[Bug 511148] Review Request: matahari - qmf agent for host management
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 15 23:23:03 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511148
David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #3 from David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com> 2009-07-15 19:23:02 EDT ---
OK - Package name
OK - License info is accurate
OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
OK - License files are installed as %doc
OK - Specfile name
OK - Specfile is legible
OK - No prebuilt binaries included
FIX- BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
OK - PreReq not used
FIX- Source md5sum matches upstream
No upstream release - consider setting up a simple webpage and a
tarball (e.g., on fedorahosted); at the very minimum, tag the release
in git. Once you have that URL should point to that released tarball,
not git. If you don't do that, you need to explain in a comment before
the URL how exactly you created the tarball (include the git commit/tag
from which it was created)
OK - No hardcoded pathnames
OK - Package owns all the files it installs
OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
OK - BuildRequires sufficient
OK - File permissions set properly
OK - Macro usage is consistent
OK - rpmlint is silent
OK - Proper debuginfo packages
Please fix the two nits above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list