[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 29 21:37:50 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Clone Of|481476 |
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roozbeh at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-29 16:37:48 EDT ---
Packaging is sane and upgrade path works
⬔⬔⬔ APPROVED ⬔⬔⬔
However:
— Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on
the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ)
— Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture
for the other and for the gentium basic variants
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list