned pointers: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:55:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060055.n060t3pw016829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060055.n060t1A6016507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060055.n060t4N7016853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060055.n060t0cd016467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478918] New: Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Summary: Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/gssapi-error.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/gssapi-error-2.5-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The gssapi-error package contains: GSSAPI Error Library BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-gss-assist-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060055.n060tSNj016908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 19:55:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > *ERROR: Brand fedora is not installed* > Either install fedora or change to a valid Brand. > Installed Brands: echo common > make: *** [pre] Error 1 Presumably "BuildRequires: publican-fedora" is required. (In reply to comment #5) > - Changelog entries are still missing. IN PROGRESS (PUBLICAN BROKEN) Fabian is referring to the spec file changelog entries. > - Source0 WE ARE DEVELOPING THIS DOCUMENT. You should still publish an url (preferred) or explain in the spec file how it is generated: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (In reply to comment #6) > Latest version... > > Spec URL: > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.spec > SRPM URL: > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-4.src.rpm I think you don't need the 10 in the package name. Presumably you are not planning to have a new fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-11-en-US in F11, etc? I still liked fedora-security-guide or linux-security-guide. Once translations are available presumably they would go into separate source packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060056.n060uocm028900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060056.n060unEk028867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060056.n060up9F028945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060056.n060uoau028925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060056.n060umgT028827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478920] New: Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-xio-popen-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-xio-popen-driver package contains: Globus XIO BW Limit Driver BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-xio-devel Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Wrong dependency information: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060100.n0610jhe017941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060100.n0610fFR017838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060100.n0610fc4017796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 467237, 467239, | |478917, 478918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060100.n0610im9017916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 00:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478919] New: Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-xio-gsi-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-xio-gsi-driver package contains: Globus XIO GSI Driver BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: gssapi-error-devel >= 2 BuildRequires: globus-gss-assist-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-xio-devel BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Fix wrong dependency type: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6586 Environment variable elimination patch: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6587 Dereferencing of type-punned pointers: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6606 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060100.n0610hBv017894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060100.n0610hm2017871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060105.n06150xK030225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:05:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060105.n06151nE030249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060104.n0614xUV030192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060105.n06152pD030591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060105.n06152Sa030328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060104.n0614wMC030152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 467239, | |478917, 478919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478922] New: Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-ftp-control.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-ftp-control-2.10-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-ftp-control package contains: GridFTP Client Control Library BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-gss-assist-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-io-devel >= 6 BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Make package descriptions unique: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6589 Remove some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6590 Dereferencing of type-punned pointers: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060102.n0612bAE018611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478920 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060102.n0612c77018638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478920 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060102.n0612aZx018570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 478917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] New: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-io.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-io-6.3-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-io package contains: uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram style communications BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-xio-gsi-driver-devel BuildRequires: globus-gss-assist-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-xio-devel BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060111.n061BVcO031794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060111.n061BV0I031818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060111.n061BWBl031842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060111.n061BUT8031762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060111.n061BXPt031862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060111.n061BTVl031720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |467237, 478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478923] New: Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-ftp-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-ftp-client-3.14-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-ftp-client package contains: GridFTP Client Library BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-xio-popen-driver-devel BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-ftp-control-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Remove some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6600 Dereferencing of type-punned pointers: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6602 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617j1v019602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060109.n0619Z2A019910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617koe019631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060109.n0619ZV6019934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060109.n0619YLY019878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617inq019570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617lJT019656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617mTD019676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060109.n0619bPl019975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060109.n0619aBe019955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617nmo019697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060109.n0619XpB019837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |478920, 478922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060107.n0617h2J019529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |467237, 467239, 478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478925] New: Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gass-transfer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gass-transfer-3.4-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gass-transfer package contains: Globus Gass Transfer BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-io-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Remove some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060115.n061FgNI032763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060115.n061FgV4000320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060115.n061Ffx2032731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060115.n061FeCb032691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478927] New: Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Summary: Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rsl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rsl-5.0-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-rsl package contains: Resource Specification Language Library BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478926] New: Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gass-copy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gass-copy-4.14-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gass-copy package contains: Globus Gass Copy BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-ftp-client-devel >= 2 BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 6 BuildRequires: globus-io-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-gass-transfer-devel >= 2 BuildRequires: globus-ftp-control-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Fix some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061EnZW021097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060116.n061Gv8i021854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060116.n061GvHO021822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061EorY021121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061EnSG021065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061Eq1C021183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061ErHK021204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061Epw2021162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060116.n061GwwG021879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060116.n061GuLD021779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 478927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061Em8w021024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |478921, 478922, 478923, | |478925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060114.n061EpoM021141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478928] New: Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Summary: Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rsl-assist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-rsl-assist package contains: RSL Manipulation Library BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-rsl-devel >= 2 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060121.n061L5Ei001329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060121.n061L6pR001354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060121.n061L4SA001296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060121.n061L7Go001378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060121.n061L87T001398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060121.n061L3Rp001254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |467237, 478921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478929] New: Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Summary: Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: = 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478931] New: Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Summary: Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rls-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rls-server-4.7-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-rls-server package contains: Replica Location Service Server Replica Location Service Server Setup uildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-rls-client-devel >= 5 BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-usage-devel BuildRequires: unixODBC-devel BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-io-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Some dependency fixes: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6594 Increase the lengths of the LFN/PFN strings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6596 Dereferencing of type-punned pointers: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6607 Remove hardcoding of paths: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Increase the lengths of the LFN/PFN strings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060118.n061IwU1022259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478929 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060118.n061IxQ0022284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478929 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060118.n061IwqF022226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478929 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060118.n061IvTs022185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 478917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478930] New: Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Summary: Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rls-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rls-client-5.1-0.3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-rls-client package contains: Replica Location Service Client BuildRequires: grid-packaging-tools BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-io-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Various dependency fixes: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061NboL001800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061NcTB001825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061NahI001767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061Nc1M001851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061NeOw001892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061Nfq7001913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061NdM3001871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 01:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060123.n061NZDi001725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |467237, 478921, 478929, | |478930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060207.n06277Kx029799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:07:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make > it easier to update them. Yes good point - I have been thinking to move all packaging stuff to a separate package, say "haskell-packaging". > If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used. According to this > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies > instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask > about this on fedora-devel. Ok thank you for all your explanations on this. :-) Additionally we would really like to automate the generation of C library buildrequires but that probably needs a bit more work with parsing cabal files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060258.n062wWt2016631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #27 from Tim Potter 2009-01-05 21:58:30 EDT --- Not sure why I thought I needed the license patch - probably just copied from the SUSE spec file. It's gone now anyway. Relative symlinks have been fixed and new files uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060419.n064JmDO000776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060420.n064KBBk001173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060419.n064JSHL000698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060417.n064Hs4i021324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060420.n064KVXZ021988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060420.n064KPnb021930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060418.n064InWF021453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 05:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/spec/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles.spec SRPM URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.src.rpm Description: Provides role based access control, where each user has a list of roles they are allowed to assume, and each restricted part of the app makes an assertion about the necessary roles. Users are granted access only if they are members in all the required roles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 05:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] New: Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Summary: Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/celt.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/celt-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm CELT (Constrained Energy Lapped Transform) is an ultra-low delay audio codec designed for realtime transmission of high quality speech and audio. This is meant to close the gap between traditional speech codecs (such as Speex) and traditional audio codecs (such as Vorbis). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 05:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/spec/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class.spec SRPM URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Catalyst::Authentication::Store::DBIx::Class class provides access to authentication information stored in a database via DBIx::Class. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 05:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060533.n065X6lU001821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 Gabriel Somlo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 05:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060533.n065X5BH001801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 Gabriel Somlo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 05:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060548.n065mcwc004329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Michael Hideo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com Depends on| |478946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 06:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060609.n0669ZSD019643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #8 from Eric Christensen 2009-01-06 01:09:34 EDT --- One problem is the package naming scheme. Publican used -... That means we can have fedora-Security_Guide but not fedora_Security_Guide. Not sure how to go forward with this. Maybe Publican can be modified to do <brand>_<title> instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 06:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060658.n066wuho028135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Bug 476471 depends on bug 478946, which changed state. Bug 478946 Summary: need lower case rpm names to comply with fedora packaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478946 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 07:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060732.n067WJNS001697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478950 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 07:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060734.n067YCNW022469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #9 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-06 02:34:11 EDT --- Latest version... Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-.-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-.-en-US-1.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 08:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225246] Merge Review: anaconda In-Reply-To: <bug-225246-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225246-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060810.n068ABER008633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246 --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 03:10:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks! I've addressed all your comments in 11.5.0.4, which should be in the next rawhide push. > Is the source available for download anywhere? The Source0: URL > should be downloadable if at all possible. The spec should at minimum > include some instructions for checking out of an SCM. > Done > As of FC-5, it is not actually necessary to have: > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils >= %{desktopfileutilsver} > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils >= %{desktopfileutilsver} > as long as you use the recommended update-desktop-database > scriptlets. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > > %post > /usr/bin/update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications &> /dev/null || : > > %postun > /usr/bin/update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications &> /dev/null || : > Fixed. > Is there any reason to keep this bit: > %triggerun -- anaconda < 8.0-1 > /sbin/chkconfig --del reconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > Removed. > Anaconda < 8.0 was, what, pre-RHL-8? > > There's some minor permission weirdness, like > /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot/syslinux.cfg and > /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/pyrc.py are executable, and also > some shell scripts that don't have a shebang line like > /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/mk-images.s390. I'll spare everyone here > the full listing; just run rpmlint and look at the > script-without-shebang errors. I've fixed most rpmlint nagging, remaining: anaconda.src:205: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/anaconda anaconda.src:206: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/anaconda-runtime * python code, so no need for lib64 anaconda.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/anaconda-11.5.0.3/ChangeLog * automatically generated from git commit messages later ones are all UTF-8, cannot use iconv, as newer parts are already UTF-8, cannot manually fix as generated on the fly. anaconda.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libbdevid-python anaconda.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libuser-python anaconda.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python These are actually all python bindings, and this are not explicit-lib-dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 08:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060833.n068XxGM000534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #8 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 03:33:58 EDT --- * You're not packing latest version of nightview (0.3.2) ftp://integral.physics.muni.cz/pub/nightview/ * Some of files are GPLv2+ example: ./xnightview/base64.cpp If not it looks working fine - too bad we don't have a CCD camera to try it out :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 08:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060843.n068hWdb014490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 03:43:31 EDT --- With one little change it builds even if libtool in the buildroot is changed: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Please review this. pfstools is now in Fedora. It is a prerequisite for this package and pfstools alone isn't really useful without pfscalibration and pfstmo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 08:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060843.n068hqOg002437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 03:43:51 EDT --- Please review this. pfstools is now in Fedora. It is a prerequisite for this package and pfstools alone isn't really useful without pfscalibration and pfstmo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060933.n069Xgxr013098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-06 04:33:41 EDT --- -Fix %changelog entry for each bump of version pfscalibration.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4-1 ['1.4-2.fc10', '1.4-2'] -Source0 is 404 ! (sf project name is pfstools, %{name} expands to pfscalibration) -CXXFLAGS set to -O3 overrides Fedora's default level (-O2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: <bug-477750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060944.n069iXTp015202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail.com> 2009-01-06 04:44:32 EDT --- ok, do you want an updated spec file before the official review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpd - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901060946.n069kOaN028142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] New: Review Request: libwpd - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images Message-ID: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libwpd - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Summary: Review Request: libwpd - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/libwpg-0.1.3-1.el5.i386/libwpg.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/libwpg-0.1.3-1.el5.i386/libwpg-0.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Build logs: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/libwpg-0.1.3-1.el5.i386/ Description: Libwpg project is a library and to work with graphics in WPG (WordPerfect Graphics) format. WPG is the format used among others in Corel sofware, such as WordPerfect and Presentations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061008.n06A8Fms020302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #7 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-06 05:08:13 EDT --- Hi Seth, any comments for this ones. Problems. %{?dist} is missing from release tag. /etc/sysconfig/system-autodeath.conf should be a config file in the %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478971] New: Review Request: scid - A chess database application Message-ID: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scid - A chess database application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478971 Summary: Review Request: scid - A chess database application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkalenkov at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid.spec SRPM URL: http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fedora/10/SRPMS/scid-3.6.26-8.3.7beta2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Scid can perform many different searches, such as for particular players, a certain opening position, material searches, and pattern searches such as isolated pawns. It is very fast, because it uses its own efficient format, but it can convert games to and from PGN, the standard format for chess game files. Scid can use a chess engine such as Crafty to analyze games and also has a "tree" mode where it automatically shows all moves played from the current position, their opening codes, success rates, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478971] Review Request: scid - A chess database application In-Reply-To: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061018.n06AIsIQ002710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478971 Mikhail Kalenkov <mkalenkov at mail.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061022.n06AMj8Y003812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-06 05:22:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > * You're not packing latest version of nightview (0.3.2) > > ftp://integral.physics.muni.cz/pub/nightview/ Updated. > * Some of files are GPLv2+ > > example: ./xnightview/base64.cpp The whole work is distributed as GPLv2. > If not it looks working fine - too bad we don't have a CCD camera to try it out > :) A bigger pity is lack of open SBIG specification I'd say... SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/nightview-0.3.2-1.el5.i386/nightview-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/nightview-0.3.2-1.el5.i386/nightview.spec Build log: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/nightview-0.3.2-1.el5.i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061034.n06AYFr8006197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 05:34:14 EDT --- bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061032.n06AWmYY026093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 05:32:45 EDT --- bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061037.n06AbZkI007155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 05:37:33 EDT --- python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061038.n06Acs9h007332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 05:38:53 EDT --- python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: <bug-226568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061050.n06AodrW029792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #16 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 05:50:37 EDT --- Email to Eric - he is ok with GPLv2+, so will change it in next xmlto release: Ond?ej Va??k <ovasik at redhat.com>: > Hello, > I'm Fedora(and since 0.0.19 upstream) maintainer of xmlto. > During review of xmlto > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568) Till Maas brought > up question about xmlif license. It seems that xmlif has GPL+ license, > but xmlto has GPLv2+ license. Therefore I have to use License: GPL+ and > GPLv2+ as the current license for xmlto. Are you ok with having xmlif > under GPLv2+ to consolidate it with xmlto? > > Thanks in advance for answer. > > Greetings, > Ondrej Vasik Yes, go ahead. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 11:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 06:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061139.n06BdKY5019274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 06:39:19 EDT --- You're right, it's sad. Also, please mail Dr. Hroch with patches. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 12:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061223.n06CN4EC015631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #9 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-06 07:23:03 EDT --- Hop, All have been fixed with your comments. You can find all things at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.08-2.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 12:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpd - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061225.n06CPho5016306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 07:25:41 EDT --- Package looks sane. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061313.n06DD3Sv006944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-06 08:13:02 EDT --- Thanks! (In reply to comment #10) > You're right, it's sad. Also, please mail Dr. Hroch with patches. I think in 0.3.2 he included fix for gcc4.3, which was our only upstreamable patch. Other ones are specific to our build. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nightview Short Description: Software package to control a CCD camera Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 (Note that I've found a typo in Summary and made it a bit shorter. I'll change it in the package upon commit as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479004] New: Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents Message-ID: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 Summary: Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-SVG-Parser.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-SVG-Parser-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Descritpion: SVG::Parser is an XML parser for SVG Documents. It takes XML as input and produces an SVG object as its output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479004] Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents In-Reply-To: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061318.n06DIfDi008276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-06 08:18:40 EDT --- Built fine in f11 mock. rpmlint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061337.n06DbRr1032138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk> 2009-01-06 08:37:26 EDT --- I would appreciate your input. I will also be working on webtools and datatools packages, hopefully very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061333.n06DXNBC031219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libwpd - |Review Request: libwpg - |Library for reading |Library for reading |WordPerfect Graphics images |WordPerfect Graphics images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061345.n06DjR8b013989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-06 08:45:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lkundrak Short Description: Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images Owners: lkundrak Branches: (just devel is needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479008] New: Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library Message-ID: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 Summary: Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/libQGLViewer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/libQGLViewer-2.3.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Description: QGLViewer is a C++ library based on Qt that eases the creation of OpenGL 3D viewers. It provides some of the typical 3D viewer functionalities, such as the possibility to move the camera using the mouse, which lacks in most of the other APIs. Other features include mouse manipulated frames, interpolated keyFrames, object selection, stereo display, screenshot saving and much more. It can be used by OpenGL beginners as well as to create complex applications, being fully customizable and easy to extend. Notes for reviewers: - libQGLViewer can be build with both Qt3 and Qt4. I have chosen to built it only with Qt4, as upstream uses the same sonames and headers paths for both (and Qt3 is quite obsolete, now). - I am in touch with the upstream developer, Gilles Debunnes. Next release of CGAL (http://www.cgal.org/) will use QGLViewer for its 3D demos, and Gilles has added an exception for CGAL in the license, because CGAL has some pieces of QPL code. Actually, he has chosen to add the same exceptions as Trolltech does with Qt4. See the file GPL_EXCEPTION in %doc - I am not sure about the License: tag. The license is GPL v2.0 or GPL v3.0 (and not the usual GPLv2+), and additionally there are exceptions. - As a matter of fact, while writing the current review request, I have discovered that there may be a license issue: libQGLViewer ships and is combined with the VRender library, which is under GPLv2+ only (not exceptions). That probably cancel the exceptions. The upstream developer of VRender is a college of Gilles Debunne. I will ask them if the exception can be added to VRender as well. Until then, libQGLViewer could be declared as "License: GPLv2 or GPLv3". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 13:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061356.n06DumTV004214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 08:56:47 EDT --- Hi Mat, If you start working on webtools, would you mind creating a list of all the dependencies and their state in Fedora? A wiki page would be nice. This will allow others interested (like me) to help with a package or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:03:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061403.n06E3Opr005760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-06 09:03:23 EDT --- With the move of the ClamTk directory into %{perl_vendorlib} and creating thus a perl module, you should add back the "Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_...)" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires. The rest of issues has been fixed, so please one more iteration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: <bug-444512-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-444512-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061421.n06ELFxl022315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 09:21:13 EDT --- This package has been reviewed and imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061431.n06EVQ6h024598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #8 from seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 09:31:25 EDT --- OKay fixed both and updated the spec file in the original location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: <bug-234831-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-234831-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061428.n06ESv7F011076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Fabrice Bellet <fabrice at bellet.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fabrice Bellet <fabrice at bellet.info> 2009-01-06 09:28:55 EDT --- Ok. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: FlightGear-data Short Description: FlightGear base scenery and data files Owners: bellet Branches: InitialCC: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: FlightGear-Atlas Short Description: Flightgear map tools Owners: bellet Branches: InitialCC: Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: <bug-225786-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225786-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061429.n06ETX5k011204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 --- Comment #17 from Ivana Varekova <varekova at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 09:29:30 EDT --- Thanks. All points you mentioned should be fixed in gd-2.0.35-7.fc11. For now gd maintainer is Jiri Moskovcak so I'm adding him to cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: <bug-234835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-234835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061431.n06EVrj7024745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 Fabrice Bellet <fabrice at bellet.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #14 from Fabrice Bellet <fabrice at bellet.info> 2009-01-06 09:31:51 EDT --- request grouped with bz #234831 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061441.n06Ef0oS014120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #1 from Laurent Rineau <laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org> 2009-01-06 09:40:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > - As a matter of fact, while writing the current review request, I have > discovered that there may be a license issue: libQGLViewer ships and is > combined with the VRender library, which is under GPLv2+ only (not exceptions). > That probably cancel the exceptions. The upstream developer of VRender is a > college of Gilles Debunne. I will ask them if the exception can be added to > VRender as well. Until then, libQGLViewer could be declared as "License: GPLv2 > or GPLv3". Cyril Soler, the upstream developer of VRender, agrees to add the same license exceptions to VRender. That should be done soon. Let us say that this will be done before the end of this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061449.n06Enqtp016252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 09:49:51 EDT --- Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz is not correct, the correct one is http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pfstools/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Changelog is a incorrect, given that the package is 1.3.2-1 The rest seems OK, wait for a full review in a while -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 15:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061501.n06F1CuF019513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 10:01:10 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: pfstmo.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3-1 ['1.3.2-1.fc11', '1.3.2-1'] => see note 1 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 8662863c5bd3acdfb83eeef26b6ff5907b5531ec pfstmo-1.3.2.tar.gz => Source0 is incorrect, see Note 2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. correct changelog should mention version 1.3.2-1 2. Source0 should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pfstools/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 3. Timestamps of manual pages are not preserved please fix the above problems and we are good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 15:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479020] New: Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin Message-ID: <bug-479020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-plugins-sa.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-plugins-sa-1.0-0.1.b2.r2909.fc10.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides one repoze.who authenticator which works with SQLAlchemy or Elixir-based models. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 15:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479021] New: Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin Message-ID: <bug-479021-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.1.a4.r3024.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an adapters and extras plugin for repoze.what. The SQL plugin makes repoze.what support sources defined in SQLAlchemy-managed databases by providing one group adapter, one permission adapter and one utility to configure both in one go (optionally, when the group source and the permission source have a relationship). This plugin also defines repoze.what.plugins.quickstart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: <bug-476315-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476315-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061602.n06G2jSC002018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 11:02:44 EDT --- Update for 0.25.4, which introduces translations: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479028] New: Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479028 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-es.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-es-0.20040810-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Spanish hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:33:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061633.n06GXeLL021379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-06 11:33:39 EDT --- Well, there are still many files in binary rpm which have CRLF line terminators as $ rpm -ql rubygem-tlsmail | xargs file | grep CRLF shows (although rpmlint does not seem to be able to detect these) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061646.n06GkaJg011820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-06 11:46:35 EDT --- Well, - On x86_64 test fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1035263 - On ppc it doesn't build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1035304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061646.n06GkbJf011845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 drago01 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drago01 at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from drago01 at gmail.com 2009-01-06 11:46:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > You are not obsoleting the netbeans-platform8 package? so, we will have 2 > netbeans-platform* packages in Fedora? I don't agree with this. Yeah, you are right. Without this people have to install the new packages to get a new version a simple update won't drag it in. Also there is no point to ship the old version once the new one is in. Victor, please add this to the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 17:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061700.n06H0iRT027107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-06 12:00:42 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support In-Reply-To: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061656.n06Guhhf026242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 11:56:42 EDT --- So, upstream has gone down since I grabbed the tarball. I emailed him, and he said he would put the svn server back up, but he has still not done so (and has not responded to any of my many additional emails). He did say in his initial email that he was focusing his efforts on adding zlib support to the next release of tcl. I suppose you can either trust me on the code, or not. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 17:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479028] Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061729.n06HT0CR032520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479028 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 12:28:58 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (59b3ffb4aa5d2817fa91b23550ef701615c4993f hyph_es_ES.zip), license (LGPLv2+) is correct. I suggest also including the second readme file (the one in Spanish) because it includes testing instructions. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 17:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061742.n06Hgeks002739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #4 from Nick Boldt <nickboldt+redhat at gmail.com> 2009-01-06 12:42:39 EDT --- One quick way to see what depends on what (minimums) is to pick a feature to install and let Eclipse 3.4.1 install it. When it's done, you'll see that feature, its included subfeatures and plugins, and any dependent features/plugins required for it to run. Creating the visual tree of dependencies can be done (for plugins only, anyway) using something like this: http://www.eclipse.org/pde/incubator/dependency-visualization/index.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 17:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061750.n06HoV4b004230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-06 12:50:30 EDT --- Well, some notes for 0.3.6-1: * SourceURL - For sourceforge hosted tarball, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * BuildRequires - "BuildRequires: gcc-c++ libstdc++-devel make" are redundant. - Is "help2man" really used when rebuilding this srpm? * Timestamps - It is preferred to use ----------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ----------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles based on recent autotools * %defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * rpmlint issue ----------------------------------------------------------- metalink.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1) metalink.src: E: description-line-too-long a .metalink is an XML file that describes a download, and includes mirrors and checksum information. metalink.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/metalink-0.3.6/example/gen.sh ----------------------------------------------------------- - Please use spaces or tabs for indention, not both, for cosmetic issue. - Cut one line in two lines or so when it exceeds 79 characters. - Usually I suggest that all files marked as %doc should have 0644 permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 18:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061817.n06IHqYI029562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks| |177841 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-06 13:17:51 EDT --- Well, another simple package. - For upstream URL, I think http://pypi.python.org/pypi/%{realname}/ is enough - For rpmlint issue: --------------------------------------------------------- E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/progressbar.py 0644 --------------------------------------------------------- If this script is not meant to be executed directory by user (i.e. is meant loaded by other applications, for example), usually this script should not have shebang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 18:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061826.n06IQ0m9011325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-06 13:25:59 EDT --- a few comments: - there is a newer upstream 2.6.1b, and it seems upstream switched to a more sane naming. - "a" and "b" tags from version seems to me like post release package, so please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease - there is a doc target for building development documentation (requires doxgey and pdfjam) - rpmlint is not silent: slimdata.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libslim.so you need to set the exec bit on the so file slimdata.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libslim.so library does not have soname set, as this is a system library this is a blocker. you will have to recompile the file with -Wl,-soname -Wl,libslim.so. You should also report this upstream. slimdata.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libslim.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 slimdata.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libslim.so exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. these are not blockers but they should be reported upstream slimdata-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation see my previous comment about documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 18:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061829.n06IT0GK011633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-06 13:28:59 EDT --- One possible simplification would be to check to see if the -devel subpkg needs qt4-devel or not (qt4 headers), and if so, include the desiginer plugin in -devel (one less subpkg). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 18:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061843.n06Ihm4R002516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-06 13:43:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, another simple package. I thought I start with the small ones and the ones I use myself. > - For upstream URL, I think > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/%{realname}/ > is enough ok. > - For rpmlint issue: > --------------------------------------------------------- > E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/progressbar.py 0644 > --------------------------------------------------------- > If this script is not meant to be executed directory by user > (i.e. is meant loaded by other applications, for example), usually > this script should not have shebang. I noticed this too, but I had a look at other packages which I have installed (for example yum) and other package reviews and this seems to be quite common. The file contains tests, but is not executable because it is in /usr/lib/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 18:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061859.n06Ixv9V017535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 13:59:56 EDT --- I've fixed all the problems pointed out and then some more (correct use of OpenMP). New versions of the files (same name): Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061903.n06J3bST006703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 14:03:36 EDT --- = Review = Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent (well, 99%) - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file One very minor item, you're using "${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" and "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in the spec. Pick one and use it consistently. You can make this change before you commit to CVS. APPROVED. I will sponsor you. Please follow the process here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479055] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class Message-ID: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/spec/perl-Class-Throwable.spec SRPM URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Class-Throwable-0.10-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module implements a minimal lightweight exception object. It is meant to be a compromise between more basic solutions like Carp which can only print information and cannot handle exception objects, and more complex solutions like Exception::Class which can be used to define complex inline exceptions and has a number of module dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061934.n06JYJY2025202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061934.n06JYIru025180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479055] Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class In-Reply-To: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061933.n06JXWG7012938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061933.n06JXV61012918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061934.n06JY3hM013021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #6 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 14:34:02 EDT --- I have no idea what you want the man page handling to look like. It's done like in every other package I know. The rest is fixed and I fixed a few problems in the code itself. New files, same name: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstmo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstmo-1.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications Message-ID: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/spec/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL.spec SRPM URL: http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides Access Control List style path protection, with arbitrary rules for Catalyst applications. It operates only on the Catalyst private namespace, at least at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061944.n06JiKXm027488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 14:44:20 EDT --- FWIW it's probably safe to remove the gcj AOT bits since the Eclipse platform doesn't contain these bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061947.n06JlGHv015482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 14:47:15 EDT --- Also (and sorry for the multiple comments), you'll probably want to check out: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/eclipse-emf/F-7/eclipse-emf.spec?revision=1.7&view=markup to verify you've properly Obsolete'd and Provide'd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901061943.n06JhinM014733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 14:43:43 EDT --- Alex, have you and Mat spoken about rpmstubby? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062002.n06K2l9P031570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 15:02:46 EDT --- Just use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" and you will notice that the packaged man pages will change from: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 600 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_drago03.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 808 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_durand02.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1232 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_fattal02.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1440 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_mantiuk06.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4087 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_mantiuk08.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1123 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_pattanaik00.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 904 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_reinhard02.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 665 Jan 6 16:38 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_reinhard05.1.gz to -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 600 Jun 9 2006 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_drago03.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 808 Sep 9 20:55 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_durand02.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1232 Jul 11 2007 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_fattal02.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1440 Jun 17 2008 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_mantiuk06.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4087 Aug 22 20:51 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_mantiuk08.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1123 Jun 14 2007 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_pattanaik00.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 904 Jun 14 2007 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_reinhard02.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 665 Jun 14 2007 /usr/share/man/man1/pfstmo_reinhard05.1.gz In the future, please be as kind as to increase the release tag each time you modify the spec Package APPROVED (I'll trust you to modify the make install line before commit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062004.n06K4Z2q018908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pfstools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062010.n06KAD0Q000453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 15:10:12 EDT --- Sorry, I have just noticed one little problem. During the build process, the fedora's default gcc -O2 is replaced by gcc -O3 Would you please fix the Makefile ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062014.n06KEXZt000994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 15:14:32 EDT --- Actually I think that the solution is to patch configure (notice the last line below): # Check whether --enable-debug was given. if test "${enable_debug+set}" = set; then enableval=$enable_debug; if test "$enable_debug" = "yes" ; then temp_CXXFLAGS=`echo $CXXFLAGS | sed "s/-O./ /; s/-g//"` CXXFLAGS="-g $temp_CXXFLAGS" cat >>confdefs.h <<\_ACEOF #define DEBUG 1 _ACEOF fi else enable_debug="no" temp_CXXFLAGS=`echo $CXXFLAGS | sed "s/-O./ /; s/-g//"` CXXFLAGS="-O3 $temp_CXXFLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062025.n06KP9Vb022886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 15:25:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Sorry, I have just noticed one little problem. During the build process, the > fedora's default gcc -O2 is replaced by gcc -O3 > Would you please fix the Makefile ? This is no problem. All the other flags are preserved. This is code which can benefit from the additional optimization -O3 provides. Things would be different of the security mechanisms etc are turned off. But they aren't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062025.n06KPgHw022970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-06 15:25:40 EDT --- The compiler should be called with the full set of %{optflags} or the resulted debuginfo package will be broken. It looks like package does not honour external set of CXXFLAGS called by rpmbuild: + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules' + export FFLAGS + ./configure .... so yo needs to be patched somehow. Please also include COPYING file in the %doc section of the package. It would be also nice to add README files, ChangeLog and AUTHORS. Please bump the release version of the package for each set of modification. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:29:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062029.n06KTb5V004360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 15:29:36 EDT --- Nothing much to say, it's pretty standard. Everything checks OK, including license ( GPL+ or Artistic ) and sha1sum (14415d7f67f7c9f4b8f29994a70879bd93af4365 Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07.tar.gz) and "make test". APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 21:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479008-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062107.n06L7CeY012567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #3 from Laurent Rineau <laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org> 2009-01-06 16:07:11 EDT --- Hi Rex, I do not know why I made a separate sub-package. Most probably I remember the time when Qt4 designer was in its own sub-package (in 2006). To answer your question, the -devel sub-package does need qt4-devel. And I forgot that Requires! :-S Update: Spec URL: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/libQGLViewer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/libQGLViewer-2.3.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Tue Jan 6 2009 Laurent Rineau <Laurent.Rineau__fedora at normalesup.org> - 2.3.1-6 - Merge the subpackage -designer-plugin into -devel. - Add Requires: qt4-devel to -devel. Note: Because of the merge, I could have add an Obsoletes: in -devel (Provides is useless as nothing currently depends on libQGLViewer-designer-plugin), but I have commented it: as the package is not yet in Fedora collection, that Obsoletes: is an overkill. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 21:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062116.n06LGNs3014522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 16:16:22 EDT --- Once again, pretty much standard. Most noticeable: rpmlint of perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class.src: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint of perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-1.fc11.noarch.rpm => Both can be ignored but keep in mind that the package will not be able to be included in a standard CD. Source rpm name has 68 chars, binary has 71 chars and both exceed the limit of 64 specified for Joliet sha1sum: ea63d54c6c5a5a1224d2913a795c68b537ea3733 Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082.tar.gz make test is OK. License: - same as perl for User.pm and Class.pm - not specified for SimpleDB.pm Could you please try to clarify with the author the situation of SimpleDB.pm ? Most probably it has the same license as the rest of the code (and as specified in the README) but a written proof would be better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 21:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:42:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062142.n06LgopZ019414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-06 16:42:49 EDT --- Ok, updated the package. - I tested it in mock for fedora-devel-i386, and it works fine now, I hadn't set the location for jni.h properly for the libjpcap.so to build. - I had those set because I saw it in an example, but it seems quite useless in retrospect, since I can just use %name and %version - Fixed the licensing issue - Changed to full upstream URL - Removed the Vendor item - Added jpackage-utils to both BuildRequires and Requires - Removed libpcap as a BuildRequire - I used "Autoreq: 0" because upstream had done so in their RPM spec file (which was nowhere near current Fedora spec) - Added an rm -f statement to the %prep which removes the jarfiles and .so pre-built in the upstream tarball - Changed to %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Now uses install -D which should fix the permissions I uploaded new versions here: Spec File: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap.spec Source RPM: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap-0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm The originals are now moved to http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/0.7-3/jpcap.spec and http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/0.7-3/jpcap-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm Thank you for the review, I look forward to your forthcoming comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062204.n06M4HQX009098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #10 from Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 17:04:16 EDT --- Hi Jens, Given this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478946 Can we still use capitalization in the package name so we can preserve the 1-to-1 correspondence with the top level xml file and <title> tag names? - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: <bug-476776-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476776-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062220.n06MKaTN026741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 17:20:35 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-shove.spec * Tue Jan 06 2009 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> 0.1.3-2 - Use consistent macros - Add comment about patch - Make rpmlint happy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: <bug-468806-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468806-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062227.n06MRGYW013298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 17:27:15 EDT --- Ugh, so apparently DBSprockets is now deprecated, and has been re-written as a new project Sprox. I'll package that up and push it into review shortly. Can we delete these branches in the mean time? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: <bug-451405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062223.n06MN3kv012516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 17:23:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-weberror Short Description: Web Error handling and exception catching middleware Owners: lmacken, ricky Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: <bug-468224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062231.n06MVJbe014230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 17:31:18 EDT --- Tagged and built, and queued up in bodhi. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: <bug-468230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062231.n06MVKdC014255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 468224, which changed state. Bug 468224 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: <bug-468224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062233.n06MXUo7029154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 17:33:29 EDT --- python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: <bug-468224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062233.n06MX8vL014480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 17:33:07 EDT --- python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062237.n06MblNS030154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 17:37:47 EDT --- python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062238.n06McfGH015408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 17:38:40 EDT --- python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 23:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062300.n06N0dBl001584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 18:00:38 EDT --- linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 23:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062300.n06N0gVU018970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-06 18:00:41 EDT --- linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 23:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479028] Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062316.n06NGZRi004462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479028 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 18:16:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-es Short Description: Spanish hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 23:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062343.n06NhQir008711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-06 18:43:25 EDT --- Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace-9.3f-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 23:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901062347.n06NlLgl027048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 18:47:20 EDT --- Well, Lubomir on IRC seems to agree with you, although I have a different opinion APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070004.n0704EqK029905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |dustismo-fonts - font with |dustin-dustismo-fonts - |serif and sans-serif |font with serif and |versions |sans-serif versions Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 19:04:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: <bug-478773-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478773-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070009.n0709RXO030665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 19:09:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: <bug-478674-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478674-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070008.n0708TqA030588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 19:08:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070011.n070BQYS031203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 19:11:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070012.n070CAlS013445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 19:12:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: <bug-468806-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468806-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070057.n070vvST019617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> 2009-01-06 19:57:56 EDT --- Okay. Since dbsprockets has been built in rawhide, I suggest we treat this as a retired package. I've updated the packagedb to orphan all the branches. Please follow the steps on:: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife to finish up. (Particularly the dead.package step as that's what we'll use to mark things retired in the packagedb once we grow that status.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070116.n071GFbP022830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:16:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476623] Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one In-Reply-To: <bug-476623-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476623-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070119.n071J6gV008150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:19:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: <bug-470756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070124.n071Ovmr023833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:24:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: <bug-451405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070123.n071NmmT023773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:23:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:22:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070122.n071MWJ2008833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:22:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: <bug-476329-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476329-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070126.n071QCiQ009461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:26:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479028] Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070130.n071Uqb5025013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479028 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:30:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070128.n071StLg024496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:28:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:30:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478825] Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-478825-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478825-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070130.n071UA6V010156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478825 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:30:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: <bug-234831-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-234831-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070133.n071X2bH010525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-06 20:33:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 02:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070243.n072hI8D020974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 21:43:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pfstmo Short Description: PFS tone mapping operators Owners: drepper at redhat.com Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 03:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: <bug-476329-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476329-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070325.n073PICd028040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-06 22:25:17 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 03:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings In-Reply-To: <bug-476346-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476346-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070325.n073PJLt028061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Bug 476346 depends on bug 476329, which changed state. Bug 476329 Summary: Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 04:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: <bug-471003-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471003-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070439.n074dkv6007006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bug 471003 depends on bug 470756, which changed state. Bug 470756 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 04:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: <bug-470756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070439.n074djZw006981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-06 23:39:44 EDT --- Thanks again for the review. Package imported and built for f11. F10 build will follow later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: <bug-471003-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471003-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070502.n0752bs3025025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 00:02:36 EDT --- Dependencies are now in rawhide. Updating package for latest packaging macros. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm (please ignore the disttag - requires ghc in rawhide to build currently) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: <bug-460727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070523.n075NFA6028075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 vivek shah <boni.vivek at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #7 from vivek shah <boni.vivek at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 00:23:13 EDT --- Pong Alive but burdened by a lot of work. Will finish off by checking with the newest gnujump by this weekend. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070533.n075XAPo015121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 00:33:08 EDT --- [was writing this yesterday] (In reply to comment #8) > One problem is the package naming scheme. Publican used <brand>-<title>... > That means we can have fedora-Security_Guide but not fedora_Security_Guide. > Not sure how to go forward with this. Maybe Publican can be modified to do > <brand>_<title> instead. I don't see any problem with fedora-Security_Guide (vs fedora_Security_Guide). However the naming issue really comes down to whether we should follow the publican naming scheme verbatim in this case. IMHO it would also be ok to name this package fedora-security-guide, but I would be happy to hear opinions from other packager reviewers too, since this is a test case as the first guide in publican going into fedora AFAIK. Having said that in order to avoid having to repeat this discussion for every publican documentation and translation package review it would probably be better if publican could generate lower-cased tarballs IMHO. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Separators http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070537.n075b9pY030179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 00:37:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-.-en-US.spec > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-.-en-US-1.0-5.src.rpm Erm, -.- is not good. Does publican generate the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479055] Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class In-Reply-To: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070537.n075bt3C030252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 00:37:54 EDT --- + koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1037262 + rpmlint is ok with following message perl-Class-Throwable.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Class-Throwable-0.10/t/TestException.pm perl(base) => I don't see any exec bits set on t/TestException.pm + License is GPL+ or Artistic + verified upstream source as 888ea61abfd8d9b60c024a997de9dbbd Class-Throwable-0.10.tar.gz + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=77, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 0.49 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.63 CPU) + Package perl-Class-Throwable-0.10-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Class::Throwable) = 0.10 perl(DB) perl(TestException) Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070540.n075edVU016494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 00:40:38 EDT --- Still no changelog in .spec and what about the .desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 06:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070609.n0769cJQ020809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 01:09:36 EDT --- I would suggest starting something like this and fixing the the FIXME's: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1037394&name=fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-en-US-1.0-5.src.rpm I guess publican needs some way not to have a version in the doc name. I tried building on F10 and ran into: Processing, Product: fedora, Version: ., Edition: 1.0, Release: 5 START: xml-en-US Wed Jan 7 15:52:34 EST 2009 copying fedora/en-US Common_Content cleaning files 7_Zip.xml Can't locate XML/TreeBuilder.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.1\ 0.0 /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib64/perl5\ /vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/pe\ rl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl .) at /usr/bin/xmlClean line 43. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/xmlClean line 43. make: *** [xml-en-US] Error 4 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rQtsc2 (%build) Does perl-XML-TreeBuilder need to be rebuilt in f10? Scratch build in koji buildsystem however is successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1037394 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 06:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478780] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions In-Reply-To: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070647.n076ldmD008903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 06:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478780] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions In-Reply-To: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070647.n076lb1F008880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-07 01:47:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear Short Description: Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 08:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070834.n078YkgH028380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #8 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 03:34:44 EDT --- Thanks for the notes! I've fixed everything except for: * rpmlint issue ----------------------------------------------------------- metalink.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/metalink-0.3.6/example/gen.sh ----------------------------------------------------------- - Usually I suggest that all files marked as %doc should have 0644 permission. I am trying %attr(644,root,root) %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/example/gen.sh and %doc %attr(644,root,root) example/gen.sh Nothing seems to work. What am I doing wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 08:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070845.n078jj0S030628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #9 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-07 03:45:44 EDT --- I must be blind :), cant see any changes at http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/system-autodeath/system-autodeath.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 08:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478825] Review Request: hyphen-el - Greek hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-478825-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478825-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070849.n078nH6J015905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478825 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 08:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070854.n078sMii016882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-07 03:54:21 EDT --- I have not checked your srpm yet, however: (In reply to comment #8) > * rpmlint issue > ----------------------------------------------------------- > metalink.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/metalink-0.3.6/example/gen.sh > ----------------------------------------------------------- > - Usually I suggest that all files marked as %doc should have > 0644 permission. > > I am trying > %attr(644,root,root) %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/example/gen.sh > and > %doc %attr(644,root,root) example/gen.sh > Nothing seems to work. at %prep: chmod 0644 example/gen.sh will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070900.n0790f2r000970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #12 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 04:00:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The compiler should be called with the full set of %{optflags} or the resulted > debuginfo package will be broken. The flags provided are used. There are just some additional flags passed. Nothing got broken. Anyway, I have changed it slightly, similar to the way it is done in the pfstmo package. I'm now replacing the -O2 option only with some additional options for higher optimization. These higher optimizations are appropriate in this case. > Please also include COPYING file in the %doc section of the package. > It would be also nice to add README files, ChangeLog and AUTHORS. I did that. The resulting files are here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: <bug-469471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070906.n0796sNj020364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:06:53 EDT --- skinlf-6.7-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475082-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475082-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070911.n079BXLP004941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:11:32 EDT --- guiloader-2.13.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: <bug-471754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070910.n079AoNu004769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:10:50 EDT --- virtaal-0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: <bug-471754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070910.n079A1iN004109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:09:59 EDT --- virtaal-0.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: <bug-471754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070910.n079A3WA004440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070907.n0797xvK003434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:07:58 EDT --- srm-1.2.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update srm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: <bug-469471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070912.n079C2Vv022587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:12:01 EDT --- skinlf-6.7-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070910.n079Aamf022073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:10:35 EDT --- perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070910.n079Ac4I022114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070911.n079BlkA022499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:11:46 EDT --- conspy-1.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update conspy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: <bug-472060-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472060-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070912.n079CRim005610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:12:25 EDT --- mumbles-0.4-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: <bug-472060-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472060-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070912.n079CUBl005648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070913.n079DRf0005990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #10 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 04:13:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I have not checked your srpm yet, however: Sorry, the srpm would not build & I was waiting to fix that final issue. Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1302623 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/metalink/metalink-0.3.6-2.fc10.src.rpm > at %prep: > chmod 0644 example/gen.sh > will do. Aha, that did it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070913.n079DMMV005947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:13:21 EDT --- mr-0.35-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update mr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070915.n079FSck007057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:15:26 EDT --- bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bkchem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070913.n079DDQs005873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:13:12 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update screenie'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0069 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070914.n079EZMj023854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:14:34 EDT --- conspy-1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update conspy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: <bug-459637-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459637-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070914.n079EN9V023803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:14:21 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070915.n079Fs4x024628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:15:52 EDT --- fspy-0.1.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update fspy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 08:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479028] Review Request: hyphen-es - Spanish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479028-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070859.n078x1YE017727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479028 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: <bug-475040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070917.n079H2cH007651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:17:01 EDT --- wol-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: <bug-476357-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476357-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070916.n079Gf7O007229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:16:11 EDT --- libicns-0.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: <bug-471335-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471335-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070920.n079KEdG008978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:20:13 EDT --- libgdbus-0.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:17:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: <bug-475040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070917.n079H5eX007684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: <bug-471335-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471335-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070920.n079KHSR009025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070919.n079JLIH008310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:19:20 EDT --- srm-1.2.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update srm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070917.n079HSmV007812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:17:27 EDT --- fspy-0.1.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fspy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0099 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: <bug-453839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070918.n079IMV1025820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:18:19 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475082-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475082-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070922.n079MJdt027506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:22:18 EDT --- guiloader-2.12.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-473215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070921.n079Lbxs027316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:21:35 EDT --- perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: <bug-453839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070918.n079IPAa025872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: <bug-471335-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471335-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070922.n079MSUw010078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:22:27 EDT --- libgdbus-0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070926.n079QBAR011774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:26:10 EDT --- perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070925.n079PuEx011681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:25:55 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-473215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070921.n079LexX009667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070925.n079PxpL011717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070925.n079PWlj011479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:25:31 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update screenie'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0162 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070923.n079N61t027829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:23:04 EDT --- python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-oasa'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0131 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: <bug-475040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070931.n079Vn1i031741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:31:48 EDT --- wol-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:31:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: <bug-469273-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469273-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070931.n079VZgQ031665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:31:33 EDT --- quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070928.n079SMd6030332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070928.n079SKMP030284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:28:18 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070931.n079VudD031793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:31:55 EDT --- bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update bkchem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070929.n079TitJ030687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:29:42 EDT --- kdenetwork-4.1.3-2.fc10, kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kdenetwork kopete-cryptography'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070931.n079VjJ7031711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:31:45 EDT --- ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ethstatus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0201 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: <bug-453839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070935.n079Zutm015721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:35:54 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: <bug-476357-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476357-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070932.n079WSJk014652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:32:28 EDT --- libicns-0.6.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070936.n079aHqR015842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070933.n079XLPt014982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:33:20 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070935.n079ZjDu015621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #8 from Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk> 2009-01-07 04:35:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > FWIW it's probably safe to remove the gcj AOT bits since the Eclipse platform > doesn't contain these bits. Fair enough. AOT doesn't work for this package anyway. (In reply to comment #7) > Also (and sorry for the multiple comments), you'll probably want to check out: > > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/eclipse-emf/F-7/eclipse-emf.spec?revision=1.7&view=markup > > to verify you've properly Obsolete'd and Provide'd. Aha, thanks. I see I have some work to do here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070936.n079aEKF000951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:36:13 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070933.n079XRg1032616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:33:26 EDT --- ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update ethstatus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070937.n079bwoT016682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:37:57 EDT --- mr-0.35-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070937.n079bmpP001547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:37:47 EDT --- pfstools-1.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070938.n079c6SZ001638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 04:38:05 EDT --- python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-oasa'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901070958.n079wpJh021100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Bug 459946 depends on bug 459944, which changed state. Bug 459944 Summary: Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-07 04:58:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > The flags provided are used. There are just some additional flags passed. > Nothing got broken. - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honoured. (rpm --eval %optflags) Overriding or filtering parts of these flags is permitted only if there's a good reason to do so. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags > Anyway, I have changed it slightly, similar to the way it is done in the pfstmo > package. I'm now replacing the -O2 option only with some additional options > for higher optimization. These higher optimizations are appropriate in this > case. - -O3 flag is generally forbidden (it makes debugging difficult). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 10:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071003.n07A3rrO007267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #11 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 05:03:52 EDT --- hop, it's done :) http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.08-3.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 10:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-478759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071010.n07AATsO023924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Lane <dirjud at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dirjud at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Lane <dirjud at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 05:10:27 EDT --- Chitlesh, I am experiencing a compatibility problem with the location of the perl-SystemPerl-devel files. Verilator (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516) compiles in some of the *.cpp files from the systemperl src directory when it creates a simulation model. When you compile verilator, you give it the path to the systemperl installation, and when you use verilator to create a simulation model, it looks for those *.cpp files in the src/*.cpp directory. Because the systemperl spec file is moving these *.cpp files into the /usr/include/SystemPerl directory, there is no way for verilator to find them. They would need to go in the /usr/include/SystemPerl/src directory for verilator to be able to find them. Given these files are not used for linking but are used for actual compilation, perhaps they should go into the %{_datadir}/src directory. Lane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 10:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-478759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071017.n07AHYSK010241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #4 from Lane <dirjud at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 05:17:33 EDT --- If I change the SystemPerl spec file to: # -devel package and support for SystemC %{__mkdir} -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name}/src %{__install} -pm 0644 src/*.h $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name}/src/ %{__install} -pm 0644 src/*.cpp $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name}/src/ and then set SYSTEMPERL=%{_includedir}/SystemPerl in the verilator.spec file, then I can get verilator to pickup the systemperl files it needs to create simulation models correctly. I do not know enough of the fedora conventions to know where these cpp files *should* go, but wherever they end up, they need to be need to be in a directory called */src/ Lane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 10:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479113] New: Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479113 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-is-0.20030920-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-is.spec Description: Icelandic hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 10:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479112] New: Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479112 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-id.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-id-0.20040812-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Indonesian hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 11:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071107.n07B7aPx021180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #8 from drago01 at gmail.com 2009-01-07 06:07:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > You are not obsoleting the netbeans-platform8 package? so, we will have 2 > > netbeans-platform* packages in Fedora? I don't agree with this. > > Yeah, you are right. Without this people have to install the new packages to > get a new version a simple update won't drag it in. > Also there is no point to ship the old version once the new one is in. > > Victor, please add this to the spec. Err, he *does* obsolete it but not provide it. So anyone has the old package installed will get the new one via update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 11:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071144.n07BiqYl011218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-07 06:44:51 EDT --- There is no need to use the requires/provides filtering, I have built clamtk-4.08-2.fc11.src.rpm and the autogenerated requires/provides are fine. Anyway the "unwanted_require" string is meant to be substituted for the actual bad require (like e.g. "Gtk2::YourSuperModule"). So drop the filters from the %prep section and we should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 11:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071147.n07Bl6dQ028994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 Ivana Varekova <varekova at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #33 from Ivana Varekova <varekova at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 06:47:02 EDT --- Hello, Stepan Kasal will look at this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071223.n07CNPgo019647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #10 from seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 07:23:24 EDT --- You can't see the %{?dist} and %config? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071225.n07CPmxF020378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|drago01 at gmail.com | --- Comment #9 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 07:25:45 EDT --- used the wrong account for the previous comment, that as me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479113] Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071224.n07COi1k004290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479113 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-07 07:24:43 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (53c31ae8d0e414c4faa58dbe9f9c432784c4f5c5 hyph_is_IS.zip), license (LGPLv2+) is correct. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479112] Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071230.n07CUPKQ021480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479112 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-07 07:30:24 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (af35141d92d4e426adef552ba753d3b196c919c3 hyph_id_ID.zip), license (GPLv+) is correct. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071226.n07CQqqQ020619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 07:26:50 EDT --- REVIEW: [+] = OK [-] = NOT OK [1] = SEE COMMENTS [?] = WTF? ============================= [+] source files match upstream: sha1: http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-1.2.13.tar.gz [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. LGPLv2+ [-] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1037809 [+] package installs properly. [1] rpmlint is silent. [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [2] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [3] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. ================================ COMMENTS: Please package the COPYING file. [1]: no there are warings like this: "mingw32-SDL.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/SDL_SetColorKey.3" Those can be fixed with a line like this: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mingw32_mandir}/man3/ -type f -not -name '*.gz' -print | xargs gzip -9f "mingw32-SDL.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a" Package used for cross-compiling so this is a non issue. "mingw32-SDL.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32" Used in all mingw32 packges. "mingw32-SDL.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a" Why is this executeable ? "mingw32-SDL.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL/SDL_events.h" Fine, because package is only used for cross compiling. [2]: See comment in [1] regarding /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a [3]: Is OK, see comment in [1] =================================== Package looks good, please fix the issues noted above and I will approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479113] Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071234.n07CYWWA006401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479113 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 07:34:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-is Short Description: Icelandic hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479112] Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071235.n07CZsQJ006926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479112 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 07:35:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-id Short Description: Indonesian hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071244.n07CiCpQ024145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #13 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 07:44:11 EDT --- fixed in : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.08-4.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071253.n07CrSGJ026220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-07 07:53:27 EDT --- - everything is pretty much standard for a perl module - builds fine in local mock - rpmlint is clean on both source and binary - upstream license and the one in spec coincide (GPL+ or Artistic), - sha1sum is OK ( 827f4a56a04ab65fabccb8ca09c3ce6834d19567 Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10.tar.gz ) - Provides and Requires seem sane. - make test passes ok. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071253.n07CrEGl010493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 07:53:13 EDT --- It is GPLv3 only. Got a reply today from author. I will import now. I have requested for inclusion of license in source files also. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071256.n07CuqT0027065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 07:56:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cas Short Description: automated core analysis tool Owners: astokes Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071258.n07CwMsD011684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 --- Comment #34 from Stepan Kasal <skasal at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 07:58:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Really the only thing that bothers me is [...] the autool-ization of the > original non-autotools-using source. First, about problems with the original build system of zlib: The same CFLAGS variable is used for static and dynamic library. So using this simple build system is not so simple as using the complex autotools system. You need to do something like: make mv libz.a save-libz.a make clean ./configure -s make mv save-libz.a libz.a To see another variant of this trick, see the spec file just before the autoconfiscation: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/zlib/zlib.spec?revision=zlib-1_2_3-6_fc7 Second, there is minizip-*-autotools.patch. contrib/minizip/Makefile does not contain any rules for building libminizip.so. Consequently, some hacking is needed to get the library built; using libtool (through Automake) is a sensible way. With these things in mind, I believe that the autoconfiscation incures less maintanance costs than the complicated spec file would. Does this sound fair? If yes, should an excerpt of this explanation go to the spec file? (Text suggestions welcome. ;-) BTW, I'm going to do some cleanup of the autotools patches. But I don't think it would be a good idea to go back to the build system shipped with zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071308.n07D8kSP030053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071307.n07D7Rk1029778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-07 08:07:26 EDT --- Now I am satisfied and this package is APPROVED. I will sponsor you now, but don't hesitate to ask either me or the on the fedora-devel mailing list when you are unsure about anything related to Fedora packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071310.n07DAo5o015026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #15 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 08:10:50 EDT --- Ok, thanks ! I don't hesitate :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071324.n07DO7jA018209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 08:24:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clamtk Short Description: ClamTk is a GUI front-end for ClamAV Owners: saispo Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: saispo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071323.n07DNgn8018123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 08:23:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nufw Short Description: Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux Owners: saispo at gmail.com Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: saispo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071332.n07DWrPE004030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 08:32:51 EDT --- moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071332.n07DWvi7020613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 08:32:57 EDT --- moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071339.n07Ddj4r021757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.51-2 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #36 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-07 08:39:44 EDT --- 1152 (moon-buggy): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. 1151 (moon-buggy): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Package: moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc9 Tag: dist-f9-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc11 Tag: dist-f11 Status: complete Built by: robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 13:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071359.n07DxK5F009470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #11 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-07 08:59:19 EDT --- No. <snip> Name: system-autodeath Version: 0.2 Release: 1 </snip> <snip> %files %defattr(-, root, root) %doc README COPYING %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/system-autodeath.sh %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/system-autodeath.conf %{_mandir}/man8/system-autodeath.* %changelog </snip> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 14:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071406.n07E6nwU028447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #12 from seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 09:06:48 EDT --- okay, I think something is very wrong here. I can definitely see it. Can you download the file using wget and tell me if you see it there? Maybe some sort of weird browser caching? Either that or you're behind a very laggy transparent proxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 14:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071411.n07EBjWN013057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-07 09:11:42 EDT --- Look good now :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 14:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071420.n07EKsBT032057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 15:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071515.n07FFbF7028261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 15:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071540.n07Fe0IB017499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 15:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071554.n07FsxFJ005127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 Teemu Rytilahti <tpr at d5k.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 15:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479147] New: Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program Message-ID: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 Summary: Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tpr at d5k.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is my first package to Fedora and I'm seeking for someone to sponsor it. Spec URL: http://stetson.frozenhat.fi/~tpr/fedora/skanlite.spec SRPM URL: http://stetson.frozenhat.fi/~tpr/fedora/skanlite-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Skanlite is a light-weight scanning application based on libksane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 16:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071604.n07G4NVe007564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-07 11:04:22 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk-4.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk.spec Fixed it, but now it complains that the ruby lib is unstripped. I don't see anything in the ruby packaging guidelines that would help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 16:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071610.n07GA3pj009063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 --- Comment #1 from Teemu Rytilahti <tpr at d5k.net> 2009-01-07 11:10:02 EDT --- rpmlint output: --------------- /home/rpmbuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/skanlite-0.2-1.fc11.i386.rpm /usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:16: DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. import popen2 skanlite.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common skanlite.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 16:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: <bug-470914-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470914-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071650.n07GoLEY017190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 --- Comment #2 from Anthony Green <green at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 11:50:20 EDT --- Thanks for taking the time to review this. (In reply to comment #1) > > License: LGPLv2+ > > Web page says "Licensed under the GPL v2 or later for now". > File COPYING contains the GPL v2. > Only a few source files contain a LGPL header. > This suggests the project is: > > => License: GPLv2+ Fixed. > > > > Summary: An LV2 host library > > Suggest dropping the "An ". > Fixed. > > > %description devel > > slv2-devel contains the headers and development libraries for slv2. > > Suggest > "This package contains the headers and development libraries for SLV2." > for consistency and to avoid repeating the pkg name. > Fixed. > > > %files > > %doc AUTHORS COPYING README > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %defattr ought to be moved one line up. > Fixed. > > > %{_libdir}/*.a > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries > > Fixed. > * The slv2.pc pkg-config file adds a redundant -L/usr/lib -lrdf from redland.pc > Not fixed yet. > > * 0.6.2 is available (still marked unstable, though) > I haven't updated version. > > * Run-time warning (in src/world.c) about Redland librdf not being new enough: > > $ lv2_list > Warning: Unable to create "trees" RDF storage. > Performance can be improved by upgrading librdf. > I'll look at librdf. > > * src/world.c contains hardcoded /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib paths > also on 64-bit platforms! > Fixed with perl in %prep section. > > * The only real blockers: > * licence > * static lib > * hardcoded lib paths Thanks. New versions here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/slv2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/slv2-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 17:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071723.n07HNhA2006130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #15 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-07 12:23:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #9) > > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-.-en-US.spec > > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-.-en-US-1.0-5.src.rpm > > Erm, -.- is not good. > > Does publican generate the spec file? It can. The spec file that I have listed is the one that is generated by publican. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 17:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071729.n07HTtQZ007224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #16 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-07 12:29:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Still no changelog in .spec and what about the .desktop file? Apparently this is being addressed in the latest version of publican. Still waiting to see the update, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 17:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071754.n07HsEkN029306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-07 12:54:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Would it be okay without them? I wouldn't like to .. may be later on in case > administrators bug me. I selected it from security spin wish list. What you > suggest ? I guess you can add scripts later. Anyway a sysvinit script would be nice. -This package contains flare binary that is not free and cannot be shipped in Fedora. You need to remove this before packaging, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071805.n07I534H031839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas <opensource at till.name> 2009-01-07 13:05:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > -This package contains flare binary that is not free and cannot be shipped in > Fedora. You need to remove this before packaging, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code The URL does not cover binaries: | Some upstream packages include patents or trademarks that we are not allowed to | ship even as source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225955] Merge Review: jwhois In-Reply-To: <bug-225955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8s0F015172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225955 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: <bug-434973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-434973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IA75d017037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: <bug-176581-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-176581-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8l4W015003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396511] Review Request: webcpp - Convert C++ code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-396511-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-396511-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9VYl015938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396511 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: <bug-442522-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442522-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAksh017940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: <bug-273841-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-273841-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9AWt015510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398591] Review Request: amoebax - Action-Puzzle Game In-Reply-To: <bug-398591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-398591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9XAN015972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398591 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396121] Review Request: cfitsio - Library for working with data files in FITS data In-Reply-To: <bug-396121-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-396121-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9TuI015878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396121 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 388981] Review Request: libnss-mysql - NSS library for MySQL In-Reply-To: <bug-388981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-388981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9QZ8015828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388981 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: <bug-317101-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-317101-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9Gnw015644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: <bug-433312-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433312-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IA0k3016586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438635] Review Request: spacechart - A 3D star-mapping program In-Reply-To: <bug-438635-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438635-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IANXo017405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438635 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: <bug-427027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-427027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9iG0016269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437397] Review Request: pmtools - power management debugging tools In-Reply-To: <bug-437397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-437397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAHgx017265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437397 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-443926-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-443926-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAllN017973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: <bug-427093-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-427093-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9loH016329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 396131] Review Request: munipack - MuniPack is a CCD photometry package In-Reply-To: <bug-396131-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-396131-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9Uw8015910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396131 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: <bug-442299-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442299-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAhni017868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: <bug-345261-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-345261-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9Mx3015740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: <bug-433642-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433642-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IA1O1016619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: <bug-442263-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442263-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAgtH017838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: <bug-432265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-432265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9tfh016506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244123] Review Request: cvsplot - Collect statistics from CVS controlled files In-Reply-To: <bug-244123-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-244123-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I92rE015330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244123 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: <bug-427061-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-427061-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9jOT016300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: <bug-441805-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-441805-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAdeO017784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: <bug-241757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-241757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8xm0015277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437400] Review Request: msr-tools - tools to read/write processor model specific registers In-Reply-To: <bug-437400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-437400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAJt5017304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437400 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435064] Review Request: midisport-firmware - firmware files for M-Audio/Midiman USB MIDI and Audio devices In-Reply-To: <bug-435064-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-435064-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IA8kk017073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435064 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409281] Review Request: rmap - Rmap is a package that is able to generate images of the earth from a distance In-Reply-To: <bug-409281-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-409281-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9bTC016078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409281 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: xyz-gallery - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: <bug-261801-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-261801-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I99jE015465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: <bug-229391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-229391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8vAe015241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374771] Review Request: smstools - Tools for send and receive short messages through GSM modems or mobile phones In-Reply-To: <bug-374771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-374771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9NCa015774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374771 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399341] Review Request: Nightfall - Nightfall is an astronomy application for emulation of eclipsing stars In-Reply-To: <bug-399341-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-399341-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I9Yg6016005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399341 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436340] Review Request: ggobi - Open source visualization for exploring high-dimensional data In-Reply-To: <bug-436340-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-436340-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IACF0017137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436340 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-441699-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-441699-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071810.n07IAcMs017750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:09:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: <bug-243955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-243955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071809.n07I90Il015300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071814.n07IEtc2019794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 13:14:54 EDT --- There is a good reason for using slightly different flags and -O3 doesn't make debugging harder (where does this myth come from?). And it makes a difference for code with is vectorizable. This is the case here, this is purely mathematical code which can be optimized well by the compiler. Insisting on the rules is certainly a good thing, in general. But I know what I'm doing, I know which gcc options can benefit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071838.n07IcZAG024692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-07 13:38:33 EDT --- I do not think think this binary can be shipped with fedora and has to be treated as prohibited source, but we can always ask legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071852.n07IqGxP027716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-07 13:52:14 EDT --- No matter whether flare-dist/flare is binary or not, as flare-dist/LICENSE.TXT says this part is definitely NON-FREE (Redistribution is solely for non-commercial purposes), this part cannot be shipped (even if in srpm form) in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 19:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071900.n07J0oI7011229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 14:00:48 EDT --- NON-FREE stuff. Cannot be shipped in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 19:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071909.n07J9UcM012793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-07 14:09:29 EDT --- Ah.. is flare-dist/ part really needed for this package? I tried to rebuild your latest srpm, however for me this part does not seem to be used. If not needed, you can - remove flare-dist part - repackage tarball - and use the repackaged tarball as Fedora source tarball (as Lucian said in comment 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 19:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: <bug-473718-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473718-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071907.n07J7XFh012517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-07 14:07:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > BTW, your cvs requests for perl packages recently don't seem to have perl-sig > as a CC. Is that an oversight? If you want me to go back and add that to a list > of packages, just email me the request. Ugh, thanks for pointing that out. Seems like my script slipped a bit there; I'll go poke around and generate a list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 19:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: <bug-473718-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473718-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071908.n07J8K7T012605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-07 14:08:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 19:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071917.n07JHPJN000416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 14:17:24 EDT --- I took this package from security spin wish list and don't have much interest (on a personal note) because I don't use it. Anyway I will have a re-look. Thanks all for pointing put issues. I will bump with changes soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 19:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901071917.n07JHbih000598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072010.n07KAsCx011765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-07 15:10:53 EDT --- Oh, and line 72, you might want to replace ".so.4" with ".so.*" so that your spec doesn't need to be updated when the SONAME gets bumped upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072010.n07KAklT011734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 15:10:45 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072009.n07K9unR011327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 15:09:54 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072009.n07K9oPs011272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-07 15:09:49 EDT --- Some more comments: - Should this be System Environment/Libraries (and not Development/Libraries)? - Line 46 of the spec has a tab instead of spaces. - Line 61 should be %{cmake} . (sets everything automatically). - Line 72, the mode should be 755 not 644. Rpm only strips 755 files when looking for debuginfo, this is why you are getting the warnings about unstripped binaries. - Line 88, you should use %{_libdir} instead of /usr/lib - Line 93, this should be "%{_includedir}/chipmunk" not "%{_includedir}/chipmunk/*.h" (the latter leaves an unowned directory). - Line 87, should be "...*.so.*" (as opposed to "...*.so*"). This is because un-suffixed .so files belong in the -devel package. - Add %{_libdir}/*.so to %files devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072014.n07KEs37026601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072048.n07KmZn7018625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-07 15:48:34 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk-4.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk.spec Addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072055.n07Ktki2019971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-07 15:55:45 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072100.n07L0tDj020911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-07 16:00:54 EDT --- Um, oops, this doesn't build in mock yet: 447 Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: 448 /usr/lib/libchipmunk.a 449 /usr/lib/libchipmunk.so 450 /usr/lib/libchipmunk.so.4 It seems that your package is somehow installing libraries to /usr/lib instead of %{_libdir}; please fix this before importing it to CVS. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072102.n07L2qKS003223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-07 16:02:51 EDT --- Excellent, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chipmunk Short Description: A rigid body physics library Owners: limb Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:10:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072110.n07LApkT004750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-07 16:10:50 EDT --- Will do, good catch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072113.n07LDqTY005147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-07 16:13:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review Marek; Thanks for CVS Kevin. Imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072130.n07LUGsr008306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-07 16:30:16 EDT --- Weird, my mock build works. Macros seem ok, I'll see what happened after import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072141.n07Lfw4L028232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:41:57 EDT --- perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072142.n07Lg13b028261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:42:01 EDT --- perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072149.n07LnhJA011612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:49:42 EDT --- linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072151.n07LpU8k012477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072150.n07LojVj012249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072150.n07LoOK6012131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:50:23 EDT --- python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-repoze-tm2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072150.n07LoAuP011983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:50:09 EDT --- python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-tm2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0290 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072149.n07Lnt0D029656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:49:54 EDT --- python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072151.n07LpZox030494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:51:34 EDT --- moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072150.n07LogLm030206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:50:40 EDT --- ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some kind of car across the moon In-Reply-To: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072152.n07LqDDq030628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:52:12 EDT --- moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072149.n07Lnjc3029615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072149.n07Lnw6S029694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072151.n07LpQqL030450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Bug 452413 depends on bug 476374, which changed state. Bug 476374 Summary: Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:51:24 EDT --- bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072151.n07LpvRZ012781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:51:56 EDT --- bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478368-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072153.n07Lr2oP013043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:53:01 EDT --- linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476374-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072152.n07LqfQt012991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:52:39 EDT --- python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: <bug-476474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072152.n07LqlpY030989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:52:46 EDT --- ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072158.n07LwYXF014122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:58:34 EDT --- rfdump-1.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rfdump-1.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 21:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072158.n07LwVYj032004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 16:58:30 EDT --- rfdump-1.6-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rfdump-1.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 22:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072207.n07M7lw7016207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 17:07:46 EDT --- guiloader-c++-2.12.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guiloader-c++-2.12.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 22:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072216.n07MGRxf017903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 Bug 477520 depends on bug 477515, which changed state. Bug 477515 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 17:16:26 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 22:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072216.n07MGU7C003171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 17:16:30 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 22:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: <bug-457325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072218.n07MI3Ht003312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-07 17:18:02 EDT --- Marek please import and build this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 23:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072335.n07NZSAD017740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-07 18:35:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Weird, my mock build works. Macros seem ok, I'll see what happened after > import. I'm on x86_64. %{_libdir} != /usr/lib here, which is why rpmbuild (on x86_64) catches it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 23:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901072352.n07Nqwjm020590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(paul at all-the-john | |sons.co.uk) --- Comment #15 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 18:52:56 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 00:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479004] Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents In-Reply-To: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080021.n080LK0L008069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-07 19:21:19 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) => see also note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: c4a009fa9448c50432353e87aeb2f1c17009b9c0 SVG-Parser-1.03.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Note 1: It wopuld be nice if you could persuade the author to include the license info in the source code, not just in the separate README. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 00:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479004] Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents In-Reply-To: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080041.n080fTif028869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-07 19:41:28 EDT --- Thanks a lot for review, Wolfy! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SVG-Parser Short Description: XML Parser for SVG documents Owners: lkundrak Branches: (just devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 00:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: <bug-471275-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471275-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080046.n080kPZD012068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-07 19:46:24 EDT --- Marek please import and build this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 00:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080050.n080oBDg012784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 00:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080048.n080m5Yn012315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-07 19:48:04 EDT --- For some reason I thought a complete review was already being done on this. Taking it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 00:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: CWIRC - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080052.n080qXIt013266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(randyn3lrx at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-07 19:52:30 EDT --- Randall, can we see anything else that you have done related to Fedora Packaging ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 01:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080102.n0812sZV015228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #6 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-07 20:02:52 EDT --- It's wierd... The error on ppc seems to come from a compiler flag only present on one of the libraries, and not the others. I think I've fixed it, please re-download the files: Spec URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.4-1.fc10.src.rpm About %check, I've enabled a more verbose output to figure out what's going on there... the same code has compiled & tested OK on all platforms in Debian & Ubuntu autobuild machines, so I have no idea what's wrong here... If the more verbose output does not give any clue, I think the %check section could be removed as the last choice. Regards, JL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 02:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080221.n082L8iE012758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 21:21:05 EDT --- Hmm, well there is no need to wait for publican to improve its default .spec files. It will not be possible to use it post review anyway since the spec file needs to carry changelog info and the release number will be bumped the package is rebuilt/updated etc. If want this review to move ahead you need to start incorporating the suggestions made above so far. If you are able to do that then I am willing to offer to sponsor you pending the successful completion of this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 02:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080226.n082Qg9q013677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-07 21:26:41 EDT --- I forgot to use the dist tag in the release field of my scratch build yesterday - here is a better spec to fix that: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-en-US.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 03:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080321.n083LjhY022768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-07 22:21:44 EDT --- Before I check your srpm: Please change the release number every time you modify your srpm/spec to avoid confusion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 03:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:44:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects Message-ID: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Flexible OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: If you have ever had to use a program that made you type in the date a certain way and thought "Why can't the computer just figure out what date I wanted?", this module is for you. DateTime::Format::Flexible attempts to take any string you give it and parse it into a DateTime object. The test file tests 2500+ variations of date/time strings. If you can think of any that I do not cover, please let me know. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1039483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 03:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080347.n083lQ5C009737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #4 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-07 22:47:25 EDT --- - Removed age support (Note, I still support aix4.1 and RH7.3, but can keep those off the main trunk) - I like to put macros like %version at the top where they are easily changed. However, that is not needed in this case - so they are now removed. - I did follow the sourceforge hosting instructions. Oh - Fedora doesn't like the sf.net shortcut. Fixed. * added BuildRequires: ed * the whole point of this package is the C module. It builds for me on Fedora 9 (and RH5.2 and RH7.3 and AIX4.1). I guess I need to learn to use this koji thing now to see the problem for myself. I followed the koji link you provided, and it is for a mrpt package, not pymilter. However, I see that the failure is for Fedora 11, so I assume that the build failed for Fedora 11. This is almost certainly due to libmilter.a. I've had to file that bug for RH73, and Centos4 and Centos5. I guess it isn't obvious to the sendmail packagers that libmilter is very often used in dynamically loaded modules (for Perl, Python, and other scripting languages). But I can only test on F9 at the moment. - I added %dir %{python_sitelib}/Milter and %dir %{libdir} so that directories under sitelib are owned correctly. - Hmm, the "start.sh" file is not a config file per se. It is a glue file that it is sometimes useful for an admin to be able to modify and not have updates wipe out his changes. It really doesn't belong in etc. If it is really a problem, I will simply remove the %config tag for Fedora. Note that this package doesn't have any config files, and the start.sh glue file is for the convenience of applications that use the pymilter library. What is really needed is a python module to "run as a service" with pid file, etc. New SRPM is: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080416.n084GspL032160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:16:53 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: <bug-474843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084HM0b032263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:17:21 EDT --- pdfbook-20070930-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084H3Ra032225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080416.n084GuYT032190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080416.n084Gpg8032135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:16:50 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084HSiL014518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:17:28 EDT --- perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476386-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084H00f014389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:17:00 EDT --- perl-Verilog-3.100-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: <bug-474843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084HDQW014453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:17:12 EDT --- pdfbook-20070930-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: <bug-469897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080418.n084Iu15014887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:18:55 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: <bug-469897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084HZLC014548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:17:34 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080418.n084Ir7X014861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:18:52 EDT --- guiloader-c++-2.12.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update guiloader-c++'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084H8Sv014424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:17:07 EDT --- rfdump-1.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rfdump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0312 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: <bug-474843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084HGVY014484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080419.n084JTMK000356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:19:29 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: <bug-469897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080417.n084Hcw7032419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080419.n084J6UJ032766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:19:06 EDT --- rfdump-1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rfdump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0324 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080419.n084J2EF032742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-07 23:19:01 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 05:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:50:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080550.n085olNA029091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 00:50:46 EDT --- unhide-1.0-2.fc10.20080519 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unhide-1.0-2.fc10.20080519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 05:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080551.n085pidC029213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 00:51:44 EDT --- unhide-1.0-2.fc9.20080519 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unhide-1.0-2.fc9.20080519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 05:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects In-Reply-To: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080557.n085vY7U029989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-08 00:57:33 EDT --- This package is a prereq of perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 05:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479223] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats Message-ID: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-DateParse/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module is a DateTime compatibility wrapper around Date::Parse; it allows one to easily parse formats Date::Parse recognises for DateTime. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1039635 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 06:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 01:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080651.n086pMXR024222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #15 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-08 01:51:21 EDT --- Please put a small note in the spec file explaining O3 preference. All rest of the %optflags are honoured except "-g". Stripping out "-g" will result in an incomplete -debuginfo package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080705.n0875I99008736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] New: Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin Message-ID: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All URL: http://freshmeat.net/projects/pidgin-pp/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora pidgin privacy please is a pidgin plugin to stop spammers from annoying you. You can block messages from certain users, block messages from people who are not on your contact list, and suppress repeated authorization requests. Optionally, senders of blocked messages can be notified with an auto-reply. SPEC : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/pidgin-privacy-please.spec RPMS (i386) : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/i386/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/i386/pidgin-privacy-please-debuginfo-0.5.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm RPMS (x86_64) : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/x86_64/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/x86_64/pidgin-privacy-please-debuginfo-0.5.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm SRPMS : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Commment : rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:06:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080706.n0876knw008939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #16 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 02:06:45 EDT --- Indeed, -g has been filtered out. I missed that, sorry. I fixed it and added a comment: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 08:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 03:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: <bug-465943-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-465943-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080850.n088ocL1011750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 03:50:36 EDT --- Its built in koji for rawhide/F-10/F-9 so closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 09:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 04:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901080930.n089UWX1020162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-08 04:30:31 EDT --- I'm switching the review flag on again, because this package should not have passed. It is causing broken deps in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20090108/logs/depcheck screenie-1.30.0-2.fc11.noarch requires awk This is due to a bogus "Requires: awk". There is no such package in the Fedora collection, there is only "gawk". and I'm surprised that this wasn't picked up here, it suggests that maybe an install attempt was never made. Actually it seems to be a reviewer error from comment #1, suggesting "awk" rather than "gawk". Nevertheless the packager should have verified that it installed on their local system before applying a suggested "Requires". Please fix in rawhide (and in pending bodhi requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 10:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 05:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: <bug-471275-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471275-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081002.n08A2qP0026869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 05:02:51 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, done. Thank you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 10:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 05:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081038.n08AcjTf016675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #17 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-08 05:38:44 EDT --- Thanks for the update. Expect an formal review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 11:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 06:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081121.n08BLIoG011133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-01-08 06:21:17 EDT --- A quick note: Version number is incorrect, since you are using a SVN snapshot. Is there any reason for this? You can obtain a stable release at e.g. ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.1.3/src/extragear/skanlite-0.2-kde4.1.3.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 11:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 06:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081122.n08BMvRx026062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-08 06:22:56 EDT --- Thanks for pointing this out. This is my fault. The reviewer discovered the issue and I fixed it the wrong way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 11:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 06:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: <bug-477199-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477199-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081134.n08BYdLP028118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 --- Comment #6 from Ngo Than <than at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 06:34:38 EDT --- >! License is listed as GPLv2+, should list "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" because the >client library is LGPLv2+, otherwise OK it's fixed in new package >* Should polkit-kde-authorization appear in the menu as a standalone app or is >it enough to have it in systemsettings? (IMHO the latter, but there _is_ a >standalone executable provided by upstream.) it shouldn't appear in the menu. The polkit-kde-authorization should be started on demand. The another setting tool should be in systemsettings. >* Do we really want to ship a -devel package right now when there are no >installed headers yet? (Not that it will matter in the long term as a public >API is planned.) imo it doesn't make sense to ship the devel package that only has the symlink and there are installed headers yet. New package doesn't include -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 11:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 06:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081155.n08BtVqO000304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 06:55:29 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ratproxy.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ratproxy-1.51-3.fc10.src.rpm Somebody interested in review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 11:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 06:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: <bug-477199-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477199-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081159.n08BxH9m018420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-08 06:59:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PolicyKit-kde Short Description: PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop Owners: than rdieter kkofler ltinkl jreznik arbiter Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: tuxbrewr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: CWIRC - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081202.n08C2l3o019495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|needinfo?(randyn3lrx at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #8 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 07:02:44 EDT --- 3 reviews so far: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 1 reviewed and approved package that I am currently trying to get to work on 64 bit but so far have been unsuccessful. Koji won't build it on 64 bit. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Sponsor no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478534] Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-478534-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478534-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081214.n08CE5nD004013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478534 Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 07:14:03 EDT --- I've contacted upstream. He will change the name in a few month. I'll open a news review after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:41:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081241.n08Cf4CD009863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-08 07:41:03 EDT --- Just some comment on your spec file Preserving the time stamps in the %install section would be nice. make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" if possible Shouldn't the URL better be http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-privacy-please/ and Source0: http://pidgin-privacy-please.googlecode.com/files/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2.tar.gz than pointing to freshmeat? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: <bug-470914-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470914-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081237.n08CbYwf009033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-08 07:37:32 EDT --- > perl in %prep section. Works with this release, but is fragile. It bears the risk of replacing /usr/lib64 with /usr/lib6464 in future upgrades, for example. You could avoid that by handling the slash after /usr/lib and /usr/local appropriately in the match and replacement (if not using a more complex sed/perl expr). Typically, a patch (and optionally a guard in %prep) is safer. * slv2-devel is missing Requires: lv2core-devel redland-devel for include statements in lv2_ui.h and world.h That's easy to add in pkg cvs, though. * APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081238.n08CcLwk027396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081250.n08Coo4Q011952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-08 07:50:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429435] Review Request: gnubversion - Gnome interface to Subversion In-Reply-To: <bug-429435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081249.n08CnXAZ011362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429435 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-08 07:49:29 EDT --- The issue discussed above was fixed by moving the library, given a consensus was reached by developers on #fedora-devel which were presented this bug, that made me confident using libdir is a more correct solution to the problem than rpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: <bug-458440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081251.n08CpuwF030224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-08 07:51:53 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: <bug-226358-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226358-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081256.n08Cuqb1013163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sandmann at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-08 07:56:50 EDT --- I guess the owner is Soren Sandmann Pedersen. Added as cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 12:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: CWIRC - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081257.n08CvxZL013348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-08 07:57:58 EDT --- Confirmed, said his sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 13:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081300.n08D0iRH032242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-08 08:00:42 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream: 1844a6e3f03f585dbc8bcc3eaacf66b9 pfscalibration-1.4.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. -O3 preference was explained in specfile -g is now present, debuginfo package complete. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: pfscalibration = 1.4-4.fc10 pfscalibration(x86-64) = 1.4-4.fc10 = /bin/bash /usr/bin/perl dcraw jhead libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgomp.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpfs-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) perl perl(Getopt::Long) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. N/A owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. remove duplicated %doc at the end of %files section. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 13:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: CWIRC - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081318.n08DIPfp018744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-08 08:18:24 EDT --- heh, I was waiting for input in order to sponsor Randall :) Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9cc6426b3f3d7cddf8961151c01722b6360b01e5 cwirc-2.0.0.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 / F7/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described (on F7/x86_64) [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 13:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081326.n08DQL23006633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #15 from Julio Cezar <watchman7 at bol.com.br> 2009-01-08 08:26:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > ping? pong. What can i do to be the Package Maintainer for this package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 13:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081341.n08DfQin010139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-08 08:41:24 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk-4.1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk.spec How does this work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 13:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081347.n08Dlb5L026271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 08:47:36 EDT --- nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 13:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:50:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081350.n08DonMc012347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 08:50:47 EDT --- nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: <bug-226510-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226510-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081405.n08E5NwK030756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #11 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 09:05:21 EDT --- > rpmlint with udev-135-3 of rawhide: > > udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-pnp > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here this file contains an alias which is missing in the kernel > > udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm rm is really needed > udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. this service is _always_ needed > > udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. this service is _always_ needed > > udev.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name udev-post > The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or > one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. ok, I screwed up, when I named the service > > libudev-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libudev/libudev-libs/liblibudev > 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. the devel package depends on libudev0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478773] Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit In-Reply-To: <bug-478773-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478773-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081407.n08E7csl016548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081407.n08E7dRh016582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Bug 478846 depends on bug 478773, which changed state. Bug 478773 Summary: Review Request: cdk - Curses Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478773 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: <bug-226510-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226510-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081412.n08ECnNY032363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-08 09:12:48 EDT --- Ok, I'd put comments on these in the spec, with the exception of service-enabled-default, for which you should file a bug against rpmlint for an exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469843-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081415.n08EFjWx000773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081426.n08EQGCS020852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(paul at all-the-john | |sons.co.uk) | --- Comment #16 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-08 09:26:13 EDT --- I went through the outstanding issues and corrected the package according to Guidelines, since the maintainer seemed irresponsive. David, please pay more attention to reviews, ask your sponsor or #fedora-devel if you are unsure about something. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081429.n08ETK8k021408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: <bug-469969-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469969-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081429.n08ETMCc021471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 Bug 469969 depends on bug 469972, which changed state. Bug 469972 Summary: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 14:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:29:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: <bug-462181-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462181-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081429.n08ETLVP021439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Bug 462181 depends on bug 469972, which changed state. Bug 469972 Summary: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: <bug-457325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081512.n08FCBE9032402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: <bug-462181-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462181-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081513.n08FDpET016587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-08 10:13:49 EDT --- Imported; build pending. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081523.n08FNTHj002627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 10:23:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pfscalibration Short Description: Scripts and programs for photometric calibration Owners: drepper at redhat.com Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: <bug-451189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081551.n08FpFkZ026147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 10:51:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081558.n08FwTtQ027990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-08 10:58:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328474) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328474) Fix the std{in,out,err} openness test Much better than initial package; thanks for the patches! Upstream may be interested in them as well! 1.) Useless requires Requires: cracklib Requires: gpgme Requires: cdk Requires: dotconf Requires: ncurses Requires: libxml2 >= 2.6.16 Requires: zlib All these are useless please remove them. They appropriate dependnecies are generated automatically. 2.) You don't use optflags. Marek! What a shame! The culprit is CFLAGS= that you pass to %configure which uses its CFLAGS=. Please change it to CPPFLAGS! Once FORTIFY_SOURCE is in effect it will reveal that you use open() incorrectly. I attached a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081625.n08GPpPT002746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 11:25:49 EDT --- :) Thank you for comments, I belive all is fixed now. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm-0.23-0.1.beta.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: <bug-466301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081644.n08Gi9E7022566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 11:44:08 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235111] Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-235111-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-235111-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081646.n08GkxqE007885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235111 Nuno Santos <nsantos at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Nuno Santos <nsantos at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 11:46:58 EDT --- No longer relevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: <bug-459675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081648.n08GmGgN008074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) | --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 11:48:13 EDT --- Closing as NOTABUG. Also I removed my sponsorship on you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: <bug-280751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-280751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081651.n08GpSnb024353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 Karel Voln? <kvolny at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Karel Voln? <kvolny at redhat.com> 2009-01-08 11:51:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qmmp New Branches: EL-5 Owners: kvolny -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: CWIRC - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081701.n08H1AuG010973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 12:01:07 EDT --- Thanks Wolfy! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cwirc Short Description: An xchat plugin for sending and receiving morse code over IRC Owners: dp67 Branches: F-9, F-10, devel InitialCC: dp67 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081700.n08H0pbW026322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 12:00:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081659.n08Gxxuq025819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 11:59:57 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 16:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081658.n08GwQcB025593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 11:58:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > * the whole point of this package is the C module. It builds for me on Fedora > 9 (and RH5.2 and RH7.3 and AIX4.1). I guess I need to learn to use this koji > thing now to see the problem for myself. > I followed the koji link you > provided, and it is for a mrpt package, not pymilter. Oops, sorry. your -2 srpm fails to build due to the same reason: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1040488 > However, I see that the > failure is for Fedora 11, so I assume that the build failed for Fedora 11. Also fails on F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1040512 > This is almost certainly due to libmilter.a. I've had to file that bug for > RH73, and Centos4 and Centos5. I guess it isn't obvious to the sendmail > packagers that libmilter is very often used in dynamically loaded modules (for > Perl, Python, and other scripting languages). But I can only test on F9 at the > moment. So would you file a new bug against sendmain about -fPIC issue on libmilter.a (and post this bug a number you filed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: CWIRC - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081701.n08H1fQP011077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081701.n08H1tAf011284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081701.n08H1uHp011309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Bug 475017 depends on bug 474982, which changed state. Bug 474982 Summary: Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081716.n08HGZO1014682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 12:16:34 EDT --- Please also rebuild this package on F-10/11, and for F-10 please submit a request on bodhi to push the rebuilt package into repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081713.n08HDVJ5029221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 12:13:30 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081715.n08HFPb3029758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-08 12:15:24 EDT --- Just a few notes, most of them not serious: 1.) Is this needed? # We don't use any of this. Deleting it so the debuginfo doesn't pick it up. rm -rf source/Irrlicht/jpeglib source/Irrlicht/zlib I think the debuginfo is generated only from files that have an actual reference in dwarf debugging information in binaries 2.) Preserve timestamps for i in include/*.h doc/upgrade-guide.txt source/Irrlicht/*.cpp source/Irrlicht/*.h source/Irrlicht/libpng/*.c source/Irrlicht/libpng/*.h; do sed -i 's/\r//' $i chmod -x $i done I think sed -i modifies a timestamp. I think you should care about keeping the timestamp at least in doc file, to prevent a multilib conflict between the file in packages of different architectures, but, well, I am not quite sure... 3.) You could improve the legibility of your SPEC file cd source/Irrlicht ... make INSTALL_DIR=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} install cd ../.. This could be just make -C source/Irrlicht INSTALL_DIR=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} install 4.) Please use system libpng. While image handling libraries are frequently prone to security vulnerabilities [1], it's probably not a problem for our irrlicht's embedded one since it only reads trusted images. Still, code duplication is bad, please get libpng fixed at least in rawhide. [1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=libpng 5.) The license does not seem to be GPLv2+ Short look at the top of ./include/irrlicht.h gives me an impression this is not exactly GPLv2+. Seems like zlib license. The last paragraph (after 3.) seems to suggest something like an advertising clause for IJG code, but I think it is not applicable for this package since we link against external libjpeg, right? You'll definitely know better. * builds fine in mock * optflags used correctly - license (see above) * rpmlint silent * spec file clean and legible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081733.n08HXjcm001015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #16 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-08 12:33:44 EDT --- Or rather, it expands to that on lib64 arches. But you get the idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081732.n08HWqQu000858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-08 12:32:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > %if "%{?_lib}" == "lib64" > %{cmake} -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 > %else > %{cmake} > %endif %{cmake} already expands to something like this: CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic}" ; export CFLAGS ; CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic}" ; export CXXFLAGS ; FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic}" ; export FFLAGS ; /usr/bin/cmake \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 \ -DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/include \ -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 \ -DSYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/etc \ -DSHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr/share \ %if "lib64" == "lib64" -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 \ %endif -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON So I think what is passed to cmake is not the problem. As a "hack" solution you could move stuff from /usr/lib to %{_libdir} in %install, or else fix the CMakeLists.txt files. But this is already approved and you will have trouble building in koji until this is fixed anyways, so no need to check back in with me unless you want help :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081745.n08Hjusi003471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081745.n08HjCdM003365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 12:45:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - For rpmlint issue: > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/progressbar.py 0644 > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > If this script is not meant to be executed directory by user > > (i.e. is meant loaded by other applications, for example), usually > > this script should not have shebang. > > I noticed this too, but I had a look at other packages which I have installed > (for example yum) and other package reviews and this seems to be quite common. > > The file contains tests, but is not executable because it is in /usr/lib/ Oh, actually this script is executable (this script contains __main__ section and actually python progressbar.py does some program). So this script should have 0755 permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081754.n08Hsd8H004946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 12:54:38 EDT --- I apologize, I convinced upstream to move to fedorahosted awhile ago and have been delaying repackaging, but finally did it. Spec is the same. SRPM is http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/python-ldaphelper-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Licensing is clarified to be either license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081800.n08I0wS5023465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #25 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-08 13:00:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Will proceed with the review (reviewing -bad as well) once I could actually > install the whole thing. I commented on the twisted-web2 review asking if you > could upload the twisted-core package you used for building -web2. All requirements are now in F-9 and F-10 too. Testing for the review should be very easy now! Michel : Could you resume the review? TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: <bug-438609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081758.n08Hwx94005892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-08 12:58:57 EDT --- All requirements are now in F-9 and F-10 too. Testing for the review should be very easy now! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:05:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:05:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081805.n08I5uu4007728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://freshmeat.net/projec |http://code.google.com/p/pi |ts/pidgin-pp/ |dgin-privacy-please/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: <bug-253355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081808.n08I8trX025175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #13 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-08 13:08:52 EDT --- Clearing whiteboard (forgot to do that before!) and assigning to myself for review. Luke : Could you please confirm that you are still interested in maintaining this package? And check + merge my changes if they look okay to you. I'll then proceed to the formal review. If you are no longer interested, I'd be willing to become the maintainer as long as someone else is wanting to the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081829.n08ITZpp012490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 13:29:34 EDT --- For 0.7-4: * SourceURL - I recommend to use %{name} and %{version}, especially %{version}. With this you probably won't have to change the source URL when version is updated: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * Tarball - By the way the tarball I could download from the Source URL differs from what in your srpm: -------------------------------------------------------------- 716370 2007-06-12 03:27 downloaded/jpcap-0.7.tar.gz 715154 2009-01-06 15:51 jpcap-0.7-4.fc10.src/jpcap-0.7.tar.gz -------------------------------------------------------------- (If there is CRLF line terminators difference, please don't fix this in advance but fix CRLF terminators at %prep) * Requires - "Requires: libpcap" is not needed. rpmbuild detects libraries related dependencies automatically (in this case libpcap.so.0.9 on F-11) and adds the dependencies to binary rpms. * JAVA_HOME - There is %java_home macro and you can use it - By the way you may want to use %ant macro instead (please try $ rpm --eval %ant) * Build failure/optflags - Your srpm fails to build on x86_64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1038602 This is because C codes are not compiled with -fPIC. Also Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags For this package --------------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} CC="gcc %{optflags} -fPIC" --------------------------------------------------------------- seems to work. * Don't strip binaries - Please don't strip binaries. Debug information is required to create debuginfo rpm correctly (i.e. rpmbuild properly handles this: also please make sure that binaries are compiled with -g -- %{optflags} contains this) * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{_libdir}/%{name} itself is not yet owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081834.n08IYREQ013785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081833.n08IXKP3013539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 13:33:19 EDT --- Correction apply. SPEC : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/pidgin-privacy-please.spec RPMS (i386) : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/i386/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10.i386.rpm http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/i386/pidgin-privacy-please-debuginfo-0.5.2-2.fc10.i386.rpm RPMS (x86_64) : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/x86_64/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/x86_64/pidgin-privacy-please-debuginfo-0.5.2-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm SRPMS : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081837.n08IbtA9031855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 13:37:54 EDT --- * rpmlint - Also fix these: ------------------------------------------------------------- W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/javadoc/jpcap/javadoc/package-list W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/javadoc/jpcap/javadoc/stylesheet.css ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081846.n08Ikv9P001624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 13:46:56 EDT --- Hi Christoph, are you going to sponsor Ant? By the way I am reviewing another review request by Ant (bug 475144 : metalink) and I guess this one (metalink) can be approved (with a little more fix if needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081851.n08IpLPD002671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 13:51:19 EDT --- Assigning. * A very minor issue - 0.3.6-2 %changelog entry contains ------------------------------------------------------------ - New version, 0.3.6-1 (not -2) ------------------------------------------------------------ Now I think this package can be approved, however as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket, I will discuss with Christoph. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 18:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081848.n08ImJYX017190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-08 13:48:18 EDT --- cpm.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/cpm-0.23/cpm.1.gz cpm.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/cpm.1.gz This file is included twice. Remove it from %doc Furthermore it is not a valid roff source to a manual page, but a formatted txt file which looks well when viewed as a manual page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:05:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081905.n08J5kp8006297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #4 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-08 14:05:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Oh, actually this script is executable (this script contains > __main__ section and actually python progressbar.py does some > program). So this script should have 0755 permission. I know. This is very common and opinions on how to handle this seem to be split. On my system I have 73 files like this in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages and subdirectories and only 10 are executable. In my opinion it is best to ignore rpmlint in this case. Fixing this just makes the %files section more complicated. But I am the Fedora beginner, so I trust you. I have updated the files: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/python-progressbar.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/python-progressbar-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081907.n08J7rhm007117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 14:07:52 EDT --- I had a detailed conversation with author and he an emplyee at an Institute which has a very long and tiring process of updating the site hosting the source file. The link to that page is: http://ltrc.iiit.net/showfile.php?filename=downloads/shabdanjali-stardict/index.html The source there contains a binary rpm which I have removed using a shell script and re-compressed the resulting stuff and included into package. The normal process of removing it will be too long, so this workaround. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/stardict-dic-hi.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/stardict-dic-hi-3.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081914.n08JEJUT009667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-08 14:14:18 EDT --- I think chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%python_sitelib/progressbar.py at %install is simpler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479147-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081917.n08JH6hT024815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 --- Comment #3 from Teemu Rytilahti <tpr at d5k.net> 2009-01-08 14:17:04 EDT --- You're correct, I was using SVN snapshot because I didn't knew that the packages do exist for extragear in KDE's ftp-site. Spec URL: http://stetson.frozenhat.fi/~tpr/fedora/skanlite.spec SRPM URL: http://stetson.frozenhat.fi/~tpr/fedora/skanlite-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output: --------------- /usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:16: DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. import popen2 skanlite.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv//common skanlite.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv//common skanlite.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk//common skanlite.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk//common skanlite.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt//common skanlite.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt//common skanlite.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common skanlite.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081935.n08JZjcd028982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #12 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 14:35:44 EDT --- Thank you. Apparently I updated the spec but didn't rebuild the srpm. SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/metalink/metalink-0.3.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081934.n08JYaj1028469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-08 14:34:35 EDT --- http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/spec/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class.spec http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10.src.rpm These now contain an extra file, 'FedoraLicense.txt' which is an email reply from the maintainer clarifying the license on SimpleDB.pm and promising to include a blurb within the file itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901081959.n08Jx6cC001174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #6 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-08 14:59:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think > chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%python_sitelib/progressbar.py > at %install is simpler. yes, much better to read too. cheers. Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/python-progressbar.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/python-progressbar-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 20:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082004.n08K4Yak002451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #8 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 15:04:33 EDT --- All right, done. Here are the new files then: Spec URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 20:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082027.n08KRaiO025652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-08 15:27:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/raidutils.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/raidutils-0.0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Slightly updated to auto-load the necessary module on boot (the tool won't work without /dev/i2octl present). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 20:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082034.n08KYnfp008826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #2 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 15:34:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1303751 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm I have tried to incorporate Mamoru's suggestions for my other package, where applicable here. I also added the Epiphany extension with a BuildRequires: epiphany-devel but without a Requires: epiphany is that the correct way to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 20:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082046.n08KkOsI029449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #6 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-08 15:46:22 EDT --- Looking at the logs for F10 and F11, it *does* build for i386. It is failing for x86_64. So apparently, only the x86_64 libmilter.a is missing the -fPIC. That makes more sense, and explains why "It Works for Me"(tm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 21:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082106.n08L652T001215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #7 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-08 16:06:04 EDT --- Reported bug for sendmail component: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479325 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 21:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082107.n08L7VmC001450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-08 16:07:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Christoph, are you going to sponsor Ant? Depends on the review here. (In reply to comment #2) > I also added the Epiphany extension with a > BuildRequires: epiphany-devel > > but without a > Requires: epiphany > > is that the correct way to do it? Nope. You should make a subpackage for the epiphany extension. Please have a look at my gwget spec if you need help with this: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/F-10/gwget.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 21:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082130.n08LUH5U006410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 16:30:16 EDT --- tcping-1.3.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcping-1.3.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 21:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: <bug-448122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-448122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082145.n08LjvfJ009821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lokthare at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #31 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> 2009-01-08 16:45:53 EDT --- Great. I have left fedora, but I can still do at least part of the review. However Jean-Fran?ois has to prepare a .src.rpm. Jean-Fran?ois did you package the latest version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:31:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082231.n08MVDSq018497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-08 17:31:12 EDT --- http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/screenie/devel/screenie.spec?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&pathrev=screenie-1_30_0-3_fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082233.n08MXUh5018782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 17:33:30 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/screenie-1.30.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082233.n08MXYvX000617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-08 17:33:33 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/screenie-1.30.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082256.n08MuJiX005201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-08 17:56:18 EDT --- [wolfy at wolfy2 tmp]$ wget http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Catalyst-Authent ication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10.src.rpm --00:55:45-- http://mirror.net.cmu.edu/gls/10/source/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Sto re-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10.src.rpm Resolving mirror.net.cmu.edu... 128.2.4.9 Connecting to mirror.net.cmu.edu|128.2.4.9|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 00:55:45 ERROR 403: Forbidden. chmod +r ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:54:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082254.n08MsfW5004534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 17:54:40 EDT --- Alright! Fixed all of those problems, and tested using koji on F10 and F11 (I didn't know I had the permissions to do so!) Uploaded new source rpm and new SPEC file to: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap-0.7-5.fc10.src.rpm and http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap.spec Moved the old versions to an archive (lost the jpcap spec file to 0.7-3 somehow), and symlinked the source rpm files jpcap-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm can be found: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm or http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/jpcap/0.7-3/jpcap-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm jpcap-0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm can be found: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap-0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm or http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/jpcap/0.7-4/jpcap-0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm jpcap-0.7-4 spec file can be found: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/jpcap/0.7-4/jpcap.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 23:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082300.n08N0DWI023974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #28 from Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net> 2009-01-08 18:00:09 EDT --- Ok, for me, the spec file is now ok. Just about the fontconf, change the "sans-serif" to "serif". I will test the building this week-end. I will surely approved this package on Sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 23:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901082331.n08NVf1m012198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #4 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 18:31:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I also added the Epiphany extension with a > > BuildRequires: epiphany-devel > > > > but without a > > Requires: epiphany > > > > is that the correct way to do it? > > Nope. You should make a subpackage for the epiphany extension. Please have a > look at my gwget spec if you need help with this: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/F-10/gwget.spec?view=markup Thank you, that more than helps! I've borrowed heavily from it. :) Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1303914 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Here is what rpmlint reports gget.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: W: no-documentation gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. The bad news: gget will not run for me now, either this new rpm or the old ones I made. I updated my system today, I wonder if that's the cause. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 00:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090017.n090HMMT005238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-08 19:17:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Here is what rpmlint reports > gget.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas > gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: W: no-documentation > gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. All these are save to ignore: gconf files are no config files, but rpmlint thinks so because they are in /etc. The epiphany-extension package needs no docs because they are in the main package. The last error is because it's a noarch python package and rpmlint expects some binaries. But now we have another problem: The package needs to be arch-dependent instead of noarch, at least the epiphany subpackage because %{_libdir}/epiphany/ depends on the installed architecture. > The bad news: gget will not run for me now, either this new rpm or the old ones > I made. I updated my system today, I wonder if that's the cause. No, it because gget can't find it's icon and crashes: $ gget Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gget", line 42, in <module> application.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gget/application.py", line 50, in run gtk.window_set_default_icon_list(*gui.get_icon_list([16, 22, 24, 32])) TypeError: icons must be GdkPixbufs This is because you are installing icons in /usr/share/icons/hicolor but you are not running gtk-update-icon-cache afterwards. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache You can remove the "%define epimajor 2.23" it's not really needed for your package. Using wildcards IMO is ok here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 03:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: <bug-459210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090320.n093KJrs003988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-08 22:20:13 EDT --- This is the final ping on this bug. If in one week time I get no reply, I am going to close this one as NOTABUG and reopen Bug 475852. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 03:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090348.n093mjTr024003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 22:48:42 EDT --- >So, please, resolve issue with third party libraries (I suspect that it even >builds against shipped boost) and I'll continue. I had a good interaction upstream(on ML as well as chat) regarding this. And they wanted the third part folder containing particular versions of few dependencies to be there for now, at least till major version change. I even packaged 1 of missing onces which I maintain now, but they were strickly against pointing to outside that third folder. All these are Free software, so I guess it should not be a problem. Putting an extra effort in modifying there build system and even if it works and later on we get bugs against which upstream refuses to except would be bad. So, I would like to keep this third folder till upstream wishes it be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090402.n0942DfD026542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rakesh.pandit at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 23:02:11 EDT --- I have dropped a mail upstream to get as much as things clear for licenses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090402.n09422B5026491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Bug 473723 depends on bug 473718, which changed state. Bug 473718 Summary: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-08 23:02:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328515) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328515) make test dies in pain, at least Term/Size.pm seems to be required but missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090402.n0942IGs011766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090424.n094OSJb016243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479325 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: <bug-226462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090437.n094bpBl020016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 23:37:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090439.n094duuZ002415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 23:39:55 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225908] Merge Review: iptstate In-Reply-To: <bug-225908-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225908-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090440.n094eXdO002872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225908 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(twoerner at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090440.n094exjq002970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pvrabec at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090439.n094dIGN002239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-08 23:39:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Well I'm looking to rpmlint output now. > > > W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile > > I think it's fine - these files are config files which SHOULD NOT be replaced > but are not located in /etc or /var. thats ok then. Do you got new package to complete review with fixes other issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090500.n0950CQX009174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-09 00:00:11 EDT --- Hrm. This appears to be perl-Data-TreeDumper's fault for not having Term::Size as a requires (it's not automagically being picked up). Updating and rebuilding there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090531.n095VH3X019393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:31:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: <bug-468806-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468806-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090527.n095Rj5b017941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:27:43 EDT --- Clearing the cvs flag here. Please reset if you need any cvsadmin attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:33:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090533.n095Xtf0020450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:33:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: <bug-477199-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477199-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090536.n095ahNu009628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:36:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090539.n095daEl010572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:39:34 EDT --- I don't see you in the packager group yet. Have you requested that yet? See step 4 under here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090543.n095hN4G012662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 459945 depends on bug 459944, which changed state. Bug 459944 Summary: Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:43:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: cwirc - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090545.n095jndc024769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: CWIRC - An |Review Request: cwirc - An |X Chat plugin to allow send |X Chat plugin to allow send |and receive morse code over |and receive morse code over |IRC |IRC Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:45:47 EDT --- cvs done. No need to set owner to initialcc, they already get the emails. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090550.n095oJNt015401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:50:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479113] Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090549.n095n4c1014764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479113 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:49:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479112] Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090548.n095mLh5014562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479112 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:48:20 EDT --- The package name here should be hyphen-id right? cvs done with that package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090554.n095sO2x016835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:54:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090556.n095uRrI017706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:56:26 EDT --- I assume the package here is 'libwpg' ? cvs done with that package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478780] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions In-Reply-To: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090558.n095wGi5029183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 00:58:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: <bug-280751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-280751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090605.n0965UPW020980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 01:05:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479004] Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents In-Reply-To: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090603.n0963i4F020194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-09 01:03:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090609.n0969TTr000523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #6 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-09 01:09:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Here is what rpmlint reports > > gget.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas > > gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: W: no-documentation > > gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. > > All these are save to ignore: gconf files are no config files, but rpmlint > thinks so because they are in /etc. The epiphany-extension package needs no > docs because they are in the main package. The last error is because it's a > noarch python package and rpmlint expects some binaries. Thanks, Christoph. Ok. > But now we have another problem: The package needs to be arch-dependent instead > of noarch, at least the epiphany subpackage because %{_libdir}/epiphany/ > depends on the installed architecture. I took out the noarch, because it wouldn't let me have a subpackage that was arch-dependent when the package was noarch. Do I need to switch to %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} at the beginning of the spec file? It says "sitelib for noarch packages, sitearch for others" > > The bad news: gget will not run for me now, either this new rpm or the old ones > > I made. I updated my system today, I wonder if that's the cause. > > No, it because gget can't find it's icon and crashes: > > $ gget > Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or > Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) > Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or > Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) > Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or > Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) > Error:load_icon:Icon Load Error:Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden (or > Symbol ?gget? nicht im Thema vorhanden) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/gget", line 42, in <module> > application.run() > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gget/application.py", line 50, in run > gtk.window_set_default_icon_list(*gui.get_icon_list([16, 22, 24, 32])) > TypeError: icons must be GdkPixbufs Why don't I see any output when I run gget from a terminal? Even with this change, gget still doesn't run for me. > This is because you are installing icons in /usr/share/icons/hicolor but you > are not running gtk-update-icon-cache afterwards. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache Ok, done. > You can remove the "%define epimajor 2.23" it's not really needed for your > package. Using wildcards IMO is ok here. I removed "%define epimajor 2.23". Where should I use wildcards? Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1304091 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478971] Review Request: scid - A chess database application In-Reply-To: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090653.n096r3Fx004361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478971 --- Comment #1 from Mikhail Kalenkov <mkalenkov at mail.ru> 2009-01-09 01:53:02 EDT --- I found that scid package has some small part of nonfree code. It is Nalimov tablebase decoding code. Nalimov tablebase may be very important in the endgame analysis. That's why I discard my Review Request and try to push scid into rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090733.n097X4ku027686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090757.n097vSqR003248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 02:57:27 EDT --- pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090758.n097wapS027291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 02:58:35 EDT --- pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090757.n097vWqd026899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 02:57:31 EDT --- pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459945-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090758.n097weVW003638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 02:58:39 EDT --- pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478722] Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map In-Reply-To: <bug-478722-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478722-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090808.n0988EK1005693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-09 03:08:13 EDT --- Hello Cristian! * ossimPlanetQt-gcc43.patch did not fit, I had to remove your build root home location * I'm getting this error during --rebuild: http://pastebin.sk/en/10331/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090850.n098oRlX004614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:51:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090851.n098pkk8013155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-09 03:51:45 EDT --- Need to a fix in djvulibre to import. Reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479112] Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479112-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090903.n0993YO0015329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479112 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479113] Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479113-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090858.n098wWtb014041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479113 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090922.n099MgJo011172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 04:22:42 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcping-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090922.n099MdwJ020321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 04:22:39 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcping-1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090932.n099Whf7013086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-09 04:32:42 EDT --- Try this stuff! Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm-0.23-0.1.beta.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479397] New: internal system error, package manager error add/remove software Message-ID: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: internal system error, package manager error add/remove software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479397 Summary: internal system error, package manager error add/remove software Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boeuf32 at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: package manager error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: control center add/remove software search parameter find a report opens: an internal system error has occured ... Steps to Reproduce: 1.add/remove software 2.search +parameter 3.find Actual results: report: an internal system error has occures... Expected results: software package Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901090958.n099w1Sr018105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-09 04:58:00 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file - '%prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' looks a bit unusual. - Please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) - '--vendor fedora' is no longer needed see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor - Is 'Requires: qt4' necessary? I guess that rpm will pick this up automatically. - You should preserve the time stamps - cp -p ... - make install ..... INSTALL="install -p" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 10:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: <bug-477958-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477958-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091012.n09AC84a021182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-09 05:12:05 EDT --- Two other small things - BuildRoot tag doesn't match the guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - the manpage should not have %doc I will try to make an informal review today. I'm not a sponsor but I can help you to make some progress with this package till a sponsor will take care of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 10:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478962-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091026.n09AQdnP024127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-09 05:26:38 EDT --- heh, yes. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 10:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478971] Review Request: scid - A chess database application In-Reply-To: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091033.n09AX52I001552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478971 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com> 2009-01-09 05:33:04 EDT --- Closing as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 10:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: <bug-468189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091043.n09AhQoO003857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 10:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: <bug-478609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091048.n09AmZjg028406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-09 05:48:34 EDT --- Some issues are similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} are mixed - Please use 'make install ..... INSTALL="install -p"' to preserve the time stamps if possible https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) - BuildRoot tag doesn't match the guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091121.n09BLGCu003009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-09 06:21:15 EDT --- Well done, good to go APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: <bug-478609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091122.n09BMG7m003240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-09 06:22:14 EDT --- - License is GPLv2+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091124.n09BOu2k003528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-09 06:24:55 EDT --- Any progress with the seeking of a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091127.n09BRARF012573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-09 06:27:09 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091132.n09BWtSB005221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 06:32:54 EDT --- jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091133.n09BXghX013734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 06:33:41 EDT --- jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091133.n09BXAfu013657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-09 06:33:09 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpm Short Description: Console Password Manager Owners: mmahut Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091151.n09BphNN017352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 06:51:43 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091149.n09BnuQf016726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 06:49:54 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479397] internal system error, package manager error add/remove software In-Reply-To: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091219.n09CJYEu014206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479397 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi, | |lmacken at redhat.com, | |richard at hughsie.com, | |robin.norwood at gmail.com, | |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Component|Package Review |PackageKit AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |richard at hughsie.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091238.n09Cc2gS026845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 07:38:01 EDT --- gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091246.n09Ckc2R020641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 07:46:37 EDT --- gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: <bug-468189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091245.n09CjZ4v020466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #19 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-09 07:45:33 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm The validation script I wrote to test the RPMs produced the following output: ============================================================================== ============================================================================== Make a fresh RPM of Relax and Recover (rear) URL: http://rear.sourceforge.net ============================================================================== ============================================================================== Relax & Recover Version 1.7.12 / 2009-01-09 Creating archive '/tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz OK Creating RPM packages OK Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Finished in 6 seconds. ============================================================================== Unpack /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm ============================================================================== rear ################################################## ============================================================================== rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ============================================================================== rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ============================================================================== rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm ============================================================================== rear.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ============================================================================== rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SPECS/rear.spec ============================================================================== 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ============================================================================== rpm -qp --requires /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ============================================================================== /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 ============================================================================== rpm -qp --info /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ============================================================================== Name : rear Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.7.12 Vendor: (none) Release : 1.fc9 Build Date: Fri 09 Jan 2009 01:02:34 PM CET Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: localhost.localdomain Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Size : 466172 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) URL : http://rear.sourceforge.net Summary : Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Description : Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). This is work in progress, so some features are not yet implemented. ============================================================================== rpm -qpd /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (docfiles) ============================================================================== /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/README /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/readme.txt /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/validated/Fedora/9/i386.txt ============================================================================== rpm -qpc /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (configfiles) ============================================================================== /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf /etc/rear/Linux-x86_64.conf /etc/rear/Ubuntu/7.10.conf /etc/rear/default.conf /etc/rear/local.conf /etc/rear/site.conf /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt /etc/rear/templates/ISO_isolinux.cfg /etc/rear/templates/PXE_pxelinux.cfg /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_mailbody.txt /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_ISO.txt /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_PXE.txt /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_USB.txt /etc/rear/templates/USB_syslinux.cfg ============================================================================== Build RPM with /tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz ============================================================================== rpmbuild -ta /tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.50745 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.50745 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.50745 Processing files: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74122 Provides: config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40214 And the mock output of the following command # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm is # cat /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-i386/result/build.log ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/rear.spec'], False, '/var/lib/mock/fedora-9-i386/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 0, 487, None, logger=<mock.trace_decorator.getLog object at 0x994810c>) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/rear.spec'] Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Child returncode was: 0 LEAVE do --> ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/rear.spec'], False, '/var/lib/mock/fedora-9-i386/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 0, 487, None, logger=<mock.trace_decorator.getLog object at 0x994810c>) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/rear.spec'] Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.59520 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf rear-1.7.12 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd rear-1.7.12 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 0 = 0 ']' + /bin/chown -Rhf root . ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 0 = 0 ']' + /bin/chgrp -Rhf root . + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83696 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83696 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root + mkdir /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root + cp -ap usr etc /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/ + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/rear-1.7.12 + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Processing files: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83299 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + cp -pr CHANGES README doc/readme.txt doc/validated /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + exit 0 Provides: config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74870 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + rm -rf /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root + exit 0 Child returncode was: 0 LEAVE do --> Can I now start looking for a sponsor? Or are there some more steps that need to be improved or clarified? To all a *big* thank you for your patience with me! best regards, Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479004] Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents In-Reply-To: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091243.n09ChBOw028051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-09 07:43:10 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:07:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091307.n09D7FLI025288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #2 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-09 08:07:14 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm >- '%prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' looks a bit unusual. OK, it now uses %setup -q > - You should preserve the time stamps > - cp -p ... Done. Pixmap now preserves timestamp. > make install ..... INSTALL="install -p" Not required. The supplied makefile already does this (not an autoconf makefile anyway, so setting INSTALL won't do the right thing.) >Is 'Requires: qt4' necessary? I guess that rpm will pick this up automatically. No, it isn't. Yes rpm will get it as mathgl has it as a Requires.Fixed. > - Please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) OK. done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091323.n09DNA1s004964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-09 08:23:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd-2.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd.spec The source archive is now created manually after a check out with svn. Nothing else changed. The naming is still the same - this is not before or after the 2.0.1 release, this _is_ the 2.0.1 release. With the exception that no archive is provided via download.sf.net but only a release tag on the svn was created (because only that license text was added as I requested). The previous release was 2.0 and the next will probably be 2.1 (if there will be a next version at all). I hope we can agree on this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] New: Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python Message-ID: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Summary: Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/pywebdav.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/pywebdav-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebDAV library for Python. WebDAV is an extension to the normal HTTP/1.1 protocol allowing the user to upload data, create collections of objects, store properties for objects, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455700] Review Request: kpackagekit - KDE packagekit interface In-Reply-To: <bug-455700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091405.n09E5dOo016680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455700 Bug 455700 depends on bug 455585, which changed state. Bug 455585 Summary: Review Request: packagekit-qt - QT bindings for packagekit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455585 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455585] Review Request: packagekit-qt - QT bindings for packagekit In-Reply-To: <bug-455585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091405.n09E5cBC016650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455585 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-09 09:05:36 EDT --- Package is dead and has been EOL'd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091457.n09EvVhR028248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-09 09:57:28 EDT --- For now I want to wait for the response from sendmail maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091459.n09ExpoA019940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Bug 475017 depends on bug 474981, which changed state. Bug 474981 Summary: Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091459.n09ExoQv019913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-09 09:59:48 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091500.n09F0omS029261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 474999, which changed state. Bug 474999 Summary: Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091500.n09F0Ika029058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091500.n09F0nti029230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-09 10:00:46 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455700] Review Request: kpackagekit - KDE packagekit interface In-Reply-To: <bug-455700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091502.n09F2UbC020928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455700 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091506.n09F6OV2030977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-09 10:06:23 EDT --- > chmod +r ? nope, chcon something-something :) Didn't realize mv-ing something into /var/www/blah instead of cp-ing it would annoy selinux, now I know :) If you try again now, it should work. Sorry for the delay --Gabriel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: <bug-467290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091503.n09F3hOT030184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-09 10:03:42 EDT --- package is now part of packagekit and has been EOL'd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478780] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions In-Reply-To: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478780-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091534.n09FYnd8028350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-09 10:34:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091612.n09GClK7005131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091621.n09GLPMF016778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-09 11:21:23 EDT --- Okay, then I will wait for gget review request (for sponsorship issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091634.n09GYwFw020088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> 2009-01-09 11:34:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > thats ok then. Do you got new package to complete review with fixes other > issues? I have to prepare new minor upstream release to fix rpmlint warnings, so I hope packages will be ready Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091652.n09GqW07014366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-09 11:52:31 EDT --- Okay, now: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091721.n09HLnaK020496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #25 from Lane <dirjud at gmail.com> 2009-01-09 12:21:48 EDT --- New files available: Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.700-1.fc10.src.rpm Changes include: - Removal of duplicate file per Comment #23. verilator depends on the file /usr/share/verilator/bin/verilator_includer, so I removed the duplicate in /usr/bin. - Added dependency of perl-SystemPerl-devel for both building and installing. For verilator to work correctly with perl-SystemPerl-devel, however, you must make the change to the perl-SystemPerl-devel spec file as documented on my comment on Bug 478759 and put the src files in /usr/include/SystemPerl/src - Updated to newly released verilator 3.700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091736.n09HaPn8023228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-09 12:36:24 EDT --- For -4: * Files - In %files: ------------------------------------------------------ 49 %{python_sitelib} ------------------------------------------------------ Well, this contains the directory %{python_sitelib} itself, which should not be owned by this package as this directory is owned by python package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467642-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467642-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091732.n09HWv7T022491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-09 12:32:56 EDT --- What's the current status of this package? If it doesn't actually work then there's not much point in reviewing it, so I'll mark it as not being ready for review. Please clear the whiteboard when the situation changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: <bug-232160-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-232160-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091733.n09HXBE1022533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #46 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-09 12:33:07 EDT --- As discussed in bug #478633 I am hereby requesting the EL-5 branch for this package to be created, with me as the owner : Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ruby-gnome2 New Branches: EL-5 Owners: thias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250282] Package request/suggestion: kidled In-Reply-To: <bug-250282-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-250282-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091736.n09HarhN000709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250282 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-09 12:36:52 EDT --- There was no response, so I'm just going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091805.n09I5CHh006806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #26 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-09 13:05:10 EDT --- in file (of verilator) src/V3Options.cpp: && !V3Options::fileStatNormal(var+"/src/systemperl.h")) { if you remove /src, I believe it should pull systemperl.h from perl-SystemPerl-devel. Can you check if please ? in the 3.700 release notes, you are listed for: - Add limited support for tristate inouts. Written by Lane Brooks. This allows common pad ring and tristate-mux structures to be Verilated. See the documentation for more information on supported constructs. - Fix 'bad select range' warning missing some cases, bug43. [Lane Brooks] good job Lane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: <bug-476449-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476449-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091831.n09IVFj2011830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Bug 476449 depends on bug 476386, which changed state. Bug 476386 Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-09 13:31:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.461-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 19:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901091929.n09JTqhH015506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #8 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-09 14:29:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > For -4: > > * Files > - In %files: > > ------------------------------------------------------ > 49 %{python_sitelib} > ------------------------------------------------------ > Well, this contains the directory %{python_sitelib} itself, > which should not be owned by this package as this directory > is owned by python package. Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/python-progressbar.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/python-progressbar-2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 20:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: <bug-457059-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457059-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092042.n09KgK0R017757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #16 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-09 15:42:18 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: txt2tags New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: maxamillion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 20:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: <bug-457059-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457059-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092043.n09KhXmf017967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 20:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092051.n09KpfmP019661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tadej.janez at tadej | |.hicsalta.si) | --- Comment #4 from Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> 2009-01-09 15:51:39 EDT --- Firstly, thank you for taking the time to review my package and I apologize for not responding to your review earlier. (In reply to comment #2) > Some notes: > > * BuildRequires/Requires > - build.log shows > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 80 Failed to import numarray: PyQwt will be build without support for > numarray. > 81 Failed to find Numeric2: PyQwt will be build without support for > Numeric. > ..... > 86 'disable_numarray': False, > 87 'disable_numeric': False, > 88 'disable_numpy': False, > ------------------------------------------------------------ > These message seems contradictory. > Perhaps "BuildRequires: python-numarray python-numeric" > is needed. I would prefer to avoid all this and just disable support for Numarray and Numeric at configure stage. As far as I know, Numpy is deemed as a replacement for both Numarray and Numeric. > - Also please check if numpy (or python-numarray, python-numeric) > are also needed for "Requires" (not BuildRequires). > For python module related packages, writing a package in > "BuildRequires" does not mean that the package is installed > at runtime. Yes, it is definitely needed at run time, so I added it to "Requires". > - And check if PyQwt-devel does not require "qwt-devel". > For example, QwtList.sip contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 34 %MappedType QList<QwtPickerMachine::Command> > 35 { > 36 %TypeHeaderCode > 37 #include <qlist.h> > 38 #include <qwt_picker_machine.h> > 39 %End > ------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, you are right. I added qwt-devel to PyQwt-devel's "Requires". > * Timestamps > - 'INSTALL="install -p"' argument to "make install" does not > make sense for this package because this makefile is not > based on autotools but based on python > (actually when installing files "cp -f" is used) I don't completely understand how (not) using autotools affects the use of "install -p" option, but I trust you that it is not necessary. > > * Permission of scripts > ------------------------------------------------------------- > # non-executable script > chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/PyQt4/Qwt5/grace.py > ------------------------------------------------------------- > - If this script is not meant to be called directly by > users (but is meant to be called internally from programs > or so), then this script should not have executable > permission and the shebang should be removed. grace.py could be executed directly but it requires 'grace' package to work. If the user doesn't have it installed, it just crashes with an error that 'xmgrace' is not found. However, it seems bloated to me to add a new 'Requires: grace' just because some example script needs it. Also, upstream is a bit confusing about executable scripts, because a similar example script qplt.py could also have a shebang at the top and be made executable but it doesn't have it. I made grace.py executable because I received warning messages from rpmlint and I decided that would be the simplest solution. Maybe it is better to make all example scripts consistent and non-executable? If so, I should remove the shebang from grace.py. Updated spec file and source package are at http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 22:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092208.n09M8WBW003049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 17:08:31 EDT --- javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 22:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092208.n09M8ZGs003081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-09 17:08:34 EDT --- javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 22:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092231.n09MVMEf007644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-09 17:31:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Everything has been addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 22:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901092234.n09MY9fj008021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-09 17:34:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm - Removed the xml/ subdir for legal problems. - Also removed lib/* and docs/ because I was already modifying the source archive anyway. - Added examples/ to the docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 01:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100115.n0A1FSav023746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-09 20:15:26 EDT --- Excellent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 01:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100148.n0A1mhuH029051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328515|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-09 20:48:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328609) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328609) failed build log Make test fails: t/003_perl_critic....................... # Failed test 'Test::Perl::Critic for "blib/lib/Eval/Context.pm"' # at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Test/Perl/Critic.pm line 99. # See attachment for full error log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 02:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats In-Reply-To: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100235.n0A2ZMP6003699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-09 21:35:14 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 0c7db13f1481bbb7587625d11d14f352ea6cfc8b DateTime-Format-DateParse-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [+] "make test" passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats In-Reply-To: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100330.n0A3U0MA011156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:29:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats In-Reply-To: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100329.n0A3Twls011134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-09 22:29:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse Short Description: Parse Date::Parse compatible formats Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100327.n0A3RCdM010795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-09 22:27:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328610) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328610) revised spec according to fedora guidelines I've taken a look at the current version (http://people.redhat.com/anderson/crash-4.0-7.6.src.rpm) and did a local mock rebuild. I am attaching a slightly revised spec which fixes part of the problems. The major issues (I have not tried to fix any of these because I am not familiar with the requirements of this special package) are that 1. the package uses it's own versions of several utilities/libs (at least gdb and readline) which contradicts the guidelines. However, according to http://people.redhat.com/anderson/crash_whitepaper/ this is intended. 2.the package builds a static binary. Once again, this is intended 3.fedora compile flags are completely ignored. This also seems to be intended, each of the libraries is built with a different set of flags. Easily fixable stuff (not done): - SMP_FLAGS are not used (I did not know if it's OK to use them ) - the source files (included in -debuginfo) have the exec bit set, which makes rpmlint unhappy - license seems to be GPLv2+. A lot of files are GPL+, some are GPLv2+, some have no license at all. A cleanup of those would be nice Other problems (fixed) - usage of forbidden tags (packager, vendor) or incorrect values (buildroot, source0) - some aesthetic warnings from rpmlint - missing license file from the binary rpm - there was no changelog. I have added one but it should be properly populated - timestamps (for docs/man) were not preserved - defattr was missing in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 04:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: cwirc - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100435.n0A4Z0vc022672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 --- Comment #13 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-09 23:34:54 EDT --- Submitted for testing on F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 05:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100510.n0A5A1mS029009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #19 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-10 00:09:56 EDT --- Latest version... Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US-1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 05:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs In-Reply-To: <bug-225672-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225672-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100525.n0A5PdUB031759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 00:25:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328612) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328612) a cleaner spec - makes use of SMP - removes the obsolete [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] check - converts FAQ to UTF-8 - marks /etc/profile.d/* and /etc/pam.d/cvs as %config(noreplace). Not sure how useful that would be but it does not hurt - adding an INSTALL="install -p" to make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 05:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs In-Reply-To: <bug-225672-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225672-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100527.n0A5RsUe032003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 00:27:53 EDT --- With the new spec, the only complaint from rpmlint is: cvs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/cvs/contrib/sccs2rcs 0644 which is safe to be ignored, given that this is intentional (avoids bringing csh in as dependency). To be honest, I would have done a chmod a-x on all the scripts from the contrib dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 06:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: <bug-457279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100616.n0A6GlEg008325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #18 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos <ypod at mit.edu> 2009-01-10 01:16:38 EDT --- Having dealt with all three issues in comment #14, I 'd like to ask you to reconsider opening this review request. Thanks, Pol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 06:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100629.n0A6Trtv009622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 01:29:52 EDT --- The only file in GPLv2+ is actually a mistake done by someone. They are also planning to re-license that if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 06:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100629.n0A6T9wv009554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 01:29:06 EDT --- https://svn.enthought.com/enthought/ticket/1765 Upstream is working on fixing this issue. They planning to make most of the things to BSD 3-clause. Images are in there original license only. So, present license tag will be mix of all those licenses. I will wait for few days and check if they move quickly. If not I will update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 06:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: <bug-457279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100632.n0A6WJ3d010838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #19 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 01:32:18 EDT --- I will review it in few days or next week end. Thanks for your efforts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 06:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100655.n0A6tD9d014067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-WWW-Curl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 08:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100848.n0A8mWn7032341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dignan.patrick at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 03:48:29 EDT --- This is an informal review. Legend: [OK] - Meets the requirement or the requirement is not applicable [?] - May meet the requirement, but this is shaky ground [X] - Does not meet the requirement! [OK]: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. RPMLINT OUTPUT: [dignan at localhost i386]$ rpmlint mpop-1.0.16-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [dignan at localhost i386]$ rpmlint mpop-debuginfo-1.0.16-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. RPMLINT OUTPUT END OK :) [OK]: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [OK]: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [X]: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Fedora specific compiler options are not specified in the make [OK]: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK]: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK]: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK]: The spec file for the package MUST be legible [OK]: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. MD5SUM OUTPUT: 94a544fd610ee4434079e5dddf07324f mpop-1.0.16.tar.bz2 [OK]: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK]: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Koji Builds Successful: Fedora 10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1043517 Fedora 11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1043527 [OK]: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [OK]: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK]: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK]: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK]: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [X]: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Documentation duplicates the manpage and the info page. [OK]: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK]: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK]: Each package must consistently use macros [OK]: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [?]: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). You might want to think of moving the documentation into a separate package, considering it is the bulk of the package size, the actual binary is only 108KB while the documentation is about 1MB [OK]: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK]: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK]: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK]: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK]: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK]: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK]: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK]: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK]: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK]: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK]: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 08:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100859.n0A8xNkt002003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 03:59:22 EDT --- Oops, forgot to tell you what compiler flags you need to add to make $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/% or %{optflags} work :) So you could do make %{?