From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 01:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010119.n611J15D007513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andy at gohanman.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 21:18:59 EDT --- *** Bug 459675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 01:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010119.n611J0nV007493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 21:18:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508066 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 01:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010143.n611hYK1011835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 21:43:33 EDT --- Since you want a legal review, I'll block FE-Legal so they can take a look. I did a trademark search for the mark "Titan" with "game" anywhere in Goods & Services and found nothing applicable, which is surprising. I can find no reason for this package to be arch-specific. It's just java, isn't it? Maybe if you were doing AOT compilation, but there are no gcj calls in the spec and nothing arch-specific that I can find in the final package. The javadoc package is also completely empty, save for one empty directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010236.n612aJWq019529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:36:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010237.n612bwGf023582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:37:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010236.n612aoJ8023368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:36:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010238.n612cg0R020061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:38:41 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010239.n612dJJe020181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:39:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010241.n612f7we020911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:41:05 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010240.n612eVkD020765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:40:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010242.n612gR1t024881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:42:25 EDT --- There is no Fedora account "Hubbitus". I used "hubbitus" instead. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010243.n612hZBr025110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:43:34 EDT --- CVS done. Note that I created the package as you requested, "sK1" with a capital K, but I'm not really sure that's what you intended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 02:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508849] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010244.n612iInZ021470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 22:44:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 03:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010319.n613JweL032605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 23:19:57 EDT --- sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 03:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010320.n613KWft000672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 23:20:31 EDT --- sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 05:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010522.n615MZGr022351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-01 01:22:34 EDT --- Upstream is already at 0.0.12 ./autogen.sh %configure --disable-static autogens tend to run configure, so here we have it twice which I think is best avoided, say ./autogen.sh --help > /dev/null or looking at what autogen does autoreconf -v -i Requires: gtk-doc doesn't seem to be necessary, no doc build setup upstream yet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 05:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010539.n615d0b2025460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-01 01:38:59 EDT --- Imported. Builds done. Bodhi updates pending. Thanks again for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 05:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508849] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010539.n615dNRP025516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-01 01:39:22 EDT --- Imported. Builds done. Bodhi updates pending. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 05:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010558.n615wwji029403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 01:58:57 EDT --- miredo-1.1.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/miredo-1.1.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 06:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010600.n6160kIU029900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 02:00:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1446011 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1527cac938bc9730a30a91c03bae68715866e6dc CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=11, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 0.23 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.33 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ConfigAuto) = 1.30 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 06:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010620.n616KAhU029151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 02:20:09 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 06:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010621.n616LbIj001280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 02:21:36 EDT --- is this built for requested branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 06:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504744] Review Request: python-yams - An Entity Relationship Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010650.n616ohLw002274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504744 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 02:50:42 EDT --- when installed and tried to use I got Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/yams-check", line 8, in from yams.reader import SchemaLoader File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yams/__init__.py", line 74, in from yams.schema import Schema, EntitySchema, RelationSchema File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yams/schema.py", line 1219, in from logilab.common.logging_ext import set_log_methods ImportError: cannot import name set_log_methods -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 06:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010654.n616sGc7007107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 02:54:15 EDT --- Mayavi-3.2.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Mayavi-3.2.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 06:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010653.n616rCac002645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 02:53:10 EDT --- Mayavi-3.2.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Mayavi-3.2.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 07:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010709.n61795CN006034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 03:09:04 EDT --- Got any updates from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 07:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010710.n617A07i006144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 03:09:35 EDT --- So is this package built for requested branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 07:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010713.n617DadD006961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-07-01 03:13:33 EDT --- Could you upload a srpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 07:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010744.n617iiQ2012890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010810.n618AKMT019392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-07-01 04:10:18 EDT --- It should have been, don't know why bodhi didn't close this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010816.n618GnKB020823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 04:16:48 EDT --- php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010816.n618GsjI020859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 04:16:54 EDT --- php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010824.n618OS3Z026090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-01 04:24:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ugh, missing %{buildroot} before %{_bindir}. Fixed. Ouch, I overlooked that one, too. > > - better use pushd/popd instead of cd src/cd .. > > Maybe, if the directory structure was more complicated. The stack operations > pushd/popd seem a like an overkill :) Not to me but it's up to you. > > - "Categories=Development;TextEditor;" in the desktop file looks a little > > unconventional, but I guess in this case it is correct. > > Yes, since this is an editor for programmers. Yes, and the freedesktop spec does not know editors for programmers and thinks all editors are utilities. For programming it only knows "IDE", but this would really be too much for this app. Nevertheless some desktops might react a little strange to this and show it in both categories. > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Looks good and fixes all issues. efte-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:28:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows libatomic_ops compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010828.n618SNx8027067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-07-01 04:28:21 EDT --- - Please change the %define tags at the top of the spec file with %global (because of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define ) - What does the patch libatomic_ops-1.2-ppclwzfix.patch do? According to the filename I think it's some ppc-specific fix which doesn't have any effect on Win32 - Is it true that this package only provides a static library and no shared library (.dll) ? If that's the case, some special exceptions apply: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries (however, we may need to interpret these slightly different as we don't use -devel subpackages) - The version number in the ChangeLog doesn't match the version specified in the Version and Release tags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010840.n618ePc1029361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-01 04:40:24 EDT --- > Upstream is already at 0.0.12 Yes. Its moving quite quickly but 0.0.9 is currently what upstream is using. The plan was to get the basic moblin working and then moving components to newer versions where its easier to see what broke. > ./autogen.sh > %configure --disable-static > > autogens tend to run configure, so here we have it twice which I think is best > avoided, say > ./autogen.sh --help > /dev/null > or looking at what autogen does > autoreconf -v -i I leave it there in the dream that one day they will do releases with make dist :) > Requires: gtk-doc doesn't seem to be necessary, no doc build setup upstream > yet Yes, I'd already fixed that on my local copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 08:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010857.n618v3do000301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 04:57:02 EDT --- php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 09:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010938.n619cgol009521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-01 05:38:40 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: efte Short Description: A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor for X11 Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 09:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010935.n619ZJ8c009038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-01 05:35:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > $ ant jar javadocs > I noticed that ant is pulled by other BR's. But I added it anyways. Off course. In opposite it was not be built. But it is may be occasionaly and this BR required by guidelines for ant-based packages. > The patch is not needed for the SevenZip that is in the frinika tarball. It is > specific for the SevenZip we have in Fedora. If bundled SevenZip is not used anymore, you really need this patch? > > From this I look again on this symlinks. I think instead of doing such symlink > > you should use build-classpath: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-classpath > > build-classpath only works for jar files that go to %{_javadir}. As indicated > in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Guideline > the JNI using jar files go to %{_libdir}/%{name} and build-classpath will not > work on them. They need to be added manually. Cite from above URL: If the package installs a wrapper script you'll need to manually add %{_libdir}/%{name}/ to CLASSPATH. If you are depending on a JNI-using JAR file, you'll need to add it manually -- build-classpath will not find it. ====end cite As I can understand it, it is about adding paths into CLASSPATH manually, not create symlinks. I'm not very similar with java (as you already known), sorry if it is not correct. > I updated the package (also fixed the other issues you pointed): > Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika.spec > SRPM URL: > http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika-0.5.1-4.548svn.fc11.src.rpm > > ChangeLog: 0.5.1-4.548svn > - Update to svn revision 548 > - License is GPLv2+ > - Add BR: ant > - Add more comments on sources & patches > - Make the snapshot script nicer (thanks to Pavel Alexeev) > - Remove flexdock versioned symlink workaround > - Remove some unneeded sources > > > So, I removed the Dknob sources from src/com/dreamfabric/ . As far as I can > tell, they are not used by frinika. I think the only remaining issues are these > additional sources. I asked about them (Dknob and others) upstream > https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3319021&forum_id=447356 > They usually respond fast. Let us wait and see what will come out. Ok, I'm not hurrying yum. Meanwhile, on current stage some additional notes: 1) lib directory in tarball contains many binary jars and even library .so. It is needed? I'm still do not do any investigation, but you are assured tha don't used in build? What all built from sources? May be safely remove such binaries in our svn-fetch script? 2) Just for note: In fetch script in "latest" option first fetch last revision number to provide in -r option of svn. It is excessive. There may be HEAD. Or just this key ommited (how you was used it in "svn co" previous). Like: if [ 'latest' == "$1" ]; then REV="-rHEAD" # OR just REV="" else REV="-r$1" fi .... svn export $REV .... 3) I see comment about all other sources. But what about fetch instruction to Source0 (about what script with what parameter must be used)? 4) You remove DKnode, nice. But petersalomonsen component stil here. 5) Just intresting: # Remove some unneded sources rm -fr src/uk/ac/bath/gui/vamp/KnobWidget.java rm -fr src/uk/ac/bath/gui/vamp/VAmp2Editor.java for what them? Is there any legal issues? It is break build? Most other seems good. I'll relook on it again after we got answer from Dknob upstream and make decision what do with petersalomonsen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 09:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010938.n619cJls006157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 05:38:18 EDT --- php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 09:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907010943.n619hp6C007283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 05:43:50 EDT --- miredo-1.1.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/miredo-1.1.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 10:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011012.n61AC8BG013501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-libatomic_ops - |mingw32-libatomic_ops - |MinGW Windows libatomic_ops |MinGW Windows port of the |compression library |libatomic_ops library --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 06:12:06 EDT --- Thx for the review: Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library Changelog: --------- - Drop the powerpc patch - Move to %%global from %%define - Provides -static as there is only one static library - Rsync with native package (Fix the License tag) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 10:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011022.n61AMYtf015489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #16 from Xavier Lamien 2009-07-01 06:22:33 EDT --- David, you might miss some packaging steps. Here's how to request a push into FPC repositories: => https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO#Submit_your_update_to_Bodhi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 10:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011042.n61Aga5O022281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Xavier Lamien 2009-07-01 06:42:34 EDT --- OK source files match upstream OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK Global are used. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (MIT). License text included in package in part of reason has been given properly. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in koji (F-11 & Rawhide -- noarch). OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. -- %check is present (however, test need more work, not a blocker). OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK huge %docs has been moved to sub-package OK package installed properly According to ruby guideline, the package uses proper ruby specific packaging. ** APPROVED ** ps: sorry for have been so long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 11:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011113.n61BDe67027204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #18 from Michal Nowak 2009-07-01 07:13:36 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.12.r6793.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 11:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011130.n61BUKQg001725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #14 from Panu Matilainen 2009-07-01 07:30:16 EDT --- One possibility would be using a snapshot from the git repo instead of the "official" beta tarball, that would get the licensing straight from the start: commit 02ddf09bc3079b3e17297729b9e43f14d407b8fc Author: Lasse Collin Date: Mon Apr 13 11:27:40 2009 +0300 Put the interesting parts of XZ Utils into the public domain. Some minor documentation cleanups were made at the same time. In addition to that, there are a few fairly important looking fixes, such as xz crashing when decompressing two files with a single xz command, and identifying some corrupted files as valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 12:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 08:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011207.n61C7L8i007304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 08:07:20 EDT --- If I make the package noarch, do I need to take steps to block it from being compiled by gcj? I am not sure about javadoc. I don't believe the game is meant to export an interfaces to other stuff. There are important internal interfaces as it's client server and development is being done on a game lobby. But I don't know if that should show up in javadoc or not. When I watch the javadoc build I do get some warnings about references to stuff from jdom. I don't know if that's really an issue or not. "Titan" is currently being sold. It's a small operation, so that may not have paid to register the trademark. Also they are using new artwork. The guy who did the original artwork is kind of reclusive and they were going to want a more modern look. The original game had one color sheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 12:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 08:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011219.n61CJQDf009744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 12:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 08:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011226.n61CQWZ2011805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #17 from David Hannequin 2009-07-01 08:26:30 EDT --- i done updates in bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011309.n61D9j8T024156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-01 09:09:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hash-Merge Short Description: Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash Owners: spot Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011307.n61D7VFp023789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 --- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-07-01 09:07:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - bad license. should be MIT [1] Fixed. > - missing require for ruby(abi) Fixed. > - file listed twice > warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE > - rubygem-state_machine.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 33, > tab: line 7) Hmmm. I don't see this error. I did a scratch build, then downloaded and ran rpmlint on the RPM and saw no complaints. Can you tell me how you produced this? (mcpierce at mcpierce-laptop:rubygem-state_machine)$ rpmlint ~/Download/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1446813 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011316.n61DGVPU024777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 09:16:30 EDT --- No problem, thank you for reviewing this ticket. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rake-compiler Short Description: Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509121] New: Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-kaa-display.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-kaa-display-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Python API providing Low level support for various displays rpmlint is clean on installed file! Patch0 is a backport of what is currently in upstream svn Patch1 is a hack that seems needed when no X11 server is active on the buildhost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011346.n61DkRpb000952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libatomic_ops -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011349.n61Dni2g003985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 09:49:43 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 13:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011349.n61DnUGd003941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Michal Ingeli 2009-07-01 09:49:29 EDT --- * naming OK * licensing OK * Clean, legible spec file, American English * source file matches upstream * file list, documentation, permissions OK * builds in mock * rpmlint warnd about Artistic license, but upstream also declares usage of Ruby and GPLv2+, and that's OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011401.n61E1CVE007431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506597(EducationTracker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011409.n61E9f0G008647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 10:09:40 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-pear-HTML_Javascript) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011414.n61EEibp011355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 10:14:43 EDT --- - starting review - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011413.n61EDAUR009947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 10:13:08 EDT --- Once I want to hear spot's opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011415.n61EFnQa010879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 10:15:47 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011419.n61EJ4Zh011531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 10:19:02 EDT --- spot, would you tell us your opinion for the comment 7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011422.n61EMX2c012523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 10:22:32 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011420.n61EKD3B013369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 10:20:12 EDT --- Closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011420.n61EKFAZ013449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Bug 507761 depends on bug 504469, which changed state. Bug 504469 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011420.n61EKEWU013423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Bug 504479 depends on bug 504469, which changed state. Bug 504469 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011425.n61EPjlQ013485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ldd3-pdf - |Review Request: ldd-pdf - |Linux Device Drivers, Third |Linux Device Drivers, Third |Edition Book in PDF format |Edition Book in PDF format --- Comment #16 from steve 2009-07-01 10:25:44 EDT --- Just an FYI update to all those subscribed, I made a few changes: a. Included the source code for the examples in the book from the o'rielly ftp server. b. changed the package name from ldd3-pdf to ldd-pdf (you make have noticed that in the cvs request) c. Changed the name installation dir from %{_docdir}/ldd3-pdf to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} spec and srpm are checked into cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011436.n61EafkI017324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 10:36:40 EDT --- A new version is here : 0.71.100 %prep try to keep timestamp when using %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' It shouldn't be needed to use CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS to use our opt flags(at least on recent Fedora). License Field is GPLv2+ (which match source code header) but GPLv3 text file is redistributed. (need to check lastest version) Please submit .desktop and icon upstream or pick the one from the package if available. Try to have the compiled binary / pixmaps installed with make install at %install step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011444.n61EiNoL017928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-07-01 10:44:22 EDT --- Thanks for the review Mamoru, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML_Javascript Short Description: Class for creating simple JS scripts Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 14:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011459.n61Exd2w022936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-01 10:59:38 EDT --- The meat of this license looks fine, but Red Hat Legal pointed out that the copyright holder in xsd appears to be both Boris Kolpackov and Code Synthesis Tools. Therefore, please change the text that says "... Boris Kolpackov gives permission ..." to something like " ... Boris Kolpackov and Code Synthesis Tools CC give permission ..." to make sure we're covered in case Boris's employer is the copyright holder of some or all of the GPL-licensed code here. Once this is done, we should use this for the SPEC: # Exceptions permit otherwise GPLv2 incompatible combination with ASL 2.0 License: GPLv2 with exceptions and ASL 2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011503.n61F3aPP024107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 11:03:35 EDT --- awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011503.n61F3UFc023093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 11:03:29 EDT --- awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011514.n61FE956026616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #13 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-07-01 11:14:07 EDT --- The xsd-3.2.0+dep package is actually the xsd compiler itself packaged with all its dependencies (there is also xsd-3.2.0 which is just the xsd compiler). Some of these dependencies are copyright Boris Kolpackov while the xsd compiler and the xsd-frontend library are copyright Code Synthesis Tools. The latter two (xsd and xsd-frontend) already include the exception that allows linking to Xerces-C++. It is the other packages (which are copyright Boris Kolpackov) that need the exception added. That's why the text uses "Boris Kolpackov" instead of "Boris Kolpackov & Code Synthesis Tools". Hope this clarifies things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011517.n61FHDkH028383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-01 11:17:12 EDT --- For -2: * License - Now for this license the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * Summary - Now Fedora thinks writing the package name (Coderay) in Summary is redundant. * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{geminstdir}/lib is not owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011518.n61FIMMa027789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 11:18:21 EDT --- - starting review - OK - rpmlint panoglview is quiet on installed package OK - build in mock (fedora 11 x86_64 ) NEEDWORK - You aren't expected to run: update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime Because this package doesn't bring any new mime type. But indeed update-desktop-database is mandatory since the .desktop file use a MimeType= field. As said: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database By the way, using || : at the end of each scriptlet filters the error code if anything went wrong. So this only makes sense for the last line: example : first command &> /dev/null second command &> /dev/null || : That way, the rpm transaction will continue, even if update-desktop-database failed. NEEDWORK - License match source code : GPLv2+ but COPYING text is about GPLv3. This would need clarification NEEDWORK - url field cannot permit to download the source tarball (is it the right url ?) USABILITY test: I'm experiencing some refresh delay when moving the sphere. I will try to reproduce on another workstation. (Is it expected to see only from the inside despite of the outside of the sphere ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnat-project-common ? files shared by Ada libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Summary: Review Request: gnat-project-common ? files shared by Ada libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/gnat-project-common.spec SRPM URL: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/gnat-project-common-1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The gnat-project-common package contains some small files that help a GNAT project file to work for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of an Ada library. The plan is that all -devel packages with Ada libraries will use these files. So far they are used by PragmARC-devel. The package also adds a couple of RPM macros to help with packaging Ada programs and libraries. RPMlint output: gnat-project-common.spec: E: no-buildroot-tag Since RPMbuild now ignores the buildroot tag I don't see why I would need one. gnat-project-common.noarch: W: no-url-tag This package contains 17 lines of code in total, written by me specifically for Fedora. Do I still need to set up a website for it? gnat-project-common.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are no compiled libraries in this package but there is a GNAT project file, and GNAT looks for project files in /usr/lib/gnat so that's where I need to put it. It could be argued that /usr/share/gnat would be a better location but that would require a change in GNAT. gnat-project-common.noarch: W: no-documentation There is documentation in the form of comments in the files, which is where I think it belongs for the time being. gnat-project-common.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/gnat-project.sh gnat-project-common.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/gnat-project.csh gnat-project-common.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.gnat I suppose it could be debated whether those are configuration files or program code, but they need to be in these directories to be effective. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1447086 I should also mention that I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IFByYWdtQVJDIOKAkyBh?= =?utf-8?q?_component_library_for_Ada?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PragmARC ? a component library for Ada https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 Summary: Review Request: PragmARC ? a component library for Ada Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/PragmARC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/PragmARC-20060427-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The PragmAda Reusable Components (PragmARCs) is a library of containers, algorithms and utility components for Ada, ranging from the basic-but-essential to the high-level. This package depends on gnat-project-common, review request 509158. It won't work with gcc-gnat-4.4.0-4; see bug 507247 and the patch submitted there. RPMlint output: PragmARC.spec: E: no-buildroot-tag Since RPMbuild now ignores the buildroot tag I don't see why I would need one. I should also mention that I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011531.n61FVcCd031294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-01 11:31:37 EDT --- Yeah, sorry for the delay here. ;( He has just checked in a bunch of changes to his devel branch that he wants me to test before landing in stable. I will try and do that in the next few days and hopefully thats the version I can get imported. If not, he did tag version 0.1 in the stable repo with what we have now, so I can just check that in if there are problems with the new changes. :) Sorry again for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011534.n61FYotE000679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |509160 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509160] Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IG1pbmVfZGV0ZWN0b3Ig4oCT?= =?utf-8?q?_a_mine-finding_game?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011534.n61FYmAM000638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on| |509159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509160] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_mine=5Fdetector_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_a_mine-finding_game?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mine_detector ? a mine-finding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 Summary: Review Request: mine_detector ? a mine-finding game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/mine_detector.spec SRPM URL: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/mine_detector-5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Mine Detector is a mine-finding game with somewhat different rules from other mine-finding games. Mine Detector rarely requires guessing. Only at the higher levels may guessing sometimes be the only way to win. The program uses the PragmAda Reusable Components, review request 509159. RPMlint output: mine_detector.spec: E: no-buildroot-tag Since RPMbuild now ignores the buildroot tag I don't see why I would need one. I should also mention that I need a sponsor. By the way, Mine Detector doesn't use a flag icon to mark cells as mines, so it should be politically safe. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011534.n61FYi0R031805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |509159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011534.n61FYd3W031725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011534.n61FYgBF031759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on| |509158, 507247 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011537.n61FbqnK001983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgregor at redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Dennis Gregorovic 2009-07-01 11:37:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I disaggree with you in this point. Even if alle the releases contains the same > > content, it may be helpful to use the %{dist} tag. For example for F-12 the > > usage of LZMA to compress the rpm data is planed. So on the dist tag, you can > > see, if you can use a package for F-12 or not without a try to install it. > > Not using the %dist tag doesn't mean the F12 package won't be LZMA compressed. > What matters is when one updates, say from F11 to F12 the packages that don't > have the %dist tag won't be updated (until a new version is available in the > updates repo) if the version and release in both distros is the same: say, > foo-1-1 in F11 and foo-1-1 in F12. I'm not following the logic here. With the dist tag: If you have foo-1-1.fc11 in F11 and don't rebuild it, then you will have foo-1-1.f11 in F12. If you rebuild it, then you'll have foo-1-1.f12 in F12. Without the dist tag: If you have foo-1-1 in F11 and don't rebuild it, then you will have foo-1-1 in F12. If you rebuild it, then you'll have foo-1-2 or foo-1-1.1 in F12, depending on your numbering preference. The dist tag doesn't cause any additional builds and only helps when you need to rebuild. > When the dist tag is used the F12 package foo-1-1.fc12 will be "newer" than > foo-1-1.fc11 and thus will replace the old one. > > In case the package is (close to) identical in both distros [no binaries > compiled], not using the dist tag saves some download and update time. It sounds like there is some assumption that the dist tag ties a particular build to a release. That's not the case. There are plenty of .fc9 package in F10, for example. > > Of course, generally speaking something is compiled in every package and the > %dist tag should be used, so from a stylistic point of view using it could be > advised in these cases too. However, if the package is as big as the SRPM (11 > MB) I wouldn't put in a %dist tag since nothing is gained from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011552.n61Fqmdg006822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-01 11:52:47 EDT --- Sure, that makes sense. Once the package is updated with the new license, I'll lift FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011550.n61FoBVm006063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 11:50:10 EDT --- FE-Legal remains blocked, do we still need advices ? Searching about patent QuickTimeVR over the web seems to output a weird thing held by iPIX from 1999. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011556.n61FucMm006015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 11:56:38 EDT --- perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 15:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011556.n61FuX62008149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 11:56:32 EDT --- perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011613.n61GDVQ5012049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 12:13:31 EDT --- There isn't any icon from the package and .desktop file ! Is it possible to pick one ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011618.n61GIKXb015165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 12:18:19 EDT --- OKay, package works with radeon (x600se hardware) i686 F-11 whereas gives problem with nvidia lastest 3D driver F-11 x86_64. I will consider usability test to have succeeded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] New: Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/String-RewritePrefix OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-String-RewritePrefix.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-String-RewritePrefix-0.004-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1447402 Additional Comment: This is a new requirement of the latest GA Catalyst::Runtime. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011622.n61GM23k014314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #3 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 12:22:01 EDT --- Just to track this here, I noticed that the icon cache gets updated after javadoc is installed. If I end up needing to keep javadoc, I'll want to figureout how to attach the post and postun scripts just to the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011624.n61GOcPO014861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #4 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 12:24:37 EDT --- Further note, the scripts aren't actually in the javadoc package, the output from yum just made it look that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011624.n61GOVOJ014832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-01 12:24:30 EDT --- If the upstream sources are Fedora specific, it may be nice, if you can ask on fedorahosted.org for creating a project in which the sources may be hosted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011625.n61GPIGC017104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 Bruno Postle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #4 from Bruno Postle 2009-07-01 12:25:16 EDT --- IPIX made various claims over panorama creation, I'm not aware that panorama viewers were ever threatened. Since submitting this package I discovered it doesn't compile with the xulrunner in F11, I patched it up but now it fails at runtime - This is something for upstream to fix I think, so I'll close and reopen if a fixed version becomes available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] New: Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 Summary: Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/namespace-autoclean OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-namespace-autoclean.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-namespace-autoclean-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: When you import a function into a Perl package, it will naturally also be available as a method. The 'namespace::autoclean' pragma will remove all imported symbols at the end of the current package's compile cycle. Functions called in the package itself will still be bound by their name, but they won't show up as methods on your class or instances. This module is very similar to namespace::clean, except it will clean all imported functions, no matter if you imported them before or after you 'use'd the pagma. It will also not touch anything that looks like a method, according to 'Class::MOP::Class::get_method_list'. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1447435 Additional Comment: This is a new requirement of the latest GA Catalyst::Runtime. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:38:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011638.n61GcQp9018212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-01 12:38:25 EDT --- Okay, please cc'd wherever this package ends. I would be interested in it given the GSoC link at videolan.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011641.n61GfiPc021316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-01 12:41:44 EDT --- here are some point of my pre-review: Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package doesn't contains subpackages + Local build works fine + Package has no %doc stanza + BuildRoot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install Bad: - Because the package should be fedora specific, it should be named as fedora-gnat-... - Source tag contains not a fully qualified URI. Submitter should create a project on fedorahosted.org - Could not check packaged tar ball agains upstream. - Package doesn#t contains a URL tag - License tag say 'Copyright only' this is not a valid OSS license - Package contains not a verbatin copy of the license text - Pleace use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc in the %files stanza - you should use a version like 0.1 instead of 1, because I'm assume your are the upstream and this is the first release of the software - Package has no proper BuildRoot definition If you have any question, you may contact me via email -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011650.n61GocFb023168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-01 12:50:37 EDT --- your explaination make sense for me. for formal reason I will notifiy a FESCo member about this situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011706.n61H6iO8026854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-01 13:06:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Can I ask you to raise the flag fedora?review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:24:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011724.n61HOP1H030090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ian at ianweller.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-07-01 13:24:24 EDT --- I still can't sponsor you but Toshio will on my recommendation, he says, so I guess I'll assign this to me. - Check your %description, it's a bit messy. Everything else looks good to me, and rpmlint is quiet. Full review after you fix the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011729.n61HTCHF031443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-01 13:29:11 EDT --- RPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011740.n61HeTit004655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011740.n61HeDUm004594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-01 13:40:12 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + Package contains several subpackages + Package has proper license tag + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package files matches with upstream (md5sum: 882ec96bef41962a33a24d6ee5821a29 volume_key-0.2.tar.bz2 0910632173fb960252412bf7342b42fc cryptsetup-1.0.7-rc1.tar.bz2) + License tag state GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license tag + Copyrigh note in the source files matches with license tag + Consitantly usage of rpm macors + Package has proper BuildRoot definition + BuildRoot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Mock build works fine agains fedora-devel-x86_64 + Package nonour rpmootflags + Rpmlint is silent for source rpm + Scratch build on koji works fine + Files has proper files permissions + %files stanza contains no dupblicated entries + All packaged files belongs to this package + No packaged files are own by another package + %doc stanza is small + package has proper changelog Bad: - Application is linked staticly agains a patched release of cryptsetup. This is accepted temporarly to avoid un official changes of the programming interfaces - Could not find libblkid-devel as BR - you mas include the crypsetup patch via a Patch statement - some warnings from rpmlint on binary packages $ rpmlint volume_key-devel-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm volume_key-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [s4504kr at zeus result]$ rpmlint python-volume_key-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm python-volume_key.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - Verbatin copy of the license will no included in the %doc stanza - Please remove the *.la files instead of exclude it in the %files stanza -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011747.n61HlBlM006088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #36 from Paul Lange 2009-07-01 13:47:06 EDT --- Juan, I'm sorry. i made some mistakes but it should work right now. New build has been done and the update is issued. See https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickrnet-2.1.5-4.fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 17:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011753.n61Hrivj007461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #6 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-07-01 13:53:43 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #5) > - Could not find libblkid-devel as BR Provided by util-linux-ng in rawhide, see e.g. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=105530 > - you mas include the crypsetup patch via a Patch statement I do: | # http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/issues/detail?id=15 | Patch0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/v/o/volume_key/cryptsetup-svn-r62.patch > - some warnings from rpmlint on binary packages > $ rpmlint volume_key-devel-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm > volume_key-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > [s4504kr at zeus result]$ rpmlint python-volume_key-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm > python-volume_key.x86_64: W: no-documentation > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'm afraid there really is no documentation (well, I have a sample Python program, but not a documentation of the interface). > - Verbatin copy of the license will no included in the %doc stanza See the "libs" subpackage - if any subpackage is installed, volume_key-libs will be installed as well. > - Please remove the *.la files instead of exclude it in the %files stanza Why? Does it make any difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 18:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011801.n61I1M1M009430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-01 14:01:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > - Please remove the *.la files instead of exclude it in the %files stanza > Why? Does it make any difference? Rpm should have a bug which cause a wrong calculation of the required space, if you are excluding files in the %files stanza. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 18:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011809.n61I9MfM008535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #8 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-07-01 14:09:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > > - Please remove the *.la files instead of exclude it in the %files stanza > > Why? Does it make any difference? > Rpm should have a bug which cause a wrong calculation of the required space, if > you are excluding files in the %files stanza. #247374 indicates this is fixed in Fedora >= 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 18:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011818.n61IIEbJ013173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-01 14:18:11 EDT --- first i have to build it... ehm, i have the same error as in "bashstyle" i have to look at the weekend. "in" the week it's hard because i have a time-consuming job -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 18:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011831.n61IVml6016723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 18:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011831.n61IVmv7016702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 19:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011904.n61J4r4u025422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 15:04:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > If I make the package noarch, do I need to take steps to block it from being > compiled by gcj? I'm not sure I understand the question. If you don't call the compiler in your %build section, it doesn't get called. However, if you want to look into it, the guidelines are at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines. They say that you should (but aren't required to) call aot-compile-rpm. In that case your package does need to be arch-specific. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 19:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011921.n61JLrl1030512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 15:21:52 EDT --- What I am not sure of is if someone does a build with the gcj stuff installed, but not openjdk stuff, can they get arch dependent output? If that can't happen without doing something specific to make it happen, then I definitely should build noarch. I'll plan on switching to noarch and doing some more reading. I'll also do some more reading about javadoc. I thought this was pretty much required, but it really doesn't make much sense for stand alone programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 19:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011956.n61Juv1F006964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-01 15:56:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > The patch is not needed for the SevenZip that is in the frinika tarball. It > > is specific for the SevenZip we have in Fedora. > If bundled SevenZip is not used anymore, you really need this patch? > The patch is applied to frinika source that make the call to SevenZip library. It doesn't directly patch SevenZip. The SevenZip is bundled in frinika's source and frinika doesn't need the patch if it uses this bundled source. However we are not using the SevenZip that comes with frinika. Instead, we are using Fedora's SevenZip. In order to use Fedora's SevenZip we need to patch frinika sources. This is what the patch is for. > > As I can understand it, it is about adding paths into CLASSPATH manually, not > create symlinks. > > I'm not very similar with java (as you already known), sorry if it is not > correct. > There are two ways of handling this: With build-classpath or with build-jar-repository The build system of frinika (the build.xml stuff) looks into the directory lib/ and adds the jar files in this directory to classpath. So I use build-jar-repository for this purpose. I could also use build-classpath, but this will require a bigger modification of the build system of frinika. We don't really need that. The difference is explained in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-classpath > > Meanwhile, on current stage some additional notes: > 1) lib directory in tarball contains many binary jars and even library .so. It > is needed? I'm still do not do any investigation, but you are assured tha > don't used in build? What all built from sources? May be safely remove such > binaries in our svn-fetch script? In the fetch script, I only remove the parts that are known to be nonfree. The rest of .so, .jar, .exe binaries is removed in %prep to make sure that we are not using them. > 2) Just for note: In fetch script in "latest" option first fetch last revision > number to provide in -r option of svn. It is excessive. There may be HEAD. Or > just this key ommited (how you was used it in "svn co" previous). Like: > if [ 'latest' == "$1" ]; then > REV="-rHEAD" # OR just REV="" > else > REV="-r$1" > fi > .... > svn export $REV .... But I can't get the revision number to append to the filename this way. i.e. $ sh frinka-snapshot.sh latest ---> frinika-550.tar.bz2 Is there another way? > 3) I see comment about all other sources. But what about fetch instruction to > Source0 (about what script with what parameter must be used)? I believe that I have been quite verbose in terms of comments. Also the fetch script gives an output for usage. I don't think we need more. There is no room for confusion. > 4) You remove DKnode, nice. But petersalomonsen component stil here. Upstream responded that all these sources petersalomonsen src/uk/ac/bath/* are all written by them and they are going to be maintained in frinika. We don't need to package them separately. > 5) Just intresting: > # Remove some unneded sources > rm -fr src/uk/ac/bath/gui/vamp/KnobWidget.java > rm -fr src/uk/ac/bath/gui/vamp/VAmp2Editor.java > for what them? Is there any legal issues? It is break build? > > It broke the build. However: After my email, they removed DKnode src/uk/ac/bath/gui/vamp/ from their sources since they are not using them. So I packaged svn revision 550 with these sources removed. Ref: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3319021&forum_id=447356 SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika-0.5.1-5.550svn.fc11.src.rpm changelog 0.5.1-5.550svn - Update to svn revision 550 I think that everything you mentioned is addressed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 20:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012007.n61K7L7M005654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-01 16:07:20 EDT --- I need to add that all the dependencies (including SevenZip and toot stuff) are in the stable branches now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 20:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012019.n61KJadv008334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Postle 2009-07-01 16:19:35 EDT --- Just updating the status of this project: VLC is getting QTVR playback via freepv as part GSoC 2009, which was my incentive for submitting freepv. However it looks possible that in order to use the internal VLC QuickTime parser the code will be ported rather than link to libfreepv. It's only mid-term so this isn't certain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 20:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012028.n61KSYvk015556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-01 16:28:33 EDT --- I have create https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/175 on the response of the FESCo member. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 20:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012041.n61Kf6oN013797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-01 16:41:04 EDT --- I doublechecked the URL issue, and it is definitely the correct upstream URL (it is the closest thing to a homepage that this project has). New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-pylons.spec The rpmlint errors are fixed, and there is a clear Requires: python-decorator >= 3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 20:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012054.n61KsOhG022659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-01 16:54:23 EDT --- skanlite-0.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/skanlite-0.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 20:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012051.n61KpIqs021826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 16:51:16 EDT --- Not much to this one. Is there any part of the test suite which could be run at build time? At least some of the tests don't seem to require a database server. Why not build the documentation? It's not exactly user-friendly to provide raw tex source and a Makefile. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: a4dcac0d5ac6ae9145301fd804de238d20d5ec960e7af2a25b6df850d1f8b782 python- sybase-0.39.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: sybasect.so()(64bit) python-sybase = 0.39-1.fc12 python-sybase(x86-64) = 0.39-1.fc12 = libct.so.4()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 ? %check is not present but there seems to be a test suite. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 21:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012100.n61L0Sj5019039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 17:00:27 EDT --- Is this your first package for Fedora? I don't see any account under your name in the account system, and I'd guess you aren't in the packager group because instead of fedoraproject.org space you're using rapidshare links which make it rather difficult to even take a look at your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 21:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012101.n61L1GOI019172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 17:01:15 EDT --- It's been several more weeks; did that new release ever come out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 21:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012104.n61L4BTY019959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #3 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-01 17:04:10 EDT --- It did. Thanks for the poke. I'll get a new SRPM put up here shortly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 21:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012148.n61LmG0i003342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Postle 2009-07-01 17:48:15 EDT --- Thanks, updated spec and src.rpm here: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/panoglview/panoglview.spec http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/panoglview/panoglview-0.2.2-5.fc11.src.rpm * removed the update-mime-database line. * changed License to GPLv3+. The COPYING file isn't in SVN and was added by automake at tarball build time. So the project is still GPLv2+, but the released tarball can only be interpreted as GPLv3+. I guess we are allowed to use 'any later version'. * fixed URL paste error in Source line. * I've added an icon based on the hugin icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 21:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012155.n61LtGSJ032540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 17:55:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > What I am not sure of is if someone does a build with the gcj stuff installed, > but not openjdk stuff, can they get arch dependent output? No. Your package would have to call aot-compile-rpm. I asked the java folks and it seems that the current state of affairs is that if you don't do the aot stuff as outlined in the GCJGuidelines document, at least ARM and PPC architectures will run the code very slowly. > I'll also do some more reading about javadoc. I thought this was pretty much > required, but it really doesn't make much sense for stand alone programs. It only makes sense if the upstream code actually has javadoc content; yours doesn't seem to. (Or at least it isn't generated by the build process.) And I agree, I don't see what point javadoc would have for an standalone application. End-user documentation would be better, but probably wouldn't be packaged separately unless it was very large. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 21:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012158.n61LwR76005296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #4 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-01 17:58:26 EDT --- Alright, new spec and SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy-0.32-1.src.rpm License file is now included (public domain), but it appears that a component, wsgiserver, is distributed under the cherrypy license[1]. I note that python-cherrypy itself is listed as being under BSD in Fedora, so maybe this license is BSD compatible? I didn't see it in the Fedora license list under good or bad. I guess might be worth a post to the legal list. In any case, I'm not sure how I would indicate multiple licenses in the .spec file. [1] http://www.cherrypy.org/browser/trunk/cherrypy/LICENSE.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 22:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012200.n61M0ho5006294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 18:00:42 EDT --- Please note that the version of the GPL in the COPYING file has absolutely no bearing at all on the version of the GPL the software is under. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 22:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012212.n61MCU3F008660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 18:12:29 EDT --- That license is indeed BSD. Compare it against the "New BSD" license at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD. > In any case, I'm not sure how I would indicate multiple licenses in the .spec > file. This is covered by the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines This package fails to build for me: + /usr/bin/python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-webpy-0.32-1.fc12.x86_64 running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib64/python2.6/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) I also have a question as to why this package includes a component from another library, but it seems that there are at least two other packages in the distribution besides python-cherrypy itself that include copies of wsgiserver: python-paste-script and deluge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 22:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012217.n61MHsWP004455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #6 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-01 18:17:53 EDT --- Yeah, I noticed that precedent as well. I'll try the build on a 64-bit host and see if I can reproduce. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 22:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012228.n61MS23j006570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 --- Comment #8 from Bruno Postle 2009-07-01 18:28:02 EDT --- Regarding the license, what do you suggest? I see three options: * Delete COPYING and regenerate it with `automake --missing --copy` (result is a GPLv2 file). * Since we are entitled to upgrade to GPLv3 any time we like, just do that in the spec file. * Since the COPYING file has absolutely no bearing, ship it anyway and put GPLv2+ in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 22:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012251.n61Mptd5011262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-01 18:51:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > APPROVED. Thanks! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto Short Description: Easy config file management for CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012318.n61NIoab022336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-01 19:18:49 EDT --- Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012328.n61NSiqq018509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012334.n61NY6PD025474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:34:01 EDT --- If this is really ready for review, please post a spec file and srpm and don't have this ticket block FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012331.n61NVxov025232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:31:55 EDT --- Ghostscript is in the dependency tree of tetex-latex on F11, even though no supported Fedora release has had tetex for some time now. Some texlive package should probably be required instead. Of course, if you wanted to eventually build this for EPEL then you'd either need a different spec file or some conditionals. In that case, a build dependency on ghostscript to help RHEL5 wouldn't hurt. However, a rawhide build fails for me way down in the %install section: install -p -m 644 background_demo.py coot_utils.py get_ebi.py mutate.py hello.py raster3d.py brute_lsqman.py refmac.py coot_gui.py filter.py libcheck.py coot_load_modules.py local_code.py gap.py povray.py coot_lsq.py shelx.py group_settings.py fitting.py americanisms.py tips.py tips_gui.py generic_objects.py cns2coot.py extensions.py ncs.py clear_backup.py bones_reader.py shelx_extensions.py coot_toolbuttons.py ../src/coot.py coot-python-functions.texi coot_load_modules.py '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/coot-0.5.2-3.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/coot/python' install: will not overwrite just-created `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/coot-0.5.2-3.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/coot/python/coot_load_modules.py' with `coot_load_modules.py' Note that the install command tries to install coot_load_modules.py twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012337.n61Nbrcw020559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012337.n61NbL0v026352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|428568 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012335.n61NZoOP026008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:35:48 EDT --- Who is reviewing this and who is submitting it? I see Zach signed up to review it, but he's the one producing packages, which is a bit backwards. Nobody's going to sign up to review this since it's already assigned to Zach, yet the fedora-revlew is not set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012337.n61NbIAq026309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|479527 |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:37:12 EDT --- No response to the last ping and no progress in many months; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468570] Review Request: webmin - new package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012340.n61NefNe021386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:40:39 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490171] Review Request: mediawiki-semantic-forms - An extension to MediaWiki that adds support for web-based forms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012343.n61Nhe7f021806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490171 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:43:39 EDT --- So, it's been three months with no response. Did you wish to continue with this package? I'll go ahead and close this ticket soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012345.n61NjNvn022391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-01 19:45:21 EDT --- It's been a month since that nice review work by D Haley without response. Did you wish to continue with this package? I'll go ahead and close it out soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012359.n61NxW9g030400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|oglesbyzm at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012358.n61Nw97O030171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-07-01 19:58:08 EDT --- The license of the package looks a little unclear. hinotify-0.2/src/System/INotify.hsc says GPL but the LICENSE file says BSD3. So currently looks to me like the package is actually GPLv2+ perhaps. I send a mail to the author asking for clarification (better that you the packager does this in future:). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020001.n6201Ro3025219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012359.n61Nxvgd024600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|oglesbyzm at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020001.n6201eEv025277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|oglesbyzm at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020002.n6202HMH031242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #8 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 20:02:16 EDT --- Speed isn't that big of a deal for this app, so I think being arch independent is the way to go. There is some documentation included, and I made that part of the main package. It doesn't include the rules, but that would require someone writing a free set. A draft set was provided on BGG to get proofed before the rerelease, but I don't think it is free and it has some errors. I maintain some errata and clarifications, but they don't replace the base rules. Anyway I'll take out the javadoc and put together another source rpm to look at tonight. I'll also resync to the latest SVN. I don't plan on tracking SVN releases continuously once the game is really packaged. The colossus projects do public builds of snapshots on an irregular basis when they think things look good, especially before getting ready to break things for new features. They'll probably be once this summer and how things go with Fedora might affect that. Thanks for clarifying things. I kind of started out with a moderately hard (java + legal) package for my first one, but I have a lot of interest in this particular one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020003.n6203XQY025711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-07-01 20:03:32 EDT --- Though utf8-string (already in fedora), X11-xft, and hinotify are optional, so we could also proceed with this and add the optional builds later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020012.n620CXm0027680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #10 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 20:12:32 EDT --- Skip that last comment, it was meant for another bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020012.n620C46E001073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #9 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 20:12:03 EDT --- The last time I looked at this I don't think I thought of redefining a repo in the live base ks to point a repository that didn't match its name. Since it only defines one repo, I can just override it and that will solve my problem. In the past I tried some things to undefine a repo but never figured out how. Just for completeness is there some way to do that, or is redefine the only solution? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020022.n620M1Rb003090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2009-07-01 20:22:00 EDT --- == FULL REVIEW == [ OK ] specfiles match: 603f646439e75ee959296cb4ec71b153 wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec 603f646439e75ee959296cb4ec71b153 wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec.1 [ OK ] source files match upstream: b0ecafbc0ccdf226046474aab0d7f7a7 503434057_cets_new_blog_defaults.zip b0ecafbc0ccdf226046474aab0d7f7a7 503434057_cets_new_blog_defaults.zip.1 [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ N/A ] license text included in package. License text not provided so not necessary to be in %doc [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ N/A ] BuildRequires are proper. [ N/A ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. [ OK ] package installs properly. [ N/A ] debuginfo package looks complete. [FAILED] rpmlint is silent. wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.3-1 ['1.2.3-2.fc11', '1.2.3-2'] You need to add a changelog entry for each update (including the fix-the-description update). Add a changelog entry that you fixed the changelog as well and bump it for me to approve this package. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ N/A ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ OK ] desktop files valid and installed properly. Not approved, see above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020031.n620VFTx031356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-01 20:31:14 EDT --- SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc11.src.rpm This should fix the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020035.n620ZE8o032169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #5 from Dean Glazeski 2009-07-01 20:35:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > #1: The contents of /usr/share/openocd/contrib should go to %doc > %doc contrib/ > > and remove the /usr/share/openocd/contrib at the end of the %install section to > avoid duplicates This makes more warnings appear from rpmlint. For some reason, doing the "fuller path" %doc %{_datadir}/%{name}/contrib/* results in no warnings. > #2: source url should be complete I think I got this done. I replaced the URL parameter with the full path to the source tar on OpenOCD's project site. > #3: Preserve timestamps > add INSTALL="install -p" to your make install Added this. New links: http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd-0.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020038.n620cmBl006101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller 2009-07-01 20:38:47 EDT --- It does. ======================================================================== This package (wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults) is APPROVED by ianweller ======================================================================== (now we wait for toshio to sponsor you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020047.n620ll7S001828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020047.n620lO2n001779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020047.n620l83s001732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #8 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-01 20:47:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults Short Description: Enables default settings for wordpress-mu blogs Owners: nb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: nb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020053.n620rdEF008778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-01 20:53:37 EDT --- And by "when I wake up tomorrow", apparently I meant in the next few weeks, sorry :(. Updated, tagged, and built in devel/ --> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1448444 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 00:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020058.n620wCwn009626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #11 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 20:58:11 EDT --- I double checked the javadoc rpm and there is stuff in it. rpm -ql colossus-javadoc lists 400 files. So for now I'll just switch the arch to noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 01:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020125.n621PZqd015294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #12 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 21:25:34 EDT --- Looking through some archives on the devel-java lists suggests that gcj builds are preferred so I should at least try to get one to work. If I can, I'll do that, otherwise the fallback is noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 01:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020152.n621qa5M014429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 XiaShing at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |XiaShing at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from XiaShing at gmail.com 2009-07-01 21:52:35 EDT --- $ rpm -i mojito-0.10.3-2.fc11.src.rpm warning: user perobinson does not exist - using root warning: group perobinson does not exist - using root warning: user perobinson does not exist - using root warning: group perobinson does not exist - using root Did you build it as root? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 02:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020231.n622VgGh023678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #13 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 22:31:41 EDT --- I updated the spec file and put up an updated source rpm at: http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus-20090701-1.4427svn.fc11.src.rpm I have included the aot stuff. I did a build and it seemed to handle the aot stuff and I was able to run the program OK. I am not sure why your javadoc file didn't have anything in it. Could I be missing a buildrequires for something? I no longer get the warning about no binary, but do get one about libdir in a noarch package. I suspect this is a false positive where rpmlint doesn't know for sure how the conditional macros interact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 02:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020251.n622ppc0001668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #14 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-01 22:51:51 EDT --- I found a redundant requires for java and java >= 1.5 . I'll be updating things on my web server in a bit, but I want to look to see if I am missing anything obvious for javadoc first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020318.n623Ihln001990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #15 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-07-01 23:18:42 EDT --- I have released new versions of libcult, libfrontend-elements and libbackend-elements with the above license exception. I also uploaded a new version of the xsd-3.2.0+dep package which contains the new versions of the above libraries. Let me know if there is anything else you need from my side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020327.n623Rxw2003718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 23:27:58 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1447402 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 52d9801484932a77ff06a8f3b2f10e7292ca12ca String-RewritePrefix-0.004.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.02 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.05 CPU) + Package perl-String-RewritePrefix-0.004-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(String::RewritePrefix) = 0.004 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020328.n623SrGD009166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 23:28:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1447435 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e905b81a1a91c1ba98ce9c7a12d32b639536e185 namespace-autoclean-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=18, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.03 sys + 0.24 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.37 CPU) + Package perl-namespace-autoclean-0.08-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(namespace::autoclean) = 0.08 Requires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) perl(Class::MOP) perl(List::Util) perl(namespace::clean) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020328.n623SxcV003844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Michael Stahnke 2009-07-01 23:28:58 EDT --- hi. I started re-working the spec file to include your recommendations. %check will be the hardest part. I will finish tomorrow (US). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:30:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020330.n623UpHY009647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-01 23:30:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > APPROVED. > > Can I ask you to raise the flag fedora?review ? oh! I am sorry for that. setting fedora-review + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020345.n623j0Pi012136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020344.n623iw93012114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-07-01 23:44:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-String-RewritePrefix Short Description: Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020345.n623jDBV006617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 03:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020345.n623jBNG006595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-07-01 23:45:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-namespace-autoclean Short Description: Keep imports out of your namespace Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 04:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020411.n624BmNn017461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-07-02 00:11:47 EDT --- Given that this provides a user executable script, may I suggest splitting it into a subpackage "flickr-upload"? This will help indicate to the user that there is an enduser tool here, not just a Perl library. For examples, see perl-App-Nopaste (nopaste), perl-App-Asciio (asciio), perl-Git-CPAN-Patch (git-cpan-patch), etc, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 04:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020453.n624rEf7018816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 04:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020458.n624wL7t025248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-07-02 00:58:18 EDT --- from comment#7 I had communicated via email long back here .. but no response ... have requested for co-maintainership so that I can import it and build .. Peter in case you get some time go ahead .. or in case it is not build in few days I will import it and build. Thanks folks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 04:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020459.n624xvDq019845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #25 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-07-02 00:59:54 EDT --- ping ?? Lets finish this ASAP ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020502.n6252omm020681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:02:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020500.n62508tx020217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:00:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020504.n6254RID026261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:04:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020501.n6251gw2025979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:01:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020507.n625790d021606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:07:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020507.n6257qxF027118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:07:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020505.n6255vR1026807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-02 01:05:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020540.n625eM3t027672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 01:40:21 EDT --- wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020540.n625eQ2n027708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 01:40:26 EDT --- wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020547.n625lDWT002813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 01:47:12 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-memcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020549.n625nMSD030334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 01:49:17 EDT --- R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc10, R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc10, R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc10, R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc10, R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc10, R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020550.n625oSi3031162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 01:50:27 EDT --- R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc11, R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc11, R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc11, R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc11, R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc11, R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020549.n625nQUM030373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.4.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020550.n625oXEj004037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.4.1-1.fc10 |2.4.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 05:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020553.n625rfh1005075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 01:53:41 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.2.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-memcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7277 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509171] Review Request: perl-String-RewritePrefix - Rewrite strings based on a set of known prefixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020628.n626Sakd012269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509171 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-07-02 02:28:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509178] Review Request: perl-namespace-autoclean - Keep imports out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020629.n626TBHX007388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-07-02 02:29:10 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020640.n626e03p014243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-02 02:39:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > oh! I am sorry for that. setting fedora-review + No sweat (and thanks for the review). Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch Short Description: Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020639.n626dU2X009227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-02 02:39:29 EDT --- > Did you build it as root? No, there's no need to build it as root, I don't do anything as root. That's a standard warning of no consequence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020640.n626eKax009693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020656.n626uGvo012559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-07-02 02:56:16 EDT --- rpmlint output: rpmlint *.rpm gpointing-device-settings.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gpointing-device-settings_gnome_settings_daemon.schemas libgpds-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] New: Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 Summary: Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GUI tool for setting pointing device such as TrackPoint or Touchpad. It allows configuring of various drivers parameters on the fly. It is a successor of GSynaptics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 06:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin for CGI::Application provides a mix-in method to make using HTML::FillInForm more convenient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 07:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 03:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module gives CGI::Application a forward method that passes control to another run mode and returns its output. This is equivalent to calling $self->$other_runmode, except that CGI::Application's internal value of the current run mode is updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 07:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 03:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020716.n627GPmN021967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 08:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020801.n628188Q031153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-02 04:01:05 EDT --- I would have built it yesterday but it needs to be the same version as gobject-introspection and the 0.6.3 release of that has issues on PPC64 (builds fine on all other 3 platforms) which I haven't had a chance to investigate further or put out to the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 08:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020807.n6287JO1027136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 04:07:18 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 08:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020809.n6289uxj001949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-07-02 04:09:55 EDT --- I was thinking about splitting it into separate sub-package. But I decided no to as there is only one simple script, and summary also says that it's a flickr upload tool. But I can do it after the licensing issue on blockers is solved. Upstream is little unresponsive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 08:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020816.n628Gc0W029198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 04:16:37 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 08:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020816.n628GhIT003662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 04:16:42 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 09:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 05:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506429] Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020916.n629GPPT015920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506429 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-02 05:16:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Is there a reason to package a SVN version rather than the official 0.8.0 ? > (not a problem, just to know) I was unable to find the sources of eclo, except compiled jars from upstream. Hence I pull the sources from svn. > - Better URL seems to be http://eclox.eu/ fixed > - According to source file (eclox.core/src/eclox/core/Plugin.java p.e.) License > is GPLv2+ fixed > - AUTHORS, CHANGES, COPYING, MANUAL, README and TODO still present despite of > eclipse-eclox-bin_excludes.patch. Actually, the patch was working, but there was also the build.properties of eclox.help which needed a similar patch Updated Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-eclox.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-eclox-0.8.0-2.20090616svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 09:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 05:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020930.n629U6G2012711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-02 05:30:05 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1449056 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2853d3a87aa5ac2e2770404b4c558dfc4e8ea782 CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=50, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.39 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.48 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Forward) = 1.06 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 09:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 05:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020930.n629UZ97018879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-02 05:30:34 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing (In reply to comment #2) > Is there any part of the test suite which could be run > at build time? At least some of the tests don't seem to require a database > server. All the dbapi20 tests seem to require a working db server. The numeric parsing testcase (test_numeric_parse.py) actually fails, for which I've filed a bug upstream. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2815670&group_id=184050&atid=907701 > Why not build the documentation? It's not exactly user-friendly to provide raw > tex source and a Makefile. Converting this seems to be a major PITA. They are in python docs tex dialect requiring tex style definitions from python 2.5 tools that no longer exist for 2.6 and even for 2.5 and F10 were specifically excluded from the fedora packages. The only sane way (without major patching) that I've come up with would require getting these in the buildroot http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release25-maint/Doc/texinputs/howto.cls http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release25-maint/Doc/texinputs/pypaper.sty http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release25-maint/Doc/texinputs/python.sty and then pdflatex generating a single pdf. Couldn't get a proper html output with latex2html even with the styles present. There might be a better way using existing in fedora tools, but I can't find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 09:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 05:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907020942.n629gETH021176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #37 from Fabian A. Scherschel 2009-07-02 05:42:11 EDT --- How is this coming along? Do you need help in testing this? Cheers, Fab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 10:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 06:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021028.n62ASoXm031009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cppunit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 10:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 06:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021029.n62ATGck031079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |dirac -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 10:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 06:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502691] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021029.n62AT2Ep031042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gdbm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 12:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021222.n62CMOc5023235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|nikolay at vladimiroff.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-07-02 08:22:22 EDT --- I'm releasing the review. I'm in the eye of some s**t storm at work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 13:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021312.n62DCr2f028520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Ivana Varekova 2009-07-02 09:12:51 EDT --- Thanks, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 13:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021321.n62DLt6E030896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 13:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021330.n62DUROB008235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-02 09:30:26 EDT --- Yes, it is right, I am not in the packager group, the procedure is just too long. I thought that my contributions are welcome, but anyway, I am setting up my own repo for people who want to test my packages. And thanks for your gentle reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 13:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021349.n62DnR2Q004763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 14:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021446.n62EkPOu004168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-07-02 10:46:23 EDT --- Somebody needs to figure out what to do about the modified X-Symbol embedded in ProofGeneral. I've set the flag. Don't know how I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 14:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021449.n62EnjEw013091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-07-02 10:49:44 EDT --- OK, accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 14:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021451.n62EpwFG005828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 10:51:58 EDT --- ldd-pdf-3.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldd-pdf-3.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 14:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021451.n62EprUH014059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 10:51:52 EDT --- ldd-pdf-3.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldd-pdf-3.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 14:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021452.n62EqiYn014336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #9 from Alan Dunn 2009-07-02 10:52:43 EDT --- I apologize for having let this one sit around for so long - I'll be able to address this shortly (and hopefully I'll be able to figure out what needs to be done). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507912] Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021518.n62FIIpm013862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 --- Comment #2 from steve 2009-07-02 11:18:17 EDT --- Brought back the dist tag. Doesn't seem like a good idea to remove it considering the complications in building and tagging. Also, added the version to the path of the final install directory. New spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/alp.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/alp-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021521.n62FLjUn014929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #38 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-07-02 11:21:41 EDT --- Paul, thanks. I tried doing a koji build, and it failed again: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1449764&name=build.log I'm doing a koji build --scratch dist-f11 src.rpm Fabian, do you know if I should add another parameter so that it uses the new flickrnet? Or is that done automatically? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021535.n62FZ48C019047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-02 11:35:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > The SevenZip is bundled in frinika's source and frinika doesn't need the patch > if it uses this bundled source. However we are not using the SevenZip that > comes with frinika. Instead, we are using Fedora's SevenZip. In order to use > Fedora's SevenZip we need to patch frinika sources. This is what the patch is > for. Ok, thank you for the explanation. In this case all ok with this patch it is really Fedora-related and if comment present in spec no problem here. Than, about symlinks and ant build script - let it be, you known more than I in this. > In the fetch script, I only remove the parts that are known to be nonfree. The > rest of .so, .jar, .exe binaries is removed in %prep to make sure that we are > not using them. Good, I found that in spec. > But I can't get the revision number to append to the filename this way. i.e. > $ sh frinka-snapshot.sh latest > ---> frinika-550.tar.bz2 > Is there another way? 1) You can obtain exported revision number in both cases at end of process (how was you do before) 2) Really you need it? frinika-550.tar.bz2 is free name. It is not contain version number, "svn", "rev" keywords and only you and I now known what 550 represent actually. So, in this case common name like frinika.tar.bz2 or frinika-svn.tar.bz2 is fully enough. > > 3) I see comment about all other sources. But what about fetch instruction to > > Source0 (about what script with what parameter must be used)? > > I believe that I have been quite verbose in terms of comments. Also the fetch > script gives an output for usage. I don't think we need more. There is no room > for confusion. Please, add one of the string similar to: # ./frinika-snapshot.sh 550 or # ./%{name}-snapshot.sh %{svnver} > > 4) You remove DKnode, nice. But petersalomonsen component stil here. > > Upstream responded that all these sources > petersalomonsen > src/uk/ac/bath/* > are all written by them and they are going to be maintained in frinika. We > don't need to package them separately. Good news. >However: > > After my email, they removed > DKnode > src/uk/ac/bath/gui/vamp/ > from their sources since they are not using them. So I packaged svn revision > 550 with these sources removed. > > Ref: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3319021&forum_id=447356 I'm glad hear that. By the way, it is not even started: Splash screen appeared, and then freezes, in console: $ frinika Using language: ??????? config: MULTIPLEXED_AUDIO=false config: MAXIMIZE_WINDOW=false config: DEFAULT_SOUNDFONT=/usr/share/soundfonts/default.sf2 config: AUDIO_DIRECTORY=/home/pasha/frinika/audio config: DIRECT_MONITORING=false config: BIG_ENDIAN=false config: SOUNDFONT_DIRECTORY=/usr/share/soundfonts config: SETUP_DONE=true no saved property for configuration option LAST_PROJECT_FILENAME, using default config: sampleRate=44100 config: SCRIPTS_DIRECTORY=/home/pasha/frinika/scripts config: MOUSE_NUMBER_DRAG_INTENSITY=2.0 config: GROOVE_PATTERN_DIRECTORY=/home/pasha/frinika/groovepatterns config: TICKS_PER_QUARTER=128 config: MIDIIN_DEVICES_LIST= config: TEXT_LANE_FONT=java.awt.Font[family=Dialog,name=Arial,style=plain,size=8] config: JACK_AUTO_CONNECT=false config: AUDIO_BUFFER_LENGTH=512 config: SEQUENCER_PRIORITY=0 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/mozilla/javascript/Scriptable at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.defaultInit(ProjectContainer.java:525) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.(ProjectContainer.java:241) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.(ProjectContainer.java:542) at com.frinika.sequencer.gui.menu.CreateProjectAction.actionPerformed(CreateProjectAction.java:50) at com.frinika.FrinikaMain.main(FrinikaMain.java:112) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.mozilla.javascript.Scriptable at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) ... 5 more -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021514.n62FEIxK021781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-02 11:14:17 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (89fb0bf9da58087dfe8b2bd882c1bfec3a512cf6) - package compiles on devel (noarch) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021509.n62F9JDE019924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 --- Comment #6 from steve 2009-07-02 11:09:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > There's not much to this package. You're right that the dist tag isn't > necessary, but do keep in mind that not having it will not reduce download time > as each release is signed with a different key (and hence the packages are > different anyway), and you will be responsible for making sure that the release > you push to F11 has a different version than what you push to F10 (and from > what you push to devel). But that's up to you; the dist tag only makes this > convenient. Just don't be surprised when you get "tag already exists" errors. > I've added the dist tag back to the spec. > Packaging-wise there's not much to talk about; the package just unpacks a > tarball and drops it under /usr/share/doc. One issue that bothers me, though, > is that the directory isn't versioned, unlike essentially every other directory > in /usr/share/doc. The package I'd compare this against, diveintopython, > versions its directory. Did you consider doing that? > Sounds reasonable. Done this too. New spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/javanotes.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/javanotes-5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. Sure, will pick at least a couple up. thanks, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021539.n62Fdo6U020024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #26 from Robin Norwood 2009-07-02 11:39:47 EDT --- For the first issue, we could pretty easily catch that error and display a prettier error message. For the second, I'm not sure - we could include a more descriptive error message ("Hey, Cerebro needs a mesh network interface to work.") and maybe a link to further documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] New: Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Summary: Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsd at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090702/bitfrost.