[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 7 03:58:51 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483





--- Comment #11 from John Guthrie <guthrie at counterexample.org>  2009-07-06 23:58:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > > * License: TODO
> > > - License in spec file does not match the actual license (COPYING looks like a
> > > variant of the MIT license)
> > > - however, the included spec file mentiones BSD
> > > - the enlightenment authors mentioned usually only BSD as the license of the
> > > related projects
> > > - I've asked fedora-legal for clarification and got a response that the
> > > following license field should be used:
> > > License: MIT with advertising
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00003.html
> > > - license file packaged
> > 
> > When I looked at the license, I initially mis-identified it as being an BSD
> > license.  And then, like you saw as well, I saw other components of
> > enlightenment with BSD licenses.  So that led me to believe that I really had
> > put in the correct license.
> > 
> > Anyway, this is fixed.
> 
> Sorry, not 100% - the line must be exactly as I wrote:
> 
> License: MIT with advertising

Oops.  Missed that detail.  Fixed.

> > > * compilation: TODO
> > > - supports parallel build
> > > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used
> > > - it would be better not to build the static libraries instead of deleting them
> > > later, please add a "--disable-static" and remove the deleting of the *.a files
> > 
> > Fixed.
> 
> Please remove the commented lines completely:
> # Removing .a files
> #find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.a' -exec rm '{}' \;

Fixed.

> > > * main package should not contain development related parts: TODO
> > > /usr/lib/ewl/tests should be in -devel package
> > 
> > Fixed.
> 
> Unfortunately this fix has introduced a minor issue: the directory
> %{_libdir}/%{name} itself is now an orphan, since it isn't included neither in
> the main nor in the -devel package. Please add
> %dir {_libdir}/%{name}
> to the main pacakge.  

Missed that one.  Fixed.

Here are the new URLs:
http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec
http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-9.fc11.src.rpm

Thanks again for your help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list