_smp_mflags} %{optflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 09:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901100933.n0A9XRja012735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 04:33:25 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [!] Rpmlint output: [1] Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10.src.rpm pidgin-privacy-please.src: E: unknown-key GPG#5d512c97 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint pidgin-privacy-please* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 9db291fab302a189fef27c9922f9432a Build source: 9db291fab302a189fef27c9922f9432a [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1043532 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format [1] Packages must not be sign with your own key. Please fix this before import. Beside that I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 10:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101049.n0AAnMRI027173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #20 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-10 05:49:18 EDT --- Because you have successfully imported and built the packages, you should now close the review request as CLOSED/NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 11:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101101.n0AB1Tj0029691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 06:01:26 EDT --- I Did an informal review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 I am now looking into packaging the program Jailkit, which is on the wishlist, and seems to be a pretty useful tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 11:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:03:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101103.n0AB3FIU029906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 06:03:13 EDT --- Thanks Patrick for your review. (In reply to comment #1) > [X]: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . > > Fedora specific compiler options are not specified in the make see below > [X]: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > > Documentation duplicates the manpage and the info page. fixed and removed the other useless stuff in this directory > [?]: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of > large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to > size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). > You might want to think of moving the documentation into a separate package, > considering it is the bulk of the package size, the actual binary is only 108KB > while the documentation is about 1MB Good point but making a new package for two file is a bit overkill from my point of view. I removed *.texi files and now the complete package is 360 KB (incl. documentation) (In reply to comment #2) > Oops, forgot to tell you what compiler flags you need to add to make > > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/% or %{optflags} work :) > > So you could do > > make %{?_smp_mflags} %{optflags} This will definitely not work...What flag/flags is/are not set properly? + unset DISPLAY + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export FFLAGS Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mpop.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mpop-1.0.16-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 11:15:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:15:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101115.n0ABFRHn032435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 06:15:25 EDT --- I was citing this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags About the documentation, I agree that it seems trivial to separate a simple package into two, but I always try to think of people with 56k connections, the size difference does matter to them, and there are still a number of them out there, believe it or not. With that smaller size, it's no big deal then :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 12:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101202.n0AC2Ycx008630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-10 07:02:32 EDT --- Phil has given up SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/nopaste-2835/nopaste.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/nopaste-2835/nopaste-2835-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 12:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479515] New: Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 Message-ID: <bug-479515-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 Summary: Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: camillegallet at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://downloads.tuxfamily.org/morg/files/fedora/Music_Organizer-2.5.1-1.spec SRPM URL: ftp://downloads.tuxfamily.org/morg/files/fedora/Music_Organizer-2.5.1-1-2.5.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Music Organizer is a multi-platform program that manage mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 files. For mp3, it recogonize both id3V2 and id3V1 tags and edit them separatly. It can also organize your files i.e. create a tree from tags and puts them smartly into those. musicorganizer generate tags from files name, generate files name from the tags and let you listen your music whith your favourite player.Music Organizer use taglib to read tags and wxWidgets for the GUI. Website: http://www.musicorganizer.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 12:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101257.n0ACvscM020093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 07:57:53 EDT --- My review from Comment #3 is no longer just informal. Simon is the new submitter and already sponsored. (In reply to comment #3) > > [1] Remove the %doc in the %file section > [2] The header of the script says '# Released under the GNU General Public > License v2'. For me this is not looking like GPLv2+. Both open issues are fixed. I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101334.n0ADYW6q028549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |gauret at free.fr AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gauret at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-10 08:34:29 EDT --- Since there's been no action for over a month, I'm taking over the review :) Review for release 3.fc10: * RPM name is OK * Source backup-manager-0.7.7.tar.gz is the same as upstream * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED Two small things though: - the actual license is GPLv2+ (see the head of the backup-manager file). Please fix the RPM tag. - in the comment you add to the conf file, please switch "Specific RPM" to "RPM-specific", this is better english. Since those changes are so trivial, no need to resubmit a package here, just do it right before or after importing. Thanks Guillaume. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101344.n0ADiPoK030605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 08:44:23 EDT --- Sorry, I've been away for a while. Now I'm back and we can finish up this beast. Here are a few more issues to address. * Please add the changes you made to the changelog in the future with the correct date(s). It'll be easier to see what is actually changed. That's why we keep a changelog. * Also please switch to %defattr(-,root,root,-) * We should preserve the timestamps of all the relevant files we package in the %install section. By relevant files, I mean the non-compiled files. * Please remove the commented-out line(s) that are unnecessary. Also, in the comments and in the changelog section, we use %% for macros instead of a single %, so that the macros don't expand out during package building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101346.n0ADkI0R030940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 08:46:17 EDT --- Sorry, my review is only informal. Reset the flag and assignee. I'm not a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101357.n0ADvV5l000970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-10 08:57:30 EDT --- thank you fabian! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nopaste Short Description: Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste Owners: cassmodiah fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101422.n0AEMYTV006769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 09:22:32 EDT --- This package does not meet the packaging guidelines and therefore I'm resetting the fedora?review flag: Summary: is not good. License tag is wrong. The package is GPLv2+, not GPL. Please take a look at the headers of the scripts. Not all docs are included, THANKS is missing. Credits are important, just like licenses and should therefore be included. Some requirements are missing. There are a couple of commands in the scripts that are not included in Requires:, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies Changelog format is not correct: Changelogs get parsed automatically and therefor there should be a blank line between all entries. Also you should not add a comment line in %changelog, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs Timestamp ot Source= does not match, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 0.7.7 is a development version. Is this supposed to be included in a stable Fedora release? Aurelien, please review more carefully next time. I would like to at least see a list of the tests you have done on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101433.n0AEXOrS008836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 09:33:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry, my review is only informal. Reset the flag and assignee. I'm not a > sponsor. Fabian, your review is perfectly valid. You only need to be a reviewer and not a sponsor. Resetting your previous changes and APPROVE the package again. Guillaume, please add a blank line between every changelog entry and follow Fabians suggestions. Summing it all up the spec looks nice and clean. Good work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101438.n0AEc4l4009817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 09:38:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Summary: is not good. You can leave it as is > License tag is wrong. The package is GPLv2+, not GPL. > Not all docs are included, THANKS is missing. Sorry, It's in there, my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101438.n0AEcAug009988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 David Carter <dcarter at entertain-me.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcarter at entertain-me.com --- Comment #1 from David Carter <dcarter at entertain-me.com> 2009-01-10 09:38:09 EDT --- Hi, I'm not an approved reviewer yet, and am doing this as a practice review. So while I'm making every effort to make this as complete and accurate a review as possible, this can't be considered a final review. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i pywebdav-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i pywebdav-0.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines According to the naming guidelines, this fits into the python exception for upstream packages starting with py, so OK. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK, including python specific guidelines MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK. x86_64 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK. MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] OK. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Not really. For example, consider the line %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Which should be: %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} even though the first is given as an example in the documentation. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK. MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK. MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK. MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK. MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] OK. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK. SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK. SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Unable to test on non-x86(_64) platforms SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK. SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK. SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK. SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK. SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK. Summary - MINOR issues with use of macros in spec file. I am curious though as to why the example server isn't included in either the same package, or in a documentation package. I would expect to see it in /usr/share/pywebdav-0.8. I really think this would be a worthwhile addition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101455.n0AEtKaG013805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 09:55:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > [1] Packages must not be sign with your own key. Please fix this before > import. No need to fix this, it's ok. The buildsys will build new srpms anyway, so you can ignore this rpmlint warning. (In reply to comment #6) > It's OK (I haven't increment release just for blank line) : No need for this ether, the package was already approved by Fabian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101454.n0AEsRcv013336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 09:54:25 EDT --- + CVE-2008-2149 (patch in Debian), CVE-2008-3908 (http://www.ocert.org/analysis/2008-014/wordnet.patch.2). Debian carries a split version of the patch for CVE-2008-3908. + Please have look at the patches used in the Debian package. Some of them are useful to have in Fedora. eg., the manual page fixes. + 'wordnet' might be a better name for the package because that is the name some other distributions (eg., Debian, Ubuntu) are using. Having consistency in naming across distributions is a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101453.n0AErevx013556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-10 09:53:40 EDT --- It's OK (I haven't increment release just for blank line) : SPEC : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/pidgin-privacy-please.spec RPMS (x86_64) : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/x86_64/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/x86_64/pidgin-privacy-please-debuginfo-0.5.2-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm SRPMS : http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 15:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101510.n0AFAxqV017681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-10 10:10:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. > > Not really. For example, consider the line > %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > Which should be: > %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} > > even though the first is given as an example in the documentation. Using the first variant is completely legal. The consistency here means that $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} should not be mixed inside one spec file. > Summary - MINOR issues with use of macros in spec file. > > I am curious though as to why the example server isn't included in either the > same package, or in a documentation package. I would expect to see it in > /usr/share/pywebdav-0.8. I really think this would be a worthwhile addition. There are few reasons why not include the server by default: - the server is not installed by the upstream setup utility - I have a package that will use only the library - distributing a network server has a broader consequences (security, etc.) So until there is a real demand for this server I don't have an intent to package it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 15:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101510.n0AFACUt017908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #12 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-10 10:10:08 EDT --- Correction make : spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.src.rpm For the choice of the version 0.7 unstable it is that the 0.6 is old and is not more maintained -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 15:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101543.n0AFhZho025057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #13 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-10 10:43:33 EDT --- > I would like to at least see a list of the tests you have done on this package. As any reviewer should, I have checked these items : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review To my knowledge, there is no "Bugzilla comment format" for a review, unless this changed recently. If I missed that, please point me to the wiki page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 15:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101548.n0AFmiLF026051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 --- Comment #3 from David Carter <dcarter at entertain-me.com> 2009-01-10 10:48:43 EDT --- You are correct about the macros. Sorry, but I mis-read the documentation. That's why I'm still at the practice review stage :) As for the server, I'm not suggesting you install it in the Python libraries, but in the share section where people may refer to it as an example, perhaps as part of a documentation package. This would greatly help people who've never used the package before, and is no more dangerous than distributing any example source code. My preference would be to see it, but I understand why you haven't included it here. Just keep it in mind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101652.n0AGqvnZ006211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 11:52:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > > I would like to at least see a list of the tests you have done on this package. > > As any reviewer should, I have checked these items : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review No you didn't. The review guidelines state: "MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review." The output includes some warnings of which at least one needs to be fixed, but you did not post the output here. The review guidelines also state: "MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines." and the packaging guidelines include: "When downloading sources, patches etc, consider using a client that preserves the upstream timestamps." You did not check the timestamps, did you? @Guillaume: I'd like to have a look on these packages once more, so please wait a little. TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101724.n0AHOmcm012597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #62 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-10 12:24:39 EDT --- New upstream release (stepping in since the original submitter seems unresponsive): SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/ETL-0.04.12-4.el5.src.rpm SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/ETL.spec * HAVE_* macros have been renamed to avoid clash with autoconf. "config.h-like" file etl_profile.h was not removed, since upstream does not do that, and I tend to think that it's the good way to go. See -- this would add a requirement for programs that use this to define ~10 macros prior to include the header, which can be non-trivial and ugly for programs that don't rely on autoconf && friends. And in case a new one gets added it could unnecessarily break compatibility, possibly resulting into builds with feature set smaller than intended. I don't think doing that with this added maintenance cost is a good idea. There is a prior art as well -- many packages hardcode feature set at build time. Rpmlint is silent, this builds in f11 mock and synfig with synfig studio build cleanly against this as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101727.n0AHRnRi013120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-10 12:27:46 EDT --- New upstream release (stepping in since the original submitter seems unresponsive): SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/synfig.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/synfig-0.61.09-1.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101726.n0AHQhiU013313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #63 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-10 12:26:42 EDT --- Sorry; I forgot to reset the revision, here are new packages: SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/ETL-0.04.12-1.el5.src.rpm SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/ETL.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101733.n0AHXZ4M014241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101733.n0AHXaPu014298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] New: Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio Message-ID: <bug-479527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Summary: Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 428567,428568 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/synfigstudio.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/synfigstudio-0.61.09-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Synfig Animation Studio is a powerful, industrial-strength vector-based 2D animation software, designed from the ground-up for producing feature-film quality animation with fewer people and resources. It is designed to be capable of producing feature-film quality animation. It eliminates the need for tweening, preventing the need to hand-draw each frame. Synfig features spatial and temporal resolution independence (sharp and smoothat any resolution or framerate), high dynamic range images, and a flexible plugin system. This package contains the GUI-based animation studio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: <bug-479515-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479515-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101747.n0AHlwPl016984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 12:47:56 EDT --- Just some comment on your spec file - The name of the spec file don't match guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name - The summary needs to be improved. It's not necessary to repeat the package name. - The license is wrong, check source header -> GPLv2+ - Your description looks very ugly. - Please preserve the time stamps in the install section if it's possible make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install - There are translations... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files - AUTHORS, COPYING, and so on must be include as %doc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25files_prefixes - You must install /verify the .desktop file https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files - You must use macros in the %files section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros - Stuff from the doc directory in the source should marked as %doc in the package. - You should add a proper changelog entry. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs >From my point of view this package should be named as 'musicorganizer'. The Mac version is called 'MusicOrganizer', the Debian version 'musicorganizer', and the Windows package 'Music.Organizer'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101755.n0AHtZ5L018335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101752.n0AHqv89017815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 12:52:56 EDT --- I will try to get to this tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 17:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101757.n0AHve2v018698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-10 12:57:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328632) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328632) rpmlint for binary rpms Well, for 0.6.4-2: ** Description etc * License - License tag should be "GPLv3+". * Source - Source tarball in your srpm differs from what I could download from the Source URL in your spec: ------------------------------------------------ 9773759 2009-01-09 00:43 mrpt-0.6.4.tar.gz 9773812 2009-01-09 00:51 mrpt-0.6.4-2.fc10.src/mrpt-0.6.4.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------ * BuildRequires: - build.log says: ------------------------------------------------ 107 -- Looking for doxygen... 108 -- Looking for doxygen... - found /usr/bin/doxygen 109 -- Looking for dot tool... 110 -- Looking for dot tool... - NOT found ------------------------------------------------ Perhaps "BuildRequires: graphviz" is missing. ** %prep -> %install * Build failure - Currently your srpm does not build by 4 reasons. 1 %check fails as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1042528 This is because at "make test" this test needs system-widely installed libmrpt-core.so.0.6, but on mockbuild apparently this library is not yet installed system-widely. 2 The rebuilt libraries like libmrpt-core.so.0.6 are installed under %buildroot/usr/lib, not %buildroot%_libdir even with 64 bits architecture 3 CMakeLists.txt adds "-mtune=native" to CPPFLAGS, which is not recognized on ppc (maybe also on ppc64) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1042483 Also, CMakeLists.txt adds "-O3" compilation option, however Fedora default optimation level is "-O2" so this should be removed. 4 %files lists are wrong. Some files are installed under %{_datadir}/mrpt/datasets/ but no files are installed under %{_datadir}/mrpt/config_files/datasets/ Possible solution: - For 2,3: at %prep: ------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q sed -i.misc \ -e 's|-O3|-O2|' \ -e 's|-mtune=native||' \ -e '/DESTINATION/s|PREFIX}lib|PREFIX}lib\${LIB_SUFFIX}|' \ $(find . -name CMakeLists.txt) ------------------------------------------- - For 1: at %check: ------------------------------------------- %check export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/lib make test VERBOSE=1 ARGS="-VV" ------------------------------------------- - For 4: Check %files list ** %files, etc * Package splitting - First of all, please explain why you want to split each library into different subpackges. * desktop files - desktop-file-install or so must be executed against desktop files to be installed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage * Scriptlets - Some files has MimeType, so please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database - This package installs XML files under %_datadir/mime/packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo * Directory ownership - The directory %{_datadir}/mrpt is owned by 2 packages. Please change this so that only one package owns this directory ( I guess having this directory owned by -core package is an alternative solution) - %{_datadir}/doc/mrpt-doc/ is not owned by any packages. * pkgconfig - pkgconfig/libmrpt.pc.in contains: -------------------------------------------- 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib -------------------------------------------- This is expanded as /usr/lib, even on 64 bits architecture, while this should be expanded as /usr/lib64. - Also installed libmrpt.pc contains: -------------------------------------------- 9 Libs: -L${libdir} -ldc1394 -lGL -lGLU -lglut -lftdi -lusb -l3ds -lz -ljpeg -lrt -pthread -lmrpt-ann /usr/lib64/libboost_program_options-mt.so -pthread -lwx_baseu-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_core-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_gl-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8 -lmrpt-core -lmrpt-aria -------------------------------------------- Please check if these explicit linkage lists are _really_ needed. I guess almost all of these can be removed if the installed libraries are already properly linked. Also, note that each "-lfoo" entry adds each corresponding package dependency to mrpt-devel package. For example "-lglut" means -devel package should have "Requires: freeglut-devel", while I don't think this is needed. * Header files dependency - Please check if proper dependency packages are installed with -devel packages to satisfy "include" macro dependencies in header files. - For example, gui/WxUtils.h contains --------------------------------------------- 40 #include <wx/sizer.h> 41 #include <wx/statbmp.h> 42 #include <wx/menu.h> --------------------------------------------- This means that mrpt-devel package should have "Requires: wxGTK-devel" (not wxGTK). * Duplicate files - Please check if all subpackages need "doc COPYING" or so. Also "%doc foo" creates its own document directory (named /usr/share/doc/mrpt-foo-%{version}) for each subpackage. Especially -doc subpackage has two document directories (/usr/share/doc/mrpt-doc and /usr/share/doc/mrpt-doc-%{version}) I suggest these directories should be unified. * rpmlint issue rpmlint output attached. - Please change non-UTF8 files to UTF-8 encoding - Usually libraries themselves should not call exit() (see $ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit) - Many files has Windows-like line terminators. Please fix these by "sed -i -e 's|\r||g'" or dos2unix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479530] Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU In-Reply-To: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101819.n0AIJxUT022894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479530 --- Comment #1 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-10 13:19:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328633) The spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479530] New: Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU Message-ID: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479530 Summary: Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: swhiteho at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: Attached SRPM URL: Attached Description: This is a cross compiling GNU binutils package for the Texas Instruments MSP430 16-bit low power microcontroller. It includes all the tools required to assemble, query and manipulate msp430 object files. For further details, please see the mspgcc project's web site: http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101831.n0AIV2eK024626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-10 13:31:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.2-1.fc11.src.rpm New version: 2.7.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479530] Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU In-Reply-To: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101836.n0AIav3Q025919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479530 --- Comment #2 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-10 13:36:56 EDT --- Actually there doesn't seem much point attaching the SRPM... its got just one file in it, i.e. the binutils source: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.19.tar.bz2 This should be a trivial package to review since: a) There are no patches at all b) It follows a very similar pattern to the avr-binutils package c) Its a very small spec file d) The source comes exclusively from the GNU project itself -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479530] Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU In-Reply-To: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101844.n0AIi6IU027464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479530 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-10 13:44:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: msp430-binutils Short Description: Cross compiling GNU binutils for the Texas MSP430 16-bit MCU Owners: swhiteho Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101843.n0AIhtUE027798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #15 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-10 13:43:53 EDT --- > No you didn't. Yes I did. You can choose not to believe me of course. > The review guidelines state: "MUST: rpmlint must be run on every > package. The output should be posted in the review." The output includes some > warnings of which at least one needs to be fixed, but you did not post the > output here. Here's the output of rpmlint here : backup-manager.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.7-3 ['0.7.7-3.fc10', '0.7.7-3.fc10'] Which is completely useless. > The review guidelines also state: "MUST: The package must meet the Packaging > Guidelines." and the packaging guidelines include: "When downloading sources, > patches etc, consider using a client that preserves the upstream timestamps." Note the "consider". Preserving the timestamp of the source tarball is a minor detail. > You did not check the timestamps, did you? You should take the guidelines with a little more distance. Use your experience and your judgment to know what's important and what's "nice to have" in this very long list of guidelines. It's nice however that you found out about the binary dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: <bug-473744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101851.n0AIpflU029385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #3 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-10 13:51:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > New URLs: > http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/flint-1.0.18-1.fc9.src.rpm That URL is 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 19:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101900.n0AJ0905031614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 14:00:07 EDT --- The current version at least is just fine wrt compiler flags. The only potential problem is: GNOME Keyring support .. : no which seems to indicate a missing BR (since we ask to ship the packages with all possible features enabled). Eventually you might wrap it in a build conditional if you want to allow building without this option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 19:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101920.n0AJKvSq003503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 14:20:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Yes I did. You can choose not to believe me of course. The review guidlines include the packaging guidelines and at least the latter are not met. > Here's the output of rpmlint here : > backup-manager.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.7-3 > ['0.7.7-3.fc10', '0.7.7-3.fc10'] > Which is completely useless. You are supposed to run rpmlint on _all_packages, not only the binaries. $ rpmlint /home/chris/Desktop/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc10.src.rpm backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager-0.7.7.tar.gz 0770 backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.spec 0770 backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.cron.daily 0770 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Hint: You should also run rpmlint on the installed package, because some errors are not detected otherwise. > It's nice however that you found out about the binary dependencies. This is IMO also part of the review guidelines. P.S.: I know I am pedantic ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 19:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101929.n0AJTk7C004875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-10 14:29:45 EDT --- 1) Ehh, debuginfo looked like it was pulling in files from those dirs, I did this to be safe. 2) I've fixed it so that we have constant timestamps. 3) Good point, done. 4) Done, Tom Lane helped me find the proper fix. 5) You're right. It's zlib. My bad. :) New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/irrlicht.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/irrlicht-1.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 19:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901101944.n0AJiVLN007203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-10 14:44:29 EDT --- kdeaccessibility-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeadmin-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeartwork-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebase-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebase-runtime-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebindings-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeedu-4.1.4-1.fc10,kde-filesystem-4-23.fc10,kdegames-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdegraphics-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdelibs-4.1.4-2.fc10,kde-l10n-4.1.4-2.fc10,kdemultimedia-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdenetwork-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdepim-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdepimlibs-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeplasma-addons-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdesdk-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdetoys-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeutils-4.1.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdeaccessibility-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeadmin-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeartwork-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebase-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebase-runtime-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdebindings-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeedu-4.1.4-1.fc10,kde-filesystem-4-23.fc10,kdegames-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdegraphics-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdelibs-4.1.4-2.fc10,kde-l10n-4.1.4-2.fc10,kdemultimedia-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdenetwork-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdepim-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdepimlibs-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeplasma-addons-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdesdk-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdetoys-4.1.4-1.fc10,kdeutils-4.1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102005.n0AK5AGh011791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-10 15:05:08 EDT --- Thanks! Looks well now; good to go APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: <bug-473744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102008.n0AK8JbE011741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-10 15:08:18 EDT --- Should work now, sorry. Please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102006.n0AK6uXw011571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #8 from Dan Kenigsberg <danken at cs.technion.ac.il> 2009-01-10 15:06:54 EDT --- done. see http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:20:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects In-Reply-To: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102020.n0AKK8xf014072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 15:20:07 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in t he legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, cont aining the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 46a96fda16b24df321377df8137be31c50c11915 DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.05.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English lan guages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [+] "make test" passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102030.n0AKUFHM016627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-10 15:30:14 EDT --- please use default %defattr: %defattr(-,root,root,-) You should use %postun scriptlet; without it, the daemon will not restart itself after a package update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: <bug-245688-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245688-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102033.n0AKXAuf016984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com --- Comment #28 from Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com> 2009-01-10 15:33:04 EDT --- For what it's worth, I just used this package on F10 for an ESXi WBEM monitoring script for nagios, found here: http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-7170 Works great. Having pywbem will be a great addition to Fedora, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: <bug-477958-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477958-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102051.n0AKp4hV020018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] New: Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture Message-ID: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 Summary: Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel-0.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/gipfel.html Description: gipfel is a tool to find the names of mountains or points of interest on a picture. It uses a database containing names and GPS data. With the given viewpoint (the point from which the picture was taken) and two known mountains on the picture, it can compute all parameters needed to compute the positions of other mountains on the picture. gipfel can also generate (stitch) panorama images. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1044303 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint gipfel* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gipfel-0.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 21:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102112.n0ALCS1t024311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #17 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-10 16:12:26 EDT --- > The review guidlines include the packaging guidelines and at least the latter > are not met. That's not my point of view. I can't see _actual_ errors in your added remarks, except the binary dependencies (which could cause the package not to work). But finding those require to inspect the code, and the guidelines don't make that mandatory. Maybe it should be added as a SHOULD item, only in the case of shell scripts (where those are common) ? > backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager-0.7.7.tar.gz 0770 > backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.spec 0770 > backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.cron.daily 0770 I did run rpmlint on the src.rpm, and the "strange-permission" warning is also not something I consider important: the source permissions will not be preserved when the package is imported in CVS. > Hint: You should also run rpmlint on the installed package, because some > errors are not detected otherwise. Hey ! I never realized rpmlint could be run on installed packages ! Thanks a lot for pointing this out ! > This is IMO also part of the review guidelines. No, it's not required to inspect the source code of a package under review. > P.S.: I know I am pedantic ;) :) Look, I know you are trying to improve the quality of the packages in Fedora, and I understand your point of view. However, Fedora, and fedora.us before it, has already tried this route. And we ended up where we have to actually cache as static HTML the list of packages awaiting review, because it is so huge. And after the review, the packager is free to make all the mistakes he wants... We have a big problem here, and this bug is not the place to discuss it, but please understand that sometimes "the better is the enemy of the good". We must not scare packagers away, or bore them to death (this bug was submitted in august 2008). If my review looks perfectible to you, that's because it is. Imperfect, but good enough IMO. That's my point of view, and I can totally understand if you don't share it (and it's nice, we need people like you too). Please finish your review of backup-manager, and reassign the bug to you. And thanks for helping out, sincerely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: <bug-226658-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226658-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102201.n0AM1li4001573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 17:01:44 EDT --- Parag, is there any reason left to not approve this package and get it off the list of merge reviews ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-478429-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478429-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102223.n0AMNbVI005398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 17:23:36 EDT --- First I though that this is only a temporary problem but it seams not. I'm trying to figure out if it's a bug in the openssl package or one in tinc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102237.n0AMbqMn007553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #27 from Lane <dirjud at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 17:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > > in file (of verilator) src/V3Options.cpp: > > && !V3Options::fileStatNormal(var+"/src/systemperl.h")) { > > if you remove /src, I believe it should pull systemperl.h from > perl-SystemPerl-devel. Can you check if please ? This is not a sufficient solution. There are a additional files that verilator pulls from system perl when you turn on tracing that occur during the simulation build. I am not in favor of the approach you are proposing here for the following reasons: - Neither of us have enough background with the complete scope of verilator or system-perl to know how far such a change would reach. I can see this causing unforeseen bugs that reach into tools even beyond verilator. In addition to trying to find all places that verilator references the src/ directory, people likely have tools beyond verilator that use the systemperl files in the src/ directory (we have one, for example). - This puts added burden of maintenance on us as the packagers. Everytime a new release of verilator and system-perl come out we will have to verify our patch(s) are still valid and verify that any additional functionality added in the new releases is not broken. I prefer to stay as close to upstream as possible as the upstream project is much broader than my limited use of it. I use the tool for verilog simulation, but the tool is much broader than that. I feel inadequate putting my stamp that a change such a seemingly benign change is not problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102245.n0AMjnZ3009188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 17:45:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > GNOME Keyring support .. : no Support added Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mpop.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mpop-1.0.16-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226481] Merge Review: tcpdump In-Reply-To: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102250.n0AMobKM009952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226481 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 17:50:36 EDT --- Just done a full check on tcpdump-14:3.9.8-6 The following aesthetic change will make rpmlint happier. Otherwise the package is just fine, no need to keep it on the list of merge reviews < iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 CREDITS > CREDITS.UTF-8 < touch -r CREDITS CREDITS.UTF-8 < mv CREDITS.UTF-8 CREDITS I can do the update in CVS myself if you want. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102259.n0AMxMkQ010957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-10 17:59:21 EDT --- Current version is just fine. Patrick, thank you for the review. If you are looking for sponsorship,please make sure you mention this bug# in a comment added to the packages you have submitted. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226542] Merge Review: words In-Reply-To: <bug-226542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102302.n0AN2SFN011508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-10 18:02:26 EDT --- Karel, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479055] Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class In-Reply-To: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102304.n0AN4hS9011779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-10 18:04:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Throwable Short Description: A minimal lightweight exception class Owners: somlo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102304.n0AN4d3B011940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-10 18:04:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL Short Description: ACL Support for Catalyst Applications Owners: somlo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102304.n0AN4t90012009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-10 18:04:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles Short Description: Role based authorization for Catalyst Owners: somlo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102304.n0AN4n1D011977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-10 18:04:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class Short Description: A storage class for Catalyst Authentication Owners: somlo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102348.n0ANmZNe019753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Blocks|201449 | Resolution|NOTABUG | Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-10 18:48:32 EDT --- reopened I think i'll have enough time to continue, but I need a little bit of help, because I'm still a packaging-padawan and still in a learning process. SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/mumble-1.1.6/mumble.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/mumble-1.1.6/mumble-1.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm successfully builded in my local mock INFO: Done(mumble-1.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(fedora-10-i386) 56 minutes 47 seconds rpmlint errors: mumble-server.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mumble-server mumble-server.i386: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/mumble-server mumble-server.i386: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/mumble-server mumble-server.i386: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/mumble-server I haven't understand the nature of initscripts yet, so I need help to fix these errors, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 23:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901102351.n0ANpWS4020364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 00:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects In-Reply-To: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110010.n0B0AJ5I023473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 00:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110007.n0B07X2v023012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-10 19:07:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mpop Short Description: POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 00:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects In-Reply-To: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110010.n0B0AH3Q023471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-10 19:10:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible Short Description: Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 02:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110208.n0B28b9m009029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 21:08:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Do I need to switch to > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > > at the beginning of the spec file? It says "sitelib for noarch packages, > sitearch for others" No, because you are not using %{python_arch} anywhere in the %files section. Remove the %{!?python_sitearch:... from the spec, you are not going to need it. > Why don't I see any output when I run gget from a terminal? No idea, you should. > Even with this change, gget still doesn't run for me. What version and arch are you using? > Ok, done. Yeah, but you are using /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gget.* which is STRICTLY forbidden. Needs to be %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gget.* > I removed "%define epimajor 2.23". Where should I use wildcards? You removed the 'define...', but you did not remove %{epimajor} from Requires/BuildRequires. IMO you can remove both and then use wildcards in the files section (as you already do). A site note on this issue: $ rpm -ql gget-epiphany-extension | grep epi /usr/lib/epiphany /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions ... As you can see these three directories are already owned by epiphany and there should not be duplicate dir ownerships as outlined in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership So usually we would just own the files, not the dirs with %{_libdir}/epiphany/2.22/extensions/py* The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three directories will become unowned. BTW: This also means you will need to to a rebuild gget after every major version update of epiphany. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 02:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: <bug-477971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110258.n0B2wYl5016736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-10 21:58:33 EDT --- Ok, I'm going to close this review now. Please open a new one when you have packaged arping-ng and cc me there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 04:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] New: Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands Message-ID: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Summary: Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dignan.patrick at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jailkit.spec SRPM URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jailkit-2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Jailkit is a set of utilities to limit user accounts to specific files using chroot() and or specific commands. Setting up a chroot shell, a shell limited to some specific command, or a daemon inside a chroot jail is a lot easier and can be automated using these utilities. Jailkit is used in network security appliances from several well known manufacturers, internet servers from several large enterprise organisations, servers from internet service providers, as well as many smaller companies and private users that need to secure cvs, sftp, shell or daemon processes. Builds in Koji in F8, F9, F10, and F11. rpmlint output: [dignan at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/jailkit-2.5-1.fc10.i386.rpm jailkit.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh root 04755 jailkit.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh 04755 jailkit.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/jk_uchroot root 04755 jailkit.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/jk_uchroot 04755 jailkit.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/sbin/jk_procmailwrapper root 04755 jailkit.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/jk_procmailwrapper 04755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. [dignan at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/jailkit-debuginfo-2.5-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [dignan at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/jailkit-2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The program requires that those binaries have the setuid bit set. Since the program deals with chroot that makes sense to me. I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 04:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110407.n0B47r9b029169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-10 23:07:52 EDT --- Jailkit is packaged and up for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 04:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110406.n0B46nuR029060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Alias| |jailkit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 04:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479530] Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU In-Reply-To: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110455.n0B4tQ3P004451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479530 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-10 23:55:25 EDT --- Resetting fedora?cvs flag, because this package has not been reviewed, yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 06:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110636.n0B6avU5019006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-11 01:36:56 EDT --- New upstream release Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/portmidi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/portmidi-131-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 07:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110725.n0B7PAH9025343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 07:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110725.n0B7PEc0025365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-11 02:25:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Eval-Context.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Eval-Context-0.07-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1044661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 07:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110733.n0B7XJcQ026312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-11 02:33:19 EDT --- Err, make that: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1044663 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 07:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110752.n0B7qa7h028942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> 2009-01-11 02:52:35 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint (see comment) php-pecl-imagick.i386: I: checking php-pecl-imagick.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/INSTALL php-pecl-imagick.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/TODO php-pecl-imagick.src: I: checking php-pecl-imagick-debuginfo.i386: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + specfile name ok + license Ok (PHP) + spec in english + source ok c205ff5e38ca88aad01e74ea8d0e3816 imagick-2.2.1.tgz + source URL ok + latest stable version + build ok (i386, x86_64, ppc and ppc64) + build ok in mock (F9, F10, devel) + BR ok for fedora + no locale + own all directories ok + perm ok + clean ok + contain code ok + doc small enough + doc not required to run + no devel + no gui + install start with rm buildroot + Final Requires /bin/sh /usr/bin/pecl config(php-pecl-imagick) = 2.2.1-2.fc11 libMagickCore.so.1 libMagickWand.so.1 libc.so.6 php(api) = 20041225 php(zend-abi) = 20060613 - Final Provides not ok (see MUST) config(php-pecl-imagick) = 2.2.1-2.fc11 imagick.so php-pecl-imagick = 2.2.1-2.fc11 + package.xml is V2 (registration ok) SHOULD: - TODO is provided empty by upstream, so i think it's ok (could be not empty in another version) - INSTALL is also empty but generally provides information about "building from source" which is not usefull with RPM. You should probably remove it (some package keep it, some remove it) - add version in BR (ok for all fedora but EPEL 4 don't have requirement) BuildRequires: php-devel >= 5.1.3, php-pear, ImageMagick-devel >= 6.2.4 - setup the -n option is needless when -c used - add conditional (recommended in PHP Guidelines) %post => %if 0%{?pecl_install:1} %postun => %if 0%{?pecl_uninstall:1} Without, you package couldn't be imported in EPEL-5 (macro not defined in old php-pear, but even "pecl install" don't work => no extension registration in this case) MUST: - add the missing virtual provides (from PHP guidelines) Provides: php-pecl(%peclName) Only the "MUST" must be fixed for approval, but SHOULD need your attention. Do you want to maintain thi package in EPEL ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 07:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110758.n0B7wrgO029745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> 2009-01-11 02:58:52 EDT --- For MUST, of course i mean Provides: php-pecl(%peclName) = %{version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 08:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110823.n0B8NkVj001046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #8 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-11 03:23:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Do I need to switch to > > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > > > > at the beginning of the spec file? It says "sitelib for noarch packages, > > sitearch for others" > > No, because you are not using %{python_arch} anywhere in the %files section. > Remove the %{!?python_sitearch:... from the spec, you are not going to need it. Removed. > > Why don't I see any output when I run gget from a terminal? > > No idea, you should. It works now. > > Even with this change, gget still doesn't run for me. > > What version and arch are you using? It runs now, my 0.0.4-4 and 0.0.4-5 versions, i386. > > Ok, done. > > Yeah, but you are using /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gget.* which is > STRICTLY forbidden. Needs to be %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gget.* Ok, changed it. > > I removed "%define epimajor 2.23". Where should I use wildcards? > > You removed the 'define...', but you did not remove %{epimajor} from > Requires/BuildRequires. IMO you can remove both and then use wildcards in the > files section (as you already do). Ok, removed %{epimajor} everywhere. > A site note on this issue: > > $ rpm -ql gget-epiphany-extension | grep epi > /usr/lib/epiphany > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions > ... > > As you can see these three directories are already owned by epiphany and there > should not be duplicate dir ownerships as outlined in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > So usually we would just own the files, not the dirs with > %{_libdir}/epiphany/2.22/extensions/py* I'm using Fedora 10, which has Epiphany 2.24. So I used %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* Is that ok? > The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three > directories will become unowned. What do I need to do? Just the rebuilds you mention below? > BTW: This also means you will need to to a rebuild gget after every major > version update of epiphany. That's not a problem for me. Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1305804 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 09:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: <bug-469553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110937.n0B9bNs8016759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 04:37:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The compiler flags are not correct. They do include -g, though, so the > debuginfo package comes out OK. At the moment the package is not building with the compiler flags. > I'm concerned that /usr/bin/genkeys is a bit generic. It conflicts with at > least some installs of ntp, although not Fedora's. and liblogtrend has > /usr/bin/genkeys.pl (although, again, not in Fedora). dkim-milter has > dkim-genkey and asterisk has astgenkey. I will get in touch with upstream perhaps they will change the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 09:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478605] Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478605-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478605-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110943.n0B9hW7V017684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 04:43:30 EDT --- Thanks Christoph, very good points. From my point of view all this points should be implemented by upstream. I will get in touch with those guys and ask them to incorporate your ideas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 09:46:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901110946.n0B9kebI017913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #18 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 04:46:38 EDT --- @Christoph Wickert > You review an old package... spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.src.rpm --------------------------------------------- llaumgui at enterprise ~/Bureau/bm> ll 10:44 total 260K -rw-r--r-- 1 llaumgui llaumgui 103K janv. 11 10:42 backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.noarch.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 llaumgui llaumgui 142K janv. 11 10:43 backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 llaumgui llaumgui 3,3K janv. 11 10:42 backup-manager.spec llaumgui at enterprise ~/Bureau/bm> rpmlint ./* 10:44 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------------------- The package is OK ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 10:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111016.n0BAGJYe023137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 05:16:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: procinfo-ng Short Description: Console-based system monitoring utility Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 10:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111014.n0BAEf1l022589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 05:14:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Packaging-wise: APPROVED Thanks for the review > * The manual page could/should be patched to remove references to the old > hidden option -f (full screen), which has been removed. Patch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 12:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111228.n0BCS5Wl013031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 07:28:03 EDT --- And I have the Problem with missing glibc_private, too Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE) is needed by package mumble Package is not installable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 13:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111331.n0BDVNei025736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> 2009-01-11 08:31:22 EDT --- Firstly - thank you for review. (In reply to comment #4) > REVIEW: > SHOULD: > - TODO is provided empty by upstream, so i think it's ok (could be not empty in > another version) > > - INSTALL is also empty but generally provides information about "building from > source" which is not usefull with RPM. You should probably remove it (some > package keep it, some remove it) As mentioned initialy in first post I also thik what it is not errors and I want to stay it here because it comes from upstream. > - add version in BR (ok for all fedora but EPEL 4 don't have requirement) > BuildRequires: php-devel >= 5.1.3, php-pear, ImageMagick-devel >= 6.2.4 Ok. But from what you get minimum requirement version of ImageMagick? I do not remember what versions was used, but as you can see by changelog, I maintain (for himself repository off course) this package notably long time, nad do not remember any problems with IM... > - setup the -n option is needless when -c used I wasn't known that. Fixed. > - add conditional (recommended in PHP Guidelines) > %post => %if 0%{?pecl_install:1} > %postun => %if 0%{?pecl_uninstall:1} Done. > Without, you package couldn't be imported in EPEL-5 (macro not defined in old > php-pear, but even "pecl install" don't work => no extension registration in > this case) So, EPEL-5 do not require such registration at all?? > > MUST: > - add the missing virtual provides (from PHP guidelines) > Provides: php-pecl(%peclName) Ok, added: Provides: php-pecl(%peclName) = %{version} > > Do you want to maintain thi package in EPEL ? I'm not use this distributions itself. But I can maintain it for EPEL5 on CentOS. It is acceptable? I compleatly do not want maintain it for EPEL4 (but I can import for that branch without testing with hope to the best). May be you want co-mantain it in EPEL4 and/or EPEL5? http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-imagick/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 13:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111333.n0BDXQef025992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret at free.fr |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 08:33:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > @Christoph Wickert > You review an old package... No, I haven't really started the review yet. :) I only wanted to show Aurelien that there were some warnings in the package he reviewed and that he did not post them the review. Please stay tuned for a complete review. (In reply to comment #17) > No, it's not required to inspect the source code of a package under review. The guidelines state that all (build)requirements need to be met and this can only be checked by taking a look at the source. Not only for shell scripts, but also for code and for Makefiles. Do you have a better suggestion how to do that? > :) Look, I know you are trying to improve the quality of the packages in > Fedora, and I understand your point of view. However, Fedora, and fedora.us > before it, has already tried this route. And we ended up where we have to > actually cache as static HTML the list of packages awaiting review, because it > is so huge. The list got so long because of the merge reviews and we are caching them now because of the 'review with flags'-thing. Back in the days when we used blocker bugs there it was not necessary to cache the pages. > And after the review, the packager is free to make all the mistakes > he wants... That's what sponsors and cvsextras at fpo are for. People should look over other's commits. I as a sponsor have set up filters and I take a look at every commit of my sponsorees, at least until I trust them enough. > We must not scare packagers away, or bore them to death (this bug > was submitted in august 2008). Agreed, but I think it is very important for new packagers to get detailed reviews in order to learn the packaging guidelines. If they get sloppy reviews, they are going to do sloppy packages. A detailed review can be done within less than an hour, so this can't be the reason for this bug being open so long. > Please finish your review of backup-manager, and reassign the bug to you. Ok, will do. Can you sponsor Guillaume afterwards? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 13:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111351.n0BDpXCn029614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 08:51:32 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 13:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111359.n0BDxoWD030670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 08:59:49 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (python-progressbar) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 14:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111406.n0BE6DQJ032607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 14:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111411.n0BEBenC001213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 09:11:39 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (podcatcher) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 14:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:15:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111415.n0BEFXQL001627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 09:15:32 EDT --- Removing FE-Legal. Thank you, spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 14:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111412.n0BECYIt000944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #20 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-11 09:12:32 EDT --- I don't want to pollute this bug with justifications, so I'm not going to go into further details. As I said, I believe both approaches are useful. > The list got so long because of the merge reviews and we are caching them now > because of the 'review with flags'-thing. Back in the days when we used > blocker bugs there it was not necessary to cache the pages. No-no, the list has always been huge, even before Fedora time. Now, with merge reviews, the list is just gigantic. The fact that the static pages were officially added only recently does not change the fact that we never found a way to cope efficiently with the amount of submissions. > If they get sloppy reviews, they are going to do sloppy packages. I don't agree with that. But hey, this discussion occurred many many times before on fedora-devel, and there always were these two sides. It's probably not going to change here and now. > Can you sponsor Guillaume afterwards? Sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 14:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111423.n0BENXpS003142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-11 09:23:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-progressbar Short Description: Text progressbar library for python Owners: cdamian Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 14:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111422.n0BEMnq9002813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-11 09:22:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: podcatcher Short Description: Armangil's podcast client for the command line Owners: cdamian Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111504.n0BF42gq010973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 10:04:00 EDT --- For 1.3-2: * License - The License tag should be "LGPLv2+". * javadoc directory - Would you explain why you don't simply use %{_javadocdir}/%{name} as javadoc installation directory and instead want to use %_javadocdir/%name-%version and create symlink? ! Note On rpm packaging please take much care of creating symlink pointing to directory, because with rpm restriction (or cpio?) once this is done it gets very difficult to change this symlink to actual directory or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111538.n0BFcM6w020565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111537.n0BFbi8V020478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111544.n0BFiNBs021768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #4 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> 2009-01-11 10:44:21 EDT --- the latest mercurial spec file and patchs are good. This package (mingw32-pthreads) is APPROVED by lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111546.n0BFkW6w018953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: <bug-451153-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451153-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111601.n0BG18d4022152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 Balint Cristian <rezso at rdsor.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478722] Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map In-Reply-To: <bug-478722-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478722-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111605.n0BG5NFw026156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 --- Comment #2 from Balint Cristian <rezso at rdsor.ro> 2009-01-11 11:05:22 EDT --- Hello Marek, >I'm getting this error during --rebuild: http://pastebin.sk/en/10331/ You need FC10 or -rawhide. 1) I will require for this: BuildRequires: OpenSceneGraph-devel >= 2.6 OpenThreads-devel >= 2.6 2) Also I am getting soname and rpath issues, so hold on to spinn a new src.rpm to fix all these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111638.n0BGcGnU031595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 11:38:14 EDT --- Thanks! Package Name: xfconf Short Description: Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce Owners: kevin Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111651.n0BGp2A6001321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 11:51:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111654.n0BGsNaq031186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 11:54:22 EDT --- In reply to comment #5: > Phil has given up Have you communicated with Phil? Or just assumed they didn't have time to move forward? Typically we would want to close this if that was the case, and file a new review with the new submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111653.n0BGraRN031117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 11:53:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > I don't want to pollute this bug with justifications, so I'm not going to go > into further details. Me ether, nevertheless I'd like you to read my review and ask yourself if the package really was ready for approval. No need to answer here, just think about it. > The fact that the static pages were > officially added only recently does not change the fact that we never found a > way to cope efficiently with the amount of submissions. The static pages were not added recently but after we switched to reviews with flags because searching for flags in bugzilla is not trivial. Please ask Christian Iseli if you don't believe me. > > Can you sponsor Guillaume afterwards? > > Sure. Thanks, so I'm removing the blocker on bug # 177841 now. REVIEW FOR ab3594db4b6b5fe1740b606ad06d41cd backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/backup-manager-0.7.7-4.fc11.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 076af845dee01453f450bd06d021fcc3 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. FIX - MUST: Not all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires: The package runs pod2man to localize the manpages. pod2man is provided by the perl package, which is pulled in automatically, but should be listed explicitly because it is not in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, no content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - Paths for %{_bindir}, %{_datadir} and %{_localstatedir} are hardcoded in backup-manager and in contrib/sanitize.dh. This surely is a blocker! - Fix BuildRequires (see above) - Fix Requires: We need to at least require the commands from the default backup-manager.conf and most of the stuff from the "external commands" section in the backup-manager: -- tar, gzip, bzip2, bc -- /usr/bin/md5sum, /bin/nice, /usr/bin/tail (these 3 are in coreutils, so I recommend to require the package instead of the file names) -- /usr/bin/logger (util-linux-ng), /usr/bin/gpg (gnupg) -- /usr/bin/mkisofs, /usr/bin/cdrecord, /usr/bin/growisofs (dvd+rw-tools) and /usr/bin/dvd+rw-format (dvd+rw-tools) - Optional requirements (I'll leave these up to you) -- zip, lzma and dar -- /usr/bin/scp (openssh-clients), /usr/bin/ssh (openssh-clients) and /usr/bin/ftp (ftp) for upload-methods.sh, maybe also rsync -- /usr/bin/diff (diffutils), /usr/bin/less (less) and usr/bin/sed (sed) for upgrade-conffile.sh -- /usr/bin/svnadmin (subversion) and /usr/bin/mysqldump (mysql) - backup-manager requires both /bin/bash and /bin/sh, but /bin/bash is a superset of /bin/sh. Is this intended or are the scripts not constant in using either one or the other? - the package requires perl(BackupManager::Config), perl(BackupManager::Dialog) and perl(BackupManager::Logger). but it also provides them. They should be filtered out as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides - /var/lib/backup-manager is referenced in /etc/backup-manager.conf, but nether created nor owned by backup-manager - minor: Typo in latest changelog entry: "licence" instead of "license" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479055] Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class In-Reply-To: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111700.n0BH0MqK032383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:00:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:59:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111659.n0BGxVBV031982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-11 11:59:29 EDT --- All good. -------------------------------------------- This package (latexdiff) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------- Please supply the SRPM (in addition to the SPEC) whenever you make an update during the review process in the future. It makes life easier for reviewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111657.n0BGv3nT002168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 11:57:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111658.n0BGwEpQ002263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 11:58:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:03:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111703.n0BH3PUf000481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:03:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111707.n0BH70W1001236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:06:59 EDT --- This package was already reviewed and added to fedora. See bug 477122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111708.n0BH8hwT004210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:08:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111716.n0BHG2WT002847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:16:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111711.n0BHBwxG004947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:11:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111720.n0BHKB49003679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:20:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111719.n0BHJUF5003281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> 2009-01-11 12:19:29 EDT --- > But from what you get minimum requirement version of ImageMagick? >From upstream (and spec) description ;) > So, EPEL-5 do not require such registration at all?? No, like in older fedora (pear < 1.7) it wasn't possible. > But I can maintain it for EPEL5 on CentOS Yes > I compleatly do not want maintain it for EPEL4 Anyway, it is not possible as EL-4 only provides php 4.3.9 > May be you want co-mantain it in EPEL4 and/or EPEL5? Yes, add my FAS (remi) to the CC and request the EL-5 branch in you CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects In-Reply-To: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111721.n0BHLOB7006774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:21:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111720.n0BHK7Al006480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> 2009-01-11 12:20:06 EDT --- All changes are OK. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: <bug-232160-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-232160-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111723.n0BHNc4R004201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #47 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:23:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats In-Reply-To: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111722.n0BHMjHZ004099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:22:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111724.n0BHOb4H007131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 12:24:36 EDT --- Thank you all for reviewing and cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: <bug-457059-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457059-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111724.n0BHOi3i007176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-11 12:24:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 17:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111752.n0BHqmo3009410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 12:52:46 EDT --- Well, for 5.1.0-2: * Header files dependency: - Well, for example the installed QwtModule.sip contains: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 63 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayDouble.h> 64 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayInt.h> 65 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoubleInterval.h> 66 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoublePoint.h> ----------------------------------------------------------------- However these header files are not installed. Would you check if these are ignored? * About grace.py - Well, I checked this file again and actually this file is executable, so it is more correct that this script should simply have 0755 permission (while for qplt.py it seems that this script cannot be executed directly). Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111809.n0BI9j6q012418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 13:09:43 EDT --- mpop-1.0.16-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mpop-1.0.16-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111809.n0BI9lk3012448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 13:09:47 EDT --- mpop-1.0.16-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mpop-1.0.16-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111807.n0BI729V015125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 13:07:01 EDT --- procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111807.n0BI751C015152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 13:07:04 EDT --- procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] New: Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader Message-ID: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Summary: Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl-0.1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID Description: Megaupload-dl helps on the painful process of downloading files hosted on the popular Megaupload site if you don't have a premium account. The process is completely automatic as the captcha is recognized using a OCR. The script (run from the command line, there is no GUI) only returns the file link; use your favorite web downloader to actually get the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111846.n0BIkWAN022440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 13:46:32 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1045389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111850.n0BIo1VY022942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Dan Kenigsberg <danken at cs.technion.ac.il> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Dan Kenigsberg <danken at cs.technion.ac.il> 2009-01-11 13:50:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: latexdiff Short Description: Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files Owners: danken Branches: F-10 InitialCC: danken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111851.n0BIps3x023443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #9 from Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk> 2009-01-11 13:51:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-2.4.1-3.fc10.src.rpm What I did was make the package names the same as what they used to be, with the exception of the standalone package, which I obsoleted because upstream removed support for it in EMF 2.3. (See http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMF/EMF_2.3/Standalone_Zip_Removal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 19:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901111957.n0BJvGvb031811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.spb.su --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> 2009-01-11 14:57:15 EDT --- Excuse me, will it include Rapidshare downloader ( http://code.google.com/p/megaupload-dl/wiki/RapidShare ) as part of upstream megaupload-dl project ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112004.n0BK4qeL003831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 15:04:51 EDT --- i chatted with him. a few days ago. He gave up the whole "fedora contributor idea". he dropped moon-buggy #469585 as well.. for one little adjustment a new bug?! Okay!!! Next time, I will do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112004.n0BK4JtR003788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #22 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 15:04:16 EDT --- Correction made : spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-5.fc10.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/backup-manager-0.7.7-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112013.n0BKDPRX002167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-11 15:13:24 EDT --- Good: + RPMlist is silent on source rpm. + Basename of the SPEC file fit the package name. + Consistent usage fo rpm macros + %doc section is small, so no sepearte doc subpackage is require. + Tar Ball match with upstream tar ball: (md5sum: 8a03cafa72888565f48cf100150c004a) + Files sections contains no files or directories which belongs to othe packages. Bad: - Package should contains the BRs to python a python-BeautifulSoup. - Place remove the argument from the get_python_lib funcstion, so you should wrote: %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} - Please put %{python_sitelib}/megaupload* into the %files section, so the egg-info file may be includes into your package. - Please a 'BuildArch: noarch' on your package, because it's doesn't contains archtiecture depending contents. - Con't verfiy License tag of the package. - Not any source files of the package contains a copyright notice. - package contains no verbatin copy of the license text. (I have open a but on the upstream website. Please refer to http://code.google.com/p/megaupload-dl/issues/detail?id=2) - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: megaupload-dl.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/megaupload_dl/lib.py 0644 megaupload-dl.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/megaupload-dl-0.1.3/megaupload_dl_wget.sh megaupload-dl.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/megaupload_dl/megaupload_dl.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112018.n0BKI2Qc006093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112027.n0BKRXNl007778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 15:27:31 EDT --- You're too quick sorry :) That wasn't final SRPM I've built in koji, but it is uploaded now. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl-0.1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112040.n0BKeTLI007168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-11 15:40:28 EDT --- OK, the local build works fine now, But you should really add a 'BuildArch: noarch' on your package, because it's doesn't contains any archtecture depending content. The complaints of rpmlint agains the binary rpm sill exist. The same issue are the licensing issues because the sources contains no copyright notive and the upstream package contains no verbatin copy of the license text. Even of the project homepage i couldN't find any hint about the licensing state of the package. for will emphasis, taht this is a very severe issue. At last: Please increase the release counter if you are releasing a new source rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112046.n0BKk4YI011207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-11 15:46:03 EDT --- I have take a second look of the project homepage. On the right magin I have found the information, that the package is copyrighted on the GPLv3. This is a valid open source license for the Fedora project. But the issue of the missing copyright notices in the source files sill exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112047.n0BKljRs008250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-11 15:47:44 EDT --- I have take a second look of the project homepage. On the right magin I have found the information, that the package is copyrighted on the GPLv3. This is a valid open source license for the Fedora project. But the issue of the missing copyright notices in the source files sill exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112053.n0BKrmSK009139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #10 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 15:53:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Excuse me, will it include Rapidshare downloader ( > http://code.google.com/p/megaupload-dl/wiki/RapidShare ) as part of upstream > megaupload-dl project ? We may package repidshare downloader later, in different package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112053.n0BKrGTR012219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #9 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 15:53:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl-0.1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112052.n0BKqMjD012134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #8 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 15:52:20 EDT --- Jochen, - noarch package done - I tihnk rpmlint warnings can be ignored here, we don't need exec permission on these python scripts (they are called from the main script) - do you think it's an issue to have that doc script executable? - I've contacted legal team, to find out if it's ok to include this package in Fedora, as it could be in violation of DCMA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 20:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112059.n0BKxsO2010080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-11 15:59:52 EDT --- Thank you, Simo. Dumb question from my side: Is there a special reason for following release tag usage: rsync-3.0.5-1.fc10 rsync-3.0.5-0.fc11 Why don't have both the same release? Was there some special reason? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112104.n0BL4GBg011078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-11 16:04:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nopaste Short Description: Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste Owners: cassmodiah fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112111.n0BLB5av015608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Truch <matt at truch.net> 2009-01-11 16:11:03 EDT --- > - there is a newer upstream 2.6.1b, and it seems upstream switched to a more > sane naming. Thanks for pointing it out, and yes, significantly saner in the naming department. > - "a" and "b" tags from version seems to me like post release package, so > please see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease Of course, and since they are "Properly ordered simple versions" it's ok to have the 'b' in the Version (and the 'a' previously). > - there is a doc target for building development documentation (requires doxgey > and pdfjam) Thanks for pointing it out. It now builds the docs when I build locally, but there are errors when I try a koji scratch build. > - rpmlint is not silent: > > slimdata.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libslim.so > you need to set the exec bit on the so file OK. > slimdata.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libslim.so > library does not have soname set, as this is a system library this is a > blocker. you will have to recompile the file with -Wl,-soname -Wl,libslim.so. > You should also report this upstream. Then also the symlinks need to be generated properly. I'll report (and discuss) this with upstream before I fix fully. > slimdata.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libslim.so > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > slimdata.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libslim.so > exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 > This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() > context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library > function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the > error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any > state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an > actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the > situation. > these are not blockers but they should be reported upstream I'll let upstream know. > slimdata-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > see my previous comment about documentation. OK. New spec and srpm available: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112128.n0BLSKGd015249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-11 16:28:19 EDT --- Upstream has notified me, that a release 0.2 is available now. But unfortunately not all complainted copyrigh related issue are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112135.n0BLZL1n016556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #12 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 16:35:20 EDT --- New SRPM uploaded. http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479594] New: Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client Message-ID: <bug-479594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 Summary: Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/email.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/email-3.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.cleancode.org/projects/email Description: mail is a program for the Unix environment that sends messages from the command line. It let you send email to remote SMTP servers. Email makes it simple to implement in cron jobs. You can pipe data into email and it will accept it as your message which will bypass opening your editor, and mail it properly. Also, you can tell email to stay quiet and never display any output (except for errors) when operating. Email boasts a lot of other qualities as well. * Email supports SMTP Authentication. * Email makes it possible to send to multiple recipients and also CC and BCC multiple recipients. * You can use an address book that is in an easy to format method. * You are also able to send attachments using a swift flick on the command line to specifying multiple files. * Personalized signature file with dynamic options. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1045764 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint email* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint email-3.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: <bug-471915-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471915-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112140.n0BLeaSV020492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-11 16:40:33 EDT --- So, the key problem that Red Hat Legal identified was with the licensing on the JSON code (java/org/apache/tomcat/util/json/JSON*): /* Copyright (c) 2002 JSON.org Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. */ The sentence "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil." makes it non-free, as it is impossible for us to abide by that use-case restriction. We hit this once before with a different package, and tried to contact the copyright holder, but he was unwilling to alter the line (changing "shall" to "should" would suffice to make it a suggestion rather than a legal requirement). Either this code needs to be removed (from both the source and the binary RPM) or JSON.org needs to relicense it without that sentence. In addition to that, the license tag is incorrect on the package, there is no LGPLv3 code in this package that I could see, all of it is either Apache 2.0, LGPLv2+ or the non-free license I mentioned above. Remember that the presense of LICENSING/COPYING does not signal license versioning in the case of GPL/LGPL. Ignoring the "Evil" license, the License tag should be: License: LGPLv2+ and ASL 2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] New: Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter Message-ID: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 Summary: Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/raddump.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/raddump-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/raddump Description: raddump interprets captured RADIUS packets to print a timestamp, packet length, RADIUS packet type, source and destination hosts and ports, and included attribute names and values for each packet. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1045797 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint raddump* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint raddump-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] New: Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts Message-ID: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Summary: Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Serafettin aims to be a collection of free Latin fonts for daily usage. Currently it contains a free comic Sans font, covering the ISO8859-1 character set. It is based on Thukkaram Gopalrao's TSCu_Comic of tamillinux project. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I should note that I am the upstream of these fonts and I'm open to any constructive criticism. rpmlint is silent. fonts packaged according to the new guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package The fonts that serafettin-fonts are based on can be found at: http://tamillinux.sourceforge.net/ https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=14214 These fonts were released under GPL hence I am releasing serafettin-fonts under GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: libglfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112201.n0BM1cLu024235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: glfw - A |Review Request: libglfw - A |portable framework for |portable framework for |OpenGL |OpenGL --- Comment #17 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-11 17:01:33 EDT --- Lubomir, thanks for doing the work. I had a short look to it in CVS and it now looks fine to me. Can you also please prepare a same well done update for F-9 if not already done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112219.n0BMJb15026804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-11 17:19:36 EDT --- @spot: please check the licensing history is clean (seems so, but I'm no expert) @oget: ? please add a page ("packaging request") describing your font describing your font as documented in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle ? please make sure your description/summary does not contain trademarked terms belonging to hostile entities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479218] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible - Flexibly parse strings and turn them into DateTime objects In-Reply-To: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479218-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112238.n0BMcANg027117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479218 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-11 17:38:09 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479598] New: Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies Message-ID: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aopalliance.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aopalliance-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies such as EJB. AOP Alliance intends to facilitate and standardize the use of AOP to enhance existing middleware environments (such as J2EE), or development environements (e.g. JBuilder, Eclipse). The AOP Alliance also aims to ensure interoperability between Java/J2EE AOP implementations to build a larger AOP community. Pretty easy software / package, shouldn't make any worries for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats In-Reply-To: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112238.n0BMcFhQ030160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-11 17:38:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112250.n0BMo4vm029273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-11 17:50:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm * License corrected. * Because I was told I should in another review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019#c6 ...honestly, I've also just checked my /usr/share/javadoc/* and while there's not much in there, everything is using %name-%version with a symlink to it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112252.n0BMqY4x029638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #10 from Nick Boldt <nickboldt+redhat at gmail.com> 2009-01-11 17:52:32 EDT --- Re: comment #9 (spec URL) Your spec file has: Name: eclipse-emf but then later %package sdo-sdk Should the %packages also have the "eclipse-" prefix so that they can be easily found with `yum search eclipse`? (Forgive this newb question.) BTW, SDO is deprecated in the current release of EMF 2.5 (under development, due June 2009), so for Fedora 12, you might want to build a package for the Apache Tuscany SDO project as a replacement. http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SDO_Java_Overview -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112332.n0BNWmBO004656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112350.n0BNoZca010812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:51:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478940] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478940-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112351.n0BNpA9o010945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-11 18:51:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477122 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477122-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112351.n0BNpCok010986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |somlo at cmu.edu --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-11 18:51:09 EDT --- *** Bug 478940 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112350.n0BNob3S010858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Bug 479056 depends on bug 478940, which changed state. Bug 478940 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112350.n0BNoarG010837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 Bug 478942 depends on bug 478940, which changed state. Bug 478940 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478940 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 23:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901112356.n0BNuOcr008693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 18:56:22 EDT --- - Timestamp of Source0 is fixed. - Please remove SystemSettings from the desktop files again, it's better for comptatibility. Sorry for the noise, apart from that the desktop files are ok now. - rpmlint warning regarding usermode can be ignored, but the changelog could be a little better, e. g.: "Require usermode-gtk instead of usermode for the password dialog." But this is really trivial. - on the fly creation of files: Your decision, you are the one to maintain the package. ;) - (How) Do we own the cron files? - Can you explain the makefile.patch a little? Why are you preventing installation of the desktop files and the locales? - Provides: gvfs >= 1.0 looks bogus to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] New: Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts Message-ID: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Summary: Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/shcov.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/shcov-3-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://code.google.com/p/shcov/ Description: shcov is a gcov-like code coverage tester for bourne shell / bash scripts. It also has a lcov-like HTML output generator to present coverage results. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1046165 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint shcov-3-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint shcov-3-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120010.n0C0AmQD014459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk> 2009-01-11 19:10:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Re: comment #9 (spec URL) > > Your spec file has: > > Name: eclipse-emf > > but then later > > %package sdo-sdk > > Should the %packages also have the "eclipse-" prefix so that they can be easily > found with `yum search eclipse`? (Forgive this newb question.) > They are given the "eclipse-" prefix by default. :-) (To specify otherwise, you have to use %package with the -n flag.) > BTW, SDO is deprecated in the current release of EMF 2.5 (under development, > due June 2009), so for Fedora 12, you might want to build a package for the > Apache Tuscany SDO project as a replacement. > > http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SDO_Java_Overview I don't really use SDO (and I'm not aware of anything in Fedora that does). Is that a straight drop-in replacement? I was just planning on Obsoleting it when Andrew packages Eclipse 3.5 and just letting it die. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:11:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120011.n0C0BuVA011510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 19:11:55 EDT --- Guillaume, as soon as you are sponsored, please go on with the cvs procedure. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120020.n0C0Kna3012977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-11 19:20:47 EDT --- Change your summary to something like 'Summary: Universal data array visualization', there is no need to repeat the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120043.n0C0hOp9019630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 19:43:23 EDT --- This is the worst summary I have ever seen! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120049.n0C0ndit020449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 19:49:38 EDT --- Why not use: "AOP saves the world" as summary? ;) Package version is wrong, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:57:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120057.n0C0vIDM018979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 19:57:17 EDT --- Aurelien will sponsor Guillaume as soon as I approve bug # 459535. BTW: Fabian, generally speaking you are right: Because Guillaume is a new contributor, the review needs to be done by a sponsor. Nevertheless your review is very good, I have re-checked most of the points and the other review is nearly finished, so I don't see a problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 01:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120105.n0C15oVL020586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #24 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 20:05:49 EDT --- Please don't forget "BuildRequires: perl" as outlined comment # 21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 01:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120102.n0C12ovV022743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #23 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 20:02:48 EDT --- The requirements are still not correct. It often makes sense to use file dependencies, for some deps it is actually needed: /usr/bin/cdrecord and /usr/bin/mkisofs can be provided by different packages but not only by wodim. Also the name of a package might change over time as it did with /usr/bin/logger, so it's better to require the file. This is what I suggest: Requires: /usr/bin/logger Requires: /usr/bin/mkisofs Requires: /usr/bin/cdrecord Requires: bc Requires: bzip2 Requires: coreutils Requires: diffutils Requires: dvd+rw-tools Requires: less Requires: ftp Requires: genisoimage Requires: gettext Requires: gnupg Requires: gzip Requires: openssh-clients Requires: rsync Requires: sed Requires: tar Requires: which I also removed zip, because I doubt someone will use zip archives for backups as they can't store permissions. lzma and dar are also not very common, so I wouldn't add them. I would also remove rsync, but this is your decision. Please replace %{_var}/lib/ with %{_localstatedir} in your spec. Hint: If you want to use a macro like "%{_var}/lib/" in the changelog, you need to escape it as "%%{_var}/lib/", not "_{_var}/lib/" You have added %{_var}/lib/%{name} to the %files list, but you also need to create the dir during install, otherwise it wont get included in the package. Please remove the "It just works." from the description, because we don't want these kind of "advertising" in our packages. Some trivial typos in changelog: Fixe -> Fix No no need for making a new package now, just fix the spec and post the link here. I will look after the patch to get rid of the hardcoded patch in the meantime. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 01:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120121.n0C1LH9r023300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Bruno Mahe <bruno at gnoll.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bruno at gnoll.org) | --- Comment #3 from Bruno Mahe <bruno at gnoll.org> 2009-01-11 20:21:15 EDT --- pong. I was on vacation and didn't had time to work on it. I am back and going to finish it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 02:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:14:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120214.n0C2EOtF002350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-11 21:14:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > As you can see these three directories are already owned by epiphany and there > > should not be duplicate dir ownerships as outlined in > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > > So usually we would just own the files, not the dirs with > > %{_libdir}/epiphany/2.22/extensions/py* > > I'm using Fedora 10, which has Epiphany 2.24. So I used > > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > > Is that ok? No. It would be ok if you followed the 'no duplicate directory ownership' rule, but in this case we cannot use it, because it will leave unowned dirs behind. It's better if two packages own the a dir than no package. So you should use %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/ > > > The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three > > directories will become unowned. > > What do I need to do? Just the rebuilds you mention below? With the line you are using now you would need to do a rebuild a rebuild in time with epiphany, but _after_ it has been pushed out, because you are building against it. The users would have to install your update in the same rpm transaction as the epiphany update and in the correct order. You see: This is nearly impossible, that's why the 'no duplicate ownership' model doesn't work here. I have to admit that this is a very special case, but you can take it as a chance to learn something about packaging. ;) Maybe we can clean this up with a symlink without version, but this would need to be done in the epiphany package. %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas should not be marked as %config because gconf schemas are not meant to be changed by users and need to get replaced on updates. No need to update your package now, wait for the review and then fix all issues in one release. Sorry I did not manage to do the review today, but I will tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 03:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:33:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120333.n0C3Xwvp016179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 22:33:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I'm using Fedora 10, which has Epiphany 2.24. So I used > > > > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > > > > Is that ok? > > No. It would be ok if you followed the 'no duplicate directory ownership' rule, > but in this case we cannot use it, because it will leave unowned dirs behind. > It's better if two packages own the a dir than no package. > > So you should use > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/ Please ask nautilus maintainer to make nautilus own %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{ephy_major}/extensions before doing such a thing ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088#c25 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491 > > > The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three > > > directories will become unowned. > > > > What do I need to do? Just the rebuilds you mention below? > > With the line you are using now you would need to do a rebuild a rebuild in > time with epiphany, but _after_ it has been pushed out, because you are > building against it. This should only happen on rawhide, no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 03:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120343.n0C3hCZq017823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #12 from Nick Boldt <nickboldt+redhat at gmail.com> 2009-01-11 22:43:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I don't really use SDO (and I'm not aware of anything in Fedora that does). Is > that a straight drop-in replacement? I was just planning on Obsoleting it when > Andrew packages Eclipse 3.5 and just letting it die. That's an even better solution. :) I haven't used Tuscany, but I've heard some less than favourable reviews. It's not a direct drop-in replacement; I believe it implements an updated version of the SDO spec. I just figured if you needed something to replace it, this would be the best option. But really, I suppose it depends on the community's interest and request. Let it die, and if no one complains, then I guess no one wants or needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120414.n0C4EJmA023199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 23:14:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Please ask nautilus maintainer to make nautilus own > %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{ephy_major}/extensions before doing such a thing > ref: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088#c25 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491 No nautilus, epiphany... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 05:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120521.n0C5Lirq032409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 00:21:42 EDT --- I'll probably sound picky, but I'd say https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#When_to_.2Anot.2A_test applies here. In other words, the test should be made to pass, not deleted. I am wrong here? Does it fall under "Tests which do not test package functionality should still be invoked, but their exclusion not be considered a blocker" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 06:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support In-Reply-To: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120639.n0C6dDAx014024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 01:39:11 EDT --- I don't want block this review for other dependent packages. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 06:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476623] Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one In-Reply-To: <bug-476623-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476623-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120642.n0C6gSxw017310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 08:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120854.n0C8ss9e006288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 03:54:52 EDT --- Done: Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper-1.3.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: <bug-472348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120918.n0C9IUxL010130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 04:18:28 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hunspell-no New Branches: F-10 Owners: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: <bug-472348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120918.n0C9If0i012705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479598-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120932.n0C9WGDt012878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-12 04:32:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aopalliance.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aopalliance-1.0-1.20090111cvs.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the comments. I tried to address both issues in the new version. Writing a good summary for this is tough, though ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120946.n0C9kONB015824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dkaylor at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: <bug-469474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469474-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120945.n0C9jlSe015631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 04:45:46 EDT --- - Please preserve the time stamps while copying https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - It would be nice if you use the same style for commands everywhere in your spec file. Relating to %{__rm} vs. rm - 'Requires: webserver' has to be 'Requires: httpd' - The URL of this project is http://sovix.org/sovix/Sovix (http://gnu.org/software/sovix is a redirect) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120946.n0C9khhi015952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 --- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trmac <mitr at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 04:46:40 EDT --- Thanks for the patch. I have applied most of it in mlocate-0.21.1-3, with the following changes: - add "exit 0" to %triggerpostun as well - Don't replace /etc/cron.daily by %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily. Somebody might reasonably redefine %{_bindir} etc. to e.g. build a mlocate package located under /opt/mlocate, but the cron.daily script must be in /etc/cron.daily, where it is expected by cron configuration, not in /opt/mlocate/etc/cron.daily, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:49:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120949.n0C9nOWL018540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 04:49:22 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: <bug-448661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-448661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120951.n0C9pMVJ019254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(galak at kernel.cras | |hing.org) --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 04:51:18 EDT --- Any progress on this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901120948.n0C9mulf018437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|dkaylor at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 04:48:55 EDT --- sorry for the spurious assignments, I have not noticed that David is not in the packager group. I'll try to do a review myself later today, if I have the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: <bug-448661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-448661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121005.n0CA5thO019908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 05:05:54 EDT --- Two other small things... - The URL should be 'http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/WebHome' - Please preserve the time stamps while copying https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) and leave %attr(755,root,root) away. Without further investigations, I think it will work. Or is there an issue with the permission of mkimage? For details https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25files_section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121008.n0CA8CYC020384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tim at niemueller.de | |) --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 05:08:09 EDT --- Is there any progress with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121026.n0CAQFrZ026500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 05:26:13 EDT --- Some comment before I do a full review. - '-n %{name}-%{version}' is not needed in %setup because this is the default. - ChangeLog is missing in %doc - I personally like one line per BR ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121022.n0CAMe5j025591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-12 05:22:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Please ask nautilus maintainer to make nautilus own > %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{ephy_major}/extensions before doing such a thing > ref: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088#c25 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491 Mamoru, at least %{_libdir}/epiphany/ and %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version} _are_ already owned by epiphany and also owning %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}/extensions will _not_ help us here. Imagine this: /usr/lib/epiphany /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* When epiphany gets updated to 2.23 we have: /usr/lib/epiphany (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23 /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23/extensions The next day the gget update comes: /usr/lib/epiphany (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions (unowned and empty) /usr/lib/epiphany /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23 /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23/extensions/gget.py* The problem is the version number in there. > This should only happen on rawhide, no problem. You are right, there will be no major version update in the stable release. But the other two problems will remain. We only have the alternatives of - ether let both packages own the dirs or - use strictly versioned deps and delay the epiphany update in rawhide because of them. This is just like the firefox nightmares. To me the latter is the worst. I'm open to suggestions though, because my gwget package is also affected. I have been trying to find it's review, but gwget is one of the former fedora.us packages and I took it over some time ago. The only solution I can think of: Make epiphany own %{_libdir}/epiphany/ %{_libdir}/epiphany/plugins %{_libdir}/epiphany/extensions %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version} %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}/plugins -> %{_libdir}/epiphany/plugins %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}/extensions -> %{_libdir}/epiphany/extensions What do you think, Mamoru? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: <bug-456756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121032.n0CAWASi028112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(leigh123linux at goo | |glemail.com) --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 05:32:08 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: <bug-456756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456756-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121047.n0CAlpB1031481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(leigh123linux at goo | |glemail.com) | --- Comment #12 from leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com> 2009-01-12 05:47:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Any progress on this? Not yet , I am still working on getting the dep's passed ( dpkg debhelper ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479645] New: Review Request: hunspell-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-uk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-uk-0.20030903-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ukrainian hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121055.n0CAtOfh030745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: hunspell-uk |Review Request: hyphen-uk - |- Ukrainian hyphenation |Ukrainian hyphenation rules |rules | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] New: Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-mi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-mi-0.20080630-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Maori hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479647] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl Message-ID: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Dumpvar/perl-Devel-Dumpvar.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Dumpvar/perl-Devel-Dumpvar-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Most perl dumping modules are focused on serializing data structures into a format that can be rebuilt into the original data structure. They do this with a variety of different focuses, such as human readability, the ability to execute the dumped code directly, or to minimize the size of the dumped data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121110.n0CBAtFf004868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 06:10:54 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (63ff1e53152c60044ed8804d54e0d0e8c80e69eb hyph_uk_UA.zip), license (GPLv2+) is correct. APPROVED assuming you will use the correct name :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121114.n0CBECnW005475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 06:14:11 EDT --- Is it hyphen or hunspell ? The bug name says hunspell, the spec / SRPM say hyphen, that source file is hunspell-hyphen... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121120.n0CBKsDB007130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #8 from Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 06:20:53 EDT --- Under the status is says 'unapproved' could this be why? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121121.n0CBLjE8004621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 06:21:43 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (53d6bb363d21726aaad7e832bcd252c7ff7baa9f hunspell-hyphen-mi-0.1.20080630-beta.tar.gz), license (GPLv3+) is correct. Waiting for clarifications on the name. I assume hyphen-mi would be the correct one, but... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121135.n0CBZLdG007181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: hunspell-mi |Review Request: hyphen-mi - |- Maori hyphenation rules |Maori hyphenation rules --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 06:35:21 EDT --- hyphen-mi I mean, getting confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121133.n0CBXkiA006686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 06:33:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-uk Short Description: Ukrainian hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121141.n0CBf2W1008238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #9 from Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 06:41:00 EDT --- Ok I re-applied, may I get approval now? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: <bug-451771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121138.n0CBcBgr010511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 06:38:09 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121145.n0CBj45I011962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 06:45:03 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121149.n0CBnnUO012599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 06:49:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-mi Short Description: Maori hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] New: Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl Message-ID: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: <description here> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] New: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope Message-ID: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-pushd/perl-File-pushd.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-pushd/perl-File-pushd-1.00-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: File::pushd does a temporary chdir that is easily and automatically reverted, similar to pushd in some Unix command shells. It works by creating an object that caches the original working directory. When the object is destroyed, the destructor calls chdir to revert to the original working directory. By storing the object in a lexical variable with a limited scope, this happens automatically at the end of the scope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] New: Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration Message-ID: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Summary: Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-ORLite-Migrate/perl-ORLite-Migrate.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-ORLite-Migrate/perl-ORLite-Migrate-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: THIS CODE IS EXPERIMENTAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE SQLite is a light weight single file SQL database that provides an excellent platform for embedded storage of structured data. ORLite is a light weight single class Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) system specifically designed for (and limited to only) work with SQLite. ORLite::Migrate is a light weight single class Database Schema Migration enhancement for ORLite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226542] Merge Review: words In-Reply-To: <bug-226542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121241.n0CCfe9Z019548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(kzak at redhat.com) | --- Comment #6 from Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 07:41:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Some suggestions, I really would like to see, but no must: > - Remove "BuildRequires: coreutils", something else anyway pulls that in Fixed. > - Replace "Source: mwords.tar.Z" by "Source: > http://web.archive.org/web/20060527013227/http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/ilash/Moby/mwords.tar.Z" > as it is a valid source URL and everybody can verify it OK, good idea. Fixed. > Karel, olease close the bug report once you've applied the changes or let me > know why you won't do this and close this bug report therewith. Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121241.n0CCfZhI022609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #10 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 07:41:33 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121242.n0CCg0Gl022687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479669 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 12:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121241.n0CCfx1O022665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478362] Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers In-Reply-To: <bug-478362-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478362-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121303.n0CD3aTQ024110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478362 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 08:03:35 EDT --- Thanks Christoph for your review and your help. I will incorporate the changes as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121305.n0CD5pPG028036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 08:05:49 EDT --- I will review this package. current problems: - the latest version is not packaged (there is 1.2.34 in rawhide) rpmlint errors: mingw32-libpng.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpng12.dll.a mingw32-libpng.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpng.dll.a mingw32-libpng.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpng12.la ^^^ I don't think we need libtool *la files installed, do we? Otherwise I don't see any other problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121330.n0CDUZlk030461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-12 08:30:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > Imagine this: > /usr/lib/epiphany > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* > > When epiphany gets updated to 2.23 we have: > /usr/lib/epiphany (unowned) > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 (unowned) > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* (unowned) > /usr/lib/epiphany > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23 > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23/extensions Well, - As when epiphany is upgrade from 2.22 to 2.23, then I guess gget-epiphany-extension will no longer work (although I don't know this package well) unless gget is rebuilt against new epiphany. i.e. if epiphany can be upgraded without gget-epiphany-extension is rebuilt, it is _already_ wrong. Not-rebuilt gget-epiphany-extension should prevent epiphany from being upgraded in such a case (theoretically). Some idea: - Add "Conflicts: epiphany >= 2.23" "Conflicts: epiphany < 2.22" - Ask epiphany maintainer to support "Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22", for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121337.n0CDbgjX002660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 08:37:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) I also made a wiki page for this font: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Serafettin_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121344.n0CDiV2c000653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-12 08:44:29 EDT --- Also, as some packages already use %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions, making every package use this directory own this directory cannot be accepted and the owner of this directory must be unified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:46:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121346.n0CDkqra001438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-12 08:46:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I already do have an account, my login is "madko". I'm just trying to log in > but it says that my password has expired so i'm waiting for the reset password > email... I guess you don't find my account because i haven't filled any details > on it? well to get sponsored first you need to join the "Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group (packager)" at the flowing link. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/packager Can you do this as soon as possible ? after you join the packager's group then I will get your account sponsored and your package reviewed :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 14:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121410.n0CEAG8M009821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #10 from Simo Sorce <ssorce at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 09:10:14 EDT --- No special reason, I did a mistake in rsync-3.0.5-0.fc10 so I had to bump up to re-tag and build :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 14:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121434.n0CEYJlv014596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 --- Comment #9 from Noel J. Bergman <noel at devtech.com> 2009-01-12 09:34:18 EDT --- For what it is worth, I have a replacement for the VNC plugin. Trying to get it into upstream, and will post here for your convenience. It handles three of the common VNC viewers, so it is more distro and version independent, and provides an easy means to plugin any other VNC viewer that someone might want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 14:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121438.n0CEc4fR015498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Noel J. Bergman <noel at devtech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Ubuntu Launchpad 130334 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 14:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121437.n0CEbEqD015391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 --- Comment #10 from Noel J. Bergman <noel at devtech.com> 2009-01-12 09:37:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328742) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328742) Replacement VNC plugin for Service Discovery Applet This replaces vncviewer.py.in. It autodetects which vnc viewer is available, and handles the difference in command line parameters including the port / screen difference between XVNC and Vinagre. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 14:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121446.n0CEkUdw017521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-12 09:46:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I can't change my password: > > ---------------------------- > 500 Internal error > > The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from > fulfilling the request. > ---------------------------- > > from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/setnewpass/ your password has been mailed to you. https://fedorahosted.org/fas/ticket/84 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121505.n0CF5oxE019939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #9 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 10:05:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Any progress with the seeking of a sponsor? I have been sponsored through another package but am drowning in work things (the usual heap after being 2 weeks on vacation), I hope to get this (and jpilot-backup) pushed in the next 2 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool In-Reply-To: <bug-473348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121504.n0CF4dYc019471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org> 2009-01-12 10:04:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is not an official review. > > 1. When applying patch #2, patch returns: > > patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line > I've removed this patch and replaced it with a patch that update to latest trunk. There's only a handful of changes since the last beta. > While this doesn't abort the build, the patch file should be fixed to not > generate this error. > > 2. This would fail to run with SELinux activated. You should fix the context > of the CGI script, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux. > Creating a drraw-selinux subpackage would probably be ideal in this case. > I'm not SELinux proficient, but I'll try to take care of that. Thanks for the pointer. In your opinion, does such a requirement block the review or can we save that for later ? > 3. Patch #2 appears to be a bug fix. If you have filed a bug with the > upstream source, you should reference this in your spec file; if not, you > should file one and reference it. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment There's no bug tracker for this project. This was reported on their mailing list by a colleague of mine, as well as some patch for new features. Actually, even the svn repository is not public, but after a few mails with upstream, I now have read-only access. I'll post new spec and srpms when the selinux issue is addressed. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225700] Merge Review: docbook-dtds In-Reply-To: <bug-225700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121506.n0CF6hhR020265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225703] Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl In-Reply-To: <bug-225703-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225703-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121506.n0CF6sLn022757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225703 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225700] Merge Review: docbook-dtds In-Reply-To: <bug-225700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225700-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121540.n0CFepfD027906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmarcini at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225703] Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl In-Reply-To: <bug-225703-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225703-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121540.n0CFecuF029897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225703 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmarcini at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121542.n0CFgx5l030348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #5 from Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 10:42:58 EDT --- Spec file uses mixed spaces and tabs, please fix this issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121542.n0CFgDKA030225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121541.n0CFfqQX030155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121556.n0CFunQF031490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 10:56:47 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: fsniper.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/fsniper fsniper fsniper.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/fsniper fsniper 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. => acceptable, the daemon needs it's own user [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7f4587d83e8c1bbfb142c645f5d40a4bee50bdb7 fsniper-1.3.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047004) [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Nice to have: upstart style initscript ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ David, thank you for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121618.n0CGIWrC003617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:18:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: irrlicht Short Description: A high performance real-time 3D engine Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support In-Reply-To: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121618.n0CGIdem005994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:18:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-zlib Short Description: Tcl extension for zlib support Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474606-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474606-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121618.n0CGIT2U005958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:18:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SolarModel Short Description: Real-time 3D Solar System simulation Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121625.n0CGPgBn007699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #2 from Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:25:41 EDT --- Does not rebuild in mock, please check buildrequires and add all that are needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121630.n0CGURMR006303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:30:26 EDT --- David, Manuel, thank you both for the review. Manuel, is there any documentation on the upstart-style initscripts? A quick search of fedora wiki for the word "upstart" didn't reveal much.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121634.n0CGYJO2009296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:34:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fsniper Short Description: A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them Owners: jhrozek Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121637.n0CGbDhU010196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #10 from Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:37:12 EDT --- Ok thanks to spot I am now sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479711] New: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration Message-ID: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-Duration-Parse OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Time-Duration-Parse.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Time::Duration::Parse is a module to parse human readable duration strings like _2 minutes and 3 seconds_ to seconds. It does the opposite of duration_exact() in Time::Duration and is roundtrip safe. So, the following is always true. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047036 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121642.n0CGghEk011740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-12 11:42:42 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121647.n0CGld8t010446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:47:38 EDT --- Thanks... BuildRequires: libxml2 >= 2.4.8 was missing, as xmlcatalog used in build section as well. Updated files provided to reviewer via nfs share... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: <bug-454022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121650.n0CGoA0N011095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454020, which changed state. Bug 454020 Summary: Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support In-Reply-To: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121650.n0CGo9rY011068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 11:50:08 EDT --- Built for F-9, F-10, devel. Thanks for your patience on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 17:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121703.n0CH34iU013743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giallu at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 12:03:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Updated files provided to reviewer via nfs share... Not that there is anything wrong with this, but maybe you're just not aware of the very handy storage service available to all Fedora contributors: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 17:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121716.n0CHGY6r016649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-12 12:16:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > - As when epiphany is upgrade from 2.22 to 2.23, then > I guess gget-epiphany-extension will no longer work (although > I don't know this package well) unless gget is rebuilt > against new epiphany. Correct. It will no longer work because epiphany won't find it, because it's looking in a different location. > i.e. if epiphany can be upgraded without gget-epiphany-extension > is rebuilt, it is _already_ wrong. Not-rebuilt gget-epiphany-extension > should prevent epiphany from being upgraded in such a case > (theoretically). I disagree. It's better to temporarily loose a certain functionality than prevent epiphany from being updated. People who are using rawhide are used to thinks breaking from time to time, but still they are running rawhide because they want to follow the latest development. What if the epiphany update is part of a larger Gnome update? The older epiphany might no longer work with the updated Gnome stuff and then we make the whole app useless instead of a single extension. > Some idea: > - Add "Conflicts: epiphany >= 2.23" > "Conflicts: epiphany < 2.22" Congratulations, you have just made it conflict with _every_ epiphany release! :) > - Ask epiphany maintainer to support "Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22", > for example. And them make the extension "Requires: epiphany(abi) = 2.22"? What's the advantage over "Requires: epiphany = 2.22"? (In reply to comment #14) > Also, as some packages already use %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions, > making every package use this directory own this directory cannot be > accepted and the owner of this directory must be unified. Why? We have a couple of these situations whenever one package does not necessarily depend on the other. Duplicate ownership of a dir is bad, but unowned dirs are even worse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121800.n0CI07pX027459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 13:00:06 EDT --- Built for F-9, F-10, devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474606-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474606-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121800.n0CI09jE027487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Bug 474606 depends on bug 474603, which changed state. Bug 474603 Summary: Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] New: Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git Message-ID: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Summary: Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tmz at pobox.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/cgit/cgit.spec SRPM URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/cgit/cgit-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an attempt to create a fast web interface for the git scm, using a builtin cache to decrease server io-pressure. In addition to the spec and srpm above, the output of a mock build for F-10 i386 is at: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/cgit Potential concerns are that cgit currently requires some git sources to build. Eventually, this will be fixed when libgit2 is ready. Near term, Lars is working upstream to include the needed git files in the cgit tarballs. Another minor issue is package cleanup. The package owns the cache dir, /var/cache/cgit, but it won't know about the files created within that dir. Would a %preun script to delete these files be appropriate? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121810.n0CIAMsx026915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-12 13:10:21 EDT --- Yes? I was at fudcon this weekend, and intend to import and build this sometime soon this week time permitting. I need to first build the new libxfce4util package. Sorry for any delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121812.n0CICJK5027508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 13:12:18 EDT --- Licensing history looks clean, I will assume it is unless evidence to the contrary appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121827.n0CIR3Ya032760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-12 13:27:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > i.e. if epiphany can be upgraded without gget-epiphany-extension > > is rebuilt, it is _already_ wrong. Not-rebuilt gget-epiphany-extension > > should prevent epiphany from being upgraded in such a case > > (theoretically). > > I disagree. It's better to temporarily loose a certain functionality than > prevent epiphany from being updated. People who are using rawhide are used to > thinks breaking from time to time, but still they are running rawhide because > they want to follow the latest development. > What if the epiphany update is part of a larger Gnome update? The older > epiphany might no longer work with the updated Gnome stuff and then we make the > whole app useless instead of a single extension. "A larger Gnome update" in your sense had been already disturbed before many times (largely because some new gnome components won't build against new gnome libraries, gnome-desktop for example...). Other packages failing to rebuild have also prevented major packages in your sense from being upgraded. I can see no gain to loose dependency on this package for the reason you raised (and for this package you can simply remove this, while for gnome-desktop (for example) we actually have to wait until (almost) all package are rebuilt) > > Some idea: > > - Add "Conflicts: epiphany >= 2.23" > > "Conflicts: epiphany < 2.22" > > Congratulations, you have just made it conflict with _every_ epiphany release! > :) First of all: - Please don't use "congratulations" ":)" or "!" carelessly, please. While I don't know how commonly these words or emoticons are used in discussions like this bug report in your country, these words can be taken very differently than what you expect in other countries. Then: if epiphany has 2.22{,X} version, the epiphany won't conflict with these two. Note that this method is sometimes used when - A srpm creates 2 (or more) subpackages - The two packages don't depend on each other, and can be installed seperately or together - However if the versions of the two package differ, something nasty could occur > > - Ask epiphany maintainer to support "Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22", > > for example. > > And them make the extension "Requires: epiphany(abi) = 2.22"? What's the > advantage over "Requires: epiphany = 2.22"? It won't work for ephiphany minor release bump (i.e. 2.22.3, for example) For example ruby has "Provides: ruby(abi) = 1.8" while the current ruby version (on Fedora) is 1.8.6(.287) (and actually I think if epiphany changes the extension every time its major/middle version changes, epiphany should provide such information to rpm, like ruby, python or so actually do) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Also, as some packages already use %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions, > > making every package use this directory own this directory cannot be > > accepted and the owner of this directory must be unified. > > Why? We have a couple of these situations whenever one package does not > necessarily depend on the other. Duplicate ownership of a dir is bad, but > unowned dirs are even worse. But they all depend on epiphany. So I am asking you to ask epiphany maintainer first (as I did to vim maintainer). It is not desired that no one using that directory tries to argue with epiphany maintainer and gets satisfied with his/her "local" hack. KDE has kde-filesystem, font packages got to use fontpackages-filesystem and so on. Please contact with epiphany maintainer first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-450539-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121834.n0CIYJxG031396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Tim Niemueller <tim at niemueller.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tim at niemueller.de | |) | --- Comment #11 from Tim Niemueller <tim at niemueller.de> 2009-01-12 13:34:18 EDT --- I'm currently short in time. I still think the service-discovery-applet should be in Fedora. My time constraints (thesis) will not allow me to do this before March though. Either we wait or someone else takes over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121832.n0CIW9Se001356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-01-12 13:32:08 EDT --- I see you have updated the SPEC & SRPM. This plugin should be named purple-msn-pecan instead of pidgin-msn-pecan, since it's a plugin for libpurple (not pidgin); also other existing libpurple plugins have been named in a similar fashion: purple-facebookchat.x86_64 : Libpurple plug-in supporting facebook IM purple-microblog.x86_64 : Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121844.n0CIiBMH003775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-12 13:44:10 EDT --- That's not picky at all :) The failing test is one using Test::Perl::Critic -- it tests _how_ you code, not if the code works or not, so it's OK to exclude along the lines of Test::Kwalitee, Test::Pod::Coverage, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479730] New: Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available Message-ID: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available Alias: perl-DateTimeX-Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTimeX-Easy OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTimeX-Easy.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.085-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: DateTimeX::Easy makes DateTime object creation quick and easy. It uses a variety of DateTime::Format packages to do the bulk of the parsing, with some custom tweaks to smooth out the rough edges (mainly concerning timezone detection and selection). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121857.n0CIvoj0004038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-12 13:57:48 EDT --- I got it to build, but it's the ugly mv in %install method. Bleah. Imported and build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121905.n0CJ5F5w005610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-12 14:05:14 EDT --- chipmunk-4.1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chipmunk-4.1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479732] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles Message-ID: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Role-Parameterized OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Roles are composable units of behavior. They are useful for factoring out functionality common to many classes from any part of your class hierarchy. (See Moose::Cookbook::Roles::Recipe1 for an introduction to Moose::Role.) While combining roles affords you a great deal of flexibility, individual roles have very little in the way of configurability. Core Moose provides alias for renaming methods to avoid conflicts, and excludes for ignoring methods you don't want or need (see Moose::Cookbook::Roles::Recipe2 for more about alias and excludes). Because roles serve many different masters, they usually provide only the least common denominator of functionality. To empower roles further, more configurability than alias and excludes is required. Perhaps your role needs to know which method to call when it is done. Or what default value to use for its url attribute. Parameterized roles offer exactly this solution. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121916.n0CJGJHW008010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #2 from Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> 2009-01-12 14:16:18 EDT --- httpd is required for ownership of /etc/httpd/conf.d. If that can be made more generic, I'd be all for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121911.n0CJBYLA006902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:11:33 EDT --- - rpmlint output celt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Just move (or duplicate) the README and TODO files into the -devel subpackage. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ? license matches the actual package license There's a number of source files (both *.c and *.h) that don't contain explicit license information. Are we sure about the origin of these files? + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm dd7cda953e4df448083b69af9afc15e1 401008 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture x86_64 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047518 n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: ? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047518 + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ------ So there's that %doc thing to fix, and can you query upstream about the libcelt/*.[ch] files which don't have license information to find out who wrote them and/or where they came from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:11:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121911.n0CJBioO009386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |svidal at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:11:42 EDT --- rpmlint checks out package passes all MUST requirements from review checks Does it REALLY require httpd - or does it only require 'webserver'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:14:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479055] Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class In-Reply-To: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121914.n0CJE40n009728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> 2009-01-12 14:14:02 EDT --- successfully built and submitted for stable (forgot to add -b 479055 to bodhi) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121914.n0CJE5l6009750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Bug 479056 depends on bug 479055, which changed state. Bug 479055 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121933.n0CJXxlO014886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-12 14:33:58 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121934.n0CJY7Xe014923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-12 14:34:07 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121945.n0CJj7nM015340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |svidal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121941.n0CJfljD016807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #12 from Edouard Bourguignon <edouard.bourguignon at oxalya.com> 2009-01-12 14:41:46 EDT --- Ok I will change that. thanks for the info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121951.n0CJpCPm016592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #14 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:51:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328778) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328778) mail from legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121948.n0CJmUAM017982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-12 14:48:28 EDT --- Any chance you want to work with the maintainer of xmoto to get xmoto 0.5 to use the system chipmunk? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121950.n0CJotV7018726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:50:54 EDT --- The other comment I have from a quick look is that the %define at the top for the make really probably should just be explicitly in the %build section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121949.n0CJnUEW018121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #13 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:49:28 EDT --- Jochen, Cleared issue with legal team, we are good to go, I'll attach mail from legal later. http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl-0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121952.n0CJqWtr016831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-12 14:52:29 EDT --- Just kidding, it appears you are the xmoto maintainer. Good job :D. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121952.n0CJqm9F016897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #13 from Edouard Bourguignon <edouard.bourguignon at oxalya.com> 2009-01-12 14:52:46 EDT --- So here are the new files: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan.spec http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121956.n0CJuQ2r017780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #4 from seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:56:25 EDT --- >From Tibbs: The package shouldn't own this dir: %define scriptdir %{_localstatedir}/www/cgi-bin End from Tibbs. >From Me: that is provided by httpd which the pkg already deps on, so it's okay to remove that dir ownership. If you remove the ownership of that dir then this pkg is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474606-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474606-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121954.n0CJsX93017134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 14:54:32 EDT --- Built for F-9, F-10, rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122001.n0CK1Fbx021031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #5 from Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> 2009-01-12 15:01:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The other comment I have from a quick look is that the %define at the top for > the make really probably should just be explicitly in the %build section. True, it could be. I had it there to start, but it causes a spurious warning from rpmlint, which I figured could be easily avoided by defining it outside of %build and %prep. Does that cause any harm? And is it uglier there than the rpmlint warning might be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901121957.n0CJva1h020137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-12 14:57:36 EDT --- Had a reply half typed to #20 when I saw #21. . .:) I've made a few attempts, but it looks like a lot of paths might reply on the presence of the bundled version. I'm in conversation with upstream about it. They have no problem using the system version, it's not not in any distros. I let them know Fedora has it now, so we'll see what develops. If I get it working before then, I will of course patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: <bug-479594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122004.n0CK4Oaq019485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 15:04:23 EDT --- I realize it's the upstream project name, but... wow, that name is going to cause a lot of search collisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122010.n0CKAfSU021112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #23 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-12 15:10:40 EDT --- I think there is a packaging guideline that is something along the lines of: MUST not use private copy of system libraries. So please do work this out with upstream, or failing that hack up a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122007.n0CK7Zjg022486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> 2009-01-12 15:07:33 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review Seth (and the helpful eyes from Tibbs). I'll fix that ownership up thusly: -%{scriptdir} +%{scriptdir}/* Any concerns about getting the SELinux contexts setup properly before importing the package? I could add some policy to the package, but I couldn't find any guidelines on whether that was preferable to getting the changes into selinux-policy directly. All I found was a draft, which might be old and outdated: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:18:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122018.n0CKIket022954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-12 15:18:45 EDT --- I think it's actually a SHOULD, but I feel pretty strongly about it and have done quite a bit with several of my PHP packages to that end. The sooner the better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: <bug-467324-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467324-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122021.n0CKLOg2025439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 15:21:23 EDT --- As an aside, Sun is (slowly) working through resolving this issue. Hopefully, they'll have this fixed across the board by the time Fedora 11 rolls around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: <bug-468631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122046.n0CKkbvs028747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 15:46:35 EDT --- I can find no patents in a preliminary search that this would violate. While the format is clearly not documented publicly, there is no problem with a reverse engineered implementation, especially since this is being done for the explicit reason of providing interoperability with Linux environments. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122104.n0CL4jBZ002037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122110.n0CLASLk001203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-12 16:10:26 EDT --- Package looks from a packagers view good to me, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] New: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> Message-ID: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cmontgom at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/CELT/libcelt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/CELT/libcelt-0.5.1-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: CELT is a fully open, non-proprietary, patent- and royalty-free, low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music. The libcelt package contains runtime libraries for use in programs that support Ogg CELT. Note that the package name is consistent with the other packaged Xiph codec libraries; the upstream is named 'CELT' [as opposed to libcelt] mostly because the developer who handled the initial release engineering was partially unaware of the naming scheme across the Xiph repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: <bug-469553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122116.n0CLGfCP004976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 16:16:38 EDT --- We're probably okay, since libpcap is 99% 3 clause BSD and the only parts which are BSD with advertising relate to the ATM layer. Lifting FE-Legal, because I'm not losing sleep here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122125.n0CLPeCq007222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rstrode at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122121.n0CLLjS2006290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: <main |Review Request: libcelt - |package name here> - <short |low-latency compressed |summary here> |audio format for voice and | |music Alias| |libcelt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122127.n0CLR0qI007509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122134.n0CLYcoR006042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-12 16:34:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Other packages failing to rebuild have also prevented major packages in > your sense from being upgraded. I can see no gain to loose dependency > on this package for the reason you raised (and for this package > you can simply remove this, while for gnome-desktop (for example) > we actually have to wait until (almost) all package are rebuilt) I was not talking about packages that fail to rebuild but about packages that stop working after an update, although all dependencies are still met. Please ask yourself, what is better from a users point of view: a) When epiphany gets updated he will loose the functionality of the gget extension until it's getting rebuilt. When gget gets updated afterwards, everything is fine again: everything works, no orphaned dirs b) When epiphany gets updated the update will fail due to broken deps. The user has to work around them by removing gget-epiphany-extension and installing it and to re-install it when it was rebuilt. Or he has to wait and to bear the risk that epiphany itself gets broken. I know that my suggestion does not follow the rules, but IMO we don't need to follow a rule as if it was a mantra. > Then: > if epiphany has 2.22{,X} version, the epiphany won't conflict > with these two. You are right, I did not think if the minor version. Nevertheless "Conflicts" must only be used when packages really conflict, this means they cannot be installed at the same time, e.g. because both provide the same files or functionality. > So I am asking you to ask epiphany maintainer first (as I did to > vim maintainer). It is not desired that no one using that > directory tries to argue with epiphany maintainer and gets satisfied with > his/her "local" hack. > KDE has kde-filesystem, font packages got to use fontpackages-filesystem > and so on. Please contact with epiphany maintainer first. And we have mozilla-filesystem and we have ... I think a filesystem package would be overkill here, but I agree you pointed out some valid points. OK, but I want to make a constructive suggestion and not only open a bug. So hat do you think abut my suggestion from the bottom of comment #13? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122145.n0CLj7up008262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-12 16:45:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > So > hat do you think abut my suggestion from the bottom of comment #13? Of course I meant comment #12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122148.n0CLmmHl008809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #19 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 16:48:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > As you can see these three directories are already owned by epiphany and there > > > should not be duplicate dir ownerships as outlined in > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > > > So usually we would just own the files, not the dirs with > > > %{_libdir}/epiphany/2.22/extensions/py* > > > > I'm using Fedora 10, which has Epiphany 2.24. So I used > > > > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > > > > Is that ok? > > No. It would be ok if you followed the 'no duplicate directory ownership' rule, > but in this case we cannot use it, because it will leave unowned dirs behind. > It's better if two packages own the a dir than no package. > > So you should use > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/ Ok. > > > The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three > > > directories will become unowned. > > > > What do I need to do? Just the rebuilds you mention below? > > With the line you are using now you would need to do a rebuild a rebuild in > time with epiphany, but _after_ it has been pushed out, because you are > building against it. The users would have to install your update in the same > rpm transaction as the epiphany update and in the correct order. You see: This > is nearly impossible, that's why the 'no duplicate ownership' model doesn't > work here. > I have to admit that this is a very special case, but you can take it as a > chance to learn something about packaging. ;) Maybe we can clean this up with a > symlink without version, but this would need to be done in the epiphany > package. Maybe I should have just disabled the epiphany-extension :) Nah, this is interesting. > %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas should not be marked as %config > because gconf schemas are not meant to be changed by users and need to get > replaced on updates. No need to update your package now, wait for the review > and then fix all issues in one release. Ok, removed the %config there. > Sorry I did not manage to do the review today, but I will tomorrow. No rush! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122151.n0CLpU5e012569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-12 16:51:29 EDT --- I just wanted to point out that that release bump should have been to rsync-3.0.5-0.fc10.1 instead of rsync-3.0.5-1.fc10 That way we don't actively screw anyone who wants to update to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122153.n0CLrDMg009907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-12 16:53:12 EDT --- Bumping Rawhide to -1.fc11 also solves it - as alternative. Personally, I don't like the -X.fc10.Y style. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122159.n0CLxh8s014245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-12 16:59:41 EDT --- If spot is ok with the package I'm ok too. Full review (going a bit deeper than usual since you're also upstream) 1. Maybe change the summary to "A sans-serif cartoon font" 2. No need to write about ISO-8859-1 in the description, you'll increase the coverage with time (I hope) and then get stuck with a wrong summary (please target MES-1 coverage at least) 3. Please wrap your description at 79 columns, not 60 4. There is no need to go at such lengths to make the rpmlint relative warning go away http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#rpmlint_complains_of_absolute_symbolic_links.21 5. please make your package name match the font name (if it is Serafettin Cartoon, name the package serafettin-cartoon-fonts) ????? 6. consider using the .txt extension for your documentation files, that makes GUI users much happier 7. It's a good idea to add a fontlog.txt that traces the font history 8. your package says it's at 0.4 but the font files say they're at 0.3. Don't do that (a good trick is to have a version variable in your makefile and change the generated font version to this variable at build time, cf dejavu and liberation) 9. please ask on the fontforge mailing list how to change the FStype so the restricted font warning goes away. Most people will take it as the font not being really gpl 10. Please specify the GPL version(s) in the font metadata (v1, v2, v2+, v3, etc) (and no need to write it's under the GPL twice in the copyright field) 11. the subfamily/style ttf name in the main file seems wrong 12. More generally it looks like you still need to clean up your font metadata a bit more 13. rawhide fontforge complains about misplaced mu in the font files 14. should probably not be classified as a sans-serif font in the fontconfig file, but as a cursive or decorative one (your OS/2 metadata says it's decorative, but fontforge classifies Comic Sans MS as cursive=script in OS/2 speak) 15. please look at the substitution-font-template template in fontpackages-devel to tell fontconfig to use your font instead of TSCu_Comic when a document requests TSCu_Comic and it's not installed on-system 16. a font with Tamil glyphs should use 65 fontconfig prio at least 17. you can use http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0B80.pdf to place the tamil glyphs on the right unicode points, it would be a shame to lose them 18. adding some info in the readme on what a Serafettin is would be nice for us not in the know Apart from the package name there's nothing blocking or that can't be handled upstream, so I'll tentatively approve the package. But please change its name before filling in the CVS request ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Reassigning the request, my part is now done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122204.n0CM4jjY012833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-12 17:04:44 EDT --- (also you can probably get yourself fedorahosted if you'd like to, and share the fedora fonts mailing list with lohit, liberation and the fonts sig) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479763] New: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine Message-ID: <bug-479763-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 Summary: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/seam/ Description: SEAM (Simple Extensible Abstract Machine) is a virtual machine architecture and library. SEAM is designed to be language- and platform-independent, to be simple and based on few principled services. * Uniform data representation and memory management * Platform-independent external representation * Abstract execution model Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047921 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint seam* seam.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libseam.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 seam-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. At the moment this package is not building in 64-bit environments. -> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} ppc I guess it's around the GNU Lightning support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122204.n0CM4wcm015715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-12 17:04:57 EDT --- You don't really have to like it, I suppose, but if you need to bump a non-rawhide branch and don't want to bump any later branches then you have no choice; it's the only versioning scheme that permits that. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122211.n0CMBFr7014474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 --- Comment #1 from Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:11:14 EDT --- The only real issue i see is that you need to Requires: pkg-config since you ship .pc files Other than that, rpmlint gave a few warnings that you may want to fix up: 1) you run make check in %build but normally you'd run that in %check 2) you mix tabs and spaces 3) the tarball in the srpm is 0600 instead of 0644 or whatever 4) You're changelog entry doesn't have a version at the end of it. Normally you'd do something like: * Mon Dec 22 2008 Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> 0.5.1-0 - Initial spec file Last thing I'd bring up is you have an Epoch: 0 and Requires: libcelt = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} but often epochs aren't explicitly given unless they're non-zero. Anyway, the only change you really need afaict is the Requires for pkg-config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122223.n0CMNsBW016728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 --- Comment #2 from Monty <cmontgom at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:23:52 EDT --- >The only real issue i see is that you need to >Requires: pkg-config >since you ship .pc files Fixed >1) you run make check in %build but normally you'd run that in %check Changed >2) you mix tabs and spaces Emacs is doing that mainly because the .emacs file config to make it stop seems to change every minor release and I'm sick of fixing it every time I update. >3) the tarball in the srpm is 0600 instead of 0644 or whatever Changed 4) You're changelog entry doesn't have a version at the end of it. Fixed I've refreshed the files at http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/CELT with the above changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122228.n0CMSCvg020774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:28:11 EDT --- Well, we're still thinking about this one. Please be patient with us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122227.n0CMRaKm020688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:27:35 EDT --- looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122232.n0CMWenc021743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Monty <cmontgom at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Monty <cmontgom at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:32:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcelt Short Description: The CELT Low-Latency Audio Compression Codec Owners: xiphmont Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122239.n0CMdjhK019832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:39:43 EDT --- So, just to be clear... this is content that is only useful with proprietary applications, right? There is no relevant guideline to match this. Our emulator policy is the inverse (you can include the FOSS emulator, if there are FOSS ROMS). I think this needs to go to FESCo for review (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content): "All content is subject to review by FESCo, who has the final say on whether or not it can be included." I'll put this on FESCo's radar. For what it is worth, I support including this FOSS licensed content, as it "enhances the OS user experience" has "an open source compatible license", and is not "legally questionable", the main three barriers for content inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122248.n0CMmVMs021839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 17:48:30 EDT --- Will be discussed in the next FESCo meeting (1/16 - noon EST, 17:00UTC) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122247.n0CMltnw021753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 17:47:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think a manual is content as opposed to code and therefore freely > distributable is ok. I hate this loophole. I really really really do. Can you ask upstream if we can have permission to make derived works of the manual? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122301.n0CN1rCW024693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-12 18:01:50 EDT --- As promised.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122310.n0CNAcaK026331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-12 18:10:32 EDT --- Thanks, I just want to remind FESCo, that ovm is used in high end commercial simulators and its apache 2.0 license and its inclusion in fedora will help in the creation of tools around ovm by the community. Other opensource upstream projects can update their simulators accordingly. Someone has to make the first step. Currently there are some tools (in alpha version) which are available online, however too early for normal usage. If ovm is approved by fedora, I'll also bring in vvm which is in the exact situation as ovm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122318.n0CNIx1U027765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 18:18:58 EDT --- After consulting with RH Legal, we've decided that the requirement for Fedora to accept that restriction on behalf of our users in order to simply download the source code is unacceptable. Your only remaining recourse would be to ask upstream if they would lift that restriction. Its a rather odd restriction, seeingly tied to Swiss Economic Sanctions (not crypto related)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: cwirc - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122323.n0CNNtp3028821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 --- Comment #14 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 18:23:53 EDT --- Koji build pages F-9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=78134 F-10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77826 Devel http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77823 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122337.n0CNbosl031515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-12 18:37:49 EDT --- Oh, and because it is freely redistributable, is it ok to *not* cull this from the upstream tarball at each release (just remove it in %prep)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122336.n0CNabem031382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-12 18:36:36 EDT --- (For those too lazy to read above: the current state of the package is that we are *not* shipping the manual.) I will ask upstream to put something in their LICENSE about allowing derived works for the manual. If they insist upon not allowing derived works, I take it you (spot) would prefer we not ship the manual? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901122346.n0CNkOhg004275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-12 18:46:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328805) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328805) Email Body This is the body of the email query I sent to Gfan's author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 00:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130012.n0D0CAD9005477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-12 19:12:09 EDT --- guiloader-c++-2.13.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guiloader-c++-2.13.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 00:14:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130014.n0D0EQDX009405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-12 19:14:25 EDT --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 01:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130152.n0D1qgSh023491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 20:52:40 EDT --- Eric, do we agree that we can't have the fedora version number (11) in the package name? And what about comment 18? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 02:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:03:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130203.n0D23kKg029805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #21 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-12 21:03:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Eric, do we agree that we can't have the fedora version number (11) in the > package name? > > And what about comment 18? Yes. I forgot to manually change that. Publican can't seem to do the fc11 thing. I manually put the changelog information in the .SPEC file but I don't know how to put it in so that it will show up in the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 02:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130223.n0D2Nvah000827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-12 21:23:56 EDT --- Imported and built into the dist-f11-xfce tag. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048289 Closing this now. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 02:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130252.n0D2qUc6005945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 02:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477839] Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce In-Reply-To: <bug-477839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477839-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130256.n0D2uixt002893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-12 21:56:42 EDT --- checked in and built in dist-f11-xfce. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048353 Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130302.n0D32rg3003986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #7 from Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> 2009-01-12 22:02:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cgit Short Description: A fast webinterface for git Owners: tmz Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130327.n0D3RvpX013129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 --- Comment #5 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 22:27:56 EDT --- License -- Fixed Documents -- Not sure on this one. Most gems have README in /usr/lib/ruby/.... A few examples. /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionmailer-2.1.1/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.1.1/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeresource-2.1.1/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.1/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cgi_multipart_eof_fix-2.3/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.10/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.7/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/eventmachine-0.12.2/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fcgi-0.8.7/README /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fcgi-0.8.7/README.signals I am not opposed to it either way, but if it is installing as a gem, I don't know that I can unpack and relocate the README file easily. Any suggestions? Fixed macro. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130332.n0D3WprM014214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 22:32:49 EDT --- I am afraid you need to drop the publican generated spec file going on and start to learn how to edit it yourself: I encourage to start from my version above or merge my changes into your latest one. You can create an srpm with "rpmbuild -bs fedora-security-guide-en-US.spec" say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-477526-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477526-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130345.n0D3jJGZ017190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 22:45:18 EDT --- rpmlint rpmlint SRPMS/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-hpricot-doc-0.6.164-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm rubygem-hpricot-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. 1ad4f33559a0c41fb7e4a2d4eb43f3b7 hpricot-0.6.164.gem (Matches upstream -- this is good) ext/fast_xs/FastXsService.java: -- Looks like Apache license, also boingboing samples are CC licenesed. Not sure how one package handled multiple liceneses. Outside of that, I think it looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479732] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles In-Reply-To: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130354.n0D3sYN6014901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 22:54:33 EDT --- - Needs work + Ok Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047503 - rpmlint is silent NOT for SRPM and for RPM. perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized.src: W: summary-not-capitalized parameterized roles perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized parameterized roles + source files match upstream url 2adcf2c7225c34768d80efb018d877ab MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=17, Tests=104, 6 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 5.19 cusr 0.24 csys = 5.51 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.02-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterizable) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterized) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Parameters) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Tutorial) = 0.02 Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterizable) perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterized) perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Parameters) perl(constant) Suggestion: 1) Summary is not capitalized as reported by rpmlint. Fix that before cvs import. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479730] Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available In-Reply-To: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130359.n0D3x4hY015935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 22:59:02 EDT --- - Needs work + Ok Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047456 - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM. But silent for RPM. perl-DateTimeX-Easy.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse) + source files match upstream url a43d1aeefd0e3cdac3228df0be053713 DateTimeX-Easy-0.085.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=107, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.66 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.78 CPU) + Package perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.085-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(DateTimeX::Easy) = 0.085 perl(DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Date::Parse) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Format::Flexible) perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) perl(DateTime::TimeZone) perl(DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Time::Zone) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Fix unversioned-explicit-provides rpmlint message by using perl(DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse) = %{version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 03:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130356.n0D3uvJJ019644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-12 22:56:55 EDT --- Could you define "WinPE" in your %description? Just a parenthetical "Windows Preinstallation Environment" should be sufficient. Also, it needs a period at the end. You're missing Requires(preun): initscripts, and also a python dependency for your %post script. Does it make sense to include the sample .sif files? What about the manual from the upstream web site (http://oss.netfarm.it/guides/ris-linux.pdf)? This package is a little odd in that it installs as a service, but doesn't actually put any executables in %path. There isn't anything in the guidelines that would prohibit this as far as I can tell, but it seems a little admin-unfriendly. I don't know what to do about it; maybe a wrapper script that just calls "python /usr/share/ris-linux/binlsrv.py". But I'll leave that up to you. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 196c7441f498154d1ae41ef4f1e5107296b7de39f345c763ccce2e913432ae19 ris-linux-0.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description could use a bit of work * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(ris-linux) = 0.4-3.fc11 ris-linux = 0.4-3.fc11 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env chkconfig config(ris-linux) = 0.4-3.fc11 initscripts python(abi) >= 2.1 samba tftp-server * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files X scriptlet dependencies are off. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 04:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130432.n0D4WPw5026186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #23 from Michael Hideo <mhideo at redhat.com> 2009-01-12 23:32:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > I am afraid you need to drop the publican generated spec file going on and > start to learn how to edit it yourself: I encourage to start from my version > above or merge my changes into your latest one. > Hi Jens, Can you give us a list of things publican needs to do wrt to specfiles/changelogs/packagenaming? Cheers, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 04:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130452.n0D4qgAk030072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-12 23:52:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048549 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c0d63d05db01a6da3aebd7cd6f93e520 File-pushd-1.00.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=37, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.26 CPU) + Package perl-File-pushd-1.00-1.fc11=> Provides: perl(File::pushd) = 1.00 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(overload) perl(strict) Suggestions: 1) Remove "BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.004" from spec. 2) remove "Requires: perl(Test::More) >= 0.45" Not needed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] New: Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor Message-ID: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Summary: Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cpphs.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cpphs-1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Cpphs is a re-implementation of the C pre-processor that is both more compatible with Haskell, and itself written in Haskell so that it can be distributed with compilers. This version of the C pre-processor is pretty-much feature-complete and compatible with traditional (K&R) pre-processors. Additional features include: a plain-text mode; an option to unlit literate code files; and an option to turn off macro-expansion. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048629 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130517.n0D5HgRv030542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 Wes Shull <wes at kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wes at kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu --- Comment #3 from Wes Shull <wes at kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu> 2009-01-13 00:17:40 EDT --- Seeing how the Ocsigen home page says "02/09/08 Ocsigen and Lwt in Fedora", maybe we ought to work on making it true? I just tried to build the srpm on a local f10-x86_64 box (w/all current updates) with no success. I did ferret out a few missing BuildRequires: ocaml-camlp4-devel for /usr/bin/camlp4 ocaml-ocamlnet-devel for -lnetaccel_c ocaml-pcre-devel for -lpcre_stubs Now it gets all the way past %doc and dies with: File not found: /home/wes/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ocsigen-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib64/ocsigen Looking at the build output, I see a "Checking for ocamlduce... not found", but I see no ocamlduce in the repo (I do have cduce installed of course). also diff: xHTML.mli: No such file or directory and later ocamlyacc http_parser.mly 4 shift/reduce conflicts. But I have no immediate idea what to do with that. Does someone who actually knows the ocaml buildsystem (Richard?) want to take another stab at this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479795] Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479795-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479795-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130519.n0D5JSV3002784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479795 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 00:19:27 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048685 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130519.n0D5JjXp002850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-13 00:19:43 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130519.n0D5JmNl002888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-13 00:19:47 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479795] New: Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell Message-ID: <bug-479795-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479795 Summary: Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/happy.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/happy-1.18.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Happy is a parser generator for Haskell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] New: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source Message-ID: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Summary: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec Description: Haskell-Source with Extensions (HSE, haskell-src-exts) is an extension of the standard haskell-src package, and handles most common syntactic extensions to Haskell, including: * Multi-parameter type classes with functional dependencies * Indexed type families (including associated types) * Empty data declarations * GADTs * Implicit parameters * Template Haskell and a few more. Apart from these standard extensions, it also handles regular patterns as per the HaRP extension as well as HSX-style embedded XML syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130537.n0D5bS8C006453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 00:37:26 EDT --- Koji build can't be done because happy and cpphs aren't in yet (but they have been submitted for review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479797] New: Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate Message-ID: <bug-479797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479797 Summary: Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-syb.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-syb-0.1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the generics system described in the Scrap Your Boilerplate papers (see http://www.cs.vu.nl/boilerplate/). It defines the Data class of types permitting folding and unfolding of constructor applications, instances of this class for primitive types, and a variety of traversals. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048726 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479799] New: Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals Message-ID: <bug-479799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Summary: Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-uniplate.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-uniplate-1.2.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Uniplate is a boilerplate removal library, with similar goals to the original Scrap Your Boilerplate work. It requires few extensions to Haskell. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048735 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] New: Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings Message-ID: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings-0.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Warnings are an important part of any application. Your web application should warn the user when something is amiss. This module lets you retrieve the warnings that your forked server throws. That way you can test that your application continues to throw warnings when it makes sense. Catching the warnings also keeps your test output tidy. Finally, you'll be able to see when your application throws new, unexpected warnings. Note: This package is a new dependency of rt3, introduced in rt3-3.8.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479795] Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479795-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479795-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130559.n0D5x2O1005439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479795 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 00:59:01 EDT --- Just kidding, this is already in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479797] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate In-Reply-To: <bug-479797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130605.n0D65orF006993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479797 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 01:05:48 EDT --- Just kidding, this is part of GHC apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] New: Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions Message-ID: <bug-479800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Summary: Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: HLint gives suggestions on how to improve your source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: <bug-479799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C8Em008248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C7wp008227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C7c4008203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: <bug-479800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C6Y0008182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Depends on| |479799, 479796, 479793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479711] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration In-Reply-To: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6CTcp008301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 01:12:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047036 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a23b7ca50a909df57e484cf39a3fa414 Time-Duration-Parse-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=2038, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.41 usr 0.03 sys + 1.16 cusr 0.04 csys = 1.64 CPU) + Package perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.06-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Time::Duration::Parse) = 0.06 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter::Lite) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: <bug-479800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130614.n0D6EG6g013042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|479793 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130614.n0D6EGEF013063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|479800 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6CoaR012879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6Cn30012858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130625.n0D6PVmT010625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 01:25:30 EDT --- Thank you for a quick review. The useless requirements will be removed before pushing package into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130626.n0D6QgAW010852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 01:26:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-pushd Short Description: Change directory temporarily for a limited scope Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130632.n0D6WFaJ016224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 01:32:13 EDT --- APPROVED. You can think of adding disttag. Its not mandatory though. Once you build this new package in rawhide, you can close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130645.n0D6jGoJ018710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-13 01:45:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328838) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328838) Proposed spec changes to address issues from comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130643.n0D6hdW9018163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-13 01:43:38 EDT --- MUSTFIX: - Missing BR: to pull in dos2unix I recommend to use /usr/bin/dos2unix and using BR: /usr/bin/dos2unix CONSIDER: - CRLF conversion should be performed on sources, not on installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479730] Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available In-Reply-To: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130654.n0D6s73P015402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479730] Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available In-Reply-To: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130654.n0D6s6Pd015380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-13 01:54:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTimeX-Easy Short Description: Parse a date/time string using the best method available Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479732] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles In-Reply-To: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130654.n0D6saZs019996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479732] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles In-Reply-To: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130654.n0D6sYwF019974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-13 01:54:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized Short Description: parameterized roles Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226427] Merge Review: specspo In-Reply-To: <bug-226427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130700.n0D70xgg021372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226427 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|roozbeh at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479711] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration In-Reply-To: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130702.n0D72dtp017183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479711] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration In-Reply-To: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130702.n0D72cim021749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-13 02:02:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Time-Duration-Parse Short Description: Parse string that represents time duration Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130717.n0D7HHSc024363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-13 02:17:16 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] New: Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell Message-ID: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Summary: Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A first cut at separating the haskell packaging files out of ghc into a separate package. Some thoughts: - package could also be called ghc-packaging but that might sound more upstream (it is pretty fedora specific currently) - probably need to host it on fedorahosted - change license to GPLv3 or LGPLv3 (like fontpackages)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130722.n0D7MLR6025395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479647] Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl In-Reply-To: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130734.n0D7Ydct027543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 02:34:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048777 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 751632a35f17c95c8d31ba2fe5aab44b Devel-Dumpvar-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=12, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.10 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-Dumpvar-0.04-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Devel::Dumpvar) = 0.04 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Scalar::Util) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestions: 1) Remove "BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.005" from spec as its not needed APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130804.n0D84IZL028710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:04:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328843) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328843) cpphs.spec-1.patch Probably my bad for a bug in the current binlib template, but this needs to be a proper binlib package. Here is a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130801.n0D81d3o000947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #4 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-13 03:01:38 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-3.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm > Change your summary to something like 'Summary: Universal data array > visualization', there is no need to repeat the package name. Summary has been changed. If it is possible to aggregate comments, this would be appreciated, as there is a small amount of overhead in updating these packages. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130807.n0D87hsQ002191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:07:41 EDT --- I think Conrad realised already, but happy is already in fedora actually just for the benefit of other reviewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130808.n0D88uap002358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 03:08:55 EDT --- + OK - Need Work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048832 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM + rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings-0.03-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ==>This filename is too long to fit on a joliet filesystem (limit is 64 unicode chars). + source files match upstream url 0a63b8f45217f05611717292b7ec02e5 Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=8, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.25 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.29 CPU) + Package perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings-0.03-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Test::HTTP::Server::Simple::StashWarnings) = 0.03 Requires: perl >= 0:5.008 perl(NEXT) perl(Storable) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479647] Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl In-Reply-To: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130812.n0D8CRFt003259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:12:26 EDT --- Thank you. It will be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130815.n0D8FQtJ004019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:15:25 EDT --- Thank you for your review. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.11-2.fc10.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479647] Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl In-Reply-To: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130814.n0D8ESjs003498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:14:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-Dumpvar Short Description: Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130816.n0D8GuKQ004253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:16:55 EDT --- I'm sorry, there's typo. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-pushd Short Description: Change directory temporarily for a limited scope Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:41:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130841.n0D8faGm008809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-476720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130859.n0D8xhql007079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-13 03:59:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > PS for the fontforge warning, ask on the fontforge mailing list hi, I've asked. No reply till date. No help on the IRC too. I'll try looking elsewhere. Any suggestions? Also,I havent packaged a multi font yet so it will take me a while to understand the new spec. I'll refer the fonts already packaged and get it done as quickly as possible. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130857.n0D8vTWV012217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-13 03:57:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > > The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I > > dint quite get that. > > You did ok, I've tried to clarify the wiki page ping me if it's still unclear > > > Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: > > symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf > > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" > > This is an rpmlint of dubious utility that will be discussed by FPC soonish. In > the meanwhile, ignore it > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 > > Please make your fontconfig file adhere more closely to the basic template in > fontpackages-devel. > > Otherwise, everything else seems fine hi, I have the package installed. I dont know the location of the templates :( . Can you tell me where these are located? I was still referring to the ones i had downloaded earlier. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130909.n0D99I5c015280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-13 04:09:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have the package installed. I dont know the location of the templates :( rpm -ql packagename will get you the file listing in packagename -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226148-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130908.n0D98dWu015182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 Miloslav Trmac <mitr at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-476720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130911.n0D9BmOa010659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-13 04:11:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > PS for the fontforge warning, ask on the fontforge mailing list > I've asked. No reply till date. No help on the IRC too. I'll try looking > elsewhere. Any suggestions? You can try to ask eimai or moyogo on #dejavu. Otherwise, not idea :(. > Also,I havent packaged a multi font yet so it will take me a while to > understand the new spec. I'll refer the fonts already packaged and get it done > as quickly as possible. Ok. There should be plenty of examples to take inspiration from in rawhide right now (dejavu, vera, mgopen, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130930.n0D9U00P014391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 04:29:58 EDT --- few questions 1) why URL still drafts url? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901130958.n0D9wnk9021037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 04:58:46 EDT --- Please look at the package review queue befora submitting review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131001.n0DA1Wh4027513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131001.n0DA1Ua9027468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks| |479750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131011.n0DABDM5029833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-13 05:11:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings Short Description: Catch your forked server's warnings Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131040.n0DAemjb030604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 05:40:47 EDT --- I should add about the 'spurious-executable-perm' warning: libtool / gcc add executable permissions when they generate these files. In other words, this is not something that we are adding, but something that the tools are doing. It has to be said that we don't really understand why the tools do this, but at the same time we are loathed to change any details of the linking process since at the moment it works, but in the past it has proven quite fragile in that seemingly insignificant changes have broken things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131041.n0DAfHtx030794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 05:41:15 EDT --- This is the same as my package review. And the package is not labelled according the the fedora policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131037.n0DAbkZC029909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 05:37:44 EDT --- We do install *.la files for mingw32 packages because they are needed for libtool to link. This is mentioned in the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Libraries_.28DLLs.29 Here's an updated package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libpng/mingw32-libpng.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1049093&name=mingw32-libpng-1.2.34-1.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.2.34-1 - Rebase to 1.2.34 and patches from Fedora. - Requires pkgconfig. - Add documentation. Here is a Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049092 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131055.n0DAtq7E001234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 05:55:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-pthreads Short Description: MinGW pthread library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131054.n0DAsC2g006509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 05:54:10 EDT --- I made some small (non-functional) cleanups to the spec file and did a scratch-build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 11:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131131.n0DBV9Ww014731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #3 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 06:31:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Some comment before I do a full review. > > - '-n %{name}-%{version}' is not needed in %setup because this is the default. Duh... sure. > - ChangeLog is missing in %doc ...but is also 0lenght, not much use of it. It's GNU build system residuum. > - I personally like one line per BR ;-) So do I. From now on. -- Updated: Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp-0.2.5-3.fc10.src.rpm Tue Jan 13 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 0.2.5-3 - minor SPEC file changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131201.n0DC1xFf014597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-13 07:01:58 EDT --- Well, what I cannot grok is why including tests which do not pass. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f8e11b8416b276fbe359c7b16f6fab07021f4f55 Eval-Context-0.07.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [+] "make test" passes => with some tests skipped ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131209.n0DC9Tme021794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 07:09:27 EDT --- I imported this package into the Fedora MinGW temporary repository because I want to have other packages depend on it. Here is an updated package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1049268&name=mingw32-dlfcn-0.1-0.2.r11.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.1-0.2.r11 - Import into fedora-mingw temporary repository because there are packages which will depend on this. - Fix the version/release according to packaging guidelines. - Tidy up the spec file. - Use dos2unix and keep the timestamps. Here is a successful Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049267 rpmlint says: mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/dlfcn.h mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. These are all errors which can be ignored for MinGW packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131223.n0DCNAwL018965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-dlfcn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226481] Merge Review: tcpdump In-Reply-To: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131225.n0DCPw0Y025637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226481 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 07:25:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'll add the conversion in the next update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131223.n0DCNWm0024912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131223.n0DCNVf6024879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131224.n0DCO8aM024984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467325 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: <bug-467325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131224.n0DCO9Vg025013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: <bug-452427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131229.n0DCTJt4026289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #40 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 07:29:17 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 3.1.1-1 - 3.1.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131243.n0DCharq029814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 07:43:35 EDT --- > "mingw32-SDL.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a" > > Why is this executable ? See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397#c4 Here is an updated package which should fix everything else: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/SDL/mingw32-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-4.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.2.13-4 - Verify we are still up to date with Fedora release. - Include COPYING in documentation. - Build with dlfcn. - List all BRs. - No need to package the man pages, don't duplicate what's in the base Fedora package already. - Requires pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131254.n0DCs4Qp025766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #5 from Robert Marcano <robert at marcanoonline.com> 2009-01-13 07:54:03 EDT --- First email sent, Hopefully they can do something to help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131257.n0DCvkCb000544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131257.n0DCvjtW000507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478640 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 07:57:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pixman/mingw32-pixman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.13.2-1 - Resynch with Fedora package (0.13.2). - Disable static library for speed. - Use _smp_mflags. - Requires pkgconfig. - Depends on dlfcn. Here's a Koji scratch-build without the additional dlfcn dependency: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049362 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 13:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131306.n0DD67au002836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 08:06:06 EDT --- Doesn't need to be in NEEDINFO any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 13:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131306.n0DD6CJp002876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev at sun.com> 2009-01-13 08:06:10 EDT --- Lillian, Adel, Since release 6.5-2 all netbeans-platform8* packages are obsolete. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ProvidesObsoletes "If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a compatible enough replacement as defined in above, use only the Obsoletes from above." Of course, the document is draft only, but I think it establishes right point that is applicable for this case. All the packages, including netbeans-platform, netbeans-platform-harness and netbeans-platform-javadoc, are *not compatible replacements* for corresponding netbeans-platform8* packages. Therefore, I don't use the "Provides" clause for all these packages. The next release is prepared. Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.src.rpm Changes: -------- - All %post and %preun scriplets are removed. Creation of the .noautoupdate files is completely provided in the %install section. All .noautoupdate files are listed in the corresponding %files sections, so RPM will take care about deleting the files during erasing of the packages. rpmlint results: ---------------- Results are the same as mentioned above, but, of course, there are 3 additional warnings: - netbeans-platform.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netbeans-platform8 - netbeans-platform-harness.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netbeans-platform8-harness - netbeans-platform-javadoc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netbeans-platform8-javadoc Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049128 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 13:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131316.n0DDGBWS005313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-13 08:16:10 EDT --- There is a redundant "Requires: perl(Pod::POM)" in your spec. APPROVED, provided you remove this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 13:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131333.n0DDXfOZ009318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 08:33:39 EDT --- Here's an updated version which includes the license information and bumps everything to the latest version: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.4.20090113.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.1-0.4.20090113 - New upstream version 20090113, resolving licensing issues. - Use omake to build. - Added a check section to run automated tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 13:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: <bug-476622-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476622-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131346.n0DDkohE005423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 08:46:48 EDT --- Here is a new upstream version: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.2-1.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.8.2-1 - New upstream version 0.8.2. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:09:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131409.n0DE9sE7010775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 09:09:53 EDT --- I'll remove it before push to repo. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl Short Description: Parse error messages from the perl interpreter Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] New: Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game Message-ID: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Summary: Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maintainer at mt2009.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmpong.net/trac/export/406/trunk/dist/rpm/mmpong.spec SRPM URL: http://mmpong.net/trac/downloads/mmpong-0.9-0.src.rpm Description: mmpong is an ATARI-pong-like multiplayer game, where a moving ball reflects on impact from paddles on the left and right sides of the screen. . A special feature of this variant is the ability to play the game with far more than two players. Players are split into two teams, and the position of each team's paddle is determined by the mean value of the positions of all the players' paddles on the team. mmpong supports a number of different paddle profiles (like flat or round). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131419.n0DEJ7fG019397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 --- Comment #1 from Kai <maintainer at mt2009.com> 2009-01-13 09:19:06 EDT --- Since this is my first package, I will require a sponsor apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226481] Merge Review: tcpdump In-Reply-To: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131425.n0DEPgPJ014829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226481 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-13 09:25:41 EDT --- make sure to close this bug when you are done, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131426.n0DEQMlp015025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Kai <maintainer at mt2009.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131429.n0DET1lD015496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #1 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-13 09:29:00 EDT --- Ah, I also meant to add, this is the first package that I have attempted to submit, so I would need a sponsor :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131430.n0DEUbEt016033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 09:30:36 EDT --- An even more updated version that runs the automated tests and builds in Koji: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.1-0.10.20090113 - Tests require ounit & ruby. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131427.n0DERwfS015331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 09:27:56 EDT --- Here's an updated package which fixes everything in comment 3 and builds in Koji: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocsigen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocsigen-1.1.0-8.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.1.0-8 - Add some missing BRs (thanks Wes Shull). - Make sure examples, extensions get installed in _libdir. - ExcludeArch ppc64. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049581 Note that we cannot yet build ocamlduce for OCaml 3.11.0 as we are waiting for upstream to release a new version: http://www.cduce.org/ocaml_install.html Since I don't really use ocsigen at the moment, I can't say whether this gravely affects the functionality of this package. However it does compile OK without ocamlduce. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] New: Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library Message-ID: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Summary: Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at alexhudson.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/log4c/log4c.spec SRPM URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/log4c/log4c-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Log4c is a C language library for flexible logging to files, syslog and other destinations. It is modeled after the Log for Java library (log4j), staying as close to their API as is reasonable. This is similar to log4cpp which already exists in Fedora; and is in use by a number of applications that I would like to package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131433.n0DEXXoD016798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 09:33:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I should add about the 'spurious-executable-perm' warning: > libtool / gcc add executable permissions when they generate > these files. In other words, this is not something that we > are adding, but something that the tools are doing. > > It has to be said that we don't really understand why the > tools do this, but at the same time we are loathed to change > any details of the linking process since at the moment it works, > but in the past it has proven quite fragile in that seemingly > insignificant changes have broken things. Well, I don't see any reason to have *dll.a files with executable perms but if it is created automatically leave it as is. Review: source files match upstream: YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: YES dist tag is present: YES build root is correct: YES license field matches the actual license: YES license is open source-compatible: YES latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: YES compiler flags are appropriate: YES %clean is present: YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): YES rpmlint is silent: no, but warnings/errors are ok for mingw* package final provides and requires look sane: YES owns the directories it creates: YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: YES no duplicates in %files: YES file permissions are appropriate: well, as written in comment #4 it's ok code, not content: YES => reviewed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131449.n0DEnCQG020460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 09:49:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libpng Short Description: MinGW Windows Libpng library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131447.n0DEljFP026187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 --- Comment #7 from Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 09:47:44 EDT --- Hi Peter, Monty explained why the name is "libcelt" instead of "celt" in his initial comment. Do you guys mind being comaintainers with each other? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131516.n0DFGkmL000919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131527.n0DFRIUI003222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #64 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-13 10:27:13 EDT --- ETL is an header-only package, why split in ETL and ETL-devel? I've been told that you can proceed either way but I think that having only ETL is better. By the way: are you a sponsored packager (I couldn't find you in the packager group). If not, you'll have to wait a sponsor to step in and review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131526.n0DFQg3F030254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 10:26:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Oh, and because it is freely redistributable, is it ok to *not* cull this from > the upstream tarball at each release (just remove it in %prep)? Yes. There is no need to hack up the upstream tarball to remove this. I'd really prefer we didn't ship the manual. I'm thinking seriously about closing this loophole with FESCo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131533.n0DFX2MD004536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131544.n0DFidS9002271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131543.n0DFhdAI002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #5 from Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 10:43:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2411c19ed4fb141f3fa3d389fae40736 docbook-5.0.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is NOT included in package. redistributable without licence + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + package docbook-schemas-5.0-1-fc11 -> Provides: config(docbook5-schemas) = 5.0-1.fc11 docbook5-dtd = 5.0-1.fc11 docbook5-rng = 5.0-1.fc11 docbook5-sch = 5.0-1.fc11 docbook5-xsd = 5.0-1.fc11 docbook5-schemas = 5.0-1.fc11 Requires: /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl config(docbook5-schemas) = 5.0-1.fc11 libxml2 >= 2.4.8 libxml2 >= 2.4.8 perl(English) perl(strict) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 xml-common >= 0.6.3-24 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131549.n0DFndSn003413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 10:49:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 42f5f41ff5822c57242d9413e7f98aef docbook-xsl-ns-1.74.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is NOT included in package. redistributable without licence + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + package docbook5-style-xsl-1.74.0-1.fc10 -> Provides: docbook-xsl-ns = 1.74.0 docbook5-style-xsl = 1.74.0-1.fc10 Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/perl libxml2 >= 2.4.8 libxml2 >= 2.4.8 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 xml-common >= 0.6.3-8 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131556.n0DFu23d005094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 10:56:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: docbook5-schemas Short Description: Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X Owners: ovasik Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131557.n0DFvse5005543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131640.n0DGegKe015451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131640.n0DGefHS019907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-13 11:40:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Eval-Context Short Description: Evaluate perl code in context wrapper Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:45:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131645.n0DGjBDX021085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 11:45:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: docbook5-style-xsl Short Description: Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5.X Owners: ovasik Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:45:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131645.n0DGj8Y8021053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #11 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 11:45:06 EDT --- I'm so sorry about the delay in doing this review -- it got sucked into the Christmas-holiday black hole. I'd say I wouldn't worry about the duplicate-classes thing until it comes up as an issue. The suggestions to use %{_java} etc were based on my misunderstanding of some packaging guidelines and you should be able to just use java/jar/etc. directly. I'd also recommend adding a link somewhere in the comments to the findbugs website. It failed to build for me on F10 i386 mock with the following errors. It looks like you need to specify "-source 1.5" on the javac line? This is probably related to gcj/openjdk differences because it built cleanly for me using local rpmbuild. 33. ERROR in src/java/org/apache/bcel/classfile/ConstantUtf8.java (at line 45) private static HashMap<String, ConstantUtf8> cache; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Syntax error, parameterized types are only available if source level is 1.5 ---------- 34. WARNING in src/java/org/apache/bcel/classfile/ConstantUtf8.java (at line 70) cache = new LinkedHashMap<String, ConstantUtf8>(INITIAL_CACHE_CAPACITY, 0.75f, true) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The serializable class does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of type long ---------- 35. ERROR in src/java/org/apache/bcel/classfile/ConstantUtf8.java (at line 70) cache = new LinkedHashMap<String, ConstantUtf8>(INITIAL_CACHE_CAPACITY, 0.75f, true) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Syntax error, parameterized types are only available if source level is 1.5 ---------- 36. ERROR in src/java/org/apache/bcel/classfile/ConstantUtf8.java (at line 78) ConstantUtf8 result = cache.get(s); ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Type mismatch: cannot convert from Object to ConstantUtf8 ---------- ---------- 37. ERROR in src/java/org/apache/bcel/generic/ObjectType.java (at line 38) private static HashMap<String, ObjectType> cache; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Syntax error, parameterized types are only available if source level is 1.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131647.n0DGlhNJ022019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |swhiteho at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 11:47:41 EDT --- *** Bug 479530 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479530] Review Request: msp430-binutils - GNU binutils for the MSP430 16-bit MPU In-Reply-To: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131647.n0DGlg9a021986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479530 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 11:47:41 EDT --- I missed the previous bz, not sure why my search missed it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 460600 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131700.n0DH0IPe019651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #4 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:00:15 EDT --- Robert, the spec file looks good, except as per Jan's comments. Could you update it and let us know? It might also be a good plan to consider updating to bintuils 2.19 now, as I think that means you can drop the patches. I am keen to see this package make it into Fedora, so I'll do my best to help move things along. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131704.n0DH4OVs020575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #5 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:04:23 EDT --- Robert, Btw, are you intending to also submit packages for msp430-gdb & msp430-gcc as well? That would be a good set to have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131706.n0DH6W1J026500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #6 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-13 12:06:31 EDT --- Hi Steve, Sure, I should be able to sort out this RPM later today. I also have specs queued up for msp430-gcc, msp430-libc and msp430-gdb -- I was waiting on this one before I submitted them. Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: <bug-459444-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459444-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131702.n0DH2eJP025667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:02:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I made the change and re-uploaded the srpms. You can find them in the same > locations mentioned in comment #4 > > Thanks! > --Abhi Abhi, there are a few more changes I'd like to see you make, and then I'd be willing to sponsor you. Chris, please look over this, as you should have caught some of these before approving this package. * Please update this package to the latest release, which seems to be 1.0.68 * In Source0, use the full URL to the upstream source. RPM is smart enough to know how to parse that. (Don't worry, it doesn't try to download it, it uses the local file) * For Patch0, please submit it for upstream inclusion, and leave a comment next to it describing where you sent it (a URL to an open bug is sufficient, for example). See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment * The License tag is wrong, it should actually be: GPLv3+ * It doesn't look like the upstream source comes with a copy of the license. You should contact upstream to ask them to add it for future releases (and when they do, it should be packaged as %doc). See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text * Flesh out the Summary a bit more, so that it avoids acronyms. I have no idea what a TDB is. Even simply "A Clustered Database" would be better. * In your CFLAGS, you're overriding the Fedora optimization flag by passing -O0. Don't do that. :) * You're also using ./configure rather than the %configure macro. Please use %configure instead (it defines all of the flags you're passing in the same way). In your spec, you can simply do: CFLAGS="$(echo '%{optflags}') $EXTRA -D_GNU_SOURCE -DCTDB_VERS=\"%{version}-%{release}\"" %configure * Be sure you're using "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" in every %files section. * Also, be sure you're passing four parameters for %attr (if you don't need to change the fourth field <dir mode>, just use a - ). * Your %files sections need to be cleaned up. You're duplicating files there. One trick that should help you out quite a bit: If you specify a directory and end it with a /, RPM will own that directory, and all the files and directories below it. So, for example, instead of: %{_sysconfdir}/ctdb %{_sysconfdir}/ctdb/events.d/00.ctdb %{_sysconfdir}/ctdb/events.d/10.interface %{_sysconfdir}/ctdb/events.d/40.vsftpd ... Just use: %{_sysconfdir}/ctdb/ When you're test building your package, RPM will complain about these duplicated files. Be sure you've got rid of any such warnings. ######### If you have not done so, please take a moment and read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines When you've gotten all of those items resolved, please upload a new SRPM and put a link in this bugzilla ticket. I'll come back and look at it and then re-approve and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131710.n0DHAvKs027572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |swhiteho at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131719.n0DHJ1Dx023630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #25 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-13 12:18:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > You have added %{_var}/lib/%{name} to the %files list, but you also need to > create the dir during install, otherwise it wont get included in the package. The line 106 isn't good ? # mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_var}/lib/%{name} > Please remove the "It just works." from the description, because we don't want > these kind of "advertising" in our packages. It's the official description to http://www2.backup-manager.org... But OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:27:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] New: Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework Message-ID: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-linuxprofilingframework.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-linuxprofilingframework-0.1.0-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Plugins common to Eclipse Linux Tools profiling tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131735.n0DHZ31D026940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #7 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:35:02 EDT --- Ok, sounds good. Be sure to Cc me (or assign the bz to me if you can) when you submit the review requests for the other packages and I'll take a look at them as soon as I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131733.n0DHX85a032346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-13 12:33:07 EDT --- It will be nice, if you can create a SRPM of release 0.2.1. On this release all source files should contains a copyright notice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131733.n0DHXsfn032434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #26 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-13 12:33:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #23) > > You have added %{_var}/lib/%{name} to the %files list, but you also need to > > create the dir during install, otherwise it wont get included in the package. > The line 106 isn't good ? > # mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_var}/lib/%{name} Damn, Firefox has taken the old file from the cache once again. It's ok, no problem, but better use use %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/%{name} . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131744.n0DHiMFn001876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 --- Comment #8 from Monty <cmontgom at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:44:21 EDT --- I'm happy to do it any which way. I'm part of the upstream team, so it makes sense especially as the codebase is brand new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131750.n0DHoZjB029744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 12:50:34 EDT --- Oh, just kidding -- I didn't notice you changed the review flag back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131747.n0DHlYTH029127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 12:47:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfan Short Description: Software for Computing Gr?bner Fans and Tropical Varieties Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131755.n0DHt2ke030593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cmontgom at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:54:59 EDT --- *** Bug 479750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131755.n0DHt1CY030271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 12:54:59 EDT --- Alright, let's close this report out since the other one was filed first. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 478941 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131753.n0DHroJN003665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 12:53:49 EDT --- Right, sorry. Still can't be built because cpphs isn't in yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131800.n0DI0gAG031567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-13 13:00:41 EDT --- Patch applied, with one minor correction (s/LICENSE/LICENCE/); new URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cpphs.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cpphs-1.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479874] New: Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq (MingW) Message-ID: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq (MingW) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq (MingW) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql/mingw32-postgresql.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql/mingw32-postgresql-8.3.5-1snapshot.fc10.src.rpm Description: postgresql compiled by mingw (libpq.dll) and header files. koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049994 some patch's need's to be merged into upstream, should I cc Tom Lane here ? https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=64290&forum=11&post_id=306080 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00367.php I'm also need help enabling openssl in postgresql with this package I am able to build and run programs linked with libpq http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/libpq-build.html this package also depends on secur32.dll mingw32(secur32.dll) is needed by mingw32-postgresql-8.3.5-1snapshot.fc10.noarch wine seems to have this file. [itamar at itamar pg-snap]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/wine/secur32.dll.so wine-core-1.1.10-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq (MingW) In-Reply-To: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131816.n0DIGv5c002367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-postgresql -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: <bug-459444-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459444-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131831.n0DIVHCc011436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 13:31:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > * Also, be sure you're passing four parameters for %attr (if you don't need to > change the fourth field <dir mode>, just use a - ). This is wrong. I forgot that %attr only takes three parameters. :) Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131831.n0DIVgFY011641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479871 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131842.n0DIgZZV007598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: <bug-471915-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471915-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131851.n0DIpGtY009532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Elliott Baron <ebaron at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ebaron at redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Elliott Baron <ebaron at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 13:51:14 EDT --- I came across this problem with the JSON license before. There is an Apache licensed source zip available from http://www.json.org/java/apache.zip. I'm not sure how it came about, it's not referenced on the main page, I came across it in an Apache mailing list - http://www.nabble.com/JSON-License-td5252908.html. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131855.n0DItHu3010637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #27 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-13 13:55:14 EDT --- Correction made : http://trac.llaumgui.com/browser/rpmbuild/SPEC/backup-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479876] New: Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing Message-ID: <bug-479876-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479876 Summary: Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yabasic.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yabasic-2.763-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.yabasic.de Description: Yabasic implements the most common and simple elements of the basic language. It comes with for-loops and goto with while-loops and procedures. Yabasic does monochrome line graphics, printing comes with no extra effort. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1050066 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint yabasic* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint yabasic-2.763-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: <bug-253355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131901.n0DJ1Itf018705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: <bug-453395-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453395-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131906.n0DJ6FiA020108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #15 from Jerry Amundson <jamundso at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 14:06:12 EDT --- Still needs BuildRequires: zlib-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131907.n0DJ7MBM020439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Jerry Amundson <jamundso at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131919.n0DJJmFX023010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-13 14:19:47 EDT --- Directory %{_datadir}/%{name}/ is not included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131930.n0DJUuFm018497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-13 14:30:55 EDT --- Just skimming over the spec file: * The guidelines want you to choose either %buildroot or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, not both. * Use "install -p ..." especially when installing files yourself. * Unowned directories alarm in -devel package! It can easily be seen that the following %files entries are missing: %dir %{_includedir}/%{project_name} %dir %{_includedir}/%{project_name}/compat %dir %{_includedir}/%{project_name}/compat/FL > %package doc > Summary: Doxygen documentation for FLTK2 > Group: Documentation > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Why that? > BuildRoot: doxygen Uh? A typo, most likely. Make that BuildRequires: doxygen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131931.n0DJVLWr025619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #65 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-13 14:31:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) > ETL is an header-only package, why split in ETL and ETL-devel? I've been told > that you can proceed either way but I think that having only ETL is better. I don't split the package. The only binary (well, non-src) package that gets built from this package is ETL-devel, there's no main package, since because there's no %files section other than one for -devel subpackage. Package guidelines suggest that packages with content like this should be in -devel subpackage. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Devel_Packages It could be argued that this package is exceptional, since it is only useful for development, but I find it much more consistent to call it -devel. It is only useful for development, not run-time and the -devel name makes is easily distinguishable as such not only to the user, but also to the tools (such as rpmdev-rmdevelrpms). This is also more future-proof (for the unlikely cause it gains some library code). It might be a good idea to provide ETL now though. > By the way: are you a sponsored packager (I couldn't find you in the packager > group). If not, you'll have to wait a sponsor to step in and review the > package. Yup, I am sponsored. I believe you can view my groups there, and packager is among those: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/lkundrak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131941.n0DJf1Mx020609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 14:40:59 EDT --- Thanks for fixing the remaining issues, the package looks fine now. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131944.n0DJib9f028061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 14:44:35 EDT --- Looks good now. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131950.n0DJoqtX022452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 14:50:51 EDT --- "- Build with dlfcn." missed this one, removed the "+" for now until this package is in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131952.n0DJq82w029805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicoleau.fabien at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:52:07 EDT --- I wonder two things. 1) %doc Changes LICENSE README README.Win32 `---------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^ What's the purpose of file 'README.Win32' in Fedora? I don't see there anything useful for Linux user/developer. 2) %changelog * Thu Dec 11 2008 Nicoleau Fabien (eponyme) 4.05-1 `------------------------------------------^ Having here an email, in 'nick at provider dot tld'-form at least, makes me feel it complies with Fedora guidelines somewhat more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131959.n0DJx482024055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #3 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:59:03 EDT --- Please preserve the original time-stamp. -rw-rw-r-- 1 newman newman 40162 2008-07-06 00:37 /home/newman/WWW-Curl-4.05.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 newman newman 40162 2008-12-11 13:12 WWW-Curl-4.05.tar.gz The first file is the original ("wgetted"), the second one is the one from SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-473184-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473184-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901131957.n0DJvUVG030895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-13 14:57:28 EDT --- > %post > update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime > update-desktop-database > > %postun > update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime > update-desktop-database * Be aware of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132003.n0DK3X9t025264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 15:03:31 EDT --- "Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/somefile -- DONT use dos2unix, that can cause build fail on FC3. " Well you should stick to the guidelines even if FC3 is long dead. Pass %{?_smp_mflags} to make unless you have a reason not to do so. Will do a formal review later this week (limited time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: <bug-474787-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474787-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132015.n0DKFCs6002506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-13 15:15:11 EDT --- * "Summary" of -devel package is not "short and concise" as recommended by the guidelines, but two sentences squeezed into an overlong line. * Run rpmlint also on your src.rpm * src.rpm download URL gives 404 Not Found * %description of the -devel package is the same as the description of the main package. That can't be right. Typically, you can cut down on that and simply say something like: "This package contains development files for compiling software that uses %{name}." * -devel pkg typically must "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" to stay in sync with the main package. Note : That could also be the answer to your problem with the .so symlink. The symlink must be in the -devel package, and the -devel package requires the main package which contains the library file. * %files devel section is missing %defattr parameter * %files devel section contains unowned directories! Either add the missing %dir %{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1 %dir %{_includedir}/stxxl or use equivalent entries to include these directories and their contents recursively. You would do this by removing the "*" wildcard that you use currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132025.n0DKPdEM004615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:25:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132030.n0DKUmXi030667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:30:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132030.n0DKU5QC030549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |serafettin-fonts - Comic |serafettin-cartoon-fonts - |Sans fonts |Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 15:30:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: serafettin-cartoon-fonts Short Description: Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:29:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132029.n0DKTbUb005119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:29:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132028.n0DKS9jj004925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:28:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132034.n0DKYSBJ031221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:34:27 EDT --- ok. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132032.n0DKWdrd005949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-13 15:32:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - ChangeLog is missing in %doc > ...but is also 0lenght, not much use of it. It's GNU build system residuum. you are right, my fault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132032.n0DKWN98005899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:32:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132035.n0DKZRb0006649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:35:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479647] Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl In-Reply-To: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132039.n0DKd76f032189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:39:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132037.n0DKbFHb031973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:37:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132038.n0DKcENT007088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:38:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132041.n0DKfHbn007827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:41:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132042.n0DKgDvI000558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 15:42:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132050.n0DKoOcu009711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev at sun.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev at sun.com> 2009-01-13 15:50:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netbeans-platform Short Description: NetBeans Platform Owners: victorv Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225246] Merge Review: anaconda In-Reply-To: <bug-225246-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225246-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132105.n0DL5R5j012860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 16:05:25 EDT --- Yes, the explicit lib dependency bits are obviously bogus and you can't really fix the changelog. The hardcoded-library-path complaints are bogus as well. That clears rpmlint. The other issues have all been fixed, so I'd say we're done. Thanks for your attention. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132108.n0DL8XRP013206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-13 16:08:32 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ncmpcpp-0.2.5-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint ncmpcpp* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: acd8df3f5512f7cab8b5b9207c778db1 Build source: acd8df3f5512f7cab8b5b9207c778db1 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1050322 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132115.n0DLF7Rr007466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:15:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132114.n0DLE6SF007021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:14:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132112.n0DLCunT006832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 16:12:52 EDT --- > With these things in mind, I believe that the autoconfiscation incures less > maintanance costs than the complicated spec file would. That seems quite reasonable. I'd suggest just noting that in the specfile with something like: # The following two patches add an autotools build system to work around # problems in the regular zlib build system. just to make things clear, but it's not seriously important. I think that takes care of this review. Thanks for your time. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226671-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132113.n0DLDEaR014159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:13:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132113.n0DLDFOE014192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226671, which changed state. Bug 226671 Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132117.n0DLHPOw007970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:17:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479730] Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available In-Reply-To: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132119.n0DLJ4gd008236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:19:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479711] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration In-Reply-To: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132118.n0DLIBAs008114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:18:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479732] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles In-Reply-To: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132119.n0DLJqwl008367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:19:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132116.n0DLGpqL007879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:16:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: <bug-472348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132120.n0DLKcHn008800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:20:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132124.n0DLOa3D009553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:24:34 EDT --- Can you add a cvs template here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132124.n0DLO6DK009463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:24:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132136.n0DLaoLC012298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132138.n0DLc5r5012456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |vmware-requirements -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132146.n0DLk4F5014222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-13 16:46:02 EDT --- --disable-static should be added to %configure before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: <bug-469514-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469514-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132142.n0DLg8V0013396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |debmirror -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132145.n0DLjIkq014124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |gPlanarity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: <bug-472696-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472696-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132144.n0DLiY9j013741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |vcards-daemon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: <bug-471575-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471575-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132143.n0DLhaUg013625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |libnautilus-vcards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: <bug-470066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132142.n0DLgSn1013504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |R-qtl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132143.n0DLhP6c020276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:43:24 EDT --- Jeff, ping? Can you please follow the review and perform the suggested changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: <bug-473037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132145.n0DLj4qo020786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |tinycc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-470547-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470547-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132142.n0DLgu5f020222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |SEMI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470545] Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-470545-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470545-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132142.n0DLgqTu020192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |Wanderlust -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132144.n0DLiALm020385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |PyQwt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132145.n0DLjmjL021030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |bullet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132145.n0DLjbb1020974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |WordNet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132142.n0DLgfqE020127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |xword -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225902] Merge Review: intltool In-Reply-To: <bug-225902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132150.n0DLoXlW015228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225902 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:50:32 EDT --- intltool.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132149.n0DLnxav014851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: <bug-474802-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474802-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132149.n0DLn11u014712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |vacation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132150.n0DLovMa015316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #15 from seth vidal <svidal at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 16:50:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-autodeath Short Description: Automatically disable system default route on a specific date Owners: skvidal Branches: F10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132149.n0DLnJJA014756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |nopaste -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132148.n0DLm7GO014633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Blocks|177841 | Alias| |libmsn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132150.n0DLoNbo022038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |pymilter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132148.n0DLmRN3021477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |pidgin-musictracker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: <bug-225796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132148.n0DLmApY021424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nmurray at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(nmurray at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:48:08 EDT --- Norm, you're the package maintainer of giflib. Can you please perform the suggested changes by Michael and at least show up here in the bug report? Removing you from being assigned, as this field is reserved to the reviewer not to the package owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479895] New: Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases Message-ID: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479895 Summary: Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mzazrivec at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mzazrive/perl-DDL-Oracle.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mzazrive/perl-DDL-Oracle-1.11-1.src.rpm Description: A Perl tool to reverse engineer the DDL of Oracle objects from Oracle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: <bug-226032-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226032-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132155.n0DLtQZn016392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:55:24 EDT --- Tom, can you please show up at this bug report? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132155.n0DLtD6Q016342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-13 16:55:11 EDT --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226027] Merge Review: libICE In-Reply-To: <bug-226027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132152.n0DLqG3u015663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226027 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:52:15 EDT --- libICE.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libICE-1.0.4/README libICE.src:68: E: files-attr-not-set libICE.src:69: E: files-attr-not-set libICE.src:70: E: files-attr-not-set libICE.src:72: E: files-attr-not-set libICE.src:74: E: files-attr-not-set libICE.src:75: E: files-attr-not-set -> Add %defattr(-,root,root,-) to %files devel and kill the empty file or solve it somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132155.n0DLtAbx016305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-13 16:55:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226027] Merge Review: libICE In-Reply-To: <bug-226027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132152.n0DLqx3C022572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226027 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:52:58 EDT --- Adam, are you now the maintainer of the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226045] Merge Review: libSM In-Reply-To: <bug-226045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132157.n0DLvaBY016806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226045 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:57:35 EDT --- libSM.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libSM-1.1.0/README - remove or solve it somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226062] Merge Review: libX11 In-Reply-To: <bug-226062-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226062-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132159.n0DLxQfs023689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226062 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 16:59:25 EDT --- libX11.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: libX11-0.99.3-datadir-locale-dir-fix.patch libX11.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/ja.S90/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/nokhchi-1/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/C/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/tscii-0/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/iscii-dev/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/el_GR.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/el_GR.UTF-8/XI18N_OBJS libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/am_ET.UTF-8/XI18N_OBJS libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/ja.U90/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/ja_JP.UTF-8/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/am_ET.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/th_TH/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/zh_CN.UTF-8/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/zh_TW.UTF-8/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/th_TH.UTF-8/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/microsoft-cp1256/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/ko_KR.UTF-8/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/microsoft-cp1255/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/microsoft-cp1251/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/isiri-3342/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/tatar-cyr/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/zh_HK.UTF-8/Compose libX11.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/X11/locale/iso8859-11/Compose libX11.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libX11-devel.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libX11-devel.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132203.n0DM3ePw024773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 --- Comment #29 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:03:36 EDT --- neon.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/neon-0.28.3/THANKS neon.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226068] Merge Review: libXdmcp In-Reply-To: <bug-226068-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226068-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132201.n0DM1sE3024554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226068 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:01:53 EDT --- libXdmcp.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXdmcp-1.0.2/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: <bug-225302-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225302-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132215.n0DMFvPb020524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:15:55 EDT --- automake.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/automake-1.10.1/NEWS Easily to solve. automake.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/automake-1.10/ansi2knr.c Is that correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225624] Merge Review: booty In-Reply-To: <bug-225624-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225624-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132218.n0DMIBov020894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225624 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at linuxnetz.de AssignedTo|pjones at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(pjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:18:10 EDT --- Peter, can you please show up on this bug report? It's your package. Removing you from assigned, as you're just the package owner, not the package reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4 In-Reply-To: <bug-225675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132220.n0DMKFYD028407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:20:14 EDT --- Jindrich, Jon - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: <bug-225302-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225302-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132222.n0DMMQ7e021783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet. | |de) | --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-13 17:22:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > automake.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/automake-1.10/ansi2knr.c > > Is that correct? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: <bug-245688-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245688-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132225.n0DMPM13022511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 17:25:16 EDT --- I think this looks fine now. I will sponsor you. It doesn't look like you've gotten as far as completing the CLA at this point, so you'll need to do that (which may involve HP legal; I don't know) and then apply for membership in the packager group. I will sponsor you, although if it takes some time for you to get to that point then please ping me in this ticket as I might not notice when you apply. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-473184-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473184-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132222.n0DMM3lf028721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #8 from Jim Radford <radford at blackbean.org> 2009-01-13 17:22:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo Thanks. Dependency on shared-mime-info and desktop-file-utils removed. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-0.2-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: <bug-225714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132224.n0DMOeNf029057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:24:38 EDT --- e2fsprogs.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 113, tab: line 1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132225.n0DMPbSb029558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:25:34 EDT --- Tyler, Ondrej - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: <bug-225698-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225698-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132221.n0DMLes9028655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davej at redhat.com, | |prarit at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:21:38 EDT --- dmidecode.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tool to analyse BIOS DMI data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: <bug-225709-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225709-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132222.n0DMMpA3028804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 17:22:50 EDT --- doxygen.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.5.7.1/LANGUAGE.HOWTO doxygen.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot A documentation system for C/C++. doxygen.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog doxygen.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog doxygen.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/doxygen-1.5.7.1-1.src.rpm.6705/doxygen.spec doxygen.src:71: W: configure-without-libdir-spec doxygen.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A documentation system for C/C++. doxygen.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog doxygen.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132237.n0DMbl20031961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #1 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 17:37:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328928) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328928) The spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] New: gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures Message-ID: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Summary: gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornatics at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=328927) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328927) the rpm file Cycle through a collection of pictures. Will display image captions (IPTC,Jpeg Comment, EXIF) if available. The spec file: ----------------------------------------------------- Name: gdesklet-slideshow Version: 0.9 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Cycle through a collection of pictures Group: User Interface/Desktops License: GPL+ URL: http://www.gdesklets.de Source0: http://http://www.gdesklets.de/files/desklets/SlideShow/SlideShow-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: http://www.gdesklets.de/files/controls/ImageSlideShow/ImageSlideShow-0.8.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %define _appname SlideShow %define _ctrlname ImageSlideShow BuildRequires: python Requires: gdesklets Requires: python-imaging %description Cycle through a collection of pictures. Will display image captions (IPTC,Jpeg Comment, EXIF) if available. %prep %setup -q -n %{_appname} tar -xf %{SOURCE1} -C ../ %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT #need to install the control first mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/ install -p -m644 ../ImageSlideShow/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/. #add shebang and execution mode find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/. \( -name "*.py" \) -exec sed -i '1i\#!/usr/bin/python' {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/. \( -name "*.py" \) | xargs chmod a+x #install the display now mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/ cp -rp * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/. %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc LICENSE #%{_datadir}/gdesklets/ %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/ %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/ %changelog * Mon Jan 12 2009 Jonathan MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> - 0.9-1 - Initial Packaging for Fedora ----------------------------------------------------- rpmlint issue: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/SlideShow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Error: no installed packages by name ../RPMS/noarch/SlideShow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/SlideShow-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Error: no installed packages by name ../SRPMS/SlideShow-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132242.n0DMg5ee025768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #2 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 17:42:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328929) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328929) The src.rpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: <bug-245688-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245688-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132253.n0DMrGDY027773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #30 from Tim Potter <tpot at hp.com> 2009-01-13 17:53:14 EDT --- Thanks Jason. I've sent a request to HP legal and hopefully I can complete the CLA soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:08:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226519] Merge Review: usermode In-Reply-To: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132308.n0DN87OC005382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:08:05 EDT --- It's been quite some time since my previous comments, and some of it seems to be out of date when compared to the current state of the package. There's now an upstream URL and released source tarball. The WITH_SELINUX stuff is gone now. COPYING is now included. Most of the above rpmlint stuff is still there. Additionally there are some bogus "no-dependency-on" complaints about the debuginfo package, which might be a bug in rpm but isn't an issue with this package. So we're left with: No need for the SysVinit conflict; even RH9 has SysVinit 2.84. Similarly, you can drop some of the versions from the dependencies, as we don't support any releases with such old versions of libselinux-devel or pam. Why does this have a direct dependency on /etc/pam.d/system-auth? It's been provided by the pam package as far back as the oldest machine I can access (RH 7.2). usermode.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/halt usermode.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/poweroff usermode.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/reboot I'm not sure what to do with these. If they're really configuration files then they need to nave %noreplace so updates don't overwrite local changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132317.n0DNHGhX032332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:17:15 EDT --- Did you want to get this imported and built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132317.n0DNHoRD032435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #16 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 18:17:49 EDT --- SRPM: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl-0.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226599] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i810 In-Reply-To: <bug-226599-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226599-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132318.n0DNIRHf032506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226599 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:18:25 EDT --- I guess I can close this; if you do want the name changed, you can make a CVS request at any time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:20:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: <bug-473235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132320.n0DNKuJT008118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:20:54 EDT --- Were you going to get these built and pushed on the release branches? Or should these tickets be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132317.n0DNH3vj007228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rrakus at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-13 18:17:01 EDT --- Current package owner is rrakus, no laroche. Okay, so let's go for now: [ DONE ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result/gperf-* gperf.src:9: E: prereq-use /sbin/install-info 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ -> See below, mentioned there and how to fix. [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...] [ ?? ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license [FAILED] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc -> Add COPYING to %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> cc20e58975a38075440423c8fb85fd00 gperf-3.0.3.tar.gz -> cc20e58975a38075440423c8fb85fd00 gperf-3.0.3.tar.gz.1 -> 3c535d2727eb0dca10ca87cefa03720a8280c7a2 gperf-3.0.3.tar.gz -> 3c535d2727eb0dca10ca87cefa03720a8280c7a2 gperf-3.0.3.tar.gz.1 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden [ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. -> We're optional suggesting %defattr(-,root,root,-) rather current [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ ?? ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). -> gperf/doc/* is currently nearly unused, let's talk about why and so [ ?? ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. -> First clarify point above... [ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ N/A ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - Change BuildRoot e.g. to: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Use _smpflags for make or explain, why/that it can't used, e.g. make %{?_smp_mflags} - Kill "Prereq: /sbin/install-info" line, replace by Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info - Shouldn't it be the following rather the current (add || :)? %preun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/gperf.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir || : fi exit 0 - Please let us talk about why nearly nothing of gperf/doc/* currently ends up in the package, there's *.pdf, *.ps, *.html documentation. Reasons? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify In-Reply-To: <bug-461106-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461106-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132325.n0DNPT9s001746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:25:27 EDT --- Did you want to get this built and pushed out? I see an F-10 build, but no rawhide or F-9 builds and no update notice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-472150-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472150-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132322.n0DNMupP001122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Bug 472150 depends on bug 472149, which changed state. Bug 472149 Summary: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: <bug-472149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132322.n0DNMtZV001091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:22:53 EDT --- This seems to have been pushed out now; I'll go ahead and close the ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: <bug-226032-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226032-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132325.n0DNPRcN001712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tgl at redhat.com) | --- Comment #7 from Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 18:25:26 EDT --- I haven't been too excited about this because hacking on those 1998-vintage makefiles is just putting lipstick on a pig :-(. I am hopeful that the sourceforge project will produce an update sometime soon and then we'll have an upstream that is worth cleaning up. BTW, the ftp.uu.net address *is* the original, well-published, and still functional URL. Let's not have any historical revisionism in the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: <bug-467175-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467175-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132327.n0DNRQtg009442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:27:22 EDT --- This seems to have been pushed out to the release branches, so I see no reason not to close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: <bug-475035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132332.n0DNWpNR003393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:32:50 EDT --- This seems to have been pushed out to the release branches, so I see no reason why this ticket shouldn't be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: <bug-474430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132335.n0DNZOZu011247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rayvd at bludgeon.or | |g) --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:35:23 EDT --- Any response? It's been over a month now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132342.n0DNgCZr005049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: <bug-439630-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-439630-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132345.n0DNj58r012794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Bug 439630 depends on bug 439627, which changed state. Bug 439627 Summary: Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: <bug-439627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-439627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132345.n0DNj2db012709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(walters at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:45:00 EDT --- Over two months later, I'm just going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-472639-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472639-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132347.n0DNlm6i013227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 439630, which changed state. Bug 439630 Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-472639-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472639-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132349.n0DNnPFq013363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:49:23 EDT --- Unfortunately the gluegen ticket was closed due to a non-responsive submitter, which now leaves jogl unreviewable (and hence closed as well) and this would cascade up to this package except that I'm tired of closing tickets now and I'm sure someone will complain. Does anyone want to submit their own gluegen package and reopen and fix up the jogl ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: <bug-439630-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-439630-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132347.n0DNlkIX013168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:47:43 EDT --- Since this depends on gluegen, which was closed because the submitter neglected to comment after several months, this is left in an unreviewable state. I'm going to go ahead and close it, although if someone wants to re-submit gluegen (and respond to review commentary) then I guess this can be re-re-reopened and made to depend on the new gluegen review ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:54:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:54:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445208] Review Request: rubygem-rapt - Rails Plugin Tool In-Reply-To: <bug-445208-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-445208-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901132354.n0DNswSr006915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445208 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 18:54:56 EDT --- Since there's nothing to review here, I'm going to go ahead and close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140003.n0E03wUx016807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dlfcn - |Review Request: |mingw32-dlfcn |mingw32-dlfcn - Implements | |a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen | |dlclose dlsym dlerror) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455149] Review Request: latency-policy - Policy for system wide latency In-Reply-To: <bug-455149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140003.n0E03lWp016753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455149 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rhughes at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 19:03:45 EDT --- So it's been a month without comment; setting needinfo. I'll close this soon if there's no further movement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: dlfcn - mingw32-dlfcn In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140003.n0E031d8016591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 19:03:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > "Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/somefile -- > DONT use dos2unix, that can cause build fail on FC3. " > > Well you should stick to the guidelines even if FC3 is long dead. I'm missing the context here. Was the above in reply to something? > Pass %{?_smp_mflags} to make unless you have a reason not to do so. I agree, this should be added. > Will do a formal review later this week (limited time). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140013.n0E0DS9M018661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #5 from steve <steve at lonetwin.net> 2009-01-13 19:13:26 EDT --- Debarshi, thanks for you comments. (In reply to comment #4) > + CVE-2008-2149 (patch in Debian), CVE-2008-3908 > (http://www.ocert.org/analysis/2008-014/wordnet.patch.2). Debian carries a > split version of the patch for CVE-2008-3908. > > + Please have look at the patches used in the Debian package. Some of them are > useful to have in Fedora. eg., the manual page fixes. I took a look at the debain patches and as far as I could tell, the man page that you pointed out and the security patch mentioned above were the only ones that I think were relevant to this Fedora package. Both have been included. > > + 'wordnet' might be a better name for the package because that is the name > some other distributions (eg., Debian, Ubuntu) are using. Having consistency in > naming across distributions is a good thing. Umm, although i agree that naming across distributions is a good thing, I would say naming the package as the way the original (upstream) package, is a better thing. There are a couple of other reasons: a. 'wordnet' is a common noun where as 'WordNet' refers to the actual package from princeton ...don't believe me ? Ask WordNet :) ... [steve at laptop ~]$ wn wordnet -over Overview of noun wordnet The noun wordnet has 2 senses (no senses from tagged texts) 1. wordnet -- (any of the machine-readable lexical databases modeled after the Princeton WordNet) 2. WordNet, Princeton WordNet -- (a machine-readable lexical database organized by meanings; developed at Princeton University) [steve at laptop ~]$ b. Changing the %{name} in the spec file, implies that i'd have to change the name of the included tarball, but then the "Source:" tag would not be correct (actually, i did try to change all occurrences of WordNet to wordnet in the spec, but got some errors while building, which i could not understand ...not that i didn't spent too much time on investigation). I could still rename the package if you still think it is a good thing. The new spec and source files are at: http://lonetwin.net/WordNet.spec http://lonetwin.net/WordNet-3.0-2.fc10.src.rpm - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: <bug-476776-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476776-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140018.n0E0I5ws019552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 19:18:04 EDT --- Looks good now. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140021.n0E0Ld0X020377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-13 19:21:38 EDT --- 1.) Spec file legibility: No useless comments please. #ExclusiveArch: x86_64 #ExcludeArch: ia64 #Patch0: ksh-20041225-gcc4.patch #%patch0 -p1 -b .gcc4 ... 2.) If you temporarily disable a patch, please remove it only from %prep, not the tag itself, so that the patch is bundled with srpm: # for debugging only: #Patch100: ksh-20060124-iffedebug.patch 3.) Use macros. Replace /usr/bin with %{_bindir} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{/bin,/usr/bin,%{_mandir}/man1} /usr//bin/ksh ln -sf /bin/ksh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/ksh ... 4.) Use %find_lang for locales %files %{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/* 5.) RPMlint: ksh.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ksh93 ksh.src:29: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ksh93 Though it is advisable to version I think it's ok if you leave these as they are; this had been unversioned for some time already and ksh93 is probably won't coming back anyways. ksh.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch4: ksh-20080725-ttou.patch Either remove the file, or explain why is it disabled. 6.) Upstream the patches Please submit the patches to usptream & comment on status. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment 7.) Latest upstream release Latest release seems to be 2008-11-04. Please update. 8.) Avoid absolute symlinks ln -sf /bin/ksh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/ksh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140026.n0E0QMgl021134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 19:26:20 EDT --- Good questions: > 1) why URL still drafts url? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Yeah it is kind of a chicken'n'egg kind of situation. Actually I didn't follow the whole process of fontpackages wrt FPC (Fedora Packaging Committee) and the recent revision of the Fonts Packaging Guidelines: the files in the package are really part of the new Haskell Packaging Draft so it would probably make sense for them to be looked at by FPC as part of the Haskell Packaging Guidelines revision process. > 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? Hmm maybe the rpm macros and the templates should be separated then. There are more rpm bits (scripts) coming for dependency generation. I could move the spec templating part to haskell-packager: in the longer term we would probably like to rewrite/replace it with something in Haskell (like cabal2rpm). > 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released > with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? Yeah, before doing that I just wanted to put it out for discussion first. :) Currently it is really small though and I doubt any other non-derived distro would be interested in the templates anyway so I was half-naively thinking that it could even just live in pkg cvs but that would probably be frowned upon these days? > 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go > for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. Good point: I will change that. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140040.n0E0ehYi015954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 19:40:41 EDT --- Sorry about not being able to finish this up sooner, but I've been swamped with work the last few weeks. Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag. * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Rpmlint produces no warnings or errors. * Package builds in Mock fine. Note: I was unable to test that this works since I don't have a Zenoss installation available. +1 APPROVED. Apply for the packager group in FAS, and I'll be your sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140056.n0E0uvAZ018619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #29 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 19:56:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Dependency on gd adds libX11 as a dependency too. I, personally, don't think > > that these fancy graphs worths it, but if people will insist, then I'll add > > support for gd. > > I agree with you, let's drop the gd dependency. What about making (yet another) subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 01:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140135.n0E1ZnA8000906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 20:35:48 EDT --- OK, this one still builds for me, and I guess I'm lucky to be building on the one platform where the tests pass, because I get: Ran: 333 tests in: 0.72 seconds. OK I don't see anything in particular to complain about, so: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 01:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226519] Merge Review: usermode In-Reply-To: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140140.n0E1eG6x001757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 20:40:14 EDT --- Sorry, one more: The build root is not correct. It needs to reference at least %name, %version and %release. Suggested values are at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 01:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140153.n0E1r5Lt028357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226495, which changed state. Bug 226495 Summary: Merge Review: tmpwatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 01:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch In-Reply-To: <bug-226495-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226495-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140153.n0E1r4pp028328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 20:53:01 EDT --- I've no idea why I haven't looked at this in a year; I guess I was waiting for that "next version" to exist, which happened last February. I'm going to say at this point that everything looks fine to me. However, I think that it would be better to reference the tarball you uploaded to the releases directory instead of the one attached to the wiki, as then the URL is much simpler and you can use it directly: Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/t/m/tmpwatch/tmpwatch-2.9.13.tar.bz2 This is, however, minor. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 02:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140201.n0E21sdp006018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225608, which changed state. Bug 225608 Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 02:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: <bug-225608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140201.n0E21rA3005984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-13 21:01:51 EDT --- Honestly, the decision about whether this package should die or not has no bearing on whether what is currently in the distro is packaged correctly. We can't treat it like a regular package and refuse to allow it in; it's already in, and the purpose of this ticket is to ensure that the packaging is OK. The packaging is obviously OK; the package has nothing substantive save Requires(Pre): setup filesystem name, version, license, summary, description, buildroot, changelog, are all OK. There's no source to check, no files to inspect. As such I'm going to approve it. Sure, it would be nice if it was killed off, but we could certainly find worse-packaged pieces of historical cruft in the distro. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 02:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140231.n0E2VAJl003219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 02:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225902] Merge Review: intltool In-Reply-To: <bug-225902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140250.n0E2oBZv014964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225902 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-13 21:50:10 EDT --- Feel free to apply pedantic fixes like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 03:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479750-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140346.n0E3k55f026866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 22:46:03 EDT --- I'm happy with co-maintainer, I initially packaged it so I could add support to ekiga. Will update the other bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 03:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140341.n0E3foer025965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #8 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-13 22:41:49 EDT --- Hello. Thanks for the analysis Jan :-) I've bumped up to binutils 2.19 and I believe I've fixed all the issues that Jan mentioned. Spec: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-binutils.spec SRPM: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-binutils-2.19-1.fc10.src.rpm The MAKEINFO variable was set because the configure script in binutils 2.18 had a bug that meant makeinfo detection would fail. Setting MAKEINFO bypassed this test. Binutils 2.19 has fixed this problem. I think that I should explain where the patches come from slightly more. The mspgcc project has maintained these patches against binutils for at least two years now. They add support for a variety of MSP430 variants. For 2.19, these patches have been merged into one. These patches are available in the mspgcc CVS: http://mspgcc.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mspgcc/packaging/patches/ I'm not completely sure why these are not in binutils itself. However, I think that keeping this patch out would just irritate users. I will post to the mspgcc mailing list about this and try to get that patch into binutils itself. Not now though, it's very late/early here. Cheers, Rob p.s. Apologies if I sound irritated in this post. Xorg hung on me and the Firefox session saving thing doesn't save form element contents... so I ended up writing this twice! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: <bug-451771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140408.n0E48ueK022723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #7 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 23:08:54 EDT --- Sorry, none. I have been busy. If you don't mind letting this wait in the queue, hopefully i will come back to it soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: <bug-226462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140417.n0E4HvJj024484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 --- Comment #14 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 23:17:55 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: <bug-226462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140435.n0E4ZMih003611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(jparsons at redhat.c |fedora-review+ |om) | --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 23:35:21 EDT --- Ok. looks like some changes was already committed in rawhide without notifying here for further review. Based on today's rawhide spec, + rpmlint only gave system-config-lvm.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode ==> ok + all issues asked to fix since comment#1 looks fixed now in rawhide package. + Package now follows packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140443.n0E4hKm7004782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #12 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 23:43:19 EDT --- Argh, you're right. Just specifying BuildRequires: java-devel gets you gcj, not openjdk. That's ... contrary to my expectations. Okay, let's try this: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel-5.2-1.3.7.fc10.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225894] Merge Review: icon-naming-utils In-Reply-To: <bug-225894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140459.n0E4xTSW031353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225894 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-13 23:59:28 EDT --- APPROVED new rawhide build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=78414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 05:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: <bug-441570-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-441570-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140514.n0E5EfeV001808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 00:14:36 EDT --- Jeff? Any movement here? Sorry this bug dropped off my radar, but I was waiting for you to move forward on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 05:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: <bug-459455-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459455-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140543.n0E5h7bj015445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 00:43:03 EDT --- Hey Jebba. Sorry this dropped off my radar, and it sure seems to have dropped off yours as well. ;) CVS was done, but I don't see the package imported or built. Can you please do so, so we can close this out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 05:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140547.n0E5lRW0007761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-14 00:47:26 EDT --- Kevin, you seem to have missed my request for F-9 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings Short Description: Catch your forked server's warnings Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140600.n0E60Psm010069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 01:00:24 EDT --- Sorry about that. ;( Should be done now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226458] Merge Review: system-config-keyboard In-Reply-To: <bug-226458-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226458-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140604.n0E64hPT019330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226458 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 01:04:41 EDT --- Any news on this? If you would like me to look again since it's been so long, I would be happy to run through my checklist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: <bug-225906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140606.n0E66GDH019907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 01:06:15 EDT --- Any news here? Since it's been so long I would be happy to run through my checklist again against the current package... Or if you would care to look and address those last 2 items, I can look after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479647] Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl In-Reply-To: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479647-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140632.n0E6Wx54024278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope In-Reply-To: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479669-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140700.n0E70iqq029580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140700.n0E70jqM029603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Bug 479667 depends on bug 479669, which changed state. Bug 479669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140702.n0E72I4F021210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 02:02:16 EDT --- Update to the latest upstream release SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1051177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140716.n0E7GRoG032377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 02:16:26 EDT --- Thanks for the update. For fun I tries to push it through http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/fedora-qa (though that is a little old now apparently). Here is my review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: [rpmlint] packages are clean [+] MUST: base name is ok and matches spec [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. GPL+ and LGPLv2+ [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 8a7565ff3b2d7bdb594af4c10c594951 cpphs-1.6.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something else. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package contains code [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ghc-cpphs provides -devel for now [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added in the future. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Once the above file ownership issue is resolved I think I can approve this, but I will attach a small patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140720.n0E7KkF9000817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140725.n0E7PjfW025321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #6 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 02:25:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > "Fix it with sed in the %prep section: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' src/somefile -- > > DONT use dos2unix, that can cause build fail on FC3. " > > > > Well you should stick to the guidelines even if FC3 is long dead. > > I'm missing the context here. Was the above in reply to something? Yeah forgot to quote the context: "- Use dos2unix and keep the timestamps." dos2unix shouldn't be used, use sed instead. (see above quote from the guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140722.n0E7MfI1001063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 02:22:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328957) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328957) cpphs.spec-2.patch - simplify summaries - move lgpl license file to ghc-cpphs - add html doc and some trivial cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140729.n0E7TDX5025791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-14 02:29:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > ... > I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told you on IRC. > ... > [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. > > Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by > ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. > > Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something > else. Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a subpackage for the docs). > ... > I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added > in the future. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4 In-Reply-To: <bug-225675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140737.n0E7bWRA003732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 --- Comment #10 from Jindrich Novy <jnovy at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 02:37:31 EDT --- Forgot to post an update here. Added this comment to unversioned obsoletes in spec preamble: # unversioned obsoletes are OK here as these BDB versions never occur again Obsoletes: db1, db2, db3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479666] Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl In-Reply-To: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479666-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140752.n0E7qV0A030064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 08:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140810.n0E8ARVl001334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 03:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told > you on IRC. Strange - builds ok for me on f10 (and f11 mock) anyway. > > Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by > > ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. > > > > Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something > > else. > > Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a > subpackage for the docs). Right. Since ghc-doc is quite big I am leaning towards subpackaging for all libraries' docs generated by haddock. I guess in this case ghc-cpphs-doc say. Any other thoughts from the Haskell SIG? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 08:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: Seeking sponsorship: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140837.n0E8bR3Z006639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Kai <maintainer at mt2009.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mmpong - a |Review Request: Seeking |massively multiplayer pong |sponsorship: mmpong - a |game |massively multiplayer pong | |game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 08:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140845.n0E8jbPZ008284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #5 from Wes Shull <wes.shull at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 03:45:35 EDT --- I can verify it now builds, installs, and runs (only did basic testing) without error for me on f10-x86_64; thanks Richard. A few minor points: * /usr/bin/ocsigen is system_u:object_r:bin_t; do we maybe want to make it system_u:object_r:httpd_exec_t like apache httpd since it's "just" another webserver? * I got no -debuginfo package out of the build, and /usr/bin/ocsigen is not stripped. * The ocsigen quickstart page indicates most distros include an initscript, which we seem to be lacking. I'd volunteer but shell scripts make me want to gouge my eyes out. Apart from these potential considerations, looks good to me. Should I start rabble-rousing on the -devel list to get some real certified reviewers on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479895] Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases In-Reply-To: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140902.n0E92Qo9020895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479895 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:02:23 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 94b43a139feb903609e1e15326e982ae OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140914.n0E9ENLs014833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:14:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, this one still builds for me, and I guess I'm lucky to be building on the > one platform where the tests pass, because I get: > Ran: 333 tests in: 0.72 seconds. > OK Yes, the tests only work on x86-64. 1/333 fails on 32 bit platforms, and lots of things fail on ppc64. I'm going to raise the issue with upstream. Thanks for your patience looking at this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140916.n0E9G95j024384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:16:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-preludeml Short Description: OCaml utility functions Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140921.n0E9LNdF016823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140916.n0E9GWRG015553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:16:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > --disable-static should be added to %configure before import. `--disable-static' is used "against" .a static archives. Which are now not created. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] New: Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files Message-ID: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Summary: Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at alexhudson.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser.spec SRPM URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser-3.0b-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IniParser is a simple ANSI-C library used by other applications to parse "ini-style" files as used mainly on Windows. There is a small problem with this library; it doesn't come with a "full" build system - it has a Makefile which compiles the library, but doesn't even have "make install", thus the manual fiddling around in the spec file. I suspect this makes the -debuginfo package less useful - it doesn't come with copies of the source, for example. Another issue is that the library is simply called libiniparser.so.0 - there is no minor version. I imagine this would make it difficult to correctly work out dependencies (for example, if new API was added to the library later and an application wished to declare that dependency) - however, there is also a compatibility issue there if it's changed just for Fedora? I'm contemplating writing a patch which would effectively drop in a more standard autotools build, but would appreciate any easier ideas. Also, this is only the second package I've submitted and I'm not a package maintainer (yet, hopefully ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140926.n0E9QHiP026908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:26:16 EDT --- OK I'll look at this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: <bug-454416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140921.n0E9LoKI025807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-454410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140921.n0E9Ln5R025780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq In-Reply-To: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140923.n0E9NROj026083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:23:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I will mail Tom Lane myself and ask him if he wants to > be CC'd on this bug, but he's quite a busy chap. Actually he's already in the CC for the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140925.n0E9Pe2J026803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-01-14 04:25:38 EDT --- Also, drop the Requires: pidgin >= 2.0.0 line, since one can use the plugin with any piece of software that uses libpurple. After that the package is IMHO good to go, you just need to get sponsored by someone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq In-Reply-To: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140921.n0E9LmnQ025756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 454416 Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-postgresql - |mingw32-postgresql - |postgresql development |postgresql development |library's libpq (MingW) |library's libpq --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:21:46 EDT --- Please send any upstream patches to the PostgreSQL mailing list: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/ I will mail Tom Lane myself and ask him if he wants to be CC'd on this bug, but he's quite a busy chap. > this package also depends on secur32.dll > > mingw32(secur32.dll) is needed by > mingw32-postgresql-8.3.5-1snapshot.fc10.noarch We need to add that pseudo-provides to mingw32-filesystem. I'll do this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140927.n0E9RgZL018151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Seeking |Review Request: mmpong - a |sponsorship: mmpong - a |massively multiplayer pong |massively multiplayer pong |game |game | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140931.n0E9V16p028148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140927.n0E9RAwO027174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140927.n0E9RPBx027232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #9 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:27:24 EDT --- The URL you've given still points at the old spec file, but I have installed the SRPM which does have the new spec file in it, and that does look much better now. I don't think the patch is an issue which should hold up review. Obviously its much better if you can get the binutils maintainers to take it since it reduces the future work that needs to be done, but its fine for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479895] Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases In-Reply-To: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140928.n0E9SYEY027400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479895 Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Milan Zazrivec <mzazrivec at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:28:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DDL-Oracle Short Description: DDL generator for Oracle databases Owners: mzazrive Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140934.n0E9YFaO028607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:34:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > 1) why URL still drafts url? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Added a comment > 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? Still thinking on this - added a comment in spec - I need to look at some other packages for examples. > 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released > with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? Done (but untested:) > 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go > for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140938.n0E9cFJU029502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:38:14 EDT --- I updated the templates in the draft haskell-packaging package to handle doc subpackages btw (haven't tested it though yet:). You could try http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm (though the cabal2spec will conflict with the one in ghc currently). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140940.n0E9e7L6030038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Dan Kenigsberg <danken at cs.technion.ac.il> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140949.n0E9nd0V022397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-14 04:49:38 EDT --- BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.6.0 is redundant, we ship 5.8 for a loooong long time There seems to exist a missing BR: ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for perl(File::pushd). Exiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479955] New: Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479955 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-pt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-pt-0.20021021-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Portuguese hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] New: Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library Message-ID: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Summary: Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gtksourceviewmm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gtksourceviewmm-2.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: gtksourceviewmm is a C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library. It offers all the power of gtksourceview with an interface familiar to c++ developers, including users of the gtkmm library. Notes to reviewer: this package is a renaming of the existing libgtksourceviewmm package (which got renamed since the 2.0 release). Currently only 2 applications use it (nemiver and glom), both of which can support the 2.0 API already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:50:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479956] New: Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules Message-ID: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479956 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ro.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ro-3.3-0.1.test3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Romanian hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901140956.n0E9uWuG024391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 04:56:31 EDT --- The missing requirement was imported today into CVS. You can find it here> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141010.n0EAAeTq028416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 05:10:39 EDT --- mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141007.n0EA7sPc027682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:07:51 EDT --- Thanks everyone for helping out with this. It's now built in EL-5, F-10 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:11:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141011.n0EABV3a005359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:11:29 EDT --- Thanks everyone. I've built this for EL-5 and Rawhide, but cannot yet build it for F-10 because I'm waiting for the mingw32-zlib dependency to work its way into dist-f10-updates. I'll leave the bug open until then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: JRosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141011.n0EABegG028761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: jrosetta - |Review Request: JRosetta - |JRosetta provides a common |A common base to build a |base for graphical |graphical console |component | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 05:11:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/JRosetta.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/JRosetta-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A common base to build a graphical console Changelog - Fix License (GPLv2 only) (was confirmed by phone call with upstream, the shortname license can be seen in the MANIFEST of the jar files.) - Fix Summary - Update to 1.0.2 - previous patch merged upstream - Rename to JRosetta Koji scratch build for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1051591 rpmlint is quiet on local build from F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify In-Reply-To: <bug-461106-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461106-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141021.n0EAL3C3007646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-14 05:21:00 EDT --- Yes, had to figure out why it didn't build on rawhide. Fixed now, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479955] Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141024.n0EAOZ64031398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479955 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq In-Reply-To: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479874-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141024.n0EAOYt3031371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:24:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > this package also depends on secur32.dll > > > > mingw32(secur32.dll) is needed by > > mingw32-postgresql-8.3.5-1snapshot.fc10.noarch > > We need to add that pseudo-provides to mingw32-filesystem. > I'll do this today. I've done this now. You will need to adjust the dependencies as follows: branch dependency ---------------------------------------- devel: mingw32-filesystem >= 42 F-10: mingw32-filesystem >= 40-3 EL-5: mingw32-filesystem >= 40-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479956] Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141024.n0EAOhVo008107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479956 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141033.n0EAXbDp000948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:33:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I can verify it now builds, installs, and runs (only did basic testing) without > error for me on f10-x86_64; thanks Richard. > > A few minor points: > > * /usr/bin/ocsigen is system_u:object_r:bin_t; do we maybe want to make it > system_u:object_r:httpd_exec_t like apache httpd since it's "just" another > webserver? I have absolutely no idea how to do this, but sure it sounds like a good idea. > * I got no -debuginfo package out of the build, and /usr/bin/ocsigen is not > stripped. Debuginfo isn't really that useful for OCaml programs, since gdb doesn't know about OCaml. So you end up having to debug assembler. > * The ocsigen quickstart page indicates most distros include an initscript, > which we seem to be lacking. I'd volunteer but shell scripts make me want to > gouge my eyes out. Probably best to copy the one from Debian, if they have one: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocsigen.git;a=summary > Apart from these potential considerations, looks good to me. Should I start > rabble-rousing on the -devel list to get some real certified reviewers on this? Sure thing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479956] Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141033.n0EAXXwl000907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479956 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 05:33:31 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1051694 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. b984466d932377b9a81a93644efcf663 hyph_ro_RO.3.3-test3.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: <bug-468189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141033.n0EAXx7I001018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #20 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-14 05:33:55 EDT --- Ran the validation script on " 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64 " type of system with the same results (as on a x86 platform): # valrear ============================================================================== ============================================================================== Make a fresh RPM of Relax and Recover (rear) URL: http://rear.sourceforge.net ============================================================================== ============================================================================== Relax & Recover Version 1.7.12 / 2009-01-09 Creating archive '/tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz' OK Creating RPM packages OK OK Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Finished in 3 seconds. ============================================================================== Unpack /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm ============================================================================== rear ################################################## ============================================================================== rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ============================================================================== rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ============================================================================== rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm ============================================================================== rear.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ============================================================================== rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SPECS/rear.spec ============================================================================== 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ============================================================================== rpm -qp --requires /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ============================================================================== /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 ============================================================================== rpm -qp --info /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ============================================================================== Name : rear Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.7.12 Vendor: (none) Release : 1.fc9 Build Date: Wed 14 Jan 2009 11:25:28 AM CET Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: sloeber Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Size : 468819 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) URL : http://rear.sourceforge.net Summary : Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Description : Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). This is work in progress, so some features are not yet implemented. ============================================================================== rpm -qpd /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (docfiles) ============================================================================== /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/README /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/readme.txt /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/validated/Fedora/9/i386.txt ============================================================================== rpm -qpc /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (configfiles) ============================================================================== /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf.rpmnew /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf.rpmsave /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf /etc/rear/Linux-x86_64.conf /etc/rear/Ubuntu/7.10.conf /etc/rear/default.conf /etc/rear/local.conf /etc/rear/os.conf /etc/rear/site.conf /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt /etc/rear/templates/ISO_isolinux.cfg /etc/rear/templates/PXE_pxelinux.cfg /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_mailbody.txt /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_ISO.txt /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_PXE.txt /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_USB.txt /etc/rear/templates/USB_syslinux.cfg ============================================================================== Build RPM with /tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz ============================================================================== rpmbuild -ta /tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz + umask 022 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33872 + cd /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD + rm -rf rear-1.7.12 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd rear-1.7.12 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 0 = 0 ']' + /bin/chown -Rhf root . ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 0 = 0 ']' + /bin/chgrp -Rhf root . + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 + umask 022 + cd /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44208 + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44208 + umask 022 + cd /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root + mkdir /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root + cp -ap usr etc /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/ + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD/rear-1.7.12 + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Processing files: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.48527 + umask 022 + cd /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + cp -pr CHANGES README doc/readme.txt doc/validated /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12 + exit 0 Provides: config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.15262 + umask 022 + cd /home/gdha/RPM/BUILD + cd rear-1.7.12 + rm -rf /var/tmp/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9-root + exit 0 ************************************************************ Log-file is saved as : /tmp/valrear.txt ************************************************************ Are there more tests I can execute? best regards, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141034.n0EAYltB010252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:34:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > * The ocsigen quickstart page indicates most distros include an initscript, > > which we seem to be lacking. I'd volunteer but shell scripts make me want to > > gouge my eyes out. > > Probably best to copy the one from Debian, if they have one: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocsigen.git;a=summary Here we go, smimram wrote one: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocsigen.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/ocsigen.init;hb=HEAD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479955] Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141033.n0EAXZAH010080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479955 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 05:33:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1051701 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 327989bbbfc9f9d56eb772427a344eb3 hyph_pt_PT.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141043.n0EAhwgo003519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-14 05:43:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source RPM: perl-ORLite-Migrate.src: E: description-line-too-long SQLite is a light weight single file SQL database that provides an excellent platform for e mbedded perl-ORLite-Migrate.src: E: description-line-too-long storage of structured data. ORLite is a light weight single class Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) perl-ORLite-Migrate.src: E: description-line-too-long system specifically designed for (and limited to only) work with SQLite. ORLite::Migrate is a light 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. binary RPM: perl-ORLite-Migrate.noarch: E: description-line-too-long SQLite is a light weight single file SQL database that provides an excellent platform fo r embedded perl-ORLite-Migrate.noarch: E: description-line-too-long storage of structured data. ORLite is a light weight single class Object-Relational Mapp er (ORM) perl-ORLite-Migrate.noarch: E: description-line-too-long system specifically designed for (and limited to only) work with SQLite. ORLite::Migrate is a light 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. => current lines have 92 chars, exceeding the 80 chars limit checked by rpmlint [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging G uidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license( s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 010475d7e87a17316db969c4fe9ce71602c0cb6f ORLite-Migrate-0.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. [x] "make test" passes ================ *** APPROVED *** but before commit please shorten the lines used in %descriptions to <80 chars ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479955] Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141047.n0EAlPYZ013555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479955 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:47:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-pt Short Description: Portuguese hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479956] Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141048.n0EAmOGM013769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479956 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:48:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-ro Short Description: Romanian hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141048.n0EAmcGj013845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:48:36 EDT --- dos2unix issue raised with FPC: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00066.html Here's an updated package which reverts the dos2unix change and should fix everything else: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/dlfcn/mingw32-dlfcn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10.src.rpm * Wed Jan 14 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0-0.3.r11 - Use Version 0 (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00064.html) - Revert use of dos2unix for now (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00066.html) - Use _smp_mflags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 10:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch In-Reply-To: <bug-226495-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226495-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141054.n0EAssKP015278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 --- Comment #7 from Miloslav Trmac <mitr at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 05:54:51 EDT --- Thanks. I'll fix the URL in the next release (which won't be available as a wiki attachment), I don't think it's worth the effort to fix it in 2.9.13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141100.n0EB0uAh016867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 06:00:55 EDT --- About ocamlduce, see bug 479970. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141115.n0EBF8MO020115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 06:15:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328966) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328966) Patch to add BR libsoup-devel You need the patch attached here. I will continue the review assuming you have added this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:22:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141122.n0EBMEVt012154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 06:22:13 EDT --- - rpmlint output gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vala/vapi/gssdp-1.0.deps gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: no-binary gupnp-vala-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. I think the first & third errors are real ones which need to be looked at. Not sure about the 'no-binary' error. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora - license matches the actual package license No, the license is LGPLv2+ + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 26f9c6d5de9a300cf2ec3cc04313e2ea 104744 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture x86_64 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies (assuming you add the BR in the patch in comment 5) + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock - the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin A few things to fix there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141122.n0EBMTsx021637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #12 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 06:22:27 EDT --- I guess Tyler approved that package before, so no reason to ping him. Patrice afaik withdrawn from Fedora process ~1 month ago, I fixed versioned obsoletes in rawhide now, but I'm reluctant to remove links symlinks for links v2 package. Links v.2 (with graphics) brings framebuffer/X-Windows requirement. It is common in other linux distributions to have its binary named links2 and to ship links version 0.X or 1.X separately (RedHat shipped links v.0.X until 0.96, then replaced by elinks). I'm ok with removing those symlinks if the links v.1.X package will be added to Fedora - not for links v.2+. So the only question is if John is ok with it - then we could close that merge review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141138.n0EBcwPb015502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #9 from Wes Shull <wes.shull at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 06:38:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * /usr/bin/ocsigen is system_u:object_r:bin_t; do we maybe want to make it > > system_u:object_r:httpd_exec_t like apache httpd since it's "just" another > > webserver? > > I have absolutely no idea how to do this, but sure it sounds > like a good idea. bug 243302 details another package dealing with the same thing (yay for bz being indexed by google now) I do have a reasonable level of familiarity with creating selinux modules, so unless you've nothing else to do, leave it for me and I'll take a poke at it tomorrow. Once we've got something tested/working we can run it by dwalsh to make sure it's not insane. > Debuginfo isn't really that useful for OCaml programs, since > gdb doesn't know about OCaml. So you end up having to debug > assembler. I take it the symbols are of use to ocamldebug then? Or could we just strip useless baggage and discard? > > * The ocsigen quickstart page indicates most distros include an initscript, > > which we seem to be lacking. I'd volunteer but shell scripts make me want to > > gouge my eyes out. > > Probably best to copy the one from Debian, if they have one: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocsigen.git;a=summary I can handle that level of copy-and-tweak, again unless you've just nothing better to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] New: Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. Message-ID: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Summary: Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: randyn3lrx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xwxapt.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xwxapt-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: xwxapt is a GTK+ graphical version of wxapt. An application for decoding and saving weather images transmitted in the APT format of NOAA and METEOR satellites. It seems that at the present time (fall 2005) there are still no satellites transmitting in the latter format in the 137 MHz band, that I know of at least. But there are a few NOAA satellites that operate continuously in this mode and frequency band: NOAA-12 and NOAA-15 are the "veterans" of the field and NOAA-17 and NOAA-18 are the current morning and afternoon pass birds. It uses the same decoding engine as wxapt but it displays APT images at half-size as they are received, storing the full-sized files when reception is completed. It also displays some status information (audio level, sync level, sync status etc) and text messages as it runs. * Wed Jan 14 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject.org> 1.2-1 - Upstream upgrade to 1.2 - Mock build f9/f10/devel - check rpmlint 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - submit for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 11:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] New: Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library Message-ID: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Summary: Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pascal22p at parois.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/libnewmat.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.debroglie.net/fedora-test/SRPMS/10/libnewmat-10D-1.fc10.debroglie.src.rpm Description: This C++ library is intended for scientists and engineers who need to manipulate a variety of types of matrices using standard matrix operations. Emphasis is on the kind of operations needed in statistical calculations such as least squares, linear equation solve and eigenvalues. rpmlint gives the following warnings: - libnewmat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation (the documentation is in the libnewmat package) - libnewmat.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 41) (the tabulation is within a echo string) - libnewmat.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnewmat.so.10.4 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 The package has been successfully built in mock. It's my first package and I am seeking for a sponsor. Cheers, Pascal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226519] Merge Review: usermode In-Reply-To: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141210.n0ECAZJK022466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 --- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trmac <mitr at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 07:10:34 EDT --- Thanks for the review, everything should be fixed in rawhide usermode-1.99-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141219.n0ECJx4U023944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 07:19:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Debuginfo isn't really that useful for OCaml programs, since > > gdb doesn't know about OCaml. So you end up having to debug > > assembler. > > I take it the symbols are of use to ocamldebug then? Or could we just strip > useless baggage and discard? In ordinary Fedora C packages, foo-debuginfo contains the unstripped object files (ie. containing DWARF debugging info). The base package ('foo') is stripped of course. However the programs in the base package contain a special buildid section, which, with a suitably modified version of gdb, causes gdb to get the right symbols out of the corresponding foo-debuginfo file. All well and good for ordinary C/C++ programs. However OCaml has its own native code generator (ie. it generates machine code directly). This code generator doesn't embed any DWARF debugging info, and as a result if you try to generate a ocaml-foo-debuginfo subpackage it will usually be empty. (Except in some special cases, ie. where C code is linked in to the program). Thus we disable generation of ocaml-foo-debuginfo subpackages as a matter of policy. There's a separate issue which is that gdb is still able to find ordinary symbols in unstripped OCaml executables, but because gdb doesn't have DWARF info and in any case doesn't know anything about the OCaml language, all it can do is show symbol locations in assembler. Believe it or not, I have debugged OCaml programs on many occasions using gdb like this ... ocamldebug is quite separate. Firstly it only works on bytecode- compiled OCaml programs. Secondly, OCaml bytecode contains its own debugging information, not related to and totally incompatible with DWARF, which is only understood by ocamldebug and a few other programs like ocamlprof. Some enterprising person with LOTS of time on their hands needs to add DWARF output to the OCaml native code generator(s), and add support for the OCaml language in gdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: <bug-474787-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474787-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141231.n0ECVbx3026299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #6 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-14 07:31:36 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-3.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Rpmlint: SRPM: empty SPEC: empty RPM: empty >"Summary" of -devel package is not "short and concise" as recommended by the >guidelines, but two sentences squeezed into an overlong line. I shortened it in the main package, though I thought it was pretty short to begin with. In the devel section it has been corrected, as it was clearly overlong. The main summary is slightly shortened but cannot be shortened further without losing information. >Run rpmlint also on your src.rpm My apologies if I had not -- I thought I had, as stated in comment 3. Clearly not, as running it produces a myriad of errors. >src.rpm download URL gives 404 Not Found Again, that's just sloppy on my part -- I didn't transfer it to the server. Both the old and the new have been uploaded. > %description of the -devel package is the same as the description of the main package. Fixed. > -devel pkg typically must "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" to stay in sync with the main package. Fixed > %files devel section contains unowned directories! Fixed -- would have been evident had i run rpmlint correctly. >%files devel section is missing %defattr parameter Done. >Note : That could also be the answer to your problem with the .so symlink. The >symlink must be in the -devel package, and the -devel package requires the main >package which contains the library file. It wasn't that -- I worked it out in the end with the help of http://en.opensuse.org/Shared_Library_Packaging_Policy . Which was very clear, both in procedure and rationale. Seems to keep rpmlint happy and matches what is happening in other packages in my /usr/lib/. I hope this package is less sloppy than the last attempt! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141239.n0ECdlMO004273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #10 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-14 07:39:45 EDT --- Hi Steve, Thanks. I did change the specfile on the server. I guess it could be a cache issue. R -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141238.n0ECc7GH004020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141250.n0ECoMor030132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328928|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141250.n0ECoZmq030224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328929|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141249.n0ECnwce029764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328927|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141249.n0ECn2ml006659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #3 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 07:49:01 EDT --- The new spec file: ----------------------------------------------------- Name: gdesklet-slideshow Version: 0.9 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Cycle through a collection of pictures Group: User Interface/Desktops License: GPL+ URL: http://www.gdesklets.de Source0: http://http://www.gdesklets.de/files/desklets/SlideShow/SlideShow-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: http://www.gdesklets.de/files/controls/ImageSlideShow/ImageSlideShow-0.8.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %define _appname SlideShow %define _ctrlname ImageSlideShow BuildRequires: python Requires: gdesklets Requires: python-imaging %description Cycle through a collection of pictures. Will display image captions (IPTC,Jpeg Comment, EXIF) if available. %prep %setup -q -n %{_appname} tar -xf %{SOURCE1} -C ../ %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT #need to install the control first mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/ install -p -m644 ../%{_ctrlname}/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/. #add shebang and execution mode find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/. \( -name "*.py" \) -exec sed -i '1i\#!/usr/bin/python' {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/. \( -name "*.py" \) | xargs chmod a+x #install the display now mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname}/ cp -rp * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname}/. %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc LICENSE #%{_datadir}/gdesklets/ %dir %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname} %dir %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname} %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/* %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname}/* %changelog * Mon Jan 12 2009 Jonathan MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> - 0.9-1 - Initial Packaging for Fedora ----------------------------------------------------- rpmlint: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gdesklet-slideshow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141253.n0ECr3m7030858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com> 2009-01-14 07:53:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Could you define "WinPE" in your %description? Just a parenthetical "Windows > Preinstallation Environment" should be sufficient. Also, it needs a period at > the end. > Fixed. > You're missing Requires(preun): initscripts, and also a python dependency for > your %post script. > Fixed. > Does it make sense to include the sample .sif files? What about the manual > from the upstream web site (http://oss.netfarm.it/guides/ris-linux.pdf)? > I've included the sample .sif file, although I'm reluctant to say it's good enough. The upstream .pdf documentation though I'm not including. Other documentation is in the works that includes using Cobbler to manage the largest part of what is in the upstream documentation, and I'd rather set the record straight then whilst not confusing users of the package now (like with patching in.tftpd). > This package is a little odd in that it installs as a service, but doesn't > actually put any executables in %path. There isn't anything in the guidelines > that would prohibit this as far as I can tell, but it seems a little > admin-unfriendly. I don't know what to do about it; maybe a wrapper script > that just calls "python /usr/share/ris-linux/binlsrv.py". But I'll leave that > up to you. > Fixed, and actually works way better for "service ris-linuxd status". Maybe this should be a Packaging Guidelines? ;-) New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/ris-linux.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/ris-linux-0.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:59:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141259.n0ECxkcr032165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #4 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 07:59:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328981) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328981) SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141300.n0ED0YZH009652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #5 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 08:00:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328982) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328982) The src.rpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141301.n0ED1KbA009839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #6 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 08:01:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328983) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328983) the rpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141302.n0ED2hVN000790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #7 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 08:02:42 EDT --- Easy install on f10: $ su -m -c 'wget http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm && yum --nogpgcheck localinstall gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm' Easy install on F9: su -m -c 'wget http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc9.noarch.rpm && yum --nogpgcheck localinstall gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc9.noarch.rpm' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141303.n0ED3uLG000989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 08:03:55 EDT --- Thank you. I cut the description. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ORLite-Migrate Short Description: Extremely light weight SQLite-specific Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] New: Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. Message-ID: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Summary: Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: randyn3lrx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/wxapt.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/wxapt-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: wxapt is a non-interactive command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites using the APT format. Currently wxapt can decode images in the American NOAA and Russian Meteor satellite APT formats. Images are decoded either in real time direct from the receiver o/p through the computer's sound card, or from a file of sound samples recorded by wxapt. * Wed Jan 14 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject dot org> 1.3-2 - mock build F9/10/devel - rpmlint 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - Submit for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: <bug-226032-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226032-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141321.n0EDLQb1005512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-14 08:21:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > BTW, the ftp.uu.net address *is* the original, well-published, and still > functional URL. Let's not have any historical revisionism in the specfile. My bad, I had to hunt down a working URL when I saw that there was no .tar.bz2 there, but that has been resolved since. As for the makefile change, the one I suggest is trivial and (IMHO) clean. It just sets the paths to the usual Fedora values and adds a $(DESTDIR). I've just has a look at the sf.net project, and the latest files in CVS don't look much different, so it seems like you have high hopes... I'd suggest cleaning up the package as much as possible now, and if things ever get better later, then great, but if they don't, we'll at least have the package in a somewhat cleaner state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141320.n0EDKkvG005280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-14 08:20:45 EDT --- Why don't you simply act like everyone else and provide the URL for spec and src.rpm in the bug number, instead of providing them over and over again as attachments in bugzilla ? At first I assumed that you do not have a place to host the files, but comment #7 proves that you obviously do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141323.n0EDN3ZJ005875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-14 08:23:02 EDT --- I suggest to rephrase the Short Description. It is almost as unclear as it could be. Maybe into "light weight SQLite-specific schema migration" or something similar ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479397] internal system error, package manager error add/remove software In-Reply-To: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141323.n0EDNZbB006012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479397 Richard Hughes <rhughes at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Richard Hughes <rhughes at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 08:23:33 EDT --- What does the internal error say? What version PackageKit are you using? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454979] Review Request: python-slip - Miscellaneous convenience, extension and workaround code for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-454979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141326.n0EDQO0Q016087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454979 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 08:26:23 EDT --- Long since built, sorry for not closing earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: <bug-473235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141324.n0EDOq5A015417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 08:24:51 EDT --- Whoops, sorry, they're built already. Forgot about closing this with all the holidays and stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: <bug-473318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141326.n0EDQfro007152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: <bug-473406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141326.n0EDQpg5007221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: <bug-473452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141327.n0EDR8gh007326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: <bug-473413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141326.n0EDQxn4007271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141328.n0EDSqci016641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 08:28:50 EDT --- Yes, I see now, sorry about that, anyway it looks good to me. I've set the + flag so that you should now be able to submit the request for CVS access. The only thing that I've not done yet is to sponsor you. Its the first time I've done that, so I'm currently enquiring as to the correct way to go about it and I'll try and get the process underway as soon as I can. Btw, if you are able, it would be helpful if you could also submit the other packages for review now too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] New: Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs Message-ID: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Summary: Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew-6.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Mew provides a very easy user interface to email, MIME and PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) on the Emacs and the Editors derived from the Emacs and so on. This is a request to rename a srpm to make mew package better for Packaging policy. I'm not starting to orphan old package yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141333.n0EDXaBY018089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 08:33:35 EDT --- Ok. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ORLite-Migrate Short Description: light weight SQLite-specific schema migration Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141344.n0EDi9IB020491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev at sun.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev at sun.com> 2009-01-14 08:44:07 EDT --- The koji build (dist-f11, devel:netbeans-platform-6_5-4_fc11) completed successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1052085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141352.n0EDquAe014446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141355.n0EDtaN9015196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> 2009-01-14 08:55:35 EDT --- I withdrawn from Fedora, but I can still make evil comments ;-). The versionned Obsoletes doesn't looks good to me. The Obsolete version should be the old links version, not the elinks version. So could be along Obsoletes: links < 1:0.97 Provides: links <= 1:0.97-1 though I didn't found a full list of old links rpm in RHEL or fedora this seems to be fine, since as you said above 0.96 was the latest packages and upstream is already at 0.99 or 1.00pre. Otherwise, I am fine with keeping the symlink as long as links is not brought back in fedora. Once it is in, maybe using alternatives would be better. And I am also fine with using links2 for the links 2 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 13:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: <bug-470703-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470703-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141352.n0EDqABJ022769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> 2009-01-14 08:52:07 EDT --- Ok for me with using links2. There is a wiki page with those kind of name changes to coordinate with other distros, but I can't find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479397] internal system error, package manager error add/remove software In-Reply-To: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141417.n0EEHmP0021991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479397 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141418.n0EEIfCq022166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #9 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 09:18:38 EDT --- rpm and src.rpm for F9: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc9.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------- rpm and src.rpm for F10: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141422.n0EEMajT031350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(randyn3lrx at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-14 09:22:34 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 *** Does not successfully compile on PPC or PPC64. See build log here https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1052191&name=build.log - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Need to address the build issues with PPC and PPC64 other than that looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch In-Reply-To: <bug-226495-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226495-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141455.n0EEtT1Q009017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-14 09:55:27 EDT --- I agree completely. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: <bug-253355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141454.n0EEsW56008469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-14 09:54:28 EDT --- Ping? I'm going to need this package for elisa-plugins-ugly in another repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141457.n0EEvUXs001402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 09:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Other packages failing to rebuild have also prevented major packages in > > your sense from being upgraded. I can see no gain to loose dependency > > on this package for the reason you raised (and for this package > > you can simply remove this, while for gnome-desktop (for example) > > we actually have to wait until (almost) all package are rebuilt) > > I was not talking about packages that fail to rebuild but about packages that > stop working after an update, although all dependencies are still met. So my viewpoint is that in this case the dependency is _not_ satisfied because gget-epiphany _actually_ needs epiphany(abi) = 2.22. For ruby, all ruby modules package have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" even if they are noarch and currently this is mandatory by ruby packaging guideline on Fedora. With forcely removing "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" line from the spec file for ruby module package built as noarch, the package will allow ruby to be upgraded to 1.9 or so (I don't know ETA on Fedora, though), however then the ruby module will stop working. Current ruby package guideline strictly bans this. > Please ask yourself, what is better from a users point of view: > a) When epiphany gets updated he will loose the functionality of the gget > extension until it's getting rebuilt. When gget gets updated afterwards, > everything is fine again: everything works, no orphaned dirs > b) When epiphany gets updated the update will fail due to broken deps. The user > has to work around them by removing gget-epiphany-extension and installing it > and to re-install it when it was rebuilt. Or he has to wait and to bear the > risk that epiphany itself gets broken. So my opinition is b) (and on rawhide this frequently happens because it's rawhide... On released stable branches this should not occur) > > Then: > > if epiphany has 2.22{,X} version, the epiphany won't conflict > > with these two. > > You are right, I did not think if the minor version. Nevertheless "Conflicts" > must only be used when packages really conflict, this means they cannot be > installed at the same time, e.g. because both provide the same files or > functionality. This is exactly "functionality" case. > And we have mozilla-filesystem and we have ... I think a filesystem package > would be overkill here, but I agree you pointed out some valid points. > > OK, but I want to make a constructive suggestion and not only open a bug. So > hat do you think abut my suggestion from the bottom of comment #13? Well, I don't know if I grasped what you want to say here correctly, however anyway my current idea is - ephiphany should have "Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22" or so - epiphany should own %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions (and some other epiphany related directories if any) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:06:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141506.n0EF68FW011451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 10:06:07 EDT --- Please rebuild your package also on F-10 and EL-5, and for F-10 please visit bodhi https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and submit updates request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141510.n0EFACD4004311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 10:10:11 EDT --- Okay, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141509.n0EF9Rp6011956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 10:09:25 EDT --- Please rebuild your package also on F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141506.n0EF6sO0011671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #14 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 10:06:53 EDT --- Ok, you are right, I thought about that possibility as well... will change the versioned obsoletes to that better style in next release... thanks for "evil comment" :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141511.n0EFBb4B012589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 10:11:36 EDT --- Okay, I re-approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141518.n0EFIIrv005935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 --- Comment #30 from Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 10:18:15 EDT --- I've fixed the former upstream; not sure what is causing the latter, the last changelog entry looks fine to me * Thu Aug 28 2008 Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> 0.28.3-2 - update to 0.28.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141518.n0EFIEpU005900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-14 10:18:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #17) > > "Conflicts" > > must only be used when packages really conflict, this means they cannot be > > installed at the same time, e.g. because both provide the same files or > > functionality. > > This is exactly "functionality" case. You suggested epiphany to conflict with gget-epiphany-extension, but a web browser certainly does not provide the same functionality as download manager. > Well, I don't know if I grasped what you want to say here correctly, > however anyway my current idea is > - ephiphany should have "Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22" or so Please take a look at bug # 479921, where I have taken this suggestion into account. Malte obviously understood what I'm talking about. > - epiphany should own %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions (and > some other epiphany related directories if any) Yes, also applies to the plugins dir. Simply owning %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions will not help. We also need to get rid of the version, but all this is explained in bug # 479921. (In reply to comment #19) > Maybe I should have just disabled the epiphany-extension :) No need to, Malte already fixed it in rawhide, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1052223 Not sure if/when this will appear in the other releases. > Nah, this is interesting. Indeed. Thanks to Mamoru for his feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: JRosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141519.n0EFJ7Lj013905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 10:19:06 EDT --- @Haley ----------- %setup -qc [...snip] pushd . [...snip] popd #The zip file is a bit messy. #We reshuffle the top level dir mv %{name}-%{version}-GPL/* . mv %{name}-%{version}-GPL/.[A-z]* . ----------- This is weird to fix problem you have introduced with not using the correct %setup macro: %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}-GPL Along with your debuginfo tweak in the scilab package (that, again, isn't needed), You seem to have a strange buildsys. At this time, I don't know if you got inattentive or your buildsys is buggy. The result is that I cannot trust any packages that comes from your side. I hope you can solve this, because we really need hands for scilab and others... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141536.n0EFarqV018173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 --- Comment #31 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-14 10:36:52 EDT --- Okay, then feel free to ignore it. If find time, I'll go for a full review in the next time; if there are takers before, feel free as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141540.n0EFeJ17018873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 10:40:17 EDT --- Well, where is your new srpm? (please change the release number every time you modify your spec file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141543.n0EFhLUv011010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 10:43:19 EDT --- Well, I am just saying that README file should be marked as %doc, not suggesting that README file should be relocated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141545.n0EFjaLQ011534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 10:45:35 EDT --- docbook5-schemas-5.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docbook5-schemas-5.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141544.n0EFicYi011164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 10:44:37 EDT --- Robert: Nice package! Please try to get upstream binutils to take that patch (and put a comment in the spec file showing the mailing list thread or bug submission). I will sponsor you, since Steve can't. :) Please pick up the process at this step: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141555.n0EFtLrY022021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 10:55:20 EDT --- docbook5-style-xsl-1.74.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docbook5-style-xsl-1.74.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 16:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141605.n0EG56sg015229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 11:05:05 EDT --- Good: + Package name fit with nameing guidelines + Name of SPEC file fit with basename of package + Package has a valid open source license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Consistently usage of macros + source can be downloaded via spectool + Tar ball in the package fits with upstreams (md5sum: 366849faf106f4fdfb6e1ff1f72b9e9d) * BUILDROOT will cleaned on the beginning of the %install and %clean stanza + Rpmlint is quiete on source rpm + Package contains no subpackages + Files containing in the package doesn't belongs to others + Content of %doc is small, so no separate subpackage is require + Package will be built on noarch + Local build works fine + Build on koji works fine + Local install works fine + Starting of application without argument works + Removing of the package works fine. Bad: - License tag should be CPLv3+ because the copyright notice on the source files allow the usage of later version of the GPL - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: megaupload-dl.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/megaupload-dl-0.2.1/megaupload_dl_wget.sh megaupload-dl.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/megaupload_dl/lib.py 0644 megaupload-dl.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/megaupload_dl/megaupload_dl.py 0644 - Files on %{_sitedir}/metagupload_dl/*.py should be executables - Files on %{_docdir} should be not executable - __init__.py file should have a shebang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 16:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141618.n0EGITIa027122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 11:18:28 EDT --- Bad: - Main package contains no Provides for mew-common - subpackage el don't contains any Obsoletes/Provides statements - you man name the subpacke wiht 'el' insteat of '-n %{name}-el' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 16:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141635.n0EGZZqc021853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225675, which changed state. Bug 225675 Summary: Merge Review: db4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 16:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141636.n0EGaNLN022114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-14 11:36:22 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 16:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4 In-Reply-To: <bug-225675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225675-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141635.n0EGZYjb021826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-14 11:35:33 EDT --- Looks great. Full review of the current version looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 16:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141657.n0EGvRGf003400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 11:57:26 EDT --- Good: + Package name fits with nameing guidelines. + Source file could downloaded with spectool + Tar ball in package fits with upstreams (md5sum: 89b7d97b9fb24ce4c31743cc4d13ce44) + Package contains valid Group + Package contains valid license tag + License from the license tag is a valid OSS license + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains varbatin copy of the license text + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm + Rpmlint is quite on intalled rpm + Rpmlint is quite on debuginfo package, Debuginfo package contains valid source files. + Package contains scriptlets for ldconfig + Package contains a devel subpackage + devel subpackage contains Requires on main package + Files contains no files belongs to other packages + Files have proper file perms + %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Package builds fine on koji, if you are add '-fPIC' + Package contains proper %changelog stanza + Local install of the package works fine + Local uninstall of the package works fine Bad: - Local build failed, Please add '-fPIC' compilerflag if you want to create a dynamic library - Please use install for installing the files of your package - Please notify upstream, that each source file should have a copyright notice - Please remove %check stanza, if you don't have the testsuite which should be executing during the build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141716.n0EHGZDg007556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 12:16:33 EDT --- Well, some notes: * License - The License tag should be "LGPLv2+". * BuildRequires - Would you check if "automake, autoconf" is needed for BuildRequires? * optflags - Would you check if 'CC="gcc %{optflags}"' is really needed? * Documents - The file "INSTALL.txt" is usually for people who compiles and installs the software by him/herself and not for people using rpm binary. - Files under %_mandir are automatically regarded as %doc. Well, as this package deals with security issues, I will anyway wait for one week or so before I approve this package to see if who knows how to deal with security software will post some comments on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141721.n0EHL1Yh031389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] New: Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer Message-ID: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Summary: Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkasik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/cups-pk-helper.spec SRPM URL: http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/cups-pk-helper-0.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Use PolicyKit to define policies for accessing the cups functionality in system-config-printer. Originally developed by Vincent Untz. (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CupsPolicyKitIntegration for more details) To test this feature, one need to use patched system-config-printer (see links below). You can also test this feature in Fedora 10. http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/cups-pk-helper-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer-1.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer-1.1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141732.n0EHWJOQ001152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 12:32:18 EDT --- Okay, - For your pre-review for bug 478412, about compiler flags: * %configure macro sets CFLAGS environment value (you can check what %configure does by "$ rpm --eval %configure"). Usually when using configure/Makefile generated by recent autotools this $CFLAGS value is correctly honored. However when using some old configure/Makefile, which are originally written by the upstream developer sometimes these files does not correctly catch $CFLAGS. In such cases you may have to use "CC='gcc %{optflags}'", for example. - For jailkit, packaging itself seems almost good (I wrote some comments) ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (jpcap) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141734.n0EHYpbJ011000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141732.n0EHWapJ010840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 12:32:35 EDT --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141738.n0EHcCIx002191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #18 from Marek Mahut <mmahut at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 12:38:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > - Files on %{_sitedir}/metagupload_dl/*.py should be executables Why? > - __init__.py file should have a shebang Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141740.n0EHeSlr012408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 12:40:27 EDT --- Builds fine in mock. rpmlint says: cups-pk-helper.i386: W: no-documentation cups-pk-helper.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.CupsPkHelper.Mechanism.conf cups-pk-helper.i386: E: description-line-too-long cups-pk-helper is an application, which helps system-config-printer to use PolicyKit infrastructure The warnings are ignorable, the line-too-long error should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141745.n0EHjKtQ013427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 12:45:19 EDT --- Here are my proposals for Summary / Description: Summary: A helper that makes system-config-printer use PolicyKit %description cups-pk-helper is an application which makes cups configuration interfaces available under control of PolicyKit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: <bug-474430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141746.n0EHkpMp003853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson at esri.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvandolson at esri.com Flag|needinfo?(rayvd at bludgeon.or | |g) | --- Comment #7 from Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson at esri.com> 2009-01-14 12:46:49 EDT --- Apologies on the delay. Vacation and resulting fallout but I'll get on this again today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 17:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141749.n0EHnGDO013814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicoleau.fabien at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 12:49:14 EDT --- Updates : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/perl-WWW-Curl.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog : - Timestamp preserved - changelog format fix - README.Win32 file removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141810.n0EIAO7u009367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #19 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 13:10:22 EDT --- Plese refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir Because the complaints files contains executable code, the files perms should set for allow executing of this files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141826.n0EIQMfx021437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 13:26:21 EDT --- Good + Package naming fits with naming guidelines + Basename of SPEC file matches with package name + License tag contains valid license + License GPLv2 is a valid OSS license + Local build works fine + Could download tar ball with spectool + Tar ball in source rpm matches with upstream (md5sum: db1c91dcb3c9f7ef3270fe29c25178a4) + Consistently use of rpm macros + Buildroot will be clean on begin of %install and %clean + Local build works fine + Rpmlint doens't complaints debuginfo rpm + Local install works fine + Local uninstall wworks fine + Package contains no subpcakges + Build works fine on koji + Pakcage contains no files belong to others + Files Permissions looks right + Package contains valid %changelog stanza Bad: - Rpmlint complaints source rpm: cups-pk-helper.src: E: description-line-too-long cups-pk-helper is an application, which helps system-config-printer to use PolicyKit infrastructure - Rpmlint complaints binary rpm: cups-pk-helper.x86_64: W: no-documentation cups-pk-helper.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.CupsPkHelper.Mechanism.conf cups-pk-helper.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long cups-pk-helper is an application, which helps system-config-printer to use PolicyKit infrastructure - License tag should be GPLv2+, because the copyright notes in the source files aloow use of later versions of the GPL. - Verbatin copy of the license text is not included in the rpm, but available in the original source tree. - %doc stanza contains no files question: * Can I run a test without a printer. Is there a text plan for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141832.n0EIWnai022414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 13:32:48 EDT --- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1053523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] New: Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter Message-ID: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Summary: Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libchamplain.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libchamplain-0.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libchamplain is a C library aimed to provide a ClutterActor to display rasterized maps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-477526-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477526-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141854.n0EIsYMP026859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 13:54:33 EDT --- Thank you for comments. (In reply to comment #5) > ext/fast_xs/FastXsService.java: -- Looks like Apache license, also boingboing > samples are CC licenesed. Not sure how one package handled multiple liceneses. I didn't notice these FastXsService.java is okay, under ASL 2.0. However boingboing.html is under CC-BY-NC, which is bad for Fedora, this must be removed from the original gem file. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-3.fc.src.rpm * Thu Jan 15 2009 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 0.6.164-3 - Fix license tag, removing non-free file (thanks to Michael Stahnke) For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1053547 For F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1053562 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141906.n0EJ6DIa029451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-14 14:06:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > (In reply to comment #17) > > > "Conflicts" > > > must only be used when packages really conflict, this means they cannot be > > > installed at the same time, e.g. because both provide the same files or > > > functionality. > > > > This is exactly "functionality" case. > > You suggested epiphany to conflict with gget-epiphany-extension, but a web > browser certainly does not provide the same functionality as download manager. Ah, what I wanted to say is that - Package A can work with B installed or without B installed - But A won't work if B with _old_ version is installed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Optional_Functionality > > Well, I don't know if I grasped what you want to say here correctly, > > however anyway my current idea is > > - ephiphany should have "Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22" or so > > Please take a look at bug # 479921, where I have taken this suggestion into > account. Malte obviously understood what I'm talking about. > > > - epiphany should own %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions (and > > some other epiphany related directories if any) > > Yes, also applies to the plugins dir. Simply owning > %_libdir/epiphany/XXXX/extensions will not help. We also need to get rid of the > version, but all this is explained in bug # 479921. This seems pretty good!! Thank you for your effort (By the way if epiphany(abi) = foo is provided, Conflict method is no longer needed, just using "Requires: epiphany(abi) = foo" is much preferred. Or maybe also using this method is no longer needed... now that version-independent symlink is provided, need checking) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141909.n0EJ9KPO029808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 14:09:19 EDT --- Formal review: rpmlint: see above package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: - Looks to me like the dbus-glib and PolicyKit requires are redundant, since they are already pulled in by library dependencies - should include AUTHORS and NEWS as %doc license: ok license field: should be GPLv2+ (note the +), since the source files say "or any later version" license file: must be included spec file language: ok spec file legible: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: ok build deps: ok locale handling: ok shared libraries: ok relocatable: not applicable directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok header files: ok static libs: ok pkgconfig files: ok shared libs: ok devel package: not applicable libtool archives: ok desktop files: not applicable file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok summary: - fix summary/description - fix license tag - include license file - remove redundant requires - include %doc files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141926.n0EJQcRG026274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 14:26:37 EDT --- Jochen, testing this requires a patched system-config-printer that we don't have yet. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CupsPolicyKitIntegration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141927.n0EJRqNL026385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 14:27:51 EDT --- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc Changes LICENSE README README.Win32 `-----------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^ I am sorry but the file README.Win32 is still present in the %doc section. Changelog and timestamp are both fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set In-Reply-To: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141930.n0EJUNAE001911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 475661 depends on bug 475593, which changed state. Bug 475593 Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 14:30:21 EDT --- I poked around this package for 2 hours now. I couldn't find any blockers. There are two minor things I think I should say: * Not a blocker but, as I say in all my reviews, I prefer using %defattr(-,root,root,-) * All fonts (including sans-serif ones) say that they are "Serif" as (OS/2) PFM-Family in fontforge. I think upstream needs notified. Other than these two, you might want to wait for the subpackage naming decision of FESCO for http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) Otherwise, everything is clean ----------------------------------------------------- This package (google-droid-fonts) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:31:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] New: Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain Message-ID: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 Summary: Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libchamplain-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libchamplain-gtk-0.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libchamplain-gtk is a library providing a GtkWidget to embed libchamplain into Gtk+ applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141941.n0EJfE81003915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 14:41:13 EDT --- Apologies :D ... Here is the update, with README.Win32 removed : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/perl-WWW-Curl.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901141940.n0EJeXcd003759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bugs.michael at gmx. | |net) --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 14:40:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > * The guidelines want you to choose either %buildroot or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, not > both. OK. Will be fixed. > * Use "install -p ..." especially when installing files yourself. It's only in commented lines, will be removed completely in new revision. > * Unowned directories alarm in -devel package! It can easily be seen that the > following %files entries are missing: Will fix. > > %package doc > > Summary: Doxygen documentation for FLTK2 > > Group: Documentation > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > Why that? Not sure what you mean. The whole sub-package seems to you useless, or you're pointing to the 'Require:' field? To the first point: it's 2.2 MB more data, which are not directly useful. To the second one: sure it can be avoided, no problem here. > > BuildRoot: doxygen > > Uh? A typo, most likely. Make that BuildRequires: doxygen Typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142004.n0EK4Y75000680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 15:04:33 EDT --- Good: + Basename of spec file match with package name + Package name fits naming guidelines + Source tar ball could downloaded with spectool + Tar ball in package matches with upstream (md5sum: fa4a620efa1a1c1036b6701b7d4dafe1) + Package contains a valid OSS license on license tag + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + Rpmlinkt ok with source package. + Rpm macros are used consitently + BUILDROOT will be clean on the beginning of the %install and %clean stanza + Package contains ldconfig scriptlet + Package contains several subpackages + devel subpackage Requires maiin package + %doc stanza is small + Koji build works fine + Rpmlint is quite on binary packages + Rpmlint is quite on debugin package + Local install works fine + Rpmlint is quite on instlled package + Local remove of the package works fine + files of the packages doesn't belongs to other packages + no duplicate files are listed in the %file stanza + All listed files are owned by the package + %doc stanza is small so we need no doc subpackage + Package contains valid %changelog Bad. - Local build fails with: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o .libs/libchamplain-scan .libs/libchamplain-scan.o -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lclutter-cairo-0.8 -lclutter-glx-0.8 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo -lsoup-2.4 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ../../champlain/.libs/libchamplain-0.2.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 creating libchamplain-scan gtk-doc: Running scanner libchamplain-scan Scan failed: make[2]: *** [scan-build.stamp] Error 255 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD/libchamplain-0.2.8/docs/reference' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD/libchamplain-0.2.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 ToDO. you can wrote %{_includedir}/%{name}-0.2/ instead of %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}-0.2 %{_includedir}/%{name}-0.2/champlain and %{_datadir}/champlain/ instead %dir %{_datadir}/champlain %{_datadir}/champlain/error.svg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142018.n0EKI0xi003413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142017.n0EKHm1c010895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 15:17:46 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl MUST Items: [OK] * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [OK] * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [OK] * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . [OK] * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . MIT derivate [OK] * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] [OK] * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] [N/A] * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] Dunno I am not a linguist. [OK] * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [OK] * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. a49d09edc7491d9d8abec3ef79799853 /home/newman/WWW-Curl-4.05.tar.gz a49d09edc7491d9d8abec3ef79799853 SOURCES/WWW-Curl-4.05.tar.gz [OK] * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] Builds on all primary archs. [OK] * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Build in mock & koji just fine. [N/A] * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] No such support present. [N/A] * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] This is interpreted languange. Even though it includes Curl.so library it is not treated the ldconfig way. [N/A] * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [OK] * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] [OK] * MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [13] [OK] * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] [OK] * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] [OK] * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] [OK] * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [N/A] * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] [OK] * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] Only Linux related docs are present. [N/A] * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [N/A] * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [N/A] * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] [N/A] * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [N/A] * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] [OK] * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] [OK] * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] [OK] * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] [OK] * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] [OK] * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] -- Just a note for packager from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl """ Set inital-cc to 'perl-sig' It's common practice to set the Fedora perl SIG mailing list as a member of the initial-cc list for bugzilla. This can be done by adding the user perl-sig to the initial CC list. """ -- Don't forget to package clive2 soon :). -- This package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142028.n0EKSQgg019574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |fltk2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142034.n0EKYWCZ006404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #30 from Mart??n Marqu?s <martin at marquesminen.com.ar> 2009-01-14 15:34:29 EDT --- First it has to be posible to make the GD support modular (as a shared object). I'm not sure if that is posible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142046.n0EKkAjV008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2009-01-14 15:46:08 EDT --- Thanks for looking into this. I've updated the upstream bug accordingly. Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py-0.9.2-6.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jan 14 2009 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.9.2-6 - Use system doctest module again, as this wasn't the real cause of the test failure. Instead, remove the failing test for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: <bug-475852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142030.n0EKU4qU020900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: <bug-475852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142031.n0EKVH3L021216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 15:31:16 EDT --- This bug should take over the part of BZ #459210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142055.n0EKtiLE027300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 15:55:43 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review :) I'll of course build clive2 when this package will be imported :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WWW-Curl Short Description: Perl extension interface for libcurl Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142105.n0EL5OMJ012659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 --- Comment #12 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-14 16:05:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Please rebuild your package also on F-11. that is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142111.n0ELBl8Z013936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-14 16:11:46 EDT --- Good: + Base name of the SPEC file metches with package name + Package name fits with naming guidelines + Package contains most recent release. + Tar ball could be downloaded from upstream vis spectool + Tar Ball in package matches with upstream (md5sum: 2306402f31dff1cb9d3d664aa9153c28) + License tag contains valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin text of the license + content of the license tag fits with copyright notes in the source files + Rpmlint is ok for source rpm + Package contains devel subpackage + devel subpackage contains req. to main package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Files of the package belongs to the package + Files doesn't owned by an other package Bad: - Local build fails with: checking for gm4... no checking for m4... m4 checking whether m4 is GNU m4... no checking whether make is GNU Make... yes checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for GTKSOURCEVIEWMM... configure: error: Package requirements (gtkmm-2.4 >= 2.4 gtksourceview-2.0 >= 2.2.0) were not met: No package 'gtksourceview-2.0' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GTKSOURCEVIEWMM_CFLAGS and GTKSOURCEVIEWMM_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. - Build on koji fails, Please refer to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1053743 - Group tag should be Development/Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142117.n0ELHS8A015004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:17:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142119.n0ELJ9nR031508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:19:08 EDT --- This is still blocking FE_LEGAL. Spot: should this be oked now? Or is it waiting pending something further? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479956] Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142123.n0ELNhJb016187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479956 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:23:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:24:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142124.n0ELOdMm016290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:24:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479955] Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142123.n0ELNAGM032488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479955 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:23:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142126.n0ELQI2V000810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:26:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142127.n0ELR4SK016967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 16:27:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > This is still blocking FE_LEGAL. > Spot: should this be oked now? Or is it waiting pending something further? Conrad, did you remove the manual from the package (not the tarball)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479895] Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases In-Reply-To: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142132.n0ELWkCI002146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479895 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-14 16:32:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142141.n0ELfCeS020065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 --- Comment #13 from Christof Damian <christof at damian.net> 2009-01-14 16:41:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Please rebuild your package also on F-10 and EL-5, and > for F-10 please visit bodhi > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ > and submit updates request. those are now done too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142153.n0ELrci4022287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |google-droid-fonts - The |google-droid-fonts - |Droid font set |General-purpose fonts | |released by Google as part | |of Android Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-14 16:53:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I poked around this package for 2 hours now. I couldn't find any blockers. > There are two minor things I think I should say: > > * Not a blocker but, as I say in all my reviews, I prefer using > %defattr(-,root,root,-) For fonts an explicit defattr is part of the guidelines since there is no reason to have fonts with strange permissions installed :p > * All fonts (including sans-serif ones) say that they are "Serif" as (OS/2) > PFM-Family in fontforge. I think upstream needs notified. Missed this, nice to know, will do > Other than these two, you might want to wait for the subpackage naming decision > of FESCO for > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) Since the changes FPC requested didn't affect srpm naming, I'll do the cvs request now. > ----------------------------------------------------- > This package (google-droid-fonts) is APPROVED by oget > ----------------------------------------------------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: google-droid-fonts Short Description: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Owners: nim Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142250.n0EMotav016740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-14 17:50:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > --disable-static should be added to %configure before import. > > `--disable-static' is used "against" .a static archives. Which are now not > created. Am I missing something? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1050325&name=build.log ... checking whether to build static libraries... yes ... There are no .a files created. I only looked at the single line and not at the build process as a whole. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: <bug-475852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142256.n0EMujNH001230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-14 17:56:40 EDT --- *** Bug 459210 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: <bug-459211-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459211-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142256.n0EMukIN001259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Bug 459211 depends on bug 459210, which changed state. Bug 459210 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: <bug-459210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142256.n0EMuigB001201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review- |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-14 17:56:40 EDT --- Since - we had no reply from the OP since it was submitted, despite several suggestions and pings - we have another active bug for the same package, I am closing this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475852 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:01:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142301.n0EN129g018641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #32 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-14 18:00:55 EDT --- [ DONE ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result/neon-* neon.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/neon-0.28.3/THANKS 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ -> Solved upstream as per comment #30 and will pop into Fedora with the next release at latest, that's okay for me and has to be okay for Fedora as well therefore ;-) [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption [ OK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> 47599a328862ce64ac3c52726d6daa12 neon-0.28.3.tar.gz -> 47599a328862ce64ac3c52726d6daa12 neon-0.28.3.tar.gz.1 -> 544a92dbfba144ec600506cadbda92ae0b0eb9b0 neon-0.28.3.tar.gz -> 544a92dbfba144ec600506cadbda92ae0b0eb9b0 neon-0.28.3.tar.gz.1 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [ OK ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present [ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package [ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ OK ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ OK ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built -> Special case, already discussed above and thereby accepted. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 - Consider using the following to preserve timestamps of non-created files: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" >From my view as a packager, this package seems personally good to me as well, thus: APPROVED. Joe, apply or refuse my suggestion and close the bug report afterwards with the hint which option you've chosen (it's a SHOULD, not more). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142303.n0EN3BEa002597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 --- Comment #33 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-14 18:03:10 EDT --- Oh, you may want to consider disttag, but it's only a SHOULD. As you've e.g. refused it for httpd, I'm assuming same here - but just to mention it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142315.n0ENFH8u004660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-14 18:15:16 EDT --- This is very weird; I thought I reviewed this package something like two years ago, and indeed it seems that I did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479955] Review Request: hyphen-pt - Portuguese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142317.n0ENHA0p005003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479955 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473723-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142317.n0ENHGMR005046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-14 18:17:15 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479711] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration In-Reply-To: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142317.n0ENHPkB005084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-14 18:17:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479730] Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available In-Reply-To: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479730-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142318.n0ENIrgC005366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-14 18:18:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: JRosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142321.n0ENLFrp006023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 --- Comment #6 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-14 18:21:14 EDT --- Nicholas, If you have specific problems with my packages, I would be most apprreciative if you could please comment on them one by one and where appropriate. My packages are subject to review and can be rejected as required. Personal attacks are unprofessional, and finally it is not up to you to decide whether to accept packages or not. My personal policy is that others are allowed to modify my work, if I fail to do so in a timely fashion.] A bug report forum is not a place to conduct such aggressive behaviour. If you dont like it, please say so in a review, or contact me personally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479732] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles In-Reply-To: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142318.n0ENIuPi021717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-14 18:18:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479956] Review Request: hyphen-ro - Romanian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479956-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142325.n0ENPYU9006875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479956 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142338.n0ENcXj1009131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #18 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-14 18:38:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > This is still blocking FE_LEGAL. > > Spot: should this be oked now? Or is it waiting pending something further? > > Conrad, did you remove the manual from the package (not the tarball)? Yup. (Went back to using the original (not-stripped) tarball though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480091] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose Message-ID: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480091 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-DateTime OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.03-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module packages several Moose::Util::TypeConstraints with coercions designed to work with the DateTime suite of objects. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1054070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479895] Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases In-Reply-To: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479895-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901142343.n0ENhnp1009897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479895 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150016.n0F0GrcI015510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #2 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-14 19:16:52 EDT --- Jochen, Thank you very much for taking the time out to review my package, much appreciated. I've updated here (SRPM has changed): Spec URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser.spec SRPM URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser-3.0b-2.fc10.src.rpm I've addressed the three points you've raised about the .spec, and will engage upstream on the copyright issue. I did a scratch build on Koji (task id #1054148), and can confirm it builds - sorry, I should have done that originally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150026.n0F0Q49N032742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(randyn3lrx at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #2 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 19:26:03 EDT --- Thanks Steven, *** Does not successfully compile on PPC or PPC64. See build log here https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1052191&name=build.log ********* * Fixed * ********* Koji Build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1054174 Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/wxapt.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/wxapt-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm I also fixed a few minor issues I overlooked. * Wed Jan 14 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject dot org> 1.3-3 - Makefile patch change dir from /usr/local to /usr - Build for ppc and ppc64 previously failed - Fix Documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: JRosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150027.n0F0RbD8000380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-14 19:27:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Spec URL: > http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/JRosetta.spec > SRPM URL: > http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/JRosetta-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm > Description: A common base to build a graphical console > > Changelog > - Fix License (GPLv2 only) (was confirmed by phone call with upstream, the > shortname license can be seen in the MANIFEST of the jar files.) > - Fix Summary > - Update to 1.0.2 - previous patch merged upstream > - Rename to JRosetta Full review: rpmlint clean: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Naming: Please rename it back to jrosetta. There is no good reason to have mixed-case name. In fact, no java package present in Fedora has mixed-case name. Pre-built binaries: The 1.0.2 source tarball contains pre-built binaries in build/*, please remove them in %prep and ask upstream to provide a source-only tarball, if possible. 1.0.1 was shipped without those binaries and the tarball was half the size. Source MD5 matches upstream: ef0f9208202762c93c8c415d8472aa76 jrosetta-1.0.2-GPL.zip ef0f9208202762c93c8c415d8472aa76 JRosetta-1.0.2-GPL.zip Other than that, it seems fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150039.n0F0dD4r002001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-14 19:39:11 EDT --- Looks good now Randall. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: cwirc - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150053.n0F0r4w5020819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 --- Comment #15 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 19:53:02 EDT --- Pushed to updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150055.n0F0tY0r021309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 19:55:33 EDT --- Thanks Steven! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wxapt Short Description: A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. Owners: dp67 Branches: F-9, F-10, devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 01:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:02:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] New: Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis Message-ID: <bug-480102-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 Summary: Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xjakub at fi.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/weka/weka.spec SRPM URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/weka/weka-3.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Weka is a collection of machine learning algorithms for data mining tasks. The algorithms can either be applied directly to a dataset or called from your own Java code. Weka contains tools for data pre-processing, classification, regression, clustering, association rules, and visualization. It is also well-suited for developing new machine learning schemes. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1054196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 01:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: <bug-472098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150106.n0F16Uf2023174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 --- Comment #7 from Mathieu OUDART <services at mindtouch.com> 2009-01-14 20:06:28 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. So far our packages intended to make the Wiki work "out of the box" but many things seem to be contradictory with the distribution(s) packaging guidelines. So we decided to start over and created new packages. The objective is to be as standard as possible. Please have a look at it and let us know what you think. Here are the links : SPEC file : http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/NEW_RPMS/SRPMS/dekiwiki.spec SRPM : http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/NEW_RPMS/SRPMS/dekiwiki-8.08.2-1.src.rpm Fedora RPM : http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/NEW_RPMS/RPMS/Fedora/dekiwiki-8.08.2-1.noarch.rpm Any suggestions to make this package better would be greatly appreciated, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 01:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150125.n0F1PNMv009231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-14 20:25:21 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Everything built fine all arches. All BRs present. No issues Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 01:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150141.n0F1f1Yd011515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 20:40:59 EDT --- Thanks again Steven New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xwxapt Short Description: An application for decoding and saving weather images. Owners: dp67 Branches: F-9, F-10, devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 01:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] New: Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) Message-ID: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Summary: Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twisnie+fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Hi. This is the first time I'm trying to contribute an RPM to Fedora and would love for someone to sponsor me and review my rpm. All criticism is welcome :). bnIRC is a ncurses based IRC client as well as a modular IRC framework. It can easily be extended through the creation of plugins written in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150209.n0F29Kco032618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 21:09:18 EDT --- > Can you give us a list of things publican needs to do wrt to > specfiles/changelogs/packagenaming? The thing at the moment I see is the product versioning issue which doesn't really make sense for Fedora I think. Well maybe it could in some cases - then the version should just go into the package version field ("Fedora 11 Foo Bar manual" -> fedora-Foo_Bar_Guide-en-US-11-5.fc11 say). Otherwise if the version is not linked to the Fedora release version it should not appear in the tarball, name, etc. Also for Fedora usually English is assumed for documentation, and since it seems to be the base language for our docs, I would probably suggest dropping "en-US" from base doc package name. Let me ask on fedora-packaging list about the naming though too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150207.n0F27xcZ015699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225659] Merge Review: cracklib In-Reply-To: <bug-225659-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225659-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150218.n0F2IXN3017263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225659 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-14 21:18:31 EDT --- Hmm, nothing from Jef. I took a quick look, though, and while the spec looks very nice and clean, I do have a couple of comments. Were this a new package that hadn't existed for approximately forever, I would complain about these files: /usr/include/crack.h /usr/include/packer.h /usr/sbin/mkdict /usr/sbin/packer as being terribly generic. However, if the first package in wins then this beats everything by default, and there's obviously no point in changing it now. rpmlint does have a few complaints which can be essentially ignored: cracklib-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cracklib-dicts.x86_64: W: no-documentation cracklib-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation True but not problematic. cracklib-dicts.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is true, but I don't really see a problem in what you're doing. Does anything absolutely require those symlinks to be there? If it didn't, you could conceivably make this subpackage noarch (once the buildsys support for that is finished). cracklib-dicts.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/packer cracklib-packer cracklib-dicts.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/mkdict cracklib-format These are fine; the dependencies ensure that the symlinks aren't dangling. cracklib.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcrack.so.2.8.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 This is kind of weird, and usually indicates a bug or thinko in the package, but isn't a packaging issue. It also complains about a couple of things which could do with fixing: cracklib-dicts.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The standard CrackLib dictionaries. Terribly minor, but perhaps worth fixing if you're in the spec. cracklib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cracklib-unpacker ['/usr/lib64'] cracklib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cracklib-packer ['/usr/lib64'] cracklib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cracklib-check ['/usr/lib64'] cracklib-python.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/_cracklibmodule.so ['/usr/lib64'] I don't know why these didn't turn up earlier. Maybe libtool2 actually makes things worse? In any case, the recommended hack of tweaking libtool didn't help, so I guess a call to chrpath is needed. If the latter were fixed, I'd have no qualms about approving this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150227.n0F2RrCC003119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 21:27:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Main package contains no Provides for mew-common Thank you for catching this up. fixed. > - subpackage el don't contains any Obsoletes/Provides statements Does -el subpackage really need Obsoletes/Provides statements? I suppose it should works since it requires emacs-mew which do obsolete/provide old package. > - you man name the subpacke wiht 'el' insteat of '-n %{name}-el' Indeed. just followed a template in Emacs packaging policy. fixed. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew-6.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150233.n0F2XIQd019291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 21:33:17 EDT --- Additional questions: is the documentation Fedora specific? Does it need to be Fedora branded at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150242.n0F2g6oe005383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #26 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-14 21:42:05 EDT --- It should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150250.n0F2oc1a006881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:50:36 EDT --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: <bug-478294-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478294-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150250.n0F2ooM3006933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:50:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: <bug-478294-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478294-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150250.n0F2ol35022598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:50:46 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150250.n0F2oeeJ022560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467643-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467643-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150253.n0F2rJQa007722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:53:18 EDT --- sugar-speak-9-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: <bug-449869-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-449869-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150252.n0F2qanP007593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:52:34 EDT --- tasque-0.1.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: <bug-469027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150252.n0F2qEOh007536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:52:13 EDT --- bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2tTiY008504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2tdba008581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:55:38 EDT --- nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150252.n0F2q7OJ007502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:52:06 EDT --- gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150254.n0F2sxKA008122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:54:58 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2tYKv008535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:55:33 EDT --- tcping-1.3.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tcping'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150256.n0F2uBpM008761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 21:56:10 EDT --- I had a quick look through http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/security-guide.pdf and noticed that section 1.5. "Security Updates" seems currently to be quite specific to Red Hat not Fedora (some of it may have applied for Fedora Core in the past), so it would be good to rework it for the Fedora version: otherwise it all looks fairly generic to me so far, but I would have to read it all through carefully to be sure. If that is the case then maybe it does not have to be fedora branded? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: <bug-460779-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460779-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150254.n0F2sRqO023629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:54:25 EDT --- nekovm-1.8.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: <bug-469027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2traP024407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:55:53 EDT --- bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2tQVC024311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:55:24 EDT --- mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150253.n0F2rFWk007698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:53:13 EDT --- mpop-1.0.16-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mpop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0380 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150254.n0F2sclK023704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:54:36 EDT --- pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150254.n0F2s4kG007910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:54:03 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jakarta-commons-compress'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0392 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467643-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467643-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150253.n0F2rLps023353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: <bug-469027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150252.n0F2qHaZ023091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: <bug-460779-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460779-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150254.n0F2sUqR023673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150254.n0F2sgXI023740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2t2qa023938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150255.n0F2t9hZ024120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:55:08 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update screenie'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150251.n0F2pdZF022827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:51:38 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-Dump-Streamer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:57:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: <bug-477854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150257.n0F2vgF1009557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:57:41 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150300.n0F30ndq010503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:00:48 EDT --- jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150300.n0F309oY010333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:00:08 EDT --- nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150259.n0F2xHCc009828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: <bug-477854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150257.n0F2vjJF009589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150301.n0F31S9c010791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:01:26 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Data-Dump-Streamer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: <bug-449869-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-449869-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150257.n0F2vUKQ025259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:57:29 EDT --- tasque-0.1.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150258.n0F2wpj1025624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: <bug-476414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150301.n0F31b6j026768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:01:36 EDT --- assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474981-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150259.n0F2x4Sa025696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:59:03 EDT --- jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library In-Reply-To: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474149-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150258.n0F2wmeZ025592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:58:47 EDT --- chipmunk-4.1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150259.n0F2xEI8025730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:59:14 EDT --- docbook5-style-xsl-1.74.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150257.n0F2vqnl025373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150257.n0F2voq6025333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:57:49 EDT --- tcping-1.3.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150259.n0F2xlfU025872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 21:59:45 EDT --- kdenetwork-4.1.4-2.fc10, kdeaccessibility-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeadmin-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeartwork-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebase-runtime-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebindings-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeedu-4.1.4-1.fc10, kde-filesystem-4-23.fc10, kdegames-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdegraphics-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdelibs-4.1.4-2.fc10, kde-l10n-4.1.4-2.fc10, kdemultimedia-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdepim-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdepimlibs-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeplasma-addons-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdesdk-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdetoys-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeutils-4.1.4-1.fc10, kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-8.fc10, kdebase-4.1.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kdenetwork kdeaccessibility kdeadmin kdeartwork kdebase-runtime kdebase-workspace kdebindings kdeedu kde-filesystem kdegames kdegraphics kdelibs kde-l10n kdemultimedia kdepim kdepimlibs kdeplasma-addons kdesdk kdetoys kdeutils kopete-cryptography kdebase'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: <bug-477854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33UIW011700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:03:29 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150302.n0F32mci011487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:02:47 EDT --- javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33mKv011778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:03:48 EDT --- gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33P3j011671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:03:24 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update screenie'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459946-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150304.n0F34QNv027623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:04:25 EDT --- pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33tiZ011803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:03:54 EDT --- procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update procinfo-ng'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150305.n0F35Dnx012340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:05:12 EDT --- mpop-1.0.16-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update mpop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: <bug-478659-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478659-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150301.n0F31kC2027025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:01:45 EDT --- xfce4-screenshooter-1.4.90.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150306.n0F36RJI028555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:06:27 EDT --- javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: <bug-472027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150304.n0F34jbY027700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:04:45 EDT --- onboard-0.91.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: <bug-476414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150301.n0F31eFO026853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: <bug-472027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150304.n0F34msg027730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150306.n0F36KTt028509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:06:19 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dhcping'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150306.n0F36aL8028588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150304.n0F34eA9027663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:04:40 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jakarta-commons-compress'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0514 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33aEs027459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:03:35 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dhcping'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0496 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: <bug-476414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150307.n0F379VU013199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:07:08 EDT --- assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: <bug-478294-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478294-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150310.n0F3ARWE014254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:10:26 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: <bug-461454-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461454-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150308.n0F38poJ013604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:08:48 EDT --- lordsawar-0.1.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471243-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150306.n0F36XIV012764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:06:33 EDT --- docbook5-schemas-5.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: <bug-461454-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461454-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150308.n0F38snx013646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication In-Reply-To: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478942-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150310.n0F3AaFQ014327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:10:36 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150310.n0F3A0rS013832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:10:00 EDT --- procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update procinfo-ng'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0566 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: <bug-472027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150310.n0F3A51a029876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-14 22:10:04 EDT --- onboard-0.91.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150315.n0F3F0rH031465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> 2009-01-14 22:14:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zapplet Short Description: Zenoss Tray monitoring applet Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150318.n0F3IF4P016351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150317.n0F3HxrQ016231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 22:17:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jpcap Short Description: Packet capturing library for Java Owners: dignan Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: dignan mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150325.n0F3PItA018048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 22:25:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > It should be. Hmm, please explain a little more. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150333.n0F3XGqh003176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-14 22:33:15 EDT --- Ah nevermind, I see now it is needed for Fedora to appear as the product name through the document of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455358] Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan In-Reply-To: <bug-455358-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455358-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150353.n0F3rt3T024236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution|NOTABUG |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150356.n0F3uxfv024910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #23 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-14 22:56:58 EDT --- Although we are still waiting for the epipahny bug to be fixed, here is a preliminary review: Review for 969acdd5a5ca3e849221489021fdc9f5 gget-0.0.4-5.fc10.src.rpm FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gget-* gget.i386: E: no-binary gget.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas gget-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package gget-epiphany-extension.i386: W: no-documentation gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. - First error is because of python and can be ignored. rpmlint expects python packages to be noarch, but we need to make this one arch dependent because of the epiphany extension. - Warning about the gconf schema can be ignored, see comment # 9 - The debuginfo package is empty because of python. You need to prevent it from being built by adding %define debug_package %{nil} somewhere at the beginning of the spec. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo for more info - no doc warning for extension package can be ignored, doc is in the base package - the last error is also because of python and can be ignored. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines (except for the issues mentioned) OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. FIX - MUST: The License field in the package spec file does not match the actual license: The license included is GPLv2, but if you take a look at the py files you will see the typical "or any later version", so this is GPLv2+ FIX - MUST: The license file from the source package is not included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 914d2d51186f6d24237409e59f8f9cde OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but there are a couple of redundant packages that don't need to be listed explicitly: python is required by python-devel pygobject2-devel is required by pygtk2-devel OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. FIX - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, but that file is not properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files FIX - MUST: The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages, but you need to wait until bug # 479921 is fixed and add "%define epimajor 2.24", "Requires: epiphany(abi) = %{epimajor}" and "BuildRequires: epiphany-devel >= %{epimajor}" to the extension package again. BTW: Instead of %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* I suggest %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* to make sure you don't package unwanted files, but shouldn't really matter. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package basically functions as described, but tends to crash if the downloads.xml is malformed. Traceback mailed to upstream with Ant cc'ed. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane, but remember the mimeinfo stuff N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other issues: - Changelog is incomplete, there is a gap between 0.0.4-1 and 0.0.4-5. Please fix it up with the specs from the pastebin. - ChangeLog from source needs to be included in %doc - "chmod +x ..." of the py files during install is not needed, remove it. - There are some issues with the desktop file: - Categories includes "Application" which is no longer valid in latest freedesktop.org specs. Use "--remove-category="Application" in desktop-file-install - the desktop file contains a mimetype, so you have to run update-mime-database, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo - Add "Requires: dbus" because dbus-python and notify-python will only pull in dbus-libs automatically - Timestamp of Source0 does not match. Please download it again with wget or alike, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Suggestions: - Summary of the epiphany extension could be improved a little: "GGet extension for the Epiphany web browser" - lowercase some words in the descriptions: download manager, package. Only names (such as Gnome or GGet) should be upper case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 04:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: <bug-225809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150403.n0F43NIR025998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-14 23:03:21 EDT --- I took a look at this. I had some weird problem getting it to build in mock, but it builds fine in koji so that must be on my end. The only rpmlint complaint is: gmp.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgmpxx.so.4.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 which really isn't that big of a deal. I tried the usual libtool tweak to pass -Wl,--as-needed but it didn't work, and I don't think it's worth trying to find a fix that works. I'll run through a full review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 04:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150426.n0F4QNnb030531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #12 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 23:26:22 EDT --- Thank you for the sponsorship and review Mr. Tasaka. I understand now when the %{optflags} tag is needed, have made the appropriate changes to Jailkit, and have taken the appropriate next steps for this package. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 04:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150425.n0F4PkEj013845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #4 from Dale Bewley <dale at bewley.net> 2009-01-14 23:25:45 EDT --- I should have checked here first. I spent a good part of the afternoon creating a rpm for this package. I didn't finish it or test it yet, but I'll go ahead and post mine so you can see if it is of use to you. * http://bewley.net/linux/rpms/jailkit/ It is a bit different. It includes a init script for jk_socketd and adds jk_chrootsh to /etc/shells. Also automake and autoconf are not required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 04:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150424.n0F4O3p0013270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 23:24:02 EDT --- Alright, made the modifications you requested and uploaded on updated version Spec file: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jailkit.spec Source RPM: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jailkit-2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm As usual, I have moved the older versions into an archive they can be found here: Spec File: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/jailkit/2.5-1/jailkit.spec Source RPM: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/jailkit/2.5-1/jailkit-2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Turns out, neither autoconf nor automake were needed. The same goes for optflags, since it was built using autotools. I removed INSTALL.txt from the docs and I took the %doc tag off the %_mandir files. Thank you for all the help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 04:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: <bug-457279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150433.n0F4Xvfq031916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #20 from Robin Norwood <robin.norwood at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 23:33:53 EDT --- Here's a new SRPM and spec based on ypod's latest 3.0.5 release: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~rnorwood/rpms/cerebro-3.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm http://people.fedoraproject.org/~rnorwood/rpms/cerebro.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 04:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480091] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150459.n0F4xQ7F019878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480091 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-14 23:59:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1054070 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a270e7d20c23ef23ee782563187d93c5 MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave skipped: DateTime::Format::DateManip required All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=21, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.36 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.03-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Types::DateTime) = 0.03 perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) Requires: perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Duration) perl(DateTime::Locale) perl(DateTime::TimeZone) perl(DateTimeX::Easy) perl(MooseX::Types) perl(MooseX::Types::DateTime) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(Time::Duration::Parse) perl(namespace::clean) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) you can enable test by adding perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip as BR APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 05:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480091] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150546.n0F5krOI012553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480091 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 05:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480091] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150546.n0F5kp7U028242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480091 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-15 00:46:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime Short Description: DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 06:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150600.n0F60iPo030853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 01:00:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Ah nevermind, I see now it is needed for Fedora to appear as the product name > through the document of course. Well that is not actually true: product and brand are separate in publican config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 06:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150654.n0F6s9KT007705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #24 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 01:54:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Although we are still waiting for the epipahny bug to be fixed, here is a > preliminary review: > > FIX - MUST: The package does not own files or directories already owned by > other packages, but you need to wait until bug # 479921 is fixed and add > "%define epimajor 2.24", "Requires: epiphany(abi) = %{epimajor}" and > "BuildRequires: epiphany-devel >= %{epimajor}" to the extension package again. Changed everything besides this, waiting until bug # 479921 is fixed. > BTW: Instead of > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > I suggest > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* > to make sure you don't package unwanted files, but shouldn't really matter. That leads to: Processing files: gget-epiphany-extension-0.0.4-6.fc10 error: File not found by glob: /home/tuxdistro/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/tuxdistro/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* Instead, using what you said in comment #9: %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/ Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1308934 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 07:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150710.n0F7AwEl010761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #15 from Edouard Bourguignon <edouard.bourguignon at oxalya.com> 2009-01-15 02:10:56 EDT --- Ok the Requires pidgin has been droped Now I'm just waiting to get sponsored, I think it's on the way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 07:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150734.n0F7YPJK014538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 02:34:23 EDT --- Mostly OK. Needs a license file. I'm not quite sure what the make-pixman-snapshot.sh script is used for. Its not packaged nor used during the build process that I can see. I presume it must be for creating a git/svn/cvs snapshot, which AFAICT we're not using a snapshot so does it need to be included. It also doesn't currently build in koji but that's expected due to the lack of mingw32-dlfcn. It does build without it though. I'm not sure whether mingw32-dlfcn is currently being reviewed. Its got input on the ticket but nobody currently has ownership of it. + rpmlint output $ rpmlint -i mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-1.fc10.src.rpm mingw32-pixman.src: W: strange-permission make-pixman-snapshot.sh 0775 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license - %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 837df4a02c61a60a880644393b57faed pixman-0.13.2.tar.gz - package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1054744 + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 07:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150747.n0F7lUMZ000483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 07:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: <bug-426753-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426753-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150752.n0F7qHpN001337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 08:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150809.n0F89ce7004761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 03:09:36 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 08:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python In-Reply-To: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478877-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150810.n0F8AWLF021424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 03:10:31 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 09:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150933.n0F9Xah8022247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 04:33:34 EDT --- mingw32-libpng-1.2.34-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libpng-1.2.34-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 09:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901150958.n0F9waBQ010994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-15 04:58:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I guess I shouldn't have set review flag to + before the legal issues are > resolved. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_about_the_RSA_license_on_their_MD5_implementation.3F_Isn.27t_that_GPL-incompatible.3F (thanks tibbs!) there's no issue, but upstream should be asked to remove RSA's licence and keep the copyright notice only. Lifting FE-Legal, so please go ahead and import this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 10:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151011.n0FABjWp031501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-15 05:11:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 10:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151058.n0FAwBwW024975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 05:58:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > ... > checking whether to build static libraries... yes > ... > > There are no .a files created. I only looked at the single line and not at the > build process as a whole. Sorry for the noise. Well, yeah, that could save me some troubles in the future. http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Jan 15 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 0.2.5-4 - disable building static archives -- Thanks Fabian review! -- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ncmpcpp Short Description: Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ Owners: mnowak Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 11:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151104.n0FB4b4U026346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 --- Comment #2 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-15 06:04:36 EDT --- Yikes, fixed thanks! > Group tag should be Development/Libraries Hmm, are you certain ? I'm using the same Group (for the libraries) as is used for all other glib/gtk packages, such as glib2, gtk2, gtkmm24, etc... Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gtksourceviewmm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gtksourceviewmm-2.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 11:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: <bug-469553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151127.n0FBRXbh015446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 06:27:32 EDT --- Thanks Tom for the legal stuff. So far there is no answer from upstream. I will wait some more days and resend the message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 11:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151134.n0FBYvhn000499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 06:34:56 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 55772762ae9822983099d2edc89c2ead OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 11:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151154.n0FBsIct020857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 06:54:17 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. - There is no need for '%define name bnIRC' and '%define version 1.1.1' because 'Name:' and 'Version:' can be used as macros later. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros - Source0: should point to the upstream location of the tarball. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - 'BuildRoot:' please use on of the examples in the guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - Your %description is too long. Didn't rpmlint complain about this? - Please preserve the time stamps in your %install section if possible make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" - You are using '%post -p /sbin/ldconfig' and '%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig'. Aren't 'Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig' and 'Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig' missing? - Please use one of the formating style from the guidelines for your %changelog entry https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151204.n0FC4ajt023327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 07:04:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shcov Short Description: A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] New: Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser Message-ID: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 Summary: Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: saispo at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-bicyclerepair.spec SRPM URL: http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-bicyclerepair-0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Python Refactoring Browser, helping Pythonistas everywhere glide over the gory details of refactoring their code. Watch him extract jumbled code into well ordered classes. Gasp, as he renames all occurrences of a method. Thank You Bicycle Repair Man! I see with Alexander Kurtakov and bicyclerepair will help for building and maintaining eclipse-pydev. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151209.n0FC9QH5008068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #10 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 07:09:25 EDT --- And here the spec file: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151212.n0FCCtoJ009053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-15 07:12:53 EDT --- MUSTFIX: /usr/share/shcov/ is unowned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: <bug-439100-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-439100-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151230.n0FCUGkH028548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |needinfo?(ed at eh3.com) --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 07:30:12 EDT --- Ed, is this package still approved after the fix for the archs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: <bug-439100-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-439100-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151234.n0FCYhkp029279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Comment #20 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 07:34:42 EDT --- Claudio, I think that the package is still approved. Please update the spec file because as mentioned in Comment #18 the old one didn't build on ppc/ppc64. F-10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=649644 F-9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=649642 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151239.n0FCdZZ5030506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #11 from Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 07:39:34 EDT --- Hi, could i get a status update on this? Is there anything else needed from me? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151237.n0FCb4YL014044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gentium-basic-fonts - |sil-gentium-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family Flag|needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #15 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 07:37:00 EDT --- Here are the updates according to new font packaging guidelines: SPEC URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: <bug-225809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151257.n0FCvQ3J002406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #23 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-15 07:57:25 EDT --- The reasons is a [probably years old] configure check, which explicitly adds -lm to the linker options, GMP_CHECK_LIBM_FOR_BUILD in configure.in. Since autoreconf is run anyway, this check could be removed. Alternatively, and more "dirty", it's possible to drop -lm from config.status and rerun configure afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151300.n0FD0ZTL019384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 MartinG <gronslet at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gronslet at gmail.com --- Comment #39 from MartinG <gronslet at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 08:00:29 EDT --- I just tried the repo file from ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/9/mondorescue.repo but get Error: Missing Dependency: afio is needed by package mondo-2.2.7-1.fc9.x86_64 (mondorescue) Error: Missing Dependency: buffer is needed by package mondo-2.2.7-1.fc9.x86_64 (mondorescue) when I try "yum install mondo mindi". Any workaround? Anything I can do to help testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151327.n0FDRAJI025887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 08:27:05 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mldonkey Short Description: Client for several P2P networks Owners: peter Branches: El-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151333.n0FDXJXO011286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 08:33:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Mostly OK. Needs a license file. I'm not quite sure what the > make-pixman-snapshot.sh script is used for. Its not packaged nor used during > the build process that I can see. I presume it must be for creating a > git/svn/cvs snapshot, which AFAICT we're not using a snapshot so does it need > to be included. That file is from the base Fedora pixman package. I just included it so that we keep as close to the base package as possible. It's not used currently in the base package either. > It also doesn't currently build in koji but that's expected due > to the lack of mingw32-dlfcn. It does build without it though. I'm not sure > whether mingw32-dlfcn is currently being reviewed. Its got input on the ticket > but nobody currently has ownership of it. I'm hoping that Adel Gadllah will have a look at mingw32-dlfcn (bug 478640) soon. > + rpmlint output > > $ rpmlint -i mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-1.fc10.src.rpm > mingw32-pixman.src: W: strange-permission make-pixman-snapshot.sh 0775 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Not sure what rpmlint is complaining about here :-) It's a shell script, in the SRPM, (potentially) used to build the package, so I don't think this is incorrect. > - %doc includes license file This is annoying isn't it. Upstream don't provide a license file and the base Fedora package doesn't include one either. I've raised the following bug upstream: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19582 Below is a new build which preemptively includes this patch. Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pixman/mingw32-pixman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Jan 15 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.13.2-2 - Include LICENSE file (freedesktop bug 19582). $ rpm -qlp /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc11.noarch.rpm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1/pixman-version.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1/pixman.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.dll.a /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.la /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/pixman-1.pc /usr/share/doc/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2 /usr/share/doc/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2/LICENSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151335.n0FDZ26B027800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 08:35:01 EDT --- Bug link should be: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151336.n0FDatlB028176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #13 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-15 08:36:53 EDT --- Hi. I've mailed the binutils mailing list. I've already got a response. The copyright for the patch needs to be assigned to the FSF. I will attempt to get on top of this soon -- by mailing the mspgcc list. I've updated the specfile to contain a link to my post. Available at the same url. SRPM here: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-binutils-2.19-2.fc10.src.rpm Tom: Just to make sure, am I right in thinking that I am now required to demonstrate my ability to follow the Fedora procedures? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151346.n0FDkusu014303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #33 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 08:46:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Thanks! > > New Package CVS Request > ======================= > Package Name: mldonkey > Short Description: Client for several P2P networks > Owners: peter > Branches: El-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 Couple of questions: (a) do you want me to co-maintain, and (b) EL-4 is a bit adventurous isn't it?? Do we have all the deps in EL-4 for mldonkey? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 13:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151348.n0FDm8fC014490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #25 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-15 08:48:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > error: File not found by glob: > /home/tuxdistro/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* Sorry, the files are named gget-epiphany.py* and gget.ephy-extension. So you could use %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget-epiphany.py* %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.ephy-extension or simply %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* as you did before. > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: > /home/tuxdistro/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* > > Instead, using what you said in comment #9: > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/ This would be ok if we did what I suggested first and did _not_ file the bug against epiphany, but now it's no longer ok. > Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1308934 > SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.src.rpm Ok, I will have a final look over them tonight and if everything is ok approve them. Leave the files as they are now and do the final fixes in the -7 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151411.n0FEBkit021624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #6 from Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 09:11:45 EDT --- Hi, thank you for comments. I modified the package according to your comments and I uploaded it to the same location (the same addresses). Original versions are stored in "http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/old/". Regards Marek P.S.: I had to modify also the scp-policykit.patch patch in http://mkasik.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer-1.1.1-3.*.src.rpm. I forget to remove one line from the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:24:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151424.n0FEOdRa024346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 09:24:37 EDT --- ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151424.n0FEOAPa024261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 09:24:09 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-nokogiri/rubygem-nokogiri.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-nokogiri/rubygem-nokogiri-1.1.1-1.fc.src.rpm * Thu Jan 15 2009 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 1.1.1-1 - 1.1.1 For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1055417 For F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1055424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151425.n0FEPFfQ008022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 09:25:14 EDT --- Thanks everyone, this is now built in F-10 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151434.n0FEYqjL010011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com> 2009-01-15 09:34:51 EDT --- No, I'm sorry: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-restr Short Description: Simple client for RESTful web services Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151439.n0FEdEiX011114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 09:39:13 EDT --- Looks fine now. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151457.n0FEvvh2000568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #28 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-15 09:57:54 EDT --- Did a quick check (as new packager) on backup-manager.spec v0.7.7-6 1/ the spec file looks OK to me, but I'm not an expert on the field (wip) 2/ do a build test: $ rpmbuild -ba backup-manager.spec .... remark 1: Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh ==> see comment #21 (bash is a superset of sh) remark 2: Converting encoding some doc-files + for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog THANKS + mv AUTHORS timestamp + iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o AUTHORS timestamp but later I saw: + cp -pr AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README THANKS /var/tmp/backup-manager-0.7.7-6.fc9-root-makerpm/usr/share/doc/backup-manager-0.7.7 ==> the files NEWS README and THANKS are not converted. Why not? Small check: in spec file I see: %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README THANKS and, [makerpm at localhost backup-manager-0.7.7]$ file THANKS THANKS: UTF-8 Unicode English text [makerpm at localhost backup-manager-0.7.7]$ file README README: ASCII English text remark 3: the "t" directory in the source tree is not very meaningful, why not call it "tests"? ==> I know inspecting the code is not part of the packaging guidelines, but all bits help. You may ignore this if you want as at the end the tests are not part of the RPM itself. 3/ doing a build with the tarball: [makerpm at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmbuild -tb -vv /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SOURCES/backup-manager-0.7.7.tar.gz error: Name field must be present in package: (main package) error: Version field must be present in package: (main package) error: Release field must be present in package: (main package) error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package) error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) error: License field must be present in package: (main package) D: May free Score board((nil)) ==> this fails. Could this be of a missing spec file in the tarball? [makerpm at localhost rpmbuild]$ tar ztf SOURCES/backup-manager-0.7.7.tar.gz | grep spec ==> not found 4/ the remark conc. the development release 0.7.7 is correct. Once the bug report gets a GO (package ready to checked into CVS) make a stable release package instead, e.g. 0.8.0 OK for me, on some minor remarks. Thanks for the learning experience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 15:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:05:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151505.n0FF5mE6002786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 10:05:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Well, there are still many files in binary rpm which have > CRLF line terminators as > > $ rpm -ql rubygem-tlsmail | xargs file | grep CRLF > > shows (although rpmlint does not seem to be able to detect these) Here's an update with those CRLF issues fixed: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 15:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151551.n0FFp07g013594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 10:50:59 EDT --- Well, at least for this package, yes. :) I'm willing to sponsor you based on the cleanliness of the package and the adherence to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines). Please read them over and be sure you understand them, if you have not done so. Then, go ahead and create your fedora account, sign the CLA, and request to be added to the packager group. All of that is documented in the link I posted in the previous comment. I'll sponsor you, then you can continue on to request CVS for this package, import the SRPM, and throw builds at the koji buildsystem. If you have any questions along the way, feel free to ask them here or email me directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 16:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151600.n0FG0pre016452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 11:00:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > (In reply to comment #16) > > > This is still blocking FE_LEGAL. > > > Spot: should this be oked now? Or is it waiting pending something further? > > > > Conrad, did you remove the manual from the package (not the tarball)? > > Yup. (Went back to using the original (not-stripped) tarball though.) Lifting FE-Legal then. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 15:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151557.n0FFvBKs015382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-15 10:57:07 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning but does not apply to Sugar OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Assume no .desktop is needed since this is for Sugar. Package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 15:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151559.n0FFxcVq032349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 10:59:37 EDT --- Adam, please follow the process at this step (and read that document from top to bottom, so you understand how things work). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 16:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151630.n0FGUFd1008051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-15 11:30:13 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning but does not apply to Sugar OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Keep working to get upstream to correct the shebang issues, but I dont see that as a reason to delay this getting in any longer. Everything else looks good. Package Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 16:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480187] New: Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480187 Summary: Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-el.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-el-0.20070412-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Greek thesaurus as used by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 16:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480186] New: Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480186 Summary: Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-fr-2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: French thesaurus as used by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 16:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151654.n0FGsejX030202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 11:54:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > * Because I was told I should in another review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019#c6 > ...honestly, I've also just checked my /usr/share/javadoc/* and while there's > not much in there, everything is using %name-%version with a symlink to it :) I checked this by using repoquery, i.e. _all_ packages installing javadoc files under /usr/share/javadoc/. It seems packages reviewed in earlier days seem to be creating such symlinks. Actually this is the first package creating javadoc subpackage trying to create such symlink I reviewed. However this is not a blocker. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (TVAnytimeAPI) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151700.n0FH086x031639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-15 12:00:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > Does -el subpackage really need Obsoletes/Provides statements? I suppose it > should works since it requires emacs-mew which do obsolete/provide old package. I have take a further look on the new and the old package. As far as I can see, the el subpackage should replace the xemace subpackage. So please add the rigth Provides and Obsoletes-Statements for it. As second are you sure that the el subpackage is usable for GNU Emacs, because the old package contains a subpackage with the name xemacs? Gest Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151701.n0FH1rrU032048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480187] Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151710.n0FHALpH001959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480187 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151707.n0FH7n6J001373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 12:07:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-implode Short Description: Implode for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480186] Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151710.n0FHA8Rp017663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480186 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151707.n0FH7JhR016948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 12:07:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-distance Short Description: Distance measurement for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480187] Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151721.n0FHLaUt004716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480187 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 12:21:35 EDT --- * koji build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1055835 * rpmlint is silent * license text included and is open source * upstream source verified as 491b6b88184f3f935e9fe2111adb4555 th_el.zip APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151723.n0FHNIhg021006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 12:23:16 EDT --- I'd still ship the apigen documentation. Maybe something like this:: # see pylib issue67 cp -p py/doc/apigen.txt apigen.txt.bak cp -p py/doc/index.txt index.txt.bak rm py/doc/apigen.txt sed -i '/apigen/d' py/doc/index.txt PYTHONPATH=$(pwd)/py %{__python} py/bin/py.test py cp -p apigen.txt py/doc/apigen.txt.bak cp -p index.txt.bak py/doc/index.txt You can do this after import, however. This is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:29:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151729.n0FHTArw006133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mcepl at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 12:29:09 EDT --- New version of SRPM: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm New version of the Spec file: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-libasyncns.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151733.n0FHXCkQ023194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 12:33:10 EDT --- Well, sorry for not pointing out before, however: - now you defined %gemdocsdir, it is better that you use this macro also on %files - Also you use %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ in %files, while %{geminstdir} is also used in %files. - Now build.log warns about: ----------------------------------------------------------- warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tlsmail-0.0.1/README.txt ----------------------------------------------------------- - In %changelog, please use %% instead of single % (i.e. %%doc, for example) to aviod macros from being expanded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: <bug-446976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-446976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151739.n0FHdusq024480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 12:39:54 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:38:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480186] Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151738.n0FHcS7s024327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480186 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 12:38:27 EDT --- * koji build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1055865 * rpmlint is silent * license text included and is open source * upstream source verified as 74ca532d23176886beb05248dfa49d0a thesaurus_2-1.zip APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151748.n0FHmW5m026291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-15 12:48:30 EDT --- Good: + Name of the package fits naming guidelines + Version of the tar ball matches with package version + Packaged version is the most current release of the application + Package contains a valid license tag + License tag contains GPLv2+ as an valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Source in package matches with upstream (md5sum: 2306402f31dff1cb9d3d664aa9153c28) + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains devel subpackage + Devel subpackage containts proper Req. to main package + Package contains no patches + %setup use -q flag + BUILDROOT will cleaned on the beginning of %install and %clean + Local build works fine + Build use %{_smp_flags] + Build use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Local install works fine + Rpmlint has no complaints for installed package + Local uninstall works file + Koji build works file + Package contains dlconfig scriptlets + Rpmlint has no complaints for source rpm + Rpmlint has no complaints for the binary rpm + Rpmlint has no complaints for the debuginfo rpm + Debuginfo rpm contains source files + Packaged files doesN't belongs to another package + Packaged files have proper file permissions + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + %changelog has a proper format *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480215] New: Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer Message-ID: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480215 Summary: Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/slsnif.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/slsnif-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://slsnif.sourceforge.net/ Description: Serial line sniffer (slsnif). slsnif is a serial port logging utility. It listens to the specified serial port and logs all data going through this port in both directions. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1055945 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint slsnif* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint slsnif-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151832.n0FIW1OF003095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 13:32:00 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:32:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151832.n0FIWB3H003148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 13:32:11 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151832.n0FIWINL003225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-15 13:32:16 EDT --- God: + Package name fits naming guideline + Basename of SPEC file fits package name + Could download upstrem tar ball via spectool + Tar ball in Package matches with upstream (md5sum: 825f48384febefacf0717738e909321) + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains most recent release of thw software + License tag has a valid value + License tag state BSD as a valid OSS license + Package contains a verbatin license text + Local build works fine + Package will build as noarch + Rpmlint ok for source rpm + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %install and %clean % All packaged files are owned by the package + No files has a complict with other package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Proper %changelog stanza Bad: - Rpmlint complaints, that file in %{python_sitelib} should be executables - Please notify upstream, that eatch source file should have a copyright notice - Koji build failed. Please change 'BR python' to 'BR python-devel' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151840.n0FIe6vZ021229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-15 13:40:04 EDT --- Sorry for not responding.. I will check this package tomorrow or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] New: Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals Message-ID: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Summary: Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nullmodem.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nullmodem-0.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.ant.uni-bremen.de/whomes/rinas/nullmodem/ Description: nullmodem creates a virtual network of pseudo-terminals. It can be used as an adapter to connect two programs that normally need serial interface cards. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1056035 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint nullmodem* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nullmodem-0.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151922.n0FJMVTa030107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #29 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 14:22:26 EDT --- I have made some change : - Replace bin/sh by bin/bash - Use patch insted multiple sed - UTF8 encode doc files spec: http://trac.llaumgui.com/browser/rpmbuild/SPEC/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.src.rpm I have my validation ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151923.n0FJNmXE014287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 14:23:47 EDT --- nopaste-2835-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nopaste-2835-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:23:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151923.n0FJNp5G014325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 14:23:51 EDT --- nopaste-2835-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nopaste-2835-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151955.n0FJtrSE026376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 14:55:52 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151957.n0FJvVNp026655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 14:57:30 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480235] New: Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. Message-ID: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 Summary: Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparrish at shallowcreek.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/subtitlecomposer/subtitlecomposer.spec SRPM URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/subtitlecomposer/subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. Build logs here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1056201 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152009.n0FK9gNF029039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 15:09:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Well, sorry for not pointing out before, however: > > - now you defined %gemdocsdir, it is better that you use this macro > also on %files > > - Also you use %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ in %files, while > %{geminstdir} is also used in %files. > > - Now build.log warns about: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tlsmail-0.0.1/README.txt > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > - In %changelog, please use %% instead of single % (i.e. %%doc, for > example) to aviod macros from being expanded. The above points have been fixed: SPEC URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152015.n0FKFGgg013107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:15:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152021.n0FKLPjq014391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:21:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152020.n0FKK2b4014041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:20:01 EDT --- cvs done. Please fix the item from comment #3 before importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152018.n0FKIS2w030727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:18:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152022.n0FKM7pw014536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #31 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 15:22:05 EDT --- Ok, it's repair : spec: http://trac.llaumgui.com/browser/rpmbuild/SPEC/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. In-Reply-To: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152023.n0FKNnar014728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-15 15:23:48 EDT --- initial comments from quick perusal: 1. use BR: kdelibs4-devel instead of kdelibs-devel (to avoid ambiguity) 2. omit -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$(kde4-config --prefix) -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull not required or desired, %_cmake_kde4 macro includes both already 3. what's -DKDE4_BUILD_TESTS:BOOL=${BUILD_TESTS} for? I don't see BUILD_TESTS defined anywhere. ? 4. missing icon scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152025.n0FKPPss032342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:25:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901151945.n0FJjKjF005342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #30 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 14:45:19 EDT --- Hum... is there a problem : root at enterprise /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result> rpm -Uvh backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.noarch.rpm erreur: D?pendances requises: perl(BackupManager::Config) est n?cessaire pour backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.noarch perl(BackupManager::Dialog) est n?cessaire pour backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.noarch perl(BackupManager::Logger) est n?cessaire pour backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152030.n0FKUgAQ001155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:30:39 EDT --- Can you guys figure out what branches you need and re-set the fedora-cvs flag to ? when you are ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152026.n0FKQptb032622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:26:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152033.n0FKXUb6016728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2009-01-15 15:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I'd still ship the apigen documentation. Maybe something like this:: The testsuite is run in BUILD, not BUILDROOT, (and after %install) so deleting some files there doesn't have an effect on the final package, and thus I don't think it is necessary to make backups. > You can do this after import, however. This is APPROVED. Thanks for the review, Toshio! