[Bug 511895] Review Request: clutter-imcontext - IMContext Framework Library for Clutter

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jul 19 00:11:20 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511895





--- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-07-18 20:11:19 EDT ---
Here is my review for this package. Most are minor things but there is a
license issue.

- Package builds in koji rawhide:
   http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1484535

- rpmlint is silent

* Package fails to build on F-11:
  checking for CLUTTER... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 
  clutter-0.9 >= 0.9.3) were not met:
  No package 'clutter-0.9' found

I think this BR on clutter-devel should contain the explicit version
requirement.
Is this package for rawhide only?

! All relevant doc files should be packaged. It would be good to include the
AUTHORS and ChangeLog files in %doc

* The files clutter-imtext.{c,h} are LGPLv3. The rest is LGPLv2. AFAIK These
are incompatible. This needs to be clarified by upstream.

! BR's automake, autoconf are unnecessary since these will always be dragged in
by libtool. Similarly, BR's glib2-devel, pkgconfig will be dragged in by
clutter-devel. However, it is not a blocker to keep them.

* It looks like the devel package should require clutter-devel. There are other
dependencies as well such as glib2-devel, pango-devel. But these will be
dragged in by clutter-devel.

! The %{name} macro could be used more consistently.

? Do we need to package the Makefile* stuff in %doc? One last suggestion: You
could use "%doc doc/*" instead of just "%doc doc/" to avoid an extra
subdirectory.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list