[Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 9 23:22:48 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399
Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish at gmail.com> 2009-07-09 19:22:46 EDT ---
Everything looks good here and it built just fine for all archs. I'll approve
this with one caveat. Just remove the conflicts: sugar-update-control. When
you do the initial build go on and apply your patch to s-u-c and do a
chain-build. this will build a new s-u-c package at this same time so the
conflicts will not be needed. Don't forget to include s-u-c in your bodhi
request for F11.
Steven
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list