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090702/bitfrost-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This represents an effort to get more of OLPC's platform included in Fedora and also to clean up the current disorganised distribution of bitfrost modules (which are scattered over various packages). The sugar-update-control package will need to be modified to depend on this (rather than shipping its own bitfrost modules). More packages which use these modules will be added soon. Please review this package for F11 inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021553.n62FrG4D032086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #7 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-02 11:53:15 EDT --- Hmm, I get this too using koji but it works fine using rpmbuild on my local Fedora 11 system. Too bad mock on EL5 no longer can build for Fedora 11 without jumping through hoops. Will keep poking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021557.n62FvcKG024541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-02 11:57:37 EDT --- You probably just need python-devel. A local rpmbuild run doesn't really do anything to test that your build dependencies are correct, since the package build with everything that happens to be installed on your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021556.n62Fusc2000829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-02 11:56:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350300) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350300) patch for sugar-update-control spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 15:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021555.n62FttvE000515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuxbrewr at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021605.n62G5dtF026621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #39 from Paul Lange 2009-07-02 12:05:37 EDT --- Juan, update has been pushed to stable around 2 hours ago. I expect it needs more time to be used in the build processes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021603.n62G3atj025823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #9 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-02 12:03:35 EDT --- Yep, seems to be the case. My goof, should have known better on that one. Will have a new SRPM ready shortly (testing in Koji now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021610.n62GAWOJ027942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 12:10:32 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/efte-1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021609.n62G9id0027341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 12:09:43 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/efte-1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021619.n62GJVI1006064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #10 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-02 12:19:30 EDT --- Ok, continuing on with my simple package made hard packaging adventure :) http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy-0.32-1.src.rpm Changes: * Including correct python-devel BuildRequires * Should be meeting multi-license guidelines * Included the text of both licenses in the documentation * Builds ok in Koji and under mock for EL-5. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021619.n62GJthq030027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #11 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-02 12:19:54 EDT --- If this thing only had an edit feature. SRPM is here actually: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy-0.32-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021626.n62GQipk008212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-02 12:26:43 EDT --- Ok, I have done a successful koji build : SPEC URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/pypoppler.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/pypoppler-0.10.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1450585 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021636.n62GaRaE010486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-02 12:36:25 EDT --- python-decorator-3.0.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-decorator-3.0.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021639.n62GdebY002530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-02 12:39:39 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submitted push requests on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021643.n62GhS4d011967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-07-02 12:43:27 EDT --- Any news on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021645.n62Gj85r003937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-02 12:45:06 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021649.n62Gn50w013925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-07-02 12:49:03 EDT --- No php-hkit component in BZ yet. Thus I comment changes here: New version in rawhide: * Thu Jul 2 2009 Patrick Monnerat 0.5-3. - Move class files from /usr/share/php to /usr/share/php/hkit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 16:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021654.n62Gs4Wc006177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #3 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-07-02 12:54:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanks for your comments, Jochen. I have fixed some of your points but I have questions on some others: > - Because the package should be fedora specific, it should be named as > fedora-gnat-... Fixed (but it looks like I can't update the title of this review request). > - Source tag contains not a fully qualified URI. Submitter should create > a project on fedorahosted.org Done. > - Could not check packaged tar ball agains upstream. > - Package doesn#t contains a URL tag Tarballs will be at https://fedorahosted.org/released/fedora-gnat-project-common/. > - License tag say 'Copyright only' this is not a valid OSS license "Copyright only" is listed under Good Licenses at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main. Please explain why you think it isn't valid. These files are so small that I don't care much about the license. I'd place them in the public domain, but as I understand it I can't do that under Swedish copyright law, so I figured I'd require copyright attribution only and otherwise let anyone do anything with them. > - Package contains not a verbatin copy of the license text common.gpr contains the complete license text: -- Copyright 2009 B. Persson, Bjorn at Rombobeorn.se -- No restrictions are placed on this code. > - Pleace use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc in the %files stanza Fixed. > - you should use a version like 0.1 instead of 1, because I'm assume > your are the upstream and this is the first release of the software Yes, I am upstream and this is the first release, but I don't understand what's wrong with the version number. Version 1 means it's the first version, which is what it is. The package is too small to have major and minor version numbers, so if I need to change something I'll release version 2. What's the problem? > - Package has no proper BuildRoot definition Could you please explain why a buildroot definition is still needed? I'm not planning to package this for anything older than Fedora 10, so any buildroot I define will be ignored and %_topdir/BUILDROOT will be used instead. Before I upload a new package I want to understand why you think the version number is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 17:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021705.n62H5PAR009277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2009-07-02 13:05:23 EDT --- You will need to remove the .la file https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Also %{_libdir}/python2.6/site-packages is wrong https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture Here's an example http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/pypoppler.spec P.S I'm not going to review your package as you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 17:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021719.n62HJKc0022065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-02 13:19:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > Fixed (but it looks like I can't update the title of this review request). You should be able to change the title of the bug by following the (edit) link right on the title on top of this bug > "Copyright only" is listed under Good Licenses at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main. Please explain why you think it > isn't valid. Your right. 'Copyright only' sounds a little odd for a OSS license, but you have right that this is it one. > These files are so small that I don't care much about the license. I'd place > them in the public domain, but as I understand it I can't do that under Swedish > copyright law, so I figured I'd require copyright attribution only and > otherwise let anyone do anything with them. > > - Package contains not a verbatin copy of the license text > > common.gpr contains the complete license text: > -- Copyright 2009 B. Persson, Bjorn at Rombobeorn.se > -- No restrictions are placed on this code. > It's a good style to distribute the verbatin text of the license. Of corse this may be a small file on your case, but in common it's a good idea, because the user will get the version of the license text which was valid at the time of publisching of your software. Additionally, It's not a blocker for approvement, if a packaging is missing one. > Yes, I am upstream and this is the first release, but I don't understand what's > wrong with the version number. Version 1 means it's the first version, which is > what it is. The package is too small to have major and minor version numbers, > so if I need to change something I'll release version 2. What's the problem? first, because it's your first release, I have to assume, that this package is not widely tested and may contains bug. So it's a good idea to beginn the versioning with a version nummer less the 1.0. Second, If you have a major and a minor version number you can disting between greater changes which may introduced new feature or have a API breakage and minor changes which only fixed bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 17:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gnat-project-common_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021725.n62HPEiL014180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-02 13:25:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Could you please explain why a buildroot definition is still needed? I'm not > planning to package this for anything older than Fedora 10, so any buildroot I > define will be ignored and %_topdir/BUILDROOT will be used instead. for the buildroot stuff please keep in mind, that there are the EL-4 and EL5 branches which based on RHEL 4 and RHEL 5. this releases contains older releases of rpm because this distributions are designed for a very long lifecycle in enterprises. If you may interesting on RHEL without paying money, you may have a look on the CentOS project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 17:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021730.n62HUlH0025211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #6 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-02 13:30:46 EDT --- Ok, I updated the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 17:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021731.n62HVxBP025559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|tuxbrewr at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-07-02 13:31:58 EDT --- I'll start looking at this today. Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 18:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021846.n62IkKWu014845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |PyQt4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 18:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021851.n62Ip9FC012386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-07-02 14:51:08 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 19:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021921.n62JLPFP025050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #15 from vivek shah 2009-07-02 15:21:23 EDT --- Can we please wrap up this review request soon ? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 19:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021936.n62Ja7GM028631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #40 from Fabian A. Scherschel 2009-07-02 15:36:04 EDT --- Cool! @Juan: Sorry, I am really new to Fedora and RPM in general so I am afraid I can't say. I will be happy to test install anything, though. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 19:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021948.n62JmfKK026894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-02 15:48:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > But I can't get the revision number to append to the filename this way. i.e. > > $ sh frinka-snapshot.sh latest > > ---> frinika-550.tar.bz2 > > Is there another way? > 1) You can obtain exported revision number in both cases at end of process (how > was you do before) > 2) Really you need it? frinika-550.tar.bz2 is free name. It is not contain > version number, "svn", "rev" keywords and only you and I now known what 550 > represent actually. So, in this case common name like frinika.tar.bz2 or > frinika-svn.tar.bz2 is fully enough. > I was using the "svnversion" command after doing "svn co ..." but now I made it parse the "svn export ..." output and get the revision number from there. I know that the filename is pretty much free, but having some sort of version/revision number in the filename makes things easier to track. > Please, add one of the string similar to: > # ./frinika-snapshot.sh 550 > or > # ./%{name}-snapshot.sh %{svnver} > okay I added this > > By the way, it is not even started: > Splash screen appeared, and then freezes, in console: > [cut] It sounds like you are using gcj as your java. gcj doesn't support everything required by frinika. Run # alternatives --config java and make sure that you have openjdk selected. If you are using openjdk and still getting the same error, this means that your rpm database is messed up. You will need the "rhino" package which should be pulled by openjdk itself. SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.src.rpm changelog 0.5.1-6.551svn - Update to svn revision 551 - Optimize the fetch script and comment in the SPEC file about its usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 20:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022001.n62K15nn032648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #1 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-07-02 16:01:05 EDT --- The Link for the source rpm is: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm It was a typo.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 19:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021958.n62Jworx031954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 19:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: praveen_paladugu at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 19:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021956.n62JuwI2001947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #19 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-02 15:56:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Ghostscript is in the dependency tree of tetex-latex on F11, even though no > supported Fedora release has had tetex for some time now. Some texlive package > should probably be required instead. Of course, if you wanted to eventually > build this for EPEL then you'd either need a different spec file or some > conditionals. In that case, a build dependency on ghostscript to help RHEL5 > wouldn't hurt. > Would something like: BuildRequires: ghostscript BuildRequires: /usr/bin/latex be sufficient for both EL and fedora? > However, a rawhide build fails for me way down in the %install section: > > > Note that the install command tries to install coot_load_modules.py twice. Thanks - I'll post a new src.rpm once the latex issue is fixed. I'm currently attempting to delve more deeply into the circular dependency issue as well, but that will probably take a large chunk of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 20:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022037.n62Kbgv0018174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #12 from IBM Bug Proxy 2009-07-02 16:37:39 EDT --- Hi Praveen and Matt, Try Spec URL: http://ratliff.net/sfcb/sblim-sfcb.spec SRPM URL: http://ratliff.net/sfcb/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-4.fc11.src.rpm It has bee updated and it now requires cim-schema as defined in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 for both building and running. It has Provides: cim-server Here are a couple of things that don't feel entirely clean yet: * I removed %{?_smp_mflags} from the make directive because it was causing build failures since later steps depend on earlier steps which hadn't yet completed. * I added sfcbrepos -f statement to %post so that sfcb can find the cim-schema so that adds some time during the install. In OpenSUSE, they add this to the init file instead. It only has to be run once. * The init script is still named sfcb rather than sblim-sfcb which is consistent with upstream and OpenSUSE, but rpmlint complains. * Very likely incorrectly, I added a statement about the static libraries to silence an rpmbuild complaint. Emily -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 20:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022037.n62Kbbvd018132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Olsa 2009-07-02 16:37:36 EDT --- made updates based on comments, new spec file and sources are uploaded: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jolsa/latrace/latrace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jolsa/latrace/latrace-0.5.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 20:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022038.n62KcUdc011488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #41 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-07-02 16:38:27 EDT --- Thanks Paul, I waited as suggested and it built succesfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1451298 @Fabian, I'm new as well, perhaps we should compare notes? :P I installed the rpms on my computer, and so far, gnome-do's been working with the plugins fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 20:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022044.n62KiVKB019405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: | - |packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 20:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022047.n62Klg79020258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-02 16:47:42 EDT --- Your account, praveenp, is not in the packager group, so I've indicated that you require a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 21:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022131.n62LVtVc030421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #8 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-07-02 17:31:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 22:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022231.n62MVA5g003903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-02 18:31:09 EDT --- That one builds; rpmlint says: python-webpy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages /web/utils.py 0644 python-webpy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages /web/application.py 0644 python-webpy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages /web/__init__.py 0644 These happen because those files start with the usual "#!" lines that scripts start with, but they aren't executable. For some reason, python programmers like to do this although I've never understand why. Some packagers prefer to fix them by stripping the first line; others just leave the files alone and ignore the rpmlint warning. You shouldn't generally make them executable. Please also check the licensing of the files debugerror.py and httpserver.py; they definitely aren't public domain. Those files have different copyright, but I'm pretty sure they're also under the BSD license. You should double check and update the comment about the licensing in your spec. There's a test suite present. I know some of the tests expect an existing database, which obviously won't work. I don't know if there are any others that could be run in a %check section at package build time, but it would be good to check. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 4e92f0e46731181cbb1daa9d20c5ac4850fa1650144b4f82ed0f296ebeb6f40b web.py- 0.32.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: python-webpy = 0.32-2.fc12 = python(abi) = 2.6 ? %check is not present, but there a test suite. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 23:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907022311.n62NBp48018272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fedora at christoph- | |wickert.de) | --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-02 19:11:49 EDT --- One way to speed up this review is to do reviews yourself. The more reviews you do, the more likely it is that others do a review for you. I searched bugzilla for reviews you did or in which you participated and I found nothing, although you already joined in 2007. So may I ask who is your sponsor? Usually you are expected to do 3 pre-reviews before getting sponsored. IMHO you are not in the position to complain. Feel free to CC me in any reviews you work on, so I can decide to pick up this review or not. BTW: Could you please remove privacy in FAS, so we could get to know more about you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 02:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030216.n632GB0g020142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nushio at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-07-02 22:16:10 EDT --- Hi Hicham, One of the first things you should do to any specfile, is run rpmlint on it. rpmlint will show any errors or warnings there are on your Specfile, like mixed use of spaces and tabs. rpmlint said: pypoppler.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 20) Also, what Leigh said about the Static Libraries is right. On %configure, use --disable-static and on %install, remove the la file, using: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/*.la I updated your specfile with these changes. http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/pypoppler.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 02:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030237.n632b4FB025000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #8 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-02 22:37:03 EDT --- Ok updated the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 02:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030236.n632aNuK024849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #24 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-02 22:36:20 EDT --- Okay, as I said it is not a blocker, it was just a suggestion. Anyhow, I'll ask for the 4th time (comments #6, #10, #17 and #24): > > Ok, How about the samples? > > I'll have a look > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 03:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030329.n633TJA1003778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-02 23:29:17 EDT --- Here's my review for this: * Buildroot doesn't obey the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * The source files claim GPLv2+ but the COPYING file says GPLv3. This software cannot be GPLv3 because it links to kdebase-workspace which is GPLv2. GPLv2 and GPLv3 don't go very well together. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix The license tag should be GPLv2+ but please ask upstream and verify this. Also, please don't package the false COPYING file. * Source0 must be given in full URL. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source * build.log says NOTE: msgfmt not found. Translations will *not* be installed You need to add gettext to BR. ! Please make the description span 80 columns (as much as possible). * Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Also, rpmlint says: rekonq.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/kde4/rekonq.desktop * ScriptletSnippets aren't used properly. Follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ! Please use the %{name} macro extensively for consistency * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Currently, package does not own %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/ . You can replace %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/rekonqui.rc %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/pics/loading.gif %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/defaultbookmarks.xbel %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/htmls/notfound.html %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/pics/webkit-icon.png with just %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/ to deal with this issue. ? You are using versioned BR. Why are you not using the corresponding versioned R? ! Also the versions you use for BRs do not match what CMakeLists.txt file says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 03:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030328.n633S7V3029963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 --- Comment #1 from Rajeesh 2009-07-02 23:28:06 EDT --- While testing in Fedora, identified a bug where Meiga is not finding the internal IP, due to missing PATH settings. I talked to the upstream developer and fixed this issue in new release - 0.2.1 The updated SPEC and SRPM are: http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga.spec http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 04:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 00:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030448.n634mMOj018158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 00:48:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452073 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 46e4ad333fdfdaa85f0eabc72a14ecce254326ca CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=35, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 0.16 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.24 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::FillInForm) = 1.14 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 05:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030500.n63505af014231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #17 from vivek shah 2009-07-03 01:00:04 EDT --- Hi Christoph, I am not complaining about any reviews. Since this review request was stuck (a large part of it because I did not get the time to follow it up after the initial comments), so once things were back in shape(thanks to Fabian and your reviews), I hoped maybe we could push thing in quickly. I started packaging from June 2008. I had an active FAS account from 2007 since I needed it to maintain MirrorManager for my University and at that time I created a bugzilla account too. My sponsor is Mamoru Tasaka . Thanks for all the suggestions so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 05:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030503.n6353l1p021049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #27 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-07-03 01:03:43 EDT --- @robin that would suffice .. after this I don't see any other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 06:12:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030612.n636CqIp028208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-03 02:12:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > For -2: > > * License > - Now for this license the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". - Fixed > * Summary > - Now Fedora thinks writing the package name (Coderay) in > Summary is redundant. - Where is this written? I didn't see it in packaging guidelines. > * Directory ownership issue > - The directory %{geminstdir}/lib is not owned by this package. Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-coderay.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-coderay-0.8.312-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 06:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030621.n636LYXE003404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 02:21:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452075 - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. mojito.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 mojito.i586: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 mojito-devel.i586: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 == Fix it to LGPLv2 + source files match upstream url 6fcc6b5b439bd95d18901aa2ee7f2241e381a02a mojito-0.10.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + mojito-client.pc and mojito-module.pc files present. + -devel subpackage present. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package mojito-0.10.3-2.fc12.i586 => Provides: libmojito-client.so.1 libmojito-service-dummy.so libmojito.so.0 libtwitter.so Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libgconf-2.so.4 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libjson-glib-1.0.so.0 libmojito-client.so.1 libmojito.so.0 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libsoup-2.4.so.1 libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1 libtwitter-glib-1.0.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package mojito-devel-0.10.3-2.fc12.i586 => Provides: pkgconfig(mojito-client) = 0.10.3 pkgconfig(mojito-module) = 0.10.3 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libmojito-client.so.1 libmojito.so.0 pkgconfig(dbus-glib-1) pkgconfig(glib-2.0) pkgconfig(libsoup-2.4) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Fix rpmlint warnings. 2) you can also add examples and tests sample code to %doc of -devel package as %doc tests/*.c examples/*c examples/*.py APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 07:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030704.n6374Ykf011239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-03 03:04:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 6] this application looks for me like dead, the latest version is from Jan 4, > 2006. - This my point is not valid anymore as I'm now co-developer of this project :) - Gui package is wrongly created put there only files related to gui (desktop file, webinjectgui.pl and other gui-only related files) and require webinject package. - would you consider adding this patch to this package and applying it during %prep section? http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/bugfix.patch this is bug fix for following issues: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2807516&group_id=100145&atid=1131923 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2807516&group_id=100145&atid=1131923 - if you would like, i could co-maintain this fedora package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 07:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030714.n637EJrZ013119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 03:14:18 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 07:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030719.n637JNhZ013948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #2 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-07-03 03:19:22 EDT --- Orcan, Thank you very much for your detailed and helpful package review ( you found a bit more issues than I was hoping for :) ). I think I've covered most of the issues you found by now. I'm now waiting for upstream to comment on the license part. I'll post the updated files as soon as I've fully (I hope) sorted things out (can't access my Fedora account from here either). - Eelko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 07:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030727.n637RWCN015727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 03:27:31 EDT --- 3) and also remove following from SPEC BuildRequires: gnome-keyring-devel BuildRequires: libsoup-devel because glib2-devel will pull those in buildroot. See successful build after removing those BRs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452185 4)forgot to tell that you will also need to chmod 644 examples/*.py in %prep section to make rpmlint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 07:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030756.n637ukKn015719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-07-03 03:56:45 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv3+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. BAD file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - source archives differs - a newer one is packaged in srpm, you should never change a publicly released archive, but release a new one with increased version - rpmlint complains a bit: latrace.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog latrace.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs latrace.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libltaudit.so - can be ignored here latrace.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libltaudit.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 - hint when rpmlint is run with "-i" This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. - requires a comment why this is correct latrace.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/latrace 0555 latrace.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/libltaudit.so 0555 - should be 0755 - config files in /etc should be writable by owner (0644) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 08:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 04:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030857.n638veMT030304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 04:57:38 EDT --- Brilliant. I'll update the spec before I push it to cvs. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 08:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 04:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030858.n638wvYC030573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 04:58:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mojito Short Description: A social network data aggregator Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030905.n6395Tui006184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 05:05:27 EDT --- Isn't there any release hosted somewhere for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030919.n639Jpcc008869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-03 05:19:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Thanks, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm Short Description: Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030921.n639L2Vi003148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-03 05:21:00 EDT --- Thanks! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward Short Description: Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030923.n639NphV009923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-07-03 05:23:49 EDT --- Hi John, I was going to do a full review, however I've stumbled upon some major issues. Please can you solve them first before I do the complete review? - the package contains a rather old snaphost from 1/2008 - can you package a newer snapshot e.g. from 6/2009? - rpmlint reveals 139 warnings and errors, especially: * formatting fo the description * lots of example *.c files in the main package (they should be in the devel package) * static libraries were packaged - usually they should be completely omitted unless there is a reason: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries * if the %post/%postun section only contains one line, it should be written like this: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig - using %ghost for *.so.x should not be necessary, %{_libdir}/*.so.* should be sufficient - pkgconfig must be required by the devel pacakge since *.pc is packaged - probably the tests should be moved into the devel package, too Best regards, Christian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509521] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::TT adds support for the popular Template Toolkit engine to your CGI::Application modules by providing several helper methods that allow you to process template files from within your runmodes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::LogDispatch adds logging support to your CGI::Application modules by providing a Log::Dispatch dispatcher object that is accessible from anywhere in the application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030929.n639TZGt011062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 05:29:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452145 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. jana.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.5-0.1 ['0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12', '0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41'] ==> Fix this + source files match upstream url 98d622dc60b9fdcd442294311dac8a8cfd9f2242 jana-0.4.5-20090622.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + libjana-ecal.pc,libjana-gtk.pc,libjana.pc files present. + -devel subpackage present. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package jana-0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12.i586 => Provides: libjana-ecal.so.0 libjana-gtk.so.0 libjana.so.0 Requires: libORBit-2.so.0 libatk-1.0.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libcairo.so.2 libecal-1.2.so.7 libedataserver-1.2.so.11 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgconf-2.so.4 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libical.so.0 libicalss.so.0 libicalvcal.so.0 libjana-ecal.so.0 libjana-gtk.so.0 libjana.so.0 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libsoup-2.4.so.1 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package jana-devel-0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12.i586 => Provides: pkgconfig(libjana) = 0.0 pkgconfig(libjana-ecal) = 0.0 pkgconfig(libjana-gtk) = 0.0 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libjana-ecal.so.0 libjana-gtk.so.0 libjana.so.0 pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0) pkgconfig(libecal-1.2) pkgconfig(libjana) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) you don't need BuildRequires: glib2-devel as it will be pulled by gtk2-devel 2) It will be always good to use make install as make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" this will make sure you will keep timestamps of upstream files that are copied as it is. 3) Add documentation like you added for mojito 4) I am not sure whether we can have some more additional subpackages like libjana-gtk and libjana-ecal Do you think we can have them separate? Submit new SRPM with above fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509524] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml - Generate XML reports from unit test results Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml - Generate XML reports from unit test results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509524 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml - Generate XML reports from unit test results Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Test::Unit::Runner::XML generates XML reports from unit test results. The reports are in the same format as those produced by Ant's JUnit task, allowing them to be used with Java continuous integration and reporting tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030951.n639pDtp016263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 05:51:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452266 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 11dd5d100994dc3f5dcf56b53831f876e9e1fb84 CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=30, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.00 sys + 0.82 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.94 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::LogDispatch) = 1.02 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) perl(File::Spec) perl(Log::Dispatch) perl(Log::Dispatch::Screen) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(UNIVERSAL::require) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) looks this package needs Requires: perl(Sub::WrapPackages) Requires: perl(Class::ISA) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 09:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509521] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907030959.n639xE1R017819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 05:59:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452265 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8457506a05277b125cb3f8367150ff8f3c97a4f5 CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=61, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.03 sys + 2.56 cusr 0.16 csys = 2.84 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::TT) = 1.04 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) >= 4.0 perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Template) >= 2.0 perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031000.n63A0Evk012358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 06:00:13 EDT --- oops sorry looks Requires: perl(Class::ISA) is provided by perl itself. so you need to include only Requires: perl(Sub::WrapPackages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031007.n63A77g3013925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-03 06:07:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > so you need to include only > Requires: perl(Sub::WrapPackages) Done. Thanks, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch Short Description: Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509521] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031008.n63A8njc020080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-03 06:08:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Thanks for the review! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT Short Description: Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509524] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml - Generate XML reports from unit test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031005.n63A5Zpm019583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509524 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 06:05:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452301 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fdbc1a465b0940445ba853471d702c4837da377a Test-Unit-Runner-Xml-0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=27, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.76 cusr 0.14 csys = 0.94 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml-0.1-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Test::Unit::Runner::XML) = 0.1 Requires: perl(Time::HiRes) perl(XML::Generator) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031010.n63AAOPq014768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chkr at plauener.de --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-07-03 06:10:23 EDT --- I would volunteer to do this review. I had a quick look at the package and here are some thoughts: * Did you hear anything from upstream regarding 0.11.2? * The package includes the script "volume-of" which - does not work (wrong python module imported) - has a very generic name - does not seem to be necessary - is not mentioned in the README.txt - has no manpage I think it can be omitted. ;-) * The URL of Source0 is different from the download URL mentioned on the homepage of the project: http://trash-cli.googlecode.com/files/trash-cli-0.11.1.2.tar.gz * the usage of %{__...} commands should be consistent - either use them entirely or omit them completly (the usage of %{__python} for determining python_sitelib is ok, since it is consistent with the packaging guidelines, however, I would not use %{__sed} ...) * Please add a short comment regarding the changes to the source files in the %prep section * What's the difference between trash-restore and restore-trash in the package? The latter doesn't have a man-page... * IMHO the usage of %{pyver} could be omitted, just use e.g. %{python_sitelib}/trash_cli*.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509524] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml - Generate XML reports from unit test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031018.n63AIcFj022414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509524 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-07-03 06:18:36 EDT --- Thanks Parag, that was really fast :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml Short Description: Generate XML reports from unit test results Owners: xavierb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] New: Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 Summary: Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: julian at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap.spec SRPM URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap-0.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: SAP is a small CLI audio player featuring a volume control and supports many file formats through the gstreamer framework. As I don't have any packages in Fedora yet, I need a sponsor for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031056.n63Aup9B030163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 Julian Aloofi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 10:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031059.n63Ax7aH024346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-03 06:59:06 EDT --- I assume this package review is for Fedora that mean I should get this package working and functionally fine. When I installed this and restart gdm, I got both applets in systray but in disabled mode. I can't even rigth-click it. Why those applets are not enabled by defualt. Is it because I already have gnome-volume-control-applet running? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031105.n63B5HD1032129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 07:05:15 EDT --- Its for moblin. Its not designed or been tested to run within the standard gnome desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031117.n63BHrwl002531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 07:17:52 EDT --- > jana.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.5-0.1 > ['0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12', '0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41'] > ==> Fix this Fixed. My understanding was that it was fine to shorten those versions to just the build number > Suggestions: > 1) you don't need > BuildRequires: glib2-devel as it will be pulled by gtk2-devel Fixed > 2) It will be always good to use make install as > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" > this will make sure you will keep timestamps of upstream files that are copied > as it is. Not seen that in the package guidelines. > 3) Add documentation like you added for mojito Done > 4) I am not sure whether we can have some more additional subpackages like > libjana-gtk and libjana-ecal > Do you think we can have them separate? We can if there's a demand. I'm not sure what the advantage is as its a small set of libraries. It can easily be split out later if there's a demand. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/jana-0.4.5-0.2.20090622gitb416a41.fc11.src.rpm SPECS: same as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::ValidateRM helps to validate web forms when using the CGI::Application framework and the Data::FormValidator module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509538] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509538 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin works by adding extra run modes (named view_code and view_pod) to the application. By calling this run mode you can see the source or POD of the running module (by default) or you can specify which module you would like to view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031152.n63BqjFl009953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031152.n63BqBPc009863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-07-03 07:52:08 EDT --- Let me take this one over then. Apparently it won't build without the UTF-8 package, which i'm going to take over as a review too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 11:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 07:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031159.n63BxtZZ005099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #8 from David Hannequin 2009-07-03 07:59:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Hi, > > 6] this application looks for me like dead, the latest version is from Jan 4, > > 2006. > - This my point is not valid anymore as I'm now co-developer of this project :) Great :-). > - Gui package is wrongly created > put there only files related to gui (desktop file, webinjectgui.pl and other > gui-only related files) and require webinject package. I added require webinject in webinject-gui because webinject-gui need webinject.pl. > - would you consider adding this patch to this package and applying it during > %prep section? > http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/bugfix.patch > > this is bug fix for following issues: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2807516&group_id=100145&atid=1131923 > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2807516&group_id=100145&atid=1131923 I try to apply your patch. > - if you would like, i could co-maintain this fedora package. Hum, i try to do by myself but if i'm having trouble i will seek. Thank -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 12:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031206.n63C6M1i006641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-07-03 08:06:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Its for moblin. Its not designed or been tested to run within the standard > gnome desktop. So would you mind to explain why this package should be in Fedora? Are you going to implement a "moblin-desktop" or is this just a piece of currently more or less defunct, immature SW, lacking generality? That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora. Besides this, I am not excited about how you package your moblin packages. In particular, I consider you to be acting pretty careless wrt. the autotools, NVRs and further details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 12:17:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031217.n63CHUML014634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #18 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-07-03 08:17:28 EDT --- The package needs to BR ghc-utf8-string too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 12:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031220.n63CKBjU009610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #19 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-07-03 08:20:10 EDT --- And not paying attention, i forgot to mention it also needs to BR ghc-X11 itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 12:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031218.n63CIRHM009110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 08:18:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Its for moblin. Its not designed or been tested to run within the standard > > gnome desktop. > > So would you mind to explain why this package should be in Fedora? > Are you going to implement a "moblin-desktop" or is this just a piece of > currently more or less defunct, immature SW, lacking generality? Yes. I am. That's why its a dep against the FedoraMoblin tracker bug. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraMoblin for further details. > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora. Why? > Besides this, I am not excited about how you package your moblin packages. In > particular, I consider you to be acting pretty careless wrt. the autotools, > NVRs and further details. What's exactly wrong with them, I'm quite happy with constructive criticism. I believe the adhere to to the Package Guidelines but its always possible that I've missed stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 12:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031247.n63ClmcU021148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-07-03 08:47:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora. > > Why? Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a "bleeding edge" distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages. IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind. > > Besides this, I am not excited about how you package your moblin packages. In > > particular, I consider you to be acting pretty careless wrt. the autotools, > > NVRs and further details. > > What's exactly wrong with them, You should not run the autotools at build-time, but run them in advance and add the result through patches - That's how the autotools are supposed to be used. By not doing so, you are exposing yourselves to the risks of non-determinisic builts and your users to risks of exposing them to mis-built packages. > I > believe the adhere to to the Package Guidelines but its always possible that > I've missed stuff. The FPG doesn't contain a rule mandating it, because certain key-people in Fedora refuse to implement such a rule and prefer to expose people to risks because "it's so convenient". My opinion differs substantially. I conside running the autotools during builts as elementary beginners mistake and refuse to review any package doing so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 13:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031303.n63D3WfG024753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 09:03:31 EDT --- > > > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora. > > > > Why? > Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a "bleeding edge" > distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages. > > IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind. That is your opinion, not mine or others I've spoken to, its not a topic for a bug report. > > > Besides this, I am not excited about how you package your moblin packages. In > > > particular, I consider you to be acting pretty careless wrt. the autotools, > > > NVRs and further details. > > > > What's exactly wrong with them, > You should not run the autotools at build-time, but run them in advance and add > the result through patches - That's how the autotools are supposed to be used. > > By not doing so, you are exposing yourselves to the risks of non-determinisic > builts and your users to risks of exposing them to mis-built packages. But its a much used method within packages. Same as above its not a discussion to be had on a bug report but a discussion to be bought up as a proposed on fedora-devel if you feel strongly about it. > > I > > believe the adhere to to the Package Guidelines but its always possible that > > I've missed stuff. > The FPG doesn't contain a rule mandating it, because certain key-people in > Fedora refuse to implement such a rule and prefer to expose people to risks > because "it's so convenient". > > My opinion differs substantially. I conside running the autotools during builts > as elementary beginners mistake and refuse to review any package doing so. I'm not making you review my package and as you mentioned its your opinion. I don't necessarily disagree but until upstream do proper 'make dist' packages its going to remain the way it is. Its a perfectly valid package as the current packaging requirements. Packaging guidelines discussions are for the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 13:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031335.n63DZJ1T032636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #25 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 09:35:16 EDT --- > Anyhow, I'll ask for the 4th time (comments #6, #10, #17 and #24): AFAICS the only things I didn't directly address directly are as follows: Comment #6 > At least the license file can get into this. > opal-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openh323-devel Fixed in cvs as of Jan 6th > Is openh323 compatible with opal? If yes, you should provide it. No, its not compatible. > * Please package the docs directory. I think it makes more sense to put it in > the -devel package. Fixed in cvs as of Jan 6th > * Shall we package samples and plugins (possibly in different subpackages)? > Note that some plugins have different licenses. Possibly but there's never been a request for them, alot of the samples don't work well so they end up causing more issues than their contribute. Comment #10 > Ok, How about the samples? See comment above. > Btw, currently the "MPEG4 Part 2" plugin is disabled for obvious reasons. Shall > we include it in a freeworld package at rpmfusion? Is there any benefit in > that? Possibly but out of scope for this. Comment #17 Already addressed in other parts of the bug. Comment #24 Already addressed in other parts of the bug. > Anyhow, I'll ask for the 4th time (comments #6, #10, #17 and #24): AFAICS the only things I didn't directly address directly are as follows: Comment #6 > At least the license file can get into this. > opal-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openh323-devel Fixed in cvs as of Jan 6th > Is openh323 compatible with opal? If yes, you should provide it. No, its not compatible. > * Please package the docs directory. I think it makes more sense to put it in > the -devel package. Fixed in cvs as of Jan 6th > * Shall we package samples and plugins (possibly in different subpackages)? > Note that some plugins have different licenses. Possibly but there's never been a request for them, alot of the samples don't work well so they end up causing more issues than their contribute. Comment #10 > Ok, How about the samples? See comment above. > Btw, currently the "MPEG4 Part 2" plugin is disabled for obvious reasons. Shall > we include it in a freeworld package at rpmfusion? Is there any benefit in > that? Possibly, but out of scope for this. Comment #17 Already addressed in other parts of the bug. Comment #24 Already addressed in other parts of the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 13:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031343.n63DhFx9027461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-03 09:43:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Now there is a tarball available. I will update the package and submit the new > files here. Is there an ETA on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 14:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031442.n63Egknl008149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-07-03 10:42:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > > > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora. > > > > > > Why? > > Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a "bleeding edge" > > distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages. > > > > IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind. > > That is your opinion, not mine or others I've spoken to, its not a topic for a > bug report. A package's maturity/quality is topic within a review. > But its a much used method within packages. Yes, these packages and your specs are of low quality. > Packaging guidelines discussions are for the mailing > list. Free free to continue shipping these apparently dysfunctional low quality packages. My advise to reviewers: Do not approve this package in this current shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 15:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031500.n63F0AB4012158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-03 11:00:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > * Summary > > - Now Fedora thinks writing the package name (Coderay) in > > Summary is redundant. > - Where is this written? I didn't see it in packaging guidelines. See the (long) discussion beginning on http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg01484.html especially http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg01676.html and try: $ rpmlint -I name-repeated-in-summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 15:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031510.n63FAc4g020158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-03 11:10:37 EDT --- Please post the full URLs of your spec/srpm files every time you modified them. Also please make it sure that you change the release number of the spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 16:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031617.n63GHQIS000602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gnat-project-common ? files |fedora-gnat-project-common |shared by Ada libraries |? files shared by Ada | |libraries --- Comment #6 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-07-03 12:17:25 EDT --- New version: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common.spec http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > It's a good style to distribute the verbatin text of the license. Of corse this > may be a small file on your case, but in common it's a good idea, because the > user will get the version of the license text which was valid at the time of > publisching of your software. The license text inside the actual project file is also the one that was valid at the time of publishing. Anyway, I've added a license file now. It should at least make it clearer that the license covers all four files. > first, because it's your first release, I have to assume, that this package is > not widely tested and may contains bug. So it's a good idea to beginn the > versioning with a version nummer less the 1.0. That version numbers would contain any information about the quality of the software is an illusion. The amount of bugs depends on how meticulous the programmer is and what measures he takes to avoid bugs, not on the version number. I've seen high-quality software with low version numbers, and garbage with high version numbers. Version numbers should be ordinal numbers ? first, second, third and so on. There is no such ordinal number as "zeroth". I'll call it the zeroth version if I must to get the package approved, not otherwise. > Second, If you have a major and a minor version number you can disting between > greater changes which may introduced new feature or have a API breakage and > minor changes which only fixed bugs. Now that I think about it I can see situations where a minor version number would be useful, so this is the first major version, and the first minor version of that major version, that is version 1.1. (In reply to comment #5) > for the buildroot stuff please keep in mind, that there are the EL-4 and EL5 > branches which based on RHEL 4 and RHEL 5. this releases contains older > releases of rpm because this distributions are designed for a very long > lifecycle in enterprises. When I started making my packages on Fedora 9 I had to hack around all sorts of problems ? broken debuginfo packages, bogus dependencies, bad symlinks and whatnot. Then I found that several of my workarounds were unnecessary on Fedora 10, so I removed them. One more is unnecessary on Fedora 11. To build the packages for EPEL I'd have to insert the workarounds again, and probably run into even more problems. I'll take one step at a time. When the time comes for RHEL 6, maybe I'll be ready to build my packages for EPEL 6 ? which will hopefully not need any more workarounds than Fedora 11 (nor buildroot tags) ? but for now Fedora 10 and 11 is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 16:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031621.n63GLQ8i028227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #1 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-07-03 12:21:25 EDT --- Updated to require fedora-gnat-project-common: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/PragmARC.spec http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/PragmARC-20060427-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 16:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031648.n63Gm27w000713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-07-03 12:48:01 EDT --- Hmm, has this package been brought to attention of Fedora's GCC maintainers or upstream GCC? I am having strong doubts on whether this package is required at all, useful or correct, for several reasons: * gnat has been multilib'ed in gcc. * the profile.d scripts pollute the envionment. ... however my knowledge on gnat is rather limited ... Finally, this spec looks really bewildering to me - The %global _GNAT_project_dir ... line This can be done very much efficient during a %build - We do not support translations in *.specs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 17:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031744.n63HikP4017056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-03 13:44:45 EDT --- spec/srpm seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 17:54:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031754.n63HshHn018934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-03 13:54:41 EDT --- Your srpm does not build on dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1453152 By the way please make it sure that you change the release number of your spec file every time you modify your spec file (and post the URLs of new spec/srpm files) to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 18:52:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031852.n63IqZaT025440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-03 14:52:34 EDT --- Rahul: if you're reviewing this, please set the bug status to assigned and change the fedora-review tag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031906.n63J6jb1028337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #8 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-07-03 15:06:44 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this rpm. The problem is with version mismatch of automake. Should I call libtool manually, like in the first version, i.e. ./libtool --mode=install install -m 755 xyconv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} or rather run more autotools after changing Makefile.am? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031932.n63JWiqJ018980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:32:43 EDT --- acheck-0.5.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031933.n63JXCOl019099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:33:11 EDT --- flickcurl-1.10-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031934.n63JYaVG011272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:34:35 EDT --- acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031935.n63JZ2A7012898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:35:01 EDT --- python-AppTools-3.2.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031935.n63JZXLw013816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:35:32 EDT --- python-EnvisageCore-3.1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031934.n63JYfw0011539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3.1-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031936.n63JaJpK014902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.1m-2.fc9 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031943.n63Jh2kD027782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031941.n63JfFGA026154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.4-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63Je4tN023786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:40:03 EDT --- php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-parsekit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63Jes5x025605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:40:53 EDT --- awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update awesfx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7333 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031942.n63JgK76022292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:42:19 EDT --- php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JehJI021828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:40:42 EDT --- python-EnvisagePlugins-3.1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031941.n63JfAM3022035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:41:09 EDT --- libint-1.1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JexYo021912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:40:58 EDT --- python-EnvisageCore-3.1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031943.n63JhFrT022500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.4-4.fc10 |3.0.4-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031942.n63Jgu2D022447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:42:55 EDT --- ldd-pdf-3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031944.n63JijIZ022923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1m-2.fc11 |1.0.1m-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031943.n63JhlgQ022634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1.0_66-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JeZMh021785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.4-4.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JeO12021733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031944.n63JifRv022889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:44:40 EDT --- php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JelH2021867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.1.0-1.fc9 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031944.n63JiT8S022846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:44:28 EDT --- sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031943.n63JhZIB022588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:43:33 EDT --- skanlite-0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update skanlite'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 18:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031801.n63I133n025050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #26 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-03 14:01:02 EDT --- Thanks for the report. As it has been a while since I did the review and the package has been updated many times since, I made a quick check about the current status: * There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now. * rpmlint on the installed package complains: $ rpmlint opal opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libdl.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libsasl2.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/liblber-2.4.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.8 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libz.so.1 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libexpat.so.1 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libresolv.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand? * There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is considered as file duplication. * %configure --prefix=/usr Please use the %{_prefix} macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031947.n63Jlla1032276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:47:46 EDT --- acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031947.n63Jlpvx032310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.1-2.fc10 |0.3.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031943.n63Jhg1r028974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:43:41 EDT --- pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031943.n63JhAN6027912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:43:09 EDT --- python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031945.n63JjD5f031487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.1-3.fc9 |3.0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031944.n63JiHiw030138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:44:16 EDT --- python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031944.n63JiYtN030778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc10 |0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031947.n63Jlf89032236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.5.1-5.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031944.n63JiMjJ030325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.1-3.fc9 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031946.n63JkOc7031896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.3-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031946.n63Jk4N8031793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:46:03 EDT --- awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update awesfx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031947.n63Jlw9L024572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:47:57 EDT --- python-AppTools-3.2.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031947.n63JlacU024451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:47:35 EDT --- dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031948.n63Jm3tm024608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2.0-1.fc11 |3.2.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031945.n63Jj9Qk023363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:45:08 EDT --- python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031946.n63JkK3Z024090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:46:19 EDT --- wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031950.n63Jo1dQ025463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:50:00 EDT --- wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031946.n63JkV2E024151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:46:30 EDT --- miredo-1.1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update miredo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031945.n63JjiUl023841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:45:43 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqrMT001878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:52:53 EDT --- flickcurl-1.10-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqWg9001750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:52:31 EDT --- python-EnvisagePlugins-3.1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqmUm001843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-3.fc11 |1.10-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031951.n63JpGZm001478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.0-1.fc9 |3.1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqbZp001788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.0-1.fc10 |3.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031951.n63Jp0J9001410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:50:59 EDT --- dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031950.n63JoJPD001166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1.0_66-3.fc11 |2.1.0_66-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031950.n63Jo6hx001022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.3-3.fc11 |1.2.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031950.n63JoECK025866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:50:13 EDT --- pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63Jqh6K027178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:52:42 EDT --- flickcurl-1.10-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031954.n63JsvrT027729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:54:57 EDT --- acheck-0.5.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63Jq9f2026988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:52:09 EDT --- dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63Jqvnh027239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-3.fc9 |1.10-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031951.n63Jp5mO026508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.1-5.fc10 |0.5.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031951.n63JpMq1026659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:51:21 EDT --- ldd-pdf-3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031951.n63JpBOm026550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:51:10 EDT --- python-EnvisagePlugins-3.1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqLTZ027063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:52:20 EDT --- python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031954.n63Jsowc027687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2.0-1.fc9 |3.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqFdC027029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.1-5.fc11 |0.5.1-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031952.n63JqQeA027108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.1-3.fc11 |3.0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031951.n63JpRbF026707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0-3.fc11 |3.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 20:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032002.n63K2pia008902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-03 16:02:50 EDT --- I finally found some time to make it back to this package; sorry for taking so long. This one builds fine and rpmlint is silent. Generally there's no point in mentioning the name of the package in the summary. There's a group trying to clean these up; there's little point in adding another for them to fix. It would be nice to elaborate just a bit in the %description. One gets the impression that this package is something akin to mysqlclient, but in reality it's very far from that. I'd at least mention that it can parse log files and allow you to make sql-like queries on them. I'm supposed to ask you to bug upstream to include the text of the license. In this case I guess I'm just bugging you directly. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: a5aa0e8a938f786cd78678cae98f0033565a95b4cc80af36d052244b73b542d8 squeal-0.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary could use a tweak. ? description could use some elaboration. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: squeal = 0.4-3.fc12 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 python-augeas * %check is not present; no upstream test suite. I installed and tested this a bit and it seems to work fine. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031936.n63JaEfL020302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:36:13 EDT --- php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 20:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032004.n63K424p030646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #10 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-07-03 16:04:01 EDT --- Jussi, I'm just wondering why changing Makefile.am is preferred to calling ./libtool --mode=install install ... The latter seems more portable to me. I couldn't find anything about it in Fedora guides. Marcin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JeUuu025018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:40:29 EDT --- python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031937.n63Jb1ZL020466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:37:01 EDT --- python-EnvisageCore-3.1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031942.n63JgPF7027597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1m-2.fc9 |1.0.1m-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031941.n63JfM4C026344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:41:21 EDT --- libint-1.1.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031938.n63JcVC9020790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:38:30 EDT --- perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031940.n63JeJLM024621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:40:18 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031936.n63Ja3UQ014525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:36:02 EDT --- perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031937.n63Jb6Pi016131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.0-1.fc10 |3.1.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031941.n63Jf4Mc025857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.0-1.fc9 |3.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 20:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032009.n63K9eTl011939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-03 16:09:39 EDT --- It's because it isn't supposed to be used that way. It defeats the whole purpose of autotools: a simple(ish) way of configuring and building software on many platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031935.n63JZj1L014096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:35:43 EDT --- sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 20:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032010.n63KAmDs032202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #17 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-07-03 16:10:47 EDT --- Good news. Upstream made requested changes(renaming libraries) so I had a chance to create new packages. Please review and let me know if there is anything else that needs changing. SPEC: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC.spec RPM: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm SRPM: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm DEVEL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-devel-1.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm 830c2a3d2ac694ac23900f35805e8ff4 bnIRC-1.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm 050865e2fcf07c2bc9c8e210392231fe bnIRC-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm cfb5e3af3f1f2f5403c1b4ba0381e68b bnIRC-devel-1.1.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031938.n63JcaLw020832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.11-2.fc10 |0.11-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031955.n63Jt2to003073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.1-2.fc11 |0.5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031954.n63JsjQU002702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:54:44 EDT --- python-AppTools-3.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031941.n63JfRjL026469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.4-1.fc10 |1.1.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031933.n63JXHEB019140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.10-3.fc11 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031932.n63JWmtU019024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.5.1-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031935.n63JZckw020098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.1.0-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031935.n63JZ7oS019792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.2.0-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031936.n63Ja8K0020270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.11-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031935.n63JZoX8014222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031937.n63JbpcO017299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:37:50 EDT --- miredo-1.1.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update miredo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7318 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031937.n63JbIUo016437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:37:16 EDT --- php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-parsekit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7312 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031931.n63JVZqc018732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-03 15:31:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks for looking at this rpm. > > The problem is with version mismatch of automake. Should I call libtool > manually, like in the first version, i.e. > ./libtool --mode=install install -m 755 xyconv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} > > or rather run more autotools after changing Makefile.am? The first option is of course to get upstream to change the makefile to install the binary by default. The second one is to run more autotools. (The third one is requiring the necessary version of automake to build the package. Automake 1.10 doesn't seem to be available on F12, though...) Funny, I tried the build with F11 which has the same version of automake as F12, so there shouldn't be any problem with that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031956.n63JuTvc028979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:56:28 EDT --- python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031956.n63Ju882028835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 15:56:08 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031956.n63JuXuQ004279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.4-4.fc9 |3.0.4-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 19:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907031956.n63JuDIt028890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.0-1.fc11 |0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 20:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504641] Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032043.n63Khm6U018502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-03 16:43:47 EDT --- This is somewhat trivial; nobody's looked at it in a while so I'll tale a look. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 10e0a8d03f504f93ee4b9178c86f1882ac718e76d427602b1f9e10653cde0dde sendxmpp-0.0.8.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: sendxmpp = 0.0.8-2.fc12 = /usr/bin/perl perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Net::XMPP) perl(strict) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I don't really have a way to test this since I don't use jabber. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 21:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 17:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sK1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032129.n63LTkKp014562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sk1 - |Review Request: sK1 - |illustration program |illustration program |similar to corel draw or |similar to corel draw or |adobe illustrator |adobe illustrator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 22:11:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032211.n63MB3xB022403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #27 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-03 18:11:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > > * %configure --prefix=/usr > Please use the %{_prefix} macro Actually, just the %configure macro should be enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 22:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032228.n63MSn9S025476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #8 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-07-03 18:28:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hmm, has this package been brought to attention of Fedora's GCC maintainers or > upstream GCC? Well, it blocks review request 509159, which depends on bug 507247, which is a bug in GCC that I hope at least Jakub Jelinek is aware of. Other than that I haven't contacted the GCC maintainers yet. It's quite possible that some or all of this package ought to be included in the gcc-gnat package eventually, but I felt that it would be more flexible to make a separate package initially. If I find, as I continue packaging Ada software, that I need another RPM macro or project file variable, then I can add it to this package quickly without requiring an update to GCC. When my approach has stabilized and proven itself functional, as I hope it will, then it may be time to merge it into the gcc-gnat package, or even upstream GCC. > * gnat has been multilib'ed in gcc. I want to use GNAT project files to make Ada libraries easy to use. The project files have to reference architecture-specific library files in either /usr/lib or /usr/lib64. That means either the project files have to be architecture-specific, or else a single project file must be made to change its behaviour depending on the architecture. Architecture-specific project files would have to be placed in architecture-specific directories, so that both versions could be installed simultaneously in a multilib environment. Then GNAT would have to look for project files in the one or the other directory, not depending on which version of GNAT is installed, but depending on which architecture it's compiling for at the moment. As far as I can see, GNAT has no support for that. Therefore I chose the other approach, to make the project files adapt to the architecture. Rather than duplicating the code to do that in each project file, they should import common.gpr. > * the profile.d scripts pollute the envionment. They do, and I'm not happy about it. It's not even a complete solution as (I think) they're effective only in interactive shells. Nonetheless it's the best solution I could find. I can't invoke uname from common.gpr because GNAT project files have no shell-out feature. I thought I had found the solution when I saw the variable HOSTTYPE, but apparently Bash doesn't export that to child processes, and it's not affected by setarch. At least these scripts will pollute the environment only for programmers who install -devel packages that depend on this package. > Finally, this spec looks really bewildering to me > - The %global _GNAT_project_dir ... line > This can be done very much efficient during a %build I agree that it's ugly but I figured that the SPOT rule was more important. This directory is already defined twice, in macros.gnat in this package, and somewhere in the GCC source. I didn't want to add a third location by hard-coding it in the spec file. How do you mean it should be done in %build? By defining the directory in the spec file and writing it to macros.gnat during %build? I considered that but then the "upstream project" wouldn't contain the complete source code, which I found a bit weird. I can do it that way however, if it's deemed preferable. > - We do not support translations in *.specs Then why do I find this SHOULD item on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines? "The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available." How else do you think translations should be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 22:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032247.n63Ml3lk028882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 --- Comment #1 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-07-03 18:47:01 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [OK] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] [OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [OK] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] [??] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] Here is the rpmlint after building in mock against -devel [JKnife at Lappy result]$ rpmlint libqinfinity-1.0-0.1.b3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [JKnife at Lappy result]$ rpmlint libqinfinity-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.b3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [JKnife at Lappy result]$ rpmlint libqinfinity-devel-1.0-0.1.b3.fc12.x86_64.rpm libqinfinity-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 22:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032254.n63Ms4dX030061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 22:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032250.n63MovtO029591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-07-03 18:50:56 EDT --- Spec file looks good. However will not build on Koji. See build log here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1453471&name=build.log When you have a SRPM that builds let me know and I'll finish the review. Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 22:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032253.n63MrmqD010877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 --- Comment #2 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-07-03 18:53:47 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 23:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032302.n63N2889012476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-03 19:02:07 EDT --- FYI, another of your documentation packages seems to have spawned some discussion about the admissibility of, well, some class of documentation-only packages (or packages containing books) that nobody seems able to define but which this package seems to fall into. The fact that nobody ever complained about diveintopython, or python-docs for that matter, was all the justification I needed to approve this, but this discussion has shown that it's at least prudent to wait to see what comes of the discussion. So at this point I'd approve this if I knew the rules weren't going to change. If nothing happens at the next FESCo meeting (on the 10th) then I'll move forward with this. Unfortunately there was no meeting today due to the US independence holiday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 23:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032306.n63N6ViW013408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-03 19:06:30 EDT --- Did you have any response to the above review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 02:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 22:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040205.n6425FXk029549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 22:05:13 EDT --- python-stomper-0.2.2-8.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-stomper-0.2.2-8.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 02:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 22:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040242.n642g5CE004853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 --- Comment #5 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-03 22:42:04 EDT --- All right, almost a year later things are finally in place to have this in Fedora. :) Here's the latest spec and srpm: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/pathfinder.spec http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/pathfinder-1.0.0-0.2.fc11.src.rpm All the above issues should be fixed. It builds and works on x86_64. The patches that are applied in this RPM have all been submitted upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 03:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040321.n643Lo8m012180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 23:21:49 EDT --- python-stomper-0.2.2-8.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-stomper-0.2.2-8.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 03:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509609] New: Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 Summary: Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: herlo1 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mediawiki-rss.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mediawiki-rss-1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: mediawiki-rss is an extension to mediawiki that provides an rss tag and several options associated with rss feeds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 03:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040340.n643eUoP015170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #2 from John Guthrie 2009-07-03 23:40:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi John, > > I was going to do a full review, however I've stumbled upon some major issues. > Please can you solve them first before I do the complete review? > > - the package contains a rather old snaphost from 1/2008 - can you package a > newer snapshot e.g. from 6/2009? Not done yet. Should be finished in a couple of days. > - rpmlint reveals 139 warnings and errors, especially: Doh! I think I must have run rpmlint on the specfile and then absent-mindedly forgotten to check the RPM that I had just built. Here is the latest output from rpmlint: ewl.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libewl.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ewl-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > * formatting fo the description Fixed > * lots of example *.c files in the main package (they should be in the devel > package) Fixed. > * static libraries were packaged - usually they should be completely omitted > unless there is a reason: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries Fixed. > * if the %post/%postun section only contains one line, it should be written > like this: > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig Fixed. > - using %ghost for *.so.x should not be necessary, > %{_libdir}/*.so.* should be sufficient Is this true even when the file is a symlink created by the %post section. My thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post section, so they should be ghosted. > - pkgconfig must be required by the devel pacakge since *.pc is packaged One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is /usr/bin/pkg-config. Is that not sufficient? > - probably the tests should be moved into the devel package, too > > > Best regards, > Christian I haven't posted the latest package. I'll be posting it once I get a new version of the software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 04:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 00:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509609] Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040424.n644Ofeg003114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 --- Comment #1 from Clint Savage 2009-07-04 00:24:40 EDT --- rpmlint SPECS/mediawiki-rss.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/mediawiki-rss-1.5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm mediawiki-rss.noarch: W: invalid-license Unknown 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Working on getting the license data updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 05:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 01:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040537.n645bPKo015093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #16 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-04 01:37:22 EDT --- Updated tarball in SRPM as well as added license tag recommended in comment 12 Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd.spec SRPM URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd-3.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1453720 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 06:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 02:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509619] New: Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509619 Summary: Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/srtp/srtp.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/srtp/srtp-1.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The libSRTP library is an open source implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) originally authored by Cisco Systems, Inc. SRTP is a security profile for RTP that adds confidentiality, message authentication, and replay protection to that protocol. It is specified in RFC 3711. More information about the SRTP protocol itself can be found on the Secure RTP page. Author: -------- David A. McGrew , Cisco Systems, Inc. l@@k -> http://www.callweaver.org/wiki/TCP+TLS+SRTP https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=5413 koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1453779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 06:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 02:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040627.n646RKgP023524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #6 from Liang Suilong 2009-07-04 02:27:19 EDT --- Ping? Does anyone continue to do package review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 07:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 03:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040742.n647gjeD023374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-04 03:42:44 EDT --- > * There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now. I'm aware of it but I'm waiting for the new version of ekiga that will work with it. > * rpmlint on the installed package complains: > > $ rpmlint opal > opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 > /lib64/libdl.so.2 > > This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand? I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now fixed. [perobinson at neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal* ../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [perobinson at neo SPECS]$ > * There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc > file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is > considered as file duplication. Removed the extra copy of the licence in devel > * %configure --prefix=/usr > Please use the %{_prefix} macro Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to specify the prefix :-) You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3 http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 07:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 03:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907040753.n647rPCV005614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause 2009-07-04 03:53:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - the package contains a rather old snaphost from 1/2008 - can you package a > > newer snapshot e.g. from 6/2009? > > Not done yet. Should be finished in a couple of days. I've just had a deeper look into the download directories of enlightenment and unfortunately even if there are newer snaphot directories, they don't always contain all packages, only the updated ones. And indeed version 0.5.2.042 seems to be the most recent one... I'm sorry for this - I should have looked more carefully yesterday... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 10:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041038.n64AchcD021036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 --- Comment #17 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-04 06:38:39 EDT --- I've posted an updated package here, informally: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/ New release, added javadocs etc. I did not attempt to address everything in comment #14 (and for example I don't know if a JAR symlink would be a good thing), but hopefully this saves Colin Walters some time. Feel free to check/fix/repost it for review. Also, I put the examples in the -javadoc package, which isn't really correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 10:38:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041038.n64AciZU001270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #8 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-04 06:38:41 EDT --- Moblin (the distro) version 2.0 beta has been released, so it seems reasonable to package the individual components for rawhide now. If these shows up automatically on GNOME logins then it's a bug that breaks existing functionality, where functionality means "a GNOME desktop that is not cluttered with broken and irrelevant icons". In that case I agree that it should be a priority to fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 11:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 07:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041147.n64BlNtx000377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 11:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 07:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041146.n64BkvAO032700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 11:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 07:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041159.n64BxEsK015232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-07-04 07:59:12 EDT --- > My thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post > section, so they should be ghosted. We run ldconfig primarily to update the dynamic linker's cache file. ldconfig creates the *.so.N symlink, if it isn't present already (or it changes it, if a newer library version is found). However, the *.so.1 symlink ought to be included in your package already. If "make install ..." doesn't create it, you can do it yourself: %install ... make install ... /sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ > One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is > /usr/bin/pkg-config. Is that not sufficient? It is, but only for Fedora >= 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 12:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 08:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041229.n64CTm66007551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-04 08:29:47 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 12:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 08:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041231.n64CVFiX020793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-04 08:31:15 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 12:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 08:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Build eclipse-phpeclipse for EPEL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041241.n64Cf4m8022366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth 2009-07-04 08:41:03 EDT --- Unfortunately, one of the dependencies is missing (htmlparser) so I've sent an email to the maintainer asking for an EL5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 14:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041416.n64EG56k006689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-04 10:16:03 EDT --- Some more comments: * URL should be http://trash-cli.googlecode.com/ * License is GPLv2+, take a look at the headers of the scripts ("...any later version"). * Try to preserve timestamps when modifying files in %prep. Can be done similar to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 * Timestamp of Source0 does not match * Most of the docs are missing, at least AUTHORS and COPYING *must* to be included in the package * What's the use of this? install -d $(dirname %{buildroot}%{_mandir}) mv %{buildroot}/usr/man %{buildroot}%{_mandir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 14:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041422.n64EMgBl007705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-04 10:22:41 EDT --- Updated to the latest upstream release - 0.0.13 SPEC: as above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anerley-0.0.13-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 14:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041431.n64EVqCV028918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #10 from vivek shah 2009-07-04 10:31:49 EDT --- Pong. Sorry about the long delay. I have updated the package to the new version 1.0.6. Can someone please check if the bug exists for x86_64 for the new upstream release as well. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnujump.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnujump-1.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 14:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041444.n64EiU0U030930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #12 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-07-04 10:44:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > It's because it isn't supposed to be used that way. It defeats the whole > purpose of autotools: a simple(ish) way of configuring and building software on > many platforms. Sorry, but do you really mean that using well-documented, portable libtool script "defeats the whole purpose of autotools"? It's much more elegant way than hacking Makefile.am and running autotools. If for some reasons using libtool is not recommended in fedora project (but I haven't seen such a statement in docs and there is a number of specs in fedora CVS that _are_ using libtool in this way), the second most portable way is to just call install. Marcin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 15:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041543.n64Fhv5l008816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 15:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041543.n64FhbkS008751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |linuxdonald at linuxdonald.de Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 16:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 12:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041632.n64GWZk0017368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #19 from Mat Booth 2009-07-04 12:32:33 EDT --- Bit of an update: - Update to 2.0.17. - Add OSGI manifest info to the runtime jar. - Bundle generator docs with the generator in the main package. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 17:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041702.n64H2ocs002731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-07-04 13:02:49 EDT --- > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > sh ./build > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} >>> > %clean > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %buildroot, not both at once. > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} > cp -p README gpl.txt %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} You could simply include them with %doc in the %files section: %doc README gpl.txt > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 > gzip sap.1 > cp -p sap.1.gz %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 Install it uncompressed, and rpmbuild will compress it automatically. > %{_mandir}/man1/sap.1.gz Here prefer %{_mandir}/man1/sap.1.* as automatic compression of manual pages makes it possible to replace gzip with a different compressor any time. > %doc > %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} > %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README > %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/gpl.txt These lines can be deleted in favour of the "%doc README gpl.txt" mentioned above. > License: GPLv3 Actually the source files say it's "GPLv3+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 17:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041756.n64HutUt031406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #2 from Julian Aloofi 2009-07-04 13:56:54 EDT --- Thanks for the correction. I updated the spec file and rebuilt the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 17:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041758.n64HwQGc011522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |luya at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 18:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509658] New: Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Summary: Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josephsmidt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/h5py.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/h5py-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Please Review: The h5py package provides both a high- and low-level interface to the HDF5 library from Python. rpmlint gives no warnings or errors. Builds cleanly on f-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454385 Builds cleanly on f-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454390 Builds cleanly on f-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454405 on all archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 18:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041816.n64IGAaJ014972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 18:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041816.n64IG9aG014947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josephsmidt at gmail.com Depends on| |509658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 18:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041820.n64IKFId015728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |luya at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 19:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041913.n64JD4DK012058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-07-04 15:13:03 EDT --- + both binary and source package passed rpmlint test $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + The package is correctly named according to Packaging Name Guideline ruby-icon-artist + spec file %{name} matches the package - Is %find_lang needed for this kind of package? If so, it should be included for future translation. + Package is licensed under LGPL2+ + COPYING which is a license file is linked under %doc + SPEC file is in American English and legible + Source used to build package matches upstream source through md5. f5ebfea7ab6ecd4d97b1953f6cb53e97 + Package succesfully built and compiled -- $ rpmbuild --rebuild ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm Installing ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm warning: user mso does not exist - using root warning: group mso does not exist - using root warning: user mso does not exist - using root warning: group mso does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.484N5P + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf icon-artist-0.1.90 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/luya/rpmbuild/SOURCES/icon-artist-0.1.90.tar.bz2 + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd icon-artist-0.1.90 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.z9uWzt + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd icon-artist-0.1.90 + export 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686' + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686' + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ISNvd7 + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd icon-artist-0.1.90 + rm -rf /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386 + DESTDIR=/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386 + ./install.rb + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DHMDIL + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd icon-artist-0.1.90 + exit 0 Processing files: ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.noarch Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DX4wjq + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd icon-artist-0.1.90 + DOCDIR=/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90 + /bin/mkdir -p /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90 + cp -pr doc/AUTHORS doc/classes doc/COPYING doc/created.rid doc/CREDITS doc/files doc/fr_class_index.html doc/fr_file_index.html doc/fr_method_index.html doc/index.html doc/rdoc-style.css /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90 + exit 0 Provides: ruby(icon-artist) = 0.1.90 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386 warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: muamba.benashima Wrote: /home/luya/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6ZJNKK + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd icon-artist-0.1.90 + rm -rf /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386 + exit 0 Executing(--clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.G4Nh9p + umask 022 + cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf icon-artist-0.1.90 + exit 0 --- + All dependencies are listed in spec file such as ruby Those are initial reviews. I will work further once the listed issue is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 19:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907041927.n64JRhn5027104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sourada 2009-07-04 15:27:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Is %find_lang needed for this kind of package? If so, it should be included > for future translation. In the future most likely yes, but as of now it does not support translations, so %find_lang is superfluous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 20:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] New: Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Summary: Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-1.r3/tremfusion.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-1.r3/tremfusion-0.99-1.r3.fc11.src.rpm Description: TremFusion is an enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 21:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 17:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042104.n64L4kea031273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-07-04 17:04:45 EDT --- Here is further review + Permissions on files are properly set with the use of %defattr(...) line. + Package has a %clean section containing rm -fr %{buildroot} + Use of macros is consistent + Package contains code + There is no large documentation + Files inside %doc do not affect runtime + No header files nor static libraries + No .la libtool archives + Package does not contain GUI application + Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, package has rm -rf %{buildroot} + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Before approval, would you mind to give the list of command for ruby-icon-artists and what does it do in Inkscape? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 21:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 17:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042108.n64L85iP011852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-07-04 17:08:04 EDT --- Scratch builds: dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454508 dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454480 dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 21:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 17:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042105.n64L5e8c011584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org --- Comment #35 from Ian Weller 2009-07-04 17:05:34 EDT --- What's the status on this, Callum? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 21:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 17:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] New: Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife_ma at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/compat-libgdamm.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: this package provides compat libs for libgdamm-3.0.1 from fedora 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 22:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042216.n64MGqEk011757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2009-07-04 18:16:51 EDT --- You will need to fix this. [leigh at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint '/home/leigh/Desktop/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm' error checking signature of /home/leigh/Desktop/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm compat-libgdamm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 27, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [leigh at localhost Desktop]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 22:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509609] Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042231.n64MVL92014191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ian at ianweller.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ian at ianweller.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-07-04 18:31:20 EDT --- I'll take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 22:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509673] New: Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509673 Summary: Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/bastet-0.43-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bastet stands for "bastard tetris", and is a simple ncurses-based Tetris(R) clone for Linux. Unlike normal Tetris(R), however, Bastet does not choose your next brick at random. Instead, it uses a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible. As you can imagine, playing Bastet can be a very frustrating experience! Checked both spec and srpm with rpmlint. No errors for the spec and the srpm throws up just one warning: [steve at laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bastet-0.43-1.fc10.src.rpm bastet.src: E: summary-too-long Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I don't know how i can make the summary any shorter. Thanks for your time, cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 23:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 19:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042311.n64NBXHv021078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #10 from Alan Dunn 2009-07-04 19:11:30 EDT --- It seems like a potential solution for now is to disable the X-Symbol functionality. Since I've used Proof General for a little bit now at least, it seems that the X-Symbol functionality is rather minor compared to the total functionality of the package: It's merely used to render "nicer versions" of symbols for certain provers. (Eg: in Coq mode, it will turn "->" into an actual arrow) The functionality seems to be disabled by default, so it won't prevent the package from being used. I have a version which excludes the X-Symbol part at SPEC: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral.spec SRPM: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Additionally, I looked at the Debian package for Proof General. It seems that their support for X-Symbol in Proof General just suggests that X-Symbol should be installed, and they have no package for it. (Actually, it seems they did at some point and it was removed: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00964.html) I'll also note that it seems that X-Symbol upstream is also dead; the last version was released in 2003 and no fixes/updates seem forthcoming. One thing that's new is that the package doesn't seem to build in the version of xemacs that's now in F12. The logs reveal (from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1450936): xemacs --batch --no-site-file -q -eval '(setq load-path (append (mapcar (lambda (d) (concat "/builddir/build/BUILD/ProofGeneral-3.7.1/" (symbol-name d))) (quote (acl2 ccc coq demoisa hol98 isar lclam lego pgshell phox plastic twelf generic lib mmm))) load-path))' -f batch-byte-compile phox/phox.el Compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/ProofGeneral-3.7.1/phox/phox.el... While compiling toplevel forms in file /builddir/build/BUILD/ProofGeneral-3.7.1/phox/phox.el: !! Wrong type argument ((arrayp #s(char-table type generic data ()))) Done >>Error occurred processing phox/phox.el: Wrong type argument: arrayp, #s(char-table type generic data ()) However, things seem to be fine in F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1450956 I'll look at this part now; just thought I'd post where I am on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 23:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 19:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042354.n64NsSSR007916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at lonetwin.net --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-04 19:54:26 EDT --- *** Bug 509673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 4 23:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 19:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509673] Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907042354.n64NsRC4007882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509673 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-04 19:54:26 EDT --- This is already in Fedora. Please check the package database next time before you submit. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 503519 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 00:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 20:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050008.n6508wUc030569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Peter Gordon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 00:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 20:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050008.n6508HML010376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Peter Gordon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Alias| |tremfusion Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Gordon 2009-07-04 20:08:16 EDT --- I haven't checked it thoroughly enough to be certain, but it seems to build against its own local (in-tarball) copies of zlib, libjpeg, and libspeex. These should be changed to build against and use the system copies of the libraries. Other comments, and a full review to come shortly. (Thanks for packaging this, by the way! =]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 01:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 21:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050129.n651TXW7023742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #10 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-04 21:29:32 EDT --- Updated SPEC URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/pypoppler.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/pypoppler-0.10.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 04:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050442.n654gRaq023507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #6 from John Guthrie 2009-07-05 00:42:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > My thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post > > section, so they should be ghosted. > > We run ldconfig primarily to update the dynamic linker's cache file. ldconfig > creates the *.so.N symlink, if it isn't present already (or it changes it, if a > newer library version is found). However, the *.so.1 symlink ought to be > included in your package already. If "make install ..." doesn't create it, you > can do it yourself: > > %install > ... > make install ... > /sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ Fair enough. Fixed. > > One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is > > /usr/bin/pkg-config. Is that not sufficient? > > It is, but only for Fedora >= 11. Fixed for Fedora <= 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 04:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050441.n654f3wh010978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #5 from John Guthrie 2009-07-05 00:41:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - probably the tests should be moved into the devel package, too Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 04:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050446.n654kisF024271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #7 from John Guthrie 2009-07-05 00:46:43 EDT --- I have posted a new version of the package. It adds a pkgconfig requirement to the devel package if running on Fedora 10 or earlier. Here is the rpmlint output: ewl.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libewl.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 ewl-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Here are the relevant URLs for the new version: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 06:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050604.n6564eP0025188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-07-05 02:04:39 EDT --- Amanieu (upstream lead) told me that the copy of libjpeg in the tarball is a modified version, specific to Trem{ulous,Fusion}. So we need to build against the tarball version. The system copy of zlib works fine, but there's a version mismatch between libspeex in the tarball and libspeex in speex-devel that makes the package not build. However upstream told me to kill the VoIP feature (the only thing that uses libspeex) because it's broken, so that's not a problem anymore ;) And so: * Thu Jun 4 2009 Ian Weller 0.99-2.r3 - Use system version of zlib - Disable VoIP at upstream's request since it's broken Spec and SRPM in http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-2.r3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 06:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050600.n6560uPh024770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #29 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-05 02:00:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > > > * rpmlint on the installed package complains: > > > > $ rpmlint opal > > opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 > > /lib64/libdl.so.2 > > > > This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand? > > I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now > fixed. > > [perobinson at neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal* > ../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm > 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > [perobinson at neo SPECS]$ > Yes, but you can also run rpmlint against installed packages, which may show other flaws if there are any. One of these flaws that doesn't show up when you run rpmlint against the actual rpm files is the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warning. Just simply run $ rpmlint opal and you will see > > * %configure --prefix=/usr > > Please use the %{_prefix} macro > > Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to > specify the prefix :-) > Nice. Btw, %configure should define the prefix for you among other things. You can run $ rpm -E %configure to see what else it defines. > You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor > changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3 > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup All good. I'll go over the package one last time and let you know if there's anything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 08:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 04:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050824.n658Og8C029480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #30 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-05 04:24:41 EDT --- > Yes, but you can also run rpmlint against installed packages, which may show > other flaws if there are any. One of these flaws that doesn't show up when you > run rpmlint against the actual rpm files is the unused-direct-shlib-dependency > warning. > > Just simply run > $ rpmlint opal > and you will see And you get those errors for glib2 and others as well. I don't see it as a blocker. > All good. I'll go over the package one last time and let you know if there's > anything else. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051036.n65AaBap019776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:36:09 EDT --- ping, what's the status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051035.n65AZZ0t019716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:35:33 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051036.n65AaUbS008481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:36:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051037.n65AbJFU008547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:37:17 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:36:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051036.n65AaL64008442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:36:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051037.n65AbjOh008614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:37:44 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051037.n65AbVCd008583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:37:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051036.n65Aa1nJ008298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:35:59 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503148] Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051038.n65Acmmq020000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503148 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:38:47 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051040.n65AeO0L020540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:39:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051040.n65AeOkl020545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:39:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051040.n65AenwS020631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:40:48 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051040.n65AeSCu020579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #43 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:39:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051040.n65AeOdW009216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:39:36 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 10:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051040.n65AebkS009253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:40:34 EDT --- ping, have you done any other submissions or informal package reviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 11:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 07:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051150.n65BoSj8020804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #20 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 07:50:27 EDT --- Shakthi, this is NOT serious. You have not yet build the package on the build system. It is already 2 weeks since you committed. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/mcu8051ide Is there any blocker I am not aware of ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051205.n65C5fC0003048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051206.n65C6IAa003145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-07-05 08:06:16 EDT --- Minor error: $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-ekg-0.4.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm python-ekg.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ekg/migration/manage.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Suggest to remove the shebang from that file if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051205.n65C56jI002793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #21 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-07-05 08:05:03 EDT --- After discussion on the Fedora-MinGW mailing list ( http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001739.html ) we decided that it's okay to keep the commented out blocks and -tools subpackage if that's what the packager desires. Now that's cleared up we can continue with the review. $ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer.spec mingw32-gstreamer.spec:196: E: files-attr-not-set mingw32-gstreamer.spec:553: W: macro-in-%changelog doc mingw32-gstreamer.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 7) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer-* mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: description-line-too-long The mingw32-gstreamer-static package contains static library for mingw32-gstreamer development. mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcontroller-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbase-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstdataprotocol-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstnet-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gstreamer-tools.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized common tools and files for GStreamer streaming media framework mingw32-gstreamer-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. All these rpmlint messages need to be fixed with the exception of the arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object and no-documentation ones (as they're false positives for the mingw32 toolchain). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051207.n65C7dGJ023941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-07-05 08:07:37 EDT --- The URL http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm gives me a 404 right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051219.n65CJE2j026145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #36 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 08:19:11 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as LICENSE - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051219.n65CJWXv005640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051220.n65CK7oR006000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-07-05 08:20:05 EDT --- This package doesn't compile on my Fedora 11 environment using rpmbuild: libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -o .libs/RGBtoYUV411.exe RGBtoYUV411.o common/libconv_common.a ../../libdirac_common/.libs/libdirac_common.a libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -o .libs/RGBtoYUV420.exe RGBtoYUV420.o common/libconv_common.a ../../libdirac_common/.libs/libdirac_common.a common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:62: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:54: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [RGBtoYUV420.exe] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:62: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:54: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [RGBtoYUV411.exe] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502691] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051229.n65CTXDY007495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-07-05 08:29:32 EDT --- This package fails while executing the ./configure command on both my F11 x86_64 notebook and on Koji: checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed and: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1454965&name=build.log I think it's caused by an ancient version of the autotools which was used to generate the ./configure script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051242.n65CgKOn030501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #69 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 08:42:17 EDT --- Give me your latest spec & srpm, I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051247.n65ClrVt010774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 08:47:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think I got this done. I replaced the URL parameter with the full path to > the source tar on OpenOCD's project site. No actually, source0 should have the full URL for downloading the sources. URL is the url for the upstream website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 12:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051249.n65CngBB010985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 08:49:41 EDT --- Sorry, I was in Berlin for the Fedora's FUDCon. Can you fix all the rpmlint warnings on each generated rpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 13:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 09:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051306.n65D6tln002972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-05 09:06:54 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455007 SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2944/fife-2009.0-0.3.r2944svn.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2944/fife.spec RPMLINT: fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/pythonize.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/savers.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/pychan/__init__.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/loaders.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/fifelog.py fife-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fife-2009.0_r2944/engine/core/loaders/native/audio_loaders/sounddecoder_ogg.h fife-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fife-2009.0_r2944/engine/core/loaders/native/audio_loaders/sounddecoder_ogg.cpp fife-editor.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/fife-editor/__init__.py fife-editor.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/fife-editor/plugins/LayerTool.py 0644 fife-editor.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/fife-editor/plugins/__init__.py fife-editor.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/fife-editor/plugins/ObjectEdit.py 0644 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 2 warnings. I added LinuxDonald as CC, because he is a part of upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 13:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 09:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051352.n65DqA89011305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 09:52:09 EDT --- Whoops, sorry for the delay, somehow this slipped under my radar. - Use the %{version} macro in Source0. - You have duplicate ownership of files in %{_sysconfdir}/csync. As you specify the files in that directory, just change %{_sysconfdir}/csync to %dir %{_sysconfdir}/csync/ (I recommend using the trailing slash whenever listing a directory, makes the spec file easier to read). - You might want to put an explicit require on the libs package in the main package, since the license is in -libs. - There is a test option, so you should use it. You probably need just BR: check(-devel?) and then the section %check make test - Is the config used just by the binary or by the libraries too? **** rpmlint output: csync-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Change the Source0 line to use %{version}. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK - Duplicate ownership as stated above. MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Missing AUTHORS and TODO. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - Libs package required. MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK - Only builds in rawhide due to missing iniparser package in <=F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 14:05:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051405.n65E5SXt013735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #8 from Robert Spanton 2009-07-05 10:05:27 EDT --- > ping? Yep, I'm still on this. No time slices have been allocated recently, but they will soon ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 14:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051416.n65EGwGG016047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #22 from Levente Farkas 2009-07-05 10:16:57 EDT --- i updated the spec and hope to fix everything except the W: macro-in-%changelog doc since it's comes from the native part of the changelog and i'd not like to change it: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SPECS/mingw32-gstreamer.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SRPMS/mingw32-gstreamer-0.10.23-3.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455083 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 14:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051451.n65EpCwr023136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen 2009-07-05 10:51:11 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, other stuff came up. I need to see what the rules are for setuid binaries etc, and probably at least do some good code review of it before it goes in. I appreciate the very quick review, sorry for the slowness on my end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051504.n65F4t4p005167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-07-05 11:04:54 EDT --- Ok, fixed the tab issue: [3|zap at zap|~/rpm/SRPMS]rpmlint -v QtDMM-0.8.12-1.fc11.zap.src.rpm QtDMM.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. the updated spec and src.rpm is on the same URLs as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051509.n65F908x026736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 11:08:59 EDT --- There are still some warnings on the debug rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:14:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051514.n65FEu0v007374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(linuxdonald at linux | |donald.de) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-05 11:14:54 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051518.n65FIxt8028681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |linuxdonald at linuxdonald.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051518.n65FI7cp008077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051548.n65Fm967001160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-05 11:48:08 EDT --- wrong kojitask above. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455087 here is the correct one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 15:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051558.n65FwD20015085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #23 from Juha Tuomala 2009-07-05 11:58:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > RPM build errors: > File not found: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xorriso-0.3.8-5.pl00.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/xorriso_servicemenu.desktop fixed. Spec URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec SRPM URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10.src.rpm f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455129 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051622.n65GM4AF019598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-05 12:22:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > It sounds like you are using gcj as your java. gcj doesn't support everything > required by frinika. Run > # alternatives --config java > and make sure that you have openjdk selected. NO... yes. But I had not even installed gcj before it is inspired by frinika dependencies!: sha at x-www frinika]$ sudo yum install frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch.rpm ... Setting up Install Process Examining frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch.rpm: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch Marking frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package frinika.noarch 0:0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: toot2 >= 3 for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: tootaudioservers >= 3 for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: RasmusDSP for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: SevenZip for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: flexdock for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: jVorbisEnc for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: jgoodies-looks for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: jjack for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: jmod for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: skinlf for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: soundfont2-default for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: tritonus-shared for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package RasmusDSP.i586 0:0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libfftw3.so.3 for package: RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11.i586 ---> Package SevenZip.i586 0:4.65-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package flexdock.i586 0:0.5.1-13.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ant-commons-logging for package: flexdock-0.5.1-13.fc11.i586 ---> Package fluid-soundfont-gm.noarch 0:3.1-3.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package jVorbisEnc.i586 0:0.1-3.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package jgoodies-looks.noarch 0:2.2.1-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package jjack.i586 0:0.3-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package jmod.i586 0:0.9-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package skinlf.noarch 0:6.7-7.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: laf-plugin for package: skinlf-6.7-7.fc11.noarch ---> Package toot2.noarch 0:3-0.4.beta2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package tootaudioservers.i586 0:3-0.1.beta2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package tritonus.i586 0:0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: tritonus-aos = 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 for package: tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: tritonus-core = 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 for package: tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: jorbis for package: tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11.i586 --> Running transaction check ---> Package ant-commons-logging.i586 0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ant = 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 for package: ant-commons-logging-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: ant-nodeps = 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 for package: ant-commons-logging-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 ---> Package fftw.i586 0:3.2.1-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package jorbis.i586 0:0.0.17-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package laf-plugin.noarch 0:1.0-5.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package tritonus-aos.i586 0:0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package tritonus-core.i586 0:0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package ant.i586 0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: java-devel >= 1.5.0 for package: ant-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: xerces-j2 for package: ant-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 ---> Package ant-nodeps.i586 0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11 set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package java-1.5.0-gcj-devel.i586 0:1.5.0.0-28.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libgcj-src >= 4.1.2-5 for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: gcc-java >= 4.1.2-5 for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: eclipse-ecj >= 3.2.1 for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/gcj for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/gcj for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 ---> Package xerces-j2.i586 0:2.7.1-11.3.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: xml-commons-resolver >= 1.1 for package: xerces-j2-2.7.1-11.3.fc11.i586 --> Running transaction check ---> Package ecj.i586 1:3.4.2-4.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package gcc-java.i586 0:4.4.0-4 set to be updated remi/filelists_db | 77 kB 00:00 remi-test/filelists_db | 25 kB 00:00 --> Processing Dependency: libgcj-devel = 4.4.0-4 for package: gcc-java-4.4.0-4.i586 ---> Package libgcj-src.i586 0:4.4.0-4 set to be updated ---> Package xml-commons-resolver.i586 0:1.1-3.15.fc11 set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package libgcj-devel.i586 0:4.4.0-4 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: zlib-devel for package: libgcj-devel-4.4.0-4.i586 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib/libz.so for package: libgcj-devel-4.4.0-4.i586 --> Running transaction check ---> Package zlib-devel.i586 0:1.2.3-22.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved =============================================================================================================================================== Package ???. ?????? Repository Size =============================================================================================================================================== Installing: frinika noarch 0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11 /frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch 2.1 M Installing for dependencies: RasmusDSP i586 0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 updates 1.3 M SevenZip i586 4.65-1.fc11 updates 116 k ant i586 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 fedora 2.5 M ant-commons-logging i586 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 fedora 29 k ant-nodeps i586 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 fedora 773 k ecj i586 1:3.4.2-4.fc11 fedora 2.8 M fftw i586 3.2.1-2.fc11 fedora 1.2 M flexdock i586 0.5.1-13.fc11 fedora 433 k fluid-soundfont-gm noarch 3.1-3.fc11 fedora 126 M gcc-java i586 4.4.0-4 fedora 3.7 M jVorbisEnc i586 0.1-3.fc11 updates 3.4 M java-1.5.0-gcj-devel i586 1.5.0.0-28.fc11 fedora 48 k jgoodies-looks noarch 2.2.1-2.fc11 fedora 622 k jjack i586 0.3-2.fc11 updates 231 k jmod i586 0.9-1.fc11 fedora 695 k jorbis i586 0.0.17-2.fc11 updates 222 k laf-plugin noarch 1.0-5.fc11 fedora 19 k libgcj-devel i586 4.4.0-4 fedora 1.6 M libgcj-src i586 4.4.0-4 fedora 12 M skinlf noarch 6.7-7.fc11 fedora 327 k toot2 noarch 3-0.4.beta2.fc11 updates 845 k tootaudioservers i586 3-0.1.beta2.fc11 updates 62 k tritonus i586 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 updates 134 k tritonus-aos i586 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 updates 18 k tritonus-core i586 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 updates 98 k xerces-j2 i586 2.7.1-11.3.fc11 fedora 8.2 M xml-commons-resolver i586 1.1-3.15.fc11 fedora 143 k zlib-devel i586 1.2.3-22.fc11 fedora 44 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================================================================================== Install 29 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total size: 169 M Total download size: 167 M -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051634.n65GYgJB021595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-05 12:34:41 EDT --- Previous run was on my work notebook. Today I upgrade my home computer to Fedora 11, but frinika still not work: $ ll `which java` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 ??? 10 2008 /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java [pasha at x-www frinika]$ [pasha at x-www frinika]$ ll /etc/alternatives/java lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 ??? 5 12:31 /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk/bin/java [pasha at x-www frinika]$ [pasha at x-www frinika]$ frinika Using language: ??????? Creating frinka user settings directory /home/pasha/frinika Can't find file /home/pasha/frinika/FrinikaConfig.xml. It will be created when you quit the program or change configuration options. config: MULTIPLEXED_AUDIO=false FrinikaConfigure: javasound.output=null loaded jjack native library /usr/lib/jjack/libjjack.so natively registering jack client "Frinika" JACK is not available.. Toot using language: ??????? javasound=PulseAudio Mixer PulseAudio Mixer null javax.sound.sampled.LineUnavailableException at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.openImpl(PulseAudioMixer.java:714) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.openLocal(PulseAudioMixer.java:588) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.openLocal(PulseAudioMixer.java:584) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.open(PulseAudioMixer.java:579) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioDataLine.open(PulseAudioDataLine.java:95) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioSourceDataLine.open(PulseAudioSourceDataLine.java:75) at uk.org.toot.audio.server.JavaSoundAudioServer$JavaSoundAudioOutput.open(JavaSoundAudioServer.java:353) at uk.org.toot.audio.server.JavaSoundAudioServer.openAudioOutput(JavaSoundAudioServer.java:225) at uk.org.toot.audio.server.MultiIOJavaSoundAudioServer.openAudioOutput(MultiIOJavaSoundAudioServer.java:57) at com.frinika.audio.toot.FrinikaAudioServer.openAudioOutput(FrinikaAudioServer.java:104) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.createMixer(ProjectContainer.java:466) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.defaultInit(ProjectContainer.java:531) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.(ProjectContainer.java:241) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.(ProjectContainer.java:542) at com.frinika.sequencer.gui.menu.CreateProjectAction.actionPerformed(CreateProjectAction.java:50) at com.frinika.FrinikaMain.main(FrinikaMain.java:112) Sorry but I do not want to go on without an audio output device. Bye bye . . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] New: Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Summary: Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giesen at snickers.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/daemonize.spec SRPM URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/daemonize-1.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051654.n65GsgQU012835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(linuxdonald at linux | |donald.de) | --- Comment #11 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-07-05 12:54:40 EDT --- In bug 501132 will be addressed whether by openal openal-soft in f12 replaced. But so far there is no response came from the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051653.n65GrXPc012698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-05 12:53:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) That is because some of the dependency libraries of frinika (jVorbisEnc, jorbis, ...) require the minimum java version 1.5 which is lower than frinika's requirement. Now you might ask: I already have openjdk installed which provides java 1:1.6 which is higher than 1.5; why is gcj being dragged in? This is a good question. The answer is: For java libraries that the minimum dependency can be met by gcj, the AOT bits are being built and included in the package. These AOT bits are .so files and naturally they are linked to libgcj. RPM's automatic dependency generator is picking this up as a dependency. There have been a couple discussions in the fedora-java mailing list to drop the requirement of building the AOT bits but the idea got rejected, mainly because the AOT bits bring a performance improvement, especially in slow computers and in ppc* architectures. I'm sure this topic will be revisited in the future as starting with F-13, ppc* are going to be dropped from primary archs. (In reply to comment #14) Did you configure jack as explained in /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora ? Also, wait a little for frinika to launch. Don't kill it right away. In my system it takes ~15 seconds to launch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051657.n65GvU11026064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051657.n65GvRb5026045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #6 from Juha Tuomala 2009-07-05 12:57:26 EDT --- Fixed the summary and COPYING file. Waiting for leagal. http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp.spec src: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp-0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455171 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051655.n65GtCrN025601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 --- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-05 12:55:11 EDT --- Fixed the warning. Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/compat-libgdamm.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454719 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051658.n65Gw2ao026165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051653.n65Grgwx025170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #1 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 12:53:41 EDT --- This is a new package and I require a sponsor. daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. As defined in W. Richard Stevens? 1990 book, Unix Network Programming (Addison-Wesley, 1990), a daemon is ?a process that executes ?in the background? (i.e., without an associated terminal or login shell) either waiting for some event to occur, or waiting to perform some specified task on a periodic basis.? Upon startup, a typical daemon program will: - Close all open file descriptors (especially standard input, standard output and standard error) - Change its working directory to the root filesystem, to ensure that it doesn?t tie up another filesystem and prevent it from being unmounted - Reset its umask value - Run in the background (i.e., fork) - Disassociate from its process group (usually a shell), to insulate itself from signals (such as HUP) sent to the process group - Ignore all terminal I/O signals - Disassociate from the control terminal (and take steps not to reacquire one) - Handle any SIGCLD signals Most programs that are designed to be run as daemons do that work for themselves. However, you?ll occasionally run across one that does not. When you must run a daemon program that does not properly make itself into a true Unix daemon, you can use daemonize to force it to run as a true daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051657.n65GvovL013693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 12:57:48 EDT --- The ticket this one depends on has been closed because the submitter has gone away; I'm closing this one as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051657.n65GvHpg013608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Bug 467814 depends on bug 467813, which changed state. Bug 467813 Summary: Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 16:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467813] Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051657.n65GvFEi013521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 12:57:13 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478722] Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051700.n65H0Uv6026968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(cristian.balint at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 13:00:29 EDT --- And another month; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051705.n65H58vf015168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |182235(FE-Legal) | Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(jani at mikkonen.biz | |) | --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 13:05:05 EDT --- It's been months with no progress here; there have been several pings and it's been over a month since needinfo was set. I'll close it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051704.n65H4kcW027465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-05 13:04:45 EDT --- Orcan thank you for the detailed explanation about AOT, it is very intresting. > (In reply to comment #14) > Did you configure jack as explained in > /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora ? No, I'll try do it now. But can we make package work "out of box"?? > Also, wait a little for frinika to launch. Don't kill it right away. In my > system it takes ~15 seconds to launch. I'm generally not kill it, it is failed start (first master appear, and after few steps its end with provided backtrace). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051708.n65H8qGZ015781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #31 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-05 13:08:51 EDT --- rpmlints are usually blockers. If not, the packager should explain/defend why each rpmlint can be disregarded. In this case, the fix should be straightforward. "Some X package gives those errors too" is not a proper way of defending this. Please file bugs to those packages too. They need to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487978] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051712.n65HC2Hr029105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 13:12:00 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051727.n65HRtxL031988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-05 13:27:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Orcan thank you for the detailed explanation about AOT, it is very intresting. > You're welcome. > > (In reply to comment #14) > > Did you configure jack as explained in > > /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora ? > No, I'll try do it now. But can we make package work "out of box"?? > The jack setup is pretty much a standard procedure for folks using audio production software. ardour, hydrogen, muse, etc. they all need a jack to run properly. During this setup, you will need to give certain permissions/priorities to your user. Making these packages work out of the box means giving these permissions/priorities globally to all users. I am not a jack maintainer, but sometime in the past, they decided to not to do so. I assume that they had valid reasons. This topic might be revisited too. But as I said, audio production people are usually familiar with setting up jack. Also, after setting up jack, one has to know how to use it. There are GUI applications such as qjackctl which help with using jack. (I realized that this started going a bit out of topic now. :)) > > Also, wait a little for frinika to launch. Don't kill it right away. In my > > system it takes ~15 seconds to launch. > I'm generally not kill it, it is failed start (first master appear, and after > few steps its end with provided backtrace). Before you start frinika, it is good to have a running jack daemon. You can use qjackctl for this purpose. Now when you start frinika, you will get a splash screen. There is a "Setup" button on that screen. When you go to the setup, you will want to select jjack (java jack) as your preferred backend. I advise for not selecting/using pulseaudio in audio production software such as frinika. pulseaudio is not designed for this purpose. But jack is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051739.n65HdGxa001275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller 2009-07-05 13:39:15 EDT --- * Sun Jun 5 2009 Ian Weller 0.99-3.r3 - Upstream changed 0.99r3 tag Spec and SRPM in http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-3.r3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051742.n65HgnPs021513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-05 13:42:48 EDT --- Yeah, I'll take care of it shortly. I just need to rewrite the mime files to actually work with KDE 4 (the existing ones are obsolete). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051749.n65HnA0S022517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-05 13:49:09 EDT --- > When you go to the setup, you > will want to select jjack (java jack) as your preferred backend. I advise for > not selecting/using pulseaudio in audio production software such as frinika. > pulseaudio is not designed for this purpose. But jack is. I need to add to this: For audio production software there is another viable option: Instead of jack, one can also use plain alsa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] New: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife_ma at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/solang.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/solang-0.1-1.20090624git.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solang is a free photo manager that will act as a front-end for directory based local storage as well as remote photo-storage systems, as can be said, on the "Cloud". Basic editing support is also planned as well as a small pipeline for RAW processing. The aim of this project is to break the performance characteristics of current popular photo management softwares and provide a fast and reliable alternative that does not place humongous demands on user's hardware resources even to meet basic functionality. This package depends on compat-libgdamm, which is still in review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509745] New: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509745 Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife_ma at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/solang.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/solang-0.1-1.20090624git.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solang is a free photo manager that will act as a front-end for directory based local storage as well as remote photo-storage systems, as can be said, on the "Cloud". Basic editing support is also planned as well as a small pipeline for RAW processing. The aim of this project is to break the performance characteristics of current popular photo management softwares and provide a fast and reliable alternative that does not place humongous demands on user's hardware resources even to meet basic functionality. This package depends on compat-libgdamm, which is still in review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 17:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051752.n65HqpJn023299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 13:52:50 EDT --- Ok, seems fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 18:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051847.n65Il8iK012848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 14:47:06 EDT --- *** Bug 509745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 18:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051847.n65Ilrc9012941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |509744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 18:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051847.n65IlqJv012909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Depends on| |509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 18:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509745] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051847.n65Il7t4012823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509745 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 14:47:06 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 509744 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 18:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051853.n65Ird4i001708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 18:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 14:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051853.n65IrOle014224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 14:53:23 EDT --- - You don't need to specify -n daemonize-%{version} in %setup, as this is the default value. - What is $common_flags doing in %configure? - You are using incorrect characters in the description: change ? to ' and ? to ". - The provide Provides: daemonize is redundant, since by default all packages provide themself (with a versioned provide). I can sponsor you, if you show me you know the Fedora guidelines. You need to read and understand the packaging and review guidelines, and to demonstrate your knowledge you need to make at least one other submission, and do unofficial package reviews of packages of other people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051914.n65JE6fC005936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Peter Gordon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ian at ianweller.org | |) --- Comment #5 from Peter Gordon 2009-07-05 15:14:04 EDT --- The only other issue I see at first glance is that the some of the data (in %{_datadir}/%{name}) could potentially be in its own noarch subpackage, for less churn when updating, etc.; but that data is reasonably small enough (just over a megabyte) that splitting the package even further just for this purpose seems a bit overkill. Oh well. Full review of tremfusion 0.99-3.r3 follows. ++ GOOD: * rpmlint against the binary packages is clean. * Naming and version/release are good. Spec file name is "%{name}.spec" as required. * %changelog section is valid. * BuildRoot is properly defined, and cleaned both as the first step in %install and as the only step in %clean. * Other than the server subpackage, the Licenses (mix of CC-BY-SA and GPLv2+) are acceptable for Fedora and match the actual licenses (as mentioned in the README file), copies of which are properly included in the %doc listings. * Spec file is in American English, and is legible. * Successfully builds in mock on both Rawhide and F-11 (tested on x86_64). * It installs and runs just fine (which was why I waited until today to do the review, sorry... XD) * Timestamps are kept ("install -p") * Sources match those of upstream. (Not a pristine tarball, so I only checked that the included method of acquiring the sources produced a tarball whose file listings matched those provided in the linked SRPM.) * Ownership and permissions of files/directories are sane with no duplicates in the %files listing; and the %defattr line is good. * Final Requires/Provides list is sane. * Macro variable usage is consistent. * Builds/runs agains the system libraries instead of local copies (except for the libjpeg difference, as you noted). * Files marked as %doc are not required at runtime. * Dependencies OK between subpackages and the main package. * No libtool (.la) files present in built package. * All filenames in built package are valid UTF-8. * Package contains no translations (so %find_lang stuff is not necessary). * Package contains no static libraries, header files, or pkconfig data. + Game data (tremulous-data, required by tremfusion-common) is separate from the content/binaries. + License files included as part of %doc. ++ BAD: (1) The server subpackage needs a License tag. (2) The server should run as its own user, not as 'root' or 'games' or any other system user account. (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for detailed instructions). (3) You should also use the opengl-games-utils wrapper, as indicated on the Games SIG wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging#OpenGL_Wrapper . Fix up those three issues, and it'll garner my approval. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051923.n65JNICS007696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051923.n65JN7AK019944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051937.n65Jb4rC010201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #3 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 15:37:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - You don't need to specify > -n daemonize-%{version} > in %setup, as this is the default value. > > - What is > $common_flags > doing in %configure? I had used another package spec file as a template and I believe that was some garbage leftover. > > - You are using incorrect characters in the description: change ? to ' and ? to > ". Was a cut and paste from the package site. Corrected in updated spec file. > > - The provide > Provides: daemonize I believe I was following the convention in the template spec I was using, I have since reviewed that particular guideline, and corrected accordingly . > is redundant, since by default all packages provide themself (with a versioned > provide). > > > I can sponsor you, if you show me you know the Fedora guidelines. You need to > read and understand the packaging and review guidelines, and to demonstrate > your knowledge you need to make at least one other submission, and do > unofficial package reviews of packages of other people. Understood. Will submit at least one other package and submit some reviews. I've also reviewed the packaging guidelines (again), as well as the review guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines). I believe the updated package now meets all of those. Thanks, GG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051947.n65JlRYV024103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #20 from Mat Booth 2009-07-05 15:47:25 EDT --- And again: - Fix version number on the java libraries. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.17-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051949.n65JnXIY024353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 15:49:32 EDT --- Please post the updated package spec & srpm (increment the release tag and add a changelog entry). Also, you might want to change the original entry from "RHEL" to "Fedora". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051951.n65Jpo0p012848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #5 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 15:51:50 EDT --- The eventual goal for this package is EPEL, should I use a combined Fedora/EPEL or should I maintain two seperate spec files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051954.n65JsR1C013140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 15:54:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The eventual goal for this package is EPEL, should I use a combined Fedora/EPEL > or should I maintain two seperate spec files? EPEL is a part of Fedora, not RHEL. And the primary target of Fedora is Fedora, EPEL is sort of an addon. Also, install -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 should be install -p -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 to preserve timestamps, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Quite often one needs to add INSTALL="install -p" as an argument to 'make install' to make it preserve time stamps too. Is the man page not installed automatically by make install..? P.S. You don't have to create the directory, instead of mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 install -p -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 you can install -D -p -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/daemonize.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051959.n65JxCXx026188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052002.n65K2lZe027019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 19:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051959.n65Jx27b026159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: daemonize - |Review Request: daemonize - |daemonize runs a command as |run a command as a Unix |a Unix daemon. |daemon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446991] Review Request: python-coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052002.n65K21IP026878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446991 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:01:59 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499023] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052003.n65K3Bus027198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499023 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052003.n65K37Mn027121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:03:04 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052012.n65KC7VI028975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-05 16:12:04 EDT --- Ah, sorry, I didn't notice that I wasn't receiving email from this account for the past month or so. I plan to follow up on the review, I'm just catching up to all the mail I've missed. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052015.n65KFFkW029730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-05 16:15:14 EDT --- It is not intentional; I'll update to the latest. As I've mentioned in other reviews, I didn't notice I wasn't fetching mail from this account for the past month or so :(. Sorry for all the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503800] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052015.n65KFXoL029811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052017.n65KHXPs030016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-05 16:17:32 EDT --- Yes, it was settings related. I can start it now. So, as I very far from music production, I don't even try use it. But it started ans GUI seemed ready to use. So, package APPROVED. Oget, thank you for the patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052015.n65KFjiG029855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:15:44 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052015.n65KFQMY017209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:15:23 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052027.n65KR0pY019143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #7 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 16:27:00 EDT --- Strangely enough, it's not installed automatically. A quick perusal of Makefile.in reveals nothing that even touches that file. Incremented release tag and posted update files to http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/ Made the changes to install as you suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052032.n65KW3cM032695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:32:02 EDT --- Also, you don't need to create the directories with mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 if you just pass the -D switch to install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052032.n65KWmpt000334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-05 16:32:47 EDT --- KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455359 SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2947/fife.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2947/fife-2009.0-0.7.r2947svn.fc11.src.rpm RPMLINT: (silent) 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. @Thomas, I added your (and mine) sponsor Mamoru Tasaka as CC. He should take a look at this, because he is ultra-high skilled and perhaps he find things, which we won't find. I believe that this step is very important; you are "biased", because you are a part of upstream. Please don't take it personally... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052031.n65KVScq032595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:31:25 EDT --- - The -n %{name}-%{version} in %setup is redundant, as it is the default setup path. - Any reason why SMP make is not enabled? If it doesn't work, document it with a comment in the spec file. - Use the -p argument in all of the install commands. (At least for the files that are not generated in the %build phase.) - The %post and %trigger stuff seems very cumbersome. Two easier possibilities come to mind: Create the symlinks in %install and make the package own them. Additionally, for the dir ownership: 1) Require sendmail, which provides the directory. [If the package works also with postfix, exim &c then this is not adviseable.] 2) Make the package own the /etc/smsrh/ directory. [This creates a double provides, but a necessary one.] Or, you could even put the symlinks in a subpackage, say vacation-sendmail, which would require sendmail and own the symlinks. - You might want to change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/*.1 to be a bit more precise, or even list the two files explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052037.n65Kbp4j001437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-05 16:37:50 EDT --- Well, I thank you for your patience too. Audio production in Linux is getting better every day. IMHO frinika needs some more work for professional use, but the project seems promising and it is active and it is a nice example for what can be done with java sound api. I'm confident the glitches will be resolved in time. And thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: frinika Short Description: Music Workstation Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052035.n65KZvaB001183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ian at ianweller.org | |) | --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller 2009-07-05 16:35:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > ++ BAD: > > (1) The server subpackage needs a License tag. Whoops :) > (2) The server should run as its own user, not as 'root' or 'games' or any > other system user account. (See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for detailed > instructions). Is this necessary? The server doesn't have an init/upstart script. > (3) You should also use the opengl-games-utils wrapper, as indicated on the > Games SIG wiki page: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging#OpenGL_Wrapper . Done. * Sun Jul 5 2009 Ian Weller 0.99-4.r3 - Add OpenGL wrapper - Upstream changed 0.99r3 tag again (hg:1421) - Switch VERSION buildflag to the release version and add release macro to it Spec and SRPM in http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-4.r3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052042.n65KgwkM022008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052042.n65Kgcss021948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-07-05 16:42:37 EDT --- It?s my first review. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. All Okay # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Okay # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Okay # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Okay # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Okay # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Okay # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Okay # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Okay # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Okay # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Okay # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Okay # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Okay # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Okay # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Okay # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Okay # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Okay # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Okay # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Okay # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Okay # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Okay # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Okay # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Okay # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Okay # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Okay # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Okay # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Okay # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Okay # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Okay # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Okay # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Okay # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Okay # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Okay # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Okay # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Okay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052051.n65Kpm31004165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:51:47 EDT --- Please send the updated patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052050.n65KoNd3003977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:50:22 EDT --- Here's the review: rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Optflags are not used in compilation. (Patch to follow.) MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Don't include INSTALL, it is of no use in the package (it only contains building instructions). MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052054.n65Ks4wj024089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:54:03 EDT --- The man file install is still missing from the makefile, you can add that as well to the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052051.n65KpVDH023784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 16:51:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350551) Patch to make build respect CFLAGS given by configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052056.n65KugJa024766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #23 from Kevin Kofler 2009-07-05 16:56:41 EDT --- Just double the percent sign. It should be fixed in the native package as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 20:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052058.n65KwBAB005223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Peter Gordon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|peter at thecodergeek.com | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Peter Gordon 2009-07-05 16:58:10 EDT --- Per our IRC discussion, the server does not need its own user, since it's not meant to be a system-level daemon. The other changes look good. Thanks for the quick turnaround. APPROVED. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 21:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052102.n65L2oQ1025780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller 2009-07-05 17:02:49 EDT --- Thanks for the fast review, Peter :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tremfusion Short Description: Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous Owners: ianweller Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 21:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052125.n65LPLve010458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 17:25:19 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says the following: erlang-erlsom.x86_64: E: no-binary erlang-erlsom.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib which are normal for erlang packages. The spec does not consistently use macros; in some places, macro-ized forms like "%{__rm}" are used, while elsewhere plain non-macro versions are used. This must be consistent; personally I see no benefit in the extra typing from using "%{__rm}" but you can use what you like. The license is definitely not GPLv2+. Most files seem to be LGPLv3+, but erlsom_sax_lib.erl is GPLv2+. This would seem to imply that the whole is GPLv3+, but you should check with upstream to see what they intend. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 414b342f58ae0d35e612914223fa4b24355ede2f6586a53efbe73791a5dab3e3 erlsom-1.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: erlsom = 1.2.1-3.fc12 erlang-erlsom = 1.2.1-3.fc12 erlang-erlsom(x86-64) = 1.2.1-3.fc12 = erlang * %check is present, no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test this. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 21:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052136.n65LaXTP012534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-05 17:36:32 EDT --- Fixed and updated: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-event.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-event-3.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 21:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052135.n65LZfNj031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-05 17:35:41 EDT --- Fixed: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zc-lockfile.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zc-lockfile-1.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 21:40:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052140.n65LeZmZ032549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-05 17:40:35 EDT --- Updated and fixed: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-proxy.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-proxy-3.5.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 22:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052217.n65MHiDw019327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #12 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 18:17:43 EDT --- New build available at http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/ Includes patch to Makefile that respects CFLAGS and installs man page. Adjusted spec file accordingly. Bumped release tag. Emailed new patch to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 22:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052220.n65MK1Z0019709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #13 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 18:20:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350559) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350559) New patch to have make honour CFLAGS passed to configure, as well as support DESTDIR and install man pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 22:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052233.n65MXFID022043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 18:33:14 EDT --- You missed the .c.o part: .c.o: - $(CC) -c $< -I. + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -I. (Also, you don't need to put the patches here too since you are the one who makes the srpms :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 22:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052242.n65MgqFI023616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Juha Tuomala 2009-07-05 18:42:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorriso Short Description: ISO 9660 image manipulation tool Owners: tuju Branches: f10 f11 EL4 EL5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 22:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052250.n65MoZKM025065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-05 18:50:31 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 22:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052253.n65Mr85r012594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #15 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-05 18:53:08 EDT --- Let's try this one more time. Updated files are up. Fixed missing $(CFLAGS) in patch. Bumped rev. Everything should be good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 23:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052302.n65N2x3g014428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 19:02:59 EDT --- Okay, but now the install process isn't preserving the time stamps. Add INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. After you've fixed this the package should be good to go. I won't give an official approval yet, since to import you need to be sponsored, which I won't do before you fill the criteria (other submission and informal reviews). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 23:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052331.n65NVu0J019483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 19:31:55 EDT --- This builds fine, though I'm still seeing the 0775 permissions thing. You didn't respond to tell me if you see that as well, so I did a koji build and it doesn't happen on the buildsys, so I'll just assume some problem with mock on my end. Ignoring those permission complaints, I get: scotch-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation scotch-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation These aren't problems. scotch.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/scotch.conf scotch-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These are necessary because of the way the libraries from this package are placed into a subdirectory. Honestly, looking at the contents of /usr/lib64/scotch, I have to wonder why you'd want to go through that extra effort. There's nothing there that's going to conflict, and you're not doing any fancy versioning of the directory that you'd need for parallel installation or anything like that, so why not just put the libraries in %_libdir and dispense with the ld.so.conf.d magic? The source file downloaded from the Source0 URL is not the same as the source file in the tarball. The download is quite a bit smaller, and seems to contain older files. CeCILL-C is not GPL-compatible, but mpich2 is MIT and zlib is very liberally licensed so I see no linking issues. I note that the -static subpackage has no dependency on the -devel package. I don't believe this is mandatory, but most -static packages seem to do it and it does make sense from the perspective of someone who wants to use it (yum install scotch-static would bring in what you need to actually use those libraries). X source files do not match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. ? rpmlint has a couple of complaints which may go away. * final provides and requires: scotch-5.1.6-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm libptscotch.so.0()(64bit) libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit) libptscotcherrexit.so.0()(64bit) libptscotchparmetis.so.0()(64bit) libscotch.so.0()(64bit) libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit) libscotcherrexit.so.0()(64bit) libscotchmetis.so.0()(64bit) scotch = 5.1.6-3.fc12 scotch(x86-64) = 5.1.6-3.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) libmpich.so.1.1()(64bit) libptscotch.so.0()(64bit) libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit) libptscotcherrexit.so.0()(64bit) libptscotchparmetis.so.0()(64bit) libscotch.so.0()(64bit) libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit) libscotcherrexit.so.0()(64bit) libscotchmetis.so.0()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) scotch-devel-5.1.6-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm scotch-devel = 5.1.6-3.fc12 scotch-devel(x86-64) = 5.1.6-3.fc12 = libptscotch.so.0()(64bit) libptscotcherr.so.0()(64bit) libptscotcherrexit.so.0()(64bit) libptscotchparmetis.so.0()(64bit) libscotch.so.0()(64bit) libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit) libscotcherrexit.so.0()(64bit) libscotchmetis.so.0()(64bit) scotch = 5.1.6-3.fc12 scotch-static-5.1.6-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm scotch-static = 5.1.6-3.fc12 scotch-static(x86-64) = 5.1.6-3.fc12 = scotch = 5.1.6-3.fc12 * %check is present; no test suite upstream. I've no way to test this. The executables don't crash, but I have no date to feed them. * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig called properly unversioned .so files are in the -devel subpackage. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries present in a separate -static package. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 23:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907052345.n65Nj7GD021799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #8 from Christian Krause 2009-07-05 19:45:06 EDT --- Thanks for the new package. I've fully reviewed the package now. In general it looks quite good, there are only some minor TODO items left: * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/ewl.spec SRPMS/ewl-0.5.2.042-7.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/ewl-* ewl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libewl.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 ewl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. According to rpmlint's help the usage of exit in libraries is discouraged since the calling application can not handle the error. However, in this case it seems to be a design decisions of the enlightenment developers and other libraries like ecore suffer from the same problem. This will not block the review. But depending on your involvement with upstream it would probably be worth to ask them for the reasons and/or explain them why its discouraged. * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name * sources: OK - md5sum: 385082d91eb112671a5c64af295da91d ewl-0.5.2.042.tar.gz - sources matches upstream - Source0 tag ok - spectool -g works * License: TODO - License in spec file does not match the actual license (COPYING looks like a variant of the MIT license) - however, the included spec file mentiones BSD - the enlightenment authors mentioned usually only BSD as the license of the related projects - I've asked fedora-legal for clarification and got a response that the following license field should be used: License: MIT with advertising https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00003.html - license file packaged * package containing *.pc files must "Requires: pkgconfig": TODO - IMHO the usage of %if conditions should be omitted if not really needed - even if this may be questionable or whether in this case it would be meaningful, the packaging rules are indisputable here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files please require pkgconfig unconditionally in the -devel package * spec file written in English and legible: OK * compilation: TODO - supports parallel build - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used - it would be better not to build the static libraries instead of deleting them later, please add a "--disable-static" and remove the deleting of the *.a files - builds in mock (F10) - builds in koji: F12: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454826 F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454836 F10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454851 * BuildRequires: OK * locales handling: OK (n/a) * ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * package owns all directories that it creates: OK * no files listed twice in %files: OK * file permissions: OK - %defattr used - actual permissions in packages ok * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * main package should not contain development related parts: TODO /usr/lib/ewl/tests should be in -devel package * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * header files in -devel subpackage: OK * static libraries in -static package: OK (n/a) * *.so link in -devel package: OK * - devel package requires base package using fully versioned dependency: OK * packages must not contain *.la files: OK * GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: OK (n/a) * packages must not own files/dirs already owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install: OK * all filenames UTF-8: OK * functional test: OK - ewl_config (which uses libewl) in main package (simple tool to configure the themes etc.) works * debuginfo sub-package: OK - non-empty - debuginfo file works together with gdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 00:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060006.n6606ge0025560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 00:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060007.n6607QBb025664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 20:07:25 EDT --- Looks like the fedora-review flag should be set here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 00:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060026.n660QJcs029035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 20:26:18 EDT --- About the only comments I can make, since I really know nothing of cross-toolchain packages: Nothing seems to own /usr/msp430/include. msp430-binutils owns /usr/msp430, and /usr/msp430/lib, but this package doesn't have a dependency on msp430-binutils so those directories will be unowned. If this package really isn't supposed to depend on msp430-binutils then you need to rethink which packages need to own which directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 01:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060154.n661s7TI011571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #9 from John Guthrie 2009-07-05 21:54:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks for the new package. I've fully reviewed the package now. In general it > looks quite good, there are only some minor TODO items left: Thank you for taking the time to do such a thorough review. > * License: TODO > - License in spec file does not match the actual license (COPYING looks like a > variant of the MIT license) > - however, the included spec file mentiones BSD > - the enlightenment authors mentioned usually only BSD as the license of the > related projects > - I've asked fedora-legal for clarification and got a response that the > following license field should be used: > License: MIT with advertising > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00003.html > - license file packaged When I looked at the license, I initially mis-identified it as being an BSD license. And then, like you saw as well, I saw other components of enlightenment with BSD licenses. So that led me to believe that I really had put in the correct license. Anyway, this is fixed. > * package containing *.pc files must "Requires: pkgconfig": TODO > - IMHO the usage of %if conditions should be omitted if not really needed > - even if this may be questionable or whether in this case it would be > meaningful, the packaging rules are indisputable here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files > please require pkgconfig unconditionally in the -devel package Fair enough. Fixed. > * compilation: TODO > - supports parallel build > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used > - it would be better not to build the static libraries instead of deleting them > later, please add a "--disable-static" and remove the deleting of the *.a files Fixed. > * main package should not contain development related parts: TODO > /usr/lib/ewl/tests should be in -devel package Fixed. Here are the URLs for the new release: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 02:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060204.n6624wnQ013506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 --- Comment #2 from Robert Spanton 2009-07-05 22:04:57 EDT --- Hi Jason, > Nothing seems to own /usr/msp430/include. Yep, I think you're right. It looks like this package should own that. I'll resolve this soon. > ... If this package really isn't supposed to depend on msp430-binutils then you need to rethink which packages need to own which directories. ... This package depends on msp430-gcc, which depends on msp430-binutils. R -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 02:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060230.n662UKra018543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #13 from Tim Potter 2009-07-05 22:30:19 EDT --- Hi everyone. I've just returned from three months leave and seem to have missed all the pywbem excitement. Thanks very much Jason and David for getting this done. I'm not sure what happened to my request to legal - it seems have gotten lost somewhere. David, I'm happy to take over maintainership if that's still what you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 02:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060244.n662ii1f001022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #14 from David Nalley 2009-07-05 22:44:44 EDT --- Hi Tim, Welcome back. As I said earlier, I'd prefer that someone more connected with upstream maintain it. I packaged it because I had a need for pywbem in EPEL at $dayjob. Once you get the CLA squared away and get the packager sponsorship taken care of, please let me know, I'll be happy to pass this off to you. Thanks, David Nalley -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 03:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060307.n6637khW005721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #70 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-07-05 23:07:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) > Give me your latest spec & srpm, I'll do a full review. http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.12-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint reports no errors and no warnings on the .src.rpm Upon generation of the binary packages, there is only one very minor warning on "armadillo-devel-0.6.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm": armadillo-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/armadillo-0.6.12/README.txt This is due to DOS end-of-line encoding used for that file (alone) in the upstream package. The DOS encoding was specifically used so the README file is readable using the brain-damaged Notepad under Windows (which is the default program for opening text files). Under Linux, the DOS end-of-line encoding has no ill effects for all practical purposes. The file is viewed without any problems using viewers/editors such as "more", "less", "gedit", "kwrite", "nano", etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 03:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060316.n663Gcav027276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 23:16:37 EDT --- Indeed, this builds fine now and rpmlint has only the usual two complaints. Please don't define a macro (%packrel) for your release; this makes it difficult for others (or the mass rebuild scripts) who may do maintenance on the package. Just use Release: 2%{?dist} The license for this package seems to be GPLv3+, not GPLv3. Or did I miss somewhere where later versions of the GPL or not permitted? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 21c528b1431d0ef1ea9ab9486a61e58de184172e9a4451b532658b719beb218b RM2_0.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: R-RM2 = 0.0-2.fc12 = /bin/sh R R-msm R-mvtnorm * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (R package registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 03:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060356.n663uL5C014592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-05 23:56:20 EDT --- I will close this review within this week as submitter is non-responsive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060407.n6647VLf016479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:07:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509521] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060403.n664398h015678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:03:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060406.n6646GPO003717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:06:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060408.n6648QhV003911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:08:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509524] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Runner-Xml - Generate XML reports from unit test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060411.n664B4Dm017261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509524 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:11:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060412.n664CK72017426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:12:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060416.n664GBaV018263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:16:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060417.n664HA9I005657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:17:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060418.n664IYNc018523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 00:18:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:24:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060424.n664OPQ0006815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 00:24:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455810 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e5455459cc69eac3f495a002ddc52c1ef0d43414 CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=20, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 0.42 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.54 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-1.fc12.noarch=> Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ValidateRM) = 2.3 Requires: perl(Data::FormValidator) perl(Exporter) perl(HTML::FillInForm) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498285] Review Request: mozilla-adblockplus - Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060427.n664RjWK020219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498285 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nb at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509538] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060425.n664PMbJ019988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509538 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 00:25:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455812 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5b8097597431c3e089a9ff8a70281c62d3625273 CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=31, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.67 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.80 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ViewCode) = 1.02 Requires: perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 04:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060427.n664RqZI007545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 00:27:51 EDT --- Ah! directory ownership issue. I am revoking approval. please submit new spec Change %attr(644,root,root) %{perl_vendorlib}/CGI/Application/Plugin/ValidateRM.pm to %{perl_vendorlib}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 05:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060503.n6653mvt014318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #21 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-07-06 01:03:46 EDT --- I didn't know I had to build the package. Till which part should I do from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Tag_Or_Update_Your_Branches Should I enter into each directory (devel, EL-5, F-10, F-11) and do the following?: cvs up make tag make build No wonder, my documentation stopped at this: http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/howtos/packaging-rpm-workflow.