[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 12 15:04:39 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348





--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org>  2009-01-12 10:04:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is not an official review.
> 
> 1.  When applying patch #2, patch returns:
> 
> patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
> 
I've removed this patch and replaced it with a patch that update to latest
trunk. There's only a handful of changes since the last beta.

> While this doesn't abort the build, the patch file should be fixed to not
> generate this error.
> 
> 2.  This would fail to run with SELinux activated. You should fix the context
> of the CGI script, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux. 
> Creating a drraw-selinux subpackage would probably be ideal in this case.
> 
I'm not SELinux proficient, but I'll try to take care of that. Thanks for the
pointer. In your opinion, does such a requirement block the review or can we
save that for later ?

> 3.  Patch #2 appears to be a bug fix.  If you have filed a bug with the
> upstream source, you should reference this in your spec file; if not, you
> should file one and reference it.  See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment

There's no bug tracker for this project. This was reported on their mailing
list by a colleague of mine, as well as some patch for new features. Actually,
even the svn repository is not public, but after a few mails with upstream, I
now have read-only access.

I'll post new spec and srpms when the selinux issue is addressed. Thanks for
the pre-review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list