[Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 6 10:50:39 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568





--- Comment #16 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com>  2009-01-06 05:50:37 EDT ---
Email to Eric - he is ok with GPLv2+, so will change it in next xmlto release:

Ondřej Vašík <ovasik at redhat.com>:
> Hello,
> I'm Fedora(and since 0.0.19 upstream) maintainer of xmlto.
> During review of xmlto
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568) Till Maas brought
> up question about xmlif license. It seems that xmlif has GPL+ license,
> but xmlto has GPLv2+ license. Therefore I have to use License: GPL+ and
> GPLv2+ as the current license for xmlto. Are you ok with having xmlif
> under GPLv2+ to consolidate it with xmlto? 
> 
> Thanks in advance for answer.
> 
> Greetings,
>          Ondrej Vasik

Yes, go ahead.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list