[Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 2 20:37:42 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183





--- Comment #12 from IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy at us.ibm.com>  2009-07-02 16:37:39 EDT ---
Hi Praveen and Matt,

Try

Spec URL: http://ratliff.net/sfcb/sblim-sfcb.spec
SRPM URL: http://ratliff.net/sfcb/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-4.fc11.src.rpm

It has bee updated and
it now requires cim-schema as defined in 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287
for both building and running.

It has Provides: cim-server

Here are a couple of things that don't feel entirely clean yet:
* I removed  %{?_smp_mflags} from the make directive because it was causing
build failures since later steps depend on earlier steps which hadn't yet
completed.
* I added sfcbrepos -f statement to %post so that sfcb can find the cim-schema
so that adds some time during the install. In OpenSUSE, they add this to the
init file instead. It only has to be run once.
* The init script is still named sfcb rather than sblim-sfcb which is
consistent with upstream and OpenSUSE, but rpmlint complains.
* Very likely incorrectly, I added a statement about the static libraries to
silence an rpmbuild complaint.

Emily

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list