[Bug 511212] Review Request: cluster-glue - reusable clustering components
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 23:40:27 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511212
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-07-27 19:40:24 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
See below - Sources match upstream md5sum:
a9aba6ae59030a148dd95bfea163852c 75cab275433e.tar.gz
ecc791dec7788293ad3d7f22b1d80cf5 75cab275433e.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - .la files are removed.
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
Issues:
1. What is the 'uid' define for?
2. You should use %global instead of %define.
3. Is this a pre-release for version 1.0? Or a post release of 0.9? or
something else?
The release might need adjustment. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release
I suspect it should be something like: 1.0.0-0.0.75cab275433e ?
4. The %{configure} macro should pass all of these I think, so no need to do
so:
--prefix=%{_prefix} \
--localstatedir=%{_var} \
--libdir=%{_libdir}
5. Your source doesn't match the upstream Source url. Perhaps you are using a
checkout?
It needs to match exactly.
6. rpmlint says:
cluster-glue.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/nobody
0700
cluster-glue.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/root
0700
cluster-glue.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/daemon
0700
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
I think those can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list