[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 16:10:46 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694
David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #34 from David Lutterkort <lutter at redhat.com> 2009-07-27 12:10:45 EDT ---
OK - Package name
OK - License info is accurate
OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
OK - License files are installed as %doc
OK - Specfile name
OK - Specfile is legible
OK - No prebuilt binaries included
OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
OK - PreReq not used
OK - Source md5sum matches upstream
OK - No hardcoded pathnames
OK - Package owns all the files it installs
OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
OK - BuildRequires sufficient
OK - File permissions set properly
OK - Macro usage is consistent
OK - rpmlint is silent
OK - Proper debuginfo packages
APPROVED (thanks to everybody doing inofficial reviews, made the official
review a lot easier)
Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import
the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported
and built.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list