[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504





--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-01-11 22:33:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I'm using Fedora 10, which has Epiphany 2.24. So I used
> > 
> > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget*
> > 
> > Is that ok?
> 
> No. It would be ok if you followed the 'no duplicate directory ownership' rule,
> but in this case we cannot use it, because it will leave unowned dirs behind.
> It's better if two packages own the a dir than no package.
>
> So you should use
> %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/

Please ask nautilus maintainer to make nautilus own
%{_libdir}/epiphany/%{ephy_major}/extensions before doing such a thing
ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088#c25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491

> > > The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three
> > > directories will become unowned. 
> > 
> > What do I need to do? Just the rebuilds you mention below?
> 
> With the line you are using now you would need to do a rebuild a rebuild in
> time with epiphany, but _after_ it has been pushed out, because you are
> building against it. 

This should only happen on rawhide, no problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.