[Bug 481508] New: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 25 20:30:27 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508
Summary: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple
alignments of genomic sequences
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.src.rpm
Project URL: http://ygingras.net/bioinfo
Description:
Pipviewer is a visualizer for multiple alignements of genomic
sequences. It highlights conserved regions and allows basic
anotations. Its main goal is to find conserved probes for the
construction of gene order data sets. Selected regions marked as
'probes' can be expoxted to fasta format. It can also retreive gene
annotations form the NBCI and display this information along the
alignement.
Pipviewer is not an aligner. You must compute the alignment with
another tool like Clustal or Multi PIP Maker.
Koji scratch build:
depends on vhybridize
rpmlint output:
[fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list