[Bug 481521] New: Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 25 23:30:56 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521
Summary: Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-clock.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-clock-20090126-1.fc10.src.rpm
Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Clock
Description:
This activity displays time in analog, digital, and "natural" forms.
The "natural" form will be an image of a sun or moon arcing across
the sky, rising and setting as the day progresses. This is more than
a simple clock; the user will be able to grab any element and readjust
it, which will update each of the other elements. In this manner,
hopefully the children can explore and understand different methods of
telling time.
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1081637
rpmlint output:
[fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-clock-20090126-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
sugar-clock.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-clock-20090126-1.fc10.src.rpm
sugar-clock.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list