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 05:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060512.n665C1OQ016116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Peter Gordon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com --- Comment #13 from Peter Gordon 2009-07-06 01:11:59 EDT --- Matej, the Koji link for the src RPM now appears to be dead. Would you please upload it to a more static location and post the link here? I'd very much appreciate that. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 05:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060554.n665s1Hd003769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #22 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-07-06 01:54:00 EDT --- Ok, I have built it under devel/ (it also built for EL-5), FC-10, FC-11. Just had to use 'make build' since this is the first build. Updated my documentation revision 1.2: http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/howtos/packaging-rpm-workflow.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 06:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060603.n66637nL024972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 02:03:06 EDT --- staring review for this package.Also I would like to needinfo package owner so that he will not miss about this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 06:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060609.n6669lUo006713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 02:09:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350571) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350571) modified spec file Can you commit attached patch that fixes most of things according to packaging guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 06:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060610.n666AmJf007223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(jorton at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 06:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060625.n666Pve9010038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Konstantin Dmitryev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ksee at list.ru --- Comment #40 from Konstantin Dmitryev 2009-07-06 02:25:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > while compiling synfigstudio, it failed at this step: > synfig -q synfig_icon.sif -o 128x128/synfig_icon.png --time 0 -w 128 -h 128 > synfig(10044) [22:26:57] info: target name not specified - using png > Segmentation error > > It seems that synfig failed at runtime for some reasons. That's because synfig is not compatible with latest ffmpeg. Use "--without-libavcodec" option when doing "./configure" for synfig as workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 06:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060638.n666cqIT012160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 02:38:51 EDT --- tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 06:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060638.n666cu5q012194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 02:38:56 EDT --- tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 07:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060731.n667VclV010321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #11 from Till Bubeck 2009-07-06 03:31:37 EDT --- Again, thanks for the comments. I fixed anything mentioned above. Also I dropped support for sendmail restricted shell as it seems to produce more questions than answers... I've uploaded again an updated SPEC/SRPMs to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-5.fc11.src.rpm Please review, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 07:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060749.n667n9Pp013689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 03:49:06 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.9-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 07:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060746.n667kc3q013326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #71 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 03:46:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > Upon generation of the binary packages, there is only one very minor warning on > "armadillo-devel-0.6.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm": > > armadillo-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/armadillo-0.6.12/README.txt > > This is due to DOS end-of-line encoding used for that file (alone) in the > upstream package. The DOS encoding was specifically used so the README file is > readable using the brain-damaged Notepad under Windows (which is the default > program for opening text files). > > Under Linux, the DOS end-of-line encoding has no ill effects for all practical > purposes. The file is viewed without any problems using viewers/editors such as > "more", "less", "gedit", "kwrite", "nano", etc. Still, you need to fix it. This is quite trivial: run for file in README; do sed 's/\r//' $file >$file.new && \ touch -r $file $file.new && \ mv $file.new $file done in the %setup phase to convert it. (If you try catting the file it doesn't work properly.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 07:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060750.n667oh5c027825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 03:50:43 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.9-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.9-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 07:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060752.n667qAoo028297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 03:52:09 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.9-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.9-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 07:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060754.n667s06i014803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #14 from Matej Cepl 2009-07-06 03:53:59 EDT --- OK, I have actually lost my package when switching between computers (one more reason to have the package on fedorapeople), so this is reconstruction from .spec and patch attached to this bug. Built again in koji (to be sure, I haven't screwed up much) and it is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456205. However, canonical location is SPEC file: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus.spec SRPM: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus-0.0.17-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060806.n6686VrN018324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #72 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-07-06 04:06:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #71) > Still, you need to fix it. This is quite trivial: run > (...) > in the %setup phase to convert it. Can do this, or how about just "dos2unix" ? Seems less hassle than embedding a shell script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060814.n668EC1x019979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #73 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 04:14:11 EDT --- Well, you can do just a sed oneliner sed -i 's/\r//' README but this loses the time stamp. Same with dos2unix. That's why it's best to use the former version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060816.n668GDkJ020854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #74 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-06 04:16:12 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding Use the fix Jussi gave, as it preserves timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060822.n668McOY022210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-06 04:22:37 EDT --- Sorry for the delay - here is updated package: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-eradius.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-eradius-0-0.3.cvs20070627.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 6 2009 Peter Lemenkov 0-0.3.cvs20070627 - Proper versioning scheme - Added two missing header-files - Fixed permissions for MIT_LICENSE and eradius_server.erl rpmlint log: [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint erlang-eradius-0-0.3.cvs20070627.fc11.ppc.rpm erlang-eradius.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-eradius.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456232 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060827.n668R0Yb004812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-06 04:26:59 EDT --- Once the package has been approved and cvs access is granted (this also applies for the eventual updates of the package), - commit the SRPM - build the package - send the package to the respective repos Now that you have built the package, you will need to send it to the repositories https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ Don't forget to add the bugzilla number of this package review in the "Bugs" section of the above url. This will automatically, update the status of this package review. The fedora packaging guidelines (which is being used even by OpenSuse) is a set of guidelines that are constantly reviewed by FESCo. Sometimes new guidelines are added, please stay tuned on the fedora devel mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060840.n668enm0007736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #75 from Michael Schwendt 2009-07-06 04:40:48 EDT --- You can tell dos2unix/unix2dos to preserve the timestamp, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060842.n668gYlo008102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #15 from Peter Gordon 2009-07-06 04:42:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) Thanks very much! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060842.n668gIhV007986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-06 04:42:17 EDT --- Fixed by adding BuildRequires: bitfrost http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090606/bitfrost-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090606/bitfrost.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060845.n668j0pU008779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #76 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-06 04:44:59 EDT --- Let's stick to the Fedora packaging guidelines's equivalent, for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 08:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060859.n668x3TW030132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-06 04:59:02 EDT --- I mean, BuildRequires: Pyrex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060902.n66929rX012694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 05:02:08 EDT --- CC-ing to spot. Spot: would you investige the following license? http://reinerstileset.4players.de/readmeE.html#b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060900.n6690Y9x030709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 05:00:32 EDT --- Overall: LGPLv2+ (License text) ./clients/editor/LICENSE [1] ./clients/rio_de_hola/LICENSE [2] GPLv3+ (some files under) \ ./clients/rio_de_hola/objects/items/ [2] GPLv3 or CC-BY-SA ./clients/rio_de_hola/objects/clouds/ [2] GPLv2+: ./clients/editor/plugins/LayerTool.py ./clients/editor/plugins/ObjectEdit.py clients/pychan_demo/fonts/freefont/CREDITS [3] ./utils/frmconv/frmconv.c GPLv2+?? (some png files under) \ ./clients/editor/gui/icons/ [1] GPLv2 ./clients/rio_de_hola/fonts/rpgfont.png [2] ./tests/data/rpgfont.png [2] BSD ./clients/editor/scripts/events/signal.py GFDL ./tests/data/wolf_walk/gfx/LICENSE CC-BY-SA ./clients/rio_de_hola/sounds/ [2] (some files under) \ ./clients/rio_de_hola/objects/items/ [2] ./clients/rio_de_hola/objects/buildings/beach_bar/ [2] CC-BY-ND ./clients/rio_de_hola/music/ [2] http://reinerstileset.4players.de/readmeE.html#b [2] ./clients/rio_de_hola/objects/{agents,grounds,items,nature} ====================================================================== (It seems the following files are not included in the rebuilt binary rpms) NG-for-Fedora ./tests/data/LICENSE [4] ./tests/data/audiotest1.ogg [4] ./tests/data/left_right_test.ogg [4] CC-BY-NC (NG_for_Fedora) Note: According to [5] some files under ./tests/data are originally .mp3 file, which cannot be allowed in Fedora ./tests/data/MUSIC.README [5] "freeware" ./tests/data/crate/LICENSE [6] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:08:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060908.n6698BT9032393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell 2009-07-06 05:08:09 EDT --- Sorry for the delay on this. I've requested Luke to split the nethack fonts into a separate package. Until that happens, slashem will avoid the issue by simply requiring nethack to ensure that the fonts are installed. New spec: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/slashem.spec New SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc12.src.rpm Will go ahead and check this in unless I hear otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509521] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060910.n669AYox000572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 05:10:33 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060918.n669I3Lv001984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #77 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-07-06 05:18:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #74) > > Use the fix Jussi gave, as it preserves timestamps. Done. http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint reports no errors on any of the rpms (source and binary) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226150] Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060919.n669JMdO002213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 05:19:21 EDT --- staring review for this package.Also I would like to needinfo package owner so that he will not miss about this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226153] Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060921.n669LfZj016863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226153 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 05:21:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350589) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350589) modified spec file Can you commit attached patch that fixes most of things according to packaging guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226153] Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060919.n669JhB6016163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226153 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 05:19:42 EDT --- staring review for this package.Also I would like to needinfo package owner so that he will not miss about this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226153] Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060924.n669O4Ji003338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226153 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jorton at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226150] Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060923.n669NuJB003312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jorton at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226150] Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060921.n669Lhen003033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226150 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 05:21:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350590) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350590) modified spec file Can you commit attached patch that fixes most of things according to packaging guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060924.n669OVrL003435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-06 05:24:30 EDT --- Imported, built in rawhide. Updated to the latest release and added in support for languages and the new backends. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060923.n669NYf4003247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 05:23:32 EDT --- (From update of attachment 350571) >--- mod_auth_mysql.spec 2009-02-26 07:23:21.000000000 +0530 >+++ mod_auth_mysql-new.spec 2009-07-06 11:33:45.000000000 +0530 >@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ > Summary: Basic authentication for the Apache web server using a MySQL database > Name: mod_auth_mysql > Version: 3.0.0 >-Release: 8 >+Release: 9%{?dist} > Epoch: 1 > Group: System Environment/Daemons > URL: http://modauthmysql.sourceforge.net/ >-Source: mod_auth_mysql-%{version}.tar.gz >+Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/modauthmysql/mod_auth_mysql-%{version}.tar.gz > Source2: auth_mysql.conf > Patch0: mod_auth_mysql-3.0.0-apr1x.patch > Patch1: mod_auth_mysql-3.0.0-disable.patch > License: ASL 1.1 > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > BuildRequires: httpd-devel, mysql-devel >-Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing httpd-devel) >+Requires: httpd-mmn > > %description > mod_auth_mysql can be used to limit access to documents served by a >@@ -28,17 +28,17 @@ > -c %{name}.c -L%{_libdir}/mysql -lmysqlclient > > %install >-[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT >+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/httpd/modules > install -m755 .libs/%{name}.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/httpd/modules > > # Install the config file > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d >-install -m 644 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/auth_mysql.conf \ >+install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/ > > %clean >-[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT >+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root) >@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/*.conf > > %changelog >+* Mon Jul 06 2009 Joe Orton 1:3.0.0-9 >+- Spec cleanup >+ > * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:3.0.0-8 > - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060925.n669PHl1003874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 05:25:17 EDT --- updated attachment as rpmlint complained on srpm that results to change $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/auth_mysql.conf to %{SOURCE1} as done in above comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060929.n669TGjG018300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #33 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-07-06 05:29:12 EDT --- Ping. This is quite a useful package to have, Leigh are you still going to bump it to the latest upstream ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060930.n669UVrp004751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 05:30:30 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060947.n669llTl007803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #24 from Levente Farkas 2009-07-06 05:47:46 EDT --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] New: Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 Summary: Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils-2.19.51.0.11-23.fc11.src.rpm Description: Binutils is a collection of binary utilities, including ar (for creating, modifying and extracting from archives), as (a family of GNU assemblers), gprof (for displaying call graph profile data), ld (the GNU linker), nm (for listing symbols from object files), objcopy (for copying and translating object files), objdump (for displaying information from object files), ranlib (for generating an index for the contents of an archive), readelf (for displaying detailed information about binary files), size (for listing the section sizes of an object or archive file), strings (for listing printable strings from files), strip (for discarding symbols), and addr2line (for converting addresses to file and line). This is a first my attempt to create cross-binutils suitable for Fedora ARM SIG. It's just a plain binutils.spec from main Fedora repository with only two additions - "ExcludeArch: armv5tejl" (this should be properly fixed and added to main Fedora's binutils.spec) and "%define binutils_target armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi" (not sure how to add it properly - using file with rpm-macro in something like armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-filesystem or so). Anyway, feel free to blame me, send me kudos for this or add other suggestions and comments here. Here is a koji scratchbuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456340 rpmlint is silent: [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils-2.19.51.0.11-23.fc11.ppc.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060954.n669skCJ009078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-06 05:54:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 3) and also remove following from SPEC > BuildRequires: gnome-keyring-devel > BuildRequires: libsoup-devel > > because glib2-devel will pull those in buildroot. See successful build after > removing those BRs > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452185 Actually that should be the other way around. glib2-devel would be pulled in by gnome-keyring-devel. See failed build here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1456399&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 09:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 05:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060953.n669r8Ff023107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 05:53:07 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061004.n66A4PLj011165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #25 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-07-06 06:04:24 EDT --- rpmlint still isn't silent: $ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer.spec mingw32-gstreamer.spec:558: W: macro-in-%changelog doc mingw32-gstreamer.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 7) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061013.n66ADhpa013153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 06:13:41 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509538] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061016.n66AG3pJ013771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509538 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-06 06:16:02 EDT --- Thanks! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode Short Description: Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061022.n66AM5Dr029569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #26 from Levente Farkas 2009-07-06 06:22:04 EDT --- forget to upload the spec:-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061026.n66AQfZj030508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-06 06:26:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Ah! directory ownership issue. I am revoking approval. please submit new spec > Change > %attr(644,root,root) %{perl_vendorlib}/CGI/Application/Plugin/ValidateRM.pm > to > %{perl_vendorlib}/* Done. I've also added a chmod line to fix the file's permissions. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061055.n66At80c004146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 06:55:07 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061057.n66AvKj8004473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-06 06:57:18 EDT --- > If these shows up automatically on GNOME logins then it's a bug that breaks > existing functionality, where functionality means "a GNOME desktop that is not > cluttered with broken and irrelevant icons". In that case I agree that it > should be a priority to fix that. I've excluded the autostart files from the rpm so it won't start when in other desktop environments. I'm going to investigate other ways of starting them, possibly through the moblin session manager/startup. Thoughts? SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.0.27-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061056.n66AuAss021808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 06:56:09 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 10:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061059.n66Ax1Fj022080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-06 06:59:01 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 11:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061102.n66B2tO8022914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 07:02:54 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456569 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 11:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061112.n66BCsxt024832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #14 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 07:12:52 EDT --- I got successful build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456571, with following in SPEC BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel BuildRequires: glib2-devel BuildRequires: GConf2-devel BuildRequires: NetworkManager-devel BuildRequires: pkgconfig BuildRequires: rest-devel BuildRequires: twitter-glib-devel BuildRequires: intltool BuildRequires: gtk-doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 11:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061132.n66BWmCv028651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-06 07:32:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4): > > APPROVED. Thanks, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM Short Description: Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 11:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509806] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Server/perl-CGI-Application-Server.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Server/perl-CGI-Application-Server-0.061-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a simple HTTP server for for use during development with CGI::Application. At this moment, it serves our needs in a very basic way. The plan is to release early and release often, and add features when we need them. That said, we welcome any and all patches, tests and feature requests (the ones with which are accompanied by failing tests will get priority). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 11:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509807] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509807 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config/perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config/perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module defines a minimum standard interface that configuration plugins for CGI::Application should meet. Having such a standard allows other plugin authors to rely on basic configuration functionality without coding exceptions for several configuration modules, or giving up on such integration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 11:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061147.n66Bl3JD000529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-06 07:47:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I got successful build > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456571, > > with following in SPEC > BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel > BuildRequires: glib2-devel > BuildRequires: GConf2-devel > BuildRequires: NetworkManager-devel > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > BuildRequires: rest-devel > BuildRequires: twitter-glib-devel > BuildRequires: intltool > BuildRequires: gtk-doc I don't think the 0.10 version explicitly depended on them and hence still built fine without the feature but the later version does add an explicit dependency on a couple of packages. NetworkManager-glib-devel was another one of those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509807] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061301.n66D1kh9016589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509807 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 09:01:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456757 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7db11443193e7fae6fab8d9a6220dbfbd8a22efe CGI-Application-Standard-Config-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.13 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.19 CPU) +Package perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config-1.01-1.fc12.noarch Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Standard::Config) = 1.01 Requires: perl(base) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509806] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061301.n66D1YVb016501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 09:01:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456755 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 411d9acf5048e18f7f4dcae647add0c65caee715 CGI-Application-Server-0.061.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=92, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 1.96 cusr 0.23 csys = 2.26 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Server-0.061-1.fc12.noarch Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Server) = 0.061 Requires: perl(CGI) perl(Carp) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Server::Simple::Static) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061308.n66D8WZd018308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 09:08:31 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509823] New: Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509823 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ti.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ti-0.20090704-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509822] New: Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509822 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-am.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-am-0.20090704-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Amharic hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061311.n66DBQvp003832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 09:11:25 EDT --- - Don't run the build any more in %install: drop the line sh ./build - Instead of running mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} cp -p sap %{buildroot}%{_bindir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 cp -p sap.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 you could just install -D -p -m 755 sap %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/sap install -D -p -m 644 sap.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/sap.1 - You could do with a bit of space inbetween spec file sections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061331.n66DV88t008525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #4 from Julian Aloofi 2009-07-06 09:31:07 EDT --- Thank you, I edited the spec file and rebuilt the SRPM again. I was not really familiar with the install command so I didn't use it, but familiarized myself with it now. I also left more space in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061328.n66DSids007696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 09:28:42 EDT --- This is an extremely permissive license, and it is clearly Free and GPL Compatible. I've added it to the Licenses list, please use: License: Newmat Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061343.n66DhmKM027152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 09:43:47 EDT --- any ETA to build this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509822] Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061344.n66DiNwQ027269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509822 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 09:44:22 EDT --- + koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456840 + rpmlint output is silent on rpms + verified with upstream as 4bec717f2fc14efd74d14ad59381330e19e162fd am_ET.zip APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061347.n66Dl7kH012599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |503590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061347.n66Dl6mG012566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |503586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509823] Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061343.n66DhDYp011627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509823 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 09:43:12 EDT --- + koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456818 + rpmlint output is silent on rpms + verified with upstream as 470f336a61e451f2f18618d5aa2e319017283e5b ti_ER.zip APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509822] Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061355.n66DtwhJ015076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509822 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-07-06 09:55:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-am Short Description: Amharic hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061355.n66DtCt0014812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 09:55:10 EDT --- Did some digging here, and found a copy of the original website, which was current at the time of the last release of libnurbs (aka, nurbs++), 3.0.11. http://web.archive.org/web/20021128215257/libnurbs.sourceforge.net/ >From that, it is clear that the author intended nurbs++ to be under the LGPLv2+. Looking at the CVS history, the author appears to have been the only person who has checked in files, so I have no reason to assume that the unlicensed files come from questionable licensing. In addition, most of the unlicensed files are little more than stubs for c++ (e.g. nurbs/f_nurbsS_sp.cpp), the only unlicensed files of any real significance are: numerical/statistic.cpp numerical/chebexp.cpp numerical/integrate.h numerical/fft.cpp Based on that, I think it is safe to assume that all of the unlicensed files are LGPLv2+. So, please fix the license tag to be: License: LGPLv2+ If upstream ever comes back to life, it would still be nice if they fixed the licensing on the unlicensed files (along with the other issues highlighted in the sourceforge ticket), but I won't hold this review up for it. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 13:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509823] Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061356.n66DuPjm031098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509823 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-07-06 09:56:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ti Short Description: Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061401.n66E1pFI032504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 10:01:49 EDT --- That license is not acceptable for content, even though it claims to give permission to freely distribute the icons, it later restricts bundling of those images with "any software product without Stardock's express permission". In addition, the use restrictions here are extremely restrictive. I would strongly suggest that you open a trac ticket with the Fedora Design team, so that they can generate replacement icons for this application that are available under a free license: https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ Leaving FE-Legal in place until this issue is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061429.n66ETmhn023898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 10:29:47 EDT --- Okay, thank you for clarifying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061438.n66Ec30V026341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 10:38:02 EDT --- Thank you for your continued thoroughness in identifying and reviewing these issues! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061439.n66EdDbT009631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 --- Comment #4 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-06 10:39:12 EDT --- This the shortest I've achieved at getting a doc built. Open to any suggestions on how to deal with it better. SPEC: http://declera.com/~yaneti/python-sybase/python-sybase.spec SRPM: http://declera.com/~yaneti/python-sybase/python-sybase-0.39-2.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Jul 6 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.39-2 - Try harder to build human readable documentation - Move the sybasect.so chmod after the install phase -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:45:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061445.n66EjFwh028402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 10:45:13 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, everything seems okay here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061449.n66EncWS012270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 10:49:36 EDT --- That's the license? Seriously? I should block this package on the grounds that the license author is not acting even remotely responsibly. However, if one does sed 's|blah||g' over that license, it looks like a Copyright only license, so just use: # Copyright holder places no restrictions on use, modification, or redistribution License: Copyright only Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 14:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061459.n66Ext5a015268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-06 10:59:53 EDT --- Thanks, spot. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] New: Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Summary: Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bowe at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode-3.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: qrencode is a C application for encoding data in a QR Code symbol, a kind of 2D symbology that can be scanned by handy terminals such as a mobile phone with CCD. The capacity of QR Code is up to 7000 digits or 4000 characters, and is highly robust. IN NEED OF SPONSOR: this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061501.n66F1lEU000352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 11:01:46 EDT --- The artwork here is certainly similar, however, it is not an exact copy. I'd prefer a little more variance, but IMHO, there is enough to minimize legal risk here. In addition, while the "Titan" trademark is in play for a board game, I cannot find any reference to it being trademarked in the software space. Lifting FE-Legal, as everything seems okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061504.n66F4A2K016689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-06 11:04:09 EDT --- Great! Thanks, Jason. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: b43-openfwwf Short Description: Open firmware for some Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip Owners: peter Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061503.n66F3e2Z000928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Bowe Strickland changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061514.n66FE8oS003974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #16 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-06 11:14:06 EDT --- Thanks for the legal review. If circumstances change later, upstream has offered to help with any new artwork. They have already made extra legion markers for the variants and those are where things are the closest. The upstream project is known as Colossus, so excising "Titan" won't be a huge burden if that becomes necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061537.n66FbuAl009916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #79 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-06 11:37:55 EDT --- Complete the packaging process as from "Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner" section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061535.n66FZsVZ026045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #78 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-06 11:35:52 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (LGPLv3+) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as LICENSE.txt - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061541.n66Ff0EG010982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|489686 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061540.n66Fex56010928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), | |505154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061555.n66Ft54N014940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 11:55:04 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 15:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061554.n66FsT2p014563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-06 11:54:29 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061601.n66G1oEK016370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #18 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-06 12:01:48 EDT --- Thanx! Can somebody now mark the package as fedora-review+ ? :) I have a question though: does it make sense to add to spec: Provides: xsd-devel For example syslinux (which contains headers and closely related binaries just like this package) does so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061604.n66G4YMN000617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 12:04:33 EDT --- For 3.2.0-2: ? ace -------------------------------------------------------- # Requires: ace-devel - only needed for applications using ACE streams # enable when Fedora gets ACE packages -------------------------------------------------------- - Is this differect from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ace ? * compiler flags -------------------------------------------------------- 67 make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult' 68 m4 /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/cli/mapper.hxx.m4 69 c++ /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/eh/exception.cxx 70 c++ /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/mm/new.cxx 71 c++ /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/mm/counter.cxx 72 c++ /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/mm/buffer.cxx 73 c++ /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/rtti/type-info.cxx 74 c++ /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.4/cult/trace/log.cxx -------------------------------------------------------- - From this build.log it "seems" that Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Please make it sure that Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored. If this is already honored, make build.log more verbose so that we can easily check it from build.log. ! rpmlint warnings --------------------------------------------------------- xsd-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsd-doc-3.2.0/cxx/tree/guide/cxx-tree-guide.ps xsd-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsd-doc-3.2.0/cxx/parser/guide/cxx-parser-guide.ps xsd-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsd-doc-3.2.0/cxx/tree/manual/cxx-tree-manual.ps --------------------------------------------------------- - Can these files be converted into UTF-8 easily? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061603.n66G3eFE016694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-06 12:03:39 EDT --- pong please hold, I will do this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061605.n66G5QiG017339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 12:05:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have a question though: does it make sense to add to spec: > Provides: xsd-devel I don't think this is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061613.n66GDJBB002856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 12:13:16 EDT --- Well, the newest srpm is the one written in comment 14, right? (Personally I would prefer that srpm is also to renamed as "mausezahn") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:22:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061622.n66GMbkh020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #11 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-06 12:22:34 EDT --- Everything is all set except that aqua seems to only be available as part of the apbs download. However, its LGPLv2+, which doesn't jive with apbs. Should I just pull aqua out of apbs' SVN repo and make it its own package that way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061623.n66GN7nx021158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #21 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-06 12:23:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > ? ace > -------------------------------------------------------- > # Requires: ace-devel - only needed for applications using ACE streams > # enable when Fedora gets ACE packages > -------------------------------------------------------- > - Is this differect from > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ace ? Yep! The ace that XSD supports is an Adaptive Communication Environment and can be found from here: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html I'll add this URL as a comment to the spec file as a reminder what the hell is ACE ;) > Please make it sure that Fedora specific compilation flags are > correctly honored. If this is already honored, make build.log more > verbose so that we can easily check it from build.log. I'll look into it. Thanx. > --------------------------------------------------------- > xsd-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/xsd-doc-3.2.0/cxx/tree/guide/cxx-tree-guide.ps > xsd-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/xsd-doc-3.2.0/cxx/parser/guide/cxx-parser-guide.ps > xsd-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/xsd-doc-3.2.0/cxx/tree/manual/cxx-tree-manual.ps > --------------------------------------------------------- > - Can these files be converted into UTF-8 easily? Unfortunately I'm not aware of a tool that can convert Postscript files to UTF-8. I tried to do it manually, but wasn't successful :( I did however document this error in initial report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061623.n66GNbSW005281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|xsdcpp |xsd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061639.n66GdLGi008626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 --- Comment #4 from Jiri Olsa 2009-07-06 12:39:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > formal review is here, see the notes below: > > BAD source files match upstream: > OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > OK dist tag is present. > OK license field matches the actual license. > OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv3+). License text included in > package. > OK latest version is being packaged. > OK BuildRequires are proper. > OK compiler flags are appropriate. > OK %clean is present. > OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). > OK debuginfo package looks complete. > BAD rpmlint is silent. > OK final provides and requires look sane. > N/A %check is present and all tests pass. > OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. > OK owns the directories it creates. > OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > OK no duplicates in %files. > BAD file permissions are appropriate. > OK correct scriptlets present. > OK code, not content. > OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > OK no headers. > OK no pkgconfig files. > OK no libtool .la droppings. > OK not a GUI app. > > - source archives differs - a newer one is packaged in srpm, you should never > change a publicly released archive, but release a new one with increased > version > - rpmlint complains a bit: > latrace.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > latrace.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs fixed > latrace.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libltaudit.so > - can be ignored here fixed > latrace.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libltaudit.so > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > - hint when rpmlint is run with "-i" > This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() > context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library > function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the > error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any > state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an > actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the > situation. > - requires a comment why this is correct it is in the flex code.. YY_FATAL_ERROR define defaults to yy_fatal_error function, which calls exit. So far I can see 2 options: - either leave it as it is, ending up in the program exit due to the fatal cond., - or redefine YY_FATAL_ERROR to notify user without exit, but this ends with segfault.. currently I'd rather leave it as it is > > latrace.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/latrace 0555 > latrace.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/libltaudit.so 0555 > - should be 0755 > - config files in /etc should be writable by owner (0644) fixed new spec file and sources are uploaded: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jolsa/latrace/latrace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jolsa/latrace/latrace-0.5.6-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061641.n66GfxTo025314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #17 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-06 12:41:58 EDT --- Updated package incorporating new release (1.5.6), which upstream has applied Makefile patches for. Incorporated changes to INSTALL="install -p" Package is available at: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/daemonize-1.5.6-1.src.rpm http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/daemonize.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061645.n66Gjix0010166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 12:45:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > > ? ace > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > # Requires: ace-devel - only needed for applications using ACE streams > > # enable when Fedora gets ACE packages > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > - Is this differect from > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ace ? > > Yep! > The ace that XSD supports is an Adaptive Communication Environment > and can be found from here: > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html Ah, thanks. This one is review request bug 450164 (which is blocked by legal issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 16:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061657.n66GvJN9012807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-06 12:57:18 EDT --- Should this obsolete ltrace? Maybe I'm confused as to the usage case overlap here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061702.n66H2sXp030762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-06 13:02:53 EDT --- That license seems to contradict itself (commercial use is OK with credit, but no permission to sell, etc.) but I have a hard time thinking that even a liberal interpretation could be free. It starts out good: " All the graphics and meshes are freeware. Even for commercial Games. I just want my name in the Credits in the commercial case: Reiner "Tiles" Prokein. You can modify my graphics in every needed way to fit it to your needs: size, colour, fileformat, etc., you can reuse the textures ... . " But then it contradicts itself: " Even when the Graphics and meshes are freeware, it doesn?t mean that you can upload my raw graphics and meshes to your page, sell them or do something else with it. This also includes recoloured or in other ways modified Sprites, Tilesets or meshes. The graphics and meshes itself are mine as long as you haven?t made something with it. But it becomes completely yours when you make a game or something like that with it :) . " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061708.n66H8ErD015858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #23 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-06 13:08:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > correctly honored. If this is already honored, make build.log more > verbose so that we can easily check it from build.log. Build flags were already correctly honoured, the build log is now more verbose. Updated package: %build -CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./build.sh +MAKEFLAGS="verbose=1" CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./build.sh Also added new entries to changelog and a few comments. Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd.spec SRPM URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd-3.2.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1457171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061710.n66HAgis000520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 13:10:40 EDT --- Wow, that license is a mess. I'm just going to say non-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061712.n66HCCkT017000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] New: Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Summary: Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giesen at snickers.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/sipcalc/sipcalc.spec SRPM URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/sipcalc/sipcalc-1.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: Sipcalc is an "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator This is a new package, I am a new packager (this is my second package submitted for review) and I require a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509609] Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061718.n66HI5cw002028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(herlo1 at gmail.com) --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-07-06 13:18:04 EDT --- Clint, can you confirm for me that this PHP script pulls in the Magpie RSS libraries properly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061720.n66HKnXu019144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 13:20:47 EDT --- For 3.0.11-4: * License - As spot commented, please change the license tag to "LGPLv2+". * Conditional BuildRequires ----------------------------------------------------- 274 checking for cppunit-config... no ----------------------------------------------------- - cppunit-devel is available on Fedora. Would you try to add "BR: cppunit-devel" ? - Also configure.in suggests that ImageMagick support should be enabled by default. Would you try to add "BR: ImageMagick-devel"? * Man files ---------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/man/man1/%{name}-config.1.gz %files devel %{_bindir}/nurbs++-config --------------------------------------------------- ?- For macros: * Please use %{_mandir} for %{_datadir}/man * If you use %{name} macro for %{name}-config.1.gz, please also use %{name} in %{_bindir}/nurbs++-config Then: - %{name}-config.1.gz man file should belong to -devel subpackage, not to main package. * Undefined non-weak symbols - $ rpmlint nurbs++ shows lots of rpmlint warnings related to undefined non-weak symbols: --------------------------------------------------- nurbs++.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4PLib11ClassPOvoidIdEE nurbs++.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4PLib6MatrixIfEE nurbs++.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4PLib6MatrixIdEE .... .... nurbs++.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4PLib11ClassPOvoidIfEE nurbs++.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4PLib6MatrixIfEE nurbs++.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4PLib6MatrixIdEE --------------------------------------------------- You can see these undefined non-weak symbols also by: --------------------------------------------------- $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 >/dev/null undefined symbol: _ZTIN4PLib11ClassPOvoidIdEE (/usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0) undefined symbol: _ZTIN4PLib6MatrixIfEE (/usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0) undefined symbol: _ZTIN4PLib6MatrixIdEE (/usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0) ....... --------------------------------------------------- It seems that - libnurbsd.so.0 should be linked also against * libmatrix.so * libmatrixN.so * libmatrixI.so - libnurbsf.so should be linked also against * The above 3 libraries * Also libGL.so, libGLU.so For example: ---------------------------------------------------- $ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libmatrix.so.1:/usr/lib/libmatrixN.so.1:/usr/lib/libmatrixI.so.1:/usr/lib/libGL.so:/usr/lib/libGLU.so ldd -r /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00c8b000) /usr/lib/libmatrix.so.1 (0x007f0000) /usr/lib/libmatrixN.so.1 (0x00aaa000) /usr/lib/libmatrixI.so.1 (0x00eea000) /usr/lib/libGL.so (0x00110000) /usr/lib/libGLU.so (0x00ce0000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x003e5000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x008c7000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00184000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00b61000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x004dc000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x006c2000) libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x00300000) libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x00327000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x00305000) libdrm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdrm.so.2 (0x0030a000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00c22000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00caa000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00761000) libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x00730000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00bbd000) librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00315000) ---------------------------------------------------- * %changelog format - It is useful in Fedora CVS that one line is put between each %changelog entry like: ---------------------------------------------------- * Sat Jun 06 2009 3.0.11-4 - Patch to fix build for gcc-4.4 - Add buildrequires to fix autoreconf/libtool command missing in f11 koji * Sat Jan 24 2009 3.0.11-3 - Modified patch to enable opengl build * Sat Jan 24 2009 3.0.11-2 .... ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061727.n66HRuSj020644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-06 13:27:55 EDT --- Any reason the name is so terribly long? We already have msp430-binutils, spu-binutils and mingw32-* which seems to give precedence to armv5ejl-binutils, unless you expect to actually need to package binutils for some OS other than linux or some particular variant other than "unknown". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061725.n66HPv2B020318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 13:25:55 EDT --- Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061741.n66HfWHc008871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-06 13:41:31 EDT --- fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Scriptaculous/python-Scriptaculous.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Scriptaculous/python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1457322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061753.n66HrugD012087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #14 from Dave Malcolm 2009-07-06 13:53:55 EDT --- Thanks. > Generally there's no point in mentioning the name of the package in the > summary. There's a group trying to clean these up; there's little point in > adding another for them to fix. Fixed; summary now reads "Data manipulation tool for the command line" > It would be nice to elaborate just a bit in the %description. One gets the > impression that this package is something akin to mysqlclient, but in reality > it's very far from that. I'd at least mention that it can parse log files and > allow you to make sql-like queries on them. Good point; I'd entirely missed that. I've rewritten the description based on your suggestion. > I'm supposed to ask you to bug upstream to include the text of the license. In > this case I guess I'm just bugging you directly. I consider myself bugged :-) I did a 0.4.1 release containing a COPYING file, and added it to the specfile. Updated SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/squeal-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Updated specfile: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/squeal.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061756.n66Hubto029557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #18 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-06 13:56:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Okay, but now the install process isn't preserving the time stamps. Add > INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. > > After you've fixed this the package should be good to go. I won't give an > official approval yet, since to import you need to be sponsored, which I won't > do before you fill the criteria (other submission and informal reviews). Would you like me to add you to the CC for my other submissions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 17:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061759.n66HxLb5013197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-06 13:59:19 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (xsd) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 18:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061825.n66IPvCd020705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #12 from Jerry James 2009-07-06 14:25:56 EDT --- Sorry for missing the fonts in the first place. Since this has already been approved and CVS is done, you can do anything you like. If it was me, though, and it looked like a nethack-bitmap-fonts package would appear within a short time, I'd just wait. Otherwise, you could be pushing an update in only a couple of weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 18:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061848.n66ImJpT008620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-06 14:48:18 EDT --- Thank You! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xsd Short Description: W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler Owners: anttix Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 18:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061858.n66Iw6rb010832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #13 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-07-06 14:58:05 EDT --- I changed the spec to avoid using automake. Spec URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib-0.4-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 19:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061929.n66JTkdE017835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause 2009-07-06 15:29:45 EDT --- > > * License: TODO > > - License in spec file does not match the actual license (COPYING looks like a > > variant of the MIT license) > > - however, the included spec file mentiones BSD > > - the enlightenment authors mentioned usually only BSD as the license of the > > related projects > > - I've asked fedora-legal for clarification and got a response that the > > following license field should be used: > > License: MIT with advertising > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00003.html > > - license file packaged > > When I looked at the license, I initially mis-identified it as being an BSD > license. And then, like you saw as well, I saw other components of > enlightenment with BSD licenses. So that led me to believe that I really had > put in the correct license. > > Anyway, this is fixed. Sorry, not 100% - the line must be exactly as I wrote: License: MIT with advertising > > * compilation: TODO > > - supports parallel build > > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used > > - it would be better not to build the static libraries instead of deleting them > > later, please add a "--disable-static" and remove the deleting of the *.a files > > Fixed. Please remove the commented lines completely: # Removing .a files #find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.a' -exec rm '{}' \; > > * main package should not contain development related parts: TODO > > /usr/lib/ewl/tests should be in -devel package > > Fixed. Unfortunately this fix has introduced a minor issue: the directory %{_libdir}/%{name} itself is now an orphan, since it isn't included neither in the main nor in the -devel package. Please add %dir {_libdir}/%{name} to the main pacakge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 19:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061946.n66JkfMk006495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #26 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-07-06 15:46:40 EDT --- > Requires: ace-devel I don't think adding a requirement for ACE is a good idea. ACE support is optional and I would expect only a few people needing this functionality (binary serialization to ACE CDR streams). Is there something like Suggests: or Recommends: ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 19:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061949.n66JnQQe022744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #27 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-07-06 15:49:25 EDT --- > Can these files be converted into UTF-8 easily? I think these files can be safely removed from the package. They are a by-product of creating the PDF files from XHTML and we only keep them because, well, we have them and maybe somebody would need them for something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 19:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061950.n66JoGwB007661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 --- Comment #6 from Jiri Olsa 2009-07-06 15:50:15 EDT --- Well, ltrace is able to display system calls also, which latrace is not, as it is a pure glibc LD_AUDIT frontend. The justification for the latrace usage should be probably the speed.. it should be far more faster then ltrace, since it uses callbacks directly from the glibc dynamic linker. for latrace usage plz see links on http://latrace.sourceforge.net/doc.shtml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 19:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061951.n66JpUhq023640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #9 from Denis Arnaud 2009-07-06 15:51:28 EDT --- Thanks for that review! 1. You are absolutely right about the license. The authors specify "GPL >= 3"; so, GPLv3+ must be used (instead of GPLv3). 2. As for the %{packrel} macro, as I now understand, it should be used for the release of the upstream R package (and not the RPM release). The updated specification file and source RPM are to be found at the following URLs: ----------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/3/R-RM2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/3/R-RM2-0.0-3.fc11.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------- As for the package review process, besides a few reviews, I watch almost all the C++-related packages, so as to try to help where there is no other reviewer assigned (it is not that much, but I own quite a few upstream open source projects, which I have to push if I ever want them to reach a critical mass). However, you are right, and I do fully understand that we are never enough to perform peer reviews :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 20:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062006.n66K6alo028229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-06 16:06:35 EDT --- would be okay if i drop rio_de_hola aka demo? these files are in the srpm, too.. but not in the rpms. is this a compromiss? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 20:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062011.n66KB0aH012945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #28 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2009-07-06 16:10:56 EDT --- Addressed both issues and replaced the sha module with hashlib to eliminate the DeprecationWarning. The latest RPMs can be found at the usual place: http://dev.laptop.org/~ypod/releases/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 20:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062018.n66KHx9h014773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 16:17:58 EDT --- If it gets rid of all the files which are under that non-free license, then that should be enough to lift the legal hold. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 20:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062023.n66KNU9B016482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #57 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-06 16:23:25 EDT --- Can I have an update of yafaray package to be compliant with selinux ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 20:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062032.n66KWjoe018338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-06 16:32:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Optflags are not used. Upstream fixed this > - scons install recompiles targets. fixed Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/elfelli.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/elfelli-0.3.1-1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1457695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 20:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062045.n66Kj7b4021173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2009-07-06 16:45:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libqinfinity Short Description: Qt interface for libinfinity Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062104.n66L4MN5025530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 17:04:21 EDT --- Hmm, it seems that aqua is a customized version of PMG as per http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/APBS . In that case I'm really not sure what should be done. Many possibilities come to mind - package aqua separately [if it has development that is clearly separate from apbs] - create a aqua subpackage [development as part of apbs but still other apps might use it] - don't package aqua at all [an incompatible fork of the PMG library that is used nowhere else] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062108.n66L8mw9009442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 17:08:47 EDT --- Sure, and for the informal reviews too. Or you can just put the bug numbers here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062107.n66L7I8Q009217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 17:07:16 EDT --- btw on fedora-devel there has been a discussion raging on whether autotools files are OK to patch and rerun autotools vs hacking the preprocessed files manually, which is analogous to this matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062108.n66L8QWv009379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-06 17:08:24 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062124.n66LOFVi012864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062124.n66LO6U4012824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-06 17:24:04 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (a0e296c454571dd650abd7d830a311c2c84e9339) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062127.n66LRwb2030924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #28 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-06 17:27:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > > Requires: ace-devel > > I don't think adding a requirement for ACE is a good idea. ACE support is > optional and I would expect only a few people needing this functionality > (binary serialization to ACE CDR streams). Is there something like Suggests: or > Recommends: ? AFAIK there is no "recommended packages" information in RPM files. The dependency is currently commented out because Fedora does not have ACE packages. If they become available, the decision whether to depend on them or not can be made. The current information in the spec file serves only as a reminder to me and other package maintainers to look into the issue when ACE packages become available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062137.n66LbKjh000520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 17:37:18 EDT --- - I think it would be nice if the linking would use the optflags too, but it seems the current elfelli build scripts don't support it. Probably it's fine (unless -fPIC is in %{optflags} in which case the linking too needs -fPIC). - You might use a macro for the release version to avoid the duplicates in release, source and build root. E.g. %global rel rc1 and change all references to rc1 to %{rel}. - You are missing the icon cache updates, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** Fix the issues before import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062143.n66LhN0j017198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Dave Malcolm 2009-07-06 17:43:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: squeal Short Description: Data manipulation tool for the command line Owners: dmalcolm Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062145.n66LjxqV002490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-07-06 17:45:56 EDT --- Just to clarify legal status, this is waiting first on the board to clarify whether Fedora wants to disallow software that is specifically for downloading porn. If no ban is put in effect, spot will look into the legal aspects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 21:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062150.n66LoFwo018986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-06 17:50:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Hmm, it seems that aqua is a customized version of PMG as per > http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/APBS . > > In that case I'm really not sure what should be done. Many possibilities come > to mind > > - package aqua separately [if it has development that is clearly separate from > apbs] > - create a aqua subpackage [development as part of apbs but still other apps > might use it] > - don't package aqua at all [an incompatible fork of the PMG library that is > used nowhere else] Oh, this is getting fun. I'll go with option 2, since Nathan seems to have taken over the aqua development anyway. It looks like this will also be necessary with pmgZ, as again - it seems to primarily be developed as part of apbs, not really its own independent library. Only maloc can really be its "own" library - Mike Holst still manages that. Here's a shot at an rpm for pmgZ - I can't seem to find much in the way of guidelines for subpackages in this sort of instance - should independent package requests be made for each (with blockers added for this package)? Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pmgz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-pmgz-1.1.0-1.20090706svn1360.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 22:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062201.n66M17hk021490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from steve 2009-07-06 18:01:06 EDT --- Thanks for your time, Spot ! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wmfire Short Description: WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames Owners: lonetwin Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 22:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062215.n66MFZ1S024265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #11 from Jerry James 2009-07-06 18:15:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350698) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350698) New display-table support The problem with Rawhide XEmacs is that the implementation of char-tables, and therefore display-tables, has changed. They are no longer vectors, but objects. The vector implementation was okay for ASCII/ISO8859-1, when we could limit the length to 256 and be okay. That approach does not scale for international character sets, hence the new implementation. I'm attaching a patch that starts dealing with the problem. This isn't a complete solution, because the new file (generic/pg-display-table.el) isn't in the right place. The x-symbol code needs it, so the compile fails. If you can find a good place to put that file so it can be (require)d at need, I think it will work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 22:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062229.n66MT3dE026573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-06 18:29:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: elfelli Short Description: Visualisation tool for flux lines Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 22:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062225.n66MPu4x026216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 18:25:55 EDT --- If the releases are made along apbs, then you can just build them all in the same spec and do e.g. %package -n aqua and %package -n pmgZ and so on... Probably best to ask first upstream, though, if those are meant to be distributed as individual packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 22:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062228.n66MSFuO026504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-06 18:28:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > - I think it would be nice if the linking would use the optflags too, but it > seems the current elfelli build scripts don't support it. Probably it's fine > (unless -fPIC is in %{optflags} in which case the linking too needs -fPIC). Upstream added the scons option "ccflags". I will get in touch with them and see if there is a possibility to add support for optflags in the linking too. > - You might use a macro for the release version to avoid the duplicates in > release, source and build root. E.g. > %global rel rc1 > and change all references to rc1 to %{rel}. Upstream made the 'release candidate' release only for the package review. But you are right that the usage of a macros would facilitate the handling. > - You are missing the icon cache updates, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Thanks, I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 22:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062244.n66MiDlB014480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-06 18:44:12 EDT --- Scratch build failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1457973 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 23:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] New: Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Summary: Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jortel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/chameleon/trunk/chameleon.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/h/chameleon/chameleon-0.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Description: Chameleon is a tool used to transform database schema (DDL/SQL) files from a common DDL/SQL to database specific schema files. Target users are projects that need to maintain schema creation/upgrade files and support multiple databases. Initially supported databases are Oracle and PostgreSQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 23:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062313.n66NDHbc020923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-06 19:13:15 EDT --- Given the license of the build dependency,(wxWidgets, zlib, libtiff) which all are GPLv3 compatible we will not have a problem to move to GPLv3+ (like if any dependency were GPLv2 only). Now nothing requires us to be GPLv3+ either (exept if we consider COPYING text matter much than source code). Quoting the guidelines, we have to: - Have a license field - If a COPYING is provided, have it bundled. - Consider the binary rpm as the license field. What we don't have to do: - Have license field to match COPYING text. So this ends to be the #3rd choice which is the one of the src.rpm All other fields from the review have been corrected. ----------------------- This package (panoglview) is APPROVED by me ----------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 23:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907062352.n66NqkYa010344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #20 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-06 19:52:45 EDT --- Submitted new package for review: Bug 509883 - Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 00:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070010.n670AOmN013641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-06 20:10:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > gives me a 404 right now fixed, I've re-organized the review queue on my fpeople.org Note: the native Fedora package has been orphaned and remains as such until now. I think there is a plan to have it merged with gc. I may drop this package then. (And with advices from the gc native package maintainer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 00:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070028.n670SBTO016694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 00:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509936] New: Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Summary: Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mads at kiilerich.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kiilerich.com/tortoisehg.spec SRPM URL: http://kiilerich.com/tortoisehg-0.8-3.src.rpm Description: TortoiseHg is "TortoiseSVN for Hg" ... if you happen to know TortoiseSVN ... It consists of a gui layer on top of hg, available from the commandline through the hgtk command. The commands can also be made available in the context menu in Nautilus. I created the rpm package for upstream and would like to have it properly included in fedora. This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 00:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070029.n670TvuN002224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tortoisehg-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 00:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070041.n670fJ1f004564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 20:41:18 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 00:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070041.n670ftRl019516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-06 20:41:54 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 01:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070106.n6716OBn009088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-07-06 21:06:23 EDT --- I?m from fife upstream and i will fix that license problem with the demo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 01:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070123.n671NpXC012353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org --- Comment #2 from Adam Goode 2009-07-06 21:23:50 EDT --- Why "armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi"? I think the ARM SIG is using "armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 02:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070208.n6728RVq020643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-06 22:08:26 EDT --- Looks good; the license is fixed and Release: isn't obfuscated. In general I'd suggest removing commented lines from the %files section and simply not defining unused macros like %packrel, but these are hardly blockers. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 03:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070344.n673i6K6024511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 23:44:05 EDT --- ok, upstream just pushed out version 0.1.1. ;) This is what I will be importing: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/supybot-meetbot/supybot-meetbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/supybot-meetbot/supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: supybot-meetbot Short Description: Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings Owners: kevin Branches: devel F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 03:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070358.n673wpdf027781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #11 from John Guthrie 2009-07-06 23:58:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > > * License: TODO > > > - License in spec file does not match the actual license (COPYING looks like a > > > variant of the MIT license) > > > - however, the included spec file mentiones BSD > > > - the enlightenment authors mentioned usually only BSD as the license of the > > > related projects > > > - I've asked fedora-legal for clarification and got a response that the > > > following license field should be used: > > > License: MIT with advertising > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00003.html > > > - license file packaged > > > > When I looked at the license, I initially mis-identified it as being an BSD > > license. And then, like you saw as well, I saw other components of > > enlightenment with BSD licenses. So that led me to believe that I really had > > put in the correct license. > > > > Anyway, this is fixed. > > Sorry, not 100% - the line must be exactly as I wrote: > > License: MIT with advertising Oops. Missed that detail. Fixed. > > > * compilation: TODO > > > - supports parallel build > > > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used > > > - it would be better not to build the static libraries instead of deleting them > > > later, please add a "--disable-static" and remove the deleting of the *.a files > > > > Fixed. > > Please remove the commented lines completely: > # Removing .a files > #find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.a' -exec rm '{}' \; Fixed. > > > * main package should not contain development related parts: TODO > > > /usr/lib/ewl/tests should be in -devel package > > > > Fixed. > > Unfortunately this fix has introduced a minor issue: the directory > %{_libdir}/%{name} itself is now an orphan, since it isn't included neither in > the main nor in the -devel package. Please add > %dir {_libdir}/%{name} > to the main pacakge. Missed that one. Fixed. Here are the new URLs: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-9.fc11.src.rpm Thanks again for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 03:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070359.n673xKlE012610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-06 23:59:19 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070402.n67421hi013498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:02:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070400.n6740ewM028308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:00:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509538] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070407.n6747cx7014987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509538 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:07:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070405.n6745FMf029166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:05:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509822] Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070411.n674BnQD030518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509822 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:11:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509823] Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070413.n674DUcL018370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509823 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:13:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070415.n674Fai7019487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:15:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070421.n674LdAY000713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:21:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070425.n674P9oR021889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:25:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070426.n674QDKl022108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 00:26:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070438.n674cTCl004260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-07 00:38:28 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070450.n674otkF027702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 00:50:54 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 04:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070454.n674sDAf028054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 00:54:13 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 05:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070535.n675Z8Tj003446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #11 from Denis Arnaud 2009-07-07 01:35:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-RM2 Short Description: Revenue Management and Pricing for R Owners: denisarnaud Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 05:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070535.n675ZYeY016065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 05:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070543.n675h2K5017269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #12 from Denis Arnaud 2009-07-07 01:43:02 EDT --- Taking into account comment #10, the updated specification file and source RPM are to be found at the following URLs: ----------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/4/R-RM2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/4/R-RM2-0.0-4.fc11.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------- If nobody vetoes, that is the version I will import in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 05:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070559.n675x67i020116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 01:59:05 EDT --- b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 05:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070559.n675xBSa007680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 01:59:10 EDT --- b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 06:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070634.n676YNKd026878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #15 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-07 02:34:22 EDT --- it's easier to modify source0 to meet the license requirements! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 06:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070643.n676hOas016254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 02:43:23 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 06:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070648.n676mFvE017435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 02:48:15 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-meetbot-0.1.1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:10:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070710.n677AUMm022237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-07 03:10:29 EDT --- I am sorry kevin that I seem to overlooked at spec and approved with wrong install location. Thanks for fixing this immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070710.n677AKx9022202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 03:10:19 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070714.n677E39o002481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 03:14:02 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070714.n677ExDA002608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 03:14:59 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509538] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070737.n677biQH007225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509538 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 03:37:43 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070743.n677haFl008370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #21 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-07 03:43:35 EDT --- Submitted new package for review: Bug 509965 - Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070742.n677gDfx008237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] New: Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Summary: Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giesen at snickers.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/snmptt/snmptt.spec SRPM URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/snmptt/snmptt-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl This is a new package, I am a new packager (this is my third package submitted for review) and I require a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509806] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070754.n677sMkT031027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-07 03:54:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Thanks! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Server Short Description: Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 08:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070801.n6781ViG012392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 04:01:30 EDT --- slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 08:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070814.n678E4Aj015797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-07 04:14:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > A new version is here : 0.71.100 > > %prep > try to keep timestamp when using %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' Done > > It shouldn't be needed to use CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS to > use our opt flags(at least on recent Fedora). > removed > License Field is GPLv2+ (which match source code header) but GPLv3 text file is > redistributed. (need to check lastest version) > GPLv3. Its been clarified in the latest version. > Please submit .desktop and icon upstream or pick the one from the package if > available. Submitted them. If the upstream does not provide them, I need to make them ? I got them from http://hanzlici.cz/packages/fedora/panini/ this time. > > Try to have the compiled binary / pixmaps installed with make install at > %install step. I'm not sure on how to do this. The package generates a makefile using qmake-qt4. I need to patch this generated makefile before make uses it?? the srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini-0.71.102-1.fc12.src.rpm the spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini.spec all other files, (logs and the desktop and icon etc.) are at http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 08:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070801.n6781ao8000445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 04:01:36 EDT --- slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 07:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509807] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070758.n677weRI032029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509807 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-07-07 03:58:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1): > > APPROVED. Thanks, Parag! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config Short Description: Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 08:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070831.n678V518020923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #76 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-07 04:30:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #73) > Can anyone give me some pointers on how to scrub the extra $ORIGIN that keeps > getting added on? grep \$ORIGIN * -R This will help to find potential place where $ORIGIN rpath will be set. > Alfred who runs the Solaris rpm for Songbird essentially disables the rpath, > then sets his own afterwards in order to clean anything being added > automatically: > > LDFLAGS="-norunpath -z ignore -R'\$\$ORIGIN:\$\$ORIGIN/..'" Overriding environnement value do not always work and may provide undesired effects. You need to patch the Makefile.am or configure.in to have the rpath usage conditionalized as needed. Building in mock for F-11... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 08:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070842.n678ghvk023377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-07 04:42:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Any reason the name is so terribly long? We already have msp430-binutils, > spu-binutils and mingw32-* which seems to give precedence to armv5ejl-binutils, > unless you expect to actually need to package binutils for some OS other than > linux or some particular variant other than "unknown". I'm afraid that these cross-tools are named wrong (except mingw, which is different). Cross-toolchain should inform potential user about processor architecture it designed for (armv5tejl), target (linux) and binary format (GNU EABI). I think, that only "unknown" part may be omitted, but I feel that it's better to rename it to something like "fedora" (not "redhat", as Adam suggested). For example, if someone will develop bootloaders for arm-platforms, then he should obtain two different cross-toolchains. One - for developing Linux kernel and user-space applications (which is exactly what I submitted) and another - for developing "bare-metal" applications, such as bootloaders. See these links for the details: http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/arm/portal/release830?@template=datasheet http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/arm/portal/release858?@template=datasheet That's why we should specify explicitly what exact type of cross-toolchains we're providing. I didn't dig into details yet, but it seems that conventional gcc tries to link by default with libraries and routines, which cannot be used at the boot-stage (for example, in my case, it tries to link with code for trapping division by zero). I would like to remind you, that I'm still not an authoritative person in developing for ARM, so I can be wrong in some particular details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509823] Review Request: hunspell-ti - Tigrigna hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070907.n67970Xa016841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509823 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509822] Review Request: hunspell-am - Amharic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070906.n6796MYI016748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509822 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070922.n679MHIe000304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-07 05:22:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Why "armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi"? I think the ARM SIG is using > "armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi". Yes, naming scheme is wrong. However, I think that proper scheme will be armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070928.n679SmR2001918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-07 05:28:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) >> License Field is GPLv2+ (which match source code header) but GPLv3 text file is >> redistributed. (need to check lastest version) >> >GPLv3. Its been clarified in the latest version. How ? from the source code header, none are tag as GPLv3 but GPLv2+, with the exeption of pvQt_QTVR.{cpp,h} which are licensed as LGPLv2+ The binary package will ends to be GPLv2+ then! But since the GPLv3 is available from the svn repository, this will be more accurate to use GPLv3+ in the license fied anyway. So OKay. ... > > Try to have the compiled binary / pixmaps installed with make install at > > %install step. > > I'm not sure on how to do this. The package generates a makefile using > qmake-qt4. I need to patch this generated makefile before make uses it?? You will need to patch the panini.pro file. > the srpm: > > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini-0.71.102-1.fc12.src.rpm I don't understand why having %global fname panini, then fname is only used once?! But this remains trivial. Also, you could consider to clean the old comments while importing. FE-Legal: >From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252#c3 my understanding is that we aren't really creating panorama with this tool, but we are extracting perspective from already made panorama pictures. Hence, this doesn't fall under any patent anyone may beleive to have. But I would like a confirmation from FE-Legal about this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070938.n679c5Xk024371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnu |armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnuea |eabi-binutils - A GNU |bi-binutils - A GNU |collection of binary |collection of binary |utilities |utilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070936.n679aS4b004071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-07 05:36:27 EDT --- Just changed names: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils-2.19.51.0.11-23.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070943.n679h2wV025481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-07 05:43:01 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070944.n679iWoI005624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-07 05:44:31 EDT --- Thank you Jan, seems fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070946.n679kdFY026571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #41 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-07 05:46:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Is anything happening with this package? Any progress on fixing the issues? Are there any outstanding and known issues (guideline violations)? I was under impression this is just waiting for a reviewer (sorry for not answering the ping). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070947.n679l0Vk006425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | --- Comment #42 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-07 05:46:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Is anything happening with this package? Any progress on fixing the issues? Are there any outstanding and known issues (guideline violations)? I was under impression this is just waiting for a reviewer (sorry for not answering the ping). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070949.n679nJpB006629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-07 05:49:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > >> License Field is GPLv2+ (which match source code header) but GPLv3 text file is > >> redistributed. (need to check lastest version) > >> > > >GPLv3. Its been clarified in the latest version. > How ? from the source code header, none are tag as GPLv3 but GPLv2+, with the > exeption of pvQt_QTVR.{cpp,h} which are licensed as LGPLv2+ > The binary package will ends to be GPLv2+ then! But since the GPLv3 is > available from the svn repository, this will be more accurate to use GPLv3+ in > the license fied anyway. So OKay. > i was referring to this in the release file (panini-0.71-release.txt): "LICENSE Panini 0.7 is free software, copyright (C) 2008 - 2009 Thomas K Sharpless. You can redistribute and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." Hadn't checked the source files. I'll try contacting upstream to clarify. > ... > > > Try to have the compiled binary / pixmaps installed with make install at > > > %install step. > > > > I'm not sure on how to do this. The package generates a makefile using > > qmake-qt4. I need to patch this generated makefile before make uses it?? > You will need to patch the panini.pro file. okay. I'll try that. might take me 2-3 days to learn up qt. > > the srpm: > > > > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini-0.71.102-1.fc12.src.rpm > I don't understand why having %global fname panini, then fname is only used > once?! But this remains trivial. I had used it more earlier. will remove it. > Also, you could consider to clean the old comments while importing. will do that. > > FE-Legal: > From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252#c3 my understanding is > that we aren't really creating panorama with this tool, but we are extracting > perspective from already made panorama pictures. Hence, this doesn't fall under > any patent anyone may beleive to have. > But I would like a confirmation from FE-Legal about this... okay I'll do the other work until then regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 09:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907070951.n679pdX4027775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-07-07 05:51:35 EDT --- It?s your package you can do want you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] New: Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 Summary: Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints/CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints/CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071014.n67AEgek001064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #8 from Juha Tuomala 2009-07-07 06:14:41 EDT --- $ rpmlint -v /home/tuju/PKGS/SRPMS/python-utmp-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm python-utmp.