[Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 17 05:24:31 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183





--- Comment #15 from Matt Domsch <matt_domsch at dell.com>  2009-07-17 01:24:28 EDT ---
I built Emily's 1.3.4 package now.  Yes, the plugins have moved into
/usr/lib*/sfcb/.  Thank you.

Are the /usr/lib*/sfcb/*.la files needed?  I wouldn't expect so.

I believe that generating the RSA keypair should be moved from RPM installtime
to the initscript, similar to how sshd's initscript works.  At installtime
(which may well be in a factory), there may not be sufficient entropy to
generate the keypair which would hang the install process.  At least at first
boot initscript startup time, there is a higher likelihood of a console being
present to add entropy if needed.

For Praveen's comment 1), the source package contains a COPYING file listing
the Eclipse Public License 1.0.  which is getting installed.  That handles the
concern.

Removing %{_smp_mflags} because parallel build doesn't work is fine.  Please
file a bug with upstream noting this though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list