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-py Short Description: Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties Owners: thm Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:32:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152032.n0FKWOWx001544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:32:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152041.n0FKfK4h018546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:41:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152037.n0FKbdtu002642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:37:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152043.n0FKhAer018872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:43:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152045.n0FKjZna019511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:45:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152046.n0FKkd2r004960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:46:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480091] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152048.n0FKm8Sp019983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480091 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-15 15:48:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 21:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. In-Reply-To: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152107.n0FL7XKY024566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-15 16:07:31 EDT --- 1, 2, 3 all fixed Can you give an example of what you are looking at for #4. Never used scriplets for icons b4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 21:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. In-Reply-To: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152114.n0FLEHLS025864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-15 16:14:16 EDT --- example, kdetoys: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/kdetoys/kdetoys.spec?revision=1.42&view=markup Requires(post): xdg-utils Requires(postun): xdg-utils %post xdg-icon-resource forceupdate --theme hicolor 2> /dev/null || : %postun xdg-icon-resource forceupdate --theme hicolor 2> /dev/null || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 21:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152125.n0FLP4Mj012735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-15 16:25:02 EDT --- I signed up for co-maintainer as Jeff seems to be AWOL. Looks like he's maybe a better upstream maintainer rather a downstream one - sorry Jeff. When looking around in Red Hat Bugzilla for open bug reports, I also had a look to upstream version control system in order to gather maybe some patches solving mentioned issues or even referenced fixes being not in Fedora: git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/ethtool/ethtool.git Unluckily, I've now to add a FE_LEGAL blocker as Jeff was somehow so nice to remove *any* hint how ethtool is now licensed after version 6. And the only license hint in this clone seems to be just the man page - which is referring in a comment, that the man page itself (and just the man page) is licensed as "GNU Public License." - could be a mislabeled GPL. So: Tom, your turn first before continuing with something else in this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 21:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152127.n0FLR64x013204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #15 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-15 16:27:05 EDT --- Apologies for the previous confusion. I had already applied for membership to the packager group, and have completed the CLA. I have read through the Guidelines previously. I had another look just now to verify that I'm familiar with them. Cheers, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 21:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152133.n0FLX5Ce029592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jgarzik at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 16:33:03 EDT --- It's not missing licensing at all. The bog-standard COPYING file is present in every release tarball, including the one in each Fedora and RHEL source rpm. And autogen.sh installs COPYING locally via automake if you are a developer building the git repo. It is 100% standard GNU autotools setup including license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 21:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152138.n0FLclNB015138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Dale Bewley <dale at bewley.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dale at bewley.net --- Comment #5 from Dale Bewley <dale at bewley.net> 2009-01-15 16:38:46 EDT --- I fixed a couple bugs. The /etc/shells is now handled properly, and I've added a patch to jk_init.ini. Scp needs /dev/null, but that was missing. That should be reported upstream. I don't have a bug account with them yet. * http://bewley.net/linux/rpms/jailkit/jailkit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] New: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility Message-ID: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Summary: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz-0.63-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unalz is a utility to decompress .alz files. It supports bzip2/raw format transformation, splitting the compressed file into smaller chunks (alz, a00, a01, ...), extract password protected .alz files, and CRC checks. rpmlint is silent. I had submitted this package before (bug# 477106) but it got rejected because (with the help of friends at #fedora-devel) we figured that the project webpage said: - it is free as in cost, but you are prohibited from on commercial distribution in magazines or CD - it allows distribution only unmodified and patches must be distributed separately. And the tarball did not contain a license file. Now all of these issues seem resolved. The tarball contains a zlib license and the non-free clauses at the project webpage [1] are replaced via zlib license [2]. This package still might have a patent issue (although I couldn't find one) because it is a decompressor of the commercial compressor Alzip [3]. It should be checked by FE-LEGAL to verify that it's OK to distribute this on Fedora. [1] http://www.kipple.pe.kr/win/unalz/ [2] http://www.kipple.pe.kr/etc/zlib_license/ [3] http://www.altools.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152208.n0FM8gTv003921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> 2009-01-15 17:08:41 EDT --- So depending on the Version of automake I'm using to build (the package from vcs) I get a different license (GPLv2+ vs. GPLV3+)? Can I change the license at random by building it using evilmake, my very own automake-fork? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152216.n0FMGMZf022168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152216.n0FMGVsH022237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 17:16:30 EDT --- I'll do what I can to merge the two spec files and add your patches. Perhaps it would be best that we co-maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152225.n0FMPT0B006945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-15 17:25:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: TVAnytimeAPI Short Description: A Java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480186] Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152258.n0FMw4Ok012231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480186 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 17:58:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-fr Short Description: French thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 22:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480187] Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152258.n0FMwwpw012317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480187 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 17:58:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-el Short Description: Greek thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152302.n0FN2orZ030304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226519, which changed state. Bug 226519 Summary: Merge Review: usermode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226519] Merge Review: usermode In-Reply-To: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152302.n0FN2mLW030274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-15 18:02:43 EDT --- Indeed, that looks good. Thanks for your time. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152309.n0FN9fII031404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-15 18:09:40 EDT --- Following from Freenode #fedora-devel (time is UTC+01:00): [23:19:32] < spot> rsc: jgarzik is going to add a LICENSE file to git that states the licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:16:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226519] Merge Review: usermode In-Reply-To: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226519-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152316.n0FNGm1L015805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152327.n0FNRQDZ017982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-15 18:27:25 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:32:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901152332.n0FNWbYA003949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-15 18:32:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtksourceviewmm Short Description: C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library Owners: denis Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160002.n0G02N1U024250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #40 from Bruno Cornec <bruno.cornec at hp.com> 2009-01-15 19:02:18 EDT --- I'm making my integration tests for fedora at the moment for my first package buffer. In the mean time, my tests packages available with that repo file: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/mondorescue.repo Sorry for the confusion. As soon as I've finished validating them, I'll put them in the main directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480254] New: Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails Message-ID: <bug-480254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480254 Summary: Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/deletemail.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/deletemail-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.jhweiss.de/software/deletemail.html Description: deletemail is a non-interactive tool for removing mail which is older than a configurable number of days from one or more IMAP mailboxes. By default, mail which is not marked as seen on the server will not be deleted. If, for example, fetchmail is used for receiving mail from an IMAP server, deletemail might be useful, since fetchmail deletes mail either immediately or not at all. Thus, you could use fetchmails keep option (so that fetchmail never deletes anything) and let deletemail handle the removal of mail. Currently, the IMAP4 and IMAP4rev1 protocols are supported, optionally using SSL/TLS for secure IMAP connections. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1056944 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint deletemail* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint deletemail-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE. In-Reply-To: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160009.n0G09xRb025543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #4 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-15 19:09:58 EDT --- all fixed new spec and srpm online -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160006.n0G06egr025236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #7 from Dale Bewley <dale at bewley.net> 2009-01-15 19:06:39 EDT --- I didn't mean to hijack anything, but I've been needing to finish this RPM ASAP for myself anyway and wanted to contribute what I had. I'd be happy to co-maintain, but this would be my first package submission and I haven't gone through all the motions to get into koji and cvs etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160014.n0G0E7Go011115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 19:14:06 EDT --- Thanks Michael for your comment. Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel-0.2.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160020.n0G0Kcb6027744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 19:20:37 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing and cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160020.n0G0KMrw027666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-15 19:20:20 EDT --- Thank you both for reviewing and cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160017.n0G0HrGx011964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 19:17:52 EDT --- Looks good now, approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160040.n0G0eYVX016031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 19:40:33 EDT --- sugar-implode-5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-implode-5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160041.n0G0ftFf031216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-15 19:41:54 EDT --- sugar-distance-13-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-distance-13-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 01:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160150.n0G1oWqI009272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-15 20:50:31 EDT --- Looks good to me. No big deal if you don't want to include the PDF docs; I didn't actually verify that they were useful. This seems a useful thing to be able to do and I hope that at some point there's some reasonable documentation explaining the procedure. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 01:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160149.n0G1n1gI008843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #2 from Tom Wisniewski <twisnie+fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 20:49:00 EDT --- Thanks for your input. Much appreciated. I went ahead and made the appropriate changes and uploaded a new set of rpm's. I have to admit, the %changelog thing took me a while to figure out. I kept staring at it and staring at it, but not seeing what's wrong. I then noticed that I was missing the version/release number :) I had a look through the Fedora Guidelines for the %post ldconfig sections but didn't see any reference to 'Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig. I then did a quick google search and came across the following bugzilla entry which mentions that '%post -p /sbin/ldconfig' notation automatically mentions 'Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig'. So I left 'Requires(post):' out. If it's really needed, please let me know and I'll add it in. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 When running rpmlint against the RPM, I do have errors. They seem to have something to do with ownership of directories. Here is a sample: bnIRC.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share Not quite sure what I can do differently in my spec file to fix this. I can only assume I would have to make changes to my %files section and/or %defattr, but I have no idea what to change. Once again, any and all feedback/guidance is really appreciated. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 02:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480091] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime - DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480091-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160251.n0G2pOqB018766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480091 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-15 21:51:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 03:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160320.n0G3KjWL009610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #32 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-15 22:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Ok, it's repair : Not quite. Now your package lacks all perl module requires/provide. Removing your requ/prov-filtering entirely should resolve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 03:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160331.n0G3VojE026247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #33 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-15 22:31:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Removing your requ/prov-filtering entirely should resolve this. Huh? I thought we were supposed to do this. Packages should not provide things that no other packages but themselves require. Or am I mistaken here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 03:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160341.n0G3fwql013992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-15 22:41:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have take a further look on the new and the old package. As far as I can see, > the el subpackage should replace the xemace subpackage. So please add the rigth > Provides and Obsoletes-Statements for it. upstream doesn't support xemacs anymore. that's why I've got rid of it from new package. I'm not quite sure if adding Provides and even Obsoletes is a good idea in this case. > As second are you sure that the el subpackage is usable for GNU Emacs, because > the old package contains a subpackage with the name xemacs? the elisp source package is a kind of -debuginfo package. it's typically used for debugging purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 03:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160351.n0G3pVI7029931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #34 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-15 22:51:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Removing your requ/prov-filtering entirely should resolve this. > > Huh? I thought we were supposed to do this. Packages should not provide things > that no other packages but themselves require. Or am I mistaken here? It's the latter. In case of this package's perl modules: The package is installing some perl modules to a globally accessible location. To denote this fact rpm-wise, it must provide these. => it _must_ Provide: perl(BackupManager::...) Removing the requ/prov-filters causes rpmbuild to do this automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 04:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160407.n0G47ClZ032635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-15 23:07:08 EDT --- Any update? It would really nice to get rid of this ancient review ticket. Actually, I think I'll just go ahead and do a full review. I was about to complain about a missing pkgconfig dependency for the -devel package, but then noted that rpm automatically generates a /usr/bin/pkg-config dependency. That seems to solve the issue, although I'm not quite sure where the dependency comes from. So really it's just the rpmlint complaints above that could use fixing. * source files match upstream (verified manually). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summaries are OK. * descriptions are OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has some valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: agg-2.5-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm libagg.so.2()(64bit) libaggfontfreetype.so.2()(64bit) libaggplatformX11.so.2()(64bit) libaggplatformsdl.so.2()(64bit) agg = 2.5-6.fc11 agg(x86-64) = 2.5-6.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libagg.so.2()(64bit) libaggfontfreetype.so.2()(64bit) libaggplatformX11.so.2()(64bit) libaggplatformsdl.so.2()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) agg-devel-2.5-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libagg) = 2.5.0 agg-devel = 2.5-6.fc11 agg-devel(x86-64) = 2.5-6.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config agg = 2.5-6.fc11 automake freetype-devel libagg.so.2()(64bit) libaggfontfreetype.so.2()(64bit) libaggplatformX11.so.2()(64bit) libaggplatformsdl.so.2()(64bit) pkgconfig(freetype2) * shared libraries present. ldconfig called properly unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files present; pkgconfig dependency is there (via /usr/bin/pkg-config auto-dep). * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 04:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:07:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160407.n0G47YnX018317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-15 23:07:33 EDT --- I'm not sure how that works, I'll ask around, in the meantime I'll work on getting it Fedora-ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 04:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160436.n0G4aQgI004849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |fedora-Linux_Security_Guide |fedora-security-guide - A |- A security guide for |security guide for Linux |linux | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 05:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160504.n0G54AoN008922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-16 00:04:09 EDT --- Hmmm, but it can't be the new libtool, as agg was last built in February 2008. WTF?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 05:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160502.n0G52baR026541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-16 00:02:35 EDT --- > Any update? It would really nice to get rid of this ancient review ticket. > Actually, I think I'll just go ahead and do a full review. Oops, sorry, I was busy with more important stuff. But I see the spec already reruns libtoolize, so IMHO this is a bug in libtool. The libtool 2 upgrade in Rawhide dropped the multilib patch, thinking it is no longer necessary. That turns out to be false. IMHO libtool should get fixed, not every single package running libtoolize. > I was about to complain about a missing pkgconfig dependency for the -devel > package, but then noted that rpm automatically generates a /usr/bin/pkg-config > dependency. That seems to solve the issue, although I'm not quite sure where > the dependency comes from. The new pkgconfig autodeps maybe? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 05:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160531.n0G5VLMc013310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 00:31:20 EDT --- Submitted for updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 05:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160530.n0G5UY8O013120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 --- Comment #6 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 00:30:33 EDT --- Submitted for updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 06:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:11:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480215] Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer In-Reply-To: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160611.n0G6BdNY005430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480215 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-16 01:11:37 EDT --- I'll review it a bit later. Looks pretty muck alike logserial which I maintain and use... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 06:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] New: Package Reveiew for gnome-globalmenu . Message-ID: <bug-480279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Reveiew for gnome-globalmenu . https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Summary: Package Reveiew for gnome-globalmenu . Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rainwoodman at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/svn/tags/v0.7.2/gnome-globalmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gnome-globalmenu-0.7.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Global Menu is the centralized menu bar. Refer to http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/ . This src rpm will build the gtk module, gnome-panel applet, and xfce panel plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 07:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160702.n0G72wYY027187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #35 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 02:02:56 EDT --- Like that : http://trac.llaumgui.com/browser/rpmbuild/SPEC/backup-manager.spec ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 08:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160829.n0G8T6VK026717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 08:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160828.n0G8Ssf7026682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 03:28:53 EDT --- I will review this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160900.n0G90NQi014537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #35 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 04:00:19 EDT --- Sorry about that Kevin - I should have set the flag back. Peter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160903.n0G933eE015325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:03:01 EDT --- $ rpmlint Download/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/term.h mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/term.h mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpdcurses.dll.a mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpdcurses.dll.a mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/curses.h mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/curses.h mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/panel.h mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/panel.h mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpdcurses.dll.a mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. This should be OK, because of the cross compiler nature of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160905.n0G95gUN001323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 04:05:40 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.2.r6525.fc10.src.rpm -- * Wed Jan 14 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 2.0.x-0.2.r6525 - use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead of %%{buildroot} - added library header files directories to %%files section - fixed bad field in -doc sub-package to contain BR field -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160910.n0G9A8XO017233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:10:07 EDT --- $ md5sum PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz 65c9b1d4c5ef3e031039da620d6199ee PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz (upstream) 4e04e4412d1b1392a7f9a489b95b331a rpmbuild/SOURCES/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz (SRPM) X Source checksum don't match upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160910.n0G9ATK0017302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #5 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:10:27 EDT --- MUST: * package is named appropriately mingw32-* * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager, Vendor ,Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * /sbin/ldconfig used in packages containing libraries. no native libs * Not GUI app * header files goes into -devel sub-package. no native header files * *.so goes into -devel sub-package. no *.so files * devel package require the base package using a fully versioned dependency no *-devel * *.la files is deleted. no *.la files * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * The spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang ) (no locales) * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates . %defattrs present ( %defattr(-, root, root, -)) * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime no docs * follow the MinGW guidelines on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc no license file for Public Domain * package should build on i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160911.n0G9BSC7002610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #6 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:11:27 EDT --- if the source in the SRPM is fixed to match upstream, then i will approve the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160916.n0G9GE9M003705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 04:16:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > $ md5sum PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz > 65c9b1d4c5ef3e031039da620d6199ee PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz (upstream) > 4e04e4412d1b1392a7f9a489b95b331a rpmbuild/SOURCES/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz (SRPM) > > X Source checksum don't match upstream Are you sure about this one? I just downloaded it again and I get the same (4e04...) md5sum: $ wget 'http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pdcurses/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz?modtime=1220886172&big_mirror=0' --2009-01-16 09:10:47-- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pdcurses/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz?modtime=1220886172&big_mirror=0 Resolving downloads.sourceforge.net... 216.34.181.60 Connecting to downloads.sourceforge.net|216.34.181.60|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found Location: http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pdcurses/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz [following] --2009-01-16 09:10:48-- http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pdcurses/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz Resolving surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net... 130.59.138.20, 2001:620:0:1b::20 Connecting to surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net|130.59.138.20|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 331253 (323K) [application/x-tar] Saving to: `PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz' 100%[======================================>] 331,253 222K/s in 1.5s 2009-01-16 09:10:50 (222 KB/s) - `PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz' saved [331253/331253] $ md5sum PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz 4e04e4412d1b1392a7f9a489b95b331a PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160916.n0G9GxnM018704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:16:57 EDT --- I will take this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160918.n0G9IPfI004028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 04:18:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.noarch.rpm > mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/term.h Actually I will correct the executable perms on these header files before uploading. The executable perms on the library files should be OK though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160943.n0G9h0vp008739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:42:59 EDT --- $ rpmlint Download/mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-readline.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/keymaps.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libhistory.dll.a mingw32-readline.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libhistory.dll.a mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/rlconf.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/tilde.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/rlstdc.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/history.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/rltypedefs.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/chardefs.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/readline/readline.h mingw32-readline.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libreadline.dll.a mingw32-readline.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libreadline.dll.a mingw32-readline.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libreadline.dll.a mingw32-readline.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libhistory.dll.a mingw32-readline.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 Should be ok, because of the cross compiler nature of the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160948.n0G9mavq024419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:48:35 EDT --- I will take this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160946.n0G9kbq2024252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:46:35 EDT --- MUST: * package must match the upstream source e39331f32ad14009b9ff49cc10c5e751 readline-5.2.tar.gz (SRPM) e39331f32ad14009b9ff49cc10c5e751 readline-5.2.tar.gz (upstream) * package is named appropriately mingw32-* * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * no license text included in package * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager, Vendor ,Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * /sbin/ldconfig used in packages containing libraries. no native libs * GUI app, has .desktop file and uses desktop-file-install to install it. not a gui app * header files goes into -devel sub-package. no native header files * *.so goes into -devel sub-package. no *.so files * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * The spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang ) no locales * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * %defattrs present * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * packages is following the MinGW guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901160954.n0G9sZbg025501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 04:54:34 EDT --- $ rpmlint Download/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gdbm.h mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.la mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. Looks like false positives, because of the cross compiler nature of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161000.n0GA0hbw026967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 05:00:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-readline Short Description: MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161002.n0GA2vb9012526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 05:02:55 EDT --- MUST: * package must match the upstream source cd543862287f55ad66e62cc9d82cc906 gdbm-1.8.0.tar.gz (upstream) cd543862287f55ad66e62cc9d82cc906 gdbm-1.8.0.tar.gz (srpm) * package is named appropriately mingw32-* * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * no license text included in package * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager, Vendor ,Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * /sbin/ldconfig used in packages containing libraries. no native libs * GUI app, has .desktop file and uses desktop-file-install to install it. not a gui app * header files goes into -devel sub-package. no native header files * *.so goes into -devel sub-package. no *.so files * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * The spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang ) no locales * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * %defattrs present * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * packages is following the MinGW guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161012.n0GACNMb029391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 05:12:22 EDT --- i will take this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161016.n0GAGaSN015289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 05:16:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gdbm Short Description: MinGW port of GNU database routines Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161016.n0GAGq85030286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 05:16:51 EDT --- $ rpmlint Download/mingw32-freetype-2.3.7-5.fc10.src.rpm mingw32-freetype.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: freetype-2.1.10-enable-ft2-bci.patch mingw32-freetype.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: freetype-2.3.0-enable-spr.patch mingw32-freetype.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch3: freetype-2.2.1-enable-valid.patch mingw32-freetype.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch4: freetype-2.2.1-memcpy-fix.patch 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Patches should be applied or removed from spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161018.n0GAITY3015529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 05:18:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:30:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161030.n0GAUBxI032700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #6 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 05:30:10 EDT --- if the patch issue is handled, then i will remove the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161026.n0GAQr4Q032091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 05:26:52 EDT --- MUST: * package must match the upstream source 83306194817ebdea554133b4232a34aa freetype-2.3.7.tar.bz2 (SRPM) 83306194817ebdea554133b4232a34aa freetype-2.3.7.tar.bz2 2ba135e6a126ed86e9b462167511ced8 freetype-doc-2.3.7.tar.bz2 (SRPM) 2ba135e6a126ed86e9b462167511ced8 freetype-doc-2.3.7.tar.bz2 * package is named appropriately mingw32-* * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * no license text included in package * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager, Vendor ,Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * /sbin/ldconfig used in packages containing libraries. no native libs * GUI app, has .desktop file and uses desktop-file-install to install it. not a gui app * header files goes into -devel sub-package. no native header files * *.so goes into -devel sub-package. no *.so files * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * The spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang ) no locales * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * %defattrs present * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * packages is following the MinGW guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161029.n0GATG77032307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #5 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 05:29:15 EDT --- rpmlint ../rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-freetype-2.3.7-5.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/freetype-config mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftcid.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftmm.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ttunpat.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftheader.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftsizes.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftcache.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/fttypes.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftstdlib.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftstroke.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/fttrigon.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/t1tables.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/ft2build.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftotval.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/fterrdef.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftrender.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftsnames.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftlist.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftconfig.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftgzip.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftmodapi.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftchapters.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftxf86.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftgasp.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftlzw.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftmoderr.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftbbox.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftimage.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftbdf.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.dll.a mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.dll.a mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftoption.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftgxval.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftlcdfil.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftglyph.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftsynth.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/fterrors.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/tttags.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftincrem.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftsystem.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftoutln.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftpfr.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ttnameid.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftbitmap.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftmodule.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftmac.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.la mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/ftwinfnt.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/freetype2/freetype/tttables.h mingw32-freetype.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.dll.a mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 52 warnings. Look like false positives, because of the cross compiler nature of the packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: <bug-283081-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-283081-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161037.n0GAb0wP019085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net, | |nsantos at redhat.com --- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-16 05:36:54 EDT --- > Requires: pcre > Requires: postgresql-libs > Requires: openssl > Requires: krb5-libs > Requires: gsoap All these ought to be removed in favour of the automatic dependencies on the library SONAMEs. It's not very obvious, but the review guidelines mention it in the packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480215] Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer In-Reply-To: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161055.n0GAtfVf005554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480215 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-16 05:55:40 EDT --- "Serial line sniffer (slsnif). slsnif is a serial port logging utility." is not OK. I suggest "Serial line sniffer (slsnif) is a serial port logging utility." How can I test the applications, short of manually creating /dev/pty? strace says: open("/dev/ptyp0", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/dev/ptyp1", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/dev/ptyp2", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/dev/ptyp3", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/dev/ptyp4", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/dev/ptyp5", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) [...] open("/dev/ptyTe", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/dev/ptyTf", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) dup(2) = 4 fcntl(4, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 5), ...}) = 0 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2aaaaaaad000 lseek(4, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) write(4, "Failed to open a pty: No such fi"..., 48Failed to open a pty: No such file or directory and the application dies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161054.n0GAs3CP005031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 05:54:01 EDT --- REVIEW: [+] = OK [-] = NOT OK [1] = SEE COMMENTS [?] = WTF? =========================== [+] source files match upstream: sha1: 0b691107a23554d927987d4ddfca6e84dfd85313 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. LGPLv2+ [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1058151 [+] package installs properly. [1] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [2] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. ============================ COMMENTS 1: not silent. mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/dlfcn.h mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.dll.a mingw32-dlfcn.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 Those are fine thought (package used for cross compiling) 2: header is present, but its fine (cross compile package) ============================ Package looks good => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 10:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480215] Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer In-Reply-To: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480215-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161058.n0GAw4XL023359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480215 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-16 05:58:03 EDT --- Uhm, and it cannot use different parity types ? My PBX requires very specific settings, defaults never work... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 11:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161136.n0GBa5eG031096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 06:36:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-dlfcn Short Description: Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 11:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161137.n0GBbLsM031314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 11:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161137.n0GBbKUT031277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478640 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 06:37:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > if the patch issue is handled, then i will remove the package. Heh, hope you meant "approve" :-) In hindsight, this package was a bit of a mess, so I have made lots of improvements in the new version, including using all the patches. Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/freetype/mingw32-freetype.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Jan 16 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 2.3.8-1 - New upstream version 2.3.8. - Use the patches from the Fedora native package. - Disable patented code. - Don't build the static library. - Use _smp_mflags. - BR mingw32-dlfcn (not required, but uses it if installed). - Add license file to doc section. $ rpmlint mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch.rpm | grep -v devel-file-in-non-devel-package mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.dll.a mingw32-freetype.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.la mingw32-freetype.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libfreetype.dll.a mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 These can all be ignored. (Note that the MinGW packaging guidelines allow the *.la file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 11:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161141.n0GBfmAh014588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 06:41:46 EDT --- dlfcn (bug 478640) has now been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161205.n0GC595E019341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Luk?? Tinkl <ltinkl at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ltinkl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161218.n0GCIIc8007411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 07:18:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > dlfcn (bug 478640) has now been approved. I know, because I was the one who reviewed it ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161242.n0GCgNDe012432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 07:42:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-SDL Short Description: MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 13:55:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161355.n0GDtIx9011812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 08:55:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-libasyncns Short Description: Python binding for libasyncns Owners: mcepl Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 14:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161455.n0GEt5PT026814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #17 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 09:55:04 EDT --- Source matches upstream 58a2bc6d39c0ba57823034d55d65d606 gettext-0.17.tar.gz (upstream) 58a2bc6d39c0ba57823034d55d65d606 gettext-0.17.tar.gz (srpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 14:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161452.n0GEqLYl026055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 09:52:20 EDT --- I will take this one too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 14:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161453.n0GErvmu026322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #16 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 09:53:54 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-gettext-0.17-6.fc10.src.rpm (SRPM) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-gettext-0.17-6.fc10.noarch.rpm (RPMS) mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/bindtextdomain.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/xgettext.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgfilter.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/dgettext.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/autopoint.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/dcgettext.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/gettext.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgcat.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgcomm.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msginit.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgconv.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgen.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/envsubst.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msggrep.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/dngettext.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msguniq.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/textdomain.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgmerge.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgunfmt.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgattrib.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgexec.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/gettext.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/bind_textdomain_codeset.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/dcngettext.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3/ngettext.3 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/gettextize.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/recode-sr-latin.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgcmp.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/ngettext.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: manpage-not-gzipped /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/msgfmt.1 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/finddomain.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/gettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/dgettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/ngettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/localename.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/textdomain.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-objc-gnustep/AppController.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/hellowindow.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/osdep.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-php/hello.php "@PHP@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-php/hello.php 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/langprefs.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/loadmsgcat.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextpo.la mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/config.sub 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/missing 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/vasnprintf.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/intl-compat.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/vasnprintf.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/bindtextdom.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/plural-exp.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/explodename.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/plural.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/compile 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/printf-args.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/plural-exp.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/mkinstalldirs 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/dngettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/printf-parse.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/config.pl 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/build-aux/javaexec.sh.in 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/build-aux/csharpcomp.sh.in 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/wprintf-parse.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/localealias.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libasprintf.la mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-guile/hello.scm "@GUILE@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-guile/hello.scm 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gettext-po.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/hash-string.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/hash-string.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/version.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/config.guess 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextsrc.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextsrc.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-perl/hello-1.pl.in "@PERL@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-perl/hello-1.pl.in 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/relocatable.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-tcl/hello.tcl "@TCLSH@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-tcl/hello.tcl 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/eval-plural.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextpo.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextpo.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/gettext.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextlib.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextlib.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/l10nflist.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/os2compat.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/tsearch.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/lock.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/lock.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/printf-args.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/intl-exports.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/ylwrap 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextsrc.la mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/cvs-clean.pl 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/vasnwprintf.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c-gnome/hello.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/os2compat.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/tsearch.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/printf-parse.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/dcigettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libintl.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/build-aux/csharpexec.sh.in 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/printf.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/loadinfo.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libintl.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/am_edit 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/detect-autoconf.sh 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/relocatable.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-gawk/hello.awk "@GAWK@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-gawk/hello.awk 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/xsize.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libasprintf.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libasprintf.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c/hello.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-perl/hello-2.pl.in "@PERL@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-perl/hello-2.pl.in 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/build-aux/javacomp.sh.in 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/dcngettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-objc-gnustep/Hello.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/cvs.sh 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/install-sh 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextlib.la mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/gettextP.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-tcl-tk/hello.tcl "@WISH@" mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-tcl-tk/hello.tcl 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/localcharset.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/localcharset.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/debianrules 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/log.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/dcgettext.c mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/gmo.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-sh/hello.sh 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/conf.change.pl 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/gettext/examples/hello-c++-kde/admin/depcomp 0644 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/autosprintf.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gettext/intl/export.h mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libintl.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextlib.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextpo.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgettextsrc.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libasprintf.dll.a mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en at boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en at boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en at quot/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en at quot/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo mingw32-gettext.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-tools.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 43 errors, 173 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 14:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161458.n0GEwWcx013077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #18 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 09:58:30 EDT --- rpmlint is a little noicy, but it looks like false positives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 15:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161506.n0GF6X7s015587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 10:06:30 EDT --- MUST: * package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines mingw32-* * spec file name match base package * package meet Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines * License field match the actual license. * available license(s) file(s) is included in %doc. * spec file is written in American English. * spec file is legible. * package compile on x86 * build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires * no linux locales * no shared libs * package not relocatable * package own all directories that it creates. * no duplicate files in the %files listing. * Permissions on files must be set properly. (%defattr(...) line) * %clean section present and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) * package is consistently using macros * package contain code, or permissable content * no large doc * %doc does not affect runtime * no linux headers * no static libs * no *.pc files * no *.so.* libs * no -devel packages * package dont contain .la libtool archives. * not a GUI app. * no files or directories already owned by other packages. * %install begins with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) * filenames is valid UTF-8 SHOULD: * source package include license text(s) in separate file from upstream ? builds in mock. I have not tried, but I don't think it is a problem * no scriptlets * no subpackages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 15:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161548.n0GFmID2024954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 10:48:15 EDT --- Tim, thanks for looking at these. When I upload this package, I will upload one which removes the man pages, which should result in a less verbose rpmlint. The man pages are available in the native Fedora package, so they are not required here as well. Spec file: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gettext/mingw32-gettext.spec * Fri Jan 16 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.17-7 - Remove the manpages - already available in base Fedora gettext-devel. - Use _smp_mflags for build. - Added list of potential BRs. - Added license file to doc section. ------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gettext Short Description: GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226638] Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem In-Reply-To: <bug-226638-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226638-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161601.n0GG1j5F009837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226638 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 11:01:41 EDT --- Alright, lets pick this old merge review up, because I think we can beat it into shape. The biggest item that I see here is that there is an embedded update "script". That would make a lot more sense to have it live as a Source file, especially since it is not using any rpm macros. It would also simplify the rpm spec file quite a bit. There is the question as to whether this script (and the %pre copy) are still necessary in Fedora. If you think so, please keep them, if not, please remove them both from the package. Please add an empty %build section. Also, %dir %{_bindir}/xorg-x11-filesystem-upgrade is just wrong. That's a script, not a directory. The last issue is that there seems to be fair bit of directory ownership duplication in the xorg stack. /usr/lib/X11: filesystem, xorg-x11-filesystem /usr/include/X11/: xorg-x11-filesystem, libfontenc-devel, libxkbfile-devel, libXdmcp-devel, libXfixes-devel, libICE-devel, libSM-devel, libXau-devel, libXt-devel, libXpm-devel, libXmu-devel, libXft-devel, libXv-devel, libXcursor-devel, libXvMC-devel, libXaw-devel, libXevie-devel, libXres-devel, libXfont-devel, libXcomposite-devel, libXrender-devel, libXdamage-devel, xorg-x11-xtrans-devel, libX11-devel, libXrandr-devel, xorg-x11-proto-devel /usr/share/X11: xorg-x11-filesystem, xorg-x11-server-utils, xorg-x11-font-utils, xorg-x11-utils, imake, libX11, xkeyboard-config If we don't need the upgrade script anymore, do we need this package anymore? Could we let filesystem own /usr/lib/X11 and /usr/share/X11, xorg-x11-proto-devel own /usr/include/X11 (and all those other dupes should Require: xorg-x11-proto-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-473835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161608.n0GG8bor011208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #1 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-16 11:08:36 EDT --- Home page of project: http://autoarchive.sourceforge.net/ File Section on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=239510 Analysis Report ================ ** OK ** - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint -i -v SPECS/autoarchive.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i -v ~/Download/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm autoarchive.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ** OK ** - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. Package name "autoarchive" is acceptable and does not yet exist in the list of registered packages. ** OK ** - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. ** OK ** - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv3+) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. ** FIX ** - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. ** OK ** The file COPYING matches the spec License line. !! Warning !! The file PKG-INFO mentions as license GNU GPL which does not match GPLv3+ !! Warning !! The source files do not match the license: # archiver.py # # Project: AutoArchive # License: GNU GPL ** OK ** - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. ** OK ** - MUST: The spec file is in American English. ** OK ** - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. ** OK ** - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by e5d447c99c056027778ea7abf4d4c91e Download/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 8cede45be633221fca031b4825ede1ea Download/autoarchive-0.1.1.tar.bz2 extracted tarball (from rpm -ivh ~/Download/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm) equals: $ md5sum autoarchive-0.1.1.tar.bz2 8cede45be633221fca031b4825ede1ea autoarchive-0.1.1.tar.bz2 ** OK ** - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 $ rpmbuild -ba ../SPECS/autoarchive.spec error: Failed build dependencies: python-setuptools-devel is needed by autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.noarch $ grep Requires ../SPECS/autoarchive.spec BuildRequires: python BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel (first installing python-setuptools-devel) $ rpmbuild -ba ../SPECS/autoarchive.spec succeeds. $ rpmlint -v -i RPMS/noarch/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm autoarchive.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ** N/A ** - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. ** OK ** - MUST: Not all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires: $ rpm -qp --requires RPMS/noarch/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 !! Warning !! Not all Requirements are listed - lzma seems to be used and is not part of the Packaging/FullExceptionList (it is up to you to decide). ** OK ** - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. ** N/A ** - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ** N/A ** - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. ** OK ** - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. $ rpm -qpl RPMS/noarch/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/aa /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/aautils.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/aautils.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/aautils.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/archive_spec.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/archive_spec.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/archive_spec.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/archiver.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/archiver.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/archiver.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/meta.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/meta.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/meta.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/options.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/options.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/AutoArchive/options.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/autoarchive-0.1.1-py2.5.egg-info /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1 /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1/COPYING /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1/NEWS /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1/README /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1/README.sk /usr/share/man/man1/aa.1.gz ** OK ** - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ** OK ** - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. ** OK ** - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}. ** OK ** - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ** OK ** - MUST: The package contains code, no content. ** N/A ** - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. ** OK ** - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. ** N/A ** - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ** N/A ** - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. ** N/A **- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. ** N/A ** - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ** N/A ** - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =%{version}-%{release} ** OK ** - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. ** N/A ** - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ** OK ** - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ** OK ** - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. ** FIX ** - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. $ file /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1/COPYING /usr/share/doc/autoarchive-0.1.1/COPYING: ASCII English text Keeping the original date/time of documentation file is probably a good idea (no guidelines about this) A simple solution : # Convert to utf-8 for file in COPYING NEWS README README.sk; do mv $file timestamp iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o $file timestamp touch -r timestamp $file done ** N/A ** - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. ** N/A ** - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. ** OK ** - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. $ mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm builds are succssfully. ** OK ** - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. $ koji build --arch=i386 --scratch dist-f10 ../../SRPMS/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../../SRPMS/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:02 24.74 KiB 10.11 KiB/sec Created task: 1058745 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1058745 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1058745 build (dist-f10, autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm): free 1058745 build (dist-f10, autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1058746 buildArch (autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm, i386): free 1058746 buildArch (autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm, i386): free -> open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1058746 buildArch (autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1058745 build (dist-f10, autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm): open (x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1058745 build (dist-f10, autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm) completed successfully ** OK ** - SHOULD: The package functions as described. $ cat .my_config.aa # AutoArchive file for users configuration files [General] name: users-config path: /home/makerpm include_files: .* include_files: * exclude_files: *.gz [makerpm at localhost ~]$ aa .my_config.aa /usr/bin/aa: *.gz: No such file or directory ** N/A **- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. ** N/A ** - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ** N/A ** - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. ** N/A ** - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - Would be nice to provide some example config-files with extention .aa - command name "aa" does not remind me of "autoarchive", perhaps better use autoarchive - The name autoarchiver is sometimes written as AutoArchiver. Why the difference? - FIX the above mentioned items - Summary line (in spec file) is a bit simplistic "Simple backup tool". Does not give me any hint about autoarchiver. Please give a better summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:43:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161643.n0GGhxWc018829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-16 11:43:57 EDT --- Well, - Divide a bit long %changelog line into two or so. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (xtvd) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:44:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480356] New: Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480356 Summary: Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-mi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-mi-0.20080630-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Maori thesaurus as used by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480355] New: Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480355 Summary: Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-it.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-it-2.0.9l-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Italian thesaurus as used by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 17:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161704.n0GH420Q023538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-16 12:04:01 EDT --- (As I said in my comment 1, anyway I will postpone approving this package until Jan 21 to see if someone knowing security issues well may post some comments on this bug) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 17:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161701.n0GH1aGp023150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-16 12:01:33 EDT --- It seems you reversed the following? (In reply to comment #2) > For 0.0.1-1: > > * Documents > - README.txt should be marked as %doc. What I mean is that %files should be ------------------------------------ %dir %{geminstdir} %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* %{geminstdir}/*/ ------------------------------------ or so. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-tlsmail) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 17:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161704.n0GH4J4W010000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 12:04:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > $ md5sum PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz > > 65c9b1d4c5ef3e031039da620d6199ee PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz (upstream) > > 4e04e4412d1b1392a7f9a489b95b331a rpmbuild/SOURCES/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz (SRPM) > > > > X Source checksum don't match upstream > > Are you sure about this one? I just downloaded it again and > I get the same (4e04...) md5sum: Ok, the must have been some download error :) 4e04e4412d1b1392a7f9a489b95b331a PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz 4e04e4412d1b1392a7f9a489b95b331a /home/tim/rpmbuild/SOURCES/PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz * Source match upstream APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 17:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161710.n0GHAK2E025018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-16 12:10:18 EDT --- Sources matches upstream: 6cf31a08826715a0d16ae366da9c7d3b freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2 6cf31a08826715a0d16ae366da9c7d3b /home/tim/rpmbuild/SOURCES/freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2 de1cc7cf098e11fba5898efdab1bc23d freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2 de1cc7cf098e11fba5898efdab1bc23d /home/tim/rpmbuild/SOURCES/freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2 The rest of the new spec looks fine. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 17:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: JRosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161715.n0GHFvYn012487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 12:15:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/jrosetta.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jrosetta-1.0.1-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: A common base to build a graphical console I'm reverting back to jrosetta as package named as the .jar files are named jrosetta*.jar anyway. Im' not bumping the release since they were not a package named jrosetta 1.0.2 previously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161804.n0GI4diM021469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #21 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-16 13:04:35 EDT --- I suggest to add Require: libxml++-devel to synfig-devel subpackage, otherwise synfigstudio won't build (pkg-config fails in mockroot due to missing libxml++-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161804.n0GI4DBd021379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #11 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 13:04:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > It seems you reversed the following? > > (In reply to comment #2) > > For 0.0.1-1: > > > > * Documents > > - README.txt should be marked as %doc. > > What I mean is that %files should be > ------------------------------------ > %dir %{geminstdir} > %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* > %{geminstdir}/*/ > ------------------------------------ > or so. > > Other things are okay. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (rubygem-tlsmail) is APPROVED by mtasaka > ------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks. I've changed the RPM per your final suggestions. Thank you, and I'll begin your review tomorro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161807.n0GI7XHA003820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 13:07:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-tlsmail Short Description: This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls Owners: mcpierce Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161816.n0GIGDKn005684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 13:16:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-pdcurses Short Description: Curses library for MinGW Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161816.n0GIGIhX005716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-freetype - MinGW |mingw32-freetype - Free and |Windows Freetype library |portable font rendering | |engine Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 13:16:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-freetype Short Description: Free and portable font rendering engine Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] New: Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. Message-ID: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 Summary: Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/cilk.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/cilk-5.4.6-1.src.rpm Description: Cilk (pronounced 'silk') is a language for multithreaded parallel programming based on ANSI C. Cilk is designed for general-purpose parallel programming, but it is especially effective for exploiting dynamic, highly asynchronous parallelism, which can be difficult to write in data-parallel or message-passing style. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161845.n0GIj4YQ030243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-16 13:45:02 EDT --- Well, currenly I make this package blocked by FE-Legal This package itself is under GPLv2+, however - This package also depends (BRs) on skinlf and l2fprod-common - skinlf (bug 469471, already imported into Fedora) is under "ASL 2.0 and zlib and ASL 1.1" - I checked l2fprod-common (bug 475017) and actually this is under "ASL 2.0 and ASL 1.1" - And ASL 1.1 is not compatible with GPLv2+: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing So: - Would you ask l2fprod-common upstream to relicense all files under ASL 1.1 to ASL 2.0? - And also would you ask skinlf upstream to do so? By the way ASL 1.1 is this: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 18:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161847.n0GIlRwR012842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-16 13:47:25 EDT --- Blocking FE-Legal. This package itself is okay (ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0), however ASL 1.1 conflicts with GPLv2+ (i.e. tvbrowser, bug 472144) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 19:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] New: Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger Message-ID: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Summary: Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmforbes at linuxtx.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.linuxtx.org/rpms/python-epdb/python-epdb.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxtx.org/rpms/python-epdb/python-epdb-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: python-epdb is an extended python debugger with support for things such as showmethods and showdata. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 19:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161959.n0GJxZuu027648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 19:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161959.n0GJxaMs027678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162000.n0GK0nBg013895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #31 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-16 15:00:47 EDT --- Okay, I'm getting excited now. Thanks to the new version of publican I now have an SRPM and a SPEC file that look good (I think) and the rpmbuild passes the rpmlint test. SPEC URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US-1.0-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 19:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901161958.n0GJwgUA013193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 14:58:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Local build fails with: > gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o .libs/libchamplain-scan > .libs/libchamplain-scan.o > -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lclutter-cairo-0.8 > -lclutter-glx-0.8 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 > -lpango-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo > -lsoup-2.4 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 > ../../champlain/.libs/libchamplain-0.2.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 > creating libchamplain-scan > gtk-doc: Running scanner libchamplain-scan > Scan failed: > make[2]: *** [scan-build.stamp] Error 255 > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD/libchamplain-0.2.8/docs/reference' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD/libchamplain-0.2.8' > make: *** [all] Error 2 It is strange, but I tried this on an updated Fedora 10 x86_64 system and on Koji against the dist-f11 tag and both passed. Here is the relevant portion from a rpmbuild on my Fedora 10 x86_64 system: [...] gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o .libs/libchamplain-scan .libs/libchamplain-scan.o -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lclutter-cairo-0.8 -lclutter-glx-0.8 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo -lsoup-2.4 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ../../champlain/.libs/libchamplain-0.2.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 creating libchamplain-scan gtk-doc: Running scanner libchamplain-scan touch scan-build.stamp gtk-doc: Rebuilding template files [...] Which version of Fedora did you try? > ToDO. > > you can wrote > > %{_includedir}/%{name}-0.2/ > > [...] > > and > > %{_datadir}/champlain/ Actually, I do not do that with directories created by the package to avoid being suprised by the addition or removal of an important sub-directory in a new upstream release. In a way this is merely a personal preference which I follow in almost all my packages. I hope that it goes well with the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:05:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: <bug-226659-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226659-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162005.n0GK5TI1029646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 15:05:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226314] Merge Review: prctl In-Reply-To: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162006.n0GK6O4u015131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226314 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 15:06:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: <bug-447738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-447738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162013.n0GKDsgF031339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) --- Comment #18 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 15:13:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > SPEC URL: > http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs/libzypp/libzypp.spec;hb=HEAD > SRPM URL: > http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/libzypp-4.28.24.1-1.fc10.src.rpm These URLs are not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: <bug-442714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162012.n0GKCxEo016674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) --- Comment #40 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 15:12:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > SPEC URL: > http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec;hb=HEAD > SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm These URLs are not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476440-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162020.n0GKKYov018336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 15:20:33 EDT --- latexdiff-0.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/latexdiff-0.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162027.n0GKRnQZ001858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 zhenya <zhenyaZhukova at mail.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zhenyaZhukova at mail.ru --- Comment #16 from zhenya <zhenyaZhukova at mail.ru> 2009-01-16 15:27:47 EDT --- Very useful files search engine. <a href=http://indexoffiles.com>Indexoffiles.com </a> is a search engine designed to search files in various file sharing and uploading sites -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162031.n0GKVdGm020378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-16 15:31:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xtvd Short Description: A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 20:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162048.n0GKmbQQ023585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #41 from MartinG <gronslet at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 15:48:32 EDT --- Thanks - the test repo seems to work just fine. I'm able to install: Installing: mindi x86_64 2.0.5-1.fc9 mondorescue 218 k mondo x86_64 2.2.8-1.fc9 mondorescue 900 k Installing for dependencies: afio x86_64 2.5-1.fc9 mondorescue 75 k buffer x86_64 1.19-4.fc9 mondorescue 22 k mindi-busybox i386 1.7.3-1.fc9 mondorescue 244 k mtools x86_64 3.9.11-4.fc9 fedora 212 k syslinux x86_64 3.61-2.fc9 fedora 770 k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: JRosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162105.n0GL5H2x009470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 --- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-16 16:05:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Spec URL: > http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/jrosetta.spec Specfile says 1.0.2, but... > SRPM URL: > http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jrosetta-1.0.1-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm this is 1.0.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225612] Merge Review: beagle In-Reply-To: <bug-225612-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225612-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162122.n0GLMvim013237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225612 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162125.n0GLPRkO013874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Justin M. Forbes <jmforbes at linuxtx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:23:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162123.n0GLNp8r030900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 16:23:49 EDT --- Updated to 0.6.1: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/libkml-0.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/libkml.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225612] Merge Review: beagle In-Reply-To: <bug-225612-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225612-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162121.n0GLLxE3030622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225612 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 16:21:57 EDT --- Okay, here comes rpmlint on the latest in rawhide: beagle.src: W: strange-permission beagle-thunderbird-update.sh 0775 Probably safe to ignore. beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-windows beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/BeagleSearch.xml beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/query-mapping.xml beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/beagled-autostart.desktop beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-applications beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/Networking.xml beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/blocate.conf beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-monodoc beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/external-filters.xml.sample beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/Daemon.xml beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-documentation beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-executables beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/FilesQueryable.xml beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-manpages Please mark all of these as %config(noreplace). beagle.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/beagle/keygrabber.py 0644 Please fix permissions on that script. beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/beagle beaglidx beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/cache/beagle beaglidx beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/beagle/indexes beaglidx beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/cache/beagle/indexes beaglidx Safe to ignore. beagle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/beagle-config beagle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/beagle/libbeagleglue.so beagle.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libbeagle Safe to ignore. Odd that it doesn't end up building against libbeagle though. beagle.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm beagle.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm Safe to ignore. beagle-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Please mark /usr/lib64/monodoc/sources/beagle-docs.* as %doc. beagle-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Safe to ignore. beagle-epiphany.x86_64: W: no-documentation beagle-epiphany.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Safe to ignore. beagle-epiphany.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/epiphany/2.24/extensions/beagle.py 0644 Please fix permissions on that script. beagle-evolution.x86_64: W: no-documentation beagle-evolution.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib beagle-firefox.x86_64: W: no-documentation Safe to ignore. beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/locale/zh-CN/contents.rdf beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/beagleAddFilter.xul beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/indexLink.xul beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/skin/classic/overlay.css beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/utils.js beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/locale/zh-CN/beagle.dtd beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/beagleAddFilter.js Are these really executable scripts? Do they need to be chmod +x? beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/locale/zh-CN/contents.rdf Please fix the end of line encoding here. sed -i 's/\r//' foo beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib beagle-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation Safe to ignore. beagle-gnome.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/beagle/libbeagleuiglue.so You should have a beagle-gnome-devel package for this one. beagle-thunderbird.x86_64: W: no-documentation beagle-thunderbird.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Safe to ignore. ***** Please make the changes that I illustrated from rpmlint, and I'll finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162144.n0GLi6sr017619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 --- Comment #5 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 16:44:04 EDT --- Pushed to updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 21:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479982-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162144.n0GLilAM017716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 --- Comment #7 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 16:44:46 EDT --- Pushed to updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 22:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:04:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162204.n0GM4cTV021849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Gabriel Somlo <somlo at cmu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 22:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162202.n0GM2qje021564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #42 from MartinG <gronslet at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 17:02:49 EDT --- ...and then I tried it, and it failed: "---FATALERROR--- Failed to generate boot+data disks" Seems to be because of this: "Unable to find mindi-busybox, please install it" Hm, read bug #187317 and understand there are some problems regarding (mindi-)buybox. This is what I've got on my system: mindi-busybox-1.7.3-1.fc9.i386 Hope this will be sorted out, good luck Bruno! In the meantime, is there a workaround anyone can suggest...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 22:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475661-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162209.n0GM9YIK023015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-16 17:09:32 EDT --- Will let it steam in rawhide a bit before importing in stable releases as it includes CJK fonts and we always seem to get them wrong at first somehow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162302.n0GN2Brq032484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: JRosetta - |Review Request: jrosetta - |A common base to build a |A common base to build a |graphical console |graphical console --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 18:02:10 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jrosetta-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162316.n0GNGRx9019513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #43 from Bruno Cornec <bruno.cornec at hp.com> 2009-01-16 18:16:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > ...and then I tried it, and it failed: > "---FATALERROR--- Failed to generate boot+data disks" > > Seems to be because of this: > "Unable to find mindi-busybox, please install it" > > Hm, read bug #187317 and understand there are some problems regarding > (mindi-)buybox. This is what I've got on my system: > mindi-busybox-1.7.3-1.fc9.i386 Which is not compatible with mondo x86_64 and mindi x86_64 You should exclude the i386 arch when using yum to get the right one I think. Maybe there is a better way to indicate that in the repo file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162340.n0GNeXD8006686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:40:32 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162341.n0GNfRpM024262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:41:26 EDT --- shcov-3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update shcov'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162341.n0GNfEsM024150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:41:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > - Please remove SystemSettings from the desktop files again, it's better for > comptatibility. Sorry for the noise, apart from that the desktop files are ok > now. Okay! Done in -5 > - rpmlint warning regarding usermode can be ignored, but the changelog could be > a little better, e. g.: "Require usermode-gtk instead of usermode for the > password dialog." But this is really trivial. Okay, you are right. > - on the fly creation of files: Your decision, you are the one to maintain the > package. ;) Okay thank you > - (How) Do we own the cron files? mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/{cron.d,cron.daily,cron-hourly,cron.monthly,cron.weekly}/ touch %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/{cron.d,cron.daily,cron-hourly,cron.monthly,cron.weekly}/%{name} %ghost %{_sysconfdir}/cron*/%{name} this should do the trick... > - Can you explain the makefile.patch a little? Why are you preventing > installation of the desktop files and the locales? i changed this part, completely! I hope you'll like it. The patch for the makefile is now only for the settings of the directories and the permission of the configfile. The makefile is damn ugly and almost unusuable. I made a mix of patching makefile and installation via spec. this was very ugly, too... locales: there are unofficial translations which are not listed in the makefile, but shipped with sbackup. why are they unofficial? These translation were made by the ubuntu-community (this project is an Ubuntu project) so they are not made by the "upstream team" and are unofficial. I added the others to use all available locales. I realized the installation of the locales with a sed command. desktop files: Now the original desktop files will be deleted and the new ones will installed. Commenting out the desktopfiles in the makefile was a bad idea. > - Provides: gvfs >= 1.0 looks bogus to me yes, you are right. This is a bogus. I removed it in -5 SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162343.n0GNhdGj007613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:43:38 EDT --- mingw32-libpng-1.2.34-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162345.n0GNjRNn008172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:45:26 EDT --- nopaste-2835-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162344.n0GNi4en007672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:44:03 EDT --- ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: <bug-477567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162344.n0GNiWWl007739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: <bug-477567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162344.n0GNiTWK024992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:44:28 EDT --- nload-0.7.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162342.n0GNgpjj024651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:42:50 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:44:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477313-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162344.n0GNi7f5024901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162342.n0GNgOYv024556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:42:24 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467397-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162343.n0GNhflG024794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications In-Reply-To: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162342.n0GNg5Rc024509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:42:04 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL-0.10-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162345.n0GNjUXq025504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467645-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162342.n0GNggtt024610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:42:41 EDT --- sugar-distance-13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-distance'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162346.n0GNkiwq008969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:46:43 EDT --- nopaste-2835-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162347.n0GNlGFr009175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:47:15 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-WWW-Curl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0663 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162348.n0GNmDUx009360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:48:12 EDT --- sugar-implode-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-implode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162347.n0GNlALd009138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:47:09 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-WWW-Curl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901162347.n0GNljfh026207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 18:47:44 EDT --- shcov-3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shcov'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0677 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 00:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170002.n0H02HWw029010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #44 from MartinG <gronslet at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 19:02:16 EDT --- Ok, I'm not sure how to exclude i386 (not even sure that is the right thing to do - some stuff relies on i386 even on 64bit), but this is what I did: 'yum remove mindi-busybox' (also removed mondo and mindi), then 'yum install mondo' (wants to install mondo.x86_64, mindi.x86_64 and mindi-busybox.i386, all from mondorescue repo). So it seems the x86_64 version is not available: "yum list mindi-busybox" shows only mindi-busybox.i386 1.7.3-1.fc9. Any hints appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 02:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170206.n0H26SW0000720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 21:06:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jpilot-backup Short Description: Enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot Owners: pcfe Branches: F-10 InitialCC: thl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170310.n0H3Akm8011257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 22:10:46 EDT --- python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170310.n0H3AoIS028913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-16 22:10:49 EDT --- python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170311.n0H3BPEW029014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:11:23 EDT --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170316.n0H3GBAt012418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:16:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170315.n0H3FEe6012183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:15:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:17:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170317.n0H3HT1W012669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:17:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170318.n0H3IZiB012842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:18:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170319.n0H3Jrb6013051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:19:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480187] Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170324.n0H3OqTx014227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480187 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:24:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170326.n0H3Q4cu014741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:26:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480186] Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170323.n0H3NAkb031406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480186 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:23:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:22:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170322.n0H3MFZm031253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:22:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170327.n0H3R2nV015022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:27:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170331.n0H3VSF0016042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:31:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170330.n0H3UIfT015771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:30:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring In-Reply-To: <bug-478771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170329.n0H3TcTR015365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170326.n0H3QkdT014952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:26:45 EDT --- Things I see right now: License field in spec matches: Fail -- The license is GPLv2+: license text in main.c and other files reads "or an other version" Package compiles and builds on at least one arch: Fail -- See these Koji logs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1060419&name=build.log "What is this? -pipe" -- near end of log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170329.n0H3T6v7015278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:29:04 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review all four packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170328.n0H3SZxe032545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:28:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170329.n0H3TVmI032739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:29:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine In-Reply-To: <bug-478770-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478770-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170329.n0H3TTeS032695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170329.n0H3TFOl032643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170336.n0H3a0dT016977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:35:59 EDT --- Problem: Spec file given and spec file in SRPM don't match. See attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170332.n0H3WZ3V016294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-16 22:32:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170340.n0H3ebac017926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:40:36 EDT --- A few more notes: - The Description doesn't seem very descriptive. Can you be more specific? - Commas clutter up the BRs and Requires fields. - Since spring-engine is a subpackage of spring with the same versioning, the requires between these packages need to be version/release specific. - The --vendor option to desktop-file-install is no longer wanted in new packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170337.n0H3b1W8002000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 22:36:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329269) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329269) md5sum and unified diff on both specfiles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 04:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170425.n0H4Pu7a010167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #3 from Tom Wisniewski <twisnie+fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 23:25:55 EDT --- Forgot to provide the new links. SRC RPM: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC FILE: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 04:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170430.n0H4UVrk026034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Bug 469811 depends on bug 479385, which changed state. Bug 479385 Summary: Updated to 3.5.21 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479385 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 04:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170440.n0H4e6em027539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #11 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 23:40:05 EDT --- jpilot-backup-0.53-5.fc10 is now in cvs and has built fine (taskID=1060518). a scratch build for dist-rawhide failed with "BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 20" is that an error on my side? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 04:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170448.n0H4mOVC013340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #10 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-16 23:48:23 EDT --- Fabian, (In reply to comment #7) > Any progress with the seeking of a sponsor? I have CVS commit rights now. Is 1.9.5-4 good (I will request a CVS module to be created if yes) or does it need more polishing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 04:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170457.n0H4vcqi030139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-16 23:57:37 EDT --- Imported in Rawhide ... will build for F-10 and F-9 once djvulibre are in stable. Need to wait for a day before building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 05:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469811-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170554.n0H5skJ9006490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Bug 469811 depends on bug 479385, which changed state. Bug 479385 Summary: Updated to 3.5.21 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479385 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 07:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170743.n0H7hqw6023381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 02:43:51 EDT --- there is a new upstream release available. but not at the specified download location. there is a link on the project homepage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 09:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480434] New: Review Request: xcall - GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio Message-ID: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xcall - GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 Summary: Review Request: xcall - GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: randyn3lrx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xcall.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xcall-0.17-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio by Joop Stakenborg <pg4i at amsat.org> 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Fri Jan 16 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject.org> 0.17-2 - Edit spec for standards - Attempt build for F9 - mock build for f9/10/devel i386 - koji scratch build f9/10/devel all arches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 09:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480435] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments Message-ID: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480435 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-MultiInitArg OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: If you've ever wanted to be able to call an attribute any number of things while you're passing arguments to your object constructor, Now You Can. The primary motivator is that I have some attributes that were named inconsistently, and I wanted to rename them without breaking backwards compatibility with my existing API. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1060872 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 09:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901170955.n0H9tlhk029842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #12 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> 2009-01-17 04:55:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > a scratch build for dist-rawhide failed with "BuildrootError: could not init > mock buildroot, mock exited with status 20" is that an error on my side? No idea without the detailed logs, but guess not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 10:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171027.n0HAR5K7002906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #45 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-17 05:27:02 EDT --- I do not want to sound rude, but Martin, none of your comments is related to package submission / review. Please be as kind as to solve your problem[s] via more appropriate channels. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 10:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480435] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments In-Reply-To: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171030.n0HAUwKl003608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480435 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-17 05:30:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 261aaebf3bf65db9c6f3da65d41e878e18730939 MooseX-MultiInitArg-0.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** but please replace %description with something more relevant. "The primary motivator is that I have some attributes that were named inconsistently, and I wanted to rename them without breaking backwards compatibility with my existing API." does not fit my bill. ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 10:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171036.n0HAabvh019904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 05:36:36 EDT --- python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 10:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480355] Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171054.n0HAscGa007603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480355 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-17 05:54:37 EDT --- * builds fine in mock * rpmlint is silent * license text included and is open source (AGPLv3+) * upstream source verified as 54ce337bae79c04fa429b003f8cb1eb82ec65d43 thesaurus2_it_02_09_l_2008_11_29.zip APPROVED but please preserve all timestamps by using: for i in th_it_IT_README th_it_IT_ChangeLog th_it_IT_AUTHORS; do iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 $i > $i.new --->>> touch -r $i.new $i <--- mv -f $i.new $i done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480356] Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171100.n0HB0YD5024309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480356 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-17 06:00:33 EDT --- * RPM name is OK * Source mythes-mi-0.1.20080630-beta.tar.gz is the same as upstream, d5c2332e6b6ccdc90ba6cd96378e9c225c4a24aa mythes-mi-0.1.20080630-beta.tar.gz * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint empty * File list looks OK * license is OK (public domain) and included in the rpm ======== APPROVED ======== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 10:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171057.n0HAvr5w008398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-17 05:57:48 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: <bug-480279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171102.n0HB2hpt024786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Reveiew for |Package Review for |gnome-globalmenu . |gnome-globalmenu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171124.n0HBOU8S013161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-17 06:24:29 EDT --- Julio, incorporate the the changes suggested in Comment #13, sooner or later somebody will make a full review and go on with the steps mentioned at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join . To get sponsored: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171127.n0HBRLqh029172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | AssignedTo|jgarzik at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-17 06:27:18 EDT --- Tom has clarified, that the legal points are solved for Fedora, removing the blocker. --- snipp --- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:53:41 -0500 From: Tom spot Callaway To: Robert Scheck Cc: Sven Lankes, Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: COPYING for ethtool On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:50 +0100, Robert Scheck wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > As Jeff has pointed out, he's not inserting COPYING, the autotool stack > > is. This is one main reason why we cannot go off the version it uses. > > GPLv3 COPYING gets stuck in all sorts of things that are not GPLv3 as a > > result. > > That's wrong. It's caused, because he's putting no COPYING there in GIT > already and thus the --add-missing at autotools are putting that into. As > far as I know, an existing COPYING gets not overwritten except with use > of maybe --force (which can be overwritten by IIRC --foreign). Well, feel free to try to convince him. We don't need this additional step for Fedora licensing. ~spot --- snapp --- To continue the review as co-maintainer, I've made multiple changes to the package, I'm suggesting the following for formal review. Update to git seems to be necessary for me as it solves some bug reports and feature requests. In order to make me and Sven happy, I've solved the COPYING thing downstream. Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ethtool.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/ethtool-6-2.20090115git.src.rpm Sven, will you go for the formal review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171151.n0HBpS4G017666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 06:51:27 EDT --- mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171152.n0HBq7SW000802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 06:52:03 EDT --- mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:54:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171154.n0HBs2ot001003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 06:54:01 EDT --- mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:55:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171155.n0HBtBMU001417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-17 06:55:09 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: e2cc807b553da0f7df337638aeb4319afd6f48db ethtool-6.tar.gz Note: this is a snapshot version [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Timestamps are not preserved 2. autoconf is already brought in by automake so it's not really needed to BR it ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171156.n0HBu64m018580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-17 06:56:05 EDT --- Comment #10 was meant for the src.rpm from #9... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171151.n0HBpmei017746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 06:51:47 EDT --- mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 11:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171154.n0HBskZO018036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 06:54:43 EDT --- mingw32-gettext-0.17-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gettext-0.17-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: <bug-451189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171320.n0HDKc7o020081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 08:20:33 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: <bug-466301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171323.n0HDN8o0020599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 08:23:06 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: <bug-470696-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470696-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171325.n0HDPBG6021183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 08:25:07 EDT --- Please let me know if there is any news from the upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171333.n0HDX0kL022752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(joseluisblancoc at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 08:32:57 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171334.n0HDYw1H022966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-17 08:34:56 EDT --- Also need to take care of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming (sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171331.n0HDViD0004981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 08:31:40 EDT --- Please submit push request also for F-9 on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171335.n0HDZG9U005712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171343.n0HDhD09024581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 08:43:12 EDT --- ethtool-6-2.20090115git.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ethtool-6-2.20090115git.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171341.n0HDfure024454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225735, which changed state. Bug 225735 Summary: Merge Review: ethtool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171341.n0HDfsdL024429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-17 08:41:52 EDT --- Manuel, thanks for doing the review. As we've spoken in IRC, preserving timestamps is not supported in GIT. Seems that old-style CVS and SVN have a useful feature more at that point rather the cool GIT... ;-) I've commited my updates into CVS, tagged and built packages from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225735-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171343.n0HDhBLm006902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 08:43:10 EDT --- ethtool-6-2.20090115git.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ethtool-6-2.20090115git.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:53:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171353.n0HDr0XW026601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dpierce at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] New: Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor Message-ID: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 Summary: Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/gaupol.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Editor for text-based subtitle files. It supports multiple subtitle file formats and provides means of correcting texts and timing subtitles to match video. The user interface is designed with attention to batch processing of multiple documents and convenience of translating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:52:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171352.n0HDqCDO008846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpierce at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171420.n0HEKL6J031902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171420.n0HEKB8Y014093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 --- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> 2009-01-17 09:20:10 EDT --- No license file is included in the .gem. Can you ask the upstream to put a COPYING or LICENSE file into the gem? Not a negative on the review, but a suggestion for upstream if you could pass it along. In the spec the file hoe.rb is deleted. Is this package dependant on hoe? You should add rubygem(hoe) as a dependency. The install target directory used is the relative path "./" rather than %{buildroot} macro. Please fix that. Perhaps I'm misreading, but I don't see where the RPM claims to own %{geminstdir}, instead it just lists the contents of that directory. Can you make it more explicit? For the subpackage ruby-nokogiri, the Requires: does not match the packaging guidelines: the guideline says the non-gem should require "rubygem(%{name})", but the spec file has "%{name}". Please fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171419.n0HEJ007013710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Bug 467416 depends on bug 467397, which changed state. Bug 467397 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-17 09:18:58 EDT --- I see you've used these commands in the %install phase: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mingw32_libdir}/charset.alias rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mingw32_libdir}/libcairo.a Why is the charset.alias file removed? Why haven't you used %configure --disable-static to prevent building the static library? Do we really want to pull in freetype and fontconfig as a dependency? Cairo provides a native Win32 implementation for font rendering, so I guess adding a dependency on freetype and fontconfig only introduces unnecessary bloat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171421.n0HELXiW032148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-17 09:21:32 EDT --- as discussed on IRC, make build in devel worked, so a problem with scratch closing NEXTRELEASE as per step 13 of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474768-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171429.n0HETI41000707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 09:29:18 EDT --- jpilot-backup-0.53-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jpilot-backup-0.53-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171448.n0HEmgCp018682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com> 2009-01-17 09:48:40 EDT --- Thanks, I owe you a beverage of your choice ;-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ris-linux Short Description: RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F9 F-10 InitialCC: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171454.n0HEs1as005027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-17 09:53:59 EDT --- Dan Berrange is probably in a better position to comment on these questions since he did the original packaging. > Why haven't you used %configure --disable-static to prevent building the static > library? Yes, that's a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:56:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171456.n0HEu5FL005582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-17 09:56:03 EDT --- > I'll go ahead and review all four package Thanks ! > Problem: Spec file given and spec file in SRPM don't match. See attachment. Oops, sorry about that. Looks like I made a last-minute update to the srpm and I forgot to re-upload the spec file. The dependency on spring-maps-default should be there. > The Description doesn't seem very descriptive. Can you be more specific? OK, I've tried to add a few lines from Wikipedia, and I've added a README.Fedora file. > Commas clutter up the BRs and Requires fields. Well, actually I kind of like it like that, it make separation clearer when using versioned requires. But I don't care very much... :) > - Since spring-engine is a subpackage of spring with the same versioning, > the requires between these packages need to be version/release specific. Hmm, I'm not sure, because the "spring" package here is just a meta-package to pull all needed package to play the game. The meta-package in itself does not care which version of the spring-engine is installed. It's not like -devel subpackages. It's not a problem to add the version either, so if you really feel it should be a versioned dependency, I'll add it. > The --vendor option to desktop-file-install is no longer wanted in new packages. Oh, thanks, I missed that. > There is a new upstream release available Woot ! Updated, thanks. New SRPM: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171454.n0HEsI8F019624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zprikryl at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-17 09:54:15 EDT --- Adding Zdenek Prikryl (zprikryl), seems currently to be the maintainer. So lets go for beginning the review: [ DONE ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result/gpm-* gpm.src:17: E: prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/install-info gpm.src:459: W: macro-in-%changelog config gpm.src:518: W: macro-in-%changelog preun gpm.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A mouse server for the Linux console. gpm.src: W: strange-permission gpm.init 0755 gpm.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gpm-1.20.5/TODO gpm.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A mouse server for the Linux console. gpm.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 gpm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 gpm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 gpm.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gpm gpm.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gpm gpm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gpm-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A mouse server for the Linux console. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 13 warnings. $ [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption [FAILED] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines -> See below for details [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> 3915bdd6bf947ef867752a30b4be2387 gpm-1.20.5.tar.gz -> 3915bdd6bf947ef867752a30b4be2387 gpm-1.20.5.tar.gz.1 -> 71ee9125414e5a4c3916c5f5f35ee76ca1397f9d gpm-1.20.5.tar.gz -> 71ee9125414e5a4c3916c5f5f35ee76ca1397f9d gpm-1.20.5.tar.gz.1 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [ OK ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. -> We're suggesting %defattr(-,root,root,-) as a should rather current [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content [ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present -> No %doc for -devel? [ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package [FAILED] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package -> Are the static libraries needed at all? [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] [ OK ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package [ OK ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I don't know how to handle the following - ideas? W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 There are more things not mentioned here yet, wait for the next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171457.n0HEvOYe020323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 09:57:22 EDT --- Thank you for initial comments. (In reply to comment #2) > No license file is included in the .gem. Can you ask the upstream to put a > COPYING or LICENSE file into the gem? Not a negative on the review, but a > suggestion for upstream if you could pass it along. - The license clause is included in README{,.ja}.txt. > In the spec the file hoe.rb is deleted. Is this package dependant on hoe? You > should add rubygem(hoe) as a dependency. - No. This is (hoe.rb) only needed for Rakefile and so not needed at runtime. > The install target directory used is the relative path "./" rather than > %{buildroot} macro. Please fix that. - In this case (i.e. in the case rubygem creates C module) the way of packaging gem into rpm is different. Actually I wrote the packaging draft and it was accepted by FPC/FESCo. Please refer to my first comment on this bug. > > Perhaps I'm misreading, but I don't see where the RPM claims to own > %{geminstdir}, instead it just lists the contents of that directory. Can you > make it more explicit? - Well, I already write this explicitly. ------------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root, root,-) %{ruby_sitearch}/%{gemname}/ %dir %{geminstdir}/ <------------------------------- %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* %{geminstdir}/[a-l]*/ ------------------------------------------------------------- > For the subpackage ruby-nokogiri, the Requires: does not match the packaging > guidelines: the guideline says the non-gem should require "rubygem(%{name})", > but the spec file has "%{name}". Please fix that. - "Requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" will pull in rubygem(%{gemname}), and this dependency is more strict than "Requires: rubygem(%{gemname})", so this should be okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171508.n0HF88qC007521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-17 10:08:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329283) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329283) Patch to solve some issues in gpm spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial In-Reply-To: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171520.n0HFKrxY009899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-17 10:20:52 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:17:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171517.n0HFHTbJ023831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-17 10:17:28 EDT --- You're currently adding "Requires: bash >= 2.0" to gpm package. Is this really needed? Bash < 2.0 existed before 1998 in Red Hat Linux - that was just before Red Hat Linux 5.2. If we still need it, please explain the need for it. Do we really need the static library? If yes, we need a -static subpackage. But personally, I don't see a need for a *.a file - can we remove it? I think, we can ignore macro-in-%changelog warnings, there's nothing which gets expanded here. Do we really need to package the TODO file as %doc? That seems to be needed for upstream, not for downstream, yes? If we need it, we have to convert it to UTF8 using e.g. the following: iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 -o TODO.utf8 TODO touch -c -r TODO TODO.utf8 mv -f TODO.utf8 TODO We can't fix W: strange-permission gpm.init 0755 as CVS won't let us do this, AFAIK. Please have a look in the future, that you're importing/adding files with the correct permissions, please (0644) - thanks. BTW, somebody an idea, what causes W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ libgpm.so.2.1.0 and how to solve it? Zdenek - please take action, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine In-Reply-To: <bug-478770-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478770-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171522.n0HFMZTV010208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 --- Comment #1 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-17 10:22:34 EDT --- * Sat Jan 17 2009 Aurelien Bompard <abompard at fedoraproject.org> 0.0.1.10387-1 - version 10387 - remove vendor from the desktop file New SRPM: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10387-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171524.n0HFO8wE010376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #31 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> 2009-01-17 10:24:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Hmmm, but it can't be the new libtool, as agg was last built in February 2008. > WTF?! Looks like Tibbs rebuilt it locally? pkgconfig(libagg) deps are fairly recent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] New: Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks Message-ID: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Summary: Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cpmtools.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package allows to access CP/M file systems similar to the well-known mtools package, which accesses MSDOS file systems. I use it for file exchange with a Z80-PC simulator, but it works on floppy devices as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 15:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: <bug-453395-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453395-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171538.n0HFc489027428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #16 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-17 10:38:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Still needs BuildRequires: zlib-devel Fixed: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-0.7.svn949.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171605.n0HG56WL032374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-17 11:05:03 EDT --- Yes, I always do a local mock build. If you want, just think of it as a predictor of problems you'll see when you next rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171614.n0HGEttG019155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 11:14:54 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171620.n0HGKXl7020236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-17 11:20:32 EDT --- Do you know if he's reading along this review ticket or should he be CC'ed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171658.n0HGw2Er025874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 11:58:02 EDT --- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1062155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171657.n0HGviQR025854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 11:57:43 EDT --- Please change the release number every time you change your spec file (In reply to comment #6) > - in %{_javadocdir} move the docs to %{name}-%{version} and make a symlink > %{name} pointing to that dir. This is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] New: Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML Message-ID: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Summary: Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/emacs-htmlize.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/emacs-htmlize-1.34-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: HTMLize is an add-on package for GNU Emacs. It converts the buffer text and the associated decorations to HTML. The conversion is quite sophisticated, it understands non-ascii characters, looks up colours in the X11 RGB database, and can generate either CSS or old style font bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171658.n0HGwrNh008280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 16:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: <bug-475471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171659.n0HGxuR7008398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 11:59:55 EDT --- Would you update the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: <bug-460727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171702.n0HH2pa0009268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 12:02:49 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171738.n0HHcMSM015537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-17 12:38:20 EDT --- Well, for 1.51-3: - I guess Solaris.README is not needed. Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (ratproxy) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171756.n0HHuBN5018779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|debarshi.ray at gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171816.n0HIG8KZ007258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-17 13:16:07 EDT --- So it's a libtool bug which should be fixed in libtool. Do you really want me to try to hack around it in agg? I'd much rather it get fixed for everyone in libtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171815.n0HIF6Pl022489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com AssignedTo|debarshi.ray at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 13:15:04 EDT --- Did not notice that you need a sponsor. Unassigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171825.n0HIPGYh024349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 13:25:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I took a look at the debain patches and as far as I could tell, the man page > that you pointed out and the security patch mentioned above were the only ones > that I think were relevant to this Fedora package. > > Both have been included. The manual pages append "WN" to the section numbers. There is a Debian patch to fix this. It will be good to have in our package too. > Umm, although i agree that naming across distributions is a good thing, I would > say naming the package as the way the original (upstream) package, is a better > thing. Not really. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming lays equal, if not more stress, on having consistency across distributions. > There are a couple of other reasons: > a. 'wordnet' is a common noun where as 'WordNet' refers to the actual package > from princeton ...don't believe me ? Ask WordNet :) ... That is not a problem. > b. Changing the %{name} in the spec file, implies that i'd have to change the > name of the included tarball Not at all. > I could still rename the package if you still think it is a good thing. Finally it is going to be yours and your sponsor's call, but I think "wordnet" is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480435] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments In-Reply-To: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171829.n0HIT0mP009217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480435 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-17 13:28:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg Short Description: Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171831.n0HIV4i2009779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 13:31:03 EDT --- + The package fails to build in a chroot: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1062215 To fix this add 'BuildRequires: libXft-devel'. + Header and lib*.so should not be a part of the main package. Instead they should be put in a -devel sub-pacakge. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Devel_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: <bug-226036-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226036-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171827.n0HIR48V009074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |caolanm at redhat.com, | |oget.fedora at gmail.com, | |walters at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 13:27:02 EDT --- I reviewed this package. There are some issues, questions and suggestions that I'll bring into your attention. * The latest version is not packaged! Please update to the latest version. * The HACKING file should be packaged, possibly in the %doc of devel ? The examples directory can go into the %doc of devel too. ? Some files in m4 and the file "missing" indicates GPLv2+ license.But I don't think these make their way into the package, so I guess BSD is good enough. * I don't think glib2-devel is required to build the package. I built an identical package in mock without BR'in glib2-devel. Some of the examples require glib2-devel. So if you are going to package those examples you'll need to require glib2-devel in the devel subpackage. * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The directory %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ is created but not owned. So the devel package should require "gtk-doc" which is the rightful owner of that directory. ! Try to make use of the %{name} macro. * From the SPEC file: # multi-jobbed make makes the build fail: # ./build_prototypes_doc >liboilfuncs-doc.h # /bin/sh: ./build_prototypes_doc: No such file or directory make %{?_smp_mflags} Isn't there a contradiction here? What is that commented-out section for? * From the SPEC file: # Disable Altivec, so that liboil doesn't SIGILL on non-Altivec PPCs # See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252179#c15 #sed -i 's/CFLAGS="$CFLAGS "-maltivec""/CFLAGS="$CFLAGS "-fno-tree-vectorize -Wa,-maltivec""/' configure #sed -i 's/LIBOIL_CFLAGS -maltivec/LIBOIL_CFLAGS -fno-tree-vectorize -Wa,-maltivec/' configure Do we still need these lines in the SPEC file? Adding Colin and Caolan to CC since they were the last two known maintainers. Sorry if this was not desired -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480435] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments In-Reply-To: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171829.n0HIT1jQ024689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480435 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 18:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171844.n0HIicJ9027382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-17 13:44:37 EDT --- Ping? My changes have still not been merged into your repo. :-( In addition, we still need to look into the optflags issue (i.e. RPM optflags are supposed to be used at least for the native Fedora parts and currently aren't). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 19:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171929.n0HJTnHr019827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 14:29:48 EDT --- Thank you Christoph New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sbackup Short Description: Simple Backup Suite for desktop use Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 19:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901171926.n0HJQnPr002552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-17 14:26:47 EDT --- Let me see: sbackup-0.10.5-5 - owns the cron files - requires gvfs - has nice desktop files - includes updated patches that now work as expected and as we figured out on irc. I see no other blockers and issues and therefore the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172002.n0HK2nmt025544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(joseluisblancoc at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #11 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 15:02:47 EDT --- Sorry for the delay... Yes, I read everything and have some things already solved, other still pending. I wanted to ask you about some small doubts: 1) Until now, I'm building rpms/srpms by invoking: "rpmbuild -ta TARBALL.tar.gz", where the .spec file is inside the tarball. I guess this is not the best practice, since any change in the spec file requires an update of the whole tarball. I've read the rpmbuild manpage but not found a command such as "rpmbuild -ta TARBALL.tar.gz <SOME-FLAG> mrpt.spec" which allows me to provide the spec file separately. Any ideas about this? 2) "Package-splitting: First of all, please explain why you want to split each library into different subpackges." I understand here the splitting into "mrpt-XXX" library packages, right? My intention is to separate dependencies, so an application (in a future package) might require only a subset of the libs. Do you want me to explicitly explain this in comments in the spec file? Again, thanks a lot for all the time you're expending on the review. I think I'll upload a new revised version by the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172014.n0HKE7DQ010567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #12 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 15:14:06 EDT --- I've solved my previous point (1) about rpmbuild and tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172025.n0HKPGtR029562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 15:25:15 EDT --- update to f10 Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xcall.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xcall-0.17-3.fc10.src.rpm * Sat Jan 17 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject.org> 0.17-3 - Update source to f-10 - fix lint error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172049.n0HKnrU4001009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 15:49:51 EDT --- FESCo believes that this is of value. However, we'd like to see iverilog or other similar tools for dealing with this content in at the same time, realizing that those tools might not be useful right now, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 22:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172205.n0HM54P2014587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-17 17:05:03 EDT --- Jochen, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 22:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: <bug-469291-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469291-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172253.n0HMrmFr022397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(paul at xelerance.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-17 17:53:46 EDT --- I'll check the things you mentioned. And of course, it built fine for me. I'm using my own package on our dev servers :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 22:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172255.n0HMtUi4005656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #8 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-17 17:55:29 EDT --- Okay, upstream has fixed the issue. I've created a package with their rc release, though I'll redo the package in a day or two when the final release is made by upstream. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.1rc1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226180] Merge Review: mysql In-Reply-To: <bug-226180-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226180-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172301.n0HN1hCK023895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226180 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com, | |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 18:01:40 EDT --- The full review arrived! * Summary and especially the description are bizarre. Can you update them. You can find these on the manpage: Xinerama - API for Xinerama extension to X11 Protocol Xinerama is a simple library designed to interface the Xinerama Extension for retrieving information about physical output devices which may be combined into a single logical X screen. * rpmlint says libXinerama.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs libXinerama.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs libXinerama.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel libXinerama.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel libXinerama.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXinerama-1.0.3/AUTHORS libXinerama.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXinerama-1.0.3/README libXinerama.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs libXinerama.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs libXinerama-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel libXinerama-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel The zero-length files are obviously not needed so they should be removed. The obsoletes look very problematic. Can you fix those (or alternatively explain them in the SPEC file as comments)? * BR: libXau-devel is not needed. Afaict it is not used. * BRs: libX11-devel pkgconfig and xorg-x11-proto-devel are not needed. They will be picked up by libXext-devel. * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). This applies to the devel package. ! Try to make use of the %{name} macro (e.g. files sections). * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. Added Adam and Matthias to CC since they are the last two known maintainers. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226075] Merge Review: libXinerama In-Reply-To: <bug-226075-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226075-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172305.n0HN5b4j024491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226075 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com, | |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 18:05:35 EDT --- The full review arrived! * Summary and especially the description are bizarre. Can you update them. You can find these on the manpage: Xinerama - API for Xinerama extension to X11 Protocol Xinerama is a simple library designed to interface the Xinerama Extension for retrieving information about physical output devices which may be combined into a single logical X screen. * rpmlint says libXinerama.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs libXinerama.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs libXinerama.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel libXinerama.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel libXinerama.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXinerama-1.0.3/AUTHORS libXinerama.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXinerama-1.0.3/README libXinerama.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs libXinerama.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs libXinerama-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel libXinerama-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel The zero-length files are obviously not needed so they should be removed. The obsoletes look very problematic. Can you fix those (or alternatively explain them in the SPEC file as comments)? * BR: libXau-devel is not needed. Afaict it is not used. * BRs: libX11-devel pkgconfig and xorg-x11-proto-devel are not needed. They will be picked up by libXext-devel. * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). This applies to the devel package. ! Try to make use of the %{name} macro (e.g. files sections). * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. Added Adam and Matthias to CC since they are the last two known maintainers. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:03:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226180] Merge Review: mysql In-Reply-To: <bug-226180-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226180-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172303.n0HN3nMb006803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226180 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC|ajax at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com | AssignedTo|oget.fedora at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 18:03:48 EDT --- Shoot! Wrong bug. Sorry for the mess. I'll review this next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226180] Merge Review: mysql In-Reply-To: <bug-226180-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226180-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172324.n0HNOvrN010560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226180 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 18:24:56 EDT --- I can't find the koji entry for the new version.. I guess it is still being worked on. fitzsim, can you provide a SRPM when you're done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172331.n0HNVfK3029445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jmforbes at linuxtx. | |org) --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> 2009-01-17 18:31:39 EDT --- Spec looks very clean This appears to be a noarch package, there is no compiled code in the python modules. Add a BuildArch: noarch so that this builds noarch. Once that's done, rpmlint is silent. epdb/telnetclient.py is unlicensed, unlike other files, should probably put a copyright/license on it. Upstream sha256sums match. -- Summary -- Add BuildArch: noarch to make this a noarch package Perhaps get upstream to apply a copyright/license on epdb/telnetclient.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172337.n0HNbrVj030488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 18:37:51 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901172339.n0HNdWhr030641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-17 18:39:31 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 00:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180010.n0I0Axq4003795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #22 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-17 19:10:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Please submit push request also for F-9 on bodhi. When I tried to submit updates on bodhi I kept getting 500 server errors. I'll try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 00:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180015.n0I0Fx8Z004657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #23 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-17 19:15:58 EDT --- Ok, bodhi thinks that "gfan-0.3-3.fc9 update already exists!" But it doesn't show up in the list nor do searches show anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 00:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180056.n0I0uRWh026284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 19:56:26 EDT --- I'll review this package but please update to the latest version first (2.4.4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 01:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: <bug-478506-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478506-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180129.n0I1Tavb016397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 20:29:35 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 01:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180142.n0I1gdgl018704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 20:42:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > The Description doesn't seem very descriptive. Can you be more specific? > > OK, I've tried to add a few lines from Wikipedia, and I've added a > README.Fedora file. > Oops, I meant to say the Summary isn't very descriptive. But thanks for the other addition, too! > > - Since spring-engine is a subpackage of spring with the same versioning, > > the requires between these packages need to be version/release specific. > > Hmm, I'm not sure, because the "spring" package here is just a meta-package to > pull all needed package to play the game. The meta-package in itself does not > care which version of the spring-engine is installed. It's not like -devel > subpackages. > It's not a problem to add the version either, so if you really feel it should > be a versioned dependency, I'll add it. > This isn't a packaging requirement (I thought it was, silly me), but keep in mind that if this isn't followed, those users who update the spring package alone will not see an update to spring-engine. Of course, since this is a metapackage, the other deps wouldn't seen an update either unless you hardcoded other values. Full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 02:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225998] Merge Review: libdmx In-Reply-To: <bug-225998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225998-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180207.n0I27JpV005883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225998 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com, | |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 21:07:17 EDT --- This pretty much has the same issues with libXinerama. I just copied/pasted the same bits from that review. Note that there are a few differences (the last two issues). * Summary and especially the description are bizarre. Can you update them. You can find these on the manpage: DMX - X Window System DMX (Distributed Multihead X) extension The DMX extension provides support for communication with and control of Xdmx server. Attributes of the Xdmx server and of the back-end screens attached to the server can be queried and modified via this protocol. * rpmlint says libdmx.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs libdmx.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs libdmx.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel libdmx.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel libdmx.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libdmx-1.0.2/README libdmx.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libdmx-1.0.2/AUTHORS libdmx.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs libdmx.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs libdmx-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel libdmx-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel The zero-length files are obviously not needed so they should be removed. The obsoletes look very problematic. Can you fix those (or alternatively explain them in the SPEC file as comments)? * BR: libXau-devel is not needed. Afaict it is not used. * BRs: libX11-devel pkgconfig and xorg-x11-proto-devel are not needed. They will be picked up by libXext-devel * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). This applies to the devel package. ! Try to make use of the %{name} macro (e.g. files sections). * Do we need this line? #%dir %{_mandir}/man3x * There is no "make" command in the SPEC file. The "make" is done via "make install" which is not good. Please add a parallel "make" . Adding Adam and Matthias to the CC since they were the last known maintainers. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 02:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180227.n0I2RqYw009288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Justin M. Forbes <jmforbes at linuxtx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jmforbes at linuxtx. | |org) | --- Comment #2 from Justin M. Forbes <jmforbes at linuxtx.org> 2009-01-17 21:27:51 EDT --- Added BuildArch: noarch to spec and reuploaded. rpmlint python-epdb.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. License request on telnetclient.py has been sent to upstream via irc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 02:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180233.n0I2XaD5027720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #3 from Justin M. Forbes <jmforbes at linuxtx.org> 2009-01-17 21:33:35 EDT --- <jforbes> in epdb, telnetclient.py has no license info in the file <dugan> oops <jforbes> just thought I would pass it along :) <dugan> definitely same license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 03:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473583-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180301.n0I3118k000341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #9 from steve <steve at lonetwin.net> 2009-01-17 22:00:56 EDT --- Debarshi, Thanks for the through review and all your comments ! (In reply to comment #7) > The manual pages append "WN" to the section numbers. There is a Debian patch to > fix this. It will be good to have in our package too. Fixed. I also noticed that although the Debian patch fixed the names of the man pages, it didn't fix the references with the pages itself. I've done those too. > > I could still rename the package if you still think it is a good thing. > > Finally it is going to be yours and your sponsor's call, but I think "wordnet" > is better. Fixed. (In reply to comment #8) > + The package fails to build in a chroot: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1062215 To fix this add > 'BuildRequires: libXft-devel'. Fixed. > + Header and lib*.so should not be a part of the main package. Instead they > should be put in a -devel sub-pacakge. See: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Devel_Packages Fixed. The new srpm and spec file are at: http://lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-3.fc10.src.rpm - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 02:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180259.n0I2xDp1014846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-17 21:59:11 EDT --- rpmlint output: spring.src:65: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build installprefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} \ spring.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: spring-0.77-allegro.patch spring.i386: E: no-binary - I'm not exactly sure why the rpm-buildroot-usage message is appearing. - If you're not using Patch0, remove it. - The metapackage needs to be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 05:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180542.n0I5ghG8025202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #10 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 00:42:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > - The metapackage needs to be noarch. Or, even better: nuke the -engine package and make it just the spring package. Then just have spring pull in the other necessary packages. This would save quite a bit of trouble, I think, as the metapackage seems excessively useless... I'm told they should be avoided if at all possible and it seems so here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 06:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180646.n0I6kfJ4017047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 01:46:40 EDT --- Alright, looks good now. Go ahead and apply for the 'packager' group in the Fedora account system and I'll approve you. In the mean time also do the CVS request so that your package module will be waiting for you once that's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 09:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:15:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180915.n0I9Fq5R009184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #11 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-18 04:15:51 EDT --- > if this isn't followed, those users who update the spring package > alone will not see an update to spring-engine. That's only if the user chooses to explicitly only update the spring package, and not the spring-engine package, because the latter will also appear in the available updates (since they come from the same srpm). So I don't think this will have any impact on updating, meta-packages are only useful for installing. But I could be wrong ! > - I'm not exactly sure why the rpm-buildroot-usage message is appearing. That's because I use "RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %build and not in %install. I have to do it however, because that's how scons works. > - If you're not using Patch0, remove it. Yes, it was needed for the cmake buildsystem, but since I'm using scons... > - The metapackage needs to be noarch. I don't think it's possible to have a noarch package and a binary package come from the same srpm. > nuke the -engine package and make it just the spring package. Yeah, I'm leaning in this direction too. * Sun Jan 18 2009 Aurelien Bompard <abompard at fedoraproject.org> 0.78.1.1-2 - Other changes from the review: - remove Cmake-specific patch - drop meta-package http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 09:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901180947.n0I9lgUW015923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #4 from Bruno Mahe <bruno at gnoll.org> 2009-01-18 04:47:41 EDT --- I discovered a bug in the makefiles for 64bit architectures. I will send a patch to upstream and add a patch to the rpm in the mean time. It is not yet ready for a second review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 10:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181040.n0IAen4R011377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-18 05:40:48 EDT --- Ahh. the good old days of CP/M ... Waiting for SFDX :) full review will come soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 10:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181043.n0IAh0VG011741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-18 05:42:59 EDT --- There is a small change, mock build fails with: + rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64 + mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin + mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1 /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmto ols-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/man/man5 + make install BINDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin MANDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROO T/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/man 'INSTALL=install -p' install -p -m 755 cpmls /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/cpmls install -p -m 755 cpmcp /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/cpmcp install -p -m 755 cpmrm /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/cpmrm install -p -m 755 cpmchmod /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/cpmchmod install -p -m 755 cpmchattr /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/cpmchattr install -p -m 755 mkfs.cpm /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/mkfs.cpm install -p -m 755 fsck.cpm /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/fsck.cpm install -p -m 755 fsed.cpm /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/fsed.cpm install -p -m 644 diskdefs /usr/share/diskdefs install: cannot create regular file `/usr/share/diskdefs': Permission denied make: *** [install] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PUxmZC (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 11:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181117.n0IBHqCT032732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-18 06:17:51 EDT --- to be read "There is a small change needed" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 11:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] New: Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ Message-ID: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Summary: Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/botan.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/botan-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Botan is a BSD-licensed crypto library written in C++. It provides a wide variety of basic cryptographic algorithms, X.509 certificates and CRLs, PKCS \#10 certificate requests, a filter/pipe message processing system, and a wide variety of other features, all written in portable C++. The API reference, tutorial, and examples may help impart the flavor of the library. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1063508 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 11:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181144.n0IBikxS004624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 06:44:46 EDT --- already in. don't think we need review anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 11:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181153.n0IBrpYQ006174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 11:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181153.n0IBreLX006142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 06:53:39 EDT --- Merge review cannot be closed without properly reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 12:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181209.n0IC91gr026968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 07:08:59 EDT --- Thanks, I will remove that file before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ratproxy Short Description: A passive web application security assessment tool Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 12:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181229.n0ICTpaO012386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #20 from Justin Zygmont <solarflow99 at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 07:29:48 EDT --- ok, i've fixed most of the problems Andrea pointed out in the last message, rpmlint now shows only 2 warnings which I think I have to keep, and I still dont see whats wrong with the release tag so far, I welcome any comments. Ive uploaded the latest RPM's and spec file into: http://fedorapeople.org/~jzygmont/ BTW, the reason why i'm creating an SVN snapshot is because there are important changes in SVN since the last release, and it could be some time before the maintainer creates another main release if ever. In all the years i've been with the project, theres less interest in DOS than there used to be. Having no package available doesnt help, i'd love to have a RPM available for Fedora. This is my first at package building and i've learned a lot so far, i'm also not a developer, i'm a system and network admin. hope this helps.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 12:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181257.n0ICvpw8003283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 07:57:51 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 12:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181257.n0ICvGlu017343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 07:57:15 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 13:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181327.n0IDRBPo008355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-18 08:27:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > There is a small change, mock build fails with: I'm not entirely sure why it failed for you, but 'my mock' didn't complain. Different root cache ? Anyway I moved diskdefs to %{_datadir}/%{name}/ I've used sed to modify diskdefs location. I also had to modify path used in the man files. new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cpmtools.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cpmtools-2.8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181403.n0IE3Bb5015196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-18 09:03:10 EDT --- Small suggestion, omit "GTK+" from the pkg summary/description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181419.n0IEJovD018202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 09:19:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Ok, bodhi thinks that "gfan-0.3-3.fc9 update already exists!" But it doesn't > show up in the list nor do searches show anything. I see this issue (I tried to submit gfan 0.3-3.fc9 updates request and got the same error). CCing to Toshio. Would you examine what is happening? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181425.n0IEP8sx019432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 09:25:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Sorry for the delay... Yes, I read everything and have some things already > solved, other still pending. > > I wanted to ask you about some small doubts: > > 1) Until now, I'm building rpms/srpms by invoking: "rpmbuild -ta > TARBALL.tar.gz", where the .spec file is inside the tarball. I guess this is > not the best practice, since any change in the spec file requires an update of > the whole tarball. I've read the rpmbuild manpage but not found a command such > as "rpmbuild -ta TARBALL.tar.gz <SOME-FLAG> mrpt.spec" which allows me to > provide the spec file separately. Any ideas about this? - Please use $ rpmbuild -ba foo.spec . > 2) "Package-splitting: First of all, please explain why you want to split each > library into different subpackges." I understand here the splitting into > "mrpt-XXX" library packages, right? - Yes. > My intention is to separate dependencies, > so an application (in a future package) might require only a subset of the > libs. Do you want me to explicitly explain this in comments in the spec file? - Please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: <bug-463767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181429.n0IETSUx020006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 09:29:25 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181429.n0IETF9G019952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tadej.janez at tadej | |.hicsalta.si) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 09:29:13 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181436.n0IEah5q021633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-18 09:36:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for pointing it out. It now builds the docs when I build locally, but > there are errors when I try a koji scratch build. It won't fail if you correctly pick doxygen and pdfjam as BR. Also please add doc section as requested to -devel subpackage > Then also the symlinks need to be generated properly. I'll report (and > discuss) this with upstream before I fix fully. My suggestion is to set soname to to libslim.so. And no further modification would be necessary. Now the test target fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 14:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181443.n0IEhnZC022789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #5 from Justin M. Forbes <jmforbes at linuxtx.org> 2009-01-18 09:43:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-epdb Short Description: Extended Python debugger Owners: jforbes Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 15:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181505.n0IF53Ct007572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 10:05:00 EDT --- Well, for 0.0.17-1: * Macros - Please use macros consistently for cosmetic issue. As you defined %{realname} macro, it is preferred that you use this macro also for Name: item. * License - The license tag for this package should be "GPLv2+". * Make build.log more verbose - build.log shows: -------------------------------------------------------------- 36 + make -j4 37 [CC] msn.o 38 [CC] nexus.o 39 [CC] notification.o 40 [CC] page.o 41 [CC] session.o 42 [CC] switchboard.o -------------------------------------------------------------- This is not useful. For example we cannot check from these messages if Fedora specific compiler flags (see below) are correctly honored. * Compiler flags / debuginfo rpm https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags - And actually Fedora specific compiler flags are not correctly honored currently. You can check what compiler flags should be passed by $ rpm --eval %optflags Currently, on i386: ------------------------------------------------------------- + make -j2 V=1 gcc -O2 -Wall -I. -D PACKAGE='"libmsn-pecan"' -DENABLE_NLS -DHAVE_LIBPURPLE -DPURPLE_DEBUG -D PLUGIN_NAME='msn-pecan' -DPECAN_CVR -DPECAN_DEBUG_SLP -fPIC -I/usr/include/libpurple -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I./fix_purple -D VERSION='"0.0.17"' -MMD -o msn.o -c msn.c gcc -O2 -Wall -I. -D PACKAGE='"libmsn-pecan"' -DENABLE_NLS -DHAVE_LIBPURPLE -DPURPLE_DEBUG -D PLUGIN_NAME='msn-pecan' -DPECAN_CVR -DPECAN_DEBUG_SLP -fPIC -I/usr/include/libpurple -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I./fix_purple -D VERSION='"0.0.17"' -MMD -o nexus.o -c nexus.c ------------------------------------------------------------- while, ------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables ------------------------------------------------------------- - Also, as a result the created debuginfo rpm contains no debugging information. * gettext files - It seems that po/ directory contains many gettext .po files. Would you explain why you don't compile these files by msgfmt (in gettext rpm) and install the created .mo files? * Test program - This tarball contains some files under tests/ directory. If some test programs can be executed, add %check section and write the programs in %check section. * Documents - Also add the following file(s) to %doc. ------------------------------------------------------------ AUTHORS COPYING (TODO) ------------------------------------------------------------ By the way, please change the release number every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 15:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181525.n0IFPexs011442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Truch <matt at truch.net> 2009-01-18 10:25:39 EDT --- > It won't fail if you correctly pick doxygen and pdfjam as BR. > Also please add doc section as requested to -devel subpackage Missed that first time around; docs now build, and since there are docs, I now have them included in -devel. > > Then also the symlinks need to be generated properly. I'll report (and > > discuss) this with upstream before I fix fully. > My suggestion is to set soname to to libslim.so. And no further modification > would be necessary. Now the test target fails. Soname set as requested. The test target has never failed on my machine, nor in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1064087 What error are you seeing? New spec and srpm: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 15:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181527.n0IFR5Qo011587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Truch <matt at truch.net> 2009-01-18 10:27:04 EDT --- I forgot to add, rpmlint still complains about the soname, and about the unstripped binaries/executables. I'm not fully sure what is wrong now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 15:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] New: Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan Message-ID: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Summary: Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All URL: http://lsl88.yo2.cn OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liangsuilong at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec file: http://rpm4fc-cn.googlecode.com/files/iptux.spec rpm file: http://rpm4fc-cn.googlecode.com/files/iptux-0.4.4-3.fc10.i386.rpm sprm file: http://rpm4fc-cn.googlecode.com/files/iptux-0.4.4-3.fc10.src.rpm debuginfo file: http://rpm4fc-cn.googlecode.com/files/iptux-debuginfo-0.4.4-3.fc10.i386.rpm Description: A software for sharing and transporting files and directories in LAN. It is written by C++ and the skin is designed by gtk. Iptux is based on ipmsg, so you can use it send files to a Windows PC which has an ipmsg Windows edition in Lan. If you want, you can compile it in x86_64 platform. Because I have a Fedora x86_64 edition, I do not build rpm for x86_64. Details: You can see more details in here: http://code.google.com/p/iptux/ Also here is its google group: https://groups.google.com/group/iptux These two sites are written in Simplified Chinese. So before reading it, you can use google translate! I feel it is a pretty good software. So I hope iptux can be admitted to add into Fedora repository! Thank you for spending the time to review this package for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181608.n0IG8Ukp019281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181612.n0IGC1jF006468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 11:12:00 EDT --- Well, some random comments. ! First of all, please check your srpm / binary rpms by rpmlint (in rpmlint rpm) to detect some generic packaging errors. - %define _prefix is not needed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros - Also, %_prefix/share/man should be %{_mandir} , for example - Please consider to use %{?dist} macro in Release number https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag - "Games" is not valid Group on Fedora. See the explanation by $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group - "GPL 3" license tag is not a valid tag for Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - Please consider to %{version} macro in Source0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D - BuildRoot you are using is not valid on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - Would you explain what the periods at the head of sentences are for? - Please don't use debian's way of naming like "libmmpong0.9" and "%package libs" for example if you want to split libraries and create a seperate rpm. and -devel package should simply be "%package devel". ! note that "%package foo" is the same as "%package -n %{name}-foo". You are using many "%package -n", but almost all of these can (and should) be replaced by "%pacakge foo" (same for %description, %files) - Please write the dependencies between binary rpms created by this srpm. For example -devel subpackage should have "Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}". - By the way would you explain why you have to write "mmpong is an ......" sentence on %description of each subpackages? - %setup should be quiet (use -q option) - Patch0 does not correspond with %patch (rpm 4.6 refuses this. you should use %patch0 if you use Patch0) - By the way your patch cannot not be applied with --fuzz=0 (this is the default on rpm 4.6) - Please check if %cmake macros can be used for this package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake Also as written in cmake wiki: - support parallel make when possible. Otherwise write in your spec file as comments that this package does not support parallel make : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - Perhaps you have to add "VERBOSE=1" option to "make" to make build.log verbose. - %buildroot must once be cleaned at the beginning of %install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - Please avoid to use %makeinstall unless impossible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used - What is %run_ldconfig macro? Also your srpm does not seem to create %{name} package itself. Would you explain why? - %{name}-libs package needs /sbin/ldconfig at %post{,un} (by the way if only /sbin/ldconfig should be executed at %post, use "%post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig", for example) - %defattr is missing on all packages (see ReviewGuidelines wiki) - Please don't ship static archives (libfoo.a) unless needed. If not avoidable, please package it seperately: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries - By the way would you explain why -devel subpackge contains no header files? (is this -devel subpackage useful?) - Packages containing pkgconfig .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig" (written in ReviewGuidelines wiki) - Using %_prefix/games, %_datadir/games is not allowed on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging - Installed desktop file must be handled by desktop-file-{install,validate} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage - %{_prefix}/share/icons directory _itself_ should not be owned by -gl subpackage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership - Please write %changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181617.n0IGHm9t020700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-18 11:17:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I forgot to add, rpmlint still complains about the soname, and about the > unstripped binaries/executables. I'm not fully sure what is wrong now. You need to setup soname to libslim.so.<major>. I'm sorry for misleading you. For now you can setup soname to libslim.so.2, but probably the best way to handle this is to contact upstream. btw any news on that ? Also you need to make sure test target correctly picks libslim.so.2, so you need to symlink libslim.so to libslim.so.2 in builddir, or tests would fail: ../bin/slim --preserve -k -C -m2 -i -c1 -r16384 /tmp/data_partial.bin ../bin/slim: error while loading shared libraries: libslim.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Another suggestion is using INSTALL="install -p" to make install from %files section to preserve timestamps of installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181643.n0IGhm1s011614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 11:43:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Which version of Fedora did you try? F-10 (x86_64) full updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181646.n0IGkv87012470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 11:46:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > upstream doesn't support xemacs anymore. that's why I've got rid of it from new > package. > I'm not quite sure if adding Provides and even Obsoletes is a good idea in this > case. Ok, at the minimum you should have a Obsolete-Statement, so the xemacs subpackage may remove clearly. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181655.n0IGtF3l027221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 11:55:14 EDT --- Good: + Local build works fine. + Files are install with the install programm. + Empty %check stanza is removed. Bad: - Package doesn't contains verbatin copy of the license text, but upstream tar ball contains a LICENSE file. If you are add the LICENSE file into the %doc stanza you package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 17:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181731.n0IHVH5t019982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 12:31:16 EDT --- Well, I cannot see any license texts in this package. Would you explain what file shows the license of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 17:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181740.n0IHeN8V021350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #12 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-18 12:40:22 EDT --- * Sun Jan 18 2009 Aurelien Bompard <abompard at fedoraproject.org> 0.78.2.1-1 - update to 0.78.2.1 (bugfix release) http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 17:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181748.n0IHmiZ1022613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-18 12:48:43 EDT --- Hello, Jochen. Are you a sponsor? (sorry if you are so) Any NEEDSPONSOR blocking review tickets needs the approval by sponsor members. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 17:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181755.n0IHtXFQ004924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 12:55:32 EDT --- I tried a Koji scratch build against dist-f10-updates-candidate and it finished successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1064274 Any idea what is going wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181810.n0IIARJX007501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 13:10:26 EDT --- Unfortunately No. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181815.n0IIFTiI008328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange <berrange at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 13:15:28 EDT --- The reason I let it pull in Freetype/fontconfig is that this matches the deps from the Linux native specfile & I was trying to keep as closely aligned as possible. Likewise for removing the charset.alias this is just matching native. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181823.n0IINgFD028453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-18 13:23:41 EDT --- Failed koji scratch build of http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cpmtools-2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm, in case that you want to investigate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1064398 http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cpmtools-2.8-2.fc10.src.rpm seems OK, I'll come back with a review tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181834.n0IIYlkF011249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-18 13:34:46 EDT --- As I see it, fontconfig and freetype are really required for Cairo on Linux enviroments (as they are considered 'native' for Linux). However, for Windows environments there's a Cairo font backend available which uses the native font rendering functions from the Win32 API. To me it looks like adding dependencies on freetype and fontconfig only introduces unncessary bloat for a Win32 build of Cairo. Are there any specific reasons why you want to add dependencies on fontconfig and freetype? Applications (like GTK+) shouldn't really care about the font backend used by Cairo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462621] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: <bug-462621-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462621-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181843.n0IIhKTW013120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462621 Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181914.n0IJEiEY005736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 14:14:43 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC file matches with package name + Package contains proper License tag + License tag contains BSD as a proper OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains most recent version of the software + Tar ball in source package matches with upstream (md5sum: 827c81f42cd1c118fc9bf1891be7cde5) + source package could downloaded form upstream with spectool + consistently usage of rpm macros + Build use RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Package contains devel subpackage + Devel subpackage has proper Requires to main package * Local build works fine + Build use _smp_mflags + Rpmlint quite on source package + Rpmlint quite on binary package + Rpmlint quite on debuginfo package + Local install works fine + Rpmlint is quite on installed package + Package contains a testsuite in the %check stanza + Local uninstall works fine + Main package contains proper ldconfig scriptlets + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of the %clean and %install stanza + All files of the package are owned by the package + %files stanza contains no duplicated file definiton + There are no file conflict with other packages + All packaged files has proper files permissions + As far as I can see, system libraries for bzis2, openssl and zlib was used. + %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Build on Koji works fine Bad: + The files tutorial.* and api.* should be part of the devel subpackage stanza, because they contains explainations how to develope applications for this library TODO: - Please notify upstream, that each source file should have a proper copyright notice You package is APPROVED, if you may move the tutorial.* and api.* doc files into the %doc stanza of the devel subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181915.n0IJF27M019395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager In-Reply-To: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478846-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181921.n0IJL1Ah007197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-18 14:21:00 EDT --- This seems imported & built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181920.n0IJKsmV007154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 14:20:53 EDT --- UNfortunately, I'M was not aware, that ther is a libgtksourceviewmm package which is depending on gtksourceview. So I wan't to suggest, that you are renaming the package into libgtksourceviewmm2 for clarification, if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: <bug-478674-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478674-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181924.n0IJOa16020989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-18 14:24:35 EDT --- Marek: ping. Please import && build this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181927.n0IJRuhk008459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-18 14:27:55 EDT --- I contacted the author, he'll include the missing license informations in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181941.n0IJfDXo010967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Severity|urgent |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181938.n0IJcE99010248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #13 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 14:38:12 EDT --- (The correct URL is http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ....) == FULL REVIEW == - The timestamp on the source file is not the same as the server. Please download source files with "wget -N" or "curl -R". https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps - Please don't use a trademark in the Summary tag or the %description. For the Summary: "Multiplayer, 3D realtime strategy combat game" would work for me. [ OK ] source files match upstream: 4765d25d44f4bdc2f68af0f76743f30d spring_0.78.2.1_src.tar.lzma 4765d25d44f4bdc2f68af0f76743f30d spring_0.78.2.1_src.tar.lzma.1 [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ OK ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. [ WAIT ] package installs properly. [ OK ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ OK ] rpmlint is silent. rpm-buildroot-usage %build message due to scons. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. I'm assuming /usr/lib/spring isn't a regular linker search path. please correct me if I'm wrong. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ OK ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ OK ] desktop files valid and installed properly. Waiting on these for package approval: - Timestamp fix - Summary/%description without trademarks - Other three package reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181941.n0IJfS33024453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #14 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 14:41:27 EDT --- Well, here is the new revision: SPEC: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.5-0.1.20090118svn746.fc10.src.rpm I finally decided to use the "snapshot versions format" so I can integrate all the fixes in upstream. btw, if I got it right, a package, say "foo-1.2.3-0.1.20090118svn" MUST have an associated tarball "foo-1.2.3.tar.gz", without any indication of the snapshot?? I'd prefer more descriptive names containing the snapshot part, so please confirm me if that is the preferred naming or I can create tarballs with the svn number prefix. Next are the answers to your points: (In reply to comment #9) > ** Description etc > * License > - License tag should be "GPLv3+". Done. > * BuildRequires: > - build.log says: > ------------------------------------------------ > 107 -- Looking for doxygen... > 108 -- Looking for doxygen... - found /usr/bin/doxygen > 109 -- Looking for dot tool... > 110 -- Looking for dot tool... - NOT found > ------------------------------------------------ > Perhaps "BuildRequires: graphviz" is missing. This is not an issue. "dot" is actually not used. In fact the CMake command is "look for doxygen", but it internally also looks for dot... > ** %prep -> %install > * Build failure > - Currently your srpm does not build by 4 reasons. > 1 %check fails as > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1042528 > This is because at "make test" this test needs > system-widely installed libmrpt-core.so.0.6, but on mockbuild > apparently this library is not yet installed system-widely. Fixed with your "LD_LIBRARY_PATH..." solution. > 2 The rebuilt libraries like libmrpt-core.so.0.6 are installed > under %buildroot/usr/lib, not %buildroot%_libdir even with > 64 bits architecture Fixed in upstream CMakeLists.txt's. > 3 CMakeLists.txt adds "-mtune=native" to CPPFLAGS, which > is not recognized on ppc (maybe also on ppc64) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1042483 > Also, CMakeLists.txt adds "-O3" compilation option, however > Fedora default optimation level is "-O2" so this should > be removed. Fixed through a cmake argument "-DCMAKE_MRPT_IS_RPM_PACKAGE=1" which internally disables "-mtune" and "O3". > 4 %files lists are wrong. Some files are installed > under %{_datadir}/mrpt/datasets/ but no files are installed > under %{_datadir}/mrpt/config_files/datasets/ Solved. > ** %files, etc > * Package splitting > - First of all, please explain why you want to split each > library into different subpackges. Comments added to specfile. > * desktop files > - desktop-file-install or so must be executed against > desktop files to be installed. Done, at %install. > > * Scriptlets > - Some files has MimeType, so please refer to: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > > - This package installs XML files under %_datadir/mime/packages: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo Both done at %post/postun of mrpt-apps. > * Directory ownership > - The directory %{_datadir}/mrpt is owned by 2 packages. Please > change this so that only one package owns this directory > ( I guess having this directory owned by -core package is > an alternative solution) The -core package now owns that directory. > - %{_datadir}/doc/mrpt-doc/ is not owned by any packages. It's now of the package "mrpt-doc". > * pkgconfig > - pkgconfig/libmrpt.pc.in contains: > -------------------------------------------- > 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib > -------------------------------------------- > This is expanded as /usr/lib, even on 64 bits architecture, > while this should be expanded as /usr/lib64. Fixed using the LIB_SUFFIX variable in CMake (not tested...). > - Also installed libmrpt.pc contains: > -------------------------------------------- > 9 Libs: -L${libdir} -ldc1394 -lGL -lGLU -lglut -lftdi -lusb -l3ds -lz > -ljpeg -lrt -pthread -lmrpt-ann /usr/lib64/libboost_program_options-mt.so > -pthread -lwx_baseu-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_core-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_gl-2.8 > -lwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8 -lmrpt-core -lmrpt-aria > -------------------------------------------- You're right! Most of the -lxxx were not required. > * Header files dependency > - Please check if proper dependency packages are installed > with -devel packages to satisfy "include" macro dependencies > in header files. > - For example, gui/WxUtils.h contains > --------------------------------------------- > 40 #include <wx/sizer.h> > 41 #include <wx/statbmp.h> > 42 #include <wx/menu.h> > --------------------------------------------- > This means that mrpt-devel package should have "Requires: wxGTK-devel" > (not wxGTK). Ok, done. > * Duplicate files > - Please check if all subpackages need "doc COPYING" or so. > Also "%doc foo" creates its own document directory (named > /usr/share/doc/mrpt-foo-%{version}) for each subpackage. I tried removing COPYING and README, but rpmlint complains about packages without documentation, so I finally left them. > Especially -doc subpackage has two document directories > (/usr/share/doc/mrpt-doc and /usr/share/doc/mrpt-doc-%{version}) > I suggest these directories should be unified. Done, /usr/share/doc/mrpt-doc is the only directory now. > * rpmlint issue > rpmlint output attached. > - Please change non-UTF8 files to UTF-8 encoding > - Usually libraries themselves should not call exit() > (see $ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit) > - Many files has Windows-like line terminators. > Please fix these by "sed -i -e 's|\r||g'" or dos2unix All fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181946.n0IJk4aY012028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 14:46:03 EDT --- OK, upstream is obnoxious and deletes their old releases when they come out with new versions. 20090115 is apparently out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181946.n0IJk96B012131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181941.n0IJfqVf011146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181943.n0IJhCj1011351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181942.n0IJgJoN024608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 14:42:18 EDT --- Wrong SRPM url (404): http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-installer-20081228-2.fc10.src.rpm seems correct, using that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901181942.n0IJgg6q024682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 --- Comment #8 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-18 14:42:41 EDT --- I would rather not, since the upstream tarball name was indeed renamed to "gtksourceviewm" for the 2.0 API release. In a way the naming of the 1.0 API to "libgtksourceviewmm" was an anomaly which got corrected :-) Also, the plan is to EOL libgtksourceviewmm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182008.n0IK8YYZ016478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #14 from Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 15:08:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329305) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329305) python 2.6 sconstruct patch for building on rawhide python 2.6 sconstruct patch for building on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182035.n0IKZFq4021471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-18 15:35:14 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC files matches with package name + Package contains a License tag + Package contains most recent release of the software + %setup use -q flag + make use _smp_mflags + Local build works fine. + Debuginfo package contains source files + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %install andn %clean + Files permissions seems ok + All packaged files are owned by this package + There are no file comflict with other packates. + %doc stanza contains a small amount of files, so we need no separate doc subpackage Bad: - License tag contains no proper license specification, it should be GPLv2+ - Source0 tag is not full qualified - Build doesn't use RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Rpmlint complaints on source package: iptux.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A software for sharing in LAN. iptux.src: W: non-standard-group Application/Network iptux.src: W: invalid-license GNU General Public License v2 - Rpmlint complaints on binary package: rpmlint iptux-0.4.4-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm iptux.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib iptux.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A software for sharing in LAN. iptux.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Application/Network iptux.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog -0.4.4-3 ['0.4.4-3.fc10', '0.4.4-3'] iptux.x86_64: W: invalid-license GNU General Public License v2 iptux.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/iptux.mo - Package contains no verbain copy of the license text, but upstream tar ball contains one - Package contains no BR and Req. to desktop-file-utils - Please ud %{_bindir} instead of %{_prefix}/bin - Build fails on Koji please refer to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1064580 - Please use %file_lang macro for localization -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182046.n0IKkEA3023551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182044.n0IKiQqg022979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182042.n0IKgLZW022788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |rbhalera at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-18 15:42:18 EDT --- You still need to take care of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_font_packaging_changes_are_needed_with_post-1.13_fontpackages_.3F Since FPC unexpectedly decided to change our package naming rules. Apart that is looks nice so I'm going to approve it now and let you take care of the naming before the Fedora import. You can now continue starting from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a ? re-assigning Thank you for packaging a new font in Fedora ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182045.n0IKjLB3004284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182048.n0IKmcvY023830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 --- Comment #3 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 15:48:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xcall.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xcall-0.17-4.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Jan 18 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject.org> 0.17-4 - Omit GTK+ from description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182047.n0IKl5XR004506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182048.n0IKmnAo004640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or |jochen at herr-schmitt.de |g | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182059.n0IKxscu025695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 AssignedTo|jochen at herr-schmitt.de |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-18 15:59:53 EDT --- I just took a short look at your package.. just a very short look RPMLINT-ERRORS -------------- 1) - iptux.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A software for sharing in LAN. remove the . 2) - iptux.src: E: description-line-too-long A software for sharing and transporting files and directories in LAN. It is written by C++ and the skin is designed by gtk. Iptux is based on ipmsg, so you can use it send files to a Windows PC which has an ipmsg Windows edition in Lan. split it in more and shorter lines 3) - iptux.src: W: non-standard-group Application/Network take a look at /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.6.0/GROUPS Applications/Internet 4) - iptux.src: W: invalid-license GNU General Public License v2 take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing GPLv2 5) - iptux.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib you don't need glib in Requires 6) - iptux.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog -0.4.4-3 ['0.4.4-3.fc10', '0.4.4-3'] you packed the source! don't do this. use the source that upstream given. 7) - iptux.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/iptux.mo %files -f %{name}.lang Things in the specfile ---------------------- a) you: Source0: iptux-0.4.4-3.tar.gz should: Source0: http://iptux.googlecode.com/files/iptux-0.4.4.tar.gz better: Source0: http://iptux.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz b) %doc INSTALL NEWS README TODO AUTHORS - don't use INSTALL for %doc, because users are not interessted in a howto of installation. this is a package and the installation was done by you. - add the COPYING file to %doc, because License file are very - NEWS looks like "this is just a chinese header"-file. if news don't show news, just an header you should remove it - Same for README c) you %{_prefix}/bin/iptux very better: %{bindir}/%{name} d) you: %{_datadir}/applications/* better: %{_datadir}/applications/iptux.* or: %{_datadir}/applications/iptux.desktop e) you: %{_datadir}/locale/* add %files -f %{name}.lang and remove this completely f) you: %{_datadir}/pixmaps/* better: %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ip-tux.png %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ip-penguin.png to d/e/f please create an ownage of the files YOU packaged. not of all in the directory, because you will take ownage of files you haven't created. files of other packages. g)desktop file install --rebuild-mime-info-cache Why? ip-tux doesn't need to mime a h) desktop file install --delete-original Why are you deleting the desktop file to reinstall it again. You should validate the desktopfile https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage i) Add the desktop-file-utils to BuildRequires j) BuildRequires: glib-devel, GConf2, gtk2-devel Requires: glib, gtk2, GConf2, gtk2 rpm can create Requires from the BuildRequires. Example: If you say BuildRequires: gtk2-devel rpm will automaticly create Requires: gtk2 gtk2 is doubled... k) %post update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications &>/dev/null || : %postun update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications &>/dev/null || : you don't need this. why are you adding these commands? l) you should think about better texts for the changelog and use the right version-number. I will remove me from Asignee and add me to CC because you are sponsored and you need a sponsor. I will add the "need sponor bug" I can not sponsor you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182117.n0ILHakY010315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #42 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 16:17:30 EDT --- Ok, finally, and i should be alot more on top of this in the far reaching future (i think), i have some packages. SPEC:http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11.spec SRPM:http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-1.4.5-1.fc11.src.rpm This is more or less pretty much based on the latest template. It's being managed by fedora-devshell, which means getting hotfixes done should be fast. Note: AFAIK, we don't have the macros needed in F10 right now, so this only builds in rawhide. The SRPM is output from mock using rawhide. Once the macros are in F10, supporting it there should be trivial. I submit this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480434-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182107.n0IL7a3k027542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xcall - |Review Request: xcall - |GTK+ Packet Radio Terminal |Packet Radio Terminal |Program for ham radio |Program for ham radio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] New: Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server Message-ID: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Summary: Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/poweradmin.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/poweradmin-2.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Poweradmin is a friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server. The interface has full support for most of the features of PowerDNS. It has full support for all zone types (master, native and slave), for supermasters for automatic provisioning of slave zones, full support for IPv6 and comes with multi-language support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182128.n0ILS7rB031166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #17 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-18 16:28:05 EDT --- In 0.0.17-3: * The realname macro is now also used in Name item * License has been changed to GPLv2+ * Build.log has been made more verbose by adding make flags V=1 DEBUG=1 * Translation is now packaged, .mo files are created and installed * Check section added * Missing documents have been added * Release number changed thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182126.n0ILQwsD011993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182145.n0ILjP8T001600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #18 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-18 16:45:23 EDT --- Sorry, I forget the links The .spec is here: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan.spec And the srpm: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182145.n0ILj2wQ014795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-18 16:45:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - license seems to be GPLv2+. A lot of files are GPL+, some are GPLv2+, some > have no license at all. A cleanup of those would be nice Certain files (xen_hyper*) use GPLv2 (only), spot already fixed this in CVS. > Other problems (fixed) There are yet more: - You use "Revision" tag to mark upstream release, which is wrong. It is meant to be used to version the SPEC file. Given you (package owner, "crash" group, seem to be upstream, you can definitely fix this by changing the versioning scheme. (e.g use 4.0.8 instead of 4.0-8)) - The bundled gdb is old and has issues. It is likely that some of older GDB security problems affect it: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-1704 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-1705 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2006-4146 Please address those, if they are relevant. Notify your SRT that you bundle GDB code and communicate with GDB upstream (or people involved in Archer, your colleagues) to avoid having to bundle GDB in longer run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182148.n0ILm7RE015434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2009-01-18 16:48:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: botan Short Description: Crypto library written in C++ Owners: thm Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478565] Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping In-Reply-To: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182154.n0ILs7Io016499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478565 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |denis at poolshark.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-18 16:54:06 EDT --- * Package name OK * Source md5sum correct * License is LGPLv2+ * Package works (able to compile tests and examples) * Buidls, BR and R are OK * %files section OK * rpmlint - mixed-use of-spaces-and-tabs : can be ignored - unused-direct-shlib-dependency : could use the --as-needed sed trick, but not a blocker Warning: on Fedora branches <= 10, the devel package will Require gupnp-devel Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467627-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182204.n0IM4f4G004997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 17:04:39 EDT --- Built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1064686 Other branches will follow accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182208.n0IM8vDJ005846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Justin M. Forbes <jmforbes at linuxtx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182209.n0IM9hDw019459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #15 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 17:09:42 EDT --- Problems with building on rawhide: - Python 2.6 isn't detected (see patch in comment 14) - the devil libraries aren't detected correctly for some odd reason So these will also need to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182229.n0IMTKSH009361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:29:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182231.n0IMVM6X010060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-01-18 17:31:21 EDT --- Change the build line to make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} V=1 DEBUG=1 That way the Fedora compiler flags are correctly used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182230.n0IMUOB7009804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:30:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182230.n0IMUxsA009890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 17:30:57 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I reviewed this package. There are a few minor things to go through: * rpmlint gives bunch of dangling-symlink warnings. But these are resolved by the dependencies by the packages, so it is OK. The other rpmlint complaints are: rubygem-mechanize.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mechanize-0.9.0/lib/www/mechanize/chain/post_connect_hook.rb Is this needed? rubygem-mechanize-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation I see that both rubygem-gettext-doc and rubygem-zoom-doc install their documentation (examples,test) inside %doc What is the reason that this package is different? rubygem-mechanize-doc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mechanize-0.9.0/test/htdocs/google.html This is possibly a wrong permission error. It can easily be fixed. ruby-mechanize.noarch: W: no-documentation This one can be ignored. * I don't think we need to package Manifest.txt. Do we usually package manifest files on ruby packages? * The license file and the website license page say GPLv2+. The source code files do not indicate a license. I think setting the license as GPLc2+ will be more appropriate. * Latest version must be packaged. I can't find any information to confirm this. Where is download section on the website? * Ruby guidelines say: "A ruby extension/library package must indicate what it provides with a Provides: ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION declaration in the spec file" So I think Provides: ruby(%{gemname}) = %{version}-%{release} Provides: rubygem(%{gemname}) = %{version}-%{release} must be changed to Provides: ruby(%{gemname}) = %{version} Provides: rubygem(%{gemname}) = %{version} * Do we need this line:? #Requires: rubygem(hoe) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182228.n0IMSLwC022741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:28:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:33:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182233.n0IMXeGN010400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:33:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480435] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments In-Reply-To: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182234.n0IMYano010505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480435 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:34:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182232.n0IMWC6I023590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:32:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182250.n0IMoupi026928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 17:50:55 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this package... the src.rpm link seems to be 503 right now. Is there an updated link I can use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478565] Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping In-Reply-To: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182253.n0IMrFOi013790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478565 --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 17:53:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Warning: > on Fedora branches <= 10, the devel package will Require gupnp-devel Yeah, I'm not planning on adding this to any branches <= 10. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:55:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478565] Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping In-Reply-To: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182255.n0IMtPwg014281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478565 Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 17:55:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gupnp-igd Short Description: Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182300.n0IN0SCo015123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-18 18:00:27 EDT --- Yeah, I've updated it, but forgot to post the new URL here, sorry about that. I tried to update to the latest version, but it needs a more recent version of ocaml-zip (at least 1.04), so I'll stick with 20081228 if you don't mind. I'll try to find a tarball of 20081228 somewhere you could check for (but that's pretty hard...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182302.n0IN26O5029041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 18:02:05 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review here in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480187] Review Request: mythes-el - Greek thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182307.n0IN7lNf016639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480187 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:15:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:15:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480355] Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182315.n0INFRuC018282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480355 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 18:15:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-it Short Description: Italian thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480356] Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182313.n0INDIvY017695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480356 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 18:13:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-mi Short Description: Maori thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480186] Review Request: mythes-fr - French thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480186-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182311.n0INBrt2030891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480186 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901182333.n0INXa2n002476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-18 18:33:35 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv3+) See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: cf83b89c6931160684de52a0b3ea3678 poweradmin-2.1.2.tgz cf83b89c6931160684de52a0b3ea3678 poweradmin-2.1.2.tgz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Seems like all the files that refer to the license say "or later", so shouldn't this be 'GPLv3+' ? 2. You seem to have a typo in your Source0 line. A 'i' that shouldn't be there. 3. You should probibly require 'httpd' instead of 'webserver' as you are putting files in httpd specific locations. 4. The URL seems wrong... www.poweradmin.org instead of www.poweradmin.com ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 00:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:28:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190028.n0J0S8Oo011746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #20 from Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 19:28:06 EDT --- DEBUG=1 just adds -ggdb to the CFLAGS. If you want to use fedora CFLAGS I suggest you remove DEBUG=1. And maybe V=yes is more understandable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 01:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480435] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg - Attributes with aliases for constructor arguments In-Reply-To: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480435-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190128.n0J1S6bQ009419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480435 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-18 20:28:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 02:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190200.n0J20BJH015022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #21 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-18 21:00:09 EDT --- also fix this issue with rpmlint rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-3.fc9.src.rpm purple-msn-pecan.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 23, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 02:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: <bug-199020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190206.n0J26tNE029603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #4 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-18 21:06:53 EDT --- Since it appears that the new version of conexus obsoletes conexusmm: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=78660 you need to take the appropriate steps to retire conexusmm, described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife This includes checking in dead.package to the devel branch with an explanation and a request to rel-eng to block conexusmm from rawhide, since it is currently causing broken deps (item 6 in the checklist above): Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- conexusmm-0.5.0-6.fc8.i386 requires libpapyrusmm.so.0 conexusmm-devel-0.5.0-6.fc8.i386 requires libpapyrusmm.so.0 (see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20090118/logs/depcheck ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 02:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] New: Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool Message-ID: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Summary: Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf-1.10-1.src.rpm Description: DNSSEC configuration and priming tool. Keys are required until the root is signed, as well as for local unpublished DNSSEC keys to be preloaded into the recursive nameserver. These DNSSEC configuration files can be directly included in the bind or unbound nameserver configuration files. dnssec-conf includes a commandline configuration client for Bind and Unbound, known DNSSEC keys, URL's to official publication pages of keys, and harvested keys, as well a script to harvest DNSKEY's from DNS. See also: system-config-dnssec (filed seperately for package review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 02:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: <bug-480279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480279-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190257.n0J2vsVY024141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #1 from Feng Yu <rainwoodman at gmail.com> 2009-01-18 21:57:53 EDT --- Comparing to the old request-for-review package of global menu, this new release no longer requires a patched GTK. After installation, add the 'Global Menu' applet to gnome panel, right click on it, goto references and click 'enable global menu for GTK applications'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 03:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190323.n0J3NMY7028504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-18 22:23:20 EDT --- please fix %patch line should be somthing like this %Patch0 -p1 this is your first package ? what's your fedora account (FAS) user name ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 03:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190357.n0J3v9Qi000987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 03:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190359.n0J3xsGD014118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #36 from Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> 2009-01-18 22:59:51 EDT --- Requested Fedora 10 tree for renamed package 'cjkuni-fonts' according to new font packaging guidelines. [engineering.redhat.com #34002] AutoReply: New package tree on Fedora 11: cjkuni-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 04:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:40:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479953] Review Request: gtksourceviewmm - C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190440.n0J4ejW9020711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479953 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480572] New: Review Request: xgridloc - A GTK+ application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators Message-ID: <bug-480572-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xgridloc - A GTK+ application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Summary: Review Request: xgridloc - A GTK+ application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: randyn3lrx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xgridloc.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xgridloc-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1065372 Description: xgridloc is a GTK+ graphical version of gridloc and performs the same basic functions for ham radio operators, but additionally it can use xplanet to display the home and DX locations and the great circle path between them. * Sun Jan 18 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' <dp67 at fedoraproject.org> - 0.9-4 - Check rpmlint fix lint errors - 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - Submit for review - Mock build f9/10/devel i386 - Test build on Koji all arches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190617.n0J6HBxW022676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477373 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190640.n0J6e7tH026411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480269 Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #16 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-19 01:40:06 EDT --- > - Timestamp fix Strange, I do have "timestamping = on" in my ~/.wgetrc... I've re-downloaded it, tell me if it's better this time. > - Summary/%description without trademarks Done. > - Python 2.6 isn't detected Patch added, thanks ! > - the devil libraries aren't detected correctly for some odd reason This comes from bug 480269. I've updated the package with the other items: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 07:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190717.n0J7HYdY032479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-19 02:17:33 EDT --- Hmm, I can't find 20081228 anywhere, but I found the revision control system (it changed at least 2 times...): http://github.com/spring/spring/tree/6299949266be55fc08cbbcc28044d310426d7c4c/tools/SpringInstaller Right now I'm cloning it to check if I can rebuild the 20081228 tarball, but it takes tiiiiiime. I'm also trying to contact the author, I'll keep you posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 07:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190756.n0J7u9Ff006458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #22 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-19 02:56:08 EDT --- In 0.0.17-4: * Build line changed, DEBUG=1 removed * V=1 changed to V=yes * Spaces removed in the description, using tabs everywhere (rpmlint ok) Here are the links: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan.spec http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 08:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190826.n0J8Qi8e025460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 03:26:42 EDT --- Sure. Updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew-6.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 08:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190833.n0J8X6Xv026544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 03:33:05 EDT --- I can confirm that package builds fine on my machine (F10 x86_64) as well as i686 (my test box): I also did a all arch build on koji which was successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1065454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190916.n0J9GSp4003774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473972-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190915.n0J9FUH8003624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190930.n0J9UmwI025724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #8 from Patrice FERLET <metal3d at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 04:30:46 EDT --- Hi, I will fix and do some changes for F10. Another problem appears with xulrunner that I have to correct. I've got a lot of work since 6 month, but I will have more time soon... I've already done some packages for my own repository, but none has ever been registered with Fedora. I have no FAS for now. Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190933.n0J9XBqo007435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 04:33:10 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 11c62f478bcd9cd10a88752e4545e1d2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190940.n0J9e7kV027616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 --- Comment #35 from Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 04:40:03 EDT --- Yes, this was fedora-review+'ed by you but Rex cleared it and reopened the bug in comment 10 (see the history link). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190940.n0J9eUEn027707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 04:40:29 EDT --- botan-1.8.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/botan-1.8.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190940.n0J9eXfE009057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 04:40:32 EDT --- botan-1.8.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/botan-1.8.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190942.n0J9gaW3028165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-19 04:42:35 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gaupol Short Description: Subtitle editor Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901190942.n0J9gnnX009445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #36 from Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 04:42:47 EDT --- Yeah, I don't see a need for disttag in the devel branch, and it screws up in some cases when it's there. I've committed and the "install -p" fix - thanks a lot Robert for the re-review! :) Closing out for good, hopefully... 1065558 build (dist-f11, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/neon/devel:neon-0_28_3-3) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191008.n0JA807d001337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #2 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 05:07:58 EDT --- Hi, I put a -2 version with the fixed things. For file in %{python_sitelib} i prefer to chmod 0644 and remove the shebang, i think it's not necessary You can find files here : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-bicyclerepair.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-bicyclerepair-0.9-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191011.n0JAB4JV015656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #5 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-19 05:11:02 EDT --- Hi Aurelien, OK, I have quickly looked at the spec for this one -- I am not able to provide a solid review at this stage. If I get time (weekend), I may provide patches to some of these, if you like. * Not sure about grabbing the data from what appears to be part of their filesystem that is laid out to fit neatly into the ubuntu repository. Might be a bit too dynamic... The Git repository sounds like a much better idea. * I think offering an installer for a TA mod "CA" may have licencing issues. TA is copyright of what used to be infogrames, which i know think is Atari. The content that this installer obtains is probably copyright protected, as I undesrtand that Complete Annihilation uses TA game data. * Is specifying the content of the sub-package in the main package description normal? I have not seen this before, and it strikes me as a touch confusing. * Using chrpath to remove hardcoding of path information is considered a last resort option [1]. Consider patching the build system to remove invocations to chrpath. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191015.n0JAF2Hx002739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:14:55 EDT --- I can have a look at this one today unless Dan jumps in before me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191017.n0JAHdRM016886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:17:38 EDT --- I'm sorry about that. My webserver was down this morning, but I've just checked and everything should be alright again now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191022.n0JAMRAv004435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:22:26 EDT --- Koji scratch-build in dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1065724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191029.n0JATHZw019324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #5 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-19 05:29:16 EDT --- Many thanks again, Jochen - I've added the LICENSE and bumped the rpm. Spec URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser.spec SRPM URL: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser-3.0b-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191028.n0JASHpp019178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Mahe <bruno at gnoll.org> 2009-01-19 05:28:15 EDT --- About the issue from my previous message, I have opened a ticket in bullet's ticket tracking system. See http://code.google.com/p/bullet/issues/detail?id=174 I included the patch in the srpm and put a link to the ticket in the spec file as recommended by the packaging guidelines. I also applied most of/all the suggestion made. I can successfully build packages locally and through koji (see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1065627 for instance) See http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet-2.73-2.fc10.src.rpm and http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet.spec Could someone review it ? This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. Thanks, Bruno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial In-Reply-To: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191037.n0JAbEdu021139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:37:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: radial Short Description: A simple program for calculating radial velocities of stars in a binary system Owners: mkasik Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191051.n0JApU3C011645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 Peter Vrabec <pvrabec at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pvrabec at redhat.com |skasal at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(pvrabec at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from Peter Vrabec <pvrabec at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:51:28 EDT --- done. /sbin/ was not replaced, since there is no macro for that. All packages that place their files in /sbin use "/sbin". I'm removing myself from CC list and assigning kasal as a new maintainer of dosfstools, see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/dosfstools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191047.n0JAlFhx023222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-19 05:47:14 EDT --- I will do a full review soon but be aware I can't sponsor you. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226235] Merge Review: pax In-Reply-To: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191055.n0JAtXR0025242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226235 Peter Vrabec <pvrabec at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pvrabec at redhat.com |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Vrabec <pvrabec at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:55:31 EDT --- I'm removing myself from CC and adding ovasik. He is current maintainer of pax, according to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191058.n0JAwlh0012898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-19 05:58:46 EDT --- unfortunately I can't review your package you need to be sponsored first please follow the guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join look at "Get a Fedora Account" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165932] Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client In-Reply-To: <bug-165932-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-165932-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191100.n0JB01bd013279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nikolay at vladimiroff.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> 2009-01-19 05:59:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: msmtp New Branches: EL-5 Owners: turki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191059.n0JAxwkc013056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 05:59:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cups-pk-helper Short Description: A helper that makes system-config-printer use PolicyKit Owners: mkasik Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165932] Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client In-Reply-To: <bug-165932-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-165932-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191101.n0JB1MZh026470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #17 from Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> 2009-01-19 06:01:19 EDT --- Sorry about this wrong bug number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: <bug-243631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-243631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191102.n0JB2chJ014106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #45 from Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> 2009-01-19 06:02:30 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: msmtp New Branches: EL-5 Owners: turki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. In-Reply-To: <bug-245080-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245080-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191106.n0JB613E027679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> 2009-01-19 06:05:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libntlm New Branches: EL-5 Owners: turki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191107.n0JB72iK027893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #10 from Patrice FERLET <metal3d at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 06:06:59 EDT --- I already ask for sponsor when I packaged Screenlets (refused because licence was not really free...) and roadsend-PHP... I've got aloready read this page, but I don't know why my demand was not accepted again (since 1 year). So, if someone can sponsor :) help ! Have I to create a review with a new subject ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework In-Reply-To: <bug-245120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191106.n0JB6fcg027806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> 2009-01-19 06:06:39 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libgsasl New Branches: EL-5 Owners: turki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] New: Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts Message-ID: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Summary: Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paskalis at di.uoa.gr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-cm-lgc-fonts/ctan-cm-lgc-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-cm-lgc-fonts/ctan-cm-lgc-fonts-0.5-14.fc11.src.rpm Description: The CM-LGC PostScript Type 1 fonts are converted from the METAFONT sources of the Computer Modern font families. CM-LGC supports the T1, T2A, LGR, and TS1 encodings, i.e. Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek. This is a request for review for renaming the existing tetex-font-cm-lgc package according to the new font naming guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) Although no official documentation for renaming exists, some mail exchanges indicate that a full review should take place for the renaming of the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] New: Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts Message-ID: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Summary: Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paskalis at di.uoa.gr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-kerkis-fonts/ctan-kerkis-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-kerkis-fonts/ctan-kerkis-fonts-2.0-17.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kerkis type 1 fonts for LaTeX. These fonts are particularly useful for typesetting Greek. The Greek repertoire includes full support for polytonic Greek, Greek numerals, and double forms of several letters that occur in variant forms. This is a request for review for renaming the existing tetex-font-cm-lgc package according to the new font naming guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) Although no official documentation for renaming exists, some mail exchanges indicate that a full review should take place for the renaming of the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191118.n0JBIW5Y017492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-19 06:18:30 EDT --- no. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ what's your fedora account name in Fedora Account System (FAS) ? when you finish to create your account please join the fedora package group in FAS. to get sponsored please post your fas username here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191117.n0JBHfK3030078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:24:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191124.n0JBOGLa018518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226235] Merge Review: pax In-Reply-To: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191129.n0JBTnBH032320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226235 --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 06:29:48 EDT --- Thanks for review. Afaik buildroot is completely ignored by latest rpm, so that guideline is no longer so important. Anyway - it is one commit, so could be fixed as well for sanity. I fixed all your objections, built as pax-3.4-7.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191129.n0JBTSVr032263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Kai <maintainer at mt2009.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #3 from Kai <maintainer at mt2009.com> 2009-01-19 06:29:27 EDT --- Ok, thanks very much for your detailed suggestions. Unfortunately `rpmlint -a` seems to crash on my systems, so I was only able to get a fraction of the errors you posted above. I believe, I was able to work around some (most?) of errors mentioned above, and have updated the SRPM package. Since the spec file is managed by our subversion repository, the revised URL is now: Spec URL: http://mmpong.net/trac/export/442/trunk/dist/rpm/mmpong.spec There is one thing I'm not quite clear about yet: How do I package man pages? When using debian, everything is zipped up automatically, but for fedora I wasn't able to find the right macro to gzip them, so `rpmbuild -ba` still fails... I'd appreciate any hints. And another point: You mentioned that there was no `mmpong` package, and obviously you're right. So, to facilitate things, I thought about making `mmpong` a meta-package, that's basically empty and just depends on the components. Is this the way to go on fedora? Thank you for your help, everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191135.n0JBZU1S001102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #23 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-19 06:35:28 EDT --- now seems to be good. koji scratch build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1065827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191138.n0JBc3Wb001339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-19 06:38:01 EDT --- Will look at it this evening -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191143.n0JBh7T8002237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-19 06:43:05 EDT --- will work on it this evening (CET) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191215.n0JCF4Ow027664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-19 07:15:03 EDT --- Hi Jon, thanks for chasing the license. I did another check of the rpm, and everything looks fine. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191232.n0JCWTjQ011671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 --- Comment #2 from Roman Rakus <rrakus at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 07:32:27 EDT --- >[FAILED] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of > the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc > -> Add COPYING to %doc Fixed. >- Change BuildRoot e.g. to: > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fixed. >- Use _smpflags for make or explain, why/that it can't used, e.g. > make %{?_smp_mflags} Fixed. >- Kill "Prereq: /sbin/install-info" line, replace by > Requires(post): /sbin/install-info > Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info Fixed. >- Shouldn't it be the following rather the current (add || :)? > %preun > if [ $1 = 0 ]; then > /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/gperf.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir || : > fi > exit 0 Is it necessary? Fixed. >- Please let us talk about why nearly nothing of gperf/doc/* currently ends up > in the package, there's *.pdf, *.ps, *.html documentation. Reasons? Added *.{html,ps,pdf} fixed in gperf-3.0.3-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191240.n0JCe3Li013308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-19 07:40:02 EDT --- Hi Kevin, thanks for the review. > 1. Seems like all the files that refer to the license say "or later", so > shouldn't this be 'GPLv3+' ? Fixed. > 2. You seem to have a typo in your Source0 line. A 'i' that shouldn't be there. Ah, fat fingers. Fixed as well. > 3. You should probibly require 'httpd' instead of 'webserver' as you are > putting files in httpd specific locations. Hmm, interesting issue. On the one hand, poweradmin works fine with lighttpd under fastcgi for example, on the other hand, most people will run this under apache. Adding the httpd conf file makes it run almost out of the box for the most users. But if you want to run poweradmin under another http server, it would still drag in httpd as a dependency. phpMyAdmin does exactly the same btw. What do you think? > 4. The URL seems wrong... www.poweradmin.org instead of www.poweradmin.com ? Oops, fixed as well. New spec: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/poweradmin.spec New srpm: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/poweradmin-2.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191243.n0JChBCP000902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 07:43:10 EDT --- ratproxy-1.51-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ratproxy-1.51-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:43:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191243.n0JCh9mU013844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 07:43:07 EDT --- ratproxy-1.51-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ratproxy-1.51-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469997-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191250.n0JCoGpO015333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 12:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429809-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191252.n0JCqiE9015638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #13 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 07:52:40 EDT --- Kevin Fenzi told me that this is not the right way to continue a closed review. I closed this and will open a new review request after i fixed the problems. perhaps someone is faster than me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191311.n0JDB7eG020199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 08:11:06 EDT --- zapplet-0.1-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zapplet-0.1-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191311.n0JDBAvD020231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 08:11:10 EDT --- zapplet-0.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zapplet-0.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480607] New: Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API Message-ID: <bug-480607-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480607 Summary: Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fkooman at tuxed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/bluecove.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bluecove-2.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: BlueCove is a JSR-82 implementation on Java Standard Edition (J2SE) that currently interfaces with the Mac OS X, WIDCOMM, BlueSoleil and Microsoft Bluetooth stack. Originally developed by Intel Research and currently maintained by volunteers. Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API. Additional GPL licensed module to support BlueCove runtime on Linux BlueZ. Issues with this package that still need to addressed: - in the i386 builds the bluecove-gpl package includes debug files, this is not the case on x86_64, I have no idea what is going on here. - whether or not to have a bluecove-gpl subpackage as bluecove package without bluecove-gpl package installed is useless. - the bluecove-gpl jar file and the native library are installed in %{_libdir}/bluecove but the "main" bluecove.jar file is installed in %{_javadir}, this seems a bit cluttered as you now need to include 2 jars from different locations in your apps classpath - rpmlint complains about "No binary" in the bluecove.jar file, it should probably be noarch, but I didn't find many JAR files that have BuildArch: noarch... - javadoc subpackage should be BuildArch: noarch as well? Upstream is very helpful in helping resolving packaging issues and committed already some things useful for packaging to svn :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191324.n0JDOtIo010049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 08:24:54 EDT --- APPROVED by Darryl Pierce (dpierce at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191341.n0JDfG7J013853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 08:41:15 EDT --- python-epdb-0.11-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-epdb-0.11-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462621] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: <bug-462621-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462621-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191339.n0JDdKTX013191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462621 Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-19 08:39:18 EDT --- I've been working with upstream for a while now to build pycryptopp againsts the cryptopp library provided by Fedora, instead of the cryptopp source that is shipped with pycryptopp. We've bumped into an issue between C++ and python, and so far haven't found a solution. I'll close this bug for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191341.n0JDfBXA026745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 08:41:10 EDT --- python-epdb-0.11-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-epdb-0.11-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:39:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191339.n0JDddSn026118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #3 from Liang Suilong <liangsuilong at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 08:39:38 EDT --- Thank Jochen Schmitt and Simon Wesp for your help! I am fixing my spec file. Later I will submit a new spec file which has been fixed to this bug report. Could you review my new spec file again? For the reason that I did not used koji server, I really do not know building a RPM file is quite different from in my local machine. Yes! It is very smooth to build an iptux RPM package in my machine. Are there difference between koji and rpmbuild in local machine? I am a Chinese student, so my English is so poor. I need to practise English more. PS: I am not an author of iptux. I just built a RPM for iptux. I feel it is a good software. So I want it to be added into Fedora repository soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226235] Merge Review: pax In-Reply-To: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191342.n0JDgbYt014142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226235 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 08:42:35 EDT --- You are welcome Ondrej. There is one more thing that I missed last time. The guidelines state that: "Fedora's RPM includes a %makeinstall macro but it must NOT be used when make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} works." [1] For pax, this really doesn't matter much since %makeinstall just works as desired. But it is stated in the above guideline as a "MUST" so I had to bring it into your attention. Otherwise, I couldn't find any problems. Review is done on my side. ------------------------------------------- This Merge Review (pax) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191346.n0JDkkd5028059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #50 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-19 08:46:38 EDT --- Devrim, what's up with this package, do you still want to proceed. I'm running out of patience after two years ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 13:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459548-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191357.n0JDvcLE017592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #12 from Patrice FERLET <metal3d at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 08:57:37 EDT --- Alright, I have created my account. I didn't undestood what was missing :) Ok my FAS is "metal3d". Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 14:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225908] Merge Review: iptstate In-Reply-To: <bug-225908-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225908-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191427.n0JERsfL005699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225908 Thomas Woerner <twoerner at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(twoerner at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Thomas Woerner <twoerner at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 09:27:53 EDT --- Please have a look at iptables-2.2.1-4.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 14:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191436.n0JEar5J007716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #46 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-19 09:36:45 EDT --- Official review of 47a66f982319e2c8d0b73a6400f4342f mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines Good. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . ==> in spec file the line: Source: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/src/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz can better be called Source0: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/src/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Good. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Good. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Good. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). Good. Might want to trim the changelog (getting too large to be useful in spec file) - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Good. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Good. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Spec file mentions: ExcludeArch: ppc ==> Please read above recommendation carefully and do what is required. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Requires: rtld(GNU_HASH) seems to be missing. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Good. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. Good. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Good. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. ==> In spec file there is : %defattr(-,root,root) Please replace it with : %defattr(-,root,root,-) - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). Good. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . Good. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Good. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Good. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. NA. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. Good. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/AUTHORS: ASCII text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/ChangeLog: ASCII text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/COPYING: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/INSTALL: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/mondorescue-howto.html: HTML document text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/mondorescue-howto.pdf: PDF document, version 1.4 /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/NEWS: UTF-8 Unicode English text, with very long lines /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/NEWS.old: UTF-8 Unicode English text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/README: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/TODO: ASCII English text ==> please convert to UTF-8 Keeping the original date/time of documentation file is probably a good idea (no guidelines about this) A simple solution : # Convert to utf-8 for file in COPYING INSTALL NEWS README TODO AUTHORS Changelog; do mv $file timestamp iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o $file timestamp touch -r timestamp $file done I guess the NEWS.old is not relevant? - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Good. - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Good. - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. Good on i386. - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. $ koji build --arch=x86_64 --scratch dist-f10 SRPMS/mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Uploading srpm: SRPMS/mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:55 1.91 MiB 35.31 KiB/sec Created task: 1066356 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1066356 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1066356 build (dist-f10, mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1066357 buildArch (mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1066357 buildArch (mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1066356 build (dist-f10, mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1066356 build (dist-f10, mondo-2.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm) completed successfully Good. - SHOULD: The package functions as described. Good. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. NA. - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. NA. - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. NA. - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191503.n0JF3Lv3032204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 10:03:20 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191502.n0JF29Vn012802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 10:02:08 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191505.n0JF5MbK013691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #15 from Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 10:05:20 EDT --- can you comment on t his? $ sudo rpm -Uvh netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.src.rpm netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm netbeans-platform-javadoc-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: netbeans-platform8 >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-ide9-6.1-9.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8 = 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-9.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8 >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-6.1-9.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8 is needed by (installed) java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.6.0.0-8.b14.fc11.i386 netbeans-platform8-harness = 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-9.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8-harness >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-6.1-9.fc10.noarch $ sudo rpm -e --nodeps netbeans-platform8-harness netbeans-platform8 $ sudo rpm -Uvh netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.src.rpm netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm netbeans-platform-javadoc-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:netbeans-platform ########################################### [ 25%] 2:netbeans-platform-harne########################################### [ 50%] 3:netbeans-platform-javad########################################### [ 75%] 4:netbeans-platform warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root ########################################### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/langel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/netbeans-6.5-200811100001-ml-platform-src.zip;497495d0: cpio: open failed - Permission denied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:09:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226416] Merge Review: shadow-utils In-Reply-To: <bug-226416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191509.n0JF9wli014387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226416 --- Comment #5 from Peter Vrabec <pvrabec at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 10:09:57 EDT --- fixed * Mon Jan 19 2009 Peter Vrabec <pvrabec at redhat.com> 2:4.1.2-11 - fix license tag (#226416) - get rid of tabs in spec file (#226416) - convert HOWTO to UTF8 (#226416) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:39:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191539.n0JFdw0m021140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 10:39:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I contacted the author, he'll include the missing license informations in the > next release. Does this mean that the upstream is going to release the new version in a short time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191542.n0JFg4hq021931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 10:42:02 EDT --- (What I mean is that the latest srpm does not seem to have addressed the issue raised on the comment 6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191550.n0JFosSK023980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 10:50:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, thanks very much for your detailed suggestions. > Unfortunately `rpmlint -a` seems to crash on my systems, so I was only able to > get a fraction of the errors you posted above. - Just $ rpmlint foo.rpm or $ rpmlint <rpmname installed> is sufficient. > I believe, I was able to work around some (most?) of errors mentioned above, > and have updated the SRPM package. Since the spec file is managed by our > subversion repository, the revised URL is now: > Spec URL: http://mmpong.net/trac/export/442/trunk/dist/rpm/mmpong.spec - Please also post the URL of your new srpm. Also, please change the release number every time you modify your spec file. > > There is one thing I'm not quite clear about yet: > How do I package man pages? When using debian, everything is zipped up > automatically, but for fedora I wasn't able to find the right macro to gzip > them, so `rpmbuild -ba` still fails... > I'd appreciate any hints. - Man pages should be automatically compressed by rpmbuild. > And another point: > You mentioned that there was no `mmpong` package, and obviously you're right. > So, to facilitate things, I thought about making `mmpong` a meta-package, > that's basically empty and just depends on the components. - I guess usually people expects that after "$ yum install mmpong" people can play this game. So I think that some virtual package should be provided or mmpong-client-caca should be renamed to mmpong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 15:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191554.n0JFsDMO024476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 10:54:12 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-nokogiri Short Description: An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191606.n0JG6nWo014246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 11:06:48 EDT --- Given FESCo's approval of this item, I'm lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191615.n0JGFr4i016018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-19 11:15:51 EDT --- Good: + Build on Koji works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. Bad - Local build fails: writing dependency_links to ide-integration/bicyclerepair.egg-info/dependency_links.txt writing manifest file 'ide-integration/bicyclerepair.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' warning: manifest_maker: standard file '-c' not found reading manifest file 'ide-integration/bicyclerepair.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' writing manifest file 'ide-integration/bicyclerepair.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' Copying ide-integration/bicyclerepair.egg-info to /home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-bicyclerepair-0.9-2.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bicyclerepair-0.9-py2.5.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191618.n0JGIAPM016410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|jochen at herr-schmitt.de |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-19 11:18:09 EDT --- Sorry, I'm not a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191638.n0JGcs0H000919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #47 from Jan ONDREJ <ondrejj at salstar.sk> 2009-01-19 11:38:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/AUTHORS: ASCII text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/ChangeLog: ASCII text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/COPYING: ASCII English text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/INSTALL: ASCII English text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/mondorescue-howto.html: HTML document text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/mondorescue-howto.pdf: PDF document, version 1.4 > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/NEWS: UTF-8 Unicode English text, > with very long lines > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/NEWS.old: UTF-8 Unicode English text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/README: ASCII English text > /usr/share/doc/mondo-2.2.8/TODO: ASCII English text > > ==> please convert to UTF-8 What do you need to convert? I think Bruno can't convert these to UTF-8. 7bit ASCII will remain ASCII also after conversion and HTML and PDF does not say aboout encoding here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] New: Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates Message-ID: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Summary: Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/urlwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/urlwatch-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://thpinfo.com/2008/urlwatch/ Description: This script is intended to help you watch URLs and get notified (via email or in your terminal) of any changes. The change notification will include the URL that has changed and a unified diff of what has changed. The script supports the use of a filtering hook function to strip trivially-varying elements of a webpage. Basic features * Simple configuration (text file, one URL per line) * Easily hackable (clean Python implementation) * Can run as a cronjob and mail changes to you * Always outputs only plaintext - no HTML mails :) * Supports removing noise (always-changing website parts) * Example hooks to filter content in Python Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1066723 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint urlwatch-1.7-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint urlwatch-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475058-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191637.n0JGbS1l020420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #16 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev at sun.com> 2009-01-19 11:37:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > can you comment on t his? > > $ sudo rpm -Uvh netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.src.rpm > netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > netbeans-platform-javadoc-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > netbeans-platform8 >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) > netbeans-ide9-6.1-9.fc10.noarch > netbeans-platform8 = 6.1 is needed by (installed) > netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-9.fc10.noarch > netbeans-platform8 >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-6.1-9.fc10.noarch > netbeans-platform8 is needed by (installed) > java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.6.0.0-8.b14.fc11.i386 This dependency must be changed to netbeans-platform in java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel > netbeans-platform8-harness = 6.1 is needed by (installed) > netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-9.fc10.noarch > netbeans-platform8-harness >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) > netbeans-6.1-9.fc10.noarch It is because netbeans-platform* packages obsoletes corresponding netbeans-platform8* packages, but not provides it. > > $ sudo rpm -e --nodeps netbeans-platform8-harness netbeans-platform8 > > $ sudo rpm -Uvh netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.src.rpm > netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > netbeans-platform-javadoc-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:netbeans-platform ########################################### [ 25%] > 2:netbeans-platform-harne########################################### [ 50%] > 3:netbeans-platform-javad########################################### [ 75%] > 4:netbeans-platform warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root > warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root > ########################################### [100%] > error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /home/langel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/netbeans-6.5-200811100001-ml-platform-src.zip;497495d0: > cpio: open failed - Permission denied It is a strange error. The netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm is not a source package. It doesn't contain the upstream sources zip file. How the rpm tool can know about the source zip!? I can't reproduce it on my Fedora box: # rpm -Uvh netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: netbeans-platform8 = 6.1-5.fc10 is needed by (installed) netbeans-platform8-harness-6.1-5.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8 >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-ide9-6.1-10.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8 = 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-10.fc10.noarch netbeans-platform8 >= 6.1 is needed by (installed) netbeans-6.1-10.fc10.noarch # rpm -e --nodeps netbeans-platform8-harness netbeans-platform8 [root at fedora9nbpackager noarch]# rpm -Uvh netbeans-platform-6.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:netbeans-platform ########################################### [100%] # i.e. all is OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191704.n0JH4NF0026116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 12:04:22 EDT --- Thank you for initial comments. (In reply to comment #3) > rubygem-mechanize.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mechanize-0.9.0/lib/www/mechanize/chain/post_connect_hook.rb - From quick glance it does not seem to be needed, however for now I will leave this file as it is. > I see that both rubygem-gettext-doc and rubygem-zoom-doc install their > documentation (examples,test) inside %doc > What is the reason that this package is different? - The way on this package is usual. For the other two packages (especially for rubygem-gettext) I wanted to strip gem file itself so I removed some document files from gem itself and installed the removed files by %doc method. > rubygem-mechanize-doc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mechanize-0.9.0/test/htdocs/google.html - Fixed. > * I don't think we need to package Manifest.txt. - Removed. > * The license file and the website license page say GPLv2+. The source code > files do not indicate a license. I think setting the license as GPLc2+ will be > more appropriate. - Well, what URL shows that this is under GPLv2"+"? (note that I saw that rubyforge.org website says that this is under GPLv2, however I guess this license tag is automatically tagged from license text. Moreover I saw that in many cases the license tag on website is wrong....) > * Latest version must be packaged. I can't find any information to confirm > this. Where is download section on the website? - See: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/ > * Ruby guidelines say: "A ruby extension/library package must indicate what it > provides with a Provides: ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION declaration in the spec file" > So I think > Provides: ruby(%{gemname}) = %{version}-%{release} > Provides: rubygem(%{gemname}) = %{version}-%{release} > must be changed to > Provides: ruby(%{gemname}) = %{version} > Provides: rubygem(%{gemname}) = %{version} - Provides: rubygem(%{gemname}) = %{version}-%{release} also provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %{version} and I want to write this more strictly for some reason. > * Do we need this line:? > #Requires: rubygem(hoe) - This dependency is implied by gemspec file, however currently I don't see this is needed. So for now I want to keep this comment. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mechanize/rubygem-mechanize-0.9.0-2.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mechanize/rubygem-mechanize.spec * Tue Jan 20 2009 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 0.9.0-2 - Some cleanup For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1066652 For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1066658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191701.n0JH1qKC005961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-19 12:01:51 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches package name + Package name fits naming guildelines for emacs packages + Package contains most recent release of the software + Could download upstream tar ball with spectool + Tar ball in source rpm matches with upstream (md5sum: 615de2bc3c511f244311d22485306bb9) + Provides/Obsoletes of the renaming prcoess seems ok. Rpmlint produced some warning, but because the new package doesn't suppoer XEmacs, this seems ok for me. + Package contains a valid license tag + License tag contains BSD as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Emacs source files are package in a separate el subpackage + el subpackage contains proper Req. to main package + Local build works fine + Debuginfo package contains source files + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %install and %clean + Build on koji works fine. + Local install works fine + %doc section contains a small amount of data, so we don't need a doc subpackage + All packaged files have proper file permissions + All packaged files are owned by the package + There are no files which are in conflict with other packages Bad: - Rpmlint complaints source package emacs-mew.src:396: W: macro-in-%changelog post emacs-mew.src:401: W: macro-in-%changelog description emacs-mew.src:419: W: macro-in-%changelog post emacs-mew.src:420: W: macro-in-%changelog postun emacs-mew.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog - Rpmlint complaints binary package emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/incm 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/mewest 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/cmew 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/mewcat 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/smew 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/mewencode 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/mewl 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/mewdecode 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/mew-pinentry 0555 emacs-mew.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 6.2.3 ['6.2-3.fc10', '6.2-3'] emacs-mew.x86_64: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog emacs-mew.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided mew-xemacs - rpmlint compaints el subpackage emacs-mew-el.x86_64: W: no-documentation emacs-mew-el.x86_64: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog emacs-mew-el.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided mew TODO: - Please notify upstream, that eatch source file should contains a valid copyright notice - Local uninstall produced the following messages: install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/share/info/mew.info'; nothing deleted install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/share/info/mew.jis.info'; nothing deleted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: <bug-478743-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478743-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191709.n0JH9dex007251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 12:09:38 EDT --- I'll review this. I tried building it on F-10, and got the following output at the end of the rpmbuild run: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.a /usr/lib64/saga/libcontrib_a_perego.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgeostatistics_grid.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgeostatistics_kriging_variogram.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgeostatistics_points.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_analysis.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_calculus.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_discretisation.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_filter.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_gridding.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_spline.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_tools.a /usr/lib64/saga/libgrid_visualisation.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_esri_e00.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_gps.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_grid.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_grid_gdal.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_grid_grib2.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_grid_image.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_shapes.a /usr/lib64/saga/libio_shapes_dxf.a /usr/lib64/saga/liblectures_introduction.a /usr/lib64/saga/libpj_georeference.a /usr/lib64/saga/libpj_proj4.a /usr/lib64/saga/librecreations_fractals.a /usr/lib64/saga/librecreations_games.a /usr/lib64/saga/libshapes_grid.a /usr/lib64/saga/libshapes_lines.a /usr/lib64/saga/libshapes_points.a /usr/lib64/saga/libshapes_polygons.a /usr/lib64/saga/libshapes_tools.a /usr/lib64/saga/libsim_cellular_automata.a /usr/lib64/saga/libsim_ecosystems_hugget.a /usr/lib64/saga/libsim_fire_spreading.a /usr/lib64/saga/libsim_hydrology.a /usr/lib64/saga/libta_channels.a /usr/lib64/saga/libta_hydrology.a /usr/lib64/saga/libta_lighting.a /usr/lib64/saga/libta_morphometry.a /usr/lib64/saga/libta_preprocessor.a /usr/lib64/saga/libta_profiles.a /usr/lib64/saga/libtable_calculus.a /usr/lib64/saga/libtable_tools.a /usr/lib64/saga/libtin_tools.a Since you built shared libraries, too, you probably don't want to build the static libraries. I suggest passing --disable-static to %configure. I also see that you are installing the *.la files. Normally, this should not be done; see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries. Is there some reason for installing those files in this case? I'll do a full review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191711.n0JHBDA9007856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us Flag| |needinfo?(bioinfornatics at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #11 from David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> 2009-01-19 12:11:12 EDT --- So a few comments: 1. License type per the source is GPLv2+ not GPL+ 2. Source0 has two 'http://' in the listing 3. This is a gui application and yet there is no .desktop file see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop The package appears to build fine in mock rpmlint output below: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 noarch]$ rpmlint gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint gdesklet-slideshow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. While working on this review I looked for your fas account and don't see one with your name or your email address as listed in this bug. If you don't have one, you'll need to get one, and that probably means you need to set this bug to block the fe-needsponsor bug so that you can be sponsored as a packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: <bug-478743-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478743-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191718.n0JHI1jp028751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 12:17:59 EDT --- Sorry, I read the spec file incorrectly. You are excluding the .la files. So I've added --disable-static to my copy of the spec file to get a clean build and will base a review on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191740.n0JHeCuY032635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com --- Comment #25 from Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 12:40:11 EDT --- The bodhi issue should be fixed. There was a stray PackageBuild lying around, without the corresponding PackageUpdate. You should be able to re-submit it without problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191746.n0JHkMcX014516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Fran?ois Kooman <fkooman at tuxed.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fkooman at tuxed.net --- Comment #10 from Fran?ois Kooman <fkooman at tuxed.net> 2009-01-19 12:46:20 EDT --- Is it not an option to create an installation instructions document on the wiki, or propose for the VMware website, that states the packages you need to install on x86_64 / i386 before installing VMware (server)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191757.n0JHvOgm016500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |pidgin-msn-pecan - |purple-msn-pecan - |Alternative MSN protocol |Alternative MSN protocol |plugin for libpurple |plugin for libpurple Alias|pidgin-msn-pecan |purple-msn-pecan Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 12:57:23 EDT --- Okay, now this pacakge itself is good. So: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 18:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191830.n0JIUDJv010251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 13:30:12 EDT --- Well, I have not checked your latest srpm yet (currently I just verified that your latest srpm builds), however: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will may be accepted with another few work (in fact I have not checked your latest srpm yet...) But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 18:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191831.n0JIVFNa023334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #5 from Liang Suilong <liangsuilong at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 13:31:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329376) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329376) iptux srpm I also upload an iptux SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 18:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191828.n0JISdpk022614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #4 from Liang Suilong <liangsuilong at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 13:28:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329375) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329375) a new iptux specfile Now I fix the problems and build RPMs again in my machine. After that, I create a new directory and copy packages and specfile to test by rpmlint in CLI. The result is that: [fedora at fedora-desktop iptux]$ ls -a . iptux-0.4.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm iptux-debuginfo-0.4.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm .. iptux-0.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm iptux.spec [fedora at fedora-desktop iptux]$ rpmlint -a * 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/rpmlint/rpmlint.py", line 295, in <module> main() File "/usr/share/rpmlint/rpmlint.py", line 139, in main for item in ts.IDTXload(): AttributeError: 'rpm.ts' object has no attribute 'IDTXload' Is it OK now? Should I correct AttributeError? If it needs to be fixed, I do not know how to fix the AttributeError exactly. Could you help me? I upload a new iptux specfile as an attachment. You can download it and see it. At last, how can I find a sponsor to sponsor me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 18:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191843.n0JIhAt4025595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-19 13:43:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Unfortunately `rpmlint -a` seems to crash on my systems Anyway I reported this issue as bug 480664. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191912.n0JJC26m019035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-19 14:12:01 EDT --- God: + Basename of SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fits with maming guidelines + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains no subpackages + Source tar ball could downloaed via spectool + Tar ball in package matches with upstream (md5sum: 29b3a00caad5f45c905ec621bec26687) + Package contains valid License tag + License tag has MIT as an valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Buildroot will be clean on the beginning of %install and %clean + Package has a %clean stanza + Local buidl works fine. + Local install works fine + Simple call to urlwatch works without crash + Local uninstall works fine + Build on koji works fine + Package will be build as noarch + Rpmlint has no complaints for source rpm + Rpmlint has no complaints for binary rpm + Files has proper file permissions + All packaged files are owned by the package + No packaged files are claimed by other packages + %doc stanza has small amount of files, so we need no separate doc subpackage *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: <bug-478743-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478743-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191915.n0JJFIe3000743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 14:15:17 EDT --- It turns out that adding --disable-static isn't enough. Your attempt to use the system libtool wasn't quite right. You need to pass the -f flag to autoreconf, and throw away the first of your two sed invocations. That it, the %build section should contain this: autoreconf -i -f sed -i -e 's|SG_T(\"LD_LIBRARY_PATH\")|SG_T(\"%{_libdir}\")|g' \ src/saga_core/saga_api/module_library.cpp %configure --enable-unicode --disable-static make %{?_smp_mflags} Even then, rpmlint shows that there are still some problems in this package. This is what I get: saga.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin saga.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 saga.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 saga.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/saga-2.0.3/AUTHORS saga.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/saga-2.0.3/NEWS saga.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/saga-2.0.3/ChangeLog saga.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/saga-2.0.3/README saga.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_richtext-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0 saga.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsaga_api.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 Finally, I see in the build output that there are a number of incorrect printf directives in this program. They may cause no harm, but it is probably worth checking whether they will cause any trouble. Look for warnings of the form: warning: format '%FLAG' expects type 'TYPE1' but argument N has type 'TYPE2' Some of those look like they will print integers incorrectly on 64-bit platforms. Can you fix all of this and roll a new package so I don't get confused as to what you have and what I changed? Thanks. If you need a hand with any of it, let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191936.n0JJa0X4024718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #26 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-19 14:35:59 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191934.n0JJYFK6004915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-19 14:34:14 EDT --- the license stated in urlwatch website is another. http://thpinfo.com/2008/urlwatch/ "License urlwatch is released under the terms of the BSD license" why MIT in spec file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191941.n0JJfRMK007025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #6 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-19 14:41:26 EDT --- > * Not sure about grabbing the data from what appears to be part of their > filesystem that is laid out to fit neatly into the ubuntu repository. Might be > a bit too dynamic... The Git repository sounds like a much better idea. Actually, the tarballs are better to check that I'm not introducing malware in Fedora. With a Git clone, it would be a little harder to check, and the SCM has already changed in the past. I have contacted the author about this, so hopefully he's aware of this issue. > * I think offering an installer for a TA mod "CA" may have licencing issues. > TA is copyright of what used to be infogrames, which i know think is Atari. > The content that this installer obtains is probably copyright protected, as I > undesrtand that Complete Annihilation uses TA game data. The package does not contain the copyrighted files, you still have to download them by hand. The CA installer does not download them. > * Is specifying the content of the sub-package in the main package description > normal? I have not seen this before, and it strikes me as a touch confusing. Oops, no, that's a cut-n-paste mistake. Good catch ! > * Using chrpath to remove hardcoding of path information is considered a last > resort option [1]. Consider patching the build system to remove invocations > to chrpath. It looks like it very very hard to remove rpath with ocaml. I've search the web but the only available option seems to use chrpath. If you find a cleaner way, I'm interested of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: <bug-467413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191944.n0JJiVTN007689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|467416 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: <bug-467325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467325-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191944.n0JJiTje007634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191944.n0JJiWVx007730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: <bug-454416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191944.n0JJiROE007606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191944.n0JJiQYt007579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|467396, 467413 |478640, 467325, 454416 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 14:44:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-3.fc10.src.rpm * Mon Jan 19 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.8.0-3 - Include license file in documentation section. - Disable building static library to save time. - Remove BRs on mingw32-fontconfig and mingw32-freetype which are not needed on Win32. - Use _smp_mflags. - Added BRs mingw32-dlfcn, mingw32-iconv, mingw32-zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191944.n0JJiUeh007663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|467416 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:52:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191952.n0JJqC8g029105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 14:52:11 EDT --- Sorry, I meant to get round to this one today, but I've run out of time. I will attempt to look at it tomorrow morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191954.n0JJsqrr029671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-19 14:54:51 EDT --- God: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + Name of the package fits naming guidelines + Package contains most recent release + Package contains valid License tag + License tag contains GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + License review on source files state, that GPLv2 may be + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + Package has no subpackages + Local buidl works fine + Package contains %clean stanza + Buildroot will be deleted on the beginning of %clean and %install + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + Start of dnssec-conf without argument works witoht crash + Build on koji works fine + Rpmlint has no complaints about the source package + Rpmlint has no complaints about the binary package + Files has proper file permissions + All packaged files belong to the package + Package contains no files belong to other packages + %doc subpackage has a small amont, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Package contains proper %changelog Bad. - source tag not fully quallified - Package use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - License review on source files state, that GPLv2 may be right value for the license tag TODO: - Please notify upstream, that eatch source file should have a proper copyright notice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901191958.n0JJwPEn011904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rstrode at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 14:58:23 EDT --- Any updates on this, Peter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 20:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: <bug-226210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192054.n0JKsbLq010755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 15:54:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry to bother you again, but, please, provide more explanations - it still > not clear for some people, whether iLBC legal or not. > > Opal ships this implementation of RFC3951 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3951 > ), which distributes under very strange license: > > http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf > > See also this thread: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/90195 > > We already removed iLBC support from Asterisk - can we re-add this support > back? Sorry for the delay. Red Hat Legal got this one wrong (it happens to everyone sometimes). The iLBC codec needs to be removed from the opal tarball. Reblocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 21:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192100.n0JL0BN0026512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-19 16:00:10 EDT --- Itamar, you are right the license seems more to match the 'New BSD (no advertising, 3 clause)' than MIT. I will change the license tag to BSD before cvs import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 21:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192100.n0JL0ueA026722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-19 16:00:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: urlwatch Short Description: A tool for monitoring webpages for updates Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 21:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods In-Reply-To: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478769-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192123.n0JLNhFb016611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-19 16:23:42 EDT --- News from the author: we now have a fixed download location, and he worked on making the package more portable. Here's the new SRPM : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-installer-20090119-1.fc10.src.rpm Note that the package does not contain a license file, I've notified the author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192205.n0JM5Mec007114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-19 17:05:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I contacted the author, he'll include the missing license informations in the > > next release. > > Does this mean that the upstream is going to release the new version > in a short time? There was just a new version released upstream and updated the SRPM and spec files. http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin.spec As of http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568351 I also introduced a small hack to get around it. Koji scratch build ran fine. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1067281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192228.n0JMSTmw011261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-19 17:28:26 EDT --- Roman, thank you for taking action. I think, I've forgotten the suggestion of preserving timestamps before and to avoid the usage of %makeinstall, thus we recommend packagers to use instead: make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install INSTALL='install -p' Regarding the documentation I'm not really happy. We've currently much more documentation rather rest of gperf inside of the package. We've multiple options: Creating -docs subpackage and moving everything out there OR just kill the huge *.ps from %doc (*.ps vs. *.pdf seems to be a bit redundant and *.pdf is usually better searchable) - last of it was accepted and got told to be useful in Freenode #fedora-devel, #fedora-de by several packagers. Choose what you like as packager and let me know. I can deal with both or even a better option - afterwards we should be (hopefully) fine with review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192232.n0JMWq9T030023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |paskalis at di.uoa.gr Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192232.n0JMW5v5012167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-19 17:32:04 EDT --- 1. you need a %define _texmf_main %{_datadir}/texmf or import it from something you buildrequires (I assume the _ means you intend to import it from some central package) 2. the main package does not need to Requires: fontpackages-filesystem 3. didn't check if all the font names were accounted for in the fontconfig rules You should probably test if the recipe Behdad suggested in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 works for you and manages to create a single unicode font from all the local type one variants of each font family That being said the obsoletes work and that's all I'm supposed to check in a rename review, so ??? APPROVED ??? Please don't forget to add your fonts subpackages to comps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Comps_fonts_rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480103-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192240.n0JMeoiu014183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-19 17:40:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329407) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329407) rpmlint output There are still some issues. - From my point of view, the name should be bnirc.spec https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name - One line per BR would be nice - The %file section needs some work - duplicates - ownership - You need to make a devel subpackage - *.la files must be deleted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries The rpmlint output [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint bnIRC* bnIRC.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/src/debug/bnIRC-1.1.1/plugins/server_strings/server_strings.c .... .... .... bnIRC.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/bnirc.debug bnIRC.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/bnirc.debug 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 22 errors, 75 warnings. see attachment for full details -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192243.n0JMhZS9032308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 17:43:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you for initial comments. > You're welcome. > (In reply to comment #3) > > * The license file and the website license page say GPLv2+. The source code > > files do not indicate a license. I think setting the license as GPLc2+ will be > > more appropriate. > - Well, what URL shows that this is under GPLv2"+"? > (note that I saw that rubyforge.org website says that this is > under GPLv2, however I guess this license tag is automatically tagged > from license text. Moreover I saw that in many cases the license > tag on website is wrong....) > On the bottom of the homepage for this gem: http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/mechanize/ there is a LICENSE section. When I click on the LICENSE, it gives me the full text of GPLv2 (which has the "or later" clause). Don't you think we should believe the website? > > * Latest version must be packaged. I can't find any information to confirm > > this. Where is download section on the website? > - See: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/ > Yeah I tried to go there before and got a 403 mirror. I guess I hit to a bad mirror. Now I confirm that 0.9.0 is the latest version. Everything else is fine. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-mechanize) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192256.n0JMuGki002219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 17:56:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192255.n0JMtTjU002007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-19 17:55:25 EDT --- Some comments before full review: Why do you have: BuildArch: i386 BuildArch: x86-64 BuildArch: ppc in the spec? BuildArch: can only be specified once, so merge these three. Otherwise it fails with: $ rpmbuild -bb flexdock.spec error: No compatible architectures found for build x86-64 is not a valid arch designation, by the way. You should use x86_64. I think you should use ExcludeArch: ppc64 to disable the unsupported arch instead and open a bug for that (blocking FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 tracker bug). Fails to build in mock on rawhide/i386: [...] ++ build-classpath jgoodies-looks skinlf /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find jgoodies-looks Java extension for this JVM /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find skinlf Java extension for this JVM /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Some specified jars were not found [...] You seem to have forgotten to add these as BuildRequires as well. Once the above are fixed, it builds in mock, but rpmlint output is not clean: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package flexdock.src:157: E: files-attr-not-set flexdock.src:158: E: files-attr-not-set flexdock.src:159: E: files-attr-not-set 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. You need to fix that. According to Java Packaging Guidelines, you're installing the files in the wrong location. Please fix that. Also, the specfile has lots of trailing whitespace and inconsistent usage of spaces and tabs for indentation. Please fix that, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192259.n0JMxsgM002631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 17:59:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478565] Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping In-Reply-To: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192258.n0JMwjdR002509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478565 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 17:58:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:01:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192301.n0JN198T003186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:01:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192257.n0JMv2sX017463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #24 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-19 17:57:01 EDT --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as you are already sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192302.n0JN2Q9C003570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-19 18:02:25 EDT --- Manuel, thanks for the patch and the reworked spec file. Here are the new files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/httping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/httping-1.2.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192305.n0JN52Qb004190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-19 18:05:01 EDT --- 1. needs _texmf_main defined like cm-lgc 2. rpmlint complains of mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs 3. kerkis calligraphic and the small caps variants clearly needs their own subpackage. Please make sure you only group in the same font subpackage fonts of the same family (differing only in weight, width or slant). I didn't check the others 4. the main package does not need to Requires: fontpackages-filesystem 5. It's probably a good idea to add fontconfig substitution rules for the URW fonts kerkis is derived of, assuming the Kerkis creators didn't change the design and metrics too much (cf the substitution template in filepackages-devel) 6. please try to get you fontconfig files merged in upstream kerkis once you're happy with them 7. please add your new fonts subpackages to comps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Comps_fonts_rules 8. you obsoletes should be Obsoletes: tetex-font-kerkis < 2.0-17 to provide an upgrade path to the F10 kerkis package, so this version does not pass rename review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192304.n0JN4jAf018737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-19 18:04:43 EDT --- Very nice, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: <bug-472792-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472792-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192316.n0JNGWwg006512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-19 18:16:31 EDT --- We should have RH Legal look at it just in case. Blocking FE-Legal for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial In-Reply-To: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192319.n0JNJusp006936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:19:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192321.n0JNL0VX022403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:20:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: <bug-243631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-243631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192323.n0JNNE0q007899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #46 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:23:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480355] Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192321.n0JNLhim007683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480355 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:21:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework In-Reply-To: <bug-245120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245120-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192324.n0JNOv7u008170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:24:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. In-Reply-To: <bug-245080-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-245080-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192323.n0JNNhYu008008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:23:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192322.n0JNMu4B022774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 18:22:55 EDT --- So, my initial request is still valid. Could you update to the latest version so that we can have a proper review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480356] Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192322.n0JNMRTr022675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480356 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-19 18:22:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192338.n0JNcuCK026121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #37 from Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 18:38:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cjkuni-fonts Short Description: Chinese, Japanese, Korean Unicode TrueType fonts. Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192342.n0JNgc1v026927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192344.n0JNikr2027222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192346.n0JNkNDg027821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192347.n0JNlQog012898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts |Package Review: cjkunifonts |(split from fonts-chinese) |(split from fonts-chinese) | |[renamed to cjkuni-fonts] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901192347.n0JNlpHS028160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200005.n0K05g8J016775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #16 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 19:05:41 EDT --- Ok, copy that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200003.n0K03sSA031796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-19 19:03:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200002.n0K026cK031654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 19:02:05 EDT --- urlwatch-1.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/urlwatch-1.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:02:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200002.n0K023Y9031618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-19 19:02:02 EDT --- urlwatch-1.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/urlwatch-1.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200148.n0K1mEfF017962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-19 20:48:12 EDT --- For the optflags, I have this patch: http://svn.calcforge.org/viewvc/fedora/nsis/nsis-2.34-RPM_OPT_FLAGS.diff?revision=2&root=repo-specfiles&view=markup in my old packages, but it's for an old version (2.34) and I also haven't checked yet that it doesn't break the cross-built parts (my old packages didn't build the W32 stuff from source). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200244.n0K2idPJ027461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #32 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-19 21:44:36 EDT --- Updated the files... Builds clean, still. SPEC URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US-1.0-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200333.n0K3XdKn006578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 22:33:38 EDT --- The package name still contains the version number which is bad. How about fedora-security-guide-en-US-11-7.fc10 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200351.n0K3pSEd028919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 22:51:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Templates and cabal2spec have been removed from ghc-6.10.1-7.fc11 so this should now install. * Tue Jan 20 2009 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 0.4-1 - move ghc_version back to templates for now - leave macros.ghc in ghc - require ghc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200352.n0K3qEkS029256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 22:52:13 EDT --- Still open to improvements to the name. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200401.n0K41UAD013180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-19 23:01:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-2.fc10.noarch.rpm * Tue Jan 20 2009 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 0.4-2 - remove old todo comments about splitting and ghc dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200400.n0K40oNu012994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #34 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-19 23:00:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > The package name still contains the version number which is bad. > > How about fedora-security-guide-en-US-11-7.fc10 ? At the risk of sounding dumb... Why are version numbers bad? If anything the "11" is something I don't like but the version "1.0-7" seems like a really good idea. I've already filed a ticket against the "11" part (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478950) but not sure where that is. I can manually remove it from the package if that makes everything right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225908] Merge Review: iptstate In-Reply-To: <bug-225908-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225908-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200429.n0K4TpMd004275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225908 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 23:29:50 EDT --- APPROVED. As approved package is already in rawhide, I am closing this review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200434.n0K4YQDo005109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 23:34:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200433.n0K4XiZi019055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-19 23:33:43 EDT --- As already suggested in comment #4 and from %files section it will not be good to have this package installing 2 directories /usr/share/doc/dosfstools /usr/share/doc/dosfstools-3.0.1 That should be either one. Please update SPEC and build new package. Best you can do as suggested in comment #4 is to write mv COPYING ChangeLog doc/ to %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200459.n0K4x6rS009048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-19 23:59:04 EDT --- http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cpphs.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cpphs-1.6-4.fc9.src.rpm Now with separate -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] New: Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications Message-ID: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 Summary: Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk2-parasite/gtk2-parasite.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk2-parasite/gtk2-parasite-0-0.1.gitf485897d.src.rpm Description: Parasite is a debugging and development tool that runs inside your GTK+ application's process. It can inspect your application, giving you detailed information on your UI, such as the hierarchy, X window IDs, widget properties, and more. You can modify properties on the fly in order to experiment with the look of your UI. Parasite includes an embedded Python shell that lets you write new code that directly interacts with your application's UI, regardless of the language the application is written in. Create new dialogs, attach temporary signal handlers to buttons, test out new logic, and gather additional debug information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200521.n0K5Lvgo027525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #3 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 00:21:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/cilk.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/cilk-5.4.6-2.src.rpm Fixed the license field and prematurely filed the request without running in mock, the %optflags are slapped into %configure and the '-pipe' is what is causing the failure in the package build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200530.n0K5UOBl014929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Bug 477533 depends on bug 477883, which changed state. Bug 477883 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200530.n0K5UMHd014899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-20 00:30:21 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submitted push request for F-10/9, closing. Thank you for reviewing and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200526.n0K5QY9o014274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-20 00:26:33 EDT --- Thank you. (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > * The license file and the website license page say GPLv2+. The source code > > > files do not indicate a license. I think setting the license as GPLc2+ will be > > > more appropriate. > > - Well, what URL shows that this is under GPLv2"+"? > > (note that I saw that rubyforge.org website says that this is > > under GPLv2, however I guess this license tag is automatically tagged > > from license text. Moreover I saw that in many cases the license > > tag on website is wrong....) > > > > On the bottom of the homepage for this gem: > http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/mechanize/ > there is a LICENSE section. When I click on the LICENSE, it gives me the full > text of GPLv2 (which has the "or later" clause). > > Don't you think we should believe the website? - LICENSE section says this is just under GPL and the following link shows just GPLv2 license text ("any later" clause is just a example also written in "other" GPLv2 license text). So this does not render this package to be under GPLv2. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mechanize Short Description: A handy web browsing ruby object Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200558.n0K5wAZo019648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-20 00:58:10 EDT --- gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200557.n0K5vNRk000979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-20 00:57:22 EDT --- gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480483-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200559.n0K5xcBc001217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] New: Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein Message-ID: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein Alias: djbdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Summary: Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora `djbdns' is a Domain Name System written by the eminent author of qmail, D. J. Bernstein. djbdns is also suppose to be utmost secure like qmail. SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/djbdns.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/djbdns-1.05-1.fc10.src.rpm `djbdns' depends on another package called daemontools, which is again written by D J Bernstein. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] New: Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. Message-ID: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. Alias: daemontools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 Summary: Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 URL: http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora daemontools is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. supervise monitors a service. It starts the service and restarts the service if it dies. Setting up a new service is easy: all supervise needs is a directory with a run script that runs the service. multilog saves error messages to one or more logs. It optionally timestamps each line and, for each log, includes or excludes lines matching specified patterns. It automatically rotates logs to limit the amount of disk space used. If the disk fills up, it pauses and tries again, without losing any data. SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools-0.76-1.fc10.src.rpm Daemontools is required by another package called `djbdns', which is open for review at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 I hereby request the reviewers to vet both the packages. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200623.n0K6NqUG005760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 01:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-ldaphelper Short Description: A wrapper around LDAP search results Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200626.n0K6QwT1006468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #1 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-20 01:26:57 EDT --- Daemontools package is open for review at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200627.n0K6RvHc006570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200628.n0K6SKLB006647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200634.n0K6YDeO025688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-20 01:34:13 EDT --- this is your first package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200632.n0K6WrMc025551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480727 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200632.n0K6WskQ025580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 06:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200643.n0K6hrLZ009221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-20 01:43:52 EDT --- I am the sponsor of the submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200716.n0K7GH04000474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-20 02:16:16 EDT --- Some remarks: This package will need a lot of love to let it pass a review. * %files .. /usr/local/etc/* /usr/local/bin/* => Distro packages must not contrain files below /usr/local * Package doesn't seem to honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. * *.tar.gz doesn't match upstream (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz) * I can't spot any license (I am not sure, but haven't there been some legal issues with DJB's works?). Blocking FE-LEGAL. Finally: Does this package still have an active upstream? I thought, DJB discontinued all his works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200712.n0K7CaK1014181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #36 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-20 02:12:30 EDT --- @Christoph > Your review is finish ? The review is approve ? Because this review block my sponsorships and the pidgin-privacy-please integration... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200713.n0K7D35P014232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #38 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-20 02:13:01 EDT --- fedora-review+ ? will review the cjkunifonts changes anyway and it's easier for me if they're done directly with the new srpm name in the new srpm component before the review (and not the reverse) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200719.n0K7J7XT000809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 02:19:05 EDT --- > At the risk of sounding dumb... Why are version numbers bad? If anything the > "11" is something I don't like but the version "1.0-7" seems like a really good > idea. Yep, the version number in the package name itself is bad... ie the "-11" part in the Name field: Name: fedora-security-guide-11-en-US This has already come up several times in the review. Source (base) package names are stable in fedora over releases. (I am happy to discuss the packaging on irc if I can make things clearer.) > I can manually remove it from the package if that makes everything right. That would help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200730.n0K7UmW1002896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 02:30:46 EDT --- Nicolas, then better to open new review bugs IMHO than reopening old reviews for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200727.n0K7RNC4002289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200727.n0K7RAGt002247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-20 02:27:09 EDT --- Some remarks: This package will need a lot of love to let it pass a review. * %files .. /usr/local/etc/* /usr/local/bin/* => Distro packages must not contrain files below /usr/local * Package doesn't seem to honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. * *.tar.gz doesn't match upstream (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz) * I can't spot any license (I am not sure, but haven't there been some legal issues with DJB's works?). Blocking FE-LEGAL. Finally: Does this package still have an active upstream? I thought, DJB discontinued all his works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200726.n0K7QwoZ016644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-20 02:26:57 EDT --- Sorry, comment #3 was addressing djbdns (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724) Re-adding comment there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: <bug-459948-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459948-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200733.n0K7Xdbq003299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200742.n0K7gcFS018867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 02:42:37 EDT --- Also builds fine on all dist-f11 rawhide platforms http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1068024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200742.n0K7gZ0d018839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 02:42:34 EDT --- Thanks for the update. :) One last tweak: you can remove this line I think: Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} it is now taken care of by the doc requires(postun). With that the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200800.n0K80cca021829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-20 03:00:37 EDT --- Ah, OK. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpphs Short Description: A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200802.n0K82NmH007968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-20 03:01:21 EDT --- Debian's package database had the missing legal link: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/djbdns/djbdns_1.05-4/djbdns.copyright => Put a similar document as Debian does into your rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200802.n0K82M51007959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-20 03:02:03 EDT --- The same as with dbjdns, Debian's link: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/daemontools/daemontools_0.76-3/daemontools.copyright => Put a similar document as Debian does into your rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200826.n0K8QCWd011973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #40 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-20 03:26:11 EDT --- I don't know, the whole renaming process is under-formalised. Ask nirik -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480356] Review Request: mythes-mi - Maori thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200849.n0K8nEi1016443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480356 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480355] Review Request: mythes-it - Italian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200848.n0K8mu8v030037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480355 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200858.n0K8wCTP018090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 03:58:10 EDT --- I've queried upstream about the license on the files. Can someone provide me a list of know files? I've had a quick look but not had enough time to look at all files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:58:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200858.n0K8wvXp031879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #9 from Zdenek Prikryl <zprikryl at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 03:58:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > You're currently adding "Requires: bash >= 2.0" to gpm package. Is this really > needed? Bash < 2.0 existed before 1998 in Red Hat Linux - that was just before > Red Hat Linux 5.2. If we still need it, please explain the need for it. It seems that this requires isn't needed any more. > Do we really need the static library? If yes, we need a -static subpackage. But > personally, I don't see a need for a *.a file - can we remove it? We need the static library. So, I added -static subpackage. > I think, we can ignore macro-in-%changelog warnings, there's nothing which gets > expanded here. I changed % to %% so this warnings disappear. > Do we really need to package the TODO file as %doc? That seems to be needed for > upstream, not for downstream, yes? If we need it, we have to convert it to UTF8 > using e.g. the following: > > iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 -o TODO.utf8 TODO > touch -c -r TODO TODO.utf8 > mv -f TODO.utf8 TODO > I my opinion this file is needed. If anyone wants to start writing patches, then he'll look into this file and start writing. So, I added the conversion to the spec file. > We can't fix W: strange-permission gpm.init 0755 as CVS won't let us do this, > AFAIK. Please have a look in the future, that you're importing/adding files > with the correct permissions, please (0644) - thanks. Ok. > BTW, somebody an idea, what causes W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ > libgpm.so.2.1.0 and how to solve it? I'll take a look on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478941-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200910.n0K9Auw0021586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 04:10:53 EDT --- Look at the files libcelt/*[ch] and query the ones which don't have license information in them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200915.n0K9F48L022647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #6 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-20 04:15:03 EDT --- Hello Ralf, that was real quick, thanks. (In reply to comment #3) > * %files > /usr/local/etc/* > /usr/local/bin/* > => Distro packages must not contrain files below /usr/local But that's the prefix where files get installed. What do you suggest /usr? > * Package doesn't seem to honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Flags like? > * *.tar.gz doesn't match upstream (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz) Yep, I had to do some changes to get a clean compile && install. > * I can't spot any license (I am not sure, but haven't there been some legal > issues with DJB's works?). Blocking FE-LEGAL. I don't think there are any legal issues, for djb has declared it as a Public Domain work. But still please correct me if I'm wrong. > Finally: Does this package still have an active upstream? > I thought, DJB discontinued all his works. That's right, it's development has seized since 2007, I guess. please see: http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200914.n0K9EhUF003431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 04:14:41 EDT --- Hmmm, don't understand, build fine for me under Rawhide localy, have you more log ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages (was: haskell-packaging) In-Reply-To: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479803-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200916.n0K9Gdmv004124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: cabal2spec |haskell-packaging - RPM |- generates spec files for |macros and spec templates |Haskell packages (was: |for Haskell |haskell-packaging) --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 04:16:37 EDT --- I think now it makes more sense to name the package after the script itself (currently cabal2spec). Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.4-3.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480724-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200926.n0K9Q7G6006235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #4 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-20 04:26:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Debian's package database had the missing legal link: > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/djbdns/djbdns_1.05-4/djbdns.copyright > > => Put a similar document as Debian does into your rpm. Sure, I'll put that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901200930.n0K9U23U007025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://cr.yp.to/daemontools |http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools |/ |/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201006.n0KA6EG3000704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ivazqueznet at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201005.n0KA5YRK000508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ivazqueznet at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201006.n0KA6KkU000746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201004.n0KA4BLs032475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-20 05:04:10 EDT --- > Yep, I had to do some changes to get a clean compile && install. include small patch'es here are a example to generate a patch diff -ruNp daemontools-0.76.old daemontools-0.76.new > fix_xyz.patch or diff -ruNp daemontools-0.76.old/file daemontools-0.76.new/file > fix_xyz_file.patch I recommend you to work with daemontools first and after you get this package approved then start the work with djbdns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201021.n0KALoH4017582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 05:21:49 EDT --- I'm going to second David's idea of including the server (made non-executable) in %doc, but I otherwise approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] New: Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev Message-ID: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Summary: Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: harald at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/udev-extras/udev-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/udev-extras/udev-extras-20081230-0.1.20090120git.fc10.src.rpm Description: Here is udev-extras which is needed for DeviceKit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201110.n0KBA7t9013788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-20 06:10:06 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: checked with diff BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. BAD license field matches the actual license. N/A license is open source-compatible. XXX License text not included upstream. XXX License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - package name should reflect upstream name, eg. gtkparasite is appropriate package name here (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming) - snapshot packages should include date in the release tag (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages) - license information is completely missing in the sources files and even GPL is symlinked from autotools, but the license tag says it should MIT as written only on the web page - the empty run of configure should be dropped from the autogen.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201115.n0KBFESm028685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-20 06:15:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pywebdav Short Description: WebDAV library for Python Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201113.n0KBDfJ4028077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-20 06:13:39 EDT --- I am convinced now, I will put the server as an example into %doc. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: <bug-458643-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458643-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201115.n0KBFmSf028813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #16 from Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> 2009-01-20 06:15:45 EDT --- I have to apologize for having you wait so long. But now I got enough time to do the review. A few things to get the review going again: - Could you please update to the latest stable version 2.10.0.2? - This is the rpmlint output I get when running on the binary RPM: dansguardian.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dansguardian/scripts/systemv-init 0644 dansguardian.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dansguardian/scripts/logrotation 0644 dansguardian.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/dansguardian dansguardian.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dansguardian/scripts/bsd-init 0644 dansguardian.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dansguardian/scripts/solaris-init 0644 dansguardian.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dansguardian/dansguardian.pl 0644 dansguardian.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dansguardian/authplugins/ident.conf (...) dansguardian.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/dansguardian $prog dansguardian.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/dansguardian $prog dansguardian.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/dansguardian $prog If you are unsure how to solve this issues you can try rpmlint -I. Example: rpmlint -I incoherent-subsys Please also feel free to ask here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201123.n0KBNwOT016592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #66 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 06:23:51 EDT --- Look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567#c17 The current package miss the etl_profile.h move into %{_libdir}/ETL and the related adds in ETL.pc (Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${libdir}/ETL) If ever the current ETL_HAS_ are the same with both arches on multilibs system, I would still prefer this solution since it will still be valid if others ETL_HAVE need to be introduced later. About the package name. One could say this is not a -devel but a -headers subpackage only, since it doesn't contain the symlink to a shared object. But -devel and -headers only exist when there is a "main" package also. (kernel-headers and kernel-devel exist because they are for a different usage than the kernel package itself.) Since there is no such "main" package, I think the current package is the main. In other words: >From one side, I don't see anything to override the Fedora guideline which tell to use the upstream source archive name as the "source" package name. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567#c31 On the other side, it remains possible for the ETL source package to only build an ETL-devel or ETL-headers package. (or to have only the ETL-%{version}-%{release}.src.rpm just build a plain ETL-%{version}-%{release}.%{_target_cpu}.rpm) (either using ETL-devel or ETL, the pkgconfig(ETL) provides will be properly extracted). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: <bug-443771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-443771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201128.n0KBS6rl017562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 06:28:01 EDT --- if some content are unsure, you can also remove them from the source tarball and repack the whole sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201130.n0KBUqOM032142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 06:30:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jrosetta Short Description: A common base to build a graphical console Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201140.n0KBeg2I002014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 --- Comment #3 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-20 06:40:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. you need a > %define _texmf_main %{_datadir}/texmf > or import it from something you buildrequires (I assume the _ means you intend > to import it from some central package) Correct. I added a BuildRequires: texlive-texmf (which contains the macro definition) > 2. the main package does not need to > Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Fixed. > 3. didn't check if all the font names were accounted for in the fontconfig > rules > You should probably test if the recipe Behdad suggested in > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 > works for you and manages to create a single unicode font from all the local > type one variants of each font family I will try, but probably in a few days time. > That being said the obsoletes work and that's all I'm supposed to check in a > rename review, so > > ??? APPROVED ??? > > Please don't forget to add your fonts subpackages to comps > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Comps_fonts_rules Will do as soon as a rawhide build is available. Thanks. New versions of spec and srpm in the same location http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-cm-lgc-fonts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201148.n0KBmAvp003518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-20 06:48:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts New Branches: devel Owners: sarantis This is a rename request of tetex-font-cm-lgc for the devel branch only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201153.n0KBr6PX022783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201152.n0KBqJLK022639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #36 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 06:52:14 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. > (a) do you want me to co-maintain Yes! I'll add rjones as co-maintainer. > Do we have all the deps in EL-4 for mldonkey? According to the cocan's page, we have met almost all requirements except one about version of ocaml itself (3.09 in EPEL). However I plan to build mldonkey for EPEL anyway, at least for EL-5 (Probably, it will take some additional time). OK, here is my another one request :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mldonkey Short Description: Client for several P2P networks Owners: peter rjones Branches: El-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201152.n0KBqg6O004557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: <bug-476315-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476315-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201201.n0KC1VGf024743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 07:01:17 EDT --- Update for 0.25.5. No changes to packaging. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201207.n0KC7uY3007804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 --- Comment #2 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 07:07:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1.) Spec file legibility: No useless comments please. > > #ExclusiveArch: x86_64 > #ExcludeArch: ia64 > #Patch0: ksh-20041225-gcc4.patch > #%patch0 -p1 -b .gcc4 > ... fixed: removed > 2.) If you temporarily disable a patch, please remove it only from %prep, not > the tag itself, so that the patch is bundled with srpm: > > # for debugging only: > #Patch100: ksh-20060124-iffedebug.patch fixed: removed > 3.) Use macros. Replace /usr/bin with %{_bindir} > > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{/bin,/usr/bin,%{_mandir}/man1} > /usr//bin/ksh > ln -sf /bin/ksh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/ksh > ... fixed: now uses %{_bindir} > 4.) Use %find_lang for locales > > %files > %{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/* fiexed: locales are no longer supported by upstream - removed > 5.) RPMlint: > > ksh.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ksh93 > ksh.src:29: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ksh93 > > Though it is advisable to version I think it's ok if you leave these as they > are; this had been unversioned for some time already and ksh93 is probably > won't coming back anyways. didn't decided what to do with these two yet > ksh.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch4: ksh-20080725-ttou.patch > > Either remove the file, or explain why is it disabled. fixed: removed, no longer needed > 6.) Upstream the patches > > Please submit the patches to usptream & comment on status. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment fixed: only one (Fedora specific) patch remains > 7.) Latest upstream release > > Latest release seems to be 2008-11-04. Please update. fixed: updated > 8.) Avoid absolute symlinks > > ln -sf /bin/ksh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/ksh could you please point me to some packaging guidelines or something about why should I avoid them? ln -sf ../../bin/ksh seems to me pretty ugly to do it without knowing the reason. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201220.n0KCK5ea010595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #37 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 07:20:03 EDT --- Oops, typo in branch name. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mldonkey Short Description: Client for several P2P networks Owners: peter rjones Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201225.n0KCP7Eo011689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #33 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 07:25:02 EDT --- Update for official Alpha6 release. No changes to packaging. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-1.alpha6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226481] Merge Review: tcpdump In-Reply-To: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226481-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201229.n0KCTJO9029739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226481 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201232.n0KCWLCm013134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 --- Comment #3 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 07:32:20 EDT --- also this is fixed: # rpmlint x86_64/ksh-20081104-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ksh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun mv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201237.n0KCbR9W014107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #20 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-20 07:37:24 EDT --- hi, I changed the fontconfig in accordance with the basic font config template. I think the rest is fine now? Here are the packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201244.n0KCirIc032670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #29 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-20 07:44:49 EDT --- hi, Made the change. packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: <bug-188542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-188542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201250.n0KCoiQo017073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #97 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 07:50:28 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1068402 package built fine in dist-f10 for all supported arches. The historic of this review is huge, I haven't read all for now. So that's just few notes. (probably not a complete review). * As the package is already hylafax, You don't need to have Provides: hylafax * BuildRequires: ... gcc, gcc-c++ - Those aren't needed as they are implicitly added in the BuildDependency and shouldn't be mentioned. (older fedora version will need this indeed). * Conflicts: mgetty-sendfax - We need to find a solution to avoid conflict. and implement a proper alternative. Since this can probably not hit F-9/F-10 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1068404&name=build.log - JBIG library was not found on x86_64 Checking for JBIG library support ... not found. Disabling JBIG support Can the support for this can be enabled ? (it needs to be added as BuildRequires first) * Various checks are made at build time: WARNING, could not locate sendmail on your system. Beware that the mail notification work done by this software uses sendmail-specific command line options. If you do not have a sendmail-compatible mailer things will break. ... WARNING, no egetty program found, using /bin/egetty. ... Looks like /usr/bin/gs is the PostScript RIP to use. WARNING, /usr/bin/gs does not seem to be an executable program; -> Does the necessary Requires: are requested for the runtime ? either using Requires on the package, or the "virtual provides" or on the program path name. * rpmlint on installed package: [root at kwizatz T?l?chargement]# rpmlint hylafax hylafax.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax hylafax.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax hylafax.x86_64: E: useless-provides hylafax hylafax.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so.5.2.8 /lib64/libm.so.6 hylafax.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.2.8 HYLAFAX_VERSION_STRING hylafax.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.2.8 /lib64/libm.so.6 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. -> the cron scripts should probably stay as %config files -> the undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.2.8 HYLAFAX_VERSION_STRING can probably be fixed. * --with-PAGESIZE=A4 - I appreciate that my standard page format to be set as default, but is there a way to have this fixed at runtime while using system wide configuration files for localization ? (I haven't made runtime test, as i don't have the required hardware/phone connection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: <bug-188542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-188542-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201255.n0KCtjkW002747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #98 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 07:55:44 EDT --- About: * Conflicts: mgetty-sendfax I meant, when the package will be fixed, the conflicts will remain in version-release older than the one which got the fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201312.n0KDC7KM005779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 --- Comment #6 from Kai <maintainer at mt2009.com> 2009-01-20 08:12:06 EDT --- Thanks for your help! I finally got an SRPM/spec file that appears to build correctly using `rpmbuild -ba`. I believe, I managed to create a virtual package (not sure if it complies to guidelines, since I wasn't able to find much on the topic except for a couple of paragraphs on http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch19s03.html, but it appears to do the job). The updated URLs are as follows: Spec URL: http://mmpong.net/trac/export/450/trunk/dist/rpm/mmpong.spec SRPM URL: http://mmpong.net/trac/downloads/mmpong-0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm I'd appreciate if anyone can look them over. Thank you very much for your efforts! - Kai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201316.n0KDGidI021932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] New: Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game Message-ID: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 Summary: Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/tunneler-1.1.1-1.fc11.i386/tunneler.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/tunneler-1.1.1-1.fc11.i386/tunneler-1.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm logs: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/tunneler-1.1.1-1.fc11.i386/ Description: A clone of legendary game made by Geoffrey Silverton in 1991. In the game two players using the same keyboard and the same screen each control an underground tank. Goal is to find and destroy the opponent's tank. Since only small part of the map is displayed on the split screen, you might actually have some searching to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201319.n0KDJwNF007062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #36 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-20 08:19:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > Yep, the version number in the package name itself is bad... > ie the "-11" part in the Name field: Okay, consider the -11 gone. SPEC URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201331.n0KDV253009253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 --- Comment #3 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-20 08:31:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. needs _texmf_main defined like cm-lgc Fixed. > 2. rpmlint complains of mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Fixed (probably, local rpmlint does not complain, I could not see where tab was) > 3. kerkis calligraphic and the small caps variants clearly needs their own > subpackage. Please make sure you only group in the same font subpackage fonts > of the same family (differing only in weight, width or slant). I didn't check > the others OK with the Calligraphic family. The SmallCaps files however define the font family to be "Kerkis", and not "Kerkis-SmallCaps" or something like that. I put it therefore in the -serif subpackage. The other font files that differentiate themselves are the SemiBold variants, that define a family of "Kerkis-SemiBold". This however is just another weight (like Bold) as described by the font's authors (http://www.tug.org/TUGboat/Articles/tb23-3-4/tb75tsol.pdf), so I placed it in the -serif-fonts subpackage > 4. the main package does not need to > Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Fixed. > 5. It's probably a good idea to add fontconfig substitution rules for the URW > fonts kerkis is derived of, assuming the Kerkis creators didn't change the > design and metrics too much (cf the substitution template in > filepackages-devel) Added some substitution rules for the font family names as displayed in Gnome Character Map. > 6. please try to get you fontconfig files merged in upstream kerkis once you're > happy with them It's kind of dead upstream, and considering that the primary force to create the font was the usage in LaTeX, I don't think I will be very successful. I will try though. > 7. please add your new fonts subpackages to comps > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Comps_fonts_rules Will do as soon as there are rawhide rpms. > 8. you obsoletes should be > Obsoletes: tetex-font-kerkis < 2.0-17 > to provide an upgrade path to the F10 kerkis package, so this version does not > pass rename review Fixed. New spec and srpm in the same location http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-kerkis-fonts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial In-Reply-To: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201349.n0KDnhIO011906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 --- Comment #6 from Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 08:49:42 EDT --- Hi, I committed this package to CVS and I built it. Marek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201350.n0KDo0Rc027336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 --- Comment #10 from Marek Ka??k <mkasik at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 08:49:59 EDT --- Hi, I committed this package to CVS and I built it. Marek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201410.n0KEARrf016054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 --- Comment #2 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 09:10:25 EDT --- Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtkparasite/gtkparasite.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtkparasite/gtkparasite-0-0.2.20090120git928494e5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201408.n0KE8g7O030871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lukasim at atlas.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lukasim at atlas.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:08:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201408.n0KE8ANu030760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #25 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-20 09:08:07 EDT --- Hopefully this package is near completion. I must be close to winning a most revised package award. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-8.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-8.fc10.src.rpm Now that deps are satisified, I have provided a scratch build. Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1068723flexdock-0.5.1-8.fc10.src.rpm I swear that the rpmlint is emty. really! [makerpm at box SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-8.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at box SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at box SPECS]$ rpmlint flexdock.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. >$ rpmbuild -bb flexdock.spec >error: No compatible architectures found for build Now I'm not sure why I have not left this out. I see no reason that PPC64 is special, at least not considering the changes to the sdk.home. >You seem to have forgotten to add these as BuildRequires as well. Added >$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result >flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package >flexdock.src:157: E: files-attr-not-set[makerpm at spiderbox SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at spiderbox SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-8.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at spiderbox SPECS]$ rpmlint -i flexdock.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. >flexdock.src:158: E: files-attr-not-set >flexdock.src:159: E: files-attr-not-set >3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. Defattr set, strip command modified to only unneeded, rather than all. >According to Java Packaging Guidelines, you're installing the files in the >wrong location. Please fix that. Re-Reading: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI I have moved them into their own subfolder /%{_libdir}/%{name}/. The origin of this particular rationale is somewhat unclear to me. Having examined a long thread from March 2007 (http://osdir.com/ml/linux.redhat.fedora.java/2007-03/msg00044.html), consensus was at best unclear. Nevertheless, they are moved. >Also, the specfile has lots of trailing whitespace and inconsistent usage of >spaces and tabs for indentation. Please fix that, too. Trailing whitespace is now gone -- I dont see any indentation issues (grep), as such this has not been fixed. Also rpmlint warns mixed tab/space indenting -- am I not understanding something? $ grep -E '^\ ' flexdock.spec $ There was a trailing endline, and I got rid of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201430.n0KEUQrg020654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201433.n0KEXDcF021216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-20 09:33:12 EDT --- All issues are fixed, package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201440.n0KEe9lc022570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 09:40:08 EDT --- Misses some build deps: BuildRequires: glib2-devel BuildRequires: libusb-devel BuildRequires: libxslt Adding those three makes the build succeed in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201442.n0KEgOtg023256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 09:42:23 EDT --- rpmlint says: udev-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/udev-extras-20081230/ChangeLog udev-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/udev-extras-20081230/README udev-extras.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20081230-0.git20090120.1 ['20081230-0.1.20090120git.fc11', '20081230-0.1.20090120git'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. So I guess you want to remove those 0 length files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-454668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201448.n0KEmlpQ024533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 09:48:45 EDT --- > gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vala/vapi/gssdp-1.0.deps > gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: no-binary > gupnp-vala-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. > > I think the first & third errors are real ones which > need to be looked at. Not sure about the 'no-binary' > error. I've queried the first one upstream and awaiting a response but I'm not sure whether the 3rd one is actually an issue as vala actually generates C code which is then compiled do I don't think language bindings would generate executable code and hence there wouldn't be any debuginfo. See http://live.gnome.org/Vala/ for basic details. As I can't see any vala specific guidelines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I'm going to query fedora-devel > - license matches the actual package license > > No, the license is LGPLv2+ I've fixed this locally but I haven't put up a new version until I've fixed/clarified the others above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 14:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtk2-parasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201449.n0KEnUV5007253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 09:49:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtkparasite Short Description: A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201500.n0KF0rb3027335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 10:00:51 EDT --- Compiles fine now it has the dependencies in rawhide. Not sure if any of these are applicable for mingw binaries. [perobinson at neo download]$ rpmlint -i mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc11.noarch.rpm mingw32-pixman.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.la This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. mingw32-pixman.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/pixman-1.pc A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. mingw32-pixman.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1/pixman.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. mingw32-pixman.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.dll.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. mingw32-pixman.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.dll.a The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. mingw32-pixman.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1/pixman-version.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. mingw32-pixman.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.dll.a The package contains a binary or object file but is tagged noarch. mingw32-pixman.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 Your package is creating a non-standard subdirectory in /usr. The standard directories are: X11R6, X386, bin, games, include, lib, lib64, local, sbin, share, src, spool, tmp. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201516.n0KFGNWl013900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 10:16:22 EDT --- package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: from a brief look, it appears that probe-modem is GPLv2, while the rest is GPLv2+. Might just be an oversight, worth checking with dcbw. If it is not, the license field needs to reflect that license file: ok spec language: ok spec readable: ok upstream sources: should add a comment explaining where to get the sources buildable: ok excludearch: ok build deps: need to add glib2-devel, libusb-devel, libxslt locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a la files: ok gui: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok, though I don't see why you create sbindir if you don't install any content there ? utf8 filenames: ok summary: - fix build deps - clarify license - add source comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201518.n0KFIckJ014239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #21 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 10:18:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > ok, i've fixed most of the problems Andrea pointed out in the last message, > rpmlint now shows only 2 warnings which I think I have to keep, and I still > dont see whats wrong with the release tag so far, I welcome any comments. * Dosemu 1.4.0 (1.4.0 is the version you declared) has already been released. So the one you are packaging is a post-release snapshot version and it must follow this guideline: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Therefore 1868svn in the release tag is not acceptable. Release Tag for Post-Release Snapshot Packages is %{X}.%{alphatag}. In this syntax, %{X} is the release number increment and %{alphatag} is the checkout string. * You are still not updating the changelog after each release. This is wrong. I already told you. In this way we cannot read the history of the package. * desktop-file-install \ --vendor=fedora \ --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE2} You must not use a vendor. Please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor * Categories=System;Emulator; The Categories in the desktop file should be changed to "Game;Emulator;". This is what other emulators use. * Source: %{name}-%{version}.tgz Source1: %{name}-freedos-bin.tgz Source is missing full URL (which is OK because this is a snapshot package) but you are not following the guidelines on how to create the snapshot. Full URL for Source1 is missing. More info about both issues here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * BuildRequires: binutils This is not required. This dependency is already pulled in by default. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * BuildRequires: bison flex For constituency with other BR's, please split the above in two lines. * You are still not following the guidelines about licensing. There are parts that are not covered by the GPL. You must identify those parts and understand under what licences they are. After that you must update the License tag accordingly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios * I cannot build the rpm ATM, but it seems to me that the following problems where not addressed: - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used. - Text files are not UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201528.n0KFStql000951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 10:28:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/LuxRender.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/LuxRender-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system Koji build on Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1068814 Changelog - Fix compilation with boost 1.34 - (backport) - Subpackage the Blender_Exporter plugin - Subpackage -devel-docs for doxygen docs. Note, despite been checked with cmake, the libXdamage-devel aren't needed. I will remove the dependency before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: <bug-441570-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-441570-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201529.n0KFTfQH001049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #24 from Jeff Goldschrafe <goldschr at cshl.edu> 2009-01-20 10:29:37 EDT --- Sorry, fell off my radar as well -- was waiting for Fedora 10 to have a final release so I could test appropriately, and didn't have time to pick it up afterwards. You'll see some submissions by the end of the week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: <bug-224245-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-224245-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201544.n0KFiTE8019844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #19 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 10:44:23 EDT --- first round done rmplint squirrelmail.spec is quiet rmplint squirrelmail-*-src.rpm is quiet lot of not used/not useful/obsolete patches removed, some of them are not removed from cvs repository *for now* rpmlint noarch/squirrelmail-*-noarch.rpm is little less verbose (just a little) > htaccess-file moved to squirrelmail.conf > W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.12.txt > W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.13.txt fixed with sed in spec > E: zero-length > /usr/share/squirrelmail/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/serversidefilter.po.new removed in spec > W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/filters/bulkquery/bulkquery.c > E: non-executable-script /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/demo/getpot 0644 I still haven't decided what to do with these two... (not only demo/getpot but demo/*) 1) move to /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail 2) remove completely 3) move to subpackage ---------- Tomas, if you could explain me (irc?) something about the utf-8 vs. CJK mess, it would be really appreciated. I've got this package with some fixes for CJK and that confuses me... I thought utf-8 should be able to handle it, so I'm little bit confused about all CJK workarounds/patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201613.n0KGDAvM026589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 --- Comment #4 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 11:13:09 EDT --- ok, revised Spec URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/udev-extras/udev-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/udev-extras/udev-extras-20081230-0.2.20090120git.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-469894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201625.n0KGP3cc029753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #9 from Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 11:25:01 EDT --- JPackage.org will soon have a cglib22 package with cglib 2.2 (which uses the objectweb-asm 3.0) package. Interested? Can you use cglib 2.2 in place of 2.1.3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226416] Merge Review: shadow-utils In-Reply-To: <bug-226416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201657.n0KGvNix020729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226416 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2009-01-20 11:57:22 EDT --- Looks great, APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426387-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201657.n0KGvOSD020755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226416, which changed state. Bug 226416 Summary: Merge Review: shadow-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201702.n0KH2iam021967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> 2009-01-20 12:02:42 EDT --- Simple and neat package to me. Rpmlint is silent, mock build ok. Package meets all *MUST* items. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475055-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201702.n0KH2WO8021934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-20 12:02:30 EDT --- Okay, now this review request is closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201716.n0KHGqBi024438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 12:16:51 EDT --- Looks fine now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201743.n0KHhaZC012859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-20 12:43:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329492) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329492) build log from local build Of corse I can offer you a build log. I hope this may be helpful for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201755.n0KHt6me032700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net> 2009-01-20 12:55:04 EDT --- Great ! The package is now APPROVED by me ! Congrats ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201814.n0KIEMql019139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #31 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-20 13:14:21 EDT --- :D my first approved package! thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201854.n0KIstmG011960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Bug 476460 depends on bug 479325, which changed state. Bug 479325 Summary: libmilter.a missing -fPIC for x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201900.n0KJ03e0028033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 --- Comment #7 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 14:00:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: udev-extras Short Description: extra rules and tools for udev Owners: harald Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201859.n0KIxLUR027655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 13:59:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: udev-extras Short Description: extra rules and tools for udev Owners: harald Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:06:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201906.n0KJ6PXs029464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> 2009-01-20 14:06:23 EDT --- -1 from my side here. - Does not yield the guidelines for icon cache as stated here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache - desktop-file-install must not use a vendor. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor Reviews should definitely be made more thorough and conscientious. It would be great if you also checked the SHOULD items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201909.n0KJ9ktu015206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-01-20 14:09:42 EDT --- You're welcome to try and get libtool changed to do what you want. From my perspective, however, this package fails to meet the packaging guidelines and I cannot approve it until it does. Were it a new package it would simply stay out of the distribution until it were fixed, but since this is a merge review I can't really do anything about it and you of course have no incentive to fix it. I guess this ticket will just stay open until something gives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:19:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-221717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201919.n0KJJeJk031968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #35 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-20 14:19:39 EDT --- The thing is, this always worked previously, it's a regression in libtool (bug 478840), and absolutely not agg's fault. The guidelines explicitly suggest running libtoolize to avoid rpath trouble, agg does exactly that. And the libtool bug is causing rpaths in many packages, not just this one. It makes no sense whatsoever to block the merge review on a bug in another package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901201925.n0KJPQVk001180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-20 14:25:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > -1 from my side here. > > - Does not yield the guidelines for icon cache as stated here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache As far as I understand, these are just "best practices", not part of guidelines. Guidelines just read "If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.". When it comes to my scriptlet, it is functionally equivalent and only difference is harmless error output in case gtk-update-icon-cache. Given it is an aesthetic annoyance, I'll use the other version when importing the package, but this is definitely not a reason for blocking the review. Moreover, the first form is already used in packages, and referred to in wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/iconcache > - desktop-file-install must not use a vendor. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor Wrong again. This is not a guideline. Actually, the guideline says the opposite: "If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as<vendor_id>." See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage > Reviews should definitely be made more thorough and conscientious. It would be > great if you also checked the SHOULD items. I'd be very thankful if you refrained from being harsh to other contributors at least until you study the packaging guidelines. Thanks! (In reply to comment #1) > Simple and neat package to me. Rpmlint is silent, mock build ok. Package meets > all *MUST* items. > > APPROVED. Diky za review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tunneler Short Description: Clone of legendary Tunneler game Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202001.n0KK1wRo005615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-20 15:01:57 EDT --- I couldn't download the source rpm. I have got a 404 Page not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202015.n0KKF23j016312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 15:15:01 EDT --- fixed, (deleted the new src.rpm instead of the older by mistake). @Jochen btw. I have a very bad problem with the way blender create the ~/.blender directory nowadays. the main issue is that directories created with the "blender-wrapper" script are set root:root even in /home/user directories. Can we be more in shape with what upstream does in this area ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202025.n0KKPgaX024227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mhlavink at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: <bug-459065-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459065-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202025.n0KKPaiR024182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #17 from Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> 2009-01-20 15:25:34 EDT --- Is this still on the agenda? I don't mind taking the review if that helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202025.n0KKPwQQ009344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> 2009-01-20 15:25:57 EDT --- Sory for dalay. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-imagick Short Description: Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library Owners: Hubbitus CC: remi Branches: F9 F10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202034.n0KKYkQB012699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-20 15:34:44 EDT --- I have a look on my own system. On my system the .blender directory is owned by my onw userid. The Directory should be create on the first start of blender. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202035.n0KKZRYk013400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 15:35:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202036.n0KKaa9q013627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 15:36:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202040.n0KKehXR029846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-20 15:40:41 EDT --- Some more comments: Requires: libX11 >= 1.1.4 Why do you need a specific libX11 version? Please add a comment with an explanation. Also, please sort both Requires: and BuildRequires: alphabetically for better readability. %description FlexDock is a Java docking framework for use in cross-platform Swing applications Why is the description indented? Also, it's missing the end period. #Modify the jni dir that is hardcoded in the patch cp -pf %{PATCH0} %{PATCH0}.tmp sed -i 's!%%{_libdir}/%%{name}/!%{_libdir}/%{name}/!' %{PATCH0} Why don't you just modify the patch? if [ `uname -m` == "x86_64" ] || [ `uname -m` == "ppc64" ] ; then JDK_DIR=`echo %{_jdkdir} | sed 's!/$!!'`.`uname -m` I suggest using a case statement here. It'll be easy to add other arches later. For example sparc64. #OK # Apache commons Logging component # http://commons.apache.org/logging/ # ./lib/commons-logging-1.1.jar rm -f ./lib/commons-logging-1.1.jar ln -s %{_javadir}/commons-logging.jar ./lib/commons-logging-1.1.jar #remove jmf, as it is only used in a demo, #which is unused after patching rm -rf ./lib/jmf/ #" Looks" project # https://looks.dev.java.net/ rm -f ./lib/looks-2.1.1.jar ln -s %{_javadir}/jgoodies-looks.jar ./lib/looks-2.2.1.jar #skinlf "Skin look and Feel" project # https://skinlf.dev.java.net/ rm -f ./lib/skinlf.jar ln -s %{_javadir}/skinlf.jar ./lib/skinlf.jar Manually making symlinks is fragile, especially for versioned JARs. It'll break when their version changes. I think you should use build-jar-repository for that: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#build-jar-repository dos2unix -d2u $i; What does -d2u option do? It's not documented in --help or in the manpage. flexdock has funny arch flags, such as "libRubberBand-linux-x86.so" on i386 SOFILE=`find ./ -name libRubberBand*so` Couldn't you just patch the build system not to put arch in lib filename? strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE Calling strip from the specfile is not allowed. rpm post-build scripts do that while building the debuginfo package. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig These are not needed, as the library is not in ld.so search path (and not directly linkable). *Tue Jan 20 2009 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 0.5.1-8 - Set defattr - Fix arch (again) - Change install dir from %%libdir to %%libdir/%%name - Update patch0 to match changed so dir + make dynamic *Sat Dec 20 2008 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 0.5.1-7 - Re-enable system skinlf link & jar check. Changelog entries must have a space between * and date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202053.n0KKrQWd004480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-20 15:53:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) [...] > strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE > > Calling strip from the specfile is not allowed. rpm post-build scripts do that > while building the debuginfo package. Although in this case they seem to fail. If I remove that strip call, I get: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package flexdock.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/flexdock/libRubberBand-0.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202100.n0KL00D3008365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 15:59:59 EDT --- cvs done. The new package is created, please follow the eol procedure for the old one. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202023.n0KKNNAo007825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-20 15:23:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanks for quick reply and addressing the problems! /me is much impressed > > 8.) Avoid absolute symlinks > > > > ln -sf /bin/ksh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/ksh > > could you please point me to some packaging guidelines or something about why > should I avoid them? ln -sf ../../bin/ksh seems to me pretty ugly to do it > without knowing the reason. thanks Apart from that I don't see what's ugly about "ln -sf ../../bin/ksh", you're probably right that the guidelines don't mandate this. At least I could not find anything. Only piece of information I was able to dig was a rpmlint warning, which is pretty non-specific: "Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments." I can't think of a real world-scenario where this would cause serious trouble. (Not considering "Imagine I have a complete tree somewhere and I do `something' to the linked file, such as write to it (there actually are tools that write to binaries, such as prelink or execstack)"). So, while I strongly urge you to get rid of that absolute symlink, it seems not to be mandatory. By the way -- how about removing it? What's ksh in /usr/bin good for? We're probably early enough in rawhide to have enough time to test if it breaks something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202104.n0KL4xS3027075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:04:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202107.n0KL7bqQ014717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:07:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtkparasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202106.n0KL6gsr028280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: gtkparasite |gtk2-parasite - A GUI |- A GUI debugging tool for |debugging tool for GTK+ |GTK+ applications |applications | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:06:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202116.n0KLGac8002226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:16:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202115.n0KLFJQc020364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:15:17 EDT --- If all you have to go on is the LICENSE.txt file, the spec file should have 'GPL+' because it could be under any version of the GPL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202118.n0KLIOqR023575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #38 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:18:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202119.n0KLJYRF024067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:19:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202119.n0KLJqhS004584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-20 16:19:50 EDT --- no F-9 ??? Lubomir, please add F-9 to active branches for this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202121.n0KLLHLN006004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:21:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202123.n0KLNoIp028996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 16:23:49 EDT --- ok, so this is a rename of an existing font? I can't seem to get to any of the above spec urls... If this package correctly obsoletes the old package, I can make the new package and you can follow the end of life procedure on the old package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202127.n0KLR4WB010242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-20 16:27:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tunneler Short Description: Clone of legendary Tunneler game Branches: EL-5 F-10 Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 Owners: cassmodiah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202131.n0KLVpTu013409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su> 2009-01-20 16:31:50 EDT --- I forgot EL-5 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-imagick Short Description: Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library Owners: Hubbitus CC: remi Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202140.n0KLeDLG009226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.underwood at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 16:40:12 EDT --- Since this is just a single elisp file with the license at the top, it's probably overkill to ask the author to distribute a COPYING file with the elisp file. You could generate a license file during build time with eg. head -21 %{SOURCE0} > COPYING and package that file as a %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202055.n0KKtVLO005538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 15:55:30 EDT --- ------------------------ LuxBlend v0.5 WARNING: LuxPath "" is not valid Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/bpymodules/BPyRegistry.py", line 267, in SaveConfigData raise Warning(e) # Resend exception as warning Warning: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/home/kwizart/.blender/scripts/bpydata/config/luxblend.cfg' ------------------------ And as ~/.blender/scripts/bpydata/readme.txt say.the bpydata directory is a place for plugin to put their data into. Unfortunately, in the current state of the blender-wrapper script, it is a symlink to /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata, hence, cannot be written unless root. I don't know if there is a solution that can avoid to duplicate the system plugins while allowing for system plugins to write their data into by-users directory. Can we just patch the config directory for python plugin instead ? (so both system/users and arch/noarches plugins can use the same config directory?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202057.n0KKvcvn007444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-20 15:57:37 EDT --- Good: + Package names fits with naming guideline of emacs addon + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + Package contains el subpackage for emacs source code + Package contains a valid License tag + Package contains GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + Copyright note of source file matches with license tag + Could download source file from upstream via spectool -g + consistently usage of rpm macros + Packaged source metches with upstream (md5sum: 7cc77e3e44beecb688b744464159af9e) + Local build works fine + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + Koji build works fine + Buildroot will be cleaned on beginning of the %clean and %install stanza + R?mlint is quite on source package + Package contains subpackage for elisp source + el subpackage contains proper Req. to main package + Rpmlint ok for binary package + Packaged files contains proper files permissions + Packaged files are owned by the package + Package has no %doc stanza + Package contains proper %changelog stanza Bad: - htmlize-init file contains no copyright notice TODO: - Package doesn't contains a verbatin copy of the license, Please ask upstream to include a verbatin copy of it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202145.n0KLjKCl012534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #6 from Robert Marcano <robert at marcanoonline.com> 2009-01-20 16:45:19 EDT --- Second email sent, the first one has not been replied. Starting to reevaluate http://www.eclipse.org/subversive/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202206.n0KM6qLj028500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 17:06:51 EDT --- Oh, er, sorry. Ignore that, the stuff at the top isn't actually the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: <bug-480855-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480855-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202210.n0KMAN81030726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: <bug-480851-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480851-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202210.n0KMAP8g030753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202131.n0KLVctQ013102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #28 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-20 16:31:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > [...] > > strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE > > > > Calling strip from the specfile is not allowed. rpm post-build scripts do that > > while building the debuginfo package. > > Although in this case they seem to fail. If I remove that strip call, I get: > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result > flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package > flexdock.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/flexdock/libRubberBand-0.so Actually it's simple. Just don't chmod the .so to 644. It has to be executable for rpmbuild debuginfo scripts to find it. rpmlint is silent afterwards. Some more nitpicks: You don't need mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share There's still trailing whitespace in the following lines: Name: flexdock # This patch is fedora specific -- System.loadLibrary fix to help locate JNI components #Licence is MIT on their website, Apache in their LICENSE.txt patch3: flexdock-skinlfTitlebarui-path.patch patch4: flexdock-skinlfPainter-path.patch BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel Requires: libX11 >= 1.1.4 JDK_DIR=`echo %{_jdkdir} | sed 's!/$!!'`.`uname -m` echo "Relying on spec file buildpath: $JDK_DIR " >> tmpLog echo "sdk.home=$JDK_DIR" > workingcopy.properties # https://skinlf.dev.java.net/ ant -Dbuild.sysclasspath=first build.with.native jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480720] Review Request: gtkparasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480720-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202222.n0KMMNBA013091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480720 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 17:22:22 EDT --- Built for F9, F10, and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202152.n0KLqrDu027741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 16:52:52 EDT --- This is not easy: - to ease the installation of the LuxBlend plugin, I should put a luxrender.cfg into /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata/config/luxblend.cfg and that file need to be transferred to the user directory even if the ~/.blender directory was already created but not if the luxrender.cfg file is already present. Will you accept extensions to your blender-wrapper script ? Something like: for f in /etc/blender-wrapper.d ; do sh ${f} done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:02:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480851] New: Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams Message-ID: <bug-480851-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Summary: Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://ccrypt.sourceforge.net/ Description: ccrypt is a utility for encrypting and decrypting files and streams. It was designed as a replacement for the standard unix crypt utility, which is notorious for using a very weak encryption algorithm. ccrypt is based on the Rijndael cipher, which is the U.S. government's chosen candidate for the Advanced Encryption Standard. This cipher is believed to provide very strong security. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1069879 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint ccrypt* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package build failed on ppc 64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1069883&name=build.log -------<%--------- *** stack smashing detected ***: ./maketables terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail-0x8cc08)[0x400001fc118] /lib64/libc.so.6(__stack_chk_fail-0x8cc4c)[0x400001fc0c4] ./maketables[0x10001170] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x400000fc1b8] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main-0x1848f0)[0x400000fc3d0] -------%>--------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] New: Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system similar to Plan9's dumpfs Message-ID: <bug-480857-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system similar to Plan9's dumpfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Summary: Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system similar to Plan9's dumpfs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henriquecsj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/pdumpfs/1.3-1/pdumpfs.spec SRPM URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/pdumpfs/1.3-1/pdumpfs-1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: pdumpfs is a simple daily backup system similar to Plan9's dumpfs which preserves every daily snapshot. pdumpfs is written in Ruby. You can access the past snapshots at any time for retrieving a certain day's file. Let's backup your home directory with pdumpfs! pdumpfs constructs the snapshot YYYY/MM/DD in the destination directory. All source files are copied to the snapshot directory for the first time. On and after the second time, pdumpfs copies only updated or newly created files and stores unchanged files as hard links to the files of the previous day's snapshot for saving a disk space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480855] New: Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries Message-ID: <bug-480855-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Summary: Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bournal.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bournal-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://frankpena.googlepages.com/bournal.html Description: Bournal is a bash script that allows you to keep a personal, minimalistic, password-protected journal, log, or diary. It includes encryption, regexp searches, and a date-sorted list for editing old entries. Since Bournal is pure bash, it should be easily editable for the CLI-savvy. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1069895 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint bournal-1.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint bournal-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: <bug-474802-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474802-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202212.n0KMCeKA032526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #6 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-20 17:12:38 EDT --- $ rpmlint -vi vacation-1.2.7.0-3.fc9.src.rpm vacation.src: I: checking vacation.src:90: W: macro-in-%changelog post Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. vacation.src:91: W: macro-in-%changelog postun Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. ==> read and apply to your changelog vacation.src: W: strange-permission vacation-1.2.7.0.tar.gz 0640 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. ==> set the correct permissions before rpmbuild process starts 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/vacation.spec builds OK $ rpmlint -vi RPMS/x86_64/vacation-1.2.7.0-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm vacation.x86_64: I: checking vacation.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.7.0-1 ['1.2.7.0-3.fc9', '1.2.7.0-3'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ==> changelog entry and version must match => Release: 3%{?dist} => first line in %changelog 1.2.7.0-1 << 3 not 1 vacation.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln vacation.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm vacation.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln vacation.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. => probably no way around this. $ rpm -qp --requires RPMS/x86_64/vacation-1.2.7.0-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgdbm.so.2()(64bit) perl >= 1:5 perl(GDBM_File) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) smtpdaemon => spec file misses: Requires: /usr/bin/perl I would add it, but opinions may differ. => in spec file "License: GPLv2 and BSD" : looking at vacation.c I note that we're dealing with the "Original BSD License (BSD with advertising)" and checking url http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses learn us that it is not compatible with GPLv2 ! That must be fixed somehow - check the documentation what is acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] New: Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) Message-ID: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Summary: Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at coralbark.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse.spec SRPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Description: Diffuse is a graphical tool for merging and comparing text files. Diffuse is able to compare an arbitrary number of files side-by-side and gives users the ability to manually adjust line matching and directly edit files. Diffuse can also retrieve revisions of files from Bazaar, CVS, Darcs, Git, Mercurial, Monotone, Subversion, and SVK repositories for comparison and merging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202256.n0KMuI1C012120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202256.n0KMuKIY012147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Bug 479796 depends on bug 479793, which changed state. Bug 479793 Summary: Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] New: Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations Message-ID: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Summary: Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/timespan.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/timespan-2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/timespan/ Description: timespan performs date-based time calculations. It can calculate days, hours, minutes, or seconds between 1 Jan 1970 and the specified date or between two specified dates. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070012 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint timespan* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint timespan-2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479793-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202254.n0KMsXKf020163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-20 17:54:32 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480863] New: Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Summary: Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ro.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ro-3.3-0.1.test3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Romanian thesaurus as usable by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: <bug-453395-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453395-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202318.n0KNIgF6024767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #17 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 18:18:41 EDT --- Update to official 0.8 ("ROMULUS") release. Introduces a new openchange-python subpackage with Python bindings for the libmapi API. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system similar to Plan9's dumpfs In-Reply-To: <bug-480857-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480857-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202327.n0KNRSL8026579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-20 18:27:27 EDT --- Just some quick comments - For %setup is '-n %{name}-%{version}' not needed, this is the default. - the manpage should not have %doc - Summary should be changed. Not everybody knows what 'Plan9's dumpfs' is. - Use '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' instead of '%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901202331.n0KNVovq027610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #42 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 18:31:49 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-16.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210015.n0L0FNvP026868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 19:15:22 EDT --- Now that cpphs is done, maybe you update this to the latest templates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478565] Review Request: gupnp-igd - Library to handle UPnP IGD port mapping In-Reply-To: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478565-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210014.n0L0EV5H002309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478565 Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Brian Pepple <bdpepple at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 19:14:30 EDT --- Built for rawhide. Denis, thanks again for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] New: Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon Message-ID: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 Summary: Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda-v0.9.5_2009_01_15-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CRDA acts as the udev helper for communication between the kernel and userspace for regulatory compliance. It relies on nl80211 for communication. CRDA is intended to be run only through udev communication from the kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210031.n0L0VtJR005476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #1 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 19:31:53 EDT --- Future versions of the kernel are likely to have limited wireless functionality without this package (or some future equivalent). I would like to have this in F11 if at all possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480872] New: Review Request: irssi-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for irssi Message-ID: <bug-480872-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: irssi-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for irssi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480872 Summary: Review Request: irssi-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for irssi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/irssi-otr.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/irssi-otr-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is an irssi module which implements Off-The-Record (OTR) Messaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480872] Review Request: irssi-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for irssi In-Reply-To: <bug-480872-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480872-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210046.n0L0kDUo008046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480872 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-20 19:46:12 EDT --- Builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system similar to Plan9's dumpfs In-Reply-To: <bug-480857-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480857-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210149.n0L1nClP011876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #2 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior <henriquecsj at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 20:49:11 EDT --- Hi, Fabian, thanks for the hints. SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/pdumpfs/1.3-2/pdumpfs.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/pdumpfs/1.3-2/pdumpfs-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480863] Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210225.n0L2PCBZ028279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210250.n0L2oQwd024426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-20 21:50:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > If all you have to go on is the LICENSE.txt file, the spec file should have > 'GPL+' because it could be under any version of the GPL. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F It is already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210303.n0L33qjS027346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 22:03:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > ok, so this is a rename of an existing font? Yep, new package required for rename under new fonts packaging guidelines. cvs admin done Caius please import and build new package there so that Nicolas can review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210310.n0L3AL4G005230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 22:10:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > If all you have to go on is the LICENSE.txt file, the spec file should have > 'GPL+' because it could be under any version of the GPL. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F I thought so but I heard mixed opinions about this. See, e.g. comments 22, 23 and 24 in bug #444366 . deco does not have any GPL version info in source files but I was told to set the license tag as GPLv3 instead of GPL+. Different people suggest different things... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210313.n0L3D711029481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 22:13:06 EDT --- Sorry, nevermind my last message. It was a different situation. I think I'm just confusing myself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480863] Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210341.n0L3ftQk004501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-20 22:41:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070355 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2ba6c21bae99d7e30ee87e52b6f327ba th_ro_RO.3.3-test3.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210441.n0L4f75Z023345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #44 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> 2009-01-20 23:41:06 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:41:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] New: Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine Message-ID: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Summary: Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tse3.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tse3-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: TSE3 is a powerful open source sequencer engine written in C++. It is a 'sequencer engine' because it provides the actual driving force elements of a sequencer but provides no form of user interface. Sequencer applications or multimedia presentation packages will incorporate the TSE3 libraries to provide a user with MIDI sequencing facilities. Koji: F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070317 F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070322 Rpmlint: silent There are 3 patches to fix compilation issues. These patches have been around (for other distros) for a while now as the project itself seems pretty much dead. I'm not sure I should bother sending them upstream again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210448.n0L4mY6O016504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 23:48:33 EDT --- Sorry, I must have looked at a eariler spec, the one from comment #4 does indeed have GPL+. Sorry for my confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210447.n0L4lLx4016374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210447.n0L4lKtq016354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] New: Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor Message-ID: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Summary: Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar-0.5.1-1.20090120svn.fc10.src.rpm Description: KGuitar is powerful KDE-based music tabulature editor with support of multiple guitar (or any fretted instrument) and drum tracks. KGuitar also supports classic note scores, MIDI synthesizer output, chord, scales, modes, melody and rhythm construction and analysis tools, lots of tab effects, lyrics, Guitar Pro files import and lots of other things. Rpmlint: kguitar.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kguitar/common ../common This is resolved through dependencies. I picked the SVN snapshot because the stable version seems more problematic for compiling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210459.n0L4xdV9018429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-20 23:59:37 EDT --- 1, 2, 4: looks good. 3. Yeah, there isn't a great solution here. I think for now at least you need to require httpd, as you are putting files in a directory it owns and you need to either own it or require it for the directory. Perhaps it's worth mailing the packaging list and see if someone can come up with a clever way around this problem? Change the requires to httpd, and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210600.n0L60WpP030511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #8 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-21 01:00:30 EDT --- > include small patch'es include small patches and send to whom? I'm not sure if djb(or anybody) is actively maintaining it to apply those patches. > I recommend you to work with daemontools first and after you get this package > approved then start the work with djbdns. Right, I understand. I too was thinking about the same. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210630.n0L6Ul6d004307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-21 01:30:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > include small patch'es > > include small patches and send to whom? Nowhere. You are supposed to use the original tarballs + patches inside of your rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210711.n0L7Bkx4011971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #18 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 02:11:44 EDT --- ping Peter, around ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479413] Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479413-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210818.n0L8IlQh025132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-21 03:18:44 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225977-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210818.n0L8ITWY025071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mhlavink at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 03:18:27 EDT --- > "Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments." yes, but because only common directory for /bin/ksh and /usr/bin/ksh is / directory, so chroot will never work here even with relative path I think there is no package that require 'ksh' at all, so yes... I'll remove this link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210819.n0L8JOZE001788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 03:19:20 EDT --- Thanks Yaakov, will try to take a look at it soon. (The bug will soon have its first birthday so hope it can be resolved soon.:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210824.n0L8OI9N026121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 03:24:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > Note: AFAIK, we don't have the macros needed in F10 right now, so this only > builds in rawhide. The SRPM is output from mock using rawhide. Once the macros > are in F10, supporting it there should be trivial. Ok, finally I built ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10 for F10. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79616 Unfortunately still need to update haddock and gtk2hs before it can be pushed to F10 updates. (With the number libs going in fedora now I suspect it is going to get harder and less common to backport ghc going forward but let us see.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210828.n0L8SUM8027006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 03:28:29 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210854.n0L8sVc5008966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 --- Comment #7 from Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> 2009-01-21 03:54:29 EDT --- I didn't meant to sound harsh. If you felt offended by the way I wrote my comment I hereby apologize for that. For reference here is the Guideline on desktop files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage It says: For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480863] Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210902.n0L92w30001484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 04:02:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-ro Short Description: Romanian thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210905.n0L954W2011960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #10 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-21 04:05:02 EDT --- > Nowhere. You are supposed to use the original tarballs + patches inside of > your rpm. Why? I don't think that's a good idea. I think it'll be easy for me to maintain the patched sources, may be on my local svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210906.n0L96ipX002857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 --- Comment #8 from ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> 2009-01-21 04:06:42 EDT --- > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Imho it has changed during this review. I saw old vendor tag here few hours ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210921.n0L9L01Z006073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-21 04:20:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > It was just wiki package was not updated. wiki page was (not updated) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210918.n0L9ITFA005379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-21 04:18:27 EDT --- Actually this desktop-file-install usage change (i.e. that for new packages --vendor=fedora is removed) took place in last October: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02273.html http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081021 It was just wiki package was not updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: <bug-225808-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225808-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210931.n0L9VdT0018209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alexl at redhat.com) --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 04:31:37 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210929.n0L9TpnK017561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(davidz at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 04:29:49 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: <bug-225865-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225865-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210932.n0L9WWbv008866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ajax at redhat.com) --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 04:32:31 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480771] Review Request: tunneler - Clone of legendary Tunneler game In-Reply-To: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210940.n0L9eYp1020263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480771 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-21 04:40:33 EDT --- So please remove --vendor=fedora from desktop-file-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: <bug-224245-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-224245-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210948.n0L9mZNs021792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #20 from Tomas <tokul at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-21 04:48:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Tomas, if you could explain me (irc?) something about the utf-8 vs. CJK mess, > it would be really appreciated. I've got this package with some fixes for CJK > and that confuses me... I thought utf-8 should be able to handle it, so I'm > little bit confused about all CJK workarounds/patches. If you need explanation about patches in squirrelmail-1.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm, see information in bugzilla. squirrelmail-1.4.6-japanese-multibyte-view-body.patch - RH bug #194457 squirrelmail-1.4.6-japanese-multibyte-view-text.patch - RH bug #195452 squirrelmail-1.4.6-zenkaku-subject-convert.patch - RH bug #196017 All patches written by RH/Fedora and information about them was never submitted to upstream. I can't explain why scripts are modified without seeing broken emails. zenkaku-subject-convert.patch might be needed because according to Wikipedia article on Katakana, hankaku (halfwidth form of katakana) is not supported by ISO-2022-JP. If you need explanation why SquirrelMail Japanese translation works that way - it was written that way by third party (risumail.jp) contributors in SquirrelMail 1.3-dev branch. In SquirrelMail 1.4.4 and older utf-8 and charset conversion support was very simple and limited to message display. Only SquirrelMail 1.4.5 improved charset handling in compose. I suspect that risumail.jp just wanted to get things working and they did it in their own "works for us, lets ignore other part of the world" way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901210958.n0L9weoI014166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 04:58:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Why? I don't think that's a good idea. I think it'll be easy for me to > maintain the patched sources, may be on my local svn. it's more easy to track what's changed if you "use the original tarballs + patches inside of your rpm.", and if you like your package reviewed please work in this way include small patchs like daemontools-0.76-errno.patch and others -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 10:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211032.n0LAWwta022215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #37 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-21 05:32:56 EDT --- 1/ basic rpmbuild/rpmlint tests: $ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/backup-manager.spec => No issues here. Good. $ rpmlint -vi SRPMS/backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc9.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc9.noarch.rpm backup-manager.src: I: checking backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.spec 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. backup-manager.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. => pls. fix the permission of the spec file before starting the rpmbuild process 2/ check spec file: The spec file contains 'Requires' lines which are not really needed - see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 Requires: /bin/bash Requires: bzip2 Requires: gzip Requires: diffutils Requires: sed Requires: tar Requires: which 3/ install & usage backup-manager: - install rpm : ok - usage : ok - removal of rpm : ok Good your almost there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 10:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211053.n0LArqHL026664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 05:53:50 EDT --- mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 10:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211053.n0LArGjK026491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 05:53:12 EDT --- mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 10:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467407-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467407-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211053.n0LArVMj026567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 05:53:29 EDT --- mingw32-sqlite-3.6.6.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-sqlite-3.6.6.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 10:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460959-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211058.n0LAwxTB004592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 05:58:57 EDT --- Will review during this week (probably). Unfortunately, I have no access to internet at home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 11:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: <bug-446976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-446976-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211111.n0LBB42t007412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 06:11:02 EDT --- Alexey Lubimov promised me in private email, that he will renew tkabber package soon. So, I think we should wait for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 11:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211119.n0LBJhcc008870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #12 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-21 06:19:40 EDT --- > it's more easy to track what's changed if you "use the original tarballs + > patches inside of your rpm.", and if you like your package reviewed please > work in this way Uff...alright; I've made the changes. Please have a loot at the following SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools.spec SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools-0.76-1.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 11:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] New: Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders Message-ID: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Summary: Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: felix at fetzig.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/w_scan.spec SRPM URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/w_scan-20081106-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The w_scan tool is similar to dvbscan from dvb-apps. However it does not require initial tuning data and thus is able to find more channels. Note that w_scan does not support DVB-S (only DVB-C/T). rpmlint is silent on this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 11:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211148.n0LBmLAQ005203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #38 from Christoph Wickert <fedora at christoph-wickert.de> 2009-01-21 06:48:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > @Christoph > Your review is finish ? The review is approve ? Because this > review block my sponsorships and the pidgin-privacy-please integration... Why that? I thought Aurelien already said he will sponsor you. I'm not really happy with the hardcoded paths bin /backup manager, but on the other hand I don't want to write a ./configure. This should be done upstream. I see backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10 fixes all issues from comment #23, but instead of %{name}-%{version}-configtpl.patch you should use %{name}-0.7.7-configtpl.patch Otherwise you will have to delete and re-add the file in cvs on every update. Nevertheless this is your decision and you can fix it after import, so I will APPROVE the package now. (In reply to comment #37) > The spec file contains 'Requires' lines which are not really needed - see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 This list is for _BuildRequries_ in the build system but not for _Requires_ of the package itself. Also note that your third test from comment #28 is not supposed to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 11:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211156.n0LBuIMn006713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #13 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-21 06:56:15 EDT --- Please consider this new SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools-0.76-2.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 11:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211159.n0LBxswr007098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools |http://cr.yp.to/daemontools |/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz |/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 13:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: <bug-464430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211304.n0LD4PXl022895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #46 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> 2009-01-21 08:04:22 EDT --- Is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 13:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: <bug-225302-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225302-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211338.n0LDckTh008839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 --- Comment #6 from Karsten Hopp <karsten at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 08:38:45 EDT --- NEWS file fixed in automake-1.10.2-2. Can't fix the ansi2knr stuff as this is used by some m4 macros and will be compiled when needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 13:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211348.n0LDm63a001457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 08:48:05 EDT --- 1 - instead changing conf-cc please use daemontools-0.76-errno.patch as Patch0 2 - debug info package is not being created for some reason, we need to figure why 3 - should be good to have a svscanboot [UPS] running with upstart, Mamoru is the best person to answer about what directory, because /service should not be used, may be somthing like /var/run/daemontools ? UPS -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/daemontools-installer/+bug/66615 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480589] Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480589-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211415.n0LEFSut008423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-21 09:15:26 EDT --- Built in rawhide. Edited comps. tetex-font-cm-lgc EOLed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211419.n0LEJX0d009732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-21 09:19:31 EDT --- ! First of all: Please check your srpm / rebuilt binary rpms using "rpmlint" (in rpmlint rpm). This will detect some generic packaging errors. For 0.3.2-1: * odd issue in srpm - Please change the permissions of all files in srpm to 0644. * disttag - Please consider to use %{?dist} tag: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * Macros in SourceURL - Using %{name}, %{version}, especially %{version} in SourceURL is recommended: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * Misc rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------------ W: summary-ended-with-dot A simple plug-in to do fourier transform on you image. E: description-line-too-long A simple plug-in to do fourier ... ------------------------------------------------------------ - Summary must not end with dot. - Please shorten the length of a line in %description. It should not exceed 79 characters. * License - The licene tag "GPL" is invalid on Fedora. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL For this package the license tag should be "GPLv3+". * (Build)Requires - Please check if "BuildRequires: gimp" is needed. - "Requires: fftw3" is definitely unneeded. Such library related dependencies are automatically detected by rpmbuild itself and rpmbuild correctly adds those dependencies. ! "Requires: gimp" is needed for this case because of directory ownership issue * compiler flags - Fedora specific compiler flags are not honored correctly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags This can be specified by %optflags (you can check what compiler flags must be honored by $rpm --eval %optflags) ! As a result, currently debuginfo rpm creation is incomplete. * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs %{buildroot} - Choose one. Please don't use both. * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{_libdir}/gimp/2.0{,/plug-ins} themselves should not be owned by this package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership * Documents - Please add the following file(s) to %doc. ------------------------------------------------- README gpl.txt ------------------------------------------------- ! By the way README files are not in UTF-8, and this has CRLF, LF line terminators. Please fix these. * %changelog - We recommend that one line is put between each %changelog entry (it will be helpful in Fedora CVS), like: ------------------------------------------------- * Mon Jan 19 2009 Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 0.3.2-1 - Updated to 0.3.2 - Includes license note - Small hack around gimptool-2.0 bug. * Sun Dec 07 2008 Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 0.3.1-1 - Version 0.3.1 - Initial. ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results Message-ID: <bug-480944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Harness-Straps/perl-Test-Harness-Straps.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Harness-Straps/perl-Test-Harness-Straps-0.30-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Test::Harness is limited to printing out its results. This makes analysis of the test results difficult for anything but a human. To make it easier for programs to work with test results, we provide Test::Harness::Straps. Instead of printing the results, straps provide them as raw data. You can also configure how the tests are to be run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: <bug-480944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480944-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211434.n0LEYYeQ023591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 09:34:33 EDT --- Test::Harness doesn't use Straps. These are included in this package only for backward compatibility. Details of problem are mentioned in this thread: www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2009/01/msg143565.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211434.n0LEY0g3023520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 09:33:58 EDT --- These are all rpmlint warnings/errors that we'd normally ignore. I'll explain here why: script-without-shebang [...] libpixman-1.la - We use *.la files when linking. This is explicitly allowed in the MinGW guidelines that were passed. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Libraries_.28DLLs.29 devel-file-in-non-devel-package - All MinGW packages are for development only, so when we passed the guidelines we didn't opt to have a separate -devel subpackage. See bug 468987 for why this warning isn't suppressed. spurious-executable-perm - See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397#c4 arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object - See bug 468989. non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 - This breaks the FHS, but is permitted by the MinGW guidelines. /me should put this information in a wiki page ... /me starts https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint .... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211438.n0LEcXMt014517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 --- Comment #2 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-21 09:38:31 EDT --- Fixed all issues (bad and TODO) Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf-1.13-1.src.rpm Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211438.n0LEce9o014545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Fran?ois Kooman <fkooman at tuxed.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fkooman at tuxed.net --- Comment #1 from Fran?ois Kooman <fkooman at tuxed.net> 2009-01-21 09:38:38 EDT --- (Just some remarks from quickly looking over the package) - For your Source line see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl, maybe also make it Source0 instead of just Source. - See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python for specific Python packaging guidelines - See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo for a template of a spec file (or use rpmdev-newspec), it might be nice to create your spec file based on this or modify yours to better match the template. rpmlint output: [fkooman at franek SPECS]$ rpmlint diffuse.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fkooman at franek SPECS]$ [fkooman at franek SRPMS]$ rpmlint diffuse-0.2.15-1.fc10.src.rpm diffuse.src: W: summary-not-capitalized graphical tool for comparing and merging text files diffuse.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Tools/Version Control diffuse.src: W: no-url-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [fkooman at franek SRPMS]$ [fkooman at franek noarch]$ rpmlint diffuse-0.2.15-1.fc10.noarch.rpm diffuse.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized graphical tool for comparing and merging text files diffuse.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Tools/Version Control diffuse.noarch: W: no-url-tag diffuse.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/diffuserc diffuse.noarch: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/diffuse.desktop 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. [fkooman at franek noarch]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211504.n0LF4Sqe032007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Depends on| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211511.n0LFBeBj001618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 10:11:39 EDT --- please don't gzip man pages. gzip -9 %{buildroot}/usr/share/man/man1/diffuse.1 all files in /usr/share/man are magically gziped by rpm please macronify your %files section please replace all hardcoded paths below with macros. /usr/bin/diffuse /usr/share/diffuse/ /usr/share/applications/diffuse.desktop /usr/share/gnome/help/diffuse/C/diffuse.xml /usr/share/man/man1/diffuse.1.gz /usr/share/omf/diffuse/diffuse-C.omf /usr/share/pixmaps/diffuse.png for more info about macros please l@@k https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:13:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool (first package, seeking sponser) In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211513.n0LFDFvp023122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211515.n0LFFtUL023732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-21 10:15:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > 2 - debug info package is not being created for some reason, we need to figure > why The cause is this *.spec not acknowledging RPM_OPT_FLAGS. In other words: You must somehow propagate $RPM_OPT_FLAGS from inside of the *.spec into the build-machinery. One way is to edit compile-cc inside %prep (e.g. using sed). 4. You patch's file name is weird. The standard extensions for patches is *.diff or *.patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211525.n0LFPQ6g025837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org --- Comment #11 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-21 10:25:24 EDT --- I use VMWare a lot but I do have a hard time seeing this making it into Fedora even if brought to FeSCO. David I think it would be more productive to package this for RpmFusion. > in real employment world we use xen/kvm/qemu No offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. VMWare's share of the virtualization market is about 80%. The rest is Microsoft. The FOSS solutions are in the noise (unfortunately). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-187318-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211528.n0LFSvxV026486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #48 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-21 10:28:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) As mention in comment #46: for file in COPYING INSTALL NEWS README TODO AUTHORS Changelog; do => only above files should be converted if needed during the build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211542.n0LFgwl2030340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #17 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-21 10:42:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > if you like to contribute with a patch to speed up this review, I believe it > will welcome Well, for didactical reasons, I prefer candidate maintainers to write such things themselves, because Fedora needs maintainers who have an understanding of what they are doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211543.n0LFhjWu030448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-21 10:43:44 EDT --- For 0.6.5-0.1: * Tarball - For svn repo based tarball, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control * BuildRequires - Some reviewers may say that "BuildRequires: tex(latex) tex(dvips)" is preferred. (In reply to comment #14) > btw, if I got it right, a package, say "foo-1.2.3-0.1.20090118svn" MUST have an > associated tarball > "foo-1.2.3.tar.gz", without any indication of the snapshot?? Including revision number in tarball name is highly recommeded. * Dependency for -devel subpackage - Requires: opencv is not needed. - For this package "Requires: opencv-devel" does not seem to be needed, either. * Compiler flags - On some parts Fedora specific compiler flags are not honored. For example: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 179 /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/CMakeFiles 180 [ 1%] 181 Building CXX object otherlibs/aria-2.5.1/src/CMakeFiles/mrpt-aria.dir/ArAction.o 182 cd /builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/otherlibs/aria-2.5.1/src && /usr/bin/c++ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__ -Dmrpt_aria_EXPORTS -O2 -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -fno-exceptions -pthread -fPIC -I/usr/include/opencv -isystem /usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8 -isystem /usr/include/wx-2.8 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/. -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/include/mrpt-config/unix -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/include/mrpt/otherlibs -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/include/mrpt/otherlibs/aria -o CMakeFiles/mrpt-aria.dir/ArAction.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-0.6.5/otherlibs/aria-2.5.1/src/ArAction.cpp -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (I usually check this by seeking for the word "FORTIFY") * Directory ownership issue - -doc subpackage should own %{_datadir}/doc/mrpt-doc/ directory. Also I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 15:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211527.n0LFRptp006062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 10:27:50 EDT --- > > > 2 - debug info package is not being created for some reason, we need to figure > > why > The cause is this *.spec not acknowledging RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > > In other words: You must somehow propagate $RPM_OPT_FLAGS from inside of the > *.spec into the build-machinery. > > One way is to edit compile-cc inside %prep (e.g. using sed). > > > 4. You patch's file name is weird. The standard extensions for patches is > *.diff or *.patch. if you like to contribute with a patch to speed up this review, I believe it will welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211603.n0LG3LCu014365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bioinfornatics at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #12 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 11:03:19 EDT --- 1 and 2/ The new spec file are update. The new src.rpm file are update And the new rpm file update rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gdesklet-slideshow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. 3/ this is not a GUI but a plugin for gdesklet so they are not .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211606.n0LG6wxR003449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #45 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 11:06:53 EDT --- Glad to know it builds for you too. When will the review be done? Even if we don't backport all these packages, this can still go in rawhide. Also, i see you made some changes to the templates. I'm gonna have to actually update the package once the templates hit rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211616.n0LGG8Hr017399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #9 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-21 11:16:07 EDT --- Thanks for the addition comments Adam, here is the new release: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.1-0.1.rc1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211629.n0LGT7T4008768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211636.n0LGa0VR022425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #10 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 11:35:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Thanks for the addition comments Adam, here is the new release: > Well, package looks better but I still can't give you review, two problems are remaining: autotrust.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.1-0 - please use 0.2.1-0.1.rc1 instead Drop --sysconfdir configure parameter, it is not needed (as written in comment #5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] gdesklets plug-in, Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211635.n0LGZfXn022370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #13 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 11:35:40 EDT --- rpm and src.rpm for F9: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-2.fc9.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------- rpm and src.rpm for F10: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-2.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm The spec file http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-slideshow.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211647.n0LGlR5r024787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-21 11:47:26 EDT --- Updated; see: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-haskell-src-exts-0.4.8-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: <bug-480999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211700.n0LH0QqH015883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: <bug-468230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211700.n0LH0RLE015910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480999 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480999] New: Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps Message-ID: <bug-480999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Summary: Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/python-webflash.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a8.fc10.src.rpm Description: WebFlash is a library to display "flash" messages in python web applications. These messages are usually used to provide feedback to the user (eg: you changes have been saved, your credit card number has been stolen, ...). One important characteristic they must provide is the ability to survive a redirect (ie: display the message in a page after being redirected from a form submission). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211709.n0LH9Cpa017897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 St?phane Glondu <steph at glondu.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steph at glondu.net --- Comment #11 from St?phane Glondu <steph at glondu.net> 2009-01-21 12:09:09 EDT --- There might be problems building with OCaml 3.11.0, see: http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4699 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] New: Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql Message-ID: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Summary: Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pg_top/pg_top.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pg_top/pg_top-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: pg_top is 'top' for PostgreSQL processes. See running queries, query plans, issued locks, and table and index statistics. koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1071512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211729.n0LHT3Lk001009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-21 12:29:01 EDT --- I don't unterstand you issue: I have done the following: 1.) Build your package locally. 2.) Install it 3.) Start blender, so the wrapper script should create the symlinks 4.) View the ~/.blender/scripts directory I have got the following expected result: lrwxrwxrwx 1 s4504kr s4504kr 42 21. Jan 18:24 LuxBlend_0.1.py -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 s4504kr s4504kr 43 21. Jan 18:24 LuxBlend_0.1.pyc -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.pyc lrwxrwxrwx 1 s4504kr s4504kr 43 21. Jan 18:24 LuxBlend_0.1.pyo -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.pyo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211741.n0LHfBSg024258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-21 12:41:10 EDT --- Bad: - The current upstream release is 1.12. - License tag was not changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv2 I couldN't download 1.13 via spectool -g - Please write $$RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %%{buildroot} in the %changelog stanza for excaping the special chars '$' and '%' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211742.n0LHgOjS024466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-21 12:42:23 EDT --- I wan't to notify you, that 1.8.1 was released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211745.n0LHj6eo025112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #20 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-21 12:45:04 EDT --- PIng. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211744.n0LHipAE024771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 12:44:49 EDT --- that's not what will append for real: 1- As the per user ~/.blender directory is already created no more files will be copied to the user directory. 2- Nobody wants to write on LuxBlend_0.1.py?. Instead what the plugin expects is to write in its config directory and in its content directory. (see the readme.txt). Please note that the permission you have showed are the perm of the symlinks, not the perms of the files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 17:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211753.n0LHrLUd006214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-21 12:53:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > that's not what will append for real: > 1- As the per user ~/.blender directory is already created no more files will > be copied to the user directory. Sorry, On eatch start of blender there will be creating symlink from ~/.blnder/scripts to /usr/share/blender/scripts. > 2- Nobody wants to write on LuxBlend_0.1.py?. Instead what the plugin expects > is to write in its config directory and in its content directory. (see the > readme.txt). I can't find your readme.txt file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481009] New: Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu Message-ID: <bug-481009-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 Summary: Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sshedmak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description: Its Free OpenType font for Telugu created by Dr. Tirumala Krishna Desikacharyulu. Font is Unicode version 5.1 compliant. SPEC: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/pothana2000-fonts.spec SRPM: rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/pothana2000-fonts-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm The source had a binary file called Pothana2k.exe which I removed and re compressed the source to tar.gz using generate-tarball.sh. I have kept this shell script as Source2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: <bug-481009-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481009-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211801.n0LI1mmf028484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 --- Comment #1 from sandeep shedmake <sshedmak at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 13:01:46 EDT --- Updated SRPM url http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/pothana2000-fonts-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211803.n0LI3xQg028860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-21 13:03:58 EDT --- Well, rpmlint <rpmname> should work and checking your rpms by rpmlint is always recommended. For 0.9-2 - BuildRequires: gcc is redundant: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - I think people don't expect that "$ yum install mmpong" will install development packages (i.e. -devel). Rather I think that mmpong-client-caca should be renamed to mmpong. - By the way "Requires: %{name}-libs=%{version}-%{release}" will seek for a rpm package with the name "%{name}-libs=%{version}-%{release}" (not %{name}-libs), so anyway this needs fixing (I guess if you try to install this rpm you will see such errors.) - The Group "Libraries" is not common. You can see the Group tag which Fedora regards as valid by: $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group - Summary should begin with a capital letter. - Usually dependencies within packages rebuilt from a srpm must be exact EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific, not with inequality - For -client-gl subpackage, "Requires: libgl" is not needed. Such libraries based dependency is automatically detected by rpmbuild itself and rpmbuild correctly adds such dependency to rebuilt binary rpms. - Also, would you explain why the dependency for libcaca(-devel) is EVR specific? (If there is some reason, please write it as comments in the spec file) - %cmake macro already sets -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH, -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH (and -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 for 64 bits architecture), and CFLAGS and so on. Would you check if "-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} ...." in your spec file really needed with using %cmake macro? By the way what %cmake macro does can be shown by $ rpm --eval %cmake . Also please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake - On Fedora %run_ldconfig macro is not defined (Is this really working on your Fedora system?) (Also, as currently mmpong package is just empty, no scriptlets is needed... however also please see my suggestion about renaming -client-caca subpackage for this issue) - For -libs subpackage, /sbin/ldconfig must be called on %post{,un} scriptlets. Add --------------------------------------------------------- %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig --------------------------------------------------------- for example. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries - Any packages containing pkgconfig .pc files must have "Requires: pkgconfig". https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files - By the way even on x86_64, mmpong.pc contains: --------------------------------------------------------- 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib --------------------------------------------------------- This is not correct because on 64 bits architecture libdir should point to /usr/lib64, not /usr/lib. - The directory %{_includedir}/mmpong must be owned by -devel subpackage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory - Directories for installing man files are not right. For example, man files with suffix 6 should be installed under %{_mandir}/man6 (then rpmbuild automatically gzips this file) - Again desktop files to be installed must be treated by "desktop-file-{install,validate}": see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Currently mmpong-gl.desktop is a invalid desktop file and need fixing by desktop-file-install. - -client-gl package must not own %_datadir/icons/hicolor directory and so on (also here please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership and check what directories are owned by hicolor-icon-theme) - Usually daemon executables are installed under %{_sbindir} (i.e. /usr/sbin ) and some initscript is provided. * Would you check if mmpongd should be under %_bindir or %_sbindir ? (I don't know well about mmpongd, however I guess this should be under %_sbindir) * Also would you consider to supply sysv initscripts for mmpongd? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript - As -client-gl installs some icons under %_datadir/icons/hicolor, please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache - Please create %changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:07:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211807.n0LI7FDN009556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|gdesklets plug-in, Cycle |Review Request: |through a collection of |gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle |pictures |through a collection of | |pictures -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458090-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211816.n0LIGihX011935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 13:16:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > that's not what will append for real: > > 1- As the per user ~/.blender directory is already created no more files will > > be copied to the user directory. > > Sorry, On eatch start of blender there will be creating symlink from > ~/.blnder/scripts to /usr/share/blender/scripts. It depends on where you consider your error is, so as you like: but quoting blender-wrapper: When "" if [ ! -d ~/.blender ]; then "" install -d ~/.blender/scripts ln -sf /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata ~/blender/scripts/bpydata ^^ this part is wrong - and a misunderstanding of what bpydata and bpydata/config directories are (namely the content and configuration directories for scripts that are meant to be user <<<writable>>>). But there is a typo (blender instead of .blender) so it doesn't work anyway. Then,: rm -r ~/.blender/scripts/*.p* Why end-users aren't allowed to have their own scripts ? > > 2- Nobody wants to write on LuxBlend_0.1.py?. Instead what the plugin expects > > is to write in its config directory and in its content directory. (see the > > readme.txt). > > I can't find your readme.txt file rpm -ql blender |grep readme.txt I'm still unsure of the accurate solution, so it is just workinprogress thoughts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 19:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211901.n0LJ1Cad021799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #21 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-21 14:01:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329637) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329637) blender wrapper script I have create a fixed release of the blender-wrapper script. It may be nice, if you can try out this script. If the script is ok, I will include it in the next release of the blender package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 19:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211913.n0LJD0r2013039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 14:12:59 EDT --- Review ======= Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (338bc398ace91a05af769f6b555cce89ba997fbe) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for .desktop file Bad: * Package is not using %{optflags} during compilation. * There is no packaged documentation aside from the manpage * The license text is not packaged as %doc * %defattr(-,root,root) is used instead of %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Patch1 is completely pointless. * Missing BuildRequires: elfutils-libelf-devel Please fix these issues and show a new SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 19:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released In-Reply-To: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211925.n0LJPa7j016341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|SPE it is a Python IDE |Review Request: SPE it is a |editor released |Python IDE editor released -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 19:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] New: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released Message-ID: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Summary: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornatics at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 Spec URL: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/spe.spec SRPM URL: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released ______________________________________________________________ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/spe.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.noarch.rpm spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/Blender_signature.py "BPY" spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/spe_blender.py "BPY" spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/winpdb_blender.py "BPY" 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. ________________________________________________________________ rpmlint don't know the shebang #!BPY This shebang makes it possible Blender to recognize script as a plugins #!BPY It tells Blender that this is a Blender script, and therefore it will consider it when scanning for scripts. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Blender_3D:_Noob_to_Pro/Advanced_Tutorials/Python_Scripting/Export_scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 19:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901211950.n0LJodL4021452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-21 14:50:38 EDT --- Please use "KGuitar is a powerful ..."I am not a native speaker but AFAIK it's a bit closer to correct English. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212010.n0LKAvcW025829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: diffuse - |Review Request: diffuse - |graphical diff tool (first |graphical diff tool |package, seeking sponser) | Alias| |diffuse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:12:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481030] New: Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs Message-ID: <bug-481030-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Summary: Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pmd-emacs/pmd-emacs.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pmd-emacs/pmd-emacs-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: pmd-emacs supports the invocation of PMD from within (X)Emacs. Specifically, it supplies function pmd-current-buffer and pmd-current-dir, and enables parsing of the resulting list of PMD complaints so that, for example, next-error will walk through the list correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212025.n0LKPp6B028996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 15:25:50 EDT --- Right. Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212026.n0LKQ7qk007961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 15:26:06 EDT --- done. http://ispbrasil.com.br/pg_top/pg_top.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pg_top/pg_top-3.6.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] New: Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) Message-ID: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Summary: Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle-0.1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Coccinelle is a tool to utilize semantic patches for manipulating C code. It was originally designed to ease maintenance of device drivers in the Linux kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212046.n0LKkd0o001383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.emn.fr/x-info/co | |ccinelle/ --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 15:46:38 EDT --- Home page is http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/ and there is a LWN article about the tool here: http://lwn.net/Articles/315686/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212049.n0LKnUA7001680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 15:49:29 EDT --- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. - *** The 'v' in the version seems extraneous. In fact, there seem to be identical tarballs on the upstream download site with and without the 'v'. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - BSD *** The code doesn't specify a license, so it's assumed from the included LICENSE file. Would be nice if the code made it explicit. Given the keys/signing involved in the build process, it would have been highly entertaining if this package was GPL3. Alas, it is not. - License field in spec matches - OK - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible - OK *** 'An' in the summary is probably superfluous. - Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A - BuildRequires correct - OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - *** There are READMEs for both the daemon and the wireless regdb that should probably be in %doc. - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested rawhide x86_64, F10 x86) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - *** Should own /usr/lib/crda - No rpmlint output. - *** crda.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/regulatory.rules See below about udev rules. crda.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Can be ignored. - final provides and requires are sane: - *** Arguably, should require udev. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK (tested i386) - Should build on all supported archs - didn't test - Should function as described. - didn't test, don't have appropriate drivers - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - OK Random notes not covered above: - We end up building two different upstreams into one package here. It could be done with the wireless db built as a separate package, that includes its pubkey in /etc/pki for the daemon to build later. If the daemon and the regulatory information are going to be updated asynchronously, that might be worthwhile - system udev rules should go in /lib/udev/rules.d, and usually are named XX-regulatory.rules, where XX is some relative numeric priority - the regulatory db is on /usr ... will it be needed before /usr is mounted? - the usage flow seems to be 'user sets a domain -> netlink message to kernel -> uevent -> udev helper to daemon -> reads database -> new netlink message to kernel -> implements restrictions in driver. Seems overly convoluted, but.. meh. - we remove the upstream key, and sign the regulatory db with our own key, generated at build time (and then thrown away). As I understand it, this means users won't be able to drop in new upstream releases of the regulatory db. Is this intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 20:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212052.n0LKqM6C013368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 15:52:21 EDT --- Looks good, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212100.n0LL0RSh004592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 16:00:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pg_top Short Description: pg_top is 'top' for PostgreSQL processes Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212104.n0LL4ovi015933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #22 from Justin Zygmont <solarflow99 at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 16:04:45 EDT --- I tried following all the sketchy guidelines, and following your advise, etc. I'm ready to just leave it with comments like this, I can build a fedora RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212113.n0LLDnqX007450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #51 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 16:13:43 EDT --- I can't answer this question for Devrim, but 2 years is alot of time. Devrim have your own repo. http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/ and It's have a slony 2.0 rpm in his repo. http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/srpms/8.3/fedora/fedora-10-x86_64/ I don't know if him want to continue, but if he is not available I want to contribute to have slony imported into fedora. (In reply to comment #50) > Devrim, what's up with this package, do you still want to proceed. > I'm running out of patience after two years ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] New: Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems Message-ID: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 Summary: Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye-1.2.6-2.rc1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Originating from GDB/Armulator, the goal of SkyEye is to provide an integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems. Now it supports a series ARM architecture based microprocessors and Blackfin DSP Processor. You can run some Embedded Operation System such as ARM Linux, uClinux, uc/OS-II (ucos-ii) etc. in SkyEye, and analysis or debug them at source level. koji scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1072452 EL-5 build in use for a couple of days in the company I work for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212123.n0LLNMu3009484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.skyeye.org/index | |.shtml CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212125.n0LLPWnE020987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:25:31 EDT --- botan-1.8.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212128.n0LLSs5k011109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:28:53 EDT --- python-epdb-0.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212126.n0LLQlXQ010537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:26:47 EDT --- python-epdb-0.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212130.n0LLUqb0011958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:30:50 EDT --- mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212130.n0LLUKXU011771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:30:16 EDT --- mingw32-gettext-0.17-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212131.n0LLVV1R012207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212128.n0LLSUOZ010995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212130.n0LLUN9H011816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212127.n0LLRdo7010739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:27:38 EDT --- urlwatch-1.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update urlwatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478640] Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) In-Reply-To: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478640-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212128.n0LLSRH1021793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:28:26 EDT --- mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480380-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212126.n0LLQoCn021349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467388-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212130.n0LLUuDF022862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212131.n0LLVSo6012160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:31:26 EDT --- kdenetwork-4.1.4-2.fc10, kdeaccessibility-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeadmin-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeartwork-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebase-runtime-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdebindings-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeedu-4.1.4-1.fc10, kde-filesystem-4-23.fc10, kdegames-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdegraphics-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdelibs-4.1.4-2.fc10, kde-l10n-4.1.4-2.fc10, kdemultimedia-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdepim-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdepimlibs-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeplasma-addons-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdesdk-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdetoys-4.1.4-1.fc10, kdeutils-4.1.4-1.fc10, kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-8.fc10, kdebase-4.1.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212128.n0LLSY18011031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Bug 468376 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:28:33 EDT --- mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212128.n0LLSbak021842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212127.n0LLRthG010871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:27:53 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212131.n0LLVBaD022992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLT2Xq021962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:29:01 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update ncmpcpp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480646-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212127.n0LLRaSu021561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:27:35 EDT --- urlwatch-1.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update urlwatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212131.n0LLV45q022903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:31:03 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rubygem-restr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475897-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212126.n0LLQjp9021236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:26:43 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ncmpcpp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:31:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467396-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212131.n0LLV84i022949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Bug 467396 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:31:07 EDT --- mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212135.n0LLZ5lp013946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXs5A013357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467407-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467407-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212136.n0LLaYZt014522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212134.n0LLYHne013423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:34:16 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-restr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXg1F013278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:33:41 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467391-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212135.n0LLZ22R024877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:35:01 EDT --- mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLX6xN024043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:33:05 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: <bug-467407-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467407-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212136.n0LLaVuW014479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Bug 467407 depends on bug 467388, which changed state. Bug 467388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467407 depends on bug 467399, which changed state. Bug 467399 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:36:29 EDT --- mingw32-sqlite-3.6.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467399-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXqq4024264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:33:51 EDT --- mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212134.n0LLYhiG024476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:34:42 EDT --- botan-1.8.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLX9JR024076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXDtM024123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:33:12 EDT --- python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-libasyncns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0794 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468462-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212138.n0LLc3FZ015387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:38:02 EDT --- sbackup-0.10.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212137.n0LLbFDM015167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:37:14 EDT --- python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212137.n0LLbH2G015203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212137.n0LLboBk015346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:37:49 EDT --- zapplet-0.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zapplet'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0837 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478614] Review Request: python-transitfeed - Google Transit Feed Specification library and tools In-Reply-To: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478614-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212139.n0LLdTHj026433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478614 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:39:28 EDT --- python-transitfeed-1.1.9-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212138.n0LLcFoM026172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 16:38:14 EDT --- zapplet-0.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update zapplet'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: <bug-171993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-171993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212154.n0LLsifn030486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 Kelvin J. Hill <kelvin at bughunter.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kelvin at bughunter.co.uk --- Comment #91 from Kelvin J. Hill <kelvin at bughunter.co.uk> 2009-01-21 16:54:33 EDT --- The links to the rpm and spec files below seem to be unreachable. > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec Does anyone have a mirror available or is there an "official" version somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212159.n0LLxXt2032192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-21 16:59:31 EDT --- This one is good ??? APPROVED ??? You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a If you still need sponsoring state your FAS username here and I'll approve it (however that does not mean you're of the hook for bug #476720 ; please finish packaging Beteckna) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 22:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212219.n0LMJR7R025711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 17:19:26 EDT --- Small problem with Python 2.6 in Rawhide. The updated package below fixes this: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle-0.1.4-3.fc11.src.rpm * Wed Jan 21 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.1.4-3 - Patch for Python 2.6. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1072634 rpmlint reports: coccinelle.src:42: W: configure-without-libdir-spec - This is OK because this isn't an autoconf-based configure. coccinelle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h - Coccinelle uses this as a data file, it's not a normal include file. coccinelle.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/spatch - This file shouldn't be stripped, which will damage it. coccinelle.x86_64: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/spatch - This is fine. Prelink-defeating config script is implemented. coccinelle.x86_64: W: ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dll*.so - This is OK because it's not an OCaml library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 22:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] New: Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter Message-ID: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gavin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Spec URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-vm.spec SRPM URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-vm-3.10.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Squeak is a full-featured implementation of the Smalltalk programming language and environment based on (and largely compatible with) the original Smalltalk-80 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 22:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212223.n0LMN3Z4005491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |paskalis at di.uoa.gr Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-21 17:23:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 3. kerkis calligraphic and the small caps variants clearly needs their own > > subpackage. Please make sure you only group in the same font subpackage fonts > > of the same family (differing only in weight, width or slant). I didn't check > > the others > > OK with the Calligraphic family. > > The SmallCaps files however define the font family to be "Kerkis", and not > "Kerkis-SmallCaps" or something like that. I put it therefore in the -serif > subpackage. Ok. However please note that both the w3c (in CSS) and Microsoft (in its whitepaper to new fonts authors) only define weight, width or slant as selection axis for font faces within a font family. So if the font files were created today, small caps would be a different font family. > It's kind of dead upstream, and considering that the primary force to create > the font was the usage in LaTeX, I don't think I will be very successful. I > will try though. xetex uses fontconfig IIRC > New spec and srpm in the same location > http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-kerkis-fonts/ ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 22:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:39:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212239.n0LMdCK5009064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 17:39:11 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec file, the SRPM, and the i386 and x86_64 rpms, no errors, these are the only warnings: squeak-vm.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakV3.sources ../../../..//usr/share/squeak/SqueakV3.sources squeak-vm.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakV39.sources ../../../..//usr/share/squeak/SqueakV39.sources These links point to files in the squeak-image package, to be submitted for review as soon as I finish this review. These files are arch independent, as is all of squeak-image, except that for historical reasons squeak-image requires these packages to be in this arch dependent (under /usr/lib/) place. rpmlint, rightfully, doesn't like arch dependent files in a noarch package, so putting the files in an arch independent place (under /usr/share) in squeak-image, and haveing links to them from /usr/lib (or /usr/lib64) in squeak-vm (which is arch dependent). squeak-vm-nonXOplugins.i386: W: no-documentation This is a sub-package that is dependent on it's super-package and the super-package has doc. squeak-vm-nonXOplugins.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-4/SqueakFFIPrims Yes, it does have an executable-stack, it must. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 22:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212257.n0LMvV6a002300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 17:57:30 EDT --- Review ======= Good: - rpmlint checks return: dateshift.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdsintercept.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 dateshift-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation You should continue trying to get upstream to resolve this, but I won't block this package review on it. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (0bcc71038686a1afdd0713b01eb81e7652634fa6) - license text in %doc - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Bad: - License tag (GPLv2) is wrong. License tag should be GPLv2+. ***** Please fix the license tag before you commit to cvs, but this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: <bug-481064-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481064-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212316.n0LNGDW0018049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 18:16:12 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec file, the SRPM, and the x86 and x86_64 RPMs, no errors, no warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481064] New: Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM Message-ID: <bug-481064-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Summary: Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gavin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-image.spec SRPM URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/squeak-image-3.10.2.7179-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is the standard Squeak image as distributed by sqeak.org. The Squeak image is split into three interdependent parts, the .image file, the .changes file, and the .sources file. This package depends on the squeak-vm package (BZ481056). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: <bug-481066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212320.n0LNKDJn007079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 18:20:12 EDT --- I've run rpmlint on the spec, SRPM, and RPM; no errors, no warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481066] New: Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM Message-ID: <bug-481066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Summary: Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gavin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/etoys.spec SRPM URL: http://squeak-fedora.googlecode.com/files/etoys-4.0.2201-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Squeak Etoys was inspired by LOGO, PARC-Smalltalk, Hypercard, and starLOGO. It is a media-rich authoring environment with a simple powerful scripted object model for many kinds of objects created by end-users that runs on many platforms, and is free and open source. It includes 2D and 3D graphics, images, text, particles, pres-entations, web-pages, videos, sound and MIDI, etc. It includes the ability to share desktops with other Etoy users in real-time, so many forms of immersive mentoring and play can be done over the Internet. This package depends on the squeak-vm package (BZ481056). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:26:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212326.n0LNQJBX008374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #2 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 18:26:18 EDT --- I've sent a note about this package (and related packages) to fedora-packaging, subject "Squeak and Etoys packages". BZ481066 is related to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212325.n0LNP7tk019859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #3 from Jon Levell <fedora at coralbark.net> 2009-01-21 18:25:05 EDT --- I hope I've addressed all the comments. Updated files are: Spec URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse.spec SRPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-2.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-2.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212326.n0LNQeen008503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Jon Levell <fedora at coralbark.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212330.n0LNUmHf021012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #3 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 18:30:47 EDT --- BZ481064 is also related. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212334.n0LNYl4M021566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 18:34:46 EDT --- you're missing somethint in changelog * Wed Jan 21 2009 Jon Levell <fedora at coralbark.net> 0.2.15-2 should be something like this * Wed Jan 21 2009 Jon Levell <fedora at coralbark.net> - 0.2.15-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212338.n0LNcg1g022610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 18:38:41 EDT --- change from %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:36:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212336.n0LNauth022397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 18:36:55 EDT --- macronify more. from %{_bindir}/diffuse %{_datadir}/diffuse/ to %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212341.n0LNf23E023283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-21 18:41:01 EDT --- fix your buildroot according with guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] New: Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts Message-ID: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Summary: Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides Adobe Type 1 fonts (PFB format) for MusiXTeX (musixtex). The fonts are based on the original MetaFont sources, such as musix20.mf, which are distributed with MusiXTeX. The fonts provided here may be used to produce printer-independent PostScript files or PDF files. Rpmlint: Silent Notes: The map files that can be found in the tarball are provided in the tex-musixtex package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] New: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting Message-ID: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Summary: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tex-musixtex.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tex-musixtex-0.114-1.src.rpm Description: MusicTeX provides TeX extensions for music typesetting. It allows you to use TeX to write polyphonic, orchestral or instrumental music. MusixTeX is growing up from MusicTeX and has advantages both in set of macros and quality of output. The package contains source files (macros, styles), fonts (mf, tfm) and the MusiXTeX+plain format. Rpmlint: tex-musixtex.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/musixtex ../../../../fonts/ctan-musixtex/ This one is resolved through dependencies tex-musixtex-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation Well, this package is TeX documentation, which goes to its own TeX folder. Notes: The upstream version of this package is T114. The project is pretty mature and I don't think they will change the release version scheme. I set the Fedora version as 0.114, which is also the way this is versioned in Debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212352.n0LNqu0v025189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901212352.n0LNqvug025210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: <bug-171993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-171993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220002.n0M02J3P027139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #92 from Deji Akingunola <dakingun at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 19:02:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #91) > The links to the rpm and spec files below seem to be unreachable. > > > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm > > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec > > Does anyone have a mirror available or is there an "official" version > somewhere? You can now get them at; http://deji.fedorapeople.org/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm http://deji.fedorapeople.org/mpich2.spec Note: It is not an official Fedora package yet. Can someone please review this package, pretty please ;). @Orion, You were once trying to do the review, anything holding it back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220007.n0M07HJW015986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220007.n0M07Gig015966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481071 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 19:07:16 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar-0.5.1-2.20090120svn.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Updated description - Added TeX support I put the TeX support inside the main package, which pulls about 30MB of dependencies (if TeX is not installed). I can put it in a subpackage but I don't think 30MB of deps is too much to care about. But please let me know what your suggestion for the subpackage name is, if you think that will be a better option. kguitar-tex kguitar-kgtabs tex-kguitar tex-kgtabs tex-kguitar-kgtabs ??? (this question was to anyone who reads this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220026.n0M0Q5vw031905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 19:26:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Even if we don't backport all these packages, this can still go in rawhide. Well assuming ghc-6.10.1 reaches f10-updates then no problem to create an F-10 branch for ghc-X11. > Also, i see you made some changes to the templates. I'm gonna have to actually > update the package once the templates hit rawhide. Better to do that now IMHO: perhaps I should have left cabal2spec in ghc longer but I wanted the review package to be installable - I would appreciate more testing while we are proposing the revision to FPC. I am not anticapating any major changes until we add the ghc requires deps scripting for rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220040.n0M0embP002139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 19:40:47 EDT --- Ankur, what is your FAS account name? You should use the same email address for bugzilla and FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220037.n0M0b0xG001423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 19:36:58 EDT --- According to this review Ankur needs a sponsor? and the first package can only be approved by one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: <bug-464430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220037.n0M0bQwZ001494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #47 from Peter Scheie <peter at scheie.homedns.org> 2009-01-21 19:37:23 EDT --- I don't know how to answer the question. I've run make build & make update for a version 0.0.9 and 0.0.10 in the past couple of weeks; do I need to do something beyond that? Another change was subsequently necessary; Warren said he built it, but that it wasn't in the repo. I don't understand what I should do next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 01:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220151.n0M1pSeE014325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review |Review Request: |Request:ctan-musixtex-fonts |ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe |- Adobe Type 1 versions of |Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX |MusiXTeX fonts |fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220210.n0M2Am9c018352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #34 from Jerry Amundson <jamundso at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 21:10:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Andrew, something annoying I've been struggling with: > > If I already have the samba4 packages installed and I go to rebuild them, the > configure script wants to link against the libldb.so from samba4-libs instead > of building its own. So I have to uninstall all my samba4 packages (along with > openchange and evolution-mapi) before building new ones. > > Any way to force samba to build its own ldb whether it finds one already > installed or not? Has progress been made here? Annoying, yes, and I'm guessing would be a blocker at some point... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220222.n0M2MYFE020608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Bug 467403 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-21 21:22:33 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: f3e9870e213518b407a959f8d29cd554 libgpg-error-1.6.tar.bz2 f3e9870e213518b407a959f8d29cd554 libgpg-error-1.6.tar.bz2.orig See below - BuildRequires correct See below - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install MINGW32 - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. MINGW32- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig MINGW32- .so files in -devel subpackage. MINGW32- .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag MINGW32 - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: First off, this is my first mingw32 review, so I am sure I will ask some stupid questions... 1. For buildrequires I see in the build.log: checking for msgfmt... no checking for gmsgfmt... : checking for xgettext... no checking for msgmerge... no ... checking for GNU gettext in libc... no Should you add those to BuildRequires? 2. Any reason you can't use %{?_smp_mflags} with your make? Or does that not work with mingw32 packages? 3. rpmlint of course has a bunch to say... perhaps you could get it to not complain when the package is mingw32-* on a lot of these? Ignore: mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/gpg-error-config mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gpg-error.h mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.dll.a mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.la mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.dll.a mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgpg-error.dll.a Should you be using %find_lang here: mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo mingw32-libgpg-error.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/libgpg-error.mo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220235.n0M2Z56p010356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #22 from Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 21:35:04 EDT --- hi, Its "ankursinha". I'll finish Beteckna in a few days. What do I need to do once I'm sponsored? Is it still just package and submit? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220232.n0M2W6Ec022524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #34 from Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-21 21:32:05 EDT --- hi, It's ankursinha at fedoraproject.org. I have changed change my bugzilla login email to it. I do need a sponsor. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220248.n0M2mcDT025091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #46 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 21:48:35 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: <bug-464430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220330.n0M3UifW001585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #48 from Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 22:30:43 EDT --- http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/k12linux-quick-start-guide It is built. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ You have to fill out the form to get it into the repository for F-9 and F-10. Skip testing, as there is nothing left to test in this case. (Normally you would put a package into testing first.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: <bug-426754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220335.n0M3ZTPT022154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 22:35:28 EDT --- Let's pick this one up too SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Only builds in rawhide for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: <bug-426753-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426753-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220334.n0M3Y6u3002101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #17 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 22:34:04 EDT --- Let's pick this up again. SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Currently, this only compiles on rawhide, so get your rawhide builders ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220411.n0M4BCaV009694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #35 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 23:11:08 EDT --- Only solution I can think of that doesn't involve hacking on Samba's build scripts is to split ldb into it's own standalone package (not a subpackage) and list it as a BuildRequires in the samba4.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220425.n0M4Pel0031746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #9 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-21 23:25:39 EDT --- Removed -lsmutil with patch. (Some systems need it.) New SRPM: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220424.n0M4O5kP031251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-21 23:24:03 EDT --- done Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint autotrust-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm /autotrust-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.x86_64.rpm /autotrust-debuginfo-0.2.1-0.2.rc1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220426.n0M4QYcu012531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-21 23:26:33 EDT --- Version update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz-0.64-1.fc10.src.rpm It looks like the author put the license information on more source file headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220434.n0M4Yu2C013703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 --- Comment #4 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-21 23:34:55 EDT --- - Upstream was at 1.13, but upstream misplaced the file and fixed it :=) - Upstream license is GPLv2+, not GPLv2 - spectool -g now properly downloads 1.13 - fixed macros in changelog Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnssec-conf/dnssec-conf-1.13-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: <bug-458238-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458238-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220458.n0M4w0Zn004680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|ibus | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 06:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220628.n0M6SrV0021404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #18 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-22 01:28:51 EDT --- > 1 - instead changing conf-cc please use daemontools-0.76-errno.patch as Patch0 Pardon me..? > 2 - debug info package is not being created for some reason, we need to figure > why It did for me as daemontools-debuginfo-0.76-2.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 06:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220639.n0M6da1E004878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #19 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-22 01:39:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The cause is this *.spec not acknowledging RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > In other words: You must somehow propagate $RPM_OPT_FLAGS from inside of the > *.spec into the build-machinery. I'm sorry, I still don't get what you are trying to convey. Could you please be more specific. > 4. You patch's file name is weird. The standard extensions for patches is > *.diff or *.patch. Huh...I'll do the change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: <bug-474430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474430-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220711.n0M7BUJA011173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #8 from Ray Van Dolson <rayvd at bludgeon.org> 2009-01-22 02:11:29 EDT --- Updated spec and SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid-1.30-2.el5.src.rpm Switched to noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: <bug-459065-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459065-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220726.n0M7Q6ot014055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #18 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm at atrpms.net> 2009-01-22 02:26:03 EDT --- Sure it is, but maybe there are newer spec/srpms, I just looked it up and there are the latest: Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/italc.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/italc-1.0.9-6.src.rpm Note that I found some issues with multiple users using X (with fastuserswitch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220819.n0M8Jiox011902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-22 03:19:43 EDT --- Thanks Tom for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220821.n0M8LOr0012664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-22 03:21:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dateshift Short Description: A date/time test tool Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220825.n0M8P7IQ027129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2009-01-22 03:25:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: botan New Branches: EL-5 Owners: thm Sorry, forgot that in the original request. The monotone package currently has a copy of botan, which is going to be changed in one of the next releases. That was the main reason for packaging botan now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220848.n0M8m9Pa018328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschmidt at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 03:48:08 EDT --- - The license notes in the sources do not have the "...or (at your option) any later version" wording, so the license should be GPLv2, not GPLv2+. - You rename the 'dllpycaml_stubs.so' file to 'dll*.so' by mistake. - It would be nice to have the demos/ and docs/ directories in the package or in a separate -doc package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220851.n0M8pZVj019171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #4 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 03:51:35 EDT --- - Shouldn't coccilib go under %{python_sitelib}? - coccilib/ contains two useless Makefiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199020] Review Request: conexusmm (Gtkmm widgets for the conexus network and serial I/O library) In-Reply-To: <bug-199020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220856.n0M8u9Sl000925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199020 --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-22 03:56:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > This includes checking in dead.package to the devel branch with an explanation > and a request to rel-eng to block conexusmm from rawhide, since it is currently > causing broken deps (item 6 in the checklist above): I took the liberty of filing the rel-eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481115] New: Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Summary: Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-sl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-sl-0.20090121-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Slovenian thesaurus as usable by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481116] New: Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus Message-ID: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Summary: Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ru.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ru-0.20070613-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Russian thesaurus as usable by openoffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: <bug-480851-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480851-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220903.n0M93ptx003069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #1 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-22 04:03:48 EDT --- My review. I cannot sponsor you as I'm not (yet) an approved packager. Once this package gets approved contact a sponsor from the official list. To that end, have you done any unoffical reviews of other's packages? If so, please post links. If not, do a few, and post links. Package: 94e1a15eec27d8db271df733230aae5e ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm $ rpm -i ~/Download/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Clean. $ md5sum ../SOURCES/ccrypt-1.7.tar.gz 19526e31a7d234e29d54dbcc876605d5 ../SOURCES/ccrypt-1.7.tar.gz $ md5sum ~/Download/ccrypt-1.7.tar.gz 19526e31a7d234e29d54dbcc876605d5 /home/gdha/Download/ccrypt-1.7.tar.gz Source tarball is the same in SRPM package as on the official web-site. Good. $ rpmbuild -bs ccrypt.spec Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm $ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/ccrypt.spec Clean build on x86. Requires: libcrypt.so.1 (noticed this requirement during build) To be checked... $ rpm -qpl /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/i386/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/bin/ccat /usr/bin/ccdecrypt /usr/bin/ccencrypt /usr/bin/ccrypt /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7 /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7/COPYING /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7/NEWS /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7/README /usr/share/doc/ccrypt-1.7/cypfaq01.txt /usr/share/man/man1/ccat.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/ccdecrypt.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/ccencrypt.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/ccrypt.1.gz - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines Good. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Good. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Good. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Good. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). Good. Wondering if the following line is relevant for the description: "which is the U.S. government's chosen candidate for the Advanced Encryption Standard." Your call. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Good. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Good. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Will you be able to fix the build problem on PPC? Otherwise, add a tag to exclude it. Via koji I was able to build on ppc. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. You need the glibc-devel package for -lcrypt - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Good. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. Good. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Good. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Good. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). Good. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . Good. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . Good. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Good. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Good. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. NA. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. Good. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Good. - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Good. - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Good. - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. # mock -r default rebuild SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Good on i386. - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. $ koji build --arch=x86_64 --scratch dist-f10 SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Good. $ koji build --arch=ppc --scratch dist-f10 SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Good. (See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1071232 ) - SHOULD: The package functions as described. Good. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. NA. - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. NA. - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. NA. - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220908.n0M980qY004246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 04:07:59 EDT --- - I stripped /usr/bin/spatch and it ran just fine afterwards. Does the stripping exception really apply then? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml#Stripping_binaries) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481115] Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220928.n0M9S7jJ029285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481116] Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220927.n0M9RtX2009781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481115] Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220934.n0M9YoLw030976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 04:34:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1073483 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 7c37f6908b484b718bd9716432b37e74 thes_sl_SI_v2.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481116] Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220934.n0M9YlCF011134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 04:34:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1073485 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 802cc8a3e5447a65debdbad13247f5c4 thes_ru_RU_v2.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220937.n0M9bM6m011921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #13 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-22 04:37:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Adam, please follow the process at this step (and read that document from top > to bottom, so you understand how things work). > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner Adam you should always build in rawhide first before pushing updates to the F-10 and F-9 branches: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Request_Builds This requirement should be made explicit in that doc. In any case your push of cas has caused broken deps in rawhide because koji "inherited" the F-10 build in rawhide (since there wasn't any F-11 cas build to "override" it). But that F-10 package of cas won't work on rawhide because rawhide requires Python 2.6, not Python 2.5 (which is shipped on F-10): Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- cas-0.13-118.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20090122/logs/depcheck So I took the liberty of rebuilding it for you: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79757 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220945.n0M9jnrb001195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481115] Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220946.n0M9kIL7014066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 04:46:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-sl Short Description: Slovenian thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481116] Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901220947.n0M9l04Y014416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 04:46:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-ru Short Description: Russian thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464781-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221109.n0MB9jeo001990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #29 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-22 06:09:42 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-9.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-9.fc10.src.rpm Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1073687 $ rpmlint flexdock.spec ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-9.fc10.i386.rpm ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-9.fc10.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. >There's still trailing whitespace in the following lines I re-ran the whitespace removal through vim. What is so bad about trailing whitespace anyway - provided it isn't multi-kilobyte? >mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share Gone. >Why don't you just modify the patch? Because of lib64 vs lib. >-d2u It forces dos to unix conversion mode. I now just use sed instead, its neater and is one less require. >Couldn't you just patch the build system not to put arch in lib filename? The way they do this, from memory is a bit odd. Patching would require more work than simply locating the SOFILE -- locating the SOFILE is easier and the project is not changing that much, and the SOFILE name wont change a lot, so it is maintainable. Either way the end result is the same -- we locate the SOFILE. Using find is marginally slower, but I am not writing my spec files for speed. >strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE Calling strip is not allowed because you need the debugging symbols, however calling strip-unneeded does not intefere with the debugging symbols. However to make it neater I have changed this (see next item) > Actually it's simple. Just don't chmod the .so to 644. It has to be executable > for rpmbuild debuginfo scripts to find it. rpmlint is silent afterwards. Done. >Manually making symlinks is fragile, especially for versioned JARs. Versioned jars were not being symlinked, although named ones were. The version number is to satisfy the flexdock buildsys. I have switched it to using build-jar-repository, but I feel that the new method is less straightforward, and more likely to break. I personally think the new method is more obscure. >These are not needed, as the library is not in ld.so search path (and not directly linkable). Dropped post/postun >I suggest using a case statement here. It'll be easy to add other arches later. >For example sparc64. Done. > Changelog entries must have a space between * and date. Done. >Why do you need a specific libX11 version? Gone. I cant seem to track down any reason for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221119.n0MBJ7nW022971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-22 06:19:05 EDT --- Nicolas, I think you wanted to set the fedora-review+ flag instead of fedora-cvs+ Anyway, Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctan-kerkis-fonts New Branches: devel Owners: sarantis This is a rename request of tetex-font-kerkis for the devel branch only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468797-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221132.n0MBWAPR007565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: <bug-472639-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472639-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221132.n0MBWCee007618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 468797, which changed state. Bug 468797 Summary: Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221202.n0MC2jEE014790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #20 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-22 07:02:44 EDT --- > Pardon me..? only one time :-), don't worry you're welcome > It did for me as daemontools-debuginfo-0.76-2.fc10.i386.rpm run rpmlint on it rpmlint daemontools-debuginfo-0.76-2.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221213.n0MCD4o6017130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-22 07:13:03 EDT --- Thanks, I'll take it up with the packaging list. Until then I'll add a requires for httpd. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: poweradmin Short Description: A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server Owners: ruben Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] New: Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool Message-ID: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Summary: Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msivak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://msivak.fedorapeople.org/pycryptsetup/pycryptsetup.spec SRPM URL: http://msivak.fedorapeople.org/pycryptsetup/pycryptsetup-0.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Python libraries to ease LUKS manipulation from python code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221218.n0MCIxFA018413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221249.n0MCnRHs010895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 07:49:26 EDT --- Firstly if your package should be also in other distro, please reconsider inclusion of spec file. That's for your upstream package ;-) Now Fedora packaging: FAIL source files match upstream You should create tar file somewhere on the project homepage. FAIL package meets naming and versioning guidelines. Use python-%{name} FAIL specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. macro %name-%version should be %{name}-%{version}. Without {} take some global constants. Anyway brackets are used in most cases. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package is need. FAIL rpmlint is silent. later OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. pycryptsetup.src: E: no-changelogname-tag pycryptsetup.x86_64: E: no-changelogname-tag pycryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: no-changelogname-tag Docs are usually package in %files section like %doc CHANGES etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221254.n0MCs7w6012306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #7 from Robert Marcano <robert at marcanoonline.com> 2009-01-22 07:54:05 EDT --- Good news, response received: "To make things short: we removed the export restriction clause and the checkbox from the download page, downloaders also need not to accecpt the BSD license anymore. There is now a direct download link" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221255.n0MCtqpb027254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 07:55:49 EDT --- Ok, all issues written in comment #5 are fixed => package is reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 12:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221258.n0MCwr0J013636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 07:58:51 EDT --- Great news. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221308.n0MD8nhV016411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschmidt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221309.n0MD91hW031059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #16 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 08:08:59 EDT --- This seems to have stalled again. Robert, do you have everything you need to submit the CVS request now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221321.n0MDL03s020051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 08:20:57 EDT --- Sorry for the late answear, I've hit #475283 which prevented me to have a system ready for packaging. I've implemented the comments from Dan in #23, few notes: - The main package should be multilibs compliant so I've splitted the bin and python (which are mono-arches) and have them required by the main. - NetworkManager plugin is merged back in the main package since dbus-libs which it depends on is not much. - Enabled all plugins by default at build time - Add virtual Requires on %{name}-pac (EV) which are provided (EVR) by mozjs and webkit. We only requires on Epoch:Version to let open for another package to provides that capability Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libproxy-0.2.3-8.fc10.src.rpm I plan to import libproxy to F10 and devel soon; unless that still needs improvements... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221339.n0MDdTBD024527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pg_top -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released In-Reply-To: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221339.n0MDdkmF006459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> 2009-01-22 08:39:43 EDT --- *** Bug 444134 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: <bug-444134-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-444134-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221339.n0MDdjvq006434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #18 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> 2009-01-22 08:39:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 481022 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221341.n0MDflUR025484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmaslano at redhat.com |mcepl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221342.n0MDg1SI007393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #17 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-22 08:41:58 EDT --- Steve: I'm waiting for my application to the packager group to be approved. The guidelines are a little hazy on whether I can submit the CVS request when I'm not yet a member of the packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221349.n0MDnGDd008961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #18 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 08:49:15 EDT --- Tom, can you approve Robert's application now? Then I think we can stop bothering you :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221404.n0ME461K031108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 --- Comment #2 from Martin Siv?k <msivak at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 09:04:05 EDT --- Ok, modified spec and srpm: http://msivak.fedorapeople.org/pycryptsetup/python-cryptsetup.spec http://msivak.fedorapeople.org/pycryptsetup/python-cryptsetup-0.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm We do not have homepage at the moment though, but this project is related to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/StorageRewrite (so i set the Url temporarily to this page). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221407.n0ME7O85032289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #23 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 09:07:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > I tried following all the sketchy guidelines, and following your advise, etc. > I'm ready to just leave it with comments like this, I can build a fedora RPM. I cannot follow you. Can you clear your thought? If you need support, please ask. If something is not clear, please ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: <bug-429486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221426.n0MEQUi2004789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 09:26:25 EDT --- This is a more than 6 month pending review. I will expect Remi to sponsor Patrice. Until then, here is a pre-review: @leigh scott I will pick the Patrice's spec file as he's the original submitter of the package. Feel free to participate in this review and submit other package if you want to be sponsored . screenlet pre-review - started only a spec review at this time - not package buit. NEEDWORK - %{!?python_sitelib: and %{!?python_sitearch: are not needed anymore in recent Fedora version. (since they are already defined) - Please remove at least the python_sitearch macro which is irrelevant for a noarch package. In the same way, please remove every lines that are not relevant for a noarch package (# Remove CFLAGS=, comments from the spec template, etc). NEEDWORK - A new version has been released : 0.1.2 NEEDWORK - use the Appropriate short name for License ( GPLv2+ ) NEEDWORK - #Source1 have to be remove - unuseful comment NEEDWORK - Use Applications/Multimedia instead of Applications/System NEEDWORK - no doc are bundled in the package, please add the relevant ones. NEEDWORK - If possible , choose to install the svg icon into /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, then follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache NEEDWORK - the package bundle a .desktop file, but the file was not validated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files NEEDWORK - You need to use the find_lang macro (you may need to tweak it for both screenlet and screenlet-manager locales) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221427.n0MERg86019355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 09:27:39 EDT --- This package hasn't been imported , Why ? Once imported the bug should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221433.n0MEXa3p021024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #14 from Adam Stokes <astokes at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 09:33:35 EDT --- Thank you, still getting used to the processes here and you're right the documentation should perhaps mention to build in devel branch first. Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481159] New: Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml Message-ID: <bug-481159-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-autoconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-autoconf-0.1-0.1.git20090122.fc10.src.rpm Description: Autoconf macros for OCaml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: <bug-481159-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481159-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221445.n0MEjrPt010309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 09:45:52 EDT --- NOTE: setting NotReady flag on this review. We are still resolving licensing issues upstream. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1074116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: <bug-246524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-246524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221447.n0MEleHZ010937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 09:47:38 EDT --- Is there any news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: <bug-246525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-246525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221447.n0MElIOa010854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 09:47:15 EDT --- This is a LGPLv2+, there is no dedicated License for LGPLv2+ The + is usually found on source code headers. There is a 8.9.2 version. I don't know if it is suitable for packaging. (depend upon the meaning of the "development version"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: <bug-429486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221453.n0MErm3Y012657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 --- Comment #32 from leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com> 2009-01-22 09:53:45 EDT --- @ Nicolas Chauvet As far as I know screenlets has been abandoned (It's a dead project) and has been replaced by universal applets. I am not going to package universal applets as I don't think it's ready for prime time http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~screenlets-dev/screenlets/trunk/files https://code.launchpad.net/~universal-applets-core -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221504.n0MF4OPb015620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #36 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:04:21 EDT --- Red Hat Legal is still deliberating over this one. Once I hear back from them, I should be able to move forward (in one way or another). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477190-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221503.n0MF31Vf015316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Adam you should always build in rawhide first before pushing updates to the > F-10 and F-9 branches: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Request_Builds > > This requirement should be made explicit in that doc. I've added a warning to that section which should hopefully make that clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221504.n0MF4USd015656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:04:29 EDT --- First of all: > varov?n?: Nalezeny instalovan?, ale nezabalen? soubory: > /usr/lib/pycryptsetup/examples/selftest.py > /usr/lib/pycryptsetup/examples/selftest.pyc > /usr/lib/pycryptsetup/examples/selftest.pyo Just let it be uninstalled (setup.py would leave it alone) and put examples/ into %doc. And now about the spec file: > %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysc onfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sy sconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} Only one of these, please. > #I don't want the unpackaged file check > %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 Why? There is no reason in the world, I would know about, why you don't want it, and actually it would save your from the above blunder. Either explain pretty well in the comment why you need, or get rid of it. > Requires: cryptsetup-luks Needless Requires should be avoided. [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpm -qRp RPMS/i386/pycryptsetup-0.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcryptsetup.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpm -q --whatprovides libcryptsetup.so.0 cryptsetup-luks-1.0.6-6.fc10.i386 [matej at viklef redhat]$ > BuildRequires: python-devel Needless BuildRequires should be avoided as well: [matej at viklef ~]$ rpm -qR python-setuptools-devel /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 python-devel python-setuptools = 0.6c9-1.fc10 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [matej at viklef ~]$ > %attr(0644,root,root) %{_datadir}/doc/%name-%version/COPYING This should be %doc COPYING --- Please replace all occurrences of %{__rm}, %{__install}, %{__mv} and others with direct calls to the real command. (OK, you won with %{__python}) --- Still unhappy rpmlint: [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/pycryptsetup-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/pycryptsetup-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm pycryptsetup.src: E: no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. pycryptsetup.src: W: strange-permission pycryptsetup.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [matej at viklef redhat]$ --- Source0 should be URL -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Cannot compare MD5 checksum with upstream. URL: field doesn't make sense as well. Please, make the upstream for it and THEN file a version of the package for review. --- It does build in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1074220) but it shouldn't because of broken %files -- see the top of this comment. Please fix all the above problems, build upstream, and then we can go through the next round of review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221504.n0MF4Kfu029484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:04:19 EDT --- I'm just not going to get to look at this in the next few days, so if anyone wants to pick it up, go for it. Otherwise I might get a chance next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221508.n0MF8gLf016771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:08:41 EDT --- Sorry, I didn't see Robert's request come across, my spam trap must have caught it. He's sponsored now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: <bug-429486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-429486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221510.n0MFAxMh017571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 Patrice FERLET <metal3d at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #33 from Patrice FERLET <metal3d at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 10:10:57 EDT --- alright, screenlets has licence that cannot be applied for fedora repositories... Screenlets were abandonned by author but another project contributor continues to work. I have no news... This is why I decided to leave this package stand by for now. I will propose my other packages to be sponsored. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221506.n0MF6pI8030434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:06:50 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, as there is no longer any problem with the restrictions removed. Thanks for following up on this with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221525.n0MFPb72021080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327964|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221523.n0MFNdkx001878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-22 10:23:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: msp430-binutils Short Description: Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at msp430 Owners: rspanton Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: <bug-464074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221526.n0MFQO7a002675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #47 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 10:26:21 EDT --- Using static libraries instead of shared libraries isn't a matter of preference. Upstream should be educated to use shared library. Unless there is a very imperial technical reason (circle dependency, ABI un-stability, etc). This package shouldn't make use of a static library instead of creating a shared object. Futhermore src-mathlink and src-mathlink2 aren't compiled Again, there is no reason for such package to install theses headers in /usr/include instead of /usr/include/cddlib to prevent namespace issues. Also, Adding pkgconfig support should have been done to ease the -I/usr/include/cddlib addition. cddlibman.pdf should have been generated from the .tex file. How do you run the example ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221528.n0MFSbc9003053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 10:28:36 EDT --- This package was APPROVED but cvs creatin hasn't been requested. Why ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: <bug-467655-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467655-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221535.n0MFZvlh023502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 10:35:54 EDT --- So according to the newest blender.spec in devel (at least), we now have a blender arch dependent plugins directory. Once that said i'm not sure how it can be useful; specially if yafaray needs to writte it's own configuration and content data. You can look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 for some discution with the blender maintainer. On your side, did you have improved the yafaray package. Is it possible to have some clean patches adopted upstream so you don't needs the tweaks in %prep ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: <bug-431013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-431013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221533.n0MFXhYS004430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org> 2009-01-22 10:33:41 EDT --- Ralf, I know you're not participating in EPEL, but you offered to let me maintain your packages there if needed. I need to update rt3 to 3.6.7 in EPEL, so here's the branch request. Regards, Xavier Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-CSS-Squish New Branches: EL-5 Owners: xavierb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221538.n0MFc4pt005600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 --- Comment #3 from Karsten Hopp <karsten at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:38:02 EDT --- fixed in dictd-1.11.0-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: <bug-477979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221538.n0MFcmfs005729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madko at linuxed.net --- Comment #1 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-22 10:38:47 EDT --- This is my first review, I hope I won't say anything wrong. Review ====== Good: - rpmlint checks return 0 errors, 0 warnings - package meets naming guidelines - license (BSD) OK, matches source - source matches upstream (25761b8a533bc935f75902724fb73244) - package compiles on F10-i386/x86_64 Bad: * Package is not using %{optflags} during compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221547.n0MFlgJH026587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #25 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-22 10:47:39 EDT --- I've just submited a review on Bug 477979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221548.n0MFmskC008324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #26 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 10:48:52 EDT --- You probably want to consistently use Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} for all subpackages (some miss the release part, currently) Other than that, it looks great to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 16:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] New: Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL Message-ID: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Summary: Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: madko at linuxed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, musuruan at gmail.com, felipe.contreras at gmail.com, itamar at ispbrasil.com.br, erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl, jussi.lehtola at iki.fi, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Name Service Switch library that interface with PostgreSQL. more info on http://pgfoundry.org/projects/sysauth/ Having 1 rpmlint warning on this package: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnss_pgsql.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 16:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221607.n0MG7c7X012720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #26 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-22 11:07:36 EDT --- I've also submitted a new review request (Bug 481173) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 16:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: <bug-458714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221636.n0MGaMkT006609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Not API/ABI stable yet | --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 11:36:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libkate.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libkate-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format Changelog - Update to 0.3.0 - Add KateDJ and katalyzer in -utils - Add BR liboggz and -utils Requires liboggz Koji build on Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1074429 Despite the version are changing often, the ABI hasn't changed that much in previous releases; so I've removed the comment on the whiteboard. This package is ready to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 16:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221646.n0MGkSXW009208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 11:46:26 EDT --- This package has been imported only in F-10 but failed. Any Reason ? A scratch build succeed targeted as dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1074452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 16:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:54:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221654.n0MGsAub010972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-22 11:54:09 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 6be7b8299b2ee01e42e1a1566497d2c6a0d0ed6c httping-1.2.9.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-En glish languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === Please get in touch with the author and inform him that mentioning "GPL" in the source files makes them GPL+, not GPLv2 and that he should add the versioning bits to the source files. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] New: Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL Message-ID: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Summary: Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql_perl/perl-pgsql_perl5.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql_perl/perl-pgsql_perl5-1.9.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Pg module permits you to access all functions of the Libpq interface of PostgreSQL. Libpq is the programmer's interface to PostgreSQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221717.n0MHHfrF017637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-22 12:17:38 EDT --- Good: + Could downloaded upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream one. (md5sum: c998c8050c77c14eda496b26891bb4c1) + License GPLv2+ is matches with the copyright notice in the course file + Local build works fine + Build on koji works fine. TDDO: + You need on add a extran '%' to escape the specila '%' char in the %changelog stanza. Escaping the '$' character is no necessary in the %changelog stanza, so you can write * Wed Jan 21 2009 Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> - 1.13-1 - Clarify license - Fix mixed use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %%{buildroot} - Source tag fully qualified now *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221725.n0MHPQNj019254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-pgsql_perl5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221740.n0MHecOg006559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 12:40:34 EDT --- oups, indeed, fixed the kde and gnome sub-packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221741.n0MHfl5n022732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-22 12:41:46 EDT --- koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1074558 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221742.n0MHgVZf007196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |199154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221742.n0MHgUtU007174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481192 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221801.n0MI176q027285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim at commandprompt.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|199154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221801.n0MI16Ht027260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim at commandprompt.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|481192 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221802.n0MI2rpS027779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #52 from Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim at commandprompt.com> 2009-01-22 13:02:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > Devrim, what's up with this package, do you still want to proceed. > I'm running out of patience after two years ;-) Ok, let's push this a bit more: Spec file: https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgcore/repo/rpm/redhat/8.3/slony1/F-10/slony1.spec SRPM: http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/srpms/8.3/fedora/fedora-10-i386/slony1-2.0.0-2.f10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221804.n0MI4A2L028088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 13:04:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Sorry for the delay here: Hey no problem, thanks for taking the time to look at this. > 1. For buildrequires I see in the build.log: > > checking for msgfmt... [..] > Should you add those to BuildRequires? Yes, they should be. I have added those in the updated package. > 2. Any reason you can't use %{?_smp_mflags} with your make? > Or does that not work with mingw32 packages? Also a bug, added ... > 3. rpmlint of course has a bunch to say... perhaps you could get it > to not complain when the package is mingw32-* on a lot of these? This page summarises rpmlint warnings: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint > Should you be using %find_lang here: Yes, we should be, and I have added it. Spec file: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libgpg-error/mingw32-libgpg-error.spec SRPM file: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1074597&name=mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-9.fc11.src.rpm * Thu Jan 22 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.6-9 - Verify that we are still matching current native package. - Use auto-buildrequires to identify more accurate list of BRs: + BR gettext (for /usr/bin/msgfmt etc) + BR mingw32-dlfcn + BR mingw32-iconv - Use _smp_mflags. - Use find_lang. A koji scratch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1074596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: <bug-455226-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455226-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221818.n0MIIZFV015517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com> 2009-01-22 13:18:33 EDT --- > How I should number its versions 0.9-1.1.CVS20080512 seems ok. > For what and where more I should comment it? I'd like to see the exact commands use to build the tarball, just above the %source., p.e. (export greater than checkout) : # cvs -d :pserver:cvsread at cvs.php.net/repository export -D 2009-01-22 pecl/runkit # tar cjf runkit-CVS20090122.tar.bz2 -C pecl runkit %Source0: %{peclName}-CVS%{CVS}.tar.bz2 Don't use an URL which doesn't exists I have well understood than patches are for PHP ABI. Even if this package is unmaintained, please report the bug and post your patch(es), it will be usefull for everyone, and probably commited (last commit is only 5 weeks old on runkit.c). I don't think restarting apache for each extension is a good idea. This should probably be removed (Have to search about this in the Guidelines). Please : - clean release (remove .Hu... and probably not usefull #*Hu comments) - update to a recent CVS snapshot - register the extension (package2.xml is included) - add PHP ABI check (see PHP Guidelines) - add upstream bug reference above %patch - use Fedora macros %pecl_xmldir, %php_extdir, %pecl_install, ... - clean $Revision and $Log cvs status lines (spec is quite obfuscated) - clean changelog (mainly % not acceptable) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221837.n0MIbdeE004636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #10 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-22 13:37:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-privacy-please Short Description: Security and Privacy plugin for Pidgin Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221840.n0MIeEAr005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #11 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-22 13:40:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-privacy-please Short Description: Security and Privacy plugin for Pidgin Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221911.n0MJBFuV013153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Thibault North <thibault.north at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221909.n0MJ9Ebs027331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |llaumgui at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221912.n0MJClvo028521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221912.n0MJCSRR028431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |llaumgui at gmail.com --- Comment #39 from Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 14:12:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: backup-manager Short Description: A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221916.n0MJGEV9029410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-22 14:16:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > hi, > > Its "ankursinha". I'll finish Beteckna in a few days. What do I need to do once > I'm sponsored? You follow the steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a for your packages that already passed review For Beteckna, you still have to pass the review step Most people on #fedora-devel will help you as long as they don't have to do the reviewing or sponsoring themselves -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221918.n0MJIL42014884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #9 from Thibault North <thibault.north at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 14:18:19 EDT --- Review completed: * Naming is okay, * Licencing is ok, * Paths are ok, * Chmods are ok, * Install scripts are ok. rpmlint doesn't find errors or warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901221945.n0MJjGNO021664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 14:45:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Bad: > - htmlize-init file contains no copyright notice Fixed. > TODO: > - Package doesn't contains a verbatin copy of the license, Please > ask upstream to include a verbatin copy of it Since this is distributed as a single Emacs Lisp file, I think it is futile to ask the upstream author to distribute a copy of the GPLv2. Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/emacs-htmlize.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/emacs-htmlize-1.34-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222015.n0MKFnxd029756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-22 15:15:47 EDT --- Okay. I went trough all those issues and solved them (and also try to remeber them :) ). Except the optflag part. Could you give me a hint where are samples how to solve this? Up to know I've put an updated version to http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222030.n0MKU5VI014855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-22 15:30:04 EDT --- Ok, the package is fine for me. I hope you have contact the upstream author for including a verbatin copy of the license text into they upstream package. So the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222034.n0MKYlKJ001508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 15:34:45 EDT --- Thanks, I'm going to try looking at this tomorrow. But on the subject of stripping binaries, firstly you can tell if the binary was damaged by strip by looking at the end of the binary: $ cp /usr/bin/spatch . $ hexdump -C spatch | tail -3 00254d50 42 00 00 0c 66 43 52 43 53 00 00 10 58 00 00 00 |B...fCRCS...X...| 00254d60 05 43 61 6d 6c 31 39 39 39 58 30 30 38 |.Caml1999X008| 00254d6d Notice the Caml1999... signature there. $ strip spatch $ hexdump -C spatch | tail -3 00040940 ee 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| 00040950 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| 00040960 And notice that it's gone after stripping, and the binary no longer works: $ ./spatch No bytecode file specified. Secondly, this method of attaching bytecode to binaries (a) sucks, (b) is deprecated upstream, and (c) we should build a native code (non-bytecode) version of spatch for Fedora which bypasses the entire issue. So the whole thing is a big bug, and I need to rebuild this RPM, with any luck tomorrow. Although the RPM above will work for people who just want to try out coccinelle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:47:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222047.n0MKlft8004763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #3 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 15:47:40 EDT --- I chose the "v" version of the crda tarball because those had later dates than the equivalent non-"v" versions. I made the assumption that this was the new release policy for the project. I'm happy to change the spec summary -- how about "Regulatory compliance daemon for 802.11 wireless networking"? I will also include the README files, probably as README.crda and README.wireless-regdb. I will change the ownership of /usr/lib/crda. I will move and rename the udev rules. Any suggestions for choosing a numeric priority? Adding a udev requirement makes perfect sense. The point about /usr being mounted later is a good one. I don't know how realistic a NFS-mounted /usr over wireless is, but it probably makes sense to allow for wireless networking and all allowed channels even when /usr isn't mounted. Are there any other guidelines differentiating /lib versus /usr/lib? Regarding one package versus two, I'm open to suggestions. I combined them under the thought that relying on an externally signed binary would drive some people nuts. Building them together allows for an automatically generated key that can be discarded, similar to how kernel module signing has been handled in the past. If that isn't important, than your suggestion regarding /etc/pki is a good one. Realistically I don't know how much difference it makes -- I don't think either crda or wireless-regdb are likely to be spun very often, and crda is not such a big package as to discourage revving it when wireless-regdb changes -- thoughts? In the interim, I'll revise the spec assuming that it remains as a single package, and I'll probably continue to use /usr/lib/crda for now just because the crda upstream is preconditioned for that behavior. Thanks for the feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222058.n0MKwVwX022352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 15:58:30 EDT --- Rpmlint warnings for fix before going to formal review * W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/trilead-ssh2-213/HISTORY.txt - Easily fixable * W: obsolete-not-provided ganymed-ssh2 - eclipse-slide is requiring ganymed-ssh2 so i guess we would be on the safe side to provide it * W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 18) * W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation There is one more rpmlint warning but it is clearly a bug in rpmlint W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} Also please fix Source0 to point to the download url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222057.n0MKveY9022224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 15:57:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I chose the "v" version of the crda tarball because those had later dates than > the equivalent non-"v" versions. I made the assumption that this was the new > release policy for the project. Just using whichever they're using would work - I find it odd that they have both tarballs. > I'm happy to change the spec summary -- how about "Regulatory compliance daemon > for 802.11 wireless networking"? Sounds good. > I will move and rename the udev rules. Any suggestions for choosing a numeric > priority? It probably doesn't make a big difference. If nothing else is acting on regulatory events, pick an earlier number and you may want to add OPTIONS+="last_rule"; this (theoretically) would speed up processing some. > The point about /usr being mounted later is a good one. I don't know how > realistic a NFS-mounted /usr over wireless is, but it probably makes sense to > allow for wireless networking and all allowed channels even when /usr isn't > mounted. Are there any other guidelines differentiating /lib versus /usr/lib? With NetworkManager on /usr, we don't really support nfs-over-wireless - my main concern is whether these events are going to be generated on driver load or similar activities on startup, and will then get 'missed' if /usr isn't there yet. If that's not the case, it's probably fine. > Realistically I don't know how much difference it makes -- I don't > think either crda or wireless-regdb are likely to be spun very often, and crda > is not such a big package as to discourage revving it when wireless-regdb > changes -- thoughts? If updates aren't going to be that often, it's not a big deal. I was just worried about if there is going to be a 'monthly' spin of the regdb or something similar that the updates might start to add up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: <bug-464074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222108.n0ML8EE0009704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #48 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-22 16:08:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > Using static libraries instead of shared libraries isn't a matter of > preference. > Upstream should be educated to use shared library. Unless there is a very > imperial technical reason (circle dependency, ABI un-stability, etc). > > This package shouldn't make use of a static library instead of creating a > shared object. The last update from upstream was in early 2008 and the email address bounces. > Futhermore src-mathlink and src-mathlink2 aren't compiled Are these useful? > Again, there is no reason for such package to install theses headers in > /usr/include instead of /usr/include/cddlib to prevent namespace issues. Agreed. > Also, Adding pkgconfig support should have been done to ease the > -I/usr/include/cddlib addition. Unneeded work considering how many dependencies this library will have. > cddlibman.pdf should have been generated from the .tex file. Done. > How do you run the example ? $ gcc /usr/share/doc/cddlib-devel-094f/src/testcdd1.c -I/usr/include/cddlib -lcdd $ ./a.out When it asks you for a file, pass one of the files in /usr/share/doc/cddlib-devel-094f/examples/*.ine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] New: Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang Message-ID: <bug-481224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Summary: Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hubert at lshift.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.lshift.net/~hubert/rabbitmq-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lshift.net/~hubert/rabbitmq-server-1.5.1-1.src.rpm Description: RabbitMQ is an implementation of AMQP, the emerging standard for high performance enterprise messaging. The RabbitMQ server is a robust and scalable implementation of an AMQP broker. I am also looking for a sponsor. rpmlint v0.85 returns following errors and warnings (which are not fixed on purpose): rabbitmq-server.i386: E: no-binary rabbitmq-server.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib rabbitmq-server.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown rabbitmq-server.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbitmq-server rabbitmq-server.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbitmq-server The first two are because rpmlint doesn't properly recognize Erlang binary *.beam files and they need to be placed in the standard path (for example for i386 it is "/usr/lib/erlang/lib/"). The warnings about chown and service levels are also incorrect in this case, and are set on purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222111.n0MLBqXD025794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #7 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 16:11:51 EDT --- I forgot I had /usr/local/bin/spatch from my previous experiments, so that's why spatch ran fine even after I stripped /usr/bin/spatch :-) Sorry for the confusion in #5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222120.n0MLKmiA028043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-22 16:20:47 EDT --- Nicolas: Can you set this fedora-review: + if you approve it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222125.n0MLP1ii013087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222122.n0MLM3uB028265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222133.n0MLXQXN015200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222134.n0MLYZae015340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 16:34:34 EDT --- OK rpmlint shows no warnings OK package named correctly OK spec file named correctly OK meets the Packaging Guidelines . OK license is correct, approved and in the %doc OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK Shell script for fetching sources is included OK The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK owns all directories OK doesn't contain any duplicate files OK permissions are correctly set OK clean section present OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK no large documentation files OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. T OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 The package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222133.n0MLX6Jg030401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 16:33:05 EDT --- Taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:39:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222139.n0MLd2ad016412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-22 16:39:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Nicolas: Can you set this fedora-review: + if you approve it? Sorry, my bad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 22:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222206.n0MM6QMc022917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-22 17:06:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: ovm Short Description: Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 22:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222202.n0MM241A004533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #11 from Robert Marcano <robert at marcanoonline.com> 2009-01-22 17:02:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > * W: obsolete-not-provided ganymed-ssh2 - eclipse-slide is requiring > ganymed-ssh2 so i guess we would be on the safe side to provide it I missed this one, trilead-ssh2 is not binary/nor 100% source compatible (but only a few package renames are needed), so both packages are needed until eclipse-slide is updated (ganymed-ssh2 project is dead). I will ask the developer about that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 22:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222252.n0MMq8jX015144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-22 17:51:54 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv3+ (see also note 1) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 82aeb860dc7f82078ab12326fae996ac280ed6aa cpmtools-2.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English l anguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Notes === 1. A couple of files are licensed as GPLv2+ ( getopt* ). All the others have no licensing information. The only indication of the projects's license comes from the accompanying COPYING file which is a verbatim copy of GPLv3 and the README which states that the license of the project is GPLv3+. Please drop a note to the author and ask him to include the necessary info about the licenses in all the source files. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222305.n0MN5RmA018278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ianweller at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 18:05:26 EDT --- I'll review this because it's badly needed to update gwibber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901222331.n0MNVqtG009193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 01:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230130.n0N1UmhV014266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #35 from Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com> 2009-01-22 20:30:44 EDT --- The holdup has been jakarta-commons-cli 1.1 needs to be pushed to stable, it has been in test for a few weeks now (before that the maintainer forgot to push it for a few weeks into that). If you can give jakarta-commons-cli karma love we can get this on on its way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 01:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230143.n0N1hPY3000769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #5 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-22 20:43:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda-v0.9.5_2009_01_15-2.fc10.src.rpm Did I do the /usr/lib/crda directory ownership right? Or is there more magic? I'll propose the last_rule thing to the upstream project. Is it worth us carrying a patch for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 02:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230243.n0N2hLXi027196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-22 21:43:20 EDT --- == FULL REVIEW of python-distutils-extra == [ OK ] specfiles match: 44a5da41e9a439cc18e94cf932eadbab python-distutils-extra.spec 44a5da41e9a439cc18e94cf932eadbab python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-1.fc9.src/python-distutils-extra.spec [ OK ] source files match upstream: 413ebd3e52c45437eaa36d1d9e6912fd python-distutils-extra_1.91.2.tar.gz 413ebd3e52c45437eaa36d1d9e6912fd python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-1.fc9.src/python-distutils-extra_1.91.2.tar.gz [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [FAILED] license field matches the actual license. Actual license is GPLv2+ according to debian/copyright [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ n/a ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. Scratch builds on Koji: dist-f11 task # 1075451 passed dist-f10 task # 1075453 passed dist-f9 task # 1075470 passed [ OK ] package installs properly. [ n/a ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ OK ] rpmlint is silent. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ n/a ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ n/a ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ n/a ] desktop files valid and installed properly. ------------------------------------------------- I approve this package (python-distutils-extra) ------------------------------------------------- Please make sure you fix the license tag before you import this into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 04:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230407.n0N47xTk029996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #26 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-22 23:07:56 EDT --- Is this review going anywhere? The lack of this package is still causing broken deps in rawhide: Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts If this review is abandoned, I will try and pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 04:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: <bug-464074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230407.n0N47C6r013411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #49 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-22 23:07:10 EDT --- The mathlink stuff is interfacing code to Mathematica. I don't know if mathlink is Free Software, Mathematica definitely isn't. :-) In any case, that code can't be built without mathlink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 04:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230414.n0N4EB4H031166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-22 23:14:09 EDT --- That addresses all the issues I saw... so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler Message-ID: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Devel-SmallProf.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Devel::SmallProf profiler is focused on the time taken for a program run on a line-by-line basis. It is intended to be as "small" in terms of impact on the speed and memory usage of the profiled program as possible and also in terms of being simple to use. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1075565 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230520.n0N5KXEH011010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: <bug-273701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-273701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230530.n0N5Uc6r028866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike at cchtml.com --- Comment #61 from Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> 2009-01-23 00:30:30 EDT --- Stumbled on this bug looking for a new main menu. I recommend that you update your spec and rpms with the official 0.9.12 release for NetworkManager API changes. Plus you can remove the patch for the shutdown desktop file. I'm really liking this menu with the "file-browser-applet." This should be the default setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230528.n0N5SAF3028172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 00:28:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1075567 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 498704ed1b888fc62b0c7092f8b590f5 Devel-SmallProf-2.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + make test gaveAll tests successful. Files=5, Tests=14, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.09 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(DB) perl(Devel::SmallProf) = 2.02 Requires: perl(Time::HiRes) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230549.n0N5nbd5016088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-23 00:49:36 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I will contact upstream. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpmtools Short Description: Programs for accessing CP/M disks Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 06:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230656.n0N6uM8X011821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #21 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-23 01:56:20 EDT --- > only one time :-), don't worry you're welcome What, No! I mean, I didn't get what you were trying to say by this: "instead changing conf-cc please use daemontools-0.76-errno.patch as Patch0" > run rpmlint on it > rpmlint daemontools-debuginfo-0.76-2.fc10.i386.rpm Alright found it, He(djb) was stripping the symbols while linking: `gcc -s`, and thus I *debeuginfo was empty. Anyway, I've made the changes, please see the files below SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools.spec SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools-0.76-2.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230740.n0N7eUhv020985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-23 02:40:29 EDT --- Thanks Ian for the review. I will fix the license tag before the cvs import and clan up the spec a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230741.n0N7fTqg021126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-23 02:41:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-distutils-extra Short Description: Integrate more support into Python's distutils Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: <bug-443771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-443771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230745.n0N7juhq022009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2009-01-23 02:45:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > if some content are unsure, you can also remove them from the source tarball > and repack the whole sources. Yes. I've asked upstream for clarification. If I don't get an answer, I'll repack the tarfile. Meanwhile, we are at 0.4.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230742.n0N7gS0u021291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-23 02:42:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: httping Short Description: Ping alike tool for http requests Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 08:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230820.n0N8KDOn028625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-23 03:20:11 EDT --- For 0.9.0-3: * Re-definig %__python - Would you explain why you redefine %__python? (On Fedora %__python is defined as /usr/bin/python). * Seemingly redundant version specific dependency - python 2.4 is introduced on Fedora Core 4 - sendmail 8.13.1 is already on Fedora Core 3 I think Requires: python ">= 2.4", sendmail ">= 8.13" is now just redundant. * Macros - Use macros for some basic directories. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros /var should be %{_localstatedir} * Using INSTALLED_FILES - Your way of using INSTALLED_FILES is still unsafe. It will cause unowned directories when pymilter comes to create some subdirectories under %_libdir or %python_sitearch/Milter . Instead there is much simpler and safer way like: ------------------------------------------------------ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README ... %{python_sitearch}/Milter/ %{libdir}/ %dir %attr(0755,mail,mail) /var/run/milter ------------------------------------------------------ ! Note For example, %{python_sitearch}/Milter/ contains the directory %{python_sitearch}/Milter/ itself and all files/directories/etc under this directory. ! By the way this package uses %python_sitearch not %python_sitelib so currently rebuild fails on x86_64, ppc64. * No config file - Files under %_libdir (for this package start.sh) should not be marked as %config (If this file really should be marked as %config, put the file under %_sysconfdir and use symlink). ? Seemingly missing directory - It seems that %libdir/start.sh needs %{_localstatedir}/log/milter but it is uncertain which rpm owns this directory (at least yum returns currently no packages in Fedora owns this directory). Should this directory be owned by this package? Or is it expected that this directory already exists? (in such case which rpm will create this directory?) ! %changelog format - I recommend that one line is put between each %changelog entry like: ---------------------------------------------------- %changelog * Wed Jan 07 2009 Stuart Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> 0.9.0-2 - Changes to meet Fedora standards * Mon Nov 24 2008 Stuart Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> 0.9.0-1 - Split pymilter into its own CVS module - Support chgfrom and addrcpt_par - Support NS records in Milter.dns * Mon Aug 25 2008 Stuart Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> 0.8.10-2 - /var/run/milter directory must be owned by mail ---------------------------------------------------- This is useful on Fedora CVS for some reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 09:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: <bug-463035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230907.n0N970F7005729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #6 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-23 04:06:59 EDT --- what is the current status? Will you release a new version of the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 09:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration In-Reply-To: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901230943.n0N9hBZ7029105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 10:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:07:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries In-Reply-To: <bug-455558-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455558-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231007.n0NA7F4e001637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455558 Adrian Reber <adrian at lisas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Adrian Reber <adrian at lisas.de> 2009-01-23 05:07:13 EDT --- The file conflict has been resolved a few months ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 10:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries In-Reply-To: <bug-455558-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455558-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231008.n0NA8SOs018023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455558 Adrian Reber <adrian at lisas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480335 Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Adrian Reber <adrian at lisas.de> 2009-01-23 05:08:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: udns New Branches: EL-5 Owners: adrian ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 10:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231054.n0NAsg5t012854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 05:54:41 EDT --- Thanks Kevin for looking at this. CVS request coming up ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 10:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: <bug-475755-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475755-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231053.n0NArkdS029459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Monnerat <pm at datasphere.ch> 2009-01-23 05:53:45 EDT --- Ping ? Package has passed review successfully (comment #7). Bernie, do you still plan to import this package in Fedora ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 10:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231057.n0NAvqXL013888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 05:57:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libgpg-error Short Description: MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library Owners: rjones lfarkas berrange mingwmaint Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 11:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: <bug-481224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231116.n0NBGahK018466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 06:16:35 EDT --- Nice addition to Fedora/EPEL repository. If nobody will volunteer to review it, then I'll pick it up (probably diring next week or so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 11:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231119.n0NBJTHa018856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 06:19:28 EDT --- Hello, this is my first package, and you I am seeking a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 11:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:17:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] New: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser Message-ID: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Summary: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psklenar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/python-webunit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/python-webunit-1.3.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unit test your websites with code that acts like a web browser. Features in a nutshell: 1. Browser-like page fetching including fetching the images and stylesheets needed for a page and following redirects 2. Cookies stored and trackable (all automatically handled) 3. HTTP, HTTPS, GET, POST, basic auth all handled, control over expected status codes, ... 4. DOM parsing of pages to retrieve and analyse structure, including simple form re-posting 5. Two-line page-fetch followed by form-submit possible, with error checking 6. Ability to register error page content across multiple tests 7. Uses python's standard unittest module as the underlying framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 11:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231120.n0NBKAXP003813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 06:20:09 EDT --- BTW there was a closed ticket with attempt to submit this package already. I thought there are some license issues - are they resolved (if any). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 11:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231126.n0NBQQrM020542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #1 from Pascal <pascal22p at parois.net> 2009-01-23 06:26:25 EDT --- Sorry guys, I broke my webserver, files are no longer available at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 11:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231151.n0NBpWZE010269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #22 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-23 06:51:31 EDT --- l@@k http://qmail.kldp.org/src/patches/glibc-2.3.1/daemontools-0.76.errno.patch about stripping in conf-ld, you can do this in .spec instead of creating a patch, something like this echo "gcc" > src/conf-ld but if you want to use patch there are no problem, but create one patch for each change for example. 0 - daemontools-0.76.errno.patch 1 - daemontools-0.76.install.patch 2 - daemontools-0.76.remove_stripping_conf-ld.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 12:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231206.n0NC6eSr013516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #23 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-23 07:06:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > echo "gcc" > src/conf-ld Wrong. sed -i -e \ "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -include /usr/include/errno.h!" src/conf-cc sed -i -e \ "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}!" src/conf-ld -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 12:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481288] New: Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation Message-ID: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 Summary: Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-wokkel.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-wokkel-0.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Wokkel is collection of enhancements on top of the Twisted networking framework, written in Python. It mostly provides a testing ground for enhancements to the Jabber/XMPP protocol implementation as found in Twisted Words, that are meant to eventually move there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 13:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: <bug-226034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231332.n0NDW4jt016385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-23 08:32:02 EDT --- I see no objections, I'll move forward on EOL'ing these asap. A libmusicbrainz3 pkg rename can be reconsidered at a later date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 13:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231333.n0NDXmnL001324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 08:33:47 EDT --- Still not silent rpmlint: > python-cryptsetup.src: W: strange-permission python-cryptsetup.spec 0600 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. That's from your playing with git ;-) and on the binary package: > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python- cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.1 ['0.0.1-1.fc10', '0.0.1-1'] > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cryptsetup.so > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py /usr/bin/python Please, get rid of these (or at least most of them -- the last probably goes away if the examples are not executable). No idea, about unscript binary object. > #Requires: cryptsetup-luks It is considered bad habit to comment out in spec files -- CVS is not an ideal VCS, but we have previous versions recorded. > Requires: python Don't you care about version? Will python 1.5 work? (OK, maybe not that, but people may want to rebuild this on RHEL for example). What happened to examples/ ? Still no URL in Source. Stuff you have in URL: field should be in Source: However, MD5 is OK d6b3486e096097c52e939b40c33aa130 So, yes, we need one more round to get this together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 13:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: <bug-226034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231352.n0NDqMk9021178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-23 08:52:21 EDT --- Damn, looks like the new kscd in kdemultimedia-4.2.x has a hard-dep on libmusicbrainz... the best laid plans go awry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 13:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231355.n0NDt0Bu021557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k <dan at danny.cz> 2009-01-23 08:54:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Still not silent rpmlint: > > > python-cryptsetup.src: W: strange-permission python-cryptsetup.spec 0600 > > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > That's from your playing with git ;-) > > and on the binary package: > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python- cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.1 ['0.0.1-1.fc10', '0.0.1-1'] > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cryptsetup.so > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py /usr/bin/python > > Please, get rid of these (or at least most of them -- the last probably goes > away if the examples are not executable). No idea, about unscript binary > object. > unstripped-binary-or-object is usually result of missing the executable bits on that object -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231412.n0NECWDS011113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 09:12:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-SmallProf Short Description: Per-line Perl profiler Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-473184-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473184-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231420.n0NEKplu028360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gratien.dhaese at it3.be --- Comment #9 from Gratien D'haese <gratien.dhaese at it3.be> 2009-01-23 09:20:49 EDT --- spec files contaims: BuildRequires: libcurl-devel, libgcrypt-devel, expat-devel => Required libgpg-error.so.0 library is part of libgpg-error-devel package (missing) A mock build tells us: desktop-file-install: command not found ==> missing in BuildRequires When I have a look at the libraries needed by binary clamz $ ldd clamz linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libgcrypt.so.11 => /lib/libgcrypt.so.11 (0x030e8000) libgpg-error.so.0 => /lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x02888000) libcurl.so.4 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4 (0x00bc5000) libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x005e9000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0017a000) libidn.so.11 => /lib/libidn.so.11 (0x02550000) libssh2.so.1 => /usr/lib/libssh2.so.1 (0x00b75000) libldap-2.4.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap-2.4.so.2 (0x00b31000) librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x0044a000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x031f1000) libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x04415000) libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x0279f000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00596000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00350000) libssl3.so => /lib/libssl3.so (0x02fd8000) libsmime3.so => /lib/libsmime3.so (0x0300b000) libnss3.so => /lib/libnss3.so (0x04527000) libplds4.so => /lib/libplds4.so (0x00d6e000) libplc4.so => /lib/libplc4.so (0x00d74000) libnspr4.so => /lib/libnspr4.so (0x02f6e000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00317000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00310000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0015a000) libssl.so.7 => /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x00ae4000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x047a4000) liblber-2.4.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber-2.4.so.2 (0x00d3e000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x00111000) libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x02d3c000) libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x0014d000) libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00148000) libnssutil3.so => /lib/libnssutil3.so (0x02faa000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0284f000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00332000) => suspect that Requires: field is needed too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231422.n0NEMNqM028686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #24 from Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 09:22:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bonvenocf-fonts Short Description: A set of fun fonts from the crud factory, by Barry Schwartz. Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231423.n0NENrxP013554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #35 from Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 09:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oldstandard-sfd-fonts Short Description: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231456.n0NEuQIN003893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-23 09:56:25 EDT --- please take a l@@k when you have time. http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.18-1.fc10.src.rpm I am planning to use alternatives to make symlinks to postgresql or mysql binary's -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231456.n0NEuAP2020708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-23 09:56:08 EDT --- Please be more careful, infra will create a component with the exact name you give in your cvs request, and your srpm will have to be named the same way of this component. Please adjust your demand to the final agreed-on name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: <bug-477979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231503.n0NF3qT1005583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-23 10:03:51 EDT --- fixed http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:04:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231504.n0NF4p1A005704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-23 10:04:50 EDT --- New version, with cosmetic fixes ( removal of redundant or duplicate BRs ): Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye-1.2.6-3.rc1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231535.n0NFZraL029146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #13 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-23 10:35:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: autotrust Short Description: DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 Owners: pwouters Branches: F-10, F-9, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231537.n0NFbSVT012524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-23 10:37:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnssec-conf Short Description: DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool Owners: pwouters Branches: F-10, F-9, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] New: Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations Message-ID: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Summary: Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tom at moertel.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SPECS/emacs-magit.spec SRPM URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SRPMS/emacs-magit-0.7-1.20090122git.fc10.src.rpm Description: Magit is an add-on package for GNU Emacs. It is an interface to the Git source-code management system that aims to make the most common operations convenient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231549.n0NFnTjF015129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 10:49:26 EDT --- Ok, done. But can we have the Rawhide build at least ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 16:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481333] New: Review Request:sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-481333-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Summary: Review Request:sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparrish at shallowcreek.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/sugar-update-control/sugar-update-control.spec SRPM URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/sugar-update-control/sugar-update-control-0.19-2.src.rpm Description: This is the Activity updater for the Sugar desktop. Build log here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 16:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231616.n0NGGZeP006024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-23 11:16:33 EDT --- For 1.4.0-2 * Latest version - The last stable version (1.4.0) seems to have been released 3 years ago. While the latest version is still beta (1.5.0-beta), it was released last August (i.e. 5 months ago) and as the last stable version seems old, I think using 1.5.0 beta seems preferable for Fedora. How do you think? * autotool recall - build.log shows: ------------------------------------- 46 + ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu ...... 47 checking for a BSD-compatible install... 48 /usr/bin/install -c 49 checking whether build environment is sane... 50 yes .... 372 + make -j4 373 cd . && /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing aclocal-1.4 374 WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 375 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want 376 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from 377 any GNU archive site. 378 cd . && /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing automake-1.4 --gnu Makefile 379 cd . && /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing autoconf 380 WARNING: `automake-1.4' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 381 you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. 382 You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. 383 Grab them from any GNU archive site. 384 WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 385 you modified `configure.in'. You might want to install the 386 `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU 387 archive site. 388 /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck 389 running /bin/sh ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu .... .... 710 cd . \ 711 && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status 712 config.status: creating Makefile 713 config.status: executing default-1 commands 714 cd . && /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing autoheader ------------------------------------- Here autotools are automatically called after calling make command, this is not expected. This is usually because timestamps on some files related to autotools are wrong. Please fix so that autotools are not called automatically after make. * Documents - Please add the following files to %doc. ------------------------------------- AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README ------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 16:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231632.n0NGW95Q026568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #18 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 11:32:05 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru! Give me a few days for the changes. And about the other review, I'll probably pick something from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList Anyway: Is there any way to see the (latest) build logs at Koji? I've tried looking for "mrpt" without success... I guess the builds there are different from those in my Fedora. For example, there's a "-g" and a "-mcpu" making their way to CFLAGS and I cannot find where to remove it (some rpm config file?), and I wondered if they're not in the Koji builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 16:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231632.n0NGW8K3010268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-23 11:32:05 EDT --- Okay - This package itself is good - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments - Your another review request (bug 481173) is good to some extent (I wrote some comments) ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (purple-msn-pecan) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231707.n0NH7C2M018241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 12:07:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Alex! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231711.n0NHBOPa003479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #3 from Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 12:11:22 EDT --- I'm not sure why the review was made of the crash.spec file from the upstream package instead of the Fedora version? When updating the Fedora package, the upstream spec file is not pulled into Fedora. In any case, I'm presuming that the relevant issues brought up re: the upstream spec file should be addressed in the Fedora version if they haven't already. The Fedora crash utility NVR scheme has (up until now) simply mirrored the upstream version upon which it was based, but I can see the validity in encapsulating the upstream NVR into the Fedora version. It's been an annoyance in the past when somebody has come in (unbeknownst to me) and bumped up the release number, which in turn screwed up the upstream NVR relationship. With respect to the CVE's, both 1704 and 4146 are highly unlikely to be issues given that the crash utility does a number of checks on the vmlinux object file prior to the embedded gdb module ever being invoked. (i.e., using the supplied sample hand-carved object files, they get rejected by the crash code as not being legitimate vmlinux files) Nonetheless, the patches for both of those issues are reasonable and safe to add, and I have done so. I've also incorporated the patch for the .gdbinit-related 1705 issue. When I update the upstream version, I will follow up with a Fedora update -- after I figure out how to check into my account given that I haven't been there since the Fedora break-in. Thanks, Dave Anderson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231710.n0NHA27B003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-23 12:10:01 EDT --- We need to run this script for both mysql and pgsql subpackages after it's installed Can you help with this? /usr/sbin/alternatives --install /usr/sbin/mydns MyDNS /usr/sbin/mydns-pgsql 1 \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnscheck mydnscheck /usr/bin/mydnscheck-pgsql \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnsexport mydnsexport /usr/bin/mydnsexport-pgsql \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnsimport mydnsimport /usr/bin/mydnsimport-pgsql \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnsptrconvert mydnsptrconvert /usr/bin/mydnsptrconvert-pgsql Can I put the mysql sub-package to conflict with pgsql or it's a bad idea ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231714.n0NHECeY019454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 12:14:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework Short Description: Plugins common to Eclipse Linux Tools profiling tools. Owners: overholt Branches: F-10 InitialCC: ebaron -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231720.n0NHKm58021365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 12:20:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cf-bonveno-fonts Short Description: A set of fun fonts from the crud factory, by Barry Schwartz. Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231722.n0NHMV3N005729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-23 12:22:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I reviewed the upstream version because by definition so to say Fedora wants to have the latest version of the software, and the content in the cvs is very old. I assumed it will be easier for you to maintain a single or at least very similar spec for both places. I apologize if I made an error by this assumption. Let me know what is the URL of the files that I should have reviewed and I will do it. And yes, the relevant issues brought up re: the upstream spec file must be addressed in the Fedora version. And no, I did not touch the spec exactly because I knew that there is an active maintainer who might have a well defined agenda. As of relying on a bundled application, this is not usually permitted in Fedora and therefore they should be discussed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231723.n0NHNUBO021800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-23 12:23:29 EDT --- I meant here "relying on a bundled version of an existing application" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231735.n0NHZQDW008576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #2 from Pascal <pascal22p at parois.net> 2009-01-23 12:35:25 EDT --- Fixed, file are available again. This library is going to be used by the next package I am going to submit. I am waiting for a new release upstream to submit it (http://vincefn.net/Fox/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231732.n0NHWlr4007935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 12:32:46 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review DONE - rpmlint is silence # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. DONE - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsPolicy#Naming # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. DONE # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . DONE # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . DONE - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses <- LPPL is listed there # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. DONE - README in "upstream source package" says 5. LICENSE The license of this package is LPPL. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] not applicable # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. DONE # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. DONE # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. DONE - md5sum 1753fadcf6a0e196b583869106b5c074 - the md5sums of my download and the source0 in srpm are equivalent # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. not applicable - noarch # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. not applicable # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. DONE # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. not applicable # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. not applicable # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. not applicable # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. DONE # MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. DONE # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. DONE # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). DONE # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. DONE # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. DONE # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). not applicable # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. not applicable # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. not applicable # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. not applicable # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). not applicable # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. not applicable # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} not applicable # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. not applicable # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. not applicable # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. not applicable # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). DONE # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. DONE I see no blockers ________________________ | | | ctan-musixtex-fonts | | APPROVED | |________________________| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231738.n0NHcLA7009065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481355] New: Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. Message-ID: <bug-481355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Summary: Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-3.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076942 rpmlint: $ rpmlint -i nurbs++.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/nurbs++-3.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/nurbs++-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386.rpm nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The shared lib calls have been posted upstream. Description: A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. Also featuring vector, matrix, and OpenGL support classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231756.n0NHubcl028881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231752.n0NHqOps027861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #2 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-23 12:52:23 EDT --- * We can give a try to the beta version, I didn't notice the 1.4.0 was so old. I try to follow the naming guidelines for beta version, hope I'm right. * Now beta is built without autotools being automatically called * Missing documents have been added But there is still the warning about the shared-lib-calls-exit... Here are the links: SPEC: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql.spec SRPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.1.beta.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231757.n0NHvBEX013386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231759.n0NHxDeu029333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-23 12:59:12 EDT --- >From the next time please change the release number every time you modify your spec file. * Compiler flags - From Makefile and from what "man gimptool" says, for this package the following is simpler: --------------------------------------------------------- %build export CC="gcc %{optflags}" make %{?_smp_mflags} --------------------------------------------------------- * rpmlint issue - Now "README" file is not in UTF-8 yet. Please change the encoding of this file by iconv. * Directory permission --------------------------------------------------------- E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.2 0644 --------------------------------------------------------- - Umm.. %defattr(0644,root,root,-) does not seem to work, perhaps rpm's bug. This should be either %defattr(-,root,root,-) (preferred) or %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 18:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231805.n0NI5qvG031310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #37 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 13:05:47 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, Red Hat has determined this can proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 18:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231804.n0NI4QsP030624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Bug 467405 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-23 13:04:24 EDT --- This package doesn't compile anymore on Rawhide (due to the new libtool): Making all in . make[2]: Entering directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2' /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./include -I./include -DHAVE_WIN32_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DWIN32 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -pedantic -W -Wformat -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wuninitialized -Wparentheses -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wredundant-decls -MT SAX.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/SAX.Tpo -c -o SAX.lo SAX.c ./libtool: line 840: X--tag=CC: command not found ./libtool: line 873: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found ./libtool: line 840: X--mode=compile: command not found ./libtool: line 1007: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.: command not found ./libtool: line 1008: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: Xi686-pc-mingw32-gcc: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-DHAVE_CONFIG_H: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-I.: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-I./include: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1151: X-I./include: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1151: X-DHAVE_WIN32_THREADS: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-D_REENTRANT: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-DWIN32: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-O2: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-g: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-pipe: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wall: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-fexceptions: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X--param=ssp-buffer-size=4: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-mms-bitfields: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-pedantic: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-W: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wformat: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wunused: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wimplicit: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wreturn-type: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wswitch: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wcomment: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wtrigraphs: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wformat: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wchar-subscripts: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wuninitialized: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wparentheses: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wshadow: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wpointer-arith: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wcast-align: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wwrite-strings: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Waggregate-return: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wstrict-prototypes: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wmissing-prototypes: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wnested-externs: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Winline: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wredundant-decls: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MT: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: XSAX.lo: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MD: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MP: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MF: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X.deps/SAX.Tpo: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1151: X-c: command not found ./libtool: line 1203: XSAX.lo: command not found ./libtool: line 1208: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `': command not found make[2]: *** [SAX.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 This patch should solve this: --- mingw32-libxml2.spec.orig 2009-01-23 18:47:48.973046793 +0100 +++ mingw32-libxml2.spec 2009-01-23 18:55:02.146767159 +0100 @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ BuildRequires: mingw32-binutils BuildRequires: mingw32-zlib BuildRequires: mingw32-gettext - +BuildRequires: autoconf +BuildRequires: automake +BuildRequires: libtool %description MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library. @@ -37,7 +39,8 @@ %prep %setup -q -n libxml2-%{version} %patch1000 -p1 - +autoreconf +libtoolize %build LDFLAGS="-no-undefined" %{_mingw32_configure} --without-python --with-modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 18:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231814.n0NIEHv3000688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-23 13:14:16 EDT --- The compilation of this package fails when the Linux version of fontconfig and freetype are installed: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libpng12 -Wall -Wextra -Wsign-compare -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Wpacked -Wswitch-enum -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Winit-self -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-attributes -Wno-long-long -Winline -fno-strict-aliasing -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -MT cairo-type1-subset.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/cairo-type1-subset.Tpo -c cairo-type1-subset.c -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/cairo-type1-subset.o In file included from cairo-ft-private.h:40, from cairo-type1-subset.c:54: cairo-ft.h:46:35: error: fontconfig/fontconfig.h: No such file or directory cairo-ft.h:47:22: error: ft2build.h: No such file or directory To fix this, the option '--disable-ft' needs to the added to the %configure With this change, the %install command to remove the cairo-freetype pkgconfig file can also be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 18:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231844.n0NIi1ZR023037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 13:44:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda.spec > SRPM URL: > http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda-v0.9.5_2009_01_15-2.fc10.src.rpm > > Did I do the /usr/lib/crda directory ownership right? Or is there more magic? Looks good. > I'll propose the last_rule thing to the upstream project. Is it worth us > carrying a patch for it? Not really, no. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 18:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231852.n0NIqPFV009151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-23 13:52:23 EDT --- Thank you for the update. I note you are not using %{?dist} tag, however this is not a blocker. There is a test suite provided in the package, but it won't run correctly as dictd drops privileges to user nobody and won't be able to create/append log file _dictd.log in test/ directory. I'm not sure that's fixable. Please consider using install -p for install to preserve timestamps of installed files. Review: OK source files match upstream: 1b316bf797ff239eb87110c18cd7d5d9 dictd-1.11.0.tar.gz d1883d09f65179a3b6aa16579cb5a7e9 libmaa-1.1.0.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is not present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: config(dictd) = 1.11.0-2 dictd = 1.11.0-2 dictd(x86-64) = 1.11.0-2 = /bin/sh chkconfig config(dictd) = 1.11.0-2 initscripts libc.so.6()(64bit) libdbi.so.0()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) N/A %check is not present. Provided test suite won't correctly run N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets present look OK OK initscript looks OK. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231900.n0NJ0Z80011350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231906.n0NJ6Q6G012885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #6 from Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:06:25 EDT --- > As of relying on a bundled application, this is not usually permitted in Fedora > and therefore they should be discussed. The crash utility package is essentially built around, on-top-of, wrapped-around, or however you want to put it, and it's designed that way on purpose. There's no way it's ever going to be "unbundled". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231911.n0NJBUGd014128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-23 14:11:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Anyway: Is there any way to see the (latest) build logs at Koji? > I've tried looking for "mrpt" without success... Here you mean that you want to see my scratch build of your latest mrpt srpm on koji? Currently mrpt is not imported into Fedora (as it is currently under review here), so searching mrpt on koji returns nothing. For my scratch build, please check: For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076797 For F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076808 ! Note For my scratch build on koji done less than one week ago, they are preserved on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/ > I guess the builds there are > different from those in my Fedora. For example, there's a "-g" and a "-mcpu" > making their way to CFLAGS and I cannot find where to remove it (some rpm > config file?), and I wondered if they're not in the Koji builds. For -mcpu I don't know, however for -g %optflags also contains "-g" option and this must not be removed (to create debuginfo rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231920.n0NJKvbT032359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #7 from Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:20:56 EDT --- > I reviewed the upstream version because by definition so to say Fedora wants to > have the latest version of the software, and the content in the cvs is very > old. I assumed it will be easier for you to maintain a single or at least very > similar spec for both places. Not really. The upstream src.rpm (and its minimal .spec file) was added as a convenience to those users who prefer that format to the tar.gz file. > I apologize if I made an error by this assumption. Let me know what is > the URL of the files that I should have reviewed and I will do it. The "content in the cvs" (Fedora) is currently based upon the upstream 4.0-6.3 release from last April, and its .spec file updated when Tom Calloway rebuilt it as 4.0-7 this past August. Anyway, the .spec file in the devel branch was -- as I recall -- carried over from a RHEL package version some years ago. Anyway, that's the only .spec file I've ever touched w/respect to Fedora, and that's the one that I would have presumed would be the one that would be "review-able". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231921.n0NJLn63016488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:21:48 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this Erik. I'm just now rebuilding the entire package set against Rawhide and will fix the bugs along the way. I'll post here when I have new packages which work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: <bug-477144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231939.n0NJd1kx003859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 14:39:00 EDT --- Here's the review for this one. * The prebuilt binaries need removed in %prep ./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/plugins/com.cthing.cmakeed.core_1.0.1.jar ./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/plugins/com.cthing.cmakeed.ui_1.0.1.jar ./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/features/com.cthing.cmakeed.feature_1.0.1.jar * I believe that ./com.cthing.cmakeed.ui/doc/* should go to %doc. These don't end up in the RPM otherwise, right? * Please make the description span across 80 columns. It'll look nicer. * Macros should be used consistently. You use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixed. This needs corrected. You should also use %{__install} for consistency. * Please make use of the %{version} macro, e.g. in Source0 * Latest version must be packaged. Please update to 1.1.1 * There is no license file in the sources. The upstream should be notified to include a license file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features In-Reply-To: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231937.n0NJbJ2W003581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 14:37:18 EDT --- I made the review. There are a few minor things to go over: * Two Changelogs need packaged: ./org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpmstubby-feature/ChangeLog ./org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpmstubby/ChangeLog * I think URL needs to be: http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/projectPages/rpmstubby/ ? Could you provide a download location at the project homepage so we don't need to use this fetch script? * Macros should be used consistently. You use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixed. This needs corrected. You should also use %{__install} for consistency. * Summary looks awkward to me, maybe it should be shortened to: Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse These are all easy to do. I'm approving the package now. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (eclipse-rpmstubby) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: <bug-226528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901231950.n0NJokBl006823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |markmc at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 14:50:44 EDT --- Okay, fixes were: -ln -s %{_bindir}/consolehelper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name} +ln -s ../bin/consolehelper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name} -%{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/%{name} +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/%{name} Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 20:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232002.n0NK26GG009391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe |ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type |Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX |1 versions of MusiXTeX |fonts |fonts Alias| |ctan-musixtex-fonts Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 15:02:04 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ctan-musixtex-fonts Short Description: Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 20:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232008.n0NK8xvv010653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 20:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: <bug-481355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232011.n0NKBPwP011410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-01-23 15:11:24 EDT --- URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libnurbs/nurbs%2B%2B-3.0.11.tar.bz2?modtime=1022212800&big_mirror=0 Source: nurbs++-3.0.11.tar.bz2 should be URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libnurbs/ Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libnurbs/nurbs++-%{version}.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 21:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232106.n0NL6KiI007878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #5 from Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 16:06:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > BTW there was a closed ticket with attempt to submit this package already. I > thought there are some license issues - are they resolved (if any). Yes, there were licensing issues, they have been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 21:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232111.n0NLBqOZ024678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #8 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 16:11:50 EDT --- Richard, In the Debian review ticket for coccinelle (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512658) they noticed that the sources include a slightly modified copy of pycaml and the library part of menhir. I did not find any of these two packages currently in Fedora, so it would not cause a duplication, but still it would be nicer to have pycaml and menhir packaged separately if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 21:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232117.n0NLH3OU010341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 16:17:03 EDT --- I guess I need to add that I removed the "Adobe" bits from the summary and description to avoid trademark issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 21:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: <bug-225698-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225698-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232133.n0NLX6hu013874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|alan at redhat.com, | |davej at redhat.com, | |prarit at redhat.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |prarit at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 22:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478470-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232248.n0NMmxcQ029357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #20 from Jose Luis <joseluisblancoc at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 17:48:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > For my scratch build, please check: > For F-11: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076797 > For F-10: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076808 > ! Note > For my scratch build on koji done less than one week ago, > they are preserved on: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/ > That was exactly what I was looking for, thanks! Now with the build.log I understand that about "FORTIFY" :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:03:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] New: Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su Message-ID: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Summary: Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: honeybeehoneyhive-redhat at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.2shared.com/file/4710092/c00ed859/beesu.html 869a510778a3dc308c44f9b3cf1cde935e4158f9 beesu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.2shared.com/file/4710086/de782d01/beesu-20-1fc10src.html be7fd8990692e33bc92d37fb0849575b8c8f62f1 beesu-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Beesu is a wrapper around su and works with consolehelper under Fedora to let you have a graphic interface like gksu. It's to replace the missing gksu in Fedora. Lots of users are happy of beesu!! Here is the HOW-TO/homepage about beesu: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=201579 Some comments: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1120956&postcount=30 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1121999&postcount=34 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1130642&postcount=36 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1154044&postcount=38 So, i thought...why not!? it's useful!, so it could be placed into some YUM repo, hopefully!!! bye!!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232308.n0NN8ZKH015510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:08:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232313.n0NNDpfQ016579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:13:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232315.n0NNF6Jc017021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:15:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232311.n0NNBtp6001870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:11:54 EDT --- cvs done. Don't forget to follow the end of life procedure for the old procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477338-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232318.n0NNIe6Z017594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:18:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232320.n0NNKWke018172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:20:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232319.n0NNJdcS003283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:19:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232321.n0NNLobu018519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:21:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232324.n0NNOYRP004465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:24:32 EDT --- Note however, that "mingwmaint" doesn't seem to be a valid user to add as a co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232325.n0NNPngR005040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:25:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481116] Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232328.n0NNSVLF019909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:28:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480863] Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232327.n0NNRWlG019738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:27:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481115] Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232328.n0NNS2gG019824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:28:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232329.n0NNTo0E005805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:29:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232326.n0NNQtLA005343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:26:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232328.n0NNSG8v005540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #15 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-23 18:28:15 EDT --- Looks like an ACL is still missing? cvs commit... **** Access denied: pwouters is not in ACL for rpms/autotrust/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsVuHdcH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232333.n0NNXmd9021152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:33:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232331.n0NNVna3020909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:31:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232335.n0NNZKPa021641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:35:18 EDT --- Given that fesco wanted tools at the same time, would you like to hold off on cvs until one of those is ready also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232332.n0NNWiD1006784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:32:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232338.n0NNc2Qe022120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:38:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries In-Reply-To: <bug-455558-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-455558-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232341.n0NNfBoK022943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455558 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:41:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232340.n0NNeEXH008342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:40:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232337.n0NNb0Od007668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:36:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: <bug-431013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-431013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232341.n0NNfxrR023165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 18:41:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 23:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901232359.n0NNxsgU011800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-23 18:59:52 EDT --- well, it won't happen before 6 months. the intention of pushing it into fedora was to encourage EDA developers develop tools around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 00:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240001.n0O01tCo012624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-23 19:01:54 EDT --- The job that generates the acl runs every 30min. Please wait a while and try again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 00:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp (stalled) In-Reply-To: <bug-225684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225684-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240013.n0O0D3GE029135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 19:13:01 EDT --- This can be approved, I think. The things listed in comment #1 have all been taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 00:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473367-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240030.n0O0UljE032451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #17 from Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> 2009-01-23 19:30:46 EDT --- it worked. thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 00:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240041.n0O0fxg4020057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #13 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 19:41:58 EDT --- Right, the intent was to get iverilog (there's some code I can download from their webpage) into Fedora, realizing that it might not be usable with this particular content for 6 months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 01:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: <bug-481355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481355-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240114.n0O1EEOq008053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #2 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-23 20:14:13 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-3.0.11-2.fc10.src.rpm * Sat Jan 24 2009 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 3.0.11-2 - Use version macro in URL name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 01:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240158.n0O1wjPG015983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-23 20:58:42 EDT --- Yes, this is the current status. --- Forget "software" for a moment : For any hardware designer, the basic design methodology is : design <-> home made customized scripts <-> EDA tools this combination gives => developing hardware (with at least 12 different EDA tools to sign off a project) This somehow differs from the popular "software" methodology: code, compile and run. The questions you might be asking are : - why complain when companies have opensourced their libraries ? (forget the opensource community, the later will _never_ give you such verification methodology before the next 20 years, because it costs millions of euros to develop it) - can these libraries(text files) be incorporated directly into the user's HDL design? You may have heard "open hardware" and opensource community are proud of it. If you look closer (opensparcT2 for example) at the code, this open hardware was designed under proprietary eda tools, same applies to opencores designs. I believe building an opensource design and simulation platform -FEL- (providing software), with inclusion of ovm and vmm, will encourage digital designers extend their "open" hardware desire to "design open hardware with open source software". This is a problem and a lack in the current opensource software and hardware communities. The only way to solve it is "someone has to step in first and take the lead". With our FEL we have already taken this leadership to promote open source _content_ and ovm is an open source _content_. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240208.n0O28wMk003667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-23 21:08:57 EDT --- Maybe from mailing posts with respect to OVM : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=iverilog-devel will clarify any of your doubts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225887] Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme In-Reply-To: <bug-225887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240212.n0O2Cgji018804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225887 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 21:12:41 EDT --- I've updated the URL, removed the redundant exit 0s and included ChangeLog. dist tag seems pointless for a package that gets build only every few years. I normally don't include ChangeLogs, since a) they tend to be large and b) the user-relevant information is supposed to be in NEWS. In this case, there is no NEWS and ChangeLog is tiny, so you got it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240232.n0O2WW9d022262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:32:31 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240234.n0O2YS8r022692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:34:28 EDT --- fspy-0.1.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240233.n0O2XFwf022379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240235.n0O2ZsQU009351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:35:53 EDT --- rfdump-1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240233.n0O2XOTo008350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:33:23 EDT --- mr-0.35-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240232.n0O2WPUU008069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:32:24 EDT --- fspy-0.1.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240232.n0O2WDt6007985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:32:12 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240233.n0O2XCTc008305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:33:11 EDT --- conspy-1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240235.n0O2ZIGx023291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:35:17 EDT --- python-ldaphelper-1.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-ldaphelper'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240235.n0O2Zu6X009384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program In-Reply-To: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478628-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240232.n0O2WFcU008019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240233.n0O2XRBQ008385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478593] Review Request: fspy - Filesystem activity monitoring utility In-Reply-To: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478593-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240232.n0O2WSpE008106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478593 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478620] Review Request: conspy - Remote control for text mode virtual consoles In-Reply-To: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478620-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240241.n0O2fLRH025717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478620 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:41:20 EDT --- conspy-1.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240238.n0O2cVFP024758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:38:30 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2bLIG010156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:37:20 EDT --- srm-1.2.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2b0Tm010021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:37:00 EDT --- screenie-1.30.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478290-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2b3hU024298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:40:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478694] Review Request: rfdump - RFID-Tags detector In-Reply-To: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240240.n0O2e4KQ011267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478694 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:40:04 EDT --- rfdump-1.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240240.n0O2etcp025517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:40:54 EDT --- python-ldaphelper-1.0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-ldaphelper'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478345-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240241.n0O2fWhs012088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:41:30 EDT --- mr-0.35-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2bNdM024368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225887] Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme In-Reply-To: <bug-225887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2bo0L024502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 21:37:49 EDT --- Thanks. I don't have anything against changelogs. Actually, as a technical user, I like them; they are one of the first things I go and check when I update my Fedora. I'm pretty sure there are some people out there who don't mind large changelogs. Well that's my opinion. ---------------------------------------------------------- This Merge Review (hicolor-icon-theme) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------------- Closing the bug now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240238.n0O2cbUk010484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:38:37 EDT --- ris-linux-0.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update ris-linux'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2bE4u010103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:37:10 EDT --- libproxy-0.2.3-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libproxy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469052-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240237.n0O2bXX3010206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:37:31 EDT --- ris-linux-0.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ris-linux'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226504] Merge Review: tsclient In-Reply-To: <bug-226504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240244.n0O2iKqV026573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226504 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-23 21:44:18 EDT --- 1. The current tsclient spec file doesn't use %makeinstall 2. Adding a vendor prefix is a bad idea, it has the potential to break code that assumes that it can refer to the tsclient desktop file by the id 'tsclient'. We are moving away from blindly forcing a vendor prefix. 3. Fixed 4. I'm not going to patch old ChangeLog entries. tsclient 2.0.1 doesn't ship Greek translations, el or gr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion In-Reply-To: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478616-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240241.n0O2fjre012171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:41:44 EDT --- srm-1.2.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240242.n0O2g6Ok012840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:42:05 EDT --- guiloader-c++-2.12.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240242.n0O2gd56012982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:42:36 EDT --- tcping-1.3.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240243.n0O2hP7V013220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:43:24 EDT --- ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240243.n0O2ha7v013287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-23 21:43:36 EDT --- ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478359-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240243.n0O2hSKc013256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 03:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240328.n0O3SE21002500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-23 22:28:13 EDT --- I'm sorry Kevin, I forgot the CC. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctan-musixtex-fonts InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 03:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472848-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240338.n0O3cBiI023616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #37 from Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com> 2009-01-23 22:38:08 EDT --- done. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1078404 One more karma for jakarta-commons-cli to go live in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 05:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240554.n0O5sWR2016463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-24 00:54:30 EDT --- I've fixed most of the fixworthy things you listed. + Since an icon has been installed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor there should be a runtime dependency on hicolor-icon-theme. gok -> gtk2 -> hicolor-icon-theme + There does not seem to be any .omf files provided by the package, yet the scrollkeeper scriptlets are being used. W [mclasen at matthiasc devel]$ rpm -ql gok | grep omf /usr/share/omf/gok /usr/share/omf/gok/gok-C.omf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 06:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240653.n0O6rqci026181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Devel-SmallProf --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 01:53:51 EDT --- Provides: perl(DB) is bogus - I stripped it before checking in and building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server Message-ID: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Mail-POP3Client.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Mail-POP3Client-2.18-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server Note: This package is an indirect dependency of rt3's testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 06:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] New: Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font Message-ID: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Summary: Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: herlo1 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/2bc-fonts-19990319-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/2bc-fonts.spec ToBeContinued is a pfb font providing a fun fantasy-like script. This package was on the Fonts SIG request for packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240704.n0O74aMk027887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 02:04:35 EDT --- I wanted to add that the page for this font has been created and is available at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/To_Be_Continued_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240710.n0O7AqR3009450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server In-Reply-To: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240710.n0O7ArPA009475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents Message-ID: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Email.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Email-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Test::Email is a subclass of MIME::Entity, with the above methods. If you want the messages fetched from a POP3 account, use Test::POP3. Notes: - There is a newer version (0.07) available on search.cpan.org, however CPAN's database still carries 0.04. To avoid inconsistencies on installations using cpan, I am intentionally packaging the old version. - This package is a dependency of rt3's testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240736.n0O7aBE8013466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 02:36:10 EDT --- So confusing, setting for review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 07:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240757.n0O7vaxj004779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-24 02:57:35 EDT --- Some remarks on your spec: * BuildRequires: > BuildRequires: openssh, binutils I don't understand why you "BR: openssh". "BR: binutils" definitely is redundant. Could it be, you intend to "BR: binutils-devel" to pull in libiberty? > BuildRequires: glib-devel, xorg-x11-proto-devel BR: glib-devel is very likely wrong (glib-devel is a glib1 package). You likely intend to pull in glib2-devel, which already is implicitly pulled in by BR: gtk2-devel BR: xorg-x11-proto-devel I don't see any need to BR: this. [You seem to be building on fc7. This could explain some of your BR's above, because IIRC, several of the packages you reference have seem some significant packaging cleanups since then.] * Source code quality: Building on FC10 exposes an "exciting amount" of "not-so-harmless" warnings. Some of them definitely are worth going after and be fixed. [I have never used skeeye myself, but co-workers, I occasionally work with are using it - AFAICT, they never managed to get skeeye working on x86_64. I can ask them on next occasion ;)] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 09:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901240946.n0O9kMw3023798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #6 from ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> 2009-01-24 04:46:20 EDT --- I added FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker tag, as Gavin said he need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 10:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] New: Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer Message-ID: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 Summary: Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/viking.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/viking-0.9.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://viking.sourceforge.net/ Description: Viking is a free/open source program to manage GPS data. You can import and plot tracks and waypoints, show Google maps and/or Terraserver maps under it, download geocaches for an area on the map, make new tracks and waypoints, see real-time GPS position, etc. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1078946 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint viking* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint viking-0.9.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 10:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241045.n0OAje0i014964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 05:45:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-htmlize Short Description: Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML Owners: rishi Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 10:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks In-Reply-To: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480485-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241048.n0OAmxkV015403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 10:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241057.n0OAv2aw016907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-24 05:57:01 EDT --- Very nice to see someone else reviewing font packages :p Please do not forget the other steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480859-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241103.n0OB3dCo005553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #8 from Jon Levell <fedora at coralbark.net> 2009-01-24 06:03:38 EDT --- Another update: Spec URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse.spec SRPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-3.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-3.fc10.noarch.rpm I've addressed all the comments except for #5. I considered what you suggest when making the first "macronified" version but it seems funny to change: %{_bindir}/diffuse to %{_bindir}/%{name} If I'm not changing: %{_sysconfdir}/diffuserc to %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}rc and I've not keen on making the second change - if we were changing the name of the program, there would be bigger issues than updating the files section. If people feel strongly that I should make the suggested change I will. If so, should I change the diffuserc as well as: %{_bindir}/diffuse %{_datadir}/diffuse/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241108.n0OB8bce006603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-24 06:08:36 EDT --- 1. As noted on IRC, the font file claims "? Alex Chisholm. All rights reserved.", while the web site claims "? Matt Chisholm, OFL" so you have a licensing discrepancy. I doubt it is acceptable as-is, please have it clarified upstream 2. The TTF version is probably better for Fedora than the Type1 version. The days of Type1 being the primary Linux font format are long past 3. Please remove comments from your spec file 4. I'd have named the package chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts, both to have a common prefix to use with other fonts on that site and to respect the name the font declares -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: <bug-481009-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481009-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241140.n0OBerLb012512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sshedmak at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-24 06:40:52 EDT --- 1. you have two fonts in there, Pothana2000 and Vemana2000. Our guidelines call for their packaging in different packages or subpackages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts 2. now since they do not share the same version, this will difficult for you, unless you use a timestamp as version 3. you were quite right to remove the non-free .exe from the source, but that will stop our automatic 'did upstream release a new version' script checks from working 4. even though the PDF manual contains mostly unrelated windows info, it does contain the copyright notice so you should include it in %doc too 5. while we do accept pure GPL fonts in Fedora, the GPL has problems WRT embedding fonts in other documents (common for PDFs) so we much prefer if upstream added the FSF font exception to its licensing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#embedding ? none of those are blockers, but it would simplify your life considerably if you could convince upstream to publish each font in a separate versionned archive, with no .exe inside, and with the font exception added to its licensing Please consider asking those changes of upstream before continuing 6. since upstream release two fonts (or more?) please consider adding a foundry prefix to your package names 7. Please make sure you've completed all the steps (as requester and packager of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle up to and including 2.a) 8. This part is too much. Including the author name in the description is sufficient: ------ Author ------ "Dr. Tirumala Krishna Desikachary" <Krishna_Desikachary at newflyer.com> 9. Please wrap your description at 79column, not 46 10. 49 is much too low a fontconfig priority level. Please respect the numbering ranges documented on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_font_in_default_families 11. Never process files in %install. If you need to fix up upstream txt files, do so in %prep 12. Please do not change the fontconfig symlinking pattern documented in our templates, you'll introduce bugs. If you've properly implemented the previous steps it should just work. You have many examples of simple spec files in the gfs fonts ? NEEDINFO till this is being taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241144.n0OBiTGx025596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241145.n0OBj35R013292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241146.n0OBkhcv013621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-466193-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466193-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmqJI026640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461139-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmCSM026499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: <bug-462711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462711-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmPfg026556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: <bug-467507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241147.n0OBl7HF026353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-478570-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478570-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241146.n0OBkxfa013722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: <bug-457709-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457709-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241147.n0OBlp2q013835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241150.n0OBoGmQ014502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(herlo1 at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481040-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241156.n0OBuBVr028287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-24 06:56:09 EDT --- Thanks for the sharp eye and suggestions, Ralf. >> BuildRequires: openssh, binutils >I don't understand why you "BR: openssh". Because I trusted upstream (http://skyeye.wiki.sourceforge.net/UM8 ) >"BR: binutils" definitely is redundant. Could it be, you intend to >"BR: binutils-devel" to pull in libiberty? Indeed. Fixed. For whoever looks at the build log: configure lies. -lbfd and -liberty are used later on, despite %configure saying they were not found. >BR: glib-devel is very likely wrong (glib-devel is a glib1 package). >You likely intend to pull in glib2-devel, which already is implicitly pulled in by BR: gtk2-devel You are correct. Fixed >BR: xorg-x11-proto-devel >I don't see any need to BR: this. More cruft from upstream ("You may need to check following packages are exsiting ...x11-dev") >[You seem to be building on fc7.] Nope, I am building only in mock for EL-4,5 and rawhide. It just happens that my workstation (hence rpmbuild -bs) is F7. After approval the package should land in EL-5 ( that's where my major interest is ) and F>=10. Other versions only if I receive word that it's functional and someone volunteers for maintainance. >* Source code quality: >Building on FC10 exposes an "exciting amount" of "not-so-harmless" warnings. >Some of them definitely are worth going after and be fixed. I feel like I need to expose a bit of collateral background here: some of my colleagues needed to use skyeye on Centos-5 and needed it fast. So I figured that rather a configure/make/... mantra I'd rather package it ("quickly"). Using it did not reveal anything major (at least no one cried so far) so I figured that maybe including it in fedora would not be a bad idea. Chitlesh provided the small patch which allows compilation in Fedora and volunteered for co-maintainership so here I was with the bz. As of fixing: I will gladly pass upstream any fix that we (we as in Fedora community) come up with. However my programming skills are rusty (I've given up this sport a long time ago) and I do not feel like being able to give birth to fixes [ for skyeye ] myself (unless they are very obvious) Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye-1.2.6-4.rc1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 12:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server In-Reply-To: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241239.n0OCdosX003662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 07:39:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079143 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 27b99775072f6ad4b585f7484c47405d Mail-POP3Client-2.18.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=26, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package: perl-Mail-POP3Client-2.18-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Mail::POP3Client) = 2.18 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Socket) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 13:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241309.n0OD9V6U009506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 08:09:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1078946 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 17823d2ad0a99f76d1d2a831c63f1201 viking-0.9.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet is used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI App Suggestion: 1) you need to add Requires:hicolor-icon-theme APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 14:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480863] Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241450.n0OEoJ2K028392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 14:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481115] Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241450.n0OEoLfk015473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 14:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481116] Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus In-Reply-To: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241447.n0OElL8l014937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 15:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241531.n0OFVuHh021786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 10:31:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Very nice to see someone else reviewing font packages :p > > Please do not forget the other steps in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a > > now I already did most of those. The only thing remaining is comps and I was going to ask you about it. Do I need to put this application-specific on comps? I am not planning to put the application itself on comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 15:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241540.n0OFeSmE003836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |436843 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-24 10:40:27 EDT --- I've been chatting with the Debian packagers about these issues, and it looks like they are going to organize a revitalized upstream for pycaml. (Upstream is dead and there are at least two major forks). We don't have this package in Fedora at the moment as you say. I posted an intent to package Menhir a while back (bug 436843) but haven't got around to a package yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241601.n0OG15AK006973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-24 11:01:03 EDT --- I can't comment on the application, but as for the fonts, yes please do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 15:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241557.n0OFvlBt006319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-24 10:57:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: viking Short Description: GPS data editor and analyzer Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: <bug-463035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241605.n0OG53xc026814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-24 11:05:01 EDT --- Setting NEEDINFO. Adam, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241604.n0OG41eE026430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-24 11:03:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329912) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329912) patch to remove exit() call in the library For 1.5.0-0.1.beta1: * SourceURL - SourceURL is not correct. 605 should be 1878 * About shared-lib-calls-exit rpmlint - As $ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit shows, libraries should not call exit() inner themselves. The attached patch will remove this rpmlint. If you are happy with my patch please apply the patch. However I won't regard this rpmlint as a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241609.n0OG9kFs008047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-24 11:09:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pax-utils Short Description: PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries Owners: rathann Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241611.n0OGBSnn027846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-24 11:11:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This package was APPROVED but cvs creatin hasn't been requested. > Why ? Sorry about that, I was a bit busy. Thanks for the review, Rafa?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241627.n0OGRWNE030266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-24 11:27:30 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submit push requests on bodhi for F-10/9, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241638.n0OGcUDl031895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 17:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary In-Reply-To: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241749.n0OHnxiR022887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-24 12:49:58 EDT --- On my machines this application is crashing... [fab at laptop24 ~]$ rednotebook AppDir: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rednotebook BaseDir: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages 7955ed6d-4298-8816-362d144d-0b45e79e is dumped I will get in touch with upstream about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 17:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481428] New: Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary Message-ID: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 Summary: Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://digitaldump.wordpress.com/projects/rednotebook/ Description: RedNotebook is a desktop diary that makes it very easy for you to keep track of the stuff you do and the thoughts you have. This journal software helps you to write whole passages or just facts, and does so in style. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079749 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint rednotebook* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint rednotebook-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 17:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241747.n0OHl9HB010061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #11 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-24 12:47:07 EDT --- Ok, I'm going to jettison start.sh. /var/run/milter, /var/log/milter and create a milter-base package for the python milters that use it. Is there a better way than having a package own one tiny shell script and two directories? That will remove those objections to pymilter (and start.sh truly is cruft if you don't use it). I have already cut support for AIX and RH73, but I *must* support EL3 - EL5 because that is where all the production milters run. (I have one more RH73 system that is being migrated to EL4 as I speak. Truly a golden version.) I could make a fedora version of the spec file - but I don't want to maintain both (not so bad for just pymilter, but if more packages are accepted...). I know! A preprocessor to convert a spec file template to fedora specific and EL specific versions! It could have features like %if, %define, oh wait... I define python because I need to build pymilter for python versions other than the system default. For instance, on EL4, the system python is 2.3, but the production milter requires python2.4. Both python and python modules are easily built to coexist in multiple versions. (Of course, that argues for cutting start.sh again - so it's history.) Would it be acceptable if an %ifdef excludes the python redefinition for fedora? The version dependency is only redundant if building only for Fedora. Would it be acceptable if I %ifdef away the dependency for Fedora? Will use %{localstatedir} start.sh and associated directories will be cut Will reformat %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 17:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary In-Reply-To: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241756.n0OHuOJH024189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-24 12:56:24 EDT --- It's a known bug -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/rednotebook/+bug/320492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 17:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary In-Reply-To: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481428-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241755.n0OHtApR011285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Ubuntu Launchpad 320492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 18:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241831.n0OIVIXS029471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-24 13:31:16 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint cmconvert-1.9.5-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint cmconvert* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) spec file: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 66db83f66ee4eada22e8b4322acb6aa1 Build source: 66db83f66ee4eada22e8b4322acb6aa1 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079811 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format === ISSUES === 'Requires: expat' is not necessary, for me it looks like that rpm pick this automatically. After fixing the issue, I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders In-Reply-To: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241931.n0OJVFS5008868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders In-Reply-To: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241929.n0OJTcBp027214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 14:29:37 EDT --- REVIEW: [+] = OK [-] = NOT OK [1] = SEE COMMENTS [?] = WTF? =========================== [+] source files match upstream: sha1: 8c64968feef8ac5e53790c23a52f06e476d4dfae [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. GPLv2+ [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079863 [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. =========================== COMMENTS: Package looks good. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders In-Reply-To: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241932.n0OJW2fl027878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241949.n0OJnXoE011728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 14:49:32 EDT --- REVIEW: [+] = OK [-] = NOT OK [1] = SEE COMMENTS [?] = WTF? =========================== [+] source files match upstream: sha1: 13b75ec8ad1f4fcbed7ebe7373718ec254429e72 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. GPLv2+ [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079868 [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. =========================== COMMENTS: None, package looks good, no issues found. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241955.n0OJt67E013068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-24 14:55:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Note however, that "mingwmaint" doesn't seem to be a valid user to add as a > co-maintainer. This is our "mailing list user": https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mingwmaint Do I need to add "him" to something else apart from FAS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders In-Reply-To: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241955.n0OJtbKX013141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> 2009-01-24 14:55:36 EDT --- Thank you for your review. It's much appreciated! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: w_scan Short Description: Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders Owners: heffer Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901241955.n0OJtfmH032295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-24 14:55:41 EDT --- This package has been built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 20:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-472071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901242014.n0OKEJv5002938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-24 15:14:18 EDT --- Scratch build failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 20:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901242013.n0OKDbZ0002869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 15:13:36 EDT --- The mailing list user should just be on initialcc right? A mailing list can't be/shouldn't be a co-maintainer... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 20:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901242033.n0OKXBbw019608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(herlo1 at gmail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 15:33:10 EDT --- 1. Sent an email to Matt Chisholm about the legal discrepancy. 2. Packaged the ttf version for review instead of the Type1 font. 3. Spec file is clean. 4. Package has been renamed to accommodate such credit. I've uploaded two new files to represent the spec and srpm respective to the requested changes: SRPM: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-19990319-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901242110.n0OLA040012682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-24 16:09:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: raddump Short Description: RADIUS packets interpreter Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901242134.n0OLYPLt016947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-24 16:34:24 EDT --- 1. you need to rename your spec too 2. your summary is too generic, add graffiti or cursive or decorative in there 3. why install -m 0643 (is this a reviewer-awake test?) 4. why fantacy in the fontconfig file (is this another test?) Apart from that, you only need confirmation in the licensing in %doc to finish the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481442] New: Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas Message-ID: <bug-481442-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481442 Summary: Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/clutter-perl/clutter-perl.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/clutter-perl/clutter-perl-0.8.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Clutter Perl bindings allow you to write canvas-based applications in a Perlish and object-oriented way, freeing you from having to care about casting and memory management of the original Clutter C API, and yet remaining close to its spirit. You can find out more about Clutter at http://www.clutter-project.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250138.n0P1cdrJ008962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #27 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> 2009-01-24 20:38:36 EDT --- The URL has changed, presumably? http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-good/elisa-plugins-good-0.5.23-1.src.rpm Reviewing right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250146.n0P1kbdJ029567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:46:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250150.n0P1oMx6030348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:50:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders In-Reply-To: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250148.n0P1mqOI029805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:48:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250155.n0P1thgE012009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:55:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250157.n0P1vta7012374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:57:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250159.n0P1x1o0012515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:58:59 EDT --- I can't process this yet, until bug 481365 is cleared up. Can you reset the fedora-cvs when that bug is taken care of? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250159.n0P1x83E012600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #40 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:59:02 EDT --- I can't process this yet, until bug 481365 is cleared up. Can you reset the fedora-cvs when that bug is taken care of? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250156.n0P1ukp8031373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 20:56:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 04:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250418.n0P4IjWu004536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-24 23:18:42 EDT --- This package has been in for ages now, closing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 04:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: <bug-445970-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-445970-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250431.n0P4VQ55007095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 04:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: <bug-456398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250430.n0P4UU4b025840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 05:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server In-Reply-To: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250534.n0P5YNlb004040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-25 00:34:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-POP3Client Short Description: Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 05:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250544.n0P5ivPm019578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 00:44:56 EDT --- - you need to add a %check section because "make check" is available - please add "%{?_smp_mflags}" to the end of "make" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 05:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250543.n0P5hkhS019443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 00:43:45 EDT --- - %dir isn't necessary in %files. you can just list the directory and it will automatically add all the files under it too (so get rid of the two lines under the %dir lines while you're at it) - rpmlint is very loud: cilk.src:23: W: configure-without-libdir-spec cilk.src:51: W: macro-in-%changelog optflags cilk.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Language for multithreaded parallel programming. cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.g.p.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cilk/libcilkrt0gp.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.p.so cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/gcc-builtin.h cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cilk/libcilkrt0g.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.g.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.so cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/cilk-sysdep.h cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.g.so cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/cilk-conf.h cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/cilk-cilk2c.h cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/cilk-lib.h cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cilk/libcilkrt0.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cilk/libcilkrt0p.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.g.p.so cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/cilk-cilk2c-pre.h cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcilk.p.a cilk.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cilk/cilk.h cilk.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Language for multithreaded parallel programming. cilk.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcilk.g.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 cilk.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcilk.p.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 cilk.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcilk.g.p.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 cilk.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcilk.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 27 warnings. - why did you replace %configure? - you can use %configure CFLAGS="%(echo "%optflags" | sed -e 's/-pipe//' | sed -e 's/--param=ssp-buffer-size=4//')" instead of getting rid of the compiler flags altogether. This keeps cilkclocal happy and keeps most of the compiler flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 05:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460786] Review Request: mediawiki-Cite - An extension to provide Citation tools for Mediawiki In-Reply-To: <bug-460786-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460786-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250548.n0P5m5ZQ006625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460786 --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 00:48:03 EDT --- Can we close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 06:16:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: <bug-478506-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478506-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250616.n0P6GKaV011806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 01:16:19 EDT --- Oops, should actually give locations of fixed up things :) http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.spec http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-customfieldadmin-plugin-0.1-0.2.svn5073.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 06:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: <bug-478506-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478506-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250614.n0P6EcJp011234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 01:14:37 EDT --- 1) My bad, that's what I get for tired packaging and reusing an old spec 2) Fixed. 3) Fixed to be trac-webadmin 4) Fixed Installs fine in mock now: mock-chroot> rpm -qa | fgrep trac trac-webadmin-0.1.2-0.3.dev_r4429.fc8.noarch trac-0.10.5-1.fc10.noarch trac-customfieldadmin-plugin-0.1-0.2.svn5073.fc10.noarch mock-chroot> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 06:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250613.n0P6DRP2011117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | Bug 478767 depends on bug 480269, which changed state. Bug 480269 Summary: libraries in 1.7.5 broken for missing symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480269 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 01:13:26 EDT --- Scratch builds on rawhide: i386 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1080228 (passed) ppc http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1080230 (failed) What? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 06:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250617.n0P6Ht4N012001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #12 from David Timms <dtimms at iinet.net.au> 2009-01-25 01:17:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Is it not an option to create an installation instructions document on the > wiki, Well there is enough 3-4 page documents. The point with packaging is to make it perhaps as easy as: 1. yum install vmware-requirements 2. yum -C localinstall /downloads/vmware-server*1.0.8.rpm 3. vmware-config.pl > or propose for the VMware website, that states the packages you need to > install on x86_64 / i386 before installing VMware (server)? Sure it would be great if vmware: - packaged the two free to use apps specifically for fedora (an os that they do not support - at all) - at least open sourced / GPLd the vmware-server-console app so that it can be included in distributions. (In reply to comment #11) > I use VMWare a lot but I do have a hard time seeing this making it into Fedora > even if brought to FeSCO. David Well, some individuals have rejected having this helper package on a few grounds, none of whom are able to reference a part of the "Packaging Guidelines" that it runs foul of. The other suggestion of using comps groups has the issue that it can not work in this case on x86_64. Also, there is major changes beginning development that would make comps groups essentially go away, to be replaced with on-the-fly-built metapackages that achieve mostly the same goals. see: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00021.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00032.html http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/102644 I was reminded that the Fedora Community make Fedora a possibility. Do we want this package in Fedora ? Let me suggest that to force the resolution of the issue, perhaps it is simplest for a sponsored reviewer to review the package. If no packaging problems are found, accept the package. Once either cvs or builds are requested, this might cause some opened eyes and lead to a FeSCO discussion / decision, if anyone cares enough to reject it... > I think it would be more productive to package this for RpmFusion That is the last resort, and we need to confirm that there is no possibility of the package being accepted into Fedora proper first, with an actual reason why not. (That is the first question that an RPM Fusion reviewer would ask - why can't it be in Fedora ?). ----- Updated Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm - add missing server requires of files from pam.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 06:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250622.n0P6MXan026405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 01:22:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Ok, I'm going to jettison start.sh. /var/run/milter, /var/log/milter and create > a milter-base package for the python milters that use it. Is there a better > way than having a package own one tiny shell script and two directories? > > That will remove those objections to pymilter (and start.sh truly is cruft if > you don't use it). - Well, are /var/run/milter and /var/log/milter directories supposed to be used also by other applications than pymilter? On Fedora there are already some srpms named *milter*. Would you know why none of these packages own these two directories? If you are unsure, I think it is better that these two directories should be owned by pymilter. > I define python because I need to build pymilter for python versions other than > the system default. For instance, on EL4, the system python is 2.3, but the > production milter requires python2.4. Both python and python modules are > easily built to coexist in multiple versions. (Of course, that argues for > cutting start.sh again - so it's history.) Would it be acceptable if an %ifdef > excludes the python redefinition for fedora? > > The version dependency is only redundant if building only for Fedora. Would it > be acceptable if I %ifdef away the dependency for Fedora? - If you want to maintain pymilter also on EL-4, okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:05:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:05:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250705.n0P75SMC000861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:05:27 EDT --- The alternatives usage itself seems good (you can refer to postfix scriptlets. please check: $ rpm -q --scripts postfix) If alternatives method is used, declaring Conflicts should not be needed. - When using alternatives, both mysql and pgsql subpackages should be installed altogether as there should be no file conflicts. - It is not necessary that mysql and pgsql should have the same priority. Actually sysadmin has to choose which database to use, so anyway it is expected that sysadmin executes "alternatives --config". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250741.n0P7fKlB006429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:41:19 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250740.n0P7eYlD006230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:40:33 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: <bug-466301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250739.n0P7dYQT024797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(johnhford at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:39:32 EDT --- As this package is already in dist-f11, I close this bug for now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: <bug-451189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451189-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250737.n0P7bVZo024600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) | --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:37:27 EDT --- Closing. Also I removed my sponsorship on the submitter. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please submit a new review request and mark this request as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250753.n0P7rP9L008421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dignan.patrick at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:53:24 EDT --- Please rebuild this package on koji and for F-10/9 submit requests to push the rebuilt packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250754.n0P7sUR4008546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:54:29 EDT --- Please rebuild this package on koji and for F-10/9 submit requests to push the rebuilt packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250755.n0P7tGvA027842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:55:15 EDT --- Please rebuild this package on koji and for F-10/9 submit requests to push the rebuilt packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250801.n0P81Wjq010127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #18 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-25 03:01:29 EDT --- I have no idea what's going on here. Do we have a way to investigate PPC build errors ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 07:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250757.n0P7vB2F009214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 02:57:10 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250813.n0P8D1Z3012039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 03:13:00 EDT --- Okay, as no one else seems to write security related advice on this bug, I will restart to review this bug. To Patrick: Would you check the spec file by Dale and merge it (if you want), and re-upload your srpm/spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250834.n0P8Y5Rg001503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #41 from Guillaume Kulakowski <guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-25 03:34:03 EDT --- No, I can't. Can you remove guillaume AT llaumgui DOT com account and permit me to change my email by llaumgui AT gmail DOT com for sync my bz account with my fas ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250835.n0P8ZcpM002021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dignan.patrick at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #15 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 03:35:38 EDT --- Sorry, experiencing some hardware difficulties with my main computer (which runs Fedora), so I've had some downtime. I should hopefully be back up tomorrow, as I hadn't had time to repair it over the week and reinstall. First on my TODO list is getting this built and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250837.n0P8bHxQ015767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 03:37:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > ppc http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1080230 (failed) Please check this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1080241 For this I modified the lastest spec file in this review request as: ------------------------------------------------ scons prefix=%{_prefix} \ ..... ..... configure \ || { sleep 2 ; find . -name config.log | xargs cat ; exit 1 ; } ------------------------------------------------ Then config.log shows: ------------------------------------------------ scons: Configure: Checking for C++ header file boost/cstdint.hpp... build/sconf_temp/conftest_1.cpp <- | |#include "boost/cstdint.hpp" | | g++ -o build/sconf_temp/conftest_1.o -c ..... cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-mieee-fp" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-march=i686" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-mfpmath=sse" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-msse" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-mieee-fp" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-march=i686" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-mfpmath=sse" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-msse" scons: Configure: no ------------------------------------------------ I guess CMakeLists.txt rts/build/scons/detect.py rts/build/scons/rts.py and so on are related to this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250843.n0P8h2ht016602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-25 03:43:01 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 08:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250843.n0P8hQZD003146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-25 03:43:25 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 09:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:36:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901250936.n0P9a9oC027630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 04:36:08 EDT --- Alright, I've looked at his spec file and patches, and mostly the changes look good to me. One thing I'm going to try is using sed instead of this code: if [ "$1" = 0 ] ; then if [ -f %{_sysconfdir}/shells ] ; then TmpFile=`/bin/mktemp %{_tmppath}/.jk_chrootshrpmXXXXXX` grep -v '^%{_sbindir}/jk_chrootsh$' %{_sysconfdir}/shells > $TmpFile cp -f $TmpFile %{_sysconfdir}/shells rm -f $TmpFile fi fi I'll test something like sed 's:^%{_sbindir}/jk_chrootsh$::g' %{_sysconfdir}/shells but I'm not sure if that would make sed a BuildReq, if so I'd just stick with Dale's implementation. Other than the %preun %post %postun and the accompanying patches, his spec is pretty much the same as mine (or at least provides the same functions). So I'll add those things to mine and test it tomorrow hopefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 12:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-437419-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-437419-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251240.n0PCeSGo017423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467408] Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library In-Reply-To: <bug-467408-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467408-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251318.n0PDIxpg005641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:18:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/jasper/mingw32-jasper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-jasper-1.900.1-6.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.900.1-6 - Use _smp_mflags. - Disable static libraries. - Include documentation. - Use the same patches as Fedora native package. - Just run autoconf instead of autoreconf so we don't upgrade libtool. - +BR mingw32-dlfcn. - Don't need the manual pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:17:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251317.n0PDHZ82005346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Bug 467402 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:17:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/glib2/mingw32-glib2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-glib2-2.19.5-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 2.19.5-2 - Rebase to native Fedora version 2.19.5. - Use _smp_mflags. - Use find_lang. - Don't build static libraries. - +BR dlfcn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: <bug-467414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467414-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251317.n0PDHr3Y005418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Bug 467414 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:17:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gnutls/mingw32-gnutls.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gnutls-2.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 2.6.3-1 - Rebase to native Fedora version 2.6.3. - Enable C++ library. - Use find_lang macro. - Don't build static library. - Rebase MinGW patch to 2.6.3. - +BR mingw32-dlfcn. - +BR mingw32-readline. - Force rebuild of libtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467420-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467420-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251318.n0PDIFYX005517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 467397, which changed state. Bug 467397 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467420 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:18:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gtk2/mingw32-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk2-2.15.0-1.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 2.15.0-1 - Rebase to Fedora native version 2.15.0. - Disable static libraries. - Use _smp_mflags. - Use find_lang macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: <bug-467421-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467421-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251319.n0PDJOI9025691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:19:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gtk-vnc/mingw32-gtk-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.3.8-0.3.20081030hg.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.3.8-0.3.20081030hg - Use _smp_mflags. - Disable static library. - Rebuild libtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251317.n0PDHE3N025320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Bug 467409 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:17:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/atk/mingw32-atk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-atk-1.25.2-1.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.25.2-1 - Rebase to latest Fedora native version 1.25.2. - Use find_lang macro. - Use smp_mflags. - Fix URL. - Fix Source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:18:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library In-Reply-To: <bug-467418-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467418-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251318.n0PDIYt8025554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Bug 467418 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467418 depends on bug 467399, which changed state. Bug 467399 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:18:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/libvirt/mingw32-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libvirt-0.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.5.1-1 - Rebase to Fedora native version 0.5.1. - Use find_lang macro. - Use _smp_mflags. - Disable static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251322.n0PDMOPM006705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:22:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/libxml2/mingw32-libxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-5.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 2.7.2-5 - Use _smp_mflags. - Disable static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: <bug-467410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251321.n0PDLlQt006569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:21:46 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/libgcrypt/mingw32-libgcrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgcrypt-1.4.3-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.4.3-3 - Use _smp_mflags. - Disable static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251326.n0PDQOSr027638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:26:23 EDT --- The package in comment 11 now builds for me in Rawhide without needing autoreconf/libtoolize, so ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251322.n0PDM8C4026617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Bug 467401 depends on bug 467397, which changed state. Bug 467397 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:22:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/libjpeg/mingw32-libjpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libjpeg-6b-7.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 6b-7 - Disable static libraries. - Use _smp_mflags. - Update for new libtool 2. - +BR mingw32-dlfcn. - Added documentation (README includes the license). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: <bug-467419-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467419-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251322.n0PDMcQb026714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Bug 467419 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467419 depends on bug 467396, which changed state. Bug 467396 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 08:22:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/pango/mingw32-pango.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.22.1-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.22.1-2 - Disable static libraries. - Use _smp_mflags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480916] Review Request: w_scan - Tool for scanning DVB-C/T transponders In-Reply-To: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480916-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251327.n0PDR2TT007726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480916 Felix Kaechele <felix at fetzig.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251351.n0PDp7Y9012326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181993] Review Request: charis-fonts - Charis SIL fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-181993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-181993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251357.n0PDvEPc013575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181993 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] New: Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_sil-charis-fonts?= Message-ID: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ? sil-charis-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ? sil-charis-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 181993 Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Renaming of charis-fonts to sil-charis-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-charis-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-charis-fonts-4.104-5.fc11.src.rpm Blocking request: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1248 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 14:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-452663-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452663-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251404.n0PE4oLt015323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 14:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] New: Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_sil-andika-fonts?= Message-ID: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ? sil-andika-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ? sil-andika-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 452663 Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Renaming of andika-fonts to sil-andika-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-andika-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-andika-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Blocking request: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1249 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480591-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251516.n0PFGrKR015186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-25 10:16:52 EDT --- Built in rawhide. Added in comps. EOL for tetex-font-kerkis done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481482] New: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 Message-ID: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481482 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Perl6-Junction/perl-Perl6-Junction.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Perl6-Junction/perl-Perl6-Junction-1.40000-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5. This is a lightweight module which provides 'Junction' operators, the most commonly used being 'any' and 'all'. Inspired by the Perl6 design docs, <http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/exe/E06.html. Provides a limited subset of the functionality of L<Quantum::Superpositions>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480607] Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API In-Reply-To: <bug-480607-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480607-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251603.n0PG35TJ022681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480607 --- Comment #1 from Fran?ois Kooman <fkooman at tuxed.net> 2009-01-25 11:03:04 EDT --- * Sun Jan 25 2009 Fran??ois Kooman <fkooman at tuxed.net> - 2.1.0-2 - remove javadoc sub package, there isn't any real documentation, only references to JSR-82 API docs at jcp.org - create symlinks without version numbers - remove gpl sub package, bluecove without gpl subpackage is useless - include the interesting docs from gpl subpackage in the package instead of the subpackage - include README.dist Issues remaining: - debug files in i386 package... - it probably won't work immediately on ppc/ppc64 as there is only a check for i386 and x86_64 in the library loader at runtime (no ppc hardware to test on, it does build correctly in koji) Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/bluecove.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bluecove-2.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] New: Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi Message-ID: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Summary: Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/sj-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251625.n0PGPclP006766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251629.n0PGTsA2007312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251629.n0PGTr2i007282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|477406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251630.n0PGU88v007667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #28 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-25 11:30:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: purple-msn-pecan Short Description: msn-pecan is a pidgin plugin adding extra fixtures to enhance the msn protocole. Owners: itamarjp madko Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251631.n0PGVRUP027151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251636.n0PGaWFb008808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|477406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:40:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251640.n0PGe2lK009334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-25 11:40:00 EDT --- rpmlint is not silent: gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libdbus-glib-1.so.2 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so.6 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1 Please see : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). It is not really necessary to call ldconfig on -plugin and -engine-mysql because no libraries are added on ldconfig search path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251644.n0PGiiSW009961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #29 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-25 11:44:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: purple-msn-pecan Short Description: Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple Owners: itamarjp madko Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251647.n0PGlg00010601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #4 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-25 11:47:41 EDT --- * SourceURL has been fixed * Your patch has been included. I'm on the way to upstream it Here are the links: SPEC: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql.spec SRPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.2.beta.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251648.n0PGmMDK029849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #18 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> 2009-01-25 11:48:20 EDT --- right - dumbest bz-comment of the week-award accepted - sorry for the noise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251700.n0PH0XMc031817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #6 from Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 12:00:32 EDT --- 1. Thanks for that catch, I missed the -fonts. 2. Added Decorative to the summary 3. I honestly don't know how that happened. Fixed. 4. Again, I must have been sleepy at some point. I didn't see that change. Fixed. The new font is licensed correctly in the font itself, thus no documentation needed. Because of the license change (a new version of the font) and renaming the spec, two new files exist again. SRPM: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251703.n0PH3plT032226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta. | |si --- Comment #2 from Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> 2009-01-25 12:03:50 EDT --- This is my informal review. I cannot sponsor you as I'm not (yet) an approved packager. However, my review can help your future sponsor when he makes his own official review. Good: + rpmlint output is clean. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL (md5sum webunit-1.3.8.tar.gz: 97b9e6b5149dadce48b86adbf2db3b0a). + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package doesn't contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Package doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + I tested that the package builds in mock. + The package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. + I did a limited test that the package functions as described. + egg-info files which are generated by the module's build scripts are included in the package. Comments: - You should use %{python_sitelib} instead of %{python_sitearch}, because your package is architecture independent (noarch) - You should remove %{python_sitearch} macro definition as you don't need it. - You should remove CFLAGS=... in %build section because this a noarch package. - You should avoid putting demo folder in the top-level %{python_sitelib} folder and rather put in a subfolder like %{python_sitelib}/%{Project_name}. - You could shorten the %files section by using: %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/ instead of: %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/HTMLParser.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/IMGSucker.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/SimpleDOM.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/__init__.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/config.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/cookie.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/utility.py* %{python_sitearch}/%{Project_name}/webunittest.py* And similarly for the demo directory. - The version in the %changelog section should be on the same line as the date and your name. - Because the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, you should query upstream to include it. - You should improve the Summary and Description fields. Look at other packages for examples. Your summary should state something like "A python module for unit testing websites acting like a web browser". - Optionally, you could shorten and rename %{Project_name} macro to something like %{project} or %{module}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251715.n0PHFtC3015130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |herlo1 at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-25 12:15:53 EDT --- The SPEC still includes a install -m 0643 -p %{SOURCE1} I'll approve the package, but please fix this before import in cvs. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the wiki and comps bits. Thank your for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251719.n0PHJttx002469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457281-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251725.n0PHPecN003808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] New: Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= Message-ID: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 457281 Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Renaming of unikurd-web-font to kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-1.fc10.src.rpm Blocking request: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251727.n0PHRKfc004024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251734.n0PHYC8I004847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sven at lank.es Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-25 12:34:10 EDT --- Well, your descriptions and summaries are underwhelming, but I'm not exactly the best placed to complain. The rest is sane ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the wiki and comps bits. Thank you for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251735.n0PHZOfd005357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tadej.janez at tadej | |.hicsalta.si) | --- Comment #8 from Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> 2009-01-25 12:35:22 EDT --- Thank you for taking time to review my fixed package! And I apologize again for responding so late. (In reply to comment #5) > Well, for 5.1.0-2: > > * Header files dependency: > - Well, for example the installed QwtModule.sip contains: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 63 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayDouble.h> > 64 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayInt.h> > 65 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoubleInterval.h> > 66 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoublePoint.h> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > However these header files are not installed. Would > you check if these are ignored? I traced what is happening to these files. configure/configure.py in PyQwt-5.1.0.tar.gz contains: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 745 # FIXME: sip-4.7 does not generate those include files anymore 746 for name in [os.path.join(tmp_dir, name) for name in [ 747 'sipQwtQwtArrayDouble.h', 748 'sipQwtQwtArrayInt.h', 749 'sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoubleInterval.h', 750 'sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoublePoint.h', 751 ]]: 752 if not os.path.exists(name): 753 open(name, 'w') --------------------------------------------------------------------- So these files get created after running 'python configure.py ...', however, they remain empty. Furthermore 'make install' doesn't install them anywhere, which would indicate that they are obsolete. I think this is an issue that should be handled upstream. I submitted a bug in sourceforge.net bug tracker: https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2534030&group_id=82987&atid=567933 UPDATE: The author of the package responded that this was a rudimentary hack to maintain backwards compatibility with older SIP versions and he will remove it in future versions of the package. > * About grace.py > - Well, I checked this file again and actually this file is > executable, so it is more correct that this script should simply > have 0755 permission (while for qplt.py it seems that > this script cannot be executed directly). OK, made grace.py executable again. > Then: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. I would be very glad if you could sponsor me. > When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other > person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report > so that I can check your comments or review request. Ok, I did a pre-review of python-webunit package, which is tracked at bug 481272. Please check its quality and instruct me on my next steps. I also uploaded updated spec file and source package at http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251751.n0PHpKYb020634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 12:51:16 EDT --- ReviewTemplate PASSED ? rpmlint: Clean, but no documentation. See licensing comments below ? package name ? spec file name ? package guideline-compliant ? license complies with guidelines: Yes ? license field accurate ? license file not deleted ? spec in US English ? spec legible ? source matches upstream ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded noarch ? build dependencies complete ? own all directories ? no dupes in %files ? permission ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT ? macros used consistently ? Package contains code ? clean buildroot before install ? filenames UTF-8 SHOULD ? if license text missing, ask upstream to include it License file seems to come with the base elisa distribution. Could upstream be asked to ship this with the plugins tarball as well? ? package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described: Works, tested with audio playback on F10/x86_64. Note that video playback locks up the machine, but that is probably an Elisa / Elisa-plugins-bad problem ? scriplets are sane ? other subpackages should require versioned base ? require package not files Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251748.n0PHmOhK007207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Clint Savage <herlo1 at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 12:48:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts Short Description: To Be Continued is a decorative/graffiti sans-serif font. Owners: herlo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251754.n0PHsVO5020964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #47 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 12:54:25 EDT --- Jens, if Yaakov is working on it, do you (or Till) want to take over the review? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251757.n0PHvt7V008930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-25 12:57:53 EDT --- ? and ? are tricky to get right in rpm do yourself a favour, start at Release: 2 and Obsoletes: unikurd-web-font < 20020502-2 That will work easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251812.n0PICbKt024084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-25 13:12:35 EDT --- I solved those two issues. The included patch resolved - I actually don't know why - the non-standard-dir-perm error. http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] New: Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font Message-ID: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Summary: Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and some special characters (most European Latin characters). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251829.n0PIT34c026773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> 2009-01-25 13:29:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Sorry - typo - SJ, not DJ-Fonts: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sj-fonts Short Description: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251827.n0PIRtfS026616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> 2009-01-25 13:27:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dj-fonts Short Description: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251832.n0PIWGwk014639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251833.n0PIX9PF014814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 13:33:08 EDT --- Updated: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-2.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Jan 25 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 20020502-2 - repackage to save myself a grief -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251853.n0PIraKT031127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |mnowak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-25 13:53:34 EDT --- upgrade path works ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481502] New: Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker Message-ID: <bug-481502-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kmcmartin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ditz/rubygem-ditz.spec SRPM URL: http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ditz/rubygem-ditz-0.5-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: A command-line issue tracker written in ruby. License is GPLv3... Great tool for managing personal todo lists, can generated an html page for publishing. Upstream URL: ditz.rubyforge.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251946.n0PJkiDs027744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 14:46:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329952) some trial patch For 0.3.1-1: * About Patch2: - Well, google shows that awe_voice.h was removed from kernel headers at 2.6.21 or so (i.e. around Fedora 7) I don't think it is preferrable to re-introduce macros which was defined in the header file which is no longer supported. I guess kernel supports AWE32 in other way or kernel does not support AWE32 completely any more. Are macros related to awe_voice.h really needed even now? (removing all awe32 related parts like attached does not help ? I just tried to remove all awe_voice.h related parts and did not any functionality check as I don't know how to use this software...) * Timestamps - Please consider to use ------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. * Directory structure about document files - For HTML files in devel package, I suggest that a subdirectory should be created under %_defaultdocdir/%name-devel-%version (named as "HTML", for example) and all HTML files should be moved into the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features In-Reply-To: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251942.n0PJgeDb026859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 14:42:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-rpmstubby.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-rpmstubby-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > I made the review. There are a few minor things to go over: > > * Two Changelogs need packaged: > ./org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpmstubby-feature/ChangeLog > ./org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpmstubby/ChangeLog > Fixed > * I think URL needs to be: > http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/projectPages/rpmstubby/ > Fixed > ? Could you provide a download location at the project homepage so we don't > need to use this fetch script? Not yet because the project needs to be reviewed from eclipse.org before making official releases. > > * Macros should be used consistently. You use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > mixed. This needs corrected. You should also use %{__install} for consistency. > Fixed. > * Summary looks awkward to me, maybe it should be shortened to: > Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse > Current summary describes better what the plugin is doing. > > These are all easy to do. I'm approving the package now. > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > This package (eclipse-rpmstubby) is APPROVED by oget > ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features In-Reply-To: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901251948.n0PJmOcG008711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 14:48:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-rpmstubby Short Description: Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features Owners: akurtakov Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252012.n0PKCf1M012922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 15:12:41 EDT --- Thank you. (In reply to comment #1) > > * About Patch2: > - Well, google shows that awe_voice.h was removed from > kernel headers at 2.6.21 or so (i.e. around Fedora 7) > I don't think it is preferrable to re-introduce macros > which was defined in the header file which is no longer > supported. I guess kernel supports AWE32 in other way > or kernel does not support AWE32 completely any more. > > Are macros related to awe_voice.h really needed even > now? > (removing all awe32 related parts like attached does not help ? > I just tried to remove all awe_voice.h related parts > and did not any functionality check as I don't know > how to use this software...) > Thanks for the patch. It seems like you are right. But now I am thinking of dropping the OSS support from tse3 altogether. I see other applications/libraries in Fedora built with --without-oss flag. - It will save us some dependencies, - I am not sure how functional the library will be after this patch, and - OSS is deprecated, so we won't loose much. Does that sound OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252025.n0PKPs6d015383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-25 15:25:52 EDT --- Hey Alex, I would be happy to look at this and bug 479951 and sponsor you. Look for a full review later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] New: Clanship 1.0.5f rpm Message-ID: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Clanship 1.0.5f rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Summary: Clanship 1.0.5f rpm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jani at mikkonen.biz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Here's my first and initial submission to fedora games rpm's. Packaging request taking from Games sig wishlist: Clanship Spec file: http://www.pcuf.fi/~rasjani/fedora/clanship.spec and SRPMS: http://www.pcuf.fi/~rasjani/fedora/ClanShip-1.0.5f-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252026.n0PKQsCc015629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-25 15:26:53 EDT --- I think removing OSS support should be okay on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252031.n0PKVQXZ016465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Clanship 1.0.5f rpm In-Reply-To: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252028.n0PKSgjA002478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-25 15:28:41 EDT --- is this your first package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Clanship 1.0.5f rpm In-Reply-To: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252028.n0PKSuSS002519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252026.n0PKQuTP002272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-25 15:26:55 EDT --- Hey Alex. I would be happy to look at this and bug 479835. Look for more info later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] New: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences Message-ID: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Summary: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://ygingras.net/bioinfo Description: Pipviewer is a visualizer for multiple alignements of genomic sequences. It highlights conserved regions and allows basic anotations. Its main goal is to find conserved probes for the construction of gene order data sets. Selected regions marked as 'probes' can be expoxted to fasta format. It can also retreive gene annotations form the NBCI and display this information along the alignement. Pipviewer is not an aligner. You must compute the alignment with another tool like Clustal or Multi PIP Maker. Koji scratch build: depends on vhybridize rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] New: Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools Message-ID: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Summary: Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/vhybridize.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/vhybridize-0.5.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://ygingras.net/bioinfo Description: Virtual Hybridization uses sets of short probes to generate datasets for comparative genomics: given a DNA sequence and a set of probes, the typical output will give a sequence of oriented probe hits along the DNA sequence. Other tools are supplied to allow simple manipulations such as format conversion and extraction of permutations. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1080910 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint vhybridize-0.5.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint vhybridize-0.5.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Clanship 1.0.5f rpm In-Reply-To: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252035.n0PKZTkX004196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 --- Comment #2 from Jani Mikkonen <jani at mikkonen.biz> 2009-01-25 15:35:28 EDT --- Yes, its my first that i have submitted to fedora. I have had a talk with Hans that he could review and sponsor me in case he finds my packages good enough - but i forgot to add him to cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252037.n0PKbqkE004450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481508 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252037.n0PKbr7d004474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252050.n0PKowqh019766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-25 15:50:57 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. See below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ca5412b7515d8901714ab7892323adb6 log4c-1.2.1.tar.gz ca5412b7515d8901714ab7892323adb6 log4c-1.2.1.tar.gz.orig See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} See below - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. No need for a %check section if there is nothing in it is there? 2. Please change the Source url to match the sourceurl guidelines for sourceforge projects? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 3. Please use a consistent type of macro... either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, but not both. As a side note, I don't personally think it's worth it to macroize things like mv or mkdir, but thats up to you. 4. Please remove .la files, don't %exclude them. excluding has weird effects sometimes. 5. Looks like you might be missing a BuildRequires... from the build.log: checking for EXPAT - version >= 1.95.1... no *** Could not run EXPAT test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means EXPAT was incorrectly installed *** or that you have moved EXPAT since it was installed. In the latter case, you *** may want to edit the expat-config script: '' *** Log4C will still run without EXPAT--it uses some bundled *** lex/yacc code to parse the configuration file 6. rpmlint says: log4c.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblog4c.so.3.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 log4c-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation You might bring up the first to upstream, the second can be ignored. 7. Since your devel subpackage puts a file under /usr/share/aclocal, you probibly need to add a Requires: automake to the devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 20:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252052.n0PKqmhp020029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 15:52:47 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tse3.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tse3-0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Move the HTML documentation into an HTML subdirectory - Use INSTALL="install -p" - Drop the oss support, and the related patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252101.n0PL1xeb021657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-25 16:01:58 EDT --- On quick comment here: Is this a pre-release/post-release or snapshot package? If so, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release Ie, is it a beta of an upcoming 3.0 release? If so the version should probibly be: 3.0-0.1.b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252115.n0PLFl5h024472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org --- Comment #9 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-25 16:15:46 EDT --- Compiles fine on my F-10 system. Jochen, looks like something's borked on your setup. It's also not a compile failure, it's an error from gtkdoc-scan. Anyways, this shouldn't block the review. Jochen, if you want I can take over the review until you figure out what's going on on your end... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252121.n0PLL2uC025480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |denis at poolshark.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252122.n0PLMN9Q025762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-25 16:22:22 EDT --- OK, yuo make take over this review, because I don't want to block it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] New: Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Summary: Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-pippy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-pippy-25-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Pippy Description: Teaches Python programming by providing access to Python code samples and a fully interactive Python interpreter. The user can type and execute simple Python expressions. For example, it would be possible for a user to write Python statements to calculate expressions, play sounds, or make simple text animation. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081396 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-pippy-25-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-pippy.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-pippy-25-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-pippy.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252136.n0PLatO0028143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9213 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 21:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Clanship 1.0.5f rpm In-Reply-To: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252144.n0PLiACP016239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-25 16:44:10 EDT --- please do this. please also reduce the size of your .spec file by merging mkdir -p and cp, you can use something like install -Dp -m 0755 file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 22:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: <bug-463035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463035-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252233.n0PMXNkC005542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Adam Huffman <bloch at verdurin.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #8 from Adam Huffman <bloch at verdurin.com> 2009-01-25 17:33:21 EDT --- I've got an initscript for the package now but it needs more testing. Will upload a new version next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 22:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] New: Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-481516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Summary: Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-stopwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-stopwatch-20090126-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Stopwatch Description: This activity provides multiple stopwatches to time events with. Provide a useful timer for races, velocity measurements, etc. Be accessible to innumerate users. Help develop numeracy. Sharing of stopwatch sets, which anyone can manipulate. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081558 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-stopwatch-20090126-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-stopwatch.noarch: W: no-documentation sugar-stopwatch.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-stopwatch-20090126-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-stopwatch.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 22:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252234.n0PMYXd4025423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 22:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252233.n0PMXNvW025279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 23:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Clanship 1.0.5f rpm In-Reply-To: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481507-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252312.n0PNCBwF032254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Jani Mikkonen <jani at mikkonen.biz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jani Mikkonen <jani at mikkonen.biz> 2009-01-25 18:12:10 EDT --- Hans added to cc New spec: http://www.pcuf.fi/~rasjani/fedora/clanship.spec New srpms:http://www.pcuf.fi/~rasjani/fedora/ClanShip-1.0.5f-2.fc10.src.rpm ps. since the clanship seems dead currently, the source can be found in my games repo. git clone git://github.com/rasjani/games.git -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 23:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] New: Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Summary: Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-clock.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-clock-20090126-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Clock Description: This activity displays time in analog, digital, and "natural" forms. The "natural" form will be an image of a sun or moon arcing across the sky, rising and setting as the day progresses. This is more than a simple clock; the user will be able to grab any element and readjust it, which will update each of the other elements. In this manner, hopefully the children can explore and understand different methods of telling time. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081637 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-clock-20090126-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-clock.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-clock-20090126-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-clock.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 23:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252331.n0PNVbDq016460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 23:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901252333.n0PNX67e016715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9216 Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 00:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481523] New: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. Message-ID: <bug-481523-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kmcmartin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ditz/rubygem-trollop.spec SRPM URL: http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-ditz/rubygem-trollop-1.10.2-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: A command-line option parsing library for ruby. Trollop is designed to provide the maximal amount of GNU-style argument processing in the minimum number of lines of code (for you, the programmer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 00:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260033.n0Q0XKLf026852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8888 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 00:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:33:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260033.n0Q0XrpL014308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8889 Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 00:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] New: Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-481524-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Summary: Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-help.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-help-7-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Help_(activity) Description: The Help activity provides a quick interface to help documentation on the XO. It currently launches a browser and displays html documents describing how to use the XO and the Sugar interface. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081864 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-help-7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-help.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/sugar/activities/Help.activity/help/OLPC_simple/TuteBackingUp/.resized_400x300_sdcard.png ... ... sugar-help.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/sugar/activities/Help.activity/help/XO/.resized_600x398_xoboxcontents.jpg sugar-help.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 33 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-help-7-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-help.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] New: Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system Message-ID: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Summary: Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Bucardo is an asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system, allowing for both multi-master and multi-slave operations. It was developed at Backcountry.com primarily by Greg Sabino Mullane of End Point Corporation. It's licensed under BSD License. SRPMS and SPEC will coming soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260129.n0Q1TffK023832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 20:29:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1080910 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. f962b32a9bae82bd67e28f29ad783327 vhybridize-0.5.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) Fix license in spec which looks GPLv3+ 2) Fix summary. Summary should be Summary : Virtual Hybridization tools. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260132.n0Q1WaDb024502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |bucardo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: <bug-481523-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481523-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260141.n0Q1fxUS006146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 --- Comment #1 from Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin at redhat.com> 2009-01-25 20:41:59 EDT --- (Dependency of rubygem-ditz.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260148.n0Q1mbtI027381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260148.n0Q1mK1K027332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-DBIx-Safe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260148.n0Q1mcct027402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 01:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle Message-ID: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this module is to give controlled, limited access to an application, rather than simply passing it a raw database handle through DBI. DBIx::Safe acts as a wrapper to the database, by only allowing through the commands you tell it to. It filters all things related to the database handle - methods and attributes. koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081910 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 02:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] New: Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla Message-ID: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla Alias: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 Summary: Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://camelus.fedorahosted.org OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-Bugzilla.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The XML-RPC interface to bugzilla is quite useful, and while Bugzilla 3.x is starting to flesh their interface out a bit more (see, e.g., L<WWW::Bugzilla3>), Fedora's Bugzilla implementation has a large number of custom methods. This module aims to expose them, in a kinder, gentler way. In addition to the XML-RPC methods Bugzilla makes available, there are also some things we only seem to be able to access via the web/XML interfaces. (See, e.g., the flags, attachments and comments functionality.) This package works to expose those as well. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 02:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More Message-ID: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ispbrasil.com.br/perl-Test-Dynamic/perl-Test-Dynamic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ispbrasil.com.br/perl-Test-Dynamic/perl-Test-Dynamic-1.3.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Module to help count tests for Test::More, used by Bucardo's test suite koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 02:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260252.n0Q2qDuX018498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 02:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260252.n0Q2qDDD018477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 02:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260251.n0Q2prnx006285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Test-Dynamic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 03:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260303.n0Q33XQ9020374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-25 22:03:32 EDT --- OK, README file now marked as Doc. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 04:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:55:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481536] New: Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system Message-ID: <bug-481536-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 Summary: Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ngompa13 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/enano.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/enano-1.1.6-1.20090125hg2c20563245b2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Enano CMS is a content management system that strives to have "less bloat and more float" than other solutions. It includes powerful administrative capabilities and a variety of plugins to add portals, forums, blogs, and other functionalities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 06:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260620.n0Q6Kmb9020914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 01:20:47 EDT --- Thanks. hopefully this update wouldn't be missing something else: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew-6.2-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 06:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260628.n0Q6SLBE009543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #16 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 01:28:20 EDT --- Built in Koji for F9, F10, and devel. Submitted bodhi update requests for F-9 and F-10. Thanks for all the help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 06:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479546-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260642.n0Q6gcNQ024119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #12 from Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 01:42:36 EDT --- I've made these modifications and just want to do a run through before I upload the changes again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 07:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260708.n0Q78FGm016217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-26 02:08:14 EDT --- You package does not comply to the FPG. * Missing (mandatory): Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) * Missing: BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) * Missing: Permission fixing in %install. I.e. add %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/* or %{__chmod} -R u+w %{buildroot}/* at the end of the %install section * Superfluous: Requires: perl * The testsuite works fine when providing the package with correct BR:'s (Add BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) ) Non-blocking: I dislike packages shipping testsuites in %doc, because these a) occasionally introduce bogus deps due to defects in rpm's dependency generation. b) offen don't work c) add package bloat ... however, this is only my personal preference. BTW: Are you familiar with Fedora's cpanspec tool? This tools eases significantly helps with getting started on packaging perl-modules for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260825.n0Q8Pv2o029096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 03:25:55 EDT --- *** Bug 481483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260825.n0Q8PwUT029122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Bug 481508 depends on bug 481483, which changed state. Bug 481483 Summary: Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481483 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260835.n0Q8ZPvs010310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 03:35:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vhybridize Short Description: Virtual Hybridization tools Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260836.n0Q8akWt010585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 03:36:44 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viking-0.9.7-2.fc10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viking-0.9.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: <bug-468275-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468275-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260848.n0Q8mWjU012380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 03:48:31 EDT --- This package was built. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7038 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-turtleart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects In-Reply-To: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260854.n0Q8sgv6013560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 --- Comment #1 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-26 03:54:41 EDT --- koji scratch build in F-11/rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1082184 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: <bug-250533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-250533-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260854.n0Q8sPWh013517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 03:54:23 EDT --- Noah, can you please update this package and make a build? Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 08:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] New: Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects Message-ID: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Bio-Graphics.spec SRPM URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Bio-Graphics-1.83-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bio::Graphics is a simple GD-based renderer (diagram drawer) for DNA and protein sequences. The Bio::Graphics::Panel class provides drawing and formatting services for any object that implements the Bio::SeqFeatureI interface, including Ace::Sequence::Feature, Das::Segment::Feature and Bio::DB::Graphics objects. It can be used to draw sequence annotations, physical (contig) maps, protein domains, or any other type of map in which a set of discrete ranges need to be laid out on the number line. (This module used to be part of the perl-bioperl, but is now a standalone CPAN module that requires perl-bioperl.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 09:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260940.n0Q9eE3n023941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #8 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 04:40:12 EDT --- can't find this dep in the F10 repos. BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 43-6 only 40-3 exists, so i can't rebuild the source rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 09:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260955.n0Q9tcNq027161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jochen at herr-schmitt.de |denis at poolshark.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 09:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-438608-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260954.n0Q9sZLE026712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #29 from Matthias Saou <matthias at rpmforge.net> 2009-01-26 04:54:31 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review!!!! (In reply to comment #28) > SHOULD > ? if license text missing, ask upstream to include it > License file seems to come with the base elisa distribution. Could upstream > be asked to ship this with the plugins tarball as well? Since there are circular deps between the plugins and the base, the plugins can't be installed without the base, so I'd consider this very minor and wouldn't even bother with it. > ? other subpackages should require versioned base That's a tricky bit. All of the packages are usually released with the same version, but it has happened to see only one be immediately replaced with an "n.1" version, making the whole "Requires: foo = %{version}" (strict version) quite tricky, as it could involve useless rebuilds. Maybe having all of the defaults be "Requires: foo >= %{version}" then exceptionally hardcoding to "Requires: foo >= 0.5.24" in a single packages updated to 0.5.24.1? > ? require package not files Where is there a file requirement? Again, thanks for the review, we're now one step closer to get the Fedora elisa back into shape at last! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 09:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901260955.n0Q9t7MR015075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #11 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-26 04:55:06 EDT --- Looks solid. Pretty much agree with Jochen's review here. Minor request : - fold %dir entries in %files, as suggestde by Jochen - maybe fold 3 consecutive %doc lines into 1 ? - devel package gtk-doc Require not necessary (is pulled in by gtk2-devel anyways) - devel package Require on clutter-devel won't be necessary for F-11 Otherwise package looks good. Demo code "launcher.c" won't compile as-is because it unnecessarily include "config.h", probably should notify upstream about that. If you have time, can you sed out that line from it ? (not a review blocker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 10:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261047.n0QAlObp005553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 10:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects In-Reply-To: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261055.n0QAtTLm007052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 10:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261053.n0QArHLw006511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 05:53:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081910 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream with different url than given in spec. ca5abd5fec19da9d51e6312f6707c534 DBIx-Safe-1.2.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Nothing. + Package perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(DBIx::Safe) = 1.2.5 Requires: perl >= 0:5.008003 perl(DBI) >= 1.42 perl(IO::Handle) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) remove unnecessary BR from spec. BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)Source URL not working. Working URL is http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TU/TURNSTEP/DBIx-Safe-1.2.5.tar.gz But looks like URL have " ** UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE **" written. Not sure what that means. 3) Good if you add BRs that will remove warnings from build.log Warning: prerequisite DBD::Pg 1.49 not found. Warning: prerequisite DBI 1.49 not found. Warning: prerequisite Test::More 0.61 not found. Warning: prerequisite Test::Simple 0.3 not found. 4) License is BSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261106.n0QB67Uk009512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 06:06:04 EDT --- * Sources matches upstream dc43ff7ae6aded45f578c87b7b0c8766 libxml2-2.7.2.tar.gz (upstream) dc43ff7ae6aded45f578c87b7b0c8766 libxml2-2.7.2.tar.gz (SRPM) $ rpmlint mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-5.fc11.src.rpm (SRPM) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-5.fc10.noarch.rpm (RPMS) mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includeaddkeyword.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tree1.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includexpath.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlIO.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/relaxng.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/io1.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlstring.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/examples/testXPath.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/entities.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/examples/testSAX.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/chvalid.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/valid.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/reader2.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlautomata.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/reader4.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xinclude.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/HTMLparser.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xpathInternals.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xpath.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/parserInternals.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/nanoftp.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/c14n.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/parse4.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/list.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlreader.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlmemory.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/pattern.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libxml2.la mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlschemas.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/DOCBparser.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/uri.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/examples/testHTML.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/threads.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlregexp.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlexports.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includekeyword.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includeconvert.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/HTMLtree.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/parse3.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlsave.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/dict.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlmodule.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlwriter.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includegetattribute.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/hash.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/xml2-config mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libxml2.dll.a mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libxml2.dll.a mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/xpath1.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tree2.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/reader1.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlerror.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/parse1.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/schemasInternals.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/debugXML.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/nanohttp.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/io2.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xpointer.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/parse2.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includeaddattribute.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/schematron.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/tree.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/testWriter.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/SAX.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/globals.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xlink.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/SAX2.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlschemastypes.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/examples/xmllint.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/catalog.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/reader3.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/xpath2.c mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlunicode.h mingw32-libxml2.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libxml2.dll.a mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 78 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261104.n0QB49m7029501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 06:04:08 EDT --- also, Change Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) to Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:09:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261109.n0QB9SYM010000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #14 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 06:09:27 EDT --- The rpmlint noise should be ok for a mingw32 package https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261119.n0QBJP5u011901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261120.n0QBK0RX012054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla In-Reply-To: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261118.n0QBIqjp011808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 06:18:51 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081908 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 03e406a8f20f442684f0c83c5f8987cf Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=6, 14 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.01 sys + 13.44 cusr 0.97 csys = 14.42 CPU) + Package perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03-1.fc11-> Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Bugzilla) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::Attachment) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::Comment) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::Flag) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::NewAttachment) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bugs) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::NewBug) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::QueriedBugs) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Role::NewHash) = 0.03 perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Types) = 0.03 Requires: perl(DateTime::Format::Bugzilla) perl(DateTime::Format::Builder) perl(Email::Address) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::Attachment) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::Comment) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::Flag) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug::NewAttachment) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Bugs) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::NewBug) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::QueriedBugs) perl(Fedora::Bugzilla::Types) perl(HTTP::Cookies) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor) perl(MooseX::Types) perl(MooseX::Types::DateTime) perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(MooseX::Types::URI) perl(Path::Class) perl(RPC::XML::Client) perl(Regexp::Common) perl(URI::Fetch) perl(URI::Find) perl(XML::Twig) perl(namespace::clean) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions 1) Good if you upload source to fedorahosted.org using command scp -p Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03.tar.gz fedorahosted.org:camelus which will give you source url as https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/a/camelus/Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261118.n0QBImhJ032395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 06:18:47 EDT --- MUST: * package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines mingw32-* * spec file name match base package * package meet Packaging Guidelines . * package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines * License field match the actual license. * available license(s) file(s) is included in %doc. * spec file is written in American English. * spec file is legible. * package compile on x86 * build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires * no locales * no shared libs * package not relocatable * package own all directories that it creates. * no duplicate files in the %files listing. * Permissions on files must be set properly. (%defattr(...) line) * %clean section present and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) * package is consistently using macros * package contain code, or permissable content * no large doc * %doc does not affect runtime * no headers * no static libs * available pkgconfig(.pc) files 'Requires: pkgconfig' * no *.so.* libs * no -devel packages * not a GUI app. * no files or directories already owned by other packages. * %install begins with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) * filenames is valid UTF-8 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects In-Reply-To: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261118.n0QBIZ27032322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 06:18:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1082184 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1c1de50c9261b3e6a1b20e2f38701aa7 Bio-Graphics-1.83.