[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 22 14:12:08 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150





--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com>  2009-07-22 10:12:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - Verified the source matches upstream
> - The License matches upstream source file headers.
> 
> APPROVED

Thanks!

> little nitpicking
> 
> - The release starting with 0. is redundant to version 0. , would use just
> 1.whatever

I'm afraid, I can't do this. There are no such exceptions in Fedora Packaging
Guidelines regarding versioning of packages, based on VCS's snapshots. Anyway,
it's not a big issue.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages

> - cgit on fdo is nice. I would use 
> Source0:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~libv/bios_extract/snapshot/bios_extract-%{git_commit}.tar.bz2

Thanks for the tip! I didn't know about such feature. Fixed.

> - Having at least two executables , perhaps  s/Tool/Tools/ everywhere.  

Done.

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/bios_extract.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list