[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #5 from Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini at redhat.com>  2009-01-13 10:43:37 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
2411c19ed4fb141f3fa3d389fae40736  docbook-5.0.zip
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is NOT included in package.
redistributable without licence
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ package docbook-schemas-5.0-1-fc11 ->
Provides:
  config(docbook5-schemas) = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-dtd = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-rng = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-sch = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-xsd = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-schemas = 5.0-1.fc11
Requires:
  /bin/sh  
  /bin/sh  
  /usr/bin/perl  
  config(docbook5-schemas) = 5.0-1.fc11
  libxml2 >= 2.4.8
  libxml2 >= 2.4.8
  perl(English)  
  perl(strict)  
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
  xml-common >= 0.6.3-24
+ Not a GUI app.
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.