[Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 27 13:49:47 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564


Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br>  2009-01-27 08:49:45 EDT ---
I can't access your src.rpm files (2009-01-27 11:37:09 ERROR 404: Not Found)

but here are the review.

GOOD -> 

- no rpmlint's message.

rpmlint /home/itamar/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-2.fc10.src.rpm \
/home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm \
/home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bind-to-tinydns-debuginfo-0.4.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

- package builds fine in koji (dist-F11)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1085805

- package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
- specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
- dist tag is present.
- latest version is being packaged.
- BuildRequires are proper.
- %clean is present.
- package installs properly.
- debuginfo package looks complete.
- no scriptlets present.
- license is open source-compatible.
- package works as expected

SHOULD VERIFY ->
license sounds like GPLv2 for me instead GPLv2+  

I see no  blocker issue

------------------------------------------------------------
   This package (bind-to-tinydns) is APPROVED by itamarjp
------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list