[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |182235




--- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-01-19 15:54:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Sorry to bother you again, but, please, provide more explanations - it still
> not clear for some people, whether iLBC legal or not. 
> 
> Opal ships this implementation of RFC3951 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3951
> ), which distributes under very strange license:
> 
> http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf
> 
> See also this thread:
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/90195
> 
> We already removed iLBC support from Asterisk - can we re-add this support
> back?

Sorry for the delay. Red Hat Legal got this one wrong (it happens to everyone
sometimes). The iLBC codec needs to be removed from the opal tarball.

Reblocking FE-Legal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.