[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 6 18:26:00 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727


Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cooly at gnome.eu.org




--- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org>  2009-01-06 13:25:59 EDT ---
a few comments:

- there is a newer upstream 2.6.1b, and it seems upstream switched to a more
sane naming. 

- "a" and "b" tags from version seems to me like post release package, so
please see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease

- there is a doc target for building development documentation (requires doxgey
and pdfjam)

- rpmlint is not silent:

slimdata.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libslim.so
you need to set the exec bit on the so file

slimdata.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libslim.so
library does not have soname set, as this is a system library this is a
blocker. you will have to recompile the file with -Wl,-soname -Wl,libslim.so.
You should also report this upstream.

slimdata.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libslim.so
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
slimdata.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libslim.so
exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5
This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork()
context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library
function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the
error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any
state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an
actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the
situation.
these are not blockers but they should be reported upstream

slimdata-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
see my previous comment about documentation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list