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. spec: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp.spec src: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458499 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071020.n67AKWea002826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-07 06:20:31 EDT --- While I tend to think that creating a sub-package is useless here, I believe adding a 'flickr-upload' for the use case Chris mentioned in comment #2 may make sense. (there are examples here as well, see perl-MIME-tools perl-Pod-Coverage perl-SOAP-Lite perl-Template-Toolkit perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker perl-DBI perl-Archive-Tar perl-Tk perl-Module-CoreList perl-SGMLSpm perl-Test-Harness perl-JSON-XS perl-Module-Signature perl-XML-Twig perl-File-Find-Rule perl-Archive-Zip perl-Pod-POM perl-CPAN perl-Module-Build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071022.n67AMqc7003164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 06:22:51 EDT --- (You don't need the NEEDSPONSOR tag since I've already agreed to sponsor you.) - Drop "SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is" from the summary. - Change the Requires: /sbin/chkconfig to Requires: chkconfig. - The character set conversion should be iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 ChangeLog > ChangeLog.utf8 && \ touch -r ChangeLog ChangeLog.utf8 && \ mv ChangeLog{.utf8,} - Drop the exit 0 from %build. - %{_initdir} should be %{_initddir}. What's the idea behind the following?? %if 0%{?rhel} > 5 || 0%{?fedora} > 9 install -D -p -m 0755 snmptt-init.d %{buildroot}%{_initdir}/snmptt %else install -D -p -m 0755 snmptt-init.d %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/snmptt %endif - You can use install to create directories as well with "install -d /path/to/dir" - Use the standard script to create the user https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups - Same thing for the initscript stuff https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071025.n67APAp4015798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #17 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-07 06:25:09 EDT --- Thomas, we discussed about it yesterday, i will comment out the demo package and modify the source0 until you changed these files in demo. it's the easiest way. demo isn't an important package for fife, because it just do what it should. show that fife works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071023.n67ANK2o003362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 06:23:19 EDT --- I've agreed to sponsor you, so no need for the NEEDSPONSOR tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071038.n67Acun1006786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 06:38:55 EDT --- rpmlint output: sipcalc.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Sipcalc sipcalc.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Sipcalc 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - Drop "Sipcalc is" from the summary. Also, learn to run rpmlint on your packages. Whenever you make a submission you should post the output in the request. - You might want to change the .gz of the manfile to .*, since it is possible that the compression format changes in the future. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add ChangeLog to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071044.n67Aimmm019436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 06:44:47 EDT --- Why %dir %{python_sitelib}/lightbox %{python_sitelib}/lightbox/* instead of just %{python_sitelib}/lightbox/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504641] Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071052.n67AqjId009833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-07-07 06:52:43 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jason! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sendxmpp Short Description: A perl script to send xmpp messages Owners: ruben Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071049.n67AnbPV008864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 06:49:36 EDT --- When you have done a few informal reviews I will formally approve this package and daemonize. I suggest doing them on e.g. python- packages, which you can find on the review queue [1]. Please review only packages that aren't tagged with the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag, since I will have to check your review. Also, have you gotten yourself a Fedora account and applied for packager group membership yet? [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 10:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071050.n67AoKYe020887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 06:50:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > When you have done a few informal reviews I will formally approve this package > and daemonize. I suggest doing them on e.g. python- packages, which you can > find on the review queue [1]. .. but of course first you have to fix the two issues raised in the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071106.n67B6Uvh013380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-07 07:06:28 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458565 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071119.n67BJRhb027304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Ismael Olea 2009-07-07 07:19:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: htmlparser Short Description: HTML Parser, a Java library used to parse HTML Owners: olea Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071138.n67BcnL4021017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Novotny 2009-07-07 07:38:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Now I get this on the SRPM: > > mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-crontab-edit 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-migrate-fhs 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-update-cfg 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > these changes of permissions have to be done on the CVS server side, wrote e-mail to Fedora CVS admins btw, I built mailman-2.1.12-5.fc12 with the changes mentioned in comment #7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071148.n67BmiUB001739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-07 07:48:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Proc-Simple Short Description: Launch and control background processes Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490171] Review Request: mediawiki-semantic-forms - An extension to MediaWiki that adds support for web-based forms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071153.n67BrNSx024177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490171 --- Comment #6 from James Laska 2009-07-07 07:53:22 EDT --- Hold off for closing for a bit please. Fedora QA is going through a proof-of-concept with the help of fedora-infrastructure to evaluate whether mediawiki + semantic is a good short-term solution for managing test content on the wiki. Based on this evaluation, I will either close this request or address your concerns in comment#4 and seek approval. Thanks! Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071213.n67CDYRk008564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #18 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-07 08:13:33 EDT --- you know, that I try to include unknown horizons as well? it's a better "demo" than rio de hola! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071226.n67CQxk6011660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-07 08:26:58 EDT --- Yes, I read it, and I have tried (rpmlint from epel): $ rpmlint -I name-repeated-in-summary name-repeated-in-summary: Personally I don't think that this could be considered as blocker, I take it as recommendation Summary: Fast syntax highlighter engine for many programming languages Spec URL: http://www.brandforge.sk/hpejakle/packages/rubygem-coderay.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071229.n67CTdUI000514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-07 08:29:38 EDT --- fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Lightbox/python-Lightbox.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Lightbox/python-Lightbox-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071232.n67CWdL9001368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #18 from Konstantinos 2009-07-07 08:32:34 EDT --- Hi, This is my first package. I checked the package and the spec and I updated them using the comments of Comment 14 and playing with rpmlint. Here is the spec and srpm. SPEC URL:http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/python-urwid.spec SRPM URL:http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/python-urwid-0.9.8.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071234.n67CYQQa013048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #6 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-07-07 08:34:25 EDT --- Builds fine for i586 but fails on x86_64. See build log here. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1458702&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071236.n67CaXD7002427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Dimitris Glezos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |dimitris at glezos.com Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #19 from Dimitris Glezos 2009-07-07 08:36:31 EDT --- Reopening, as we've got a new spec/srpm from Konstantinos who hasn't got bugzilla edit permissions. Hope this is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071236.n67CaQ2W013881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skasal at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal 2009-07-07 08:36:25 EDT --- FAIL no upstream - please put these results to your web page, perhaps to jfch.fedorapeople.org - create a short page for the package - giving back to the comunity OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible, license text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK no compiler flags OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock. OK package installs properly. OK no debuginfo FAIL rpmlint complains W: no URL: tag After creating a page for the project, please add "URL:" tag to the spec file OK no provides nor requires OK no %check, no test suite OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. -- Well, this requires a comment: the package contains data exclusively. The data are precomputed list of compromised keys, as created on computers affected by CVE-2008-0166. The programs made to defend security cannot work without this list, so this package is more similar to a game level data than to a "content". (cf http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content) OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers, no pkgconfig, .la, nor desktop files. Please fix the two FAIL issues above and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071243.n67ChGeZ015183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Hoger 2009-07-07 08:43:16 EDT --- What is the benefit of having this packaged in Fedora? Do you plan to package some tool that will actually make use of them in any way? Where do those fingerprints come from? Can the package possibly get some better name? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071246.n67CkV1G004450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 08:46:29 EDT --- php-hkit-0.5-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-hkit-0.5-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071246.n67Ckapg004486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 08:46:35 EDT --- php-hkit-0.5-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-hkit-0.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071303.n67D3Nqf009780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #6 from Adam Goode 2009-07-07 09:03:22 EDT --- The ARM SIG has chosen armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi, you should probably stay consistent with them and ask them to change it if you think it is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510022] New: Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 Summary: Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/compat-readline5.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/compat-readline5-5.2-15.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Readline library provides a set of functions that allow users to edit command lines. Both Emacs and vi editing modes are available. The Readline library includes additional functions for maintaining a list of previously-entered command lines for recalling or editing those lines, and for performing csh-like history expansion on previous commands. This is a compat package for packages that have license incompatible with GPLv3+ which is used by new readline-6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071327.n67DRA0o017102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #3 from Stepan Kasal 2009-07-07 09:27:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > What is the benefit of having this packaged in Fedora? Do you plan to package > some tool that will actually make use of them in any way? Yes, one or two such packages should follow soon. > Where do those fingerprints come from? Jan has computed big part of them, some parts of the list are downloaded from various sources. Yes, that is something that has to be fixed: the sources should be acknowledged. > Can the package possibly get some better name? ;) Do you have any idea? ;-) I wrote my OK when I realized I cannot come to a better name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071328.n67DSkGZ017503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-07 09:28:46 EDT --- I'm afraid, that you're wrong - no naming scheme was chosed so far (at least they didn't do it in open manner). Moreover, I suspect that using name "redhat" is not suitable. First - it's a trademark, second - we are building Fedora, not the RHEL. Actually, maybe is it better to change this part to something neutral? I did some checks - here are valid gcc naming schemes: i686-pc-linux-gnu (gcc for F-10, i386) powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc for F-11, ppc) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc for x86_64, CentOS 5) armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi (F-10 for ARM on my arm-machine) On the other hand, if we'll add branches for EPEL, then my naming scheme (armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi) will be improper. I'll ask in mail-lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071331.n67DVHmR028790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-07-07 09:31:16 EDT --- New version: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Jun 23 2009 Patrick Monnerat 2.0-2 - Move class files to a package-specific sub-directory. - Get rid of build dependence on "ed". rpmlint output: none koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071337.n67DbcjX030145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-07-07 09:37:37 EDT --- New version: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Jun 19 2009 Patrick Monnerat 5.0.2-2 - Suppress "ed" build requirement. - Tag language files. - Move class files to a package-specific directory. rpmlint output: none koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458803 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071339.n67DdMwD020271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Hoger 2009-07-07 09:39:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > What is the benefit of having this packaged in Fedora? Do you plan to package > > some tool that will actually make use of them in any way? > > Yes, one or two such packages should follow soon. Feel free to CC me on bugs for those. Will that be for SSL only or SSH too? > > Can the package possibly get some better name? ;) > > Do you have any idea? ;-) > I wrote my OK when I realized I cannot come to a better name. I had no specific suggestion in mind, Debian/Ubuntu named their packages as open(ssh|ssl|vpn)-blacklist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071341.n67DfJk0031225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #8 from Adam Goode 2009-07-07 09:41:18 EDT --- Yes I agree that "redhat" probably shouldn't be in there. I am curious to see what comes of mailing to the list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071341.n67DfDXY031168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #20 from David Timms 2009-07-07 09:41:09 EDT --- Firstly, thanks for stepping up to work on the package. However, the original and current submitter need to decide who is wanting to become the package maintainer. If it is not the original submitter of the review request, I think the new packager should begin a new review request bug, referencing this (closed) bug. This makes for clearer reading of the work performed by the potential packager, for sponsors deciding to approve and sponsor the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071349.n67DnLsc022548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-07-07 09:49:19 EDT --- New version: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-6.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Jun 23 2009 Patrick Monnerat 1.2.0-6 - Patch "eventstatus" to allow rejecting an accepted event. - Replace "ed" by "sed -i" in build script to get rid of ed requirement. - Tag translation files. - Relocate external classes to the proper subdirectories. rpmlint output: WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.smtp.php /usr/share/php/PHPMailer/class.smtp.php WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php apache WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/hKit/hkit.class.php /usr/share/php/hkit/hkit.class.php WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar apache WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.phpmailer.php /usr/share/php/PHPMailer/class.phpmailer.php Same remarks as above. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071355.n67Dt0Cv002437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #5 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-07-07 09:54:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Feel free to CC me on bugs for those. Will that be for SSL only or SSH too? this is SSH keys > > > I had no specific suggestion in mind, Debian/Ubuntu named their packages as > open(ssh|ssl|vpn)-blacklist. Debian users knows the problem, redhats, may not. I preffer have the matter of weakness mentioned in the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:59:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071359.n67Dxn2f003847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Dave Malcolm 2009-07-07 09:59:47 EDT --- Package imported into CVS, tagged, and built successfully: - devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458819 - EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1458825 Closing as NEXTRELEASE. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071359.n67DxSsl003771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 --- Comment #1 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-07-07 09:59:27 EDT --- $ rpmlint tortoisehg-0.8-3.fc11.src.rpm tortoisehg-0.8-3.fc11.i586.rpm tortoisehg-nautilus-0.8-3.fc11.i586.rpm tortoisehg.i586: E: no-binary tortoisehg.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/hggtk/hgtk.py 0644 /usr/bin/env tortoisehg-nautilus.i586: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib tortoisehg-nautilus.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. Yes, there are no binaries, but it can't be noarch because of nautilus-python extension folder name ... hgtk.py - patch has been submitted and applied upstream. Not worth patching here. Yes, the python nautilus-python extension folder should be somewhere else, but this is how it is. There _are_ no docs for tortoisehg, especially not for the nautilus extension. The package can be build with mock and has been successfully build on x86 and x64_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 14:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071402.n67E2grq026053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-07-07 10:02:40 EDT --- Patrick: I'll get this reviewed today by COB in the states. Thanks for your work on this, David -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 14:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071433.n67EXmcG002509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Hoger 2009-07-07 10:33:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > I had no specific suggestion in mind, Debian/Ubuntu named their packages as > > open(ssh|ssl|vpn)-blacklist. > Debian users knows the problem, redhats, may not. I preffer have the matter of > weakness mentioned in the name. I do see some of the files seem to come from Debian openssh-blacklist packages (have identical creation dates). Why not getting remaining key sizes included in openssh-blacklist upstream tarball and name Fedora package after it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 14:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510022] Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071435.n67EZkG4015782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 14:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] New: Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 Summary: Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/python-icalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/python-icalendar-2.0.1-0.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The iCalendar package is a parser/generator of iCalendar files for use with Python. It follows the "RFC 2445 (iCalendar) specification." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 14:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071421.n67ELu6h010456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2009-07-07 10:21:54 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-5.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-3.0.11-5.fc10.src.rpm > - As spot commented, please change the license > tag to "LGPLv2+". Done > - Also configure.in suggests that ImageMagick support > should be enabled by default. Would you try to > add "BR: ImageMagick-devel"? Done >- cppunit-devel is available on Fedora. Would you try > to add "BR: cppunit-devel" ? I avoided this as unfortunately their cppunit tests do not compile, and I am not familiar with that particular framework. I suspect this would requires some modest level of patching to fix. ==== test_matrix.cpp:150: error: explicit instantiation of 'void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine, const std::string&) [with T = double]' in namespace 'CppUnit::TestAssert' (which does not enclose namespace 'CppUnit') test_matrix.cpp:151: error: explicit instantiation of 'void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine, const std::string&) [with T = float]' in namespace 'CppUnit::TestAssert' (which does not enclose namespace 'CppUnit') test_matrix.cpp:152: error: explicit instantiation of 'void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine, const std::string&) [with T = int]' in namespace 'CppUnit::TestAssert' (which does not enclose namespace 'CppUnit') test_matrix.cpp:155: error: 'NoExceptionExpected' is not a member of 'CppUnit' test_matrix.cpp:155: error: 'NoExceptionExpected' is not a member of 'CppUnit' test_matrix.cpp:155: error: wrong number of template arguments (2, should be 1) re ';' token et cetera... ==== > * Please use %{_mandir} for %{_datadir}/man > * If you use %{name} macro for %{name}-config.1.gz, please > also use %{name} in %{_bindir}/nurbs++-config Fixed. > - %{name}-config.1.gz man file should belong to -devel subpackage, > not to main package. Fixed. > - $ rpmlint nurbs++ shows lots of rpmlint warnings related to undefined non-weak symbols: Odd, my rpmlint (which is up-to-date) does not catch this error. Anyway, its clearly was problem, and is now Fixed. [makerpm at box SPECS]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 > /dev/null [makerpm at box SPECS]$ > - It is useful in Fedora CVS that one line is put between each %changelog Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071505.n67F534c023210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #5 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-07 11:05:02 EDT --- I actually had run rpmlint (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint output: > sipcalc.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Sipcalc > sipcalc.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Sipcalc > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > - Drop "Sipcalc is" from the summary. > Done. > Also, learn to run rpmlint on your packages. Whenever you make a submission you > should post the output in the request. I had actually done an rpmlint on it: [makerpm at centosvm SPECS]$ rpmlint -i sipcalc.spec ../SRPMS/sipcalc-1.1.4-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at centosvm SPECS]$ rpmlint --version rpmlint version 0.85 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva I guess maybe it's an older version since it's a CentOS 5 vm. I'm in the process of setting up a Fedora 11 VM to get more up-to-date packaging tools I'll also make sure I post my rpmlint output in the future. > > - You might want to change the .gz of the manfile to .*, since it is possible > that the compression format changes in the future. > Done > > MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a > duplicate. OK > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. OK > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK > MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. OK > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > OK > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. OK > MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK > MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. OK > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK > MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK > MUST: Clean section exists. OK > MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A > > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSWORK > - Add ChangeLog to %doc. > Done > MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A > MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A > MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files > ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A > MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A > MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A > MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK > MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK > SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK > SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Updated version posted. [makerpm at centosvm SPECS]$ rpmlint -i sipcalc.spec ../SRPMS/sipcalc-1.1.4-2.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071512.n67FCwMB014762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #24 from vivek shah 2009-07-07 11:12:56 EDT --- Aargh. The comment 14 hyperlink came out all wrong in my previus note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071512.n67FC9nq014507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #23 from vivek shah 2009-07-07 11:12:05 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, Yes the newest srpm is the one mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470#c14. I have a few doubts here: 1. Should I only rename the package name to mausezahn ? 2. Should the binaries and manpages be renamed to mausezahn ? 3. Should the contents of man pages which refer to mz be renamed to mausezahn ? 4. The docs contain a pdf manual as well which contains references to mz. In that case that needs to be removed as well ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] New: Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Summary: Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcbw at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/ModemManager.spec SRPM URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/ModemManager-0.2-0.20090707.fc12.src.rpm Description: A daemon that provides a D-Bus API to arbitrate and control modems, including mobile broadband (3G) modems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071528.n67FSMKJ020325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 11:28:21 EDT --- No problem. Totally my fault for not checking it more before I imported. ;( Anyhow, it's all set now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071530.n67FUdGo032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Hoger 2009-07-07 11:30:38 EDT --- Also, is there any good reason why le32_rsa_8192 contains only 5083 fingerprints, rather than full space of ~2^15 keys? It's obviously derived from the HDMoore's *incomplete* set of 8192 bit LE32 keys [1], which, if I remember correctly, was published as incomplete due to time constraints at the time of publication. [1] http://www.metasploit.com/users/hdm/tools/debian-openssl/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071544.n67Fi6T8004107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 11:44:05 EDT --- Yes, please open a new review request for the new package and close this one as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071547.n67Flta7006246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #2 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-07 11:47:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (You don't need the NEEDSPONSOR tag since I've already agreed to sponsor you.) > > - Drop "SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is" from the summary. > Fixed. > - Change the Requires: /sbin/chkconfig to Requires: chkconfig. Fixed. > - The character set conversion should be > iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 ChangeLog > ChangeLog.utf8 && \ > touch -r ChangeLog ChangeLog.utf8 && \ > mv ChangeLog{.utf8,} > I had actually used the convention here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 But I'll use your method in the future. I've corrected the spec > - Drop the > exit 0 > from %build. Fixed. > > - %{_initdir} should be %{_initddir}. What's the idea behind the following?? > %if 0%{?rhel} > 5 || 0%{?fedora} > 9 > install -D -p -m 0755 snmptt-init.d %{buildroot}%{_initdir}/snmptt > %else > install -D -p -m 0755 snmptt-init.d %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/snmptt > %endif > > This was a typo here. (I guess that's what I get for writing a package at 3am) It should have been: %if 0%{?rhel} > 5 || 0%{?fedora} > 9 install -D -p -m 0755 snmptt-init.d %{buildroot}%{_initddir}/snmptt %else install -D -p -m 0755 snmptt-init.d %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/snmptt %endif Since, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros %{_initddir} is deprecated, I was trying to have use %{_initrddir} on platforms that support it. Let me know which way you prefer I package (ie. just use %{_initrddir} all the time or use the conditional version above) > - You can use install to create directories as well with "install -d > /path/to/dir" > I had original done it that way, but changed it to make it easier to read. I've changed it back and I'll use 'install -d' going forward > - Use the standard script to create the user > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups > Fixed > - Same thing for the initscript stuff > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript Fixed. I'll post the update spec/SRPM as soon as I hear back from you on the init.d script issue above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071552.n67FqJDs008016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #43 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 11:52:17 EDT --- Failure of the submitter (Marc Wiriadisastra) to respond to a ping is sufficient reason for this to be closed. If you (Lubomir) are now submitting this package, you should have opened your own review ticket. Anyway, isn't the "doesn't work on x86_64 at all" issue sufficiently known? Ahat about comment #36? Is that problem fixed as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071556.n67Fua4N010651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-07 11:56:35 EDT --- Built and pushed to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071556.n67FucUp010717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Bug 506833 depends on bug 506486, which changed state. Bug 506486 Summary: Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071543.n67FhIWL003649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Bruno Postle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Bruno Postle 2009-07-07 11:43:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: panoglview Short Description: Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas Owners: bpostle Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071618.n67GIMrH016216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-07 12:18:21 EDT --- To comment 23: In my opinion: 1.2: necessary 3. preferable (I would do so), however instead you can write an additional note (like "README.Fedora") to notify Fedora mausezahn users that the binaries/srpm are renamed to "mausezahn" even if it is called as "mz" in the included documents. 4. see above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071626.n67GQN5a005359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Postle 2009-07-07 12:26:22 EDT --- [not a review, just trying to help] I have a spec for an earlier version of Panini here: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/Panini/Panini.spec You might find some useful stuff, in particular you are not running update-desktop-database in %post and %postun (ignore the update-mime-database bit, I have it wrong). I've spoken to upstream and there is no 'install' target, he doesn't have a use for one. You are mixing macro styles, this is frowned upon by the guidelines: $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} should be something like %{buildroot}/%{_bindir} My version of the %description has more keywords, in particular for searching you really need 'hugin', 'vedutismo', 'stereographic', 'QuickTimeVR' and 'QTVR'. You should also try and get the singular 'panorama' and the alternative 'Pannini' spelling into the description: > Panini can load most common photo and panoramic formats from image files such > as those created with hugin or QuickTimeVR (QTVR .mov) files. Like all panorama > viewers, it then shows a linear perspective view that can be panned and zoomed. > But Panini can also display a range of wide angle perspectives via the > stereographic and "Pannini" vedutismo families of projections, and shift, > rotate, and stretch the image like a software view camera. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071630.n67GU3tY018966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-07 12:30:00 EDT --- Unfortunately on my rawhide i586 machine executing gnujump rebuilt from comment 10 causes system freeze and currently I cannot figure out what is the cause.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071631.n67GV2kp006352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 12:31:01 EDT --- xsd-3.2.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xsd-3.2.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071630.n67GUu2R006304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-07 12:30:54 EDT --- xsd-3.2.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xsd-3.2.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] New: python-urwid - console user interface for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: python-urwid - console user interface for python Alias: python urwid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Summary: python-urwid - console user interface for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ultimatekonstantinos at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hi, This is my first package. It is called python-urwid and is a console user interface library for Python, very usefull for Developers. I updated the old package and I made a few fixes so that rpmlint does not complain. Here is the spec and the srpm. SPEC URL:http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/python-urwid.spec SRPM URL:http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/python-urwid-0.9.8.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071653.n67GrqtC010882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Dimitris Glezos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nsheridan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Dimitris Glezos 2009-07-07 12:53:49 EDT --- *** Bug 427706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 16:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071653.n67GroPR010854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Dimitris Glezos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #22 from Dimitris Glezos 2009-07-07 12:53:49 EDT --- Done. #510097 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 510097 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071704.n67H49nO026195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #58 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-07 13:04:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350835) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350835) Result of a yafaray test For me yafaray works fine, as you can see on the attached picture. This test was made with: blender-2.49a-2 yafaray-0.1.0.315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071709.n67H9Fef027531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #59 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-07 13:09:14 EDT --- Additional information for Comment #58: I have set the enforcing level of SELinux to Enforcing to make sure, that yafaray runs with SELinux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071721.n67HLTlH030742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #60 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-07 13:21:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #59) > Additional information for Comment #58: I have set the enforcing level of > SELinux to Enforcing to make sure, that yafaray runs with SELinux. You need to reboot in order to relabel ! yafaray remains not compliant with selinux, either the code needs to be fixed either the correct selinux context need to be set (as such it need to be reported as a bug in selinux-policy-targeted) This need 5min of time ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071722.n67HMKh1030864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-07 13:22:19 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-coderay) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] New: Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 Summary: Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cicero at insightbb.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nimbius.36bit.com/epic5.spec SRPM URL: http://nimbius.36bit.com/epic5-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: epic5 is the latest version of Epic, a chat client based on the ircII client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071748.n67HmECo004850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #61 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-07-07 13:48:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #60) > yafaray remains not compliant with selinux, either the code needs to be fixed > either the correct selinux context need to be set (as such it need to be > reported as a bug in selinux-policy-targeted) > This need 5min of time ! @kwizrart: Then Do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071757.n67HvaOD007073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-07 13:57:36 EDT --- Why not just upgrade the existing version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 17:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071758.n67HwLXE025878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #62 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-07-07 13:58:20 EDT --- I have already reported the problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071815.n67IF9gF011217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #21 from Mat Booth 2009-07-07 14:15:08 EDT --- Just FYI, I've now got an update to eclipse-dtp that builds all the features except for the SDK ready to go for when this package gets approved. To try it out you will need to build and install lpg-java-compat (a subpackage of LPG) on a Rawhide box (an update is needed to wsdl4j on F11). Here is the new eclipse-dtp srpm (I've not booked this into CVS yet): http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp-1.7.0-2.fc12.src.rpm At last, decent SQL editors in Eclipse! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071818.n67II1W3030940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Warren Togami 2009-07-07 14:17:59 EDT --- > %files > %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) > %doc COPYING README > %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.ModemManager.conf > %{_datadir}/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.ModemManager.service > %attr(0755,root,root) %{_sbindir}/modem-manager > %attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so* What package owns this directory? > /lib/udev/rules.d/* [warren at newcaprica ~]$ git clone git://git.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/ModemManager/.git/ fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Huh? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071819.n67IJQwQ031408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwalsh at redhat.com --- Comment #63 from Daniel Walsh 2009-07-07 14:19:25 EDT --- Can you fix the libraries to not require text relocation. This usually means that the libraries are not being built with -PIC flags. http://people.redhat.com/~drepper/selinux-mem.html http://people.redhat.com/drepper/textrelocs.html Fix the libraries, we do not want to disable SELinux features to accept a new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490171] Review Request: mediawiki-semantic-forms - An extension to MediaWiki that adds support for web-based forms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071826.n67IQRiH013641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490171 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 14:26:26 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard if you would like this to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071849.n67InaY6021668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 14:49:34 EDT --- I'll go ahead and take this for review, and eventually sponsor you when we get to that point. I'll wait until you have that new package up before doing a full review, but I can make a few comments: The package in comment 13 does build OK; the javadoc package still comes out empty but I suppose you're still working on that. The AOT bits compile OK (with proper debuginfo generated) and everything looks to be in the proper place. I'll install and test this when I get home. The package versioning isn't proper, however. First, is the version really "20090701" or is that just a snapshot date? I don't see that any version 20090701 was ever released, so it seems that you've just made that version up. Has upstream ever made an actual versioned release? Do you expect that in the future they will release version 1.0? I suggest you peruse the Naming Guidelines, specifically http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages My guess is that upstream hasn't actually released any versioned tarball, and so you'd just use a version of 0, making the proper NVR colossus-0-0.1.20090701svn4427 (that's a pre-release snapshot). If the last downloadable file is really versioned 20081029 and you know that they intend to use dates for versioning in the future: colossus-20080129-1.20090701svn4427 (that's a post-release snapshot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071848.n67ImGah007436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-07 14:48:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > > - Also configure.in suggests that ImageMagick support > > should be enabled by default. Would you try to > > add "BR: ImageMagick-devel"? > Done - Ah, no... I missed that in fact all ImageMagick related parts are commented out in configure.in and currently ncurbs++ does not use ImageMagick. You can remove BR: ImageMagick-devel, sorry. > >- cppunit-devel is available on Fedora. Would you try > > to add "BR: cppunit-devel" ? > > I avoided this as unfortunately their cppunit tests do not compile, and I am > not familiar with that particular framework. I suspect this would requires some > modest level of patching to fix. - Okay. It seems that cppunit is used only to build test program. > > - $ rpmlint nurbs++ shows lots of rpmlint warnings related to undefined non-weak symbols: > > Odd, my rpmlint (which is up-to-date) does not catch this error. Anyway, its > clearly was problem, and is now Fixed. - rpmlint can also be used for "installed" rpm. Then I again failed to notice that rpmlint complains also about this warnings for both libmatrixI.so and libmatrixN.so.... Both needs linking against libmatrix.so . Please also this fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 18:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071856.n67Iu0Z0023500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-07 14:55:58 EDT --- Now closing (it seems that on EL5 build fails due to gcc's ICE, however anyway I close because on F-12/11/10 build succeeded) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 19:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071925.n67JPYcm030936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|python-urwid - console user |Review Request: |interface for python |python-urwid - console user | |interface for python Alias|python, urwid | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 19:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071936.n67JaUw7020600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Niall Sheridan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nsheridan at gmail.com | --- Comment #2 from Niall Sheridan 2009-07-07 15:36:13 EDT --- highly uninterested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 19:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071947.n67Jl0fA003815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Christian Krause 2009-07-07 15:46:59 EDT --- Hi John, > Here are the new URLs: I've reviewed the latest package and all issues brought up during the review were addressed and fixed. Just one additional suggestion I've overseen before: To include the libraries in the %files sections you can better write: in %files: %{_libdir}/*.so.* instead of %{_libdir}/libewl.so.1 %{_libdir}/libewl.so.1.0.0 and in %files devel: %{_libdir}/*.so But since this is really quite subjective and there is no explicit rule about it, I don't think another review cycle is necessary. Please import the package as it was reviewed into CVS and if you like you can do this minor enhancement later. Regarding: > http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec > http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-9.fc11.src.rpm the package is: -> APPROVED Best regards. Christian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072003.n67K3Nuk007795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from John Guthrie 2009-07-07 16:03:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ewl Short Description: Enlightenment Widget Library Owners: guthrie Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072003.n67K3oxU007870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-07 16:03:49 EDT --- Just one quick comment: - Replace '%{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}' with '%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072031.n67KVMMp014808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #33 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-07 16:31:20 EDT --- Yeah! I am trying to get some meaningful debug information out of GCC to report a bug against EL-5. The compiler bug shows up when -g switch is added to GCC command line. So I have to ask: is it acceptable to remove -g from build flags as a temporary workaround so the package will build? This will have the side-effect of killing xsd-debuginfo package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072032.n67KWOPd015027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #18 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-07 16:32:23 EDT --- I am still getting stuff in my javadoc. So there is probably something different about my build environment. Are you building if F11? Do you have the openjdk stuff installed? Any other ideas on likely things to be different? On the versioning, I have been consulting with upstream. They have been using date based releases so far. There was some thoughts that they might switch, but they haven't made a decision to switch yet. What I have is closer to a prerelease version. I have asked them for guidance here. One possibility is just putting the package in rawhide until their next release. They are thinking about doing one soon. Once that is done I would expect to back port occasional fixes not follow svn. They haven't done much work in released branches in the past. I used a date in the prerelease because they currently use date based versions. Though because I don't know the date of the next release I can't use that. What they put up, they call public builds. They do this when there is enough new stuff that it seems worth doing. They pick what seems to be a solid snapshot and use that. When it turns out the snapshot wasn't that solid they have done another public build quickly, but normally there are long gaps between releases. There has been a lot of refactoring going on lately. So the current version is a lot different than what was released in 2008. Also some of the dependencies are different. For example they replaced a dependency on an options parsing package in order to make it easier to get Colossus into Fedora. That dependency wasn't in Fedora and didn't have an active upstream making not very desirable to get into Fedora. Thank you for helping by doing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072044.n67KiMDB017807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #19 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-07 16:44:21 EDT --- I got feedback from one of the developers that might give some guidance. My request is at: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20090706170444.GA13211%40bruno.wolff.to&forum_name=colossus-developers A reply is at: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20090707173746.155260%40gmx.net&forum_name=colossus-developers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072057.n67Kv3sf010578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #30 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-07-07 16:56:58 EDT --- There is a new release that incorporates everything upstream except the Mini.pc patch. Spec: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini.spec SRPM: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-9.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Here is a modification of the Yukon demo that uses the mini pkgconfig: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/yukon-1.0.0.tar.bz2 To build and run the Yukon demo: ./configure make ./Yukon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 20:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072056.n67KujCL010521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #1 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-07 16:56:44 EDT --- The Summary and %description seems wrong. (Btw I wouldn't put "which uses evolution-data-server as a backend" in there. Highlight what makes it special instead!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504151] Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072127.n67LRBdt018133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504151 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 17:27:10 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag since that seems to have been forgotten. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072124.n67LOvp7017427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 17:24:56 EDT --- I am doing rawhide builds in mock on x86_64. I did an F11 build in mock, there was no change. I did a mock scratch build (on dist-f12) and all of the javadoc packages for all architectures are empty: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1460300 If you are doing builds with rpmbuild instead of doing mock or koji scratch builds, you aren't testing things like your BuildReqires because you almost certainly have many packages installed which won't be installed on the builders. koji is open to anyone who has a Fedora account, so you can do all of the scratch builds you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072137.n67Lb2va020395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #2 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-07 17:37:01 EDT --- The License field needs to conform to the boolean format as described at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Combined_Dual_and_Multiple_Licensing_Scenario and a clarifying comment should be added above it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072139.n67LdPex030917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #21 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-07 17:39:24 EDT --- Yeah, I was using rpmbuild. Removing all of the development packages was going to make that system pretty much unusable for other stuff. I'll take a look at the koji stuff tonight to see if that gives me a clue as to what is missing from my build requires. I didn't know that I could using koji for building before I was in the packaging group. That gives me a direction to go in that should be useful. (Both for learning about using Koji and for figuring out the javadoc problem.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072142.n67LgIoO031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-07 17:42:17 EDT --- I'll review it an update it but its a small light email client for netbooks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072146.n67LkiMa000402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 17:46:43 EDT --- You should really read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join if you haven't already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072152.n67LqKYn023381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-07 17:52:19 EDT --- rpmlint warns about missing documentation in -devel. I can't find anything in the guidelines about that, but in any case, there is now an 0.3 release which does contain three files doc/*.txt which seems suitable for %doc in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072154.n67Ls72m001742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-07 17:54:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I can't find anything in the guidelines about that ...being a fatal problem, especially for a subpackage, was what I meant to write. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 21:50:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072150.n67Lopac001246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 17:50:50 EDT --- Doing a build here on x86_64 on f11 (per request on irc). - You are missing: BuildRequires: libsoup-devel BuildRequires: webkitgtk-devel - rpmlint says: solang.src: W: strange-permission Solang-0.2.tar.gz 0600 solang.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 32, tab: line 1) solang.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency compat-libgda-sqlite solang.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency compat-libgdamm solang.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgdl solang.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgphoto2 solang.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/solang-0.2/NEWS so, likely you can drop all those libraries from Requires: (rpm does this for you, you shouldn't need to be explicit) as well as the 0 length NEWS file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 22:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072246.n67MkOT4002458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #34 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-07 18:46:23 EDT --- EL5 has gcc43, but this one is unable to link ... /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/xsd: hidden symbol `void std::__ostream_fill (std::basic_ostream >&, long)' isn't defined /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The only way I can get it to build on EL5 is by filtering -g from RPM_OPT_FLAGS :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 23:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072300.n67N0bDG005790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #15 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-07 19:00:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > If the releases are made along apbs, then you can just build them all in the > same spec and do e.g. > %package -n aqua > and > %package -n pmgZ > and so on... > > Probably best to ask first upstream, though, if those are meant to be > distributed as individual packages. contacted (out of office until the 14th, apparently) - it seems like building dependencies and then using said deps in a binary build in a single spec file would be difficult to do - are there any examples of this to go by? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 23:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072308.n67N8Op9018564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 19:08:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > contacted (out of office until the 14th, apparently) - it seems like building > dependencies and then using said deps in a binary build in a single spec file > would be difficult to do - are there any examples of this to go by? Doesn't it build them automatically, or do you end up with a static library? Shipping that would be one option.. But basically what you need to do is first build the dependency and install it in the build directory (say, %{_builddir}/aqua) and set the linker and include paths so that they use the aqua in that directory. In %install you'd then install aqua manually in %{buildroot} alongside with the normal 'make install' of apbs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 23:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072333.n67NXkGX024018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #35 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-07-07 19:33:45 EDT --- > The compiler bug shows up when -g switch is added to GCC command line. Yes, this a known problem with some earlier g++ 4.x versions. It is triggered when both optimization and debug information are requested (e.g., -O2 -g). Removing -g from the compilation flags should be harmless since it only affects the XSD compiler itself (i.e., there won't be any debug information in the compiler binary). Since the runtime library is header-only, the user applications that use the generated code won't be affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 23:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072333.n67NX8Zv012292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #17 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-07 19:33:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > contacted (out of office until the 14th, apparently) - it seems like building > > dependencies and then using said deps in a binary build in a single spec file > > would be difficult to do - are there any examples of this to go by? > > Doesn't it build them automatically, or do you end up with a static library? > Shipping that would be one option.. > it builds them automatically, then glues them together into one big libapbs.so library. So I could patch the makefiles to not include them in libapbs.so and add the necessary deps to the apbs binary build. Perhaps that would be easiest. > But basically what you need to do is first build the dependency and install it > in the build directory (say, %{_builddir}/aqua) and set the linker and include > paths so that they use the aqua in that directory. > Or this, but I'd still need to patch the makefiles to not include aqua/pmg/etc into libapbs. > In %install you'd then install aqua manually in %{buildroot} alongside with > the normal 'make install' of apbs. OK, I think I have an idea of what to try now. More later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 23:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072339.n67NdJ2E025228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #13 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-07 19:39:18 EDT --- Alright, updated spec/srpm: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy-0.32-3.src.rpm Made the following changes: - Verified licenses for the files you mentioned in their upstream sources and added documentation. - Removed shebangs from non-scripts - Enabled the unit tests (the non-db components anyways) - Parts of this failed due to a depdance on Python 2.5. Submitted a bug and patch for this upstream. Applying patch locally so that unit tests succeed on Python < 2.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 23:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907072341.n67Nf6cr014280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #36 from Antti Andreimann 2009-07-07 19:41:05 EDT --- Well, I have now managed to get the package to link with gcc43 on EL5: %build +CXX=g++43 LIBS=`$CXX -print-file-name=libstdc++.a` \ MAKEFLAGS="verbose=1" CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./build.sh $CXX -print-file-name=libstdc++.a evaluates to: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux6E/4.3.2/libstdc++.a which is part of a libstdc++43-devel package. There is no corresponding libstdc++43 package. This makes me nervous, since I'm not sure which parts of libstdc++ are now statically linked and which are still dynamic. According to this blog post (http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/06/static-libstdc/), mixing statically and dynamically linked C++ code is not a very good idea. Which would be the proper solution for EL5? Filter -g and stick with GCC4.1 or compile with 4.3 and hope that this strange linking method actually works? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 00:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080044.n680icra005718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-07 20:44:37 EDT --- Ok, updated. Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/updates/11/SRPMS/SPECS/solang.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/updates/11/SRPMS/solang-0.2-0.1.20090707.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solang is a free photo manager that will act as a front-end for directory based local storage as well as remote photo-storage systems, as can be said, on the "Cloud". Basic editing support is also planned as well as a small pipeline for RAW processing. The aim of this project is to break the performance characteristics of current popular photo management softwares and provide a fast and reliable alternative that does not place humongous demands on user's hardware resources even to meet basic functionality. This package depends on compat-libgdamm, which is still in review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 00:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080057.n680vbLG029156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #37 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-07-07 20:57:36 EDT --- I would suggest we filter -g out if this is acceptable. Your concern about linking to static libstdc++ is quite correct. There is another support library (libgcc_s) that is linked dynamically and the resulting executable will use the one from g++-4.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080102.n68125D3030069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Dan Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Dan Williams 2009-07-07 21:02:04 EDT --- Fixed: Spec URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/ModemManager.spec SRPM URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/ModemManager-0.2-1.20090707.fc12.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080112.n681COJi032039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mads at kiilerich.com Bug 498723 depends on bug 498721, which changed state. Bug 498721 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080111.n681BHGS011260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #23 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-07 21:11:16 EDT --- I started looking through the build log. I see a couple of syntax errors while reporting on the javadoc build. In my case I saw lots of warnings, but didn't notice syntax errors. Maybe these aborted the javadoc creation. I have an idea how to test that. If that's the cause, it may be a compiler difference, rather the a build requires difference. I want to test that theory as well. I saw a couple of other minor things with the path names used, and will go back to the spec file to check for oddities. And on the versioning topic, below is a link to a thread where I was discussing version naming with the developers: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20090627222801.GA26934%40wolff.to&forum_name=colossus-developers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080113.n681DJ3d032224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #80 from Jens Petersen 2009-07-07 21:13:13 EDT --- I can approve the package (no problem technically there) but I would really like to hear an official word from Fedora Docs saying they are happy to import packages to Fedora with a forked version of publican until (if?) my patch gets included. (Again I am more than happy to build the patched publican in fedora if someone can give me a green light for that.) BTW where can one get the publican-1.0 test code? And who is going to build it for F12? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080117.n681HYDd012422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-07-07 21:17:33 EDT --- I had an issue with 'make update' on the EL-5 branch. This seems not to be a general, as I was able to 'make update' in the EL-5 branch for another package. $ make update * Wed Jun 03 2009 Xavier Bachelot 1.25-5 - Change License: to Copyright only. - Fix README file encoding. - Preserve timestamp on converted files. - Remove implicit BR: iconv. Creating a new update for perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25-5.el5 xavierb does not have commit access to perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple Tibbs, can you take a look ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080150.n681omxh019035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 21:50:47 EDT --- Not much I can do. I can verify that you have commit access to the EL-5 branch, but that's about it. Honestly I didn't realize that you even needed to use "make update" for EL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 01:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080158.n681w2jY009381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-07 21:58:01 EDT --- Looks like it might be an issue with bodhi using the 'rawhide' ownership for the EL branches to determine who can push updates. Luke is going to look at it tomorrow and hopefully get it fixed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 02:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080204.n6824mqn010611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #24 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-07 22:04:47 EDT --- I now think the javadoc issue is caused by different failure modes of which compiler was used to build the javadocs. The way I was running it it wasn't finding jdom for that part of the run. In my case I was getting lots of warnings, but I still got output. However I suspect that on koji this caused issues with lists being used in for statements that resulted in the process failing. Next is trying to get my updated version run in koji to test this theory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 02:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080214.n682E6vI024056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Conrad Sanderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #80 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-07-07 22:14:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: armadillo Short Description: fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS Owners: conrads Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 02:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080219.n682JSrN025450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Conrad Sanderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 02:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080233.n682XKmp017818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #18 from Luke Macken 2009-07-07 22:33:18 EDT --- I fixed this in rawhide a while back, but never pushed it out anywhere. I'm building a fix across all branches now. Thanks for the heads up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 02:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080242.n682g4cX020187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #64 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-07-07 22:42:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #63) > Can you fix the libraries to not require text relocation. This usually means > that the libraries are not being built with -PIC flags. All the code is already being compiled with -fPIC. For instance: g++ -o build/integrators/SkyIntegrator.os -c -Wall -fPIC -ffast-math -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DHAVE_PTHREAD -DHAVE_EXR -DHAVE_XML -DHAVE_JPEG -DHAVE_PNG -DHAVE_ZLIB -DHAVE_FREETYPE -DHAVE_QT -DBUILDING_YAFRAYPLUGIN -I. -Iinclude src/integrators/SkyIntegrator.cc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 02:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080251.n682p6YY022540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #25 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-07 22:51:05 EDT --- It looks like some 1.6ism's crept into part of the sources. Probably for something I am not building (possibly the test suites) since the program builds. The project has intended to have 1.5 as the minimum version and I'll get back to them about this. In the meantime having the spec file require java 1.6 produces a reasonable x86_64 (I figured I only needed one arch for testing.) build. See: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1460797 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 04:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 00:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080411.n684Bbri017795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #27 from Ed Brand 2009-07-08 00:11:34 EDT --- New src rpm available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/sslogger/files/sslogger-0.9/sslogger-0.9-43.fc10.src.rpm Addresses items Gratien pointed out: Changed /usr/bin/sl to /usr/bin/slog Changed replay to sreplay Added man pages for slog and sreplay Spec file fixes Added ability for users to review their own logs by modifying settings in sslogger.conf I cant yet add the -u option to sslogger, as slog relying on sudo for managing user access control. -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 05:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080500.n6850JmI016026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giesen at snickers.org --- Comment #1 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-08 01:00:18 EDT --- This is a mock review. I do not have permissions to approve the package: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK rpmlint -i SPECS/python-icalendar.spec SRPMS/python-icalendar-2.0.1-0.1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK According to README.txt and LICENSE.txt, this is LGPLv2+ MUST: The source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, and then that fileis included in %doc. NEEDSWORK %doc should include CHANGES.txt, CREDITS.txt, HISTORY.txt, LICENSE.txt, PKG-INFO, README.TXT, TODO.txt, version.txt MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK Timestamps of source package do not match. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Suggest using wget -N http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/i/icalendar/icalendar-2.0.1.tar.gz MUST: Binary RPM package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses or require the package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file and be installed properly. N/A MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. N/A MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 05:02:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080502.n6852XLu028150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #22 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-08 01:02:32 EDT --- Submitted review of someone else's package: Bug 510038 - Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 05:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080516.n685GlJQ031203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Alias| |snmptt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 05:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080544.n685ix0F003800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #38 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-08 01:44:58 EDT --- The RHEL 5.4 beta announcement mentions "GCC 4.4". Maybe that'll help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 06:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080641.n686fjYJ015168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-08 02:41:44 EDT --- I'll update the package today. I don't believe no docs is a blocker, given that in a lot of cases now the devel docs are split into a -docs package to allow it to be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 06:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509990] Review Request: CVE-2008-0166_fingerprints - Fingerprints of the keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080646.n686kqFp004163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #8 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-07-08 02:46:51 EDT --- > > I do see some of the files seem to come from Debian openssh-blacklist packages > (have identical creation dates). Why not getting remaining key sizes included > in openssh-blacklist upstream tarball and name Fedora package after it? because the next package with full keys will follow instead of debian. > Also, is there any good reason why le32_rsa_8192 contains only 5083 > fingerprints, rather than full space of ~2^15 keys? It's obviously derived > from the HDMoore's *incomplete* set of 8192 bit LE32 keys [1], which, if I > remember correctly, was published as incomplete due to time constraints at the > time of publication. > > [1] http://www.metasploit.com/users/hdm/tools/debian-openssl/ generating 8192 keys is extremly slow both 8192 keys are incomplete, the le64 I finish before release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 06:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080651.n686ptaX005202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 02:51:54 EDT --- Looks good; the license issues seem to be fixed (as far as my inspection has revealed, at least). The tests are run everything builds correctly and rpmlint is silent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 07:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080724.n687ON2l011673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #39 from Kalev Lember 2009-07-08 03:24:22 EDT --- The default debug information level is 2 when using -g switch. However, xsd seems to build fine with -g1, but with that we'd lose line numbers and local variable information when compared to full -g. The following produces a -debuginfo package, but source files don't get included in it because of the -g1 switch used: %build -MAKEFLAGS="verbose=1" CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./build.sh +MAKEFLAGS="verbose=1" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -g1" ./build.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 07:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080757.n687veRa030310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 03:57:39 EDT --- Would you contact gcc maintainer (i.e. file a bug report against gcc) first? Also for EL-5 build issue, please open a new bug ticket (against xsd componet) and discuss there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 08:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080854.n688sHN9010859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 04:54:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is a mock review. I do not have permissions to approve the package: > > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > review. OK > > rpmlint -i SPECS/python-icalendar.spec > SRPMS/python-icalendar-2.0.1-0.1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. You didn't run it on the binary package: [jzlehtol at politzer result]$ rpmlint python-icalendar-2.0.1-0.1.fc11.* python-icalendar.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (Also, if you run rpmlint on the srpm it already includes the spec file.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 08:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080851.n688peJq010467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 04:51:39 EDT --- OK, let's have a look. (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK > > Timestamps of source package do not match. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > > Suggest using wget -N > http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/i/icalendar/icalendar-2.0.1.tar.gz The tarball timestamp isn't an issue since it doesn't end up in the RPM. What's important is that the time stamps of the files in the tarball are preserved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 09:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080909.n6899cpe004372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 05:09:36 EDT --- - Python packages need BR: python-devel, this one has BR: python-setuptools-devel which pulls in python-devel, so that's ok. NB. python-setuptools-devel isn't available on EPEL, for that you need BR: python-devel, python-setuptools. - I suggest using "python" instead of "%{__python}". - Instead of %{python_sitelib}/* you should list %{python_sitelib}/icalendar/ %{python_sitelib}/icalendar-*.egg-info/ since the first version won't notice if the egg-info is missing. - Drop the python spec template comment # For noarch packages: sitelib ** rpmlint output in comment #3. - Add doc as mentioned in #1, except version.txt which isn't really necessary (the version info is already in the RPM itself). MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - Python module with name that doesn't contain py or Py => prefix python-. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License mentioned in src/icalendar/parser.py is GPL => license is GPL+. - Other files do not mention any license headers, readme states license is LGPL => LGPLv2+ * Resulting license tag is GPL+ and LGPLv2+ (which probably can be combined to GPLv2+). - Suggest contacting upstream about this. License headers should be present in every source code file. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add missing %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK - Included LGPLv2 license but no GPL... SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 09:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080917.n689HwKD006626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 05:17:57 EDT --- The package has been APPROVED. Continue with the CVS procedure: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Contact me by email if you have problems importing, building and/or pushing the update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 09:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080916.n689GHXe006397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 05:16:15 EDT --- I have now sponsored you. The package has been APPROVED Now you can do official reviews of Fedora packages. Which I hope you will, since a) we have a huge review queue and b) reviewing is an easy way to improve Fedora to your liking; besides it's one-time-only work when compared to maintaining packages of your own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 09:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080921.n689LnUi017126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi, | |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 05:21:47 EDT --- vcrhonek: what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 09:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907080937.n689b3MJ020035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-08 05:37:01 EDT --- SPEC: As above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gjs-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm I've updated the license and added an explanation. The docs are in git but are't part of the release tarball as yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 10:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081009.n68A9B2I026314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-08 06:09:10 EDT --- SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anjal-0.1.0-2.20090624git0424e38.fc11.src.rpm Updated the description to: Anjal is a mail client for small screen devices like NetBooks. It features a nice multi-line message list, with text-preview of the latest messages in the thread. It supports a tab interface for folders, new mail and config. Being based on evolution it supports all the same mail backends including POP3, IMAP4, Exchange and GroupWare. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 10:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510195] New: Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/eclipse-slice2java/eclipse-slice2java.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/eclipse-slice2java/eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The slice2java plugin manages the translation of Slice to Java. The plugin computes dependencies between Slice files and automatically recompiles Slice files when necessary. The plugin also manages the generated code to eliminate obsolete files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 10:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081028.n68ASaZv021668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #19 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-08 06:28:35 EDT --- @Mamoru, there aren't mp3's in test @Thomas. there is a new problem with test and editor.. The client projects and the test direcory are patchwork-projects, because most files are foreign. These files are very bad documentated. I have same problems with UH at the moment. The bad documentation is the reason that nobody really knows a) where the files from and b) under which license these files are. This is a very very big problem. barra and christoph (from upstream) will take a look on it. I will exclude test/ and clients/ and I will include clients/editor if the license check from upstream is okay then... engine only atm. I will add a new SRPM tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 10:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081046.n68Aktwo025754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #24 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-08 06:46:54 EDT --- Thanks Jussi, you've been extremely helpful (and patient). I'll definitely continue with the reviews, since I found for myself it was invaluable way to learn the proper way to do packaging and improve my own packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 12:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081219.n68CJujq023129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-08 08:19:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: daemonize Short Description: Run a command as a Unix daemon Owners: giesen Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 12:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081231.n68CVuIZ026266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-08 08:31:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sipcalc Short Description: "Advanced" console-based ip subnet calculator Owners: giesen Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 13:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081302.n68D2Y0l027172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #26 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-08 09:02:33 EDT --- The feedback from the developers is that this is the standard enhanced for loop introduced in 1.5. This code should be used with the normal build, so the problem is probably a javadoc bug. These are the only two places in the code where final is used with an enhanced loop. For now, as a workaround, I'll require java 1.6. But I'll also file a bug to see if we can get this fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 13:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081320.n68DKehh009034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #27 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-08 09:20:39 EDT --- Bug 510243 has been filed against gjdoc regarding the javadoc issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 13:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Build eclipse-phpeclipse for EPEL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081331.n68DV5M1003124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 13:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081337.n68DbSEG013832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #3 from john roman 2009-07-08 09:37:27 EDT --- I mentioned an upgrade to the last user cited in the changelog for epic4, but no response. 4 and 5 are similar, but their scripts are not compatible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 13:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] New: Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Summary: Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: victor.vasilyev at sun.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/cobertura.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/cobertura-1.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Cobertura is a free Java tool that calculates the percentage of code accessed by tests. It can be used to identify which parts of your Java program are lacking test coverage. It is based on jcoverage. This tool is used by the NetBeans 6.7 platform (netbeans-platform). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081406.n68E67Dv020620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |510128 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081427.n68ERFvd025350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #15 from D Haley 2009-07-08 10:27:13 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc10.src.rpm RPMLint: $ sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc10.i386.rpm && rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/nurbs++-*6.fc10* ../SRPMS/nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc10.src.rpm nurbs++.spec nurbs++ nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > rpmlint can also be used for "installed" rpm. I should read the docs more thoroughly. Thanks for the tip. > You can remove BR: ImageMagick-devel, sorry. I missed this one too. I checked the cpp file and saw the Magick calls, but didn't check the configure.in closely enough -- my bad & thanks for catching. Fixed. > libmatrixI.so and libmatrixN.so.... > Both needs linking against libmatrix.so . Please also this fix. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081435.n68EZ5BU027080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #5 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-08 10:35:04 EDT --- Yeah, I better contact upstream about the license bit. Everything else should be taken care of, but I want to make sure they intended LGPL and not GPL, as in a couple of files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081436.n68EapXU019347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.co |fedora-review+ |m) | --- Comment #3 from Warren Togami 2009-07-08 10:36:50 EDT --- ModemManager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.ModemManager.conf This can be safely ignored. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081442.n68EgXp3028637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Ville Skytt? 2009-07-08 10:42:32 EDT --- Jussi, if you're reviewing this, could you assign the bug to yourself? And BTW, FE-NEEDSPONSOR is still set... Anyway, I packaged this a few months ago too, but haven't really used much at all. In case you wish to compare and/or borrow something, the SRPM is at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/snmptt-1.2-0.fc10.src.rpm I suggest at least looking at the patches and TODO comments in the specfile. I've also forwarded the patches upstream in early April and he said he'd look into them when he finds time. A copy of the mail I sent which contains some comments about the patches and other things is at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/snmptt.txt, in particular the issue with world writable log files. FWIW, I'd personally just use %{_initrddir} for all distro versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081445.n68EjJ5v029291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-08 10:45:18 EDT --- Emailed primary maintainer. The PKG-INFO file states that the license is GPL2.1, so it's even less clear what the intended license is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081454.n68EsN54031723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 10:54:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jussi, if you're reviewing this, could you assign the bug to yourself? And > BTW, FE-NEEDSPONSOR is still set... I don't think I'll review this, there are a lot of people waiting to be sponsored and I have quite many reviews open still. Dropped FE-NEEDSPONSOR (must have forgotten to drop it in the last comment). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 14:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081456.n68Eud93000568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Tracker for reviews of |Tracker: Review Requests |Science and Technology |for Science and Technology |related packages |related packages Alias| |FE-SCITECH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081503.n68F3CwH002064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-07-08 11:03:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-webpy Short Description: A simple web framework for Python Owners: rayvd Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081503.n68F3GUI002103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #28 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-08 11:03:15 EDT --- I did a test build against all of the primary architectures and didn't see anything that looked like a problem in the log files. All the arches produced rpm files as expected. I don't have a way to all of the arch's rpms, but I did test the i586 rpm and it looked OK. The build is: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1461513 I think that leaves pretty much just the version name as a blocking issue. I didn't see guidance on prerelease names for date based version names. For now I only want to build in rawhide as the project would like me to wait for the next public build before putting in released versions of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081510.n68FAg0g004277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 --- Comment #8 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-07-08 11:10:39 EDT --- Just touching base to make sure you saw that I pushed out a new release with the fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510022] Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081510.n68FARA0004177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2009-07-08 11:10:25 EDT --- [ INVESTIGATE ] # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] compat-readline5.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libhistory.so.5.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 compat-readline5.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 Miroslav checked code, it's exit on -ENOMEM. compat-readline5-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Dunno what's the problem here. newman at dhcp-lab-124 ~ $ rpmls /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/readline-devel-5.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm | grep so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libhistory.so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libreadline.so newman at dhcp-lab-124 ~ $ rpmls /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/compat-readline5-devel-5.2-15.fc11.x86_64.rpm | grep so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/readline5/libhistory.so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/readline5/libreadline.so compat-readline5-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation compat-readline5-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Doc bit are intentionally removed. [ OK ] # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . We don't have general "compat" naming policy, the name looks like any other "compat" package. [ OK ] # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . Filename is "compat-readline5.spec". [ OK ] # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [ OK ] # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . > License: GPLv2+ [ OK ] # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] COPYING says GPLv2, sources: "...as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version..." [ OK ] # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/compat-readline5-5.2/COPYING > %doc CHANGES COPYING NEWS README USAGE [ WAIVED ] # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] It is (to my best knowledge). [ OK ] # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [ OK ] # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. e39331f32ad14009b9ff49cc10c5e751 readline-5.2.tar.gz e39331f32ad14009b9ff49cc10c5e751 /home/newman/rpmbuild/SOURCES/readline-5.2.tar.gz [ OK ] # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Local test performed. [ N/A ] # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] [ OK ] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ N/A ] # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] [ OK ] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [ OK ] # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [ FAIL ] # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] compat-readline5-static: newman at dhcp-lab-124 x86_64 $ rpmquery -f /usr/lib64/readline5/ file /usr/lib64/readline5 is not owned by any package Looks like the dir /usr/lib64/readline5/ is not owned by anyone. The archives inside are. [ OK ] # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] [ OK ] # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] [ OK ] # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] [ OK ] # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] [ OK ] # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [ N/A ] # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] [ OK ] # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] [ OK ] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [ OK ] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/readline5/libhistory.a -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/readline5/libreadline.a [ N/A ] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] [ OK ] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] newman at dhcp-lab-124 x86_64 $ rpmls compat-readline5-*devel*5.2-15.fc11.x86_64.rpm | grep so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/readline5/libhistory.so lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/readline5/libreadline.so [ OK ] # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] [ OK ] # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] [ N/A ] # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] [ OK ] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] [ OK ] # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] [ OK ] # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1) You might require "info" instead. > Requires(post): /sbin/install-info > Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info 2) Patches, last two at least, should have a comments associated. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment 3) Summary from the review above: A) Directory ownership B) only-non-binary-in-usr-lib warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081516.n68FGFZa005949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #44 from Konstantin Dmitriev 2009-07-08 11:16:09 EDT --- > Anyway, isn't the "doesn't work on x86_64 at all" issue sufficiently known? Issue "doesn't work on x86_64 at all" is not true. We're using both i386 and x86_64 synfig versions in production. As I have said, in #40 synfig (core) crashes only if built with libavcodec. IIRC, official Fedora repos are not shipping ffmpeg/libavcodec stuff. Please, state clearly which issues should be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081524.n68FOZOV008411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #45 from Konstantin Dmitriev 2009-07-08 11:24:34 EDT --- Forgot to mention that we are using synfig/synfigstudio on Fedora 10. ^__^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510022] Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081536.n68Famw2005006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-07-08 11:36:47 EDT --- The description for the rpmlint warning says: There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. I don't think it applies here. Everything else should be fixed in http://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/compat-readline5-5.2-16.fc12.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081537.n68FbPKj005113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-08 11:37:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > [not a review, just trying to help] > > I have a spec for an earlier version of Panini here: > http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/Panini/Panini.spec > > You might find some useful stuff, in particular you are not running > update-desktop-database in %post and %postun (ignore the update-mime-database > bit, I have it wrong). > Thanks for this.I've added this portion.However, I don't know what the command is responsible for yet. Do I need to add the update-mime-database thing too? I don't completely understand it from here. for eg, what is a "MimeType key."? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > I've spoken to upstream and there is no 'install' target, he doesn't have a use > for one. Do I still need to patch the .pro? > > You are mixing macro styles, this is frowned upon by the guidelines: > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} should be something like %{buildroot}/%{_bindir} > Corrected :) > My version of the %description has more keywords, in particular for searching > you really need 'hugin', 'vedutismo', 'stereographic', 'QuickTimeVR' and > 'QTVR'. You should also try and get the singular 'panorama' and the alternative > 'Pannini' spelling into the description: > > > Panini can load most common photo and panoramic formats from image files such > > as those created with hugin or QuickTimeVR (QTVR .mov) files. Like all panorama > > viewers, it then shows a linear perspective view that can be panned and zoomed. > > But Panini can also display a range of wide angle perspectives via the > > stereographic and "Pannini" vedutismo families of projections, and shift, > > rotate, and stretch the image like a software view camera. I changed the spec to this one.. new spec and srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini-0.71.102-1.fc12.src.rpm all the other mock build results are here (rpms etc.): http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081547.n68Flkit008193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 11:47:45 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081547.n68FllFL008220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Bug 504468 depends on bug 504475, which changed state. Bug 504475 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081547.n68Flmou008241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Bug 504479 depends on bug 504475, which changed state. Bug 504475 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081549.n68FnxJD015915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 11:49:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-bacon Short Description: A ruby-based testing framework Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081549.n68FnEIH008658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 11:49:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-configuration Short Description: Pure Ruby scoped configuration files Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081548.n68FmkEl008584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 11:48:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-diff-lcs Short Description: Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:55:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081555.n68Ftepf018299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 11:55:39 EDT --- Right, though there's little chance anyone would test a rack application w/o having rack installed. I've updated the package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rack-test.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-test-0.4.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 15:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst-gui - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081559.n68FxFhb019055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 Suravee Suthikulpanit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #43 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-07-08 11:59:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: CodeAnalyst-gui New Branches: F-11 Owners: suravee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081600.n68G0dE5020067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Suravee Suthikulpanit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-07-08 12:00:37 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libdwarf New Branches: F-11 Owners: suravee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081607.n68G7UXP013766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-08 12:07:28 EDT --- http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090708/bitfrost-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090708/bitfrost.spec fixed 2 problems: build with -fPIC for libraries install into python_sitearch Koji scratch build passed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081608.n68G8Nsh014355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:08:21 EDT --- There is already a populated F-11 branch. Don't forget to use "cvs update -d". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081617.n68GH6qV024395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Dan Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Williams 2009-07-08 12:17:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ModemManager Short Description: Modem arbitration and control service Owners: dcbw Branches: (F12/devel only) InitialCC: Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081621.n68GLhoe017719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-08 12:21:42 EDT --- ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-coderay Short Description: Fast syntax highlighter engine for many programming languages Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509806] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081624.n68GO3rp025897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:24:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081621.n68GLWgh025605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 12:21:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Some notes for 1.5.2-3: > > * License tag > - As website/javascripts/rounded_corners_lite.inc.js is under > LGPLv2+, license tag should be "MIT and LGPLv2+". Fixed > * Requires > - rubygem(hoe) doesn't seem to be needed. Would you check this? Good Catch. It was needed merely for rebuild, which we don't do. > * Test > - I think as this gem file contains test/ directory, it is preferable > to add %check section and execute some tet program there > (another gem seems needed, though) I would prefer not running the test suite unless absolutely necessary. They seem use rather exotic and poorly-estabilished testing tool chain -- mocha for api mocking and shoulda for just having an extra dependency. I would be really happy if we didn't have to package these, and their dependency chain for Fedora now. > By the way, I would appreciate it if you would review my > review requests (bug 508416 or bug 508417, both are rubygem related) Of course, will do. Sorry for the long delay, I'm going to look into those right now. