[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jul 5 06:00:56 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210





--- Comment #29 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-07-05 02:00:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> 
> > * rpmlint on the installed package complains:
> > 
> > $ rpmlint opal
> > opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2
> > /lib64/libdl.so.2
> > 
> > This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand?
> 
> I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now
> fixed.
> 
> [perobinson at neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal*
> ../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 
> 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> [perobinson at neo SPECS]$ 
> 

Yes, but you can also run rpmlint against installed packages, which may show
other flaws if there are any. One of these flaws that doesn't show up when you
run rpmlint against the actual rpm files is the unused-direct-shlib-dependency
warning.

Just simply run
   $ rpmlint opal
and you will see

> > * %configure --prefix=/usr
> > Please use the %{_prefix} macro  
> 
> Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to
> specify the prefix :-)
> 

Nice. Btw, %configure should define the prefix for you among other things. You
can run
   $ rpm -E %configure
to see what else it defines.

> You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor
> changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup  

All good. I'll go over the package one last time and let you know if there's
anything else.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list