[Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jan 3 11:59:34 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914
Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> 2009-01-03 06:59:33 EDT ---
> License: LGPLv2+
Web page says "Licensed under the GPL v2 or later for now".
File COPYING contains the GPL v2.
Only a few source files contain a LGPL header.
This suggests the project is:
=> License: GPLv2+
> Summary: An LV2 host library
Suggest dropping the "An ".
> %description devel
> slv2-devel contains the headers and development libraries for slv2.
Suggest
"This package contains the headers and development libraries for SLV2."
for consistency and to avoid repeating the pkg name.
> %files
> %doc AUTHORS COPYING README
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
%defattr ought to be moved one line up.
> %{_libdir}/*.a
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries
* The slv2.pc pkg-config file adds a redundant -L/usr/lib -lrdf from redland.pc
* 0.6.2 is available (still marked unstable, though)
* Run-time warning (in src/world.c) about Redland librdf not being new enough:
$ lv2_list
Warning: Unable to create "trees" RDF storage.
Performance can be improved by upgrading librdf.
* src/world.c contains hardcoded /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib paths
also on 64-bit platforms!
* The only real blockers:
* licence
* static lib
* hardcoded lib paths
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list