[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 20 22:45:46 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734





--- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan at hubbitus.info>  2009-07-20 18:45:45 EDT ---
My 2 cent in embed/shared minilzo discussion.

A also want see all libraries in system only in 1 exemplar (where it is
possible off course) to have slender system where all on self places.

And, one small note:
(In reply to comment #10)
> Even if I also don't like the large patch to use the external (mini)lzo
> library, I still think it is the correct way:
About what large patch you are speaking? There few string cuts, and size only
to file deletion. I can delete it in spec by 1 command... or even this is not
necessary!

So I only ask: It there any real advantages to use static build? Speed? Size?
For what we should try change existing guidelines? Why shared linking should be
with full lzo, not minimalistic minilzo, if it is enough?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list