[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164


Ken Sedgwick <ken+5a4 at bonsai.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(ken+5a4 at bonsai.co |
                   |m)                          |




--- Comment #33 from Ken Sedgwick <ken+5a4 at bonsai.com>  2009-07-10 18:14:17 EDT ---
I'm afraid I'm a little burned out ...

I've been through this three times in as many years; each time the license
turns out to be a blocker.  I'm worried that if I invest a bunch more time it
will prove to be a blocker again.

More importantly, getting ACE into Fedora without TAO actually makes life
*harder* for my clients.  They use *both* ACE and TAO and need a solution for
both.  Getting ACE into Fedora makes it much harder to generate the TAO
packages externally since the same build creates both.

I think I'd rather just distribute the ACE and TAO packages the way I already
do.  If someone else wants to try and get a subset into the Fedora repo I'd be
happy to help in a lightweight manner.

I'm guessing my effort would be better spent with a repository that would
accept the TAO licenses as well; maybe Livna?  This seems like a much better
use of my effort ...

Apologies for not expressing this sooner ...

Ken

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.