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rubigen.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rubigen-1.5.2-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081623.n68GNWxI017953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:23:31 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504641] Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081625.n68GP7pd018536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:25:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509807] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081624.n68GOYwm018159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509807 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:24:32 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081626.n68GQVFC026845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:26:29 EDT --- We cannot create F-12 branches yet. It is way too early for that. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081632.n68GWoMO020371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:32:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081631.n68GVemS020185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #81 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:31:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081629.n68GTpaU019406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:29:49 EDT --- This package already exists. Did you just want to add a new branch? If so, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests If you want to change owners or change who is CC'd, you can do that via the pkgdb page at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/htmlparser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081633.n68GXohT028534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:33:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081630.n68GUSIa027737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:30:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081630.n68GUsRJ027952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:30:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081637.n68Gbu9v021641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:37:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081634.n68GYQbD020785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:34:25 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081633.n68GXM5W020613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:33:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081635.n68GZZbm029297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:35:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081636.n68Ga862029470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:36:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst-gui - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081637.n68Gb2D5029657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #44 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:37:01 EDT --- A populated F-11 branch already exists. Don't forget to use "cvs update -d". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081638.n68GckFt029870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:38:45 EDT --- We cannot create F-12 branches yet; it is far too early in the release process for that. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081641.n68GfXCa030708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 12:41:32 EDT --- Okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-rack-test) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:45:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081645.n68GjFF5023896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Ismael Olea 2009-07-08 12:45:13 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: htmlparser New Branches: EL-5 Owners: olea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 16:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081654.n68GsK6P000833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 12:54:19 EDT --- Now okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (nurbs++) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081702.n68H2LY3027908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:02:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. > 1] rpmlint complaining > rubygem-syntax.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/syntax-1.0.0/test/ALL-TESTS.rb 0644 > TODO: > rpmlint This is not in the path that could contain executable scripts, and is not meant to be executable by user of the package. It's probably not worth removing the shebang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508453] Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081701.n68H1BrM002868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508453 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:01:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > work to do: > - package is distributed in the same terms as ruby is. So it should have ruby > license or GPLv2. Not GPLv2+. Good catch. Fixed. > - Consistent build root reference. In %clean stare it's referred to build root > as %{buildroot} and other stages uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Fixed. > - add BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 (maybe should be checked by rpmlint) bug #510313 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-test-spec.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-test-spec-0.10.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081707.n68H7sXh029246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:07:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1] during build following error is shown: > ERROR: While generating documentation for builder-2.1.2 > ... MESSAGE: Unhandled special: Special: type=17, text="" This seems to be just an informational message. There's not much we can to fix that before the gem unpack time, and not much point in doing that after we get the warning. > 2] rpmlint is complaining > rubygem-builder.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/builder-2.1.2/test/performance.rb Converted. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-builder.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-builder-2.1.2-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081703.n68H3Z2O028247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 13:03:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 2. Use of the exit() function in the upstream code (myexcept.cpp). 'rpmlint > -i' states: > "newmat.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnewmat.so.11.1 > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() > context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library > function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the > error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any > state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an > actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the > situation." > I have thus written a patch > (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/newmat/11/1/newmat-11-fix-exit-issue.patch) > fixing that issue. That patch should be submitted/proposed upstream (as I have > just coded a work-around, which upstream may not find appropriate). For good or worse, this is quite common behaviour in scientific packages. The rpmlint warning can be safely omitted, one can ask upstream to fix it but any Fedora specific hacks are out of the question since they break compatibility. ** - It seems you have added the functionality to build the shared library yourself. In this case no soname should be set (just produce an unversioned .so file). You should ask upstream to provide the option to build soname'd shared libraries. Denis: please don't post spec files of your own as this makes the review rather confusing. I almost mistook your spec file for that of Pascal. If you want to suggest changes, do so with an attached patch. Pascal: please fill your whole name in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081706.n68H67I9004093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 13:06:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081710.n68HA7H4004936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 13:10:05 EDT --- - Use %global instead of %define. Put the revision definition at the top of the spec file: %global revision R1119 - Include the revision in the release tag: Release: 2.%{revision}%{?dist} (every time you update the spec file update the release tag if the version hasn't been updated). - No explicit Requires: are allowed for libraries; drop Requires: wxGTK, fftw, freeglut http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - Drop the commented patch line #%patch0 -p0 - Instead of find . -type d -name .svn -print0 | xargs -0r rm -rf you can just use find . -name *.svn -exec rm -rf {} \; (or maybe even find . -name *.svn -delete; ) - Preserve time stamps by adding -p to install commands. - Use "rm" instead of "unlink". - Install the pixmap to /usr/share/pixmaps, drop the hicolor stuff. (Also, you were missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081710.n68HA6TA029894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 13:10:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > @Mamoru, > there aren't mp3's in test You're correct in that there are no mp3 files, however ./tests/data/MUSIC.README reads that some files under ./tests/ are _created_ from mp3 file, and also the original files are licensed under CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Fedora anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081711.n68HB4iL030186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 13:11:02 EDT --- Indeed, that works fine. It's too bad that none of the tests are useful; you might consider adding a comment to that effect as a reminder to try and turn at least some tests on in the future. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:10:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081710.n68HAFHk005046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:10:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rack-test Short Description: Simple testing API built on Rack Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081715.n68HFXct031346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 13:15:30 EDT --- - Drop the explicit Require: Requires: gsl http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - Keep the time stamps on the converted files with for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README; do sed 's/\r//' $file > $file.new && \ touch -r $file $file.new && \ mv $file.new $file done - Add space after the last entry in %changelog. - Update to 1.9.0.1, then I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081722.n68HMVAN000537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 13:22:29 EDT --- - Preserve time stamps during charset conversion. - Drop explicit requires. - Patch thingy looks horrible: a) it doesn't work if %{_sourcedir} is read-only b) if the build is stopped in the middle the patch file is lost and so on. I suggest either patching first and then sed'ing the resulting file, or running patch manually: sed 's!%%{_docdir}/%%{name}-%%{version}/!%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/!' %{PATCH1} > patchfile patch -p1 < patchfile - Instead of the looped rm, just run find . -name .svn -exec rm -rf {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081724.n68HOjgT008503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-08 13:24:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > - Instead of > find . -type d -name .svn -print0 | xargs -0r rm -rf > you can just use > find . -name *.svn -exec rm -rf {} \; > (or maybe even > find . -name *.svn -delete; > ) Ugh, the .svn's are directories, so what you want to run is find . -name .svn -exec rm -rf {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] New: Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Summary: Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsd at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090708/olpc-library.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090708/olpc-library-2.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package has been part of the OLPC platform for some time, so I've cleaned it up for inclusion in Fedora. It is a set of scripts to generate a HTML index page based on the content (e.g. textbooks) installed on the system. It is invoked by sugar when new textbooks are installed, and during first-boot through the olpc-configure init script in the olpc-utils package. Please review for F11 inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081726.n68HQ284009115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 13:26:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > SRPM: > http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rubigen-1.5.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081727.n68HR6tt009390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:27:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > There are many rpmlint warining/errors on -doc subpackage, however > these are on examples and I think they are safe to ignore. Agreed. * Package named correctly * Macros used consistently * Builds fine in mock * Requires/provides sane * filelist mostly sane (see below) * rpmlint mostly ok (see below) * spec file clean and legible (well, you could improve indentation in %globals paragraph :) Needs work: 1.) Tests failing. According to the comments you seem to be aware of that. Not blocking a review. 2.) Rpmlint rubygem-mkrf.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/cache/mkrf-0.2.3.gem 0600 You probably want to change this via %attr in %files or change the mode in %install or something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081733.n68HXpN3010823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:33:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > By the way the naming seems a bit strange, however gem name is > actually called as "ruby-opengl" so I think "rubygem-ruby-opengl" is > proper for srpm name. Definitely. * Named correctly * SPEC file clean, legible and in american english * license correct * builds fine in mock * Proper compiler flags used * filelists sane * require/provide list seems sane Tip: You may want to fill in the %check section with the testsuite executed conditionally (e.g. prepend it with [ "$DISPLAY" ] || exit 0), so that the maintainer (you) can run the tests in his development setup before sumbitting the package into the build system. APPROVED (please don't import/build before the minor concerns from the dependency package are addressed and it is approved as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081736.n68HagNO011785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081736.n68HaI6m011712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 13:36:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > SRPM: > > http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rubigen-1.5.2-4.fc11.src.rpm > > Seems 404... Whoops, sorry, I uploaded noarch package instead. Should be fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081735.n68HZMlk011363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 17:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081743.n68HhbUU005324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-08 13:43:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sybase Short Description: Python interface to Sybase Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081805.n68I5tVe011168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081804.n68I4tSb010526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 14:04:53 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for review and CVS! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081805.n68I54R4010902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 Bug 504477 depends on bug 504480, which changed state. Bug 504480 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081805.n68I57Ri010938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 14:05:06 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for review and CVS! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081805.n68I533X010876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 14:05:02 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for review and CVS! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081813.n68IDOCG019984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 14:13:22 EDT --- Thank you for review. (In reply to comment #1) > * spec file clean and legible > (well, you could improve indentation in %globals paragraph :) - Perhaps now it should look better. > 2.) Rpmlint > > rubygem-mkrf.noarch: E: non-readable > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/cache/mkrf-0.2.3.gem 0600 > > You probably want to change this via %attr in %files or change the mode in > %install or something. - Fixed. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf-0.2.3-2.fc.src.rpm * Thu Jul 9 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.2.3-2 - Improve indentation - Make sure gem is installed with proper permission -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081826.n68IQ6Oh016113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-08 14:26:05 EDT --- Looks fine now, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081833.n68IXfCL025235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 14:33:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081837.n68IbgX9018806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-08 14:37:42 EDT --- python-webpy-0.32-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webpy-0.32-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081837.n68IbqLb018886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-08 14:37:52 EDT --- python-webpy-0.32-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webpy-0.32-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081837.n68IblXt018847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-08 14:37:47 EDT --- python-webpy-0.32-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webpy-0.32-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081833.n68IXXER017784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 14:33:32 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-rubigen) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081836.n68IaBD6018585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 14:36:10 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mkrf Short Description: Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081837.n68IbvXo026322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-08 14:37:57 EDT --- python-webpy-0.32-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webpy-0.32-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081841.n68IfdII019950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 14:41:37 EDT --- Unfortunately you got the "cvs" before the date in your release, while the guidelines require that the date go first, followed by "cvs" or anything else you might like to put there (up to 16 characters). So change to "erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs" and this package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081843.n68Ih4Y1027623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 14:43:02 EDT --- Did you intend to make a CVS request so that you can get this checked in and built? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081844.n68Iig15027983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-08 14:44:41 EDT --- Thank you! Now as bug 508416 is approved: -------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ruby-opengl Short Description: OpenGL Interface for Ruby Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081847.n68Il63m021122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 18:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081857.n68Ivdv4031486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-08 14:57:38 EDT --- 1] use global instead of define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby 2] remove mv during %install, use cp -p, to keep gemdir consistent 3] imho GPLv3+ and not GPLv3 (see README file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081902.n68J2AGF032575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-08 15:02:08 EDT --- 1] use global instead of define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby i will check deeper during next days -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081906.n68J6OmB001053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #17 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-07-08 15:06:22 EDT --- Apologize for the long delay, I have been very busy with other tasks. I made changed to address all of the remaining issues raised above. The new spec / srpm can be found here: http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/anyterm.spec http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/anyterm-1.1.29-4.fc10.src_.rpm Please note the following: - as far as the executable stack in anytermd issue 'export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' did not fix the issue adding "execstack -c anytermd" after the make in the build section fixes this but I'm not sure if thats the ideal solution - removed the small patch I had added to parameterize the url vars per your concerns that it isn't upstream - Doesn't build on rawhide i386 issue: I was unable to get a rawhide system working (installed F11, enabled rawhide repo, updated, restarted, boot sequence crashed w/ a stack trace) I could not reproduce this, on a regular non-rawhide F11 i386 vm Here is the output: http://ovirt.pastebin.com/m570a2b2 Is this a major issue, it is rawhide after all - Latest Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1460119 - Current rpmlint output: $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/anyterm-1.1.29-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm anyterm.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/anytermd 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - rpmlint reports "anyterm.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/anytermd", couldn't find much info on this and adding "-i" to rpmlint didn't help - had to introduce DEFAULT_LOCKFILE to init script as rpmlint reported (without it) "anyterm.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/anyterm anyterm}" (note trailing brace) - Clarification needed for your comments: "BuildRoot is wrong. Easy fix." "Whitespace mismatch in tags" (are these still issues?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081934.n68JYrKr008655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-08 15:34:51 EDT --- python-demjson-1.3-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-demjson-1.3-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082012.n68KC26a019147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #21 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-08 16:12:01 EDT --- removed clients tests and ext. compressed sourcefile before = 32,8MB compressed sourcefile after = 0,6MB SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2951/fife.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2951/fife-2009.0-0.9.r2951svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082018.n68KI9w8020720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 --- Comment #5 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-07-08 16:18:08 EDT --- I apologize for my inactivity. Work has been taking up all my time lately. But, I will try to get checked in tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494219] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082017.n68KHLO5020559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494219 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2009-07-08 16:17:19 EDT --- These could do with being fixed too, though that's probably more of an upstream issue: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/acct_mgr/pwhash.py:13: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead import md5, sha /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/acct_mgr/pwhash.py:13: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead import md5, sha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082021.n68KL2Gn021531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-07-08 16:21:01 EDT --- Imported. Builds done. Bodhi updates penging. I added a small comment wrt the tests. Also enabled an upstream compile option for using threads. Could be a little buggy but not in the packaging sense. Thanks again for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082030.n68KUlwa015934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2009-07-08 16:30:46 EDT --- All issues are fixed OK source files match upstream: 03953b3b97ef32f5b279071c60426ce2eeb3ca53 latrace-0.5.6.tar.bz2 OK rpmlint is silent. OK file permissions are appropriate. this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082031.n68KVMqF023925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082038.n68KcxuE017467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #1 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-08 16:38:58 EDT --- This looks like http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/dsd/olpc-library/ except I only see 2.0.0 there, not 2.0.1. You need an upstream URL for Source0 or instructions on how to reproduce the tarball. License needs "and BSD" added to be valid. But the file which causes that, namely "js/home-yahoo-dom-event.js", is copied from yui_xxx.zip from http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/ which should really be packaged separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:45:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510376] New: Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Summary: Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bluemodem.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bluemodem-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://bluemodem.sourceforge.net/ Description: The bluemodem package contains a program to both run and configure, bluetooth modem connections. The bluemodem program allows you to maintain multiple modem configurations. Bluemodem also connects and dials out using ppp (dun). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1462372 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint bluemodem-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint bluemodem* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 21:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082139.n68Ldmdi008268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-08 17:39:47 EDT --- Grmbl. You're right, but the doc/*.txt thing still smells of "someone forgot to put them in EXTRA_DIST in Makefile.am", i.e. a bug for upstream. Source0 is wrong, replace 0.2 with %{version}. It looks like 0.3 gained this: gjs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgjs-dbus.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 gjs-dbus is new in 0.3. I'll try to understand if this is the normal way to use DBus. I haven't done an informal but full review yet. I'll get to it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 22:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082209.n68M9JVR007005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 00:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090018.n690IHvc008749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 00:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090019.n690JeGo008904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #17 from D Haley 2009-07-08 20:19:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nurbs++ Short Description: A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. Owners: mycae Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 00:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090056.n690uYAX016159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 20:56:32 EDT --- Indeed, builds fine for me and rpmlint is silent. You need to be consistent in your use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT versus %{buildroot}. Either style is fine, but you must pick one. You seen to use a %pyver macro that is not defined anywhere. It doesn't seem to make much difference, though; maybe 'make install' doesn't actually care if you pass PYTHONVER at all. %global is recommended over %define these days, although I don't think it matters for the situation where you're using it. The C code isn't compiled with the correct set of compiler flags. Fortunately -g is passed so the debuginfo package comes out correct, but you should pass %optflags (or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS if you prefer that form). Unfortunately it looks like this package thinks it knows best and overrides CFLAGS, so you may have to patch Makefile.common. Your manual python dependency is unnecessary; rpm will generate one. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: b411e012244a3433b250a0cd63ce50aaf74ab4ddda8c5ef37c3598ee05ff5f2c python-utmp_0.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (according to FE-Legal review). * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not correct. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires (unnecessary manual python dependency): utmpaccessmodule.so()(64bit) python-utmp = 0.7-3.fc12 python-utmp(x86-64) = 0.7-3.fc12 = ? python python(abi) = 2.6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 01:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090136.n691aG5I024179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from John Guthrie 2009-07-08 21:36:14 EDT --- The package builds cleanly in all branches, so closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 02:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491790] Review Request: mediawiki-SpamBlacklist - An extension to provide a Spam Blacklist management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090240.n692e8Xc006161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491790 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 22:40:07 EDT --- Did you receive clarification from the author? Many of these mediawiki plugins suffer from terribly confusing licensing status. This one seems especially bad as the only thing we can really go on, the README file, says: This extension and this documentation was written by Tim Starling and is ambiguously licensed. I would argue that without clarification, there is no way this can go into Fedora. It doesn't even seem that we have redistribution rights. I guess I'll block FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 03:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdam - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090337.n693bwDo010621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |compat-libgda - compat libs |compat-libgdam - compat |for libgdamm-3 |libs for libgdamm-3 Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-08 23:37:56 EDT --- Hey. Per our conversation on IRC, I will take a look at reviewing this package and sponsoring you. I'm adding spot here in CC. He's the maintainer of the current libgdamm package. I just want to make sure he has no objection to you maintaining a compat package here. ;) Look for a review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 03:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090342.n693g2Pd011525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-08 23:42:00 EDT --- Per our conversation on IRC I will look at reviewing this package and sponsoring you. Look for a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 03:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510401] New: Review Request: GStreamRipperX - A GTK front end to streamripper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: GStreamRipperX - A GTK front end to streamripper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510401 Summary: Review Request: GStreamRipperX - A GTK front end to streamripper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife_ma at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/gstreamripperx.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/gstreamripperx-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A GTK front end to streamripper Koji build page : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1462799 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 03:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090342.n693ge31019475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #28 from Ed Brand 2009-07-08 23:42:38 EDT --- Srpm update, fix permission issue on log directory https://sourceforge.net/projects/sslogger/files/sslogger-0.9/sslogger-0.9-45.fc10.x86_64.rpm/download -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 04:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] New: Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 Summary: Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc.spec SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ZNC is an IRC bounce with many advanced features like detaching, multiple users, per channel playback buffer, SSL, IPv6, transparent DCC bouncing, Perl and C++ module support to name a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 04:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090416.n694Ga0D018117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-09 00:16:35 EDT --- Below is the rpmlint output. The no-documentation warning is because the documentation is all under the main znc package. [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint znc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint znc-0.070-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb result]$ rpmlint *.rpm znc-admin.i586: W: no-documentation znc-autoattach.i586: W: no-documentation znc-autocycle.i586: W: no-documentation znc-autoop.i586: W: no-documentation znc-away.i586: W: no-documentation znc-awaynick.i586: W: no-documentation znc-awayping.i586: W: no-documentation znc-chansaver.i586: W: no-documentation znc-crypt.i586: W: no-documentation znc-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/znc-0.070/modules/q.cpp znc-devel.i586: W: no-documentation znc-email.i586: W: no-documentation znc-fail2ban.i586: W: no-documentation znc-fixfreenode.i586: W: no-documentation znc-imapauth.i586: W: no-documentation znc-keepnick.i586: W: no-documentation znc-kickrejoin.i586: W: no-documentation znc-log.i586: W: no-documentation znc-modperl.i586: W: no-documentation znc-nickserv.i586: W: no-documentation znc-partyline.i586: W: no-documentation znc-perform.i586: W: no-documentation znc-q.i586: W: no-documentation znc-raw.i586: W: no-documentation znc-sample.i586: W: no-documentation znc-saslauth.i586: W: no-documentation znc-savebuff.i586: W: no-documentation znc-schat.i586: W: no-documentation znc-shell.i586: W: no-documentation znc-simple-away.i586: W: no-documentation znc-stickychan.i586: W: no-documentation znc-watch.i586: W: no-documentation znc-webadmin.i586: W: no-documentation 35 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 33 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 04:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090454.n694s8Xb025168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-09 00:54:07 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. See below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See Below - License (GPLv3+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Pick one of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} and use that consistently. 2. The Source url is ok, but might be better to list the savanna download: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases-noredirect/solang/Solang-0.2.tar.gz In fact it seems the link you have is giving a 404 currently and the savannah site doesn't have the 0.2 version. ;( Check with upstream? Ah, your version is a prerelease checkout? See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL You will need to explain in a comment how to do that exact checkout. 3. The License seems to be GPLv3+. No need to ship a copy of COPYING.GPLv2 I wouldn't think. 4. No need to package the "INSTALL" doc. It's generic and you are taking care of the install for the user. 5. Not a blocker, but the %{__rm} and other macros are not very useful IMHO. You're welcome to use them, but typing an extra 5 characters and making the spec less readable doesn't seem worth it to me. 6. You need to own the %{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps/ and %{_datadir}/%{name}/ui/ directories. Either remove the /* from them so rpm globs the dir too, or add %dir entries for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 05:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510404] New: Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510404 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkrsna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/hunspell-kn.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/hunspell-kn-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Kannada Hunspell Dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 05:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510404] Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090538.n695cOIr008874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510404 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 05:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090542.n695gh3V002682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 01:42:42 EDT --- python-webpy-0.32-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-webpy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 05:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090543.n695h65O010058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 01:43:05 EDT --- python-webpy-0.32-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-webpy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0011 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 05:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510404] Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090541.n695f4uJ009565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510404 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-09 01:41:03 EDT --- will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 06:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090639.n696dK0V013591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt 2009-07-09 02:39:18 EDT --- * It fails to build on Fedora 11: | channel.c:146: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'log' | user.c: In function 'users_in_channel': | user.c:299: warning: passing argument 4 of 'qsort' from incompatible pointer type /usr/include/stdlib.h:710: note: expected '__compar_fn_t' but argument is of type 'int (*)(void *, void *)' | regex.c:34: error: static declaration of 'strndup' follows non-static declaration | make[1]: *** [regex.lo] Error 1 Indeed, regex.c includes and declares its own one just a few lines further down in the file. * It doesn't adhere to the compiler flags guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags The flags you should see in the build log are those printed by "rpm --eval %{optflags}". Since %configure exports them (see "rpm --eval %configure"), but the bnirc source tarball doesn't accept the variables passed in from the outside, it may be necessary to apply a patch. * Issues pointed out in bottom of comment 10 are not fixed yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 06:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507912] Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090649.n696n12n015504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-07-09 02:49:01 EDT --- > Brought back the dist tag. Doesn't seem like a good idea to remove > it considering the complications in building and tagging. Well, that's not true. You would tag and build it only for the oldest dist branch and let koji inherit the builds for the newer targets. Example: You would tag and build alp-1.0-1 for F-10, and koji would make the built packages available for F-11 and devel, too. [The only minor problem is that there is no inheritence between the EPEL and Fedora targets, afaik, but in case you plan to publish this pkg for EPEL, you could simply add a version-less ".el" to the %release value.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 06:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090651.n696pjLf023597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #43 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-09 02:51:37 EDT --- hi, I would like to maintain/co-maintain this package. here are the specs etc: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel-2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm all the other files from the mock build can be found at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/ regards, Ankur Sinha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090724.n697OcrG030931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #44 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-09 03:24:37 EDT --- Hello, Ankur Sinha. Is there any troubles with my package? And why you use hardcoded path --prefix=/usr in their? Why not standard like %{_prefix}? And, may be you wish review it now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090734.n697YNIU000503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #45 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-09 03:34:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > Hello, Ankur Sinha. > > Is there any troubles with my package? I haven't checked your package so I don't know. > > And why you use hardcoded path --prefix=/usr in their? Why not standard like > %{_prefix}? > > Hmm.. ill check up.. thanks.. > And, may be you wish review it now? I can't. I'm a new packager, not a reviewer(at all!). I was packaging it for kicks and thought why not try co-maintaining it. :) regards, Ankur Sinha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090739.n697do39001747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-09 03:39:49 EDT --- Thanks! http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-library.spec Source URL is now http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/olpc-library/ and I removed that BSD file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090742.n697gS8s002639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #46 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-09 03:42:27 EDT --- Ok, I'm not argue - we can co-maintain it. When review will finished, I'll include you to owner in request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090744.n697ilsv002942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #47 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-09 03:44:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > I can't. I'm a new packager, not a reviewer(at all!). I was packaging it for > kicks and thought why not try co-maintaining it. :) BTW, you are packager, sponsored? Or you seek sponsor? Please keep in mind I can't sponsor you, I'm not in sponsor group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090753.n697r522030025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 03:53:03 EDT --- mcu8051ide-1.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcu8051ide-1.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090753.n697rAe5005077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 03:53:09 EDT --- mcu8051ide-1.1-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcu8051ide-1.1-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090750.n697ou8l004617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #18 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-07-09 03:50:54 EDT --- Suggested Buildroot tags are listed in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag yours is a variant of the third one, it's fine according to the guidelines. The main problem I still see if that compilation dos not pick up our RPM_OPT_FLAGS. try setting both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS with it, then it should work as expected and it will probably fix the debuginfo problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090753.n697rGIF030143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 03:53:15 EDT --- mcu8051ide-1.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcu8051ide-1.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090808.n6988WGk009065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-09 04:08:29 EDT --- Please post the URL of your srpm instead of binary x86_64 rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090811.n698Bjng002769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #49 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-09 04:11:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > (In reply to comment #46) > > Ok, I'm not argue - we can co-maintain it. When review will finished, I'll > > include you to owner in request. > great :) Sorry, it off course if you do not argue co-maintain it. If you wish, you can maintain axel single. > I'm a sponsored packager. I think the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker can be removed > from the bug now?? I think you must ask you sponsor do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090816.n698GSOr011689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-09 04:16:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rubigen Short Description: A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090822.n698MZ4Q005585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-09 04:22:32 EDT --- Jindra is on PTO (3 weeks - so quite a lot of time) so maybe someone else should fix those issues mentioned in comment #13. I'd like to see xz utils in Fedora too - as otherwise I still have to use 3 times bigger tar.gz tarball for coreutils (so bigger srpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090822.n698MOVK013376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #50 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-09 04:22:22 EDT --- Do you need now for txt in CHANGES CREDITS API axelrc.example README ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done ? As I see, this files uses UNIX-line endings now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 07:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090758.n697wiaM031603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #48 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-09 03:58:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > Ok, I'm not argue - we can co-maintain it. When review will finished, I'll > include you to owner in request. great :) (In reply to comment #47) > (In reply to comment #45) > > I can't. I'm a new packager, not a reviewer(at all!). I was packaging it for > > kicks and thought why not try co-maintaining it. :) > BTW, you are packager, sponsored? Or you seek sponsor? Please keep in mind I > can't sponsor you, I'm not in sponsor group. I'm a sponsored packager. I think the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker can be removed from the bug now?? and, made the change.. here are the new srpms and specs: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel-2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel-2.4-1.fc12.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel.spec all other files are at : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090833.n698XEOB008289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #51 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-09 04:33:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > Do you need now > for txt in CHANGES CREDITS API axelrc.example README ; do > sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new > touch -r $txt $txt.new > mv $txt.new $txt > done > ? > As I see, this files uses UNIX-line endings now. All this is trivial and will be corrected once the review process begins.. (In reply to comment #49) > (In reply to comment #48) > > (In reply to comment #46) > > > Ok, I'm not argue - we can co-maintain it. When review will finished, I'll > > > include you to owner in request. > > great :) > Sorry, it off course if you do not argue co-maintain it. If you wish, you can > maintain axel single. > > > I'm a sponsored packager. I think the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker can be removed > > from the bug now?? > I think you must ask you sponsor do it. The FE-NEEDSPONSOR is present since Ankur Srivastava at the time was not a sponsored packager. Since we are both sponsored packagers, it is no longer needed. Can I please take axel off your hands and maintain it alone (if you don't mind). I don't think the package needs 2 people maintaining it.. Anyway, Thanks a lot for your help :). regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] New: Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Summary: Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel-2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Axel tries to accelerate HTTP/FTP downloading process by using multiple connections for one file. It can use multiple mirrors for a download. Axel has no dependencies and is lightweight, so it might be useful as a wget clone on byte-critical systems. Other info on the mock build is here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/ I have closed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 and started a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090856.n698uJuX021595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ankur at ankurs.com --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-09 04:56:14 EDT --- *** Bug 454980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 08:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090856.n698uIql021574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #52 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-09 04:56:14 EDT --- hi, I'm closing this bug report (due to inactivity of the reporter of the package) and starting a new review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 regards, Ankur Sinha *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 510428 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 09:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 05:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510022] Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090922.n699Mxun021327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 --- Comment #3 from Michal Nowak 2009-07-09 05:22:58 EDT --- The warning was caused by file(1)'s fault, filed bug 510429. - patches have comments - directory ownership is now OK - builds in Koji (scratch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 09:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 05:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090957.n699vBbj006690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #4 from Konstantinos 2009-07-09 05:57:10 EDT --- Fixed that. Thanx for the tip. The new files: SPEC URL: http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/pyur/python-urwid.spec SRPM URL: http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/pyur/python-urwid-0.9.8.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 11:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] New: Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 Summary: Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/morse2txt.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/morse2txt-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://morse2txt.sourceforge.net/ Description: This program will decode morse code from your short-wave receiver using your OSS capable sound card. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463112 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint morse2txt-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint morse2txt* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 11:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091105.n69B5eFm022558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-09 07:05:39 EDT --- It worked with F-10 mingw32 but not anymore with F-11 and later: This problem is about binary mode with win32 executable, but I'm only interested in the libraries which built cannot be splitted easily from the executable. Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mingw32-dirac.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows dirac compression library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 11:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502691] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091117.n69BHLYX017120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-09 07:17:19 EDT --- Sorry, this package was added with #467391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 11:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510463] New: Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510463 Summary: Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dynamips/dynamips.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dynamips/dynamips-0.2.8-0.1.rc2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cisco 7200/3600/3725/3745/2600/1700 router emulator. You can use dynamips to create labs. It uses IOS Images (which are not part of this package). This is simply a complementary tool to real labs for administrators of Cisco networks or anyone studying to pass their CCNA/CCNP/CCIE exams. * Builds in koji - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463135 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463144 * Rpmlint - Fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510464] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers. It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems. >From package wishlist http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist#E-G * Builds in koji - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463117 * Rpmlint - Fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091204.n69C40OP029893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510463] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091206.n69C6AUg005370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510463 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2009-07-09 08:06:09 EDT --- there was already a previous review request for this package and it was rejected for fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150) instead package has been submitted for rpmfusion (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091211.n69CBLxf031912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-07-09 08:11:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Grmbl. You're right, but the doc/*.txt thing still smells of "someone forgot to > put them in EXTRA_DIST in Makefile.am", i.e. a bug for upstream. I asked on IRC, they said it probably was so. Please file an upstream bug and make sure the files gets included in -devel unless they change their minds about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdam - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091223.n69CNxna010573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-09 08:23:58 EDT --- Compat libs of libgdamm are needed for what exactly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdam - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091228.n69CS2XW011850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 --- Comment #5 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-09 08:28:01 EDT --- compat libs of libgdamm are needed for solang : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091231.n69CV2FK004840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-09 08:30:59 EDT --- *** Bug 510463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510463] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091231.n69CV10s004782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510463 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-09 08:30:59 EDT --- this package need's to be included in rpmfusion, closing now. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 246150 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091248.n69CmlfN017063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 08:48:46 EDT --- There are a bunch of rpmlint warning. [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint python-urwid* python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/dialog.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/calc.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/graph.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/browse.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/edit.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/fib.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/docgen_reference.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/tour.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/test_urwid.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/bigtext.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/docgen_tutorial.py python-urwid.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/input_test.py python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/dialog.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/calc.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/graph.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/browse.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/edit.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/fib.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/docgen_reference.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/tour.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/test_urwid.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/bigtext.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/docgen_tutorial.py /usr/bin/python python-urwid.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-urwid-0.9.8.4/input_test.py /usr/bin/python 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings. Is the Source0 entry correct? [fab at laptop09 SOURCES]$ LC_ALL=C spectool -g ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-urwid.spec --2009-07-09 14:48:14-- http://excess.org/urwid/urwid-0.9.8.4.tar.gz Resolving excess.org... 64.15.148.243 Connecting to excess.org|64.15.148.243|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-07-09 14:48:14 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091249.n69Cn599009835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #6 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-09 08:49:04 EDT --- Ok, fixed the issues. Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/updates/11/SRPMS/SPECS/solang.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/updates/11/SRPMS/solang-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solang is a free photo manager that will act as a front-end for directory based local storage as well as remote photo-storage systems, as can be said, on the "Cloud". Basic editing support is also planned as well as a small pipeline for RAW processing. The aim of this project is to break the performance characteristics of current popular photo management softwares and provide a fast and reliable alternative that does not place humongous demands on user's hardware resources even to meet basic functionality. This package depends on compat-libgdamm, which is still in review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 12:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091250.n69CogxX017747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #65 from Daniel Walsh 2009-07-09 08:50:37 EDT --- Uli, do you have any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091309.n69D9OKO022688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 09:09:23 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091309.n69D9TFZ022726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 09:09:28 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.5.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdam - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091318.n69DIFJV025215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-09 09:18:14 EDT --- After discussion on IRC, I have no problems with the existence of a compat-libgdamm, as long as it is properly end-of-lifed when it is no longer needed by solang, under the assumption that solang will eventually move to the libgdamm 4.0 API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091322.n69DMwDE026740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #10 from D Haley 2009-07-09 09:22:55 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Rpmlint provides one warning worth mentioning: mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgomp.so.1 mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 Using the suggested fix (below) to set libtool to tell the linker to "link as needed" fails. sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool Modifying the GSL_FLAGS before the ./configure to "-lgsl" also causes the build to fail: /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_ztrsv' /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_scasum' /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_izamax' ... Is rpmlint checking this correctly? The functions that mgl needs are the "special functions" of GSL, namely Airy and elliptic integral computation. I think it is safe to ignore this warning. >- Drop the explicit Require: > Requires: gsl Done > - Update to 1.9.0.1, then I'll do the review. The 1.9.0.1 tarball appears to be missing the fonts dir (note that the tarball has halved in size between versions!), and the build fails when make install cannot find these fonts, which is explicitly asked for the makefile. I have however updated to 1.9 which does have the font data, and emailed upstream for advice on what their intent is with respect to this in 1.9.0.1. Did they omit the fonts inadvertently or are they intending to use system fonts? No such discussion is apparent on their site -- according to their news, the .0.1 release is targeted at fixing a win32 specific bug. - Keep the time stamps on the converted files with... Fixed - Add space after the last entry in %changelog. Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091334.n69DYTre029505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-09 09:34:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Rpmlint provides one warning worth mentioning: > mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0 > /usr/lib/libgomp.so.1 > mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0 > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 > > Using the suggested fix (below) to set libtool to tell the linker to "link as > needed" fails. > > sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool > > Modifying the GSL_FLAGS before the ./configure to "-lgsl" also causes the build > to fail: > /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_ztrsv' > /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_scasum' > /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_izamax' > ... This looks like you are missing -lgslcblas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091354.n69DsOI0002677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #10 from D Haley 2009-07-09 09:54:23 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.2-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm >- Instead of the looped rm, just run > find . -name .svn -exec rm -rf {} \; This causes problems with nested .svn files, where find isn't happy if you try to delete a file that was in a deleted subdir.. Anyway the point is moot as the .svn files are no longer in the 0.5.2 tarball, so I have removed it entirely. > - Preserve time stamps during charset conversion. Fixed. >- Patch thingy looks horrible: > ... >I suggest either patching first and then sed'ing the resulting file, or running >patch manually: Done via manual patch. rpmlint now emits a warning, but this can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091357.n69Dv4Xj028246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2009-07-09 09:57:01 EDT --- But including gslcblas causes rpmlint to complain. Normally the build uses gsl-config. $ gsl-config --libs -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 13:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091359.n69Dx64q028774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2009-07-09 09:59:04 EDT --- Sorry for the noise: I got a response from upstream. I think it is best to stick with 1.9. >Dear D Haley, > >I don't put font files into v.1.9.0.1 because it is minor release >(mostly for windows users). Just copy font/ folder from v.1.9 or any >previous one. > >All the best, >Alexey -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 14:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091410.n69EA0l8006615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #6 from Konstantinos 2009-07-09 10:09:59 EDT --- I had followed the tips from bug 427796. But now it seems that the examples included in the package (which I had marked as documentation) have some dependencies. There are also warnings about spurious executable permissions. Can anybody help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 14:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091410.n69EAGDt007082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #87 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-09 10:10:06 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: aqsis Owners: kwizart New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 14:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091413.n69EDoqC032682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #66 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-07-09 10:13:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #65) > Uli, do you have any ideas? Probably some assembler code. I haven't looked at the source code. But most multi-media code is using streaming instructions and unfortunately the people writing the code use asm code and then do it incorrectly. Compile with debug info and then use eu-findtextrel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 14:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091439.n69EdEns014876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-09 10:39:12 EDT --- Removing FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091500.n69F08jd020966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #19 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-07-09 11:00:06 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback, I tried changing the spec to incorporate cflags / cxx flags as you suggested like so: %build export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS" %{__gzip} anytermd.1 #execstack -c anytermd Unfortunately after building / running rpm lint on it both the unstripped-binary-or-object and executable stack (note I commented out execstack) issues persisted. Looking at the 1.1.29 makefile http://svn.anyterm.org/anyterm/tags/releases/1.1/1.1.29/common.mk the issue might be that the author explicitly sets CPP_FLAGS, overwriting it if previously set, and doesn't use CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS at all. Then again, trying the rpmbuild process w/ ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} explicitly set and passed to each invocation of g++ doesn't seem to resolve either of the issues (but does add "-02 -g" to the g++ command) Still not sure what I need do to resolve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510511] New: Review Request: aws - Set of tools to access Amazon EC2, S3 and SQS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aws - Set of tools to access Amazon EC2, S3 and SQS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510511 Summary: Review Request: aws - Set of tools to access Amazon EC2, S3 and SQS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/aws.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/aws-1.42-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: aws is a command-line tool that gives you easy access to Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3. It is designed to be simple to install and simple to use. The package contains command line interface similar to Amazon API tools, making it possible to use it as a drop-in free replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091514.n69FEPSS016676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #20 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-07-09 11:14:23 EDT --- Sorry I spoke too soon. Adding the CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS as suggested above is successful in adding "-02 -g" to the g++ invocation, the same result as when I added ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} directly to g++. The two rpmlint issues persist regardless though (will leave execstack in to take care the executable stack issue) but at least RPM_OPT_FLAGS is picked up. Here is the updated spec and srpm (version bumped as well): http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/anyterm.spec http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/anyterm-1.1.29-5.fc10.src_.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507912] Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091521.n69FLmxg018807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 11:21:46 EDT --- Actually that requires rel-eng intervention and I find it difficult to imagine that it's worth the effort given that it provides exactly zero benefit. We currently use a different signing key per release, so the packages end up being different anyway. But if you want to ask rel-eng yourself, feel free. Maybe you'll get a different answer than I did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091520.n69FKWDC026330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 11:20:31 EDT --- Is there a reason, why 'parallel make' is not used? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091534.n69FYhqE029675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) --- Comment #4 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-09 11:34:42 EDT --- No. Updated the spec file at http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-library.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091530.n69FUuog028909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 11:30:55 EDT --- Can you please build 'python-zope-testing' for F11? This way I can do the review for 'python-zope-proxy' because at the moment I have no Fedora Rawhide machine with me. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091537.n69Fbppn030814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-09 11:37:50 EDT --- Sure, but it'll be a bit; you can just rebuild the F12 SRPM in mock on your machine, btw (or do a Koji scratch build). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091548.n69Fm4pJ002352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 11:48:03 EDT --- That's fine; I just wanted to make sure you weren't having problems with the procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:49:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091549.n69FnmrY002632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 11:49:45 EDT --- Still no response, so I'm revoking my approval and closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091550.n69FonCf027678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 15:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510511] Review Request: aws - Set of tools to access Amazon EC2, S3 and SQS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091539.n69Fd1Dv023654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510511 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com --- Comment #1 from R P Herrold 2009-07-09 11:39:00 EDT --- As packaged it assumes it can reach out through the network, and that the builder has AWS keying. neither assumption is reasonable, and a conditional to not emit the build message may be in order ... + perl aws --link sanity-check: "/home/herrold/.awssecret": file is missing. (Format: AccessKeyID\nSeecretAccessKey\n) + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/BUILD/timkay-aws-ecf8838a2982fdc28e713c5c4fc9c706cb04adbe ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091603.n69G3PXw006516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 12:03:24 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [?] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F11/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-zope-event-3.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop09 noarch]$ rpmlint python-zope-event-3.4.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [?] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: ZPLv2.1 [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: dedf8ec89b7852745accbee4aa5110e2 Build source: dedf8ec89b7852745accbee4aa5110e2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F11/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463549 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091608.n69G8Sib008601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #8 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-07-09 12:08:27 EDT --- will finish this tonight. thanks for the work to get it to build steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091606.n69G6J1u007969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 12:06:17 EDT --- In the meantime '%define' should be replaced with '%global' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091608.n69G8nN2008674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-09 12:08:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > But including gslcblas causes rpmlint to complain. Normally the build uses > gsl-config. > > $ gsl-config --libs > -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm And how does it complain then? - Why do you use "--disable-ltdl-install"? - You seem to be missing some buildrequirements: * giflib-devel(?) for GIF support * wxGTK-devel for wx support * python-devel for python support * octave-devel for octave support + the corresponding configure options - The package must own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm The font files don't seem to fall under the fonts policy, so they should be OK as is. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy - The package has rpath enabled: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath rpmlint output: mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl2eps ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libmgl-fltk.so.5.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mglview ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl2png ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl_example ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl_glut_example ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl_fltk_example ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl2svg ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mgl2cpp ['/usr/lib64'] mathgl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 2 warnings. Be sure that you have the redhat-rpm-config package installed on your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510511] Review Request: aws - Set of tools to access Amazon EC2, S3 and SQS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091611.n69GBF9n009822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510511 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-09 12:11:14 EDT --- I noticed that that it seems it only contains a check for the awssecret file, which it does not even read, definitely not accessing network, therefore it is harmless (unless I missed something really obvious). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091622.n69GMXex004035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-09 12:22:31 EDT --- For -0.9: * License - As now all CC-BY-SA part is removed the license for main package should be "LGPLv2+". * optflags - Fedora specific compilatin flags are not honored: ------------------------------------------------------------------- 118 FIFE msvc9 project file succesfully created (/builddir/build/BUILD/fife-2009.0_r2951/build/win32/build_environments/visual_studio_9/fife.vcproj) 119 g++ -o engine/core/audio/soundclip.os -c -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O0 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DLOG_ENABLED -DHAVE_ZIP -DHAVE_OPENGL -I/opt/include -I/usr/include/vorbis -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include/SDL -Iext/install/include -Iengine/core -Iengine/swigwrappers engine/core/audio/soundclip.cpp 120 g++ -o engine/core/audio/soundemitter.os -c -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O0 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DLOG_ENABLED -DHAVE_ZIP -DHAVE_OPENGL -I/opt/include -I/usr/include/vorbis -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include/SDL -Iext/install/include -Iengine/core -Iengine/swigwrappers engine/core/audio/soundemitter.cpp 121 g++ -o engine/core/audio/soundmanager.os -c -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O0 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DLOG_ENABLED -DHAVE_ZIP -DHAVE_OPENGL -I/opt/include -I/usr/include/vorbis -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include/SDL -Iext/install/include -Iengine/core -Iengine/swigwrappers engine/core/audio/soundmanager.cpp ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Removing rpath - Would you try to remove rpath by modifyin SConscript or so instead of using chrpath binary? As far as I tried the following is enough for this package: ------------------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}_%{revision} .... .... sed -i.rpath -e "/-rpath/s|LINKFLAGS=\[.*\]|LINKFLAGS=\[''\]|" engine/SConscript ------------------------------------------------------------------- ( Currently I cannot understand why this -rpath direction is written in engine/SConscript ) * Installing binaries ------------------------------------------------------------------- install -m0644 engine/lib*.so \ %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/engine .... chmod +x %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/engine/lib%{name}.so ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Identical binaries ------------------------------------------------------------------- 282 extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fife-2009.0-0.9.r2951svn.fc12.i386/usr/lib/fife/engine/swigwrappers/python/_fife.so 283 extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fife-2009.0-0.9.r2951svn.fc12.i386/usr/lib/fife/engine/libfife.so 284 *** WARNING: identical binaries are copied, not linked: 285 /usr/lib/fife/engine/libfife.so 286 and /usr/lib/fife/engine/swigwrappers/python/_fife.so ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Is this correct? If so, would you consider to use symlink? * Calling ldconfig - Calling /sbin/ldconfig on %post{,un} is not needed for this package because no libraries are installed under the default libraries search path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091619.n69GJo4n003073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 12:19:48 EDT --- Just a few comments: No parallel make? Sure would go faster on my lots-of-cores builder. If it doesn't work you should at least add a comment indicating that. I'm having trouble understanding the reasoning here: > The first category of warnings are all about inclusion of libraries in the > main package. Ostensibly, the whole purpose of the apron package is these > libraries, so I was not sure of whether these belong in -devel. So here's my question: What good are the static libraries without the headers in the -devel package? Static libraries have no runtime use at all; they'll be embedded into executables at build time The guidelines on static libraries should be pretty clear: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries They should be in a separate -static package unless you really have no shared libraries at all, in which case they can be in -devel but you must still provide the -static symbol so that other packages can BuildRequires: apron-static. The prelink file confuses me. Why is it in the main package? Actually, why is anything at all in the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091623.n69GN63b004137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 12:23:05 EDT --- In the meantime '%define' should be replaced with '%global' as in the other packages. Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F11/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-zc-lockfile-1.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop09 noarch]$ rpmlint python-zc-lockfile-1.0.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: ZPLv2.1 [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 6cf83766ef9935c33e240b0904c7a45e Build source: 6cf83766ef9935c33e240b0904c7a45e [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F11/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463566 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091636.n69Galuv008214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 12:36:46 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as it seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091655.n69Gtq6O012580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 16:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510533] New: Review Request: ghc-editline - Haskell editline library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-editline - Haskell editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510533 Summary: Review Request: ghc-editline - Haskell editline library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-editline/ghc-editline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-editline/ghc-editline-0.2.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains binding to the BSD editline library (http://thrysoee.dk/editline). It provides a basic interface to the editline API for reading lines in input for the user. Additionally, a readline compatibility module is included which provides a subset of the function of the readline library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091704.n69H4oQQ022321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091705.n69H5qrS014962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #20 from Liang Suilong 2009-07-09 13:05:51 EDT --- Jan Klepek I upload the latest shutter to my fedorapeople. SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.80-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091713.n69HDZd4016741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-09 13:13:34 EDT --- For -3: * Requires - -devel subpackage should have "Requires: boost-devel" because xylib/cache.h contains: ---------------------------------------------------- 23 #if 0 24 #include 25 using std::tr1::shared_ptr; 26 #else 27 #include 28 using boost::shared_ptr; 29 #endif ---------------------------------------------------- Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091727.n69HRxE4020108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 13:27:58 EDT --- There was no answer from upstream during the whole time this review was open. Perhaps in the future I will reopen this request if upstream make a statement about the 'genkeys'. Thanks Jason for your time and your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091729.n69HTVoQ028544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091737.n69HbAsC030742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-09 13:37:08 EDT --- I am lifting the FE-Legal hold, as the Fedora Board has determined there is no reason to keep this out of the Fedora package repository. However, the Board does assert that this software should not be included in any official Fedora spin. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091738.n69HcWcD030984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #20 from Tim Niemueller 2009-07-09 13:38:28 EDT --- rpmlint: - zero-length files are auto-generated and therefore not removed - complaint about no-doc is for the -devel sub-package and therefore should be fine, right? paths: You are right, I should rename at least the config path, although it is probably unlikely that you want to use both versions at the same time. However, how do I need to handle this with the .so files? The .so symlinks in the -devel package will conflict, even though the real libraries have proper version suffixes. Is that considered to be correct (package conflict) or do I need to rename the libraries as well (and then the include file path as well)? %fedora guard: I would like to keep those, as we have robots running versions as old as FC3 (and upgrading robots can be a real problem). Is that a "must remove" or "can remove"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 17:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091747.n69HlFRg024971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 13:47:14 EDT --- I agree that this is most likely acceptable content, though I'll keep FE-Legal in place and won't approve until that gets acked. However, we're already shipping this data in our release branches, it's not really small and has a completely different release cycle, so splitting it out makes sense in any case. Packaging-wise, this is trivial and looks fine. Just waiting for FE-Legal clearance. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 890dbadf44aee07999c050fcbe0c4ea8b32fba0e8b573c439dd7de8476a1a660 poppler-data-0.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: poppler-data = 0.2.1-1.fc12 = (none) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * seems acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091807.n69I72C0029038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 14:07:01 EDT --- The rpmlint complaints are fine. Honestly I don't know how to deal with the conflicting .so links. Generally yoou just can't do what it seems you're trying to do (two different versions of the same library with separate -devel packages useful in parallel) without actually renaming one of the libraries. Generally stuff in Fedora should be as clean as possible. I won't block you from checking it in, but anyone is welcome to go through and remove crap like that from packages so you really shouldn't rely on it being there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091809.n69I97XT029364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-09 14:09:05 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Fabian! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-zc-lockfile Short Description: Basic Inter-Process Locks Owners: konradm Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091810.n69IATc8029973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-09 14:10:28 EDT --- Thanks for this one as well :). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-zope-event Short Description: Zope Event Publication Owners: konradm Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:14:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091814.n69IEePd030859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091818.n69II5H0031707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 14:18:04 EDT --- There are some rpmlint warnings: [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint python-zope-proxy* python-zope-proxy.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/zope/proxy/_zope_proxy_proxy.c python-zope-proxy.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/python2.6/zope.proxy/proxy.h python-zope-proxy.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/zope/proxy/proxy.h 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091823.n69INngq009939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2009-07-09 14:23:48 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1463769 <-- built for F11. If it works ok for you, would you mod up https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-testing-3.7.3-3.fc11 ? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091822.n69IMnCj009785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(louizatakk at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 14:22:47 EDT --- It's ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091826.n69IQ0Ll010648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #31 from Orion Poplawski 2009-07-09 14:25:57 EDT --- Anyone know how different this is from AMD's x86 Open64 Compiler? http://developer.amd.com/cpu/open64/Pages/default.aspx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091832.n69IWahH012402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #17 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-09 14:32:33 EDT --- OK, new files: http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/xz.spec http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/xz-4.999.8-0.6.beta.fc11.src.rpm Changes: --- xz.spec.old 2009-07-09 14:27:13.000000000 -0400 +++ xz.spec 2009-07-09 14:27:36.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Summary: XZ Utils, LZMA compression utilities Name: xz Version: 4.999.8 -Release: 0.5beta%{?dist} -License: GPLv2+ +Release: 0.6.beta%{?dist} +License: LGPLv2+ Group: Applications/File Source0: http://tukaani.org/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}beta.tar.gz URL: http://tukaani.org/%{name}/ @@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} %description -XZ Utils are an attempt to make LZMA compression easy to use -on free (as in freedom) operating systems. This is achieved by -providing tools and libraries which are similar to use than the -equivalents of the most popular existing compression algorithms. - -LZMA is a general purporse compression algorithm designed by -Igor Pavlov as part of 7-Zip. It provides high compression ratio -while keeping the decompression speed fast. +XZ Utils are an attempt to make LZMA compression easy to use on free (as in +freedom) operating systems. This is achieved by providing tools and libraries +which are similar to use than the equivalents of the most popular existing +compression algorithms. + +LZMA is a general purporse compression algorithm designed by Igor Pavlov as +part of 7-Zip. It provides high compression ratio while keeping the +decompression speed fast. %package libs Summary: Libraries for decoding LZMA compression @@ -35,18 +35,20 @@ Requires: pkgconfig %description devel -Devel libraries & headers for liblzma. +Devel libraries and headers for liblzma. %package lzma-compat -Summary: Devel libraries & headers for liblzma +Summary: Older LZMA format compatibility binaries Group: Development/Libraries -License: LGPLv2+ +# lz{grep,diff,more} are GPLv2+. Other binaries are LGPLv2+ +License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lzma < 5 Provides: lzma = 5 %description lzma-compat -Compatibility files for lzma. +The lzma-compat package contains compatibility links for older +commands that deal with the older LZMA format. %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}beta @@ -97,6 +99,11 @@ %{_mandir}/man1/* %changelog +* Thu Jul 09 2009 Bill Nottingham 4.9999.8-0.6.beta +- fix release versioning to match guidelines +- fix up lzma-compat summary/description +- tweak licensing + * Mon Jun 22 2009 Jindrich Novy 4.999.8beta-0.5 - introduce lzma-compat subpackage As for the licensing, rather than rebase the tarball, I just updated the spec to reflect the code currently in the tarball. Core xz command is PD + LGPL code linked together, therefore it's LGPL. Similarly for the libraries. The only GPL code is the lz* scripts, which are in the compat package. Obviously, those license tags can change when the code is rebased. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091842.n69IgSif004839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #18 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-09 14:42:27 EDT --- Just one small comment - in description is a typo "purporse". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091844.n69IiIrW005141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #19 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-09 14:44:17 EDT --- Fixed. Didn't bump the release just for that. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 18:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091850.n69Iogq7006923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |510545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091910.n69JANH6021499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 --- Comment #2 from Alan Dunn 2009-07-09 15:10:22 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. (In reply to comment #1) > Just a few comments: > > No parallel make? Sure would go faster on my lots-of-cores builder. If it > doesn't work you should at least add a comment indicating that. I didn't look at this, so I'll see what I can do about allowing this. > I'm having trouble understanding the reasoning here: > > The first category of warnings are all about inclusion of libraries in the > > main package. Ostensibly, the whole purpose of the apron package is these > > libraries, so I was not sure of whether these belong in -devel. > > So here's my question: What good are the static libraries without the headers > in the -devel package? Static libraries have no runtime use at all; they'll be > embedded into executables at build time > > The guidelines on static libraries should be pretty clear: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries > They should be in a separate -static package unless you really have no shared > libraries at all, in which case they can be in -devel but you must still > provide the -static symbol so that other packages can BuildRequires: > apron-static. > The prelink file confuses me. Why is it in the main package? You're right - this should go in ocaml-apron. > Actually, why is anything at all in the main package? Well, I would think the few minor documentation files (since they are probably not enough to comprise a whole doc subpackage) could go there. I can certainly move all the static libraries to the devel subpackage, it just seemed odd to put these in apron-devel as the purpose of the whole package is already for development. I saw the guidelines, I just thought another opinion might be in order nonetheless. I'll just move the files to devel as long as it's okay to have essentially an empty main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091916.n69JGYvX013113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-09 15:16:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Anyone know how different this is from AMD's x86 Open64 Compiler? Well, AMD's version seems to be newer (4.2.2.1, assuming they use the same numbering as open64.net) and it includes the (non-free) ACML libraries in binary form: " The libacml_mv runtime library, used automatically for certain optimizations, is provided in binary form at this time. The Software License Agreement is detailed in the file LICENSE-LIBACML_MV." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091941.n69Jf3MH018940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #19 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-07-09 15:41:01 EDT --- hmm...I was sure I fixed the suggestions about ldconfig and the libdir. Must have got my spec files confused. Guess that's what happens when you don't use version control :/ I'll check with upstream to see what can be done about the compiler flags and I'll start testing in F11. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091944.n69Ji0eH029597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-09 15:43:59 EDT --- It seems the AMD version is available in the open64 svn server: http://svn.open64.net/listing.php?repname=Open64&path=%2Fbranches%2Fx86_open64-4.2.2%2F#path_branches_x86_open64-4.2.2_ so I guess they're not very separate forks. Probably the AMD guys just have added AMD-specific optimizations (such as the aforementioned math library) to their version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091945.n69JjkcL030319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 15:45:45 EDT --- Had you had the headers in the main package as well, I suppose I'd agree with you, but you put them in -devel which makes the main pacakge essentially useless. You didn't answer my question about what good the static libs are without the headers. I don't think there's any actual requirement for you to build a main package at all. Just build -devel, and if upstream in the future starts producing shared libraries then you can start producing a main package containing the libraries, a -devel package with the usual bits and a -static package with the .a files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091947.n69Jl2ts030594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-07-09 15:47:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - bad license. should be MIT [1] > Fixed. OK > > - missing require for ruby(abi) > Fixed. OK > > - file listed twice > > warning: File listed twice: > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE You can see this warning at the end of build.log [1]. > > - rubygem-state_machine.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 33, > > tab: line 7) > > Hmmm. I don't see this error. I did a scratch build, then downloaded and ran > rpmlint on the RPM and saw no complaints. Can you tell me how you produced > this? > > (mcpierce at mcpierce-laptop:rubygem-state_machine)$ rpmlint > ~/Download/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. You should run rpmlint on both result rpm and src rpm. This warning is from src rpm. > Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine.spec > Updated SRPM: > http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm (note, this is not srpm) > Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1446813 [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1446816&name=build.log sorry for late response -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510573] Review Request: olpc-bootanim - OLPC XO boot animation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907091953.n69Jrl8k031853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510573 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 19:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510573] New: Review Request: olpc-bootanim - OLPC XO boot animation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: olpc-bootanim - OLPC XO boot animation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510573 Summary: Review Request: olpc-bootanim - OLPC XO boot animation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsd at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-bootanim.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-bootanim-2.6-1.src.rpm Description: This is OLPC's boot animation implementation, as a plymouth replacement. We are not using plymouth yet because it adds about 20 seconds to the time needed to boot the XO (our own boot animation is simple, and heavily optimized). Looking to get this included in F11 for the OLPC spin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 20:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092006.n69K6X37002951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-07-09 16:06:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > > - file listed twice > > > warning: File listed twice: > > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE > > You can see this warning at the end of build.log [1]. I'm not sure what the issue is there. The spec file does not mention it more than once, and the file only shows up once in the gem itself. Any recommendation on how to proceed, and is this a blocker for review? > > Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine.spec > > Updated SRPM: > > http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > > (note, this is not srpm) Sorry, my bad, I pasted the wrong URL. The correct one is: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 20:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499875] Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092005.n69K5r7W002613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 16:05:52 EDT --- So, no-soname is really the only issue. This is generally one of those "get upstream to fix their broken build procedure" kind of things. You can fix it by patching in another option to the gcc call, but I'm not really sure that's a good idea. This code hasn't changed in five years so I doubt there's any kind of an issue here. However, the real issue I see is that this code isn't public domain. Yes, we have this from README.txt: libdasm is public domain software. You can do whatever you like with it. but then the source files have copyright statements. I guess spot gets another FE-Legal ticket; maybe the "whatever you like" clause gives us sufficient rights. I would recommend using _includedir instead of /usr/include, just in case. You're already doing that in the %files list but not in %install. Why do you have a separate copy of the unversioned .so file in the -devel pacakge instead of a symlink? I guess it doesn't really matter that much but I can't figure out a reason for it. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 34d6c17dbb318bf2e21c6a3ae7dcc53d918ce247f1bd422b123d5e41a730a676 libdasm-1.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. ? license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libdasm.so.1.0()(64bit) libdasm = 1.5-2.fc12 libdasm(x86-64) = 1.5-2.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libdasm-devel-1.5-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm libdasm.so()(64bit) libdasm-devel = 1.5-2.fc12 libdasm-devel(x86-64) = 1.5-2.fc12 = libdasm = 1.5-2.fc12 pydasm-1.5-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm pydasm.so()(64bit) pydasm = 1.5-2.fc12 pydasm(x86-64) = 1.5-2.fc12 = libdasm = 1.5-2.fc12 libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * shared libraries are installed: * ldconfig is called properly. X unversioned .so file is a separate copy and not a link. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * header is in the -devel subpackage. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 20:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510584] New: Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Summary: Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/openssl-ibmca.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/openssl-ibmca-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA crypto hardware on IBM zSeries machines. Koji scratch build: https://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83198 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 20:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469548] Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092010.n69KAN7M003884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469548 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-09 16:10:21 EDT --- No answer about the compiler warnings. The upstream project seems to be inactive. I will leave the spec file and the SRPM in place for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 20:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092037.n69KbsHf000585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 --- Comment #25 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-09 16:37:50 EDT --- If you don't want maintain it anymore, please, close bug as WONTFIX, and I'll open new request with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 20:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092052.n69KqhrK003791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 --- Comment #5 from Michal Ingeli 2009-07-09 16:52:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > - file listed twice > > > > warning: File listed twice: > > > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE > > > > You can see this warning at the end of build.log [1]. > > I'm not sure what the issue is there. The spec file does not mention it more > than once, and the file only shows up once in the gem itself. Any > recommendation on how to proceed, and is this a blocker for review? Yes, it is a blocker. According to [1][2] files can be listend only once. It's quite easy fix. You should replace the "%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/" entry with "dir %{geminstdir}" and list all entries in that directory separately. Just note that examples, tests, rdoc and so should be listed as %doc. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_ref-12 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 21:06:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092106.n69L6meD007629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 17:06:47 EDT --- elfelli-0.3.1-2.rc1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/elfelli-0.3.1-2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 21:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092106.n69L6r3d017634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 17:06:53 EDT --- elfelli-0.3.1-2.rc1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/elfelli-0.3.1-2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 21:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510573] Review Request: olpc-bootanim - OLPC XO boot animation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092135.n69LZT2O024317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510573 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-09 17:35:28 EDT --- are the Obsoletes/Provides lines OK? I wouldn't want yum on normal users systems to see this as an upgrade for plymouth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 21:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510626] New: Review Request: olpc-switch-desktop - OLPC utilities for switching desktop environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: olpc-switch-desktop - OLPC utilities for switching desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510626 Summary: Review Request: olpc-switch-desktop - OLPC utilities for switching desktop environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsd at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-switch-desktop.