[Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 5 18:25:41 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-05 13:25:39 EDT ---
Well:
- First of all, your srpm doesn't build on F-11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1031148
- Please explain why you want to define %jpcap, %jpcap_version
- For license tag:
- No version of LGPL is specified in the codes
- However some files are licensed under BSD with advertising
(and BSD)
So the license tag should be "LGPLv2+ and BSD with advertising"
- Source must be given by full URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- Please remove Vendor item. This is defined automatically when
rebuilding your srpm on Fedora buildsystem.
- For BuildRequires:
* Please explicitly write "BuildRequires: jpackage-utils" to
honor Java packaging guidelines (even if java-devel implicitly
pulls in jpackage-utils dependency) (same for Requires)
* "BuildRequires: libpcap" should be removed as libpcap-devel always
requires it.
- Please explain why you set "Autoreq: 0".
- Remove all pre-compiled binaries (like foo.jar) at %prep
stage to make it sure that all binaries are compiled from the
source.
- We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-)
- The directory %{_libdir}/%{name} is not owned by any packages (ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories )
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list