[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 15 02:09:20 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471





--- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-01-14 21:09:18 EDT ---
> Can you give us a list of things publican needs to do wrt to
> specfiles/changelogs/packagenaming?

The thing at the moment I see is the product versioning issue which doesn't
really make sense for Fedora I think.  Well maybe it could in some cases - then
the version should just go into the package version field ("Fedora 11 Foo Bar
manual" -> fedora-Foo_Bar_Guide-en-US-11-5.fc11 say).  Otherwise if the version
is not linked to the Fedora release version it should not appear in the
tarball, name, etc.

Also for Fedora usually English is assumed for documentation, and since it
seems to be the base language for our docs, I would probably suggest dropping
"en-US" from base doc package name.

Let me ask on fedora-packaging list about the naming though too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list