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090709/olpc-switch-desktop-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This new package provides a Sugar control panel extension for switching to GNOME, and a GNOME app for switching to sugar. It is used in the Fedora-for-XO spin. Please consider for Fedora inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 21:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510626] Review Request: olpc-switch-desktop - OLPC utilities for switching desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092144.n69LiL1u016059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510626 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 22:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092224.n69MOaxl001744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #30 from Ed Brand 2009-07-09 18:24:33 EDT --- Oops, Here you go: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sslogger/files/sslogger-0.9/sslogger-0.9-45.fc10.src.rpm/download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 22:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092242.n69Mg4A0027432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 18:42:01 EDT --- Seems to run OK for me (F11, x86_64, binary nvidia drivers). I'll go ahead and review this package; hopefully we can get this ticket closed out before its first anniversary. This builds OK and rpmlint is silent. The license seems to be to be GPLv3+, not GPLv2+; most of the source files carry the usual GPLv3+ notice. SDL_rotozoom.c just says "LGPL" and SFont.c says GPLv2+, but both of those convert to GPLv3+ when linked to the rest of the code. Nothing seems to own /usr/share/gnujump. You have "%{_datadir}/%{name}/*" in the %files list, but you should just have "%{_datadir}/%{name}/" so that the directory is owned properly instead of just whatever is inside it. You should not pass --vendor="fedora" to desktop-file-install. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 3bfaac66b1429e8879e16bd7e9074ff1d6e3835a2ef1927af7d084deb186cf9d gnujump-1.0.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: gnujump = 1.0.6-1.fc12 gnujump(x86-64) = 1.0.6-1.fc12 = libGL.so.1()(64bit) libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_image-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit) X doesn't own all of the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. X desktop file installed with --vendor. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 23:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092316.n69NGpik001662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Gideon Mayhak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnafu_the_great at hotmail.com --- Comment #3 from Gideon Mayhak 2009-07-09 19:16:50 EDT --- Hey, just a friendly nudge wondering if this will ever go anywhere. I would love to see this awesome zen simulation in the Fedora (and even EPEL) repos. Unfortunately, I don't have the knowledge or the time right now to take this up myself (I'd love to become a packager someday, but I can't right now). Will Woods, do you think you might have some time to address Till's concerns? I just wanted to let you know that there's at least one person who would love to see this go through! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 23:22:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092322.n69NMm2N012735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-07-09 19:22:46 EDT --- Everything looks good here and it built just fine for all archs. I'll approve this with one caveat. Just remove the conflicts: sugar-update-control. When you do the initial build go on and apply your patch to s-u-c and do a chain-build. this will build a new s-u-c package at this same time so the conflicts will not be needed. Don't forget to include s-u-c in your bodhi request for F11. Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 23:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907092334.n69NYivw014760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #12 from Alan Dunn 2009-07-09 19:34:42 EDT --- Thanks for the patch. After adding a change to the Makefile (to not compile their modified copy of the X-Symbol code, though your changes to their files that use X-Symbol are still compiled) the rest of the code now compiles. Thus, again with the caveat that the X-Symbol functionality won't yet work due to the changes that they made to X-Symbol needing to be present, the main functionality for the package now works and compiles in rawhide. new specfile in the same location as before, new SRPM at http://www.openproofs.org/packages/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 00:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100050.n6A0oLXl018368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mhideo at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #81 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-09 20:50:16 EDT --- Approved to use a "hacked" version of Publican as long as it isn't changing the building which would having problems in koji, too. (which this one isn't). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Docs_IRC_log_20090709 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100108.n6A188Gm021364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 21:08:06 EDT --- I'm sorry that nobody has looked at this yet. It builds cleanly on rawhide and seems to install and run fine (although I have no idea at all what data I'm supposed to provide). The tarball in the src.rpm does not match the tarball I downloaded from the Source0: URL. Do you know why this might be the case? It looks like the upstream source differs in that it includes a COPYING file, although it's v3 of the copying file while the source still seems to be GPLv2+ (which is OK; the version of the copying file has no bearing on the version of the GPL the software is under). The debuginfo package has the C source files but no header files. I don't know what might cause that; I don't see anything in the build process that would indicate anything out of the ordinary. I'll ask around. Please note the following output from desktop-file-install: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xgridloc-0.9-5.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/applications/xgridloc.desktop: warning: value "xgridloc.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path Any reason not to fix that up? X source files match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. ? debuginfo package is missing some files; not sure why. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: xgridloc = 0.9-5.fc12 xgridloc(x86-64) = 0.9-5.fc12 = /bin/sh libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. X desktop file could use a tweaak. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100113.n6A1DhQl000641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #5 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-09 21:13:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-MultiHook/zikula-module-MultiHook.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-MultiHook/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-3.fc11.src.rpm Should have fixed those warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100114.n6A1EHuu022649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100113.n6A1DsnU022552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #82 from Jens Petersen 2009-07-09 21:13:52 EDT --- Okay. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora by Jens Petersen. I will still feel more comfortable once the publican patch goes into rawhide: do hope that will happen very soon. Since it has been tested and there are no known problems with it I don't seen any reason not to go ahead with that. In the meantime I will try to update the package to be based off the fedora publican.spec since svn is out of sync. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100121.n6A1LMSN002383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nb at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100136.n6A1ae2v005217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|478950 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100136.n6A1aAGn005082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #83 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-09 21:36:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-security-guide Short Description: A Guide to Securing Fedora Linux Owners: sparks radsy Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mhideo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100141.n6A1foBv006145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Bug 507072 depends on bug 507071, which changed state. Bug 507071 Summary: Review Request: libqinfinity - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100141.n6A1fnEK006116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-07-09 21:41:46 EDT --- Closing, built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100146.n6A1kIkj028861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-09 21:46:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) @David Have you heard anything else about these licensing issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 01:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100154.n6A1sb2X008987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-09 21:54:35 EDT --- mcu8051ide-1.1-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mcu8051ide'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 02:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100200.n6A20ApE031722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(gaburici at cs.umd.e | |du) --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 22:00:06 EDT --- Wow, this is an old one. Did anything ever happen with this package? I know that lcdf-typetools was submitted by Vasile, then closed due to a lack of response and resubmitted by someone else. It's now in the distribution, so this could progress, but given the lack of response to that review, I'm not sure if this one is still active. So, Vasile, please respond. Do you want to continue with this review? If so, please address the above commentary and provide a new package. I'll wait a month and if I don't hear back then I'll go ahead and close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 02:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100228.n6A2Sg8f005957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from David Nalley 2009-07-09 22:28:41 EDT --- I have not -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 02:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100234.n6A2YU8B007384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-07-09 22:34:29 EDT --- That appears to fix the outstanding issue with the review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 02:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100241.n6A2fHq6020074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-09 22:41:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-crpTag Short Description: Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks Owners: sparks ke4qqq Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 02:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100247.n6A2lGht010569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #8 from David Nalley 2009-07-09 22:47:13 EDT --- Hey Patrick I am still working through this review - and much later than I originally intended :( A quick question for you; where did all of the patches come from? Did you generate them? Did they come from upstream? Take a look at this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment If this is stuff you generated - we need to push them to upstream and annotate the spec file. If these patches are from upstream we need to document that as well, though I don't think there is much of a point in doing so to each one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 02:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100246.n6A2k7S6021298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-09 22:46:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-Scriptaculous Short Description: Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100303.n6A33ngC024944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 --- Comment #3 from Randall Berry 2009-07-09 23:03:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The tarball in the src.rpm does not match the tarball I downloaded from the > Source0: URL. Do you know why this might be the case? It looks like the > upstream source differs in that it includes a COPYING file, although it's v3 of > the copying file while the source still seems to be GPLv2+ (which is OK; the > version of the copying file has no bearing on the version of the GPL the > software is under). I wrote to the author earlier and asked if he could include a GPL license looks like he added it. I'll use the newer tarball and rebuild the src rpm. > Please note the following output from desktop-file-install: > > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xgridloc-0.9-5.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/applications/xgridloc.desktop: > warning: value "xgridloc.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an > icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in > the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path Fixed: removed the extension from the icon in .desktop file. Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xgridloc.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xgridloc-0.9-6.fc11.src.rpm Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1464685 * Thu Jul 9 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' - 0.9-6 - Upstream source added COPYING file - Fix .desktop file removed ext from icon - Mock build f11/devel i386 - Test build on Koji all arches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100312.n6A3CeMJ015502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #9 from David Nalley 2009-07-09 23:12:38 EDT --- Package review for webcalendar. Package Review Guidelines MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./WebCalendar.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/WebCalendar-1.2.0-6.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/WebCalendar-1.2.0-6.fc11.noarch.rpm WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.smtp.php /usr/share/php/PHPMailer/class.smtp.php WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php apache WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/hKit/hkit.class.php /usr/share/php/hkit/hkit.class.php WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar apache WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.phpmailer.php /usr/share/php/PHPMailer/class.phpmailer.php 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv2 throughout source code and in GPL.html OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum WebCalendar-1.2.0.tar.gz* 520bd108e9e4d2a14425d2b5b8cc2e1e WebCalendar-1.2.0.tar.gz 520bd108e9e4d2a14425d2b5b8cc2e1e WebCalendar-1.2.0.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. QUESTION: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). This is up to your discretion - I personally don't think it constitutes a separate subpackage - however upstream did package it separately. You may also want to consider moving this to %doc and symlinking datadir/name/docs to that directory. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. This is starting to look pretty close - I am going to reply to one other item in this review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100316.n6A3GGtD027689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-09 23:16:15 EDT --- OK # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint phpFlickr.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint phpFlickr-2.3.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] OK # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] OK # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] OK # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] OK # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] OK # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] OK # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] OK # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] ------------------------------------- This package has been APPROVED by nb ------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100322.n6A3MGkg017591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #10 from David Nalley 2009-07-09 23:22:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > New SRPM: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-5.fc12.src.rpm > _ hkit unbundled. php-hkit (review request 505358) required > _ PHPMailer unbundled. php-PHPMailer (review request 505356) required > _ captcha unbundled. php-captchaphp (review request 505354) required > _ JSCookMenu unbundled. JSCookMenu (review request 505360) required Wow, that's a ton of work - I know I have reviewed one, I'll check on the rest this weekend and see their status and if not reviewed will punch them out this weekend. > > rpmlint output: > WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink > /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.smtp.php > /usr/share/php/class.smtp.php > WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php apache > WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 > WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink > /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/hKit/hkit.class.php > /usr/share/php/hkit.class.php > WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar apache > WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 > WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink > /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.phpmailer.php > /usr/share/php/class.phpmailer.php > > New warnings (i.e.: dangling-symlinks) are symbolic links to files in the > required packages mentioned above. > > _ I did not contact Ray Jones, since its captcha updates are now deleted from > the package. OK > _ There are still files in the menu subdir: these are WebCalendar-specific menu > themes for JSCookMenu. OK > _ Everaldo's icons are retained for now: they are used by the specific menu > themes. I left a question at WebCalendar's forum about icons licensing > (https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3299158&forum_id=11587), but > I have no answer yet. So I see - Are the icons replaceable with the crystal stuff? The crystal project is LGPL (http://www.everaldo.com/crystal/?action=license) - so it works, but as you noted they aren't 1 to 1 exacts. This is the largest issue that is looming. > _ There is still a module I have tried to unbundle: popups.php. It uses some > Javascript code (infobox.js) from Klaus Knopper's web site > (http://www.knopper.net), but although this original code is GPL2, it has never > been publicly released (there is no home page for this script: it is only > accessible as a part of Knopper's site). In addition, both versions have been > changed in incompatible ways. Thus unbundling this code and making it a > maintainable package is hardly feasible: I suggest we live with it as now. I don't foresee a problem with this at the moment, largely because the entire Javascript within the packaging guidelines is a murky matter. There may come a time in the future when this is different, but certainly for now this seems acceptable. > _ Unbundling captchaphp was a pain the the ass, because it was not initially > intended to be used this way ! I bet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100327.n6A3RtgJ018608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100323.n6A3NUbY017771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100327.n6A3Rm1J029700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:27:46 EDT --- Looks good; thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100334.n6A3YEWE030917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:34:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100335.n6A3Z5oC020056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:35:04 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100336.n6A3aoGn020342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:36:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100337.n6A3bZZp020452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:37:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100335.n6A3ZdBq031479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:35:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100340.n6A3e3Kt032360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:40:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100338.n6A3ceMo020675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #88 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:38:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100342.n6A3gqs2021502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:42:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:38:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100338.n6A3cieP020720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-09 23:38:42 EDT --- I am waiting for dependency python-Scriptaculous to be built in rawhide and available for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100340.n6A3em0E032505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:40:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100342.n6A3gEVT000323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #84 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:42:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100343.n6A3hae5021641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:43:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100350.n6A3olD2001931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Randall Berry 2009-07-09 23:50:45 EDT --- Thanks Tibbs New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xgridloc Short Description: An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators Owners: dp67 Branches: F-10, F-11, devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100355.n6A3toWX002909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-09 23:55:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100358.n6A3wkQR003289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-09 23:58:45 EDT --- As requested on IRC, here is a new spec and SRPM with all the modules being packaged in one. SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-2.fc11.src.rpm [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint znc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint znc-0.070-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb i586]$ rpmlint * znc-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/znc-0.070/modules/q.cpp znc-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 03:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100359.n6A3xjJj003418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-07-09 23:59:44 EDT --- Had this conversation with nb in irc re the 22 subpackages. 23:27 < ke4qqq> np - mind answerin a question or two? 23:28 < ke4qqq> nb ^^ /me can't type apparently 23:28 < nb> sure 23:29 < ke4qqq> so can you tell me why so many subpackages - are they really all necessary to subpackage? esp since so many of them seem to be a single file. 23:30 < nb> hrmm 23:30 * nb was doing like the old spec i based them off of 23:31 < nb> i think the idea was some people may not want all the modules 23:31 < nb> although i could see making it all one package since they arent that big 23:31 < nb> and you have to load them anyway 23:31 < nb> either via webadmin or the config or once you are on irc 23:31 < nb> either via webadmin or the config or once you are on irc 23:32 < ke4qqq> so you can interactively/programmatically load the modules - ie, it's not a memory issue with all of them being loaded ? 23:32 < nb> yeah, they dont get loaded unless you tell it to 23:34 < ke4qqq> give me just a minute 23:41 < ke4qqq> so it looks like it would build 22 sub-packages - and while I can't really find anything that specifically talks about what qualifies something as a package, I think it greatly complicates things without a lot of advantages - I could see saving the ssl stuff, perl, sasl etc as subpackages. 23:41 < ke4qqq> but you may also want to seek another opinion other than mine as well 23:42 < mujahid> its been a while.; 23:42 < nb> i could see that 23:42 < mujahid> lol how so? 23:42 * nb can put the rest besides perl sasl and ssl in the main package 23:43 < nb> iirc the modules arent that big of files 23:43 < nb> or would it be ok just to BuildRequires: everything and put everything in the one package? 23:44 < ke4qqq> that would strike me as ok as well - perhaps even logical - not many systems are going to be without perl or ssl, sasl might not be as common, but it's a small dependency 23:45 < ke4qqq> where did you get the old spec? 23:46 < nb> let me get the link 23:47 < nb> http://home.ircnet.de/cru/znc/sources/znc-0.052-4.cru.src.rpm 23:47 < nb> its a old version 23:48 < ke4qqq> did it have a changelog? 23:48 < nb> no 23:48 * nb is building a version with all in 1 package 23:48 < ke4qqq> weird - ok I have a few other comments as well that I'll add to the review. 23:48 < nb> ok Also - the other sources should probably be noted as to where they came from. For instance - that you can get the znc-log code from here: http://cnu.dieplz.net/code/znc/log/znc_log-0.002.tar.bz2 (it's listed as a separate source file.) Look more at this shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510651] New: Review Request: trafshow - A tool for real-time network traffic visualization Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trafshow - A tool for real-time network traffic visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510651 Summary: Review Request: trafshow - A tool for real-time network traffic visualization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/trafshow/trafshow.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/trafshow/trafshow-5.2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: TrafShow continuously display the information regarding packet traffic on the configured network interface that match the boolean expression. It periodically sorts and updates this information. This funny program may be useful for locating suspicious network traffic on the net or to evaluate current utilization of the network interface. Koji build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1464034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100412.n6A4C1ia026818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 00:12:00 EDT --- python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100412.n6A4Cine026912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 00:12:43 EDT --- python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100411.n6A4BgLY006084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100411.n6A4BYL5006037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-07-10 00:11:33 EDT --- You probably also want to strip this from the description: Available rebuild switches: --without ipv6 Build without IPv6 connection support. --with debug Build debugging binaries. The rpms you are providing don't really have that option (they could rebuild the rpms, but not helpful in the package description really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100417.n6A4HSAN007053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 00:17:27 EDT --- python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100427.n6A4Ra2H029776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 00:27:33 EDT --- armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100426.n6A4QTtT008723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry 2009-07-10 00:26:28 EDT --- Key: [*] Pass [x] Fail [-] Not applicable [?] Questions (see comments) [*] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [*] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [*] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . [*] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv2+ [*] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [*] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [*] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [*] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [*] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [-] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [*] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [*] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/[ ] is strictly forbidden. [-] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [-] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [*] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. [*] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [*] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [*] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [*] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [*] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) [*] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [-] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [-] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [-] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [*] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [*] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [*] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [*] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [*] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ============ = APPROVED = ============ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100432.n6A4WC6Y009704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-10 00:32:11 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100443.n6A4hHGg032703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #83 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 00:43:16 EDT --- armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 04:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100445.n6A4je1v000887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 05:24:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510401] Review Request: GStreamRipperX - A GTK front end to streamripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100524.n6A5OP4s019519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510401 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry 2009-07-10 01:24:24 EDT --- Requires Streamripper which has MP3 decode. Which is prohibited for inclusion in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 05:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100554.n6A5sq7W024914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 05:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100554.n6A5s0dc013368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 05:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100553.n6A5rpqq013317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(kmcmartin at redhat. | |com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 05:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100554.n6A5sQAH013454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #15 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-10 01:54:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 05:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100555.n6A5tPjH025317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 06:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100601.n6A61QFq026467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry 2009-07-10 02:01:25 EDT --- spec file is a mess use macros instead of hard coded path. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros /usr/share/epic5/script/ should be %{_datadir}/%{name}/script Package must own all directories it creates. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership use %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} and %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/script Shorten list by using %{_datadir}/%{name}/script/* No %changelog entry Package does not build as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 07:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] New: Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Summary: Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus-0.7-1.R1163.fc11.src.rpm Description: Canorus is a free extensible music score editor. It supports note writing, import/export of various file formats, MIDI input and output, scripting and more! Using a Qt4 framework Canorus offers a fast and modern GUI and cross-platformability. rpmlints: 6 W: dangling-relative-symlink warnings These are satisfied through font dependencies and can be ignored. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465031 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100802.n6A82IXC018727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 04:02:15 EDT --- Thanks Randall for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100806.n6A862Nf007779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |randyn3lrx at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 04:06:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: morse2txt Short Description: Morse Code Reader Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100807.n6A87uPK020121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-10 04:07:54 EDT --- > I asked on IRC, they said it probably was so. Please file an upstream bug and > make sure the files gets included in -devel unless they change their minds > about it. I'll do that over the weekend, I don't see that as a showstopper for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510404] Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100824.n6A8OXh3011687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510404 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-10 04:24:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465110 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 41d8f40a892b5d63ee4208320271a09f1026a948 kannada.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100831.n6A8VBhm025416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 04:31:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > spec file is a mess use macros instead of hard coded path. > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros > /usr/share/epic5/script/ should be %{_datadir}/%{name}/script > > Package must own all directories it creates. > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership > use %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} and %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/script > > Shorten list by using %{_datadir}/%{name}/script/* Yes, it seems to be rather a mess. %{_datadir}/epic5/ should be owned too, so the files section would end up as %{_bindir}/epic5 %{_bindir}/epic5-1.0 %{_datadir}/epic5/ %{_mandir}/man1/epic5.1.* %{_libexecdir}/epic5-wserv4 <- add trailing slash if this is a directory - The Requires Requires: ncurses-devel >= 5.7-2 Requires: ruby-devel >= 1.8.6 Requires: perl-ExtUtils-Embed >= 1.28-69 should be BuildRequires. Also, you probably need perl-devel. - Contact upstream so that they fix SMP make. - The install command should be make install IP=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL_PROGRAM="install -c -p -m 755" INSTALL_DATA="install -c -p -m 644" to preserve time stamps (OK, not essential for the binaries). I have no idea why make install compiles some test program, but it isn't installed so the optflags are not needed in install. - You could also ask upstream to change IP to the standard DESTDIR in the makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226150] Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100833.n6A8XLBM013487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226150 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-10 04:33:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 08:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100859.n6A8xE56030386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-10 04:59:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bitfrost Short Description: OLPC bitfrost security modules Owners: dsd cjb pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100901.n6A9110I019173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-10 05:01:00 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100902.n6A92QEA019426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-10 05:02:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100902.n6A927Fa019372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Bug 504476 depends on bug 504473, which changed state. Bug 504473 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100902.n6A925WD019347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-10 05:02:03 EDT --- Thanks a lot, Mamoru (not being sure which part of a Japan name is a given name, to be used when referring to a person :) Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100902.n6A92RBu019452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 Bug 504471 depends on bug 504474, which changed state. Bug 504474 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100904.n6A94EiE019935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-07-10 05:04:13 EDT --- btw, the licensing issues have been solved; see the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100907.n6A97w9K020916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #9 from David Hannequin 2009-07-10 05:07:57 EDT --- Hi, I fix webinjectgui. New spec file and srpm : Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-5.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510401] Review Request: GStreamRipperX - A GTK front end to streamripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101021.n6AALuGo004610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510401 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510698] New: Review Request: klavaro - Typing tutor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: klavaro - Typing tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510698 Summary: Review Request: klavaro - Typing tutor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/klavaro.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/klavaro-1.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://klavaro.sourceforge.net/ Description: Klavaro is a touch typing tutor that is very flexible and supports customizable keyboard layouts. Users can edit and save new or unknown keyboard layouts, as the basic course provided by the program was designed to not depend on specific layouts. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465292 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint klavaro-1.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint -i klavaro* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] New: Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Summary: Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/unetbootin.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/unetbootin-0-1.356bzr.fc11.src.rpm Upstream url: http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ Description: UNetbootin allows you to create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions from Windows or Linux, without requiring you to burn a CD. You can either let it download one of the many distributions supported out-of-the-box for you, or supply your own Linux .iso file if you've already downloaded one or your preferred distribution isn't on the list. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510698] Review Request: klavaro - Typing tutor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101042.n6AAgrJr008647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510698 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-10 06:42:52 EDT --- will pick this for review on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101042.n6AAgi0Z020793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-07-10 06:42:42 EDT --- All patches are from me but one. They all have been reported some way upstream, except those designed for "unbundling" (this is specific to Fedora). Some patches have been accepted upstream (for next release ?), some others have not even been commented. None has been rejected. Commenting patches seemed enough to me (links are not eternal!) but I'll provide upstream links in the next spec version. Documentation tarball is ~600k: I think this is too small for a -doc subpackage. In addition, it provides the online user manual that is accessible from the WebCalendar's help menu. There are 65 icons in the menu subdirectory :-( Replacing them one by one is a huge job. Since nobody answers to my question on this subject on the WebCalendar forum, I'll try to ask Everaldo himself (this can save hours of work and package obfuscation). More to come... stay tuned ! Many thanks for the time you spend on this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101053.n6AArbRp022795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-10 06:53:36 EDT --- I can't download http://downloads.sourceforge.net/UNetbootin/unetbootin-source-356.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 10:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101058.n6AAw5Gd023713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-10 06:58:04 EDT --- when the UNetbootin runs I can see a warning about "7z not found", Can you fix this ? about unetbootin.desktop what you think about puting this file outside spec file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101101.n6AB1Ibi024492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-07-10 07:01:16 EDT --- Doing a full review after such long time, see comments at the end of the check-list. OK* source files match upstream: 6bdd0eaae0b2e1240023335398bd7c84dce88e36 pathfinder-1.0.0-Source.tar.gz BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK* package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. BAD %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present (shared libs, new user, service). OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel. OK pkgconfig files in -devel. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - googlecode return 404 when trying to download the sources, but in few times I was successful, strange ... - why Release == 0.2 when 1.0.0 is a regular release, not a pre-release - it builds with the check section disabled - checks don't run in a chrooted environment (in mock) - rpmlint complains a bit, but it's harmless and expected pathfinderd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/pathfinderd pathfinderd pathfinderd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/pathfinderd pathfinderd pathfinderd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pathfinderd $prog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101103.n6AB3QKG012514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kmcmartin at redhat. | |com) --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-10 07:03:24 EDT --- 1] use global 2] missing dependency (rubygem-hoe) 3] complaining rpmlint rubygem-trollop.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A command-line option parsing library for ruby. rubygem-trollop.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.10.2-1 ['1.10.2-0.fc10', '1.10.2-0'] rubygem-trollop.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A command-line option parsing library for ruby. rubygem-trollop.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101114.n6ABEWkn027107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 Rasmus Ory Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-07-10 07:14:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert Short Description: Perl implementation of Hilberts space-filling curve Owners: ron Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101125.n6ABPk6s030129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-10 07:25:45 EDT --- Done. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-eradius.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101125.n6ABPFfJ029970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 07:25:14 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F11/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint unetbootin-0-1.356bzr.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint unetbootin* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) spec file: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv2+ [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 4a8e72ab32afbb8564519a211c798f71 Build source: 4a8e72ab32afbb8564519a211c798f71 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [x] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [1] [x] Follows desktop entry spec [x] Valid .desktop Name [x] Valid .desktop GenericName [x] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [x] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F11/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465326 [?] Package functions as described [2] [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format [1] Is there a reason why you aren't using the .desktop file from the source tarball? [2] If you want to start the application from the menu, there is a warning that it must be run with root permissions. I think that for end users this will be a bit annoying. After the start from the command line as root, a box shows up and tell me that 7zip was not found. The complete message: '7z not found. This is required for either install mode. Install the "p7zip-full" package or your distribution's equivalent.' But it's available. [root at laptop09 i586]# rpm -qa p7zip p7zip-4.65-1.fc11.i586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101130.n6ABUtna031460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 07:30:53 EDT --- Sorry guys, I guess that I picked the review from somebody. Did I? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101137.n6ABbvlY020541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-10 07:37:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry guys, I guess that I picked the review from somebody. Did I? may be, from panemade ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101133.n6ABXOo8019523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 07:33:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I can't download > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/UNetbootin/unetbootin-source-356.tar.gz Source0 should be 'http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-source-%{rel}.tar.gz' or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510401] Review Request: GStreamRipperX - A GTK front end to streamripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101135.n6ABZfVP020233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510401 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 07:35:40 EDT --- Hicham, this application can go to RPMFusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101137.n6ABbpek020502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-10 07:37:46 EDT --- Quick notes: - Why OpenThreads-devel can be enabled ? - Does GREYCStoration could be usefull ? - switch to rm -rf GL (moved from Mini/GL to GL) - squish (if enabled) should uses pkg-config support, I was not able to enable squish support as there is a missing -lsquish at link time. (not needed for this review). - Is it possible to avoid using the whole autogen.sh ? Given the recent discution on fedora-devel, it will always be best to avoid usage of autotools at build step. - It would be better to use one BuildRequires per line (easier to see BR changes on cvs commit). Build time and usage test succeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469485] Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101138.n6ABcjml000733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 11:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101158.n6ABwYRb005541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 07:58:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry guys, I guess that I picked the review from somebody. Did I? No, no-one had set the review flag, the assigned-to field or the bug status to assigned before you. (In reply to comment #5) > Source0 should be > 'http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-source-%{rel}.tar.gz' or > similar. thx, fixed. (In reply to comment #2) > when the UNetbootin runs I can see a warning about "7z not found", Can you fix > this ? fixed. (In reply to comment #3) > [1] Is there a reason why you aren't using the .desktop file from the source > tarball? Done. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/unetbootin.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/unetbootin-0-2.356bzr.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101206.n6AC6qkC008295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #26 from Marek Mahut 2009-07-10 08:06:48 EDT --- Pavel, thank you - go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101223.n6ACNLec012794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 08:23:20 EDT --- Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101234.n6ACYUEU015472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10 08:34:29 EDT --- I will gon on with this as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101239.n6ACduTJ016774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 08:39:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unetbootin Short Description: Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101257.n6ACvSsN021817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 08:57:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101257.n6ACvpNB021885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 08:57:48 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 12:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101259.n6ACxZ7t009056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #85 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-10 08:59:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #84) > CVS done. Sorry... I forgot about this being a Publican doc... The package name is actually fedora-security-guide-en-US. Can that be changed, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 13:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101310.n6ADA6YL025399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #6 from john roman 2009-07-10 09:10:04 EDT --- Thanks very much for the valuable input! and sorry for wasting time by not reading the aforementioned docs. upstream maintainer has been warned of bugs, and im rebuilding the spec file to look less like the taco bell value menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 13:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101309.n6AD97nR011592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 09:09:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you, I edited the spec file and rebuilt the SRPM again. > I was not really familiar with the install command so I didn't use it, but > familiarized myself with it now. > I also left more space in the spec file. You should increment the Release tag every time you make changes to the spec file. Otherwise it is really confusing. (Now you have even too much space! One empty line or two is enough in between sections of the spec file.) Once you have been sponsored you will be able to do formal package reviews of your own. I am willing to sponsor you, if you demonstrate your knowledge of the Fedora packaging guidelines by submitting at least one other package for review and perform informal reviews of packages of other people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 13:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510729] New: Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510729 Summary: Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kalev at smartlink.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/pkcs11-helper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/pkcs11-helper-1.07-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: pkcs11-helper is a library that simplifies the interaction with PKCS#11 providers for end-user applications using a simple API and optional OpenSSL engine. The library allows using multiple PKCS#11 providers at the same time, enumerating available token certificates, or selecting a certificate directly by serialized id, handling card removal and card insert events, handling card re-insert to a different slot, supporting session expiration and much more all using a simple API. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 13:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510729] Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101348.n6ADmZwd002535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510729 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pkcs11-helper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101410.n6AEA19w008166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-10 10:10:00 EDT --- Hi Bowe, This is an unofficial review: rpmlint of spec file: $ rpmlint qrencode.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Building the package: 1) checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for png... configure: error: Package requirements ("libpng12") were not met: No package 'libpng12' found After installing "libpng-devel" it completes so should be added to the BuildRequires of course. 2) Rpath errors. If you add %__arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot to your ~/.rpmmacros which you do by running "rpmdev-setuptree" then you get the following... ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/qrencode' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6ynHaY (%install) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath for explanation. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101415.n6AEF3qq009699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 --- Comment #27 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-10 10:15:01 EDT --- Manuel, thank you. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101410.n6AEAPAn008663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #29 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-10 10:10:23 EDT --- I asked for some more feedback from the packaging list and so far the best suggestion seems to match your treat it as version 0 suggestion. I think with the possibility that the project will start doing versioned releases in the future and the issue with doing prerelease naming with date based version it's better to go that route. I can still get their date / SVN snapshot number in the Fedora release (once it happens) to make it clear which public build the Fedora release corresponds to. Barring some new information that suggests doing something differently, I'll get another test build up tonight with the above version-release naming scheme as well as using the latest snapshot from the project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] New: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: x11vnc is to X Window System what WinVNC is to Windows, i.e. a server which serves the current X Window System desktop via RFB (VNC) protocol to the user. Based on the ideas of x0rfbserver and on LibVNCServer, it has evolved into a versatile and performant while still easy to use program. Koji build successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465614 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] New: Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 Summary: Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jgregusk at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~jgregusk/pycdio/pycdio.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~jgregusk/pycdio/pycdio-0.13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The pycdio (and libcdio) libraries encapsulate CD-ROM reading and control. Python programs wishing to be oblivious of the OS- and device-dependent properties of a CD-ROM can use this library. Please note that this is my first Fedora package, so I am seeking a sponsor as well. Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101420.n6AEKHls011236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 --- Comment #1 from Jay Greguske 2009-07-10 10:20:17 EDT --- Additionally, there is an rpmlint issue I could use some advice on: rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/pycdio-0.13-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm pycdio.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cdio.py 0644 pycdio.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/iso9660.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. If I change the permissions to be executable, it complains about lacking a she-bang instead, but these are Python modules. Is it ok to ignore this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:30:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101430.n6AEUXrv030529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-10 10:30:32 EDT --- Spec and SRPM seem to be back now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101434.n6AEYAiC031000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-10 10:34:09 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101434.n6AEYuo7031075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-07-10 10:34:55 EDT --- You should add openssl-devel as BR, otherwise the package is built without SSL support. Quoting http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1465616&name=build.log: checking for crypt... no checking for crypt in -lcrypt... yes checking for RAND_file_name in -lcrypto... no checking for SSL_library_init in -lssl... no configure: WARNING: ========================================================================== *** The openssl encryption library libssl.so was not found. *** An x11vnc built this way will not support SSL encryption. And, if I am not mistaken, your package suffers from the same problem as described under https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772, it is built using the internal minilzo instead of the ones made available by lzo-minilzo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101441.n6AEfi1q015798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 14:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] New: Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 Summary: Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aschwab at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym-0.9.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ARAnyM is a multiplatform virtual machine (a software layer) for running Atari ST/TT/Falcon TOS/GEM applications on any hardware with many host operating systems. The reason for writing ARAnyM is to provide Atari power users with faster and better machines. The ultimate goal is to create a new platform where TOS/GEM applications could continue to live forever. Features: * 68040 CPU (including MMU040) * 68040 and 68881/2 FPU * 14 MB ST-RAM and up to 3824 MB (configurable) of FastRAM * VIDEL, Blitter, MFP, ACIA, IKBD for highest possible compatibility * Sound (compatible with Atari XBIOS Sound subsystem, including TimerA DMA IRQ) * Atari floppy DD/HD for connecting floppy image or real floppy drive * Two IDE channels for connecting disk images, hard drives, or CD-ROMs * Extended keyboard and mouse support (including mouse wheel) * Direct access to host file system via BetaDOS and MiNT xfs drivers * Networking using ethernet emulation with a driver for MiNT-Net * TOS 4.04, EmuTOS, or Linux as the booting operating system * Runs with FreeMiNT, MagiC, and any other operating system that runs also on real Atari computers * Native CD-ROM access (under Linux, other OS: audio CD only) without scsi, ide, or other emulation Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1465750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101502.n6AF2qGQ004654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 --- Comment #5 from Luke Macken 2009-07-10 11:02:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql Short Description: The repoze.what SQL plugin Owners: lmacken Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101508.n6AF866v006190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-07-10 11:08:05 EDT --- Don't you plan to make a separate (noarch) package for AFROS? AFAIK the release schedules of Aranym and AFROS are independent. I have a preliminary version at http://fedora.danny.cz/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101505.n6AF5kuk005933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-10 11:05:45 EDT --- Hi Praveen, This is not an official review as am trying to become a package maintainer myself. Things to change I would say: 1) $ rpmlint sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 2) 2) There should be an initial changelog entry. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs 3) The build fails with checking for CMPI headers... checking standard... checking /usr/include/cmpi... checking /usr/local/include/cmpi... checking /src/Pegasus/Provider/CMPI... checking /opt/tog-pegasus/include/Pegasus/Provider/CMPI... checking /usr/include/Pegasus/Provider/CMPI... checking /usr/include/openwbem... checking /usr/sniacimom/include... configure: error: no. Sorry cannot find CMPI headers files. so I must be missing a BuildRequires I guess. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101508.n6AF8WD0021590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-10 11:08:31 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101516.n6AFGbj5023586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 11:16:34 EDT --- nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101519.n6AFJFqK023960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-10 11:19:14 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101519.n6AFJaov024031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #6 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-10 11:19:35 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101518.n6AFItJ0009032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-10 11:18:54 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101528.n6AFSl6e011800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Bug 502065 depends on bug 505613, which changed state. Bug 505613 Summary: nethack contains fonts that should be packaged according to guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505613 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101530.n6AFUmjS027281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-10 11:30:47 EDT --- How is this different from vino? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 15:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101548.n6AFmu08030843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-07-10 11:48:55 EDT --- Regarding #1, There is no need to package the PKG-INFO, as it is merely setuptools egg metadata that is already contained in the package as /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sprox-0.6.1-py2.5.egg-info/PKG-INFO Regarding #2, I remove the tests for a couple of reasons. First, they get installed into %{python_sitelib}/tests, instead of /sprox/tests. Second, after they are run in %check, they do not provide much value to ship within the package. If we really want them, we can move them to the proper location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 16:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101610.n6AGAPpt003635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 12:10:24 EDT --- What are those extra modules? I find putting 3rd party stuff in a bit questionable.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 16:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101626.n6AGQvsk007441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-07-10 12:26:56 EDT --- (setq tls-program '("openssl s_client -connect %h:%p -no_ssl2 -no_ticket")) (setq jabber-account-list '( ("rakesh.pandit at gmail.com" (:password . nil) (:network-server . "talk.google.com") (:connection-type . ssl)) )) Just of testing purpose this is configuration I am using on my F11 box for gmail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101736.n6AHa8mP016315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 13:36:07 EDT --- So, nearly six months later, what is the status of this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101733.n6AHXUAP015188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 13:33:29 EDT --- URLs are 404 now. Sorry for nobody having responded over the past eight months; I'm trying to put some effort into these old review tickets. Unfortunately most folks don't really want to review something they don't understand, and I have to say that I don't understand the package summary. I suspect that's why this ticket hasn't been looked at yet. In any case, I'll try to take a look at this if I can get working links to the spec and source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101735.n6AHZECx023279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 13:35:13 EDT --- It's been three months since Toshio's commentary with no response, and still no package that fixes the licensing issues pointed out nearly eight months ago. I'll close this ticket soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101742.n6AHgbQH018157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-10 13:42:35 EDT --- Some notes: * src.rpm itself - All files in src.rpm should have 0644 permission. * License - As far as I checked the whole source code, the license tag should be "GPLv2+". * %description - You don't have to repeat the same explanation on -devel subpackage which already appears in the %description of main package. * Fedora specific compilation flags https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored: -------------------------------------------------------- 217 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/munge-0.5.8/src/libcommon' 218 if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../config -I../../src/libmunge -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT fd.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/fd.Tpo" -c -o fd.lo fd.c; \ -------------------------------------------------------- ( By the way, please check what %configure actually does by $ rpm --eval %configure ) * Timestamps https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Scriptlets - Calling /sbin/ldconfig on -devel %post(un) scriptlets is not needed. - Use %_var or %_localstatedir instead of directly using "/var" - This is not always needed, however would you check if "condrestart" is not needed at %postun? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets * %files - "INSTALL" file is usually for people who want to build and install software by themselves and not needed for rpm users. - From the contents of create-munge-key, it seems that %files should have %ghost %_sysconfdir/%name/%name.key entry. - Usually man pages of entry 3 is for the explanation of APIs of functions in libraries or so and should be in -devel subpackage. - %defattr must be set on -devel subpackage (please use rpmlint) - Currently %{_var}/lib/munge has 0711 permission, which is not usual, however explicit %attr is not set for this directory. If this permission is correct, set %attr on this directory explicitly. Otherwise fix the permission on this directory at %install. The same issue also applies to %{_sysconfdir}/munge, %{_var}/log/munge * -devel subpackage - munge.h does not work as: -------------------------------------------------------------------- +++++ TEMP.c ++++++++ #include int foo (munge_enum_t type){ return munge_enum_is_valid(type, 0); } +++++++++++++++++++++++ $ env LANG=C gcc -c TEMP.c In file included from TEMP.c:1: /usr/include/munge.h:39:4: error: #error By linking against libmunge, the derivative /usr/include/munge.h:40:4: error: #error work becomes licensed under the terms of the /usr/include/munge.h:41:4: error: #error GNU General Public License. Acknowledge by /usr/include/munge.h:42:4: error: #error defining the GPL_LICENSED preprocessor macro. -------------------------------------------------------------------- * service -------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# env LANG=C service munge status [root at localhost ~]# (returns nothing) -------------------------------------------------------------------- - Usually this should be something like: -------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service xttpd status xttpd is stopped -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461793] Review Request: spu-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at spu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101747.n6AHlwwg026755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461793 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 13:47:56 EDT --- Wow, this is an old one. Unfortunately I'm not at all sure how one is supposed to review this. Generally when bootstrapping compilers, we allow the initial package to carry the necessary binaries required to build them. After they're in the distribution, that can be turned off. I see no reason why you couldn't just include the binaries for newlib here until a compiler could be built that could then build newlib This would require work for each architecture, of course, but I don't see that as being insurmountable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101751.n6AHpqVw020973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(wwoods at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 13:51:50 EDT --- I could review this, but I'd like to know that someone is listening on the other end before going to the trouble. However, it's been 2.5 months with no response, so I'll go ahead and close this ticket in another week if nothing happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 17:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101757.n6AHvDdZ022637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #86 from Eric Christensen 2009-07-10 13:57:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #85) > (In reply to comment #84) > > CVS done. > > Sorry... I forgot about this being a Publican doc... > > The package name is actually fedora-security-guide-en-US. Can that be changed, > please? Disregard... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101808.n6AI88Sx031748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(leamas.alec at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 14:08:06 EDT --- Well, it's been well over a week, so I'll go ahead and close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101811.n6AIBmYr025739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 14:11:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101811.n6AIBI4Q000315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 14:11:16 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101812.n6AICL72000525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 14:12:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101813.n6AID9hM000660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 14:13:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101819.n6AIJDD7027769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 14:19:12 EDT --- Did anything happen here? Toshio, this is assigned to you; are you planning to review? I note that the two bugs in comment 9 have been closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101822.n6AIMDt4003273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(leamas.alec at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-10 14:22:10 EDT --- Closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101829.n6AIT0BQ030113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(wwoods at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Will Woods 2009-07-10 14:28:59 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. I've rebuilt -2 with the following changes: - URL used for Source0 - Patch0 sent to upstream developers (and noted as such in the spec) - %files section converted to using %{_prefix} and %{_datadir} - .gz suffix removed from lines for info & man pages I also did a mock --rebuild to ensure that the BuildRequires are correct, at least for Fedora 11. SPEC: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/robotfindskitten.spec SRPM: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/robotfindskitten-1.7320508.406-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101832.n6AIWUfT005378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101832.n6AIWV1S005416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507697 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101831.n6AIVs1t005228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2009-07-10 14:31:52 EDT --- The .py files are installed under /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg because it needs to work alongside python-sqlalchemy. See our egg guidelines for more details: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs The BuildRequires: python-sqlite2 is for the test suite. http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-2.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5.spec * Fri Jul 10 2009 Luke Macken - 0.5.3-2 - Remove the executable bit from *.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] New: Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 Summary: Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris at tylers.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chris.tylers.info/rpm/WebShell.spec SRPM URL: http://chris.tylers.info/rpm/WebShell-0.9.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebShell provides shell access via a web browser. It includes a standalone python AJAX web server and an html/js/css browser application which use ssl to encrypt the connection from the browser to the server and ssh to encrypt the connection from the AJAX server to a standard ssh daemon. It includes a touch keyboard so that it can be used from a touchscreen mobile device which has no hardware keyboard. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint SPECS/WebShell.spec SRPMS/WebShell-0.9.6-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/WebShell-0.9.6-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101841.n6AIfY8e013463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 Benjamin Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101909.n6AJ9838027953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-07-10 15:09:07 EDT --- Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101835.n6AIZevM006311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #2 from Chris Adams 2009-07-10 14:35:39 EDT --- Hmm, not sure why my files were deleted from fedorapeople.org. :-( Anyway, it is back now. SHM driver == IPC shared memory driver with ntpd (Network Time Protocol daemon) PPS == pulse-per-second high-resolution time signal Thanks for looking at this. It is a pretty bare-bones package; the only documentation is in the source code, although I documented all the options in the sysconfig file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 18:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] New: Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 Summary: Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ben.lewis at benl.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec SRPM URL: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: dieharder is a fairly involved random number/uniform deviate generator tester. It can either test any of its many prebuilt and linked generators (basically all of those in the Gnu Scientific Library plus others I've added) or a potentially random dataset in a file. With file input, it can manage either a variety of ascii-formatted input or a raw binary bitstring. It is thus suitable for use in testing both software RNG's and hardware RNG's. See http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/General/dieharder.php for more information As this is my first package I will be requiring a sponsor. A few quick notes: - The spec file is based on the one found in the srpms on the above link, but has been heavily edited to conform to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines - The original spec file had no changelog entries, hence the sparse nature of that section - rpmlint is complaining about dieharder-libs.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libdieharder.so.2.28.1 exit at GLIBC_2.0 I am unsure what to do about this as a quick grep "exit" *.c in libdieharder/ reveals that this is pretty endemic to the code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101930.n6AJUJBI030411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-10 15:30:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > $ env LANG=C gcc -c TEMP.c > In file included from TEMP.c:1: > /usr/include/munge.h:39:4: error: #error By linking against libmunge, the > derivative > /usr/include/munge.h:40:4: error: #error work becomes licensed under the terms > of the > /usr/include/munge.h:41:4: error: #error GNU General Public License. > Acknowledge by > /usr/include/munge.h:42:4: error: #error defining the GPL_LICENSED preprocessor > macro. Hey, can we patch this out? 1) It's terribly passive-aggressive, and I think our code shouldn't do that 2) We don't do this in any other libraries; we assume users can figure out licensing on their own 3) It's not even correct. a) the licensing only covers distribution. If you don't distribute, it doesn't really matter b) is that even a legally enforceable 'agreement'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101932.n6AJWGs8000873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sourada 2009-07-10 15:32:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Any update? Um, sorry, in a bit of hectic week I forgot about this one. (In reply to comment #3) > > Before approval, would you mind to give the list of command for > ruby-icon-artists and what does it do in Inkscape? It's actually a library, so no commands. Doc is at http://mso.fedorapeople.org/icon-artist/doc/index.html If you'd like to try it, install http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/RPMS/noarch/echo-artist-0.1.90-0.2.fc10.noarch.rpm Running 'echo-git-{setup,update} --help' or 'echo-icon-{add,new} --help' should tell you enough about what those commands do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101916.n6AJGtTF026057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-10 15:16:54 EDT --- > You should add openssl-devel as BR, otherwise the package is built without SSL > support. Thank you. Added. > And, if I am not mistaken, your package suffers from the same problem as > described under https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772, it is > built using the internal minilzo instead of the ones made available by > lzo-minilzo Hmmmm. Yes, you are right again. I'm fix it. Now used system variant. (In reply to comment #2) > How is this different from vino? First, main difference - it is not DE related, minimum dependencies. Second... so, I'm not use Gnome at all and even wasn't try vino at all :( But x11vnc provide several advantages: 1) It's easy to start (It was first really working solutions, what I found when search how get access to running X11 session at home computer from work, when only SSH was available) 2) It is uses several useful patches like TurboVNC (VNC is very slow protocol, so, any speed improvements is highly appreciated), tightvnc-filetransfer, lzo and others.(In reply to comment #1) 3) It can be used to provide access not only first running X11 session, but really to any (to which auth files you can get access) 4) It can provide access even before X11 session starts, to GDM/KDM/XDM/CDE login screen for example ( http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/faq.html#faq-display-manager ) It would be great, If you can try and compare its comprehensive. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-3.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466147 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101946.n6AJk0PN002046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(paul.goessinger at g | |mx.de) --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 15:45:57 EDT --- So, over eight months later, I see no response to Michael's commentary. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101943.n6AJhGst001263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 15:43:15 EDT --- All I get from rpmlint is robotfindskitten.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A game/zen simulation. You are robot. Your job is to find kitten. which is technically true, but I don't think it makes much sense to elide just the final period here. robotfindskitten.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 1) I don't particularly care about this; fix it if you like. I installed and ran the resulting package and it seemed to work. I'm not sure what the point is, but perhaps there's not supposed to be one. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 08c8a826c3cf90a7f3dc1d42b087425af661971585f125b9bedca2bcc2a11852 robotfindskitten-1.7320508.406.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: robotfindskitten = 1.7320508.406-2.fc12 robotfindskitten(x86-64) = 1.7320508.406-2.fc12 = /bin/sh info libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101954.n6AJslZa006004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 Chris Dunlap changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cdunlap at llnl.gov --- Comment #3 from Chris Dunlap 2009-07-10 15:54:46 EDT --- Could you change the munge.spec summary field to "MUNGE Uid 'N' Gid Emporium"? MUNGE is a recursive acronym. Please drop the dont-exit-form-lib.patch. All it does is comment out the exit() call in the _log_die routine that it supposed to log a message and then die. The code expects execution to stop once a fatal error message is logged. Continuing after that will cause unexpected and likely undesired behavior. As for GPL_LICENSED, it's fine with me if you patch it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101955.n6AJt9eb003975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-10 15:55:08 EDT --- Just a few drive-by comments: - Shouldn't the menu image go to %{_datadir}/pixmaps? Then you could drop the hicolor stuff. - Is the %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc directory accessed by the executable? Is the documentation in that directory human-readable? If yes, I suggest putting the doc/ directory in %doc and replacing %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc with a symlink to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/, thus simplifying %doc %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/ %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/examples/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/images/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/plugins/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/scripts/ to %doc doc/ (or whatever is the location of the docs in the source tree) %{_datadir}/%{name}/ - The install command DESTDIR=%{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} has one DESTDIR too much :) You should be able to drop the former one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 19:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907101956.n6AJuTwq006648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-07-10 15:56:28 EDT --- Lukas, what's the story on the bundled libraries? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102001.n6AK1aXW008061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-10 16:01:34 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102005.n6AK5Lhe006196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-10 16:05:20 EDT --- As it was almost my spec (or very-very closest) I think it should be easy :) Formal review follow, meantime, as I already mention before ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980#c50 ) unwieldy line endings conversion absolutely is not needed in you case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102007.n6AK7eKj009468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #4 from Chris Dunlap 2009-07-10 16:07:39 EDT --- You don't need the libgcrypt-devel BuildRequires. MUNGE requires either OpenSSL or libgcrypt -- not both. You can force the selection with configure's --with-crypto-lib option, but it will use OpenSSL if it finds it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102011.n6AKB22a007513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 16:11:01 EDT --- sugar-update-control-0.21-2.fc11,bitfrost-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-update-control-0.21-2.fc11,bitfrost-1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102012.n6AKCObK007863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-10 16:12:22 EDT --- Thanks Steven! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102012.n6AKCnda007970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-10 16:12:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just a few drive-by comments: > > - Shouldn't the menu image go to %{_datadir}/pixmaps? Then you could drop the > hicolor stuff. > I once heard that %{_datadir}/pixmaps is being deprecated, and new stuff should go into the hicolor directory. > - Is the %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc directory accessed by the executable? Is the > documentation in that directory human-readable? If yes, I suggest putting the > doc/ directory in %doc and replacing %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc with a symlink to > %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/, thus simplifying > %doc %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/ > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > %{_datadir}/%{name}/examples/ > %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/ > %{_datadir}/%{name}/images/ > %{_datadir}/%{name}/plugins/ > %{_datadir}/%{name}/scripts/ > to > %doc doc/ (or whatever is the location of the docs in the source tree) > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > The docs are in the Qt format and afaik they can't be read externally. They can be read through the software only, by going Help->User's guide I can also build the PDF docs. But these will be identical to the Qt docs. And I think, from a users perspective, it is more convenient to access them through the software itself. > - The install command > DESTDIR=%{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} > has one DESTDIR too much :) You should be able to drop the former one. Ah, yes. I was testing stuff and I forgot to clean that up. Thanks for pointing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492094] Review Request: darksnow - GTK Interface for darkice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102014.n6AKE5dm010922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492094 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(yanstadel at googlem | |ail.com) | --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 16:14:04 EDT --- It's been well over a week; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492744] Review Request: python-grizzled - The Grizzled Utility Library is a general-purpose Python library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102013.n6AKDT5X008250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(thesuperjason at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 16:13:27 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102016.n6AKGx6p011841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-10 16:16:59 EDT --- Oh, also I can't do the suggested simplification because there are also Qt locale files inside %{_datadir}/%{name}/lang/ that need to be marked with %lang($locale) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102027.n6AKR0QG013761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 16:26:56 EDT --- Did anything ever happen regarding selinux? Or did you want to have this reviewed with the known caveat of selinux issues? (That would be OK, although it should be documented that problems exist and the selinux folks should be contacted to try and work out a solution.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102042.n6AKgML8014951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 16:42:21 EDT --- unetbootin-0-5.356bzr.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unetbootin-0-5.356bzr.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102044.n6AKi7cO017938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 16:44:07 EDT --- unetbootin-0-5.356bzr.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unetbootin-0-5.356bzr.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102044.n6AKiuJK018072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #12 from LukasHetzi 2009-07-10 16:44:55 EDT --- Hello, we need to package the some libraries first: - pnincludes/greybox: seems to be from http://orangoo.com/labs/GreyBox/Download/ The used files are in the folder "GreyBox_v5_53/greybox" - pnincludes/lightboxXL Download from http://webeaters.blogspot.com/2008/02/lightboxxl-for-prototypejs.html - pnincludes/phpFlickr Download from http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/phpflickr/ Should be named php-pear-Flickr - pnincludes/simplepie Already packaged as php-simplepie.noarch When these packages are available the folders could be replaced by symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102043.n6AKhY7f017842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-10 16:43:33 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this list and more] [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [-] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. File COPYING must be included. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Source matched: $ md5sum axel-2.4.tar.gz a2a762fce0c96781965c8f9786a3d09d axel-2.4.tar.gz Consider use %{version} in Source URL - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Package compiled. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. No shared libraries. [+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review Package is not relocatable. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. No static libraries. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Have not pkgconfig(.pc) files. [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Have not. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Only cli. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Source include it, but package does not (see above). [+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. No translations in spec. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466319 [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A'm test it before and even try using... (wget more convenient :) , IMHO) [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Scriplets haven't used. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. No such dependencies. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102046.n6AKk91M015871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 16:46:08 EDT --- unetbootin-0-5.356bzr.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unetbootin-0-5.356bzr.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102056.n6AKuhkN020976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 LukasHetzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492091 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 20:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102056.n6AKugb8020936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 LukasHetzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |506517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102102.n6AL2Cwb022222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #13 from LukasHetzi 2009-07-10 17:02:10 EDT --- Bug 506517 - Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr this package was approved by Nick Bebout on 2009-07-09 23:16:15 EDT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102107.n6AL70iw023297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com --- Comment #1 from R P Herrold 2009-07-10 17:06:59 EDT --- I get a failure on CentOS 5 what libtool are you using? /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DVERSION=2.28.1 -I ../include -I /usr/include -O3 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT bits.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/bits.Tpo -c -o bits.lo bits.c ../libtool: line 813: X--tag=CC: command not found ../libtool: line 846: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found ../libtool: line 813: X--mode=compile: command not found ../libtool: line 979: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.: command not found ../libtool: line 980: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] New: Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Summary: Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pondus.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pondus-0.5.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.ephys.de/software/pondus/ Description: Pondus is a personal weight management program written in Python and Gtk+2 released under the GPL. It aims to be simple to use, lightweight and fast. The data can be plotted to get a quick overview of the history of your weight. A simple weight planner allows to define "target weights" and this plan can be compared with the actual measurements in a plot. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102144.n6ALietI029670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 --- Comment #9 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-07-10 17:44:40 EDT --- Checked in and built on devel, F-10, F-11. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102143.n6ALhQHT026825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Lewis 2009-07-10 17:43:25 EDT --- [blewis at dominus dieharder-2.28.1]$ ./libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) is the version on my F10 box. I don't have access to a box running CentOS 5, sadly, so am not sure how to proceed with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102153.n6ALrkDs031523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 17:53:44 EDT --- This also fails to build for me in rawhide: + ./autogen.sh Running aclocal... Running autoconf... configure.ac:85: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. Running autoheader... Running automake... libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make sure libdieharder/Makefile.am:21: its definition is in aclocal's search path. I believe you are missing a build dependency. Are you building in mock? If you don't you aren't actually testing that the package builds with the set of BuildRequires: you indicate. You are welcome to build in Fedora's build system if you don't have a local mock setup. Instructions are in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join which you should probably read through in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 21:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102159.n6ALxvle032667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ken+5a4 at bonsai.co | |m) --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 17:59:52 EDT --- It's July now; has there been any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:05:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102205.n6AM5SDB001816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 18:05:26 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard if this becomes ready for review in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102214.n6AMEKs7003357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Ken Sedgwick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ken+5a4 at bonsai.co | |m) | --- Comment #33 from Ken Sedgwick 2009-07-10 18:14:17 EDT --- I'm afraid I'm a little burned out ... I've been through this three times in as many years; each time the license turns out to be a blocker. I'm worried that if I invest a bunch more time it will prove to be a blocker again. More importantly, getting ACE into Fedora without TAO actually makes life *harder* for my clients. They use *both* ACE and TAO and need a solution for both. Getting ACE into Fedora makes it much harder to generate the TAO packages externally since the same build creates both. I think I'd rather just distribute the ACE and TAO packages the way I already do. If someone else wants to try and get a subset into the Fedora repo I'd be happy to help in a lightweight manner. I'm guessing my effort would be better spent with a repository that would accept the TAO licenses as well; maybe Livna? This seems like a much better use of my effort ... Apologies for not expressing this sooner ... Ken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102224.n6AMORQR005404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 18:24:26 EDT --- Indeed, this is a simple package which build fine and elicits no complaints from rpmlint. I checked the tests; none of them seem to be runnable. It might be nice to add a comment about that. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 72cfe231feae7b860b9e00fb2d83e1cb54f0d38719267a4701818c4c8aa6e922 kaa-display-0.1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: _FBmodule.so()(64bit) _SDLmodule.so()(64bit) _X11module.so()(64bit) python-kaa-display = 0.1.0-1.fc12 python-kaa-display(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc12 = libImlib2.so.1()(64bit) libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXcomposite.so.1()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102229.n6AMTnof006326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #22 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-10 18:29:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gnaughty-1.2.0/gnaughty.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gnaughty-1.2.0/gnaughty-1.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460799] Review Request: R2CORBA - Ruby Language wrapper for TAO (First Package, searching Sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102231.n6AMVU8F003423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460799 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|450164(ace-tao) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460799] Review Request: R2CORBA - Ruby Language wrapper for TAO (First Package, searching Sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102232.n6AMWnwL003566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460799 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 18:32:48 EDT --- Closing due to the closure of the ace-tao review on which this depends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102231.n6AMVQr8003332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |182235(FE-Legal), | |460799(R2CORBA) | Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 18:31:24 EDT --- Well, the license isn't going to become any more free unless upstream does the work to replace or relicense the code. That's just the way it is. If you think your effort is better spent getting this package into a repository that accepts non-free code, you are more than welcome to do so. I'll go ahead and close these tickets out for you. Do note, however, that Livna has essentially been replaced by RPMFusion (rpmfusion.org). Its review and package maintenance procedures are mostly the same as Fedora's, as far as I know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102238.n6AMc1HB008062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #35 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-10 18:37:59 EDT --- Ken, for what it is worth, the only two licensing issues that I think remain are: ACE_wrappers/ace/UTF*_Encoding_Converter.* - These have a license from Unicode, Inc. which, in part, reads, "Unicode, Inc. hereby grants the right to freely use the information supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard, and to make copies of this file in any form for internal or external distribution as long as this notice remains attached." The concern here is in the comments: // It is not the actual code provided by Unicode, Inc. but is an // ACE-ified and only slightly modified version. An argument could be made that no permission to modify was given by Unicode Inc in their license terms, but I'm inclined to think that a grant of: " the right to freely use the information supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard" is a wordy way of granting permission to modify. I'll run it past Red Hat Legal to see if they agree or not. and The files under the Sun Interface Definition Language CFE License: TAO/CIAO/tools/IDL3_to_IDL2/be_extern.h TAO/TAO_IDL/be_include/be_extern.h TAO/TAO_IDL/driver/drv_args.cpp This is the real blocker. I've had some recent success getting Sun to relicense some stuff, I'll send another reminder to my contacts there. Don't give up hope! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102240.n6AMeaPU008656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-07-10 18:40:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phpFlickr Short Description: PHP client library for Flickr Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 23:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102301.n6AN1S9J012433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Lewis 2009-07-10 19:01:26 EDT --- I've rectified the missing libtool dependency, and the package now builds in koji for dist-f10 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466547). However, there is a curious libtool error on dist-f11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466565), which I will look into in the morning. In the interim, an updated SRPM and spec file: SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 23:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102303.n6AN3hoE012686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 19:03:42 EDT --- I downloaded the srpm but it doesn't look like any change was made to the spec there. I know that was a trivial change, but please do bump the release and submit a new src.rpm when you make changes. Could you indicate which files are under which license? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines has information on doing that. Your Source0: URL is 404 for me. Everything else looks good, but I've no experience at all with Sugar stuff so I may not be the best person to review this. This doesn't seem to fall under the usual guidelines for Sugar activities so I'm not sure if there are any additional strictures I should consider. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 23:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102316.n6ANGEIT011754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-10 19:16:13 EDT --- python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-Scriptaculous'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0043 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 23:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102316.n6ANG6Kq015404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 19:16:04 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 23:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102331.n6ANVinj018487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #36 from Kevin Kofler 2009-07-10 19:31:42 EDT --- What about the IIOP license (comment #23)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 23:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102359.n6ANxQJi023347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-07-10 19:59:25 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #2) > > How is this different from vino? > First, main difference - it is not DE related, minimum dependencies. Second... > so, I'm not use Gnome at all and even wasn't try vino at all :( > and even if it would not be different... that would not be a problem, would it? just for the record, I am a big fan of x11vnc. I'm using it quite regularly since 2007 or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110021.n6B0LXr8027604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: anerley - |Review Request: anerley - |Moblin widgets for people |Moblin widgets for people |information |information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110029.n6B0TZDV028715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 20:29:33 EDT --- Well, for some definition of "soon". My time available for reviews comes infrequently and at random intervals. Anyway, I do have some time now. So, some questions and comments: The spec file on your web site seems to be out of date compared to what's in the src.rpm in comment 4. My understanding is that the emacs files work for both emacs and xemacs. Did you also intend to provide an xemacs package? (I know the emacs/xemacs thing is rather insane, but that's just the way it is. If you package for one and not the other, you can probably expect some bug reports about it.) Yes, that means four packages with one file apiece and another block of macros. If you only intend to build for Fedora, you can make them noarch, though. The package includes a test suite in doc/tst_suite; is there any reason not to run it in a %check section? Note that the emacs files are GPLv2+, not GPLv2. The source code actually contradicts the README file here. This package in general seems to be a bit lax about the license version in use. (license.txt doesn't specify a version, README does but says v2 only for the emacs mode while gri-mode.el explicitly says v2+.) Always trust what's in the source code, but do ask upstream to be clearer about whether they intended GPLv2 only or GPLv2+. rpmlint says: gri.