[Bug 511148] Review Request: matahari - qmf agent for host management

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 15 23:23:03 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511148


David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)      |




--- Comment #3 from David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com>  2009-07-15 19:23:02 EDT ---
  OK - Package name
  OK - License info is accurate
  OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
  OK - License files are installed as %doc
  OK - Specfile name
  OK - Specfile is legible
  OK - No prebuilt binaries included

  FIX- BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
       See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag

  OK - PreReq not used
  FIX- Source md5sum matches upstream
       No upstream release - consider setting up a simple webpage and a
       tarball (e.g., on fedorahosted); at the very minimum, tag the release
       in git. Once you have that URL should point to that released tarball,
       not git. If you don't do that, you need to explain in a comment before
       the URL how exactly you created the tarball (include the git commit/tag
       from which it was created)

  OK - No hardcoded pathnames
  OK - Package owns all the files it installs
  OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
  OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
  OK - BuildRequires sufficient
  OK - File permissions set properly
  OK - Macro usage is consistent
  OK - rpmlint is silent
  OK - Proper debuginfo packages

Please fix the two nits above

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list