[Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 21 14:34:00 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2009-01-21 09:33:58 EDT ---
These are all rpmlint warnings/errors that we'd normally ignore.
I'll explain here why:
script-without-shebang [...] libpixman-1.la
- We use *.la files when linking. This is explicitly allowed in
the MinGW guidelines that were passed.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Libraries_.28DLLs.29
devel-file-in-non-devel-package
- All MinGW packages are for development only, so when we passed
the guidelines we didn't opt to have a separate -devel subpackage.
See bug 468987 for why this warning isn't suppressed.
spurious-executable-perm
- See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397#c4
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
- See bug 468989.
non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
- This breaks the FHS, but is permitted by the MinGW guidelines.
/me should put this information in a wiki page ...
/me starts https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint ....
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list