[Bug 480607] New: Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 19 13:18:11 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480607
Summary: Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82
Java Bluetooth API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fkooman at tuxed.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/bluecove.spec
SRPM URL:
http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bluecove-2.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
BlueCove is a JSR-82 implementation on Java Standard Edition (J2SE) that
currently interfaces with the Mac OS X, WIDCOMM, BlueSoleil and Microsoft
Bluetooth stack. Originally developed by Intel Research and currently
maintained by volunteers.
Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API. Additional GPL licensed module to
support BlueCove runtime on Linux BlueZ.
Issues with this package that still need to addressed:
- in the i386 builds the bluecove-gpl package includes debug files, this is not
the case on x86_64, I have no idea what is going on here.
- whether or not to have a bluecove-gpl subpackage as bluecove package without
bluecove-gpl package installed is useless.
- the bluecove-gpl jar file and the native library are installed in
%{_libdir}/bluecove but the "main" bluecove.jar file is installed in
%{_javadir}, this seems a bit cluttered as you now need to include 2 jars from
different locations in your apps classpath
- rpmlint complains about "No binary" in the bluecove.jar file, it should
probably be noarch, but I didn't find many JAR files that have BuildArch:
noarch...
- javadoc subpackage should be BuildArch: noarch as well?
Upstream is very helpful in helping resolving packaging issues and committed
already some things useful for packaging to svn :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list