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=49, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.55 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.62 CPU) + Package perl-Bio-Graphics-1.83-2.fc11-> Provides: perl(Bio::Graphics) = 1.83 perl(Bio::Graphics::ConfiguratorI) perl(Bio::Graphics::DrawTransmembrane) perl(Bio::Graphics::Feature) perl(Bio::Graphics::FeatureBase) perl(Bio::Graphics::FeatureFile) perl(Bio::Graphics::FeatureFile::Iterator) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::Factory) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::alignment) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::anchored_arrow) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::arrow) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::box) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::broken_line) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::cds) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::christmas_arrow) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::crossbox) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::dashed_line) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::diamond) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::dna) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::dot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::dumbbell) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::ellipse) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::ex) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::extending_arrow) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::fixedwidth) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::flag) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::gene) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::generic) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::graded_segments) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::group) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::heat_map) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::heat_map_ideogram) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::heterogeneous_segments) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::ideogram) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::image) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::lightning) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::line) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::merge_parts) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::merged_alignment) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::minmax) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::oval) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::pentagram) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::phylo_align) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::pinsertion) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::primers) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::processed_transcript) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::protein) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::ragged_ends) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::redgreen_box) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::redgreen_segment) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::repeating_shape) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::rndrect) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::ruler_arrow) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::saw_teeth) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::segmented_keyglyph) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::segments) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::smoothing) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::so_transcript) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::span) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::spectrogram) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::splice_site) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::stackedplot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::ternary_plot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::text_in_box) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::three_letters) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::tic_tac_toe) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::toomany) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::trace) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::track) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::transcript) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::transcript2) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::translation) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::triangle) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::two_bolts) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::wave) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::weighted_arrow) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::whiskerplot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::wiggle_box) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::wiggle_density) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::wiggle_xyplot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::xyplot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Panel) perl(Bio::Graphics::Pictogram) perl(Bio::Graphics::RendererI) perl(Bio::Graphics::Util) perl(Bio::Graphics::Wiggle) perl(Bio::Graphics::Wiggle::Loader) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Bio::AlignIO) perl(Bio::Assembly::IO) perl(Bio::Coordinate::Pair) perl(Bio::DB::GFF::Util::Rearrange) perl(Bio::DB::SeqFeature::Store) perl(Bio::Graphics) perl(Bio::Graphics::Browser::Util) perl(Bio::Graphics::Feature) perl(Bio::Graphics::FeatureFile) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::Factory) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::generic) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::minmax) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::segments) perl(Bio::Graphics::Glyph::xyplot) perl(Bio::Graphics::Panel) perl(Bio::Graphics::Util) perl(Bio::Graphics::Wiggle) perl(Bio::Location::Simple) perl(Bio::Root::Version) perl(Bio::SCF) perl(Bio::SearchIO) perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Generic) perl(Bio::SeqIO) perl(Bio::Tools::CodonTable) perl(Bio::Tools::GuessSeqFormat) perl(Bio::TreeIO) perl(CGI) perl(CGI::Carp) perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Dumpvalue) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::stat) perl(GD) perl(GD::Simple) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Seekable) perl(List::Util) perl(Math::Trig) perl(Memoize) perl(POSIX) perl(SVG) >= 2.26 perl(Statistics::Descriptive) perl(Text::ParseWords) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261145.n0QBjfx7017435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-26 06:45:39 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (andika-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) (Also done a quick QA review, did not find anything questionable). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261142.n0QBgMe1004935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-26 06:42:21 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (charis-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) The changelog line references apanov-edrip-fonts, please correct this before importing. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226493] Merge Review: tix In-Reply-To: <bug-226493-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226493-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261147.n0QBlBJ3017761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226493 Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt --- Comment #4 from Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> 2009-01-26 06:47:09 EDT --- I would like to take this review. My interest in tix comes from the python side and it is always nice to have one more merge review finished. :-) I noticed the open review since comment #3 but I have been busy meanwhile. Sorry. :-) The first standard question regarding this issue is the output of rpmlint over the produced rpms: tix.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/tix-i386.conf tix.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/tcl8.5/Tix8.4.3/pref/WmDefault.tcl tix.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: tix-8.4.2-tcl8.5.patch tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/twofont.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/notebook.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/combo.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/hierarchy.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/dirlist.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/relation.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/dirtree.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/sl-bar.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/exfile.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/oop/arrows.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/select1.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/pane_vert.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/widgets.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/law_comp.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist_ex3.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/tlist.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tix32.png tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/sl-nobar.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/ARROWS.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist_ex1.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hierarchy.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/pane_horz.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/dirtree.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/lawyer.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/horizontal.gif tix-doc.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/Release-8.4.0.txt tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/fb_comp.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/ctl_wopt.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/select-vert.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist_ex2.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/joe.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hierarchy.png tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/ctl_subw.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/pane_add.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/vertical.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tix32.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/twofont2.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/select.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/arrows.png tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist1.gif tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/ctl_noopt.gif Note that I am quite aware that some of the those warnings are bogus, with the firts one being too obvious. :-) Nevertheless I would like to hear about the others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261158.n0QBwPZq019970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #12 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 06:58:23 EDT --- you are right, libexpat gets picked up automatically. fixed, will request CVS in next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261202.n0QC2Y8s009330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 07:02:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cmconvert Short Description: CacheMate import file converter Owners: pcfe Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] New: Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format Message-ID: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Summary: Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-1.el5.src.rpm Description: This is a program that parses zone files used by the BIND DNS server and converts them to the native format of the tinydns component of Dan Bernstein's djbdns DNS server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261212.n0QCCA92023139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #16 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> 2009-01-26 07:12:08 EDT --- this still not compile on epel as i wrote in #6, would you add aclocal before autoreconf: ---------------------------------------------- cd . && /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run aclocal-1.10 /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.10: command not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run autoconf cd . && /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run automake-1.10 --gnu /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: automake-1.10: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. aclocal.m4:20: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to. If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely. To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically `autoreconf'. configure.in:41: error: Autoconf version 2.60 or higher is required aclocal.m4:7055: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE is expanded from... configure.in:41: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 make: *** [configure] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1386 (%build) ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261220.n0QCKa9q024783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 07:20:35 EDT --- I only updated it in Rawhide at the weekend, so it's possible that it didn't make it out to the mirrors yet. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/mingw32-filesystem/ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80111 And yes, mingw32-filesystem >= 43-6 really is required because of a bug related to the way we were detecting the C++ compiler. For Fedora 10 you can just copy the RPM from that Koji build above and it will work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261216.n0QCGom1011990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |bind-to-tinydns Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261222.n0QCMDPc025135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 07:22:12 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this package Tim. (In reply to comment #16) > this still not compile on epel as i wrote in #6, would you add aclocal before > autoreconf: Don't worry Levente, I'll sort this out when I check in/build for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261224.n0QCOpew025426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 07:24:50 EDT --- 'FE-NEEDSPONSOR' removed, you are a member of the packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261223.n0QCNqSL013212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 07:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libxml2 Short Description: MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261226.n0QCQs23026153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 07:26:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-andika-fonts Short Description: A font for literacy and beginning readers Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261234.n0QCYCPK027455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 07:34:11 EDT --- Doh, will fix of course before import (can you review the renaming of edrip too please?) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-charis-fonts Short Description: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Owners: nim kevin roozbeh Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261236.n0QCa6Pv015901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 07:36:05 EDT --- (please do not forget your cvs request now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects In-Reply-To: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261236.n0QCairV015980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net> 2009-01-26 07:36:43 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Bio-Graphics Short Description: Graphics support for generating images of BioPerl objects Owners: alexlan perl-sig Branches: F-9, F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481288] Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation In-Reply-To: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261245.n0QCjOOj029752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 07:45:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1082699 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 3f6acd2752ad12a3a67bd54ed02698e0 wokkel-0.4.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:00:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261300.n0QD058Z000549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-26 08:00:04 EDT --- Can you follow the packaging source url guidelines ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Can you merge this 2 lines in only one ? mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} install -m 755 bind-to-tinydns $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ something like this install -Dp -m 755 bind-to-tinydns $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/bind-to-tinydns -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481288] Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation In-Reply-To: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261308.n0QD8CuP003047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-26 08:08:10 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wokkel Short Description: Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation Owners: ruben Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481567] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings Message-ID: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Async/perl-MooseX-Async.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Async/perl-MooseX-Async-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MooseX::Async is a set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261309.n0QD9GYS003225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 08:09:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1082741 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 366c3a9f6a28851af93145c09c17e370 pysnmp-2.0.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestion: 1) Drop unnecessary pysnmp-examples subpackage. Same examples files already got included in main package pysnmp so its duplicate files installation at different paths. 2) License is BSD not MIT. submit new srpm with above changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server In-Reply-To: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480552-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261319.n0QDJsAh005848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261321.n0QDLltU026326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 08:21:46 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Owners: mnowak rename unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts just for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261328.n0QDSVPx027798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 08:28:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1082732 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. libxnm.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxnm-1.0.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 + source files match upstream. 368655a553e594161f14286352165e41 libxnm-0.1.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libxnm.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. suggestions: 1) source url should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xnm/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) for -devel package make docs in %files as %doc doxygen-doc/* ==> This will reduce one level depth of directory hierarchy. I am approving this package with hope that you will convince upstream to avoid usage of exit() function in library project source which made rpmlint to complain. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261338.n0QDcM0i009943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #35 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 08:38:19 EDT --- Ops, it disappeared from F10 spec - missing in devel branch, sorry. I'll prepare patch for 4.2.0 and rebuild it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261341.n0QDfh21030659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 08:41:42 EDT --- Thanks for noticing all my mistakes. First I thought that there is a benefit for making an separate -examples package but it will only save a small amount of space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261349.n0QDnLqZ012322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Trever Adams <nightbox at hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nightbox at hotmail.com --- Comment #38 from Trever Adams <nightbox at hotmail.com> 2009-01-26 08:49:16 EDT --- Will we see this in F11-Rawhide soon? Is it possible to add winbind for those of us who are playing with it looking to the day it can replace Samba3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261347.n0QDlKZ3032022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 08:47:18 EDT --- (and the usual CCs please, see bug #481478 for an example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261354.n0QDsPgH001028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 --- Comment #3 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 08:54:24 EDT --- hi, thank much for review of specfile. I changed it up your comments, except licence: there is MIT-licence in /usr/share/doc/python-webunit-1.3.8/README.txt Is it enough for licence ? Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/python-webunit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/python-webunit-1.3.8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261401.n0QE1Y0H015433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 09:01:32 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Owners: mnowak Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes rename unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts just for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261358.n0QDw5IX002025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #39 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 08:58:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Will we see this in F11-Rawhide soon? Not until someone reviews the package. > Is it possible to add winbind for those of us who are playing with it looking > to the day it can replace Samba3? For now, Samba4 is being added primarily to support OpenChange, and OpenChange does not require the winbind subpackage. It also conflicts with Samba3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261401.n0QE1Veu003055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #10 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 09:01:29 EDT --- * Sources matches upstream b9f8453dd38266108641c448ea8d5bee glib-2.19.5.tar.bz2 (upstream) b9f8453dd38266108641c448ea8d5bee glib-2.19.5.tar.bz2 (SRPM) $ rpmlint mingw32-glib2-2.19.5-2.fc11.src.rpm (SRPM) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-glib2-2.19.5-2.fc10.noarch.rpm (RPMS) mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmappedfile.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gloadableicon.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfilteroutputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcompletion.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gi18n-lib.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/grand.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfileenumerator.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gseekable.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfilterinputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gmountoperation.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gvolumemonitor.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gconvert.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcache.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/grel.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtimer.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gthread-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gregex.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gprintf.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gqueue.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmessages.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gbufferedinputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gsignal.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfileoutputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gioscheduler.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gmemoryoutputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/genums.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/glib-2.0.def mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/glist.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gicon.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gparam.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbase64.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gsourceclosure.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gslist.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/galloca.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gcancellable.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfilenamecompleter.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gpoll.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gsequence.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglib-2.0.la mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbacktrace.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdataset.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gioerror.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gmarshal.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gerror.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/giomodule.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/giochannel.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdate.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gbufferedoutputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmain.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghash.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gvalue.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gnativevolumemonitor.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gcontenttype.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgio-2.0.la mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gsimpleasyncresult.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gemblem.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gasyncresult.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gslice.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtype.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglib-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglib-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gchecksum.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgobject-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgobject-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gvfs.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gio-unix-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gkeyfile.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gio.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gclosure.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfileattribute.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/garray.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gvaluetypes.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgobject-2.0.la mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gscanner.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gobject-2.0.def mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmarkup.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfile.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgthread-2.0.la mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gshell.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfileicon.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gmemoryinputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gdatainputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gpattern.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gmodule-no-export-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gnode.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfileinfo.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib-object.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gfileutils.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobject.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gquark.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gi18n.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobjectnotifyqueue.c mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbookmarkfile.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgio-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgio-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gurifuncs.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtypemodule.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtypeplugin.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gappinfo.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gioenums.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgthread-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgthread-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gdataoutputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gprimes.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstrfuncs.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/goption.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gmodule.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/ginputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gspawn.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gemblemedicon.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gvaluearray.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/giotypes.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmem.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/goutputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gvolume.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghook.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gatomic.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gmodule-2.0.def mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gobject-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstring.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gwin32.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfilemonitor.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gmodule-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gboxed.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gthread-2.0.def mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gvaluecollector.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gio-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gioenumtypes.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdir.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gqsort.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gparamspecs.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gio-2.0.def mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gunicode.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gutils.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtree.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthread.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gfileinputstream.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthreadpool.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gmodule-export-2.0.pc mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gthemedicon.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gdrive.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/gio/gmount.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gasyncqueue.h mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgthread-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgio-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgobject-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglib-2.0.dll.a mingw32-glib2.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 145 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261403.n0QE3UiY015911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #11 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 09:03:28 EDT --- the rpmlint warning and error is ok for a mingw32 packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261403.n0QE3Zgo015956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 09:03:33 EDT --- Updates submitted https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-2.fc9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: <bug-467655-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467655-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261405.n0QE5Ceg016510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #31 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 09:05:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > So according to the newest blender.spec in devel (at least), we now have a > blender arch dependent plugins directory. > Once that said i'm not sure how it can be useful; specially if yafaray needs to > writte it's own configuration and content data. > You can look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 > for some discution with the blender maintainer. > > On your side, did you have improved the yafaray package. > Is it possible to have some clean patches adopted upstream so you don't needs > the tweaks in %prep ? No. Surprisinly enough, it still builds with today's snapshot. Unless you have another suggestion, I think everything is in its appropriate place. The problem is that I cannot test it in F10. I have an Intel card and, besides the performance being really poor, blender segfaults all the time. Using F8, however, I had no problem whatsoever. Can you test yafaray in F10? Regarding the patches, they can be done, but they would have to be Fedora independent, and I do not know how to select the architecture without using macros, such as %{_lib}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261410.n0QEAiMB017691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 09:10:42 EDT --- MUST: * package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines mingw32-* * spec file name match base package * package meet Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines * License field match the actual license. * available license(s) file(s) is included in %doc. * spec file is written in American English. * spec file is legible. * package compile on x86 * build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires * available locales handled properly. (%find_lang macro) * no shared libs * package not relocatable * package own all directories that it creates. * no duplicate files in the %files listing. * Permissions on files must be set properly. (%defattr(...) line) * %clean section present and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) * package is consistently using macros * package contain code, or permissable content * no large doc * %doc does not affect runtime * no headers (native) * no static libs * available pkgconfig(.pc) files 'Requires: pkgconfig' * no *.so.* libs * no -devel packages * package dont contain .la libtool archives. no native ones * not a GUI app. * no files or directories already owned by other packages. * %install begins with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) * filenames is valid UTF-8 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:28:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-472071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261428.n0QESja2021732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 --- Comment #5 from Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 09:28:44 EDT --- This is due (I think) to the conversion to the new python. The build works on dist-f10, but not for target dist-f11. I will dig into this a bit more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261431.n0QEV9Pf022423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER59Z021522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Bug 458254 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Bug 458254 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 458254 depends on bug 447740, which changed state. Bug 447740 Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: <bug-447740-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-447740-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER483021500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Bug 447740 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 447740 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #10 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:27:03 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261430.n0QEUTK7009847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 09:30:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-glib2 Short Description: MinGW Windows GLib2 library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261428.n0QESo8L009111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 09:28:48 EDT --- Tim, great again. Having glib in MinGW makes the project very much more useful. I guess I owe you several reviews now. A CVS request coming up ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261429.n0QETDd1009268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:29:12 EDT --- Again, this review depends on core ZYpp stack components which are not yet ported to RPM 4.6 and won't build. Closing and waiting until upstream adds support for RPM 4.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: <bug-442714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442714-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER2bs008700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) | --- Comment #41 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:26:56 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: <bug-447738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-447738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER4pa008765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) | Bug 447738 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #19 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:26:59 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER6kk008868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Bug 458254 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Bug 458254 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 458254 depends on bug 447740, which changed state. Bug 447740 Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: <bug-447738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-447738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER4cX008764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) | Bug 447738 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #19 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:26:59 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-458254-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER6Ub008871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Bug 458254 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Bug 458254 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 458254 depends on bug 447740, which changed state. Bug 447740 Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: <bug-447740-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-447740-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER5IO008835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Bug 447740 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 447740 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #10 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:27:03 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: <bug-447740-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-447740-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261427.n0QER5Fm008836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Bug 447740 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 447740 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #10 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani at binaryhelix.net> 2009-01-26 09:27:03 EDT --- Closing the request until upstream makes the necessary changes to libzypp to support RPM 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261433.n0QEXUTY010576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #15 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com> 2009-01-26 09:33:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Tim, great again. Having glib in MinGW makes the project > very much more useful. I guess I owe you several reviews now. > Just helping out :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] New: Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML Message-ID: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Summary: Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Code2HTML converts a program source code to syntax highlighted HTML. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/code2html.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/code2html-0.9.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:56:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261456.n0QEu3rt028948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #4 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-26 09:56:02 EDT --- Kevin, Thanks for the detailed comments, much appreciated. Updated SRPM: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/log4c/log4c-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/log4c/log4c.spec 1: The %check was there to remind me to tie in the built-in tests; however, they fail to run cleanly at the moment - indeed, with the current compiler flags, one crashes very nicely. I've removed this entirely for now; I suspect the tests needs to be reworked upstream before being useful here. 2, 3, 4: Thanks! 5: Well, it was optional, but the config parsing seems much more robust using Expat instead of the built-in grammar, so I've changed it to use that 6: Yes, indeed - I'll follow this up with the log4c guys 7: I'm going to disagree with you here ;) The .m4 file is there as a convenience for automake-using developers; you don't need to use automake to compile against log4c. E.g, I have a project here using CMake to build against log4c - it doesn't need that macro at all. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261433.n0QEXp8J023233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-26 09:33:50 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (edrip-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) The license patch in the spec file is a bit mysterious, so I had to dig CVS history to see why it was there in the first place. Could you please restore the spec file comments explaining the need for this patch? Or alternatively (if you don't want to litter the spec file with comments) put it in another FILE mentioned in the spec? No other comments, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261458.n0QEwuMv029786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 09:58:56 EDT --- At the begin of January the developer of libxnm told me that he have fixed the issue about exit(). But so far he haven't released a new version. I will made the cvs request but wait for the new release of libxnm, then incorporate your suggestions, and commit to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:59:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261459.n0QExks8029904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 09:59:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libxnm Short Description: A library for parsing the XNM format Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261500.n0QF0ZJM030405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 10:00:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-4.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Jan 26 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.8.0-4 - Disable freetype in configure so it doesn't break if freetype or fontconfig are actually installed. (Erik van Pienbroek). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:03:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261503.n0QF3FqG031092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 --- Comment #4 from Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> 2009-01-26 10:03:14 EDT --- Ok, looks good to me, approved. Now you have to wait for someone, who can sponsor you and give you an official review and approval. As for the license text, the package review guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) states that: "If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it." So, the license should be in a separate LICENSE file instead of being at the end of README.txt file. You are not required to do this, however, when you have time, contact upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261509.n0QF9htu020569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 10:09:42 EDT --- Unfortunately I deleted the spec file and the Source RPM at the mentioned location in Comment #2. Please be patient till the two files are back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261511.n0QFBTDo021410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 10:11:27 EDT --- I should probably check with Spot if the patch is still needed, upstream did imporve its licensing documentation lately Anyway: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apanov-edrip-fonts Short Description: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261517.n0QFHcYA022939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 10:17:37 EDT --- This is just updated to remove the unused rm -f in the install section: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261526.n0QFQUtt024940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 475018, which changed state. Bug 475018 Summary: Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472683-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261524.n0QFOU0q024212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 10:24:28 EDT --- Okay, now closing, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261525.n0QFPWZM024769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 474983, which changed state. Bug 474983 Summary: Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261526.n0QFQTvv024912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 10:26:27 EDT --- Now closing, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261525.n0QFPVFZ024739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 10:25:29 EDT --- Now closing, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261531.n0QFVoOv006145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 10:31:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1083165 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 368377696547026c79c51a274571dc39 latest.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Suggestions: 1) License is MIT(Modern Style with sublicense) not BSD. 2) use -p in install command to preserve timestamps. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481567] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings In-Reply-To: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261533.n0QFXKdB006293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 10:33:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1083163 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bddb5edbe0e3e325d84eb4e5c6a49e7d MooseX-Async-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.35 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Async-0.07-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(MooseX::Async) = 0.07 perl(MooseX::Async::Meta::Class) perl(MooseX::Async::Meta::Method::State) perl(MooseX::Async::Meta::Role) perl(MooseX::Async::Meta::Trait) Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(MooseX::Async::Meta::Method::State) perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261545.n0QFjkMd009438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Kay Sievers <kay.sievers at vrfy.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kay.sievers at vrfy.org --- Comment #9 from Kay Sievers <kay.sievers at vrfy.org> 2009-01-26 10:45:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > license field: from a brief look, it appears that probe-modem is GPLv2, while > the rest is GPLv2+. Might just be an oversight, worth checking with dcbw. If > it is not, the license field needs to reflect that Checked with dcbw, changed everything to "GPLv2 or later", like the main udev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261553.n0QFrGMR011160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 10:53:15 EDT --- Phew, that was a bit more complicated than I anticipated ... Here is an updated version which installs the optimized / native code version of spatch by default, and leaves the bytecode version for those poor platforms that have no code generator. Every Fedora platform should get the fast version in other words ... The native code spatch can be, and is, stripped. The Python 2.6 patch that I included earlier was a bit broken, this includes a corrected version of that patch. Menhir and pycaml and still built internally. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle-0.1.4-6.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Jan 26 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.1.4-6 - Install the shared library in _libdir. - Install the native code version if we have the optimizing compiler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261552.n0QFqFv0030429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-26 10:52:14 EDT --- Good: + Rpmlint is ok now. Bad: - Error message when uninstall package still occurs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261559.n0QFxvoS012457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 10:59:56 EDT --- Thanks, I have updated in accordance with both of points mentioned: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/code2html.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/code2html-0.9.1-2.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: code2html Short Description: Covert source code to HTML Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481567] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings In-Reply-To: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261615.n0QGF09f016002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 11:14:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Async Short Description: Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261632.n0QGWxwf020246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #9 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-26 11:32:58 EDT --- Hi Kevin, Thanks for taking a look at this! You're right about the version number - for some reason, I had assumed that this was a subsequent release to 3.0, but it appears not. I've updated the spec. to take into account the pre-release numbering: http://www.alexhudson.com/fedora/iniparser/iniparser.spec This is actually rpm-older than the previous version, but hopefully that's not really a problem at this point. Also, while this is "pre-release", iniparser seems to be developed quite slowly and conservatively, and I would expect most software that uses it would expect this more up-to-date version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261632.n0QGWfZl007396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Liang Suilong <liangsuilong at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |liangsuilong at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Liang Suilong <liangsuilong at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 11:32:40 EDT --- anyone can help me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] New: Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API Message-ID: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 Summary: Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: pygooglechart is a complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API. See http://pygooglechart.slowchop.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool In-Reply-To: <bug-473348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473348-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261655.n0QGtvIB025253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org> 2009-01-26 11:55:55 EDT --- Updated spec and srpm : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/drraw.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/drraw-2.2-0.2.b1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:54:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla In-Reply-To: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261654.n0QGshJe024847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla In-Reply-To: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261652.n0QGqUBB024524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-26 11:52:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Suggestions > 1) Good if you upload source to fedorahosted.org using command > scp -p Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03.tar.gz fedorahosted.org:camelus > which will give you source url as > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/a/camelus/Fedora-Bugzilla-0.03.tar.gz Thanks for that note -- I'll do that before importing :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla In-Reply-To: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261654.n0QGsg89011780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-26 11:54:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla Short Description: Access Fedora's Bugzilla Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365141] Review Request: iotop - Top like utility for I/O In-Reply-To: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261657.n0QGvhF7025611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365141 --- Comment #6 from Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 11:57:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: iotop New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: drago01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365141] Review Request: iotop - Top like utility for I/O In-Reply-To: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261658.n0QGwE3g012616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365141 Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: <bug-239883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-239883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261700.n0QH0uHw013339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 12:00:54 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: powertop New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: ajackson at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-431047-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-431047-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261702.n0QH2jjJ026791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 12:02:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: latencytop New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: michich -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261715.n0QHFn0U016842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 12:15:48 EDT --- This software is from 2005. Why do you need you still need this ? Why Fedora tools aren't enought for Adaptec support. (dmraid should support most hardware raid controller nowadays) Why is there patches not upstreamed in a newer release ? This package deserve a "-" (not maintained from an upstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:23:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261723.n0QHNpWo018465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #13 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 12:23:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Let me suggest that to force the resolution of the > issue, perhaps it is simplest for a sponsored reviewer to review the package. > If no packaging problems are found, accept the package. Once either cvs or > builds are requested, this might cause some opened eyes and lead to a FeSCO > discussion / decision, if anyone cares enough to reject it... "Just do it and see if anyone complains"? That seems a bit off. I'll raise this to FESCo and/or the Packaging committee, we'll get it sorted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261727.n0QHR6KJ019294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 12:27:05 EDT --- Please provide srpm, not binary rpm :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261729.n0QHTD9C019504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-26 12:29:11 EDT --- I dropped both projects a quick line outlining the issue and what we'd like from them. Both have the same head developer which makes it a bit easier. Unfortunately, both projects haven't seen a commit or release in many months or even some years...not sure if I'll get any answer at all and how much they're interested in changing licenses after such a long time. While all websites of those projects and the head developer's website on all his projects are pretty much outdated, his blog is still current...so we know at least the head developer is still alive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261727.n0QHRXcD019340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-26 12:27:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > This software is from 2005. Why do you need you still need this ? > Why Fedora tools aren't enought for Adaptec support. (dmraid should support > most hardware raid controller nowadays) I need this for an old Adaptec (formerly DPT) hardware RAID controller. Frankly I haven't tried using dmraid to access it. I'll investigate that. > Why is there patches not upstreamed in a newer release ? The patch from Debian is necessary to build this on recent Fedora. > This package deserve a "-" (not maintained from an upstream) There are many packages in Fedora where upstream is not active. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261740.n0QHetoh002200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 12:40:55 EDT --- Uh oh. Sorry, my bad! I uploaded the appropriate SRPM file to the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: <bug-467655-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467655-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261744.n0QHiFJj002742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #32 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-26 12:44:12 EDT --- I will notify you, that I have create a new package of blender (blender-2.48a-13) which a modivied release of blender-wrapper of rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-431047-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-431047-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261749.n0QHnlvU003872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 --- Comment #16 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 12:49:46 EDT --- Jeremy, please explain what you mean by the request. Are you willing to maintain the package in the new branches or do you expect me to do it? I have doubts about the usefulness of latencytop in EL-4 and EL-5 because their kernel do not have latencytop support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261759.n0QHxDwX025861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 12:59:12 EDT --- Okay, thank you for update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261759.n0QHxlPT026005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 12:59:46 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (libnss-pgsql) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261810.n0QIAat2028724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 13:10:35 EDT --- Okay, good. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (tse3) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261819.n0QIJ5Gm009819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 13:19:05 EDT --- Great. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tse3 Short Description: MIDI Sequencer Engine Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261823.n0QINirX031190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 13:23:43 EDT --- Okay, then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261832.n0QIWnj3012868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261851.n0QIpRGm016988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:53:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261853.n0QIrYcX017389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #42 from Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 13:53:29 EDT --- My bubzilla account problem is solved. I have the permission on the good account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261854.n0QIs6im017492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #43 from Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 13:54:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: backup-manager Short Description: A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261854.n0QIsor7006345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #13 from Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 13:54:49 EDT --- My bubzilla account problem is solved. I have the permission on the good account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261858.n0QIwLEw018462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261857.n0QIvlCK018403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #14 from Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 13:57:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-privacy-please Short Description: Security and Privacy plugin for Pidgin Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471520-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261858.n0QIwNRr018487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 13:58:22 EDT --- For 1.1-3: * License - License tag should be "LGPLv2+", not with "or Ruby". * duplicate files - Now build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------------- 49 Processing files: rubygem-simple-rss-1.1-3.fc11 50 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/simple-rss-1.1/README ------------------------------------------------------- One of the way to suppress this warning is: ------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %{geminstdir}/ %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* %{geminstdir}/*/ ------------------------------------------------------- ! By the way, please use macros consistently. You use both %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ and %{geminstdir} at %files, however these are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:57:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261857.n0QIvZb5007108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-26 13:57:34 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream: 7ccb4c831f9a33c14f6c6e599e1ac102 nullmodem-0.0.5.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. NOT OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: nullmodem = 0.0.5-1.fc11 nullmodem(x86-64) = 0.0.5-1.fc11 = libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. License tag should be GPL+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 19:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261903.n0QJ32UE008307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-26 14:03:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnss-pgsql Short Description: Name Service Switch library that interface with PostgreSQL Owners: madko Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 19:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261910.n0QJAupV021568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #12 from Robert Marcano <robert at marcanoonline.com> 2009-01-26 14:10:55 EDT --- Updated: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/trilead-ssh2/trilead-ssh2-213-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/trilead-ssh2/trilead-ssh2.spec Updated GCJ AOT to the latest guidelines (I still provides it even when people is starting to not generate it, OpenJDK still is not fully ported outside i386/x86_64 The only rpmlint warnings remaining are: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/trilead-ssh2-213/HISTORY.txt I think this is a rpmlint bug, the only char I see on that document outside the ASCII range is used for the name "Micha?l" and I see it without errors on UTF-8 non-standard-group Development Documentation This is as the Java packaging guidelines specfile template libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} The same, GCJ AOT packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 19:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474356-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261912.n0QJC2qg010293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #13 from Robert Marcano <robert at marcanoonline.com> 2009-01-26 14:12:01 EDT --- oops forgot, removed Obsoletes until eclipse-slide is updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 19:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261914.n0QJENXj010531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-26 14:14:20 EDT --- On with the final checklist :) $ rpmlint mingw32-cairo.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-4.fc11.noarch.rpm mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-win32.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-ps.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-deprecated.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.dll.a mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.dll.a mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-version.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-win32-font.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-win32.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-png.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-features.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.la mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-pdf.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/cairo/cairo-svg.h mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-svg.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-ps.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/cairo-pdf.pc mingw32-cairo.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcairo.dll.a mingw32-cairo.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 18 warnings. All these rpmlint warnings and errors can be ignored. You might want to fix the spurious-executable-perm warning, but this isn't a blocker for the review ------ $ curl http://cairographics.org/releases/cairo-1.8.0.tar.gz | md5sum % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 5529k 100 5529k 0 0 329k 0 0:00:16 0:00:16 --:--:-- 391k 4ea70ea87b47e92d318d4e7f5b940f47 - $ md5sum ../SOURCES/cairo-1.8.0.tar.gz 4ea70ea87b47e92d318d4e7f5b940f47 ../SOURCES/cairo-1.8.0.tar.gz ------ $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-cairo rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem >= 43 mingw32-runtime mingw32(gdi32.dll) mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libpixman-1-0.dll) mingw32(libpng12-0.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) mingw32(zlib1.dll) ----- + OK - Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= xx is in the .spec file [+] Requires are OK [+] BuildArch: noarch [+] No man pages or info files [+] No static libs [+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific ones [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [*] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [*] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %i install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [/] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [/] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [*] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Almost good, just a missing Requires: pkgconfig I trust you in fixing the Requires: pkgconfig before pushing this package in Fedora, so let's finish this review: =================================================== The package mingw32-cairo is approved by epienbro =================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 19:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: <bug-477144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261919.n0QJJJMj022958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 14:19:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cmakeed.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cmakeed-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) > Here's the review for this one. > > * The prebuilt binaries need removed in %prep > ./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/plugins/com.cthing.cmakeed.core_1.0.1.jar > ./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/plugins/com.cthing.cmakeed.ui_1.0.1.jar > ./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/features/com.cthing.cmakeed.feature_1.0.1.jar > Fixed. > * I believe that > ./com.cthing.cmakeed.ui/doc/* > should go to %doc. These don't end up in the RPM otherwise, right? No. This is documentation that is part of com.cting.cmakeed.ui_*.jar and is the documentation shown inside the editor. > > * Please make the description span across 80 columns. It'll look nicer. Fixed. > > * Macros should be used consistently. You use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > mixed. This needs corrected. You should also use %{__install} for consistency. Fixed. > > * Please make use of the %{version} macro, e.g. in Source0 Fixed. > > * Latest version must be packaged. Please update to 1.1.1 Fixed. Updated to version 1.1.2. > > * There is no license file in the sources. The upstream should be notified to > include a license file. Fixed. Upstream released new version with License.html in it for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 19:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901261956.n0QJuY2n019248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 14:56:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: crda Short Description: Owners: linville Branches: F-10 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479866-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262000.n0QK0N28031127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 15:00:22 EDT --- This is now built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262003.n0QK3THl031906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 15:03:28 EDT --- Thanks Erik. I've added the 'Requires: pkgconfig' to my local copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262002.n0QK2TgO020593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #9 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 15:02:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: crda Short Description: Regulatory compliance daemon for 802.11 wireless networking Owners: linville Branches: F-10 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262001.n0QK1uBm020519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #8 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 15:01:56 EDT --- Ugh...forgot description... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: crda Short Description: Regulatory compliance daemon for 802.11 wireless networking Owners: linville Branches: F-10 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262004.n0QK4t30020867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 15:04:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-cairo Short Description: MinGW Windows Cairo library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262017.n0QKH3oU002233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-26 15:17:02 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file patches with package name + Package name fits naming guidelines + Package is written in English + Could download upstream package via spectoll -g + Package contains the most current release of the software + Source tar ball in package matches with upstream (md5sum: ec6e1ddd678485c7971c8c0b5dd3cec6) + Package contains no patches + Package has proper BRs + Package will build as noarch + Package contains a valid license tag + GPLv3+ is a valid OSS license + consistently usage of rpm macros. + Package contains no subpackages + Small %doc stanza, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Local buidl works fine + Local install works fine + Try to run the samples scripts works fine + Locel uninstall works fine + Build on koni works fine + Rpmlint is silent on SRPM and binary rpm. + Buildroot will been cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Package contains %clean stanza + Files have proper files permission + All files belong to the package + No files from the package is claimed by an other package. + Proper %changelog Bad: - Upstream package contains a verbatin package of the license text which was no put into the %doc stanza - I have found a test/test.py files, so it may be nice, if you can create a %check stanza in which this script may be execute as a testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479585-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262022.n0QKMSYq003515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #22 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-26 15:22:27 EDT --- ??? There was somethin going wrong with me. Please ignore comment #21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262024.n0QKOrnZ025175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262042.n0QKgHJb007921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262042.n0QKgJoD008010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262042.n0QKgIW9007967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262045.n0QKjqHg029749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262059.n0QKxtYW011561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sven at lank.es Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 15:59:54 EDT --- You have the wrong source archive and the review link in your wiki page is not pointing here. The rest of the package is perfect and you're an experienced packager so I'll approve anyway but do make sure you push the right font in koji. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262113.n0QLDuk5003339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-26 16:13:55 EDT --- Surprise, surprise! I got an answer in short time and the head developer (Fred) replied that he was under the impression that everything is already licensed under ASL 2.0 (for both packages). He said, that if I provide him a list with the files with a different license he'll happily change those to ASL 2.0. So, the question now is: what's the easiest way to create a list of all files showing each file's license? Or can this only be done manually? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262120.n0QLKNRM005017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-26 16:20:22 EDT --- licensecheck.pl does a pretty good job as a first iteration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262125.n0QLPDPY017169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #14 from David Timms <dtimms at iinet.net.au> 2009-01-26 16:25:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > "Just do it and see if anyone complains"? That seems a bit off. Perhaps I could have written more clearly, "if a reviewer helps to make sure that there is no non-conforming parts of the spec, then at least a committee decision wouldn't be made confused by such issues." > I'll raise this to FESCo and/or the Packaging committee, we'll get it sorted. Excellent, thanks Bill. I also see that someone blocked on FELegal, but I'm not sure what issue they are concerned about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262133.n0QLXVxe007215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-26 16:33:30 EDT --- > I also see that someone blocked on FELegal, but I'm not sure what issue they > are concerned about. vmware is a registered trademark, we need authorization to use this name ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262146.n0QLksRA010286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> 2009-01-26 16:46:53 EDT --- Thank you for another font review, Nicolas. I have already fixed the issues you noted and uploaded an updated spec. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts Short Description: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262156.n0QLuvwk012511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 16:56:56 EDT --- The files are back... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262210.n0QMA1Wj014969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:10:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481494-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262214.n0QMEgTP027374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:14:40 EDT --- Please include all the info you would with a new package request moving forward? (It's a pain to have to look up the Short description everytime) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262215.n0QMFbxf016447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:15:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262219.n0QMJJ5B028344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:19:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262220.n0QMKSSe017318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:20:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262218.n0QMIWUI016722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:18:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262221.n0QMLQ6D017492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:21:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262225.n0QMPUQd030021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:25:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server In-Reply-To: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481410-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262224.n0QMOWUD029587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:24:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481288] Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation In-Reply-To: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481288-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262222.n0QMMTnS017683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:22:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262229.n0QMTWSP030846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:29:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481567] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings In-Reply-To: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262228.n0QMSLrY018828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:28:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects In-Reply-To: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481544-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262226.n0QMQtjL018581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:26:54 EDT --- perl-sig cannot be a co-maintainer. cvs done without that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] New: Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. Message-ID: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Summary: Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian.deutsch at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc-0.52-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The xmlenc library is a fast stream-based XML output library for Java. http//xmlenc.sf.net My first java package. I've used the non standard group Development/Libraries/Java. But rpmlint doesn't show more errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262239.n0QMdLBZ021017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262239.n0QMdG26020991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:39:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262242.n0QMgaWJ001387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Mike McCune <mmccune at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262243.n0QMhfDY022160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:43:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262245.n0QMjMaU022794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:45:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262245.n0QMjKpV022723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-26 17:45:19 EDT --- One small issue is related to ant. I get the following warning when running rpmbuild -ba: jar: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/xmlenc-0.52/build/classes/main [javac] Compiling 11 source files to /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/xmlenc-0.52/build/classes/main [javac] [javac] WARNING [javac] [javac] The -source switch defaults to 1.5 in JDK 1.5 and 1.6. [javac] If you specify -target 1.3 you now must also specify -source 1.3. [javac] Ant will implicitly add -source 1.3 for you. Please change your build file. [jar] Building jar: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/xmlenc-0.52/build/xmlenc.jar I actually don't know how to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481668] New: Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. Message-ID: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmccune at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, dennis at ausil.us, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmccune.fedorapeople.org/spacewalk-koan-0.1.6/spacewalk-koan.spec SRPM URL: http://mmccune.fedorapeople.org/spacewalk-koan-0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: spacewalk-koan is python code that serves as a bridge between Spacewalk's client side functionality and the koan package. It allows users in Spacewalk's web application to direct a client to kickstart itself or a virtual machine through the use of the koan command. This is part of the client-side spacewalk tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262249.n0QMntBS002884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: 2bc-fonts - |Review Request: |A stylized font |chisholm-to-be-continued-fo | |nts - A stylized font Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:49:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262248.n0QMmfbI002656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 17:48:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-andika-fonts Short Description: A font for literacy and beginning readers Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with one another. A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika addresses those issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262247.n0QMljcp023178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-26 17:47:44 EDT --- COPYING says GPLv2, source header not specified, index.html says GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262246.n0QMkreO023010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:46:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:50:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262250.n0QMo2tq023915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 17:50:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apanov-edrip-fonts Short Description: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Edrip font is a contrast sans-serif font. It is based on the Teams font released on 2000 by TopTeam Co. Edrip contains symbols for basic Cyrillic and Latin alphabets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262250.n0QMoRVF024093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-26 17:50:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-charis-fonts Short Description: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Owners: nim kevin roozbeh Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles ? regular, italic, bold, bold italic ? and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262253.n0QMrvPO003884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:53:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262256.n0QMu7gv025147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:56:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262252.n0QMqt3J024495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:52:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262256.n0QMukLo004635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262259.n0QMxmKF004935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 17:59:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262302.n0QN2ADg005891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-26 18:02:09 EDT --- Just fixed this, we have to set javac.targetvm at build time. http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc.spec http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc-0.52-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features In-Reply-To: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262303.n0QN3A2w006029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 18:03:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262306.n0QN64rA027751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-26 18:06:02 EDT --- Okay. Here's a second package: xmlenc, a java xml library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla In-Reply-To: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262304.n0QN4LU8027000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 18:04:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262301.n0QN1wYV026716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 18:01:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262305.n0QN5MnU027617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-26 18:05:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-2.fc11.src.rpm Release number changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365141] Review Request: iotop - Top like utility for I/O In-Reply-To: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262306.n0QN6j51027883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365141 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 18:06:43 EDT --- iotop requires python 2.5, which neither EL4 nor EL5 have. Did you find some way to port it back to previous python versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262305.n0QN5JED027561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 18:05:17 EDT --- F-8 is end of life and no longer supported. cvs done otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: <bug-239883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-239883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262308.n0QN8gk2007205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-26 18:08:39 EDT --- Ajax: did you want to maintain this in EPEL? Does it work with the RHEL kernels? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262349.n0QNn3Nf015595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #16 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-26 18:49:02 EDT --- Itamar, please remove the legal block. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262346.n0QNkpO6015367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-26 18:46:49 EDT --- licensecheck.pl only recognizes four different types of 'licenses' in l2fprod-common and l2fprod-skinlf: - Apache (v2.0) - UNKNOWN - GENERATED FILE - *No copyright* GENERATED FILE Is it safe to say anything not ASL 2.0 is ASL 1.1? Some should be zlib according to Mamoru, though. I'm _really_ bad with licenses and need some help here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-467854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262352.n0QNqgKr016473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 18:52:40 EDT --- it seems that the package is in F-10 and built in F-8/F-9 Can this bug be closed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901262354.n0QNsNgN005732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 John Matthews <jmatthew at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmatthew at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481676] New: blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. Message-ID: <bug-481676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481676 Summary: blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: blender AssignedTo: jochen at herr-schmitt.de ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, jochen at herr-schmitt.de, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 458090 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #458090 +++ --- Additional comment from kwizart at gmail.com on 2009-01-20 15:15:01 EDT --- @Jochen btw. I have a very bad problem with the way blender create the ~/.blender directory nowadays. the main issue is that directories created with the "blender-wrapper" script are set root:root even in /home/user directories. Can we be more in shape with what upstream does in this area ? --- Additional comment from jochen at herr-schmitt.de on 2009-01-20 15:34:44 EDT --- I have a look on my own system. On my system the .blender directory is owned by my onw userid. The Directory should be create on the first start of blender. --- Additional comment from kwizart at gmail.com on 2009-01-20 15:55:30 EDT --- ------------------------ LuxBlend v0.5 WARNING: LuxPath "" is not valid Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/bpymodules/BPyRegistry.py", line 267, in SaveConfigData raise Warning(e) # Resend exception as warning Warning: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/home/kwizart/.blender/scripts/bpydata/config/luxblend.cfg' ------------------------ And as ~/.blender/scripts/bpydata/readme.txt say.the bpydata directory is a place for plugin to put their data into. Unfortunately, in the current state of the blender-wrapper script, it is a symlink to /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata, hence, cannot be written unless root. I don't know if there is a solution that can avoid to duplicate the system plugins while allowing for system plugins to write their data into by-users directory. Can we just patch the config directory for python plugin instead ? (so both system/users and arch/noarches plugins can use the same config directory?). --- Additional comment from kwizart at gmail.com on 2009-01-20 16:52:52 EDT --- This is not easy: - to ease the installation of the LuxBlend plugin, I should put a luxrender.cfg into /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata/config/luxblend.cfg and that file need to be transferred to the user directory even if the ~/.blender directory was already created but not if the luxrender.cfg file is already present. Will you accept extensions to your blender-wrapper script ? Something like: for f in /etc/blender-wrapper.d ; do sh ${f} done --- Additional comment from jochen at herr-schmitt.de on 2009-01-21 12:29:01 EDT --- I don't unterstand you issue: I have done the following: 1.) Build your package locally. 2.) Install it 3.) Start blender, so the wrapper script should create the symlinks 4.) View the ~/.blender/scripts directory I have got the following expected result: lrwxrwxrwx 1 s4504kr s4504kr 42 21. Jan 18:24 LuxBlend_0.1.py -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 s4504kr s4504kr 43 21. Jan 18:24 LuxBlend_0.1.pyc -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.pyc lrwxrwxrwx 1 s4504kr s4504kr 43 21. Jan 18:24 LuxBlend_0.1.pyo -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.pyo --- Additional comment from kwizart at gmail.com on 2009-01-21 12:44:49 EDT --- that's not what will append for real: 1- As the per user ~/.blender directory is already created no more files will be copied to the user directory. 2- Nobody wants to write on LuxBlend_0.1.py?. Instead what the plugin expects is to write in its config directory and in its content directory. (see the readme.txt). Please note that the permission you have showed are the perm of the symlinks, not the perms of the files. --- Additional comment from jochen at herr-schmitt.de on 2009-01-21 12:53:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > that's not what will append for real: > 1- As the per user ~/.blender directory is already created no more files will > be copied to the user directory. Sorry, On eatch start of blender there will be creating symlink from ~/.blnder/scripts to /usr/share/blender/scripts. > 2- Nobody wants to write on LuxBlend_0.1.py?. Instead what the plugin expects > is to write in its config directory and in its content directory. (see the > readme.txt). I can't find your readme.txt file --- Additional comment from kwizart at gmail.com on 2009-01-21 13:16:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > that's not what will append for real: > > 1- As the per user ~/.blender directory is already created no more files will > > be copied to the user directory. > > Sorry, On eatch start of blender there will be creating symlink from > ~/.blnder/scripts to /usr/share/blender/scripts. It depends on where you consider your error is, so as you like: but quoting blender-wrapper: When "" if [ ! -d ~/.blender ]; then "" install -d ~/.blender/scripts ln -sf /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata ~/blender/scripts/bpydata ^^ this part is wrong - and a misunderstanding of what bpydata and bpydata/config directories are (namely the content and configuration directories for scripts that are meant to be user <<<writable>>>). But there is a typo (blender instead of .blender) so it doesn't work anyway. Then,: rm -r ~/.blender/scripts/*.p* Why end-users aren't allowed to have their own scripts ? > > 2- Nobody wants to write on LuxBlend_0.1.py?. Instead what the plugin expects > > is to write in its config directory and in its content directory. (see the > > readme.txt). > > I can't find your readme.txt file rpm -ql blender |grep readme.txt I'm still unsure of the accurate solution, so it is just workinprogress thoughts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270017.n0R0Heo8021047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #13 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-26 19:17:37 EDT --- > - Well, are /var/run/milter and /var/log/milter directories supposed to be > used also by other applications than pymilter? The /var/run/milter, /var/log/milter, /usr/lib/pymilter directories and start.sh are not used at all by pymilter. They are simply there so that some package can own them, and since all python milters use pymilter, it made sense to put them there. However, not all python milters use those directories, so maybe it doesn't make sense. > On Fedora there are already some srpms named *milter*. Would > you know why none of these packages own these two directories? > If you are unsure, I think it is better that these two directories > should be owned by pymilter. Milters can be written in any language - C being the most popular. Only milters written in Python use pymilter. And even those don't necessarily use the log and run directories provided. Now I am leaning toward removing the %config flag from start.sh and leaving things the way they are otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270021.n0R0L4kw010740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #14 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-26 19:21:03 EDT --- It just occurred to me that maybe /var/run/milter should be renamed to /var/run/pymilter and likewise for /var/log/milter. But since no other package has claimed them, maybe I won't (since it would involve changes to my dependent packages). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481676] blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. In-Reply-To: <bug-481676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270025.n0R0PeIN011680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481676 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 19:25:39 EDT --- Bug cloned as this problem deserves it's own bug report: Testing the blender-wraper script from 2.48a-13 devel cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481681] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style Message-ID: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481681 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute/perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute/perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to declare class attributes in exactly the same way as object attributes, using class_has() instead of has(). You can use any feature of Moose's attribute declarations, including overriding a parent's attributes, delegation (handles), and attribute metaclasses, and it should just work. The one exception is the "required" flag, which is not allowed for class attributes. The accessor methods for class attribute may be called on the class directly, or on objects of that class. Passing a class attribute to the constructor will not set it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270041.n0R0fhOu025381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-26 19:41:40 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning but does not apply to Sugar OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ?????? SOURCE1: sugar-connect-checkout.sh ?????? Not sure what the purpose of this is. Not used during the creation of the SRPM or build process. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Have a question in regards to the purpose behind SOURCE1 in the SPEC file. Everything else looks good. Will await an answer for final approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270044.n0R0if1S014724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475971] Review Request: gadget - MPP server component for tracking presence In-Reply-To: <bug-475971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475971-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270046.n0R0kwjr015349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475971 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |needinfo?(mpg at redhat.com) --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-26 19:46:56 EDT --- Marco, do you have an updated SPEC to correct the 2 points mentioned. Please update so the review can be completed. Thanks Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481681] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style In-Reply-To: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270108.n0R189xj030231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481681 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-26 20:08:07 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: cc2a9c7d7d76397230b6b8fecedca7fb14aed921 MooseX-ClassAttribute-0.07.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] "make test" passes Obs: It does not make much sense to %define something and use it in just one place. I assume you wanted to shorten the Source line, but you might just as well use %{tarname} in the URL I suggest to remove the commented "perl_vendorarch" lines, they are as useless as they could be. ======== APPROVED ======== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270109.n0R19521019382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-26 20:09:04 EDT --- needs to use system defined macros. needs proper obsoletes/provides instead of the conflict needs full url to the source tarball rhel version check needs fixing own directories created. hey all need adressing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270111.n0R1BqFn031185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel |fedora-review+ |ess.net) | --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-26 20:11:51 EDT --- Did some wiki digging and found the answer to my question. Everything looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270114.n0R1EV5h031507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at shallowcreek.net> 2009-01-26 20:14:30 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning but does not apply to Sugar OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Everything looks good. Build Ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270120.n0R1KgB4000476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 20:20:41 EDT --- Hmm, no idea. it works for me. is it added to /usr/share/info/dir when the package is installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270122.n0R1MLxx021975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 --- Comment #2 from Mike McCune <mmccune at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 20:22:20 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://mmccune.fedorapeople.org/spacewalk-koan-0.1.7/spacewalk-koan.spec SRPM URL: http://mmccune.fedorapeople.org/spacewalk-koan-0.1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481681] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style In-Reply-To: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270122.n0R1MBvr021935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481681 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 20:22:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute Short Description: Declare class attributes Moose-style Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:21:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270121.n0R1LrAY021884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-26 20:21:52 EDT --- are you sure you want to submit this? the standard "date" command does everything this tool does, and much much more. info date -> examples for a quick grasp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kCVj005410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:46:11 EDT --- python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kWjR005500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kUZM026522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:46:29 EDT --- pax-utils-0.1.17-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kJSj026478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:46:18 EDT --- xtvd-2.0.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kFqa026443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1khr4005644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:46:37 EDT --- mldonkey-2.9.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pULK007658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:51:29 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469265-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270148.n0R1msDi006506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:48:53 EDT --- pax-utils-0.1.17-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nI6o006564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:49:17 EDT --- ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270150.n0R1oZOG028340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:50:34 EDT --- procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270150.n0R1ocFr007352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kvF7005799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:46:56 EDT --- TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270150.n0R1o6HW007096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pIrW028627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:51:17 EDT --- mpop-1.0.16-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pLuS007600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475018-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pBn5028593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:51:10 EDT --- xtvd-2.0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nQqS027468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:49:25 EDT --- TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1n4bU027371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:49:02 EDT --- mnemosyne-1.1.1-3.r1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kpvH005756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:46:50 EDT --- raddump-0.3.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update raddump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0951 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478553-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270150.n0R1o39N027991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:50:02 EDT --- perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1p5v8028523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:51:04 EDT --- dateshift-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dateshift'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nYOk027509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:49:34 EDT --- raddump-0.3.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update raddump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nLTP006602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils In-Reply-To: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472066-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nubb027664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:49:55 EDT --- python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270146.n0R1kkrL005718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270148.n0R1mi2S027288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:48:43 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.10.beta4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmsn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270147.n0R1lp7u026880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:47:49 EDT --- httping-1.2.9-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update httping'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1n7J0027408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459800-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270147.n0R1ljcm026835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:47:43 EDT --- python-py-0.9.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-py'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0968 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270147.n0R1l7Qw005844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:47:06 EDT --- viking-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update viking'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0956 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471145-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270155.n0R1tTHT009424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:55:28 EDT --- procinfo-ng-2.0.217-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475107-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rUg7008670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:53:29 EDT --- guiloader-c++-2.13.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481070-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rJn9008622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:53:18 EDT --- ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rB8j008586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:53:10 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478660-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rw1r008746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:53:57 EDT --- dateshift-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dateshift'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270155.n0R1tQdR009402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:55:25 EDT --- perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Devel-SmallProf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481004-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270152.n0R1qL64008359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:52:20 EDT --- pg_top-3.6.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pg_top'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rfub029911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:53:40 EDT --- mldonkey-2.9.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481257-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270155.n0R1tJHC009349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:55:18 EDT --- perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Devel-SmallProf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-461929-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270154.n0R1sbVX030114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:54:36 EDT --- mnemosyne-1.1.1-3.r1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: <bug-239883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-239883-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270156.n0R1uYAn031133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 --- Comment #13 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 20:56:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Does it work with the RHEL kernels? Not particularly well. No RHEL kernel is built with CONFIG_NO_HZ, which means the interrupt list will be dominated by the 'normal' timer interrupt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes In-Reply-To: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478412-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270156.n0R1uH78031063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:56:16 EDT --- mpop-1.0.16-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270155.n0R1t2Ul030475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:55:01 EDT --- mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: <bug-477567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270152.n0R1qDjJ029488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:52:12 EDT --- nload-0.7.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270156.n0R1uQR6009934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:56:23 EDT --- msp430-binutils-2.19-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update msp430-binutils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pnKB028843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:51:48 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478662-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pqkx028946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270155.n0R1tvhN030893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:55:56 EDT --- viking-0.9.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update viking'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478398-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270152.n0R1quCG029743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:52:55 EDT --- httping-1.2.9-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update httping'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1008 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270155.n0R1t5JM030519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1r45b029789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-26 20:53:03 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.10.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libmsn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1012 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 02:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365141] Review Request: iotop - Top like utility for I/O In-Reply-To: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270226.n0R2QBY7016487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365141 --- Comment #8 from Jeremy West <jwest at redhat.com> 2009-01-26 21:26:10 EDT --- Kevin, No I did not. Just cancel this request. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 02:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270234.n0R2YRQJ017649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #15 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-26 21:34:25 EDT --- Kept start.sh and dirs, but removed config flag. Removed INSTALLED_FILES Spaced changelog Two changes for RHEL controlled by RHEL flag (redefine __python and require minimum python/sendmail versions). New SRPM: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 02:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481668-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270235.n0R2ZXjJ018067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-26 21:35:32 EDT --- builds fine in mock uses macros consistently Requires/Obsoletes/Provides are sane Would be nice to add a copy of the license in the tarball and include it in the docs would quieten down rpmlint spacewalk-koan.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. sha1sum spacewalk-koan-0.1.6.tar.gz ../SOURCES/spacewalk-koan-0.1.6.tar.gz de6fde08a8cf821bfc7f4f10adc17c6dcfbfac89 spacewalk-koan-0.1.6.tar.gz de6fde08a8cf821bfc7f4f10adc17c6dcfbfac89 ../SOURCES/spacewalk-koan-0.1.6.tar.gz once rhn-check is in ill approve this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 02:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270235.n0R2ZJoB006872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #16 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> 2009-01-26 21:35:18 EDT --- Kept start.sh and dirs, but removed config flag. Removed INSTALLED_FILES Spaced changelog Two changes for RHEL controlled by RHEL flag (redefine __python and require minimum python/sendmail versions). New SRPM: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 03:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270300.n0R300pR022438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-26 21:59:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Surprise, surprise! I got an answer in short time and the head developer (Fred) > replied that he was under the impression that everything is already licensed > under ASL 2.0 (for both packages). He said, that if I provide him a list with > the files with a different license he'll happily change those to ASL 2.0. Thanks you for feedback. I will post on this bug the list of the files which needs license change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 02:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270257.n0R2vllg011066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 21:57:45 EDT --- Images have different licenses. For image license breakdown check image_LICENSE.txt file. Except enthought/traits/ui/editors_gen.py which is GPLv2+ all remaining source or image files are in BSD 3-clause license. Confirmed from upstream. They will fix all concerned issues and include license blocks in source locks where it has been missing in future releases. I have kept a note of about different licenses and where more information can be found on just top of license tag which is: BSD and EPL and LGPLv2 and GPLv2+ %changelog * Tue Jan 27 2009 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh at fedoraproject.org> 3.0.2-2 - Fixed permissions for ctraits.so and _speedups.so - Fixed license after confirming from upstream SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-Traits.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-Traits-3.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 03:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270317.n0R3HGJU015394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 03:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270326.n0R3QOAl017510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 --- Comment #2 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-26 22:26:23 EDT --- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart.spec Updated per your requests. Note the %check section will skip some test because from what I could tell PyQrCodec is not packaged for for Fedora, so I couldn't make it a BR. Everything builds fine and all other tests (and the test file in general) do pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481695] New: Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI Message-ID: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description : The TraitsBackendQt project contains an implementation of TraitsGUI using PyQt. It provides Qt-based support for visualization and editing of Traits-based objects. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsBackendQt.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Need for Mayavi packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270528.n0R5SpvO019181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-27 00:28:50 EDT --- 1. ok. You can always add a comment reminding yourself to add the check when it's working. 2, 3, 4: All look good. 5. ok. Sounds good. 6. Sounds good. 7. Sadly, thats not going to pass guidelines: MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. I think your choices are: - Requires: automake - Split the .m4 file into a subpackage (log4c-automake?) and Requires: automake there. - Move the .m4 file over to being a %doc file. - Don't ship the .m4 file at all. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270544.n0R5iKxG015549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-27 00:44:19 EDT --- Paragraph 9 of COPYING: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing says: "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 06:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270649.n0R6n1jO027040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 01:49:01 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-Traits-3.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsBackendQt.spec Fixed license after confirming from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-452584-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270700.n0R70nQ3029175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #41 from Naveed Hasan <naveed at cs.columbia.edu> 2009-01-27 02:00:47 EDT --- FYI, MLDonkey 2.9.7 was released last week - http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=29072 http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=156414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481472-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78juU030616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481476-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78lmN030696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481478-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78n9M030767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-467854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270802.n0R82TLU013958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: <bug-472676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270804.n0R84KHj008619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481482] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 In-Reply-To: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270808.n0R883aJ015043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481482 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 03:08:01 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 0d94cc39ac646175ad38451ef752e982 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1085238 OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Please remove the empty lines from description before build. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270809.n0R89Go1009767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #8 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-27 03:09:15 EDT --- thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270809.n0R897sK009719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #31 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-01-27 03:09:06 EDT --- Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481701] New: Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework Message-ID: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The TraitsGUI project contains a toolkit-independent GUI abstraction layer (known as Pyface), which is used to support the "visualization" features of the Traits package. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsGUI.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Need for Mayavi packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:26:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270826.n0R8QKvV018604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 03:26:18 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 6da4d203440470d2709f3894e648b4aa OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. FAIL specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs. buildroot - use only one of these macros OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. FAIL license field matches the actual license. - You can find GPLv3+ in COPYING and PKG-INFO OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270851.n0R8pccD023337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 03:51:38 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsBackendQt.spec pasted wrong spec earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270853.n0R8raMq018269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 03:53:36 EDT --- About automake .m4 file: My recognition is that we have not reached consensus yet about whether every packaging shipping aclocal .m4 files should have "Requires: automake" or not. c.f. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-October/msg00046.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270852.n0R8qDwm018091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 03:52:12 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsGUI.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 09:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270919.n0R9JPVL029246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #2 from Tim Jackson <rpm at timj.co.uk> 2009-01-27 04:19:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you follow the packaging source url guidelines ? Sure, I can't imagine why that's not there - must have been having a bad day or something when I originally wrote the spec. Updated. > Can you merge this 2 lines in only one ? > > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} > install -m 755 bind-to-tinydns $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ > > something like this > install -Dp -m 755 bind-to-tinydns $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/bind-to-tinydns Yes, but it's unnecessary. However I've changed it to avoid any debate. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 09:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270929.n0R9TSLt025717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #7 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-27 04:29:27 EDT --- Guys, Thanks very much for the comments - I have a better appreciation of the automake issue now; I had just thought about it in terms of "what dependencies are needed to develop?" instead of the technical directory ownership issue. It does seem on the face of it that moving /usr/share/aclocal to filesystem would be a good idea, or at least some new automake-macros package which can then be required and not bring in the entire automake system. However, that's obviously something which needs agreement project-wide. So in that context, I suspect the best solution right now is Requires: automake. It solves the guideline issue, and it's consistent with other -devel packages. I can put a comment in the spec. about keeping a weather-eye out for changes to that, but I imagine there would be some mass bug-posting if that changed anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 09:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270950.n0R9o7rS030043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 04:50:05 EDT --- This activity is more or less working on Fedora. Some examples/scripts need olpcgames. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 09:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901270947.n0R9lv7t029462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 04:47:56 EDT --- Thanks Steven for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > ?????? SOURCE1: sugar-connect-checkout.sh ?????? > Not sure what the purpose of this is. Not used during the creation of the SRPM > or build process. This is the script to checkout the source code from the VCS. The reason why this is 'SOURCE1' is that everybody, especially the reviewer, is able to checkout the source the same way as I did. I know it is a bit unusual but this way I can reuse it easily and it's part of the Source RPM. The bug about the release tarball is open for three months now. https://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271000.n0RA0IAs005842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 05:00:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-imageviewer Short Description: Simple image viewer for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481521-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271000.n0RA0gai032429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 05:00:41 EDT --- After a short test it shows that this activity is working on Fedora. I think that the sound is not working if there is any. Same problem as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271002.n0RA2x8t006619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 05:02:58 EDT --- The license text may be found at the end of the README file. If you need it to be in a separate file I grant you permission to copy it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271001.n0RA1ovq006436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 05:01:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-connect Short Description: Connect for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271003.n0RA3YCv000476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 --- Comment #6 from Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 05:03:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The license text may be found at the end of the README file. If you need it to > be in a separate file I grant you permission to copy it there. ps. I am the author of webunit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271037.n0RAbgUO013679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #6 from Jerome Soyer <saispo at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 05:37:41 EDT --- Hi, excuse me i'm away for a couple of days. I see the error but haven't got any 64bits machine to test, it's due to %{_lib} in chmod command under 64bits which try to use /usr/lib64 and all python-bicyclerpair files are un /usr/lib. I think i must patch the setup.py or something else. Will see. Thanks for the build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271101.n0RB1URu012614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Efremov <iefremov at unipro.ru> 2009-01-27 06:01:28 EDT --- Note: this is my first package in fedora so I need a sponsorship -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] New: Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite Message-ID: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Summary: Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iefremov at unipro.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM URL: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: Review is needed for UGENE - complex bioinformatics toolkit based on Qt. Unipro UGENE is a cross-platform visual environment for DNA and protein sequence analysis. UGENE integrates the most important bioinformatics computational algorithms and provides an easy-to-use GUI for performing complex analysis of the genomic data. One of the main features of UGENE is a designer for custom bioinformatics workflows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-462311-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271059.n0RAxT6m011802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> 2009-01-27 05:59:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > This software is from 2005. Why do you need you still need this ? > > Why Fedora tools aren't enought for Adaptec support. (dmraid should support > > most hardware raid controller nowadays) > > I need this for an old Adaptec (formerly DPT) hardware RAID controller. Frankly > I haven't tried using dmraid to access it. I'll investigate that. OK, I've checked dmraid and it seems to support only various fakeRAID "controllers". Adaptec/DPT 2400A is a real hardware RAID and raidutils are necessary to monitor and manage it without rebooting and entering controller BIOS setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271107.n0RB7aLD013987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Ivan Efremov <iefremov at unipro.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271135.n0RBZvkl020132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] New: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin Message-ID: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Setuptools plugin that automates building of docs from ReST source. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-setupdocs.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-setupdocs-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Required for packaging Mayavi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271158.n0RBw5iq031976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271158.n0RBw6QX032000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271159.n0RBx41u024953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #24 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-27 06:59:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > http://qmail.kldp.org/src/patches/glibc-2.3.1/daemontools-0.76.errno.patch is it different than saying -include /usr/include/errno.h? > but if you want to use patch there are no problem, but create one patch for > each change for example. Are you kidding, one patch for each change? May I know what's the advantage of doing that?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271202.n0RC2eZO025991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #25 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-27 07:02:39 EDT --- > sed -i -e \ > "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -include /usr/include/errno.h!" > src/conf-cc > sed -i -e \ > "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}!" src/conf-ld Yeah, may be that looks clean. But still I fail to see how it is helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271207.n0RC7C8e001562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481727 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481727] New: Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework Message-ID: <bug-481727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 481725 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Envisage is a Python-based framework for building extensible applications, that is, applications whose functionality can be extended by adding "plug-ins". Envisage provides a standard mechanism for features to be added to an application, whether by the original developer or by someone else. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-EnvisageCore.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Need for Mayavi package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271214.n0RCEWQD003308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 07:14:31 EDT --- Some quick comments on your spec file - Please place the changelog section at the end of the file. It's not wrong just unusual. - Please add the dist tag to Release -> 'Release: 1%{?dist}' - You don't need to define macros at the beginning of the file. 'Name:' and 'Version:' are already macros. But you must use macros in the %files section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros - Please preserve the time stamps, use ' make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" ' if possible instead of ' make install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} ' - This application has a GUI. You need to install the .desktop file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files - COPYRIGHT and LICENSE must be added as %doc in the %files section. Maybe adding the sample files (out of data/samples in the source) is also a good idea. - There are 'unowned directories' in your %files section. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: <bug-479515-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479515-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271218.n0RCIPsJ004282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(camillegallet at yah | |oo.fr) --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 07:18:23 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475799-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271220.n0RCKRm3004868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(watchman7 at bol.com | |.br) --- Comment #18 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 07:20:25 EDT --- Any progress on this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: <bug-478609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478609-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271218.n0RCIijx029275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 07:18:42 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271232.n0RCWJkl032433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #26 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-27 07:32:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > sed -i -e \ > "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -include /usr/include/errno.h!" > src/conf-cc Wait, this changes the whole command in src/conf-cc, I don't think that's intended, do you? > sed -i -e \ > "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}!" src/conf-ld How/where do you set this RPM_OPT_FLAGS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271235.n0RCZEVx000715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 07:35:13 EDT --- Usually I like the freedom to choose from several applications with similar functionality but your reason not to go on with this review is quite good. I don't want to waste your time. Let's drop this review request. At the other hand it's a simple package and a simple review. Maybe a person who is seeking a sponsor would like to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: <bug-478372-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478372-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271232.n0RCWnqJ032534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 07:32:47 EDT --- Some comment for me. - Summary without package name would be nice (as UDAV :-) ) - Please preserve the time stamps, use ' make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" ' if possible instead of ' make install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} ' - Use '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' instead of '%defattr(-, root, root)' (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint output (spec, SRPM and RPM): > mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 > exit at GLIBC_2.0 Will the upstream fix this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:40:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features In-Reply-To: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271240.n0RCeVGl001906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 07:40:30 EDT --- Builded in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] New: Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster Message-ID: <bug-481731-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Summary: Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fdinitto at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/ras/01/resource-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/ras/01/resource-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Red Hat Resource Agents provides a set of scripts to interface with several services to operate in a High Availability environment. The resource-agents are, at this point in time, released together with cluster (srpm). Upstream has been evaluating for sometime the area that receives the most frequent updates. resource agents is one of them. by separating the agents into its own tarball and rpm it makes updates a lot simpler for everybody. This package will replace parts of rgmanager rpm once approved (see also note in the spec file). rgmanager will be update accordingly at the right time as I don't want to break rgmanager functionalities in a transition phase while this package is reviewed. thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271254.n0RCsUKd011519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271254.n0RCsG1Q011490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-27 07:54:15 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Some tipps: - List of Sponsors https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager/*/sponsor - show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Read_the_Guidelines a) try to find other reviews and give tipps to make theyr rpms better (at the time you are not sponsored, you can not do a formal review) b) submit other review requests (with enough quality) - Are you a member of the mailinglists? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Join_the_important_Mailing_Lists for your package: take a look at the rpm-opt-flags (Jochen told you, i haven't take a look on it yet) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] New: Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict Message-ID: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 Summary: Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psklenar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/stardict-english-czech.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/stardict-english-czech-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpmCzech dictionaries for StarDict. Description: This is autogenerated dictionary for StarDict. Data were downloaded from following website: GNU/FDL: http://slovnik.zcu.cz/ Dictionary was generated using: GNU/FDL Anglicko-?esk? slovn?k to stardict converter version 1.2 You can get conversion script from: http://cihar.com/software/slovnik -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271254.n0RCsskU004607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271254.n0RCstcm004628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271253.n0RCrKim004421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-27 07:53:19 EDT --- I am sorry , I did not want to imply that there is a problem or something. It's just that I simply find it useless. I like your idea with leaving this review for someone seeking for sponsorship. Unassigning... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 12:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481734] New: Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework Message-ID: <bug-481734-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 481725,481727 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The EnvisagePlugins project includes a number of plug-ins for the Envisage framework that Enthought has found useful for building scientific applications. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-EnvisagePlugins.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Need for Mayavi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features In-Reply-To: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476973-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271301.n0RD1ZvE013427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271306.n0RD6G22007753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #1 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 08:06:16 EDT --- Hello, this is my second package, I am seeking sponsor like at bug 481272 There is GNU/FDL licence in separate file /usr/share/doc/stardict-english-czech-20081201/README Should I rename it to 'LICENSE' or is it OK? Original author has this name of file for licence. I made mistake for URL in first comment, this is right URL: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/stardict-english-czech.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/stardict-english-czech-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Czech dictionaries for StarDict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: <bug-479594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271306.n0RD6jaB014736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 08:06:44 EDT --- The release history of 'email' goes back till 2001. I guess that those guys definitely aren't going to change the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271313.n0RDDbrs016196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-27 08:13:36 EDT --- No, it is not necessary to rename the files from the source (unless there is a very good reason, for instance in order to avoid a conflict with another package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271315.n0RDFAjo016803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481738] New: Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core packages for the Enthought Tool Suite Message-ID: <bug-481738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core packages for the Enthought Tool Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Summary: Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core packages for the Enthought Tool Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 481725 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The EnthoughtBase project includes a few core packages that are used by many other projects in the Enthought Tool Suite: * enthought.etsconfig: Supports configuring settings that need to be shared across multiple projects or programs on the same system. * enthought.logger: Provides convenience functions for creating logging handlers. * enthought.util: Provides miscellaneous utility functions. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-EnthoughtBase.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Need for Mayavi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271316.n0RDGG1h010158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-EnthoughtBase - Core |python-EnthoughtBase - Core |packages for the Enthought |package for the Enthought |Tool Suite |Tool Suite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271323.n0RDNj2g019295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-27 08:23:43 EDT --- > + Does owns the directories it creates. Directory %{_includedir}/xnm/ is not included. This can easily be seen in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271326.n0RDQhVm013637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-27 08:26:42 EDT --- > Requires: %{name} == %{version}-%{release} Does that work? > %install > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" \ "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is missing as the first cmd in %install section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271342.n0RDgKkj017254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 08:42:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > + Does owns the directories it creates. > > Directory %{_includedir}/xnm/ is not included. This can easily be seen in the > spec file. Yes, this need to be fixed before the import. Thanks Michael. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] New: Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster Message-ID: <bug-481751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Summary: Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fdinitto at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/01/fence-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/01/fence-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Red Hat Fence Agents is a collection of scripts to handle remote power management for several devices. The fence-agents are, at this point in time, released together with cluster (srpm). Upstream has been evaluating for sometime the area that receives the most frequent updates. fence agents is one of them. by separating the agents into its own tarball and rpm it makes updates a lot simpler for everybody. Other projects, non cluster related, are using those agents now. This split will allow those external projects to use the agents without pulling in the whole cluster stack. This package will replace parts of cman rpm once approved (see also note in the spec file). cman will be update accordingly at the right time as I don't want to break cman functionalities in a transition phase while this package is reviewed. thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271349.n0RDnl9i018732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-27 08:49:45 EDT --- I can't access your src.rpm files (2009-01-27 11:37:09 ERROR 404: Not Found) but here are the review. GOOD -> - no rpmlint's message. rpmlint /home/itamar/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-2.fc10.src.rpm \ /home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm \ /home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bind-to-tinydns-debuginfo-0.4.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - package builds fine in koji (dist-F11) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1085805 - package meets naming and versioning guidelines. - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - dist tag is present. - latest version is being packaged. - BuildRequires are proper. - %clean is present. - package installs properly. - debuginfo package looks complete. - no scriptlets present. - license is open source-compatible. - package works as expected SHOULD VERIFY -> license sounds like GPLv2 for me instead GPLv2+ I see no blocker issue ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (bind-to-tinydns) is APPROVED by itamarjp ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271352.n0RDqYw5019604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-27 08:52:33 EDT --- The original %files section was fine: > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/ > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/ Why did you change it...? > %dir %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname} > %dir %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname} > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/* > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname}/* Both are equivalent. > %setup -q -n %{_appname} > tar -xf %{SOURCE1} -C ../ The way the two tarballs are extracted is strange. Sure, you can do it like that, but having to deal with the "../" in subsequent commands decreases the readability of the spec file. I strongly encourage you to use %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 to extract both tarballs into the same root directory, and then either use your two macros %_appname and %_ctrlname when accessing files or entering directories. The LICENSE, MANIFEST, README and "todo" files are installed in addition to %doc, and it is important to note that the LICENSE file must not be removed from /usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/LICENSE - or else it cannot be displayed by the desklet. Opening "Configure desklet" and selecting a folder from which to load images always displays an error dialog: | The folder contents could not be displayed | | Operation not supported It seems it always starts in the root directory due to that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271400.n0RE0eUK029073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 09:00:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > Requires: %{name} == %{version}-%{release} > > Does that work? Yes (at least on F-9/10/11) > > %install > > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" \ > > "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is missing as the first cmd in %install section. Sorry for not pointing this out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271400.n0RE0IYT028988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-27 09:00:17 EDT --- The build step does not respect the mandatory compiling flags: cc -Wall -g -o bind-to-tinydns bind-to-tinydns.c bind-to-tinydns.c: In function 'handle_entry': bind-to-tinydns.c:610: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'str_to_uint' differ in signedness bind-to-tinydns.c: In function 'main': bind-to-tinydns.c:969: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of 'handle_entry' differ in signedness + exit 0 this must be fixed before approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271404.n0RE4Ema029975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-27 09:04:13 EDT --- > -shared -Wl,-soname,libnewmat.so.10.4 > ln -s libnewmat.so.10.4 libnewmat.so.10 Are you sure you didn't want the soname to be libnewmat.so.10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271403.n0RE3RL4029847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #11 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 09:03:26 EDT --- I don't think %{_libdir} is the correct path for the stub lib. Other ocaml-* packages put them in %{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs/. And they have a *.so.owner file there too. I don't how that file is created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271401.n0RE1iiA029455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-27 09:01:43 EDT --- Itamar, please assign the bug to yourself and change the status from NEW to ASSIGNED when you perform a review. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271419.n0REJPcP000713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271416.n0REGpUf000412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus <rrakus at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 09:16:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330088) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330088) gperf specfile >Roman, thank you for taking action. I think, I've forgotten the suggestion >of preserving timestamps before and to avoid the usage of %makeinstall, thus >we recommend packagers to use instead: > > make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install INSTALL='install -p' > Ok. I changed it to make install. But why to use install -p? >Regarding the documentation I'm not really happy. We've currently much more >documentation rather rest of gperf inside of the package. > >We've multiple options: Creating -docs subpackage and moving everything out >there OR just kill the huge *.ps from %doc (*.ps vs. *.pdf seems to be a bit >redundant and *.pdf is usually better searchable) - last of it was accepted >and got told to be useful in Freenode #fedora-devel, #fedora-de by several >packagers. > >Choose what you like as packager and let me know. I can deal with both or >even a better option - afterwards we should be (hopefully) fine with review. I removed *.ps files. I am including specfile for review. Maybe there is something more and I'd like to prevent many useless builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] New: Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools Message-ID: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Summary: Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 481725 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The AppTools project includes a set of packages that Enthought has found useful in creating a number of applications. They implement functionality that is commonly needed by many applications * enthought.appscripting: Framework for scripting applications. * enthought.help: Provides a plugin for displaying documents and examples and running demos in Envisage Workbench applications. * enthought.io: Provides an abstraction for files and folders in a file system. * enthought.naming: Manages naming contexts, supporting non-string data types and scoped preferences * enthought.permissions: Supports limiting access to parts of an application unless the user is appropriately authorised (not full-blown security). and many more. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-AppTools.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-AppTools-3.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478452-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271423.n0RENK17027349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 09:23:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > + Does owns the directories it creates. > > Directory %{_includedir}/xnm/ is not included. This can easily be seen in the > spec file. aha. Thanks for catching that. I missed that when I looked into output of rpm -qlvp libxnm-devel-0.1.2-1.fc11.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271424.n0REOgHJ027502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #6 from Tim Jackson <rpm at timj.co.uk> 2009-01-27 09:24:41 EDT --- Sorry, the SRPM was: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns- 0.4.3-2.src.rpm Since no specific license version is explicitly specified by the author, it should actually be marked as "GPL+" as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses This is corrected in http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-3.src.rpm and the corresponding spec. Manuel, those are warnings only in the compiler output; the package builds successfully on all architectures and whilst it would be better if they weren't there, as far as I can see there is nothing in the Packaging Guidelines stating that all compiler warnings must be patched out. Final point: I am intending to only import this on the EL-5 branch so if anyone wants to co-maintain in devel/F-10/F-9 then let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271435.n0REZ6ag004087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #4 from Pascal <pascal22p at parois.net> 2009-01-27 09:35:05 EDT --- You are right, it's a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271437.n0REbExr030522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-27 09:37:12 EDT --- A 'install -p' makes install preserving the original timestamps of the files it is installing (e.g. for stuff like man pages or non-generated files during build). That's optional and nice to see for people (whether something changed or not), but just suggested. Spec file from comment #4 looks fine to me now, thus: APPROVED. Thank you, Roman for solving the issues fast. Please close this bug report, once you've applied the changes from comment #4 into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271443.n0REhOtx005954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 09:43:23 EDT --- + is OK - Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1085955 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. perl-Test-Email.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Email-0.04/Changes perl-Test-Email.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Email-0.04/README ==>This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. + source files match upstream url bb409977cffb292cd85d80d10506f59e Test-Email-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=7, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.15 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.17 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Email-0.04-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(Test::Email) = 0.04 perl(Test::POP3) = 0.05 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(MIME::Parser) perl(Mail::POP3Client) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Email) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestion:- 1) Fix rpmlint message before importing to cvs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271450.n0REoOJb001001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #17 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> 2009-01-27 09:50:21 EDT --- for #9 is there any reason you not pushed 43.6 or 44.1 to f10 and epel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271451.n0REpTrO001208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #4 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> 2009-01-27 09:51:28 EDT --- Adam, will you take this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:57:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271457.n0REvgsw009603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|481701 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271457.n0REvfOH009578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|481695 | --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 09:57:40 EDT --- removed dependency - not applicable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 14:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225854-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271458.n0REw4og009667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 Roman Rakus <rrakus at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Roman Rakus <rrakus at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 09:58:03 EDT --- Hmm, I think, noone looks at timestamps, but ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271506.n0RF6GmR012046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2009-01-27 10:06:15 EDT --- Hrm... looks like we kinda forgot about this... let's see if we can get this reviewed soonish, and push with (or near after) kde-4.2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271502.n0RF27Od003992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info --- Comment #16 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> 2009-01-27 10:02:05 EDT --- Fabian, (In reply to comment #5) > - Use make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" to preserve the > timestamps instead of make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} And specific reasons for that? It's likely unneeded. This topic recently was discussed on https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195#c9 and http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2009-January/003546.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: <bug-431047-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-431047-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271507.n0RF7lkf012488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271508.n0RF8k53005342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-27 10:08:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330097) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330097) change makefile to accept cflags. change makefile to accept cflags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:11:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271511.n0RFBic2006144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-27 10:11:43 EDT --- > Manuel, those are warnings only in the compiler output; the package builds > successfully on all architectures and whilst it would be better if they weren't > there, as far as I can see there is nothing in the Packaging Guidelines stating > that all compiler warnings must be patched out. Manuel is talking about CFLAGS, include the patch in Comment #7 and change your spec file to pass the correct CFLAGS parameters. make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271520.n0RFKLTM015569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #27 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-27 10:20:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #23) > > sed -i -e \ > > "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -include /usr/include/errno.h!" > > src/conf-cc > > Wait, this changes the whole command in src/conf-cc, I don't think that's > intended, do you? This is what is intended. It changes the compiler call to acknowledge the settings rpm-packaging expects it to acknowledge. It has the same effect as make CC=%{__cc} CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -include /usr/include/errno.h" would have with ordinary Makefiles. Unfortunately DJB's build-system is "special" and doesn't allow overriding settings from the environment, therefore one has to resort to hardcoding settings (which is what this sed call does). > > sed -i -e \ > > "s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}!" src/conf-ld > > How/where do you set this RPM_OPT_FLAGS? RPM_OPT_FLAGS is an rpm internal variable. It contains the CFLAGS all packages are supposed to compile with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: <bug-481224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481224-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271518.n0RFIV1S008081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 10:18:30 EDT --- Ok, I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271530.n0RFUMxf018059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 10:30:21 EDT --- I hoped so and asked ltinkl for review several times to review this ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271529.n0RFTGkC017425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-27 10:29:15 EDT --- please look now http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271546.n0RFkK0E015043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 10:46:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Adam, will you take this review? yes, of course. Sorry for late response, I lost this review in my "working queue". Review: source files match upstream: YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: YES dist tag is present: YES build root is correct: YES license field matches the actual license: YES license is open source-compatible. YES latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: YES compiler flags are appropriate: YES %clean is present: YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): YES rpmlint is silent: NO but errors are ok for mingw32 package final provides and requires look sane: NO owns the directories it creates: YES no duplicates in %files: YES file permissions are appropriate: YES code, not content: YES ----------------------------------------------------------- Currently I see one problem - win32 binaries are installed: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/cjpeg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/djpeg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/jpegtran /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/rdjpgcom /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/wrjpgcom Is here any reason to have them installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271553.n0RFrkpB016735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #9 from Tim Jackson <rpm at timj.co.uk> 2009-01-27 10:53:44 EDT --- Ah, OK. Thanks for spotting that. New SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-4.src.rpm Spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271552.n0RFqjkT016599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-27 10:52:44 EDT --- Good: + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains a %check stanza + Local build works fine Bad: - Koji build fails. Please refer to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1086077 This is caused by the PyQrCodec issue, If you are unable to fix it, we should remove the %scheck stanza. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481676] blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. In-Reply-To: <bug-481676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481676-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271557.n0RFvAkg023228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481676 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-27 10:57:09 EDT --- It may be nice, if you may remove your ?/.blender directory and try your test again. It may be helpful, if you can explain all your steps you have done for your test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271557.n0RFvkVb017952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-27 10:57:45 EDT --- Thanks for the reviews, Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Email Short Description: Test email contents Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 15:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365141] Review Request: iotop - Top like utility for I/O In-Reply-To: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-365141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271558.n0RFw8d6018036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365141 --- Comment #9 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 10:58:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > iotop requires python 2.5, which neither EL4 nor EL5 have. > Did you find some way to port it back to previous python versions? The python version issue might be fixable, but the kernel support is missing in RHEL4/5 too.. So no this package is not suitable for EPEL until RHEL6 is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: <bug-225698-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225698-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271603.n0RG3L8c024956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 --- Comment #3 from Prarit Bhargava <prarit at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 11:03:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330102) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330102) Patch to resolve this issue I'm waiting for write access to fedora cvs. I'm also going to ping Alan to see if he wants to remain as the owner. P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271607.n0RG7u8n021032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 --- Comment #6 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> 2009-01-27 11:07:55 EDT --- yes and no. we usually ship those binaries which needed on win32 eg: openssl.exe the reason for this is that nsis or nsiswrapper can collect all required libs and exes for the installer and then the final installer can contain all component which required on win32. however in this case these exe should have to be called *.exe:-( i send a patch to the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271615.n0RGFt5I028314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 11:15:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330106) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330106) License analysis License analysis for l2fprod-common and skinlf is attached. Some files in l2fprod-common and almost all files in skinlf are under ASL 1.1 (for skinlf, LICENSE text itself shows ASL 1.1). For skinlf, src/examples/Clock.java has a quite questionable license clause: ----------------------------------------------------- ii) Licensee does not utilize the software in a manner which is disparaging to Sun. ----------------------------------------------------- I guess this clause is NON-FREE. In Fedora skinlf this file is currently removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271623.n0RGNPs2030042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 --- Comment #4 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 11:23:24 EDT --- Yes, it appears that trying to connect to the internet is the problem through Koji. The unit tests attempt to contact GoogleCharts. I actually don't think it's PyQrCodec. Either way, the %check has to go. Rebuilt: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart-0.2.1-3.fc11.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472525-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271635.n0RGZ9tH000991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 --- Comment #3 from Luk?? Tinkl <ltinkl at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 11:35:08 EDT --- Well hopefully after I'm done with the 4.2.0 updates :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271636.n0RGaasE001352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-27 11:36:35 EDT --- I have done some examinations: It's seems that something with the F-10 info package is broken. I have found odd entries in the %{_infodir}/dir file. After I have built the texinfo package from the devel branch the complainted issue doesn't occurs anymore. Because that was the last issue with your package I'm glade that I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271638.n0RGcpIV001986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-27 11:38:49 EDT --- Sorry, I have got a 404 error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271637.n0RGbvOh028644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt --- Comment #1 from Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> 2009-01-27 11:37:56 EDT --- The package is simple (as it should :-) ). Some quirks, In the the spec file the URL should be just http://pypi.python.org/pypi/setupdocs In the next line the comment there should be also removed: #md5... My suggestion regarding the description is to change it to %description Python setuptools plugin... That is just to add Python to the begin of the sentence. I am aware that this is redundant but it does not hurt. :-) Anyway this is a suggestion and you are free to ignore it. Other than that the package is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481482] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 In-Reply-To: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271656.n0RGuMeK001531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481482 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 11:56:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Perl6-Junction Short Description: Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 17:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271707.n0RH77Sg004541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 12:07:05 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 17:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480887-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271707.n0RH78Fa004566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Bug 480887 depends on bug 480886, which changed state. Bug 480886 Summary: Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 17:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271722.n0RHMTBT007808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 12:22:28 EDT --- Thanks SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-setupdocs.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-setupdocs-1.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 17:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481819] New: Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-481819-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481819 Summary: Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-finance.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-finance-0-1.20090126.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Finance Description: Finance is a simple financial planning activity. It can be integrated into classroom assignments, or else used to track finances for a school club. It might also be useful for students who wish to help their parents with home finances. The register view allows students to enter income and expenses, assign categories, and review past transactions. The chart view shows students a visual breakdown of their expenses by category. The budget view allows users to assign a monthly budget to each category, and to see how each month's expenses compare to the budget. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1086293 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-finance-0-1.20090126.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-finance.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-finance-0-1.20090126.fc10.src.rpm sugar-finance.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 17:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271752.n0RHqeUF014765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271805.n0RI5Lsv023839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 13:05:19 EDT --- Okay. - This package itself is now good - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments ---------------------------------------------------- This package (PyQwt) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480886] Review Request: tse3 - MIDI Sequencer Engine In-Reply-To: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480886-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271805.n0RI5g1T018804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480886 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 13:05:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > %install > > > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" \ > > > > "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is missing as the first cmd in %install section. > > Sorry for not pointing this out... No problem. I missed this as much as you did. But this is weird because rpmlint normally warns us if one of the "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is missing (one in %install, one in %clean). Maybe we hit an rpmlint bug. I'm revoking my requests for pushing to F-9 and F-10 update-testing and rebuilding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271808.n0RI8sDV024513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Bug 481071 depends on bug 481070, which changed state. Bug 481070 Summary: Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:17:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271817.n0RIHlas022181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-27 13:17:46 EDT --- Review: OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: portmidi-131-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libportmidi.so.0()(64bit) libporttime.so.0()(64bit) portmidi = 131-1.fc11 portmidi(x86-64) = 131-1.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libasound.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libportmidi.so.0()(64bit) libporttime.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) portmidi-devel-131-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm portmidi-devel = 131-1.fc11 portmidi-devel(x86-64) = 131-1.fc11 = libportmidi.so.0()(64bit) libporttime.so.0()(64bit) portmidi = 131-1.fc11 OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. OK shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers are in a separate -devel package. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. Suggestions: - There is a doxygen style documentation provided in this package, you should include it in the -devel and don't forget to pickup doxygen as a BR. - Please consider preserving timestamps of installed files APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271830.n0RIUlY5030903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> 2009-01-27 13:30:46 EDT --- OK. The package follows the guidelines. The package name is OK. The license (BSD) is correct and acceptable. The source tar ball is the same as shipped upstream. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXE21031629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXDTa031585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271835.n0RIZpca032445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|482216 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481734-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481734-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXGPV031672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: <bug-481727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXFS2031651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481695-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXCSE031563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481738-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXHTg031695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481573] Review Request: code2html - Covert source code to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481573-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXBXb031542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481573 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271833.n0RIXIdU031716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475098-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271835.n0RIZoiL032419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271835.n0RIZm1s032388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|481573 |475098 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 13:35:47 EDT --- Description is wrong both in spec and request will updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] New: Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer Message-ID: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Summary: Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 481573,481695,481701,481725,481727,481734,481738,48175 9 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The AppTools project includes a set of packages that Enthought has found useful in creating a number of applications. They implement functionality that is commonly needed by many applications * enthought.appscripting: Framework for scripting applications. * enthought.help: Provides a plugin for displaying documents and examples and running demos in Envisage Workbench applications. * enthought.io: Provides an abstraction for files and folders in a file system. * enthought.naming: Manages naming contexts, supporting non-string data types and scoped preferences * enthought.permissions: Supports limiting access to parts of an application unless the user is appropriately authorised (not full-blown security). and many more. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-Mayavi.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-Mayavi-3.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271841.n0RIfwx0028674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 13:41:57 EDT --- I'll take this one. Review coming up in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271854.n0RIstOT004378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 13:54:55 EDT --- > Suggestions: > > - There is a doxygen style documentation provided in this package, you should > include it in the -devel and don't forget to pickup doxygen as a BR. > - Please consider preserving timestamps of installed files > > APPROVED. Thanks! Will do. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: portmidi Short Description: Real-time Midi I/O Library Owners: oget Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:58:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271858.n0RIwHVd005591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 13:58:15 EDT --- Some notes for 0.52-3: - After discussion on fedora-devel-list, we reached consensus that duplicating Name in Summary is redundant. ------------------------------------------------------------ I've used the non standard group Development/Libraries/Java. But rpmlint doesn't show more errors. ------------------------------------------------------------ - rawhide rpmlint (rpmlint-0.85-3.fc11) still complains about this ($ rpmlint -I non-standard-group for details) - For Sourceforge hosted source code, please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net - # Doesn't run with gcj, so better build it with icedtea/openjdk too In such case, please use ------------------------------------------------------------ BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ Note that this (Build)Requires has Epoch (1:). On Fedora this is Provided only by java-1.6.0-openjdk(-devel) - Install java .jar file under %_javadir, not %_javadir/%name-%version. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Directory_structure ------------------------------------------------------------ install -d -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -pR CHANGES COPYRIGHT README THANKS %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------------ - Using %doc is simpler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 18:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271858.n0RIwTIE032347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 19:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271911.n0RJBlVn009035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 --- Comment #9 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 14:11:46 EDT --- Tagged and built for Fedora 9, Fedora 10 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 19:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:12:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480486] Review Request: emacs-htmlize - Convert buffer text and decorations to HTML In-Reply-To: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480486-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271912.n0RJCTZd009151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480486 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 19:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271913.n0RJDW6R009375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 14:13:30 EDT --- Looks good, approving. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (opencsv) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 19:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271948.n0RJm13Q016805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 14:48:00 EDT --- MUST items: - rpmlint output: emacs-magit-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - package name: follows Emacs-specific guidelines - spec file name matches base package name: OK - packaging guidelines: OK - approved Fedora license: OK - License field matches actual license: FAIL The file magit.el includes the "or later" phrase, so the license is actually GPLv3+, not GPLv3. Furthermore, the info file contains a declaration that it is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.2 or any later version. Therefore, the License field should read "GPLv3+ and GFDL+". The guidelines strongly encourage you to separate the info file into a separate subpackage, so that each can have a single license, but I will not insist on this. - File containing license should be in %doc: FAIL. You must add COPYING to the %doc line in the spec file. Why is that empty, by the way? I suggest also adding AUTHORS, ChangeLog, NEWS, and README to the %doc line. - spec file in American English: OK - spec file is legible: OK - source URL guidelines: FAIL Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL. In short, you need to add a comment saying how to produce the source tarball. See the section entitled "Using Revision Control". - builds on at least one arch: OK - appropriate use of ExcludeArch: OK - complete BuildRequires: FAIL The use of autoreconf triggers an invocation of automake. Since automake Requires autoconf, you can simply replace "autoconf" with "automake" on the BuildRequires line. - locale handling: OK - use of ldconfig: OK - relocatable package: OK - own all created directories: OK - no duplicate %files entries: OK - proper file permissions: OK - %clean section: OK - consistent use of macros: OK - code or permissible content: OK - large documentation files: OK - %doc files not needed at runtime: OK - header files in -devel: OK - static libraries in -static: OK - Requires pkgconfig: OK - .so files in -devel: OK - devel packages require base package: OK - no .la archives: OK - desktop file: OK - do not own files/directories created by other packages: OK - clean build root before installing: OK - filenames are valid UTF-8: OK SHOULD items: - query upstream for license text: the tarball includes the text of GPLv3 in COPYING, but does not include the GFDL text that I can see. Please ask upstream to include it in future releases. - include available translations: OK - package builds in mock: OK - package builds on all supported architectures: DID NOT CHECK - package functions as described: MINIMAL TESTING ONLY - sane scriptlets: OK - subpackages require the base package: OK - pkgconfig files in -devel: OK - file dependencies: OK Finally, just a note that you can replace "-n %{name}-el" with just "el" in the %package, %description, and %files lines where it appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 19:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901271959.n0RJxtZU012739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 14:59:54 EDT --- Description: The Mayavi project includes two related packages for 3-dimensional visualization: * Mayavi2: A tool for easy and interactive visualization of data. * TVTK: A Traits-based wrapper for the Visualization Toolkit, a popular open-source visualization library. These libraries operate at different levels of abstraction. TVTK manipulates visualization objects, while Mayavi2 lets you operate on your data, and then see the results. Most users either use the Mayavi user interface or program to its scripting interface; you probably don't need to interact with TVTK unless you want to create a new Mayavi module. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-Mayavi.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-Mayavi-3.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482216-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272002.n0RK2RIs020313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272003.n0RK38Jv013605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 --- Comment #6 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 15:03:07 EDT --- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-pygooglechart-0.2.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Sorry, accidentally uploaded the fc10 one instead of fc11. Fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272011.n0RKBoM2015697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #1 from bee <honeybeehoneyhive-redhat at yahoo.com> 2009-01-27 15:11:49 EDT --- If nobody has posted here, it's because i've no sponsors!! I need one sponsor!!!! i'm seeking for a sponsor; somebody to help me to push my beesu into yum!! will you help me? thanks if yes! bye!!!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272051.n0RKpiDr008485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 15:51:43 EDT --- Marcela, thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > FAIL specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros > consistently. > - RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs. buildroot - use only one of these macros a stupid copy-and-paste-error, fixed > FAIL license field matches the actual license. > - You can find GPLv3+ in COPYING and PKG-INFO fixed Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer-0.3.9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272055.n0RKtLH6016903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-27 15:55:20 EDT --- Well, I have not checked your latest srpm at all, just answering your question: * postin-without-install-info - Please check: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo i.e. texinfo .info files must be registered by install-info. * service-default-enabled - This is written on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line i.e. in contrib/mydns.redhat, the line # chkconfig: 345 52 50 should be: # chkconfig: - 52 50 Again I have not checked your latest srpm at all.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 21:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272100.n0RL0BN7018135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-27 16:00:10 EDT --- next time I will try cpanspec tool please looks if like better now. http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-Test-Dynamic/perl-Test-Dynamic.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-Test-Dynamic/perl-Test-Dynamic-1.3.3-2.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1086995 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272032.n0RKWS1H031770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from John W. Linville <linville at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 15:32:27 EDT --- Packages built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272035.n0RKZWjE001294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #2 from ?imon Luka??k <lukasim at atlas.cz> 2009-01-27 15:35:31 EDT --- I added FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker to this bug, so Sponsors can easily find you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272037.n0RKbSEo009582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-27 15:37:27 EDT --- new version with a working http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.19-1.fc10.src.rpm Can you help to fix this rpmlint message ? [itamar at itamar mydns]$ rpmlint /home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mydns-1.2.8.19-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm mydns.x86_64: E: postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/mydns.info.gz mydns.x86_64: E: postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/mydns.info.gz mydns.x86_64: E: no-binary mydns.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mydns 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. in special postin-without-install-info and service-default-enabled -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 21:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] New: Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data Message-ID: <bug-482757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 Summary: Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pascal22p at parois.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/objcryst-fox.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.debroglie.net/SRPMS/9/objcryst-fox-1.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The FOX program was made for the ab initio crystal structure solution from diffraction data (mostly powder diffraction data). Its most interesting features for ab initio structure determination are: * a versatile description of the crystal contents: either isolated atoms, molecules described using a bond length, bond angles and dihedral angles, and polyhedra for inorganic compounds. You can describe your structure by using any combination of groups of atoms, using a chemist's or crystallographer knowledge about the connectivity in your sample to constrain possible solutions; * an automatic correction for special positions and shared atoms between polyhedra, suitable for global optimization algorithms; * the ability to use simultaneously multiple powder patterns (X-rays, neutrons), as well as single crystal data (e.g. extracted from a powder pattern); * smart global optimization algorithms which can get out of false minima; * a graphical interface with a 3D crystal structure view, with live updates during the optimization process. This program can be used also for educational purposes, to show a 3D display of Crystal structures, and the associated powder pattern(s) (see how adding atoms, changing the lattice, or changing the spacegroup affects the powder spectrum and the 3D structure). webpage : http://vincefn.net/Fox/ rpmlint is quiet. This package needs libnewmat : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 I need a sponsor, these are my first 2 packages. Cheers, Pascal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272224.n0RMObSM003568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libnewmat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479978-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272224.n0RMO5Ng003486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482757 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: <bug-482757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272224.n0RMO6S0003512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: <bug-482757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482757-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272223.n0RMNUYg003421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272228.n0RMSe9n004446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272228.n0RMSKcw004395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-27 17:28:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opencsv Short Description: A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478382-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478382-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272250.n0RMoCfm008756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 22:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481513-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272250.n0RMoBSR008731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478382 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 17:50:10 EDT --- Updates files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-pippy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-pippy-25-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482763] New: Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 Message-ID: <bug-482763-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/compat-guichan07.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/compat-guichan07-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Compatibility packages for guichan-0.7.1 This is primarily a rename of the current guichan-0.7.1 package. The purpose of the rename is so that guichan can be upgraded to 0.8.1 while not breaking compatibility with existing packages that link against guichan-0.7.1. This compat- package will only be built for F-9. F-10 and later already contain the more recent guichan-0.8.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <bug-482763-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482763-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272324.n0RNOH6Y021232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481249 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272337.n0RNbeqW019091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Tadej Jane? <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si> 2009-01-27 18:37:39 EDT --- OK, thanks for sponsoring me! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PyQwt Short Description: Python bindings for Qwt Owners: tadej Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272342.n0RNgEdt025062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272343.n0RNhHso025243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478383-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478383-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272343.n0RNhGCb025217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Depends on| |478381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478382-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478382-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272342.n0RNgD8R025033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Depends on| |478381 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 18:42:12 EDT --- - Shouldn't the url be 'Url: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/TamTamEdit' ? - I would like to suggest that you change the %files section to the sample in the Packaging Guidelines of the Sugar Activity [1]. This will make it easier for reviewers. - I guess that 'Requires: sugar' is missing [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SugarActivityGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272343.n0RNhhid020163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272343.n0RNhP3K020088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478384-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272343.n0RNhgJF020139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Depends on| |478381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478385-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478385-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272343.n0RNhOOV020061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Depends on| |478381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272350.n0RNo686026705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 18:50:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, > so I use GPLv2+ in spec What did the upstream say about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 23:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901272358.n0RNwGrQ023023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-27 18:58:15 EDT --- Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pysnmp.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pysnmp-2.0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280010.n0S0AqJq025680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #37 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-27 19:10:50 EDT --- Okay, lots of work today. Fixed the code (at least on my end) to remove the %PRODUCTNUMBER from the SPEC which also removes it from the package name. Here are links to the latest and greatest: SPEC URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-10.fc10.src.rpm Verified to be clean with rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:50:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: <bug-213904-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213904-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280050.n0S0oYUP032525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Wart <wart at kobold.org> 2009-01-27 19:50:32 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tclchecker New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: wart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: <bug-213596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280056.n0S0uPHB001110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Wart <wart at kobold.org> 2009-01-27 19:56:24 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tclcompiler New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: wart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: <bug-213595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280059.n0S0x0aa006394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Wart <wart at kobold.org> 2009-01-27 19:58:59 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tbcload New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: wart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: <bug-213905-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213905-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280057.n0S0vGMf006210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Wart <wart at kobold.org> 2009-01-27 19:57:15 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcldebugger New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: wart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:59:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: <bug-213907-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213907-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280059.n0S0xbdT001443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Wart <wart at kobold.org> 2009-01-27 19:59:35 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tclpro New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: wart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 00:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:58:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: <bug-213902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280058.n0S0w3f4001301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 Wart <wart at kobold.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Wart <wart at kobold.org> 2009-01-27 19:58:02 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tclparser New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: wart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 01:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280120.n0S1KOH1005555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-27 20:20:23 EDT --- Yes, that was some what redundant. rpmlint also showed this non-standard-group error to me. I just looked at some other packages which used thos group tag. I was unsure whether non standard names are allowed or not. Download url is fixed. So when requiring explicitly icedtea I just use java(-devel) >= :1.6.0? Because sometimes it does not work, compiling some java classes with gcj, so i really need to maek sure that openjdk is used. Path is fixed. I was quite dumb not using %doc. Updated: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc.spec http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc-0.52-4.fc9.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 02:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463587] Review Request: cwirc - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC In-Reply-To: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463587-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280209.n0S29CO5019092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx at gmail.com> 2009-01-27 21:09:09 EDT --- Pushed to stable F9/10/devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 02:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280257.n0S2vURX027746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 21:57:29 EDT --- thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-mew Short Description: Email client for GNU Emacs Owners: tagoh Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 04:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280411.n0S4B4sA006936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 23:11:02 EDT --- Thanks. Koji scratch build is successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1087751 I can sponsor you, Chris, based on a successful completion of this review. :) You still need to address some earlier comments though: (In reply to comment #1) > - 'Source0:' should point to the upstream source location, if possible. > > - About the .desktop file. The guidelines says that it should be include as > 'SourceX:' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > See 'desktop-file-install usage' for details about the installation of this > file. Get in touch with upstream and ask them to include the .desktop file. (In reply to comment #4) > - URL should be https://fedorahosted.org/securityguide/ > - Source0 should be point to the upstream source location, to the source > tarball to be more precise. > Please refer to https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq, Section 'How can I publish > archive releases (tgz, zip, etc) for my project?' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 04:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280423.n0S4NPJF009370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-27 23:23:24 EDT --- I guess since this is Fedora only, all the htmlview stuff is not needed in the spec file and the desktop file should use xdg-open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:09:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280509.n0S59pqR023094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 --- Comment #3 from Tom Moertel <tom at moertel.com> 2009-01-28 00:09:51 EDT --- Jerry, thanks for the quick and helpful review! I have fixed the problems you identified: * Updated the License field. * Added the missing docs. * Added source-URL comment per guidelines for VCS-pulled source. * Tweaked BuildRequires. * Also, I patched the .texi file to include the fdl.texi file, which strangely enough *was* included in the upstream source but never got included into the magit.texi file. I submitted the patch upstream. * Finally, thanks for the tip on simplifying the "-n %{name}-el" incantations. The new spec replaces the old: Spec URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SPECS/emacs-magit.spec SRPM URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SRPMS/emacs-magit-0.7-2.20090122git.fc10.src.rpm Please let me know if you find any other problems or can think of any meaningful improvements I can make to the package. Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280512.n0S5Co9G018672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 00:12:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-B-Utils New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280518.n0S5IZ9s025077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianburrell at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 00:18:33 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: <bug-472072-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472072-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280520.n0S5Kvw6020446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianburrell at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 00:20:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Sub-Override New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: <bug-472664-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472664-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280524.n0S5OIx7026306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianburrell at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 00:24:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280535.n0S5Z4eb028573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:35:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481482] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 In-Reply-To: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280536.n0S5aJmp028883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481482 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:36:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280533.n0S5XLEa022661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:33:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280537.n0S5bMft029125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #40 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 00:37:17 EDT --- The srpm from comment 33 builds fine in mock. Here is the rpmlint output: samba4.i386: W: no-documentation samba4.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/samba4/old 0700 samba4.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/samba4 0700 samba4.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 115, tab: line 145) samba4-client.i386: W: no-documentation samba4-common.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/samba4/private 0700 samba4-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/samba-4.0.0alpha6/source4/torture/raw/pingpong.c samba4-devel.i386: W: no-documentation samba4-python.i386: W: no-documentation samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/ndr.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/samdb.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/__init__.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/dcerpc/unix.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/samdb.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/samba3.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/getopt.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/dcerpc/rpcecho.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/dcerpc/sam.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/hostconfig.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/dcerpc/registry.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/__init__.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/idmap.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/samba3.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/upgrade.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/upgrade.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/dcerpc/bare.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/dcerpc/__init__.py 0644 samba4-python.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/tests/provision.py 0644 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 22 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280539.n0S5dlUC023812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:39:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472229-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280538.n0S5cFva023647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:38:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481681] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style In-Reply-To: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280543.n0S5hV0b030269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481681 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:43:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280545.n0S5j1KM030480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:45:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280541.n0S5fuGl024504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:41:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280546.n0S5kCNV025314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: <bug-213595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213595-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280550.n0S5odwg031769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:50:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: <bug-472072-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472072-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280548.n0S5mrXM031267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:48:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: <bug-472664-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472664-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280549.n0S5nxIo025842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:49:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: <bug-213596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213596-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280551.n0S5pglw026431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:51:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: <bug-213902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280554.n0S5s0C6026680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:53:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: <bug-213904-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213904-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280557.n0S5vWkJ000425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:57:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: <bug-213905-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213905-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280558.n0S5wj5h000555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:58:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280601.n0S61QT2001259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 01:01:25 EDT --- **** Access denied: tagoh is not in ACL for rpms/emacs-mew/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvs9C0IaR Something not yet finished to setup. can you check for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474867-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280600.n0S60Bef027987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 01:00:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: <bug-213907-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-213907-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280559.n0S5xPDC027587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 00:59:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280611.n0S6BARs030289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 01:11:09 EDT --- ok, that was the last blocker item I had... so with the addition of the Requires, this package is APPROVED. I will sponsor you... continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Please feel free to contact me here, via email, or on irc if you have any questions at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280613.n0S6DVur030712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 01:13:30 EDT --- I don't see any further issues here, so this package is APPROVED. removing NEEDSPONSOR as I am sponsoring Alex. Thanks for reviewing this Jochen! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280617.n0S6HEZu004445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 01:17:14 EDT --- Yes. There are several syncs that happen after the package is added. The acls are generated only every hour I think on the cvs machine. Please wait a while and try again. Feel free to set the fedora-cvs flag again if you need further attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280617.n0S6Hk8A031582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479983] Review Request: emacs-mew - Email client for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479983-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280704.n0S744Da014045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 02:04:03 EDT --- Thanks. works fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280730.n0S7Uc9i013901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #28 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-28 02:30:37 EDT --- Hi, I've made the changes. Please have a look at the following SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools.spec SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/daemontools-0.76-3.fc10.src.rpm Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280848.n0S8m6pe002239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 03:48:05 EDT --- ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 09:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280900.n0S90pwO031945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 04:00:49 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1088064 1)rpmlint outputs only perl-DBIx-Safe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) ==>Can be fixed using "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-DBIx-Safe.spec" 2) Also, add following at the end of the %install section %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/* Make sure you will fix above 2 issues first before committing to cvs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: <bug-478372-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478372-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280858.n0S8w1Jd031099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #5 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> 2009-01-28 03:58:00 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-3.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8-3.fc10.src.rpm RPMLint: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/mathgl-1.8-3.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.8-3.fc10.i386.rpm mathgl.spec mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1088112 >Summary without package name would be nice (as UDAV :-) ) Done. >Please preserve the time stamps, use ' make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" ' if possible instead of ' make install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} ' mathgl *does* use configure, so this is Done. >Use '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' instead of '%defattr(-, root, root)' Done. >Will the upstream fix this issue? Here is what upstream had to say: --- I understand badness of usage of exit() function. Unfortunately I don't know how user can terminate the program by other way using GLUT window :(. So the only suggestion I have is exclude the module libmgl-glut from the package. The matter is that this is not the part of MathGL core and the same functionality can be reached by other widget classes (FLTK or Qt). --- So yes, if a suitable solution can be found. I haven't looked into it, it may be trivial or it may not -- I have not used glut for generating windows. Without suggestions as to the correct way to modify upstream code, no. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 09:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280914.n0S9ErpR002836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 04:14:40 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1088069 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 09:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: <bug-449135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-449135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280935.n0S9ZAGr007680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 04:35:07 EDT --- Was the project renamed ? What is the status of the package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 09:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901280945.n0S9jRsC009844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #23 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 04:45:24 EDT --- Robert, you ought to be able to give your F-10 updates package a +1 from yourself. I've given it a +1 and there is another too, so that should be enough to get it released properly. If you are looking for a second maintainer, then I'm happy to do that. For now though I've only applied for the two "watch" permissions on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 10:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281010.n0SAAOEO016068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 05:10:22 EDT --- 1) drop vendor tag in desktop-install-file. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop-file-install_usage 2) from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo, use %preun if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : fi 3) from Emacs guildeines "Usually an add-on package will require a startup file, and this should be called foo-init.el and be placed in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/. " I think then you should have %{name}.el.site-start renamed to %{name}-init.el -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 10:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281026.n0SAQcoB024689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 05:26:36 EDT --- Although application programs are excluded from the MinGW project, we do ship the occasional Win32 binary if it would be useful for testing, development or debugging. Examples include: - openssl.exe (so developers and end users can debug certificates) - certtool.exe (for the same reason) - worms.exe (useful demo program which can be used to find out if all the components leading up to the windows console are working) In this case, I don't think any of those binaries are useful for this purpose, so they should be excluded. The following excludes them, and also includes Levente's patch from comment 6. Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/libjpeg/mingw32-libjpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libjpeg-6b-8.fc11.src.rpm * Wed Jan 28 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 6b-8 - Exclude the binaries. - Rename the binaries to *.exe (Levente Farkas). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 10:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] New: Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels Message-ID: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Summary: Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libfli.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libfli-1.7-1.src.rpm Description: Finger Lakes Instrument library is used by applications to control FLI line of CCDs and Filter wheels -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 10:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281034.n0SAYvHM026187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 05:34:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > for #9 is there any reason you not pushed 43.6 or 44.1 to f10 and epel? Levente, let's discuss unrelated issues on the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 10:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281038.n0SAcAfe027142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 11:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281111.n0SBBLUA029891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> 2009-01-28 06:11:20 EDT --- >From IRC: 11:51 < killefiz> Kevin_Kofler: from the libfli-spec - what does %cmake -DLIB_POSTFIX=64 11:51 < killefiz> do? Will that hardcode lib64 as library path? 11:52 <@Kevin_Kofler> I guess so. Looks like this is broken indeed. 11:53 <@Kevin_Kofler> This needs to be conditional on %if "%{?_lib}" == "lib64" 11:54 <@Kevin_Kofler> But ideally the upstream CMake machinery should be fixed to use the standard LIB_SUFFIX which is already set by our %cmake macro instead of the nonstandard LIB_POSTFIX. 11:54 <@Kevin_Kofler> (upstream = libfli in this context) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 11:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226314] Merge Review: prctl In-Reply-To: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281125.n0SBPZGi000436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226314 --- Comment #4 from Karsten Hopp <karsten at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 06:25:33 EDT --- The only parameters of prctl that do anything other than printing help are --unaligned= and --fpemu=. Both work only on ia64, on other archs you'll get this output: 'ERROR: Kernel on this platform may not implement this prctl feature.' I've added this as a comment before the ExclusiveArch: in the spec file and commited it to CVS. As IA64 is a secondary arch in Fedora, a build will need to be done by the secondary arch maintainers. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/IA64 for more info about Fedora-IA64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467416-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281205.n0SC543x009076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 07:05:00 EDT --- Waiting for bug 467376 (mingw32-pixman). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281204.n0SC44wc008610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Bug 467376 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 07:04:01 EDT --- Peter, ping? If you have rawhide & mingw32-filesystem >= 44 installed, then rpmlint errors are reduced to this single warning[1]: mingw32-pixman.src: W: strange-permission make-pixman-snapshot.sh 0775 I don't think this is a valid warning because it's perfectly normal for shell scripts to have executable permission. [1] However this is cheating slightly, because all we are doing is dropping in an rpmlint configuration file which tells rpmlint to suppress the warnings listed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint for MinGW packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281211.n0SCBXmH010531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 07:11:31 EDT --- Built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5. In response to comment 16 - Levente this built fine in EL-5. I'll wait for the F-10 update before closing this bug. Thanks to Tim and Kevin for working on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281218.n0SCIVVP017784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 07:18:30 EDT --- This has been built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5. Thanks again Tim and Kevin for helping with this review. I'll leave this bug open until the F-10 update goes through. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281222.n0SCMBgl018664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #17 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 07:22:09 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281224.n0SCO07r018889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #18 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 07:23:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281225.n0SCPDb8013306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281227.n0SCR65N019660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 07:27:05 EDT --- fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-3.fc10.src.rpm koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1088470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281227.n0SCR2VN019633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #3 from Ivan Efremov <iefremov at unipro.ru> 2009-01-28 07:27:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Please place the changelog section at the end of the file. It's not wrong > just unusual. done > - Please add the dist tag to Release -> 'Release: 1%{?dist}' done > - You don't need to define macros at the beginning of the file. 'Name:' and > 'Version:' are already macros. But you must use macros in the %files section > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros fixed > - Please preserve the time stamps, use ' make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} > INSTALL="install -p" ' if possible instead of ' make install > INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} ' Since Makefile is generated by qmake it has some specific features: 1) it uses INSTALL_ROOT instead of DESTDIR 2) it uses INSTALL_FILE, INSTALL_PROGRAM etc. instead of INSTALL 3) these INSTALL_* variables already have '-p' option so, there is no problem with time stapms > - This application has a GUI. You need to install the .desktop file. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files desktop file is part of the upstream tarball and is installed during 'make install' > - COPYRIGHT and LICENSE must be added as %doc in the %files section. Maybe > adding the sample files (out of data/samples in the source) is also a good > idea. done. Samples are installed into /usr/share/ugene/data during 'make install' > - There are 'unowned directories' in your %files section. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories fixed New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281229.n0SCTXR5013937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 07:29:32 EDT --- package approved in Comment #4 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Safe Short Description: Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281245.n0SCjinB017519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 07:45:43 EDT --- > this must be fixed before approval. Manuel please look at Comment #9, and answer if sounds good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-469894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-469894-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281256.n0SCuGDM025904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #10 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 07:56:15 EDT --- I'd certainly prefer cglib 2.2 -- when the jpackage package appears, will/can a jpackage person submit it to Fedora or should I do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281300.n0SD0BX3026817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:00:09 EDT --- All fixed. APPROVED!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482807-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281257.n0SCvScS026091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 07:57:27 EDT --- My fault, I didn't check it in i386. I have patched the cmake file to use LIB_SUFFIX instead of LIB_POSTFIX Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libfli.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libfli-1.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281305.n0SD530V028218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 08:05:00 EDT --- Builds cleanly for me in mock this time. Better late than never: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281305.n0SD5CLu028280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Martin Siv?k <msivak at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Martin Siv?k <msivak at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:05:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-cryptsetup Short Description: Python libraries to ease LUKS manipulation from python code Owners: msivak Branches: Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281303.n0SD3Kcb021150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 08:03:18 EDT --- Argh, sorry about that ... Christmas holidays followed by $DAYJOB busy-ness. The changes look good, and the lack of documentation is annoying but I guess not a total show-stopper. It builds cleanly in mock for me. Better later than never: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281313.n0SDDEBE023775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 08:13:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pipviewer Short Description: Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281313.n0SDDkxU023871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 08:13:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pysnmp Short Description: SNMP engine written in Python Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281324.n0SDOoSs026532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #7 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:24:48 EDT --- any progress on the kernel patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281329.n0SDT4QN002034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-28 08:29:02 EDT --- Taking this. (In reply to comment #1) > Hello, this is my second package, I am seeking sponsor like at bug 481272 I could sponsor you, but I can't find any reviews you've participated in. Would you mind pointing me to some, so I can be sure about your packaging abilities? In case you haven't done so, I recommend picking up a couple of review requests and doing preliminary reviews. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281343.n0SDhYos005818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-28 08:43:33 EDT --- I've tested it yesterday :) With your patch it looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281344.n0SDiqO6005978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #4 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:44:51 EDT --- I started with fedora packaging these time so I haven't done any pre-review, but I would like. Please can you recommend me some review to do preliminary review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281343.n0SDhDm5005592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:43:12 EDT --- Ok, all problems have been fixed => reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225694-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281343.n0SDhFer031623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 --- Comment #5 from Karsten Hopp <karsten at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:43:13 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review ! I've added the disttag as that one makes it much easier to reuse the spec file for different releases and I just forgot to add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281351.n0SDp8PI007804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-28 08:51:05 EDT --- Petr, you could start for instance with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 which is an easy one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281353.n0SDrnJu008391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 08:53:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libjpeg Short Description: MinGW Windows Libjpeg library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 13:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281359.n0SDxqRn009697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 08:59:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I've tested it yesterday :) > With your patch it looks OK. then please add the review flag again "+", so Tim Jackson will able to request cvs access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281401.n0SE1n0p010511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #6 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 09:01:48 EDT --- re Comment #5: OK, thanks much -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281402.n0SE2Faa010613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #24 from Robert Spanton <rspanton at zepler.net> 2009-01-28 09:02:13 EDT --- Steve, thanks -- I wasn't sure whether it was "the done thing" to add karma to one's own package. If you want to be a second maintainer on it, I've not problem with that :-) I should get around to submitting the msp430-gcc, msp430-libc and msp430-gdb packages for review in the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] New: Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee Message-ID: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 Summary: Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-extension-mirage.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-extension-mirage-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Mirage is a Banshee plugin that provides innovative spectrum analysis capabilities for the purpose of generating "intelligent" playlists. See also http://hop.at/mirage/ for demonstration videos and further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281411.n0SEB2me012286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-28 09:11:01 EDT --- Here's the review queue: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/REVIEW.html You are probably looking for bugs in NEW state, assigned to (Nobody). By skimming through the list I've managed to find one package for which the review did not start at all yet: python-argparse (bug #462505) You may want to help your colleagues with Merge reviews as well ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 310631] Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker In-Reply-To: <bug-310631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-310631-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281413.n0SED5Wc012690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310631 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281420.n0SEKjcw007661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-28 09:20:43 EDT --- Feel adviced to add perl-sig to InitialCC, like most perl package maintainer do. Activate the test suite. A test suite being noisy doesn't justify deactivating it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281416.n0SEGtbC006687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #25 from Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 09:16:53 EDT --- Yes, I wondered about that too, but I've tended to find that with the packages that I've been working on (with a fairly low user base compared with the core packages) if I don't do that and then specifically ask other people to look at the package, then it can just sit around in limbo forever. I think provided you've checked to see that it works, there should be no problem really. I'll send the requests through shortly for the other permissions in that case. It will be really good to get the other packages in too. I guess the one bit we can't do is the gdb proxy bit as it has a funny license, which is a pity I think as it would have made a nice set. Even so, getting the core bits in is really good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:26:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281426.n0SEQJJv015810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #6 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 09:26:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/cilk.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/cilk-5.4.6-3.src.rpm Added the %check, fixed the CFLAGS, also added the %{?_smp_mflags} rpmlint still throws warning about devel-file-in-non-devel-package but i'm not entirely sure that's a valid warning as the libs are specific to the app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480373-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281452.n0SEqUPB014415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 09:52:29 EDT --- rpmlint still throws warning about devel-file-in-non-devel-package because you need a -devel subpackage for those files. See the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281512.n0SFCvpq025767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 10:12:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) done. http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-DBIx-Safe/perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-4.fc10.src.rpm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Safe Short Description: Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281516.n0SFGHNS019542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 10:16:16 EDT --- Looks good, Tom. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480146-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281517.n0SFHvX0019723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 10:17:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330235) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330235) Suggested SPEC file for python-bicyclerepair I have found the x86_64 reletating issue. You have to use the %{python_sitelib} macro instead of %{_libdir} on the find command in your SPEC files. Additionaly, I think we can remove the python-devel BR, because it's only require for compiled python extension. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281525.n0SFP5E0021410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 10:25:04 EDT --- Good: + Package has comment about why the test script could not used. + Local build works fine. + Build on koji works fine *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281540.n0SFeGco031804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #8 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 10:40:14 EDT --- It's an entirely different kernel patch now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281541.n0SFfMUe024673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 10:41:20 EDT --- Sorry, it takes so long but now it's already built for rawhide - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1088883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session Message-ID: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-POE/perl-MooseX-POE.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-POE/perl-MooseX-POE-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MooseX::POE::Object is a Moose wrapper around a POE::Session. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281545.n0SFjux0025912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psklenar at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 10:45:55 EDT --- Hello, This is my informal review. I cannot sponsor you as I'm not an approved packager. Your package and specfile seems OK for me: My review: + rpmlint output is clean. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. There is timespan.spec. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. GPLv2+ + There is license in separate file in %doc : /usr/share/doc/timespan-2.1/COPYING + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL (md5sum timespan-2.1.tar.gz c9d545eb5f617b29b3a634d7a0aec39a + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + There isn't duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Package doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All file names in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. architectures. + I did a limited test that the package functions as described, like '/usr/bin/timespan -l now' + Summary and description corresponds package's home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281606.n0SG6hTL004620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 11:06:41 EDT --- Sorry, been away. It all seems fine to me. Overall with the mingw* packages I think there generally need to be updates to the packaging specs to cover the mingw requirements (and rpmlint as appropriate) and also to include the license file (to be fair we'd roast a commercial company for this!) and most of the mingw reviews would be a breeze! APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281613.n0SGD5pj006017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #41 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 11:13:01 EDT --- Looks like the description of the -python subpackage should end in a period, not a slash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application Message-ID: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Daemonize/perl-MooseX-Daemonize.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Daemonize/perl-MooseX-Daemonize-0.08-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Often you want to write a persistent daemon that has a pid file, and responds appropriately to Signals. This module provides a set of basic roles as an infrastructure to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281614.n0SGEF29031835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #42 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 11:14:13 EDT --- And I think python wants to be capitalized when used as a name (compare descriptions of other python packages). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281625.n0SGP7Ma008797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 11:25:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-pixman Short Description: MinGW Windows Pixman library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281623.n0SGNSva001760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 11:23:27 EDT --- Thanks Peter. CVS request coming up ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281625.n0SGPgJa002458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #9 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 11:25:40 EDT --- This one: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/27/297 together with sreadahead-1.0 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/27/296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: <bug-476758-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476758-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281630.n0SGUO4F003502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 11:30:23 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libspiro New Branches: F-9 F-10 Owners: kevin nphilipp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: <bug-474864-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474864-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281637.n0SGbc8V011604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 11:37:37 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Test-Signature New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281638.n0SGcFh3011680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Tom Moertel <tom at moertel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Tom Moertel <tom at moertel.com> 2009-01-28 11:38:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-magit Short Description: Emacs interface to the most common Git operations Owners: tmoertel Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281642.n0SGg0MS012554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #3 from bee <honeybeehoneyhive-redhat at yahoo.com> 2009-01-28 11:41:59 EDT --- Thank you for your help Simon lukas?k!!!! But, how much time do i have to wait for a sponsor to find me? i see nobody around! Thank you again!! bye!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281644.n0SGirWT006482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-28 11:44:51 EDT --- Right, here we go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281646.n0SGkmP8013708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 11:46:46 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC file matches with package name + Name of the package fits naming guidelines for python addon packages + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Could download upstream tarball with spectool + Package contains most recent release of the software + Tar ball in the package matches with upstream (md5sum: e67d9b40a9f88f62246a8248faede6c5) + Package contains proper License tag + License tag claims BSD and LGPLv2+ as valid OSS licenses + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + %doc stanza is small, so we not need a separate doc subpackage + Buildroot definition seems ok + Local install/uninstall works fine + Packaged files have proper files permissions + Packaged files are owned by the package + Packaged files doesn't own by other packages + Build on koji without python-setupdocs fails, because package try to download it from the internet + Package contains no subpackages + Locel build works fine + Rpmlint is silient for source and binary rpms. + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Package contains proper %changelog Questions: * Does it may sense to pacakge the %{python_sitelib}/integrationtest directory? I assume it's only require for testing the built package, so we should remove this directory from the package. Bad: - Cant find python-setupdocs in the Fedora repository - Please remove the AppTools.egg-info directory from the sources in the %setup stanza to make sure, that the err-info files are built from sources TODO: - Not all source files have a proper copyright note (Please notify the upstream maintainer to fix this issue in the next release) - A refview shows, that mostly all files which have a copyrith note are licensed under the terms of the BSD license. So why there are references agains the LGPLv2+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226314] Merge Review: prctl In-Reply-To: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281648.n0SGms6j007526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226314 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 11:48:53 EDT --- Thanks for the explanation. So I can't to do a test to evaluate the software but I could do a generic package review since it is a simple one. There is one minor issue and a few suggestions. Let me know whenever you update the package so we can close the bug. * rpmlint says prctl.src:22: W: setup-not-quiet You need to use %setup -q ! no disttag. I think it could be better to have a disttag to avoid incompatibilities between the binaries produced by different versions of the compiler. What do you think? ! The patch is trivial. I don't think it is necessary to submit upstream. It would be nice though. ! You can make use of the %{name} macro a little more frequent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281656.n0SGujFM009371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 11:56:44 EDT --- Unfortunately I have found a mistake in the package The packaging guidlines says, theat the egg-info files should be build from source. So it may be helpful to remove the setupdocs.egg-info directory from source in the %setup stanza. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227027] Review Request: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: <bug-227027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-227027-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281657.n0SGvFrT016018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 11:57:10 EDT --- This package is in Fedora [1], but the review is '-' [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ant-contrib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226314] Merge Review: prctl In-Reply-To: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281705.n0SH5rYH017987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226314 --- Comment #6 from Karsten Hopp <karsten at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 12:05:52 EDT --- I've added changes for those in CVS: - added disttag - setup -q - frequent use of %{name} macro with the exception of the URL, because that's the string I use with cut&paste and firefox to check if there's a new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: <bug-442233-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442233-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281704.n0SH4ZiO010975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281715.n0SHFPxW020250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Bernard Johnson <bjohnson at symetrix.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482882 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] New: Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl Message-ID: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-Sane.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-Sane-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to access SANE-compatible scanners in a Perlish and object-oriented way, freeing you from the casting and memory management in C, yet remaining very close in spirit to original API. Note: I've already queried the author regarding adding a license file and he thought that the README was sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281714.n0SHE2qf013334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 --- Comment #5 from Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> 2009-01-28 12:14:01 EDT --- Argh... good catch. I have examined the source ball egg-info dir and I have forgot to do the same in the generated rpm as I was expecting for setuptools to do the right thing. My mistake. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226314] Merge Review: prctl In-Reply-To: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226314-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281716.n0SHGkI0014137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226314 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 12:16:45 EDT --- Great! Thanks. --------------------------------------------- This Merge Review (prctl) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281715.n0SHFGPm013945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-28 12:15:15 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 3e7bf8b2bd2e21c5082a52a37e381046 qtgpsc-0.2.3.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary a short and concise description. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is sane. NOT OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: qtgpsc = 0.2.3-1.fc11 qtgpsc(x86-64) = 0.2.3-1.fc11 = libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgps.so.17()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. OK gui application; desktop file installed properly Source0 is mistyped desktop-file-validate qtgpsc.desktop qtgpsc.desktop: warning: value "Application;Utility;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" License should be BSD not MIT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281726.n0SHQHqQ022944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 12:26:16 EDT --- Unfortunately, I have not seen, that you have a review request for the python-setupdocs package. So I have built it self on the base of the source rpm provided by your review request. After then I have create an local yum repository in which I have put python-setupdocs. Now, when I try to doa mock build agains rawhide (x86_64) and including my local yum repository, the build works fine. I want to suggest, that you are notify me, if the python-setupdocs package is available on koji, so we can do another tryp to build your package on koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281723.n0SHN4b3015577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 12:23:03 EDT --- sponsors generally are too busy, don't worry, someone will sponsor you as soon as possible, but if you like to speed up this process then you can submit more packages to review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482884] New: Review Request: CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler Language With No Pronounceable Acronym Message-ID: <bug-482884-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler Language With No Pronounceable Acronym https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Summary: Review Request: CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler Language With No Pronounceable Acronym Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/CLC-INTERCAL.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/CLC-INTERCAL-0-0.0.fc11.src.rpm Description: Compiler Language With No Pronounceable Acronym. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089200 Notes: CLC-INTERCAL uses a novel perversion (rather than "version", for correctness) numbering system consisting of a floating point number with independent signs for the integer and fractional parts. The current number is 1.-94.-2. Unfortunately, RPM is unable to cope with such numbering, so I took some liberties with sub-packages to make the resulting binary RPMs look almost right. The license is almost-but-not-quite 3 clause BSD. The clauses are the same, but the introduction slightly different: "In addition to the above, permission is hereby granted to use, misuse, modify, distribute, break, fix again, etcetera CLC-INTERCAL-1.-94.-2 provided that the following conditions are met". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281741.n0SHfcBU026685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #44 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 12:41:36 EDT --- I think the disabling of the winbind package would better be done with %if %enable_winbind or somesuch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281739.n0SHdAXf019234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #43 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 12:39:07 EDT --- There is some mixed use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} that should probably be cleaned up always use the one or the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482884] Review Request: CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler Language With No Pronounceable Acronym In-Reply-To: <bug-482884-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482884-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281747.n0SHll2D028124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 12:47:46 EDT --- Question: It this your first Fedora package? I ask this, because the package look like it's need some love. I try to summarize my first mind about this package: 1. At first, you should try to get a better description the package, so a user which want to install the package may got a idea, why he should try out this new programming language 2. Your have specified 0 as the global package version and add version information on the definition of subpackage. This is not ok, you should put the version information on the Version statement and the subpackage shouldn't have any version information in thier name. 3.) It's look very ugly, that you are using rpm macros for the whole content of the Summary and Group statement. Unfortunately, I either a sponsor or a perl packaging specialist, so I can't review your package, but I would show your some points which are needs some homework. If this you first package and you need a sponsor please set the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug as a blocker. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281759.n0SHxubG023685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 12:59:55 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 18:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281802.n0SI2jZc024604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 13:02:44 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > Source0 is mistyped fixed > desktop-file-validate qtgpsc.desktop > qtgpsc.desktop: warning: value "Application;Utility;" for key "Categories" in > group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" fixed and added an icon > License should be BSD not MIT. fixed Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/qtgpsc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/qtgpsc-0.2.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 18:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281830.n0SIUTtC003958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 18:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281827.n0SIRsCu003304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-28 13:27:53 EDT --- Looks good; thank you! