[Bug 513253] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt-TCK - libvirt Technology Compatability Kit

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 23 12:56:45 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513253


Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |markmc at redhat.com




--- Comment #3 from Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>  2009-07-23 08:56:44 EDT ---
Suggest adding %{?dist}

>From bug #199688 I see %{extra_release} is for autobuilder - worth a comment,
it's not obvious

%{perlvendorarch} is unused

Any particular reason for the %{perlversion} requirement? Doesn't seem normal
for perl packaging, is it? What perl version is actually required?

Do you need this:

 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires

Just tried to build, used yum-builddep to install the build deps and got:

  Checking prerequisites...
   - ERROR: Test::Pod::Coverage is not installed
   - ERROR: Test::Pod is not installed
   - ERROR: XML::XPath is not installed

although it built okay, anything to worry about?

Apart from that looks good to me:

$ rpmlint perl-Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0-2.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint perl-Sys-Virt-TCK.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

and scott's FAIL items are sorted

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list