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 92, tab: line 28) I don't particularly care; fix this if you like. emacs-gri.x86_64: W: no-documentation emacs-gri-el.x86_64: W: no-documentation These are fine. I note you're not using the %dist tag on this pacakge. It's not mandatory, but I do need to ask if you understand the issues that occur when you don't use it and the procedure for making sure that you keep proper ordering between release branches. Your manual Requires: readline should be unnecessary. rpm correctly finds the dependency on libreadline. Your scriptlets should conform to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo unless you have some reason why that doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110039.n6B0d0vK026890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(karl at qdh.org.uk) --- Comment #87 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 20:38:49 EDT --- It has been over a year since the last comment by the submitter of this ticket. Karl, if you still intend to submit this package, please address the review commentary. Otherwise I'll close this ticket soon. If someone else is going to submit this then please submit your own review ticket and close this one as a duplicate. We have a lot of package review tickets and not many reviewers, so please help us keep things straight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] New: Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Summary: Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/maloc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/maloc-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MALOC is a small, portable, abstract C environment library for object-oriented C programming. MALOC is used as the foundation layer for a number of scientific applications, including MC, SG, and APBS. MALOC can be used as a small stand-alone abstraction environment for writing portable C programs which need access to resources which are typically architecture-dependent, such as INET sockets, timing routines, and so on. MALOC provides abstract datatypes, memory management routines, timing routines, machine epsilon, access to UNIX and INET sockets, MPI, and so on. All things that can vary from one architecture to another are abstracted out of an application code and placed in MALOC. MALOC is also useful for APBS, which acts as a poisson-boltzmann solver for pymol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110044.n6B0iQw1031555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510822 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110044.n6B0iPmF031531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497622 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110044.n6B0i5mK031477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #18 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-10 20:44:04 EDT --- I've made the maloc package as a separate submission: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 And soon I'll have a version of apbs compatible with this and the current list of recommendations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 00:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110059.n6B0x5Cg001942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 20:59:04 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: maloc.x86_64: W: no-documentation maloc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which are OK, and maloc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmaloc.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libncurses.so.5 Which is odd; why is this linked against ncurses when it doesn't call ncurses? I guess this has something to do with readline. I wouldn't say it's a problem because libncurses is going to come in either way. Full review forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 01:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110114.n6B1E54n004606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-10 21:14:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > maloc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmaloc.so.1.0.0 > /lib64/libncurses.so.5 > Which is odd; why is this linked against ncurses when it doesn't call ncurses? > I guess this has something to do with readline. I wouldn't say it's a problem > because libncurses is going to come in either way. > Noticed that - the configure.ac specifically checks for ncurses, I don't know why. I'll mention it to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 01:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110128.n6B1S5rJ003396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 21:28:04 EDT --- I'm a bit confused about the versioning. Is the "-1" in the tarball indicative of some sub-version thing? Will they release 0.2-2 in the future? What would you call this package in that case? Upstream also produces RPMs and seems to use the dashed portion of the version as their Release: (or perhaps that's just coincidental), but it should be obvious that we can't do that. The blank line at the start of %description does make it into the final package and should probably be removed. Did you intend not to build and package the documentation? It seems like that would be a good idea, but I haven't checked that the documentation is actually useful. Why does this require pkgconfig? I don't see any .pc files in the package. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 9b29c4b6401adf20ce1ab3c47fe71066ca7952eb10db4b1e6b1440973f616cda maloc-0.2-1.tar.gz ? name is OK; not sure about package versioning. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. ? final provides and requires: maloc-0.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm libmaloc.so.1()(64bit) maloc = 0.2-1.fc12 maloc(x86-64) = 0.2-1.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libmaloc.so.1()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) maloc-devel-0.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm maloc-devel = 0.2-1.fc12 maloc-devel(x86-64) = 0.2-1.fc12 = libmaloc.so.1()(64bit) maloc = 0.2-1.fc12 ? pkgconfig * %check is present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files (but maybe there should be?) * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 01:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110134.n6B1YvdB008367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 21:34:56 EDT --- How can this work without dynamips? It doesn't really seem to do anything for me without it (and IOS images which we obviously can't include). I thought I saw a recent package submission for dynamips that was being moved to rpmfusion; this should almost certainly follow unless I'm missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 01:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497001] Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110151.n6B1pjL5007909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 21:51:43 EDT --- Builds find and rpmlint is silent. There is a simple test program included; is there any reason not to run it? I see that you had commented out a build dependency on ruby, so perhaps you intended this. I guess it takes a while (almost exactly 3 minutes on my 2.4GHz 8-core Nehalem machine) but I doubt it will need to be built often. Could you add the sentence "auto-nng is a software for analysis and classification of data, using artificial neuronal networks." to the beginning of %description? It makes a little more sense that way. You use both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} forms. You can use which ever you prefer, but you must be consistent. The compiler flags are not correct. You need to pass %{optflags} (or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS if you prefer) to the compiler. It looks like you just need to pass CFLAGS to the Makefile, but you may need to patch out the '-O3' call unless you can demonstrate that it helps. The debuginfo package is broken because -g isn't passed to the compiler. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 1beff6a1ff8bdafcd945627d4d2a6087bb3ada0c34f1071e6b8ea842d30d9fc3 auto-nng.v1.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description could use a tweak. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not correct. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X debuginfo package is mostly empty. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: auto-nng = 1.5-1.fc12 auto-nng(x86-64) = 1.5-1.fc12 = (none) X %check is not present, but there's a test suite. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 01:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110155.n6B1twUT008763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 21:55:57 EDT --- I built this and noted that the python module isn't in the usual place for python modules, which ends up causing the files to not be byte-compiled. This could cause problems if, for example, root runs the program and python decides to byte-compile the module then. This used to be an issue, but I don't really know enough about python to know if it still is or what to do about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 02:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110238.n6B2cj3j021072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #37 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-10 22:38:41 EDT --- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 02:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110251.n6B2p0R8019973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #37 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-07-10 22:50:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > What about the IIOP license (comment #23)? Ehh, that one is non-free too. :( Turns out Red Hat Legal thinks the Unicode license is also non-free. So, three license problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 02:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110228.n6B2S35b018728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 22:28:02 EDT --- OK, the problem was that python isn't in the build root. Adding BuildRequires: python fixes it. You should also use %{_datadir} instead of hardcoding /usr/share and use cp -p to copy your files so the timestamps are preserved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110313.n6B3D7dX023727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #38 from Lane 2009-07-10 23:13:06 EDT --- Who are you pinging? What are the next steps? Is the procedure documented somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110319.n6B3Jv0B028617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 23:19:56 EDT --- Since the package is approved, it is up to the submitter of the ticket to take the next step, that being a CVS request so the package can be imported, built and pushed out. The procedure is fully documented in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Every new packager should read over that before submitting packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110319.n6B3JZLX028555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #30 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-10 23:19:34 EDT --- I changed the version to version 0, got the latest snapshot and tested building on f10, f11 and f12. The builds all succeeded, though I haven't looked through all of the build logs. I also tested the i586 rpms build on f11 and things looked OK. If there is anything else I need to do yet, please let me know. The scratch builds are: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466728 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466734 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466733 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110321.n6B3LJFG025294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #40 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-10 23:21:18 EDT --- hehe to you Lane. No the process isn't over yet. You have to put verilator on fedora cvs, then build it on koji(fedora's build system) then finally push to mirrors. Currently you are here at "Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner Can you please add me as one of the owners please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110326.n6B3Qw7A026267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-10 23:26:57 EDT --- hi, (In reply to comment #4) > Here is the review: > > +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing > > MUST Items: > [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. > [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} > [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this > list and more] > [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet > the Licensing Guidelines. > [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > [-] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. > File COPYING must be included. Included.. I had missed it somehow.. > [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. > [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. > [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. > Source matched: > $ md5sum axel-2.4.tar.gz > a2a762fce0c96781965c8f9786a3d09d axel-2.4.tar.gz > > Consider use %{version} in Source URL - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D > Corrected.. > [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on > at least one supported architecture. > [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. > Package compiled. > [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires > [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the > %find_lang macro. > [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just > symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in > %post and %postun. > No shared libraries. > [+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state > this fact in the request for review > Package is not relocatable. > [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not > create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does > create that directory. > [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. > [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf > %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). > [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros > section of Packaging Guidelines. > [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is > described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. > [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. > [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the > runtime of the application. > [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. > [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. > No static libraries. > [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' > (for directory ownership and usability). > Have not pkgconfig(.pc) files. > [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. > libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in > a -devel package. > Have not. > [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = > %{version}-%{release} > [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be > removed in the spec. > [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the > %install section. > Only cli. > [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. > [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf > %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). > [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > > SHOULD Items: > [=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a > separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > Source include it, but package does not (see above). Corrected. > [+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file > should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > No translations in spec. > [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all > supported architectures. > Done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466319 > [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. > A'm test it before and even try using... (wget more convenient :) , IMHO) > [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. > Scriplets haven't used. > [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. > [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and > this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. > A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not > installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. > [+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, > /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file > instead of the file itself. > No such dependencies. > [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed > files. Spec and srpm : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/axel-2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Other files from mock build can be found at : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/axel/ regards, Ankur Sinha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110328.n6B3SKLW030109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-10 23:28:20 EDT --- As requested, here is a new spec and SRPM with only the modules from the regular ZNC package. SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110346.n6B3kurp029535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-10 23:46:55 EDT --- Oh, please let me know via irc or here what your Fedora Account System name is so I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 03:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110345.n6B3ju3f029435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-10 23:45:55 EDT --- 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. - All look good. 5. There are still some of those macros left, but as I said, not a blocker if you wish to use them. Now that the Source url works I can confirm that the version matches upstream: 20a05edee2137c76add270452a1ab4d7 Solang-0.2.tar.gz 20a05edee2137c76add270452a1ab4d7 Solang-0.2.tar.gz.orig Everything looks ok now to me... so this package is APPROVED. I will go ahead and sponsor you now (but note I need to finish reviewing your compat package before you can build this one). Continue the process from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 04:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110414.n6B4EUZI001358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-07-11 00:14:29 EDT --- This can still be used to draw network topologies as well as connect to remote dynamips hypervisors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 04:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110424.n6B4OSCf002991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 00:24:27 EDT --- Well, all it seemed to do for me was tell me to point it at an IOS image whenever I tried to drag an item to the canvas. Maybe some other reviewer can find some use in it, but I can't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 04:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510464] Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110432.n6B4WDc1004393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510464 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-07-11 00:32:12 EDT --- Okay that's the case but i do not see how different this is from wine, which is distributed by fedora and yet we cannot supply them with the actual windows software that it will run ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 04:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110451.n6B4pI8L007450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 00:51:16 EDT --- nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 05:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110541.n6B5fnXK018964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 01:41:48 EDT --- Indeed, this builds fine and rpmlint is silent. In the source I see four files in the lzf/lzf directory which are dual-licensed 2-clause BSD and GPLv2+. The h5py authors are supposed to choose one license (or leave it as dual licensed if they want) but then I'm not at all sure how the GPL makes its way into the rest of the code. The lzf code gets linked directly into h5.so. I guess I can bother spot again and block FE-Legal. My best guess is that the license of this code ends up as "BSD and (BSD or GPLv2+)", with h5.so being dual-licensed. There's an entirely separate question of whether this package should be including the lzf code at all. It wouldn't be the first package (that honor belongs to php-pecl-lzf) but it sure would be nice if there was some library version of this that things could link against, especially since this code currently has an open security issue. Actually, I would recommend not importing this package until that issue is fixed. I note that you package up all of the tests. Is there any reason to do so? Shouldn't those tests be run at build time instead? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 4edf35fa6c538c5e9132414061ac18258cf8a1a743fc16db94176657e382c6d7 h5py-1.2.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? unsure about the license tag. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: h5.so()(64bit) h5a.so()(64bit) h5d.so()(64bit) h5e.so()(64bit) h5f.so()(64bit) h5fd.so()(64bit) h5g.so()(64bit) h5i.so()(64bit) h5l.so()(64bit) h5o.so()(64bit) h5p.so()(64bit) h5r.so()(64bit) h5s.so()(64bit) h5t.so()(64bit) h5z.so()(64bit) utils.so()(64bit) h5py = 1.2.0-1.fc12 h5py(x86-64) = 1.2.0-1.fc12 = libgomp.so.1()(64bit) libhdf5.so.6()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) numpy >= 1.0.3 python(abi) = 2.6 ? %check is not present, but a test suite is included. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 05:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110557.n6B5v3Jr017794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | Flag|needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 05:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110555.n6B5tOmk017597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 05:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110555.n6B5tmOG017664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 05:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110556.n6B5uYwr017734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 05:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509619] Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110554.n6B5sZTn017114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509619 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 01:54:34 EDT --- It really helps if you could run rpmlint on your packages and address the output before you submit them for review. srtp-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package You should disable the debuginfo package if you don't create a main package. srtp-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/srtp-devel-1.4.2/draft-irtf-cfrg-icm-00.txt This needs to be run through tr -d \\r or dos2unix to fix up the line endings. In addition, I feel significant unease at a security sensitive network protocol being available only as a static library. If a security issue is found, everything that linked against it will need to be rebuilt. At least one distro seems to build this as a shared library: http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org/msg58219.html Also, version 1.4.4 seems to be current, while you've packaged 1.4.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110603.n6B63rp4018764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110603.n6B63bTi018726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 02:03:36 EDT --- Umm, you're supposed to give him a month to reply, then ping, then close after a week. You didn't even give Luke a full week before your first ping, and now I see you've dropped the other tickets in the dependency chain back into the review queue. Is there some problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110622.n6B6MU8M025156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-11 02:22:29 EDT --- Can you submit updated SRPM? Though, I am continuously in talk with you but still I think you should submit SRPM and check what upstream says on unfunctionality of some features in ayttm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110622.n6B6M6Ad025107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(panemade at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-11 02:22:05 EDT --- I think Luke is very busy with his security work. I almost ping him daily on #fedora-devel and #fedora-python. But very few times I got reply like he will be going to work. So I thought instead of pinging him again and again I better move on and pick some other reviews. And if I am dropping first package in chain then it will be good to drop others also. As first package itself will take some more time to appear in rawhide repository. I hope there is no policy that prevents reviewer from leaving review at any point. If there is any please point me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110631.n6B6VA17023131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 02:31:09 EDT --- Of course you're welcome to drop reviews at any time if you feel like you can't stick with it and wait a while for a busy person to respond. That just means that I or one of the other few reviewers will have to take care of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110644.n6B6ihhr024948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 02:44:42 EDT --- Did you consider a dependency on python-matplotlib? Without it you can't actually plot anything, and the description probably needs to account for that. Also, the message printed when you don't have python-matplotlib doesn't really help the user to figure out what package to install. (It references "Matplotlib", which you can search for, but it would be better if it indicated the package name.) I don't think that's a blocker, but do think of the users. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 5b5dcecd570d2242663771f23d5d7679164fb04a82accf6a142b78bf485c1181 pondus-0.5.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pondus = 0.5.3-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop files valid and installed properly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 06:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110647.n6B6lAhv028951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-07-11 02:47:09 EDT --- and hey! I have not closed this review. Just moved back to New queue. Don't worry I will pick some more reviews to look queue count lower for you. I know you are very much worried about New Package Count. And if you are really, I will say first we should try to do something for Merge-reviews. I also see we have not very good but good amount of reviewers nowadays. I also know you got busy with fedora-cvs work that is not giving you much time on reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110707.n6B77nOg028898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:07:45 EDT --- Well, that was a bust. At this point I'm of the opinion that yes, this is potentially problematic, but we aren't installing on everyone's system by default and if there's a problem we can deal with it. Honestly a review ticket shouldn't have to sit around for fourteen months anyway. So, I have some time so I'm going to go ahead and work on this. Here's the latest rpmlint output: dchroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dchroot 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/schroot 04755 dchroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/dchroot root 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/schroot root 04755 These are OK; being setuid is kind of necessary. schroot.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 schroot.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libboost_filesystem.so.5 schroot.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libboost_program_options.so.5 The indicated library is linked against those three libraries without actually calling anything in them. This is common with libtool-using packages. It's not an especially big deal, but you can find some info on making it go away at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency schroot.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 schroot.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 You must call ldconfig when installing shared libraries into system locations. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries dchroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dchroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-listmounts ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-mount ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-releaselock ['/usr/lib64'] These need fixing, and unfortunately passing --disable-rpath to %configure didn't help. There's some info at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath Some other random comments: The description for the dchroot package could use a bit more elaboration. I think the license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3 only. Do you see some place where the version is limited to v3? Nothing owns /etc/schroot, /etc/schroot/exec.d, /etc/schroot/setup.d, /usr/libexec/schroot or /var/lib/schroot. That's enough for now. If you get those fixed up I'll do a complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510022] Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110716.n6B7GaTY030492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2009-07-11 03:16:34 EDT --- APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110722.n6B7MhXW031450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:22:40 EDT --- There's actually an interesting problem with this package that I don't see mentioned above. The spec is under the same license as the package, which means you didn't have the right to make any of the changes you've been making. Now, it's incredibly dumb to try to license a spec file like that, and far dumber to put it under a license that does not permit modification. I would honestly argue that you can't even copyright the factual information present in a spec file. However, I don't think we can just remove the license, and since we've looked at the spec I'm not sure if we can just recreate it. What are we supposed to do now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110730.n6B7U2BM003507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:30:01 EDT --- It's getting less and less useful to have an i386-only package; I don't even try building anything on i386 these days. Is there no chance of getting this to work on x86_64 or any other 64-bit architecture? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110734.n6B7Y01c003992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:33:59 EDT --- Sorry, I also note that 0.27 seems to be out as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110733.n6B7XKhL000789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:33:18 EDT --- This fails to build for me in rawhide on x86_64: checking for png_create_read_struct in -lpng... no checking for png_create_read_struct in -lpng10... no checking for png_create_read_struct in -lpng12... no configure: error: cannot find required library png A missing build dependency, perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110735.n6B7ZODp004444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:35:23 EDT --- Who are you pinging? Nobody is assigned to review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110739.n6B7dSse004862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:39:27 EDT --- This does build, but the resulting package does not install. My build script catches this because it installs the built packages into the chroot. Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install /mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch.rpm php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch from /php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: dejavu-fonts is needed by package php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch (/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch) Error: Missing Dependency: dejavu-fonts is needed by package php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch (/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110744.n6B7iISx005675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-11 03:44:17 EDT --- Thx for the review. About usability test: this package is part of the python-kaa framework which is made for the freevo multimedia center. As freevo will requires at least xine-ui for multimedia playback I will work on freevo for fedora ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110746.n6B7kAfM003073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-11 03:46:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-kaa-display Short Description: Python API providing Low level support for various displays Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-11 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110749.n6B7nCEU006632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:49:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110746.n6B7ktC4006363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:46:51 EDT --- This is a terribly ancient ticket. I believe I tried once to get Gnome-knowledgeable people interested in looking at it, but I failed. Still, it's worth asking: What relevance does this have to F-11? We never got an updated package with 0.8.1, which might explain part of why nobody ever took care of this review. What's the current version? Finally, is there still a reason to keep this ticket open? Does Pablo still wish to get this package into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110750.n6B7oXfA007131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:50:32 EDT --- You should post links to the new spec and src.rpm so that I can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 07:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110751.n6B7pKE4007363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:51:18 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110804.n6B84GYQ009908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 04:04:15 EDT --- Oh, I just noticed that this already blocks the relevant ghostscript bug. This package already has the appropriate license tag as indicated in bug 487510, so I'd say that we're good to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110806.n6B86A0A006985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 04:06:05 EDT --- Time for my monthly ping. Did you have any luck with that updated package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110809.n6B89iYK011006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-11 04:09:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: erlang-eradius Short Description: RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110814.n6B8EHWX008378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 04:14:15 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110827.n6B8RJqe010893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-07-11 04:27:18 EDT --- Ok, after reviewing, this package is now approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110801.n6B81w3G005832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 04:01:57 EDT --- It seems that FESCo took up this issue, although it looks like there were talking about something different. See http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-10/fedora-meeting.2009-07-10-17.00.html (Adobe CMap files - code or content?) and https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/177. That seems to answer one question (the legal one) but begs another: is this package duplicating something that's already in ghostscript? Can the data be unified and shared between the two packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110836.n6B8ai4L016147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-11 04:36:43 EDT --- Ankur, each time when you make changes and new build preformed, you must change release number and write appropriate changelog. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 08:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110846.n6B8k57h017705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-11 04:46:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Ankur, each time when you make changes and new build preformed, you must change > release number and write appropriate changelog. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs hi, yeah.. i dint think it was necessary for these changes.. sorry.. Ill do it from now.. is the rest of the package okay? Ankur Sinha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110904.n6B94bX1016938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Lewis 2009-07-11 05:04:35 EDT --- Ok, this now builds in koji on F11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467017) and rawhide (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467026) as well. Updated SRPM and Spec: SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec Could this be reviewed now, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110914.n6B9EFsW022200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 05:14:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review, and for spotting the missing req! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pondus Short Description: A personal weight management program Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:15:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110915.n6B9FLbe019156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 05:15:21 EDT --- Actually, I think I want the EPEL 5 branch as well. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pondus Short Description: A personal weight management program Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110952.n6B9qpV9025783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 05:52:50 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110952.n6B9qfMj025730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 05:52:40 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110952.n6B9qaSa028914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 05:52:35 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 09:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907110952.n6B9qkt1028966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 05:52:46 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 10:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] New: Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Summary: Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qrupdate.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: qrupdate is a Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions. rpmlint output: qrupdate-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This package is needed for fast QR & Cholesky in Octave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 10:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111053.n6BArkqp002928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpandit at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 06:53:45 EDT --- Cc Rakesh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 10:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111058.n6BAwtUX003734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #6 from Julian Aloofi 2009-07-11 06:58:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > You should increment the Release tag every time you make changes to the spec > file. Otherwise it is really confusing. > > (Now you have even too much space! One empty line or two is enough in between > sections of the spec file.) > > Once you have been sponsored you will be able to do formal package reviews of > your own. I am willing to sponsor you, if you demonstrate your knowledge of the > Fedora packaging guidelines by submitting at least one other package for review > and perform informal reviews of packages of other people. Thank you! I'll start with that as soon as possible and then post the related links here. I adjusted the Release tag and deleted some whitespaces. The new SRPM is here: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap-0.4.4-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 11:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111106.n6BB6onW005140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 07:06:49 EDT --- The release should have gone to 2 not 4 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 12:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111204.n6BC45sF014397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-11 08:04:04 EDT --- Yes, almost other is done. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 12:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111256.n6BCuoEX026287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #8 from Julian Aloofi 2009-07-11 08:56:49 EDT --- If I change it now I had to set release to 3. That would be confusing... Just changed to 4 because it is the 4th release :) Should I change it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 13:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111304.n6BD4TgR024757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 09:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > If I change it now I had to set release to 3. That would be confusing... > Just changed to 4 because it is the 4th release :) > Should I change it? Oh, that's right. You just need to fill in the changelog for the missing entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 13:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111312.n6BDCDIx029086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 --- Comment #31 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-07-11 09:12:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > What relevance does this have to F-11? > > We never got an updated package with 0.8.1, which might explain part of why > nobody ever took care of this review. What's the current version? > > Finally, is there still a reason to keep this ticket open? Does Pablo still > wish to get this package into Fedora? I dislike the current mechanism so I'm trying to redevelop the program using the 'OnlyShowIn' feature from freedesktop.org and the 'applications-merged' directory. My first attempt breaks KDE and I'm quite busy with the translation to correct now this bug. So yes, I want to package this but rather in the medium terms. I think we can close this ticket and I will reopen it (or create a new one) once I found a solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 14:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111403.n6BE3Lb7002714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #10 from Julian Aloofi 2009-07-11 10:03:20 EDT --- OK, that includes all fixes and changelogs: Spec URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap/sap.spec SRPM URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap/sap-0.4.4-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 14:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111417.n6BEHrVn005338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 10:17:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 14:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111418.n6BEIfM2008237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #32 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-07-11 10:18:40 EDT --- http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus-0-0.1.20090710svn4432.fc11.src.rpm http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus.spec I had mistakenly assumed you would be pulling those from the scratch builds once I started doing those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 14:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510843] New: Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Summary: Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ron at ron.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools.spec SRPM URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools-0.1.5c-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: SAM (Sequence Alignment/Map) is a flexible generic format for storing nucleotide sequence alignment. SAM tools provide efficient utilities on manipulating alignments in the SAM format. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467349 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 14:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111442.n6BEgnKQ009640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 --- Comment #6 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-07-11 10:42:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > > - file listed twice > > > > > warning: File listed twice: > > > > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE > > > > > > You can see this warning at the end of build.log [1]. > > > > I'm not sure what the issue is there. The spec file does not mention it more > > than once, and the file only shows up once in the gem itself. Any > > recommendation on how to proceed, and is this a blocker for review? > > Yes, it is a blocker. According to [1][2] files can be listend only once. It's > quite easy fix. You should replace the "%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/" > entry with "dir %{geminstdir}" and list all entries in that directory > separately. Just note that examples, tests, rdoc and so should be listed as > %doc. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_ref-12 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c7 Thanks for the advice. I've fixed the aforementioned bugs in the srpm and rpm, and both check out clean for me: Updated SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111503.n6BF3S8v012975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 11:03:27 EDT --- rpmlint output is actually: qrupdate-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation not a problem qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 The library is linked against other libraries that it does not use. You have to install the rpm and then do "rpmlint qrupdate" to see these. I don't think these are problematic; it's not as if those libraries won't be linked in for some other reason. I'm surprised there's nothing like a header, but I guess that's Fortan. You just call the functions and hope you get the arguments the right way 'round. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 45ba0b4e6b15236a219b5b380e15fc9acfe6760a9ca5e53484de9b534969ba0d qrupdate- 1.0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm libqrupdate.so.1()(64bit) qrupdate = 1.0.1-1.fc12 qrupdate(x86-64) = 1.0.1-1.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libblas.so.3()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3(GFORTRAN_1.0)(64bit) liblapack.so.3()(64bit) libqrupdate.so.1()(64bit) qrupdate-devel-1.0.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm qrupdate-devel = 1.0.1-1.fc12 qrupdate-devel(x86-64) = 1.0.1-1.fc12 = libqrupdate.so.1()(64bit) qrupdate = 1.0.1-1.fc12 * %check is present and all tests pass: TOTAL: PASSED 112 FAILED 0 * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111505.n6BF5rqF016109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #9 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-11 11:05:52 EDT --- thanks Kevin for your help my Fedora Account System name is : hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111518.n6BFILpa018256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 --- Comment #2 from Chris Tyler 2009-07-11 11:18:20 EDT --- Summary of review: X license text vs. spec file X noarch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111515.n6BFFpYc017944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 Chris Tyler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris at tylers.info --- Comment #1 from Chris Tyler 2009-07-11 11:15:49 EDT --- Review results: [x] Bad [+] Good [na] Not applicable [x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [x] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ### GPLv2+ in spec file vs. GPL3 text included in source zip [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] [na] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [na] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] [na] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [na] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [na] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] [na] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [na] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [na] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] [na] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [na] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] [na] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. [na] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] [na] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [na] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] [na] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] [na] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] [na] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] Question: Can't this package be noarch? Note: This package is one version behind upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111529.n6BFTHGj019992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 11:29:16 EDT --- Thanks for the speedy review! (In reply to comment #2) > qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 > /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 > qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 > /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 > The library is linked against other libraries that it does not use. You have > to install the rpm and then do "rpmlint qrupdate" to see these. I don't think > these are problematic; it's not as if those libraries won't be linked in for > some other reason. Oh,?didn't notice that. > I'm surprised there's nothing like a header, but I guess that's Fortan. You > just call the functions and hope you get the arguments the right way 'round. So was I. I think this is a 'feature' of Fortran 77; Fortran 90 has module files that do this. I really don't know *why* anyone would still want to write in a language that lacks e.g. dynamic memory allocation and has an 8 character length limit in function names and so on. qrupdate seems to have been written in 2008-2009!!! (Not to mention that modern Fortran compilers often have lacking F77 capabilities..) ** New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qrupdate Short Description: A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111528.n6BFSeK4019928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 11:28:39 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The compiler is not called with the proper set of flags. You will need to find some way to pass %{optflags} to the makefile. Sometimes setting CFLAGS does it, but sometimes you have to patch the Makefile. At least -g is passed to the compiler so the debuginfo package isn't broken. I would suggest packaging the manpage as a manpage instead of leaving it with the rest of the documentation. Please consider using install -p to preserve the timestanps on the scripts you install. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 54949e99009f8f4484609b136e46439ebaa54bc9760a35f10c714e169a36f9e3 samtools-0.1.5c.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not correct. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: samtools = 0.1.5c-1.fc12 samtools(x86-64) = 0.1.5c-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/perl libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111544.n6BFiLDo022370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 11:44:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111547.n6BFleEa023078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 11:47:39 EDT --- The SRPM URL above does not seem to exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111549.n6BFnovY023339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-11 11:49:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > just for the record, I am a big fan of x11vnc. I'm using it quite regularly > since 2007 or so. So, may be you are review it? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 15:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487128] Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111559.n6BFxQlh022353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 11:59:25 EDT --- This builds but does not install: eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch from /eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: perl(NOCpulse::CF_DB) is needed by package eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch (/eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch) Error: Missing Dependency: perl(NOCpulse::CF_DB) is needed by package eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch (/eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111613.n6BGDc21025024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 12:13:38 EDT --- I cannot seem to make any text-mode browser download the rpms from that koji link so that I can look at them. They always fail due to certificate issues. Do you have a trick for doing that, or could you fix the certificate issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111617.n6BGHXXQ028530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111626.n6BGQ8wo027209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-11 12:26:05 EDT --- Well, for 0.9-45: * Tarball - First of all, is the tarball used in the srpm formally released 0.9 tarball or 0.9 tarball is not yet released formally? * License - Now the license tag should be "GPLv3+" * %description ============================================================== %description A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation %{!?log_dir:%define log_dir /%{_localstatedir}/log/slog} %{!?sslogger_user:%define sslogger_user slogger} %{!?sslogger_group:%define sslogger_group sloggers} %if 0%{?rhel} Requires(pre): shadow-utils util-linux %else Requires(pre): shadow-utils util-linux-ng %endif ============================================================== %pre -------------------------------------------------------------- - These lines (before %pre like) are all in %description. Actually $ rpm -qi shows that "Requires(pre)" _comment_ is included in %description ! By the way on Fedora "util-linux-ng" provides "util-linux" so this conditional requires is not strictly needed. * Macros - Use %_sysconfdir instead of /etc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible. If not possible, write some comments that parallel make is disabled on the spec file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * Timestamps - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * Permission - Please check the permissions of installed files and set them properly. * Usually normal files should have 0644 permission * From rpmlint: --------------------------------------------------------------- sslogger.i586: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/sslogger_rotate --------------------------------------------------------------- - It seems that this logrote file should be named as %_sysconfdir/logrotate.d/%{name} * %changelog format - It is useful in Fedora CVS system that one line is inserted between each %changelog entry like: --------------------------------------------------------------- %changelog * Sun Jul 05 2009 Ed Brand - 09-40 - Split man files into slog, sslogger and sreplay - Chmod 775 $log_dir to allow normal user access - Add check to slog to disallowe passing '-' when -c option is used * Tue May 18 2009 Ed Brand - 0.9-32 - removed $global * Sun Mar 29 2009 Ed Brand - 0.9-30 - Change Licence to GPLv3 - Misc. spec file fixes --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111629.n6BGTCrK030286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-11 12:29:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111628.n6BGSZo9030207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-11 12:28:33 EDT --- Please rebuild this package also on devel (F-12). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111629.n6BGTdTM030346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-11 12:29:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111630.n6BGUitK028044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111632.n6BGWgnY031082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-07-11 12:32:41 EDT --- Can you try http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83198 (s/https/http/)? The downloads work for me from elinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111636.n6BGa3wk031707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-11 12:36:01 EDT --- Hi! Patrice, would you still want to import this package into Fedora? If so, please post your newest spec/srpm again and I will try to review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111656.n6BGuQQ9032671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-11 12:56:25 EDT --- 4] missing dependency (rubygem-hoe) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111654.n6BGsEHC031660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 12:54:13 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111654.n6BGsJY9031699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111700.n6BH0109003820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 12:59:59 EDT --- slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slashem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111658.n6BGwPMc003537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 12:58:24 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xorriso'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111702.n6BH2Dkb002206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:02:12 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111702.n6BH2IJG002244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111700.n6BH06nA001535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:00:05 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xorriso'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111702.n6BH282R002166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:02:06 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update efte'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111700.n6BH0SsP001816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:00:26 EDT --- b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-openfwwf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111702.n6BH2dYF002312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:02:38 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111705.n6BH55gA005626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:05:05 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510856] New: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510856 Summary: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ascii.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The ascii utility provides easy conversion between various byte representations and the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) character table. It knows about a wide variety of hex, binary, octal, Teletype mnemonic, ISO/ECMA code point, slang names, XML entity names, and other representations. Given any one on the command line, it will try to display all others. Called with no arguments it displays a handy small ASCII chart. $ rpmlint SPECS/ascii.spec SRPMS/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/i586/ascii-* ascii.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII ascii.i586: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. mock rebuild for fedora-11-i386 was successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111705.n6BH5ACw003489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2-1.fc11 |2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111704.n6BH4DPm003031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:04:12 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wmfire'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111709.n6BH9TUP006752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:09:28 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-notcouriersans-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111712.n6BHCBxE005702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:12:10 EDT --- slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slashem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7464 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111711.n6BHBqnb005610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:11:49 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update frinika'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111716.n6BHGLHB007626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:16:19 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111713.n6BHDfQP006576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 13:13:39 EDT --- *** Bug 510856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111716.n6BHGsqp007710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.99-4.r3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111717.n6BHH24v007751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:17:01 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wmfire'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510856] Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111713.n6BHDeRh006539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 13:13:39 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 501353 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111716.n6BHGnpK009550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:16:48 EDT --- tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111716.n6BHGQMv009482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.1-8.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111720.n6BHKDa1010328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:20:12 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111720.n6BHKItQ008833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:20:18 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111721.n6BHLExv009101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:21:13 EDT --- tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111721.n6BHLtbR009212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 13:21:54 EDT --- Yes, that works. Can't believe I didn't think of it myself. rpmlint is silent and according to the build logs this builds fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 5a2ee2084cbf2355a4d081a89ea3cd7debd6224affab89239b2bae105bea6275 openssl-ibmca-1.0.0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in koji. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: libibmca.so()(64bit) openssl-ibmca = 1.0.0-1.fc11 openssl-ibmca(s390-64) = 1.0.0-1.fc11 = libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) openssl >= 0.9.8 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111720.n6BHKN4V010571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-8.fc10 |1.2.1-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111721.n6BHLJw6010894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.99-4.r3.fc10 |0.99-4.r3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111721.n6BHLUGK010971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:21:29 EDT --- b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-openfwwf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7484 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111727.n6BHRNev010772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.1-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111727.n6BHREZj010726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:27:13 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-notcouriersans-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111729.n6BHTd1M012823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:29:38 EDT --- phpFlickr-2.3.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpFlickr-2.3.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111729.n6BHTW4q012758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:29:31 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111725.n6BHPN9b012018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:25:22 EDT --- php-hkit-0.5-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111729.n6BHTa89012794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5-1.fc10 |5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111727.n6BHRJda012405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:27:18 EDT --- xdrfile-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111730.n6BHU7Re013179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:30:06 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update frinika'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7520 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111729.n6BHTKVk012721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:29:19 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update efte'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509520] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch - Add Log::Dispatch support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111727.n6BHRphT012505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509520 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:27:51 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-LogDispatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111729.n6BHThks011374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:29:43 EDT --- phpFlickr-2.3.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpFlickr-2.3.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111730.n6BHUevt012001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:30:39 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111732.n6BHWtN8012308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:32:55 EDT --- xdrfile-1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509521] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111730.n6BHU2Fq011788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:30:01 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111728.n6BHSmjS011232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:28:47 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111728.n6BHShgr011194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:28:42 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111733.n6BHXupx014040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:33:55 EDT --- php-hkit-0.5-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111733.n6BHX0sY013875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc10 |1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111730.n6BHUkY4013471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-9.fc9 |1.2.1-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111732.n6BHW12c013722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 --- Comment #2 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-07-11 13:32:00 EDT --- Thank you for your quick response. Here's the updated files with all your recommendations: Spec URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools.spec SRPM URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools-0.1.5c-2.fc10.src.rpm Updated scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509538] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode - Allows you to view the source of a CGI::Application module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111734.n6BHY73b014093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509538 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 13:34:06 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ViewCode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111748.n6BHmTtx016872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-11 13:48:28 EDT --- Thanks, fixed all that. http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090711/olpc-library.spec http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090711/olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Indeed, it is not an activity. You can look at it as an independent program which parses the contents of certain directories and outputs an HTML file at a predetermined location. That's all :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510729] Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111757.n6BHvCJD017143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510729 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 13:57:11 EDT --- I wonder if upstream realizes that they're supposed to replace "" in their license text with either their names or the name of their organization. Without doing that the provision is essentially void and they might just as well use the 2-clause BSD or the MIT license. rpmlint says: pkcs11-helper.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libpkcs11-helper.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libz.so.1 I guess the openssl pkgconfig files mandate that everything link against zlib, even if nothing in zlib is being called. You can clean this up if you like, but it's not really a problem. It looks like /usr/share/aclocal is unowned. This package needs to depend on automake if it's going to put files there. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 7849ddd06a4f3996358264ca6f92fbb4980d40aefaf6cda67a05f524476c345f pkcs11-helper-1.07.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: pkcs11-helper-1.07-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm libpkcs11-helper.so.1()(64bit) pkcs11-helper = 1.07-1.fc12 pkcs11-helper(x86-64) = 1.07-1.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) libpkcs11-helper.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) pkcs11-helper-devel-1.07-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libpkcs11-helper-1) = 1.07 pkcs11-helper-devel = 1.07-1.fc12 pkcs11-helper-devel(x86-64) = 1.07-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/pkg-config libpkcs11-helper.so.1()(64bit) openssl-devel pkcs11-helper = 1.07-1.fc12 pkgconfig * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files are in the -devel package with pkgconfig dependency. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 17:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111759.n6BHxO0k018736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-07-11 13:59:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openssl-ibmca Short Description: A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 18:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111830.n6BIUlXB024394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #32 from Ed Brand 2009-07-11 14:30:46 EDT --- Updated: https://sourceforge.net/projects/sslogger/files/srpms/sslogger-0.9-48.fc10.src.rpm/download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 18:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111830.n6BIUsKm024425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 14:30:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 18:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111848.n6BImOfF027445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 14:48:23 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 18:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111845.n6BIjIX9027060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 14:45:17 EDT --- OK, that sounds simple enough. Builds fine and rpmlint is silent; everything else seems fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 08d85b26501c37f5c0c3be420cddf5eb75559d2327b50e0383b33ec0bfb1b105 olpc-library-2.0.2.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: olpc-library = 2.0.2-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/env python-jinja sugar * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 18:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111854.n6BIsaw9028433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 18:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111854.n6BIsEe4026974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-11 14:54:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: olpc-library Short Description: OLPC library page generator Owners: dsd cjb pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111902.n6BJ2IPe028416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 15:02:17 EDT --- qrupdate-1.0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qrupdate-1.0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111904.n6BJ4V9I030094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-11 15:04:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus-0.7-2.R1163.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: 0.7-2.R1163 - Minor cleanup in %%install section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111904.n6BJ4gOs028597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 15:04:41 EDT --- pondus-0.5.3-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pondus-0.5.3-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111905.n6BJ59kE028955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 15:05:09 EDT --- qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111905.n6BJ5iUT030508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 15:05:44 EDT --- pondus-0.5.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pondus-0.5.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111906.n6BJ6XRJ030738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 15:06:32 EDT --- pondus-0.5.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pondus-0.5.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111906.n6BJ680w030654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 15:06:08 EDT --- qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111916.n6BJGV1u030808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 15:16:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510729] Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111917.n6BJHhje032484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510729 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember 2009-07-11 15:17:42 EDT --- Thanks for your review! > I wonder if upstream realizes that they're supposed to replace "" > in their license text with either their names or the name of their > organization. Without doing that the provision is essentially void and they > might just as well use the 2-clause BSD or the MIT license. I notified Alon Bar-Lev by email and also added opensc-devel mailing list to CC: http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2009-July/012311.html > rpmlint says: > pkcs11-helper.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libpkcs11-helper.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libz.so.1 > I guess the openssl pkgconfig files mandate that everything link against zlib, > even if nothing in zlib is being called. You can clean this up if you like, > but it's not really a problem. The warning looks harmless enough that I guess I'm going to leave it as it is. > It looks like /usr/share/aclocal is unowned. This package needs to depend on > automake if it's going to put files there. Added automake dependency to devel subpackage: Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/pkcs11-helper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/pkcs11-helper-1.07-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] New: Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Summary: Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ccze/ccze.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ccze/ccze-0.2.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: CCZE is a roboust and modular log colorizer, with plugins for apm, exim, fetchmail, httpd, postfix, procmail, squid, syslog, ulogd, vsftpd, xferlog and more. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510864] New: Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 Summary: Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/colorize/colorize.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/colorize/colorize-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a short perl script to colorize your logs. You can use your own colors, you can simply modify your config file in your home directory, or system-wide (/etc/colorize). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 19:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111935.n6BJZZtI002952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-07-11 15:35:34 EDT --- If no one else steps in a decent period of time, I'll try to. Unfortunately $DAYLIFE occupies almost all my time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 20:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510729] Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112025.n6BKPSai009884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510729 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 16:25:27 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 20:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510869] New: Review Request: tmux - Terminal multiplexer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tmux - Terminal multiplexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510869 Summary: Review Request: tmux - Terminal multiplexer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/tmux.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/tmux-0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Terminal multiplexer that enables a number of terminals (or windows) to be accessed and controlled from a single terminal. tmux is intended to be a simple, modern, BSD-licensed alternative to programs such as GNU screen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 20:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112037.n6BKbg6i011666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |icon at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-11 16:37:40 EDT --- - Release = 0.2 because it's not the final version of the spec. :) I usually change it to 1 before importing into cvs - Checks seem to only be failing on ppc, while passing on i586 and x86_64. Filed a bug upstream and added ifnarch. This is a scratch build of the 0.3 spec release: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1468032 Updated .spec and .src.rpm: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/pathfinder.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/pathfinder-1.0.0-0.3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112101.n6BL1U4F015951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Rasmus Ory Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-07-11 17:01:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: samtools Short Description: Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format Owners: ron Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112103.n6BL3ur9017839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #18 from Sven Lankes 2009-07-11 17:03:54 EDT --- *** Bug 510869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510869] Review Request: tmux - Terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112103.n6BL3trB017807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510869 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2009-07-11 17:03:54 EDT --- And closing again - for some reason I did not find the existing review request when I searched bz earlier :( *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 506755 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112116.n6BLGSsH018931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #19 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-11 17:16:27 EDT --- just for your information: 0.9 is out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112115.n6BLFFfk020443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 17:15:14 EDT --- Doesn't the makefile support DESTDIR? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112130.n6BLUuFr023499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Pascal Parois changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pascal22p at parois.net --- Comment #13 from Pascal Parois 2009-07-11 17:30:54 EDT --- > - It seems you have added the functionality to build the shared library > yourself. In this case no soname should be set (just produce an unversioned .so > file). You should ask upstream to provide the option to build soname'd shared > libraries. ok, I'll fix the spec file. And add the license as well. > > Pascal: please fill your whole name in bugzilla. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112140.n6BLe1x2024952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-07-11 17:39:59 EDT --- So I think that you can also drop the logic about whether or not to be include debug. It should be included by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112141.n6BLff5G023602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-11 17:41:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'm a bit confused about the versioning. Is the "-1" in the tarball > indicative of some sub-version thing? Will they release 0.2-2 in the > future? What would you call this package in that case? Upstream also > produces RPMs and seems to use the dashed portion of the version as their > Release: (or perhaps that's just coincidental), but it should be obvious that > we can't do that. > I'm not sure what that indicates, and its entirely reasonable to assume a "-2" version will be made at some point. Is it possible/OK to just transmogrify "0.2-1" into "0.2.1"? Perhaps its best to ask upstream WTF that number represents? > The blank line at the start of %description does make it into the final package > and should probably be removed. > done. > Did you intend not to build and package the documentation? It seems like that > would be a good idea, but I haven't checked that the documentation is actually > useful. > Oh, yeah - i kind of whipped this up in a jif so I could test the apbs builds I was doing - I'll add that in. > Why does this require pkgconfig? I don't see any .pc files in the package. > Oops - removed. > > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. When I get enough free time, I'll jump in! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 21:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112141.n6BLfOV0025536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-11 17:41:22 EDT --- Any ideas how I should handle the %trigger* lzma part of deco? http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/deco-archive/deco-archive.spec?view=markup Will lzma-compat trigger it or should I change the %trigger* entries to lzma-compat? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 22:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112224.n6BMOtLA030572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 18:24:54 EDT --- - The source URL site is incorrect, instead of dl.sourceforge.net it should be downloads.sourceforge.net - Instead of %{_libdir}/znc/*.so %{_libdir}/znc/modperl.pm %{_datadir}/znc/webadmin/skins/* the main package should own %{_libdir}/znc/ %{_datadir}/znc/ - Instead of %{_includedir}/znc/* the devel package should own %{_includedir}/znc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 22:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510729] Review Request: pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112247.n6BMlrgY001689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510729 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-07-11 18:47:52 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review, Jason! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pkcs11-helper Short Description: A library for using PKCS#11 providers Owners: kalev Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 23:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112317.n6BNHbxb006805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 19:17:36 EDT --- olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 23:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112319.n6BNJEdv006989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Daniel Drake 2009-07-11 19:19:13 EDT --- Thanks Jason, much appreciated! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 23:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112337.n6BNboke011390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-11 19:37:49 EDT --- R-RM2-0.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-RM2-0.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 23:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112341.n6BNfX0E012063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #9 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-11 19:41:33 EDT --- As requested, here is a new spec and SRPM with the debug logic removed (having it included by default, and with the updated %files section SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 23:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907112357.n6BNv6AG014443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2009-07-11 19:57:05 EDT --- Would you mind updating this to the latest release (0.8.6)? I'm very interested in getting this into Fedora/EPEL. Unfortunately I won't be able to review this (due to lack of experience) but hope to find someone who actually will once this is up-to-date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 00:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120008.n6C08IHH014899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 20:08:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Would you mind updating this to the latest release (0.8.6)? I'm very interested > in getting this into Fedora/EPEL. Done. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mrepo.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mrepo-0.8.6-1.fc11.src.rpm > Unfortunately I won't be able to review this > (due to lack of experience) but hope to find someone who actually will once > this is up-to-date. OK, but you only get experience by doing reviews :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 00:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510881] Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120015.n6C0Fqwu016388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510881 Paul W. Frields changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506038 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 00:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510881] Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120015.n6C0FJ8C016274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510881 Paul W. Frields changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504066(FE-ZIKULA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 00:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510881] New: Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510881 Summary: Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stickster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/php-LightweightPicasaAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/php-LightweightPicasaAPI-3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PHP wrapper for Google's Picasa Data API, which is implemented using Atom feeds in XML. The package is meant to make it easy for PHP developers to integrate their own applications with Picasa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 00:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120058.n6C0w4dS022618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #19 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-11 20:58:03 EDT --- OK, here's a shot at the split version of the package: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm notes: circular dep. problems: - pmgZ links against aqua and vice versa - i linked aqua against pmgZ, but pmgZ has an undefined non-weak-symbol as a result. - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that reflect this. I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 01:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120111.n6C1BdKY024818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 21:11:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > notes: > circular dep. problems: > - pmgZ links against aqua and vice versa - i linked aqua against pmgZ, but pmgZ > has an undefined non-weak-symbol as a result. Maybe you can rebuild the former to get it use the latter library? > - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs > package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that reflect > this. > > I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW. Ugh. This really looks like they're not intended to be broken up but should be just shipped in the main package, if they still are available in libapbs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 01:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120135.n6C1ZvXA029850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-11 21:35:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > notes: > > circular dep. problems: > > - pmgZ links against aqua and vice versa - i linked aqua against pmgZ, but pmgZ > > has an undefined non-weak-symbol as a result. > > Maybe you can rebuild the former to get it use the latter library? > That could work, sure. > > - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs > > package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that reflect > > this. > > > > I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW. > > Ugh. This really looks like they're not intended to be broken up but should be > just shipped in the main package, if they still are available in libapbs... Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather keep them separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing... right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 02:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120229.n6C2TKL1004893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Jason Woofenden changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason294 at herkamire.com --- Comment #20 from Jason Woofenden 2009-07-11 22:29:19 EDT --- Awesome work! Looks like the "s" is missing from the end of the summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 03:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120353.n6C3rnBf018264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 03:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120353.n6C3rH5J018217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #10 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-07-11 23:53:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: solang Short Description: A Photo Manager for GNOME Owners: hicham Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hicham.haouari at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 03:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdamm - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120355.n6C3tRUp019608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |compat-libgdam - compat |compat-libgdamm - compat |libs for libgdamm-3 |libs for libgdamm-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 04:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120428.n6C4S2gd024202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #10 from David Nalley 2009-07-12 00:28:01 EDT --- Note - SRPM link above is or a previous version - actual version is: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-4.fc11.src.rpm New Note 16 Package Review Guidelines FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./znc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/znc-0.070-4.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/znc* znc-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/znc-0.070/modules/q.cpp znc-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Please take care of the spurious executable perm warning OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv2 OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Code is a mixture of GPLv2 (bulk) with MD5.cpp being GPLv2+ - so actual package is GPLv2. FIX: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc There is also a LICENSE.openssl that needs to be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum znc-0.070.tar.gz* 18bb813cb350c6db014a0d82ecdf85fe znc-0.070.tar.gz 18bb813cb350c6db014a0d82ecdf85fe znc-0.070.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. works at least on x86 NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. This is pretty close - should be just a couple of quick fixes here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 04:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505942] Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120442.n6C4gYr0026390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505942 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(stickster at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-07-12 00:42:32 EDT --- Paul - just wanted to check status on this (going through all of the zikula-related reviews) - looks like the package is approved and just waiting on CVS and builds. Can you push this up? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 04:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505946] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120445.n6C4jKks025999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505946 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-07-12 00:45:19 EDT --- Keep in mind you'll need the FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag, since you aren't sponsored yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 04:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120453.n6C4rsVQ027199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #11 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-12 00:53:53 EDT --- These have been fixed. SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-5.fc11.src.rpm [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint znc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint znc-0.070-5.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb result]$ rpmlint znc*.rpm znc-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 05:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120503.n6C53BGm029683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #12 from David Nalley 2009-07-12 01:03:11 EDT --- Sources no longer match upstream: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum ./znc-0.070.tar.gz* def618c8d74017908b90c91f38047836 ./znc-0.070.tar.gz 18bb813cb350c6db014a0d82ecdf85fe ./znc-0.070.tar.gz.1 That coupled with the fact that the perms error is gone suggests that you changed source by chmod -x the offending file, and then committed that source to your SRPM. Please take care of the chmod in %prep, otherwise no one else will know of the changes that you made - eg, essentially you just patched source (albeit EXTREMELY minimally) but no patch file and no record of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 05:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120516.n6C5G4ml031104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2009-07-12 01:16:02 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-3.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-2.12.18-3.fc10.src.rpm Koji builds: F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1468583 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1468584 RPMLint: ====== $ rpmlint -i gri.spec ../SRPMS/gri-2.12.18-3.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/gri-*3.fc10* ../RPMS/i386/*-gri*3.fc10* && sudo rpm -e gri && sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/gri-2.12.18-3.fc10.i386.rpm && rpmlint gri emacs-gri.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. emacs-gri-el.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. xemacs-gri.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. xemacs-gri-el.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. [sudo] password for makerpm: ^[[A^[[A^[[B1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====== >Well, for some definition of "soon". I don't think we are on a tight schedule :) >Your manual Requires: readline should be unnecessary. rpm correctly finds the >dependency on libreadline. Fixed >I note you're not using the %dist tag on this pacakge. It's not mandatory, but >I do need to ask if you understand the issues that occur when you don't use it >and the procedure for making sure that you keep proper ordering between release >branches. This was the out-of-date spec bit. I must have forgotten to rebuild before uploading. Anyway, this is therefore no longer an issue. >The package includes a test suite in doc/tst_suite; is there any reason not to run it in a %check section? Their test suite doesn't actually have any kind of test target, in contradiction to what is stated in the manual (http://gri.sourceforge.net/gridoc/html/TestSuite.html). The manual says one exists and can be invoked with "make test", but make test is not a valid target for any makefile. There is no clear way to verify the functioning of their test suite in an automated fashion, AFAIK. $ for i in `find ./ -name Makefile`; do pushd . ; cd $(dirname $i); make test; popd; done ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/gri-2.12.18 > gri.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Fixed. > This package in general seems to be a bit lax about the license version in use. Submitted upstream as a bug (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2820229&group_id=5511&atid=105511) Actually I am going to revert the package licence back to GPLv2. The licence on their site, and in their docs is GPLv2. (http://gri.sourceforge.net/gridoc/html/License.html and doc/gri.texi) GPLv2+ gives you the option of using a later version, or GPLv2. Therefore, mixing this with the GPLv2+ el files, means that the package as a whole must be distributed under 2 only, as far as I can see. >Your scriptlets should conform to >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo unless you >have some reason why that doesn't work. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 05:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120519.n6C5JZcK032261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #13 from Nick Bebout 2009-07-12 01:19:34 EDT --- SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-0.070-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 06:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510881] Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120635.n6C6Z3Ls012683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510881 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-12 02:35:02 EDT --- I'm confused; how is this not a duplicate of bug 505942 which you also submitted and which has already been approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 07:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120730.n6C7UEwf021903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-12 03:30:07 EDT --- morse2txt-1.0.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/morse2txt-1.0.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 07:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510455] Review Request: morse2txt - Morse Code Reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120730.n6C7UJSb022661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510455 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-12 03:30:18 EDT --- morse2txt-1.0.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/morse2txt-1.0.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 07:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120751.n6C7pZtk025804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-07-12 03:51:34 EDT --- Please do not run the autotools when building. You are unneccessarily exposing yourselves and the Fedora community to what I am inclined to consider lack of experience with packaging. More direct: If I were reviewing this package, I would not approve it, nor would I sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 08:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506429] Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120804.n6C84srH028432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506429 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-07-12 04:04:53 EDT --- > I was unable to find the sources of eclo, except compiled jars from upstream. > Hence I pull the sources from svn. I've also search in SVN and don't find any usefull tag :( Should ask upstream (for future release) to provide a source tarball or simply a SVN tag. REVIEW : + RPMLINT is ok eclipse-eclox-0.8.0-2.20090616svn.fc8.noarch.rpm eclipse-eclox.src: I: checking eclipse-eclox.src: W: strange-permission eclipse-eclox-download.sh 0755 eclipse-eclox.noarch: I: checking + package name ok + spec filename ok + license ok + license match ok + upstream COPYING provided (link to website) + specfile in english and legible + source from SVN + BR okown all directories that it creates + build ok F11.x86_64 + no locale + no shared library (no -devel needed) + own all directories that it creates + defattr ok + clean ok + macros ok + only code + small doc (no split needed, not required to run) + no desktop needed + not own files or directories already owned by other packages + install start with clean + all file are UTF8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + package install and run APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 08:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120824.n6C8O8Ji002456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #13 from vivek shah 2009-07-12 04:24:05 EDT --- Hi Jason, Thanks for the review and the comments. I have cleaned up the blockers. Please find the new spec and srpm at: Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnujump.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnujump-1.0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 08:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120841.n6C8fXpZ004556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-12 04:41:32 EDT --- .. except that OpenSSL is incompatible with GPL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses so the license tag is incorrect..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 08:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506429] Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120846.n6C8kBv5006709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506429 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-12 04:46:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-eclox Short Description: Eclipse-based doxygen plugin Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 09:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120905.n6C959GR008681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sm at sandro-mathys.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2009-07-12 05:05:08 EDT --- I guess you're right ;) Will do my best to review this. The spec file you've referenced above is still for the old version, please always upload new spec files together with new srpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 09:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120912.n6C9CPOZ011149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-07-12 05:12:24 EDT --- Jussi Lehtola, you are right - http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ccze/ccze.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 09:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120913.n6C9DUmf011289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-07-12 05:13:29 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - OK [wwwnick at kokain result]$ rpmlint rubygem-builder-2.1.2-4.fc10.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines & Ruby specific guidelines - OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture ... - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable... - OK, not relocatable MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static lib. MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package - OK, no devel MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, no gui MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 12 09:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907120923.n6C9NltA011725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-07-12 05:23:45 EDT --- This seems mostly okay, full review below. I used the spec file from the srpm for the review. As soon as you fixed the last bits, I'll approve this. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint SPECS/mrepo.spec SRPMS/mrepo-0.8.6-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/mrepo-0.8.6-1.fc11.noarch.rpm mrepo.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided yam mrepo.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/mrepo/up2date_client/distrotype.py mrepo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/mrepo/up2date_client/distrotype.py mrepo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/mrepo/up2date_client/repoBackends/__init__.py mrepo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/mrepo/rhn/SSL.py 0644 mrepo.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mrepo.conf 0600 mrepo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/mrepo/up2date_client/__init__.py mrepo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/mrepo/up2date_client/up2dateUtils.py mrepo.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-var mrepo mrepo.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mrepo $prog 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 3 warnings. - There's no yam package to obsolete. - Why are there empty python files? - Everything else should be okay. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - Please use %{__rm}, %{__perl}, %{__cat} and %{__make}. * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. - In %preun, why is it /service and not /sbin/service? - In %postun, why does it say