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 18:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281838.n0SIcrGq031297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 13:38:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qtgpsc Short Description: A client for the gpsd GPS server Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 18:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] New: Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one Message-ID: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Summary: Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: gsh is used to launch several remote shells on many machines at the same time and control them from a single command prompt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281935.n0SJZXxx022276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 14:35:31 EDT --- > + According to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make you should > use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' whenever possible. In this case since upstream > supports parallel builds you should use it. You have missed this one. Sorry for not mentioning this earlier, but thanks to the new RPM in Rawhide the following Requires in the -devel sub-package are redundant: Requires: libgnomeui-devel Requires: atk-devel Requires: libbonobo-devel Requires: gtk2-devel Requires: gail-devel Requires: libwnck-devel Requires: esound-devel Requires: at-spi-devel Requires: pkgconfig [rishi at freebook tmp]$ rpm --requires -qp gok-devel-2.25.3-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/pkg-config [...] pkgconfig(atk) pkgconfig(cspi-1.0) pkgconfig(esound) pkgconfig(gail) pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0) pkgconfig(libbonobo-2.0) pkgconfig(libgnomeui-2.0) pkgconfig(libspi-1.0) pkgconfig(libwnck-1.0) Even though https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files still mandates the use of 'Requires: pkgconfig', Spot confirmed that they are not needed from Fedora 11 onwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281937.n0SJbrxc028225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #45 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 14:37:50 EDT --- the main samba4 package include something called /usr/bin/tdbtorture, which from the looks of it, is a test program for the tdb code. As such, it should probably go in the -devel package, if at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281907.n0SJ7iI9006200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 14:07:43 EDT --- Good: + Base name of the SPEC file matches to package name + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginn of %clean and %install + Local build works fine + Can download upstream tar ball with spectool + Tar ball in package matches with upstream (md5sum: 7ebb939d44b64667eaa90ab1ef9a2220) + Package contains License tag + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + Buildroot declaration is ok + Package contains no patches + Package has not subpackages + $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used during the build + Excluding of pp64 is ok + Local build works fine + Start of banshee with install package works + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + Koji build works fine + %doc stanza is small, so we need no deparate doc subpackage + Packaged files of proper permissions + Packaged files are owned by the package + Package files have no comflict to other packages + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + *.a and *.la file are remove in the %install stanza + Package use %find_lang for i18n + Proper Changelog Bad: - IMHO the package name should be banshee-mirage instead of banshee-extension-mirage - Mixed use of $RRP_ROOT_BUILD and %{buildroot} - Package has no %{?_smp_mflags} without a comment why - Package banshee-musicbrainz-devel doesn't exit in Fedora repository, but I could not found a blocker bug for a review of this package - Rpmlint complaints for source package: $ rpmlint banshee-extension-mirage-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm banshee-extension-mirage.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) banshee-extension-mirage.src: W: invalid-license X11/MIT 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - rpmlint complaints binary rpm: $ rpmlint banshee-extension-mirage-0.4.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm banshee-extension-mirage.x86_64: W: invalid-license X11/MIT banshee-extension-mirage.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libmirageaudio.so banshee-extension-mirage.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libmirageaudio.so libmirageaudio.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. - License tag catins wrong license specification. A short review of the copyright notes in the source files show that GPLv2+ may be the right specificiation for the license tag) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281943.n0SJh06F029368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #46 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 14:42:58 EDT --- Similar for smbtorture and subunitrun in the -common subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281950.n0SJogJP031010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(davidz at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 14:50:41 EDT --- > You have missed this one. No, I haven't. I didn't feel it was worth it. There's only so much time I can justify spending on irrelevant details of a spec file that make no difference whatsoever to the resulting package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281955.n0SJtsJf027120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #47 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 14:55:52 EDT --- And I'm not sure we want a program called /usr/bin/nsstest shipped as part of samba4-devel. The -python subpackage has a bunch of autogenerated provides that I don't think it should have: atsvc.so auth.so base.so com.so credentials.so dfs.so drsuapi.so echo.so epmapper.so glue.so initshutdown.so irpc.so ldb.so lsa.so messaging.so mgmt.so misc.so nbt.so net.so netbios.so param.so registry.so samr.so security.so svcctl.so tdb.so tevent.so unixinfo.so uuid.so winreg.so wkssvc.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:56:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281956.n0SJuu8v000640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #48 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 14:56:54 EDT --- The -devel package shouldn't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282000.n0SK0eWZ001679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:56:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901281956.n0SJuwqS027446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-28 14:56:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > 1) drop vendor tag in desktop-install-file. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop-file-install_usage > Without a vendor , the build will fail for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282011.n0SKBEQk004927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 15:11:13 EDT --- banshee-extensions-mirage is consistent both with the application and with other distros (e.g. Ubuntu calls the same package by this name), upholding this as an unofficial standard helps users. Aside that I think I got all of them, except the unstripped .so file, by all rights now that I removed the nil statement for debug it should be stripped and split into -debug but it isn't.. advice?: Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-extension-mirage.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-extension-mirage-0.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282012.n0SKCVhg005241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 15:12:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: findbugs-bcel Short Description: Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions Owners: jjames Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282026.n0SKQB76009426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 15:26:10 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + BuildRoot tag is ok + Could download upstream tar ball with spectool + Package contains a License tag + License tag contains GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + License in the copyright notes in the source files matches with specification on the license tag + Local build works fine + Koji build works fine + Package contains no subpackages + %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Build root will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package don't contains any scriptlets + %changelog is ok. Bad: - Package doesn't fits with the python SPECE templates - Build complaints duplicate in the %files stanza - Package tar ball doesn't match with upstream one Upstream tar ball: 6b925fe21bb84606b47a9a29d1eb88fb gsh-0.3.tar.gz Packaged tar ball: 9b23c16f1265925989e2c1b4f17b04f9 ../SOURCES/gsh-0.3.tar.gz - Rpmlint compaints binary package: $ rpmlint gsh-0.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm gsh.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gsh/pity.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - Please remove the gsh.egg-info directory from the sources in the %setup stanza to make sure, theat the egg-infos will been built from source Hints: * It may be helpful, if you can read and unterstand the python packaging guideline as https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python This is not a complete review, because the package has some severe errors and need some love from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282028.n0SKSxkt009880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 15:28:58 EDT --- I tried putting the shared library into ${_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs but that just means that spatch can't find the shared library and so doesn't start up. This doesn't appear to be an ordinary use of the OCaml stublibs (which in ordinary OCaml programs are only used for bytecode, and the bytecode interpreter does dlopen with the correct library path). The *.so.owner files are generated and used by ocamlfind, and are not an issue here. So I guess we have to leave the library in %{_libdir}. In reply to comment 3: I've corrected the license. Docs and demos are now in subpackages. In reply to comment 4: I got rid of the useless Makefiles and moved the python library. However I've little idea about the Python code, not even how to test if it is working. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/coccinelle-0.1.4-8.fc11.src.rpm * Wed Jan 28 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 0.1.4-8 - Remove useless Makefiles from python/coccilib. - License is GPLv2 (not GPLv2+). - Include documentation and demos in subpackages. - Move python library to a more sensible path. - Add a check section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282028.n0SKSLLn001933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Tim Jackson <rpm at timj.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Tim Jackson <rpm at timj.co.uk> 2009-01-28 15:28:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bind-to-tinydns Short Description: Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format Owners: timj Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: <bug-220789-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-220789-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282029.n0SKTGSZ002124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maxamillion at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 15:29:13 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fail2ban New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: maxamillion Fedora owner has been contacted and expressed no interest in EPEL, I would like to maintain the EPEL package for EL-4 and EL-5 Email citing upstream packagers response to supporting EPEL: > According to > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fail2ban#Fedora%20EPEL5 > , fail2ban is available. A yum search fail2ban doesn't show it, however, > and http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/repoview/F.group.html > doesn't show it. Am I missing something, or is there still a step before it > goes fully available? I don't even see it in the testing branch. This was a bad entry, I am not supporting EPEL. You can get a fail2ban working on RHEL5/CentOS5 at ATrpms or DAG. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282039.n0SKdiU6011714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 15:39:43 EDT --- Good: + License tag has the right specification GPLv2 Bad: - Package name don't fits nameing guildlines. The package is a addon for banshee with the own name of mirage from the upstream author. So the pacnage name should be banshee-mirage. Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 We are not on Debin/Ubuntu. I know, that they have any packages with other package names then here on Fedora. - Mixed use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - Removing of the nil statement was a bad idea, because we get now a debuginfo package which is useless, because the most part of the application is writeen for the mono plattform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282039.n0SKdkXI004139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #12 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 15:39:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libchamplain.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libchamplain-0.2.8-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089611 > - fold %dir entries in %files, as suggestde by Jochen > - maybe fold 3 consecutive %doc lines into 1 ? Merely personal preferences as I explained earlier (comment #3). > - devel package gtk-doc Require not necessary (is pulled in by gtk2-devel > anyways) That is true, but I had explicitly mentioned it because libchamplain installs files in directories owned by gtk-doc and it serves as a kind of reminder. Hope you do not mind. :-) > - devel package Require on clutter-devel won't be necessary for F-11 Fixed. Could not test this because my Fedora 10 machine broke down, and libchamplain does not build on Fedora 9. > Otherwise package looks good. Demo code "launcher.c" won't compile as-is > because it unnecessarily include "config.h", probably should notify upstream > about that. If you have time, can you sed out that line from it ? Fixed. Will notify upstream also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 20:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282052.n0SKqBE5010748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 15:52:10 EDT --- You may remove the uncessaries symbols with the strip command -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282109.n0SL963x015664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 16:09:05 EDT --- yes but that will not put them into the debug package. Without a way to provide debug symbols we can't provide upstream with good backtraces which would make them hate Fedora.. also something about making baby Darwin cry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282115.n0SLFo43022928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #6 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 16:15:49 EDT --- While I believe the rename is nonsensical and does not serve our users. Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-mirage.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-mirage-0.4.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282126.n0SLQNWj019226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #49 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 16:26:20 EDT --- If you clean up these things, I'll start a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282132.n0SLWLLL020544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-28 16:32:20 EDT --- Good: + Panckage name fits packaging guidelines + Consistent usage of rpm macros + Package contains parallel build + Koji build works fine Bad: - Please strip files with thw strip command - so filesname issue still occurs (No blocker for me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282147.n0SLlZGs028836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 --- Comment #8 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 16:47:34 EDT --- Okay I think this is correct Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-mirage.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-mirage-0.4.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282148.n0SLmweC023927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-28 16:48:57 EDT --- oops; probably want to have the srpm named sil-gentium-basic-fonts since we already have a gentium-fonts package that will eventually be renamed sil-gentium-fonts (missed this, sorry, too much stuff to review and too little time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 22:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282210.n0SMAfPQ028370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #2 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 17:10:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh-0.3-2.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jan 28 2009 Adam Miller <maxamillion [AT] gmail.com> - 0.3-2 - Fixed rpmlint complaint, removed egg in setup, redownloaded source I am not entirely sure what was meant by python SPECE templates as I didn't see any mention of those on the wiki page for python packages, but I did change up the spec in ways that I saw I was lacking in compliance with the docs. Looking forward to further review and suggestions. Thank you for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 22:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480249-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282213.n0SMDjcX028724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 17:13:44 EDT --- ALZ is either a hacked up bzip2 or DEFLATE, depending on the version of ALZip used to create the file. There are no patent concerns here. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 22:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482951] New: Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-482951-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482951 Summary: Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-playgo.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-playgo-5-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/PlayGo Description: The PlayGo activity implements Go a strategic board game for two players. Go originated in ancient China, centuries before its earliest known references in 5th century BC writing. It is mostly popular in East Asia but has nowadays gained some popularity in the rest of the world as well. Go is noted for being rich in strategic complexity despite its simple rules. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089922 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-playgo-5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-playgo.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-playgo-5-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-playgo.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282328.n0SNSZ4K015765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Andreas Thienemann <andreas at bawue.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net --- Comment #13 from Andreas Thienemann <andreas at bawue.net> 2009-01-28 18:28:32 EDT --- Not to rain on the parade here, but this bug was just mentioned in a discussion about package quality. This package review is basically a joke. Just posting rpmlint results is not enough: The review guidelines clearly define several items of which only one is mentioned in the review. A short look at the spec file makes me wonder if anything else then a cursory rpmlint and mock run was attempted. While it might be debateable if the .spec file is actually legible but the missing source url is a clear blocker: "MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this." What about the duplicate Summary line? What about duplicate Requires? What about unneeded Requires? Why is the main %description tag talking about Conga and a second %description tag with a name override of "ricci" (identical to the %name tag) talking about the real program? What happened to the %files section? Why is the directory %{_docdir}/ricci-%{version}/ included as regular files instead of being marked as docs? Why isn't the %doc macro used? After taking a closer look at the .spec file I have to revise my initial verdict: This is not only a glaring example of a major failure of our review process, the entire .spec file is made out of fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282331.n0SNVs81012360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Andreas Thienemann <andreas at bawue.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282334.n0SNYpQ3012715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-28 18:34:49 EDT --- Re-opening because of fedora-review-. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282336.n0SNasCT017591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Robert Scheck <redhat at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901282337.n0SNbWSG013430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-28 18:37:31 EDT --- License tag changed. Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nullmodem.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nullmodem-0.0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478447-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290009.n0T09cU1018643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:09:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467401-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290008.n0T08j6V018582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:08:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290014.n0T0EK9S024378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-28 19:14:19 EDT --- bee: for the beginning, a real name might help. Second, you can do pre-reviews in order to prove your packaging skills. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored#Sponsorship_model -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290013.n0T0D4fQ024245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:13:02 EDT --- Note: the devel branch is always created. If you really don't want to maintain this in non EL-5 branches, you might post to the devel list asking if anyone else would like to? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290012.n0T0C5tK019331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-01-28 19:12:04 EDT --- Isn't stuff in %{_docdir} automatically marked %doc by RPM? The other complaints do sound valid though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481141-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290015.n0T0F9Xq019923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:15:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290014.n0T0EBVa019507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:14:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481508-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290019.n0T0JUpX025356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:19:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290018.n0T0IdfS025255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:18:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290020.n0T0KKkr021100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:20:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290021.n0T0LUIs021293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:21:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290025.n0T0P0mh026811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 19:24:59 EDT --- > Final point: I am intending to only import this on the EL-5 branch so if anyone > wants to co-maintain in devel/F-10/F-9 then let me know. Can I do this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220789] Review Request: fail2ban - Ban IPs that make too many password failures In-Reply-To: <bug-220789-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-220789-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290026.n0T0QMsu027455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220789 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:26:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: <bug-442233-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442233-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290025.n0T0P8oS027143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:25:05 EDT --- Please add a cvs template here so we know what branches you want, etc. Reset the fedora-cvs flag when thats ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290022.n0T0MLRd021801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:22:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290024.n0T0O5Cn026739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com AssignedTo|ankursinha at fedoraproject.or |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com |g | Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478749-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290030.n0T0Ul6V028466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-28 19:30:46 EDT --- Chitlesh, you could use the following construction: desktop-file-install \ %if 0%{?rhel} --vendor "" \ %endif --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: <bug-476758-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476758-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290027.n0T0Rsh2027883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:27:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290030.n0T0UgEa028433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:30:41 EDT --- Well, you are welcome to bring it up again to FESCo, but the decision made last time was that something that could at least potentially use the content should be added at the same time as this content package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290027.n0T0RU47022821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: <bug-474864-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474864-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290028.n0T0SgxM022943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:28:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290032.n0T0Wm9V028814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:32:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290035.n0T0ZLGh024454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-28 19:35:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482884] Review Request: CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler for the INTERCAL language In-Reply-To: <bug-482884-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482884-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290040.n0T0eFpO025348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler |CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler for |Language With No |the INTERCAL language |Pronounceable Acronym | --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 19:40:14 EDT --- Answer: No, I already maintain several other perl packages. No sponsor required. 1. Okay, description was a little weak. New text ripped from Debian package: Summary: Compiler for the INTERCAL language Description: This package provides a Perl-based compiler for the INTERCAL programming language, usable either from the command line or as a Perl module. CLC-INTERCAL is designed to be almost compatible with the original (Princeton 1972) compiler. It also implements several extensions to the original language, including support for object orientation, operator overloading and quantum computing. 2. Indeed. But RPM can't cope with hyphens in version numbers (and even if it could, it probably wouldn't realise that 1.-94.-2 is a higher version number than 1.-94.-3). It seemed appropriate for INTERCAL to seek a particularly obtuse solution, but on second thought... Since it's not yet a 1.0 release, how about Version: 0 and Release: 0.%{X}.1._94._2 (as a non-numeric pre-release tag). 3. %{summary} comment is moot if I stick the proper version into release tag; the offending sub-package is no longer necessary. Only Group: %{group} remains in UI-X sub-package. New Spec: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/CLC-INTERCAL.spec New SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/CLC-INTERCAL-0-0.0.1._94._2.fc11.src.rpm New Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090063 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290054.n0T0sgm6027404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-28 19:54:40 EDT --- Unfortunately I cannot attend FESCo's IRC meetings due to overlapping with personal matters, but I must stand on Chitlesh's side here (ref #14 )) and support him. I for one would have loved to use a rpm for OVM at the time that I deployed the software in the company I work for (see #3). And no, except for a few minor tools, the game around real EDA has no open-source players, all big boys use products from one of the three major players in the market. Stalling even the few available open source packages because in this moment there is no free tool to use them is just an administrative block and with no support in any of the guidelines I know of. Note that this is the exact opposite case of games with free engines but encumbered game data (which was downloaded at install time from links outside our repos): this time we have free content but no free engine to use it with. Pushing the content _might_ speed up the engine and harm no one; on the contrary we would once again be the leader of the movement. No content at all will definitely not help anyone. It's like saying "Look, we have free oranges ! Take as many as you want !" but you reply "No, I will not eat your oranges unless someone provides a free knife for peeling them, too !" Or in a geeky speak, "Here, have some free beer !" "No, thank you, I cannot accept it, I have no free bottle opener!" And for what it's worth: 10 days ago I had the opportunity to attend a meeting with a manager working for one of the top 3 EDA tools manufacturers mentioned above. It just happened that his next meeting scheduled during that week was with the other players of the OVM game, in view of releasing OVM 2.1. In other words, there is a real incentive over this project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290056.n0T0uvfJ000666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kmcmartin at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 19:56:55 EDT --- http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/sreadahead/ |`- http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/sreadahead/sreadahead.spec `-- http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/sreadahead/sreadahead-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Please let me know if I made a hash of the specfile. I'd like us to get this and the hooks for it into F11. I'm not willing to merge the patch for the open tracing yet, as we would effectively be "guaranteeing" a userspace interface (not that debugfs really provides these assurances.) and I'd like to wait and see what actually gets merged upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290111.n0T1B2Qo030225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #29 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 20:11:01 EDT --- > * I can't spot any license (I am not sure, but haven't there been some legal > issues with DJB's works?). Blocking FE-LEGAL. you can remove FE-LEGAL http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-November/msg00023.html > Finally: Does this package still have an active upstream? > I thought, DJB discontinued all his works. the package maintaner need's to fix the bugs :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290114.n0T1EEgQ003493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #30 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-28 20:14:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Hi, I've made the changes. Please have a look at the following seems better now, but I have a question ? how you will start djbdns ? using something like /service directory ? 3 - should be good to have a svscanboot [UPS] running with upstart, Mamoru is the best person to answer about what directory, because /service should not be used, may be somthing like /var/run/daemontools ? UPS -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/daemontools-installer/+bug/66615 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290133.n0T1XPB6006752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290133.n0T1XAXW006713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468516-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290140.n0T1evsV008102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 wsnyder at wsnyder.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wsnyder at wsnyder.org --- Comment #28 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-01-28 20:40:55 EDT --- Chitlesh notified me of this thread. The src/ prefix is because many users have multiple versions of SystemPerl installed (generally in a repository) and just point to the one they want. Lane has a the right solution for the present version, as makefiles etc also have the src/ path hardcoded. If there's a strong objection to the extra src/ in the path, I can add a new envvariable that will set the location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-478759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290138.n0T1cAoS002234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 wsnyder at wsnyder.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wsnyder at wsnyder.org Bug 478759 depends on bug 476386, which changed state. Bug 476386 Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-01-28 20:38:08 EDT --- Chitlesh notified me of this thread. The src/ prefix is because many users have multiple versions of SystemPerl installed (generally in a repository) and just point to the one they want. Lane has a the right solution for the present version, as makefiles etc also have the src/ path hardcoded. If there's a strong objection to the extra src/ in the path, I can add a new envvariable that will set the location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] New: Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module Message-ID: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 Summary: Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-Network-IPv4Addr.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-12.fc10.src.rpm Description: Network::IPv4Addr provides functions for parsing IPv4 addresses both in traditional address/netmask format and in the new CIDR format. There are also methods for calculating the network and broadcast address and also to see check if a given address is in a specific network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 02:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator Message-ID: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator-1.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: perl module for generating XML documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 03:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290305.n0T35RH4017676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 22:05:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pygooglechart Short Description: A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API Owners: stahnma Branches: F9, F10, EL4, EL5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 03:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290316.n0T3G57c025599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 03:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290336.n0T3aAM8024292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |482968 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 03:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290338.n0T3cEgi030469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 22:38:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090315 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8f9e6ba2595b07997efac1377c5484e9 XML-Generator-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=97, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.15 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Generator-1.01-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(XML::Generator) = 1.01 perl(XML::Generator::cdata) perl(XML::Generator::comment) perl(XML::Generator::final) perl(XML::Generator::overload) perl(XML::Generator::pi) perl(XML::Generator::pretty) perl(XML::Generator::util) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) Any reason for removing DOM.pm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 03:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:45:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290345.n0T3jHNG032398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-28 22:45:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090313 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1c4a9278ada5557a4895ee44b0312888 Network-IPv4Addr-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok + Package perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-12.fc11 => Provides: perl(Network::IPv4Addr) = 0.05 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Network::IPv4Addr) perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestions: 1) Use complete source url as http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/F/FR/FRAJULAC/Network-IPv4Addr-0.05.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 03:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290355.n0T3tkSA001897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #40 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-28 22:55:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) I have filed a bug against Publican for the Source0 entry (482968). I cannot hard code this in as I previously though. Am also trying to figure out how to populate the .desktop file with the proper options as I know it shows up on the computer with the proper icons and such. Will file a bug if I can't figure it out. (In reply to comment #39) I can hard code the htmlview only but it would most likely break functionality in Publican later. Is this a hard requirement? It doesn't appear to hurt the package as it is an if statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 04:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290423.n0T4NFdg032413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |482972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 04:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290439.n0T4duTf002894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgilmore at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore at redhat.com> 2009-01-28 23:39:55 EDT --- I honestly do not know why DOM.pm is removed. i picked up the spec from spacewalk and cleaned it up. lets add it back. Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator-1.01-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 04:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290449.n0T4nEUv011298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Bug 476471 depends on bug 482972, which changed state. Bug 482972 Summary: .desktop file not created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290506.n0T56aHS014763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:06:36 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290502.n0T52qqL013990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 00:02:51 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290503.n0T53Rjp014045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 00:03:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Network-IPv4Addr Short Description: Network-IPv4Addr Perl module Owners: ausil Branches: F-9 EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig use the right account name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290502.n0T52WQY013926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 00:02:31 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Network-IPv4Addr Short Description: Network-IPv4Addr Perl module Owners: dgilmore Branches: F-9 EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290502.n0T52A3p013883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:02:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090311 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7878a0155d9f2c582e14696c2115867e MooseX-POE-0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=185, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 3.09 cusr 0.19 csys = 3.34 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-POE-0.1-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::POE) = 0.100 perl(MooseX::POE::Aliased) perl(MooseX::POE::Exporter) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Class) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Class::Trait) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Instance) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Role) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Trait) perl(MooseX::POE::Object) = 0.050 perl(MooseX::POE::Object::Deferred) perl(MooseX::POE::Role) perl(MooseX::POE::SweetArgs) perl(ooseX::POE) = 0.01 Requires: perl(B) perl(Filter::Simple) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Exporter) perl(Moose::Role) perl(MooseX::POE::Exporter) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Class) perl(MooseX::POE::Meta::Role) perl(MooseX::POE::Object) perl(MooseX::POE::Role) perl(POE) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Name) perl(metaclass) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions:- 1) you can add BR:perl-MooseX-Daemonize to enable one more test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290505.n0T552n9008416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290510.n0T5AtPn015585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Bug 476471 depends on bug 482968, which changed state. Bug 482968 Summary: Source0 missing from SPEC file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482968 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290507.n0T57AQx008784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #31 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-29 00:07:10 EDT --- > the package maintaner need's to fix the bugs :-) Right I know, I could be an upstream for this and djbdns as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290513.n0T5D31C009785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:13:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090309 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 24ff349f0e2e09ca89e8ecbc73b0dc65 MooseX-Daemonize-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=82, 18 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 3.84 cusr 0.25 csys = 4.17 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Daemonize-0.08-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Daemonize) = 0.08 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Core) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid::File) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::WithPidFile) = 0.01 perl(Test::MooseX::Daemonize) = 0.03 perl(Test::MooseX::Daemonize::Testable) Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid::File) perl(MooseX::Getopt) perl(MooseX::Getopt::OptionTypeMap) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(POSIX) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290517.n0T5Hc9D016798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-29 00:17:37 EDT --- Still some issues: * The t/DOM.t test fails due to a missing XML::DOM => Please add BuildRequires: perl(XML::DOM) This should let the testsuite succeed. * This is a noarch package. => No need to pass OPTIMIZE in %build Please remove OPTIMIZE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290526.n0T5Q1NY018174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 00:25:59 EDT --- sorry for dropping the ball on this. Builds in mock source matches upstream. rpmlint is silent. sane Requires/Provides approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290531.n0T5VFiK019231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:31:14 EDT --- please remove OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from %build as this is noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290530.n0T5UEDP018981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:30:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Still some issues: > > * The t/DOM.t test fails due to a missing XML::DOM > => Please add > BuildRequires: perl(XML::DOM) > This should let the testsuite succeed. > > * This is a noarch package. > => No need to pass OPTIMIZE in %build > Please remove OPTIMIZE. Thanks for this comment. I thought its ok not to care much for noarch packages. Thanks will take care to ask to remove OPTIMIZE for perl noarch packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290529.n0T5TsLG012396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #32 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-01-29 00:29:54 EDT --- > seems better now, but I have a question? > how you will start djbdns? Well, for now will have to run it manually. I'm working on making it usable with the existing /etc/init.d and /sbin/service framework, as that'll be more intuitive and seamless I guess. > using something like /service directory ? > > 3 - should be good to have a svscanboot [UPS] running with upstart, Mamoru is > the best person to answer about what directory, because /service should not be > used, may be somthing like /var/run/daemontools? I haven't looked at it, but surely would explore about it as well. So, can I consider daemontools to be approved? May be, I can work on packaging djbdns now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290539.n0T5daR2020284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:39:35 EDT --- Also, make sure to remove OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from %build as its not needed for this noarch kind of package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290539.n0T5d7Lh020238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-29 00:39:06 EDT --- Looking good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290539.n0T5dchQ014326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:39:37 EDT --- Also, make sure to remove OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from %build as its not needed for this noarch kind of package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290542.n0T5gO74015018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-29 00:42:23 EDT --- Revoking approval - This spec file needs to be brushed up. Issues: - Clean up the spec file from remnants of cpanspec's template. - I consider BR:perl-MooseX-Daemonize to be a must. - %doc is empty. Add at least "Changes" to it. - This is a noarch package. Remove OPTIMIZE from %build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 05:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290548.n0T5mcn4015861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 00:48:37 EDT --- Can you please resubmit this package using cpanspec created SPEC file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290609.n0T69PjU024952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 01:09:24 EDT --- If you are not knowing about cpanspec usage then look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/cpanspec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457947-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290628.n0T6SOwf028855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: cf-bonveno-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457955-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290634.n0T6Ylqk029870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF |cf-bonveno-fonts - |font |BonvenoCF font Alias|bonvenocf-fonts |cf-bonveno-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290656.n0T6uOn4001937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 01:56:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nullmodem Short Description: A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290655.n0T6tlAD028292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 01:55:46 EDT --- Lucian, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290713.n0T7DeKc005120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290718.n0T7Iner006166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy <msuchy at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchy <msuchy at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 02:18:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-SetID Short Description: Provides api for correctly changing user identity Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: <bug-466953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466953-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290730.n0T7UM4Q008547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchy <msuchy at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 02:30:21 EDT --- Ough I updated spec, but forgot to update this BZ :( Updated Spec: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Utils/perl-NOCpulse-Utils.spec Update SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Utils/perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.11-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290730.n0T7UxDB008641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roozbeh at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 02:30:57 EDT --- Please rename the package to sil-gentium-basic-fonts. We already have Gentium, which will be renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. Updating the CVS request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-gentium-basic-fonts Short Description: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290731.n0T7V5SL002200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 02:31:04 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #39) > I can hard code the htmlview only but it would most likely break functionality > in Publican later. Is this a hard requirement? It doesn't appear to hurt the > package as it is an if statement. You mean the conditional stuff - yeah we can probably live with that if we are proceeding with pure publican generated spec files. But htmlview vs xdg-utils stuff should be fully conditionalized not partly like now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-176096-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-176096-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290733.n0T7XqQY009182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Message-ID: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 176096 Blocks: 477335 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 481476 Renaming of gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts.spec http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts-1.02-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290739.n0T7d9uL010425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|477335 |477337 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481530] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla - Access Fedora's Bugzilla In-Reply-To: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481530-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290745.n0T7jtZt012272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481530 Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu> 2009-01-29 02:45:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290803.n0T83hao015955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-29 03:03:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > sane Requires/Provides Not quite :( Requires(pre): perl(Class::MethodMaker) This is very likely wrong. Furthermore: - Package is noarch => OPTIMIZE doesn't make any sense - Please add perl-sig to InitialCC like most perl-packagers do. - "make test" is claimed to require "root". I recommend to add an rpm option to run this testsuite (rpmbuild --with tests or similar). Better: Make the testsuite degrade gracefully if not being run as "root". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290804.n0T845bq009242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com> 2009-01-29 03:04:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: log4c Short Description: flexible application message logging library Owners: alexh Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290804.n0T849EL009270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 03:04:08 EDT --- Perl package source generally includes license test in its perl module source text files(.pm here say) only. Suggestions: 1) SRPM when extracted got SPEC with License as "Unknown" whereas SPEC file link shows correct license as "GPL+ or Artistic" 2) Summary should be "Perl extension for the SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Project" 3) %files should be %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README examples %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/Sane* %{_mandir}/man3/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290807.n0T87C4G016870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 03:07:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Perl package source generally includes license test in its perl module source > text files(.pm here say) only. > s/test/text/ > Suggestions: > 1) SRPM when extracted got SPEC with License as "Unknown" whereas SPEC file > link shows correct license as "GPL+ or Artistic" > > 2) Summary should be > "Perl extension for the SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Project" > > 3) %files should be > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc Changes README examples > %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* > %{perl_vendorarch}/Sane* > %{_mandir}/man3/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290826.n0T8Q2Lj020928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 03:26:01 EDT --- Thanks Jochen and Jose: Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-setupdocs.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-setupdocs-1.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290826.n0T8QVKR021065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Renaming review: |Renaming review: |gentium-fonts to |doulos-fonts to |sil-gentium-fonts |sil-doulos-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-181994-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-181994-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290825.n0T8Pbpo014259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181994 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Message-ID: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 181994 Blocks: 477335 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Renaming of doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-doulos-fonts.spec http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290835.n0T8Z9Sa016106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 03:35:07 EDT --- It seems even if I donn't remove eggs folder setuptools takes care of it by creating it from source: log snippet when it was not removed: ===================== running egg_info writing setupdocs.egg-info/PKG-INFO writing top-level names to setupdocs.egg-info/top_level.txt writing dependency_links to setupdocs.egg-info/dependency_links.txt writing entry points to setupdocs.egg-info/entry_points.txt reading manifest file 'setupdocs.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' writing manifest file 'setupdocs.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' Copying setupdocs.egg-info to /home/redhat/rpm/BUILDROOT/python-setupdocs-1.0.1-3.fc10.i386/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setupdocs-1.0.1-py2.5.egg-info running install_scripts + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot ========================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290839.n0T8dAPL016729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 03:39:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-setupdocs Short Description: Setuptools plugin Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 09:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-433678-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290903.n0T93fha021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 04:03:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Isn't stuff in %{_docdir} automatically marked %doc by RPM? This is correct: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2005-May/msg00118.html Currently there are more directories under which all files/directories are automatically marked as %doc Note that I have not checked the spec file of this package at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 09:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290915.n0T9FsUd025102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 04:15:53 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 09:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290927.n0T9Rfn9002007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 04:27:28 EDT --- from build.log you can see warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/boot.msg warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/expert.msg warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/general.msg warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/param.msg warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/rescue.msg warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/snake.msg warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/pxelinux.0 warning: File listed twice: /tftpboot/linux-install/pxelinux.cfg Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Duplicate_Files ===> You want to have in %files of -cmd as only %config(noreplace) /tftpboot/linux-install/ This will make all files under this /tftpboot/linux-install/ directory as configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 09:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290935.n0T9Zg6U003974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 04:35:41 EDT --- 2) also, gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet should be %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi 3) Buildroot should be one of values from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 09:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481759-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901290943.n0T9hOXB005551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 04:43:23 EDT --- Questions: * Does it may sense to pacakge the %{python_sitelib}/integrationtest directory? I assume it's only require for testing the built package, so we should remove this directory from the package. Yeo .. will remove. Bad: - Cant find python-setupdocs in the Fedora repository Yeah in addition to adding as depends tag I should have mentioned in comments. - Please remove the AppTools.egg-info directory from the sources in the %setup stanza to make sure, that the err-info files are built from sources >From build log of python-setupdocs it looked like even if I don't remove this folder setuptools takes care of recreating it. Will very even before importing python-setupdocs and do the fix accordingly. May you also check in meantime? :) TODO: - Not all source files have a proper copyright note (Please notify the upstream maintainer to fix this issue in the next release) Yeah I have been in constant touch with upstream and this would be fixed in next release for sure. They have already started doing the process. - A refview shows, that mostly all files which have a copyrith note are licensed under the terms of the BSD license. So why there are references agains the LGPLv2+? Actually few images are in LGPLv2+ -- confirmed from upstream. image_ LICENSE.txt has details. Once python-setupdocs is done and build available will update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 10:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291004.n0TA4ZlZ010366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchy <msuchy at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 05:04:34 EDT --- > Requires(pre): perl(Class::MethodMaker) > This is very likely wrong. OK. There it seems that pure Requires: perl(Class::MethodMaker) Should be ok. > Package is noarch => OPTIMIZE doesn't make any sense OK. Will remove it. > Please add perl-sig to InitialCC like most perl-packagers do. I did not know it. I overlooked it in guidelines. Will do next time. > - "make test" is claimed to require "root". > I recommend to add an rpm option to run this testsuite All the test in this package require root. So making them optional will be the same as skipping it entirely. IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 10:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291011.n0TABKHB006614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-29 05:11:18 EDT --- Great. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 10:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472794] Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries In-Reply-To: <bug-472794-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-472794-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291014.n0TAExdE012802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472794 Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 05:14:57 EDT --- I'm withdrawing this review for the moment because it's no longer a requirement for the packages I'm currently working on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 10:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291017.n0TAHVtn013654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 05:17:31 EDT --- License should be GPL+ or Artistic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 10:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291024.n0TAONkJ015228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 05:24:22 EDT --- is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 11:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] New: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package Message-ID: <bug-483016-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Summary: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Miroslav Suchy <msuchy at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package provides an API for generating varying levels of debugging output on various output streams. Scratch build is without problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090760 rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 11:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291119.n0TBJiYj027949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 06:19:43 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Daemonize/perl-MooseX-Daemonize.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Daemonize/perl-MooseX-Daemonize-0.08-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 11:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: <bug-483016-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483016-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291120.n0TBK2Qg028207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 06:20:00 EDT --- As you are package submitter you should not change fedora?review flag. Its reviewer who want to take it for review will change it to fedora-review? and when he want to approve package he then change it from fedora-review? to fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 11:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291143.n0TBhCeT001345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 06:43:10 EDT --- Hi, I'll wait for perl-MooseX-Daemonize inclusion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 11:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] New: Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library Message-ID: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Summary: Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xjakub at fi.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/torch/torch.spec SRPM URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/torch/torch-3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Torch is a simple machine-learning library, among its features you can find: * A lot of things in gradient machines, that is, machines which could be learned with a gradient descent. This includes multi-layered perceptrons, radial bas is functions, mixtures of experts, convolutional networks and even time-delay neural networks. In fact a lot of "modules" are available that you can plug as you want to get what you need. * Support vector machines, in classification and regression. As fast as the old stand-alone program SVMTorch II, but with the powerful environment of the library. * Ensemble models such as bagging or adaboost. * Non-parametric models such as K-nearest-neighbors, Parzen regression and Parzen density estimator. * Distributions stuff, like Kmeans, Gaussian mixture models, hidden Markov models, input-output hidden Markov models, and Bayes classifier. * Speech recognition tools (Embedded training and large vocabulary decoding). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 12:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library In-Reply-To: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291220.n0TCKCED010392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483025 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 12:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: <bug-483025-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483025-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291220.n0TCKAkO010338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 Depends on| |483020 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 12:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] New: Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment Message-ID: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 Summary: Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel.at QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://filelister.linux-kernel.at/downloads/share/hatools.spec SRPM URL: http://filelister.linux-kernel.at/downloads/share/hatools-2.00-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The HA-Tools provide some programs to improve shell scripting in a High Availability environment. The halockrun program provides a simple and reliable way to implement a locking in shell scripts. A typical usage for halockrun is to prevent cronjobs to run simultanously. halockrun uses a lock on a file via fcntl(2) which ensures the release of the lock even if the process gets killed via SIGKILL. The hatimerun program provides a time-out mechanism which can be used from shell scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 12:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] New: Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns Message-ID: <bug-483025-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 Summary: Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xjakub at fi.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec SRPM URL: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.1.rc6.fc10.src.rpm Description: IMMS is an adaptive playlist framework that tracks your listening patterns and dynamically adapts to your taste. Currently we ship only the XMMS plugin. Its major features include: * IMMS is easy to install. It is purely a plugin - no XMMS patch required. A very lightweight embedded SQL database is used, so there's no need to setup a RDBMS. * IMMS is easy to use. Song rating is done completely transparently to the user. It does not get in your way. * IMMS does a much better job of shuffling than most players. It keeps track of when a song was last played, and makes sure same songs are not repeated too often. It is even able to recognise different versions of the same song (eg. remixes) and treat them as one song! * IMMS uses a variety of techniques to figure out which songs should be played together, and which should not. It studies your listening habits, as well as using acoustic properties of the songs themselves, such as BPM and frequency spectrum. * IMMS is fair. Even unfavoured songs have a (small) chance of being played. There are some outstanding issues I have to deal with and would appreciate any help: 1) rpmlint complains about executable-stack: >rpmlint imms-3.1.0-0.1.rc6.fc10.x86_64.rpm imms.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/immsd imms.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/immstool imms.x86_64: W: xmms-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib64/xmms/General/libxmmsimms.so The naming policy is not a problem imho, but I don't know how to get rid of the executable-stack warning. 2) Licensing issues The project claims to be GPL, but this license is not specified in source file. Moreover it includes some (modified) third-party code (see AUTHORS) -- this is mostly ok (better than own source files, it includes the license) except of: immscore/xidle.c model/emd.c immscore/normal.h These files and those written by the imms upstream need definitely a license specified -- I'm going to contact the author and setting FE-LEGAL for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 12:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291220.n0TCKDIP003179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 --- Comment #1 from Oliver Falk <oliver at linux-kernel.at> 2009-01-29 07:20:12 EDT --- I'm not sure about the GPL license... Maybe with more knowledge about licensing should take that this review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291301.n0TD131a019721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 08:01:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libchamplain Short Description: Map view for Clutter Owners: rishi Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291330.n0TDUb5f020270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #6 from bee <honeybeehoneyhive-redhat at yahoo.com> 2009-01-29 08:30:36 EDT --- Thank you!! I took one account there ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/honeybee ). But now what have i to do? Because BEESU is the only package i want to upload in YUM. As it's the only one, you could just upload it for me!! that would be easy for me, because i don't know how to do it. I'm really looking for somebody to push beesu into YUM! My RPM is excellent, it has 0 warnings in rpmlint!! i did it with leigh on fedoraforum!!! it works very good! could you be my sponsor? if no, can you just upload beesu into yum?(this would be perfect for me!! very easy!!!) thank you again! bye!!!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291339.n0TDdTgv029845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 08:39:28 EDT --- I don't need a sponsor but thanks for the review. You should mention this informal review to find a sponsor for yourself. For more details check out this page [1]. For RH employees is the 'seeking sponsor' procedure a bit different than for Fedora contributors. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226463-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291349.n0TDntkg032752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 08:49:54 EDT --- Added Parag as 'Assignee' because the review is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291348.n0TDmmDb024713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #42 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-29 08:48:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) Well, it looks something like this in the code: %if %{HTMLVIEW} Requires: htmlview %else Requires: xdg-utils %endif (In reply to comment #38) Apparently the .desktop file is "retarded stuff" and won't be fixed. I'm not sure what information goes into the file so I can't build one myself. Will need some help with this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291351.n0TDp6PZ025540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 08:51:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) >> You have missed this one. > No, I haven't. I didn't feel it was worth it. There's only so much time I can > justify spending on irrelevant details of a spec file that make no difference > whatsoever to the resulting package. The guidelines recommend the use of parallel builds and there is a rationale behind it: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-July/msg00004.html Can I make the change on your behalf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library In-Reply-To: <bug-227933-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-227933-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291353.n0TDrrcP026146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 08:53:49 EDT --- Why is the "fedora-review" flag set on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479798-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291359.n0TDxmrJ003179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-29 08:59:46 EDT --- Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291357.n0TDvXqf027412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482856 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 13:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482856-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291357.n0TDvWK4027382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |482863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 14:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies Message-ID: <bug-483045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Unit-Lite/perl-Test-Unit-Lite.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Unit-Lite/perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This framework provides lighter version of Test::Unit framework. It implements some of the Test::Unit classes and methods needed to run test units. The Test::Unit::Lite tries to be compatible with public API of Test::Unit. It doesn't implement all classes and methods at 100% and only those necessary to run tests are available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 14:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225744] Merge Review: fbset In-Reply-To: <bug-225744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291429.n0TETYZV004630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225744 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net, | |zprikryl at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 09:29:33 EDT --- Zdenek Prikryl is the owner according the PackageDB. Added as cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 14:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-466906-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291448.n0TEmVAD009680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-29 09:48:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Requires(pre): perl(Class::MethodMaker) > > This is very likely wrong. > > OK. There it seems that pure > Requires: perl(Class::MethodMaker) > Should be ok. No, it's entirely superfluous, rpm adds it automatically. You can completely remove it. > > Please add perl-sig to InitialCC like most perl-packagers do. > I did not know it. I overlooked it in guidelines. Will do next time. > > > - "make test" is claimed to require "root". > > I recommend to add an rpm option to run this testsuite > All the test in this package require root. Hmm, sounds like a pretty severe design problem with this package to me. > So making them optional will be the > same as skipping it entirely. IMHO. Not at all. It would enable those who want to build rpms as "root" (likely you) to test your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 14:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291452.n0TEqr2m010881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 09:52:53 EDT --- Thats not a rationale. Thats just spot saying "it should work". Do you know that it works in this case ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 14:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291456.n0TEuJ8M011679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #8 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 09:56:18 EDT --- Hi, I made informal review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860#c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 14:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481272-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291456.n0TEul4w019275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 --- Comment #7 from Petr Sklenar <psklenar at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 09:56:45 EDT --- Hi, I made informal review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860#c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library In-Reply-To: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291523.n0TFNQDb025407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 10:23:25 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - sources match upstream (e107eec98402b9fe85a273a45152cb8d7b8a277e & 59a2b0e6319dfdea5133687c232a4de501855738) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Beautiful package, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291531.n0TFVO08027405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 10:31:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Do you know that it works in this case ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291536.n0TFaYLg028744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-29 10:36:34 EDT --- http://ispbrasil.com.br/bucardo/bucardo.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/bucardo/bucardo-3.0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1091363 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am able to replicate master-master and master-slave with this RPM bucardo is one of the best replication solution for pgsql. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291539.n0TFdMba029306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 10:39:21 EDT --- So, if it makes you happy, commit it. Obsessing over trivia like this is what makes merge reviews so resented... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291545.n0TFj0tI030785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 10:44:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330368) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330368) Propose cleanup SPEC file for gsh Good: + Defining python_sitelib macro + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 6b925fe21bb84606b47a9a29d1eb88fb) + Local build works fine + Local install works fine + Simple call without argument rans without crash + Local uninstall works fine + Koji build works fine Bad: - '-n <name>' flag occurs twice in the %setup macro - You should remove the gsh.egg-info directory - %files stanza has a long list of duplicate files entries I have attached a clenup SPEC file as a proposal for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291546.n0TFk8O4024037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #53 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-29 10:46:02 EDT --- I belive you need to add docbook-utils into Build Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481192-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291542.n0TFg6bL023041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-29 10:42:05 EDT --- ok, I will fix this later. is possible to leave this package on hold and take a look in this another https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291546.n0TFkX6u024102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 10:46:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - Please place the changelog section at the end of the file. It's not wrong > > just unusual. > > done Again 'changelog', if you make any changes on the spec file, you must bump the release of the package. More details at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs . > > > - This application has a GUI. You need to install the .desktop file. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files > > desktop file is part of the upstream tarball and is installed during 'make > install' If 'make install' is taking care of the .desktop file installation, then 'validate' is the right way if the categories match the 'Desktop Entry Specification'. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Without any further investigations I think that 'Requires: qt' is not necessary, for me it looks like that rpm will pick this automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:48:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291548.n0TFmTkD024486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 10:48:27 EDT --- OK, It's look nice for me, The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch) In-Reply-To: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481034-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291552.n0TFqB0h025456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #13 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 10:52:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330369) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330369) use python_sitelib Please use the correct way to find Python's site-packages path described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python See the attached patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 15:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291559.n0TFx4Dc001670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 10:59:03 EDT --- Merge-reviews are always topic of debate on fedora lists. If we have approved spec template as given in /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-minimal.spec then why not megre-review packages simply follow them? Merge-review packages should not be considered a special case and exempted from what FESCo approved Packaging Guidelines say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: <bug-483045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291603.n0TG3Mrt002881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 11:03:21 EDT --- Not needed BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:11:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-199154-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291611.n0TGBdgH004993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #54 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-29 11:11:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #52) Devrim please build in koji first and make sure you have posted a working spec file for review. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1091454 look at Comment #53 and try to build in koji again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483074] New: Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions Message-ID: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 Summary: Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Exception-Base/perl-Exception-Base.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Exception-Base/perl-Exception-Base-0.21-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class implements a fully OO exception mechanism similar to Exception::Class or Class::Throwable. It provides a simple interface allowing programmers to declare exception classes. These classes can be thrown and caught. Each uncaught exception prints full stack trace if the default verbosity is uppered for debugging purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291611.n0TGBjlc030629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 11:11:43 EDT --- 1)I see working Source URL should be http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TU/TURNSTEP/Test-Dynamic-1.3.3.tar.gz 2) Enable make test 3) I see LICENSE is BSD. Also, This can be seen at http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Dynamic/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483079] New: Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants Message-ID: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 Summary: Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-constant-boolean/perl-constant-boolean.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-constant-boolean/perl-constant-boolean-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Defines TRUE and FALSE constants in caller's namespace. You could use simple values like empty string or zero for false, or any non-empty and non- zero string value as true, but the TRUE and FALSE constants are more descriptive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291622.n0TGMunp007843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 11:22:55 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + Package contains the most current release + SPEC file is written in English + Could download source via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: ba137a37f6725076c7d2c729cbccf4a5) + Package contains no patches + Package contains a license tag + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains proper BuildRoot specification + Consistently use of rpm macros + Package contains no patches + Package doesn't need any BRs or Reqs. + Package use parallel make + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Local build works fine + Build honors $RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Koji build works fine + Debuginfo package contains source files + Local install works fine + Start of command without arguments doesn't crashed + Local uninstall works fine + Package doesn't have subpackages + Default files permission are ok. + Files have proper file permission + %files stanza doesn't have duplicated entries + All packaged files are owned by the package + No packaged file has a conflict with ohter packages + %doc stanza is small, so we don't need a separate subpackage + %changelog is in a proper format Bad: - License tag says GPL as license. It's necessary to specified the version of the used GPL. A look on the source files says, that GPLv2+ may the right specification for the license tag. TODO: * I thing a blank line beetween the paragraph of the description will incerease the readability of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291655.n0TGtEOu015781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org> 2009-01-29 11:55:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jcodings Short Description: Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291708.n0TH88B8018660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #17 from Tim Jackson <rpm at timj.co.uk> 2009-01-29 12:08:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > Final point: I am intending to only import this on the EL-5 branch so if > > anyone wants to co-maintain in devel/F-10/F-9 then let me know. > Can I do this ? Sure, that would be great - thanks. I don't seem to be able to change the owner from the pkgdb, but just drop the CVS admin request in here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291714.n0THE3h8020213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 12:14:02 EDT --- No need to jump on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-extension-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291715.n0THF67r020703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 12:15:03 EDT --- Thank you for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: banshee-mirage Short Description: An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee Owners: dnielsen Branches: F9, F10, devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476460-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291734.n0THYZ5R019682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 12:34:33 EDT --- For 0.9.0-4 * Unused macros - It seems that %python_sitelib is not used. * Fedora/RHEL conditional - There are some useful macros, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#Conditionals For example: --------------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?el3} || 0%{?el4} %define __python python2.4 %endif --------------------------------------------------------- * About version dependency - If you are to support both RHEL and Fedora by one spec file, then ---------------------------------------------------------- Requires: %{pythonbase} >= 2.4, sendmail >= 8.13 BuildRequires: ed, %{pythonbase}-devel >= 2.4, sendmail-devel >= 8.13 ---------------------------------------------------------- is sufficient (The reason I wrote that version dependency is redundant was that it is redundant just to support Fedora) * python module dependency - Would you check if all needed dependencies related to python modules are included in Requires: For example, Milter/dns.py contains: ---------------------------------------------------------- 3 import DNS 4 from DNS import DNSError ---------------------------------------------------------- It seems this package should have "Requires: python-pydns". Also python-spf may be needed. * Macros in %changelog - $ rpm -q --changelog pymilter shows: ---------------------------------------------------------- * Thu Jan 08 2009 Stuart Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> 0.9.0-4 - Stop using INSTALLED_FILES to make Fedora happy - Remove config flag from start.sh glue - Own /var/log/milter - Use /var <-------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- that macros are expanded in %changelog. To prevent this, use %% (instead of %) in %changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:42:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:42:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291742.n0THgm7Z028314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #4 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 12:42:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh-0.3-4.src.rpm Only thing I edited from your proposed SPEC was remove the extra -n <name> entry since that was on your "Bad:" list. Thank you very much for your SPEC proposal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481531-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291748.n0THmrDF030259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-29 12:48:52 EDT --- fixed. - Include make test in %%check section, fixed license, the correct is BSD - fixed sumary and descripton of this package - fixed source url http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-Test-Dynamic/perl-Test-Dynamic.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/perl-Test-Dynamic/perl-Test-Dynamic-1.3.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] New: Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) Message-ID: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 Summary: Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvromans at squirrel.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/chordii.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/chordii-4.2-1.src.rpm Description: This is a description of a utility called chordii. It's purpose is to provide guitar players with a tool to produce good looking, self-descriptive music sheets from text files. chordii reads text files containing the lyrics of songs, the chords to be played, their descriptions and some other optional data to produce a PostScript document that includes: Centered titles Chord names above the words Graphical representation of the chords at the end of the songs chordii also provides support for Multiple columns on a page Index of a songbook Multiple logical pages per physical pages (1, 2 or 4) Configurable fonts for the lyrics and the chord names Multiple songs inside one file The complete ISO 8859-1 character set Chorus marking This is my first package, so I'm looking for a sponsor. The spec and srpm are rpmlint free of warnings and errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 17:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481732-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291758.n0THwTN5026384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-29 12:58:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hi, > I made informal review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860#c4 I like it. I'd still like to se at least a couple more, this one was pretty easy :) A review of this package: 1.) Package name. To be consistent with other existing practice applied to other stardict dictionary packages I suggest you rename the package to "stardict-dic-cs" or "stardict-dic-cs_CZ". You may still want to add a Provides: for the upstream name. 2.) Package version. %define dicdate 20081201 Version: 1.0.0 Source0: ftp://dl.cihar.com/slovnik/stable/stardict-english-czech-%{dicdate}.tar.gz Is 1.0.0 made up? Why not use 20081201 as version? 3.) URL tag. URL: ftp://dl.cihar.com/slovnik/stable/stardict-english-czech-%{dicdate}.tar.gz Purpose of the URL tag is to address the package's home page, with general information about it -- it definitely should not be the same as Source tag. 4.) BuildArchitectures tag. This is fairly minor, but: it is commonly spelled "BuildArch:" 5.) Setup %setup -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} -D -T -a 0 This could be written as: %setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version} 6.) No need to rename the README file install -p -m 0644 %{name}-%{dicdate}/README LICENSE Especially when it does not contain the license text. 7.) Your %description is not informative Description is not meant to contain information about history of the package or its build process, but rather contents of the package. The latter URL belongs to the Url: tag and rest should be replaced with something like: "Czech-English and English-Czech translation dictionaries for StarDict, a GUI-based dictionary software." 8.) Group. I guess Applications/Text would be a far better pick than Applications/System. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291805.n0TI5ffk002268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291803.n0TI3YIH027674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-29 13:03:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't need a sponsor but thanks for the review. You should mention this > informal review to find a sponsor for yourself. For more details check out > this page [1]. For RH employees is the 'seeking sponsor' procedure a bit > different than for Fedora contributors. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account I think the sponsoring procedure is the same, just the CLA signing part is different. I think Peter's review was fairly exhaustive and package simple and correct as well. Thank you both! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291809.n0TI99AU003149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291808.n0TI8xEG003093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 13:08:57 EDT --- Now I will approve this package (xmlenc is now in good shape, I am re-reviewing xmlenc now) --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gimp-fourier-plugin) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291821.n0TILVAQ006155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 13:21:30 EDT --- God: + Du??ocated -n option was removed from %setup + Files stanza has no duplicated entries + egg-info directory was removed from source in the %setup stanza Bad: - the pity.py file is marked as execuatable, but all other files are not. I think we should mark all files in %{python_sitelib}/gsh as nonexecutables. You may remove the shebang line from the pity.py file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291818.n0TIIpWL031961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-29 13:18:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: timespan Short Description: A tool that performs date-based time calculations Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] New: Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts Message-ID: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Summary: Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/allgeyer-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Robert Allgeyer's MusiQwik and MusiSync are a set of original True Type fonts that depict musical notation. Each music font may be used within a word processing document without the need for special music publishing software, or embedded in PDF files. This is one of the font families from the Fedora Font Wish List: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] New: Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier Message-ID: <bug-483116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Summary: Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch URL: http://grnotify.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora GrNotify is a simple Python written tray application that will allow you to know when there are new items in the Google Reader. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify.spec SRPMS: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.0.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Commment: rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291853.n0TIr3JZ007301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 --- Comment #3 from Bernard Johnson <bjohnson at symetrix.com> 2009-01-29 13:53:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Perl package source generally includes license test in its perl module source > text files(.pm here say) only. The author thinks that the information in the README is sufficient. > Suggestions: > 1) SRPM when extracted got SPEC with License as "Unknown" whereas SPEC file > link shows correct license as "GPL+ or Artistic" Someone I think I uploaded a file in progress - this has been fixed. > 2) Summary should be > "Perl extension for the SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Project" fixed > 3) %files should be > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc Changes README examples > %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* > %{perl_vendorarch}/Sane* > %{_mandir}/man3/* fixed Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-Sane.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-Sane-0.02-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291857.n0TIvTks008829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 13:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint also showed this non-standard-group error to me. I just looked at some > other packages which used thos group tag. I was unsure whether non standard > names are allowed or not. - Unless you have some reason you want to use the previous Group tag, I suggest to follow the suggestion from rpmint. > Download url is fixed. - Note that wiki suggest http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tgz (middle "sourceforge" is not written) > So when requiring explicitly icedtea I just use java(-devel) >= 1:1.6.0? (please make it sure that you use epoch here) - I guess you wanted to say "openjdk" because on F-9/10/11 icedtea no longer exists. However, yes, with "(Build)Requires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0" java-1.6.0-openjdk(-devel) is always selecteed, because "java-1.5.0-gcj(-devel)" does not satisfy this (Build)Requires. Now looks good (however I suggest to modify the SourceURL a bit) ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (xmlenc) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291912.n0TJCscN013158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #6 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 14:12:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/gsh-0.3-5.src.rpm Added a patch to get rid of the shebang to satisfy rpmlint instead of forcing the file to be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480727-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291923.n0TJNsiP024454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #33 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-29 14:23:53 EDT --- > So, can I consider daemontools to be approved? still not, for compatibility with other djb program's you should put /services directory in some place, for example /var/run/daemontools you need to adjust svscanboot to look for services in this directory, can you write a init.d script or a upstart script to start svscanboot? >May be, I can work on packaging djbdns now. ? feel free, packaging djb programs is not easy and you can speed up working in both packages at the same time, please posts messages related to djbdns in their own BugZilla -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291946.n0TJk6i5021027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 14:46:05 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + Package names matches with nameing guidelines for font packages + Package zip files matches with upstream (md5sum: 25106eaf88416df3006925b8383b7f69) + Package contains valid License tag + License tag specified OFL as a valid font license for Fedora + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains proper rpm group + Package contains proper buildroot defintion + Proper definition of BRs and Reqs. + Fonts subpackage contains Req to common subpackages + Filelist doesn't contains duplicate files + Files have proper file permissions + Package contains no files belong to other packages + All packaged file are owned by this package + Rpmlint is ok for source and binary rpms. + Local build works fine + Local install works fine + Fonts was shown on fc-list + Local uninstall works fine + Koji build works fine + %doc stanza is only in common subpackage which is required on all other packages + Package has proper %changelog stanza Bad: - I can't figure out on which base you have determinate the upstream version of the font - Fonts are not built from sources because upstream doesn't provides one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291949.n0TJnbJr029931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 14:49:35 EDT --- Some notes: * License - License tag should be GPLv2+. * %description place - Would you move the place of %package and %description to the upper side of %prep? * Documents - I guess it is better that QUICKSTART.mysql is installed in -mysql subpackage and QUICKSTART.postgres in -pgsql subpackage. - For HOWTO: -------------------------------------------------------------------- install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Move this to %prep section, if "HOWTO" file is not to be modified at %build. * By the way is HOWTO also needed for subpackages? * Current working directory -------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version}/mysql -------------------------------------------------------------------- - make install DESTDIR=$(pwd)/mysql is simpler. (at %build, %install (and %check) stage, the working directory is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} in this case) For "install -Dp ....", even -------------------------------------------------------------------- install -Dp ./$database%{_bindir}/mydnscheck %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/mydnscheck-$database -------------------------------------------------------------------- can be used (for DESTDIR=, usually this should be absolute path) * CFLAGS -------------------------------------------------------------------- make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} -------------------------------------------------------------------- - Would you check if this "CFLAGS=%{optflags}" is really needed? %configure sets CFLAGS environment variable and configure/Makefiles created from recent autotools honor this CFLAGS. * autotool recall -------------------------------------------------------------------- 644 + make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' -j8 645 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/mydns-1.2.8/missing --run aclocal-1.10 -I m4 646 /builddir/build/BUILD/mydns-1.2.8/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.10: command not found 647 WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 648 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want 649 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from 650 any GNU archive site. 651 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/mydns-1.2.8/missing --run autoconf -------------------------------------------------------------------- - Here autotools are called automatically after calling make. This usually means that timestamps on some files are wrong. Please modify the timestamps of those to prevent autotool recall here. * Directory structure -------------------------------------------------------------------- install -Dp -m 644 contrib/admin.php %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/admin.php -------------------------------------------------------------------- - I don't think that putting files under %_datadir (not under the subdirectory of %_datadir) is a good idea. This should be moved to %{_datadir}/%{name}, for example. * gettext .po file - This package has gettext .po files under po/ directory and actually "make install" installs compiled .mo files. Please include gettext .mo file in binary rpm (and use %find_lang) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291955.n0TJtQfI031584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-29 14:55:24 EDT --- ... and follows... * scriptlets - For SysV initscripts handling, please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets (Note that there are some Requires(post) or so) - Add "Requires(post): %{_sbindir}/alternatives" (also Requires(preun)) for -mysql and -pgsql subpackages * And please also check my comment 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453083-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901291954.n0TJsSsZ031129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #50 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 14:54:23 EDT --- Simo and I were talking about splitting several Samba libraries (talloc, tevent, tdb and ldb) into a separate, standalone "samba-base" package to be consumed by Samba3, Samba4, OpenChange and SSSD [1]. We also think we want to disable, for the time being, any parts of Samba4 not needed by OpenChange (by means of some simple toggle settings in the spec file). Expect more churn here before a formal review can start. In the meantime I'll clean up the details Matthias pointed out. Thanks again, Matthias. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SSSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292004.n0TK4BvK001352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 15:04:09 EDT --- Versioning is in two places: * Upstream URL: http://www.icogitate.com/~ergosum/fonts/musicfonts.htm * Inside the TTF metadata The fonts themselves are editable source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292020.n0TKKbKb005035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 15:20:36 EDT --- O, thank you for your hint. But I have to disagree with you, that ttf files are editable sources. But because upstream doesn't provides sources I think this is not a blocker for this review, So I can APPROVEd your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292025.n0TKPvxY029798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-29 15:25:55 EDT --- Good: + Package contains a patch + Patch seems to be reliable + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent on binary rpm. You are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292031.n0TKVQWL007529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-29 15:31:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gimp-fourier-plugin Short Description: A simple plug-in to do fourier transform on your image Owners: fabiand Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fabiand mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292031.n0TKVanG007572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-29 15:31:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmlenc Short Description: Light-weight XML output library for Java Owners: fabiand Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fabiand mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292033.n0TKXIED007882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292033.n0TKXEc2031290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292037.n0TKbhN9032387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch at gmx.de> 2009-01-29 15:37:43 EDT --- URL modified to match the guidelines. Was a mistake, I did not read acrefully enough. http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc.spec http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/hadoop/xmlenc-0.52-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: <bug-483116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483116-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292054.n0TKsxki003903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Kulakowski <llaumgui at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 15:54:58 EDT --- Fredonnement? La version 1.1.1 a ?t? lib?r?e peu d'heures avant ma demande? Je fais aller rapidement la construction T/MN avant week-end : SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify.spec SRPMS: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Commment: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/grnotify-1.1.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 21:45 grnotify.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/grnotify/GoogleReader.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292112.n0TLCoDS008285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 16:12:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gsh Short Description: aggregate several remote shells into one Owners: maxamillion Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480056-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292129.n0TLT9Zg020417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 --- Comment #1 from Denis Leroy <denis at poolshark.org> 2009-01-29 16:29:08 EDT --- Couple of things : - you should not put "%{version}" macro in the patch0 source filename, since this will force you to rename it everytime you update the package. Although not officially in the guidelines, most people hardcode the version that the patch was derived from, and keep that version in the filename until the patch no longer applies and has to be recreated... - why the pkgconfig patch ? I can see the development headers indeed only need libchamplain and gtk2 but this most likely will not stay true in the future. Seems a bit over the top... Otherwise this is very similar to the libchamplain review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292139.n0TLdhud014323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-29 16:39:42 EDT --- Also the following entries in the FAQ should apply: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: <bug-471915-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-471915-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292139.n0TLdNT2014262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #20 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 16:39:20 EDT --- Is this Apache-licensed zip acceptable? We have another package that has yet to be submitted for review because it needs this json library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292137.n0TLbol1014069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Clone Of|481476 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roozbeh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-29 16:37:48 EDT --- Packaging is sane and upgrade path works ??? APPROVED ??? However: ? Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ) ??Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture for the other and for the gentium basic variants -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483159] New: Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-483159-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483159 Summary: Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-xoirc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-xoirc-0-1.20090129.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XoIRC Description: This activity allows you to contact other OLPC users and enthusiasts on the internet, and chat with them. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092029 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-xoirc-0-1.20090129.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-xoirc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-xoirc-0-1.20090129.fc10.src.rpm sugar-xoirc.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292153.n0TLrqRC017077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Shevchuk <stlwrt at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 16:53:50 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, i'm having exams this week. * Thu Jan 29 2009 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk <stlwrt at gmail.com> - 0.2.1-2 - Added workaround for direct shlib dependency - Removed unneeded ldconfig call from plugins and engine-mysql - Added missing pkgconfig to devel requires New SPEC: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/gsql.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/10/x86_64/result/gsql-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Built RPMs for F10: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/10/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483162] New: Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar Message-ID: <bug-483162-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483162 Summary: Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-xomail.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-xomail-0-1.20090128.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Projects/xomail Description: Mail activity for the Sugar Desktop. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092039 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-xomail-0-1.20090128.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-xomail.noarch: W: no-documentation sugar-xomail.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-xomail-0-1.20090128.fc10.src.rpm sugar-xomail.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482963-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292210.n0TMAOhT020732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 17:10:23 EDT --- cleaned up in -13 package commited to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292207.n0TM7CP7020036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roozbeh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-29 17:07:11 EDT --- 1. probably better to use -n with %setup instead of using -c and playing mv games 2. Please consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Am_I_done_after_creating_a_new_fonts_.28sub.29package_or_renaming_an_existing_one.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F However, despite the uglyness associated to 1., the package and upgrade path works. ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:12:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292212.n0TMChdI021132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 17:12:42 EDT --- fixed in Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-XML-Generator-1.01-3.fc10.src.rpm i checked that the tests did infact complete sucessfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292233.n0TMXGgx025217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 17:33:15 EDT --- After talking with bee (the upstream maintainer), I'm taking this over and I will be maintaining this upon inclusion: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/beesu-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/beesu.spec Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092095 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292300.n0TN0Jqp006161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:00:18 EDT --- purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update purple-msn-pecan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478393-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292301.n0TN1cBd031574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:01:37 EDT --- sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-imageviewer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292300.n0TN0kdS031255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:00:41 EDT --- backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update backup-manager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:01:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:01:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292301.n0TN1HpC031438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:01:15 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292300.n0TN0nXe031291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:00:48 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-Safe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292300.n0TN0Cqr006093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:00:08 EDT --- purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update purple-msn-pecan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1063 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292304.n0TN4v5q007893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:04:55 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.10.beta4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3K76007533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:03:18 EDT --- mingw32-glib2-2.19.5-2.1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN22S9007135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:01:58 EDT --- mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292304.n0TN4nG8007851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:04:49 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292304.n0TN4xBL007934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467402-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3NNH007580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3801007466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292306.n0TN6MEo008894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN2Wjf007316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3uV4032371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:03:55 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481501-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN2pKU007412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:02:49 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-460600-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN2Tpx031940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:02:26 EDT --- msp430-binutils-2.19-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN35Tx032169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:03:04 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292306.n0TN6Jkm000980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:06:18 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3w1x032402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292306.n0TN645f008690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:06:03 EDT --- botan-1.8.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480754-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292305.n0TN5sJ3000897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 18:05:52 EDT --- Has been built a while ago -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475000-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292305.n0TN5dqO008471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:05:37 EDT --- cmconvert-1.9.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cmconvert'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467405-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN25f9031827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292305.n0TN5AaO000554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:05:09 EDT --- python-libasyncns-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-libasyncns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292305.n0TN54dQ008276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:05:03 EDT --- pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pidgin-privacy-please'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1118 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN2A6f031861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:02:09 EDT --- shcov-4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update shcov'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1089 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN31iJ032142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:03:00 EDT --- libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.2.beta.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libnss-pgsql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1095 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN2sVJ032090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-29 18:02:52 EDT --- - Does the .def file really need to be bundled in this package? (IOW, do other packages require this file?) - The gtk-doc should be removed from this package (as was discussed at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-January/000357.html ) - %defattr(-,root,root) needs to be changed to %defattr(-,root,root,-) Other than that, no serious issues with this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481567] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings In-Reply-To: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3h96032284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:03:42 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Async-0.07-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-MooseX-Async'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292309.n0TN99mP010302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:09:08 EDT --- opencsv-1.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:06:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: <bug-477223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477223-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292306.n0TN6meG009199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:06:47 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc9, qzion-0.3.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: <bug-477221-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477221-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292306.n0TN6jro009102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:06:44 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc9, qzion-0.3.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475242-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN8YUZ010090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:33 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475427-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7Ce3009642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:07:10 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN884x010001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN816b009936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:01 EDT --- vhybridize-0.5.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update vhybridize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7Sbv001690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:07:28 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN8HPs001999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:16 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.10.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480528-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292311.n0TNBF7J011409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:11:15 EDT --- botan-1.8.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update botan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459535-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292309.n0TN91uk010233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:09:00 EDT --- backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update backup-manager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7cgB009810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:07:37 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475019-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN85oa001888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:03 EDT --- opencsv-1.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library In-Reply-To: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475135-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7ZIS009771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:07:34 EDT --- portmidi-131-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update portmidi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-468491-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7LXg009690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:07:18 EDT --- sugar-connect-22-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-connect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481484-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292310.n0TNArh7003318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:10:53 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library In-Reply-To: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN86Rx001913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> 2009-01-29 18:08:05 EDT --- Thanks for a fast review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: torch Short Description: Torch is a simple machine-learning library Owners: mjakubicek Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481509-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7xWm001834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:07:58 EDT --- vhybridize-0.5.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vhybridize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1153 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479603-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN8ENg001960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:08:13 EDT --- shcov-4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shcov'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292311.n0TNBq85011852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:11:50 EDT --- libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.2.beta.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libnss-pgsql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1186 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479230-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292312.n0TNC7Td012074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:12:06 EDT --- pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pidgin-privacy-please'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1188 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon In-Reply-To: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480870-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292312.n0TNCFgo004064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:12:15 EDT --- crda-1.0.1_2009_01_15-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:12:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481322-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292312.n0TNCTBM004242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-29 18:12:29 EDT --- emacs-magit-0.7-3.20090122git.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-magit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292316.n0TNG1f7005188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-29 18:16:00 EDT --- I suggest to remove the first paragraph of the description. The description tag cannot refer to anything but the chordii package, hence "This is a description of a utility called chordii." is redundant. The starting phrase of the second paragraph should be modified accordingly, for instance "The purpose of chordii is to provide guitar players with [...]" Please examine if the build process can take advantage of compiling in parallel on several processors ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make ) If the program doesn't build with it, please add a comment otherwise please use it. It would also be a good idea to also add INSTALL="install -p" to the make line, this should preserve the timestamps of the man pages. Please also take a look at the Makefile, according to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1092213&name=build.log the manpages are installed twice. It's not critical now but, if I am not mistaken, patching the Makefile in order to remove the redundant lines (if this is the case) would be a good idea. Did you submit any other packages ? Or maybe you have performed some pre-reviews ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475017-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292323.n0TNNUNE014503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys <sm at sandro-mathys.ch> 2009-01-29 18:23:29 EDT --- AFAICS this shouldn't block l2fprod-common but only tvbrowser or am I missing something? Anyway, even if this blocks l2fprod-common - we know upstream is willing to change the license. Can we maybe continue with the review in the meantime (i.e. get it ready to approve it as soon as the legal issue is fixed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292324.n0TNO75g007013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-29 18:24:06 EDT --- review under way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901292342.n0TNgMDN018342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-29 18:42:20 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7fe731f15a97fc0a926a145bc48c2b42cc1d10fb beesu-2.1.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. not needed, it's a wrapper [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. You should also make it parallel make compliant. Fortunately the program builds in a couple of secs so it's not a big deal. ================ *** APPROVED *** under the condition that spot will be the Fedora maintainer ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300149.n0U1nlkN000709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |sil-gentium-fonts - |sil-gentium-basic-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300150.n0U1oQDM001235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 20:50:24 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content "If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK to be packaged in Fedora." that is why we said that we would like to have iverilog or some other tool for using the content in at the same time. understanding that the tools still have a way to go and are far from feature complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300159.n0U1xxDZ010115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 20:59:58 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and added more description for GentiumAlt. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1262 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: SIL Gentium fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:12:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300212.n0U2CqU5005516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-29 21:12:50 EDT --- I see no relation between "If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK to be packaged in Fedora" and "the user experience must be provided only by free tools". Would iverilog be nice to have? Definitely yes. Should its presence at the same time with OVM be mandatory ? Absolutely not. Users might be using EDA software from other sources. Actually I bet that 99% percent of them are using commercial tools and I also bet that in an enterprise environment they always will. <small rant on> In the company I work for we use several commercial EDA tools. Since July 2008 the number of engineers interacting with OVM increased from 2 to 25 and their number will increase in the future [, depending on the projects that end / new projects that start]. How would not the presence of OVM in a repository enhance these users' experience ? As sysadmin I would definitely have preferred to do "yum install ovm.el4" instead of "tar xzf ovm-2.0.tar.gz" For what it's worth and completely unrelated, we have a very small team of courageous people who use gtkwave from EPEL when the number of licenses for the commercial tool is insufficient. <rant off> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300216.n0U2GkfI013479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 21:16:45 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and cleaned up the %setup -c. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1263 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-doulos-fonts Short Description: Doulos SIL fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483074] Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions In-Reply-To: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300221.n0U2L37o006973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-29 21:21:01 EDT --- cannot mock build for the moment, due to ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/root/ update http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2 from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483079] Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants In-Reply-To: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300221.n0U2LpL8014342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-29 21:21:50 EDT --- cannot mock build for the moment, due to ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/root/ update http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/fdb56d145701684596fd7c0a370d99c84e802069ce23185690311f0027de44e4-primary.sqlite.bz2 from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300310.n0U3Abgk023530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 22:10:35 EDT --- The point I was trying to get at is that you have the conditional but then the desktop file just uses htmlview anyway. ;-) I suggest starting by copying the .desktop to a file (Source1) and including that in the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300339.n0U3dHUV022637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #44 from Eric Christensen <eric at christensenplace.us> 2009-01-29 22:39:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > The point I was trying to get at is that you have the conditional but then the > desktop file just uses htmlview anyway. ;-) Yeah, I'm not sure why it is in there but it might be another "feature" that I'd have to break. Doesn't look like it is going to hurt anything. > I suggest starting by copying the .desktop to a file (Source1) and including > that in the srpm. Oh! Okay, that's been done and the source tgz has been uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 04:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478504-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300408.n0U48HGX027830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Bug 478504 depends on bug 479921, which changed state. Bug 479921 Summary: Directory ownership problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|FAILS_QA |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #26 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> 2009-01-29 23:08:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > error: File not found by glob: > > /home/tuxdistro/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.py* > > Sorry, the files are named gget-epiphany.py* and gget.ephy-extension. > So you could use > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget-epiphany.py* > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget.ephy-extension > or simply > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > as you did before. Ok. > > Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1308934 > > SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-6.fc10.src.rpm > > Ok, I will have a final look over them tonight and if everything is ok approve > them. Leave the files as they are now and do the final fixes in the -7 release. Alright, I'll do the -7 release after your comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 04:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300436.n0U4aDmP007116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> 2009-01-29 23:36:11 EDT --- "the user experience must be provided only by free tools". goes with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview "Fedora is all about freedom and rapid innovation." it goes against fedoras goals of "Fedora will always be free for anybody, anywhere, to use, modify and distribute." not having iverilog in means that ovm is only available to a subset of people who have access to the closed proprietary tools. We want you to get this in, all we are asking is to provide a way for everyone to use the content. even if for now its limited in functionality. Our intention is not at all to keep this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 04:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300459.n0U4xaMh010581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #21 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> 2009-01-29 23:59:33 EDT --- I used the general name because there are families named 'basic' and 'book-basic' within this package. So changing the name in the suggested way would make the subpackages' name 'sil-gentium-basic-basic-fonts' and 'sil-gentium-basic-book-basic-fonts'. If that is fine, I would change the name as per the suggestion in Comment 19 and 20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 05:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-253813-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300516.n0U5GnAb006569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 05:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts Message-ID: <bug-483187-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/kde-plasma-weather.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/kde-plasma-weather-0.0-0.2.fc9.20090130svn.src.rpm Description: A plasmoid showing weather reports and forecasts. Note: You need KDE 4.2 to build and/or test this. Scratch build for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480037] Review Request: cups-pk-helper - PolicyKit support for system-config-printer In-Reply-To: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300605.n0U65EFa022409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480037 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482965-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300603.n0U63V2b014833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 01:03:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092744 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8f9e6ba2595b07997efac1377c5484e9 XML-Generator-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=132, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Generator-1.01-3.fc11 => Provides: perl(XML::Generator) = 1.01 perl(XML::Generator::DOM) = 0.2 perl(XML::Generator::DOM::util) perl(XML::Generator::cdata) perl(XML::Generator::comment) perl(XML::Generator::final) perl(XML::Generator::overload) perl(XML::Generator::pi) perl(XML::Generator::pretty) perl(XML::Generator::util) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(XML::DOM) perl(XML::Generator) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482880-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300608.n0U68IaG022823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 01:08:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092739 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 03fa0ad2a50e18598d91f197924fb54d Sane-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=323, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.00 sys + 0.27 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-Sane-0.02-2.fc11 => Provides: Sane.so perl(Sane) = 0.02 perl(Sane::Device) perl(Sane::Status) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libdl.so.2 libexif.so.12 libgphoto2.so.2 libgphoto2_port.so.0 libieee1284.so.3 libjpeg.so.62 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libsane.so.1 libusb-0.1.so.4 perl >= 0:5.008005 perl(Exporter) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480222-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300616.n0U6GIuS017054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:16:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300612.n0U6CJWE016354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 01:12:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092737 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 24ff349f0e2e09ca89e8ecbc73b0dc65 MooseX-Daemonize-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=82, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 1.91 cusr 0.26 csys = 2.19 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Daemonize-0.08-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Daemonize) = 0.08 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Core) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid::File) = 0.01 perl(MooseX::Daemonize::WithPidFile) = 0.01 perl(Test::MooseX::Daemonize) = 0.03 perl(Test::MooseX::Daemonize::Testable) Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Daemonize::Pid::File) perl(MooseX::Getopt) perl(MooseX::Getopt::OptionTypeMap) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(POSIX) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481594] Review Request: python-pygooglechart - A complete Python wrapper for the Google Chart API In-Reply-To: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481594-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300619.n0U6J1EJ024559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481594 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:19:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300621.n0U6LTqR025280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |banshee-extension-mirage - |banshee-mirage - An |An Automatic Playlist |Automatic Playlist |Generation Extension for |Generation Extension for |Banshee |Banshee Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:21:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:17:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480050-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300617.n0U6Hh9v017242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:17:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482902-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300626.n0U6QY9J026354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:26:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480860-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300627.n0U6RuDU026568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:27:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481411-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300631.n0U6VEv1019800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:31:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473537-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300630.n0U6U6RA019581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:30:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481725-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300635.n0U6ZtGv028135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:35:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library In-Reply-To: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483020-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300634.n0U6YOJQ027642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:34:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479835-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300637.n0U6b5iN028416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:37:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475097-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300639.n0U6dTGH028625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:39:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481667-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300640.n0U6esFv021591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:40:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300639.n0U6do51021030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-30 01:39:48 EDT --- If you look at rawhide you'll see it's perfectly possible to have one of the font subpackages named like the srpm (and in fact this is what the main gentium package is going to do) srpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts rpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts sil-gentium-basic-fonts-common sil-gentium-basic-book-fonts (or sil-gentium-book-basic-fonts if you insist, would make it harder for reporters to find the right bugzilla component associated to the package)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300642.n0U6gggc029361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:42:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300643.n0U6h1sq029400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2009-01-30 01:43:00 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: faf236290f222df013198cb0e9cb8555 gsql-0.2.1.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is not silent. gsql.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql.schemas gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql-plugins.schemas gsql-engine-mysql.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql-engine-mysql.schemas -Safe to ingore gsql.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libgsql.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_vte.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_runner.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_exporter.so gsql-engine-mysql.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/engines/libgsqlengine_mysql.so -Safe to igore as package uses g_load_module to load this so files. OK final provides and requires are sane: gsql-0.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsql.so.0()(64bit) gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh GConf2 desktop-file-utils gsql-engine-mysql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtksourceview-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) gsql-devel-0.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libgsql) = 0.2.1 gsql-devel = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-devel(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 pkgconfig gsql-engine-mysql-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsqlengine_mysql.so.0()(64bit) gsql-engine-mysql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-engine-mysql(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlengine_mysql.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libmysqlclient_r.so.16()(64bit) gsql-plugins-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsqlplugin_exporter.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_runner.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_vte.so.0()(64bit) gsql-plugins = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-plugins(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_exporter.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_runner.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_vte.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libvte.so.9()(64bit) OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. OK shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets present look OK OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers are in a separate -devel package. OK pkgconfig files present; pkgconfig dependency present OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. OK desktop files valid and installed properly Suggestion: - please consider preserving timestamps of installed files call make install with INSTALL="install -p" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300643.n0U6hoed021867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-01-30 01:43:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 07:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] New: Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap Message-ID: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=169234&use_mirror=&filename=eclipse-SystemTapGui.spec&51805119 SRPM URL: https://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=169234&use_mirror=&filename=eclipse-SystemTapGui-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm&66576057 Description: This package contains eclipse plugins which provide an IDE and a visualization perspective for the systemtap scripting language. This requires the SystemTapGui server to be installed in order to run the SystemTap scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 07:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300738.n0U7cuaD031170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra <anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 07:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-428568-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300754.n0U7sXlR010171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-01-30 02:54:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I suggest to add Require: libxml++-devel to synfig-devel subpackage, otherwise > synfigstudio won't build (pkg-config fails in mockroot due to missing > libxml++-devel) That's odd -- it worked for me, in rhel-5. But thanks for the suggestion, I'll add this in the next spin of the package, which is after I get a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300832.n0U8Wd9s017827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-30 03:32:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (or sil-gentium-book-basic-fonts if you insist, This one won't work, use the other -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300833.n0U8X3Hi009081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 03:33:02 EDT --- I have not done any java or eclipse related package review yet but let me try this package for preliminary review. 1) you should use links for sourceforge as http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/eclipse-SystemTapGui.spec http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-SystemTapGui-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 2) Source0 should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/org.eclipse.SystemTapGui.src.tar.gz 3) From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins#Specfile_Template, you should have %install as %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/SystemTapGui unzip -q -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/SystemTapGui \ build/rpmBuild/org.eclipse.SystemTapGui.systemtap.feature.zip 3) From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins#Specfile_Template, you should have %files as %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/SystemTapGui See package built successfully with above changes http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1092915 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300840.n0U8ev5U010998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 03:40:56 EDT --- how can I use generate-tarball.sh? Provide usage and add same in SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-480538-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300844.n0U8i32i020170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #8 from Liang Suilong <liangsuilong at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 03:44:02 EDT --- - Are you a member of the mailinglists? I am so sorry that I am not a member -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:46:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300846.n0U8kqLm020876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 03:46:51 EDT --- I added '%{?_smp_mflags}' and took the liberty to remove the mixed tabs and spaces warnings from RPMLint. * Fri Jan 30 2009 Debarshi Ray <rishi at fedoraproject.org> - 2.25.3-4 - Removed mixed use of tabs and spaces. - Use parallel make. +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ Please close this review as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 09:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300912.n0U9CsHm027043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 04:12:53 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/stardict-dic-hi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/stardict-dic-hi-3.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Yes very important to mention. Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 09:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300953.n0U9rlL8026278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 04:53:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1093215 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - packaged source file will does not match generated source as md5sum always changes whenever we generate tarball from upstream source. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) preserve timestamps in cp command using "cp -p" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 09:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901300959.n0U9xJlf027370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #10 from bee <honeybeehoneyhive-redhat at yahoo.com> 2009-01-30 04:59:17 EDT --- Thank you Tom and Manuel!!! i'm so happy and sure it's okay if spot will be the Fedora maintainer!! That's very very good!!! you were so kind and honey with me and beesu!! thanks a lot!!!! i'll still floating around here, so just post a message if you need me to ask me about anything! bye!!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 10:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301010.n0UAAsNS030250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paskalis at di.uoa.gr Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-30 05:10:52 EDT --- Taking this review, since I own a couple of TeX font packages: - Could you use the ctan archive for all the sources? - Could you download the sources from the said archive with "wget -N" or similar mechanism to preserve the timestamp on the files? (md5sums match) - _texmf_main is declared in /etc/rpm/macros.texlive from texlive-texmf, so the declaration -f _texmf is unnecessary. (btw if it is not a system macro, it better not start with an "_"). I believe the "BuildRequires: kpsewhich" can go as well after this. - Could you please specify a little more explicitly the directories in the files section? The spec is correct as is, but the directory ownerships are not obvious to review, especially in the future. (You can reuse the variables MUSIXTEXDIR etc). - I think the package should update the map files (running updmap-sys). Please see tetex-font-kerkis in F-10 (or ctan-kerkis-fonts, subpackage tex-kerkis) in rawhide for an example. No major problems found, fix the above and I will approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 10:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301024.n0UAObsI009402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #15 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 05:24:35 EDT --- In first, thanks for you answer. 1/ Why did you change it...? > %dir %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname} > %dir %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname} > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/%{_ctrlname}/* > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/%{_appname}/* -------------------------------------------- someone on IRC #fedora-fr say is better. i have upadte the spec file: > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Controls/ImageSlideShow/ > %{_datadir}/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/ 2/ > %setup -q -n %{_appname} > tar -xf %{SOURCE1} -C ../ -------------------------------------------- it's ok, i use %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 3/ The LICENSE, MANIFEST, README and "todo" files are installed in addition to %doc, and it is important to note that the LICENSE file must not be removed from /usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/SlideShow/LICENSE - or else it cannot be displayed by the desklet. -------------------------------------------- ok, it's done 4/ Opening "Configure desklet" and selecting a folder from which to load images always displays an error dialog: | The folder contents could not be displayed | | Operation not supported It seems it always starts in the root directory due to that. -------------------------------------------- yes i have the same error, i did'nt find the source code who make this error! 5/ they are no directory image i have see in Display/SideShow.script line 259: Prefs.image_directory.value= value[:value.rfind( "/" )] if you change the value by: Prefs.image_directory.value= "/home/user/images" is better. but where put os.environ?['HOME']? 6/ i have update spec rpm and src rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SlideShow-0.9-3.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SlideShow-0.9-3.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SlideShow.spec 7/ rpmlint: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/SlideShow-0.9-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/SlideShow-0.9-3.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/SlideShow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 10:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: <bug-226550-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226550-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301025.n0UAPA4k000761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrakus at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-30 05:25:09 EDT --- Roman Rakus is the owner acc. to the PackageDB. Added as cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 10:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301043.n0UAht9k013551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Bug 467409 depends on bug 467402, which changed state. Bug 467402 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 05:43:54 EDT --- No one is really clear on what the .def file is for, except that it duplicates(?) or enhances(?) linking information. I'm loathed to remove or change such files when libtool has created them, since I'm sure the libtool developers know far more about this than I do. In any case, the packaging guidelines allow *.def files :-) Here is an updated package which fixes the other two points that you raised. Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/atk/mingw32-atk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-atk-1.25.2-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.25.2-2 - Remove gtk-doc. - Fix defattr line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301101.n0UB1ZUe018187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-01-30 06:01:32 EDT --- The .def file contains a list of all the functions which need to be exported in the .DLL file. It is only used by the linker. After a .DLL has been made, the file has no further use (unless you want to create Visual C++ import libraries, but there are other ways to generate those from MinGW-compiled DLL's). When compiling other libraries/applicaties the .def file isn't used, just the .dll and .dll.a files. These .def files aren't created by libtool, but by some individual packages (like glib2, atk, pango and gtk2) as part of the make job. This can be seen at http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/atk/trunk/atk/Makefile.am?view=markup (lines 139 to 150 and 168-169) There was a page on the MinGW site with more details about this, but unfortunately it got lost: The Old MinGWiki pages are again offline as a result of action from SF due to flock issues with the phpwiki application. We'll be trying a different approach. Another small thing I've found with this package is the lack of a Requires: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:03:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481717-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301103.n0UB3vt5018619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #5 from Ivan Efremov <iefremov at unipro.ru> 2009-01-30 06:03:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Again 'changelog', if you make any changes on the spec file, you must bump the > release of the package. More details at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs . fixed > If 'make install' is taking care of the .desktop file installation, then > 'validate' is the right way if the categories match the 'Desktop Entry > Specification'. done > > Without any further investigations I think that 'Requires: qt' is not > necessary, for me it looks like that rpm will pick this automatically. It is necessaty since RPM won't pick versions automatically - ugene needs particular qt version. New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301118.n0UBIb4L022099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 06:18:35 EDT --- Thanks. I have a few questions: * SOURCE0 and SOURCE1 are already hosted in ctan. Can you give me a specific page (if it is at a different place at ctan) where I should download them? * I'm not very familiar with the map file updating. The package already contains two map files in %{_texmf_main}/fonts/map/dvipdfm/%{texname}/ %{_texmf_main}/fonts/map/dvips/%{texname}/ Do these map files need updated? If yes, why? (I successfully ran musixtex on some musixtex documents to produce dvi, ps and pdf files without updating any map file) Or is there a system map file that needs to be updated using these map files? Do I have to call updmap-sys once for each map file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301124.n0UBOh3m023338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467409-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301122.n0UBMRaJ023104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 06:22:26 EDT --- OK, try this one: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/atk/mingw32-atk.spec SRPM URL: still building it, but will be here: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-atk-1.25.2-4.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> - 1.25.2-4 - Remove gtk-doc. - Fix defattr line. - Requires pkgconfig. - Remove the atk*.def file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475037-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301124.n0UBOSkY014292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 06:24:27 EDT --- Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/stardict-dic-hi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/stardict-dic-hi-3.0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stardict-dic-hi Short Description: Hindi Dictionary for stardict Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483074] Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions In-Reply-To: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301125.n0UBPmWE014874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-30 06:25:47 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7325048b213204c8aab7fef0886e2ce517e43600 Exception-Base-0.21.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ====== Notes ====== Please drop the perl >= 0:5.006 line. It's been ages since Fedora and RHEL are shipping much newer versions. Not to mention that during build, perl is brought in anyway by perl(Module::Build) and for runtime you have the perl(MODULE_COMPAT) line. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-456527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301139.n0UBdxq3017717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #24 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 06:39:58 EDT --- Ok. I have changed the naming. The new spec and srpm are at: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/temp/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/temp/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Not sure if it needs reapproval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301153.n0UBrnL2030182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luya_tfz at thefinalzone.net --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-30 06:53:48 EDT --- Maybe the gdesklets maintainer can comment on this? Bottom of comment 14 is some oddity in Fedora's gdesklets package. It is reproducible with the "Calendar" v0.62 Display in F10 "gdesklets" package. Steps to reproduce: 1. Run "Calendar" desklet from date/time category. 2. Right-click on desklet display for "Configure desklet" pop-up menu. 3. Click "Open" button next to "Month image" input field. Result: An error dialog on top of the file manager is displayed: | The folder contents could not be displayed | | Operation not supported [ OK ] It looks like a bug in gdesklets or an API incompatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301158.n0UBwL40021913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #3 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> 2009-01-30 06:58:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks. I have a few questions: > > * SOURCE0 and SOURCE1 are already hosted in ctan. Can you give me a specific > page (if it is at a different place at ctan) where I should download them? Oops, sorry, I misread the URL for the Source0 link. My bad. > * I'm not very familiar with the map file updating. The package already > contains two map files in > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/map/dvipdfm/%{texname}/ > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/map/dvips/%{texname}/ > Do these map files need updated? If yes, why? (I successfully ran musixtex on > some musixtex documents to produce dvi, ps and pdf files without updating any > map file) > Or is there a system map file that needs to be updated using these map files? The latter. updmap-sys updates updmap.cfg which lists the active map files. In my system, musix.map is currently commented out in updmap.cfg, so it will not be read. I suspect that in your system the line musix.map is present in your updmap.cfg either through custom editing or from a manual musixtex install. We must also care of removing (or commenting out) that line when uninstalling. > Do I have to call updmap-sys once for each map file? No, we don't actually call updmap-sys to update the map files, but to point out that a map file called musix.map exists in the respective directories (be they dvips or dvipdfm is irrelevant). I suspect that in your system the line musix.map is present in your updmap.cfg either through custom editing or from a manual musixtex install. We must also care of removing (or commenting out) that line when uninstalling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301205.n0UC5nLp023906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-30 07:05:48 EDT --- > Branches: F9, F10, devel the devel branch are always created, so you don't need to specify it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483079] Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants In-Reply-To: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301213.n0UCDHFv002303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-30 07:13:16 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1b5c8fc4b76bd9bf61063a92fdfbf6394cac9641 constant-boolean-0.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483074] Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions In-Reply-To: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483074-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301220.n0UCK9MA027164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:20:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Exception-Base Short Description: Lightweight exceptions Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:24:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483079] Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants In-Reply-To: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483079-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301224.n0UCOBWo027982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:24:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-constant-boolean Short Description: Define TRUE and FALSE constants Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482863-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301223.n0UCN790027768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:23:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Daemonize Short Description: Role for daemonizing your Moose based application Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482827] Review Request: banshee-mirage - An Automatic Playlist Generation Extension for Banshee In-Reply-To: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482827-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301230.n0UCU7Bb006309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482827 David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:30:05 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301254.n0UCsJ8m002399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 07:54:15 EDT --- Hi! What is the status of this package ? Is this the last package version ! Just one note for now: * Why is it using zlib-static ? zlib doesn't change that much nor produce a circle dependency. So the needs of static linking doens't make sense IMO. * The source rpm is definitely enormous it would seems easier to repack the %{tarname}%{version}-860-vendor.tar.bz2 with cherry picking only what is needed to be built internally for the given Fedora version(xulrunner/taglib/other?). This can be made using a script that will have to be provided within the source package. (as source100: for example). *BTW you need to use Source0: instead of Source: But having a script to repack the source dependencies isn't that a real solution. The best way would be to have a script provided from the Songbird upstream(hi Stephen) To download a given (vanilla) version of a Songbird dependency, with only the related patch needed by Songbird (if there is). And That for each Songbird dependency. (following the VideoLan example, with vlc) This will allow for the packager (and the other packagers, that will check the Songbird Packager commits during the whole live for the package), to control which will be the difference between the system package and eventually, to override the use of an internal dependency if the Songbird patch is for another platform or already merged in the new system version... For now, I think we will need to use xulrunner internally, but what the current status of the (system) xulrunner 3.1 usability with SongBird ? (xulrunner 3.1 is already present in Rawhide/F-11). We could also ask the feodra taglib package maintainer if he will allow to backport the needed patch for F-11 (unless it breaks the taglib ABI). /me is still rpmbuilding Songbird for F-10 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483026-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301308.n0UD8xm1006727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Falk <oliver at linux-kernel.at> 2009-01-30 08:08:58 EDT --- Updated the spec, including TODO and BAD :-) I did *not* increase the release number. Thx Jochen for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: <bug-483025-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483025-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301326.n0UDQNgi021494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #1 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> 2009-01-30 08:26:23 EDT --- Torch is already built in rawhide, hence I made a scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1093697 I also added all the missing BR, had to add also automake + autoconf because of the funny configure script provided in the source tarball: >cat configure #!/bin/sh rm $0 make $0 $* New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.2.rc6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: <bug-473046-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473046-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301351.n0UDpluP028094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #22 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-30 08:51:44 EDT --- More details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301353.n0UDrnjx019140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-30 08:53:48 EDT --- fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.22-1.fc10.src.rpm I need only to replace this 2 command's by install instead using cp. mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale cp -a ./$database%{_datadir}/locale %{buildroot}%{_datadir} any suggestion about this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225707-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301425.n0UEPH50004515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 --- Comment #9 from Stepan Kasal <skasal at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 09:25:15 EDT --- fixed in dosfstools-3.0.1-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-478300-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478300-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301430.n0UEUhrp005799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301431.n0UEVxHm006204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #21 from Stephen Lau <stevel at songbirdnest.com> 2009-01-30 09:31:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Hi! > > What is the status of this package ? > Is this the last package version ! David (auralvance) has spun 1.0 Fedora RPMs here: http://wiki.songbirdnest.com/Developer/Articles/Builds/Contributed_Builds > Just one note for now: > * Why is it using zlib-static ? > zlib doesn't change that much nor produce a circle dependency. So the needs of > static linking doens't make sense IMO. It can use the system zlib. > For now, I think we will need to use xulrunner internally, but what the current > status of the (system) xulrunner 3.1 usability with SongBird ? (xulrunner 3.1 > is already present in Rawhide/F-11). Still not possible... unless the XULRunner has the patches we depend on, Songbird will not likely work. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301438.n0UEcExh007837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 --- Comment #2 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-30 09:38:13 EDT --- Thanks for the kind and constructive comments. I've added a patch for the Makefile to eliminate the double install of the man pages, and applied your other suggestions as well. I'll submit a new review request. As for the other questions: I have some more packages I'd like to submit but since this is the first time I first try one package to get used to the procedures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] New: Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) Message-ID: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Summary: Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvromans at squirrel.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/chordii.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/chordii-4.2-2.src.rpm Description: chordii provides guitar players and other musicians with a tool to produce good looking, self-descriptive music sheets from text files. chordii reads text files in chordpro format, containing the lyrics of songs, the chords to be played, their descriptions and some other optional data. It produces a PostScript document suitable for viewing and printing. chordii features include: - centered titles, - chord names above the words, - chord diagrams at the end of the songs, - multiple columns on a page, - multiple logical pages per physical pages (1, 2 or 4), - configurable fonts and sizes, - the complete ISO 8859-1 character set, - chorus marking, - automated chord transposition, - songbook creation: typeset multiple songs with page numbers and a table of contents. This is my first package, so I'm looking for a sponsor. The spec and srpm are rpmlint free of warnings and errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301437.n0UEbIc6029956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: <bug-459751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301442.n0UEgBi2031229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301455.n0UEtNVf002728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 09:55:22 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451298-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301455.n0UEtdDi002824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481173-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301456.n0UEuQTL003026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 09:56:24 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301456.n0UEuvlR003218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-30 09:56:56 EDT --- As you please, I am waiting. 2-3-4 correct packages (depending on complexity and your abilities to fix -- if needed -- errors) will[/might] bring sponsorship :) Please do no forget to increment the release tag each time you submit a modified spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: <bug-463767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-463767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301505.n0UF5fH0015202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 10:05:38 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301504.n0UF45O7005190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-30 10:04:04 EDT --- After a quick look at your spec file, some comments. - Use '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' instead of '%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)' - The 'URL:' should point to the upstream website. The 'Source0' to the upstream tarball. Move 'URL:' to 'Source' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - It would be nice if you are going to use the dist tag -> 'Release: 2%{?dist}' - Change 'examples' to 'examples/' to add all example files. To get sponsored -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: <bug-475471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-475471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301509.n0UF9WT3016046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 10:09:31 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301510.n0UFA1CS016324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(maintainer at mt2009 | |.com) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 10:10:00 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301511.n0UFBJjE007552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #22 from David Halik <auralvance at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 10:11:16 EDT --- My mistake. I forgot to log in and update the ticket after the 1.0 release. :) Yes, the 1.0 rpm's have been out for sometime. Here's the direct link to the src.rpm and spec, all of which you can find in the url stevel pointed out. As of the latest release we use system zlib. http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301523.n0UFNobC010598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 10:23:49 EDT --- Make sure which bug to mark duplicate I see this package submitted by submitter twice. see bug483250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301524.n0UFOsw7010836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 10:24:53 EDT --- Make sure which bug to mark duplicate I see this package submitted by submitter twice. see bug483108 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-473205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301529.n0UFTVTx011959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 10:29:29 EDT --- I will close this this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483258] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose Message-ID: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483258 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-LogDispatch/perl-MooseX-LogDispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-LogDispatch/perl-MooseX-LogDispatch-1.2000-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Log::Dispatch role for use with your Moose classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301532.n0UFWpbE021761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #3 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-30 10:32:49 EDT --- *** Bug 483108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483108-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301532.n0UFWoeJ021728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-30 10:32:49 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483250 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483258] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301541.n0UFfYBw023921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483258 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225852-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301542.n0UFgRYX024144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481389-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301546.n0UFkGpi025140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 10:46:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beesu Short Description: Beesu is a wrapper around su Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: ...and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: <bug-467642-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-467642-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301544.n0UFiDeK015698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-30 10:44:12 EDT --- As far as I know, is Tomeu Vizoso working on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: <bug-443771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-443771-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301545.n0UFjUnW016288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #27 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2009-01-30 10:45:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > I've asked upstream for clarification. If I don't get an answer, I'll > repack the tarfile. See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=49790675.5020701%40gmx.de&forum_name=lmms-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483115-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301546.n0UFkOMa016449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 10:46:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: allgeyer-fonts Short Description: Musical Notation True Type Fonts Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483258] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301551.n0UFpObs026548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483258 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-30 10:51:23 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1b8b177dc740b96c70d7bbe40aeea1dd1f5e6f73 MooseX-LogDispatch-1.2000.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:56:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483258] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483258-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301556.n0UFuXlp027928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483258 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 10:56:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch Short Description: Logging Role for Moose Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 16:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301603.n0UG37TV020450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #4 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-30 11:03:05 EDT --- @Fabian: Thanks for your kind and constructive feedback. I've made the suggested changes to the spec. I documented in %changelog that I changed %defattr, and now rpmlint complains about 'macro-in-%changelog'. I assume this can be safely ignored. New files have been uploaded: Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/chordii.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/chordii-4.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Last build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1094024 Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 16:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301610.n0UGAR0J031417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-30 11:10:26 EDT --- Johan, use %% in the changelog in order to silence rpmlint. Otherwise the entry is expanded as a macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 16:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301612.n0UGCsdO032040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 11:12:53 EDT --- Is the camel casing necessary in the name? Just curious ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 16:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301623.n0UGNuHv025687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 11:23:55 EDT --- Also, there's something weird happening with the feature not being included in the zips resulting from the build. I suspect something odd in the feature's build.properties or feature.xml. The "os=linux" thing may be it ... try a build without it and see if the feature is included in the zip. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 16:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: <bug-442233-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-442233-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301656.n0UGuDx9011378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 11:56:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oprofileui Short Description: GTK2 user interface for oprofile Owners: davej at redhat.com Branches: devek InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] New: Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting Message-ID: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Summary: Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tbzatek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/nautilus-gdu/nautilus-gdu.spec SRPM URL: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/nautilus-gdu/nautilus-gdu-0.1-git20090130.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Simple extension for formatting disks, usb sticks and other media, available from Nautilus context menu. This extension is built on top. of the gnome-disk-utility library with DeviceKit-disks as a backend. Access to physical devices is controlled by PolicyKit. - rpmlint reports no error, package builds successfully in koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301726.n0UHQi16011156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:29:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301729.n0UHTecv019741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301729.n0UHTJlP011640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 12:29:18 EDT --- Well, > I need only to replace this 2 command's by install instead using cp. > > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale > cp -a ./$database%{_datadir}/locale %{buildroot}%{_datadir} If "cp" can be used here, you can just use cp. I frequenty use both "install" and "cp" in one spec file. By the way for .22-1: * Working directory ---------------------------------------------------------- #install doc about alternatives install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} ---------------------------------------------------------- - Well, even in %prep after %setup -q is finished, the working directory is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} for this case. * Autotool recall - build.log says: ---------------------------------------------------------- 649 + make -j4 650 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/mydns-1.2.8/missing --run autoheader 651 /builddir/build/BUILD/mydns-1.2.8/missing: line 46: autoheader: command not found 652 WARNING: `autoheader' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 653 you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.ac'. You might want 654 to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them 655 from any GNU archive site. 656 rm -f stamp-h1 657 touch config.h.in 658 cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status config.h 659 config.status: creating config.h 660 config.status: config.h is unchanged 661 make all-recursive ---------------------------------------------------------- Still autotools are called. Please suppress this. * cflags I didn't notice this before, however: ---------------------------------------------------------- 613 checking CFLAGS... -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -ffast-math -funsigned-char ---------------------------------------------------------- - -fomit-frame-pointer is not allowed on Fedora because this makes debugging very difficult - Also -ffast-math should be avoid unless you have some reasons because this changes (decreases) the precision of math functions and introduces some assumption. * Scriptlets - As I said in my previous comment, please add proper Requires(post) or so. (In reply to comment #11) > * scriptlets > - For SysV initscripts handling, please refer to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets > (Note that there are some Requires(post) or so) > > - Add "Requires(post): %{_sbindir}/alternatives" (also Requires(preun)) > for -mysql and -pgsql subpackages By the way: ----------------------------------------------------------- if [ $1 = 1 ]; then /sbin/chkconfig --add %{name} fi ----------------------------------------------------------- - if [ $1 = 1 ] is not needed. If service name is already registered in initscript symlinks, then chkconfig --add does nothing. Also, removing [ $1 = 1 ] can handle the case in which service name changes correctly. * Info file - I checked the info file and actually mydns.info.gz is empty (try gunzip). I guess some BuildRequires are missing (perhaps texinfo) * Directory ownership issue - %_datadir/%name is not owned by any packages. * Gettext .mo files - Making gettext .mo files owned by two subpackages is not needed. Please these files to pydns package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483250-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301733.n0UHXuLf020990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #6 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-30 12:33:55 EDT --- @manuel: thanks! Fixed in a future version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301740.n0UHebZM022786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework Message-ID: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvromans at squirrel.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/perl-Data-Report.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Data::Report is a framework for report generation. You define the columns, add the data row by row, and get reports in text, HTML, CSV and so on. Textual ornaments like extra empty lines, dashed lines, and cell lines can be added in a way similar to HTML style sheets. Last koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1094325 This is one of my first packages, so I'm looking for a sponsor. The spec and srpm are rpmlint free of warnings and errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301807.n0UI78Bk029140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-30 13:07:06 EDT --- Hello, Alex: It seems that no one tried to review your package for more than 2 months. Do you still want to import your srpm into Fedora? If so, I will try to review your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301816.n0UIGZMA024474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 13:16:34 EDT --- Package builds fine in mock. rpmlint output: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476832-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301821.n0UILLNx025559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-30 13:21:21 EDT --- I will add a new .spec tomorrow. I am planning to add a user and a group called mydns and make it own the file /etc/mydns.conf, so mydns.conf will not readable by everyone, since this file stores the user and password of mydns database connection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301825.n0UIPdKu026636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 13:25:38 EDT --- requires/provides/file list look sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481071-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301841.n0UIfdWu030947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 13:41:38 EDT --- Files updated: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tex-musixtex.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tex-musixtex-0.114-2.src.rpm %changelog - Use standard macros from /etc/rpm/macros.texlive - Drop BR: kpsewhich - %%files section is made more explicit - Update updmap.cfg via updmap-sys in post&postun > (You can reuse the variables MUSIXTEXDIR etc). I couldn't use them because rpmbuild fails when a %files entry doesn't start with "/". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:46:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:46:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: <bug-459948-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459948-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301846.n0UIkYvG032273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 13:46:32 EDT --- Will update soon, thanks for the reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476471-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301849.n0UIn6eA006731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Bug 476471 depends on bug 482972, which changed state. Bug 482972 Summary: .desktop file not created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483277-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301850.n0UIovXp007365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 13:50:57 EDT --- package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file legible: ok sources: you should probably add a comment explaining how to get the tarball from git. longer-term, we need to sort out hosting buildable: ok excludearch: ok build deps: ok locale handling: ok, no translations right now. sorting that out ties in to the hosting question... ldconfig: I don't think you need to call ldconfig in %post/%postun, since you are not installing a shared library in the linker path, just a loadable module relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: n/a %doc content: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel subpackage: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: ok file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Summary: - add source comment - remove unnecessary %post/%postun -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301849.n0UInPiA000359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #17 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 13:49:24 EDT --- i have found this file: /usr/lib64/gdesklets/Controls/URI/__init__py this file is call for openning a file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 18:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library In-Reply-To: <bug-227933-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-227933-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301854.n0UIsqqN001922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> 2009-01-30 13:54:48 EDT --- I believe because back in the day, that is what one did when one submitted a review. I don't have a burning need for this to be in Fedora. But gdl uses this library rather than the main PROJ.4 distribution. Actually, gdl uses a very old version (now) of libproj4, so we'll see where that moves. I'll close for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 19:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301910.n0UJAZQU012366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fche at redhat.com --- Comment #21 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat.com> 2009-01-30 14:10:34 EDT --- Re. comment #19, > As sysadmin I would definitely have preferred to do > "yum install ovm.el4" instead of "tar xzf ovm-2.0.tar.gz" Until that time, you could make a local yum repo and publish the RPM there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 19:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301941.n0UJfRP7014109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #17 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 14:41:25 EDT --- FESCo has voted not to allow crutches for 3rd party packages, such as this one, into Fedora. This package is therefore blocked from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 19:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] New: Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer Message-ID: <bug-483301-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Summary: Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse-0.9-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: MusE is a MIDI/Audio sequencer with recording and editing capabilities. It can perform audio effects like chorus/flanger in realtime via LASH and it supports Jack and ALSA interfaces. MusE aims to be a complete multitrack virtual studio for Linux. rpmlint is silent. Epoch: 1 is there for PlanetCCRMA compatibility. See AudioCreation SIG wiki for informations about PlanetCCRMA integration: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AudioCreation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 19:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901301956.n0UJuBti018921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #22 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 14:56:10 EDT --- FESCo has voted to continue to block this content, on the basis that it does not "enhance the OS user experience". Imagine this: I'm Joe User, who wants to use ovm. I type 'yum install ovm iverilog' and expect to be able to do whatever ovm does (and I'll have to admit ignorance as to exactly what this is - I'm not a hardware guy). I find that I can't do that, and instead have to buy some expensive proprietary tool in order to make use of this free content. We're fine with the concept of ovm being in Fedora, but we also want something that is able to use this content, even if it's at a very primitive level that no one actually *would* use it in a production environment. The link that Chitlesh posted earlier to upstream iverilog forums seemed to indicate that they had other priorities other than making this work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477818-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302018.n0UKIhZE024492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Pavel Shevchuk <stlwrt at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Pavel Shevchuk <stlwrt at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 15:18:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gsql Short Description: Integrated database development tool for GNOME Owners: stalwart Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483320] New: Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) Message-ID: <bug-483320-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483320 Summary: Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://nda.amd.com/dds/user/xdoc/400001629 SRPM URL: https://nda.amd.com/dds/user/xdoc/400001628 Description: CodeAnalyst is a performance analysis suite. It provids graphical utilitys for running Oprofile, and analyzing result on AMD-based systems. CodeAnalyst includes several features to aid profile analysis such as inline-function analysis, code-block analysis, and a utility for profile comparison, DiffAnalayst. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] New: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk Message-ID: <bug-483331-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Summary: Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/asterisk-sounds-core.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Core sound files for Asterisk. After a long, long, wait the Asterisk sound files finally have a proper license (CC-BY-SA) so we can finally package them! Once the package has been reviewed and in development I'm going to be talking to rel-eng about copying the binary RPMs to each supported version of Fedora as these are rather large. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: <bug-483331-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483331-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302042.n0UKgw0d031166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff at ocjtech.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |428832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464013-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302054.n0UKsFM5007766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 15:54:14 EDT --- Thank you, Mary Ellen Foster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464014] Review Request: findbugs - Find bugs in Java code In-Reply-To: <bug-464014-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-464014-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302054.n0UKsGs2007786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464014 Bug 464014 depends on bug 464013, which changed state. Bug 464013 Summary: Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302056.n0UKuA2b008488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luya at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #18 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-30 15:56:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Maybe the gdesklets maintainer can comment on this? > > Bottom of comment 14 is some oddity in Fedora's gdesklets package. It is > reproducible with the "Calendar" v0.62 Display in F10 "gdesklets" package. > Steps to reproduce: > > 1. Run "Calendar" desklet from date/time category. > 2. Right-click on desklet display for "Configure desklet" pop-up menu. > 3. Click "Open" button next to "Month image" input field. > > Result: An error dialog on top of the file manager is displayed: > > | The folder contents could not be displayed > | > | Operation not supported [ OK ] > > It looks like a bug in gdesklets or an API incompatibility. I confirmed the bug that affect other desklets with image path and submitted it to upstream. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fedora/+source/gdesklets/+bug/323347 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: <bug-483016-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483016-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302052.n0UKq4Y0001398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 15:52:03 EDT --- I'll take care of this this evening, hopefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-474980-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302125.n0ULP7CG009964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH <cgoorah at yahoo.com.au> 2009-01-30 16:25:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > not having iverilog in means that ovm is only available to a subset of people > who have access to the closed proprietary tools. We want you to get this in, > all we are asking is to provide a way for everyone to use the content. even if > for now its limited in functionality. iverilog is under the fedora umbrella since one or two years. perl-Verilog has incorporated early perl support of SystemVerilog http://www.veripool.org/search/index/verilog-perl?q=systemverilog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481527-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302130.n0ULUZMM017416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof <ruben at rubenkerkhof.com> 2009-01-30 16:30:34 EDT --- I think it would be better to use the upstream source tarball for Source0, and remove the included, unwanted perl modules in the %prep phase. That way we can verify if the tarball is the same as upstream's -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: <bug-459948-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459948-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302142.n0ULgHXI014239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 16:42:16 EDT --- Updated to 2.0.6; build requirements on libtool and gettext added: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1094648 http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/maemo/libhildon.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/maemo/libhildon-2.0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482985-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302228.n0UMSB0U031256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-482993-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302229.n0UMTJ9R024525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] New: Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting Message-ID: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 Summary: Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pdfshuffler.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pdfshuffler-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfshuffler/ Description: PDF-Shuffler is a small python-gtk application, which helps the user to merge or split pdf documents and rotate, crop and rearrange their pages using an interactive and intuitive graphical interface. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1094786 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pdfshuffler-0.3.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pdfshuffler-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302314.n0UNEBav009523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palango at gmx.de Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] New: Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font Message-ID: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Summary: Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: palango at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Serif decorative latin TTF font by Jan Gerner, suitable for titles and short runs of text. This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: <bug-483364-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483364-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901302324.n0UNOeKT004707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483364] New: Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses Message-ID: <bug-483364-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Summary: Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvromans at squirrel.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: EekBoek is a bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses. Unlike other accounting software, EekBoek has both a command-line interface (CLI) and a graphical user-interface (GUI, currently under development). Furthermore, it has a complete Perl API to create your own custom applications. EekBoek is designed for the Dutch/European market and currently available in Dutch only. An English translation is in the works (help appreciated). The spec file is non-trivial but well commented. The spec file and rpms are rpmlint free with the exception of two files that are not utf8. This is intentional, these files need to be latin1. Results of last koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1094851 This is the third package I submit for review, and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 00:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310009.n0V097KX020967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 01:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310109.n0V19k9j031854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz> 2009-01-30 20:09:45 EDT --- MUST: + rpmlint is silent + package name + spec file name - packaging guidelines - "The summary should be a short and concise description of the package" ? "A desktop diary" -- left from different spec file ? :) + Python guidelines: + defines %{python_sitelib} + builds egg from source + egg_info included + no unnecessary pyc/pyo + license (GPLv2+) ok, in COPYING as well in source files + spec file legible, English + source matches upstream (md5sum c59f3efcbc448c39fabbaac70c4237d4) + architectures ok (noarch) + builds in mock, no unnecessary BR + no need to ldconfig + locales ok (uses find_lang) + no library, hence no devel, static etc. + not relocatable + directories ownership ok + no dups in %files, proper %clean, %install + macros consistent + code and perm. content + %docs present + UTF-8 SHOULD: + license file + it works!:) OTHERS: - if you already insist on proper English grammar when patching (which is great!), do it proper;) from the desktop file patch: "Comment=PDF Merging, Rearranging, and Spliting" ^ Provided that you fix the summary (and the patch typo:) when importing, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 01:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310130.n0V1U0c0028219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #19 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-30 20:30:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Maybe the gdesklets maintainer can comment on this? > > > > Bottom of comment 14 is some oddity in Fedora's gdesklets package. It is > > reproducible with the "Calendar" v0.62 Display in F10 "gdesklets" package. > > Steps to reproduce: > > > > 1. Run "Calendar" desklet from date/time category. > > 2. Right-click on desklet display for "Configure desklet" pop-up menu. > > 3. Click "Open" button next to "Month image" input field. > > > > Result: An error dialog on top of the file manager is displayed: > > > > | The folder contents could not be displayed > > | > > | Operation not supported [ OK ] > > > > It looks like a bug in gdesklets or an API incompatibility. > > I confirmed the bug that affect other desklets with image path and submitted it > to upstream. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/fedora/+source/gdesklets/+bug/323347 Then the package it's ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 04:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478007-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310425.n0V4PCXG027695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #18 from David Timms <dtimms at iinet.net.au> 2009-01-30 23:25:11 EDT --- OK, thanks Jon for updating the review request, and to FESCo in taking some time to examine the issue involved. Looking forward to how this went down in the irc log/meeting notes ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310522.n0V5Mstf013979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 00:22:53 EDT --- So... I don't wanna be rude, but, Is there something not clear about what I asked? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: <bug-226417-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226417-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310531.n0V5VWVx015625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: <bug-226417-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226417-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310530.n0V5Uaoh015447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 00:30:34 EDT --- I understand that dropping a line of comment can be difficult sometimes. Anyways, the package is good. I don't think anyone will complain about why you didn't include the ChangeLog. If they do, you'll add it later. Merge review APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226235] Merge Review: pax In-Reply-To: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-226235-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310532.n0V5WXck008680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226235 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 00:32:32 EDT --- closing the bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: <bug-483045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483045-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310536.n0V5ap4Y009617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: <bug-459979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459979-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310556.n0V5ukVl013890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #37 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 00:56:41 EDT --- This is one of the slowest progressing bugs I have seen. It doesn't stall, it keeps going, but slow. Folks, we do need nice applications such as kdenlive in Fedora. Can we boost up the pace a little? Complaining fellows: What else do we need from mlt upstream? Or is version 0.3.4 good enough for packaging? I have a feeling that we are waiting for mlt to be capable of running on some ancient computers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459579] Review Request: pike - Interpreted, high-level, object oriented language In-Reply-To: <bug-459579-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-459579-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310600.n0V60he3021917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459579 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 01:00:42 EDT --- ping? can you update to the latest version? is the perl module still broken? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361701] Package review: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: <bug-361701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-361701-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310605.n0V65iuY023206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 01:05:41 EDT --- ping? are you still interested in packaging this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-457210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310610.n0V6AeTg024430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #29 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 01:10:37 EDT --- Is there anyone doing this review? leigh, do you still need sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: <bug-451744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-451744-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310607.n0V67Z17023664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 01:07:31 EDT --- Joseph, please go ahead. If the initial submitter returns, you guys can cooperate in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310629.n0V6TB6e028396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 01:29:10 EDT --- 1)Add following to spec BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Entities) Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) 2) %doc is empty it should be %doc Changes README 3) Not needed to use full path to find command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310651.n0V6pdui001483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-31 01:51:38 EDT --- I am inclined to think, we first need to have Text::CSV in Fedora, before this package can be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 07:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] New: Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont Message-ID: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 Summary: Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://6mata.com:8014/review/fluid-soundfont.spec SRPM URL: http://6mata.com:8014/review/fluid-soundfont-3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm WARNING: SRPM is 130MB Description: Release 3 of Frank Wen's pro-quality GM/GS soundfont. The soundfont has lots of excellent samples, including all the GM instruments along side with the GS instruments that are recycled and reprogrammed versions of the GM presets. rpmlint is silent. Since we have only one soundfont for the entire distribution (which is also nonfree), I want to include this free soundfont in Fedora. In my opinion, it is nicer than PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont. As I explained in the SPEC file, the upstream tarball has the soundfont only in sfArk format, which had to be converted to linux-friendly sf2 format by a non-free software. Debian folks already did this and we are borrowing their ready-to-go tarball. This soundfont is 9 years old. Originally it didn't specify a license, although the README file inside the original tarball always said that "this is free". The author licensed this soundfont under MIT recently. Here is the story of when&how this soundfont received the MIT license and it got debianized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 07:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310729.n0V7TK66001151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 02:29:20 EDT --- Forgot the link. Here it is: http://www.nabble.com/RFS:-fluid-soundfont----Fluid-(R3)-General-MIDI-SoundFont-td15579882.html Adding Hans to the CC. Hans, originally I made "GUS patches" subpackages for this one, the same way you did for the PersonalCopy soundfont. But then I ended up with a ~1.5GB RPM. Shall we look for a method to cut that size? Do we need GUS patches for this? Users can build them easily themselves if they want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310905.n0V95NAq019346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |luya at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #20 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-31 04:05:21 EDT --- Yes, the package is fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: <bug-457210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-457210-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310921.n0V9LB8x030044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #30 from leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com> 2009-01-31 04:21:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Is there anyone doing this review? > > leigh, do you still need sponsorship? Yes I do still need sponsorship . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310921.n0V9LO8c022841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-31 04:21:23 EDT --- Nothing much to say, this is a textbook simple font package that closely follows the template. Best practice nowadays is to use a summary that does not include the font name. Also, it seems there is a little more info on the font history in upstream's web page, it's always good to include it in description as long as it's limited to a few paragraphs. But all of this is nitpicking, the package itself is sane ??? APPROVED ??? I'll sponsor you so you can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a as soon as I see one or two other clean package submissions from you. Thank you for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310931.n0V9VHbi031996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #22 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-31 04:31:16 EDT --- Information is on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310930.n0V9UNDe024671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #21 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-31 04:30:22 EDT --- Make sure to change Summary in something like: A slideshow of collection for gdesklets. Also get a Fedora accound, a sponsor to get approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310935.n0V9ZAIL000410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-31 04:35:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdfshuffler Short Description: PDF file merging, rearranging, and splitting Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483360-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901310934.n0V9YCO4032393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-31 04:34:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review and finding the typo. (In reply to comment #1) > - packaging guidelines > - "The summary should be a short and concise description of the package" > ? "A desktop diary" -- left from different spec file ? :) fixed > OTHERS: > - if you already insist on proper English grammar when patching (which is > great!), do it proper;) > from the desktop file patch: > "Comment=PDF Merging, Rearranging, and Spliting" > ^ fixed in summary and .desktop files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311029.n0VATZwQ010897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #20 from Aurelien Bompard <gauret at free.fr> 2009-01-31 05:29:33 EDT --- OK, it looks like Spring is not even supposed to build or to run on Linux/PPC. http://spring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=6234 I've asked for news on the subject, but if you're all OK I'll just ExcludeArch ppc and ppc64 : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures Here's the new package: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311037.n0VAbYMp012491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #3 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-31 05:37:33 EDT --- @Parag: Thanks for your feedback. 1) HTML::Entities is an optional module and not necessary for building and correct functioning of this package. Do you still need it should be added to the requirements? 2) Fixed. 3) Fixed. @Ralf: I do not understand. The package can work with either Text::CSV or Text::CSV_XS. The current version mentions Text::CSV in its requirements, and I changed that to Text::CSV_XS mainly because Text::CVS_XS is part of Fedora already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-426751-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311051.n0VAp9YV015281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/pac | |kage/X11 --- Comment #48 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 05:51:05 EDT --- Yaakov if you want to update/merge in the latest changes from http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/ I am happy to take over the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479796-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311056.n0VAuNaR016217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 05:56:22 EDT --- This looks ready for review. I will try to do that soon unless someone else takes it first. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483320] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: <bug-483320-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483320-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311121.n0VBLb5m021415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483320 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-01-31 06:21:36 EDT --- Links direct to Non Disclosure Agreement. Software clearly doesn't have a free license. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483381] New: Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps Message-ID: <bug-483381-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 Summary: Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/metromap.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/metromap-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://metromap.antex.ru/ Description: A simple pygtk+2 application for finding paths in metro (subway) maps. Maps for Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, London, and Berlin are included. Others can be downloaded. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1096182 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint metromap-0.1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint metromap-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311139.n0VBdKDN024614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #4 from Anithra <anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com> 2009-01-31 06:39:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the build results and review. I've uploaded the spec file and SRPM with all changes to SourceForge SPEC URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/eclipse-SystemTapGui.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-SystemTapGui-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311141.n0VBfP0M017909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #5 from Anithra <anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com> 2009-01-31 06:41:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is the camel casing necessary in the name? Just curious ... Its not really necessary, but is there just for the sake of uniformity as SystemTap also has camel casing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311145.n0VBjKfT026036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #6 from Anithra <anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com> 2009-01-31 06:45:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Also, there's something weird happening with the feature not being included in > the zips resulting from the build. I suspect something odd in the feature's > build.properties or feature.xml. The "os=linux" thing may be it ... try a > build without it and see if the feature is included in the zip. removing the "os=linux" solved the problem. Thanks!. The modified source tar ball has been uploaded to sourceforge. SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-SystemTapGui-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311143.n0VBhN8K018203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-01-31 06:43:22 EDT --- In my understanding, Text::CSV is an abstraction layer, which may use Text::CVS_XS underneath. That said, your patch to me is a hack to circumvent Text::CSV. => The proper way to package would be to first package Text::CSV, and then Data::Report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 12:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311223.n0VCNRjJ001230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #23 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 07:23:26 EDT --- ok i have update the summary. but i have a little problem with release 3 gdesklet do'nt add the control then the desklet do'nt work??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 13:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311304.n0VD4ekn009445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #5 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-31 08:04:39 EDT --- Thanks for your clarification. Not so long ago, Text::CSV and Text::CSV_XS were incompatible implementations with differing APIs. That is why many many tools require Text::CSV_XS directly. And I assume that is also the reason why Text::CSV_XS has been part of Fedora for a long time, while Text::CSV still isn't. Only recently (2007/2008) development of Text::CSV and Text::CSV_XS was coordinated. So I do not share your opinion on my patch being a hack. However, I have contacted the Text::CSV maintainer to ask permission for packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 13:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311316.n0VDGuxt012613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 08:16:55 EDT --- I've no idea what is going on in this bug. Its a 2 year old review request, that nobody cared about. Just read the spec file and review it. You aren't the maintainer so you can't decide when we need to upgrade to the latest upstream version, esp when we are also upstream maintainers, and libdrm is a pretty messy system component to just go upgrading due to links to X/mesa etc. I'm also nearly sure I did push 2.4.4 into rawhide 2-3 days ago, but again what has the version got to do with the spec file review? confused. Dave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 13:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311328.n0VDShRm015062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 08:28:42 EDT --- Woa, fluid relicensed under an MIT license, that is great news! You know I spend *days* mailing with soundfont authors to even find one that is freely re-distributable (albeit not free), so that we could atleast have midi playback functionality in Fedora. Anyways about the gus patches, *a* set of gus patches is needed for (older) timidity derived midi playing code, as found in libtimidity, allegro and SDL_mixer to be able to play midi. timidity itself now can also handle sf2 files. Given that all those which need gus patches explictly require PersonalCopy-Lite's gus patches, and that those do a decent job (sf2 to gus format conversion is not perfect, as the feature sets of the 2 formats are not a 100% match), I see no use in having a gus version of the fluid font, esp. given the huge package size this will cause. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 13:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] New: Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur Message-ID: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Summary: Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Schedule-Cron-Events.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Schedule-Cron-Events-1.8-1.src.rpm Description: Given a line from a crontab, tells you the time at which cron will next run the line or when the last event occurred, relative to any date you choose. And this module uses Set::Crontab to understand the date specification, so it should be able to handle all forms of cron entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 14:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311434.n0VEYerF027791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra <anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 14:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483205-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311436.n0VEaV7i020921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #7 from Anithra <anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com> 2009-01-31 09:36:30 EDT --- This is my first package to Fedora and I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 14:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] New: Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists Message-ID: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 Summary: Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/whohas.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/whohas-0.22-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.philippwesche.org/200811/whohas/intro.html Description: whohas is a command line tool that allows querying several package lists at once - currently supported are Arch, Debian, Gentoo and Slackware. whohas is written in Perl and was designed to help package maintainers find ebuilds, pkgbuilds and similar package definitions from other distributions to learn from. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1096369 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint whohas-0.22-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint whohas-0.22-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 15:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481482] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Junction - Perl6 style Junction operators in Perl5 In-Reply-To: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481482-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311542.n0VFgeiL006564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481482 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 15:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481681] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ClassAttribute - Declare class attributes Moose-style In-Reply-To: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481681-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311547.n0VFl4dJ007327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481681 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 15:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481567] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Async - Set of Metaclasses for MooseX::POE and it's siblings In-Reply-To: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481567-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311549.n0VFnYYX007595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481567 Allisson Azevedo <allisson at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 15:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311547.n0VFlDR1007376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #24 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 10:47:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > ok i have update the summary. > but i have a little problem with release 3 gdesklet do'nt add the control then > the desklet do'nt work??? no it's good, is me :p ____________________________________________________________ rpmlint: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/SlideShow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ____________________________________________________________ I have update spec rpm and src rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SlideShow.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 16:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311604.n0VG46OT001857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #7 from Alex Eskin <alexeskin at yahoo.com> 2009-01-31 11:04:05 EDT --- Yes, I still would like to import it. Thanks! --Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 17:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-225999-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311705.n0VH5Ib8020214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 12:05:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I've no idea what is going on in this bug. Its a 2 year old review request, > that nobody cared about. > There are plenty of Merge Reviews that are waiting for a reviewer. Sorry, we didn't have the manpower to finish them up in the last two years. People are working on them. > Just read the spec file and review it. > > You aren't the maintainer so you can't decide when we need to upgrade to the > latest upstream version, esp when we are also upstream maintainers, and libdrm > is a pretty messy system component to just go upgrading due to links to X/mesa > etc. > Thank you for the explanation. Being verbose just *helps*. > I'm also nearly sure I did push 2.4.4 into rawhide 2-3 days ago, Again, I'm sorry. I didn't check the rawhide SPEC. I was busy with monitoring many SPEC files and this one just slipped through. It would be nice if the maintainer wrote about the update here. > but again what > has the version got to do with the spec file review? > > confused. > Dave. Dave, this is not a "SPEC file review". It is a "package review". The former is only a subset of the latter. For reference, look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Some of these elements cannot be checked within SPEC file only and they need to be re-checked with each upstream version. I'll do the "package review" now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 17:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311742.n0VHgYKw018135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #25 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 12:42:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Information is on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers ok, i read all the document i am at : koji build --scratch dist-f10 rpmbuild/SRPMS/SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: rpmbuild/SRPMS/SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:04 143.64 KiB 28.83 KiB/sec Created task: 1096424 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1096424 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1096424 build (dist-f10, SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm): open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) 1096425 buildArch (SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): free 1096425 buildArch (SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (ppc10.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1096425 buildArch (SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc10.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1096424 build (dist-f10, SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm): open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1096424 build (dist-f10, SlideShow-0.9-4.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 17:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311750.n0VHo78J027604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-31 12:50:05 EDT --- Robert, the fedora?review flag must be set by the reviewer... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 17:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] New: Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font Message-ID: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Summary: Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: palango at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/vollkorn-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/vollkorn-fonts-1.008-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Serif latin OTF font by Friedrich Althausen with focus on good readability. This needs to be sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 17:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311756.n0VHuso6028718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, palango at gmx.de Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311808.n0VI8F7c030455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-31 13:08:14 EDT --- Of course, Manuel. Sorry, that happened accidentally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311809.n0VI9MpK030587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311810.n0VIAlg4031034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311809.n0VI9uR0022539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 13:09:55 EDT --- I made an attempt to modify the SPEC file so that one can build the GUS subpackages by passing "--with GUS" to rpmbuild: http://6mata.com:8014/review/fluid-soundfont.spec.optional.gus Should I leave it like this, or should I revert? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-478767-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311810.n0VIASEc023002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 13:10:26 EDT --- Now x86_64 is failing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1096475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311834.n0VIYUa6002335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-31 13:34:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330530) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330530) Licenses in need of audit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311833.n0VIXNRx026653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-31 13:33:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330529) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330529) License analysis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311832.n0VIW8ME026469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311836.n0VIaBAR027371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-31 13:36:10 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type according to the program: GPLv2+ License type according to the program: GPLv2 => see issue 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 936832728dccf7f2c46d741f928c52ee4f84dcb1 whohas-0.22.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Correct license is GPLv2+. The program explicitely says: # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # 2. The perl(Module_Compat) line is not needed, this is a standalone program, not a perl module. And if needed it will pull in perl as needed due to the dependencies: /usr/bin/perl perl(Env) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(sigtrap) perl(strict) perl(threads) perl-libwww-perl rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 (this is a local test, with Module_Compat removed, and which works perfectly despite being built for rawhide and tested in F7) ================ *** APPROVED *** under the condition of fixing issues 1 and 2 above ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311843.n0VIhodd028679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-31 13:43:49 EDT --- Scratch build on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1094409 CCing to spot. To spot: * Would you audit the licenses in the attached file in my comment 7? For this package, GPL compatibility check is also needed. * I found in Fedora Licensing wiki http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing that CPL is incompatible with GPLv2. Would you examine if CPL is incompatible also with GPLv3? If they are incompatible, this package already contains legal problem, because for example -------------------------------------------------------------------- libLinearMath.so.2.73: contains: src/BulletMultiThreaded/SpuNarrowPhaseCollisionTask/SpuGatheringCollisionTask.cpp .. includes Extras/software_cache/cache/include/spe_cache.h => CPL Demos/BspDemo/BspLoader.cpp => GPLv2+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Bruno: * Would you check if or how files in the attachment in my comment 6 which are marked as under "NVIDIA 1/2" are used in this software? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 18:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311858.n0VIwcTZ006746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-31 13:58:37 EDT --- Suggestion: drop the BR on perl> 5.8.0. MUSTFIX: drop the perldoc -t lines. We are not allowed to add licenses to packages which do not ship them [*]. Instead you should contact the author and ask him to include them. Note that cron_event_predict.plx has no license at all and this should be clarified before inclusion. Quote from ReviewGuidelines: MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 19:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311923.n0VJNC4d003543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 14:23:11 EDT --- NVIDIA 1 and NVIDIA 2 are non-free. I'm asking RH Legal about the SCEA license. CPL is incompatible with GPLv3 because it contains a choice of law clause, which is expressly prohibited in section 7. It looks like this will need some upstream relicensing work in order for this to be okay for Fedora, even if SCEA comes back okay, due to the CPL issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 19:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311931.n0VJVRS3013083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> 2009-01-31 14:31:26 EDT --- Interesting: In bug #193960 comment #6, I was even asked to add such a file to avoid confusions. I'm no lawyer, but the text from the Review Guidelines seems not to forbid my behaviour, it only forces the other way round. Regarding cron_event_predict.plx: It mostly contains documentation, the rest is "just" example code. So let's clarify both points you've mentioned now by someone from Fedora Legal... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 19:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-470155-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311929.n0VJT5mC004611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-31 14:29:03 EDT --- Well, I have not checked your package at all, however ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: Before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 19:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311945.n0VJjl4a007654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 14:45:46 EDT --- You can add the license text(s) if you're comfortable, but you are by no means required to do so. You should advise upstream to include them, as their omission is a notable bug in the software. As to cron_event_predict.plx, you should confirm with upstream that it is available under the same terms as the library, because the licensing attribution only covers the library: "This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." I'm leaving FE-Legal here until the licensing on cron_event_predict.plx is clarified or it is removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 19:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311949.n0VJnPj3008078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #10 from Bruno Mahe <bruno at gnoll.org> 2009-01-31 14:49:24 EDT --- Demos are not included in the rpm. Does that still count ? We could also not include libBulletMultiThreaded which include some CPL code. Generally speaking, is it ok to not include non-free parts in the resulting rpm so we end up with only free parts ? To Mamoru: * I will look into that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 19:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901311954.n0VJs3sd008977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-31 14:54:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > If they are incompatible, this package already contains legal > problem, because for example > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > libLinearMath.so.2.73: contains: > > src/BulletMultiThreaded/SpuNarrowPhaseCollisionTask/SpuGatheringCollisionTask.cpp > .. includes > Extras/software_cache/cache/include/spe_cache.h > => CPL > > Demos/BspDemo/BspLoader.cpp > => GPLv2+ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ah, sorry, please ignore this part. libLinearMath.so.2.73 does not use BspLoader.cpp. I will recheck what files are used in the libraries in this software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:00:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: <bug-477144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-477144-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312000.n0VK0T7r018251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 15:00:28 EDT --- Thanks. Good to go. -------------------------------------------------- This package (eclipse-cmakeed) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-476404-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312008.n0VK8b1o019571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-31 15:08:35 EDT --- Okay, after recheck actually codes under GPLv2+ are *NOT USED* (only used to create some demo binaries, which are not included in binary rpms). BulletDino.c is not used, either So if - non-free codes are not used - SCEA 1.0 is free this package should be okay for Fedora. Again sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312051.n0VKpKXk020233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312048.n0VKmegO019568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-31 15:48:39 EDT --- 1. You don't really need to specify the format in the summary 2. I'm quite sure that in all the German I can't read on the homepage and pdf there is some material to fatten up the description a bit. But, that's 100% nitpicking on my part. ??? APPROVED ??? And since you've proven twice you could read documentation and ask the right questions on the list, I'm also going to sponsor you. Please don't prove me wrong (as your sponsor I'm also here to help you should you have packaging problems later). You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging another Fedora font. It's a pleasure to do reviews where there is nothing really wrong, don't stop here :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483390-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312054.n0VKsd7k020701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-31 15:54:38 EDT --- As far as I can see, the Review Guideline say "if (and only if)...". I admit that my English is not so good, but I do not think that my understanding of "and only if" is wrong... Is there a special meaning due to the fact that those three words are in parenthesizes ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-479903-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312101.n0VL1JF6030039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #26 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya at fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-31 16:01:18 EDT --- Next step is to find a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] New: A colection of quote in french language for gdesklets Message-ID: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: A colection of quote in french language for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 Summary: A colection of quote in french language for gdesklets Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornatics at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-3.spec _____________________________________________________________________ rmlint issue: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/citation.spec Error: no installed packages by name rpmbuild/SPECS/citation.spec 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/Citation-1.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/Citation.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _____________________________________________________________________ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:01:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quote in french language for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312101.n0VL12lG022472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|A colection of quote in |A collection of quote in |french language for |french language for |gdesklets |gdesklets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-453422-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312108.n0VL8VuX031364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #23 from Nikolay Vladimirov <nikolay at vladimiroff.com> 2009-01-31 16:08:29 EDT --- Several things: 1) Is anyone going to make a full review for this + sponsoring the packager? 2) There is an issue with the package. When installed it places the binary executable in /usr/bin/songbird which leads to: songbird: error while loading shared libraries: libjemalloc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Running songbird-bin from /usr/lib64/songbird-1.0.0 raises the same error. I guess that the start up script "songbird" must be used. As far as I know it's some generic mozilla script that's used for starting their apps. For example firefox uses something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quote in french language for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312109.n0VL9Yfj031482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #1 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 16:09:33 EDT --- $ koji build --scratch dist-f10 rpmbuild/SRPMS/Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: rpmbuild/SRPMS/Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:04 132.10 KiB 27.94 KiB/sec Created task: 1096640 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1096640 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1096640 build (dist-f10, Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1096641 buildArch (Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): free 1096641 buildArch (Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1096641 buildArch (Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1096640 build (dist-f10, Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1096640 build (dist-f10, Citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312113.n0VLD0aJ024810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-31 16:12:59 EDT --- Thanks for the review (In reply to comment #1) > 1. Correct license is GPLv2+. The program explicitely says: fixed > 2. The perl(Module_Compat) line is not needed, this is a standalone program, > not a perl module. And if needed it will pull in perl as needed due to the > dependencies: Yes, it's not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483392-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312114.n0VLEKE3024998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <fabian at bernewireless.net> 2009-01-31 16:14:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: whohas Short Description: Command line tool for query package lists Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of French quotes language for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312135.n0VLZAMN029075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|A collection of quote in |A collection of French |french language for |quotes language for |gdesklets |gdesklets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312138.n0VLcT5i029560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|A collection of French |A collection of quotes in |quotes language for |French for gdesklets |gdesklets | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312154.n0VLscXn032506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #1 from Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> 2009-01-31 16:54:38 EDT --- Latest koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1096643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312153.n0VLrJgR032330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] New: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator Message-ID: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jvromans at squirrel.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/perl-Text-CSV.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm I packaged this module since Text::CSV seems to be preferred over Text::CSV_XS. The spec and srpm are rpmlint free of errors and warnings. If you like this please consider sponsoring me. Description of Text::CSV: Text::CSV provides facilities for the composition and decomposition of comma-separated values. An instance of the Text::CSV class can combine fields into a CSV string and parse a CSV string into fields. The module accepts either strings or files as input and can utilize any user-specified characters as delimiters, separators, and escapes so it is perhaps better called ASV (anything separated values) rather than just CSV. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:57:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483406-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312157.n0VLv7Bm008381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483286 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 21:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:57:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483286-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312157.n0VLv8ui008417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Johan Vromans <jvromans at squirrel.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |483406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 22:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312203.n0VM3bY7009634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-31 17:03:36 EDT --- COPYING is included twice: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17645 Mar 24 2007 /usr/share/doc/Citation-1.3/COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17645 Mar 24 2007 /usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/Citation/COPYING uhm, and the URL for the spec is not valid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 22:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483376-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312251.n0VMp22F019759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> 2009-01-31 17:51:01 EDT --- Having --with GUS is fine with me, but seems of little value, so dropping it might be a good idea too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312306.n0VN6cUb014891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #3 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 18:06:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > COPYING is included twice: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17645 Mar 24 2007 > /usr/share/doc/Citation-1.3/COPYING > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17645 Mar 24 2007 > /usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/Citation/COPYING > > uhm, and the URL for the spec is not valid bug is fixed http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-4.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-4.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation.spec _____________________________________________________________________ rmlint issue: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/citation.spec Error: no installed packages by name rpmbuild/SPECS/citation.spec 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/Citation.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/Citation-1.3-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/Citation-1.3-4.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312308.n0VN8Y8N015125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #4 from MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> 2009-01-31 18:08:33 EDT --- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/Citation.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483363-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312351.n0VNp6VL023607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> 2009-01-31 18:51:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts Short Description: A serif decorative latin font. Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483403-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312352.n0VNqVD9031572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-483400-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312353.n0VNrieg031740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> 2009-01-31 18:53:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vollkorn-fonts Short Description: A serif latin font. Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released In-Reply-To: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481022-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312352.n0VNqFjK023778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 MERCIER <bioinfornatics at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <bug-481564-197703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200901312354.n0VNsrJi024076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-01-31 18:54:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bind-to-tinydns Short Description: Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format Owners: itamarjp timj Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.