[Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 21 15:46:37 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259
--- Comment #10 from Juha Tuomala <tuju at iki.fi> 2009-07-21 11:46:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> You need to be consistent in your use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT versus %{buildroot}.
fixed.
> You seen to use a %pyver macro that is not defined anywhere. It doesn't seem
> to make much difference, though; maybe 'make install' doesn't
> actually care if you pass PYTHONVER at all.
fixed.
> %global is recommended over %define these days, although I don't think it
> matters for the situation where you're using it.
fixed. vim doesn't seem to recognize it, someone should file it somewhere.
> The C code isn't compiled with the correct set of compiler flags.
> Fortunately -g is passed so the debuginfo package comes out correct
>, but you should pass %optflags (or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS if you prefer that form).
> Unfortunately it looks like this package thinks it knows best and
> overrides CFLAGS, so you may have to patch Makefile.common.
You mean that line:
CFLAGS = -g -Wall -I$(PYTHONINCLUDE) $(DEFINES)
should include itself with
CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -g -Wall -I$(PYTHONINCLUDE) $(DEFINES)
> Your manual python dependency is unnecessary; rpm will generate one.
fixed.
> The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package
> reviews recently, please consider doing one.
I look into it.
$ rpmlint --verbose /home/tuju/PKGS/SRPMS/python-utmp-0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm
python-utmp.src: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1489773
src: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp-0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm
spec: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list