[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 16:10:46 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694


David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #34 from David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com>  2009-07-27 12:10:45 EDT ---
  OK - Package name
  OK - License info is accurate
  OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
  OK - License files are installed as %doc
  OK - Specfile name
  OK - Specfile is legible
  OK - No prebuilt binaries included
  OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
  OK - PreReq not used
  OK - Source md5sum matches upstream
  OK - No hardcoded pathnames
  OK - Package owns all the files it installs
  OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
  OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
  OK - BuildRequires sufficient
  OK - File permissions set properly
  OK - Macro usage is consistent
  OK - rpmlint is silent
  OK - Proper debuginfo packages

APPROVED (thanks to everybody doing inofficial reviews, made the official
review a lot easier)

Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import
the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported
and built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list